Subtitle 1. Public Utilities And Carriers
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Legal Control of Business in Arkansas, 5 Ark. L. Rev. 137.
The Growth of Utility Regulation in Arkansas: A Functional Survey, 21 Ark. L. Rev. 539.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Stafford, Separation of Powers and Arkansas Administrative Agencies: Distinguishing Judicial Power and Legislative Power, 7 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 279.
Chapter 1 General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1929, No. 284, § 2: effective on passage and publication.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Acts 1985, No. 455, § 2: Mar. 20, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that substantial uncertainty exists with respect to the interpretation and application of Act 324 of 1935, as amended, to lessors of public utility equipment or facilities that take no active role in the management or operation of such equipment or facilities; that clarification of Act 324 will provide an immediate, direct and substantial benefit to the utility ratepayers of Arkansas by enabling the financing of transactions to provide lower costs of operation of said equipment or facilities; and that this Act will provide necessary clarity to Act 324. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 688, § 7: Mar. 28, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the authority of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to impose civil sanctions is being challenged; that the PSC must have civil sanction authority in order to perform its duties in a timely manner and thereby protect the utility ratepayers of this state; and that this Act is therefore immediately necessary to clarify the Commission's authority. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 1084, § 3: Apr. 17, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain confusion exists concerning the definition of a telephone public utility and that certain nonregulated entities are attempting to take advantage of this confusion to the detriment of existing telephone utilities. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 37, § 7: June 12, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that regulation of small water and sewer utilities as ‘public utilities’ under the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission generally imposes heavy regulatory costs upon the consumers, so that the cost of preparing a rate case alone may equal or exceed the other total revenue requirements of those utilities; that the effect of regulation is often to increase costs that are proportionately far in excess of the benefits of regulation; that customers of small water and sewer utilities may be better off in the long run if they could simply buy their water or sewer utility outright and run it themselves; and that this Act is immediately necessary to remedy the present situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 21, § 4: July 15, 1988. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain small water companies which are now exempt from regulation by the Public Service Commission should be allowed to voluntarily submit to the Commission's regulations or become subject to regulation by the Commission if at least a majority of the company's customers petition the Commission to regulate the water company; that this Act would grant the authority for those water companies and their customers to cause the water companies be deemed public utilities; and that until this Act becomes effective those water companies will remain non-regulated; and that this Act should be given effect immediately in order to give the small water companies and their customers the authority to seek regulation by the Public Service Commission as soon as possible. It is furthermore determined by the General Assembly that a dispute now exists between a military installation and a municipality furnishing water and sewer services to the installation; that the Public Service Commission should, if so requested by the municipality, have jurisdiction to settle the dispute; that this Act so provides and should be given immediate effect in order to provide an efficient method of settling the dispute. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1991, Nos. 854 and 1037, § 6: Mar. 29, 1991 and Apr. 8, 1991, respectively. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that regulation of cellular mobile telecommunications service is a competitive service subject to the pressures of the market place and that rate and price regulation of such service by the Public Service Commission is unnecessary to the public interest, and is an unnecessary burden on providers of such service. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-1-101. Definitions.
As used in this act, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
“Affiliated interest with a public utility” includes the following:
- Every corporation and person owning or holding directly or indirectly twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities of the public utility;
- Every corporation or person in any chain of successive ownership, or holding, of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities of that public utility;
- Every corporation, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of whose voting securities is owned by any person or corporation owning twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities of the public utility or is owned by any person or corporation in any chain of successive ownership of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities; and
- Every person who is an officer or director of that public utility or of any corporation in any chain of successive ownership or holding of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities of the public utility;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation with respect to the particular public utilities and matters over which each agency has jurisdiction;
- “Commissioner” means one (1) of the commissioners of the Arkansas Public Service Commission with respect to the particular public utilities and matters over which that commission has jurisdiction;
- “Corporation” includes without limitation a private corporation, an association, a joint-stock association, a business trust, an electric cooperative corporation, and a limited liability company providing service for charge or compensation in any area or from any facility for which the commission has granted a certificate of convenience and necessity;
-
“Exempt wholesale generator” means a person, including an affiliate of a public utility, that:
- Is engaged directly or indirectly through one (1) or more affiliates and exclusively in the business of owning or operating all or part of a facility for generating electric energy and selling electric energy at wholesale; and
- Does not own or operate a facility for the transmission of electricity other than interconnecting transmission facilities used to effect a sale of electric energy at wholesale;
- “Gross earnings” includes all amounts received, charged, or chargeable for or on account of any public service furnished or supplied in this state by any public utility and includes all gross income from all incidental, subordinate, or subsidiary operations of the utility in this state. However, revenues from the manufacture and sale of ice shall not be included;
- “Municipality” includes a city, a town, an improvement district, other than a county, and any other public or quasi-public corporation which is created or organized under the Arkansas Constitution or laws of the State of Arkansas;
- “Person” includes a natural person, a trustee, lessee, receiver, holder of beneficial or equitable interest, a partnership, or two (2) or more persons having a joint or common interest, and a corporation as defined in subdivision (4) of this section;
-
-
“Public utility” includes persons and corporations, or their lessees, trustees, and receivers, owning or operating in this state equipment or facilities for:
- Producing, generating, transmitting, delivering, or furnishing gas, electricity, steam, or another agent for the production of light, heat, or power to or for the public for compensation;
-
Diverting, developing, pumping, impounding, distributing, or furnishing water to or for the public for compensation. However, nothing in this subdivision (9) shall be construed to include water facilities and equipment of cities and towns in the definition of public utility. Further, the term “public utility” shall not include any entity described by this subdivision (9) which meets any of the following criteria:
- All property owners' associations whose facilities are enjoyed only by members of that association or residents of the community governed by that association;
- An entity whose annual operating revenues would cause the entity to be classified as a Class B or lower water company pursuant to the uniform system of accounts adopted by the Arkansas Public Service Commission. However, the term “public utility” includes any water company that petitions, or a majority of whose metered customers petition, the Arkansas Public Service Commission to come under the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction if the water company had combined annual operating revenues in excess of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for the three (3) fiscal years immediately preceding the date of filing the petition; or
- All improvement districts;
- Conveying or transmitting messages or communications by telephone or telegraph where such service is offered to the public for compensation;
- Transporting persons by street, suburban, or interurban railway for the public for compensation;
- Transporting persons by motor vehicles if the vehicles are operated under a franchise granted by a municipality and in conjunction with, or as a part of, a street, suburban, or interurban railway, or in lieu of either thereof, for the public for compensation; and
-
Maintaining a sewage collection system or a sewage treatment plant, intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, force mains, pumping stations, ejector stations, and other appurtenances necessary or useful for the collection or treatment, purification, and disposal of the liquid and solid waste, sewage, night soil, and industrial waste. However, nothing in this subdivision (9) shall be construed to include sewerage facilities and equipment of cities and towns in the definition of public utility. The term “public utility” shall not include any entity described by this subdivision (9) which meets any of the following criteria:
- All property owners' associations whose facilities are enjoyed only by members of that association or residents of the community governed by that association;
- An entity whose annual operating revenues would cause the entity to be classified as a Class B or lower sewer company pursuant to the uniform system of accounts adopted by the Arkansas Public Service Commission; or
- All improvement districts.
-
The term “public utility”, as used for ratemaking purposes only:
- Shall include persons and corporations or their lessees, trustees, and receivers producing, generating, transmitting, delivering, or furnishing any of the services set forth in subdivisions (9)(A)(i) and (ii) of this section to any other person or corporation for resale or distribution to or for the public for compensation; and
- Shall not include persons or corporations providing cellular telecommunications service and not providing any other public utility service in this state, unless the commission finds by order, after notice and hearing and upon substantial evidence, and which shall not take effect pending appeal therefrom, that the public interest requires the application of some or all of the provisions of this subdivision (9) to such persons or corporations.
- The term “public utility”, as to any public utility defined in subdivisions (9)(A)(i), (ii), and (vi) of this section, shall not include any person or corporation who or which furnishes the service or commodity exclusively to himself or herself or itself, or to his or her or its employees or tenants, when the service or commodity is not resold to or used by others.
- Any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the term “public utility” shall not include an exempt wholesale generator as defined in subdivision (5) of this section.
-
The term “public utility”, as to any public utility defined in subdivision (9)(A)(iii) of this section, shall not include any person or corporation who or which:
- Furnishes the services exclusively to himself or herself or itself, or to employees; or
-
Furnishes the services:
- To persons who are temporary residents or guests in a hotel or motel owned by him or her or it;
- Patients in a hospital owned by him or her or it; or
- Students of a public or private institution of higher education who reside in housing provided by that institution.
-
-
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subdivision (9), the term “public utility” shall not include any person or corporation owning any interest in equipment or facilities used for any of the purposes specified in subdivision (9)(A)(i) or subdivision (9)(B) of this section, provided that:
- The interest in the equipment or facilities is leased under a net lease directly to a public utility or to a person or corporation that is exempt from regulation as a public utility, either as a sole lessee or joint lessee with one (1) or more other public utilities or persons or corporations so exempt;
- The person or corporation is otherwise primarily engaged in one (1) or more businesses other than the business of a public utility or is a person or corporation all of whose equity or beneficial ownership is held by one (1) or more persons or corporations so engaged, either directly or indirectly;
- If the lessee is a public utility, the lease to it has been authorized or approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- The lease of the interest in the equipment or facilities extends for an initial term of not less than ten (10) years, except for termination of the lease upon events set forth in the lease, unless any shorter term specified in the lease is not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the then-expected remaining useful life of the equipment or facilities or the lease is entered into following termination of a prior lease upon the liquidation, reorganization, bankruptcy, or insolvency of the prior lessee; and
- The rent reserved under the lease shall not include any amount based, directly or indirectly, on revenues or income of the lessee.
- For purposes of this subdivision (9)(F), a public utility shall not cease to be such by reason of a lease, directly or indirectly, of a part or all of its interest in such equipment or facilities to any affiliate.
- For purposes of this subdivision (9)(F), the term “person or corporation” shall include any receiver, trustee, or liquidating agent of the person or corporation.
- The exception of the definition of “public utility” described in subdivision (9)(F)(i) of this section shall continue to apply, following termination of the lessee's right to possession or use of the interest in the equipment or facilities during the lease term or following termination of the lease by the lessee or its trustee pursuant to the provisions of section 365 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code or of any similar Arkansas or federal statute, for so long as the person or corporation referred to in subdivision (9)(F)(i) of this section does not supply electricity directly to the public. In any case, the exception to the definition of “public utility” described in subdivision (9)(F)(i) of this section shall continue to apply for a period of ninety (90) days following the termination, except that no change in rates that would otherwise be subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be effected during the ninety-day period without the approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
-
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subdivision (9), the term “public utility” shall not include any person or corporation owning any interest in equipment or facilities used for any of the purposes specified in subdivision (9)(A)(i) or subdivision (9)(B) of this section, provided that:
-
-
-
- Within a county not subject to subdivision (9)(G)(i)(b) of this section, a Class B or lower water company or Class B or lower sewer company that would otherwise be exempt from the definition of “public utility” under subdivision (9)(A)(ii)(b) of this section or subdivision (9)(A)(vi)(b) of this section shall be included within the term “public utility” if the Class B or lower water company or Class B or lower sewer company petitions the Arkansas Public Service Commission to have the company included.
- Subdivision (9)(G)(i)(a)(1) of this section does not apply to a water or sewer company formed under the nonprofit corporation laws of this state or any improvement district or water distribution district law of this state.
-
- All Class B or lower water companies or Class B or lower sewer companies that would otherwise be exempt from the definition of “public utility” under subdivision (9)(A)(ii)(b) of this section or subdivision (9)(A)(vi)(b) of this section shall be included within the term “public utility” if a majority of the customers of the company petition the Arkansas Public Service Commission to have the company included. The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall determine the sufficiency of the petition at a public hearing. The water or sewer company or any customer of the company may appear and present evidence on the sufficiency of the petition.
- Subdivision (9)(G)(i)(b)(1) of this section does not apply to a water or sewer company formed under the nonprofit corporation laws of this state or any improvement district or water distribution district law of this state.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall adopt rules governing the petition process.
- A Class B or lower water company or Class B or lower sewer company shall provide the Arkansas Public Service Commission a list of metered customers upon request.
-
- The term “public utility”, as to any public utility defined in subdivision (9)(A)(i) of this section, does not include a person or corporation that furnishes compressed natural gas as a motor fuel to or for the public for compensation and is not otherwise a public utility.
-
The term “public utility”, as to any public utility defined in subdivision (9)(A)(i) of this section, does not include a person or corporation that:
- Purchases electricity from an electric public utility or a municipal electric utility;
- Furnishes electricity exclusively to charge battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to or for the public for compensation; and
- Is not otherwise a public utility;
-
“Public utility” includes persons and corporations, or their lessees, trustees, and receivers, owning or operating in this state equipment or facilities for:
- “Rate” means and includes every compensation, charge, fare, toll, rental, and classification, or any of them, demanded, observed, charged, or collected by any public utility for any service, products, or commodity offered by it as a public utility to the public and means and includes any rules, regulations, practices, or contracts affecting any compensation, charge, fare, toll, rental, or classification;
- “Securities” means capital stock of all classes and all evidences of indebtedness secured or unsecured by lien upon capital assets or revenues, not including, however, any obligation falling due on or before a fixed date that is not more than one (1) year after the date of its issuance and not secured by a lien upon capital assets or revenues; and
- “Service” includes any product or commodity furnished and the plant, equipment, apparatus, appliances, property, and facilities employed by any public utility in performing any service or in furnishing any product or commodity devoted to the public purposes of the utility and to the use and accommodation of customers or patrons.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 2064; Acts 1967, No. 234, § 4; 1973, No. 125, § 1; 1985, No. 455, § 1; 1985, No. 1084, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-201; Acts 1987 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 37, §§ 1, 2; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 21, § 1; 1989, No. 53, § 1; 1989, No. 952, § 1; 1991, No. 854, § 1; 1991, No. 1037, § 1; 1997, No. 305, § 1; 1999, No. 1322, § 1; 2013, No. 662, §§ 1-3; 2013, No. 1133, §§ 1, 2; 2015, No. 380, § 1; 2017, No. 285, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 89; 2019, No. 391, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Transportation Safety Agency have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the Transportation Safety Agency and transferred all of its authority (including regulatory authority), rights, powers, duties, records, and property to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
As codified, subdivision (3) of this section contained additional language that read as follows: “(B) One (1) of the commissioners of the Transportation Safety Agency with respect to the particular public utilities and matters over which that agency has jurisdiction;”
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No 153, §§ 2 and 3, have rendered that language obsolete, and it has accordingly been decodified.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1991, by identical Acts Nos. 854 and 1037, § 2, provided:
“This act is intended to relieve cellular telecommunications providers of the obligation to file tariffs with the Arkansas Public Service Commission in order to change prices or service offerings. Nothing in this act shall be construed to limit or affect the authority of the Commission to regulate the division of revenues among telecommunications carriers, including cellular carriers.”
Amendments. The 1997 amendment added (4)(F)(i) (b) ; and, in (4)(F)(i) (a) , added “Within any county not subject to subdivision (4)(F)(i) (b) ” to the beginning and added the last sentence.
The 1999 amendment inserted present (5) and redesignated the following subdivisions accordingly; added present (9)(D) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; substituted “agency” for “commission” in present (3)(B); and made stylistic changes.
The 2013 amendment by No. 662 substituted “Class B” for “Class C” throughout (9); in (9)(A)(ii) (b) and (9)(A)(vi) (b) , substituted “An entity” for “All entities”, “the entity” for “them”, and “company” for “companies”; in (9)(A)(ii) (b) , “includes” for “shall include”, “that” for “which”, “Arkansas Public Service Commission’s” for “commission’s”, and “if” for “provided that”, and deleted “must have” preceding “had combined”; inserted “subdivision” preceding “(9)(A)(vi) (b) ” in (9)(G)(i) (a) and (9)(G)(i) (b) ; and substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (9)(G)(ii).
The 2013 amendment by No. 1133, in (4), substituted “without limitation” for “but is not limited to” and inserted “and a limited liability company”; redesignated part of the introductory language of (5) as (5)(A); redesignated former (5)(A) as (B); deleted former (5)(B); inserted “that” at the end of the introductory language of (5); in (5)(A), inserted “Is” at the beginning, deleted “and” preceding “exclusively” and “who” from the end.
The 2015 amendment added (9)(H).
The 2017 amendment by No. 285 added (9)(I).
The 2017 amendment by No. 707 substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (2).
The 2019 amendment added the (9)(G)(i) (a)(1) , (9)(G)(i) (a)(2) , (9)(G)(i) (b)(1) , and (9)(G)(i) (b)(2) designations; inserted “of this section” in (9)(G)(i) (a)(1) and (9)(G)(i) (b)(1) ; substituted “Subdivision (9)(G)(i) (a)(1) of this section does not” for “The provisions of this section do not” in (9)(G)(i) (a)(2) ; and substituted “Subdivision (9)(G)(i) (b)(1) of this section does not” for “The provisions of this section do not” in (9)(G)(i) (b)(2)
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
U.S. Code. Section 365 of the federal Bankruptcy Code, referred to in this section, is codified as 11 U.S.C. § 365.
Case Notes
In General.
Legislature cautiously amended the definitions of this section in 1973 in order not to infringe upon or modify the power to set sewer rates previously granted to cities and towns; the legislature did not intend to grant additional authority to cities and towns to establish sewer rates subject to the review of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. City of Ft. Smith v. O.K. Foods, Inc., 293 Ark. 379, 738 S.W.2d 96 (1987).
Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of Arkansas granted a gas utility company's writ of prohibition from a county court's denial of the company's motion to dismiss finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had sole and exclusive jurisdiction under § 23-4-201(a)(1) over Arkansas residential gas customers' claims that they were being charged too much for natural gas because of the company's alleged fraudulent conduct. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 370 Ark. 190, 258 S.W.3d 336 (2007).
Class C Water Utilities.
When the General Assembly deregulated Class C water utilities in 1987, it also nullified by implication any exclusive franchises which may have otherwise been in existence pursuant to a certificate of convenience and necessity. Sebastian Lake Pub. Util. Co. v. Sebastian Lake Realty, 325 Ark. 85, 923 S.W.2d 860 (1996).
Gross Earnings.
The annual fee collected from each utility by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to § 23-3-110, and based on the utility's “gross earnings” as defined in this section applies only to intrastate services provided by the utility, since the plain language of the definition calls for assessment only on services “supplied in this state.” Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Allied Tel. Co., 274 Ark. 478, 625 S.W.2d 515 (1981).
Public Utility.
Court held that television transmission is an integral part of the telephone and telegraph business as it has developed and exists, and the fact that the pay television form of picture and sound transmission required installation of special equipment to provide the service does not militate against the conclusion that the telephone company is providing telephone or telegraph service. Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962).
A determinative characteristic of a public utility is that of service to, or readiness to serve, an indefinite public, or a portion of the public. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
It is not the number of customers served which is determinative of public utility status, but rather whether a personal company holds itself out to serve all who wish to avail themselves of the service. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Where company that leased toilets did not prove that it was regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Transportation Commission, that a city, state board, or commission had authorized it to service a territory, or that its rates were regulated by an official agency, it failed to prove that it was a public utility as contemplated by this section. Weiss v. Best Enters., 323 Ark. 712, 917 S.W.2d 543 (1996).
In litigation between landowners and the city over the scope of a utility easement and rights of ingress and egress to service a telecommunications facility, it was irrelevant whether cellular communications businesses were included within the term “public utility” as defined by this section since this definition related only to ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Bishop v. City of Fayetteville, 81 Ark. App. 1, 97 S.W.3d 913 (2003).
Cited: Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997); SEECO, Inc. v. Hales, 341 Ark. 673, 22 S.W.3d 157 (2000).
23-1-102. Construction of Acts 1935, No. 324 — Interstate commerce excepted.
- Nothing in this act shall be construed as repealing § 14-234-201 et seq. or any part thereof.
- Neither this act nor any of its provisions shall apply, or be construed to apply, to commerce with foreign nations or commerce among the several states of the United States except insofar as such an application or construction of this act may be permitted under the provisions of the United States Constitution and the acts of the United States Congress.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, §§ 9, 70; Pope's Dig., § 2072; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-203, 73-263n.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Effect of Act.
Acts 1935, No. 324 is cumulative of practically all other regulatory enactments except those directly and expressly repealed. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Matlock, 195 Ark. 159, 111 S.W.2d 500 (1937).
Telephone Rates.
Order of commission fixing rates in Arkansas of telephone company which maintained integrated exchange in both Arkansas and Texas did not interfere with interstate commerce within the meaning of the federal Johnson Act, and federal district court did not have jurisdiction to enjoin such order of the commission. General Tel. Co. v. Robinson, 132 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. Ark. 1955).
23-1-103. Compliance with Acts 1935, No. 324, and rules of commission required — Penalties for noncompliance.
- Every public utility and every person or corporation shall obey and comply with every requirement of this act and of every order, decision, direction, or rule made or prescribed by the commission in the matters specified or any other matter in any way relating to or affecting the business of any public utility. The commission shall do everything necessary or proper in order to secure compliance with, and observance of, every order, decision, direction, or rule by all officers, agents, and employees of every public utility.
-
- Upon a finding by the commission that any jurisdictional water, gas, telephone, or electric public utility has knowingly, willfully, and purposefully violated any of the provisions of this act, by agent or otherwise, the commission shall assess a civil sanction of one thousand dollars ($1,000) on the utility.
- Each instance of violation shall constitute a separate violation. However, in case of a continued violation, each day's continuance thereof shall not be deemed to be a separate and distinct violation.
- The power and authority of the commission to impose civil sanctions are not to be affected by any other civil or criminal proceeding, concerning the same violation, nor shall the imposition of the sanction preclude the commission from imposing other sanctions which are provided for by law.
- The proceeds from the civil sanctions imposed under this subsection shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues and credited to the Public Service Commission Fund.
- The imposition of a civil sanction under this subsection is subject to review by the commission and by the Court of Appeals in the manner provided by §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 61; Pope's Dig., § 2121; Acts 1985, No. 688, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-257; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2371.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment, in (a), substituted “or rule” for “rule, or regulation” in the first and second sentences.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
In General.
The “orders” referred to in subsection (a) of this section are not restricted to any particular act, but rather this section requires every public utility to obey and comply with every Arkansas Public Service Commission order in any way relating to or affecting the business of a public utility. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 68 Ark. App. 148, 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999).
Civil Liability.
Penalty may be inflicted for all violations of the provisions of the act, but there is no provision therein making any utility liable in special damages to a customer for failure to render adequate service. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948).
Willful Violation.
It is not necessary for the Arkansas Public Service Commission to find “evil intent” in order to find a willful violation of subsection (b) of this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 68 Ark. App. 148, 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999).
23-1-104. Compelling compliance with provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and orders.
The commission shall have the right, and it is made its duty, to file suit against any person or corporation in any court of competent jurisdiction by mandamus proceedings to compel compliance with the provisions of this act or any order of the commission or, by injunction proceedings, to prevent violations of this act or any order of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 36; Pope's Dig., § 2099; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-235.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Authority.
Although this section authorized the Arkansas Public Service Commission to take action to enforce its orders, such authority was not exclusive of the right of a certificate holder to likewise resort to the court for enforcement of its rights under existing certificate of convenience and necessity. Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975).
23-1-105. False testimony or reports — False or misleading records, memoranda, etc. — Penalty.
Any person who gives false testimony at any hearing held by the commission, a commissioner, or an examiner or who makes false reports to the commission, when the testimony and reports are required by this act or any lawful order or rule of the commission, who makes any false entries upon the books or records of any public utility, or who makes or preserves any false or misleading vouchers, memoranda, or records showing the nature of, or purpose for, the disbursement of funds of public utilities, shall be deemed guilty of a felony and upon conviction shall be confined in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one (1) year nor more than ten (10) years for every offense.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 61; Pope's Dig., § 2121; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-257.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioner,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-106. Penalties cumulative — Recovery of penalty not bar to further penalty or criminal prosecution.
- All penalties accruing under this act shall be cumulative.
- A suit for the recovery of one (1) penalty shall not be a bar to, or affect, the recovery of any other penalty or forfeiture, nor shall it be a bar to any criminal prosecution against any public utility or any officer, director, agent, or employee thereof or against any other corporation or person.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 63; Pope's Dig., § 2123; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-259.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-107. Acts of agent, employee, or officer are acts of corporation.
In construing and enforcing the provisions of this act relating to penalties, the act, omission, or failure of any officer, agent, or employee of any corporation shall in every case be deemed to be also the act, omission, or failure of the corporation or person.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 65; Pope's Dig., § 2125; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-261.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-108. Jurisdiction and venue of actions.
- Nothing in this act shall be construed to in any way restrict the jurisdiction of any court of equity.
- Any action brought by or against the commission of which a court of equity has jurisdiction under the Arkansas Constitution may be brought either in equity or at law. However, all actions, whether in equity or at law, against the commission shall be brought in the Pulaski County Circuit Court.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 66; Pope's Dig., § 2126; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-262.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-109. Actions for penalties, fees, and assessments.
Actions to recover penalties and all assessments and fees under this act shall be brought in the name of the State of Arkansas, in relation of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, in any court of competent jurisdiction by the attorney member of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 64; Pope's Dig., § 2124; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-260.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-110. Actions tried without jury — Exceptions.
All actions brought under the terms of this act by or against the commission in any circuit court, except those to recover penalties, forfeitures, and fees, shall be tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 66; Pope's Dig., § 2126; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-262.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-111. Copies of official papers as evidence.
Copies of official documents and orders filed or deposited according to law in the office of the commission certified by a commissioner or by the secretary under the official seal of the commission to be true copies of the original shall be evidence in like manner as the originals in all matters before the commission and in the courts of this state.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 67; Pope's Dig., § 2127; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-263.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioner,” see § 23-1-101.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Ark. L. Rev.
Documentary Evidence — Arkansas, 15 Ark. L. Rev. 79.
23-1-112. Contracts in violation of Acts 1935, No. 324, or commission's order.
- Any contract made in violation of this act or any lawful order of the commission shall be void and subject to cancellation and recoupment by action in any court of competent jurisdiction.
- Where a contract is made contrary to the provisions of this act or any lawful order of the commission, the commission, after notice and hearing, may order the public utility to take steps within ten (10) days to recover the funds or assets thus illegally loaned or transferred by action in a court of competent jurisdiction or to take such other proceedings as may be effective to release the public utility from any such contract.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 39; Pope's Dig., § 2102; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-238.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-1-101.
23-1-113. Indeterminate permits granted under Acts 1919, No. 571.
- All indeterminate permits and any rights, powers, privileges, or immunities thereunder, granted to, received by, or otherwise acquired by public utilities pursuant to authority granted by or under the provisions of Acts 1919, No. 571, are expressly declared to be assignable.
- All assignments and transfers of such indeterminate permits, or of any right, power, privilege, or immunity existing under or created by Acts 1919, No. 571, made by the holders or owners of such permits prior to June 13, 1929, are declared to be valid and effective.
-
- Neither the adoption of this section nor anything contained in it shall be construed or understood to mean that such indeterminate permits or the rights, powers, privileges, or immunities created or existing under Acts 1919, No. 571, were not assignable and transferable prior to the adoption of this section.
- This section shall not be construed as relieving any public utility from the terms of any existing contract or as enlarging or increasing in any manner any right or privilege granted under any indeterminate permit or franchise.
History. Acts 1929, No. 284, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1938; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-266.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, 23-12-301, 23-12-302.
23-1-114. Civil sanctions for violation of Acts 1919, No. 571, and Acts 1921, No. 124.
- Upon a finding by the Arkansas Public Service Commission that any jurisdictional water, gas, telephone, or electric public utility by agent or otherwise has knowingly, willfully, and purposefully violated any of the provisions of this act, the commission shall assess a civil sanction of one thousand dollars ($1,000) on that utility. Each instance of violation shall constitute a separate violation. However, in case of a continued violation, each day's continuance shall not be deemed to be a separate and distinct violation.
- The power and authority of the commission to impose these civil sanctions are not to be affected by any other civil or criminal proceeding concerning the same violation, nor shall the imposition of the civil sanction preclude the commission from imposing other sanctions which are provided for by law.
- The proceeds from the civil sanctions imposed under this section shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues and credited to the Public Service Commission Fund.
- The imposition of a civil sanction under this section is subject to review by the commission and by the Court of Appeals in the manner provided by §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 30; C. & M. Dig., § 1696; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 16; Pope's Dig., § 2015; Acts 1985, No. 688, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-125.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Meaning of “this act”. The words “this act” probably refer to both Acts 1919, No. 571 and Acts 1921, No. 124, which are codified as §§ 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, 23-12-301, 23-12-302 and as §§ 14-200-110, 14-200-112, 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-2-425, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, respectively.
23-1-115. Citizens band radio equipment.
-
- Citizens band radio equipment shall not be used unless that equipment is certified by the Federal Communications Commission.
- Citizens band radio equipment shall not be operated on a frequency between twenty-four megahertz (24 MHz) and thirty-five megahertz (35 MHz) without authorization from the commission.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any radio station that is licensed by the commission under 47 U.S.C. § 301.
-
- A first violation of this section is a violation punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100).
- A second or subsequent violation of this section is a violation punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000).
History. Acts 2001, No. 1432, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 145.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted “violation” for “misdemeanor and” in (c)(2).
Chapter 2 Regulatory Commissions
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1883, No. 114, § 44, p. 199, established a Board of Railroad Commissioners which was to assess railroad property for taxation. Its duties were transferred to the Arkansas Tax Commission by Acts 1909, No. 257, p. 764. Acts 1899, No. 53, p. 82, established a Railroad Commission which was to regulate carrier rates. This commission was succeeded by the Arkansas Corporation Commission established by Acts 1919, No. 571, which in turn was succeeded by the Arkansas Railroad Commission, established by Acts 1921, No. 124. The Arkansas Tax Commission established by Acts 1909, No. 257 was abolished by Acts 1923, No. 343 and certain of its duties were transferred to the Arkansas Railroad Commission; however, those duties were again transferred to a newly created Arkansas Tax Commission by Acts 1927, No. 129. The Arkansas Railroad Commission was succeeded by the Arkansas Corporation Commission created by Acts 1933, No. 12; the Arkansas Tax Commission and the Commissioner of Conservation and Inspection were abolished and some of their duties were transferred to the Arkansas Corporation Commission.
Acts 1935, No. 324, created a Department of Public Utilities within the Arkansas Corporation Commission in which was vested all powers and duties conferred on the Arkansas Corporation Commission with respect to public utilities by Acts 1919, No. 571, Acts 1921, No. 124, and Acts 1933, No. 12. Section 19 of the act provided that Acts 1935, No. 324 would control if any of the powers, duties, or authority so imposed conflicted with its provisions.
Acts 1945, No. 40, § 1, in part, changed the name of the Arkansas Corporation Commission to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, abolished the Department of Public Utilities, and conferred all authority, rights, privileges, etc., of both the Department of Public Utilities and the Arkansas Corporation Commission upon the Arkansas Public Service Commission. It further provided that all taxes, assessments, and fees levied by state law for the support of the Department of Public Utilities and the Arkansas Corporation Commission would be enforced and collected and paid into the State Treasury as provided in the act.
Acts 1949, No. 191, created the Arkansas Tax Commission to which were transferred the powers and duties of the Arkansas Public Service Commission relating to tax laws; the Arkansas Tax Commission was abolished and its duties were transferred to the Arkansas Public Service Commission by Acts 1951, No. 155.
Acts 1957, No. 132, § 3, transferred the powers and duties of the Arkansas Public Service Commission with respect to the regulation of transportation for compensation, safety of operation of public carriers, certification and review of assessment for ad valorem taxation, and matters concerning rates, charges, and services of carriers upon the Arkansas Commerce Commission. The section abolished the Transportation Division of the Arkansas Public Service Commission effective upon the appointment and qualification of the members of the Arkansas Commerce Commission and transferred the rights, privileges, etc., of the Transportation Division to the Arkansas Commerce Commission.
The taxing powers of the Arkansas Public Service Commission were transferred to the Arkansas Assessment Coordination Department pursuant to Acts 1957, No. 234, § 5. Subsequently, Acts 1959, No. 245, § 1, transferred these powers including the assessment and equalization of properties of public carriers from the Arkansas Assessment Coordination Department to the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
Acts 1971, No. 38, § 16 [repealed], changed the name of the Arkansas Commerce Commission to the Arkansas Transportation Commission and transferred both the Arkansas Transportation Commission and the Arkansas Public Service Commission to the Department of Commerce by a type 1 transfer.
Acts 1983, No. 691, § 1, abolished the Department of Commerce. The Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Arkansas Transportation Commission were detached from the Department of Commerce to be independent agencies of state government functioning in the same manner as they had functioned prior to their transfer to the Department of Commerce, by Acts 1983, No. 691, §§ 5 and 12, respectively.
The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23 and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2, 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Cross References. Regulation of carriers, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
Research References
ALR.
Validity and construction of statutes or ordinances regulating telephone answering services. 35 A.L.R.3d 1430.
State regulation of radio paging service. 44 A.L.R.4th 216.
Incidental provision of utility services, by party not in that business, as subject to regulation by state regulatory authority. 85 A.L.R.4th 894.
Incidental provision of transportation services, by party not primarily in that business, as common carriage subject to state regulatory control. 87 A.L.R.4th 638.
Public service commission's implied authority to order refund of public utility revenues. 41 A.L.R.5th 783.
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 26 et seq.
64 Am. Jur. 2d, Pub. Util., § 143 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 17 et seq. and § 329 et seq.
73B C.J.S., Pub. Util., § 151 et seq.
Case Notes
Administration of Law.
The administration of Acts 1935, No. 324 is delegated to the commission and not to the courts. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Subchapter 1 — Arkansas Public Service Commission
Preambles. Acts 1957, No. 75 contained a preamble which read:
“Whereas, there are many matters now pending before the Public Service Commission involving rate structures affecting many citizens of our State which should be properly adjudicated before July 1, 1957; and
“Whereas, the Public Service Commission is found to be not sufficiently staffed insofar as general counsel is concerned for the handling of this substantial increase in cases; and
“Whereas, for the Public Service Commission to function properly, additional counsel is needed;
“Now, therefore….”
Effective Dates. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 31: effective on passage.
Acts 1899, No. 119, § 10: effective on passage.
Acts 1945, No. 40, § 6: Feb. 12, 1945. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly of the state of Arkansas that revenues to be collected in the future will be materially diminished, and it has also been found that there is urgent need for immediate economies and more efficient operation of the various departments of state; and that consolidation of the agencies hereinbefore provided will make for more efficient operation and, at the same time, effect such economies that the foreseen diminution of future revenues will, in part, be offset by the economies so to be effected by such consolidation; and that only the enactment of this bill will provide such economies and efficient operation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1957, No. 75, § 3: Feb. 21, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It is found as a fact that there is an extremely large number of cases and other matters presently pending before the Arkansas Public Service Commission in which the public has a vital interest and as a result the present personnel of this agency are severely overburdened, and whereas many of these pending cases will require proper preparation and attention before June 30, 1957, this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, and an emergency is hereby declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 997, § 9: July 1, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventieth General Assembly that the Constitution of the State of Arkansas prohibits the appropriation of funds for more than a two (2) year period; that the effectiveness of this Act on July 1, 1975 is essential to the operation of the agency for which the appropriations in this Act are provided, and that in the event of an extension of the Regular Session, the delay in the effective date of this Act beyond July 1, 1975 could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and providing of essential governmental programs. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1975.”
Acts 1979, No. 64, § 4: Feb. 6, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that there is presently no authority for the appointment of a special member of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to serve on the Commission when a regular member is disqualified to participate in any matter before the Commission; that since the Commission is composed of only three members, it is in the best interests of all persons concerned that specific authority be provided for the appointment of a special member of the Commission to hear and participate in the determination of any matter before the Commission when a regular member is disqualified for any reason; that this Act is designed to accomplish this purpose and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2003, No 1321, § 19: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly, that the Constitution of the State of Arkansas prohibits the appropriation of funds for more than a two (2) year period; that the effectiveness of this Act on July 1, 2003 is essential to the operation of the agency for which the appropriations in this Act are provided, and that in the event of an extension of the Regular Session, the delay in the effective date of this Act beyond July 1, 2003 could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of essential governmental programs. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 2003.”
23-2-101. Members generally.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall consist of three (3) members to be known as “commissioners”, one (1) of whom shall be a lawyer.
- Each commissioner shall have resided in the state for five (5) years and shall be a qualified elector.
- Each commissioner before entering on his or her duties shall take the oath prescribed by the Arkansas Constitution, shall swear that he or she is not pecuniarily interested in any public utility or affiliate, or any public carrier or affiliate therewith, as employee, stockholder, or security holder.
- Each commissioner shall execute a bond to the State of Arkansas in the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), conditioned for the faithful discharge and performance of his or her duties.
-
- At the expiration of each of the commissioners' terms, the Governor, subject to the approval of the Senate, shall appoint one (1) member who shall hold office for a term of six (6) years.
- Each commissioner shall hold office during the term for which he or she was appointed and until his or her successor is appointed and qualified.
- The Governor shall designate one (1) of the commissioners as chair.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-101, 73-103, 73-104; Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The operation of subsection (c) of this section was suspended by adoption of a self-insured fidelity bond program for public officers, officials and employees, effective July 20, 1987, pursuant to § 21-2-701 et seq. The subsection may again become effective upon cessation of coverage under that program. See § 21-2-703.
Publisher's Notes. The terms of the members of the Arkansas Public Service Commission are arranged so that one term expires every two years on January 14.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment repealed former (d).
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Empowering the Governor to appoint special Arkansas Public Service Commission commissioners, without Senate approval, is a valid delegation of authority by the legislature to the branch of government that is equipped to execute and implement legislative mandates, therefore, § 23-2-102(a) passes constitutional muster. Clinton v. Clinton, 305 Ark. 585, 810 S.W.2d 923 (1991).
Appointment.
Upon failure of the Governor to submit the name of an appointee to succeed a member whose term expired while the Senate was in session within five days of the occurrence of the vacancy, the Senate had no power to make the appointment, but the member whose term expired held over until an appointment was made by the Governor, confirmed by the Senate, and the appointee qualified. Walther v. McDonald, 243 Ark. 912, 422 S.W.2d 854 (1968).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
23-2-102. Special commissioners.
- When any member of the Arkansas Public Service Commission is disqualified for any reason to hear and participate in the determination of any matter pending before the commission, the Governor shall appoint a qualified person to hear and participate in the decision on the particular matter.
- The special member so appointed shall have all authority and responsibility with respect to the particular matter before the commission as if the person were a regular member of the commission, but he or she shall have no authority or responsibility with respect to any other matter before the commission.
- A person appointed as a special member of the commission pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be entitled to receive per diem not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for each day spent in attending to his or her duties as a special member of the commission. This compensation shall be paid from any funds of the commission which are available for or may legally be used for paying the per diem.
History. Acts 1979, No. 64, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-101.1, 73-101.2.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Empowering the Governor to appoint special Public Service Commission commissioners, without Senate approval, is a valid delegation of authority by the legislature to the branch of government that is equipped to execute and implement legislative mandates, therefore, subsection (a) passes constitutional muster. Clinton v. Clinton, 305 Ark. 585, 810 S.W.2d 923 (1991).
Power of Appointment.
Even though the Public Service Commission is created by the General Assembly and performs legislative functions, the General Assembly may still delegate the right to appoint commissioners to the Governor. Clinton v. Clinton, 305 Ark. 585, 810 S.W.2d 923 (1991).
There is nothing that would prohibit the Governor from appointing one special commissioner without Senate approval, or from appointing three special commissioners. Clinton v. Clinton, 305 Ark. 585, 810 S.W.2d 923 (1991).
23-2-103. Offices — Place of hearings and investigations.
- The office of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be in Little Rock, Arkansas, but the commission may conduct hearings and make investigations anywhere in the different parts of the state when, in the opinion of the commission, the hearings will best serve the interest and convenience of the public.
- When a formal proceeding to consider a general change or modification in the rates and charges of a public utility has been initiated before the commission, the commission shall conduct a hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment in an appropriate location or locations within the service territory of the public utility.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-104; Acts 1999, No. 1072, § 1; 2017, No. 334, § 1.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (b); and made stylistic changes.
The 2017 amendment substituted “Little Rock, Arkansas” for “the State Capitol” in (a).
Case Notes
Public Comments.
Although subsection (b) of this section required the Arkansas Public Service Commission to consider public hearing comments before issuing a decision about a rate increase, its failure to do so was a harmless error when the Commission addressed the comments in a later order and the State did not argue that the rate increase was not supported by substantial evidence, and therefore, prejudice to the residential ratepayers was not shown. Although the wording of subsection (b) of this section does not state specifically that the Commission must have the transcript of the public comments before it issues its decision, that is clearly the intent of the statute. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
23-2-104. Quorum.
The concurrence of two (2) members of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be necessary for commission action.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-104.
23-2-105. Employees generally.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have power to employ during its pleasure such officers, examiners, experts, engineers, statisticians, accountants, attorneys, inspectors, clerks, and employees as it may deem necessary to carry out its proper function or to perform the duties and exercise the powers conferred by law upon the commission, as may be provided by appropriations of the General Assembly.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-105.
23-2-106. Assistant general counsel.
There is established in the Arkansas Public Service Commission the positions of two (2) assistant general counsel who shall be well-trained attorneys.
History. Acts 1957, No. 75, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-105.1.
23-2-107. Commissioners and employees — Activities restricted.
- No person while serving as a member or employee of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall practice or represent clients before any other agency of this state which is engaged in the regulation of any business, profession, or trade.
- Nor shall any person while serving as a member or employee of the commission represent any person, firm, corporation, or enterprise subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the commission in any proceeding before any court or administrative body.
History. Acts 1975, No. 997, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-105.2.
23-2-108. Costs of operation and maintenance.
- All costs of operation and maintenance of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be paid by vouchered warrants drawn against the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund in the State Treasury from appropriations made for these purposes by the General Assembly.
-
- The commission shall designate one (1) of its officers or employees who is familiar with cost accounting methods to keep an accurate record of that part of the cost of operation and maintenance of the commission having to do with matters relating to the regulation of public utilities, such costs hereafter referred to as “utilities costs”.
- In a similar manner, that officer or employee shall keep an accurate record of that part of the cost of operation and maintenance of the commission having to do with all matters other than those relating to the regulation of public utilities.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-107, 73-111.
23-2-109. Expenses of commission.
All expenses incurred by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to the provisions of this act, including the actual and necessary traveling and other expenses and disbursements of the commissioners, their officers, and employees incurred while on business of the commission, shall be paid from the funds provided for the use of the commission after being approved by the commission.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-106.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1945, No. 40, codified as §§ 23-2-101, 23-2-103 — 23-2-105, 23-2-108, 23-2-109, 23-2-403, 23-2-406, 23-2-407, 23-2-409, 23-2-413, 23-2-418, 23-3-109, 23-3-110.
23-2-110. Payment of expenses and salaries.
- The expenses of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be paid from the State Treasury on the warrant of the Auditor of State.
- The clerk of the commission shall make out an itemized account of all the expenses incurred by the commission, fees paid for officials for issuing and serving notices and process, witness fees, and any other expenses actually paid and which are authorized by this act.
- The account shall be examined by the commission and approved by it if correct, and the account so approved shall be filed with the Auditor of State.
- The Auditor of State shall issue his or her warrant on the Treasurer of State for the amount of the account and deliver the warrant to the clerk of the commission, and the Treasurer of State is authorized to pay the warrant.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 21, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1676; Pope's Dig., § 1986; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-108.
Publisher's Notes. For applicability of this section, see §§ 23-4-702 and 23-4-703.
As to the cumulative nature of the remedies given in Acts 1899, No. 53, see § 23-4-704.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1899, No. 53, codified as §§ 23-2-110, 23-2-414, 23-4-608, 23-4-701 — 23-4-720, 23-11-103, 23-11-104.
23-2-111. Salaries and expenses — Time of payment.
- The salaries and expenses of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be paid monthly upon certificate and vouchers, as required by law.
- If it becomes necessary to pay for transportation, costs, or other expenses of a similar nature during any current month, the payments may be drawn in advance upon certificate of the commissioners. However, the payments are to be embraced thereafter in the monthly statement to be made as required by law, showing the expenses to have been paid.
History. Acts 1899, No. 119, § 7, p. 194; C. & M. Dig., § 1674; Pope's Dig., § 1984; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-110.
23-2-112. Rural and Community Liaison — General job responsibilities.
- The Rural and Community Liaison will serve as a two-way communication link between the Arkansas Public Service Commission and utility customers in Arkansas, particularly those in rural areas.
-
-
The liaison is responsible for:
- Providing information to communities and rural utility customers concerning utility matters within the jurisdiction of the commission; and
- Identifying questions and concerns that rural utility customers may have concerning utility issues and relaying those concerns to the members of the commission and to the commission staff.
- In the performance of these duties, the liaison will work with stakeholders in rural areas and communities, including legislators, civic and community leaders, customers and customer groups, and rural utility personnel.
-
The liaison is responsible for:
History. Acts 2003, No. 1321, § 14.
23-2-113. Registration as lobbyist — Time limit for eligibility.
A member of the Arkansas Public Service Commission is not eligible to be registered as a lobbyist under § 21-8-601 et seq. until one (1) year after the expiration of the individual's service on the commission.
History. Acts 2013, No. 486, § 3.
Subchapter 2 — Transportation
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23 and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2, 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided:
“On and after the effective date of this Act, the Transportation Safety Agency shall cease to exist, and all authority, rights, powers, duties, records, property, unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations or other funds, privileges and jurisdiction of the Transportation Safety Agency, now prescribed by Sections 1 and 2 of Act 572 of 1987 and other laws of this State, including, but not limited to, the regulation of transportation for compensation, safety of operation of public carriers, the highway safety program authorized by Act 161 of 1967 or Arkansas Code Annotated § 27-73-101, et seq., certification and review of assessment for ad valorem taxation, and matters concerning rates, charges, and services of such carriers, are hereby expressly conferred upon the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department as fully as if so named in any law or laws of this State and are hereby transferred to said Department; all orders heretofore issued by the Transportation Safety Agency shall remain in full force and effect; all actions, proceedings and hearings of whatsoever nature, then or hereafter pending before the said Transportation Safety Agency shall be transferred to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department in the same manner and subject to the same incident and with the same results as though they had originated with the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, and all orders, actions, proceedings and hearings of whatsoever nature then or hereafter pending in the name of the Transportation Safety Agency shall survive and be continued, heard and determined by and in the name of the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department; and no rights, privileges, immunities or appropriations made, given or granted to or on behalf of the Transportation Safety Agency shall lapse or be lost by reason of such change of agencies, but shall be conferred, transferred and imposed on the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, and all furniture, fixtures, supplies, books, records, reports, equipment and funds derived from whatever source belonging to the Transportation Safety Agency shall be delivered to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and become its property. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, is hereby authorized to expend monies from the State Highway Department Fund, as such funds may be appropriated to the Department, for the purposes of fulfilling the duties herein transferred to said Department. Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Effective Dates. Acts 1957, No. 132, § 14: Feb. 28, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that hardships exist due to work load on the members and staff of the Arkansas Public Service Commission resulting from the many administrative and utility matters which that Commission is required to administer; and that the formation of a separate and distinct Arkansas Commerce Commission will afford relief to the Arkansas Public Service Commission and expedite handling of many and varied cases. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 112 et seq.
23-2-201. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Department” means the Arkansas Department of Transportation; and
- “Transportation” means the carriage of persons and property for compensation by air, rail, water, carrier pipelines, or motor carriers.
History. Acts 1957, No. 132, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-151; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 90.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (1).
Case Notes
Cited: Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
23-2-202 — 23-2-206. [Repealed.]
A.C.R.C. Notes. Former §§ 23-2-202 — 23-2-204, and 23-2-206, which concerned the Arkansas Transportation Commission, were deemed to be superseded by §§ 23-2-202 — 23-2-206 as enacted or amended by Acts 1987, No. 572 (now repealed). The superseded sections were derived from the following sources:
23-2-202. Acts 1957, No. 132, §§ 2, 4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-152, 73-155.
23-2-203. Acts 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1185, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-152.1, 73-152.2; reen. Acts 1987, No. 997, §§ 1, 2.
23-2-204. Acts 1977, No. 162, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-152.3, 73-152.4.
23-2-206. Acts 1983, No. 691, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-152a.
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning transportation, were repealed by Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 5. They were derived from the following sources:
23-2-202. Acts 1987, No. 572, § 4.
23-2-203. Acts 1987, No. 572, § 5.
23-2-204. Acts 1987, No. 572, § 3.
23-2-205. Acts 1957, No. 390, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-153; Acts 1987, No. 572, § 4.
23-2-206. Acts 1987, No. 572, § 3.
23-2-207, 23-2-208. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning officers and employees, and free transportation of employees, were repealed by Acts 2017, No. 707, §§ 91, 92. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-2-207. Acts 1957, No. 132, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-157.
23-2-208. Acts 1957, No. 132, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-158.
23-2-209. Jurisdiction of commission.
- The jurisdiction of the State Highway Commission shall extend to and include all matters pertaining to the regulation, certification, and review of assessment for ad valorem taxation and operation of all carriers providing a transportation service for compensation.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall vest the commission with jurisdiction as to any rate, charge, rule, regulation, order, hearing, investigation, or other matter pertaining to the operation within the limits of any municipality of any carrier operating wholly within a municipality.
- [Repealed.]
History. Acts 1957, No. 132, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-160; Acts 1991, No. 802, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 93.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 1991, No. 802, § 2, provided:
“With regard to the regulation of pipeline companies which are common carriers, all orders heretofore issued by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department or the Arkansas State Highway Commission shall remain in full force and effect; with regard to the regulation of pipeline companies which are common carriers, all actions, proceedings and hearings of whatsoever nature, then or hereafter pending before the said Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department or the Arkansas State Highway Commission shall be transferred to the Arkansas Public Service Commission in the same manner and subject to the same incident and with the same results as though they had originated with the Arkansas Public Service Commission; and with regard to the regulation of pipeline companies which are common carriers, all orders, actions, proceedings and hearings of whatsoever nature then or hereafter pending in the name of the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department or the Arkansas State Highway Commission shall survive and be continued, heard and determined by and in the name of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (c).
Case Notes
Cited: Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
23-2-210. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning rules and regulations, was repealed by Acts 2017, No. 707, § 94. The section was derived from Acts 1957, No. 132, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-162.
23-2-211. Proceedings before department.
- In the exercise of its jurisdiction, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have the power to promulgate reasonable rules and regulations governing procedure before the department and for other purposes.
- The department shall have full power to decide all matters which come before the department.
- Any order made by the department shall be subject to the same right of appeal by any party to the proceedings as is prescribed by § 23-2-425 or as may be otherwise provided by law.
History. Acts 1957, No. 132, §§ 9, 10; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-160, 73-161; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 95.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Appearance of Bias Standard.
The members of the State Highway Commission, although not judges, perform a quasi-judicial function and therefore, by analogy, should be subject to the appearance of bias standard for judges. Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991).
Although the State Highway Commissioners' hearing of case, in which counsel for plaintiff was also representing the commission and its members in pending lawsuits, created an appearance of bias that would ordinarily have required them to disqualify themselves from considering plaintiff's petition, the rule of necessity, applicable because there was no statutory procedure in place for the replacement of the commissioners, excepted their disqualification; and as it was necessary for them to hear plaintiff's petition they did not commit reversible error by doing so. Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991).
Cited: Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
23-2-212. Expenses.
- All expenses incurred by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under the provisions of this subchapter, including the actual and necessary traveling and other expenses and disbursements incurred while on business of the department, shall be paid from the funds provided for the use of the department.
- All costs of operation and maintenance of the department shall be paid by vouchered warrants drawn on the Treasurer of State from appropriations made for such purposes by the General Assembly.
- The department shall follow the same procedures used or established by law in writing vouchers, itemizing accounts, in expenses, keeping of records, of salaries, and in general, the cost accounting method of keeping records in the same manner as is prescribed by law for the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1957, No. 132, §§ 7, 8; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-158, 73-159; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 96.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”, and substituted “under” for “pursuant to”.
Case Notes
Cited: Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
Subchapter 3 — General Regulatory Authority of Commissions
Cross References. Publication of orders, § 1-3-103.
Effective Dates. Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Acts 1981, No. 913, § 3: Mar. 28, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that existing laws do not protect the disclosure of information by public utilities that may be necessary to the establishment of rates and charges for said utilities. This disclosure of information could be harmful to the interests of the utilities and not in the interests of the citizens of this State. There are currently pending before the Arkansas Public Service Commission rate cases which contain proprietary information and for which this legislation should be an aid to the rate-making process as the existing laws do not permit regulatory access to such information without damage to proprietary interests involve. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the health, safety, and welfare, should take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 238, § 5: Feb. 25, 1993. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of competitive and technological changes relating to telecommunications services, it is essential that the Arkansas Public Service Commission be authorized to deviate from the rate/base rate of return method of regulation in establishing rates and charges for such services; that it is in the best interest of the public that this authority be granted at the earliest possible date to enable the commission to more equitably establish a system of rates and charges for telecommunications services and that this act is designed to grant such authority and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2009, No. 246, § 2, Feb. 26, 2009. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the April date for the submission of the Arkansas Public Service Commission's annual report to the Governor precludes the commission from including full and complete public utility data for the preceding calendar year; that changing the submission date of the annual report from April to June will allow the commission to include in its annual report full and complete public utility data for the preceding calendar year; that this act is immediately necessary because the commission's next annual report is required to be submitted in the month of April 2009. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-2-301. Powers and jurisdiction of commission generally.
The commission is vested with the power and jurisdiction, and it is made its duty, to supervise and regulate every public utility defined in § 23-1-101 and to do all things, whether specifically designated in this act, that may be necessary or expedient in the exercise of such power and jurisdiction, or in the discharge of its duty.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 2071; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-3-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
In General.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission possesses the authority to regulate the promotional practices of Arkansas electric and gas utilities, and under § 23-2-305 the commission is allowed, after hearing and upon notice, to make or amend reasonable rules pertaining to the operation or service of public utilities; moreover, other statutes also give the commission the power to regulate the operations of and the service provided by public utilities. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
The legislature has given the Arkansas Public Service Commission the responsibility of protecting the public interest in energy conservation and the authority to investigate and either approve or disapprove utility actions in the conservation or distribution of energy. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
Attorney General.
The fact that § 23-4-305 gives the Attorney General the power to represent all classes of utility ratepayers before the commission does not mean that the Attorney General has veto power over the methodology employed by the commission in setting rates pursuant to the authority granted the commission under this section. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 46 Ark. App. 88, 877 S.W.2d 594 (1994).
Intrastate Sales.
State public utilities commission had the jurisdiction to regulate the wholesale intrastate sales of electricity between electric cooperative corporation and its members even though the corporation may incidentally buy or sell electricity which crosses state lines, since that is not the purpose of the corporation. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp., 273 Ark. 170, 618 S.W.2d 151 (1981), aff'd, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Public Utilities.
Court held that pay television transmission is an integral part of the telephone and telegraph business as it has developed and exists. Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962).
Rates.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is a creature of the legislature and, in ratemaking, it is performing a legislative function which has been delegated to it; the commission was created to act for the General Assembly and it has the same power that body would have when acting within the powers conferred upon it by legislative act. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's assertion of jurisdiction over the wholesale rates charged by a customer-owned rural power cooperative to its member retail distributors does not offend either the Supremacy Clause or the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution nor was such state regulation preempted by the Federal Power Act or the Rural Electrification Act. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Scope of Authority.
Arkansas Public Service Commission's statutory authority is broad enough to allow it to consider stipulations entered into by parties to a proceeding in approaching rate regulation, and it must make independent findings that the stipulations are fair, just, reasonable and in the public interest. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
The legislature's grant of authority to the Arkansas Public Service Commission is broad enough to allow it to hear a complaint brought as a class action. Brandon v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 67 Ark. App. 140, 992 S.W.2d 834 (1999).
Surcharge statutes tie surcharges to existing facility costs and costs directly related to legislative or regulatory requirements, and there is no authority granted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the implementation of social programs; moreover; the same holds true of sliding-scale ratemaking where the statutory language of § 23-4-108 and Arkansas case law refer to costs associated with gas production and service to the ratepayers, not low-income assistance programs. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Cited: City of Fort Smith v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 195 Ark. 513, 113 S.W.2d 100 (1938); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); SEECO, Inc. v. Hales, 341 Ark. 673, 22 S.W.3d 157 (2000); Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., 76 Ark. App. 201, 61 S.W.3d 193 (2001); Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 370 Ark. 190, 258 S.W.3d 336 (2007).
23-2-302. Jurisdiction of commission — “Company” defined.
-
The jurisdiction of the commission shall extend to and include:
-
-
All matters pertaining to the regulation and operation of all:
- Common carriers;
- Railroads;
- Express companies;
- Car companies;
- Freight lines;
- Toll bridges;
- Ferries;
- Steamboats;
- Street railroads;
- Telegraph companies;
- Telephone companies;
- Pipeline companies for transportation of oil, gas, and water;
- Gas companies;
- Electric lighting companies and other companies furnishing gas or electricity for light, heat, or power purposes;
- Hydroelectric companies for the generation and for transmission of light, heat, or power; and
- Water companies furnishing water within municipalities for municipal, domestic, or industrial use.
- Nothing in this act shall vest the commission with jurisdiction as to any rate, charge, rule, regulation, order, hearing, investigation, or other matter pertaining to the operation within the limits of any municipality of any street railroad, telephone company, gas company, pipeline company for transportation of oil, gas, or water, electric company, water company, hydroelectric company, or other company operating a public utility or furnishing public service as to which jurisdiction may be elsewhere conferred in this act upon any municipal council or city commission. Notwithstanding the jurisdiction of the municipality as to the above matters within the limits of the municipality, the commission shall have, and is delegated, the authority and duty to require all utility companies now furnishing public service within the limits of any municipality to furnish and continue furnishing that service to the municipality although the right of regulation of the utility as to rates and all other matters within the municipality is elsewhere in this act conferred upon the municipal councils or city commissions, subject to right of appeal to the courts.
- Further, nothing in this act shall vest the commission with jurisdiction as to any improvement district or municipality furnishing gas or electricity for any purpose; and
-
All matters pertaining to the regulation and operation of all:
- All other jurisdictions, if any, possessed by the Arkansas Railroad Commission [abolished] under the laws of Arkansas in force on March 31, 1919.
-
- For the purpose of this act, and in the construction of this act, every person, firm, association, company, partnership, corporation, or other organizations engaged in the operation of any public utility above indicated shall be deemed to be a company within the meaning of this act.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 5; C. & M. Dig., § 1618; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 2002; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-115.
Publisher's Notes. As enacted, this section conferred jurisdiction on the Arkansas Corporation Commission whose powers were transferred to the Arkansas Railroad Commission by Acts 1921, No. 124, which also amended this section. Through a series of subsequent transfers of authority, the jurisdiction established in this section devolved upon the Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Arkansas Transportation Commission. See Publisher's Notes to chapter 2 and subchapter 2 of chapter 2.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Meaning of “this act”. The words “this act” probably refer to both Acts 1919, No. 571, and 1921, No. 124, which are codified as §§ 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, 23-12-301, 23-12-302 and as §§ 14-200-110, 14-200-112, 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-2-425, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, respectively.
Cross References. Wastewater treatment districts exempted from jurisdiction, § 14-250-104.
Case Notes
In General.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission possesses the authority to regulate the promotional practices of Arkansas electric and gas utilities, and under § 23-2-305 the commission is allowed, after hearing and upon notice, to make or amend reasonable rules pertaining to the operation or service of public utilities; moreover, other statutes also give the commission the power to regulate the operations of and the service provided by public utilities. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is vested with the authority to adjudicate individual disputes involving public rights which the commission is charged by law to administer; public rights which the commission may adjudicate are those arising from the public utility statutes enacted by the General Assembly, and the lawful rules, regulations, and orders entered by the commission in the execution of the statutes. Southwestern Glass Co. v. Arkansas Okla. Gas Corp., 325 Ark. 378, 925 S.W.2d 164 (1996).
Common Carriers.
The railroad commission was authorized by this section to regulate “jitneys” or “jitney” buses operating as public carriers outside of or between municipalities. Mason v. Intercity Term. Ry., 158 Ark. 542, 251 S.W. 10 (1923).
Motor buses operating as public carriers between municipalities are included in term “all common carriers.” Kinder v. Looney, 171 Ark. 16, 283 S.W. 9 (1926).
This section did not grant to the railroad commission jurisdiction to require a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the operation of motor buses over state highways. Arkansas R.R. Comm'n v. Independent Bus Lines, 172 Ark. 3, 285 S.W. 388 (1926).
Electricity.
Under this section the railroad commission had no authority to grant a certificate of convenience and necessity to a company distributing electricity in a city under a franchise from it. De Queen Light & Power Co. v. Curtis, 157 Ark. 238, 248 S.W. 5 (1923).
Railroads.
The railroad commission had jurisdiction over the subject matter of abolishing station agencies as well as creating them, though the agencies were created by special acts of the legislature, and the commission had the implied power in the absence of statutory regulation to formulate rules of procedure for the hearing of applications by the railroad for permission to abandon an agency. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. R.R. Comm'n, 175 Ark. 425, 299 S.W. 761 (1927).
Toll Bridges.
The railroad commission was without jurisdiction to hear a petition to regulate and fix tolls of bridges not alleged to have been taken over as part of the state highway system, since the jurisdiction was vested in the county court. Ark. R.R. Comm'n v. Bovay, 174 Ark. 1057, 298 S.W. 331 (1927).
Cited: Young v. Energy Transp. Sys., 278 Ark. 146, 644 S.W.2d 266 (1983).
23-2-303. Jurisdiction over intrastate transportation services.
Nothing contained in this act shall be construed as giving the Arkansas Public Service Commission any jurisdiction over taxicab or truck service in cities or towns, and of railroad, taxicab, or motor bus service between cities or towns, jurisdiction over which is vested in the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 2064; Acts 1967, No. 234, § 4; 1973, No. 125, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-201; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 97.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-301.
Case Notes
Intrastate Sales.
State public utilities commission had the jurisdiction to regulate wholesale intrastate sales of electricity between electric cooperative corporation and its members even though the corporation may incidentally buy or sell electricity which crosses state lines, since that is not the purpose of the corporation. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp., 273 Ark. 170, 618 S.W.2d 151 (1981), aff'd, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Wholesale Rates.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's assertion of jurisdiction over the wholesale rates charged by a customer-owned rural power cooperative to its member retail distributors does not offend either the Supremacy Clause or the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution nor was such state regulation preempted by the Federal Power Act or the Rural Electrification Act. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Cited: Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981).
23-2-304. Certain powers of commission enumerated.
-
Upon complaint or upon its own motion and upon reasonable notice and after a hearing, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have the power to:
- Find and fix just, reasonable, and sufficient rates to be thereafter observed, enforced, and demanded by any public utility;
- Determine the reasonable, safe, adequate, and sufficient service to be observed, furnished, enforced, or employed by any public utility and to fix this service by its order, or rule;
- Ascertain and fix adequate and reasonable standards, classifications, rules, practices, and services to be furnished, imposed, observed, and followed by any or all public utilities;
- Ascertain and fix adequate and reasonable standards for the measurement of quantity, quality, pressure, initial voltage, or other conditions pertaining to the supply of all products, commodities, or services furnished or rendered by any and all public utilities;
- Prescribe reasonable rules for the examination and testing of the production, commodity, or service, and, for the measurement thereof, establish or approve reasonable rules, specifications, and standards to secure the accuracy of all meters or appliances for measurement;
- Provide for the examination and testing of any and all appliances used for the measurement of any product, commodity, or service of any public utility;
-
- Ascertain and fix the value of the whole or any part of the property of any public utility insofar as this value is material to the exercise of the jurisdiction of the commission.
- The commission may make revaluations of the whole or any part of the property from time to time and may ascertain the value of any new construction, extension, and addition to or retirement from the property of every public utility;
-
- Require any or all public utilities to carry a proper and adequate depreciation account in accordance with such rules and forms of account as the commission may prescribe.
- The commission may ascertain, determine, and by order fix the proper and adequate rates of depreciation of the several classes of property of each public utility.
- Each public utility shall conform its depreciation accounts to the rates so ascertained, determined, and fixed by the commission;
- Assure that retail customers should have access to safe, reliable, and affordable electricity, including protection against service disconnections in extreme weather or in cases of medical emergency or nonpayment for unrelated services;
-
- Assure that electric utility bills, usage, and payment records should be treated as confidential unless the retail customer consents to their release or the information is provided only in the aggregate.
- Notwithstanding subdivision (a)(10)(A) of this section, release of such information may be made pursuant to subpoena, court order, or other applicable statute or rule; and
-
-
- Propose, develop, solicit, approve, require, implement, and monitor financial assistance programs for utility customers who are sixty-five (65) years of age or older or who meet the income eligibility qualifications of the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program administered by the Arkansas Energy Office of the Division of Environmental Quality.
- After notice and a hearing, the commission may approve and order a financial assistance program for utility customers if the commission determines that the financial assistance program is beneficial to the ratepayers of a public utility and the public utility.
- The commission shall not fix rates, charges, or surcharges that recover, directly or indirectly, any portion of the cost of programs authorized under subdivision (a)(11)(A) of this section from a ratepayer that is not in the customer class of ratepayers eligible to participate in the programs.
-
- Because of competitive and technological changes relating to the services provided by telephone public utilities, the commission, upon petition by the telephone public utility, after notice and hearing and a finding that it is in the public interest, may deviate from the rate-base rate of return method of regulation in establishing rates and charges for services provided by the telephone public utility.
- In the discharge of its duties under this act, the commission may cooperate with regulatory commissions of other states and of the United States. It may also hold joint hearings and make joint investigations with such commissions.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, §§ 8, 19; Pope's Dig., §§ 2071, 2082; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-202, 73-218; Acts 1993, No. 238, § 1; 2003, No. 204, § 6; 2017, No. 1102, § 1; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2372–2375; 2019, No. 910, § 3239.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2003 amendment added (a)(9) and (10) and made related changes.
The 2017 amendment added (a)(11).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “or rule” for “rule, or regulation” in (a)(2) and (a)(10)(B); substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a)(3) and (a)(5); and deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (a)(5) and (a)(8)(A).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Arkansas Energy Office” for “Department of Human Services” in (a)(11)(A)(i).
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-301.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Utilities, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 611.
Case Notes
In General.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission possesses the authority to regulate the promotional practices of Arkansas electric and gas utilities, and under § 23-2-305 the commission is allowed, after hearing and upon notice, to make or amend reasonable rules pertaining to the operation or service of public utilities; moreover, other statutes also give the commission the power to regulate the operations of and the service provided by public utilities. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
The amendment of this section by Acts 2003, No. 204, is viewed by the court as recognition of the fact that no such power was previously vested in the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the provision of electricity in inclement weather, and, of course, no such power presently exists relating to natural gas. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Evidence.
The commission's statutory authority is clearly broad enough to allow the commission to consider stipulations entered into by some of the parties to a proceeding in approaching rate regulation; of course, the commission must afford a non-stipulating party adequate opportunity to be heard on the merits of the rate application and the stipulation agreed to by some of the parties, and the commission must make an independent finding, supported by substantial evidence, that the stipulation resolves the issues in dispute in a way which is fair, just and reasonable, and in the public interest. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 46 Ark. App. 88, 877 S.W.2d 594 (1994).
Jurisdiction.
Rights involving a specific regulation of the commission, and affecting the delivery, measurement and cost of electrical power supplied to a consumer, fall within the primary jurisdiction of the public service commission. Ozarks Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Harrelson, 301 Ark. 123, 782 S.W.2d 570 (1990).
Rates.
The primary object of the commission in a rate utility case is to provide that rate of return which is adjusted to utility's needs consistent always with the interest of the public. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
The commission is not bound by any formula or combination of formulas in fixing rates. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Upon application of utility company for change in rates commission was not bound by previous order as to rates and could make changes in such order upon proper notice to the company so long as it did not invade the constitutional rights of the company. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
The commission had the authority to strike proposed escalator clauses out of application of gas company for rate increase before allowing the new rates to go into effect under bond. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission has no authority to discard the rate base method in favor of the field price method in determining the net profits a public utility can earn in this state. Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is not required to take the same approach to every rate application, or even to consecutive applications by the same utility, when the commission, in its expertise, determines that its previous methods are unsound or inappropriate to the particular application. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's assertion of jurisdiction over the wholesale rates charged by a customer-owned rural power cooperative to its member retail distributors does not offend either the Supremacy Clause or the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution nor was such state regulation preempted by the Federal Power Act or the Rural Electrification Act. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Decision of administrative law judge recognized the objectives of universal fund and rapid changes in the telecommunications industry, so that Arkansas Public Service Commission did not act arbitrarily or capriciously when it adopted judge's order which revised tariffs, and its decision was supported by substantial evidence. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
Scope of Authority.
The commission does not have general authority to regulate all the activities of a public utility corporation but is limited to supervision within the legislative grant of those dealings where the corporation in fact acts as a public utility and its authority does not extend to those situations where the public utility is acting in its private as distinguished from its public capacity. Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is a creature of the legislature and, in ratemaking, it is performing a legislative function which has been delegated to it; the commission was created to act for the General Assembly and it has the same power that body would have when acting within the powers conferred upon it by legislative act. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Arkansas Public Service Commission's statutory authority is broad enough to allow it to consider stipulations entered into by parties to a proceeding in approaching rate regulation, and it must make independent findings that the stipulations are fair, just, reasonable and in the public interest. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
Surcharge statutes tie surcharges to existing facility costs and costs directly related to legislative or regulatory requirements, and there is no authority granted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the implementation of social programs; moreover; the same holds true of sliding-scale ratemaking where the statutory language of § 23-4-108 and Arkansas case law refer to costs associated with gas production and service to the ratepayers, not low-income assistance programs. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Service Provided.
Commission did not have jurisdiction to prohibit gas company from engaging in sale and installation of air-conditioning equipment. Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955).
Where a telephone company's rerouting of long distance calls will not result in inadequate service, it is not within the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission to enjoin the rerouting as a breach of contract. Allied Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 239 Ark. 492, 393 S.W.2d 206 (1965).
Violation of Rules.
Where a telephone company violated special rules promulgated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, the commission was justified in ordering that the telephone company's certificate of convenience either be revoked or transferred to another company since “reasonably adequate” telephone service was not being provided as required by former § 23-17-227. Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981).
Wholesale Sales.
State public utilities commission had the jurisdiction to regulate wholesale intrastate sales of electricity between an electric cooperative corporation and its members, even though the corporation may incidentally buy or sell electricity which crosses state lines, since that is not the purpose of the corporation. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp., 273 Ark. 170, 618 S.W.2d 151 (1981), aff'd, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Cited: City of Fort Smith v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 195 Ark. 513, 113 S.W.2d 100 (1938); United States v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 165 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1948); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948); Yancey v. City of Searcy, 213 Ark. 673, 212 S.W.2d 546 (1948); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962); Commercial Printing Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 250 Ark. 461, 466 S.W.2d 261 (1971); Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Wilkes, 269 Ark. 399, 601 S.W.2d 855 (1980); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); Contel of Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 37 Ark. App. 18, 822 S.W.2d 850 (1992); Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992); Lincoln v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993); Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 76 Ark. App. 547, 69 S.W.3d 889 (2002).
23-2-305. Rules.
The commission is empowered after hearing and upon notice to make and from time to time in like manner to alter or amend such reasonable rules pertaining to the operation, accounting, service, and rates of public utilities and of the practice and procedure governing all investigations by and hearings and proceedings before the commission as it may deem proper and not inconsistent with this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 2071; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-301.
Case Notes
In General.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission possesses the authority to regulate the promotional practices of Arkansas electric and gas utilities, and under this section the commission is allowed, after hearing and upon notice, to make or amend reasonable rules pertaining to the operation or service of public utilities; moreover, other statutes also give the commission the power to regulate the operations of and the service provided by public utilities. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
Hardship or Inconvenience.
Rules established by the Arkansas Public Service Commission are not invalid simply because they may work a hardship or create inconvenience to a public utility. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 42 Ark. App. 198, 856 S.W.2d 880 (1993).
Rates.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is a creature of the legislature and, in ratemaking, it is performing a legislative function which has been delegated to it; the commission was created to act for the General Assembly and it has the same power that body would have when acting within the powers conferred upon it by legislative act. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's assertion of jurisdiction over the wholesale rates charged by a customer-owned rural power cooperative to its member retail distributors does not offend either the Supremacy Clause or the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution nor was such state regulation preempted by the Federal Power Act or the Rural Electrification Act. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Wholesale Sales.
Public utilities commission had the jurisdiction to regulate wholesale intrastate sales of electricity between electric cooperative corporation and its member cooperatives, even though the corporation may incidentally buy or sell electricity which crosses state lines, since that is not the purpose of the corporation. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp., 273 Ark. 170, 618 S.W.2d 151 (1981), aff'd, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Cited: City of Fort Smith v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 195 Ark. 513, 113 S.W.2d 100 (1938); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962); Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); Contel of Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 37 Ark. App. 18, 822 S.W.2d 850 (1992).
23-2-306. Systems of accounts.
The commission may establish by order a uniform system of accounts to be kept by any public utility subject to the commission's jurisdiction or may classify the public utilities and establish a system of accounts for each class, and the commission may prescribe the manner in which the accounts shall be kept.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 22; Pope's Dig., § 2085; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-221.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957); Contel of Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 37 Ark. App. 18, 822 S.W.2d 850 (1992).
23-2-307. Inventories of property may be required.
The commission shall have the power and authority by order to require any public utility from time to time to furnish on forms prescribed by the commission a verified, itemized, and detailed inventory or appraisal of any or all of its property as to which the commission should have knowledge in order to enable it to perform its duties under this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 21; Pope's Dig., § 2084; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-220.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-301.
Case Notes
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
23-2-308. Reports by utilities may be required.
-
The commission may require any public utility to file:
- Annual reports in such form and of such content and at such time as the commission may require; and
- Special reports concerning any matter about which the commission is authorized to inquire or to keep itself informed.
- All reports shall be under oath.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 51; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-140.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Cross References. Gross earnings, filing annual statement, § 23-3-109.
23-2-309. Information to be furnished commission on request.
At any time, the commission may require persons, firms, associations, or corporations, so far as they may be subject to its jurisdiction under the terms of this act, to furnish any information which may be in his, her, its, or their possession respecting the rates, tolls, fares, charges, or practices in conducting his, hers, its, or their service. They may also be required to furnish the commission at all times for its inspection any books or papers or reports and statements. The reports and statements shall be under oath when required by the commission. The form of all reports required under this act shall be prescribed by the commission.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 11; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1663, 1664, 1686, 1687; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 8; Pope's Dig., §§ 1980, 1990, 1991, 2007; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-123.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-302.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Case Notes
Cited: Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955).
23-2-310. Investigations, examinations, testing, etc.
-
- The commission, whenever it may be necessary in the performance of its duties, may investigate and examine the condition and operation of public utilities or any particular utility.
- In conducting such investigations, the commission may proceed either with or without a hearing as it may deem best, but it shall make no order without affording a hearing to the affected parties.
- The commissioners and the officers and employees of the commission, during all reasonable hours, may from time to time enter upon any premises occupied by any public utility or upon or in which any of the utility's property is located for the purpose of making any investigation, examination, or test, or for exercising any power under this act. The commission may set up and use on such premises any apparatus and appliances necessary therefor.
- The public utility shall have the right to be represented at the making of such investigations and examinations, tests, and inspections.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 22; Pope's Dig., § 2085; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-221.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-301.
Case Notes
Authority of Commission.
The commission properly exercised its authority and discretion in defining the scope of the docket. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
23-2-311. Entry and inspection of utility property.
The commission shall have power, through its members, inspectors, or employees, to enter into, upon, and to inspect the property of any public utility so far as may be proper, in order to exercise the jurisdiction conferred upon the commission in this act.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 11; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1663, 1664, 1686, 1687; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 8; Pope's Dig., §§ 1980, 1990, 1991, 2007; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-123.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-302.
Case Notes
Cited: Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955).
23-2-312. Refusal to permit inspection or examination — Cancellation of charter.
- The failure or refusal of any public utility, if persisted in, to permit the inspection or examination of its physical properties, premises, plants, equipment, accessories, books, papers, files, documents, contracts, agreements, or accounts shall be deemed cause for the cancellation of its charter or license to do business in this state.
- When such a fact is certified to the Secretary of State by the commission, he or she shall cancel the charter or license of the offending utility to transact business in this state.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 60; Pope's Dig., § 2120; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-256.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
23-2-313. Subpoena powers — Compelling attendance and testimony.
- The commission shall have the power, either as a commission or by any of its members, to subpoena witnesses and take testimony and administer oaths to any witness in any proceeding or examination instituted before it or conducted by it in reference to any matter within its jurisdiction.
- In all hearings and proceedings before the commission, the evidence of witnesses and the production of the documentary evidence may be required at any designated place of hearing.
-
- In case of disobedience to a subpoena or other process, the commission may invoke the aid of the Pulaski County Circuit Court in requiring the evidence and testimony of witnesses and the production of papers, books, and documents.
- The court, in case of refusal to obey the subpoena issued to any person or to any public service corporation subject to the provisions of this act, shall issue an order calling the public service corporation or any person to appear before the commission and produce all books and papers if so ordered and give evidence touching the matter in question.
- Any failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as contempt thereof.
- A claim that any testimony or evidence may tend to incriminate the person giving it shall not excuse the witness from testifying, but the witness shall not be prosecuted for any offense concerning which he or she is compelled to testify pursuant to this section.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 11; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1663, 1664, 1686, 1687; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 8; Pope's Dig., §§ 1980, 1990, 1991, 2007; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-123.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-302.
Case Notes
Cited: Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955).
23-2-314. Fees charged by commission.
-
The commission shall charge and collect the following fees:
- Two hundred dollars ($200) for filing each application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity as required by §§ 23-3-201 — 23-3-205; and
- Such fees for copying and certifying the copy of any filed document as shall be determined by the commission from time to time after reasonable notice and hearing.
- No fees shall be charged or collected for copies of papers, records, or official documents furnished to public officers for use in their official capacity or for the annual reports of the commission in the ordinary course of distribution.
- All fees charged and collected by the commission shall be paid daily, accompanied by a detailed statement thereof, into the State Treasury.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 53; Pope's Dig., § 2113; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-114; Acts 1989, No. 742, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
23-2-315. Reports by commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall make and submit to the Governor during the month of June of each year a report containing a full and complete account of its transactions and proceedings for the preceding calendar year, together with such other facts, suggestions, and recommendations as it may deem of value to the people of the state.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 14; Pope's Dig., § 2077; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-141; Acts 1989, No. 594, § 1; 2009, No. 246, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “Arkansas Public Service Commission” for “commission” and “June” for “April”.
23-2-316. Records of commission open to public — Exceptions — Protective orders.
- All facts and information, including all reports, records, files, books, accounts, papers, and memoranda in the possession of the commission, shall be public and open to public inspection at all reasonable times.
-
- Whenever the commission determines it to be necessary in the interest of the public or, as to proprietary facts or trade secrets, in the interest of the utility to withhold such facts and information from the public, the commission shall do so.
- The commission may take such action in the nature of, but not limited to, issuing protective orders, temporarily or permanently sealing records, or making other appropriate orders to prevent or otherwise limit public disclosure of facts and information.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 27; Pope's Dig., § 2090; Acts 1981, No. 913, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-226.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Watkins, Access to Public Records under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, 37 Ark. L. Rev. 741.
Case Notes
Specific Findings.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission erred in entering a protective order when it failed to make specific findings that the documents were nondisclosable based upon the information in the record; under § 23-2-421(a), this section, and Commission Practice & Procedure Rule 13.05(b), it was necessary for the commission to find either that it was in the public interest or necessary to protect proprietary facts or trade secrets of the utility in order to seal the documents. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 45 Ark. App. 56, 871 S.W.2d 414 (1994).
Cited: Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 55 Ark. App. 125, 931 S.W.2d 795 (1996).
Subchapter 4 — Procedure Before Commissions
Effective Dates. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 31: effective on passage.
Acts 1899, No. 119, § 10: effective on passage.
Acts 1901, No. 24, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1945, No. 40, § 6: Feb. 12, 1945. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly of the state of Arkansas that revenues to be collected in the future will be materially diminished, and it has also been found that there is urgent need for immediate economies and more efficient operation of the various departments of state; and that consolidation of the agencies hereinbefore provided will make for more efficient operation and, at the same time, effect such economies that the foreseen diminution of future revenues will, in part, be offset by the economies so to be effected by such consolidation; and that only the enactment of this bill will provide such economies and efficient operation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 231, § 6: Mar. 7, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is declared by the General Assembly of Arkansas that doubt and confusion exists as to the proper construction of existing statutes pertaining to the effective date of orders of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and with respect to the proper procedures to follow to obtain judicial review of such orders; that such doubt and confusion could lead to a miscarriage of justice through a technical failure to comply with these statutes as ultimately construed by the courts; and that enactment of this bill will resolve said doubt and confusion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Acts 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 6: May 8, 1980. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the proper regulation of utilities in Arkansas requires that the procedure by which changes in rates are made be amended. This amendment is necessary in order that the needs of the companies may be properly considered while ratepayers are also properly protected. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall take effect and be in full force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 770, § 4: Apr. 3, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the practice of requiring circuit court judicial review of Public Service Commission orders works an undue hardship on the people of this State by creating undue delay in the final implementation of just and reasonable rates, and immediate correction of this hardship is necessary in order to preserve the public safety, health, peace, and general welfare of the State. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 265, § 3: Mar. 17, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the ability of utilities to react promptly to rapidly changing economic conditions through the issuance of stocks, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness, as approved by the commission, is in the best interests of utility ratepayers and the public in general and that this act is designed to permit them to do so and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Theory of Testimonial Competency and Privilege, 4 Ark. L. Rev. 377.
Rules of Evidence in Administrative Proceedings, 15 Ark. L. Rev. 138.
23-2-401. Definition.
As used in §§ 23-2-421 — 23-2-424, unless the context otherwise requires, the term “the commission” refers to the Arkansas Public Service Commission or to whatever successor agency might in the future be vested with the duties, responsibilities, powers, authorities, and jurisdiction of that commission.
History. Acts 1973, No. 231, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-229.3.
23-2-402. Powers of commission, commissioners, and examiners.
The commission and each of the commissioners and examiners specifically designated to make investigations, for the purposes mentioned in this act, may:
- Issue subpoenas, subpoenas duces tecum, and all necessary process in proceedings pending before the commission, a commissioner, or an examiner;
- Administer oaths, examine witnesses, compel the production of records, books, papers, files, documents, contracts, correspondence, agreements, or accounts necessary for any investigation being conducted; and
- Certify official acts.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 23; Pope's Dig., § 2086; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-222.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-82-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
Cited: Gatlin v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 631 F.2d 551 (8th Cir. 1980).
23-2-403. Evidence and pleading.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall prescribe the rules of procedure and for taking of evidence in all matters that may come before them.
- On the investigations, preparations, and hearing of cases, the commission and the department shall not be bound by the strict technical rules of pleading and evidence, but they may exercise such discretion as will facilitate their efforts to ascertain the facts bearing upon the right and justice of the matters before them.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-127; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 98.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Cross References. Records of proceedings, § 23-2-418.
Case Notes
Admission of Evidence.
In a hearing on a petition to transfer a certificate of convenience and necessity for the transportation of household goods, the commerce commission did not abuse its discretion by admitting in evidence lists of hauls made by the transferee taken from the books of the transferor. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Cross-Examination of Witnesses.
Although a utility argued that the Public Service Commission violated constitutional guarantees of due process by limiting the cross-examination of witnesses, the utility waived this argument on appeal by not making a timely objection below. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 Ark. App. 147, 289 S.W.3d 513 (2008).
Judicial Review.
Public Service Commission (PSC) did not act err in declaring that an electric utility's recovery of storm restoration costs in the amount of $47 million would constitute improper, retroactive ratemaking, nor did it err in using a hypothetical debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio of 52/48 to establish the cost of capital instead of the utility's 44/56 D/E ratio; however, in calculating the dividends-payable balance, the PSC erred in using the utility's parent company's lag time. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 Ark. App. 147, 289 S.W.3d 513 (2008).
Cited: Transport Co. v. Arkansas Transp. Comm'n, 255 Ark. 919, 504 S.W.2d 366 (1974); Lee's Trucking, Inc. v. Transport Co., 303 Ark. 444, 798 S.W.2d 59 (1990).
23-2-404. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning dismissal of complaints, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 1311, § 1. The section was derived from Acts 1935, No. 324, § 25; Pope's Dig., § 2028; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-224.
As to the effect of the repeal of this section, see § 23-2-430.
23-2-405. Service of process, notices, complaints, etc.
- All process issued by the commission shall extend to all parts of the state, and any such process, together with the service of all notices issued by the commission, as well as copies of complaints, rules, and orders of the commission, may be served by any person authorized to serve process issued out of courts of law, or by mail, as the commission may direct.
- In instances in which service is had by mail, a duplicate of the instrument served shall be enclosed, upon which duplicate the person served shall endorse the date of his or her receipt of the original and promptly return the duplicate to the commission.
- Any person who fails, neglects, or refuses to promptly return the receipt and duplicate shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 29; Pope's Dig., § 2092; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-228; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 203; 2019, No. 315, § 2376.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment inserted “Class A” preceding “misdemeanor” at the end of (c).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules, and orders” for “rules, orders, and regulations” in (a).
23-2-406. Oaths — Testimony.
Any commissioner, secretary, or assistant secretary employed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation may administer oaths and take testimony.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-130; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 99.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-2-407. Subpoenas for witnesses — Issuance and service.
Subpoenas for witnesses shall be issued by the secretary, assistant secretary, or any commissioner of the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation and shall be served as provided by law for the service of other subpoenas.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-130; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 100.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-2-408. Subpoenas duces tecum.
The commission may require, by order served on any public utility in the manner provided in this act for the service of orders, the production within this state at such time and place as it may designate, of any books, accounts, papers, or records of the public utility, or of any affiliate of the utility relating to the public utility's business or affairs within the state, pertinent to any lawful inquiry and kept by the public utility or its affiliate in any office or place without this state.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 28; Pope's Dig., § 2091; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-227.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
Case Notes
Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of Arkansas granted a gas utility company's writ of prohibition from a county court's denial of the company's motion to dismiss finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had sole and exclusive jurisdiction under § 23-4-201(a)(1) over Arkansas residential gas customers' claims that they were being charged too much for natural gas because of the company's alleged fraudulent conduct. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 370 Ark. 190, 258 S.W.3d 336 (2007).
23-2-409. Subpoenas — Failure to comply — Penalty.
The failure or refusal of any witness to appear or to produce any books, papers, or documents required by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation and to submit them to the inspection of the commission or the department or the refusal to answer any questions propounded by the commission or the department shall constitute a violation punishable by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-130; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 146; 2017, No. 707, § 101.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted “violation” for “misdemeanor.”
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-2-410. Refusal to attend or testify — Contempt proceedings.
In case of failure on the part of any person to comply with any lawful order of the commission, of any commissioner, or of any examiner specifically designated to conduct an investigation, or to comply with any subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, or in case of failure to testify concerning any matter on which he or she may be lawfully interrogated, any court of record of general jurisdiction or a judge thereof, upon application of the commission or of any commissioner, may compel obedience by prosecuting proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of the requirements of a subpoena issued from the court or of the refusal to testify therein.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 23; Pope's Dig., § 2086; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-222.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioner”, see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Cited: Gatlin v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 631 F.2d 551 (8th Cir. 1980).
23-2-411. No person excused from testifying — Exemption from prosecution.
-
- No person shall be excused from testifying or from producing any book, document, paper, correspondence, or account in any investigation, inquiry by, or hearing before the commission or any commissioner or examiner when ordered to do so upon the ground that the testimony or evidence, book, document, paper, correspondence, or account required of him or her may tend to incriminate him or her or subject him or her to penalty or forfeiture.
- However, no person shall be prosecuted, punished, or subjected to any forfeiture or penalty for, or on account of, any act, transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he or she shall have been compelled under oath to testify or produce documentary evidence.
- No person so testifying shall be exempt from prosecution or punishment for any perjury committed by him or her in his or her testimony.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 26; Pope's Dig., § 2089; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-225.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioner”, see § 23-1-101.
23-2-412. Depositions.
The commission, any commissioner, or any party to the proceedings in any investigation or hearing before the commission may cause the deposition of witnesses residing within or without the state to be taken in the manner prescribed by law for taking depositions in civil actions.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 24; Pope's Dig., § 2087; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-223.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioner”, see § 23-1-101.
23-2-413. Perjury.
False testimony shall constitute perjury punishable as provided by law.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-130.
23-2-414. Witness and mileage fees.
- Witnesses who are summoned before the commission shall be paid the same fees and mileage as are paid to witnesses in courts of record.
- Witnesses whose depositions are taken pursuant to the provisions of this act and the officer taking the deposition shall be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in such courts.
- Any party to a proceeding at whose instance a subpoena is issued and served shall pay the costs incident thereto and the fees and mileage of all his or her witnesses.
- The mileage and attendance fees shall be paid by the warrant of the Auditor of State, upon the presentation of the proper vouchers sworn to by the witness and approved by the chair of the commission.
-
-
No witness shall be entitled to any witness fees or mileage if that witness:
- Is directly or indirectly interested in any railroad in this state or outside this state;
- Is in any way interested in any stock, bond, mortgage, security, or earnings of any such railroad; or
- Shall be the agent or employee of such a railroad, or any officer thereof, when summoned at the instance of the railroad.
- No witness furnished with free transportation shall receive pay for the distance he or she may have traveled on free transportation.
-
No witness shall be entitled to any witness fees or mileage if that witness:
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 29, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1688; Acts 1935, No. 324, § 23; Pope's Dig., §§ 1992, 2086; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-131, 73-222.
Publisher's Notes. For applicability of this section, see §§ 23-4-702 and 23-4-703.
As to the cumulative nature of the remedies given in Acts 1899, No. 53, see § 23-4-704.
For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
Case Notes
Cited: Gatlin v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 631 F.2d 551 (8th Cir. 1980).
23-2-415. Hearings generally.
- In addition to the hearings specifically provided for by this act, the commission may conduct such other hearings as may be required or expedient in the administration of the powers and duties conferred upon it by this act.
- The commission shall fix the time and place of all hearings and shall serve notice of the hearing not less than ten (10) days before the time set for the hearing, unless the commission finds that public necessity requires that the hearing be held at an earlier date.
- At the time fixed for any hearing before the commission, a commissioner, or examiner, or the time to which any hearing may have been continued, the complainant and the person or corporation complained of shall be entitled in person or by attorney to be heard and to introduce evidence and to examine and cross-examine witnesses.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 29; Pope's Dig., § 2092; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-228.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
23-2-416. Hearings — Separation or consolidation of complaints.
- The commission, in its discretion, when a complaint is made concerning more than one (1) rate, charge, or service, may order separate hearings thereon at such times as it may prescribe.
- The commission may, for the purpose of a hearing, consolidate complaints when no injustice will arise from the consolidation.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 25; Pope's Dig., § 2088; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-224.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
23-2-417. Burden of proof.
In all actions and proceedings arising under the provisions of this act, or growing out of the exercise of the authority and powers granted by this act to the commission, the burden of proof shall be upon the parties seeking to avoid compliance with the provisions of this act or with any findings, rules, regulations, or orders of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 38; Pope's Dig., § 2101; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-237.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
Case Notes
Cited: General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392; Associated Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 25 Ark. App. 115, 752 S.W.2d 766 (1988).
23-2-418. Records of proceedings and testimony.
- A full and complete record shall be kept of all proceedings had before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, the Arkansas Department of Transportation, any commissioner, or any examiner on any formal investigation.
- All testimony shall be recorded by official reporters appointed by the commission or the department.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 32; Pope's Dig., § 2095; Acts 1945, No. 40, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-127, 73-231; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 102.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Cross References. Publication of orders of commission, § 1-3-103.
Case Notes
Cited: Transport Co. v. Arkansas Transp. Comm'n, 255 Ark. 919, 504 S.W.2d 366 (1974).
23-2-419. Quorum.
-
- A majority of the commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business, for the performance of any duty, or for the exercise of any power of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- No one (1) vacancy for the time being in the commission shall impair the rights of the remaining commissioners to exercise all of the powers of the commission.
- The act of a majority of the commissioners shall be the act of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 2070; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-128.
23-2-420. Orders, findings, rules, certificates, etc., under Acts 1935, No. 324, to be in writing — Copies as evidence.
- Every order, finding, authorization, rule, or certificate issued or approved by the commission under any provisions of this act shall be in writing and entered on the records of the commission, all of which shall be public records.
- A certificate under the seal of the commission that any such order, finding, authorization, rule, or certificate has not been modified, stayed, suspended, or revoked shall be received as evidence in all courts as to the facts therein stated.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 32; Pope's Dig., § 2095; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-231; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2377.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (a) and (b).
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
Case Notes
Judicial Notice of Commission Orders.
Arkansas Public Service Commission's orders are matters of public record under this section. Courts take judicial notice of public records that are required to be kept. Consequently, courts may take judicial notice of orders rendered by the Commission. Falcon Cable Media LP v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2012 Ark. 463, 425 S.W.3d 704 (2012).
Record of Order.
Where there was no evidence of an order of the railroad commission prior to December 1 requiring the railroad to maintain a station and agent and the violation of the order was alleged to have been committed on November 26, a finding that the railroad violated the order was reversed. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. State, 187 Ark. 1162, 60 S.W.2d 924 (1933) (decision under prior law).
23-2-421. Findings and orders of commission.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission's decision shall be in sufficient detail to enable any court in which any action of the commission is involved to determine the controverted question presented by the proceeding.
- A copy of the order certified under the seal of the commission shall be served upon the person or corporation against whom it runs, or his or her or its attorney. Notice thereof shall be given to the other parties to the proceedings or their attorneys.
-
- The order shall take effect and become operative immediately upon the service thereof, unless otherwise provided, and shall continue in force either for a period which may be designated therein or until changed or revoked by the commission, or vacated upon review.
- If an order cannot, in the judgment of the commission, be complied with within the time fixed by the commission, the commission may grant and prescribe such additional time as in its judgment is reasonably necessary to comply with the order and may, on application and for good cause shown, extend the time for compliance fixed in the order.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 30; Pope's Dig., § 2093; Acts 1973, No. 231, § 2; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-229.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey of Arkansas Law. Administrative Law, 4 U.Ark. Little Rock L.J. 157.
Case Notes
Burden of Proof.
In order to establish an absence of substantial evidence to support the commission's order, the Attorney General had the burden of showing that the proof before the commission was so nearly undisputed that fair-minded persons could not reach its conclusion. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
Findings of Fact.
In reviewing an order of the commission, the court must determine not whether the conclusions of the commission are supported by substantial evidence but whether its findings of fact are so supported. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Continental Tel. Co., 262 Ark. 821, 561 S.W.2d 645 (1978).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission erred in entering a protective order where it failed to make specific findings that the documents are nondisclosable based upon the information in the record; under subsection (a) of this section, § 23-2-316, and Commission Practice & Procedure Rule 13.05(b), it was necessary for the commission to find either that it was in the public interest or necessary to protect proprietary facts or trade secrets of the utility in order to seal the documents. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 45 Ark. App. 56, 871 S.W.2d 414 (1994).
Commission's findings held to satisfy the requirements of subsection (a) where the commission's decision was supported by substantial evidence and the total effect of the order was not unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
An order entered by the Arkansas Public Service Commission did not contain adequate findings of fact where the order did not recite any evidence supporting the findings that the commission made and where the court did not have findings on the very issues that the parties litigated. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 62 Ark. App. 154, 969 S.W.2d 203 (1998).
In a proceeding to increase nongas rates, whether the month of April should have been included in the winter (peak) usage period that was relied on by the Arkansas Public Service Commission to support the 68.5% demand allocation was a finding that should have been made by the Commission and because the decision was insufficient for the court to make an adequate meaningful review as required by subsection (a) of this section, the action was remanded. The issue was properly before the Commission. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
Arkansas Public Service Commission complied with subsection (a) of this section when it gave a considered response that informed the parties of the basis for the order and indicated the reasoning by which the Commission reached its decision; the issue in the case was whether customers were overbilled for electricity usage, and whether the customers requested that the permanent service be activated was not directly relevant to whether they were overbilled for that service. Pressler v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2011 Ark. App. 512, 385 S.W.3d 349 (2011).
Cited: Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 64 Ark. App. 303, 984 S.W.2d 61 (1998); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 68 Ark. App. 148, 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999).
23-2-422. Commission orders — Rehearings.
- Any party to a proceeding before the Arkansas Public Service Commission aggrieved by an order issued by the commission may apply for a rehearing within thirty (30) days after the date of mailing of the order of the commission.
- The application for rehearing shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the application is based.
- Upon receiving the application, the commission shall have power to grant or deny rehearing, to abrogate or modify its order without further hearing, or to reopen the record for the purpose of receiving and considering additional evidence.
- Unless the commission acts upon the application for rehearing within thirty (30) days after it is filed, the application shall be deemed to have been denied.
- An order or decision made after the rehearing abrogating, changing, or modifying the original order or decision shall have the same force and effect as an original order or decision but shall not affect any right or the enforcement of any right arising from or by virtue of the original order or decision unless so ordered by the commission.
History. Acts 1973, No. 231, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-229.1; Acts 1991, No. 811, § 1.
Cross References. Refunds of excessive bonded rate collections, order not stayed during rehearing, § 23-4-415.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Civil Procedure, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 555.
Case Notes
Aggrieved Party.
While the Supreme Court could find no prejudice resulting from the treatment of the staff as an adverse party before the commission in the case before it, the court did not generally approve of this situation which it regarded as giving an appearance of impropriety, and in other instances, prejudice may be demonstrated to have resulted from this apparent conflict. General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Authority of Commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission acts in a legislative capacity and not in a judicial one, and therefore, the Supreme Court views the orders of the commission as having the same force as would an enactment of the General Assembly. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980).
Due Process.
In an action to increase nongas rates, the brevity of time in which the Arkansas Public Service Commission approved a gas company's tariffs did not violate a consumer group's due process rights because the group was not deprived of the opportunity to petition for rehearing under subsection (a) of this section. The group did not identify any property right before the Commission or the court of which it had been deprived, and it did not show any prejudice. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
Rehearings.
Commission's staff may properly seek rehearing before the Arkansas Public Service Commission. General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392, aff'd, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Notice of appeal may be filed within thirty days of one of two dates: (1) the date on which the Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC) enters an order upon the application for rehearing, or (2) the date on which the application is deemed denied, and Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 4 does not apply; therefore, a motion to dismiss an appeal as untimely was denied because it was filed within 30 days of the PSC denying rehearing, even though the deemed denied date had already passed when the PSC decided to reconsider the case. Commercial Energy Users Group v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 369 Ark. App. 13, 250 S.W.3d 225 (2007).
Scope of Review.
The granting or denial of a petition for a rehearing is a matter resting largely within the discretion of a regulatory agency in rate-setting cases, and the general rule is that the denial of a petition for rehearing by an agency such as the Arkansas Public Service Commission should be set aside on judicial review only for the clearest abuse of discretion. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
In addressing the questions of law raised on appeal, the court of appeals may not pass upon the wisdom of the Arkansas Public Service Commission's actions or judge whether the commission has appropriately exercised its discretion. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 19 Ark. App. 322, 720 S.W.2d 924 (1986).
The court of appeals does not advise the Arkansas Public Service Commission how to discharge its functions in arriving at findings of fact or in exercising its discretion, and its review of the reasonableness of the actions of the commission relates only to findings of fact and to a determination of whether its actions were arbitrary. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 19 Ark. App. 322, 720 S.W.2d 924 (1986).
Cited: Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Yelcot Tel. Co., 266 Ark. 365, 585 S.W.2d 362 (1979); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); Great Lakes Carbon Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 31 Ark. App. 54, 788 S.W.2d 243 (1990); Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 70 Ark. App. 421, 19 S.W.3d 634 (2000).
23-2-423. Commission orders — Judicial review — Procedure.
-
- Any party to a proceeding before the Arkansas Public Service Commission aggrieved by an order issued by the commission in the proceeding may obtain a review of the order in the Court of Appeals. The review of the order may be had by filing in that court, within thirty (30) days after the order of the commission upon the application for rehearing or within thirty (30) days from the date the application is deemed to be denied as provided in § 23-2-422, a notice of appeal stating the nature of the proceeding before the commission, identifying the order complained of and the reasons why the order is claimed to be unlawful, and praying that the order of the commission be modified, remanded, or set aside in whole or in part.
- No proceeding to review any order of the commission shall be brought by any party unless that party has made application to the commission for a rehearing on the order.
-
- A copy of the petition shall immediately be transmitted by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals to the secretary of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Thereupon, the commission, within thirty (30) days from the service of the notice, shall file with the Court of Appeals the record upon which the order complained of was entered.
- The record shall consist of a complete transcript of the record in the case made before the commission which shall include a copy of all pleadings, proceedings, testimony, exhibits, orders, findings, and opinions in the case. However, the parties and the commission may stipulate that only a specified portion of the record as made before the commission shall be included in the transcript to be filed with the Court of Appeals.
-
- Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall have original jurisdiction, which, upon the filing of the record with it, shall be exclusive, to affirm, modify, or set aside the order of the commission in whole or in part.
- No objection to any order of the commission shall be considered by the Court of Appeals unless the objection shall have been urged before the commission in the application for rehearing.
- The finding of the commission as to the facts, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.
- The review shall not be extended further than to determine whether the commission's findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the commission has regularly pursued its authority, including a determination of whether the order or decision under review violated any right of the petitioner under the laws or Constitution of the United States or of the State of Arkansas.
- All evidence before the commission shall be considered by the court regardless of any technical rule which might have rendered the evidence inadmissible if originally offered in the trial of any action at law or in equity.
- The Court of Appeals, on review, shall advance commission cases as matters of public interest over all other civil cases except child custody cases, and appeals under the Workers' Compensation Law, § 11-9-101 et seq., and the Division of Workforce Services Law, § 11-10-101 et seq.
- Section 23-2-425 shall have no application to judicial review of orders of the commission.
History. Acts 1973, No. 231, §§ 3, 4; 1985, No. 770, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-229.1, 73-229.2; Acts 1991, No. 811, § 2; 2019, No. 910, § 570.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Division of Workforce Services Law” for “Department of Workforce Services Law” in (d).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Civil Procedure, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 555.
Case Notes
Construction.
This section is mandatory, and strict compliance with its provisions is necessary before any order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. Brown v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 258, 707 S.W.2d 780 (1986).
In General.
Judicial review of appeals from the Arkansas Public Service Commission is limited by the provisions of subdivisions (c)(3), (4), and (5) of this section, which define the standard of review as determining whether the commission's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, whether the commission has regularly pursued its authority, and whether the order under review violated any right of the appellant under the laws or the Constitutions of the State of Arkansas or the United States. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 46 Ark. App. 88, 877 S.W.2d 594 (1994).
This section and § 26-24-123 are easily distinguishable, inasmuch as this section pertains to public utility regulatory matters and § 26-24-123 governs judicial review on Arkansas Public Service Commission decisions concerning taxation matters. Ark. Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 307 Ark. 171, 818 S.W.2d 935 (1991).
Fact that customers were proceeding pro se before the Arkansas Public Service Commission did not warrant them special treatment because pro se parties were held to the same standard as a licensed attorney. Pressler v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2011 Ark. App. 512, 385 S.W.3d 349 (2011).
Allocation of Rates.
The commission does not have to rely on a particular cost-of-service study to decide how rates should be allocated among the various classes of customers, nor must the commission announce the method it used in the allocation. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Burden of Proof.
The burden was on local exchange carriers to justify revised tariffs and show without such rates they would be unable to earn their allowed rate of return. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
Collateral Attack.
The order or determination of an administrative body, acting within its jurisdiction and under authority of law, is not subject to collateral attack; this is so in the absence of fraud or bad faith, or, under some authority, even on the ground of fraud, since the only method of attack available is by appeal as provided by statute. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
Constitutional Rights.
Provisions of former similar section as to review of orders of commission were adequate to protect constitutional rights of telephone company which maintained integrated exchange serving subscribers in both Arkansas and another state and were “plain, speedy and adequate” within the meaning of the federal Johnson Act, so that federal district court did not have jurisdiction to enjoin rate order of commission relating to rates in Arkansas. General Tel. Co. v. Robinson, 132 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. Ark. 1955) (decision under prior law).
Local exchange carriers were not denied due process in proceedings before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, where the commission advised them of all issues before it and they were given the opportunity to present evidence to the commission in support of all the components of their proposed tariffs. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
Subsection (c)(4) of this section did not give the court jurisdiction to address the merits of the plaintiff's constitutional claims where the plaintiff did not argue that the Arkansas Public Service Commission failed to regularly pursue its authority and agreed with the commission that it lacked jurisdiction to decide the constitutional claims. AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 67 Ark. App. 177, 994 S.W.2d 494 (1999), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 344 Ark. 188, 40 S.W.3d 273 (2001).
Customers were afforded due process because they had the opportunity to subpoena witnesses but failed to do so; the Arkansas Public Service Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provide that parties before the Commission may request subpoenas from the Commission to secure the testimony of witnesses, but those rules do not specify a time in which subpoenas are required to be served. Pressler v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2011 Ark. App. 512, 385 S.W.3d 349 (2011).
Discretion of Commission.
The commission has broad discretion in choosing an approach to rate regulation and is free, within its statutory authority, to make any reasonable adjustments which may be called for under particular circumstances. Associated Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 25 Ark. App. 115, 752 S.W.2d 766 (1988).
In denying certain of the Attorney General's discovery requests in a suit involving a telephone company, the Arkansas Public Service Commission regularly pursued its authority. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 55 Ark. App. 125, 931 S.W.2d 795 (1996).
The commission has wide discretion in choosing its approach to rate regulation, and it is not bound by a particular method of evaluation. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
The appellate court is generally not concerned with the method used by the commission in calculating rates as long as the commission's action is based on substantial evidence and the total effect of the rate order is not unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Entitlement to Review.
A city is entitled to review of order by commission even though no constitutional rights are violated, since proceedings might be regular, and still order could be void if arbitrary, unreasonable, and without substantial evidence. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Utility is entitled to examination of order by commission, if order amounts to confiscation of property, or if order results in violation of constitutional rights under state and federal Constitutions. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Jurisdiction.
An objection to an order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission may not be considered by this court unless the objection has been urged before the commission in the application for rehearing. Lavaca Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 65 Ark. App. 263, 986 S.W.2d 146 (1999).
Notice of Appeal.
Attorney General's notice of appeal regarding evidentiary issues held sufficient. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
Notice of appeal may be filed within thirty days of one of two dates: (1) the date on which the Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC) enters an order upon the application for rehearing, or (2) the date on which the application is deemed denied, and Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 4 does not apply; therefore, a motion to dismiss an appeal as untimely was denied because it was filed within 30 days of the PSC denying rehearing, even though the deemed denied date had already passed when the PSC decided to reconsider the case. Commercial Energy Users Group v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 369 Ark. App. 13, 250 S.W.3d 225 (2007).
Scope of Review.
Where one seeking review does not claim that the order of the Department of Public Utilities (now Arkansas Public Service Commission) complained of violated any of its constitutional rights, the review of such order should not extend further than to determine whether the department has regularly pursued its authority. Department of Pub. Utils. v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 200 Ark. 983, 142 S.W.2d 213 (1940) (decision under prior law).
Allowance by commission would not be changed by court, since to do so would be to substitute opinion of court for opinion of commission. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952) (decision under prior law).
The court reviews the commission's findings on the record before the commission. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956) (decision under prior law).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission has broad legislative and administrative powers, and review of its findings and orders by the court is considerably limited in its extent. Incorporated Town of Emerson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 20, 295 S.W.2d 778 (1956) (decision under prior law).
The granting or denial of a petition for a rehearing is a matter resting largely within the discretion of a regulatory agency in rate-setting cases, and the general rule is that the denial of a petition for rehearing by an agency such as the Arkansas Public Service Commission should be set aside on judicial review only for the clearest abuse of discretion. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
The judicial branch of the government must generally defer to the expertise of the Arkansas Public Service Commission; however, judicial review is not reduced to a formality, and it is for the courts to say whether there has been an arbitrary or unwarranted abuse of the commission's discretion, even though considerable judicial restraint should be observed in finding such an abuse. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
The courts may not pass upon the wisdom of the commission's actions or say whether the commission has appropriately exercised its discretion; however, it is for the courts to say whether there has been an arbitrary or unwarranted abuse of discretion, even though considerable judicial restraint should be observed in finding such an abuse, and the question of reasonableness of the commission's actions relates only to its findings of fact and to a determination of whether its action was arbitrary. Russellville Water Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 270 Ark. 584, 606 S.W.2d 552 (1980).
The scope of review by the court is very narrow and limited; on the other hand, the discretion of the commission is very broad. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission acts in a legislative capacity and not in a judicial one, and therefore, the appellate court views the orders of the commission as having the same force as would an enactment of the General Assembly. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980).
In a telephone rate case, judicial inquiry is concluded if the total effect of the rate order is not unjust, unreasonable, unlawful or discriminatory. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980).
The appellate court's duty under this section is to determine whether: (1) the Arkansas Public Service Commission's findings as to the facts are supported by substantial evidence; (2) the commission has regularly pursued its authority; and (3) the order or decision under review violated any of the telephone company's rights under the laws or constitutions of the United States or State of Arkansas. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986).
It is not the theory, but the impact, of the rate order that counts in determining whether rates are just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory, and if the total effect of the rate order cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded and infirmities in the method employed are deemed unimportant. General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392, aff'd, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 24 Ark. App. 142, 751 S.W.2d 8 (1988); Contel of Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 37 Ark. App. 18, 822 S.W.2d 850 (1992).
Although § 23-2-103(b) required the Arkansas Public Service Commission to consider public hearing comments before issuing a decision about a rate increase, its failure to do so was a harmless error when the Commission addressed the comments in a later order and the State did not argue that the rate increase was not supported by substantial evidence, and therefore, prejudice to the residential ratepayers was not shown. Although the wording of § 23-2-103(b) does not state specifically that the Commission must have the transcript of the public comments before it issues its decision, that is clearly the intent of the statute. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
In an action to increase nongas rates, the Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division of the Attorney General's Office obtained some testimony that the allocation of distribution mains' cost could have been lowered if relevant data was available, but that evidence was not sufficient to convince the court that the Arkansas Public Service Commission's adoption of its staff's customer allocation was not supported by substantial evidence as required by subdivisions (c)(3) and (4) of this section. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
In an action to increase nongas rates, the Arkansas Public Service Commission found that a gas company met its burden of producing sufficient evidence of real potential harm for abuse of the company's system and a consumer group did not demonstrate that the potential for abuse did not exist or offer evidence that the proposal was unreasonable. Therefore, under subsection (c) of this section, substantial evidence supported the Commission's decision to allow the company to lower the imbalance percentages. Consumers Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 99 Ark. App. 228, 258 S.W.3d 758 (2007).
Public Service Commission (PSC) did not act err in declaring that an electric utility's recovery of storm restoration costs in the amount of $47 million would constitute improper, retroactive ratemaking, nor did it err in using a hypothetical debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio of 52/48 to establish the cost of capital instead of the utility's 44/56 D/E ratio; however, in calculating the dividends-payable balance, the PSC erred in using the utility's parent company's lag time. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 Ark. App. 147, 289 S.W.3d 513 (2008).
Because a university did not file a petition for rehearing from an administrative law judge's order, it could not argue on appeal that the order erroneously held that facilities agreements the university entered into with an energy company were void and unenforceable in their entirety. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2011 Ark. App. 453, 384 S.W.3d 674 (2011).
Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC) did not err in dismissing customer's complaint alleging that an energy company overcharged them for electric service because there was testimony that the meter on the customers' house was working properly and that the appliances installed in the home could have used the amount of electricity billed under the weather conditions during the time period in question; the administrative law judge specifically credited the testimony of a member of the PSC staff that there was no evidence that the company overbilled the customers or that it violated any of the PCS's rules. Pressler v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2011 Ark. App. 512, 385 S.W.3d 349 (2011).
—Performance of Functions.
Apart from the judicial review which may be resorted to, the Supreme Court (now Court of Appeals) will not advise the commission how to discharge its functions. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956) (decision under prior law).
In questions pertaining to the regular pursuit of Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority, the courts do have the power and duty to direct the commission in the performance of its functions insofar as it may be necessary to assure compliance by it with the statutes and constitutions. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
It is not for the courts to advise the Arkansas Public Service Commission how to discharge its functions in arriving at findings of fact or in exercising its discretion; on the other hand, it is clearly for the courts to decide the questions of law involved and to direct the commission where it has not pursued its authority in compliance with the statutes governing it or with the state and federal constitutions. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Local exchange carriers failed to show the Arkansas Public Service Commission failed to pursue its authority regularly because it engaged in single-issue rate making by considering in isolation the rate-of-return component of the algorithm for determining the Arkansas InterLATA Carrier Common Pool tariffs. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
—Substantial Evidence.
If the order is supported by substantial evidence, free from fraud, and not arbitrary, it is the duty of the courts to permit it to stand, even though they might disagree with the wisdom of the order. Department of Pub. Utils. v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 200 Ark. 983, 142 S.W.2d 213 (1940); Allied Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 239 Ark. 492, 393 S.W.2d 206 (1965) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Order of commission will not be interfered with by the court, if supported by substantial evidence free from fraud and not arbitrary. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Incorporated Town of Emerson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 20, 295 S.W.2d 778 (1956) (preceding decisions under prior law); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977).
Commission order held to be supported by substantial evidence. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Barnes v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 683, 362 S.W.2d 1 (1962) (preceding decisions under prior law); Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980); General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Commission order not supported by substantial evidence. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Continental Tel. Co., 262 Ark. 821, 561 S.W.2d 645 (1978); Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 301 Ark. 259, 783 S.W.2d 350 (1990).
In reviewing an order of the commission the court must determine, not whether the conclusions of the commission are supported by substantial evidence, but whether its findings of fact are so supported. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Continental Tel. Co., 262 Ark. 821, 561 S.W.2d 645 (1978).
The Court of Appeals is not concerned with the methodology used by the Arkansas Public Service Commission in arriving at the result as long as its findings are based on substantial evidence. Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986); General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392, aff'd, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 24 Ark. App. 142, 751 S.W.2d 8 (1988); Contel of Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 37 Ark. App. 18, 822 S.W.2d 850 (1992).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's refusal to set rates based on a times interest earned ratio (TIER), or designed to yield a TIER of at least 1.5 as requested by the telephone company, was not arbitrary, unreasonable, or unsupported by substantial evidence. Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
To establish an absence of substantial evidence to support a decision, the appellant must demonstrate that the proof before the administrative tribunal was so nearly undisputed that fair-minded persons could not reach its conclusion. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
The proper standard of review on appeal of an assessment of an ad valorem property tax by the Arkansas Public Service Commission was whether the findings of the commission were supported by substantial evidence; de novo review was not appropriate, even though the commission's order decided a question of law. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 342 Ark. 591, 29 S.W.3d 730 (2000).
—Testimony.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support the stipulated rate allocation, it was appropriate to consider the stipulation itself as the functional equivalent of testimony that the rates included were just and reasonable. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
The evaluation of testimony in a rate case is for the Arkansas Public Service Commission, not the courts, and in order to hold that the testimony does not constitute substantial evidence, the court must find that the testimony has no rational basis. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Waiver of Objections.
Consumer which did not appeal decision of the Arkansas Public Service Commission granting a rate change within the required time could not collaterally attack the new rate schedules as discriminatory in an action against the utility and the commission. Commercial Printing Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 250 Ark. 461, 466 S.W.2d 261 (1971) (decision under prior law).
Although a utility argued that the Public Service Commission violated constitutional guarantees of due process by limiting the cross-examination of witnesses, the utility waived this argument on appeal by not making a timely objection below. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 Ark. App. 147, 289 S.W.3d 513 (2008).
Cited: Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Yelcot Tel. Co., 266 Ark. 365, 585 S.W.2d 362 (1979); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989); Flower v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 31 Ark. App. 155, 790 S.W.2d 183 (1990); Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 31 Ark. App. 217A, 791 S.W.2d 719 (1990); Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992); Lincoln v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993); Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 Ark. App. 213, 907 S.W.2d 140 (1995); Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 64 Ark. App. 303, 984 S.W.2d 61 (1998); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 68 Ark. App. 148, 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999); Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 70 Ark. App. 421, 19 S.W.3d 634 (2000); AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 344 Ark. 188, 40 S.W.3d 273 (2001); Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 76 Ark. App. 547, 69 S.W.3d 889 (2002); Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003); Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2010 Ark. 221, 384 S.W.3d 477 (2010).
23-2-424. Commission orders — Rehearing or judicial review — Effect on order, stocks, etc.
-
- The filing of an application for rehearing under § 23-2-422 shall not, unless specifically ordered by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, operate as a stay of the commission's order.
- The commencement of proceedings under § 23-2-423 shall not, unless specifically ordered by the Court of Appeals, operate as a stay of the commission's order.
- The Court of Appeals may enter an order suspending or staying the operation of an order of the commission pending review of the order, provided the other parties are adequately secured against loss due to the delay in the enforcement of the order, in case the order involved is affirmed. The security is to take such form as shall be directed by the court.
-
- Any provision of this section, § 23-2-401, and §§ 23-2-421 — 23-2-423 notwithstanding, if the commission order involves rate changes which have already been made effective under bond pursuant to § 23-4-408, then the order shall take effect not less than twenty (20) days following service.
- If in this period an application for rehearing is filed, then the order shall be stayed until such time as the application is ruled on and any judicial appeals are concluded.
- Stocks or stock certificates, bonds, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness issued pursuant to and in accordance with an order of the commission shall be valid and binding in accordance with their terms, notwithstanding that the order of the commission may be or is later abrogated, vacated, changed, modified, or otherwise held to be wholly or partially invalid, unless, prior to issuance, the operation or effectiveness of the order has been stayed or suspended by the commission or a reviewing court.
History. Acts 1973, No. 231, § 3; 1985, No. 770, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-229.1; Acts 1987, No. 265, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1987, No. 265, § 1, provided that it was not the intent of the legislature to require expiration of statutory time periods before a utility could issue valid stocks, bonds, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Civil Procedure, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 555.
Case Notes
Scope of Review.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission acts in a legislative capacity and not in a judicial one, and therefore, the Supreme Court views the orders of the commission as having the same force as would an enactment of the General Assembly. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Lincoln-Desha Tel. Co., 271 Ark. 346, 609 S.W.2d 20 (1980).
Stay Pending Review.
Permanent injunction of circuit court (now Court of Appeals) restraining electric cooperative from taking any preliminary steps or action toward construction of plant as authorized by order of Arkansas Public Service Commission pending review of proceedings was too broad, hence order was modified on appeal by restraining the cooperative from construction or letting of contracts for construction of plant pending review. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co., 220 Ark. 39, 246 S.W.2d 117 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Notice of appeal may be filed within thirty days of one of two dates: (1) the date on which the Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC) enters an order upon the application for rehearing, or (2) the date on which the application is deemed denied, and Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 4 does not apply; therefore, a motion to dismiss an appeal as untimely was denied because it was filed within 30 days of the PSC denying rehearing, even though the deemed denied date had already passed when the PSC decided to reconsider the case. Commercial Energy Users Group v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 369 Ark. App. 13, 250 S.W.3d 225 (2007).
Cited: Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Yelcot Tel. Co., 266 Ark. 365, 585 S.W.2d 362 (1979); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981).
23-2-425. Appeals from department.
-
- Within thirty (30) days after the entry on the record of the Arkansas Department of Transportation of any order made by it, any party aggrieved may file a written motion with the secretary of the department praying for appeal from the order to the Pulaski County Circuit Court.
- Thereupon, the appeal shall be automatically deemed as granted as a matter of right without any further order.
- Upon the granting of the appeal, the secretary shall at once make a full and complete transcript of all proceedings had before the department in the matter and of all evidence before it in the matter, including all files therein.
- The secretary shall deposit the transcript in the office of the clerk of the circuit court immediately.
- The appeal shall be given preference over all other cases on the docket of the circuit court.
- Upon the filing of the motion of the appeal and at any time thereafter, the circuit court or its circuit judge shall have the right to issue such temporary or preliminary orders as to it or him or her may seem proper until a final decree is rendered.
- The circuit court shall thereupon review the order upon the record presented in the case and enter its finding and order thereon. It shall cause the order to be certified to the department immediately. The order shall direct that action be taken by the department in conformity with it unless an appeal from the order to the Supreme Court shall be taken within the time specified in subsection (b) of this section and in case of such an appeal to await further orders of the circuit court.
-
- Within thirty (30) days after rendition of any order of any circuit court under the terms of this act, whether such an order is rendered on appeal of municipal council action, city commission action, or department action, any party aggrieved may file a motion in writing in the circuit court or in the office of the clerk thereof praying an appeal from such an order to the Supreme Court.
- The motion, when so filed, shall be granted as a matter of right by the circuit court or by the clerk thereof.
- The appeal to the Supreme Court shall be governed by the procedure and reviewed in the manner applicable to other appeals from the circuit court. However, any finding of fact by the circuit court shall not be binding on the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court may and shall review all the evidence and make such findings of fact and law as it may deem just, proper, and equitable.
- The record shall be lodged in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court within sixty (60) days from the rendition of the order in the circuit court.
- All such cases shall be regarded and treated in the Supreme Court as cases involving public interest and shall be advanced and given preference on the docket of the court on motion of either party.
History. Acts 1921, No. 124, §§ 20, 21; Pope's Dig., §§ 2019, 2020; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-133, 73-134; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 103.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. In Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 269 Ark. 202, 639 S.W.2d 725 (1980), it was held that the provisions of this section relating to the time for lodging a transcript with the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court were superseded by Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 5.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1921, No. 124, codified as §§ 14-200-112, 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-2-425, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Mandamus to Review Administrative Action in Arkansas, 11 Ark. L. Rev. 352.
Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies in Arkansas, 25 Ark. L. Rev. 397.
Case Notes
Applicability.
This section has reference only to a party aggrieved on account of an order made by the commission involving regulation or operation of public utility and, therefore, had no applicability to action by school district for revision of tax assessment form. Little Rock Special Sch. Dist. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 210 Ark. 165, 194 S.W.2d 874 (1946).
This section controls the procedure for appeal from the circuit court to the Supreme Court in cases involving valuation assessments against a railroad by the tax division of the public service commission. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
Appealable Orders.
An order of the commission refusing to direct assessment of personal property of railroad for tax purposes was an exercise of regulatory powers over public utilities, consequently an appeal to the circuit court from such order was permissible. North Little Rock Special School Dist. v. Koppers Co., 211 Ark. 322, 200 S.W.2d 519 (1947).
Commission's Findings and Conclusions.
If the trial court felt the need for amplified findings and conclusions by the commission, it should have remanded the matter to the commission for it to supply them from the record without holding further hearings. Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 270 Ark. 831, 606 S.W.2d 575 (1980).
Erroneous Findings of Lower Court.
Where the trial court's judgment recited an erroneous finding, the Supreme Court was not required to affirm the judgment for want of a motion for new trial, since, there having been no trial, no motion for new trial was necessary, and since the error appeared on the face of the record no bill of exception was necessary. Ft. Smith Spelter Co. v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co., 153 Ark. 170, 239 S.W. 733 (1922).
Evidence.
Evidence sufficient to sustain the decision of the circuit court's reversal of the Arkansas Public Service Commission in refusing to issue certificate of public convenience to petitioning carrier. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Batesville Truck Line, 214 Ark. 448, 216 S.W.2d 857 (1949).
Evidence sufficient to reverse action of Arkansas Commerce Commission and circuit court. National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Chandler Trailer Convoy, Inc., 233 Ark. 887, 349 S.W.2d 672 (1961).
Decision held not against preponderance of the evidence. Transport Co. v. Champion Transp., Inc., 298 Ark. 178, 766 S.W.2d 16 (1989).
Modification of Orders.
Where Arkansas Transportation Commission, in its brief, acquiesced to modification of its rules desired by plaintiff, a carrier company, no prejudicial error resulted from circuit court's modification of commission's order even if it actually lacked the legal authority to alter the order. Household Goods Carriers v. Ark. Transp. Comm'n, 262 Ark. 797, 562 S.W.2d 42 (1978).
Scope of Review.
Upon trial of the matters in issue upon an appeal from the corporation commission, the circuit court is not bound by the order of the commission and, upon appeal from the circuit court, the matter is presented to the Supreme Court upon the record made before the commission for trial of the same issues de novo, and the proceeding is not essentially different from the rules of law in regard to appeals from chancery court decrees. Motor Truck Transf., Inc. v. Southwestern Transp. Co., 197 Ark. 346, 122 S.W.2d 471 (1938).
Court's duty in reviewing order of the Corporation Commission is not the same as in reviewing order of the Department of Public Utilities (now Arkansas Public Service Commission); the hearing upon an order of the Corporation Commission is de novo. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 201 Ark. 895, 148 S.W.2d 644 (1941).
If Arkansas Public Service Commission on hearing refuses to issue a certificate of public convenience to a carrier, and the decision of the commission is reversed by the circuit court, the Supreme Court on appeal will try the case de novo. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Batesville Truck Line, 214 Ark. 448, 216 S.W.2d 857 (1949).
Supreme Court will try a case de novo in determining whether Arkansas Public Service Commission was justified in issuing a certificate to petitioner, but will not proceed, as though the commission did not exist, as the commission had the benefit of seeing and hearing the witness whereas the court decided on the record, so that if evidence before the commission was sufficient to justify finding of commission as to matters involved in the petition, the court on appeal will sustain the finding of the commission. Wisinger v. Stewart, 215 Ark. 827, 223 S.W.2d 604 (1949).
Proper scope of judicial review of fact findings of Arkansas Public Service Commission is to inquire as to whether decision of the commission is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Inter City Transit Co., 216 Ark. 95, 224 S.W.2d 372 (1949).
When the legislature has set up a fact-finding body authorized to issue or withhold permits and such body has had the advantage of hearing witnesses testify, the courts are slow to set aside the body's findings; however, an appeal from the decision of the Commerce Commission is tried de novo on the record, and the Supreme Court may and shall review all the evidence and make such findings of fact and law as the court may deem just, proper, and equitable. National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Chandler Trailer Convoy, Inc., 233 Ark. 887, 349 S.W.2d 672 (1961).
The finding of the Commerce Commission and the circuit court denying a permit to applicant should be affirmed unless it appears to be contrary to the preponderance of the testimony. National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Chandler Trailer Convoy, Inc., 233 Ark. 887, 349 S.W.2d 672 (1961).
It is the function of the Supreme Court to inquire whether the determination of the commission is contrary to the weight of the evidence, but, in so doing, it must not lightly regard the findings of the commission. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Supreme Court reviews the record de novo but must affirm the order of the commission if the order is not against the preponderance of the evidence. Torrans v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 246 Ark. 930, 440 S.W.2d 558 (1969).
Error of trial court in applying the “substantial evidence” rule rather than the “weight of evidence” rule in trial de novo proceedings which affirmed commission's denial of application to haul goods intrastate was not prejudicial to applicant, as Supreme Court on appeal also reviews the record de novo and is required to determine whether the decision of the commission was contrary to the preponderance of evidence. Torrans v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 246 Ark. 930, 440 S.W.2d 558 (1969).
Stay of Orders.
Circuit court was entitled to stay order of commission pending hearing and determination of review where private electric utility company in seeking appeal based same on provisions of this section, since court could issue temporary order under the section. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co., 220 Ark. 39, 246 S.W.2d 117 (1952).
Time for Appeal.
Appeal from action of Corporation Commission in fixing ad valorem assessment not filed within 60 days from date of judgment should be dismissed; time in which to perfect appeal runs from date of judgment rather than from order overruling motion for a new trial. Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown R.R. v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 202 Ark. 589, 151 S.W.2d 665 (1941).
When the legislature fixes a short time for appeal in a particular type of case, and such time so fixed is reasonable, then the short time so fixed must govern rather than the long time allowed by the general appeal statute. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. Commerce Comm'n, 230 Ark. 663, 326 S.W.2d 805 (1959).
Transcripts.
It was not an abuse of discretion to refuse to dismiss the appeal for delay of the secretary in filing the transcript not caused by the appellant. Van Buren Waterworks v. City of Van Buren, 152 Ark. 83, 237 S.W. 696 (1922); Arkansas R.R. Comm'n v. Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown R.R., 169 Ark. 13, 272 S.W. 850 (1925).
Insofar as the provisions of this section relating to the time for lodging a transcript in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court are concerned, they are superseded by Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 5. Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 269 Ark. 202, 639 S.W.2d 725 (1980).
Cited: Ark. State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Patrick, 243 Ark. 967, 423 S.W.2d 265 (1968); Batesville Truck Lines v. Arkansas Freightways, Inc., 286 Ark. 116, 689 S.W.2d 553 (1985); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986); Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991).
23-2-426. Amendment or rescission of commission's decisions.
- The commission may at any time, and from time to time, after notice, and after opportunity to be heard as provided in the case of complaints, rescind or amend by order any decision made by it.
- Any order rescinding or amending a prior order or decision, when served upon the public utility affected and the other parties to the proceedings, shall have the same force and effect as is provided in this act for original orders or decisions. However, no such order shall affect the legality or validity of any acts done by the public utility or others before service upon it or them of the notice of the change.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 31; Pope's Dig., § 2094; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-230.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Cited: Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981); General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
23-2-427. Orders, rules, etc., of department not controverted in actions between private person and railroad company.
In all actions between private parties and railroad companies brought under Acts 1899, No. 53, the rates, charges, orders, rules, regulations, and classifications prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation before the institution of the action shall be held, deemed, and accepted to be reasonable, fair, and just, and in such respects shall not be controverted therein.
History. Acts 1901, No. 24, § 1, p. 53; C. & M. Dig., § 858; Pope's Dig., § 1062; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-137; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 104.
A.C.R.C. Notes. A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-2-428. Costs of actions.
- The commission shall not be required in any suits brought by it under the terms of this act to advance or make deposits to cover costs of such suits, nor shall it be required to give bond for such costs, or indemnity, stay, injunction, or other mesne process.
- In all cases of contest before the commission, the unsuccessful party shall be taxed with the costs unless otherwise ordered by the board of commissioners.
History. Acts 1899, No. 119, § 5, p. 194; C. & M. Dig., § 1697; Acts 1935, No. 324, § 38; Pope's Dig., §§ 1999, 2101; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-132, 73-237.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-2-402.
Case Notes
Cited: General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392.
23-2-429. Investigation, inquiry, or hearing by commissioner or examiner.
- Any investigation, inquiry, or hearing which the commission has power to undertake or hold may be undertaken or held by or before any commissioners or examiners designated for that purpose by the commission.
- The evidence in any investigation, inquiry, or hearing may be taken by any commissioner, or commissioners, or examiners to whom the investigation, inquiry, or hearing has been assigned.
- Every finding, opinion, and order made by a commissioner, or commissioners, or examiners, when approved or confirmed by the commission, shall be the finding, opinion, and order of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 2070; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-128.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the terms “commission” and “commissioners”, see § 23-1-101.
23-2-430. Effect of repeal of § 23-2-404.
The repeal of § 23-2-404 by Acts 1997, No. 1311, shall not be construed as depriving or expanding the current authority of the Attorney General to represent and bring complaints on behalf of customers of utilities in Arkansas.
History. Acts 1997, No. 1311, § 2.
Chapter 3 Regulation of Utilities and Carriers Generally
Research References
ALR.
Validity and construction of statutes or ordinances regulating telephone answering services. 35 A.L.R.3d 1430.
State regulation of radio paging service. 44 A.L.R.4th 216.
Incidental provision of utility services, by party not in that business, as subject to regulation by state regulatory authority. 85 A.L.R.4th 894.
Incidental provision of transportation services, by party not primarily in that business, as common carriage subject to state regulatory control. 87 A.L.R.4th 638.
Public service commission's implied authority to order refund of public utility revenues. 41 A.L.R.5th 783.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 26 et seq.
64 Am. Jur. 2d, Pub. Util., § 15 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 17 et seq. and § 329 et seq.
73B C.J.S., Pub. Util., § 13 et seq.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Utilities, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 611.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1911, No. 87, § 16: approved Mar. 8, 1911. Emergency clause provided: “This law being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1919, No. 264, § 3: approved Mar. 13, 1919. Emergency declared.
Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1925, No. 254, § 2: approved Mar. 27, 1925. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared, and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1945, No. 40, § 6: Feb. 12, 1945. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly of the state of Arkansas that revenues to be collected in the future will be materially diminished, and it has also been found that there is urgent need for immediate economies and more efficient operation of the various departments of state; and that consolidation of the agencies hereinbefore provided will make for more efficient operation and, at the same time, effect such economies that the foreseen diminution of future revenues will, in part, be offset by the economies so to be effected by such consolidation; and that only the enactment of this bill will provide such economies and efficient operation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1949, No. 262, § 9: Mar. 9, 1949. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that certain public utilities now subject to regulation by the Arkansas Public Service Commission are required by law to pay certain fees to the Commission while other public utilities which are equally subject to regulation by the Commission are exempt from the payment of such fees. It is further found and declared to be just and equitable that each public utility subject to regulation by the Commission should bear its fair proportion of the expenses incident to such regulation. There is urgent need for more rigid enforcement of the safety rules and regulations on the highways of this state, particularly as they relate to the motor carrier laws, rules and regulations pertaining thereto. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1965, No. 4, § 3: Jan. 25, 1965. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that many industrial consumers of utility services in this State must be able to compute their cost of utility services in order to plan new construction of industrial facilities, and to enter into agreements for financing same; that the industrial development of the State will be enhanced by authorizing utilities to enter into contracts with such customers, which will continue in force for a definite term; that this Act will encourage substantial expansion of industrial facilities and will provide employment and growth opportunities and is necessary for the public peace, health, welfare and safety. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1965, No. 11, § 2: Feb. 1, 1965. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas the economic growth and development taking place in this state has greatly increased the demand for electric power and energy in this state and the present and foreseeable future demands require that a substantial amount of additional facilities for the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power and energy be acquired, constructed and devoted to public use, and whereas, some light and power companies of other states serving customers in Arkansas have experienced, or may reasonably be expected to experience, difficulty in providing such facilities since they do not possess under the laws of the State of Arkansas the same powers and prerogatives that are conferred on light and power companies organized under the laws of Arkansas, an emergency is hereby found and declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981, No. 709, § 3: Mar. 24, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “The General Assembly hereby determines that there is an immediate and urgent need to effect revisions in the Public Utility Regulations of the State and that this Act accomplishes the same. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 758, § 5: Apr. 3, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the authority of the Public Service Commission to enforce the laws which it is charged to administer has been interpreted on occasion not to include quasi-judicial authority to vindicate public rights. This interpretation has resulted in delay of justice in the courts, and may as a practical matter have denied justice to ratepayers and utilities. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 831, § 4: Apr. 8, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that substantial uncertainty exists with respect to the interpretation and application of Subsections E and F of Section 3 of Act 40 of 1945 to wholesale sellers of electricity to electric cooperative corporations and that as a result of such uncertainty, the fees assessed against certain utilities are unfair and represent a double assessment on the same units of electricity; that clarification of Act 40 will provide an immediate, direct, and substantial benefit to the ratepayers of such utilities by lowering overall costs; and that this Act will provide necessary clarity to Act 40. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-3-101. Organization or reorganization.
- Organizations or reorganizations of all public utilities shall be subject to the supervision and control of the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
-
- No organization or reorganization shall be had or given effect without the written approval of the commission or the department.
- No plan of organization or reorganization shall be approved by the commission or the department unless it shall be established by the applicant for approval that the plan is consistent with the public interest.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 56; Pope's Dig., § 2116; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-252; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 105.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-3-102. Consolidations, stock purchases in another utility, or rentals of additional property.
-
With the consent and approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, but not otherwise:
- Any two (2) or more public utilities may consolidate with each other;
- Any public utility may acquire the stock or any part thereof of any other public utility;
- Any public utility may sell, acquire, lease, or rent any public utility plant or property constituting an operating unit or system; and
- A public utility may acquire, lease, or rent a plant or property constituting an operating unit or system, including any such plant or property owned by the public utility's affiliate or by another entity.
-
- Application for the approval and consent of the commission shall be made by the interested public utility and shall contain a concise statement of the proposed action, the reasons therefor, and such other information as may be required by the commission.
- Upon the filing of an application, the commission shall investigate it, with or without public hearing, and in case of a public hearing, upon such notice as the commission may require. If it finds that the proposed action is consistent with the public interest, it shall give its consent and approval in writing.
- In reaching its determination, the commission shall take into consideration the reasonable value of the property, plant, equipment, or securities of the utility to be acquired or merged.
- No public utility shall sell, lease, rent, or otherwise transfer, in any manner, control of electric transmission facilities in this state without the approval of the commission, provided that the approval is required only to the extent the transaction is not subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any other federal agency.
- Any transaction required by this section to be submitted to the commission for its consent and approval shall be void unless the commission shall give its consent and approval thereto in writing.
-
-
All transactions among or between a regulated electric public utility and any of its divisions, components, or affiliates that are not regulated by the commission shall be subject to such rules as may be promulgated by the commission so that:
- All such transactions that involve regulated services shall be subject to the rates, terms, and conditions specified in tariffs approved by the commission; and
- An electric utility shall not use any revenue from any regulated asset, operation, or service to subsidize the provision of any unregulated electric service or any other unregulated activity.
-
However, the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any transactions involving an electric cooperative formed under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., in which:
- The membership of such a cooperative approves the transaction; and
- In the case of subdivision (e)(1)(B) of this section, the commission has not disallowed the transaction within sixty (60) days after the filing of a notice with the commission in writing of the proposed transaction by the cooperative.
-
All transactions among or between a regulated electric public utility and any of its divisions, components, or affiliates that are not regulated by the commission shall be subject to such rules as may be promulgated by the commission so that:
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 57; Pope's Dig., § 2117; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-253; Acts 2003, No. 204, § 7; 2015, No. 736, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2003 amendment made a stylistic change in (a); inserted present (c); redesignated former (c) as present (d); and added (e).
The 2015 amendment added (a)(4).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Arkansas Law Survey, Junean, Constitutional Law, 9 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 111.
Case Notes
Abandonment of Property.
A public utility may not abandon any part of its property devoted to public service without the consent of the state, or transfer its property to someone else and be rid of duty to serve the public. North Little Rock Water Co. v. Waterworks Comm'n, 199 Ark. 773, 136 S.W.2d 194 (1940).
Duty of Purchaser.
When a public service corporation sells and transfers its property serving a certain community, the transferee succeeds to the obligation of the transferor serving the community, and when a municipality, with power to do so, purchases a distribution system serving a certain community, the purchasing municipality would be compelled to continue the service. North Little Rock Water Co. v. Waterworks Comm'n, 199 Ark. 773, 136 S.W.2d 194 (1940).
Sale of Utility.
Commission in passing upon question as to whether sale of public utility should be approved has jurisdiction to determine whether council meeting approving sale was a valid council meeting. Southwestern Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hatfield, 219 Ark. 515, 243 S.W.2d 378 (1951).
The commission is not required, in assessing a proposed sale of utility assets, to use fair market value as the only criterion of value in considering whether to allow its consummation. Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 35 Ark. App. 47, 813 S.W.2d 263 (1991).
Scope of Inquiry.
Arkansas Public Service Commission and the courts on appeal could consider matters raised by suit, since plaintiff had a full, adequate, complete and expeditious remedy to present each of the questions before the commission and on appeal to the circuit court and then to the Supreme Court. McGehee v. Mid S. Gas Co., 235 Ark. 50, 357 S.W.2d 282 (1962).
Cited: Middle S. Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985).
23-3-103. Stocks, bonds, notes, etc., and creation of liens — Regulation by commissions.
-
- The power of public utilities to issue stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes, and other evidences of indebtedness in case of public utilities incorporated under the laws of this state and to create liens on property in this state in case of public utilities incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country is a special privilege, the right of supervision, regulation, restriction, and control of which is, and shall continue to be, vested in the state.
- The power of public utilities described in subdivision (a)(1) of this section shall be exercised as provided by law and under such rules as the Arkansas Public Service Commission may prescribe.
- In instances where the public utility is also a regional transmission organization that is jurisdictional to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the debt is authorized by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and does not create a lien on property in this state, no commission authorization is required.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58; Pope's Dig., § 2118; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-254; Acts 2015, No. 899, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2378.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment inserted designations (a)(1) and (a)(2); rewrote (a)(2); and added (b).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a)(2).
Case Notes
Construction.
Sections 23-3-104 — 23-3-107 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59) must be read in conjunction with this section (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58), as well as any other provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and the various amendments thereto, whenever appropriate so as to give full effect to the intention of the General Assembly. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Classification of Utilities.
A fair reading of §§ 23-3-104 — 23-3-107 in light of this section reveals that the legislature intended two classifications of utilities to be made when it enacted the language of these sections into law: first, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of this state” and conferred upon those utilities the “special privilege” of having the power to issue “stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness” under the supervision and regulation of the state; second, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country” into another category and conferred upon those utilities a special privilege consisting of the power, under the supervision and control of the state, to create liens on property in this state. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Utilities Incorporated Elsewhere.
Where a public utility which is incorporated under the laws of another state and is providing services within the State of Arkansas seeks to issue indebtedness which will neither create a lien upon, nor otherwise encumber, any utility assets in this state, and where the effect of that indebtedness on rates may be adequately addressed in the normal course of ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, approval and other supervision of the issue by the commission is not required under §§ 23-3-104 — 23-3-107. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
23-3-104. Stocks, bonds, notes, etc. — Issuance.
-
-
When authorized by order of the commission, and not otherwise, a public utility may issue stock, bonds, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness payable at periods of more than thirty-six (36) months after the date of issuance when necessary for:
- The acquisition of property, the construction, extension, or improvement of its facilities, or the improvement of its service;
- The discharge or lawful refunding of its obligations, or reimbursement of moneys actually expended from the income from any source; or
- Any of such purposes.
- The order of the commission shall fix the maximum amount of any such issue and the purposes to which it or any proceeds up to the stated maximum amount are to be applied.
- No public utility shall apply any such issue or its proceeds to any purpose not specified in the order without the consent of the commission.
-
When authorized by order of the commission, and not otherwise, a public utility may issue stock, bonds, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness payable at periods of more than thirty-six (36) months after the date of issuance when necessary for:
- The public utility may issue notes for proper corporate purposes and not in violation of any provision of law, payable at periods of not more than thirty-six (36) months, without the consent of the commission. However, no such note, in whole or in part, shall be refunded by any issue of stock or bonds or by any evidence of indebtedness with a maturity date later than thirty-six (36) months from the date of issue without the consent of the commission.
- All securities issued without the approval of the commission shall be void.
- In instances where the public utility is a regional transmission organization that is jurisdictional to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the debt is authorized by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and does not create a lien on property in this state, no commission authorization is required.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59; Pope's Dig., § 2119; Acts 1973, No. 410, § 1; 1981, No. 709, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-255; Acts 2015, No. 899, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added (d).
Case Notes
Construction.
This section and §§ 23-3-105 — 23-3-107 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59) must be read in conjunction with § 23-3-103 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58), as well as any other provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and the various amendments thereto, whenever appropriate so as to give full effect to the intention of the General Assembly. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Classification of Utilities.
A fair reading of this section and §§ 23-3-105 — 23-3-107 in light of the provisions of § 23-3-103 reveals that the legislature intended two classifications of utilities to be made when it enacted the language of these sections into law: first, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of this state” and conferred upon those utilities the “special privilege” of having the power to issue “stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness” under the supervision and regulation of the state; second, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country” into another category and conferred upon those utilities a special privilege consisting of the power, under the supervision and control of the state, to create liens on property in this state. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Utilities Incorporated Elsewhere.
Where a public utility which is incorporated under the laws of another state and is providing services within the State of Arkansas seeks to issue indebtedness which will neither create a lien upon, nor otherwise encumber, any utility assets in this state, and where the effect of that indebtedness on rates may be adequately addressed in the normal course of ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, approval and other supervision of the issue by the commission is not required under this section and §§ 23-3-105 — 23-3-107. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Cited: Middle S. Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985).
23-3-105. Stocks, bonds, notes, etc. — Amount of issue.
The commission shall have no power to authorize the issuance of stocks, notes, bonds, or other evidence of indebtedness of any public utility in an aggregate amount at any time exceeding the fair value of the properties of the issuer and the reasonable cost of the issuance and sale of the issues.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59; Pope's Dig., § 2119; Acts 1973, No. 410, § 1; 1981, No. 709, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-255.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Construction.
This section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-106, and 23-3-107 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59) must be read in conjunction with § 23-3-103 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58), as well as any other provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and the various amendments thereto, whenever appropriate so as to give full effect to the intention of the Arkansas General Assembly. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Classification of Utilities.
A fair reading of this section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-106, and 23-3-107 in light of the provisions of § 23-3-103 reveals that the legislature intended two classifications of utilities to be made when it enacted the language of these sections into law: first, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of this state” and conferred upon those utilities the “special privilege” of having the power to issue “stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness” under the supervision and regulation of the state; second, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country” into another category and conferred upon those utilities a special privilege consisting of the power, under the supervision and control of the state, to create liens on property in this state. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Utilities Incorporated Elsewhere.
Where a public utility which is incorporated under the laws of another state and is providing services within the State of Arkansas seeks to issue indebtedness which will neither create a lien upon, nor otherwise encumber, any utility assets in this state, and where the effect of that indebtedness on rates may be adequately addressed in the normal course of ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, approval and other supervision of the issue by the commission is not required under this section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-106, and 23-3-107. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Cited: Middle S. Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985).
23-3-106. Stocks, bonds, notes, etc. — Disposition of proceeds.
The commission shall have the power to require every public utility, other than municipalities, to account for the disposition of the proceeds of all sales of stocks, bonds, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness, in such form and detail as it may deem advisable. Also, the commission shall have the power to establish such rules as it may deem necessary to insure the disposition of the proceeds for the purpose specified in its order.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59; Pope's Dig., § 2119; Acts 1973, No. 410, § 1; 1981, No. 709, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-255; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2379.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the second sentence.
Case Notes
Construction.
This section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-105, and 23-3-107 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59) must be read in conjunction with § 23-3-103 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58), as well as any other provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and the various amendments thereto, whenever appropriate so as to give full effect to the intention of the General Assembly. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Classification of Utilities.
A fair reading of this section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-105, and 23-3-107 in light of the provisions of § 23-3-103 reveals that the legislature intended two classifications of utilities to be made when it enacted the language of these sections into law: first, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of this state” and conferred upon those utilities the “special privilege” of having the power to issue “stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness” under the supervision and regulation of the state; second, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country” into another category and conferred upon those utilities a special privilege consisting of the power, under the supervision and control of the state, to create liens on property in this state. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Utilities Incorporated Elsewhere.
Where a public utility which is incorporated under the laws of another state and is providing services within the State of Arkansas seeks to issue indebtedness which will neither create a lien upon nor otherwise encumber any utility assets in this state, and where the effect of that indebtedness on rates may be adequately addressed in the normal course of ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, approval and other supervision of the issue by the commission is not required under this section and §§ 23-3-104, 23-3-105, and 23-3-107. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Cited: Middle S. Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985).
23-3-107. Stocks, bonds, notes, etc. — Liability of state.
No provision of this act and no deed or act done or performed under or in connection therewith shall be construed to obligate the State of Arkansas to pay or guarantee, in any manner whatsoever, any stock, bond, note, or other evidence of indebtedness authorized, issued, or executed under the provisions of this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59; Pope's Dig., § 2119; Acts 1973, No. 410, § 1; 1981, No. 709, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-255.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
Construction.
This section and §§ 23-3-104 — 23-3-106 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 59) must be read in conjunction with § 23-3-103 (Acts 1935, No. 324, § 58), as well as any other provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, and the various amendments thereto, whenever appropriate so as to give full effect to the intention of the General Assembly. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Classification of Utilities.
A fair reading of this section and §§ 23-3-104 — 23-3-106 in light of the provisions of § 23-3-103 reveals that the legislature intended two classifications of utilities to be made when it enacted the language of these sections into law: first, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of this state” and conferred upon those utilities the “special privilege” of having the power to issue “stocks, stock certificates, bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness” under the supervision and regulation of the state; second, the General Assembly classified public utilities “incorporated under the laws of any state or foreign country” into another category and conferred upon those utilities a special privilege consisting of the power, under the supervision and control of the state, to create liens on property in this state. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Utilities Incorporated Elsewhere.
Where a public utility which is incorporated under the laws of another state and is providing services within the State of Arkansas seeks to issue indebtedness which will neither create a lien upon nor otherwise encumber any utility assets in this state, and where the effect of that indebtedness on rates may be adequately addressed in the normal course of ratemaking by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, approval and other supervision of the issue by the commission is not required under this section and §§ 23-3-104 — 23-3-106. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 30, 727 S.W.2d 384 (1987).
Cited: Middle S. Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 772 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985).
23-3-108. Domestication of foreign railroad, pipeline, or electric light and power corporations.
-
- Before any foreign railroad corporation, foreign pipeline corporation, or foreign light and power corporation organized for the purpose of generating, transmitting, distributing, or supplying electricity to or for the public for compensation or for public use shall be permitted to avail itself of the benefits of this section and §§ 23-11-302, 23-11-401, 23-11-402, and 23-11-404, or any part thereof, the corporation shall file with the Secretary of State a certified copy of its articles of incorporation or articles of organization, if incorporated or organized under a general law of the state or territory, or a certified copy of the statute laws of the state or territory incorporating or organizing the company where the charter of the railroad, pipeline, or light and power corporation was granted by special statute of the state.
- Upon the filing of its articles of incorporation, articles of organization, or its charter and payment of the fees prescribed by law for railroad, pipeline, or light and power charters, the railroad, pipeline, or light and power company, for all intents and purposes, shall become a railroad, pipeline, or light and power corporation of this state, subject to all the laws of this state, the same as if it were formally incorporated or organized in this state, anything in its articles of incorporation, articles of organization, or charter to the contrary notwithstanding.
- Such acts on the part of the corporation shall be conclusive evidence of the intent of the corporation to create and become a domestic corporation.
- In all suits or proceedings instituted against any domesticated corporation, process may be served upon the agent of the corporation in this state in the same manner that process is authorized by law to be served upon the agents of railroad, pipeline, or light and power corporations organized and existing under the laws of this state.
History. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, p. 43; C. & M. Dig., § 8424; Acts 1925, No. 254, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 10998; Acts 1965, No. 11, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-427; Acts 2001, No. 1291, § 11.
Amendments. The 2001 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “any foreign … foreign light” for “any railroad, pipeline, or light,” deleted “of any other state or territory” preceding “organized for the purpose,” substituted “or supplying … for public use” for “electric power and energy for public use,” and inserted “or organizing”; inserted “or articles of organization” in (a)(1)-(2); inserted “or organized” in (a)(1)-(2); and deleted “with a map and profile of the proposed line” preceding “and payment of the fees” in (a)(2).
Cross References. Office to be kept in state showing stock transactions, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 2.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Property Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 549.
Case Notes
Eminent Domain.
A railroad corporation organized in a sister state, on complying with this section and §§ 23-11-302, 23-11-401, 23-11-402, and 23-11-404, becomes a domestic corporation and empowered to exercise the right of eminent domain. Russell v. St. Louis, Sw. Ry., 71 Ark. 451, 75 S.W. 725 (1903).
This section does not apply to power lines and therefore a foreign power-line company which had complied with laws authorizing it to do business in state could not condemn land. Southwestern Gas & Elec. Co. v. Patterson Orchard Co., 180 Ark. 148, 20 S.W.2d 636 (1929).
A corporation may be foreign for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction yet be treated as domestic and capable of exercising the power of eminent domain under state law. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. 55 Acres of Land, 947 F. Supp. 1301 (E.D. Ark. 1996).
When a foreign railroad corporation files a certified copy of its articles of incorporation with the secretary of state and complies with certain other requirements, it becomes a railroad of the state the same as if it were formally incorporated in the state, and as such, it acquires the power to condemn private property in Arkansas. Union Pac. R.R. v. 174 Acres, 193 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 1999).
Jurisdiction.
This section is merely a domestication statute and does not render a foreign corporation a citizen of Arkansas for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. 55 Acres of Land, 947 F. Supp. 1301 (E.D. Ark. 1996).
A corporation may be made a “domestic corporation” under this section, but it does not thereby become a citizen of the state, nor does this “domestication” affect the jurisdiction of the federal courts on a question of diverse citizenship. Union Pac. R.R. v. 174 Acres, 193 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 1999).
State Laws Applicable.
Under § 23-11-403, providing that if a railway company of another state should lease a railroad in this state it should be subject to regulations governing railroads in this state, such a railroad would become subject to statutory regulation requiring construction of stockguards. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Hale, 82 Ark. 175, 100 S.W. 1148 (1907); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Fitzhugh, 82 Ark. 179, 100 S.W. 1149 (1907).
23-3-109. Annual statements of gross earnings.
- Annually, during the month of March, each utility subject by law to the payment of fees or charges under the jurisdiction of either the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall prepare and transmit to the commission or the department having jurisdiction over the utility a certified statement of the gross earnings from its properties in Arkansas for the preceding calendar year ending December 31.
- No deduction shall be made from the gross earnings on account of any payments, expenses, or uncollectible accounts, except refunds occasioned by errors or overcharge.
- Upon receipt of these certified statements, the commission or the department shall determine the total gross earnings of all of the utilities.
- However, any utility may deduct from its gross earnings any amounts derived from wholesale sales of electricity to any other utility, an electric cooperative corporation, or any other entity at wholesale rates regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 3; 1949, No. 262, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-248; Acts 1987, No. 831, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 106.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
23-3-110. Annual fees generally.
-
- There is levied and charged and there shall be collected annually from each utility subject by law to the payment of fees or charges under the jurisdiction of either the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation a fee in an amount equivalent to that proportion of the total utilities costs that the gross earnings of each of the utilities bear to the total gross earnings of all utilities.
- However, the fee to be collected annually from each of the utilities shall not exceed, in any year, an amount exceeding two-fifths of one percent (2/5 of 1%) of the gross earnings of each respective utility.
- In determining the amount of any fee for any individual utility pursuant to this subsection, the amount of gross earnings subject to the levy shall be reduced by any amounts derived from the sale of electricity to any other utility, an electric cooperative corporation, or any other entity at wholesale rates regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
-
- After determining the amount of the fee due to be paid by each of the utilities, the commission or the department having jurisdiction shall, annually on or before August 15, prepare and transmit to each of the utilities a statement of the fees due for utilities costs during the preceding fiscal year.
- Thereafter, on or before August 31, each of the utilities shall pay to the secretary of the commission or the department having jurisdiction all fees shown to be due by the statements.
- On receipt of the fees and charges, the secretary shall pay them into the State Treasury, and the amounts so received by the Treasurer of State shall be credited by him or her to the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
- In the event any utility fails or refuses to pay the fees provided for in this section on or before August 31, the commission or the department having jurisdiction shall add to the fee a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) thereof and certify the amount of the delinquent tax and penalty to the Attorney General for collection.
History. Acts 1945, No. 40, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-249, 73-250; Acts 1987, No. 831, § 2; 2017, No. 707, § 107.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. For explanation of the term “utilities costs,” see § 23-2-108(b)(1).
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” and deleted “which shall be” preceding “equivalent” in (a)(1).
Case Notes
Purpose.
The legislature intended that the regulatory functions of the Arkansas Public Service Commission be supported by the fee imposed by this section and based on revenues generated from only intrastate services. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Allied Tel. Co., 274 Ark. 478, 625 S.W.2d 515 (1981).
Interstate Revenues.
The annual fee collected from each utility by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to this section, and based on the utility's “gross earnings” as defined in § 23-1-101, applies only to intrastate services provided by the utility, since the plain language of § 23-1-101 calls for assessment only on services “supplied in this state”; accordingly, the commission could not impose the fee on the interstate telephone revenues of a telephone company. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Allied Tel. Co., 274 Ark. 478, 625 S.W.2d 515 (1981).
Cited: Alltel Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 63 Ark. App. 197, 975 S.W.2d 884 (1998).
23-3-111. Fees — Foreign companies doing intrastate business.
- All foreign railroad, street, interurban, or other transportation companies now doing intrastate business, or desiring to engage in intrastate business, or authorized to engage in intrastate business, before being permitted to continue to do intrastate business or authorized to engage in intrastate business, shall pay the same fees as are required of like domestic corporations.
-
- Every foreign express company, sleeping car company, and private car company doing intrastate business or seeking to do intrastate business in Arkansas, before being permitted to continue to do intrastate business or authorized to engage in intrastate business, shall pay one dollar ($1.00) for every mile of railroad over which the corporation does, or proposes to do, intrastate business in this state.
- If any such corporation operates over more miles of railroad in the transaction of its business after the payment of the first fee, it shall pay an additional fee at the same rate provided by subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
History. Acts 1911, No. 87, §§ 7, 9; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1808, 1810; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-425, 73-426.
23-3-112. Forms sent to utilities to be filled out and returned.
- Any public utility receiving from the commission any blanks with directions to fill the blanks shall cause the blanks to be properly filled out so as to answer fully, specifically, and correctly every question therein propounded.
-
- Answers shall be verified under oath by the president, secretary, superintendent, or general manager of the public utility and returned to the commission at its office within a reasonable time, or within the period fixed by the commission.
- In case the public utility is unable to answer any questions, it shall give a good and sufficient reason for such a failure.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 55; Pope's Dig., § 2115; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-251.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
23-3-113. Adequate service, facilities, etc., to be provided.
- Every public utility shall furnish, provide, and maintain such adequate and efficient service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities as shall promote the safety, health, comfort, requirements, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.
- Every person, firm, or corporation engaged in a public service business in this state shall establish and maintain adequate and suitable facilities, safety appliances, or other suitable devices and shall perform such service in respect thereto as shall be reasonable, safe, and sufficient for the security and convenience of the public and the safety and comfort of its employees, and, in all respects, just and fair, and without any unjust discrimination or preference.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 6; C. & M. Dig., § 1611; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 4; 1935, No. 324, § 10; Pope's Dig., §§ 2003, 2073; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-116, 73-204.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Case Notes
Duty of Care.
This section codifies a duty to act with reasonable care in the delivery of service; that duty being to act reasonably under the circumstances not to cause harm. Bellanca v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 316 Ark. 80, 870 S.W.2d 735 (1994).
There is, without question, a duty to act reasonably when supplying power. Bellanca v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 316 Ark. 80, 870 S.W.2d 735 (1994).
Utility companies have a duty to inspect and maintain their own equipment, but those companies are not held liable for injuries that cannot be reasonably foreseen. Bellanca v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 316 Ark. 80, 870 S.W.2d 735 (1994).
Facilities.
The railroad commission had jurisdiction to require railroads to construct sheds over platforms along their tracks for the convenience of the traveling public in going to and from trains. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Albright, 176 Ark. 761, 4 S.W.2d 910 (1928).
Particular Circumstances.
District court properly granted summary judgment to a power company in an action resulting from the death of two men who were electrocuted when an aluminum tent pole came in contact with a power line because the evidence did not show that the company knew or should have known about the risk of an accident like the one which killed the men. Koch v. Southwestern Elec. Power Co., 544 F.3d 906 (8th Cir. 2008).
Special Services.
A telephone company is not liable for special damages for failure to furnish a patron special service to another patron unless there is some contract between the parties, wherein the telephone company accepts the contract with the special conditions attached thereto. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948).
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957); Litton Sys. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 539 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1976); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 824 F.2d 672 (8th Cir. 1987).
23-3-114. Unreasonable preferences prohibited.
-
- As to rates or services, no public utility shall make or grant any unreasonable preference or advantage to any corporation or person or subject any corporation or person to any unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
- No public utility shall establish or maintain any unreasonable difference as to rates or services, either as between localities or as between classes of service.
- The commission, in the exercise of its jurisdiction granted by this act, may fix uniform rates applicable throughout the territory served by any public utility whenever in its judgment public interest requires such uniform rates.
- The commission may determine any question or fact arising under this section.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 13; Pope's Dig., § 2076; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-207.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-3-107.
Cross References. Forwarding freight over connecting lines, preferences prohibited, exceptions, § 23-10-411.
Case Notes
Late Charges.
A public utility's late charge, far from being an exaction of excessive interest for the loan or forbearance of money, was in fact a device to require delinquent rate-payers to bear, as nearly as could be determined, the exact collection costs resulting from their tardiness in paying their bills, thereby automatically classifying consumers to avoid discrimination. Coffelt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 248 Ark. 313, 451 S.W.2d 881 (1970).
Rate Differences.
This section does not prohibit differences in rates; it merely prohibits unreasonable rate differences. Wilson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 278 Ark. 591, 648 S.W.2d 63 (1983); Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 Ark. App. 213, 907 S.W.2d 140 (1995).
Evidence sufficient to find that the Arkansas Public Service Commission properly held that the cost differential was a reasonable basis upon which the gas company could charge certain customers a higher price. Wilson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 278 Ark. 591, 648 S.W.2d 63 (1983).
A rate-making agency may establish different rates for different classes of customers. Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 216, 727 S.W.2d 146 (1987).
Allocation approved did not unreasonably discriminate against residential customers; commission had balanced cost and noncost factors and made choices among public policy alternatives. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 Ark. App. 213, 907 S.W.2d 140 (1995).
Evidence supported the commission's approval of reduced “corridor rates” for industrial customers who would otherwise bypass the utilities resulting in even higher rates for residential customers; corridor rates are a just and reasonable response to the threat of bypass. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Although the Attorney General's office argued that Arkansas Public Service Commission's approval of an agreement to a gas company's rate hike was unreasonable and discriminatory, substantial evidence, including witness testimony, supported the Commission's decision to approve the agreement. Consumer Utils. Rate Advocacy Div. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 86 Ark. App. 254, 184 S.W.3d 36 (2004).
Refusal to Provide Service.
Action of public utility in refusing to supply water to plaintiff businesses located within one hundred feet of its water line, on grounds that another, Class C, utility had an exclusive franchise under a certificate of necessity and convenience to supply water to the plaintiffs, was in violation of this section because the deregulation of Class C water utilities in 1987 nullified by implication any exclusive franchises which may otherwise have existed under such a certificate. Sebastian Lake Pub. Util. Co. v. Sebastian Lake Realty, 325 Ark. 85, 923 S.W.2d 860 (1996).
—Use of Risk Multiplier.
Use of risk or rate of return multiplier, which is defined as a ratio of a customer class's rate of return to the overall rate of return allowed the utility, of any number other than 1.0 is not unlawful per se. Use of a risk multiplier whereby any customer class with a risk multiplier in excess of 1.0 would be paying a higher proportional rate of return in its overall electric rate than would a customer class with a risk multiplier of less than 1.0, is not unreasonable where supported by evidence. Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 20 Ark. App. 216, 727 S.W.2d 146 (1987).
Standard of Review.
The appellate court must review the total effect of a rate order, and if the total effect cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Cited: Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992); Lincoln v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
23-3-115. Wires transmitting electricity or messages over public or private ways.
Every public utility which owns, operates, manages, or controls along or across any public or private way any wires over which electricity or messages are transmitted shall construct, operate, and maintain the wires and the equipment used in connection therewith in a reasonably adequate and safe manner and so as not to unreasonably interfere with the service furnished by other public utilities.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 50; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-267.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1979, No. 365 provided that for a period of four years after March 12, 1979, the Arkansas Public Service Commission would have no authority to require that power and communication utility facilities and distribution systems be installed underground in residential subdivisions. The determination of where to install the systems rested with the developer and the installing utility, and a method of establishing and allocating the cost differential was prescribed. The act did not limit the authority of municipalities to regulate the installation of utility distribution systems within the municipalities.
Case Notes
Burden of Proof.
Where the plaintiff tripped and fell because of a loose wire lying upon a public sidewalk, she did not meet the burden of proof that the defendant was in violation of this section. Haggans v. Jonesboro Cable TV, Inc., 252 Ark. 191, 477 S.W.2d 840 (1972).
Cited: Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939).
23-3-116. Power, water, gas, or electricity — Violation of municipal franchise — Penalties — Damages.
-
- Whenever a person, company, or corporation which has secured a franchise from any municipality in this state to furnish power, water, gas, or electricity to the municipality and to consumers thereof, fails or refuses to keep, erect, or use due diligence to maintain reasonably adequate facilities or instrumentalities to enable it to carry out its contractual obligations with the municipality and the consumers therein, and negligently or willfully fails or refuses to furnish an adequate supply of the utility it has contracted and agreed to furnish and provide, then, and in every such case, the person, company, or corporation so failing or refusing shall be subject to a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day the negligent or willful failure or refusal continues to exist. Each day shall constitute a separate offense.
- The penalty shall be recovered by the city attorney of any municipality in a suit instituted by him or her, or by the prosecuting attorney filing information in behalf of the state for the use and benefit of the municipality affected, in a court of competent jurisdiction, from any such utility because of the negligent or willful failure or refusal of such a person, company, or corporation to furnish an adequate supply of the utility as provided by its contract.
- Any person or consumer of the utility having a contract with the utility for service, upon the failure or refusal of the utility, shall have the right to institute a suit in his or her own behalf in a court of competent jurisdiction and recover compensatory damages for the failure or refusal in whatsoever amount the proof may show he or she has been damaged.
- This section shall not apply to cities or towns of a population of less than three thousand (3,000) persons that have granted franchises for electric current for lighting and other purposes that is furnished by manufacturing establishments not solely engaged in the manufacture of electric current for lighting and other purposes.
History. Acts 1919, No. 264, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 7549; Pope's Dig., § 9623; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-213.
23-3-117. Contracts for interruptible service with industrial users.
Public utilities are authorized to contract for the sale, on an interruptible basis, of utility services at agreed prices for a definite term not to exceed twenty-five (25) years with customers whose use of the service is for manufacturing, generation, processing, preparation of products, or industrial purposes. However, the contracts shall be subject to approval by the Arkansas Public Service Commission before becoming effective. These contracts, after approval by the commission, shall continue in full force and effect for the term thereof.
History. Acts 1965, No. 4, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-275.
23-3-118. Rates, charges, or service — Investigations.
- Whenever the commission believes that any rate or charge may be unreasonable or unjustly discriminatory, that any service is inadequate, or that an investigation of any matter relating to any public utility should for any reason be made, it may on its own motion and with or without notice, make a preliminary investigation.
- If, after making the preliminary investigation, the commission believes that sufficient grounds exist to justify a formal investigation of and hearing on the matters preliminarily investigated, it shall make an order to that effect.
- Thereupon, proceedings shall be had, conducted, and concluded in reference to the matters in like manner as though complaint had been filed with the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 16; Pope's Dig., § 2079; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-215.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Cited: Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948); Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., 76 Ark. App. 201, 61 S.W.3d 193 (2001).
23-3-119. Complaints.
-
- Any chamber of commerce or board of trade, mercantile, agricultural, or manufacturing association, any public utility, any municipality, any customer of a public utility, any person unlawfully treated by a public utility, or any public utility unlawfully treated by a customer, may complain to the commission in writing. The complaint shall set forth any act or thing done or omitted to be done by any public utility or customer in violation, or claimed violation, of any order, law, or regulation which the commission has jurisdiction to administer.
- Any consumer or prospective consumer of any utility service may complain to the commission with respect to the service, furnishing of service, or any discrimination with respect to any service or rates.
- Every complainant shall, before filing a complaint, make a good faith effort to informally resolve with the respondent the situation complained of. The complainant shall allege and describe, in his or her complaint, his or her efforts to achieve an informal resolution, including all informal resolution procedures which may be prescribed by commission rule or by approved tariffs.
- On the filing of the complaint, the commission shall cause a copy thereof to be served upon the respondent.
- The commission shall then have the authority, upon timely notice, to conduct investigations and public hearings, to mandate monetary refunds and billing credits, or to order appropriate prospective relief as authorized or required by law, rule, regulation, or order. The jurisdiction of the commission in such disputes is primary and shall be exhausted before a court of law or equity may assume jurisdiction. However, the commission shall not have the authority to order payment of damages or to adjudicate disputes in which the right asserted is a private right found in the common law of contracts, torts, or property.
-
- A utility may collect an award under this section by charging the complainant on his or her regular utility bill. Failure to pay shall be grounds for termination of service.
- The commission may order a utility to pay an award under this section in the form of one (1) or more billing credits. In the case of a former customer complainant, the commission may require a cash payment.
-
- It is the specific intent of the General Assembly in enacting the 1985 amendment to this section to vest in the Arkansas Public Service Commission the authority to adjudicate individual disputes between consumers and the public utilities which serve them when those disputes involve public rights which the commission is charged by law to administer.
- Public rights which the commission may adjudicate are those arising from the public utility statutes enacted by the General Assembly and the lawful rules, regulations, and orders entered by the commission in the execution of the statutes. The commission's jurisdiction to adjudicate public rights does not and cannot, however, extend to disputes in which the right asserted is a private right found in the common law of contracts, torts, or property.
- The commission's quasi-judicial jurisdiction to adjudicate public rights and claims in individual cases is in addition to the commission's traditional legislative authority to act generally and prospectively in the interest of the public. The quasi-judicial commission authority recognized in this section is a legitimate function and does not, in the judgment of the General Assembly, constitute an unlawful delegation of judicial authority under either the Arkansas Constitution or the United States Constitution.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 17; Pope's Dig., § 2080; Acts 1985, No. 758, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-216, 73-216n.
Publisher's Notes. This section was originally enacted as part of Acts 1935, No. 324, which vested regulatory authority over “public utilities” in the Department of Public Utilities of the Arkansas Corporation Commission. “Public utilities” as defined in the act (see § 23-1-101) includes carriers as well as electric, gas, water, and telephone utilities, etc. The duties of the Department of Public Utilities were then divided between the Arkansas Public Service Commission, which regulated utilities, and the Arkansas Transportation Commission, which regulated carriers. (See Publisher's Notes to chapter 2.) However, the Arkansas Transportation Commission was subsequently abolished by Acts 1987, No. 572. See Publisher's Notes to Chapter 2, Subchapter 2 of this title. Consequently, the references to “public utilities” in this section refer, by definition, to carriers as well as utilities, and references to “the commission” should refer to both commissions. However, the declaration of legislative intent which accompanied the 1985 amendment to this section and which is codified as subsection (f) of this section appears to limit the operation of the amendment to the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
Case Notes
In General.
The commission is a creature of the legislature and its duties are primarily legislative and administrative, not judicial. Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992), aff'd, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
This section does not prevent the Arkansas Public Service Commission from hearing class actions. Brandon v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 67 Ark. App. 140, 992 S.W.2d 834 (1999).
This section does not authorize the Arkansas Public Service Commission to award attorney’s fees. Brandon v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 67 Ark. App. 140, 992 S.W.2d 834 (1999).
Applicability.
Where the “public right” that petitioner was seeking to have enforced was competitive electric service, the commission correctly found that petitioner's complaint was outside the scope of this section. Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992), aff'd, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
Jurisdiction.
Rights involving a specific regulation of the commission, and affecting the delivery, measurement and cost of electrical power supplied to a consumer, fall within the primary jurisdiction of the public service commission. Ozarks Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Harrelson, 301 Ark. 123, 782 S.W.2d 570 (1990).
This section does not extend the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction to allow it to declare § 23-18-101 unconstitutional. Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992), aff'd, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
To the extent that matter involved a dispute over rates charged by power company, its resolution fell within the purview and jurisdiction of the public service commission. Cullum v. Seagull Mid-South, Inc., 322 Ark. 190, 907 S.W.2d 741 (1995).
In customer's class action suit against a public service commission and several gas utilities challenging surcharges she paid as a result of an illegal policy implemented by the commission regarding low-income assistance, the trial court properly dismissed customer's claims as the relief she was seeking was a refund, which was within the jurisdiction of the commission to resolve under subsection (d) of this section; contrary to customer's assertion, the surcharges were not a tax but a mechanism by which the utilities could recover some of the bad debt incurred as a result of the implementation of the policy in question. Austin v. Centerpoint Energy ARKLA, 365 Ark. 138, 226 S.W.3d 814 (2006).
Supreme Court of Arkansas granted a gas utility company's writ of prohibition from a county court's denial of the company's motion to dismiss finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had sole and exclusive jurisdiction under § 23-4-201(a)(1) over Arkansas residential gas customers' claims that they were being charged too much for natural gas because of the company's alleged fraudulent conduct. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 370 Ark. 190, 258 S.W.3d 336 (2007).
Because the circuit court's refusal to dismiss the representative of the Arkansas consumers was not in compliance with the court's prior decision ruling, which determined that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the claims as they related to the Arkansas customers, the court granted a writ of mandamus and directed the circuit court to dismiss the representative of the Arkansas consumers; the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission in rate disputes was primary and had to be exhausted before a court of law or equity could assume jurisdiction. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 372 Ark. 343, 276 S.W.3d 231 (2008).
When an electric cooperative's customers alleged the utility failed to refund patronage capital to the customers, the customers' claims were properly dismissed due to the customers' failure to seek relief from the Arkansas Public Service Commission because (1) it was alleged that the cooperative violated a duty to pay capital credits “on a reasonable and systematic basis,” (2) the main relief sought was a refund of those credits, (3) the commission had primary jurisdiction over claims that the cooperative violated § 23-18-327 and was authorized by subsection (d) of this section to order appropriate prospective relief, and (4) the customers' claims were not private damage claims based on tort, contract, or property law. Capps v. Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp., 2011 Ark. 48, 378 S.W.3d 148 (2011).
When an electric cooperative's customers who were Missouri residents alleged the utility failed to refund patronage capital to the customers, the customers' claims were properly dismissed due to the customers' failure to seek relief from the Arkansas Public Service Commission because (1) the customers did not allege a claim under Missouri law, and (2) the claims were based on an alleged failure of the cooperative to comply with Arkansas law, specifically § 23-18-327. Capps v. Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp., 2011 Ark. 48, 378 S.W.3d 148 (2011).
Circuit court erred in dismissing the property owners' complaint against an electric company and in finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had primary jurisdiction of the case; there was no dispute that the company had a right to use its own existing lines to transmit broadband services, but the owners' issue was with the company's entry onto their land to install completely new lines for broadband services without just compensation or an assessment of damages for the increased interference. The circuit court had exclusive, original jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving private-property rights and damages for inverse condemnation and increased interference. Stanley v. Ozarks Elec. Coop. Corp., 2019 Ark. App. 560, 591 S.W.3d 322 (2019).
Rates.
The only discretion the commission has in connection with the giving of notice as to change in rates is to require the utility to give notice to one or more of the interested parties enumerated in this section, it being important to bear in mind that the procedure under §§ 23-4-402 and 23-4-620 apparently envisions a full-scale rate hearing which might involve months and the expenditure of thousands of dollars. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Review.
Under this section, a hunting club was required to first bring a complaint for declaratory and prospective relief before the Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC), and to exhaust all of its administrative remedies before the PSC prior to seeking judicial relief. Hempstead County Hunting Club v. Southwestern Elec. Power Co., 2011 Ark. 234, 385 S.W.3d 123 (2011).
Standing.
Where Attorney General, in complaint against phone company for unjust enrichment, did not allege that either he or the state had been unlawfully treated, he was not entitled to bring a claim pursuant to this section; even if he was entitled to represent affected ratepayers collectively, the section still requires a named complainant who has been unlawfully treated by the utility. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 53 Ark. App. 114, 919 S.W.2d 522 (1996).
Cited: Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 225 Ark. 424, 283 S.W.2d 123 (1955); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Lincoln v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993); Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., 76 Ark. App. 201, 61 S.W.3d 193 (2001).
23-3-120. Definition.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “corporation” or “company” include a corporation and a limited liability company.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1291, § 12.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Property Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 549.
Subchapter 2 — Certificates of Convenience and Necessity
Effective Dates. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1957, No. 103, § 5: Feb. 27, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby ascertained and determined by the General Assembly that certain areas near incorporated cities and towns are in urgent need of additional electric facilities and in order to encourage the immediate construction of the necessary electric facilities and for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety this Act shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and approval.”
Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 2: effective October 1, 2003 by its own terms.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 20: Feb. 20, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-third General Assembly that the timetable established by the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 for its implementation does not offer enough time to properly implement the act; that this act modifies that timetable to provide for adequate time for the implementation; that some provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 will go into effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is designed to postpone those implementation dates; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act will not go into effect until after provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act are already effective which would result in confusion, if not chaos. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2011, No. 910, § 13: Apr. 1, 2011. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that recent decisions by the Arkansas Court of Appeals and the Arkansas Supreme Court have pointed out the need for the General Assembly to clarify its intentions regarding the certification and authorization of the location, financing, construction, and operation of major utility facilities; and that this act is immediately necessary to provide for the continued economic development of the state and the orderly and efficient development of essential energy resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2015, No. 842, § 2: Mar. 31, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the grant or denial of permission to operate as a public utility confers significant authority upon a public utility and is therefore an extremely important decision; that additional guidance should be provided to make this important determination and to protect citizens from potential abuses of the powers given to public utilities; and that this act is immediately necessary because a delay in implementing the standards required by this act will cause undue and long-lasting hardship to citizens affected by public utilities that were not required to meet the standards implemented by this act. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey of Arkansas Law, Public Law, 1 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 230.
23-3-201. Requirement for new construction or extension.
- New construction or operation of equipment or facilities for supplying a public service or the extension of a public service shall not be undertaken without first obtaining from the Arkansas Public Service Commission a certificate that public convenience and necessity require or will require the construction or operation.
-
-
This section does not require a certificate of public convenience and necessity for:
- The replacement or expansion of existing equipment or facilities with similar equipment or facilities in substantially the same location or the rebuilding, upgrading, modernizing, or reconstructing of equipment or facilities that increase capacity if no increase in the width of an existing right-of-way is required;
- The construction or operation of equipment or facilities for supplying a public service that has begun under a limited or conditional certificate or authority as provided in §§ 23-3-203 — 23-3-205;
-
The extension of a public service:
- Within a municipality or district where a public service has been lawfully supplied;
- Within or to territory then being served; or
- That is necessary in the ordinary course; or
- Except as provided in § 23-18-504(c), the construction or operation of a major utility facility as defined in the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, § 23-18-501 et seq., or any exemption under the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, § 23-18-501 et seq.;
-
-
This section does not require a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an electric utility that owns or has a legally recognized right-of-way, easement, or similar property right to property that is not being acquired by eminent domain and is traversed by the construction or connection of the following electric utility facilities:
- A new or existing transmission or distribution substation, transmission switching station, or transmission metering point and associated facilities or the extension to such facilities, provided that the public utility owns or has a legally recognized right-of-way, easement, or similar property right to the property that is traversed by the construction or connection of the facilities;
-
If the electric public utility is not an electric cooperative:
- Any distribution lines to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section;
- Transmission lines to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section of up to two (2) line miles in length with a voltage of greater than one hundred kilovolts (100 kV); or
- Transmission lines to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section of up to five (5) line miles in length with a voltage of less than or equal to one hundred kilovolts (100 kV); or
-
If the electric public utility is an electric cooperative:
- Any distribution lines to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section; or
- Any transmission lines up to five (5) line miles in length to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section if the electric cooperative has informed the landowners whose property is traversed according to the electric cooperative's business practices.
- Property that the public utility has previously acquired by eminent domain for the construction, operation, or connection of any other public utility facility is considered a legally recognized property right for the purposes of this subdivision (b)(2).
- This subdivision (b)(2) does not apply if the transmission or distribution lines to or from the facilities identified in subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section include a navigable waterway crossing subject to § 23-3-501 et seq.
-
This section does not require a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an electric utility that owns or has a legally recognized right-of-way, easement, or similar property right to property that is not being acquired by eminent domain and is traversed by the construction or connection of the following electric utility facilities:
-
This section does not require a certificate of public convenience and necessity for:
- To the extent a member cooperative of a generation and transmission cooperative, as defined under § 23-4-1101, is exempt from the requirement to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity under subsection (b) of this section, the exemption shall extend to the generation and transmission cooperative.
-
An exemption claimed by a public utility under § 23-18-504(a)(5) does not bar the:
- Public utility from seeking the issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity under this section; or
- Commission from granting the public utility the certificate of public convenience and necessity sought under subdivision (d)(1) of this section and thereby allowing the public utility to seek recovery of the reasonable cost of the equipment or facilities through rates.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 41; Pope's Dig., § 2104; Acts 1957, No. 103, § 3; 1967, No. 234, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-240; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 6; 2001, No. 324, § 1; 2003, No. 204, § 8; 2007, No. 468, § 1; 2009, No. 164, § 1; 2011, No. 910, § 12; 2013, No. 341, § 1; 2015, No. 736, § 2; 2015, No. 917, § 1; 2017, No. 273, § 1; 2017, No. 334, § 2; 2019, No. 765, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2001, No. 324, § 1, repealed the amendment by Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 6, that was to become effective Jan. 1, 2002.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 2, provided in part that its amendment of this section will be effective Oct. 1, 2003.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment rewrote the section.
The 2011 amendment added (b)(4).
The 2013 amendment added (b)(3)(D).
The 2015 amendment by No. 736 added (d).
The 2015 amendment by No. 917 deleted (b)(3)(D) and added (c).
The 2017 amendment by No. 273 added (b)(5).
The 2017 amendment by No. 334 redesignated (d) as (d)(1) and (2); added “or” at the end of the (d)(1); and, in (d)(2), substituted “Commission” for “nor shall such exemption bar the commission”, “the certificate” for “such certificate”, and inserted “sought under subdivision (d)(1) of this section”, and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment redesignated (b)(1) through (b)(4) as (b)(1)(A) through (b)(1)(D); rewrote former (b)(5) and redesignated it as (b)(2)(A); and added (b)(2)(B) and (b)(2)(C).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Utilities, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 611.
Case Notes
Class C Water Utilities.
When the General Assembly deregulated Class C water utilities in 1987, it also nullified by implication any exclusive franchises which may have otherwise been in existence pursuant to a certificate of convenience and necessity. Sebastian Lake Pub. Util. Co. v. Sebastian Lake Realty, 325 Ark. 85, 923 S.W.2d 860 (1996).
Convenience and Necessity.
Order of the Department of Public Utilities (now Arkansas Public Service Commission) granting applicant a certificate of convenience and necessity to construct a natural gas pipe line to serve customers which were being served adequately by another company at a higher rate held supported by substantial evidence since element of cost, although not necessarily of itself sufficient, was a very important one for the department to consider in determining whether the public convenience and necessity will be served. Department of Pub. Utils. v. Arkansas La. Gas Co., 200 Ark. 983, 142 S.W.2d 213 (1940).
Commission's decision to grant a certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct a 69-kilovolt electric transmission line affirmed; notice to affected landowners held sufficient. Harness v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 60 Ark. App. 265, 962 S.W.2d 374 (1998).
Effect of Repeal.
The repeal of Acts 1919, No. 571, § 13 requiring certificate of public convenience and necessity before constructing new utility did not violate the Constitution so as to alter a utility's franchise in a manner injurious to its corporators. City of Paragould v. Arkansas Utils. Co., 70 F.2d 530 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 586, 55 S. Ct. 101, 79 L. Ed. 682 (1934) (decision under prior law).
Legislative Intent.
The commission, in issuing or denying certificates of public convenience, acts legislatively and effectuates the legislative intent through the promulgation of rules and regulations. Harness v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 60 Ark. App. 265, 962 S.W.2d 374 (1998).
Municipal Corporations.
A city is authorized to construct a light plant without obtaining a certificate of necessity and convenience as provided by this section. Kitchens v. City of Paragould, 191 Ark. 940, 88 S.W.2d 843 (1935).
Cited: Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968).
23-3-202. Requirement for operation under suspended permit.
A public utility shall not exercise any right or privilege under any franchise or permit, the exercise of which has been suspended or discontinued for more than one (1) year, without first obtaining from the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation a certificate that public convenience and necessity require the exercise of such a right or privilege.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 42; Pope's Dig., § 2105; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-241; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 108.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “A public utility shall not” for “No public utility shall”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-3-203. Application for certificate.
- Every applicant for a certificate shall give notice of its application as the commission may require and shall file in the office of the commission evidence as shall be required by the commission to show that the applicant has received the consent, franchise, permit, ordinance, vote, or other authority of the proper municipality or other public authority if required.
- Before any certificate may issue under § 23-3-205, if the applicant therefor is a corporation, a certified copy of the articles of incorporation or charter shall be on file in the office of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 43; Pope's Dig., § 2106; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-242.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Case Notes
Content.
Where water company's initial application described the area to be served and asked that it be allocated to the company and asked that a certificate of convenience and necessity to furnish water service to customers in that area be granted and where the commission's order, even though it did not recite that applicant was granted an exclusive right to supply water to the residents in the allocated area, provided that there was no adequate supply of water in the area and that it was in the public interest to grant the application, trial court's finding that the water company had a certificate of convenience and necessity giving it the exclusive right to sell water in its allocated territory was supported by a great preponderance of the evidence. City of Van Buren v. 64-71 Highway Water Co., 270 Ark. 466, 605 S.W.2d 419 (1980).
23-3-204. Preliminary orders.
- If the applicant desires to exercise the right or privilege under a franchise, permit, ordinance, vote, or other authority which it contemplates securing or which has not then been granted to it, the applicant may apply to the commission for an order preliminary to the issuance of the certificate.
- The commission may thereupon make an order declaring that it will thereafter, upon application under such rules as it may prescribe, issue the desired certificate upon the terms and conditions as it may designate after the applicant has obtained the contemplated franchise, permit, ordinance, vote, or other authority.
- Upon the presentation to the commission of evidence satisfactory to it, if such a franchise, permit, ordinance, vote, or other authority has been secured by the applicant, the commission shall thereupon issue the certificate.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 43; Pope's Dig., § 2106; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-242; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2380.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
Case Notes
Rules and Regulations.
In effectuating the legislative intent through promulgation of rules and regulations within the scope of the authority conferred, the Department of Public Utilities acts as a law-making body, and in enforcing such rules and regulations it acts in an administrative capacity. Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939).
23-3-205. Issuance of certificate of public convenience and necessity — Terms and conditions — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “Consolidated utility district” means a consolidated utility district as defined in § 14-217-103 that owns or operates an electric system as defined in § 14-217-103; and
-
“Municipality” means a municipality as defined in § 14-202-102 that:
- Owns or operates a municipal electric utility as defined in § 25-20-402; or
- Is an owner of an electric project as defined in § 25-20-402.
-
- After conducting a hearing to assess the merits of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under this subchapter, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may grant or deny all or part of the application upon any terms or conditions the commission finds appropriate to serve the purposes of this subchapter.
- The right to a hearing under this section may be waived by the applicant.
-
-
Except as provided under subdivision (c)(2) of this section, the commission shall not issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity to any person or corporation that:
- Is not a public utility;
- Primarily transmits electricity; and
- Has not been directed or designated to construct an electric transmission facility from a regional transmission organization.
-
After the commission conducts a hearing under subdivision (b)(1) of this section for a person or corporation that primarily transmits electricity and has not been directed to construct an electric transmission facility from a regional transmission organization, the commission may grant or deny all or part of the application upon any terms or conditions the commission finds appropriate for the purposes of this subchapter subject to the following considerations:
- The commission shall only authorize the person or corporation to contract with a municipality or a consolidated utility district that is not located within the service territory of another public utility;
- The commission shall not authorize the person or corporation to serve any customers outside of the boundaries of a municipality or consolidated utility district;
- The commission shall not authorize the person or corporation to serve any customers that are otherwise served by, or located within, the service territory of another public utility; and
- The commission shall not grant a certificate of public convenience and necessity under this subchapter to a person or corporation if doing so would result in an unreasonable impact on any other public utility or on the customers of any other electric utility in this state that is inconsistent with the public interest as determined by the commission.
-
Except as provided under subdivision (c)(2) of this section, the commission shall not issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity to any person or corporation that:
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 43; Pope's Dig., § 2106; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-242; Acts 1991, No. 812, § 1; 2015, No. 842, § 1; 2019, No. 543, § 1.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment inserted “of public convenience and necessity” in the section heading; and rewrote the section.
The 2019 amendment redesignated former (a)(1) and (a)(2) as (b)(1) and (b)(2) respectively; added (a); substituted “subchapter” for “subtitle” in (b)(1); substituted “Except as provided under subdivision (c)(2) of this section, the commission” for “The commission” in (c)(1); rewrote (b) as (c)(1); and added (c)(2).
Case Notes
Convenience and Necessity.
Finding that the water company had a certificate of convenience and necessity giving it the exclusive right to sell water in its allocated territory was supported by a great preponderance of the evidence. City of Van Buren v. 64-71 Highway Water Co., 270 Ark. 466, 605 S.W.2d 419 (1980).
Terms and Conditions on Issuance.
Power of Department of Public Utilities to attach terms and conditions to rights granted by certificate of convenience and necessity relates to methods of construction and quality and extent of service rather than controversies between contending utility companies in respect of matters involving damages to their properties. Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939).
Department of Public Utilities should issue certificates of convenience and necessity to rural electric cooperative corporations unconditionally and not conditioned so as to require them to make compensation to telephone companies for damages to telephone service due to inductive interference caused by the operation of electric power lines. Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939).
23-3-206. Unauthorized construction or operation.
- Whenever any new construction or operation is undertaken or about to be begun without having secured a certificate of public convenience and necessity as required by the provisions of this act, any interested person may file a complaint with the commission.
- The commission, with or without notice, may make its order requiring the party complained of to cease and desist from the construction or operation until the commission makes and files its decision on the complaint, or until the further order of the commission.
- The commission, after hearing and after reasonable notice, may make the order and prescribe such terms and conditions in harmony with this act as are just and reasonable.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 43; Pope's Dig., § 2106; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-242.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2- 412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Subchapter 3 — Merger or Acquisition of Control of Domestic Public Utilities
Effective Dates. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 16: Mar. 13, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined that there is a substantial possibility that domestic public utilities might be merged or acquired by such persons or in such ways that would be detrimental to the continued provision of safe, reliable, and justly priced utility service by such domestic public utility, and therefore detrimental to the public health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-3-301. Legislative determination.
- The methods and manner in which utility services are provided by domestic public utilities to the citizens, businesses, institutions, and other utility customers in Arkansas are directly related to the continued health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Arkansas. Homes, schools, churches, places of business, and other facilities necessarily used and occupied by the citizens of Arkansas depend upon and must receive safe, reliable, and justly priced utility services.
-
The merger or acquisition or attempted acquisition of control of a domestic public utility may, if not regulated by the State of Arkansas:
- Diminish the ability or determination of the domestic public utility to meet its contractual obligations or render the same level of service that the domestic public utility is currently rendering;
- Substantially lessen competition in the furnishing of utility service;
- Jeopardize the financial stability of the domestic public utility;
- Be detrimental to the customers of the domestic public utility and not be in the public interest; or
- Lead to the control or operation of the domestic public utility by persons of such competence, experience, or integrity that would not be in the interest of the domestic public utility's customers or the public.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.
23-3-302. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Acquiring party” means a person and all affiliates of that person by whom or on whose behalf a merger or other acquisition of control referred to in § 23-3-306 is to be affected;
- “Affiliate” means a person who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified, including any corporation created at the direction of the person specified for purposes of corporate reorganization;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
-
- “Control”, including the terms “controlling”, “controlled by”, and “under common control with”, means the direct or indirect possession of the power to direct or cause direction of the management and policies of a domestic public utility, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise, unless that power is the result of an official position with, or corporate office held in, that person.
- Control shall be presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote, or holds proxies representing ten percent (10%) or more of the aggregate number of the issued and outstanding voting securities of any domestic public utility. This presumption may be rebutted by a showing that control does not exist in fact.
- The commission may determine, after furnishing all persons in interest notice and opportunity to be heard and making specific findings of fact to support its determination, that control exists in fact notwithstanding the absence of a presumption to that effect;
- “Domestic public utility” means a person doing business in the state, whose business of providing utility service in this state is regulated by the commission, or by a political subdivision of a state, excluding any person providing telephone utility service, as described by subdivision (9)(C) of this section, of which title to all voting securities issued and outstanding is held by a total of three hundred (300) persons or less;
- “Issuer” means any person who issues or proposes to issue any security;
- “Person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an association, a joint-stock company, a trust, an unincorporated organization, any similar entity, or any combination of the foregoing acting in concert;
-
- “Tender offer” means the acquisition of, or offer to acquire, pursuant to a tender offer or request or invitation for tenders, any issued and outstanding voting security of a domestic public utility if after acquisition the acquiring party would, directly or indirectly, be a record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent (10%) of the aggregate number of the issued and outstanding voting securities of the domestic public utility.
-
“Tender offer” does not mean:
- Bids made by a dealer for his or her own account in the ordinary course of his or her business of buying and selling voting securities; or
- Any other offer from not more than fifty (50) persons to acquire a voting security, or the acquisition of a voting security pursuant to such an offer, for the sole account of the acquiring party, which is made in good faith and not for the purpose of avoiding the provisions of this subchapter;
-
“Utility service” means:
- The furnishing and sale of gas to the public for domestic or general service by gas pipelines, distribution companies, or other companies operating within the state;
- The production, generation, transmission, distribution, delivery, or furnishing of electricity for the production of light, heat, or power to or for the public for compensation; and
- The conveyance or transmission of messages or communications by telephone where that service is offered to the public for compensation; and
- “Voting security” means any issued and outstanding stock or indenture of any class presently entitling the owner or holder to vote with respect to the direction or management of the affairs of a company, or any stock or indenture of any class issued under or pursuant to any trust, agreement, or arrangement whereby a trustee or trustees or agent or agents for the owner or holder of the stock or indenture are entitled to vote with respect to the direction or management of the company.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.1; Acts 1987, No. 954, § 1.
23-3-303. Applicability.
- If a domestic public utility seeks to acquire control of another domestic public utility which is subject to the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction in a transaction described in § 23-3-306 for which the filing of a statement would be required, then an application for approval containing any information which the commission may prescribe by rule adopted pursuant to this subchapter shall be filed with and heard by the commission after such notice as the commission may prescribe, and the transaction shall be approved or disapproved based upon the factors enumerated in § 23-3-310, subject to judicial review as provided in § 23-3-313, but the other provisions of this subchapter shall not apply to the transaction.
- Provisions of this subchapter shall not apply when voting securities are issued, exchanged, or sold by a domestic public utility upon terms and conditions approved by its board of directors.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.7; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2381.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (a).
23-3-304. Penalties.
- Any person who knowingly does or causes to be done any act, matter, or thing prohibited or declared to be unlawful by this subchapter, or who knowingly omits or fails to do any act, matter, or thing required by this subchapter, or knowingly causes such an omission or failure, shall be punished upon conviction thereof by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or by imprisonment for not more than two (2) years, or both. In addition, the violation shall be punishable upon conviction by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each day during which the offense occurs.
- Any person who knowingly violates any rule, restriction, condition, or order made or imposed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission under authority of this subchapter shall be guilty of a violation and, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, shall be punished upon conviction by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each day during which such an offense occurs.
- In addition, should any person consummate, by whatever means, the acquisition of any of the voting securities of a domestic public utility in violation of this subchapter, the commission upon finding that one (1) or more of the conditions set forth in § 23-3-310 exist or will exist by virtue of the acquisition, may order the immediate divestiture of so much of the voting securities held by that person as, in the commission's opinion, is necessary to remove the domestic public utility from the control of that person.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.11; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 454; 2019, No. 315, § 2382.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment deleted “willfully and” preceding “knowingly” throughout (a) and (b); and inserted “be guilty of a violation and” in (b).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (b).
23-3-305. Powers of commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have power to perform any and all acts, and to prescribe, issue, make, amend, and rescind any orders or rules which it may find necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.9; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2383.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “orders or rules” for “orders, rules, and regulations”.
23-3-306. Procedure generally.
-
Any person who acquires five percent (5%) or more of the aggregate number of the issued and outstanding voting securities of a domestic public utility, within two (2) business days thereafter, shall deliver written notice of the acquisition to the Arkansas Public Service Commission. The following information shall be included in the notice:
- The name and address of each person and all affiliates of that person;
- The number and class of all shares held by each person and all affiliates of that person; and
- Whether the person or any affiliate of that person, individually or collectively, intends to acquire ten percent (10%) or more of the aggregate number of the issued and outstanding voting securities of the domestic public utility.
- No person other than the issuer of the securities of the domestic public utility or an affiliate of the issuer shall make a tender offer for, request, or invite tenders of, or enter into any agreement to exchange, seek to acquire, or acquire, in the open market or otherwise, any issued and outstanding voting securities of a domestic public utility regulated by the commission if, after the consummation of that action, the person would, directly or indirectly or by conversion or by exercise of any right to acquire, be in control of the domestic public utility. No person shall merge with or otherwise acquire control of a domestic public utility unless the acquiring party is an affiliate of the domestic public utility or unless, at the time the offer, request, or invitation is made, or prior to the acquisition of the securities if no offer or agreement is involved, the person has filed with the commission and has sent to the domestic public utility a statement containing the information required by § 23-3-307 and the offer, request, invitation, or acquisition has been approved by the commission in the manner prescribed in §§ 23-3-310 and 23-3-311.
- The commission may modify the aforementioned procedures to the extent necessary to conform to the requirement of Regulation 14D under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.2.
U.S. Code. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq.
23-3-307. Statement filed with commission — Contents — Amendments.
-
The statement to be filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission as required by § 23-3-306 shall be made under oath or affirmation and shall contain the following information:
-
The name and address of each acquiring party and all affiliates thereof, and:
- If the acquiring party is an individual, his or her principal occupation and all offices and positions held during the past five (5) years, and any conviction of crimes other than minor traffic violations during the past ten (10) years; or
- If the acquiring party is not an individual, a report of the nature of its business and its affiliates' operations during the past five (5) years or for such lesser period as the acquiring party and any predecessors thereof shall have been in existence, an informative description of the business intended to be done by the acquiring party and its subsidiaries, and a list of all individuals who are or who have been selected to become directors or officers of the acquiring party or who perform or will perform functions appropriate or similar to those positions. The list shall include for each individual the information required by subdivision (a)(1)(A) of this section;
- The source, nature, and amount of the consideration used or to be used in effecting the merger or other acquisition of control, a detailed description of any transaction wherein funds were or are to be obtained for that purpose, and the identity of persons furnishing the consideration. However, where a source of the consideration is a loan made in the lender's ordinary course of business, the identity of the lender shall remain confidential if the person filing the statement so requests;
- Audited financial information in a form acceptable to the commission as to the financial condition of each acquiring party for the preceding three (3) fiscal years, or for such lesser period as the acquiring party and any predecessors thereof shall have been in existence, and similar information as of a date not earlier than one hundred thirty-five (135) days prior to the filing of the statement;
-
- Any plans or proposals which an acquiring party may have to liquidate the public utility, to sell its assets, or a substantial part thereof, to merge or consolidate it with any person, or to make any other material change in its investment policy, business or corporate structure, or management.
- If any change is contemplated in the investment policy, business, or corporate structure, the contemplated changes and the rationale for them shall be explained in detail.
- If any changes in the management of the domestic public utility or person controlling the domestic public utility are contemplated, the acquiring party shall provide a resume of the qualifications and the names and addresses of the individuals who have been selected or are being considered to replace the then-current management personnel of the domestic public utility or the person controlling the domestic public utility;
- The number of shares of any voting securities which each acquiring party proposes to acquire, and the terms of the offer, request, invitation, agreement, or acquisition referred to in § 23-3-306;
- The amount of each class of any voting security which is beneficially owned or concerning which there is a right to acquire beneficial ownership by each acquiring party;
- A full description of any contracts, arrangements, or understandings with respect to any voting securities in which any acquiring party is involved including, but not limited to, transfer of any securities, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guarantees of loans, guarantees against loss or guarantees of profits, division of losses or profits, or the giving or withholding of proxies. The description shall identify the persons with whom the contracts, arrangements, or understandings have been entered into;
- A description of the purchase of any voting securities during the twelve (12) calendar months preceding the filing of the statement by any acquiring party, including the dates of purchase, names of the purchasers, and consideration paid or agreed to be paid for the voting securities;
- Copies of all tender offers for, requests for, advertisements for, invitations for tenders of, exchange offers for, and agreements to acquire or exchange any voting securities and, if distributed, of additional soliciting material relating thereto; and
- Any additional information which the commission may by rule prescribe as necessary or appropriate for the protection of ratepayers of the domestic public utility or in the public interest.
-
The name and address of each acquiring party and all affiliates thereof, and:
-
- If a person required to file the statement referred to in § 23-3-306 is a partnership, limited partnership, syndicate, or other group, the commission may require that the information called for in subdivisions (a)(1)-(10) of this section shall be given with respect to each partner of the partnership or limited partnership, each member of the syndicate or group, and each person who controls a partner or member.
- If any partner, member, person, or acquiring party is a corporation, or if a person required to file the statement referred to in § 23-3-306 is a corporation, the commission may require that the information called for by subdivisions (a)(1)-(10) of this section be given with respect to the corporation, each officer and director of the corporation, and each person who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than ten percent (10%) of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation and each affiliate of such a corporation.
- If any material change occurs in the facts set forth in the statement filed with the commission and sent to the domestic public utility pursuant to this subchapter, an amendment setting forth the change, together with copies of all documents and other material relevant to the change, shall be filed with the commission and sent by the person filing the statement to the domestic public utility within two (2) business days after the person learns of the change.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.3; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2384.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (a)(10).
23-3-308. Statement filed with commission — Attachments and incorporation by reference.
If any offer, request, invitation, merger, or acquisition referred to in § 23-3-306 is proposed to be made by means of a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or in circumstances requiring disclosure of similar information under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or under a state law including rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, requiring similar registration or disclosure, the person required to file the statement referred to in § 23-3-306 may incorporate information contained in the documents filed under the above-mentioned statutes into the statement by attaching the other documents to the statement filed under this subchapter and making specific reference to the information provided by the attached documents.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.4.
U.S. Code. The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, are codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. and 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., respectively.
23-3-309. Payment of expenses of investigation.
The expense of conducting an analysis or investigation by the Arkansas Public Service Commission of the information required to be filed under § 23-3-307 shall be paid by the acquiring party within fifteen (15) days of the public hearing required by §§ 23-3-310 and 23-3-311. Expenses of conducting the analysis or investigation may include, but not be limited to, the cost of acquiring expert witnesses, consultants, and analytical services.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.9.
23-3-310. Grounds for disapproval.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall approve any merger or other acquisition of control referred to in § 23-3-306 unless, after a public hearing thereon, it finds that one (1) or more of the following conditions will exist if the merger or other acquisition of control is consummated, in which event it shall disapprove the merger or acquisition of control and the merger or acquisition of control shall not be consummated:
- The acquisition of control would adversely affect the contractual obligations of the domestic public utility or of any person controlling the domestic public utility or the ability or commitment to continue to render the same level of service to its customers that the domestic public utility is currently rendering;
- The effect of the merger or other acquisition of control would be substantially to lessen competition in the furnishing of public utility service in this state;
- The financial condition of any acquiring party is such as might jeopardize the financial stability of the domestic public utility or any person controlling the domestic public utility or would otherwise prejudice the interest of the domestic public utility's customers;
- The plans or proposals which an acquiring party has to liquidate the public utility or any such controlling person, to sell its assets or a substantial part thereof, or to consolidate or merge it with any person, or to make any other material change in its investment policy, business or corporate structure, or management would be detrimental to the customers of the domestic public utility and not in the public interest; or
- The competence, experience, and integrity of those persons who would control the operation of the domestic public utility are such that it would not be in the interest of its customers and the public to permit the merger or other acquisition of control.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.5.
23-3-311. Hearing — Notice — Determination.
- The public hearing referred to in § 23-3-310 shall be commenced within thirty (30) days after the statement required by § 23-3-306 is filed.
-
- The place, date, and time for the public hearing shall be set by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, and notice of the hearing shall be given by the commission to the person filing the statement and to the domestic public utility at least twenty (20) days prior to the date of the public hearing.
- Notice of the public hearing shall be given by the person filing the statement to such other persons and in such manner as may be directed by the commission at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing.
-
- Notice of the hearing, in a form to be specified by the commission, shall be mailed, or shall be given in such other manner as may be determined by the commission, by the domestic public utility to its customers within ten (10) business days after it has received notice of the hearing from the commission.
- The expenses of preparation and mailing and giving of notice shall be borne by the person filing the statement required by § 23-3-306. As security for the payment of expenses, the commission may require the person to file with the commission an acceptable bond or other deposit in an amount to be determined by the commission.
- The public hearing shall be concluded within thirty (30) days after the commencement of the hearing.
- The commission shall make a determination of the factors specified in § 23-3-310 within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing, and any merger or other acquisition of control within the purview of this subchapter shall be deemed approved unless the commission has, within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing, entered its order disapproving the merger or other acquisition of control.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, §§ 5, 6; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-142.5, 73-142.6.
23-3-312. Rehearing.
Any party to a proceeding before the Arkansas Public Service Commission aggrieved by an order issued by the commission pursuant to this subchapter may apply for a rehearing pursuant to the provisions of § 23-2-422.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.12; Acts 1991, No. 810, § 1.
23-3-313. Judicial review.
Any party to a proceeding before the Arkansas Public Service Commission aggrieved by an order issued by the commission in the proceeding may obtain a review of the order in the Court of Appeals pursuant to the provisions of § 23-2-423.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.12; Acts 1991, No. 810, § 2.
23-3-314. Stay of order pending review.
- The filing of an application for rehearing under § 23-3-312 shall not, unless specifically ordered by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, operate as a stay of the commission's order.
- The commencement of proceedings under § 23-3-313 shall not, unless specifically ordered by the Court of Appeals, operate as a stay of the commission's order.
- The Court of Appeals may enter an order suspending or staying the operation of an order of the commission pending review of the order provided the other parties are adequately secured against loss due to the delay in the enforcement of the order, in case the order involved is affirmed. The security shall take such form as shall be directed by the court.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.12; Acts 1991, No. 810, § 3.
23-3-315. Jurisdiction over nonresidents — Service of process.
- The courts of this state are vested with jurisdiction over every person not resident, domiciled, or authorized to do business in this state who files or is required to file a notice or statement with the Arkansas Public Service Commission as required by § 23-3-306 and over all actions involving such persons, and over all other persons acting on behalf or at the discretion of that person, including, without limitation, national or regional stock exchanges or securities brokers, their agents, servants, employees, representatives, account executives, and similar persons, with respect to actions arising out of violations of this subchapter.
- The commission shall be the agent for service of process for any such person, or other persons acting on behalf of that person, in any action, suit, or proceeding arising out of violations of this subchapter. Copies of all lawful process shall be served on the commission and transmitted by certified or registered mail, with return receipt requested, by the commission to any person subject to jurisdiction hereunder at his or her last known address.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.8.
23-3-316. Injunctions — Criminal proceedings.
- Whenever it shall appear to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, the Attorney General, or a domestic public utility which reasonably believes itself to be the object of a tender offer or attempt to obtain control as described in § 23-3-306, that any person is engaged or about to engage in any acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of the provisions of this subchapter, or of any rule or order thereunder, the commission, the Attorney General, or the domestic public utility may bring an action in Pulaski County Circuit Court to enjoin those acts or practices and to enforce compliance with this subchapter or any rule or order thereunder. Upon a proper showing being made, a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or permanent injunction enjoining any such person and all others acting on behalf of or at the discretion of that person shall be granted without bond.
- The commission, the Attorney General, and the domestic public utility shall transmit any evidence which may be available concerning those acts or practices or concerning apparent violations of this subchapter to the prosecuting attorney for Pulaski County who, in his or her discretion, may institute appropriate criminal proceedings.
History. Acts 1985, No. 343, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-142.10; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2385.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” twice in the first sentence of (a).
Subchapter 4 — Energy Conservation Endorsement Act of 1977
Cross References. Energy Conservation and Renewable Energy Resource Finance Act, § 14-167-201 et seq.
Energy Reorganization and Policy Act, § 15-10-201 et seq.
Effective Dates. Acts 2013, No. 253, § 2: July 1, 2013. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the costs of operations for large industrial and manufacturing businesses continue to rise; that the Arkansas unemployment rate continues to be high; that the state of the economy has dramatically affected Arkansas businesses, resulting in layoffs of numerous Arkansans; that reducing the costs of natural gas and electricity used by Arkansas businesses would provide these businesses with additional revenues to support an increase in their number of employees, which would increase productivity and provide lucrative employment for Arkansans; and that this act is necessary to aid the continual recovery of the Arkansas economy. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2013.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-3-401. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Energy Conservation Endorsement Act of 1977”.
History. Acts 1977, No. 748, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2501.
23-3-402. Legislative findings.
The General Assembly finds that the United States is confronted with a severe and very real energy crisis. Simply stated, the demand for fuels has outstripped the available supplies. The President of the United States has established energy conservation as a high-priority national goal and has called on all Americans to participate in and perhaps make sacrifices toward attaining that goal. The General Assembly recognizes that enormous amounts of energy are wasted by consumers of all classes and economic levels due to inadequate insulation of buildings and other inefficiencies in the use of energy. The overriding public interest in the conservation of natural gas and oil, as well as the use of alternative forms of energy, is indisputable.
History. Acts 1977, No. 748, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2502.
23-3-403. Energy conservation programs and measures defined.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “energy conservation programs and measures” may include, but shall not be limited to:
- Programs of residential, commercial, or industrial insulation, including measures to facilitate the financing of such insulation;
- Programs which result in the improvement of load factors, contribute to reductions in peak power demands, and promote efficient load management, including the adoption of interruptible service equipment and alternative or additional metering equipment designed to implement new rate structures; and
- Programs which encourage the use of renewable energy technologies or sources, including solar energy, wind power, geothermal energy, biomass conversion, or the energy available from municipal, industrial, silvicultural, or agricultural wastes.
History. Acts 1977, No. 748, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2504.
23-3-404. Conservation a proper utility function.
It shall be considered a proper and essential function of public utilities regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission to engage in energy conservation programs, projects, and practices which conserve, as well as distribute, electrical energy and supplies of natural gas, oil, and other fuels.
History. Acts 1977, No. 748, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2503.
23-3-405. Authority of commission — Rates and charges — Exemptions.
-
-
- Except as otherwise stated in this section, the Arkansas Public Service Commission is authorized to propose, develop, solicit, approve, require, implement, and monitor measures by utility companies which cause the companies to incur costs of service and investments which conserve, as well as distribute, electrical energy and existing supplies of natural gas, oil, and other fuels.
- The commission is authorized to order, require, promote, or engage in energy conservation programs and measures for the benefit of utility customers who are sixty-five (65) years of age or older or who meet the income eligibility qualifications for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program administered by the Arkansas Energy Office of the Division of Environmental Quality.
- After proper notice and hearings, the energy conservation programs and measures may be approved and ordered into effect by the commission if the commission determines that the energy conservation programs and measures will be beneficial to the ratepayers of the public utilities and to the public utilities themselves.
-
- In such instances, the commission shall declare that the cost of the energy conservation programs and measures is a proper cost of providing utility service.
- At the time the energy conservation programs and measures are approved and ordered into effect, the commission shall also order that the affected public utility company be allowed to increase its rates or charges as necessary to recover from consumers who have not opted out of utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures under subdivision (c)(1) of this section any costs incurred by the public utility company as a result of its engaging in the energy conservation programs and measures.
-
- Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as limiting or cutting down the authority of the commission to order, require, promote, or engage in other energy conservation programs and measures.
-
-
-
A nonresidential business consumer that is classified within sectors 31 through 33 of the North American Industry Classification System, as it existed on January 1, 2013, or a nonresidential business consumer that is a state-supported institution of higher education may provide notice by mail or email to the commission on or before September 15 of any year of the nonresidential business consumer's decision to opt out of utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures and direct the nonresidential business consumer's own energy conservation programs and measures if the nonresidential business consumer:
-
Satisfies one (1) of the following criteria:
- Has a peak electrical demand of at least one megawatt (1 MW) or an annual natural gas usage of seventy thousand million British thermal units (70,000 MMBtu) at a single facility; or
-
Has multiple facilities with identical ownership in a single public utility's service territory with:
- A peak electrical demand that exceeds two hundred kilowatts (200 kW) at each location and an aggregated peak electrical demand of at least one megawatt (1 MW) for all of the locations; or
- An annual natural gas usage that exceeds fourteen thousand million British thermal units (14,000 MMBtu) at each location and an aggregated annual natural gas usage of seventy thousand million British thermal units (70,000 MMBtu) for all of the locations; and
-
In the five (5) years preceding the notice:
-
Has not accepted:
- The installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility; or
- Financing or direct monetary compensation in the form of a rebate or incentive to enable the installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility; or
-
Has accepted but returned to an applicable public utility through a separate payment to the public utility or through payment of rates approved under subdivision (a)(3) of this section any amount received from an applicable public utility calculated from the date of the installation of the last energy conservation program or measure, including any interest and directly attributable rate effects, for:
- The installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility; or
-
Financing or direct monetary compensation in the form of a rebate or incentive to enable the installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility.
- That:
- That:
- The nonresidential customer is not eligible to participate in any energy conservation programs and measures offered by the public utility company under this section.
-
Has not accepted:
-
Satisfies one (1) of the following criteria:
- After proper notice and hearings, the commission may decrease the peak demand requirements under subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section, but the commission shall not increase the peak demand requirements under subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section.
-
A nonresidential business consumer that is classified within sectors 31 through 33 of the North American Industry Classification System, as it existed on January 1, 2013, or a nonresidential business consumer that is a state-supported institution of higher education may provide notice by mail or email to the commission on or before September 15 of any year of the nonresidential business consumer's decision to opt out of utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures and direct the nonresidential business consumer's own energy conservation programs and measures if the nonresidential business consumer:
-
The notice of exemption required under subdivision (c)(1) of this section shall include a sworn affidavit from an authorized employee of the nonresidential business consumer that states either:
- The nonresidential business consumer meets the criteria stated in subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section;
- The nonresidential business consumer has implemented or will implement energy conservation programs and measures or has made or will make an investment designated to provide energy savings for the nonresidential business consumer; and
- The energy conservation programs and measures implemented or to be implemented or the investment made or to be made has provided or is expected to provide energy savings for the nonresidential business consumer in an amount that is at least equal to the energy efficiency goals or standards established by the commission at the time the notice is issued under this subsection; or
-
-
- Upon receipt of a notice of exemption that meets the requirements of subsection (c) of this section, the commission shall issue an order of compliance stating that the nonresidential business consumer has met the requirements of this section and that the rights and limitations of subdivision (d)(2) of this section apply.
-
Beginning January 1 next following the commission's order of compliance under subdivision (d)(1) of this section:
- The nonresidential customer is not required to participate in any utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures required by the commission under this section for the applicable public utility;
- The public utility company shall not bill a nonresidential business consumer who has been granted an exemption under this subsection for the rates and charges approved by the commission under subdivision (a)(3) of this section; and
- An exemption and order of compliance issued under this subsection is permanent until it is withdrawn by the nonresidential business consumer under this section.
-
- A nonresidential business consumer seeking to withdraw an exemption granted under this section shall notify the commission by September 15 of any year.
- Upon notification of the withdrawal of an exemption under this subsection, the commission shall notify the public utility company of the withdrawal of the exemption.
-
Beginning with the January billing cycle in the year next following notice of the withdrawal of an exemption under this subsection:
- The public utility company shall begin billing the nonresidential business consumer for the rates and charges that apply at the time the exemption is withdrawn; and
- The nonresidential business consumer shall be eligible to participate in any energy conservation programs and measures offered by the public utility company under this section.
- The commission shall revise its rules and promulgate new rules only to the extent required to allow the commission to incorporate and comply with subsections (c)-(e) of this section.
(i) The nonresidential business consumer meets the criteria stated in subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section;
(ii) The nonresidential business consumer has exhausted its opportunity to economically conduct further meaningful and cost-effective energy conservation programs and measures; and
(iii) The nonresidential business consumer is unable to realize adequate benefits by participating in the utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures for the reasons stated therein.
History. Acts 1977, No. 748, §§ 3, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-2503, 73-2505; Acts 2013, No. 253, § 1; 2015, No. 78, § 1; 2017, No. 309, §§ 1, 2; 2017, No. 1102, §§ 2, 3; 2019, No. 910, § 3240.
A.C.R.C. Notes. As amended by Acts 2013, No. 253, § 1, § 23-3-405 contains two different versions of subsection (b). One version sets out the text of subsection (b) before its amendment by Act 253, and the other version illustrates by markup the amendment of the text of that subsection by Act 253. Subsection (b) as set out in the 2013 supplement incorporates the changes made to the text of that subsection by Act 253.
The amendment of subdivision (c)(1)(A)(ii) (b) of this section by Acts 2017, No. 309, § 2 and No. 1102, § 3 could not be reconciled. Pursuant to § 1-2-207(b), § 23-3-405(c)(1)(A)(ii) (b) is set out as amended by Acts 2017, No. 1102. As amended by Acts 2017, No. 309, § 23-3-405(c)(1)(A)(ii) (b) read: “ (b) Has accepted but returned to an applicable public utility through a separate payment to the public utility or through payment of the applicable utility rates any amount received from an applicable public utility calculated from the date of the installation of the last energy conservation program or measure, including any interest and directly attributable rate effects, for:
“ (1) The installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility; or
“ (2) Financing or direct monetary compensation in the form of a rebate or incentive to enable the installation of any energy conservation programs and measures by the applicable public utility.”
Amendments. The 2013 amendment added “Exemptions” in the section heading; added “Except as otherwise stated in this section” at the beginning of (a)(1); substituted “conservation programs and” for “conserving actions or” in (b); and added (c) through (f).
The 2015 amendment rewrote and redesignated the existing language of (c)(1)(A)(ii); and added (c)(1)(A)(ii) (b)
The 2017 amendment by No. 309, in the introductory language of (c)(1)(A), inserted “or a nonresidential business consumer that is a state-supported institution of higher education” and substituted “email” for “electronic mail”; and in the introductory language of (c)(1)(A)(ii)( b ), inserted “to an applicable public utility through a separate payment to the public utility or through payment of the applicable utility rates” and “received from an applicable public utility calculated from the date of the installation of the last energy conservation program or measure”, and deleted “from an applicable public utility” following “effects”.
The 2017 amendment by No. 1102 redesignated former (a)(1) as (a)(1)(A); added (a)(1)(B); in (a)(2), inserted “energy conservation” following “hearings, the”; redesignated (3) as (3)(A) and (3)(B); substituted “the energy conservations programs and” for “such conservation” in present (3)(A); in (3)(B), substituted “At the time the energy conservation programs and” for “At the time any such programs or” and inserted “from consumers who have not opted out of utility-sponsored energy conservation programs and measures under subdivision (c)(1) of this section”; in (c)(1)(A)(ii) (b) , inserted “to an applicable public utility through a separate payment to the public utility or through payment of rates approved under subdivision (a)(3) of this section" and “received from an applicable public utility calculated from the date of the installation of the last energy conservation program or measure”, and deleted “from an applicable public utility” following “effects”; and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment substituted “Arkansas Energy Office” for “Department of Human Services” in (a)(1)(B).
Case Notes
Authority.
Arkansas Public Service Commission had authority to approve a general policy to award incentives to utilities for their achievement in delivering essential energy-conservation services, because under subsection (b) of this section, the “cost” provision was not intended as a limitation on the Commission's ability to pursue other means of promoting energy efficiency. Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2012 Ark. App. 264, 410 S.W.3d 47 (2012).
Subchapter 5 — Navigable Water Crossings
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 8: Apr. 2, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that a recent decision of the Arkansas Court of Appeals has interpreted Act 310 of 1981 in a manner that is inconsistent with the interpretation of the Arkansas Public Service Commission; that this inconsistency impairs public utilities in their recovery, through an interim rate surcharge, of all investments and expenses that are not already included in the public utilities' currently effective rates and that were reasonably incurred by the public utilities as a direct result of legislative or administrative rules, regulations, or requirements relating to the protection of the public health, safety, or the environment; and that this act is immediately necessary to facilitate the timely recovery of investments and expenses so that public utilities may provide services to consumers in this state in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective manner. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-3-501. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission or any other state agency which may succeed to its powers;
-
“Navigable water crossing” means:
- The crossing of a navigable waterway by a public service facility; or
- That portion of the public service facility which is extended over, under, or across a navigable waterway, whether such a crossing is effected by suspending the public service facility from any overhead structure or by laying the public service facility upon or under the bed of the navigable waterway;
- “Navigable waterway” means any navigable river, lake, or other body of water used, or susceptible of being used in its natural condition as highways for commerce, located wholly or partly within this state;
-
“Public service facility” means any of the following:
- Electric power line;
- Pipeline for the transportation of water; or
- Pipeline for the transportation of gas, petroleum, gasoline, fuel, or any other substance capable of being moved through a pipeline as a common carrier or as a noncarrier utility; and
- “River crossing proprietor” means the owner, whether a person, a corporation, a company, a firm, partnership, or other association, that owns or proposes to construct a navigable water crossing.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2201.
23-3-502. Applicability of subchapter.
Each section of this subchapter shall apply with full effect whether the river crossing proprietor, if incorporated, derives its charter from the laws of Arkansas or of any other state and regardless of whether its activities within this state are those of interstate or intrastate commerce and, in the case of pipelines, regardless of whether its activities in this state are those of a common carrier or noncarrier utility.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2215.
23-3-503. Commission's jurisdiction, power, and authority.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have jurisdiction over all navigable water crossings.
- The commission shall have the power, authority, and responsibility, subject to the further provisions of this subchapter, to require that a navigable water crossing be constructed or operated in a manner consistent with the public safety and in such a manner as to cause no unlawful interference with some other paramount public or private use of the navigable waterway or its underlying bed at the point of the crossing.
- The commission shall further have the power, authority, and responsibility to grant to each river crossing proprietor, from such title or ownership as the State of Arkansas holds in respect to the bed of navigable waterways, all rights required or needed by the river crossing proprietor for the purpose of constructing, operating, repairing, replacing, whether with the same or a different size, dimension, or specification, altering, maintaining, or removing its public service facility at the point of any navigable water crossing.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2202.
23-3-504. Petition regarding operation.
Pursuant to the authority granted in this subchapter, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall require any river crossing proprietor operating or proposing to operate a navigable water crossing to file a verified petition with the commission showing such data and specifications in relation thereto as the commission may reasonably prescribe. The petition may include the following:
- The name of the river crossing proprietor and the nature of its organization and the nature of its business;
- The river crossing proprietor's principal office and place of business;
- A map, based upon a ground survey, showing the location of the public service facility at the point of the existing or proposed navigable water crossing, a drawing showing in some detail the specifications of the proposed crossing, and a profile plat showing, with respect to the mean surface level and the bed of the navigable waterway, the elevations of the existing or proposed public service facility;
- A general description of the physical nature of the bed underlying the navigable waterway at the point of the existing or proposed navigable water crossing, if the crossing is to be constructed on the underlying bed;
- A description of materials and the type of construction employed or to be employed in effecting the navigable water crossing;
- The size, capacity, and purpose of the public service facilities at the point of the navigable water crossing, together with operating conditions and safety factors;
- A showing of approval or permissive authorization of the existing or proposed navigable water crossing by the United States Secretary of Defense or the United States Secretary of the Army or other federal agency having jurisdiction to consent to erections in navigable waterways; and
- A prayer that the legality of the existing or proposed navigable water crossing be recognized pursuant to this subchapter.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2203.
23-3-505. Hearings.
- Upon the filing of a petition under § 23-3-504 by a river crossing proprietor which proposes to construct and operate a navigable water crossing, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall fix a date for hearing the petition.
- Unless waived by the parties, the hearing shall be held in the offices of the commission or at such other place as the commission may designate.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2205; Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 1.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added “Unless waived by the parties” in (b).
23-3-506. Objections to petition.
Any person, corporation, company, municipal agency, state agency, or institution whose rights or interests may be affected by such a proposed navigable water crossing may file written objections to the granting of the prayer of the petition.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2206.
23-3-507. Grant of petition — Exceptions.
-
Upon the hearing, if it appears that the United States Secretary of the Army, or such other federal agency as may have jurisdiction to consent to the construction of erections in navigable waterways, has approved or permissively authorized the proposed navigable water crossings, then the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall grant the prayer of the river crossing proprietor's petition unless the commission enters specific findings, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that:
- The proposed navigable water crossing, if constructed and operated as proposed, will jeopardize the public safety; or
- The construction of the proposed navigable water crossing at the point specified in the petition will result in an unlawful interference with some other paramount public or private use of the navigable waterway or its underlying bed at the point of the proposed crossing.
- In the event the commission finds that the proposed navigable water crossing would jeopardize the public safety if constructed and operated as proposed, it may grant the prayer of the river crossing proprietor's petition subject to such alteration of the proposed plans, specifications, and construction methods as may be in the interest of the public safety.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2207.
23-3-508. Order granting rights — Effect.
- When a river crossing proprietor owning or operating one (1) or more navigable water crossings in this state files with the Arkansas Public Service Commission a petition conforming to the requirements of § 23-3-504, the commission shall enter an order granting such rights to the navigable waterway and the bed thereof as will enable the river crossing proprietor to continue to own, operate, and maintain each navigable water crossing mentioned in the petition.
- The grant shall constitute approval and recognition of the legality of the navigable water crossing. However, the approval of a navigable water crossing by the commission shall not relieve the river crossing proprietor of its duty in the subsequent operation of the navigable water crossing to observe such reasonable safety precautions as may prevent conditions jeopardizing the public safety.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2204.
23-3-509. Characteristics of rights granted.
Rights in respect to the crossing of navigable waterways granted pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter shall be perpetual and shall inure to the benefit of the river crossing proprietor, its successors, mortgagees, and assigns. However, this subchapter shall not destroy, impair, repeal, or amend any right of eminent domain or reversion inuring either to the state or the river crossing proprietor under the laws of the State of Arkansas or of the United States.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2208.
23-3-510. Costs and expenses of proceedings — Damages.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall require the applicant to pay all costs and expenses of a proceeding under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2209; Acts 1993, No. 344, § 2.
23-3-511. Review by circuit court.
- Any party to a proceeding conducted pursuant to this subchapter before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, within twenty (20) days after a final order is made, may file a petition with the Pulaski County Circuit Court against the commission for the purpose of having the lawfulness of its final decision inquired into and determined.
- Every such petition to review shall state briefly the nature of the proceeding before the commission and shall set forth the order or decision complained of and the ground upon which the order or decision is claimed to be unlawful.
- Upon the filing of a petition to review, the clerk of the circuit court shall mail a notice of the filing of the petition and a copy of the petition to the commission by certified or registered mail. In the alternative, the clerk may cause the notice and a copy of the petition to be served upon either the secretary or chair of the Arkansas Public Service Commission by the Pulaski County Sheriff or his or her deputy.
- Thereupon, the commission, within thirty (30) days from the mailing or service of the notice shall answer the petition and certify to the court a complete transcript of the record in the case made before the commission, which shall include a copy of all pleadings, proceedings, testimony, exhibits, orders, findings, and opinions in the case. However, the parties and the commission may stipulate that a specified portion only of the record as made before the commission shall be included in the transcript to be filed with the court.
-
- No new or additional evidence shall be introduced in the court in which such a review is sought, but every case shall be determined upon the transcript of the record made before the commission as certified to by it.
- All evidence before the commission shall be considered by the court regardless of any technical rule which might have rendered the evidence inadmissible if originally offered in the trial of any action at law or in equity.
- Upon hearing, the court may dismiss the petition to review or vacate the order complained of in whole or in part, as the case may be. In case the order is wholly or partially vacated, the court may also in its discretion remand the matter to the commission for further procedure not inconsistent with the judgment of the court as, in the opinion of the court, justice may require.
- The review shall not be extended further than to determine whether the commission has regularly pursued its authority, including a determination of whether the order or decision under review violated any right of the complainant under the United States Constitution or the Arkansas Constitution.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, §§ 10-13; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-2210 — 73-2213.
23-3-512. Appeal to Supreme Court.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission, the river crossing proprietor, or any other party to an action in the circuit court to review the order of the commission, within thirty (30) days after the entry of the final judgment of the circuit court, may appeal to the Supreme Court.
- All such appeals will be advanced on the docket of the Supreme Court as matters of public interest.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2214; Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 2.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment repealed former (b).
23-3-513. Replacement of navigable water crossing.
- In each instance where a river crossing proprietor may desire to replace a navigable water crossing, it shall file with the Arkansas Public Service Commission a proper petition pursuant to § 23-3-504.
-
- Proceedings upon the petition shall be conducted under §§ 23-3-506, 23-3-507, and 23-3-510, subject to appeal as provided in §§ 23-3-511 and 23-3-512.
- In such a proceeding, however, the jurisdiction of the commission will be limited to a determination of whether the construction methods to be employed in replacing the navigable water crossing will jeopardize the public safety, and the river crossing proprietor's right to replace a navigable water crossing may be denied only on that ground.
History. Acts 1961, No. 188, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2216.
Subchapter 6 — Gas Utilities — Extension Projects
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 8, provided that this act shall be read in harmony with other acts which predate the passage and approval of this act and shall not be read or construed to repeal any portion of such acts.
Effective Dates. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 10: Mar. 10, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that many areas of the State do not have adequate natural gas services; that this Act provides a mechanism for expediting the extension of natural gas to unserviced areas of the State; and this Act should be given effect immediately in order to provide natural gas to the unserviced areas of the State as soon as possible. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-3-601. Purpose — Petition for certificate.
- The General Assembly finds that the proportion of the state's population that is without access to service by a gas utility exceeds the proportion of the population that is without access to telephone or electric utility service. Therefore, the General Assembly declares it to be the intent and purpose of this subchapter to increase only the availability of natural gas through the procedures provided in this subchapter and not to make the procedures available to electric or telephone utilities.
-
A gas utility may at any time petition the Arkansas Public Service Commission for a certificate of extension project. By its petition, the gas utility requests commission authorization to commence an extension project, to expend funds on the extension project, and to concurrently seek commission approval of changes in rates and surcharges sufficient to recover, at the time the plant goes into service, the excess expenditures arising out of the extension projects that have been granted certificates. A petition for a certificate shall provide information about the proposed extension project, including without limitation the following:
- An estimate of the cost of the extension project broken down into at least labor, materials, and overhead;
- A schedule of estimated completion dates;
- A brief description of the physical nature of the facilities, including pipe diameter and length of the extension in feet or miles;
- Estimated sales volumes, estimated number and types of customers, growth rates, and expected revenues;
- A calculation showing the amount of excess expenditures the gas utility expects to incur;
- A detailed description of the economic benefit to the gas utility and the gas utility's existing ratepayers; and
-
An estimate of:
- The surcharge for each class of customer consistent with the most recent determination by the commission in its order addressing the gas utility's most recent application for a general change or modification in its rates and charges; or
- The increase in rates for each class of customer if the investment is to be recovered by the gas utility under a formula rate review mechanism pursuant to the Formula Rate Review Act, § 23-4-1201 et seq.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 2; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment deleted “natural” preceding “gas utility” in the first sentence of (a); in the second sentence of (b), inserted the second occurrence of “extension” and substituted “extension projects that have been granted certificates” for “certificated extension projects”; added (b)(6) and (b)(7); and made stylistic changes.
23-3-602. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Certificate of extension project” or “certificate” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission order authorizing a gas utility seeking the order to undertake an extension project. The certificate shall be issued contemporaneously with the commission order approving the imposition of rates and surcharges sufficient to recover the excess expenditures arising out of those extension projects that have been granted certificates and completed pursuant to this subchapter;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
-
“Excess expenditures” means the difference between:
- Expenditures made by a gas utility for extensions of service to areas not served by a gas utility;
-
The sum of the investment allowable under a gas utility's extension policy, plus amounts, if any initially available from other applicable sources, which include without limitation funds from:
- The Arkansas Economic Development Council or its successor;
- Industrial development bonds, municipal bonds, city bonds, or improvement district bonds;
- Special funds which may be created by particular commission orders for individual gas utilities in rate cases or other proceedings; and
- Customer-provided contributions in aid of construction;
- “Extension project” means any extension proposed by a gas utility that is intended to serve areas of Arkansas not served by any gas utility or within the range of the extension policy of any gas utility, which will result in excess expenditures if constructed, and for which the gas utility seeks authorization from the commission to begin, together with the authorization to change its rates and surcharges to recover the excess expenditures as provided in this subchapter;
- “Gas utility” means any natural gas public utility jurisdictional to the commission; and
-
- “Surcharge” means a charge that the commission may authorize a gas utility to impose on its customers to recover, at the time the gas utility plant goes into service, the excess expenditures arising out of the extension projects that have been granted certificates.
- The amount of the surcharge to be added to the gas utility's rate under subdivision (6)(A) of this section shall be calculated under traditional cost-of-service principles so as to produce the annual revenues equal to the additional annualized revenue requirement to which the gas utility would be entitled had the excess expenditures been included in the gas utility's most recent rate determination by the commission.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 1; 1997, No. 540, § 45; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment substituted “Arkansas Economic Development Commission” for “Arkansas Industrial Development Commission” in present (4)(B)(i).
The 2017 amendment deleted “unless the context otherwise requires” from the end of the introductory language; substituted “granted certificates” for “certificated” in (1); deleted (3) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; substituted “commission” for “Arkansas Public Service Commission” in (5); rewrote (6); and made a stylistic change.
23-3-603. Grant of certificate generally.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall grant a certificate if it finds that the proposed extension project is of economic benefit to the gas utility and its existing ratepayers and is in the public interest.
- Once the certificate has been granted by the commission, including the approval of the amount and allocation of rates and surcharges, the gas utility may begin construction and may expend funds on the extension project that has been granted a certificate.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 3; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added the (a) and (b) designations; in (a), inserted “its existing ratepayers and” and deleted the second sentence; and, in (b), inserted “by the commission” and substituted “extension project that has been granted a certificate” for “certificated extension project”.
23-3-604. Rates and tariffs.
-
- Once an extension project that has been granted a certificate is placed into service and is used and useful, the gas utility may collect the excess expenditures through a rate or surcharge approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission. The tariff and rate filing made at the time of the certificate application shall include estimated excess expenditures upon which the commission may grant the certificate.
- The commission may subsequently modify the previously approved rates in any reasonable manner if the actual total costs and excess expenditures differ significantly from the estimated total costs and excess expenditures.
- If the actual total costs and excess expenditures significantly exceed the estimated costs and excess expenditures and the difference is caused by imprudence or other unsatisfactory causes, the commission may disallow recovery of a portion of the actual excess expenditures in the approved rates.
- The rate or surcharge implemented under this section remains effective until the implementation of new rate schedules in connection with the next general rate filing of the gas utility wherein such extension project investments can be included in the gas utility's base rate schedules.
- The rate or surcharge for each class of customer shall be determined consistent with the most recent determination by the commission in its order addressing the gas utility's most recent application for a general change or modification in its rates and charges.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 4; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment rewrote the first sentence of (a)(1); deleted “and tariffs” following “rates” in (a)(2); substituted “If the” for “In the event that” in (a)(3); rewrote (b) and (c); and deleted former (d).
23-3-605. Conditions, limitations on grant of certificates.
Certificates shall be granted under this subchapter under the following provisions and conditions:
-
- Only proposed extension projects are eligible for recovery of the cost of excess expenditures under this subchapter.
- Proposed extension projects are those for which neither actual construction activity has begun nor expenditures made, other than for planning the extension project, at the time the petition for the certificate is initially filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- Certificates shall be granted under this subchapter only for proposed extension projects that will serve areas not served by any gas utility at the time of the filing of the petition for the certificate;
- Certificates shall be granted under this subchapter only if the Arkansas Public Service Commission determines the extension project is of economic benefit to the gas utility and its existing ratepayers and is in the public interest;
- Certificates shall not be granted under this subchapter to recover excess expenditures incurred in replacing existing pipelines, equipment, or plants, unless the replacement is necessary for adequate gas supply for the proposed extension project;
- When the Arkansas Public Service Commission has granted more than one (1) certificate to a gas utility, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may determine prospectively the sequence in which the gas utility shall commence work on pending extension projects based on whatever reasonable criteria the Arkansas Public Service Commission develops. However, once construction has begun on any given extension project, the Arkansas Public Service Commission determination shall not serve to postpone or defer construction;
-
- There is a limitation on the total annual dollar recovery of excess expenditures to be recovered under § 23-3-604 through rates or surcharges. The limitation is a dollar amount that equals five-tenths of one percent (0.5%) of the gas utility's gross plant at original cost used in determining the gas utility's most recent application for a general change in rates and charges.
- As used in this subdivision (6), “gross plant” does not include construction work in progress or portions of extension projects that have been granted certificates and are currently included in the gas utility's base rates; and
- With respect to any extension project funded under this subchapter to provide service to a project developer that also receives funds or incentives provided by the Arkansas Economic Development Commission, any agreement between a project developer and the Arkansas Economic Development Commission shall include a provision that any funds provided by a surcharge to recover the cost of an extension project under this subchapter shall be recovered from any project developer that failed to take natural gas service from such an extension project and refunded to ratepayers as directed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 5; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated (1) as (1)(A) and (B); inserted “extension” preceding “project” in (1)(B); inserted (3); redesignated former (3)-(5) as (4)-(6); in (4), substituted “excess expenditures” for “costs” and added “unless the replacement is necessary for adequate gas supply for the proposed extension project”; inserted “extension” twice in (5); rewrote (6); added (7); and made stylistic changes.
23-3-606. Petitions not considered rate applications.
Petitions for a certificate under this subchapter are not general rate applications.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 6; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “under” for “pursuant to”.
23-3-607. Denial of certificate.
Denial of a certificate under this subchapter does not preclude recovery of the cost of excess expenditures under rates or surcharges, or both, approved pursuant to a gas utility's general rate case or other proceeding in which the Arkansas Public Service Commission finds recovery of the cost of excess expenditures through rates or surcharges appropriate.
History. Acts 1987, No. 150, § 7; 2017, No. 280, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “does not” for “shall not”.
Subchapter 7 — Avoided Costs
23-3-701. Legislative determination.
- It is declared to be the policy of this state that while the development of qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities should be encouraged, electric utilities should not be required to purchase power from the facilities at excessive rates which would result in an increase in the cost of providing electrical service to customers of the electric utility.
- In furtherance of this declared policy, it is recognized that the Arkansas Public Service Commission has adopted cogeneraton rules and it shall continue to provide for electric utilities to purchase electric energy or capacity from qualifying facilities at rates which are just and reasonable to the electric consumer of the electric utility, which do not increase the cost of providing electrical service to customers of the electric utility, are in the public interest, which do not discriminate against qualifying facilities, and which do not exceed avoided costs.
History. Acts 1987, No. 796, § 1.
23-3-702. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Avoided costs” means the costs to an electric utility of electric energy or capacity, or both, that, but for the purchase from the qualifying facility or qualifying facilities, the utility would generate itself or purchase from another source;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Purchase” means the purchase of electric energy or capacity, or both, from a qualifying facility by an electric utility;
- “Qualifying facility” means a cogeneration facility or a small power production facility which has obtained qualifying status under the cogeneration rules adopted by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 and the rules and regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission promulgated under that act; and
- “Rate” means any price, rate, charge, or classification made, demanded, observed, or received with respect to the sale or purchase of electric energy or capacity or any rule, regulation, or practice respecting any rate, charge, or classification and any contract pertaining to the sale or purchase of electric energy or capacity.
History. Acts 1987, No. 796, § 2.
U.S. Code. The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, referred to in this section, is Pub. L. No. 95-617, 92 Stat. 3117, which is codified generally as 16 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.
23-3-703. Establishment of rates.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall establish rates to be paid by an electric utility to qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities which do not, over the term of the purchased power contract, exceed avoided costs and are based upon the preponderance of evidence in the record before the commission. However, rates established for purchases from qualifying facilities whose construction commenced earlier than November 9, 1978, may be ten percent (10%) less than avoided costs.
History. Acts 1987, No. 796, § 3.
23-3-704. Basis of rate determination — Waiver of avoided cost standard.
- A determination of the avoided energy cost rate or rates for the electric utility shall be based on the electric utility's estimated avoided costs of producing or purchasing electrical energy during the time period of the purchase of electrical energy from the qualifying facility. It shall not be based upon the production or purchase of electrical energy at any time other than during the time period of the purchasing of electrical energy from the qualifying facility. A determination of the avoided capacity cost rate or rates for the electric utility shall be based at the electric utility's cost of capacity additions or purchases avoided during the time period of the purchase of electrical capacity from the qualifying facility. It shall not be based upon the purchase of electrical capacity at any time other than during the time period of the purchase of electrical capacity from the qualifying facility.
-
- In the event the Arkansas Public Service Commission finds and determines that the avoided cost rate is not necessary to encourage the appropriate amount of construction of qualifying facilities and that a rate less than the avoided cost rate is just and reasonable to the electric consumer of the electric utility, is in the public interest, and will not discriminate against qualifying facilities, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall take all reasonable and appropriate steps to obtain a waiver of the avoided cost standard from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any successor agency.
-
In addition, a determination of the avoided cost rate or rates for energy or capacity purchased by an electric utility shall:
- Be just and reasonable to the electric consumer of the electric utility and in the public interest; and
- Not discriminate against qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities.
- Nothing in this subsection requires any electric utility to pay more than the avoided costs for purchases.
History. Acts 1987, No. 796, §§ 4, 5.
23-3-705. Lower contract rates permitted.
Nothing in this subchapter shall prohibit an electric utility and a qualifying facility from negotiating a contract rate lower than the avoided cost rate established by the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the electric utility.
History. Acts 1987, No. 796, § 6.
Chapter 4 Regulation of Rates and Charges Generally
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Cross References. Establishment of rates for certain utilities, § 23-2-304.
General Assembly to pass laws to prevent excessive charges, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
Effective Dates. Acts 1921, No. 10, § 2: approved Jan. 26, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 2007, No. 647, § 2: Mar. 28, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the rates paid by customers of public utilities may be affected in a manner that is burdensome to Arkansas utility consumers and harmful to economic development and that the Arkansas Public Service Commission needs to be immediately authorized to employ counsel and experts to protect the utility consumers or Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2009, No. 434, § 2: Mar. 18, 2009. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that due to the severe ice storm that struck portions of the state on January 27 and 28, 2009, some of the electric public utilities operating in Arkansas have incurred significant costs in restoring electric service; that electric utility service is essential to the public health and welfare for the preservation of food supplies, heating and cooling of buildings, and operation of commerce that public electric utilities must have financial resources on hand to purchase replacement equipment and to field repair crews swiftly in order to accomplish the prompt restoration of electric service; and that this act is immediately necessary to provide public electric utilities the financial resources necessary to restore service in a timely manner. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
ALR.
Charitable contributions by utility as part of operating expense. 59 A.L.R.3d 941.
Advertising or promotional expenditures of public utility as part of operating expenses for ratemaking purposes. 83 A.L.R.3d 963.
Transportation, freight, mailing, or handling charges billed separately to purchaser of goods as subject to sales or use tax. 2 A.L.R.4th 1124.
Exemption from sales or use tax of water, oil, gas, other fuel, or electricity provided for residential purposes. 15 A.L.R.4th 269.
Amount paid by public utility to affiliate for goods or services as included in utility's rate base and operating expenses in rate proceeding. 16 A.L.R.4th 454.
Validity of preferential utility rates for elderly or low-income persons. 29 A.L.R.4th 615.
Propriety of considering capital structure of utility's parent company or subsidiary in setting utility's rate of return. 80 A.L.R.4th 280.
Public utility's right to recover cost of nuclear power plants abandoned before completion. 83 A.L.R.4th 183.
Public service commission's implied authority to order refund of public utility revenues. 41 A.L.R.5th 783.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
Constitutionality, construction, and application of state and local public-utility gross-receipts-tax statutes — modern cases. 58 A.L.R.5th 187.
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 141 et seq.
64 Am. Jur. 2d, Pub. Util., § 60 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 135 et seq.
73B C.J.S., Pub. Util., § 18 et seq.
23-4-101. Authority of commission or department to establish rates — Exceptions.
- With respect to the particular public utilities and matters over which each agency has jurisdiction, the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have the power, after reasonable notice and after full and complete hearing, to enforce, originate, establish, modify, change, adjust, and promulgate tariffs, rates, joint rates, tolls, and schedules for all public service corporations, companies, and utilities and all rules with reference thereto and orders directing the performance of any duties devolving on the company, utility, common carrier, or public service corporation under the terms of this act.
- Whenever the commission or the department having jurisdiction, after notice and hearing, finds any existing rates, tolls, tariffs, joint rates, or schedules unjust, unreasonable, insufficient, unjustly discriminatory, or otherwise in violation of any of the provisions of the law, the commission or the department shall, by an order, fix reasonable rates, joint rates, tariffs, tolls, charges, or schedules to be followed in the future in lieu of those found to be unjust, unreasonable, insufficient, unjustly discriminatory, inadequate, or otherwise in violation of any of the provisions of this law.
-
- Nothing in this act shall authorize either the commission or the department to make any rule or order whatever to be effective within the limits of any municipality of this state with reference to any tariff, rate, toll, schedule, duty, or action of any public service corporation, company, or public utility operating within the municipality as a street railroad; telephone company; gas company; pipeline company for transportation of oil, gas, or water; electrical company, for the generation or distribution, sale, or supply of electricity for heat, light, or power; water company; or hydroelectric company.
- It is the intention of this act, more particularly expressed in other provisions of this act, to confer upon the municipal councils and city commissions of this state jurisdiction as to these matters, so far as they are effective within the limits of any municipality of this state.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 8; C. & M. Dig., § 1619; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 2005; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-119; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 109; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2386, 2387.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Subsection (c) of this section may be superseded by § 23-4-102(a) with respect to electric, gas, telephone, and sewer utilities.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a); and deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (c)(1).
Meaning of “this act”. The words “this act” probably refer to both Acts 1919, No. 571 and 1921, No. 124, which are codified as §§ 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, 23-12-301, 23-12-302 and as §§ 14-200-110, 14-200-112, 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-2-425, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, respectively.
Case Notes
Cited: Southeast Ark. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Ark. Corp. Comm'n, 204 Ark. 1023, 166 S.W.2d 262 (1942); Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 46 Ark. App. 88, 877 S.W.2d 594 (1994); Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 76 Ark. App. 547, 69 S.W.3d 889 (2002).
23-4-102. Commission's authority over interstate rates, charges, classifications, and other actions.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have the power to investigate all existing or proposed interstate rates, charges, and classifications, and all rules and practices in relation thereto promulgated and prescribed by or for any public utility as defined in § 23-1-101, when the matters so investigated shall affect the public of this state.
- When the existing or proposed interstate rates, charges, and classifications are in the opinion of the Arkansas Public Service Commission excessive or discriminatory or in violation of any act of the United States Congress or in conflict with the rules, orders, or regulations of a commission created by the United States Congress, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may seek relief in the appropriate commission or in a court of competent jurisdiction.
-
For the purpose of this section, the Arkansas Public Service Commission:
- Is exempt from the provisions of § 25-16-702 whenever the Arkansas Public Service Commission is a party to a proceeding under subsection (b) of this section;
- May retain contract attorneys or contract consultants; and
-
- May adopt rules for direct recovery of the fees and expenses of contract attorneys and consultants from the affected utility under this section, provided that the utility is an electric public utility that is owned by a public utility holding company as defined by section 1262 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58. The maximum amount that may be directly recovered from an affected utility shall be three million dollars ($3,000,000) annually.
-
- In the event the Arkansas Public Service Commission directly recovers the fees and expenses of its attorneys and consultants from an affected utility under this section, that utility shall be allowed to implement a surcharge mechanism to recover only the expenses directly recovered from that utility.
- The surcharge shall be established annually to recover only the amounts directly recovered from that utility during the preceding calendar year.
- The surcharge mechanism shall include provisions to address any excessive or deficient recoveries during the preceding calendar year. The surcharge shall not include any interest or carrying charges.
- Any surcharge must be approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission before it can be implemented.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 9; Pope's Dig., § 2072; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-203; Acts 2007, No. 647, § 1.
U.S. Code. Section 1262 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, referred to in this section, is compiled as 42 U.S.C. § 16451.
Case Notes
Telephone Rates.
Order of commission fixing rates in Arkansas of telephone company which maintained integrated exchange in both Arkansas and Texas did not interfere with interstate commerce within the meaning of the federal Johnson Act and federal district court did not have jurisdiction to enjoin such order of the commission. General Tel. Co. v. Robinson, 132 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. Ark. 1955).
23-4-103. Rates and rules to be reasonable.
All rates made, demanded, or received by any public utility, for any product or commodity furnished, or to be furnished, or any service rendered or to be rendered, and all rules made by any public utility pertaining thereto shall be just and reasonable, and to the extent that the rates or rules may be unjust or unreasonable, are prohibited and declared unlawful.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 10; Pope's Dig., § 2073; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-204; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2388.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Rates and rules” for “Rates, rules, and regulations” in the section heading and made a similar change in the section; and deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
Cross References. Ratemaking policies for cost of acquisition or construction of incremental resources, § 23-18-107.
Case Notes
Corridor Rates.
Evidence supported the commission's approval of reduced “corridor rates” for industrial customers who would otherwise bypass the utilities resulting in even higher rates for residential customers; corridor rates are a just and reasonable response to the threat of bypass. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Escalator Clauses.
Commission had the authority under this section to determine that proposed escalator clauses of gas company seeking rate increases were not just and reasonable so as to be put into effect under bond. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Remedies.
Orders issued by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to an audit of costs allocated to telephone company upheld where telephone company's rates produced earnings in excess of a reasonable revenue requirement and an agreement was reached whereby, in lieu of proposed reductions to its rates, the telephone company would make service improvements. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 54 Ark. App. 157, 924 S.W.2d 472 (1996).
Standard of Review.
The appellate court must review the total effect of a rate order, and if the total effect cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Pursuant to the Arkansas Public Service Commission's approval of the sale of an existing telecommunications utility's assets to a new telecommunications utility, where the record was not developed sufficiently for the appellate court to decide the issue of whether the application of PSC's parity order resulted in just and reasonable intrastate switched-access rates, a remand was required. Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 76 Ark. App. 547, 69 S.W.3d 889 (2002).
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 824 F.2d 672 (8th Cir. 1987).
23-4-104. Charges, rates, etc., to be just, reasonable, and in compliance with Acts 1919, No. 571, and Acts 1921, No. 124.
- All charges, tolls, fares, and rates shall be just and reasonable.
- No charge shall be made in any tariffs, rates, fares, tolls, schedules, or classifications except as provided in this act.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 6; C. & M. Dig., § 1611; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 2003; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-116.
Publisher's Notes. This section may be partially superseded by §§ 23-3-113 and 23-4-103.
Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-101.
Case Notes
Corridor Rates.
Evidence supported the commission's approval of reduced “corridor rates” for industrial customers who would otherwise bypass the utilities resulting in even higher rates for residential customers. Corridor rates are a just and reasonable response to the threat of bypass. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
Cited: Litton Sys. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 539 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1976).
23-4-105. Rate schedules — Filing.
Under such rules and regulations as the commission may prescribe, every public utility shall file with the commission, within such time and in such form as the commission may designate, schedules showing all rates established by or for it, and collected or enforced, or to be collected or enforced, within the jurisdiction of the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 2074; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-205.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
23-4-106. Rate schedules — Public inspection.
Every public utility shall keep copies of its rate schedules open to public inspection under such rules and at such places as the commission may prescribe.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 2074; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-205; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2389.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
23-4-107. Rate schedules — Greater or lesser rate not to be charged.
No public utility shall directly or indirectly, by any device whatsoever, charge, demand, collect, or receive from any person a greater or lesser compensation for any service rendered or to be rendered by the public utility than that prescribed in the schedules of the public utility applicable thereto then filed in the manner provided in this act. Nor shall any person receive or accept any service from a public utility for a compensation greater or lesser than that prescribed in the schedules.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 12; Pope's Dig., § 2075; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-206.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
Action for Damages.
Circuit court lacked jurisdiction over civil causes of action in tort which necessarily required an assessment of damages measured by what was the filed rate with the public service commission and what the rate should have been. Cullum v. Seagull Mid-South, Inc., 322 Ark. 190, 907 S.W.2d 741 (1995).
Illegal Charges.
To have furnished the appellee unrestricted service for which a specified charge per month was required to be charged, at the restricted service rate of a lesser amount per month, would have constituted a discrimination as against other subscribers in violation of this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Hutton, 203 Ark. 969, 160 S.W.2d 201 (1942).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
23-4-108. Sliding scales of rates.
-
- Nothing in this act shall be taken to prohibit a public utility from establishing or entering into an agreement for a fixed period for a sliding scale or automatic adjustment of charges for public utility service in relation to the dividends to be paid to stockholders of the public utility, or the profit to be realized, or its expenses of operation to be incurred, or other equitable or reasonable basis for the scale or adjustment if a schedule showing the rates under the arrangement is first filed with and approved by the commission.
- Nothing in this section shall prevent the commission from revoking its approval at any time and fixing other rates and charges for the product or commodity or service if, after reasonable notice and hearing, the commission finds the existing rates or charges unjust, unreasonable, insufficient, or discriminatory.
- The commission shall have the power to fix a reasonable and just sliding scale of rates for public utilities.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 20; Pope's Dig., § 2083; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-219.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-107.
Case Notes
In General.
This section provides for a sliding scale or an automatic adjustment of rates, thereby providing for a company to receive a rate increase or decrease depending on the rise or fall of the price the company had to pay for gas to be distributed to its customers. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Surcharge statutes tie surcharges to existing facility costs and costs directly related to legislative or regulatory requirements, and there is no authority granted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the implementation of social programs; moreover; the same holds true of sliding-scale ratemaking where the statutory language of this section and Arkansas case law refer to costs associated with gas production and service to the ratepayers, not low-income assistance programs. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Escalator Clauses.
This section seems to recognize some sort of escalator clause to be possible in some situations. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Fixed Period.
The term “fixed period” was deemed by the court to refer to the length of time between adjustments rather than to the length of time the escalator clause was to remain in effect, as the latter could be renewed at any time by the utility filing another one. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Hearings.
A hearing must be held before escalator or sliding rates or scales can go into effect. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Notice.
The court interpreted the language of this section to mean that once the commission fixes a definite rate, it cannot lower the rate without giving notice to the utility and cannot raise the rate without notifying in some way the rate payers. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Petitions for Rate Increases.
Upon petition for rate increase by gas company pursuant to § 23-4-402 et seq., the company had the right when it filed its schedule to ask that its monthly consumption rate go into effect under bond and that proposed escalator clauses be considered upon final hearing. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Cited: Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 76 Ark. App. 547, 69 S.W.3d 889 (2002).
23-4-109. Minimum charges.
Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit a public utility from filing a schedule or entering into any reasonable arrangements with its customers, or prospective customers, which provide for a minimum charge for services to be rendered, or from providing for any other financial device that may be lawful if the schedule or arrangement, before becoming effective, is filed with and approved by the commission. The schedule or arrangement shall be subject to revision or modification on the part of the commission upon complaint or its own motion.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 20; Pope's Dig., § 2083; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-219.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of the term “commission,” see § 23-1-101.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-107.
23-4-110. Changes in rates under Acts 1919, No. 571, and Acts 1921, No. 124.
-
- No person, firm, or corporation subject to the provisions of this act shall modify, change, cancel, or annul any rate, joint rates, fares, classifications, charges, or rentals except after thirty (30) days' notice to the public and to the municipal council or city commission, as the case may be, depending on the utility affected and the action proposed.
- The notice shall plainly state the changes proposed to be made in the schedule then in force and the time when the changed rates, fares, or charges shall go into effect.
- The particular regulatory body having jurisdiction of the matter under this act may enter an order prohibiting such a person, firm, or corporation from putting the proposed new rates into effect pending hearing and final decision of the matter by the regulatory body.
-
- Whenever there is filed with the regulatory body any schedule proposing a change in any rates, charges, or rules, the regulatory body shall have authority, either upon complaint or upon its own initiative, and upon reasonable notice, to enter upon a hearing concerning the propriety of the rate, charge, or rule.
- Pending the hearing and the decision thereon, the regulatory body, upon filing of the schedule or after the schedule should be filed, and upon delivering to the carriers or public service corporations affected thereby a statement in writing of its reasons for such a suspension, may suspend the operation of the schedule and defer the use of the rate or charge.
- After a full hearing, whether completed before or after the rate, charge, or rule goes into effect, the regulatory body may make such orders in reference to the rate, fare, charge, or rule as shall be deemed proper and just.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 7; C. & M. Dig., § 1612; Acts 1921, No. 10, § 1; 1921, No. 124, § 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 1937, 2004; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-117; Acts 2019, No. 315, §§ 2390, 2391.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (c)(1) and made similar changes in (c)(3).
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-101.
Case Notes
Municipal Utilities.
Where municipal utility obtained a change of rates from corporation commission under Acts 1919, No. 571, and appeal was taken to circuit court, circuit court even after the abolition of the Corporation Commission (now Arkansas Public Service Commission) by Acts 1921, No. 124 had authority to determine case de novo. Van Buren Waterworks v. City of Van Buren, 152 Ark. 83, 237 S.W. 696 (1922).
Where utility serving municipality was granted an increase of rates under Acts 1919, No. 571 but on application of the municipality the Corporation Commission (now Arkansas Public Service Commission) set aside its order and granted a rehearing, the old rates were restored and after enactment of Acts 1921, No. 124, the utility had no authority to change rates greater than that authorized by the municipality. Town of Pocahontas v. Central Power & Light Co., 152 Ark. 276, 244 S.W. 712, cert. dismissed, 260 U.S. 755, 43 S. Ct. 94, 67 L. Ed. 498 (1922).
Net Profits.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission has no authority to discard the rate base method in favor of the field price method in determining the net profits a public utility can earn in this state. Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
Notice.
The filing of a schedule of changes in the rates of an electric light company was sufficient notice to the Corporation Commission (now Arkansas Public Service Commission) and to the public. Harrison Elec. Co. v. Citizens' Ice & Storage Co., 149 Ark. 502, 232 S.W. 932 (1921).
Purchaser of Utility.
In the operation of the business of a public utility such as a natural gas company, it must adhere to the rate fixed and applied to it by the Railroad Commission which fixed the rate, and the purchase of pipelines owned by other gas companies whose rates have been fixed at different amounts by the commission does not modify the rates of the purchasing company. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Chambless, 170 Ark. 418, 279 S.W. 1030 (1926).
23-4-111. Valuation of public utility property for ratemaking purposes — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
-
- “Public utility” means a public utility as that term is defined under § 23-1-101.
- However, “public utility” does not mean an incumbent local exchange carrier that has elected to be regulated under §§ 23-17-406 — 23-17-408 or § 23-17-412;
- “Original cost” means the cost incurred by a public utility when plant or property was first devoted to public service; and
- “Net book value” means the original cost less reasonable accumulated depreciation of the plant or property.
-
-
- In determining the value of plant or property that is to be included in the rate base upon which the public utility will be allowed the opportunity to earn a return, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall use the net book value of the plant or property unless the commission determines that an adjustment is appropriate under subsection (c), subsection (d), or subsection (e) of this section.
- However, for affiliate acquisitions, the value of plant or property that is to be included in the rate base upon which the public utility will be allowed the opportunity to earn a return, the commission shall use the net book value of the plant or property or a lesser amount, but in no event may the commission make an adjustment above net book value under subsection (c) of this section.
- If the original cost of the plant or property is unknown, the commission shall estimate the net book value.
-
For plant or property acquired for an amount above net book value, the commission may allow the recovery through rates of an amount greater than net book value but not more than actual cost if the public utility can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that:
- The original cost of the plant or property was reasonable and prudent; and
- The public utility's customers will receive known and measurable benefits that are at least equal to the incremental amount for which the utility seeks recovery under this subsection.
-
For plant or property acquired for an amount below net book value, the commission may allow the recovery through rates of an amount greater than the cost of acquisition but not more than the net book value if the public utility can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that:
- The original cost of the plant or property was reasonable and prudent; and
- The public utility's customers will receive known and measurable benefits that are at least equal to the incremental amount for which the utility seeks recovery under this subsection.
- The commission may allow the recovery through rates of an amount less than net book value if the commission determines that the original cost of the plant or property was not reasonable or was imprudent.
- However, for plant or property costs incurred in compliance with § 23-18-106(a), the public utility shall have a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness and prudence for the purpose of the commission's determinations in subsections (c)-(e) of this section.
History. Acts 2003, No. 1317, § 1.
23-4-112. Reserve accounting for storm restoration costs.
- This section applies to storm restoration costs incurred on or after January 1, 2009.
- Upon application by an electric public utility and after notice and hearing, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall permit an electric public utility to establish a storm cost reserve account consistent with the then-current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Uniform System of Accounts, as modified to allow a debit balance to reflect the excess of storm restoration costs over the amount recovered in rates or otherwise credited to the storm cost reserve account.
-
The use of reserve accounting under this section is subject to the following:
-
- The initial amount included in the storm cost reserve account for an electric public utility shall be the amount included in the electric public utility's currently approved rates for storm restoration costs.
- Thereafter, in future rate proceedings, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall determine the appropriate level of the storm cost reserve account considering the electric public utility's historical costs associated with normal storm damage and other factors;
- As a condition of an electric public utility's recovery of storm restoration costs through rates or inclusion of storm restoration costs in the storm cost reserve account, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall audit, analyze, examine, and adjust all storm restoration costs to ensure that only reasonable and prudent storm restoration costs are included in the storm cost reserve account or are recoverable through rates;
- Simple interest on any balance, credit, or debit in the storm cost reserve account shall accrue at a rate equal to the electric public utility's last approved rate-base rate of return;
-
- An electric public utility shall only charge operations and maintenance storm restoration costs that are not otherwise recovered against the balance in the storm cost reserve account.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall ensure that the storm restoration costs charged to the storm cost reserve account are:
- Timely;
- Specific to restoring retail electric service in Arkansas; and
- Subject to any ratemaking adjustments of the types of expenses included in the storm restoration costs that are consistent with the determination in the electric public utility's most recent application for a general change in rates.
-
An electric public utility shall:
- File a quarterly report with the Arkansas Public Service Commission identifying each instance in which the electric public utility records storm restoration costs in the storm cost reserve account; and
-
Provide with the quarterly report required by this subdivision (c)(4)(C) supporting documentation prescribed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission that includes without limitation:
- Vegetation management spending; and
- Labor costs;
-
- If an electric public utility spends less on storm restoration costs than the amount included in the electric public utility's currently approved rates for storm restoration costs in any calendar year, the electric public utility shall credit to the storm cost reserve account any difference between the amount in rates and the amount actually spent on storm restoration costs during that calendar year.
-
If an electric public utility has received any of the following payments to offset storm restoration costs, the electric public utility shall credit those payments to the storm cost reserve account:
- Insurance payments;
- Payments from a governmental entity; or
- Any other third-party payments; and
-
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall determine the following in the electric public utility's next application for a general change in rates:
- The recovery of any debit balance in the electric public utility's storm cost reserve account through the electric public utility's rates and charges over a reasonable period; or
- The appropriate ratemaking treatment of any credit balance in the electric public utility's storm cost reserve account.
- After notice and hearing and a finding that it is in the public interest, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may approve other ratemaking treatment otherwise allowed by law of any balance, credit, or debit in the electric public utility's storm cost reserve account.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall establish the method of recovery of a debit balance in the electric public utility's storm cost reserve account and may impose conditions to ensure that amounts recovered through rates are reasonable and prudent.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall determine the following in the electric public utility's next application for a general change in rates:
-
-
This section:
- Does not prevent the Arkansas Public Service Commission from adjusting an electric public utility's rate of return associated with the increased certainty of recovery of the electric public utility's storm restoration costs as a result of establishing a storm cost reserve account under this section; and
- Does not prevent an electric utility from petitioning the Arkansas Public Service Commission to approve other methods of addressing storm restoration costs and the recovery of storm restoration costs through rates as allowed by law.
History. Acts 2009, No. 434, § 1.
Subchapter 2 — Utilities Generally
Cross References. Power to fix rates, § 23-2-304.
Effective Dates. Acts 1905, No. 282, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1919, No. 264, § 3: approved Mar. 13, 1919. Emergency declared.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1951, No. 156, § 4: approved Feb. 26, 1951. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas, it has been ascertained by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the immediate enforcement of this Act is in the public interest, and it being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety of the State of Arkansas, an emergency is hereby declared, and this Act shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.”
Acts 1957, No. 275, § 5: Mar. 27, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas, certain public utility companies furnishing gas, water or electricity in this State have been authorized by the Public Service Commission to make separate charges for the disconnection of meters or other devices used for measuring the units consumed; and
“Whereas, it is common practice among certain public utilities to levy such charge for disconnection of service when in fact there is no physical disconnection of the meter and no other service performed which warrants such charge; and
“Whereas, such practice on the part of such public utility companies results in the utility user having to pay for services not actually received, which unjustly enriches the utility company at the expense of the utility user; and
“Whereas, this Act is reasonably calculated to correct this unjust situation;
“Now, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 164, § 6: Feb. 14, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the establishment of rates and charges of electric, gas and telephone public utilities in this State is nonlocal in nature and is applicable to allocated territories of the respective electric or gas or telephone public utilities; that under present law confusion has resulted, and will likely continue to result from the enactment of different rates by different municipalities served by the same electric or gas or telephone public utility; that discrimination among the customers of the same public utility may result from the establishment of differing rates by municipalities served by the same public utility; that it is in the best interest of the public that the sole and exclusive jurisdiction to determine rates to be charged in this State by electric, gas and telephone utilities be vested in the Arkansas Public Service Commission at the earliest possible date. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 688, § 7: Mar. 28, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the authority of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to impose civil sanctions is being challenged; that the PSC must have civil sanction authority in order to perform its duties in a timely manner and thereby protect the utility ratepayers of this state; and that this Act is therefore immediately necessary to clarify the Commission's authority. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 753, § 4: Apr. 3, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the authority of the Public Service Commission to mandate refunds of overcharges by a public utility is unclear under present law and that such perpetrates an injustice on Arkansas ratepayers; that this Act is designed to correct this situation and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 475, § 3: Mar. 31, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that poor utility load factors are substantially contributing to rapidly escalating utility rates and that the provisions of this act are necessary to maintain reasonable utility rates, and that economic development is important to the future of this state's economy and that advertising by utilities to promote economic development is in the public interest, and that the provisions of this act will aid in alleviating the poor economic condition of the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and welfare shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 44, § 2: June 19, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that allowing public utilities to pass through the cost of economic advertising to utility customers will increase the cost of utility service to such customers and that the cost of economic development advertising should be borne by the stockholders of public utilities unless the Public Service Commission determines that such costs should be recovered from ratepayers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and welfare shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
ALR.
Amount paid by public utility to affiliate for goods or services as includable in utility's rate base and operating expenses in rate proceeding. 16 A.L.R.4th 454.
Preferential utility rates for elderly or low-income persons. 29 A.L.R.4th 615.
Am. Jur. 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Pub. Util., § 94 et seq.
C.J.S. 73B C.J.S., Pub. Util., § 18 et seq.
23-4-201. Electric, gas, telephone, or sewer utilities — Rate-making authority — Definition.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission is vested with the sole and exclusive jurisdiction and authority to determine the rates to be charged for each kind of product or service to be furnished or rendered by electric, gas, telephone, or sewer public utilities in Arkansas.
- Cities and towns in this state shall have no authority acting either through their governing bodies or by the initiative of their citizens to assume or exercise any jurisdiction or authority to fix and determine rates charged in Arkansas by electric, gas, or telephone public utilities.
- As used in this section, “electric, gas, telephone, or sewer public utilities” includes persons and corporations or their lessees, trustees, and receivers who own or operate, in this state, equipment or facilities for producing, generating, transmitting, delivering, furnishing, or collecting electricity, sewage, or gas for the production of light, heat, or power, or for the collection of sewage or other waste; who convey or transmit messages or communications by telephone or telegraph to, or for, the public for compensation who produce, generate, transmit, deliver, or furnish electricity or gas to any other person or corporation for resale or distribution to, or for, the public for compensation or for operating or maintaining sewer facilities. This term shall not include those utilities owned or operated by municipalities or leased by them to a nonprofit corporation.
- The General Assembly determines that the existing procedures whereby rates described in this section may be determined and fixed by the cities and towns of the State of Arkansas acting through their governing bodies or by the initiative of their citizens have resulted in a multiplicity of rate determination proceedings and forums which are costly and inefficient, have created conflicts between the rates charged in different cities and towns for the same services thus establishing unreasonable preferences to certain citizens, and have discriminated unfairly against the citizens of certain cities and towns to the detriment and at the expense of those citizens and the citizens of the entire State of Arkansas.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to change or alter the rates being charged for electric, gas, telephone, or sewer public utility services until changed by order of the commission in the manner provided by law.
History. Acts 1977, No. 164, §§ 1-3, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-202a, 73-202a note, 73-202b, 73-202b note.
Cross References. Jurisdiction over utilities and appeals, § 14-200-101.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Derden, Survey of Arkansas Law: Administrative Law, 2 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 157.
Case Notes
Collective Bargaining Agreements.
In ratemaking proceeding, Arkansas Public Service Commission was not preempted by National Labor Relations Act from adjusting downward the costs associated with wages and benefits set by collective bargaining agreement where commission found those costs disproportionate to those at similar companies. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 824 F.2d 672 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 989, 108 S. Ct. 1293, 99 L. Ed. 2d 503 (1988).
Commission's Authority.
While it is true that § 14-200-101 grants municipalities the right to establish terms and conditions upon which public utilities may be permitted to operate within the borders of municipalities, this section clearly divests the cities and towns of any jurisdiction to fix or determine rates and grants exclusive jurisdiction to the Arkansas Public Service Commission in rate-making matters. City of Ft. Smith v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 278 Ark. 521, 648 S.W.2d 40 (1983).
The General Assembly has delegated investigation and rate-making authority to the Arkansas Public Service Commission; the commission is the fact finder and in performing its legislatively delegated function of rate-making the commission has broad discretion. City of Ft. Smith v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 278 Ark. 521, 648 S.W.2d 40 (1983).
To the extent that matter involved a dispute over rates charged by power company, its resolution fell within the purview and jurisdiction of the public service commission. Cullum v. Seagull Mid-South, Inc., 322 Ark. 190, 907 S.W.2d 741 (1995).
Commission's Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of Arkansas granted a gas utility company's writ of prohibition from a county court's denial of the company's motion to dismiss finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had sole and exclusive jurisdiction under subdivision (a)(1) of this section over Arkansas residential gas customers' claims that they were being charged too much for natural gas because of the company's alleged fraudulent conduct. Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, 370 Ark. 190, 258 S.W.3d 336 (2007).
Municipal Authority.
Section 14-200-101 empowers Arkansas municipalities to assess utility franchises operating within the municipalities, and telephone companies are not excluded. City of Little Rock v. AT&T Communications, 318 Ark. 616, 888 S.W.2d 290 (1994).
Rates Effective Immediately.
Since courts of equity lack concurrent jurisdiction with the Arkansas Public Service Commission in setting utility rates, rates approved by the commission may be put into effect immediately without posting a bond, and notwithstanding any provision of a municipal franchise such a utility may have been granted. General Tel. Co. v. Lowe, 263 Ark. 727, 569 S.W.2d 71 (1978).
23-4-202. Water, gas, or electricity bills rendered in accordance with rate schedules — Rate schedule furnished on request.
- It shall be unlawful for any public utility furnishing water, gas, or electricity to the general public in the State of Arkansas to bill or render statements to its customers, patrons, or consumers except in accordance with rate schedules duly filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission in the manner provided by law.
- On request by any customer, patron, or consumer, a public utility engaged in the business of the sale or distribution of water, gas, or electricity to the general public shall furnish a copy of the rate schedule under which the customer, patron, or consumer making the request is billed for the service.
-
- Upon a finding by the commission that any jurisdictional water, gas, telephone, or electric public utility has knowingly, willfully, and purposefully violated any of the provisions of this section, by agent or otherwise, the commission shall assess a civil sanction of one thousand dollars ($1,000) on the utility.
- Each instance of violation shall constitute a separate violation. However, in case of a continued violation, each day's continuance thereof shall not be deemed to be a separate and distinct violation.
- The power and authority of the commission to impose civil sanctions are not to be affected by any other proceeding, civil or criminal, concerning the same violation, nor shall the imposition of the sanction preclude the commission from imposing other sanctions as are provided for by law.
- The proceeds from the civil sanctions imposed under this section shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues and credited to the Public Service Commission Fund.
- The imposition of a civil sanction under this section is subject to review by the commission and by the Court of Appeals in the manner provided by §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1951, No. 156, §§ 1, 2; 1985, No. 688, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-205.1, 73-205.2.
Publisher's Notes. The 1985 amendment to subsection (c) of this section provides for sanctions against telephone utilities that violate the provisions of this section. However, subsections (a) and (b) of this section, which were not amended, apply only to water, gas, and electric utilities.
23-4-203. Water, gas, or electricity — Utility bills must show units charged for.
-
- All water, gas, or electric companies shall base their charges for their commodities upon the reading of the meters and shall charge for the commodities as per printed tables supplied to patrons.
- The bills or statements rendered to patrons shall show the number of units charged for.
-
- Upon a finding by the Arkansas Public Service Commission that any jurisdictional water, gas, telephone, or electric public utility has knowingly, willfully, and purposefully violated any of the provisions of this section, by agent or otherwise, the commission shall assess a civil sanction of one thousand dollars ($1,000) on the utility.
- Each instance of violation shall constitute a separate violation. However, in case of a continued violation, each day's continuance thereof shall not be deemed to be a separate and distinct violation.
- The power and authority of the commission to impose the civil sanctions are not to be affected by any other proceeding, civil or criminal, concerning the same violation, nor shall the imposition of the sanction preclude the commission from imposing other sanctions as are provided for by law.
- The proceeds from the civil sanctions imposed under this section shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues and credited to the Public Service Commission Fund.
- The imposition of a civil sanction under this section is subject to review by the commission and by the Court of Appeals in the manner provided by §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1905, No. 282, §§ 2, 3, p. 700; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7616, 7617; Pope's Dig., §§ 9726, 9727; Acts 1985, No. 688, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-211, 73-212.
Publisher's Notes. The 1985 amendment to subsection (b) of this section provides for sanctions against telephone utilities that violate the provisions of this section. However, subsection (a) of this section, which was not amended, applies only to water, gas, and electric utilities.
Case Notes
Minimum Charges.
Companies may make a regular minimum monthly charge for readiness to serve. Little Rock Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Newman, 91 Ark. 89, 120 S.W. 824 (1909).
23-4-204. Water, gas, or electricity — Disconnecting charges unlawful — Penalty.
- It shall be unlawful for any public utility furnishing water, gas, or electricity to the general public to make a charge for disconnecting service.
- Any public utility described in subsection (a) of this section which makes a charge for disconnecting service in violation of this section shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500), and each violation shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1957, No. 275, §§ 1, 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-204.1, 73-204.3.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1957, No. 275, § 2, revoked any authority previously granted to utilities to make disconnecting charges or to the Public Service Commission to approve such charges in violation of that act.
23-4-205. Refunds.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission is hereby empowered, following notice and hearing, to order any public utility subject to its jurisdiction to make refunds. The refunds shall be made in the manner and to the extent determined just and reasonable by the commission.
-
The authority of the commission to make refunds shall include, but is not limited to, the following circumstances:
- When a utility implements rates under bond, and the rates approved in the final order of the commission are less than the bonded rates;
- When a utility has charged its ratepayers an amount in excess of the utility's approved tariffs;
- When a utility imposes on ratepayers any charge prohibited by, or in excess of, any Arkansas statute;
- When a utility charges more than the lawful rate of interest; and
- When a utility has collected revenues exceeding those amounts authorized by any contract approved by the commission pursuant to § 23-3-117.
- When the commission determines that refunds are due under this section, the commission may authorize the utility to make a refund in one (1) lump sum, or may authorize the utility to prorate the refunds over the period of time over which the amount to be refunded had accrued, or some intermediate period of time as the commission deems appropriate. The commission may require that the refund be made by cash or check, or through customers' account credits. However, any refund of ten dollars ($10.00) or less shall be by billing credit only. All refunds, of whatever amount, to customers who cannot be located shall be made pursuant to subsection (e) of this section. Former customers who can be located shall be paid by cash or check.
- The commission may order that refunds due under this section be made with interest computed at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by Arkansas law.
-
When a refund is due a customer and the utility cannot, after diligent effort, locate the customer, the utility shall:
- Make the refunds available to the customer for a period of three (3) years from the date the refund was ordered; and
- Apply those funds which are not claimed after three (3) years as a credit against bad-debt expense of the utility.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed as allowing retroactive ratemaking or otherwise providing for refunds of rates collected pursuant to previous orders of the commission, except when rates have been placed in effect under bond, subject to refund.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 2071; Acts 1985, No. 753, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.
Case Notes
Authority of Commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is a creature of the legislature and, in ratemaking, it is performing a legislative function which has been delegated to it; the commission was created to act for the General Assembly and it has the same power that body would have when acting within the powers conferred upon it by legislative act. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Cited: City of Fort Smith v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 195 Ark. 513, 113 S.W.2d 100 (1938); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Norwood, 212 Ark. 763, 207 S.W.2d 733 (1948); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956); Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); Independent Theatre Owners, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 668, 361 S.W.2d 642 (1962); Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968); Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Coxsey, 257 Ark. 534, 518 S.W.2d 485 (1975); Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp., 273 Ark. 170, 618 S.W.2d 151 (1981); Redfield Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 273 Ark. 498, 621 S.W.2d 470 (1981).
23-4-206. Interest on deposits.
- Whenever any person, company, or corporation furnishing patrons or consumers with power, gas, water, electricity, or telephone service shall require a deposit from the consumer before the utility will be supplied to him or her or before a meter will be installed by the person, company, or corporation, then, in every case, the person putting up the deposit, when the deposit is taken down or meter removed, shall receive interest on the deposit until it is returned to the patron or consumer, provided all bills due for service furnished have been paid by the patron or consumer.
-
- The interest paid on any deposit shall be computed using simple interest, applying such annual rates as the commission shall determine from year to year.
- The annual interest rate applicable to deposits shall be determined annually by the Arkansas Public Service Commission following notice and hearing. Each year, the commission shall enter its order setting the annual rate of interest no later than December 31 for the following year. The new annual rate shall become effective January 1 of the following year and shall remain in effect for the remainder of the calendar year, or until such later time as the commission shall enter its order establishing a new rate.
- The annual rate of interest set by the commission for any year shall not be more than ten percent (10%).
- This section shall not apply to cities or towns of a population of less than three thousand (3,000) persons that have granted franchises for electric current for lighting and other purposes furnished by manufacturing establishments not solely engaged in the manufacture of electric current for lighting and other purposes.
History. Acts 1919, No. 264, § 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7549, 7550; Pope's Dig., §§ 9623, 9624; Acts 1985, No. 306, § 1; 1985, No. 1054, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-213, 73-214; Acts 1995, No. 843, § 1.
Case Notes
Refunds.
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission ordered the telephone company to make refunds, the interest rate on such refunds was not dictated by this section, although this section would be worthy of consideration by the commission. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
23-4-207. Advertising costs — Definitions.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Advertising” means the commercial use by a utility of any medium including newspaper, bill enclosures, radio, and television in order to transmit a message to a substantial number of members of the public or to the utility's consumers;
- “Informational advertising” means any advertising for the purpose of instructing customers in the use of service or providing information about the service;
- “Political advertising” means any advertising for the purpose of influencing public opinion with respect to legislative, administrative, or electoral matters; and
- “Promotional advertising” means any advertising for the purpose of encouraging any person to select or use any utility service. However, advertising which promotes or encourages the use of more energy-efficient appliances or the installation or usage of energy conservation measures as permitted in subsection (c) of this section shall not be considered to be promotional advertising for purposes of this section.
- No public utility, as that term is defined by § 23-1-101, shall charge, demand, collect, or receive from its customers or any person other than the shareholders or other owners of the utility any direct or indirect expenditure for promotional or political advertising.
-
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, but subject to the review of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, public utilities may properly recover from customers reasonable costs for advertising which comes within one (1) or more of the following categories:
- Advertising that informs electric and gas consumers how they can conserve energy or can reduce peak demand for electric energy;
- Advertising that is designed to promote the more efficient use of energy or energy resources within this state;
- Advertising concerning employment opportunities with the utility;
- Advertising which promotes or encourages the use of energy in such a way as to improve or maintain a utility's load factor or which promotes or encourages the acquisition, installation, or use of energy-efficient appliances, equipment, or energy conservation measures, or load management techniques including, but not limited to: caulking, weatherstripping, furnace efficiency modifications, installation or replacement of energy-efficient furnaces or boilers or furnace replacement burners, flue opening modifications, electrical or mechanical ignition systems, installation or replacement of energy-efficient air conditioning systems, heat pumps, ceiling insulation, wall insulation, floor insulation, duct insulation, pipe insulation, water heater insulation, storm windows, thermal windows, storm or thermal doors, heat-reflective and heat-absorbing windows or door material, clock thermostats, and devices associated with load management techniques;
- Any explanation of existing or proposed rate schedules, or notifications thereof;
- Information concerning the impact of facility siting, operations, or future plans on surrounding areas and populations;
- Information concerning operations at company facilities that may potentially affect the public safety, convenience, and welfare;
- Advertising which promotes economic development in the State of Arkansas where the utility can demonstrate, and the commission shall find, that the advertising expenditures were directly related to, and were reasonably incurred in the promotion of, the economic development of this state. Collection from customers of the utility of advertising expenditures shall be limited to those expenditures actually incurred within the test year utilized for ratemaking purposes as defined in § 23-4-406 and shall further be limited to five-one-hundredths of one percent (.05%) of the utility's revenues during that test year; and
- Any other advertising which the commission determines should be recovered from the ratepayers.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, and subject to approval by the commission, telephone utilities may recover from persons other than shareholders any direct or indirect expenditure for promotional and informational advertising regarding competitive service offerings.
History. Acts 1983, No. 910, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-277, 73-277.1; Acts 1987, No. 475, § 1; 1987 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 44, § 1.
23-4-208. Water and sewer services for military installations.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have jurisdiction to set rates to be paid by military installations for water and sewer services provided by a municipality located in a county having a population in excess of two hundred thousand (200,000) persons if the governing body of the municipality petitions the commission to exercise this jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 21, § 2.
Cross References. Military affairs, § 12-60-101 et seq.
Powers of municipalities generally, § 14-54-101 et seq.
23-4-209. Transition costs — Definition.
-
- As used in this section, “transition costs” means those costs, investments, or unfunded mandates, either recurring or nonrecurring, incurred by an electric utility after July 30, 1999, that are found to have been necessary to carry out the electric utility's responsibilities associated with efforts to implement retail open access or were mandated by statute or rule and are not otherwise recoverable.
- In no event shall transition costs include retirement or severance programs, marketing or promotional activities, professional or advisory services, or legal costs associated with any competitive strategy.
- In no event shall costs that are allowable in the utility's regulated cost of service and rates be included as transition costs, and the electric utility shall be required to demonstrate that its requested transition cost recovery does not contain amounts that are otherwise reflected in current rate levels.
- Additionally, no electric utility shall recover transition costs unless approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to this chapter.
-
- An electric utility shall be allowed to recover transition costs incurred no later than January 1, 2002, as may be determined by the commission after notice and hearing.
- The recovery shall be by a customer transition charge during a period of time ending thirty-six (36) months after February 21, 2003.
- The customer transition charges shall be subject to annual review by the commission. Costs included in the charges shall be prudent, reasonable, and directly caused by Acts 1999, No. 1556, and rules and orders adopted by the commission to implement that act.
- An electric utility shall have a right to recover from its customers any nuclear decommissioning costs, as determined by the commission, associated with the utility's generating assets. The commission shall retain jurisdiction sufficient to authorize the recovery of those costs.
History. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 9; 2019, No. 315, § 2392.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(1).
Subchapter 3 — Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division
Effective Dates. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 7: Dec. 11, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Third General Assembly, meeting in Extraordinary Session, that there is an immediate need to establish an office to effectively promote and rigorously advocate the interests of the ratepayers in Arkansas in all hearings, conferences and other meetings in state and federal agencies concerning utility rates, and that only by the immediate passage of this Act will such advocacy be provided. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-4-301. Title.
This subchapter shall be referred to and may be cited as the “Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division Act”.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
Case Notes
Cited: Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 53 Ark. App. 114, 919 S.W.2d 522 (1996).
23-4-302. Legislative findings and purpose.
-
The General Assembly finds that:
- The people of the State of Arkansas are faced with rapidly rising utility costs;
- Residents of the state are finding it increasingly difficult to afford basic utility usage;
- The people of Arkansas need aggressive and effective representation in utility rate hearings and other utility-related proceedings; and
- In order to make informed decisions about their energy consumption, the people of this state need to be informed about the rate-making process and the opportunity to reduce utility bills through conservation measures and the use of alternative energy sources.
- The General Assembly finds that the public policy and responsibility of the state as set forth in this section can best be attained with the establishment of the Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division within the Office of the Attorney General, and it is the purpose of this subchapter to create this division.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
23-4-303. Creation.
There is created within the Office of the Attorney General a Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
23-4-304. Director and staff.
The Director of the Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division shall hold the title of Deputy Attorney General and shall be appointed to the position by the Attorney General who may also appoint such assistants, professionals, and clerical staff as authorized by appropriation acts for the effective operation of the division.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
23-4-305. Powers and duties.
The Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division shall represent the state, its subdivisions, and all classes of Arkansas utility rate payers and shall have the following functions, powers, and duties:
- To provide effective and aggressive representation for the people of Arkansas in hearings before the Arkansas Public Service Commission and other state and federal courts or agencies concerning utility-related matters;
- To disseminate information to all classes of rate payers concerning pertinent energy-related concepts; and
- To advocate the holding of utility rates to the lowest reasonable level.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
Case Notes
Scope of Authority.
The fact that this section gives the Attorney General the power to represent all classes of utility ratepayers before the commission does not mean that the Attorney General has veto power over the methodology employed by the commission in setting rates pursuant to the authority granted the commission under § 23-2-301. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 46 Ark. App. 88, 877 S.W.2d 594 (1994).
Settlement Agreement.
The Attorney General's support of a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement with the Arkansas Power and Light Company did not violate the statutory mandate of this section. Arkansas Elec. Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 35 Ark. App. 47, 813 S.W.2d 263 (1991).
Where the Arkansas Attorney General represented the state and all classes of utility ratepayers in administrative proceeding, a settlement the Attorney General entered into in the proceeding barred by the doctrine res judicata a later administrative proceeding commenced by ratepayers; the Attorney General had represented the ratepayers' interest in the first administrative proceeding. Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., 76 Ark. App. 201, 61 S.W.3d 193 (2001).
Cited: General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
23-4-306. Intervention by others not precluded.
The right of any party to intervene on any matter before the Arkansas Public Service Commission is by no means precluded by this subchapter.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
23-4-307. Records.
The Attorney General shall designate an employee who is familiar with cost accounting methods to keep an accurate record of the costs of operation and maintenance of the Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division within the Office of the Attorney General.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 39, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217n.
Subchapter 4 — Utilities — Rate Changes and Surcharges Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 6: May 8, 1980. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the proper regulation of utilities in Arkansas requires that the procedure by which changes in rates are made be amended. This amendment is necessary in order that the needs of the companies may be properly considered while ratepayers are also properly protected. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall take effect and be in full force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 24, § 4: Dec. 1, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that inflation and mushrooming energy costs have imposed upon the Public Service Commission of this State an unusually heavy work load of considering and issuing final determinations and orders in regard to numerous public utility rate applications; that a number of public utilities are filing additional rate applications while an application then pending before the commission is still under consideration, a practice commonly referred to as ‘pancaking,’ which imposes a severe additional work load upon the Commission and detracts from the Commission's prompt and speedy resolution of the rate applications then pending; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to provide for a more orderly manner of filing rate applications before the Commission, which will enable the Commission to consider each application and make an early and prompt determination and order in regard thereto, without facing the additional burden of new rate filings by the same public utility, which compounds the problems of the Commission and its staff in making an orderly determination of the application then pending. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 8: Dec. 1, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing laws of this State authorize public utilities to put proposed rates into effect under bond while the Public Service Commission still has the rate application under consideration; that said laws are working an inequity upon the ratepayers of the State and deny to the Public Service Commission authority to deny such application to place such rates into effect under bond, without first determining that an emergency exists which justifies the same; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to correct said situation and to enable the Public Service Commission to determine that an emergency exists before a pending rate filing may be placed into effect under bond by the public utility prior to final determination and order by the Public Service Commission. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 911, § 3: Mar. 30, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of this State that the practice of public utilities collecting rates under bond during the rehearing and judicial review process works an undue hardship on the people of this state, and immediate correction of this hardship is necessary in order to preserve the public safety, health, peace, and general welfare of the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 339, § 3: Mar. 13, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the present law relating to the filing of general rate increases by public utilities is inadequate to protect utility users and to enable the Public Service Commission to effectively scrutinize successive rate increase requests of such utilities; that this Act is designed to regulate and restrict the so-called practice of ‘pancaking’ rate increase applications by utilities and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 994, § 4: Apr. 14, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of the case Ricarte v. State, CR 86-31, a question has arisen over the validity of Act 1181 of the Extended Session of 1976; that this Act is a reenactment of the former law; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the state of the law on this issue. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2015, No. 725, § 4: Mar. 27, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the costs that drive public utility rates are changing; that public utilities need to have procedures that permit their rates to change in response to those changing conditions; that there is a need to address the allocation of costs and design of rates; that there is a need to maintain stable rates and to mitigate the magnitude of future rate changes; and that affordable electricity and natural gas encourage economic activity within the state and benefit the state's industries to increase the number of available jobs and to attract new businesses and industries to the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Pub. Util., § 94 et seq.
C.J.S. 73B C.J.S., Pub. Util., § 18 et seq.
23-4-401. Notice of intention to file application.
- Every public utility shall notify the secretary of the Arkansas Public Service Commission in writing of its intention to file an application for a general change or modification in its rates and charges at least sixty (60) days but no earlier than ninety (90) days before the application is filed.
- Failure to provide such notice or failure to comply with its terms shall be grounds for denial of the application. Such grounds may be waived by the Arkansas Public Service Commission when the public interest permits.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.4.
23-4-402. Notice of proposed changes.
- Unless the Arkansas Public Service Commission otherwise orders, no public utility shall make any change in any rate duly established under this act except after thirty (30) days' notice to the commission. This notice shall plainly state the changes proposed to be made in the rates then in force and the time when the changed rates will go into effect.
- The utility shall also give notice of the proposed changes to other interested parties as the commission in its discretion may direct.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
Contents.
There is nothing fatal to a position for a rate increase merely because the petition asks for more than is allowed on preliminary hearing. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Necessity of Filing.
Where contract with United States providing for reduction in retail rates upon approval by the commission, was filed with the commission there was not sufficient compliance with the contract, since to obtain the lower rates the company was required to file a new rate schedule with the commission. United States v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 165 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1948).
Notice.
The only discretion the commission has in connection with the giving of notice as to change in rates is to require the utility to give notice to one or more of the interested parties enumerated in § 23-3-119, it being important to bear in mind that the procedure under this section apparently envisions a full scale rate hearing which might involve months and the expenditure of thousands of dollars. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-4-403. Changes allowed without notice.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission, for good cause shown, may allow changes in rates without requiring the thirty (30) days' notice under such conditions as it may prescribe. All allowed changes shall be immediately indicated upon its schedules by the public utility.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-404. Proposed changes to be reflected in schedules.
All proposed changes shall be shown by filing new schedules or shall be plainly indicated upon schedules filed and in force at the time and kept open to public inspection.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-405. Investigation of proposed rates.
Whenever there is filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission by any public utility a schedule stating a new rate, the commission, upon reasonable notice, may enter upon any investigation, either upon complaint or upon its own motion, concerning the lawfulness of the rate.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
It was the duty of the commission when utility company sought an increase in rates to determine whether the company was entitled to any increase in order to earn a fair return on its invested capital. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Judicial Review.
It is not the theory, but the impact, of the rate order that counts in determining whether rates are just, reasonable, lawful, and nondiscriminatory under this section; if the total effect of the rate order cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded, and infirmities in the method employed are rendered unimportant. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-4-406. Test periods to justify new rates.
For the purpose of justifying the reasonableness of a proposed new rate schedule, a utility may utilize either a historical test period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months or a forward-looking test period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months consisting of six (6) months of actual historical data derived from the books and records of the utility and six (6) months of projected data which together shall be the period or test year upon which fair and reasonable rates shall be determined by the Arkansas Public Service Commission. However, the commission shall also permit adjustments to any test year so utilized to reflect the effects on an annualized basis of any and all changes in circumstances which may occur within twelve (12) months after the end of the test year where such changes are both reasonably known and measurable.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.5.
Case Notes
Adjustments to Test Year.
This section does not require the Arkansas Public Service Commission to make adjustments to any test year, but only requires that the utility be permitted to adjust its test period data to reflect reasonably known and measurable changes which may occur within 12 months of the end of the test year. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986); Associated Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 25 Ark. App. 115, 752 S.W.2d 766 (1988).
Any proposed adjustment stands alone when measured by the “known and measurable” standard of this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission correctly included the revenues and expenses associated with Yellow Page operations of a related company for both the test year and the pro forma year in determining the telephone company's revenue requirement, where the commission found that the adjustment was based on reliable data supplied by telephone company and it was reasonably known and measurable within the guidelines of this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986).
The Arkansas Public Service Commission's finding that the telephone company's evidence on demand repression adjustments did not meet the reasonably known and measurable standard of this section was not arbitrary and capricious, was supported by substantial evidence, and was therefore affirmed. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 18 Ark. App. 260, 715 S.W.2d 451 (1986).
Cost-Saving Projects.
Giving effect to certain cost-saving projects by the Arkansas Public Service Commission in evaluating a rate increase request was not improper where the savings projects would be implemented during the pro forma year. General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392, aff'd, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Discretion of Commission.
The test year to be used in setting utility rates is a matter lying within the discretion of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, although the commission should consider complete and accurate information with respect to a later period of time, when available, as a check on the continuing validity of the test year experience in a period of rapid change. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980) (decision prior to enactment of this section).
Commission did not abuse its powers where “changes in circumstances” were “reasonably known and measureable” and they occurred during 12 months after the test year. General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Reliability of Data.
General disclaimer included in report did not prevent report's analysis of data from meeting the required level of certainty. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 Ark. App. 213, 907 S.W.2d 140 (1995).
Test Components.
Matters not completely within the control of a company may still be measured; analytical studies, historical data, and expert projections often must provide the basis for certain components of ratemaking. Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 Ark. App. 213, 907 S.W.2d 140 (1995).
23-4-407. Suspension of proposed rates.
- Pending its investigation and the decision thereon, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may suspend the operation of the rate by written order at any time before the new rate becomes effective. However, the suspension shall not be for a longer period than nine (9) months beyond the time when the rate would otherwise go into effect. Any order initially suspending the rate shall set a specific date for the commencement of a hearing inquiring into the rate requested unless waived by the applicant utility.
-
- Provided, however, that the commission may suspend, for a time certain, the operation of the rate or rates for a longer period than nine (9) months beyond the time when such rate or rates would otherwise go into effect if the public utility which filed the rate or rates files a waiver in writing with the commission before the expiration of the previously ordered suspension period consenting to such an additional suspension. The commission may not suspend a rate or rates for any additional period greater than that consented to by the public utility.
- The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any telephone company or telephone cooperative which has fewer than ten thousand (10,000) access lines.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 1991, No. 1090, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Purpose.
Because the investigation and consideration of rate applications can become such a complex and time consuming procedure, the General Assembly has given the commission the authority to suspend the collection of proposed rate increases for up to a specified period, during the time the commission is deliberating on the application, a provision obviously designed to protect the public from the collection of rate increases which the commission later determines to be unwarranted. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Yelcot Tel. Co., 266 Ark. 365, 585 S.W.2d 362 (1979).
Expiration.
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission has suspended the operation of proposed new utility rates for six months as allowed by this section, the proposed rates will become effective at the expiration of the suspension period unless or until the commission issues an order providing otherwise. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Refund of Collections.
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission could only suspend the operation of proposed new telephone rates for a period not to exceed six months, the commission had no authority to order a refund of revenues collected on the basis of the telephone company's proposed rates between the date of the expiration of the suspension order and the date of the commission order fixing the rates allowed; on the other hand, a refund of the collections made by the telephone company, between the date the company's proposed tariffs were made effective under an “agreement and undertaking” approved by the commission and the date that the suspension period expired, could be ordered even though no valid rate order was entered by the commission within the time limitation on the power of suspension. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 58 Ark. App. 145, 946 S.W.2d 730 (1997).
23-4-408. Interim implementation of suspended rates.
- If the public utility contends that an immediate and impelling necessity exists for the requested rate increase, a petition may be filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission narrating the alleged circumstances and requesting a hearing on the petition.
- The hearing must commence within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of the petition or at such subsequent time as may be mutually agreeable to the commission and the utility.
- If the commission finds at the hearing that there is substantial merit to the allegation of the utility's claims, the commission may permit all or a portion of the rate to become effective if there is filed with the commission a bond to be approved by it, payable to the State of Arkansas in such amount and with such sufficient security to insure the prompt payment of any damages or refunds, with interest, to the persons entitled thereto if the rate so put into effect is finally determined to be excessive or if there is substituted for the bond other arrangements satisfactory to the commission for the protection of the parties interested.
- The findings of the commission relative to the petition of the utility for the immediate and impelling necessity for relief shall be issued on or before the sixtieth day following the date of filing of the petition.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; 1985, No. 523, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Agreement and Undertaking.
When the telephone company's agreement and undertaking, which was approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission and made the company's proposed tariff effective, was read in the light of §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, it did not require any refund that the commission could not order under this section; in other words, the agreement could not bind the telephone company to do more than the commission could require under §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, and the agreement could not have the effect of increasing the commission's power or the telephone company's obligation. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Bond.
The terms of §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418 are considered as if they were written into any bond filed under this section, and, in determining extent of liability on the bond, the language of this section is controlling over the language of the bond. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Commission's Authority.
Inclusion of requests both for rate increase and escalator clauses in one schedule upon petition of gas company for increase in consumption rate was not fatal to the power of the commission to allow the rate increase to go into effect under bond where it at the same time recited that the proposed escalator clauses were not to go into effect until further order of the commission. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Contest of Rate Increase.
Where the customers and ratepayers had been allowed to intervene in the rate increase proceedings before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, they had a full and adequate opportunity to contest the proposed rate increase and its statutory basis; and, therefore, the circuit court had no jurisdiction over a subsequent class action suit brought by the customers of the utility, in which they alleged that part of this section was unconstitutional in that it allows a utility to collect a requested rate increase under bond. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lankford, 278 Ark. 595, 648 S.W.2d 65 (1983).
Rights of Utility.
Upon petition for rate increase by gas company, the company had the right when it filed its schedule to ask that its monthly consumption rate go into effect under bond and that proposed escalator clauses be considered on final hearing under § 23-4-108. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Cited: City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Bryant v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 57 Ark. App. 73, 941 S.W.2d 452 (1997).
23-4-409. Rate increase not effective until final order.
Unless the Arkansas Public Service Commission finds an immediate and impelling necessity exists as provided in § 23-4-408, or fails to enter a timely order as provided in § 23-4-411, no public utility shall place any rate increase into effect until a final decision and order is made by the commission.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; 1985, No. 523, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Effective Date.
Where order for increased rate went into effect on specified date, fact that telephone company billed creditors one month in advance did not prevent rates from going into effect on specified date. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-410. Authority of commission to fix rates — Apportionment of increase.
- If after the investigation and hearing thereon the Arkansas Public Service Commission finds the new rate to be unjust, unreasonable, discriminatory, or otherwise in violation of the law or rules of the commission, it shall determine and fix the just and reasonable rate to be charged or applied by the utility for the service in question, from and after the time the new rate took effect.
- Until rate schedules in compliance with the commission's order can be filed and approved, any rate increase allowed in the commission's order shall be apportioned among all classes of customers and shall become effective on all bills rendered thereafter through a temporary surcharge or other equitable means, as shall be prescribed in the order.
-
The public utility or any party to a proceeding before the commission to consider an application for a general change in rates and charges may, according to the commission's rules and procedures, present evidence regarding a requested return on common equity in a filing, including without limitation:
- The basis for the requested return on common equity, including quantitative analysis based on widely accepted methodologies, current market data, qualitative discussion, and analysis of factors that influence the requested return on common equity;
- Evidence that the requested return on common equity is comparable to values that have recently been approved for public utilities that are delivering similar services with corresponding risks within this state and in other similar regulatory jurisdictions in the same general part of the country;
- Evidence of the financial, business, and other risks faced by the utility, including regulatory oversight, numbers and types of customers, rate mechanisms, cost allocation methods, rate levels, rate design, reliability, and quality of service, as compared to those faced by utilities delivering similar services within this state and in other similar regulatory jurisdictions in the same general part of the country; and
-
Any other information, including without limitation:
- Macroeconomic data;
- Relevant commentary from ratings agencies and investment analysts;
- Independent analysis of utility industry trends;
- Customer impact; and
- Any other relevant information.
- If any evidence is presented as described in subsection (c) of this section, the commission shall discuss that evidence and demonstrate in its order that it considered the evidence in making its findings. The commission shall make its findings based on substantial evidence.
- The allowance for funds used during construction that will be accrued and capitalized and included as a component of the costs recoverable through rates approved by the commission shall be determined according to the requirements of the uniform system of accounts adopted by the commission in its rules. The rate of return on common equity to be used shall be the rate of return on common equity most recently approved by the commission for the utility.
- An electric cooperative corporation established under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., is not subject to subsections (c) and (d) of this section.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2015, No. 725, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added (c) through (f).
Case Notes
Purpose.
The General Assembly contemplated that the investigation and hearing by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to this section should be completed and an order for a refund made during the six-month suspension period. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Appeals.
Consumer which did not appeal decision of the Arkansas Public Service Commission granting a rate change within the required time could not collaterally attack the rate schedule as discriminatory in a circuit court action against the utility and the commission. Commercial Printing Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 250 Ark. 461, 466 S.W.2d 261 (1971).
Due Process.
There was nothing in the record to indicate a denial of due process in action of commission in establishing a rate yielding a certain return to utility company upon application of company for increase in rates. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Effective Date.
Arkansas Public Service Commission's determination that a decrease in an electric utility's rates, as established in the Commission's ratemaking order, would be effective for all bills rendered after June 15, 2007, which was the date the Commission issued the ratemaking order, was affirmed. Although the utility argued that it could face certain logistical difficulties in immediate implementation of the decrease, these difficulties could be met by utilizing appropriate debits or credits to customer bills. Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 104 Ark. App. 147, 289 S.W.3d 513 (2008).
Establishment of Rates.
The commission is not bound by any formula or combination of formulas in fixing rates. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Where utility company in its rate application chose the testing period for use in determining rates and the commission accepted the company's choice, the company could not question the use of such testing period. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
It was the duty of the commission when utility company sought an increase in rates to determine whether the company was entitled to any increase in order to earn a fair return on its invested capital. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Upon application of utility company for increase in rates refusal of commission to allow the average amount of work under construction during testing period to be included in rate base was not improper. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Upon application of utility company for change in rates, commission was not bound by previous order and could make changes in such order upon proper notice to the company so long as it did not invade the constitutional rights of the company. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
The test year to be used in setting utility rates is a matter lying within the discretion of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, although the commission should consider complete and accurate information with respect to a later period of time, when available, as a check on the continuing validity of the test year experience in a period of rapid change. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980) (decision prior to enactment of this section).
A test year used by the commission did not abuse its discretion. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Judicial Review.
It is the result reached, not the method employed, that is controlling, and it is not the theory but the impact of the rate order that counts in determining whether utility rates are just, reasonable, lawful and nondiscriminatory under this section; if the total effect of the rate order cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded, and infirmities in the method employed rendered unimportant. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Notice to Utility.
The court interpreted the language of § 23-4-108 to mean that once the commission fixes a definite rate, it cannot lower the rate without giving notice to the utility and cannot raise the rate without notifying in some way the ratepayers. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-411. Failure of commission to reach timely decision — Conditional implementation of suspended rates.
In the event no final rate determination has been made upon the schedule for new rates within ten (10) months after the date the schedule for new rates was filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission, the public utility may put the suspended rate into effect for all bills rendered thereafter immediately upon the filing of a bond to be approved by the commission payable to the State of Arkansas in such amount and with sufficient security to insure prompt payment of any refunds to the persons entitled thereto, including an interest rate as determined by the commission not to exceed the maximum interest otherwise allowed by law, if the rate or rates so put into effect are finally determined to be excessive. There may be substituted for the bond other arrangements satisfactory to the commission for the protection of the parties interested.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Implementation of Suspended Rates.
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission has suspended the operation of proposed new utility rates, the proposed rates will become effective at the expiration of the suspension period unless or until the commission issues an order providing otherwise. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Jurisdiction of Contests.
Where the customers and ratepayers of the defendant utility company had been allowed to intervene in the rate increase proceedings before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, they had a full and adequate opportunity to contest the proposed rate increase and its statutory basis; and, therefore, the circuit court had no jurisdiction over a subsequent class action suit brought by the customers of the utility. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lankford, 278 Ark. 595, 648 S.W.2d 65 (1983).
Refunds.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission had the power and the authority to order the refund of any rates collected during the suspension period which it ultimately found to be excessive, in spite of the time limitations in this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission could only suspend the operation of proposed new telephone rates for the statutory period, the commission had no authority to order a refund of revenues collected on the basis of the telephone company's proposed rates between the date of the expiration of the suspension order and the date of the commission order fixing the rates allowed; on the other hand, a refund of the collections made by the telephone company, between the date the company's proposed tariffs were made effective under an “agreement and undertaking” approved by the commission and the date that the period expired, could be ordered even though no valid rate order was entered by the commission within the time limitation on the power of suspension. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
When the telephone company's agreement and undertaking, which was approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission and made the company's proposed tariff effective, was read in the light of §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, it did not require any refund that the commission could not order under this section; in other words, the agreement could not bind the telephone company to do more than the commission could require under §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, and the agreement could not have the effect of increasing the commission's power or the telephone company's obligation. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Time Limitation.
Time limitation provisions of this section may not be waived or disregarded by any party or by the Public Service Commission itself. General Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 23 Ark. App. 73, 744 S.W.2d 392, aff'd, 295 Ark. 595, 751 S.W.2d 1 (1988).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-412. Issuance of commission order — Rates to be collected.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this act, upon issuance of the findings and order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission as prescribed in § 23-2-421, no public utility subject to the order shall continue to collect any rates theretofore permitted to be collected under bond. The public utility shall be permitted to collect only those rates set in the order of the commission, and those rates shall be effective throughout any rehearing and judicial review proceedings permitted and prescribed in §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-402.
Case Notes
Effective Date of Rates.
Where order for increased rate went into effect on specified date, fact that telephone company billed creditors one month in advance did not prevent rates from going into effect on specified date. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-413. Surcharge to collect rates increased by courts.
- In the event that the rates set in the order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission subsequently are determined to have been inadequate, either on rehearing or in accordance with court decision on judicial review, the public utility subject to the order shall be entitled to impose a surcharge on the affected customers for collection of the increased rates that otherwise would have been collected during the period between the effective date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates as increased, together with interest as determined by the commission at a rate not to exceed the maximum interest rate otherwise allowed by law.
- This surcharge shall be assessed over a period equal to the period between the date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates, as increased.
- The surcharge shall be distributed among the affected customers in proportion to the amounts those customers were charged during the period between the date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates, as increased.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-414. Refunds of excessive rate collections under bond.
In the event a public utility has implemented under bond or other arrangements as a matter involving an immediate and impelling necessity pursuant to § 23-4-408 an amount which exceeds that allowed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission in its final order, the commission shall order the immediate refund of the excessive bonded collections.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Agreement and Undertaking.
When the telephone company's agreement and undertaking, which was approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission and made the company's proposed tariff effective, was read in the light of §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, it did not require any refund that the commission could not order under this section; in other words, the agreement could not bind the telephone company to do more than the commission could require under §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-418, and the agreement could not have the effect of increasing the commission's power or the telephone company's obligation. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Commission's Authority.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission had the power and authority to order the refund of any rates collected during the suspension period which it ultimately found to be excessive, in spite of the time limitations in this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission could only suspend the operation of proposed new telephone rates for the statutory period, the commission had no authority to order a refund of revenues collected on the basis of the telephone company's proposed rates between the date of the expiration of the suspension order and the date of the commission order fixing the rates allowed; on the other hand, a refund of the collections made by the telephone company, between the date the company's proposed tariffs were made effective under an “agreement and undertaking” approved by the commission and the date that the period expired, could be ordered even though no valid rate order was entered by the commission within the time limitation on the power of suspension. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-415. Refunds of excessive bonded collections — Order not stayed during rehearing.
An application for rehearing pursuant to § 23-2-422 filed by a party aggrieved by the final order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not stay the effectiveness of the order as it pertains to refunds of excessive bonded collections.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-416. Surcharge to collect excessive refunds.
In the event that the amount of refunds ordered by the Arkansas Public Service Commission in its final order is subsequently determined to have been excessive, either on rehearing or in accordance with a court decision on judicial review, the public utility subject to the order shall be entitled to impose an additional surcharge on the affected customers to recover that portion of the refunds to which it was entitled, together with interest as determined by the commission at a rate not to exceed the maximum interest rate otherwise allowed by law. The surcharge shall be assessed over a period equal to the period between the date the rates were implemented under bond and the date of the commission's final order. The surcharge shall be distributed among the affected customers in proportion to the amount of refunds those customers received.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-417. Petition for mandamus.
If the Arkansas Public Service Commission's order is not issued before the expiration of the period of suspension, the filed rates shall remain subject to refund as provided in § 23-4-414, but the applicant utility shall have the right to petition the Pulaski County Circuit Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the issuance of an order by the commission within fifteen (15) days of the writ of mandamus issued by the Pulaski County Circuit Court. The petition shall be advanced on the docket above all other pending civil cases and a hearing thereon shall be held within seven (7) days of the filing of the petition. The scope of review shall be limited to the issue of the failure of the commission to act within the time limits provided for in this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-620.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-418. Suit to compel refunds — Proceeds.
- If the public utility fails to make refunds within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the order requiring such refunds, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall bring suit in the name of the State of Arkansas for the use and benefit of all those entitled to a refund in any court of competent jurisdiction and shall recover the amount of all refunds due, together with interest thereon at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate otherwise allowed by law, and all court costs.
- No suit to recover the refunds shall be maintained unless instituted within two (2) years after the final determination.
- The amount recovered shall be paid to the clerk of the court where the suit was pending, and it shall be the clerk's duty to distribute the amount recovered to the persons entitled thereto as directed by the order of judgment of the court.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-4-419. Applications for additional increases.
-
No public utility which has filed an application with the Arkansas Public Service Commission for a general increase in the utility rates charged by the utility shall be permitted by the commission to file an additional application for a general rate increase until thirty (30) days after the occurrence of whichever of the following events first occurs:
- The commission makes a final rate determination as required by § 23-4-409 in the last previous general rate application then under consideration by the commission; or
- The ten-month period following the filing of the utility's previous general rate application expires and no final rate determination has been made with respect to the utility's previous general rate application within the ten-month period.
- However, an application for a change in rates filed pursuant to § 23-4-501 et seq. shall not be considered a general rate increase for the purposes of this section.
- It is the intent and purpose of this section to expedite the orderly and speedy determination by the commission of public utility rate filing applications and to enable the commission to devote sufficient staff time and commission effort in regard thereto without being overburdened by additional rate filings by the same public utility until the rate application then under consideration has been considered and a final decision and order entered by the commission.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 24, §§ 1, 2; 1985, No. 339, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-217.7, 73-217.8.
23-4-420. Reports on status of applications.
-
Quarterly, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall appear before the Legislative Council, file a written report, and make such oral reports as the Legislative Council may request concerning the status of all utility rate applications pending before the commission, including:
- An identification of the cases filed;
- The status of staff progress, if any;
- The schedule of hearings and deadlines established for disposition of each case;
- The date on which hearings have been held or are scheduled to be held; and
- The projected date of completion of hearings and issuance of a final order in connection with each case.
- In the event the commission has failed to conclude a hearing and issue an order on a particular rate application within the deadlines established by law, the commission shall file with the Legislative Council a detailed statement of the reasons for the delay or failure to complete the hearing and ruling thereon within the deadline set by law, and shall advise the Legislative Council of any impact or effect thereof upon the ratepayers of the utility.
- The Legislative Council shall schedule an appropriate date and shall give notice thereof to the commission of the date on which the commission is to appear before the Legislative Council to make its quarterly report, as requested in this section.
History. Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.6.
23-4-421. No changes allowed in terms of employment subject to collective bargaining agreement.
In establishing public utility rates, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not reduce or otherwise change any wage rate, benefit, working condition, or other term or condition of employment that is the subject of a collective bargaining agreement between the public utility and a labor organization.
History. Acts 1991, No. 578, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1991, No. 578, § 1, provided:
“The General Assembly hereby finds and declares that the people of Arkansas have benefited greatly from stable and responsible labor relations in the public utility industry, and that strengthening the institution of collective bargaining between public utilities and labor organizations for wages, hours, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment in order to preserve stability and responsibility is in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds and declares that the well-being of employees of public utilities, who are residents, citizens, taxpayers, and consumers in Arkansas, is an essential element to balance with investor and consumer interest in arriving at the public interest in setting rates for public utilities.”
23-4-422. Cost allocation — Definition.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall establish and regulate the rates and charges of a public utility under this subchapter and shall allocate or assign costs among all classes of customers of the public utility.
-
In determining the rates for utility services and the cost allocation among all of a public utility's classes of customers, the commission shall:
- Consider the costs and expenses incurred by the public utility in providing the utility services to customers in each class;
- Consider the economic impact of the proposed rates and charges for utility services by giving equal consideration to each class of customers; and
- Make findings that are based on substantial evidence.
-
Notwithstanding the commission's authority to otherwise determine and fix rates for all classes of customers, including allocating or assigning costs and designing rates, if the commission finds that it will be beneficial to economic development or the promotion of employment opportunities, and that it will result in just and reasonable rates for all classes of customers, the commission shall determine rates and charges for utility services that:
- For the class of customers with the highest level of consumption per customer which has rates that include a demand component, and any successors to such class, as they existed on January 1, 2015, ensure that all costs and expenses related to demand and capacity are identified and allocated on a demand basis and recovered from customers in those classes through a demand rate component and not through a volumetric rate component unless the commission determines that the rates should be adjusted under subsections (e) and (f) of this section;
-
For the retail jurisdiction rate classes, ensure that:
- All electric utility production plant, production-related costs, nonfuel production-related costs, purchased capacity costs, and any energy costs incurred resulting from the electric utility's environmental compliance are classified as production demand costs; and
-
- Production demand costs are allocated to each customer class pursuant to the average and excess method shown in Table 4-10B on page 51 of the 1992 National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Electric Utility Cost Allocation Manual, as it existed on January 1, 2015, using the average of the four (4) monthly coincident peaks for the months of June, July, August, and September for each class for the coincident peak referenced in Table 4-10B of the manual, as it existed on January 1, 2015, or any subsequent version of the manual to the extent it produces an equivalent result.
- Subdivision (b)(2)(B)(i) of this section does not prescribe an allocation for a wind production plant; and
-
-
- For purposes of allocation of natural gas distribution plant costs, including costs in distribution mains and related distribution plant expenses, among the state's retail jurisdiction rate classes, ensure that each natural gas public utility classifies all natural gas distribution plant costs as customer-related or capacity-related.
-
For purposes of subdivision (b)(3)(A)(i) of this section, the natural gas distribution plant costs shall include:
- Amounts charged to account numbers 374 through 387, as defined under the account numbering system in the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed for natural gas public utilities by the rules of the commission; and
- Related depreciation, return on investment, property insurance and taxes, excluding state and federal income taxes, and fixed operation and maintenance expense charged to account numbers 870 through 894, as defined under the account numbering system in the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed for natural gas public utilities by the rules of the commission, including all labor-related costs for the expenses described in this subdivision (b)(3)(A).
- To develop a cost allocation method under this section for natural gas utilities, the commission shall use the Gas Distribution Rate Design Manual, June 1989 edition, as prepared by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, as it existed on January 1, 2015, or any subsequent version of the manual, to the extent it produces an equivalent result.
-
- The customer-related natural gas distribution plant costs shall be allocated to each customer class based on the number of customers in each class.
- The customer-related portion of natural gas distribution plant costs related to account numbers 374 through 376, as defined under the account numbering system in the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed for natural gas public utilities by the rules of the commission, shall be the percentage of the average cost of all mains that is represented by the average cost of the minimum size main and computed using a cost allocation method based upon the predominant size main that is installed by the natural gas public utility that is at least two inches (2") in diameter, with the investment costs of the predominant size mains set as the minimum size.
- The customer-related portion of natural gas distribution costs related to account numbers 377 through 387, as defined under the account numbering system in the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed for natural gas public utilities by the rules of the commission, shall be computed using a study that reflects the investments required to meter, regulate, and connect each class of customers to the natural gas utility's system.
- Any remaining natural gas distribution plant costs shall be classified as capacity-related costs.
-
- Except for natural gas distribution plant costs related to account numbers 380 through 385, as defined under the account numbering system in the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed for natural gas public utilities by the rules of the commission, the natural gas distribution plant costs classified as capacity-related costs shall be allocated to the customer classes based on the contribution to peak day demand that is made by each customer class.
- As used in subdivision (b)(3)(C)(i) of this section, “peak day demand” means the computed quantity of gas that would be supplied to each customer class calculated using the coldest day in a recent thirty-year period for each gas utility.
-
-
In an application for a general change or modification in a public utility's rates and charges under this subchapter:
- A public utility may present evidence that demonstrates that the implementation of rates under subsection (b) of this section will result in rates that will be beneficial to economic development or the promotion of employment opportunities and result in just and reasonable rates for all classes of customers; and
- A public utility shall present evidence of whether or not rate design in subdivision (b)(1) of this section results in an increase to the base rate charges that are billed to customers in the affected class of more than ten percent (10%) as compared to the then currently approved base rate charges of the applicable rate schedules.
- Unless the commission adjusts the rates under subsection (e) or subsection (f) of this section, the commission shall by order establish and design rates, allocate or assign costs to all classes of customers, and regulate the rates for each class of customers of a public utility according to this section.
-
Pursuant to the commission's authority to otherwise determine and fix rates for all classes of customers, including allocating or assigning costs and designing rates, the commission may adjust rates under subdivisions (b)(2) and (3) of this section if the commission finds:
- It is in the public interest;
- It is necessary to produce just and reasonable rates; or
- Implementation of rates under subdivisions (b)(2) and (3) of this section will result in rates that are not beneficial to economic development or the promotion of employment opportunities.
- If implementation of rates under subdivision (b)(1) of this section will result in an increase in the base rate charges billed to customers in the affected class of more than ten percent (10%) as compared to the currently approved base rate charges of the applicable rate schedules, the commission may adjust the rates to ensure that the greatest increase in the base rate charges billed to customers in the affected class is ten percent (10%) as compared to the then currently approved base rate charges of the applicable rate schedules.
- If the commission makes any adjustment under subsections (e) and (f) of this section, the commission shall provide in an order the rationale for determining that rates under subsection (b) of this section may not be just and reasonable and the rationale for determining that the rates adjusted in the order of the commission are just and reasonable and in the public interest. The commission shall make its findings based on substantial evidence.
- An electric cooperative corporation established under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., is not subject to this section.
- Effective March 27, 2015, the cost allocation provisions of this section shall apply to any pending application for a change in general rates and charges.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 2; 2017, No. 334, § 3.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated part of (b)(2)(A) as the introductory language of (b)(2); in (b)(2)(A), deleted “all” preceding “nonfuel” and added “and” at the end; redesignated former (b)(2)(B) and (b)(2)(C) as (b)(2)(B)(i) and (b)(2)(B)(ii); in (b)(2)(B)(i), substituted “Production” for “Ensure that production” and inserted “Electric Utility Cost Allocation”; and substituted “(b)(2)(B)(i)” for “(b)(2)(B)” in (b)(2)(B)(ii).
Subchapter 5 — Utilities — Special Surcharges
Effective Dates. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 6: Mar. 4, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “Existing statutes of this State do not provide for a procedure to permit immediate recovery of additional expenditures with respect to existing utility facilities incurred by public utilities as a result of legislative or regulatory requirements without the filing of a general rate case with the Public Service Commission. These circumstances result in a gross inequity in that utilities must make expenditures to provide facilities which are clearly in the public interest which costs cannot be recovered in a prompt and timely manner by the utility. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 8: Apr. 2, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that a recent decision of the Arkansas Court of Appeals has interpreted Act 310 of 1981 in a manner that is inconsistent with the interpretation of the Arkansas Public Service Commission; that this inconsistency impairs public utilities in their recovery, through an interim rate surcharge, of all investments and expenses that are not already included in the public utilities' currently effective rates and that were reasonably incurred by the public utilities as a direct result of legislative or administrative rules, regulations, or requirements relating to the protection of the public health, safety, or the environment; and that this act is immediately necessary to facilitate the timely recovery of investments and expenses so that public utilities may provide services to consumers in this state in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective manner. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Case Notes
Asbestos Removal.
This subchapter provides for the recovery of the costs associated with the removal of asbestos where federal regulation 40 C.F.R. § 61.147 requires removal of asbestos material, and also provides for the recovery of the costs of removal that relate to the protection of public health, safety, and the environment pursuant to § 23-4-502. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 301 Ark. 259, 783 S.W.2d 350 (1990).
23-4-501. Authority to recover costs through interim rate schedule.
-
-
Upon a proper filing with the Arkansas Public Service Commission, a public utility shall be permitted to recover in a prompt and timely manner all investments and expenses through an interim surcharge, if the investments or expenses:
- Are not currently being recovered in existing rates;
- Are reasonably incurred;
- Were not reasonably known and measurable at a time that allowed for a reasonable opportunity for the inclusion and consideration of the investments or expenses for recovery in the public utility's last general rate case;
- Are incurred by the public utility to comply with legislative or administrative rules or requirements;
- Relate to the protection of the public health, safety, or the environment;
- Cannot otherwise be recovered in a prompt and timely manner; and
-
Are any of the following:
- Mandatory;
- A condition of continued operation of a utility facility; or
- Previously approved by the commission.
- The interim surcharge shall be effective until the implementation of new rate schedules in connection with the next general rate filing of the public utility in which such investments or expenses can be included in the public utility's base rate schedule.
- However, the costs to be recovered through such an interim surcharge described in subdivisions (a)(1) and (2) of this section shall not include increases in the cost for employment compensation or benefits as a result of legislative or regulatory action.
-
Upon a proper filing with the Arkansas Public Service Commission, a public utility shall be permitted to recover in a prompt and timely manner all investments and expenses through an interim surcharge, if the investments or expenses:
-
- A public utility shall be permitted to recover, through an interim surcharge, the allowance for funds used during construction that would otherwise be accrued and capitalized that is incurred during the construction of facilities and equipment required for compliance with such legislative or administrative rules or requirements, provided that any such allowance for funds used during construction has not been capitalized or otherwise included in the utility's currently effective rates.
- The public utility shall not capitalize or otherwise recover through rates any allowance for funds used during construction incurred in connection with investments described in subdivision (b)(1) of this section when the associated financing costs are included in an interim surcharge.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.1; Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 2; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2393, 2394.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment substituted “Authority to recover costs through interim rate schedule” for “Legislative findings and intent” in the section heading; and rewrote the section.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (a)(1)(D) and (b)(1).
Case Notes
Construction.
This section speaks in terms of “additional expenses with respect to existing facilities” and recovery through an interim surcharge of “such costs,” and the court did not read the statute so broadly as to give the Arkansas Public Service Commission carte blanche authority to adopt and implement any public health or safety program of its choosing and assess the ratepayers for the cost (decided under former version of statute). Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Factors.
Arkansas Public Service Commission erred in finding that a temporary surcharge implemented by a utility company complied with Acts 1981, No. 310; when an opposing party seeks disapproval of a surcharge based on any of the statutory factors in this section, the commission must make a finding as to such factors. McDaniel v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2014 Ark. App. 529, 444 S.W.3d 380 (2014).
Low-Income Assistance Programs.
Surcharge statutes tie surcharges to existing facility costs and costs directly related to legislative or regulatory requirements, and there is no authority granted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the implementation of social programs; moreover; the same holds true of sliding-scale ratemaking where the statutory language of § 23-4-108 and Arkansas case law refer to costs associated with gas production and service to the ratepayers, not low-income assistance programs. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
Cited: Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 301 Ark. 259, 783 S.W.2d 350 (1990).
23-4-502. Filing interim rate schedule.
A public utility as defined in § 23-1-101 may recover all investments and expenses described in § 23-4-501 by filing with the Arkansas Public Service Commission, no more frequently than one (1) time every six (6) months, an interim rate schedule that would impose a separate surcharge in addition to its currently effective rates until the implementation of new rate schedules in connection with the next general rate filing of the public utility in which such investments and expenses can be included in the public utility's base rate schedules.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2; Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 3.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment substituted “all investments and expenses described in § 23-4-501” for “all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by such a utility as a direct result of legislative or regulatory requirements relating to the protection of the public health, safety, and the environment”; substituted “investments and expenses” for “additional expenditures”; and inserted “public” preceding “utility” and “utility's” near the end of the section.
Case Notes
Asbestos Removal.
This subchapter provides for the recovery of the costs associated with the removal of asbestos where federal regulation 40 C.F.R. § 61.147 requires removal of asbestos material, and also provides for the recovery of the costs of removal that relate to the protection of public health, safety, and the environment pursuant to this section. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 301 Ark. 259, 783 S.W.2d 350 (1990).
Low-Income Assistance Programs.
Surcharge statutes tie surcharges to existing facility costs and costs directly related to legislative or regulatory requirements, and there is no authority granted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for the implementation of social programs; moreover; the same holds true of sliding-scale ratemaking where the statutory language of § 23-4-108 and Arkansas case law refer to costs associated with gas production and service to the ratepayers, not low-income assistance programs. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 354 Ark. 37, 118 S.W.3d 109 (2003).
23-4-503. Calculation of interim surcharge.
The amount of the interim surcharge to be added to the public utility's rates shall be calculated so as to produce annual revenues equal to the additional annualized revenue requirement to which the public utility would be entitled had the investments and expenses described in § 23-4-501 been included in the public utility's most recent rate determination by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.3; Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 4.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment substituted “interim surcharge” for “amount of surcharge” in the section heading; inserted “interim” preceding “surcharge”; inserted “public” throughout the section; and substituted “investments and expenses described in § 23-4-501” for “additional expenditures”.
23-4-504. Surcharge effective upon filing.
The surcharge shall become effective immediately upon filing.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2.
23-4-505. Investigation by commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall enter upon an investigation concerning the reasonableness of the surcharge within thirty (30) days after filing and upon reasonable notice to the utility.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2.
23-4-506. Collection subject to refund.
The surcharge shall be collected subject to refund, and the Arkansas Public Service Commission may require reasonable security to assure the prompt payment of any refunds that may be ordered.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2.
23-4-507. Modification or disapproval of surcharge.
-
After its investigation and hearing thereon, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may modify or disapprove all or any portion of the surcharge upon a finding that:
- The investments or expenses were not reasonably incurred to comply with legislative or administrative rules or requirements;
- The investments or expenses do not relate to the protection of the public health, safety, or the environment;
- The investments or expenses were not substantiated;
- The amount of the surcharge has been erroneously calculated;
- The investments or expenses are already being recovered in existing rates;
- The investments or expenses were reasonably known and measurable at a time that allowed for a reasonable opportunity for their inclusion and consideration for recovery in the public utility's last general rate case;
- The investments or expenses were not reasonably incurred;
- The investments or expenses can otherwise be recovered in a prompt and timely manner;
- The allocation of the surcharge among the customers of the public utility is unreasonable; or
-
The investments or expenses were not:
- Mandatory;
- A condition of continued operation of a utility facility; or
- Previously approved by the commission.
-
- If the commission determines that the allocation of the surcharge among the customers of the utility should be modified, it shall fix and determine the appropriate allocation among the utility's customers which shall be applied prospectively.
- The commission shall further direct the utility to credit or charge, as the case may be, the affected classes of customers whose surcharges were determined to be improperly allocated for the period between the effective date of the surcharge and the effective date of the modification. As to those classes of customers entitled to credits, the utility also shall pay interest on those credits, as applicable.
- If the commission determines that all or any portion of the proposed surcharge should be disapproved under subsection (a) of this section, the commission shall determine the just and reasonable amount of the surcharge to be charged or applied by the public utility after the time the proposed surcharge took effect. In the same order, the commission shall fix the amounts, plus interest, if any, to be refunded to the utility's customers.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2; Acts 2015, No. 1000, §§ 5, 6; 2019, No. 315, § 2395.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote (a); and, in the first sentence of (c), substituted “under subsection (a)” for “pursuant to either subdivision (a)(1) or (2)”, inserted “public”, and deleted “from and” preceding “after the time”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (a)(1).
23-4-508. Application for rehearing no stay of order.
An application for rehearing pursuant to § 23-2-422 filed by a party aggrieved by an order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission entered pursuant to this subchapter shall not stay the effectiveness of the order of the commission.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2.
23-4-509. Inadequate surcharges permitted by commission — Additional surcharges.
- In the event that the amount of the surcharge permitted by the order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission is subsequently determined to have been inadequate, either on rehearing or in accordance with a court decision on judicial review, the public utility subject to such an order shall be entitled to impose an additional surcharge on the affected customers to recover that portion of the surcharge which was not approved by the commission which should have been collected during the period between the effective date of the initial order and the final determination or rehearing or by the court on judicial review.
- The surcharge shall be assessed over a period equal to the period between the date of the initial order and the effective date of the final determination on rehearing or by the court on judicial review.
- The surcharge shall be distributed among the affected customers in proportion to the amounts those customers were charged during the period between the date of the initial order and the final determination on rehearing or by the court on judicial review.
History. Acts 1981, No. 310, § 2; 1983, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217.2.
Subchapter 6 — Railroads and Other Carriers Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1881, No. 42, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1885, No. 31, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1887, No. 81, § 14: effective on passage.
Acts 1887, No. 129, § 4: effective 30 days after passage.
Acts 1903, No. 130, § 6: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 422, § 9: May 28, 1907.
Acts 1909, No. 71, § 4: effective 30 days after passage.
Acts 1919, No. 185, approved Mar. 6, 1919. Emergency declared.
Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1937, No. 133, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1939, No. 107, § 9: approved Feb. 20, 1939. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas, Arkansas recently has been admitted to membership in the Southeastern Governors Conference, which is striving for Southwide betterment, and whereas, on invitation from the Governor of Arkansas, officially designated representatives of the States of Louisiana and Oklahoma have given assurances of active cooperation in bringing about freight rate adjustments advantageous to the Southwest, and, whereas, Eastern and Northern States, long beneficiaries of the high freight rate barrier standing between the South and permanent prosperity, have mobilized their resources and their manpower in Congress to resist the South's efforts to improve its economic conditions; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, making the immediate operation of this act essential for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 6: May 8, 1980. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the proper regulation of utilities in Arkansas requires that the procedure by which changes in rates are made be amended. This amendment is necessary in order that the needs of the companies may be properly considered while ratepayers are also properly protected. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the of the public peace, health and safety shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 8: Dec. 1, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing laws of this State authorize public utilities to put proposed rates into effect under bond while the Public Service Commission still has the rate application under consideration; that said laws are working an inequity upon the ratepayers of the State and deny to the Public Service Commission authority to deny such application to place such rates into effect under bond, without first determining that an emergency exists which justifies the same; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to correct said situation and to enable the Public Service Commission to determine that an emergency exists before a pending rate filing may be placed into effect under bond by the public utility prior to final determination and order by the Public Service Commission. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 911, § 3: Mar. 30, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of this State that the practice of public utilities collecting rates under bond during the rehearing and judicial review process works an undue hardship on the people of this state, and immediate correction of this hardship is necessary in order to preserve the public safety, health, peace, and general welfare of the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 994, § 4: Apr. 14, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of the case Ricarte v. State, CR 86-31, a question has arisen over the validity of Act 1181 of the Extended Session of 1976; that this Act is a reenactment of the former law; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the state of the law on this issue. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 141 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 135 et seq.
23-4-601. Construction of §§ 23-4-602, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101.
Nothing in §§ 23-4-602, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101 shall be so construed as to amend or repeal any act prior to May 28, 1907, in force, nor to curtail or limit the powers and duties of the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 8, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1617; Pope's Dig., § 1942; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1415; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 110.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-4-602. Violations of §§ 23-4-601, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101, tariff of charges, or rules of department — Penalties — Recovery.
- If any person or corporation operating a railroad or express company in this state or any receiver, trustee, or lessee of any such person or corporation violates any of the provisions of §§ 23-4-601, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101, or aids or abets therein, or violates the tariff of charges as fixed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation or any of the rules regarding railroads or express companies as made by the department and for which there is no other penalty prescribed, then such a person or corporation, receiver, trustee, or lessee shall be liable to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each violation of §§ 23-4-601, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101 or such tariff of charges or rules and regulations.
-
- The penalty may be recovered by an action to be brought in the name of the State of Arkansas in the county in which such a violation may occur.
-
- The department shall institute actions for the recovery of the penalties prescribed in §§ 23-4-601, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101 through the prosecuting attorney of the proper district.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- If any prosecuting attorney neglects for fifteen (15) days after notice to bring suit, the department may employ some other attorney at law to bring the suit, who shall be allowed a fee therefor to be fixed by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- No suit shall be dismissed or compromised without the consent of the court and of the department. In such cases the prosecuting attorney shall not interfere.
- In all trials of cases brought for violation of any tariff of charges by the department, it may be shown in evidence that the tariff so fixed was unjust.
- Nothing in this section shall be so construed as to in any manner interfere with any action for damages which may be provided by law.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 7, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1695; Pope's Dig., § 1998; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1414; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 111.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-4-603. Railroads — Charges to be reasonable and just.
All charges made for any service rendered or to be rendered in the transportation of passengers or property on any railroad in this state, or in connection therewith, or for receiving, delivering, storing, or handling such property shall be reasonable and just. Every unjust and unreasonable charge for such a service is prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 9, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 857; Pope's Dig., § 1061; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1401.
Cross References. Adequate service, facilities, etc., to be provided, § 23-3-113.
General Assembly to pass laws to prevent excessive charges, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
Penalty for violating section, § 23-10-103.
23-4-604. Railroads and express companies — Schedule of rates.
- In order to ascertain what the regular charge of those companies are, all railroad and express companies doing business in this state are required to keep in all their offices in this state a schedule of the regular rates charged by them, which shall be open to the inspection of any person interested therein.
- Any agent of any railroad or express company who fails or refuses to show the schedule of rates of the company to any person interested therein and allow him or her to examine the schedule of rates as provided in subsection (a) of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
History. Acts 1897, No. 53, §§ 3, 5, p. 72; C. & M. Dig., §§ 873, 875, 10250a; Pope's Dig., §§ 1077, 1079, 14260; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1404, 73-1406.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1897, No. 53, § 3, is also codified as § 23-17-110.
23-4-605. Railroads and express companies — Overcharging prohibited.
- All agents of railroad and express companies doing business in this state are prohibited from charging, collecting, or receiving pay for any goods, wares, packages, merchandise, or any article whatever that may be sent or received by or through their respective offices in excess of the regular rates charged for those articles.
- Any person who violates the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
History. Acts 1897, No. 53, §§ 1, 4, p. 72; C. & M. Dig., §§ 872, 874, 10250a; Pope's Dig., §§ 1076, 1078, 14260; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1402, 73-1405.
23-4-606. Continuous railroad lines.
- In all cases where there is, by physical connection of railroads, a continuous line of railway communication between railroad stations within this state, whether such stations are on railroads operated by one and the same company or corporation or on railroads operated by different and independent companies or corporations, it shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, to and from such stations, to make just and reasonable rates for freight, express, and passenger traffic, to be observed by all persons, companies, or corporations operating any railroad or engaged in transporting persons or property as express or freight in this state.
-
- All persons, companies, or corporations operating any railroad in this state that forms part of a continuous line of railroad communication to any point in this state shall issue through-passenger tickets and check baggage through to and from points on the continuous line of communication at through-rates and fares.
- All freight and traffic carried wholly within this state to and from stations on lines of continuous carriage aforesaid shall be waybilled through at through-rates and tolls from point of departure to point of arrival without being rebilled at junction points. In cases of carload freights, the forwarding carrier shall receive and forward the same in cars in which the freight is tendered without breaking bulk of package.
History. Acts 1903, No. 130, §§ 2, 3, p. 218; C. & M. Dig., §§ 860, 1646; Pope's Dig., §§ 1064, 1967; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1408, 73-1409; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 112.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Authority of Commission.
The Corporation Commission could prevent the restrictive routing of oil products to specified carriers, adopted to enable the initial carrier to receive a larger proportion of revenue from such haul, as such restrictive routing would enable the initial carrier to make the joint rate and to determine the proportion of revenue it should receive. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 189 Ark. 419, 72 S.W.2d 1047 (1934).
23-4-607. Connecting railroad lines — Division of charges.
If any two (2) or more connecting lines of railroad in this state fail to agree upon a fair and just division of the charges arising from the transportation of freights, passengers, or cars over their lines, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall make the division and shall fix the pro rata part of such charges to be received by each of the connecting lines.
History. Acts 1903, No. 130, § 4, p. 218; C. & M. Dig., § 1647; Pope's Dig., § 1968; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1410; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 113.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Authority of Commission.
The Corporation Commission could prevent the restrictive routing of oil products to specified carriers, adopted to enable the initial carrier to receive a larger proportion of revenue from such haul, as such restrictive routing would enable the initial carrier to make the joint rate and to determine the proportion of revenue it should receive. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 189 Ark. 419, 72 S.W.2d 1047 (1934).
23-4-608. Penalties for violations of §§ 23-4-606 and 23-4-607 — Actions to recover penalties.
- If any person or corporation operating a railroad or express company in this state, or any receiver, trustee, or lessee of any such person or corporation, violates any of the provisions of §§ 23-4-606 and 23-4-607, or aids or abets therein, or violates the tariff of charges as fixed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation or any of the rules regarding railroads or express companies as made by the department, and for which there is no other penalty prescribed in §§ 23-4-606 and 23-4-607, then the person or corporation, receiver, trustee, or lessee shall be liable to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each violation of §§ 23-4-606 and 23-4-607, or such tariff of charges or rules and regulations.
-
- The penalty may be recovered by an action to be brought in the name of the State of Arkansas in the county in which the violation may occur.
-
- The department shall institute that action and actions for the recovery of the penalties prescribed in §§ 23-4-606 and 23-4-607 through the prosecuting attorney of the proper district.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- If any prosecuting attorney neglects for fifteen (15) days after notice to bring suit, the department may employ some other attorney at law to bring the suit who shall be allowed a fee therefor to be fixed by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected. In such a case, the prosecuting attorney shall not interfere.
- No action for the recovery of penalties shall be dismissed or compromised without the consent of the court and of the department.
- In all trials of cases brought for a violation of any tariff charges by the department, it may be shown in defense that the tariff so fixed was unjust.
- Nothing in this section shall be so construed as to in any manner interfere with any action for damages which may be provided by law.
History. Acts 1903, No. 130, § 5, p. 218; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1414, 73-1414n; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 114.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-4-609. Connecting railroad lines under one management.
- Where in this state two (2) or more connecting lines of railroad are operated by, or under, one (1) management or company, or where the majority of the stock of each of two (2) or more railroad companies whose tracks connect is owned or controlled, either directly or indirectly, by any one (1) of these companies, the lines of railroad of all these companies, in respect to the application and making of rates within the meaning and intent of §§ 23-4-601, 23-4-602, 23-4-608 — 23-4-610, 23-4-615, 23-4-706, 23-10-301, and 23-11-101 shall be considered as constituting but one and the same railroad.
- Rates for the carriage of freight or passengers over these railroads or any portion of them shall be computed upon a continuous-mileage basis, the same as upon the line of a single railroad company, whether these railroads have separate boards of directors or not.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have the power to fix different rates for different lines bearing the relation to each other described in this section whenever it finds such action necessary to do justice.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 1, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 861; Pope's Dig., § 1065; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1411; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 115.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (c).
23-4-610. Railroads — Through-freight rates and regulations.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have power, and it is its duty, to investigate all through-freight rates and regulations on railroads in Arkansas.
-
- When the through-freight rates and regulations are, in the opinion of the department, excessive or levied in violation of the interstate commerce law or the rules and regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished], the officials of the railroads are to be notified of the facts and requested to reduce the rates or make the proper correction, as the case may be.
- When the rates are not changed or the proper corrections are not made according to the request of the department, the department is to notify the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished] and to apply to it for relief.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 2, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1630; Pope's Dig., § 1952; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1412; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 116.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-4-611. Railroads — Short lines.
- Railroad companies having roads not exceeding fifty (50) miles in length may charge for loading, carrying, and unloading freights at a rate of not more than forty cents (40¢) per one hundred pounds (100 lbs.) for any distance.
-
- The rates charged by any company may be reduced by the Arkansas Department of Transportation whenever it appears that the net annual profits of the company exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of capital actually invested.
- However, the rates shall not be reduced so as to reduce the net annual profits of such a company below ten percent (10%) of the amount of its capital actually invested.
-
- If any railroad company shall charge more than the rates named in this section, the person paying the charges may recover from that railroad company five (5) times the sum so charged, together with the costs of the action, by action before a justice of the peace or other court having jurisdiction.
- Service of summons in such an action may be made by delivering a copy of the summons to any agent of the company.
History. Acts 1881, No. 42, §§ 1-3, p. 78; C. & M. Dig., §§ 869-871; Pope's Dig., §§ 1073-1075; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1421 — 73-1423; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 117.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b)(1).
23-4-612. Railroads — Switching charges on coal cars.
- When any railroad in Arkansas moves coal in car lots from one (1) switch or spur on its line to a connecting line and the distance is not more than two and one-half (2½) miles, it shall be allowed to charge and collect for such services three dollars ($3.00) per car.
- If the railroad company performing the service described in subsection (a) of this section also furnishes the car in which the freight is loaded, it shall be permitted to charge and collect ten cents (10¢) per ton for the service so rendered.
- This section shall not apply to switch limits of cities of the first and second class.
- Any railroad company violating the provisions of this section shall be punished as is provided in § 23-4-706.
History. Acts 1909, No. 71, §§ 1-3, p. 185; C. & M. Dig., § 868; Pope's Dig., § 1072; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1424 — 73-1426.
23-4-613. Railroads — Bills of lading.
- It shall be unlawful for any railroad company in this state or its officers, agents, or employees to charge and collect or to endeavor to charge and collect from the owner, agent, or consignee of any freight, goods, wares, or merchandise of any kind or character whatever, a greater sum for transporting the freight, goods, wares, or merchandise than is specified in the bill of lading.
- Any railroad company, its officers, agents, or employees having possession of any goods, wares, or merchandise of any kind or character whatever shall deliver the goods, wares, or merchandise to the owner, his or her agent, or consignee upon payment of the freight charges as shown by the bill of lading.
- Any railroad company, its officers, agents, or employees that refuse to deliver to the owner, agent, or consignee any freight, goods, wares, or merchandise of any kind or character whatever upon the payment, or tender of payment, of the freight charges due as shown by the bill of lading shall be liable in damages to the owner of the freight, goods, wares, or merchandise to an amount equal the amount of the freight charges for every day the freight, goods, wares, or merchandise is held after payment or tender of payment of the charges due as shown by the bill of lading, with the amount to be recovered in any court of competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1885, No. 31, §§ 1-3, p. 35; C. & M. Dig., §§ 863-865; Pope's Dig., §§ 1067-1069; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1427 — 73-1429.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section is constitutional. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Hanniford, 49 Ark. 291, 5 S.W. 294 (1887).
Liability.
This section does not apply to a company not a party to the bill of lading which has not carried the goods under the bill of lading and has neither authorized nor accepted it. Loewenberg v. Arkansas & La. Ry., 56 Ark. 439, 19 S.W. 1051 (1892); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Gibson, 68 Ark. 34, 56 S.W. 268 (1900).
Tender of Charges.
The entire amount of freight charges for a single shipment must be tendered before any part of the goods can be demanded. St. Louis, Ark. & Tex. Ry. v. Johnson, 53 Ark. 282, 13 S.W. 1096 (1890); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Tonn, 102 Ark. 20, 143 S.W. 577 (1912).
Where bill of lading does not show all charges that are legally demandable by carrier, the statutory penalty is not recoverable upon failure to deliver when tender of amount shown by bill of lading is made. Fordyce v. Johnson, 56 Ark. 430, 19 S.W. 1050 (1892).
23-4-614. Railroads — Freight rates on crushed stone, sand, and gravel.
-
The maximum rates which any corporation, officer of court, trustee, person, or association of persons operating any railroad line in this state shall be authorized to charge or collect for the transportation by freight from any point within this state to any other point within this state of loads of crushed stone, sand, or gravel in carload lots, shall be as follows:
- Twenty-five (25) miles and under, forty cents (40¢) per ton;
- Up to and including fifty (50) miles and over twenty-five (25) miles, fifty cents (50¢) per ton;
- Up to and including seventy-five (75) miles and over fifty (50) miles, sixty cents (60¢) per ton;
- Up to and including one hundred (100) miles and over seventy-five (75) miles, seventy cents (70¢) per ton;
- Up to and including one hundred fifty (150) miles and over one hundred (100) miles, eighty cents (80¢) per ton;
- Up to and including two hundred (200) miles and over one hundred fifty (150) miles, one dollar ($1.00) per ton;
- Up to and including two hundred fifty (250) miles and over two hundred (200) miles, one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per ton;
- Up to and including three hundred (300) miles and over two hundred fifty (250) miles, one dollar and forty cents ($1.40) per ton; and
- Up to and including four hundred (400) miles and over three hundred (300) miles, one dollar and sixty cents ($1.60) per ton.
- When shipments are transported over two (2) lines of railroad, an additional charge of thirty cents (30¢) per ton may be made and, when transported over three (3) or more lines, an additional charge of forty cents (40¢) per ton may be made.
- A ton, for the purpose of this section, shall be deemed to be two thousand pounds (2,000 lbs.).
-
- The minimum weight upon which the rates shall be calculated shall be the marked capacity of the car in which the shipment is loaded.
- However, when the shipper orders a smaller capacity and when the carrier, for its own convenience, places a larger capacity car, then in such cases the carrier shall not charge or collect freight on any greater weight than that actually loaded in the car, except that the weight charged for shall not be less than the marked loading capacity of the car ordered by the shipper.
- In every case in which a larger car is placed for loading than is ordered by the shipper, the carrier billing same shall make proper notation both in the bill of lading and the waybill instructing the destination agent as to such fact, to the end that the freight may be calculated upon the basis herein provided and overcharges avoided.
- However, the rates prescribed in this section shall apply only to crushed stone, sand, and gravel suitable for use in road building. In order to make the rate available, the shipper shall deliver to the carrier with each shipment a certificate to the effect that the crushed stone, sand, or gravel embraced in the shipment is suitable for and designed to be used in the construction of public highways in this state, and the consignee shall deliver to the carrier, upon receiving the shipment, a certificate of like effect.
-
- If any person or corporation operating any railroad in this state, or any receiver, trustee, or lessee of any such person or corporation shall violate any provision of this section by charging a greater rate on any shipment or any commodity named in this section than is prescribed in this section, the person or corporation, receiver, trustee, or lessee shall be liable to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each and every violation of this section.
- The penalty may be recovered by an action brought in the name of the State of Arkansas in any county in which any portion of any line of railroad owned or operated by any such person or corporation, receiver, trustee, or lessee may be situated.
History. Acts 1919, No. 185, §§ 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., §§ 866, 867; Pope's Dig., §§ 1070, 1071; A.S.A. 1947, 73-1419, 73-1420.
23-4-615. Railroads — Sleeping car tariffs.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is authorized and it is its duty to adopt, change, or make reasonable and just rates, charges, and regulations to govern and regulate sleeping car tariffs and service in order to correct abuses and prevent unjust discrimination and extortion in the rates for sleeping cars.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 4, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1634; Pope's Dig., § 1955; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1413; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 118.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-4-616. Railroads — Additional charge for stopping at other than regular station.
Any railroad company may charge the sum of twenty-five cents (25¢) for the carriage of any passenger who may get on or off a train at other than a regular station.
History. Acts 1887, No. 129, § 1, p. 227; C. & M. Dig., § 882; Pope's Dig., § 1084; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1416.
Case Notes
Regular Station.
A station at which a railroad company kept no regular agent but stopped its trains only when requested or signalled to do so, receiving passengers without tickets and freight without bills of lading, was not a “regular” station within this section. Clark v. Jonesboro, Lake City & E.R.R., 87 Ark. 385, 112 S.W. 961 (1908).
23-4-617. Railroads — Passengers without tickets.
All passengers who may fail to procure regular fare tickets shall be transported over all railroads in this state at the same rate and price charged for regular fare tickets for the same service.
History. Acts 1887, No. 129, § 1, p. 227; C. & M. Dig., § 883; Pope's Dig., § 1085; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1417.
Case Notes
Passenger-Carrier Relationship.
The purchase of a ticket is not a prerequisite to the relationship of passenger and carrier under this section. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Kilpatrick, 67 Ark. 47, 54 S.W. 971 (1899).
Rules of Railroad.
A railroad company may make rules prohibiting passengers from entering trains without tickets. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Hammett, 98 Ark. 418, 136 S.W. 191 (1911).
23-4-618. Railroads — Ejection of passengers upon failure to pay fare.
If any passenger shall refuse to pay his or her fare or toll, it shall be lawful for the conductor of the train and the servants of the corporation to put him or her out of the cars at any usual stopping place the conductor shall select.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 30, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 881; Pope's Dig., § 1083; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1418.
Case Notes
Applicability.
This section is confined to passengers who refuse to pay their fares. Hobbs v. Texas & Pac. Ry., 49 Ark. 357, 5 S.W. 586 (1887).
Damages.
Where passenger was expelled mile from station, he was entitled to damages for delay in completing journey, for time and trouble of having to walk back to station, and for such humiliation as he was made to undergo. Hot Springs R.R. v. Deloney, 65 Ark. 177, 45 S.W. 351 (1898).
Where passenger, carried past his destination, was put off at point several hundred yards beyond a station and walked back three miles to his destination, he was not entitled to compensation for injuries suffered in such three-mile walk but only for his loss in walking back to the station. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Williams, 100 Ark. 356, 140 S.W. 141 (1911).
Ejection.
Where conductor informs passenger he must pay fare or get off and on the passenger's refusal to pay, stops train for him to get off, he is justified in treating such conduct as an expulsion. Hot Springs R.R. v. Deloney, 65 Ark. 177, 45 S.W. 351 (1898).
Where a parent having a child with him refuses to pay the fare for such child, he may be ejected with the child though he had paid his own fare. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Smith, 155 Ark. 519, 244 S.W. 741 (1923).
Freight Trains.
Where rule of company forbids passengers to ride on freight trains from ticket stations without a ticket, failure to purchase ticket before entering train amounts to a refusal to pay fare and passenger can be expelled only at usual stopping place. McCook v. Northrup, 65 Ark. 225, 45 S.W. 547 (1898).
Partial Payment.
Where a passenger has been lawfully ejected from a railway train for nonpayment of fare, he cannot demand to be carried forward on the same train without paying the disputed fare and a purchase of a ticket at the point of ejection will not entitle him to readmission to the train, without payment for that portion of journey already traveled. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Watkins, 117 Ark. 488, 175 S.W. 1157 (1915).
Place of Ejectment.
Conductor cannot eject passenger for refusal to pay fare, except at usual stopping place, even though that would take him to his destination. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Branch, 45 Ark. 524 (1885).
Even though passenger got on train at station where passengers were not taken, when conductor demanded his fare he was treating him as a passenger and not as a trespasser and could not eject him except at a regular stopping place. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Ry. v. Holden, 66 Ark. 602, 53 S.W. 45 (1899).
23-4-619. Railroads — Rate reductions.
When any railroad shall be opened for use, the General Assembly may, from time to time, alter or reduce the rates of toll, fare, freights, or other profits upon the road. However, the rates shall not be so reduced without the consent of the corporation as to produce, with the profits, less than fifteen percent (15%) per annum on the capital actually paid in or, unless upon examination of the amounts received and expended to be made by him or her, the Secretary of State shall ascertain that the net income derived by the company from all sources for the year then last past shall have exceeded an annual income of fifteen percent (15%) upon the capital of the corporation actually paid in.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 29, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 862; Pope's Dig., § 1066; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1407.
Publisher's Notes. This section, insofar as it applies to short line railroads, may be affected by § 23-4-611.
23-4-620. Notice of rate changes.
- Unless the Arkansas Department of Transportation otherwise orders, no public utility shall make any change in any rate duly established under this act except after thirty (30) days' notice to the department. This notice shall plainly state the change proposed to be made in the rates then in force and the time when the changed rates will go into effect.
- The utility shall also give notice of the proposed changes to other interested parties as the department in its discretion may direct.
- The department, for good cause shown, may allow changes in rates without requiring the thirty (30) days' notice, under such conditions as it may prescribe. All allowed changes shall be immediately indicated upon its schedules by the public utility.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 119.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as §§ 23-4-402 and 23-4-403.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1935, No. 324, codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Case Notes
Contents.
There is nothing fatal to a petition for a rate increase merely because the petition asks for more than is allowed on preliminary hearing. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Necessity of Filing.
Where contract with United States providing for reduction in retail rates upon approval by the commission was filed with the commission there was not sufficient compliance with the contract, since to obtain the lower rates the company was required to file a new rate schedule with the commission. United States v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 165 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1948).
Notice.
The only discretion the commission has in connection with the giving of notice as to change in rates is to require the utility to give notice to one or more of the interested parties enumerated in § 23-3-119, it being important to bear in mind that the procedure under this section apparently envisions a full scale rate of hearing which might involve months and the expenditure of thousands of dollars. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-4-621. Rate changes to be reflected in schedules.
All proposed changes shall be shown by filing new schedules or shall be plainly indicated upon schedules filed and in force at the time and kept open to public inspection.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-404.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-622. Investigation of rate changes.
Whenever there is filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation by any public utility any schedule stating a new rate, the department, either upon complaint or upon its own motion and upon reasonable notice, may enter upon any investigation concerning the lawfulness of the rates.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 120.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-405.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
It was the duty of the commission when utility company sought an increase in rates to determine whether the company was entitled to any increase in order to earn a fair return on its invested capital. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956) (decision prior to creation of Arkansas Transportation Commission).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-623. Suspension of proposed rates.
Pending its investigation and the decision thereon, the Arkansas Department of Transportation by written order at any time before the new rate becomes effective may suspend the operation of the rate. However, the suspension shall not be for a longer period than nine (9) months beyond the time when the rate would otherwise go into effect. Any order initially suspending the rate shall set a specific date for the commencement of a hearing inquiring into the rate requested unless waived by the applicant utility.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 121.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-407.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Purpose.
Because the investigation and consideration of rate applications can become such a complex and time consuming procedure, the General Assembly has given the commission the authority to suspend the collection of proposed rate increases for up to a specified period during the time the commission is deliberating on the application, a provision obviously designed to protect the public from the collection of rate increases which the commission later determines to be unwarranted. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Yelcot Tel. Co., 266 Ark. 365, 585 S.W.2d 362 (1979).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-624. Interim implementation of suspended rates.
- If the public utility contends that an immediate and impelling necessity exists for the requested rate increase, a petition may be filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation narrating the alleged circumstances and requesting a hearing on the petition.
- The hearing must commence within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of the petition or at such subsequent time as may be mutually agreeable to the department and the utility.
- If the department finds at the hearing that there is substantial merit to the allegations of the utility's claims, the department may permit all or a portion of the rate to become effective if there is filed with the department a bond to be approved by it, payable to the State of Arkansas in such amount and with such sufficient security to insure the prompt payment of any damages or refunds, with interest, to the persons entitled thereto if the rate so put into effect is finally determined to be excessive or if there is substituted for the bond other arrangements satisfactory to the department for the protection of the parties interested.
- The findings of the department relative to the petition of the utility for the immediate and impelling necessity for relief shall be issued on or before the sixtieth day following the date of filing of the petition.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; 1985, No. 523, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 122.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-408.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Bond.
The terms of §§ 23-4-620 — 23-4-634 are considered as if they were written into any bond filed under this section, and, in determining the extent of liability on the bond, the language of this section is controlling over the language of the bond. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Commission's Authority.
Inclusion of requests both for rate increase and escalator clauses in one schedule upon petition of gas company for increase in consumption rate was not fatal to the power of the commission to allow the rate increase to go into effect under bond where it at the same time recited that the proposed escalator clauses were not to go into effect until further order of the commission. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Under petition for rate increase by gas company, the company had the right when it filed its schedule to ask that its monthly consumption rate go into effect under bond and that proposed escalator clauses be considered on final hearing under § 23-4-108. Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956).
Contest of Rate Increase.
Where the customers and ratepayers had been allowed to intervene in rate increase proceedings before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, they had a full and adequate opportunity to contest the proposed rate increase and its statutory basis; and, therefore, the circuit court had no jurisdiction over a subsequent class action suit brought by the customers of the utility, in which they alleged that part of this section was unconstitutional in that it allows a utility to collect a requested rate increase under bond. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lankford, 278 Ark. 595, 648 S.W.2d 65 (1983).
Cited: City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-625. Rate increase not effective until final order.
Unless the Arkansas Department of Transportation finds an immediate and impelling necessity exists or if the department fails to enter a timely order as provided in § 23-4-624, no public utility shall place any rate increase into effect until a final decision and order is made by the department.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; 1985, No. 523, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 123.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-409.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Effective Date.
Where order for increased rate went into effect on specified date, fact that company billed creditors one month in advance did not prevent rates from going into effect on specified date. City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 70, 247 S.W.2d 474 (1952).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-626. Authority of department to fix rates — Apportionment of increase.
- If, after the investigation and hearing thereon, the Arkansas Department of Transportation finds the new rate to be unjust, unreasonable, discriminatory, or otherwise in violation of the law or rules of the department, it shall determine and fix the just and reasonable rate to be charged or applied by the utility for the service in question, from and after the time the new rate took effect.
- Until rate schedules in compliance with the department’s order can be filed and approved, any rate increase allowed in the department's order shall be apportioned among all classes of customers and shall become effective on all bills rendered thereafter through a temporary surcharge or other equitable means, as shall be prescribed in the order.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 124.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-410.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Purpose.
The General Assembly contemplated that the investigation and hearing pursuant to this section should be completed and an order for a refund made during the six month suspension period. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Appeals.
Consumer which did not appeal decision granting a rate change within the required time could not collaterally attack the rate schedule as discriminatory in a circuit court action against the utility and the commission. Commercial Printing Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 250 Ark. 461, 466 S.W.2d 261 (1971).
Due Process.
There was nothing in the record to indicate a denial in due process of action of commission in establishing a rate yielding a certain return to utility company upon application of company for increase in rates. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Establishment of Rates.
The commission is not bound by any formula or combination of formulas in fixing rates. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Where utility company in its rate application chose the testing period for use in determining rates and the commission accepted the company's choice, the company could not question the use of such testing period. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
It was the duty of the commission when utility company sought an increase in rates to determine whether the company was entitled to any increase in order to earn a fair return on its invested capital. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Upon application of utility company for increase in rates, refusal of commission to allow the average amount of work under construction during testing period to be included in rate base was not improper. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
Upon application of utility company for change in rates, commission was not bound by previous order and could make changes in such order upon proper notice to the company so long as it did not invade the constitutional rights of the company. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 225, 289 S.W.2d 668 (1956).
The test year to be used in setting utility rates is a matter lying within the discretion of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, although the commission should consider complete and accurate information with respect to a later period of time, when available, as a check on the continuing validity of the test year experience in a period of rapid change. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Judicial Review.
It is the result reached, not the method employed, that is controlling, and it is the theory but the impact of the rate order that counts in determining whether utility rates are just, reasonable, lawful and nondiscriminatory under this section; if the total effect of the rate order cannot be said to be unjust, unreasonable, unlawful or discriminatory, judicial inquiry is concluded, and infirmities in the method employed rendered unimportant. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Notice to Utility.
The court interpreted the language of § 23-4-108 to mean that once the commission fixes a definite rate, it cannot lower the rate without giving notice to the utility and cannot raise the rate without notifying in some way the ratepayers. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-627. Failure of department to reach timely decision — Conditional implementation of suspended rates.
In the event no final rate determination has been made upon the schedule for new rates within ten (10) months after the date the schedule for new rates was filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the public utility may put the suspended rate into effect for all bills rendered thereafter immediately upon the filing of a bond to be approved by the department payable to the State of Arkansas in such amount and with sufficient security to insure prompt payment of any refunds to the persons entitled thereto, including an interest rate as determined by the department not to exceed the maximum interest otherwise allowed by law, if the rate or rates so put into effect are finally determined to be excessive. There may be substituted for the bond other arrangements satisfactory to the department for the protection of the parties interested.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 125.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-411.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Refunds.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission had the power and the authority to order the refund of any rates collected during the suspension period which it ultimately found to be excessive, in spite of the time limitations in this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Where the Arkansas Public Service Commission could only suspend the operation of proposed new rates for the statutory period, the commission had no authority to order a refund of revenues collected on the basis of the telephone company's proposed rates between the date of the expiration of the suspension order and the date of the commission order fixing the rates allowed; on the other hand, a refund of the collections made by the telephone company, between the date the company's proposed tariffs were made effective under an “agreement and undertaking” approved by the commission and the date that the period expired, could be ordered even though no valid rate order was entered by the commission within the time limitation on the power of suspension. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-628. Issuance of commission's order — Rates to be collected.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this act, upon issuance of the findings and order of the Arkansas Public Service Commission as prescribed in § 23-2-421, no public utility subject to the order shall continue to collect any rates theretofore permitted to be collected under bond. The public utility shall be permitted to collect only those rates set in the order of the commission, and those rates shall be effective throughout any rehearing and judicial review proceedings permitted and prescribed in §§ 23-2-422 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-620.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-629. Surcharge to collect rates increased by courts.
- In the event that the rates set in the order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation subsequently are determined to have been inadequate, either on rehearing or in accordance with court decision on judicial review, the public utility subject to the order shall be entitled to impose a surcharge on the affected customers for collection of the increased rates that otherwise would have been collected during the period between the effective date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates as increased, together with interest as determined by the department at a rate not to exceed the maximum interest rate otherwise allowed by law.
- This surcharge shall be assessed over a period equal to the period between the date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates, as increased.
- The surcharge shall be distributed among the affected customers in proportion to the amounts those customers were charged during the period between the date of the initial order and the effective date of the rates, as increased.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 126.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-413.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-630. Refunds of excessive rate collections under bond.
In the event a public utility shall have implemented under bond or other arrangements as a matter involving an immediate and impelling necessity under § 23-4-624 an amount which exceeds that allowed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation in its final order, the department shall order the immediate refund of the excessive bonded collections.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 127.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-414.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “under” for “pursuant to”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission had the power and the authority to order the refund of any rates collected during the suspension period which it ultimately found to be excessive, in spite of the time limitations in this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 267 Ark. 550, 593 S.W.2d 434 (1980).
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-631. Refunds of excessive bonded collections — Order not stayed during rehearing.
An application for rehearing under § 23-2-422 filed by a party aggrieved by the final order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall not stay the effectiveness of the order as it pertains to refunds of excessive bonded collections.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 128.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-415.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “under” for “pursuant to”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-632. Surcharge to collect excessive refunds.
In the event that the amount of refunds ordered by the Arkansas Department of Transportation in its final order is subsequently determined to have been excessive, either on rehearing or in accordance with a court decision on judicial review, the public utility subject to the order shall be entitled to impose an additional surcharge on the affected customers to recover that portion of the refunds to which it was entitled, together with interest as determined by the department at a rate not to exceed the maximum interest rate otherwise allowed by law. The surcharge shall be assessed over a period equal to the period between the date the rates were implemented under bond and the date of the department's final order. The surcharge shall be distributed among the affected customers in proportion to the amount of refunds those customers received.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; 1981 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 2; 1983, No. 911, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 129.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-416.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-633. Petition for mandamus.
If the Arkansas Department of Transportation order is not issued before the expiration of the period of suspension, the filed rates shall remain subject to refund as provided in § 23-4-630, but the applicant utility shall have the right to petition the Pulaski County Circuit Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the issuance of an order by the department within fifteen (15) days of the writ of mandamus issued by the Pulaski County Circuit Court. The petition shall be advanced on the docket above all other pending civil cases, and a hearing thereon shall be held within seven (7) days of the filing of the petition. The scope of review shall be limited to the issue of the failure of the department to act within the time limits provided for in this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 130.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-417.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-620.
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
23-4-634. Suit to compel refunds — Proceeds.
- If the public utility fails to make refunds within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the order requiring such refunds, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall bring suit in the name of the State of Arkansas, for the use and benefits of all those entitled to a refund, in any court of competent jurisdiction and recover the amount of all refunds due together with interest thereon at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate otherwise allowed by law and all court costs.
- No suit to recover the refunds shall be maintained unless instituted within two (2) years after the final determination.
- The amount recovered shall be paid to the clerk of the court where the suit was pending. It shall be the clerk's duty to distribute the amount recovered to the persons entitled thereto as directed by the order of judgment of the court.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 2081; Acts 1955, No. 31, § 1; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1181, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 4, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-217; reen. Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 131.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 994, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section, as applicable to the Arkansas Public Service Commission, are codified as § 23-4-418.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Aluminum Co. of America v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 226 Ark. 343, 289 S.W.2d 889 (1956); City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 261 Ark. 184, 546 S.W.2d 720 (1977); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984); Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-4-635. Changes in rates by common carriers.
- No change shall be made in the rates, fares, and charges or joint rates, fares, and charges that have been filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation and published by any common carrier in compliance with the requirements of § 23-4-110 except after thirty (30) days' notice to the department and to the public.
- The notice shall plainly state the changes proposed to be made in the schedule then in force and the time when the changed rates, fares, or charges will go into effect.
- The proposed changes shall be shown by printing a new schedule or shall be plainly indicated upon the schedules in force at the time and kept open to public inspection.
- The department, in its discretion and for good cause shown, may allow changes upon less notice than specified in this section or modify the requirements of this section in respect to publishing, posting, and filing of tariffs, either in particular instances or by general order applicable to special or peculiar circumstances or conditions.
- The department is authorized to make suitable rules and regulations for the simplification of schedules of rates, fares, charges, and classifications and to permit, in the rules and regulations, the filing of an amendment of or change in any rate, fare, charge, or classification without filing a complete schedule covering rates, fares, charges, or classifications not changed, if, in its judgment, it is not inconsistent with the public interest.
History. Acts 1937, No. 133, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 2128; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-118; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 132.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “that” for “which” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-4-636. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the penalty for false reports regarding receipt of money for transportation, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 562. The section was derived from Acts 1897, No. 21, § 1, p. 28; C. & M. Dig., § 7136; Pope's Dig., § 9122; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1430.
23-4-637. Discriminatory interterritorial freight rates.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation is vested with authority to formulate and adopt plans for a complete and thorough study of and attack on interterritorial freight rates adversely affecting Arkansas. However, the plans shall be subject to approval by the Governor.
- The department is authorized to enter into contracts with rate experts, accountants, counsel, and others, taking into consideration the integrity, honesty, experience, training, and general fitness of those selected.
- The department is authorized and directed, on behalf of the State of Arkansas and with approval by the Governor, to enter into agreements with other states, or associations of states or of governors or other authorized representatives of states, to institute, prosecute, or intervene in proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished] to remove freight rate discriminations against Arkansas and the southern and southwestern territories.
History. Acts 1939, No. 107, §§ 1-3; 2017, No. 707, § 133.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Subchapter 7 — Railroads and Express Companies — Establishing Rates
Effective Dates. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 31: effective on passage.
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 141 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 135 et seq.
23-4-701. Definition.
As used in this act, unless the context otherwise requires, “engaged in transporting persons or property” shall be held to include all carriers of property by railroad, whether the carriers are designated as freight or express.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 24, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1622; Pope's Dig., § 1944; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1523.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1899, No. 53, codified as §§ 23-2-110, 23-2-414, 23-4-608, 23-4-701 — 23-4-720, 23-11-103, 23-11-104.
23-4-702. Application of Acts 1899, No. 53.
- All the provisions of this act shall apply to and include all persons, companies, or corporations carrying property on any railroad as express matter and known as express companies, as fully as if the persons, companies, or corporations were specially named and designated in this act.
- All the provisions of this act shall apply to all property and all the services in and about the transportation thereof on one (1) actually or substantially continuous carriage, or a part thereof, and to the compensation therefor, whether the property is carried wholly on one (1) railroad or partly on several railroads and whether the services are performed or compensation paid or received by, or to, one (1) person or corporation, alone, or in connection with another or other persons or corporations.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, §§ 10, 24, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., §§ 877, 1622; Pope's Dig., §§ 1081, 1944; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1514, 73-1523.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
Case Notes
Cited: Myar v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 71 Ark. 552, 76 S.W. 557 (1903).
23-4-703. Acts 1899, No. 53, not applicable to interstate traffic.
The provisions of this act shall not be construed as to require the Arkansas Department of Transportation to investigate or call upon any railroad or express company for its schedule or tariff of charges in the transportation of passengers or property from any point wholly outside of this state or to in any way interfere with such rates or charges.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 20, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1629; Pope's Dig., § 1951; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1520; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 134.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-704. Remedies cumulative.
The remedies given by this act shall be regarded as cumulative. This act shall not be construed as repealing any statute giving such remedies.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 30, p. 82; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1526.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-705. Violations — Double damages for violations — Actions to recover damages — Joinder of actions.
- Each and every act, matter, or thing in this act declared to be unlawful is prohibited.
- In case any person or corporation as defined in this act who, while engaged in the transportation of persons or property, shall do, or permit to be done, any act, matter, or thing in this act required to be done, or shall be guilty of any of the violations of any of the provisions of this act, then that person or corporation shall be held to pay to the person, firm, or corporation injured an amount which is double the amount of damages so sustained, plus all costs. The amount shall be recovered by the person, firm, or corporation so damaged in any court having jurisdiction of the amount, where the person or corporation causing the damage can be found or has an agent or place of business.
- No action for damages shall be sustained unless brought within one (1) year after the cause of action or within one (1) year after the party complaining shall have come to the knowledge of his or her right of action.
- As many causes of action as may have accrued within the year to any one (1) person, firm, or company may be joined in the same suit or complaint.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 14, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1007; Pope's Dig., § 1216; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1517.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
Case Notes
Discrimination.
A carrier is liable for double damage on account of unlawful discrimination under § 23-10-410. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Kirten Gravel Co., 184 Ark. 1024, 44 S.W.2d 674 (1931).
Limitations Period.
Where original complaint making allegations authorizing recovery of double damages for unlawful discrimination between shippers was filed within statutory period, an amendment filed later specifically asking for double damages was not barred by this section. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Kirten Gravel Co., 184 Ark. 1024, 44 S.W.2d 674 (1931).
23-4-706. Penalties — Actions to recover.
- If any person or corporation operating a railroad or express company in this state, or any receiver, trustee, or lessee of any such person or corporation, violates any of the provisions of this act or aids or abets, or violates the tariff of charges as fixed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation or any of the rules regarding railroads or express companies as made by the department and for which there is no other penalty prescribed in this act, then the person or corporation, receiver, trustee, or lessee shall be liable to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each violation of this act or such tariff of charges or rules and regulations.
-
- The penalty may be recovered by an action to be brought in the name of the State of Arkansas in the county in which the violation may occur.
-
- The department shall institute the action, and actions for the recovery of the penalties prescribed in this act, through the prosecuting attorney of the proper district.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- If any prosecuting attorney shall neglect for fifteen (15) days after notice to bring suit, the department may employ some other attorney at law to bring the suit who shall be allowed a fee therefor to be fixed by the court but not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected. In such a case, the prosecuting attorney shall not interfere.
- No such suit shall be dismissed or compromised without the consent of the court and of the department.
- In all trials of cases brought for a violation of any tariff charges by the department, it may be shown in defense that the tariff so fixed was unjust. Nothing in this section shall be so construed as to in any manner interfere with the action for damages as provided in § 23-4-705.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 18, p. 82; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1414, 73-1414n; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 135.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. For construction of this section, see § 23-4-601.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-707. Rate schedules.
-
All persons or corporations engaged in the transportation of passengers or property shall and are required to keep posted up at every depot under the control of or in use by those persons or corporations, in a conspicuous place therein, plainly and legibly printed schedules which shall state:
- The different kinds and classes of property to be carried;
- The different places between which property shall be carried; and
- The rate of freight or express charges for carriage between such places and for all services connected with the transportation of such property from the time of its receipt until it is delivered or forwarded.
-
- The schedules shall be posted for at least five (5) days before the schedule shall go into effect, and the schedule shall remain in force until another schedule shall, as aforesaid, be posted.
- However, at such points where freight or express are subject to competition by water routes not controlled by this act nor complying with its provisions, the schedule provided for in this section may be posted and go into immediate effect.
- Every person or corporation engaged in the transportation of passengers or property shall receive, load, unload, transport, store, and deliver to the consignee of the property any and all of it offered for shipment, whether as freight or express matter, and these services shall be done at and for charges not greater than those specified in the schedule as may at that time be in force. The person or corporation shall, on demand, issue to shippers duplicate freight or express receipts which shall state the class of freight shipped, the weight, and the charges.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 10, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 877; Pope's Dig., § 1081; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1514.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
Case Notes
Duty of Carrier.
A carrier must receive property when tendered for shipment and issue bills of lading therefor, even though on account of temporary congestion of freight, the carrier has insufficient station facilities for taking care of property. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 84 Ark. 150, 104 S.W. 1106 (1907).
Cited: Myar v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 71 Ark. 552, 76 S.W. 557 (1903).
23-4-708. Rate sheets and tariff charges furnished department by railroads.
- Every person or corporation operating any railroad or express business in this state is required to furnish the Arkansas Department of Transportation, within fifteen (15) days after notice to do so, with the rate sheet and tariff charges for transportation of every kind over the railroad.
- The department shall fix rates and tariffs of charges accordingly for those express companies and railroads, the officers of which fail to furnish rate sheets or tariffs of charges as required in subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 9, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1627; Pope's Dig., § 1949; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1513; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 136.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-4-709. Ratemaking procedure.
-
It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation to:
- Examine and revise the rate sheet and tariff charges for freight or express matter for each railroad in this state;
- Determine whether or not, and in what manner, if any, the charges and rates are more than just and reasonable compensation for the services rendered; and
- Determine whether or not and in what manner, if any, such charges and rates are in violation of any of the provisions of this act.
-
The department:
- Will make reasonable and just rates of freight, express, and passenger tariffs to be observed by all persons and corporations operating any railroad or engaged in transporting persons or property as express or freight in this state;
- Shall make rules as to charges at any and all points for the necessary hauling and delivering of express and freight; and
- Will regulate rates and charges for such services on all railroads as, in their judgment, justice to the public and the person or corporation requires and by rule make the rates and charges conform to the requirements of this act.
- The department, in making such rules and regulations, shall first give the person or corporation to be affected notice to appear and show cause, if it can, why no change should be made in the rates then in force and shall take into consideration the character and nature of the service to be performed, the entire earnings of any railroad or express company, the expense of operating the railroad or express company, and the income and value thereof.
- When any tariff of charges is corrected and approved, the department shall append a certificate of its approval to the tariff of charges and give notice thereof to any officer or agent of the railroad or express company to be affected thereby. The tariff of charges shall be kept posted for at least five (5) days before the tariff and charges shall go into effect.
- The department shall not alter or change any tariff of charges so approved by it except upon ten (10) days' notice in writing to the person or corporation operating the express company or railroad to be affected by the change, giving the person or corporation an opportunity to be heard. The notice is to be given by delivering a copy thereof to any officer or agent of the person or corporation.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 9, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1627; Pope's Dig., § 1949; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1513; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 137; 2019, No. 315, § 2396.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b)(2); and substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (b)(3).
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-710. Discrimination in passenger or freight rates or services prohibited.
- It shall be unlawful for any person or corporation engaged alone or associated with others in the transportation of passengers or property by railroad in this state, as freight or express, directly or indirectly, to demand or receive from any person, firm, company, or corporation any greater or lesser rate or amount of compensation than is demanded or received from any other person, firm, company, or corporation for substantially similar and contemporaneous services. Nor shall any person or corporation allow any person, firm, company, or corporation, directly or indirectly, any rebate, drawback, or other advantage in any form, or to make any preference in furnishing cars or motive power.
- All persons or corporations engaged as specified in subsection (a) of this section shall furnish, without discrimination or delay, equal and sufficient facilities for the transportation of passengers, the receiving, loading and unloading, storing, carriage, and delivery of all property of a like character carried by him or her, them, or it. The persons or corporations shall perform, with equal expedition and at uniform rates, the same kind of services connected with the contemporaneous transportation of passengers or property as aforesaid.
- It shall be unlawful for any person or corporation engaged as specified in subsection (a) of this section to enter into any contract or agreement by changes of schedule, use of different cars, or any other means or device with intent to delay or prevent the shipment of such property from being continuous from the place of shipment to the place of destination, whether carried on one (1) or more railroads.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 11, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 849; Pope's Dig., § 1053; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1512.
Cross References. Railroads, discrimination in charges or facilities prohibited, § 23-10-105.
Undue discrimination in charges or facilities prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 3.
Case Notes
Amount of Compensation.
Where plaintiff inquired of the railroad's agent and was informed by him that the charge for transporting cotton to a certain point was 15 cents per hundred, and the owners of the cotton subsequently shipped it to themselves, to be delivered to the plaintiff when paid for, but on demanding the cotton, the plaintiff was informed by the carrier that the freight charge was 25 cents per hundred, carrier was not bound by lower rate since there was no agreement between the shipper and the railroad as to that freight rate, and the rate alleged by the plaintiff could not lawfully have been made. Myar v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 71 Ark. 552, 76 S.W. 557 (1903).
Baggage.
Railroad company could not carry freight as baggage without violating law. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Miller, 103 Ark. 37, 145 S.W. 889 (1912).
Duty to Furnish Cars.
A railroad is not required to provide in advance for an unprecedented and unforeseen amount of freight. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Leder Bros., 79 Ark. 59, 95 S.W. 170 (1906).
Effect of Section.
This section does not repeal § 23-10-103. Roberts v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 95 Ark. 249, 130 S.W. 531 (1910).
Rebates.
Allowance by railroad of rebates to one to the exclusion of others presents a judicial question and not an administrative question. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Kirten Gravel Co., 184 Ark. 1024, 44 S.W.2d 674 (1931).
Cited: St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Clay County Gin Co., 77 Ark. 357, 92 S.W. 531 (1906).
23-4-711. Contracts for pooling freight or dividing revenues prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person or corporation engaged in the transportation of passengers or property, as mentioned in § 23-4-710, to make or enter into any contract, agreement, or combination, directly or indirectly, for the pooling of freight, or to pool the freight of the different railroads or lines by dividing between them the gross or net earnings of those railroads or any part thereof, or by equalizing, evening up, or dividing the property or passengers carried by those railroads.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 12, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 876; Pope's Dig., § 1080; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1515.
23-4-712. Differentiation in compensation for long and short hauls prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person or corporation engaged as specified in § 23-4-710 to demand or receive a greater amount of compensation for services rendered for a similar amount and kind of property as a charge for receiving, storing, loading, unloading, carrying, or delivering the property under similar circumstances and conditions and demand or receive a greater compensation for a shorter distance than for a longer distance which includes the shorter distance. The road of any person or corporation shall include all the railroads in use by the person or corporation, whether owned or operated by the person or corporation under a contract, agreement, or lease by the person or corporation or with which the person or corporation has a traffic contract.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 13, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 878; Pope's Dig., § 1082; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1516.
Cross References. Charge not to exceed that made to more distant station, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 3.
23-4-713. Reduced rate tickets allowed.
Nothing in this act shall be so construed as to prevent any person or corporation operating a railroad in this state from issuing or selling at reduced rates emigrant, excursion, or commutation tickets, or from carrying free or at reduced rates any property for schools, churches, fairs, exhibitions, or charitable institutions, or for this state or the United States Government, or any of the United States.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 12, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 876; Pope's Dig., § 1080; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1515.
Cross References. Free or reduced rate transportation permitted, § 23-10-409.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-714. Complaints — Investigation.
It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, upon the complaint of any person, company, or corporation in writing, charging any person or corporation with discrimination or overcharge, to investigate the complaint and take such action in the premises as is provided in this act and which the facts in the case justify.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 23, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1631, 1690; Pope's Dig., §§ 1953, 1994; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1522; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 138.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-715. Complaints — Hearings.
It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation to hear all complaints made by any person, firm, or corporation against any such tariff of charges so approved, to hear the parties to the controversy in person or by attorney, or both. The department may take testimony, orally or in writing, and regulate argument thereon and conduct the investigation of such complaints in such manner as to the department may seem best adapted to arrive at the truth. When any changes are made in any tariff of charges, notice thereof shall be given to the person or corporation to be affected thereby.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 15, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1689; Pope's Dig., § 1993; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1518; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 139.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-4-716. Liability as to rates approved by department.
In no instance shall any person or corporation operating a railroad or express company, the schedule of charges of which have been submitted to, revised, and approved by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, be civilly or criminally liable for the making of any charge that has been authorized by the tariff of charges approved by the department or the rules and regulations prescribed by the department.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 15, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1689; Pope's Dig., § 1993; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1518; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 140.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” and substituted “that” for “which”.
23-4-717. Railroads required to furnish copies of traffic agreements and other information to department.
Upon notice to do so, every person or corporation operating a railroad or express company having an agent or office in the state shall furnish the Arkansas Department of Transportation with all the information required to enable the department to perform its duties relative to the management of their respective lines and connecting lines and, particularly, with copies of all leases, contracts, and agreements with other lines, express companies, or sleeping car companies and shall furnish all such information as to the number of persons employed in the different departments of their service and the wages paid these employees, as the department may require.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 16, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1628; Pope's Dig., § 1950; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1519; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 141.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-4-718. Access to railroad books by department — Penalties.
-
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have the right at such times as the department deems necessary to inspect the books and papers of any railroad company and to examine under oath any officer, agent, or employee of the railroad in relation to the business and affairs of the railroad.
- If any railroad refuses to permit the department to examine its books and papers, the railroad company, for each offense, shall pay to the State of Arkansas not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each day it shall so fail and refuse.
- Any officer, agent, or employee of any railroad company who, upon proper demand, shall fail or refuse to exhibit to the department any book or paper of such a railroad company which is in the possession or under the control of the officer, agent, or employee shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction in any court having jurisdiction shall be fined for each offense a sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, §§ 25, 26, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1625, 1626; Pope's Dig., §§ 1947, 1948; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1524, 73-1525; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 142.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” and substituted “the department deems” for “they may deem”.
23-4-719. Enforcement of Acts 1899, No. 53 — Mandamus.
If any person or corporation operating any railroad or express company fails, refuses, or neglects, after notice by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, to put up its rate sheet, giving its tariff of charges in the manner, place, and time as provided in this act; to furnish the department with the rate sheet and tariff of charges as provided for in this act; to furnish cars and motive power for the prompt transportation of freight as provided in this act; to comply with any provision of this act; or to make returns as required by this act, then the person or corporation shall be subject to a writ of mandamus. The writ shall be issued by any circuit court of this state where the person or corporation has an office, agent, or place of business to compel a compliance with the provisions and requirements of this act. The writ shall issue in the name of the State of Arkansas at the relation of the department appointed under the provisions of this act, and failure to comply with the requirements shall be punishable as and for a contempt.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 22, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1694; Pope's Dig., § 1997; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1521; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 143.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
23-4-720. Disposition of funds.
All fines and penalties recovered under the provisions of this act shall be paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 21, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1676; Pope's Dig., § 1986; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-108.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-4-701.
Subchapter 8 — Railroads and Transportation Companies — Passes and Free Transportation
Cross References. Free or reduced rate transportation permitted, § 23-10-409.
Free passes to state officers to be prevented by law, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 7.
Effective Dates. Acts 1887, No. 22, § 6: effective 30 days after passage.
Acts 1895, No. 77, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1899, No. 119, § 10: effective on passage.
Acts 1917, No. 400, § 2: approved Mar. 27, 1917. Emergency declared.
Acts 1923, No. 163, § 3: approved Feb. 21, 1923. Emergency clause provided: “This Act being necessary for the preservation of the public health, peace and safety of the people of the State of Arkansas, shall be in full force and effect after its passage.”
Acts 1923, No. 412, § 2: approved Mar. 19, 1923. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby declared and it shall be in force and effect from and after its passage.”
Acts 1931, No. 151, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1935, No. 19, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-4-801. Definitions.
As used in this section and § 23-4-802, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Officers of this state, legislative, executive, or judicial” includes all officers elective, appointive, commissioned, or qualified; and
- “Railroad” or “transportation company” shall be deemed and taken to mean all corporations, companies, or individuals owning or operating any railroad or transportation line in this state for the public transportation or conveyance as common carriers of persons or property therein.
History. Acts 1887, No. 22, §§ 3, 5, p. 27; C. & M. Dig., §§ 890, 892; Pope's Dig., §§ 1092, 1094; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1529, 73-1531.
23-4-802. Granting of free passes to certain government officials prohibited.
- No railroad or transportation company organized or doing business in this state under any act of incorporation or general law of this state shall grant any free pass in the cars or other modes of conveyance over the line of any such railroad or transportation company, for any length of time or for any distance, to any officer of this state, legislative, executive, or judicial, whereby any such officer may be transported for any length of time or for any distance over the line of the railroad or transportation company, either free of charge therefor or for a less compensation than that demanded or received from the general public.
-
- Any railroad or transportation company that shall grant any free pass to any such officer in violation of this section shall forfeit and pay for every such offense an amount not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000).
-
- The penalty is to be recovered in an action at law brought in the name of the state by the prosecuting attorney thereof in any county of the state through or into which the railroad corporation or transportation company may run its railroad or transportation line.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee for his or her services of ten percent (10%) of the amount that may be collected in any suit, in case judgment is rendered for the plaintiff.
- The balance and residue of any sums recovered in the suit shall be paid into the county treasury of the county where the suit is brought, to be appropriated to general county purposes in the county.
- In any such suit should judgment be rendered for the defendant, the costs of the suit shall be paid by the county.
History. Acts 1887, No. 22, §§ 1, 2, p. 27; C. & M. Dig., §§ 888, 889; Pope's Dig., §§ 1090, 1091; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1527, 73-1528.
Case Notes
Cited: Ex parte Butt, 78 Ark. 262, 93 S.W. 992 (1906).
23-4-803. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the penalty for state officers accepting passes, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 563. The section was derived from Acts 1887, No. 22, § 4, p. 27; C. & M. Dig., § 891; Pope's Dig., § 1093; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1530.
23-4-804. Exemptions — General Assembly and certain state officers may accept free passes.
- Members of the General Assembly within the State of Arkansas are exempted from the provisions of §§ 23-4-801 and 23-4-802. They are permitted to accept and it shall be the duty of all railroad companies doing business in the State of Arkansas to issue passes for free transportation to any such officers. In issuing free passes for transportation, the railroad companies shall not be liable to the penalties set out in § 23-4-802, or liable to prosecution under any of the laws of the State of Arkansas because of the issuance of any pass.
- The Governor, Secretary of State, Auditor of State, Treasurer of State, Attorney General, and Lieutenant Governor are permitted to accept and use a free pass from any railroad of this state without incurring the penalties prescribed in § 23-4-803 [repealed].
History. Acts 1923, No. 163, §§ 1, 2; 1931, No. 148, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1095; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1533, 73-1534.
23-4-805. Exemptions — Certain officials permitted to accept and use passes.
- Sheriffs are exempt from the provision of § 23-4-803 [repealed], and it shall not be unlawful for railroad companies to furnish free passes to them.
- The Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Director of the Division of Career and Technical Education and the prosecuting attorneys and judges of the circuit courts of the several judicial districts of this state shall be permitted to accept and use a free pass on any railroad in this state without incurring any penalty prescribed under § 23-4-803 [repealed].
- Any county judge or any constable or deputy sheriff within the State of Arkansas is permitted to accept and use a free pass on any railroad in the State of Arkansas without incurring the penalty prescribed in § 23-4-803 [repealed].
- No railroad company issuing such a pass shall be liable for the penalty set out in § 23-4-802 or liable to prosecution under any of the laws of the State of Arkansas because of the issuance of the pass.
History. Acts 1895, No. 77, § 1, p. 102; 1903, No. 192, § 2, p. 376; 1917, No. 400, § 1, p. 1866; C. & M. Dig., § 893; Acts 1931, No. 151, § 1; 1935, No. 19, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1096; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1532; Acts 2019, No. 910, § 2347.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Director of the Division of Career and Technical Education” for “Commissioner of Education and the Director of the Department of Career Education” in (b).
23-4-806. Passes in exchange for advertising space.
Railroad companies operating in the State of Arkansas are authorized and empowered to enter into contracts with newspaper and periodical publishers of the State of Arkansas for the issuance of transportation in exchange for advertising space in the publication. The transportation is to be restricted to intrastate passage.
History. Acts 1923, No. 412, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1097; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1536.
23-4-807. Free carriage, passage permitted.
- Nothing in the law shall prevent carriage, storage, or hauling free or at reduced rates for any city, county, or town government, nor the free carriage of destitute or indigent persons or ministers of the gospel, nor prevent the railroads from giving free transportation or transportation at reduced rates to the inmates of hospitals, or eleemosynary and charitable institutions.
- Nothing in the law shall be construed to prevent railroads from giving free transportation to any railroad officer, agent, or employee, or attorney, stockholder, or director of the railroad company.
History. Acts 1899, No. 119, § 8, p. 194; C. & M. Dig., § 850; Pope's Dig., § 1054; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1535.
Subchapter 9 — Rural Electric Distribution Cooperatives
23-4-901. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Board” means the board of directors of a rural electric distribution cooperative;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Co-op” means a rural electric distribution cooperative formed under § 23-18-101 et seq., and which sells electricity only at retail; and
- “Member-consumers” means the customers of a rural electric distribution cooperative.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 1.
23-4-902. Exemption from rate case procedures, etc.
A co-op, as defined in § 23-4-901, shall not be subject to rate case procedures and hearings and other requirements of §§ 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, and 23-4-620 — 23-4-634 and Arkansas Public Service Commission rules implementary thereof, hereafter referred to as “rate case procedures”, by the commission unless:
- By action of its board of directors, the co-op elects to be subject to rate case procedures by the commission;
- A proposed change in the co-op's rates and charges exceeds ten percent (10%) of total gross revenues;
- Ten percent (10%) of the co-op's member-consumers petition the commission to apply rate case procedures; or
- As otherwise provided in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2397.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language.
23-4-903. Notification of proposed rate change.
Each co-op not subject to rate case procedures, at least ninety (90) days before the effective date of any proposed rate change, shall notify the Arkansas Public Service Commission and each of its member-consumers of the proposed rate change. Notice to the commission shall include a verified statement showing the then total number of member-consumers of the co-op. Notice by the co-op to its member-consumers shall:
- Be in a form prescribed by the commission;
- Be by regular mail and may be included in regular member-consumer billings or in regularly published co-op newsletters provided to its member-consumers; and
- Include a schedule of the proposed rate change, the effective date of the proposed rate change, and the procedure necessary for the member-consumers to petition the commission to apply rate case procedures.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 3.
23-4-904. Petition for relief from rate change — Form.
Petitions provided for in this subchapter shall be prepared as follows:
-
Form.
-
The petition shall be headed by a caption, which shall contain:
- The heading, “Before the Arkansas Public Service Commission”;
- The name of the co-op seeking a change in rates and charges; and
- The relief sought.
- A petition substantially in compliance with the form set forth in this section shall not be deemed invalid due to minor errors in its form; and
-
The petition shall be headed by a caption, which shall contain:
-
Body. The body of the petition shall consist of three (3) numbered paragraphs, if applicable, as follows:
- Allegations of Facts. The allegations of facts shall be stated in the form of ultimate facts, without unnecessary detail, upon which the right to relief is based. The allegations will be stated in numbered subparagraphs as necessary for clarity;
- Relief Sought. The petition shall contain a brief statement of the amount of the change in rates and charges that is objected to or other relief sought; and
- Petitioners. The petition shall contain the name, address, telephone number, and signature of each member-consumer. Only the member-consumer in whose name the electric service is listed shall be counted as a petitioner. Every signature must be dated and shall have been affixed to the petition within ninety (90) days preceding its filing with the commission.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 9.
23-4-905. Petition for relief from rate change — Effect.
If, by the effective date of the proposed change in rates and charges, the Arkansas Public Service Commission has received petitions from fewer than fifteen percent (15%) of the member-consumers requesting that the commission apply rate case procedures, then the commission shall immediately certify that fact to the co-op. The proposed rates and charges shall become effective as published in the notice to the member-consumers. Rates and charges so established shall be in effect for not less than one (1) year, subject to the procedure provided for in § 23-4-906. If, on or before the effective date of the proposed change in rates and charges, the commission has received petitions from ten percent (10%) of the member-consumers, then the commission shall notify the co-op that it will apply rate case procedures.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 4.
23-4-906. Petition to declare co-op subject to rate case procedures.
In addition to the procedure for petition prior to any proposed change in rates and charges pursuant to §§ 23-4-903 and 23-4-905, the member-consumers of a co-op may at any time petition the Arkansas Public Service Commission to declare the co-op subject to rate case procedures. If the commission determines that at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the member-consumers of a co-op have properly petitioned that the co-op be subject to rate case procedures, the commission shall certify that fact to the co-op. Thereafter, the co-op shall be subject to rate case procedures by the commission until at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the member-consumers of the co-op properly petition, in the manner prescribed in § 23-4-904, that the co-op shall no longer be subject to rate case procedures by the commission.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 5.
23-4-907. Commission's jurisdiction not affected.
Sections 23-4-902, 23-4-903, 23-4-905, and 23-4-906 apply only to rates and charges and shall have no effect on the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction over a co-op as otherwise provided by law.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 6.
23-4-908. Authority of commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have the authority to investigate and determine the reasonableness of the change in rates and charges of each co-op changing its rates and charges pursuant to this subchapter, within one (1) year of the time of the change in rates and charges. If the commission preliminarily determines that there is substantial evidence indicating that the rates and charges are unreasonable, the commission shall have the authority to apply rate case procedures. After a hearing thereon, the commission shall have the authority to modify all or any portion of the changes found to be unreasonable. If, following the hearing, the commission orders a change in the co-op's rates and charges, the co-op shall not effect a subsequent change in rates and charges pursuant to this subchapter for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of the commission order.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 8.
23-4-909. Apportionment of rates and charges.
When determining how rates and charges established under § 23-4-903 are to be allocated among different rate classes, a co-op shall endeavor to apportion the rates and charges in a manner which reflects, as closely as practicable, the costs of providing service to each class.
History. Acts 1987, No. 821, § 7.
Subchapter 10 — Pole Attachments
23-4-1001. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
-
“Pole attachment” means the attachment of wires and related equipment to a pole, duct, or conduit owned or controlled by a public utility for the provision of:
- Electric service;
- Telecommunication service;
- Cable television service;
- Internet access service; or
- Other related information services.(B) “Pole attachment” does not mean multiground neutral connections; and
-
“Pole attachment” means the attachment of wires and related equipment to a pole, duct, or conduit owned or controlled by a public utility for the provision of:
-
- “Public utility” means an electric utility as defined in § 23-1-101, an electric cooperative as defined in § 23-18-201, or a telecommunications provider as defined in § 23-17-403.
- “Public utility” does not mean a municipal electric utility.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1.
23-4-1002. Nondiscriminatory access for pole attachments.
A public utility shall provide nondiscriminatory access for a pole attachment to:
- An electric utility;
- A telecommunications provider;
- A cable television service; or
- A cable Internet access service.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1.
23-4-1003. Regulation by commission of rates, terms, and conditions.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall regulate the rates, terms, and conditions upon which a public utility shall provide access for a pole attachment.
-
- The commission shall develop rules necessary for the effective regulation of the rates, terms, and conditions upon which a public utility shall provide access for a pole attachment.
-
In developing and implementing the rules under this subsection, the commission shall consider:
- The interests of the subscribers of the services offered through pole attachments;
- The interests of the consumers of the public utility services;
- Maintenance of reliability of public utility services; and
- Compliance with applicable safety standards.
- [Repealed.]
- Nothing in this section prevents a public utility, an electric utility, a telecommunications provider, a cable television service, or a cable internet access service from entering into a voluntarily negotiated, written agreement regarding the rates, terms, and conditions upon which access for a pole attachment is provided.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1; 2017, No. 334, § 4.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (b)(3).
23-4-1004. Authority of commission to hear complaints.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission may hear and determine all complaints arising from:
- A public utility's failure or refusal to provide access for a pole attachment;
- The inability of a public utility and an entity seeking access for a pole attachment to reach a voluntarily negotiated, written agreement governing access for the pole attachment; and
- Disputes between a public utility and an entity over the implementation of an existing contract granting the entity access for a pole attachment.
- A public utility shall provide information required for the commission to verify that the costs associated with access for pole attachments provided by the public utility are just and reasonable.
-
- The commission shall resolve any complaint or dispute that the commission may hear under this section within one hundred eighty (180) days after the complaint is filed with the commission.
- However, the commission by rule may extend the time to resolve a complaint or dispute for up to three hundred sixty (360) days after the complaint is filed.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1.
23-4-1005. Certification.
Upon the adoption of rules under § 23-4-1003, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall certify to the Federal Communications Commission that:
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission regulates the rates, terms, and conditions of access for pole attachments;
-
In regulating the rates, terms, and conditions of access for pole attachments, the state considers the interests of the:
- Subscribers of service offered by the pole attachments; and
- Customers of the public utility; and
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission has adopted rules under this subchapter that:
- Implement the Arkansas Public Service Commission's regulatory authority; and
-
Provide that complaints heard by the Arkansas Public Service Commission under this subchapter shall be resolved:
- Within one hundred eighty (180) days after the complaint is filed; or
- If the Arkansas Public Service Commission elects to extend the period, not exceeding three hundred sixty (360) days after the complaint is filed.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1.
23-4-1006. Applicability.
Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the authority and jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission over the rates, terms, and conditions of a pole attachment until after the final certification of the Arkansas Public Service Commission under § 23-4-1005.
History. Acts 2007, No. 740, § 1.
Subchapter 11 — Cooperatives
Effective Dates. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 2: Mar. 27, 2009. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the costs that drive electric utility costs are constantly changing; that electric cooperatives need to have procedures that permit their rates to change in response to those changing conditions; and that this act is immediately necessary because it is crucial to the provision of safe and reliable electric service that electric cooperatives recover their costs in a timely manner. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-4-1101. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Board” means the board of directors of a generation and transmission cooperative;
-
“Generation and transmission cooperative” means a rural electric cooperative formed under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., that:
- Does not have a certificated service territory; and
- Exclusively sells electricity at wholesale;
- “Member cooperative” means a rural electric cooperative that sells electricity at retail and is a member of a generation and transmission cooperative; and
- “Retail cooperative member” means the individual member-owner of a member cooperative.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1102. Exemption from general rate case procedure.
A generation and transmission cooperative may modify its rates and charges if:
- At least three-fourths (¾) of its board votes to change its rates and charges;
- A proposed increase in the generation and transmission cooperative's rates and charges does not exceed five percent (5%) in any twelve-month period of the total gross revenues of the generation and transmission cooperative; and
- Any additional requirements of this subchapter are satisfied.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1103. Notification of proposed rate and charge modification.
-
- A generation and transmission cooperative shall notify the Arkansas Public Service Commission, the Attorney General, and the member cooperatives in writing at least sixty (60) days before the board votes on a proposed modification of its rates and charges under § 23-4-1102.
-
-
The notice under subdivision (a)(1) of this section shall:
- Be in writing;
- Include a schedule of the proposed modification of rates and charges; and
- Include the effective date of the proposed change.
- However, if the board subsequently reduces a proposed increase in rates and charges after providing notice under subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the board does not have to provide any additional notice under this subsection.
-
The notice under subdivision (a)(1) of this section shall:
-
- The generation and transmission cooperative shall provide notice of its proposed modification of its rates and charges to the public not less than forty (40) days before the board votes on the proposed change in its rates and charges.
-
The notice under subdivision (b)(1) of this section shall:
- Be substantially similar to the public notice required by the commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure for general rate case procedures;
-
Be published in:
- A newspaper of general circulation in the service territory of the generation and transmission cooperative; or
-
Either of the following:
- Any publication that is regularly provided to the retail cooperative members by the member cooperatives; or
- The generation and transmission cooperative's newsletter to retail cooperative members; and
-
Include a statement estimating:
-
The retail impact of the proposed change in rates and charges on:
- A per-kilowatt-hour basis; and
- An average residential retail cooperative member's monthly bill; and
- The effective date of the proposed change in rates and charges.
-
The retail impact of the proposed change in rates and charges on:
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1104. Alternative procedure for modifying rates and charges of a generation and transmission cooperative.
-
-
- After the board approves the modification in rates and charges under § 23-4-1102, the generation and transmission cooperative shall file for the approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission an application for the change in rates and charges and tariffs containing the proposed change in rates and charges.
- However, a rate rider or other rider to the generation and transmission cooperative's base rates and charges shall not be modified under this subchapter unless the commission determines otherwise.
-
In addition to an attachment containing the proposed tariffs to effect the modification of the rates and charges, the application shall provide the following:
- Proof of the board vote required by § 23-4-1102;
- The proof of notice required by § 23-4-1103;
-
A current calculation of the generation and transmission cooperative's:
- Times interest earned ratio;
- Debt service coverage ratio; and
- Margins as a percent of revenue for the last available calendar year;
- An analysis of the impact of the proposed change in rates and charges on each member cooperative's cost of wholesale power that is acquired from the generation and transmission cooperative;
- Documentary evidence that the impact of the proposed change in rates and charges does not exceed five percent (5%) of the generation and transmission cooperative's total gross revenues for the previous calendar year;
- Documentation that shows the derivation of the generation and transmission cooperative's proposed changes in its rates and charges; and
-
- Any other supporting documentation or evidence required by the commission.
-
- However, the commission shall not require the generation and transmission cooperative to prepare a cost-of-service study.
- Instead of a new cost-of-service study, the generation and transmission cooperative shall rely upon the most recent commission-approved cost allocation.
-
- Within ninety (90) days after the date of filing the generation and transmission cooperative's application, the commission shall issue its final determination regarding the proposed modification of the rates and charges of the generation and transmission cooperative.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1105. Alternative procedure for modifying rates and charges of a member cooperative.
-
A member cooperative may propose a modification of its retail rates and charges to incorporate the proposed change in the generation and transmission cooperative's wholesale rates and charges filed under § 23-4-1104 if:
- The member cooperative files its application for a modification of its retail rates and charges with the Arkansas Public Service Commission on the same date as the generation and transmission cooperative files its application for a modification of its change in wholesale rates and charges under § 23-4-1104; and
- The member cooperative apportions its proposed change in rates and charges in a manner that reflects, as closely as practicable, its cost of providing service to each class.
- Within ninety (90) days after a member cooperative files its application under subsection (a) of this section, the commission shall review and approve the modification of the rates and charges of a member cooperative's retail rates and charges that reasonably reflect those changes in the generation and transmission cooperative's wholesale rates and charges that were approved by the commission under § 23-4-1104.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1106. Limitation on increase in rates.
The generation and transmission cooperative shall not increase its rates and charges under this subchapter by an aggregate total of more than eight percent (8%) during any twenty-four-month period.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
23-4-1107. Commission's jurisdiction not affected.
This subchapter does not affect the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction over a generation and transmission cooperative, including without limitation the authority to investigate and set the rates and charges of the generation and transmission cooperative, or a member cooperative as otherwise provided by law.
History. Acts 2009, No. 676, § 1.
Subchapter 12 — Formula Rate Review Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 4: Mar. 27, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the costs that drive public utility rates are changing; that public utilities need to have procedures that permit their rates to change in response to those changing conditions; that there is a need to address the allocation of costs and design of rates; that there is a need to maintain stable rates and to mitigate the magnitude of future rate changes; and that affordable electricity and natural gas encourage economic activity within the state and benefit the state's industries to increase the number of available jobs and to attract new businesses and industries to the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-4-1201. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Formula Rate Review Act”.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1202. Findings and intent.
-
The General Assembly finds that:
- Electricity and natural gas services are essential to the public health and safety of citizens of this state; and
- Affordable electricity and natural gas encourage economic activity within the state and benefit the state's industrial, commercial, and agricultural industries to increase the number of available jobs and to attract new business and industry to the state.
- The intent of this subchapter is to establish a regulatory framework that implements rate reforms to provide just and reasonable rates to consumers in this state and enables public utilities in this state to provide reliable service while maintaining stable rates.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1203. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
- “Earned return rate” means a public utility's return on common equity for a formula rate review test period that is based on the numbers or values of the formula rate review test period and calculated by dividing the weighted earned common equity rate by the common equity ratio percentage.
- As used in subdivision (1)(A) of this section, “weighted earned common equity rate” means the weighted formula rate review test period cost rate for common equity minus the operating income deficiency, or excess, divided by a public utility's rate base;
- “Formula rate review test period” means a test period as stated in § 23-4-406 or a projected year;
- “Historical year” means, when using a formula rate review test period containing projections, the twelve (12) consecutive months that precede the second and any subsequent formula rate review test period;
- “Projected year” means the twelve (12) months following the proposed effective date under § 23-4-1205 for the first formula rate review filing and each subsequent consecutive twelve-month period; and
- “Target return rate” means a cost rate of common equity value as established by the Arkansas Public Service Commission in the commission's order addressing the public utility's most recent application for a general change in rates and charges.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1204. Formula rate review — Authorized.
- A formula rate review is authorized to provide an annual streamlined review of a public utility's rates to determine if adjustments are needed to comply with this subchapter.
- An electric cooperative corporation established under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., shall not be regulated by a formula rate review.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1205. Filing — Procedure.
-
- A public utility filing an application for a general change or modification to its rates and charges under § 23-4-401 et seq., may as part of its application, file a notice with the Arkansas Public Service Commission that the public utility is electing to have its rates regulated under a formula rate review mechanism as authorized by this subchapter.
- The notice shall designate the formula rate review test period based upon either a projected year or a test period under § 23-4-406.
-
Upon receipt of a notice as described in subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the commission shall:
- Regulate the rates of the public utility according to this subchapter; and
- Be required to approve a formula rate review mechanism utilizing the formula rate review test period designated by the public utility.
-
- A public utility that has filed a notice of intent or has an application for a general change in rates and charges pending under § 23-4-401 et seq. that contains a notice of election to be regulated under a formula rate review effective March 27, 2015, shall be regulated under this subchapter.
- A public utility shall not file for an initial formula rate review until at least one hundred eighty (180) days after rates have become effective pursuant to the final order on the application for a general change in rates. A public utility that has filed a notice of intent or has an application for a general change in rates and charges pending under § 23-4-401 et seq. that contains a notice of election to be regulated under a formula rate review effective March 27, 2015, may file for the initial formula rate review one hundred fifty (150) days after rates have become effective pursuant to the final order in the general rate case.
- The rates that are approved in the application for a general change in rates and charges shall remain in effect during the formula rate review term under § 23-4-1208, subject to the rate adjustments under this subchapter.
- An approved formula rate review mechanism shall require the public utility to file the information required by the commission under this subchapter not more than one hundred eighty (180) days before the date on which the rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year.
- An approved formula rate review mechanism shall require any party, according to the commission's rules and procedures, to file with the commission a statement of the errors or objections at least ninety (90) days before the date on which rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year.
- An approved formula rate review mechanism shall require the public utility to file with the commission any corrections or a rebuttal to the errors or objections raised by the parties at least seventy-five (75) days before the date on which rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year.
-
- The commission shall conduct a hearing, unless waived by the parties, at least fifty (50) days before the date on which rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year.
- The commission shall issue a final order at least twenty (20) days before the date on which rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year.
-
- If a final order is not issued at least twenty (20) days before the date on which rates determined by the formula rate review mechanism will go into effect for each year, the public utility may put the proposed formula rate rider changes into effect subject to refund.
- The commission may require reasonable security to assure the prompt payment of any refunds, including interest, that may be ordered.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1206. Formula rate review — Required information.
- A formula rate review mechanism approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall specify the minimum information required with each annual rate review filing.
- Annual formula rate review filings under an approved formula rate review mechanism shall be developed using the formula rate review test period designated by the public utility under § 23-4-1205(a)(2).
- Annual formula rate review filings shall be prepared consistent with the commission's order on the public utility's application for a general change in rates and charges.
- Any costs disallowed by the commission in its order on the public utility's application for a general change in rates and charges shall not be eligible for recovery under a formula rate review mechanism.
-
- If a formula rate review test period utilizes projected data under § 23-4-406 or a projected year, rate changes under § 23-4-1207 shall include an adjustment to net any differences between the prior formula rate review test period change in revenue and the actual historical year change in revenue for that same year.
- A public utility shall report any differences between the prior formula rate review test period change in revenue and the historical year change in revenue for the same year.
- Netting shall not begin until a public utility has accumulated a full twelve (12) months of a historical year to prepare a report.
- The public utility shall submit documentation fully supporting all calculations and adjustments as required by the rules of the commission.
- A public utility or any other party to the proceeding subject to the commission's rules and procedures may propose additional adjustments that are based on factors unique to the public utility.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1207. Formula — Adjustment of customer rates.
- Customer rates shall be adjusted in a formula rate review mechanism based on a comparison of the earned return rate to the target return rate.
-
Adjustments of customer rates shall be calculated using the following formula:
- If the earned return rate is less than the target return rate minus five-tenths percent (0.5%), the formula rate review mechanism revenue level for the formula rate review test period shall be increased by an amount necessary to increase the earned return rate to the target return rate;
- If the earned return rate is greater than the target return rate plus five-tenths percent (0.5%), the formula rate review mechanism revenue level for the formula rate review test period shall be decreased by an amount necessary to decrease the earned return rate to the target return rate; or
- If the earned return rate is less than or equal to the target return rate plus five-tenths percent (0.5%) and greater than or equal to the target return rate minus five-tenths percent (0.5%), the formula rate review mechanism revenue level for the formula rate review test period shall not change or be adjusted.
- If a formula rate review test period utilizes projected data under § 23-4-406 or a projected year, rates shall be adjusted by the netting of historical year differences under § 23-4-1206.
-
- The total change in the formula rate review mechanism revenue level shall be allocated to each applicable rate schedule based on an equal percentage of the base rate revenue used in the development of rates in the Arkansas Public Service Commission's order addressing the public utility's last application for a general change in rates and charges.
- The total amount of a revenue increase or decrease for each rate class shall not exceed four percent (4%) of each rate class's revenue for the twelve (12) calendar months preceding the formula rate review test period.
- Only one (1) rate review adjustment shall occur during any period of three hundred sixty-five (365) days.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1208. Term — Formula rate review.
-
- The term of any formula rate review approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not exceed five (5) years from the date of the commission's final order on the application by the public utility for a general change in rates and charges.
- Upon a determination that it is in the public interest, the commission may extend the term by a period of no more than five (5) years beyond the initial term.
- The rate review mechanism shall continue until all historical years have been netted under § 23-4-1206(e)(1) and rates have been adjusted under § 23-4-1207(c).
- A formula rate review shall continue until a final order is issued on an application for a general change in rates and charges filed by a public utility or an application for a change in general rates and charges filed by the public utility as ordered by the commission. The rate review mechanism shall continue until all historical years have been netted under § 23-4-1206(e)(1) and rates have been adjusted under § 23-4-1207(c).
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
23-4-1209. Construction.
- This subchapter does not repeal any other provision in this chapter and is supplemental to other laws governing the regulation of public utility rates.
- This subchapter shall not prohibit the Arkansas Public Service Commission from exercising its powers under any other statute.
History. Acts 2015, No. 725, § 3.
Chapters 5-9
[Reserved]
Chapter 10 Transportation Of Passengers And Freight Generally
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 268 et seq.
14 Am. Jur. 2d, Carriers, § 672 et seq.
C.J.S. 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 366 et seq. and § 491 et seq.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Cross References. Railroads, canals, and turnpikes, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
Effective Dates. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1937, No. 131, § 2: approved Feb. 24, 1937. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the peace, health and public safety, an emergency is hereby declared and this act shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.”
23-10-101. Definition.
As used in this act, unless the context otherwise requires, “railroad” or “railroad corporation” means all corporations, companies, or individuals owning or operating any railroad in this state whether as owner, contractor, lessee, mortgagee, trustee, assignee, or receiver.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 11, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 842; Pope's Dig., § 1046; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1509.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1887, No. 81, codified as §§ 23-4-603, 23-10-101 — 23-10-108, 23-10-110, 23-11-311.
23-10-102. Application of Acts 1887, No. 81 — Different railroad lines operated by same company.
Whenever any railroad corporation, as lessee or otherwise, operates any railroad in connection with its own road, the provisions of this act as to charges for transportation and carrying freight and passengers shall apply to the other road so operated in like manner as if the other road were a part of the line of road owned by the corporation operating the road, and for such purposes all lines of railroad operated by the same company shall be considered as one and the same road.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 10, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 859; Pope's Dig., § 1063; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1508.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-10-101.
23-10-103. Railroads — Civil penalties for violations of §§ 23-4-603, 23-4-707, 23-4-710, 23-4-711, 23-4-713, and 23-10-104 — 23-10-108 — Actions to recover penalties.
- Any railroad corporation that violates §§ 23-4-603, 23-4-707, 23-4-710, 23-4-711, or 23-4-713 or shall be a party concerned in the violation of § 23-10-108 shall forfeit and pay for every such offense any sum not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) and costs of suit, to be recovered by civil action by the party aggrieved, in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
-
- Any president, director, officer, agent, or employee of any such railroad who shall knowingly or willfully violate any of the provisions of §§ 23-10-104 — 23-10-108 for every such violation shall be liable for the same penalties, to be recovered by any party aggrieved in the same manner as prescribed in this section.
- In case of the violation of § 23-10-108 by any such railroad corporation or president, director, officer, agent, or employee, each day of violation shall constitute a separate cause of action.
- All such actions shall be brought within one (1) year after the cause of action accrues or within one (1) year after the party complaining comes to the knowledge of his or her rights.
- No such action shall be maintained unless it is alleged and shown that before bringing his or her action the party complaining brought the matter to the attention of the railroad company by a notice or a statement of the facts in writing, accompanied by the papers showing the violation, if he or she has any, and a demand for reparation which has been delivered to some agent of the railroad company. It must also be shown that for fifteen (15) days after the reception of the notice the railroad company neglected or refused to refund any overcharge or make other proper reparation.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 12, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 1006; Pope's Dig., § 1215; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1511.
Case Notes
In General.
This section was not repealed by §§ 23-4-602, 23-4-608, 23-4-706 or 23-4-710. Roberts v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 95 Ark. 249, 130 S.W. 531 (1910).
Reparation.
The “reparation” contemplated by Acts 1887, No. 81 is compensation for injuries or wrongs suffered by reason of a railway's failure to comply with Acts 1887, No. 81, and only the person to whom the reparation is due can be entitled to the penalty provided. Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Harris, 62 Ark. 452, 36 S.W. 186 (1896).
23-10-104. Railroads — Preferences as to services prohibited.
No railroad or any lessee, manager, or employee thereof shall make any preferences in furnishing cars or motive power.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 4, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 919; Pope's Dig., § 1123; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1506.
23-10-105. Railroads — Discrimination in charges or facilities prohibited.
- All individuals, associations, and corporations shall have equal rights to have persons and property transported over railroads in this state.
- No unjust or undue discrimination shall be made in charges for, or in facilities for, transportation of freight or passengers within the state.
- Persons and property transported over any railroad shall be delivered at any station at charges not exceeding the charges for transportation of persons and property of the same class in the same direction to any more distant station, but excursion, immigration, and commutation tickets may be issued at special rates.
- No railroad shall charge or collect from a connecting railroad any greater rate of charge for transporting freight received from the connecting railroad to points on its line than the connecting road charges for similar freights originating at the point of junction to the same destination.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, §§ 1, 4, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., §§ 848, 919; Acts 1937, No. 131, § 1; Pope's Dig., §§ 1052, 1123; Acts 1961, No. 247, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1504, 73-1506.
23-10-106. Transportation companies — Discrimination in charges or facilities prohibited.
No discrimination in charges or facilities for transportation shall be made between transportation companies and individuals or in favor of either by abatement, drawback, or otherwise.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 4, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 919; Pope's Dig., § 1123; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1506.
23-10-107. Railroads — Free transportation for officers, agents, etc.
Nothing contained in this act shall make unlawful the issuance of free transportation to employees, widows and widowers of deceased employees, officers, agents, surgeons, physicians, and attorneys for common carrier railroad companies, or for dependent members of their families.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 1, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 848; Acts 1937, No. 131, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1052; Acts 1961, No. 247, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1504.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-10-101.
23-10-108. Railroads — Officers, agents, or employees not to be personally interested in contracts.
- No president, director, officer, agent, or employee of any railroad shall be interested, directly or indirectly, in the furnishing of materials or supplies to the railroad or in the business of transportation as a common carrier of freight or passengers over the works owned, leased, controlled, or worked by the railroad, nor in any arrangement which shall afford more advantageous terms or greater facilities than are offered or accorded to the public.
- All contracts and arrangements in violation of this section shall be void.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 3, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., §§ 918, 8439; Pope's Dig., §§ 1122, 11013; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1503.
23-10-109. Agreements for carrier to pay charge for use of additional mode of transportation void.
- Any part of any agreement, arrangement, or other device entered into shall be unlawful and void which, as a condition to the transportation of property, requires or permits a regulated for-hire carrier of property, freight forwarder, private carrier, or other carrier or shipper or association or group of shippers to pay a charge, allowance, assessment, or compensation to any person or organization if the charge, allowance, assessment, or compensation is dependent or contingent upon the use of another mode of transportation in addition to motor transportation for movement of the property.
-
- Should any person, firm, partnership, organization, or association of persons violate any of the provisions of this section, he, she, or it shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment for not less than thirty (30) days nor more than ninety (90) days, or by both a fine and imprisonment.
- Each day of the violation of any of the provisions of this section shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1963, No. 98, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1537, 73-1538.
23-10-110. Railroads — Actions under Acts 1887, No. 81 — Attendance and testimony of officers, agents, etc.
- In any action brought under this act, the court before which the action is pending may compel any president, director, officer, receiver, trustee, or agent of the railroad defendant in the action to attend and testify in the case. The court may compel the production of the books and papers of the railroad corporation party to the action or suit.
- The claim that any such testimony or evidence may tend to incriminate the person giving the evidence shall not excuse the witness from testifying, but the evidence or testimony shall not be used against the person on the trial of any criminal proceedings.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, § 8, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., § 1005; Pope's Dig., § 1214; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1510.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-10-101.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Theory of Testimonial Competency and Privileges, 4 Ark. L. Rev. 377.
Subchapter 2 — Passengers
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 564, § 23-10-202 was repealed even though the text of that Code section was not set out in the act and stricken through.
Effective Dates. Acts 1889, No. 93, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1891, No. 43, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1897, No. 23, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1899, No. 34, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1899, No. 86, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1911, No. 252, § 4: effective on passage.
Research References
ALR.
Motor carrier’s liability for personal injury or death of passenger caused by debris, litter, or other foreign object on floor or seat of vehicle. 1 A.L.R.4th 1249.
Liability of motor bus carrier to passenger injured through fall while alighting at place other than regular bus stop. 7 A.L.R.4th 1031.
Width or design of lateral space between passenger loading platform and car entrance affecting carrier’s liability to passenger for injuries incurred from falling into space. 28 A.L.R.4th 748.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of third party’s assault on or about carrier’s vehicle or premises. 34 A.L.R.4th 1054.
Seating, equipment and devices directly relating to passengers’ standing or seating safety in land carriers. 35 A.L.R.4th 1050.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of another passenger’s assault. 43 A.L.R.4th 189.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance specifically criminalizing passenger misconduct on public transportation. 78 A.L.R.4th 1127.
Liability of motor bus carrier or driver for death of, or injury to, discharged passenger struck by another vehicle. 16 A.L.R.5th 1.
Coverage under all-risk insurance. 30 A.L.R.5th 170.
Liability of air carrier for injury to passenger caused by fall of object from overhead baggage compartment. 32 A.L.R.5th 1.
23-10-201 — 23-10-208. [Repealed.]
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 564, § 23-10-202 was repealed even though the text of that Code section was not set out in the act and stricken through.
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning depot facilities, drinking water on passenger trains, bulletin boards showing time of arrival and departure of trains, passenger trains to depart only from depot at junction, announcements of departures, destinations, and track numbers, violation of §§ 23-10-204 and 23-10-205 a misdemeanor, protection of passengers from annoyance or fraud and penalty for perpetration, and penalties for business solicitations of passengers, were repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 564. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-10-201. Acts 1891, No. 17, § 6, p. 15; 1903, No. 160, §§ 1-3, p. 302; C. & M. Dig., §§ 950-953; Pope's Dig., §§ 1154-1157; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1201 — 73-1205.
23-10-202. Acts 1891, No. 17, § 6, p. 15; C. & M. Dig., § 953; Pope's Dig., § 1157; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1205.
23-10-203. Acts 1891, No. 132, §§ 1, 2, p. 221; C. & M. Dig., §§ 954, 955; Pope's Dig., §§ 1158, 1159; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1206, 73-1207.
23-10-204. Acts 1907, No. 146, § 1, p. 353; C. & M. Dig., § 960; Pope's Dig., § 1164; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1208.
23-10-205. Acts 1907, No. 146, §§ 2-4, p. 353; C. & M. Dig., §§ 961-963; Pope's Dig., §§ 1165-1167; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1209 — 73-1211.
23-10-206. Acts 1907, No. 146, § 5, p. 353; C. & M. Dig., § 964; Pope's Dig., § 1168; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1212.
23-10-207. Acts 1889, No. 93, § 1, p. 123; 1897, No. 34, § 1, p. 44; C. & M. Dig., § 945; Pope's Dig., § 1149; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1213.
23-10-208. Acts 1907, No. 236, §§ 1-3, p. 553; C. & M. Dig., §§ 947-949; Pope's Dig., §§ 1151-1153; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1215 — 73-1217.
23-10-209. Baggage generally.
- As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, “baggage” includes whatever a passenger upon any carrier of passengers takes with him or her, for personal use and convenience, with reference to the immediate necessities or of the journey, and shall also include such samples of goods, wares, and merchandise as may be necessary to be carried for display by commercial salespersons, and shall include theatrical costumes and effects when the samples, costumes, or effects are enclosed in trunks and similar receptacles.
-
- All carriers of passengers in this state shall transport and carry any passengers' baggage weighing not more than one hundred fifty pounds (150 lbs.) free of charge.
- Where the weight of the baggage is in excess of one hundred fifty pounds (150 lbs.), the carrier shall charge and receive such excess for a fee of not more than twelve and one-half percent (12½%) of the purchase price of the ticket or fare purchased and paid for by the passenger per one hundred pounds (100 lbs.) or fraction thereof, but in no case shall the charge for the excess be less than twenty-five cents (25¢) on the same train or boat upon which the passenger shall travel and within a reasonable time thereafter.
- The baggage shall be tendered to the carrier at least thirty (30) minutes before the arrival of the train or boat. The carrier shall deliver the baggage in good condition with due diligence to the passengers at destination.
-
- Any railroad company or other common carrier failing to comply with any of the requirements of subsections (b) and (c) of this section shall be liable to the persons aggrieved thereby for the actual damages caused by the failure to comply.
- In addition to the actual damages, the carrier shall be liable for a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for each and every failure to comply with any of the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
- The penalty may be recovered and collected, together with the actual damages, by a civil suit in any court having jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1911, No. 252, §§ 1-3; C. & M. Dig., §§ 968-970; Pope's Dig., §§ 1172-1174; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1222 — 73-1224.
Publisher's Notes. This section was held to be superseded by Acts 1941, No. 367 (superseded — now see § 23-13-201 et seq.), insofar as it applies to motor carriers, in Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Ellis, 210 Ark. 958, 198 S.W.2d 196 (1946).
Cross References. Motor carriers, § 23-13-236.
Case Notes
Baggage.
Baggage was whatever the passenger took with him for his personal use or convenience according to the habits or wants of the particular class to which he belonged either with reference to the immediate necessities or the ultimate purpose of the journey. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry. v. McGahey, 63 Ark. 344, 38 S.W. 659 (1897) (decision under prior law).
A suitcase purchased for his own use by a passenger, and which he was carrying home inside of his trunk, constituted baggage. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Skinner, 88 Ark. 189, 113 S.W. 1019 (1908) (decision under prior law).
Connecting Carrier.
Connecting carriers are responsible for baggage transported over their line. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. DeWitt, 115 Ark. 578, 171 S.W. 906 (1914).
Liability.
Where passenger, ignorant of rules of railway forbidding agents to receive money as baggage for transportation, delivered to baggage agent more money than carrier was required to transport, and informed agent of amount, carrier's common-law liability attached. St. Louis Sw. Ry v. Berry, 60 Ark. 433, 30 S.W. 764 (1875) (decision under prior law).
When a passenger in presenting his goods to a carrier for transportation either informs the carrier that they are not such as are usually carried by passengers or that fact is apparent from the outward appearance of the packages and the carrier received and carried them as baggage, he will be responsible for them as baggage, notwithstanding he was not bound to receive them as such. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry. v. McGahey, 63 Ark. 344, 38 S.W. 659 (1897) (decision under prior law).
In an action against a railroad company for damages on account of delay in the transportation of baggage, the plaintiff cannot recover damages because of inconvenience and mortification suffered on account of the delay in receiving the baggage. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Campbell, 108 Ark. 432, 158 S.W. 120 (1913).
Payment of passenger fare is usually a necessary prerequisite to the binding of the carrier to liability for the transportation of the passenger's baggage; however, if plaintiff purchased ticket for only part of journey with statement that he intended to purchase additional ticket to complete journey and agent issued baggage check for entire journey, it was bound for transportation of baggage to the end of the journey. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. DeWitt, 115 Ark. 578, 171 S.W. 906 (1914).
Initial carrier was not relieved of liability for actual value of baggage lost after delivery to connecting carrier on account of rule adopted by Corporation Commission restricting liability, since commission had no power or authority to change statutory rule fixing carrier's liability at the actual value of the baggage. Southwestern Transp. Co. v. Poye, 194 Ark. 982, 110 S.W.2d 494 (1937).
Where there were two fares in existence, one without limitations as to liability and a reduced fare with limitations, carrier, to enforce limitation would have to show that he gave the passenger an option to accept either the one or the other and that the passenger accepted the contract containing the limitations. Southwestern Transp. Co. v. Poye, 194 Ark. 982, 110 S.W.2d 494 (1937).
Passenger who paid the full fare and only fare in existence for transportation of himself and baggage and checked baggage which was lost after delivery to connecting carrier was entitled to recover actual value of baggage from initial carrier, notwithstanding printed provision in the ticket that initial carrier was acting as agent of connecting carriers and on back of baggage check limited initial carrier's liability in case of loss. Southwestern Transp. Co. v. Poye, 194 Ark. 982, 110 S.W.2d 494 (1937).
Carrier receiving baggage becomes responsible, and its obligation is not affected by the fact that carrier's regulations forbid the acceptance thereof, if those regulations are not brought to the knowledge of the passenger. Strickland v. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co., 195 Ark. 950, 115 S.W.2d 830 (1938).
Carrier taking charge and exclusive control of baggage and not permitting passenger to have anything to do with it is responsible for it notwithstanding rule filed with Corporation Commission to the effect that it will not check baggage in small containers. Strickland v. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co., 195 Ark. 950, 115 S.W.2d 830 (1938).
Motor Carriers.
This section, insofar as it applied to motor carriers, was superseded by Acts 1941, No. 367 (superseded — now see § 23-13-201 et seq.). Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Ellis, 210 Ark. 958, 198 S.W.2d 196 (1946).
23-10-210. Bicycles transported as baggage.
- Bicycles are declared to be baggage and shall be checked and transported as baggage for passengers by all railway companies operating in this state and be subject to the same charges and liabilities as other baggage. However, no passenger shall be required to crate, cover, or otherwise protect any such bicycle, and railway companies shall be responsible for the bicycle in the same manner as all other baggage.
- Under the provisions of this section, no railroad corporation shall be required to transport more than one (1) bicycle for a single individual in addition to any other baggage as shall bring the whole within the lawful weight limit.
History. Acts 1897, No. 23, § 1, p. 30; C. & M. Dig., § 971; Pope's Dig., § 1175; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1225.
23-10-211. Handling of baggage.
-
- All railroad and express companies in this state are required to provide each and every one of its trains with one (1) or more stage-planks, of not less than eight feet (8') in length and three feet (3') in width, or trucks to be used in unloading trunks and baggage from their trains to the depot platforms.
- All railroads and express companies in this state and their agents and employees are required to use the stage-planks or trucks provided for in subdivision (a)(1) of this section while they are unloading baggage and trunks from their trains, except where platforms are as high as the car doors.
- All railroads and express companies in this state and their agents and employees are prohibited from tumbling trunks and baggage from their car doors into the depot platforms, thereby breaking, injuring, or in anywise damaging the trunk or baggage or contents thereof.
- Any railroad or express company violating this section or handling trunks or baggage in such a rough and careless manner as to injure the trunks or baggage shall be liable to the owner of the damaged trunks or baggage, in addition to the value of the trunks or baggage, in the sum of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200). This sum shall be recovered by an action against the railroad or express company in any court having jurisdiction of such causes in any county in which the railroad or express company may do business, and the court may consolidate as many separate injuries as may have occurred in any counties in this state within twelve (12) months prior to the bringing of the action.
History. Acts 1891, No. 43, §§ 1-3, p. 72; 1899, No. 86, § 1, p. 142; C. & M. Dig., §§ 973-975; Pope's Dig., §§ 1177-1179, A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1226 — 73-1228.
23-10-212. Baggage — Duration of carriers' liability.
All persons or corporations engaged in the business of common carrier shall be responsible as common carrier for all baggage or goods checked by them as baggage for forty-eight (48) hours after the baggage or goods checked as baggage have reached their destinations.
History. Acts 1899, No. 34, § 1, p. 41; C. & M. Dig., § 972; Pope's Dig., § 1176; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1229.
23-10-213. Special passenger excursion train — Definitions.
-
- Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the liability of a nonprofit sponsor of a special passenger excursion train, the owner or operator of a special passenger excursion train, and the railroad or rail authority over whose tracks the special passenger excursion train is operated, for all claims, whether for compensatory damages or punitive damages, arising from a rail incident or accident occurring in Arkansas and involving a special passenger excursion train shall not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000).
- This section shall not limit the liability of a person whose intentional misconduct causes a rail incident or accident.
-
- The nonprofit sponsor of a special passenger excursion train shall maintain insurance coverage of not less than ten million dollars ($10,000,000) per occurrence, with the nonprofit sponsor and the railroad or rail authority over whose tracks the special passenger excursion train is operated as named insureds.
- Such insurance shall not have a self-insured retention or deductible greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000).
- A nonprofit sponsor shall provide evidence of such coverage upon demand of the State Highway Commission or by the railroad or rail authority over whose tracks the special passenger excursion train is to be operated.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a railroad or rail authority to permit the operation of a special passenger excursion train over its tracks.
-
As used in this section:
- “Nonprofit sponsor” means a nonprofit corporation other than a railroad or rail authority whose purpose includes the historic preservation of documents, memorabilia, and equipment associated with the railroad industry, and public education regarding the history, current functions, and future of railroad transportation and which is exclusive to religious, scientific, literary, or educational within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), as amended; and
- “Special passenger excursion train” means a train offered by a nonprofit sponsor to the public for operation over a common carrier railroad or railroad authority.
History. Acts 1995, No. 1251, §§ 1, 2.
Subchapter 3 — Freight — Carriers Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1895, No. 30, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1905, No. 144, § 6: effective on passage.
Acts 1905, No. 250, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 166, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 270, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 422, § 9: May 28, 1907.
Acts 1911, No. 356, §§ 4, 5: effective 30 days after passage.
Research References
ALR.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Coverage under all-risk insurance. 30 A.L.R.5th 170.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
23-10-301. Express and freight rules prescribed by department.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall make rules to be observed by all persons or corporations operating any railroad or engaged in transporting property as express or freight in this state, in respect to the receiving, hauling, transporting, storing, and delivering of freight and express as, in its judgment, the public convenience may require.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 3, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1649; Pope's Dig., § 1970; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1304; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 144; 2019, No. 315, § 2398.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. For construction of this section, see § 23-4-601.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
Cross References. General Assembly to pass laws to correct abuses and prevent unjust discrimination, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
Penalty for violation of orders of commission under this section, § 23-4-602.
23-10-302. Express offices and delivery — Penalties.
-
- All corporations doing an express business in Arkansas are required to establish and maintain an office in all cities of the first class in Arkansas, for the purpose of receiving shipments to be made by express and to receive and deliver all packages carried or sent by express to the cities.
- The express offices shall be open for business in the cities at all reasonable times and hours.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation is authorized and directed to define the limits in the cities in which express companies shall make free delivery of all express packages received by them.
-
- Any express company refusing to establish and maintain the offices or refusing to deliver free any express packages received by them within the limits fixed by the department shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for each failure or refusal to comply with the terms of this section or the orders of the department and shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for each offense.
- Each day that the company refuses to establish and maintain the offices and each refusal to deliver within the territory fixed by the department shall be a separate offense.
History. Acts 1911, No. 356, §§ 1-3; C. & M. Dig., §§ 854-856, 938-940; Pope's Dig., §§ 1058-1060, 1142-1144; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1301 — 73-1303; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 145.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b).
23-10-303. Goods damaged in transit — Liability generally.
- Whenever any property is received by a common carrier to be transferred from one place to another, within or without this state, or when a railroad or other transportation company issues receipts or bills of lading in this state, the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing the receipt or bill of lading shall be liable for any loss or damage or injury to the property caused by its negligence or the negligence of any other common carrier, railroad, or transportation company to which the property may pass.
- The common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing any receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover, in a proper action, the amount of any loss, damage, or injury it may be required to pay to the owner of the property, from the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company through whose negligence the loss, damage, or injury may be sustained.
History. Acts 1907, No. 270, § 1, p. 619; C. & M. Dig., § 924; Pope's Dig., § 1128; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1352.
Cross References. Motor carriers, § 23-13-236.
Case Notes
Liability of Initial Carrier.
A railroad company is liable for negligence of a connecting carrier, though the bill of lading exempted it from liability except for loss occurring on its own line. Fort Smith, Subiaco & Rock Island R.R. v. Scroggins, 150 Ark. 571, 234 S.W. 999 (1921).
The initial carrier is liable for damages caused by negligence regardless of the particular line on which it occurred. Barrett v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 151 Ark. 215, 235 S.W. 800 (1921).
Bus passenger who paid the full and only fare for transportation of himself and baggage, and baggage was lost after delivery to connecting carrier, was entitled to recover actual value of baggage from initial carrier, notwithstanding printed provision in the ticket that initial carrier was acting as agent of connecting carriers and on back of baggage check limiting initial carrier's liability in case of loss. Southwestern Transp. Co. v. Poye, 194 Ark. 982, 110 S.W.2d 494 (1937).
23-10-304. Goods damaged in intrastate transit.
- All railway companies, their assignees or lessees, and all other common carriers who receive goods for shipment at points within this state to be delivered at other points within this state and all railway companies and other common carriers, their assignees or lessees, who deliver goods, wares, and merchandise to persons at points within this state are made liable for all damages to the goods, wares, and merchandise, to the consignee or his or her legal representative.
- All damages to goods, wares, or merchandise may be collected from the agent at the point of destination, if the consignee or his or her legal representative presents to the agent of the railway company or other common carrier an itemized statement giving a clear description of the property damaged and the amount of damage to each item or article so damaged, verified by affidavit, within ten (10) days from the time the goods are received.
-
- If, after the consignee has made out and presented his or her itemized statement as required by subsection (b) of this section, the railway company or other common carrier or its agent at the point of destination fails or refuses to pay the claim for loss or damage within thirty (30) days after demand, the consignee of the goods, wares, or merchandise so damaged may enter suit against the railway company or other common carrier, their assignees, or lessees, for his or her loss or damage.
- If he or she recovers in the action against the railway company, its assignees, or lessees, a judgment equal to the amount stipulated in the affidavit of claim, the court or jury trying the cause shall render a verdict or judgment for treble the amount of the claim for his or her damage or loss.
- Any person who makes a false affidavit under subsection (b) of this section, or who swears falsely to any item or material fact upon which suit may be based, shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished according to the laws now governing such a crime.
- Nothing in this section shall be so construed as to conflict with or repeal any law now in existence or in any way change the manner of procedure in actions for damages.
History. Acts 1905, No. 144, §§ 1-5, p. 358; 1907, No. 166, §§ 1, 2, p. 401; C. & M. Dig., §§ 920-923; Pope's Dig., §§ 1124-1127; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1347 — 73-1351.
Case Notes
Connecting Carriers.
Delivering carrier is not liable for damages caused by the initial carrier. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Ledbetter, 106 Ark. 512, 153 S.W. 801 (1913).
23-10-305. Goods damaged in transit — Express companies.
- All express companies organized or doing business under the laws of the State of Arkansas shall settle in twenty (20) days with the owner of goods, after notice has been given them, for the damages or loss of goods incurred in transit on the lines of the express companies. Notice to any local agent whose duty it is to report to any of the general offices shall be sufficient notice.
- Any express company, as mentioned in subsection (a) of this section, which fails or refuses to pay for the damages or loss of goods within twenty (20) days after notice is given, as mentioned, shall be liable in damages to the owner of the goods to the amount of damage sustained or lost.
History. Acts 1905, No. 250, §§ 1, 2, p. 659; C. & M. Dig., §§ 936, 937; Pope's Dig., §§ 1140, 1141; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1353, 73-1354.
Case Notes
Cited: Simmons v. American Ry. Express Co., 147 Ark. 339, 227 S.W. 414 (1921); Beckler Produce Co. v. American Ry. Express Co., 156 Ark. 296, 246 S.W. 1 (1922); Southern Express Co. v. Couch, 157 Ark. 604, 249 S.W. 559 (1923).
23-10-306. Unclaimed goods.
- When any goods, merchandise, or other property has been received by any warehouser, commission merchant, or common carrier and is not claimed or received by the owner, consignee, or other authorized person for the period of six (6) months from the time it should have been called for, it shall be lawful for the warehouser, commission merchant, or carrier to sell the goods, merchandise, or other property to the highest bidder for cash. Twenty (20) days' notice of the time and place of sale shall first be given to the owner, consignee, or consignor, when known, and by advertisement with two (2) insertions in a daily or weekly newspaper published in the county where the sale is to take place.
-
- The proceeds of the sale are to be applied to the payment of freight, storage, and charges due and the cost of advertising and making the sale.
- If any surplus is left after paying freight, storage, cost of advertising, and all other just and reasonable charges, the surplus shall be paid over to the rightful owner of the property at any time thereafter, upon demand being made therefor.
- Railroad companies shall not charge storage for the first forty-eight (48) hours, nor more than five cents (5¢) per day after the first forty-eight (48) hours on baggage not exceeding one hundred fifty pounds (150 lbs.).
- A record of the sale shall be kept. The record shall be open to the inspection of all parties interested therein.
History. Acts 1895, No. 30, § 1, p. 34; C. & M. Dig., § 972; Pope's Dig., § 1176; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1355.
Subchapter 4 — Freight — Railroads
Effective Dates. Acts 1889, No. 67, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1895, No. 51, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1903, No. 24, § 5 and No. 157, § 5: effective 60 days after passage.
Acts 1907, No. 193, § 25: effective 60 days after passage.
Acts 1907, No. 239, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 429, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1909, No. 233, § 5: effective 30 days after passage.
Acts 1909, No. 277, § 6: effective on passage.
Acts 1919, No. 636, § 3: approved Apr. 3, 1919. Emergency declared.
Acts 1921, No. 513, § 3: approved Mar. 26, 1921. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared, and it shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Research References
ALR.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Coverage under all-risk insurance. 30 A.L.R.5th 170.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
Ark. L. Rev.
Personal Property — Exceptions to Insurer Liability of Common Carriers, 4 Ark. L. Rev. 242.
23-10-401. Definition for §§ 23-10-432 — 23-10-437 and 23-12-605.
As used in §§ 23-10-432 — 23-10-437 and 23-12-605, unless the context otherwise requires, “shipper” means any person, firm, or corporation tendering freight for shipment and any consignor or consignee of any bill of lading, or other person, firm, or corporation having the right of a consignor or consignee.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 3, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1623; Pope's Dig., § 1945; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1309.
Case Notes
Cited: Cannco Contractors v. Livingston, 282 Ark. 438, 669 S.W.2d 457 (1984).
23-10-402. Definition for §§ 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431.
As used in §§ 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, unless the context otherwise requires, “railroad company”, “railroad companies”, or “carrier” means all corporations, companies, or individuals which own or operate any railroad in this state, whether as owner, contractor, lessee, mortgagee, trustee, assignee, or receiver, and their officers and agents.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 18, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 842; Pope's Dig., § 1046; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1325.
23-10-403. Application of §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-431.
Sections 23-10-402, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 shall not apply to railroads under two (2) miles in length nor to railroads that are not public carriers.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 1, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 895; Pope's Dig., § 1099; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1310.
23-10-404. Remedies in §§ 23-10-438 — 23-10-440 cumulative.
The remedies given by §§ 23-10-438 — 23-10-440 shall be regarded as cumulative, and §§ 23-10-438 — 23-10-440 shall not be construed as repealing any statute giving such remedies.
History. Acts 1909, No. 233, § 4, p. 698; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1334.
23-10-405. Remedies in §§ 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 cumulative.
The remedies given by §§ 23-10-406 and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 shall be regarded as cumulative, and §§ 23-10-406 and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 shall not be construed as repealing any statute giving such remedies.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 24, p. 453; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1330.
23-10-406. Penalties for violations of §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, or rules of department — Actions to recover.
- If any person or corporation operating a railroad in this state for the transportation of freight, or any receiver, trustee, or lessee of any such person or corporation, or any other person or corporation as defined in § 23-10-402 or its employees or agents violate any of the provisions of §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, or aid or abet therein, or violate the tariff of charges or the rules of the Arkansas Department of Transportation as fixed by the department regarding railroad companies upon furnishing cars upon application of shippers, and regarding transportation, delivery, and storage of freight, forbidden pooling, discrimination, rebate, drawback, or other similar device, either directly or indirectly, or regarding any of the rules made by the department based upon §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, and for which there is no other penalty prescribed in §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, then the person, corporation, receiver, trustee, lessee, or any other person or corporation as defined in § 23-10-402 shall be liable to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000) for each violation of §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431, or of such rules of the department based upon §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431.
-
- The penalty may be recovered by an action to be brought in the name of the State of Arkansas in the county in which the violation may occur.
-
- The department shall institute an action for the recovery of the penalties prescribed in §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 through the prosecuting attorney of the proper district.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- If any prosecuting attorney neglects for fifteen (15) days after notice to bring suit, the department shall employ some other competent attorney at law to bring the suit who shall be allowed a fee to be fixed by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected. In such a case, the prosecuting attorney shall not interfere.
- No such suits shall be dismissed or compromised without the consent of the court and the department.
- Nothing in this section shall be so construed as to interfere in any manner with the action for damages as provided in § 23-10-431.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 22, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 914; Pope's Dig., § 1118; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1329; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 146; 2019, No. 315, § 2399.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” near the end of (a).
23-10-407. Reasonable rules for transportation of freight permitted.
- It shall be lawful for railroads to prescribe rules for the transportation of merchandise, livestock, and other freight that are reasonable and not inconsistent with the common law or statutory duties and liabilities of railroads as common carriers.
- The reasonableness or unreasonableness of the rules shall be determined by a jury in all cases where the rules become an issue before any court.
History. Acts 1907, No. 239, § 3, p. 557; C. & M. Dig., § 845; Pope's Dig., § 1049; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1358; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2400.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a) and (b); and deleted “or regulations” following “rules” in (b).
Case Notes
Reasonableness of Rules.
A stipulation that notice of any claim for damages to stock shipped shall be given the agent at an intermediate station distant from the destination is unreasonable as a matter of law. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Dunn, 94 Ark. 407, 127 S.W. 464 (1910).
A rule providing that suit therefor must be brought within six months is not unreasonable. Hafer v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 101 Ark. 310, 142 S.W. 176 (1911); Missouri & N. Ark. R.R. v. Ward, 111 Ark. 102, 163 S.W. 164 (1914).
23-10-408. Contracts or rules abridging liability of railroad void.
- It shall be unlawful for any railroad or any of its agents or employees to enter into an agreement or contract with any shipper of any livestock, merchandise, or other freight for the purpose of abridging, modifying, limiting, or abrogating the statutory and common law duties and liabilities of the railroad as a common carrier. All agreements and contracts made for that purpose are declared to be void and shall not be enforced by any of the courts of this state.
- All rules prescribed by any railroad for the transportation of any merchandise, livestock, or other freight which are inconsistent with the common law and statutory duties and liabilities of railroads as common carriers or that in anywise limit or abridge the statutory and common laws and rights of any shipper are declared to be void and shall not be enforced by any of the courts of this state.
History. Acts 1907, No. 239, §§ 1, 2, p. 557; C. & M. Dig., §§ 843, 844; Pope's Dig., §§ 1047, 1048; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1356, 73-1357; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2401.
Publisher's Notes. This section was held invalid as applied to certain stipulations in bills of lading exempting a carrier from liability for loss of shipments due to fire, since Congress, through the Interstate Commerce Act, which is codified primarily as 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., has entered upon regulation of provisions in bills of lading affecting a railroad's liability for loss of property. See Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Porter, 273 U.S. 341, 47 S. Ct. 383, 71 L. Ed. 672 (1927).
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
Case Notes
Federal Legislation.
This section is invalid as applied to stipulations in bills of lading exempting carriers from liability for loss of shipments by fire, not due to the carriers' negligence, inasmuch as Congress, through the Interstate Commerce Act, has entered upon the regulation of provisions in bills of lading affecting liability of railroads for loss of property. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Porter, 273 U.S. 341, 47 S. Ct. 383, 71 L. Ed. 672 (1927).
Void Agreements.
A provision in a contract between a railroad company and a shipper relieving the company from liability caused by fire is, as to intrastate shipments, void, though the fire occurs while the shipment is on an industrial siding. Straub v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 170 Ark. 1174, 283 S.W. 36 (1926).
23-10-409. Free or reduced rate transportation permitted.
Nothing in this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-410 — 23-10-431 shall be so construed as to prohibit any person or corporation operating a railroad in this state from transporting, delivering, or storing freight free of charge or at reduced rates for any city, county, or town government, or for any state or the United States, or any property for schools, churches, hospitals, fairs, exhibitions, eleemosynary and charitable institutions, or indigent persons, or employees of such corporations for their own personal use, or for railroad eating houses when the houses are maintained for the benefit of railroad employees and the traveling public.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 16, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 917; Acts 1921, No. 513, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1121; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1505.
Cross References. Free carriage, passage permitted, § 23-4-807.
Granting of free passes to certain government officials prohibited, § 23-4-802.
Reduced rate tickets allowed, § 23-4-713.
23-10-410. Discrimination as to freight prohibited — Pooling, rebates, etc., prohibited.
- It shall be unlawful for any railroad company or its officers or agents to discriminate between persons, firms, corporations, or places in storage, demurrage charges, furnishing cars, or transportation and delivery of freight.
- No pooling, rebate, drawback, or any similar device, either direct or indirect, will be allowed. Any such device shall be unlawful.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 16, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 917; Acts 1921, No. 513, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1121; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1505.
Cross References. Contracts for pooling freight or dividing revenues prohibited, § 23-4-711.
Undue discrimination in charges or facilities prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 3.
Case Notes
Double Damages.
A carrier is liable for double damages under § 23-4-705 on account of unlawful discrimination. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Kirten Gravel Co., 184 Ark. 1024, 44 S.W.2d 674 (1931).
Preferences.
Where a carrier ships goods intrastate to a consignee marked “prepaid” and charges the consignor's account, the consignee pays the consignor in full including the freight cost, and the consignor later goes bankrupt, the carrier could not recover payment from the consignee, since the consignee did not receive any preference. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dermott Grocery & Comm'n Co., 246 Ark. 1286, 441 S.W.2d 798 (1969).
23-10-411. Forwarding freight over connecting lines — Preferences prohibited — Exceptions.
- Every person, company, or corporation operating any railroad in this state which connects with any other railroad in this state and which forms a part of a continuous-line railway communication to any point within the state shall afford all due and reasonable facilities for receiving and forwarding by one (1) of the railroads all the traffic arising by the other and shall promptly forward this traffic at through rates without giving any undue preference or advantage to or in favor of any particular person or company or any particular description of traffic in any respect whatsoever. However, preference shall be given to livestock and perishable freight.
- The connecting lines shall comply as fully with the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409, 23-10-410, and 23-10-412 — 23-10-431 as if they were the original receivers of the freight or traffic to be shipped or transported over their own lines.
- The connecting railroads that receive cars from a connecting railroad in this state for transportation wholly in this state shall return the cars, or cars of like character, on demand, in a reasonable time after the cars are delivered to the consignee.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 17, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 925; Pope's Dig., § 1129; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1507.
Cross References. Duty to transport from connecting line without discrimination, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 1.
Unreasonable preferences prohibited, § 23-3-114.
Case Notes
Preferences.
Where a carrier ships goods intrastate to a consignee marked “prepaid” and charges the consignor's account, the consignee pays the consignor in full including the freight cost, and the consignor later goes bankrupt, the carrier could not recover payment from the consignee, since the consignee did not receive any preference. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dermott Grocery & Comm'n Co., 246 Ark. 1286, 441 S.W.2d 798 (1969).
Restrictive Routings.
Commission could prevent restrictive routing of oil products to specified carriers, adopted to enable initial carrier to receive a larger portion of revenue from such haul. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 189 Ark. 419, 72 S.W.2d 1047 (1934).
23-10-412. Demurrage charges generally.
All carload freight or freight carried at carload rates and all freight in cars, whether full carload or not, taking track delivery shall be subject to the demurrage or car service charges prescribed in §§ 23-10-413 — 23-10-431.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 5, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 899; Pope's Dig., § 1103; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1314.
23-10-413. Duty to furnish cars to shipper.
-
- When a shipper makes a written application to the station agent of a railroad company for cars to be loaded with any kind of freight embraced in the tariff of the company, stating in the application the character of the freight and its final destination, the railroad company shall furnish the cars at the place of shipment within six (6) days from 7:00 a.m. of the day following the application.
- When the shipper making the application specifies a future day on which he or she desires to make a shipment, giving not fewer than six (6) days' notice thereof, computing from 7:00 a.m. of the day following the application, the railroad company shall furnish the cars on the day specified in the application. The station agent shall give the applicant a receipt for his or her application for the cars, with the date of filing the application.
- For failure to comply with this section, the railroad company so offending shall forfeit and pay the sum of five dollars ($5.00) per car per day or fraction of a day's delay, after expiration of free time, to the shipper applying, upon demand in writing made within thirty (30) days thereafter by the shipper. However, failure on the part of the shipper to make demand of the railroad company shall not release the railroad company from its liability to the shipper for the forfeiture or demurrage charges.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 1, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 895; Pope's Dig., § 1099; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1310.
Case Notes
Defenses.
Failure to furnish cars establishes prima facie a breach of duty on the part of railroad company, but this section does not preclude the railroad company from setting of such defenses as will excuse or justify such failure. R.H. Oliver & Son v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 89 Ark. 466, 117 S.W. 238 (1909).
A carrier was not liable under this statute where the shipper of cattle failed to have them inspected and certified in time for them to be shipped out of the state before quarantine order took effect against them. Fort Smith, Subiaco & Rock Island R.R. v. Roady, 162 Ark. 580, 258 S.W. 374 (1924).
Duty to Furnish Cars.
Except in extraordinary and unusual emergencies which cannot be reasonably anticipated, it is the duty of railroad companies to equip themselves with sufficient cars to supply the demand for shipments, both interstate and intrastate, and a failure to furnish all the cars demanded under other circumstances will not be excused. R.H. Oliver & Son v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 89 Ark. 466, 117 S.W. 238 (1909).
Interstate Commerce.
An action would not lie where the owner of a wagon mine attempted to sue a railroad in state court for breach of its duty to furnish cars for the interstate shipment of coal, since the question at issue was the reasonableness of the carrier's practice of car distribution, which was an administrative question for the Interstate Commerce Commission. Midland Valley R.R. v. Barkley, 276 U.S. 482, 48 S. Ct. 342, 72 L. Ed. 664 (1928).
23-10-414. Duty to furnish cars — Interstate railroads.
Interstate railroads shall furnish cars upon application for interstate shipments the same in all respects as other cars are to be furnished by intrastate railroads under the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-413, and 23-10-415 — 23-10-431.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 17, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 925; Pope's Dig., § 1129; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1507.
23-10-415. Duty to exchange and return cars.
-
- It shall be the duty of every railroad company in this state to exchange loaded and empty cars in the transportation of freight, for the purpose of facilitating freight movement, with every other railroad with which the railroad connects forming any part of the route for the shipment of the freight or with which it has or participates in joint rates for such shipments.
- It shall be the duty of each of the railroad companies forming the route or having or participating in the joint rates, upon demand by the connecting line, to furnish to the connecting line within reasonable time after the loaded cars are delivered as many empty cars suitable for carrying the freight as may be delivered to it loaded by the connecting carrier for the purpose of transportation over its line or for delivery to any point on its line.
- Upon demand of the owner thereof, it shall be the duty of every railroad company receiving the cars of another railroad company to return the cars within a reasonable time after demand therefor and within the time and according to the rules prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 1, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 895; Pope's Dig., § 1099; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1310; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 147; 2019, No. 315, § 2402.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
23-10-416. Loading of cars generally.
-
- A shipper on whose order cars have been placed for loading shall be allowed forty-eight (48) hours for the loading of the cars, computing the time from 7:00 a.m. of the day after the cars have been placed subject to the order of the shipper. Thereafter, a demurrage charge of not more than five dollars ($5.00) per car per day or fraction of a day may be assessed and collected on all cars which have not been tendered to the railroad company with shipping instructions within the forty-eight (48) hours.
- Should the shipper fail to begin loading within forty-eight (48) hours after the expiration of free time, the railroad company shall consider the cars released and may assess and collect ten dollars ($10.00) on each car to cover the demurrage then due, provided that the delay is not caused by unavoidable accident or strike. The cars are to be released at once.
- If, after placing the cars required by § 23-10-413, the railroad company temporarily removes any or all of them or in any way prevents, obstructs, or delays the loading of the cars during or after the free time, the shipper shall not be chargeable with the delay caused thereby.
- When, by reason of delay or irregularity on the part of the railroad company in filling orders, cars are bunched in excess of the ability of the shipper to load, as indicated in his or her application, the shipper shall be allowed separate and distinct periods of free time within which to load the cars specified in each separate application.
- Railroad companies shall not be compelled to furnish cars for future shipments to parties in default as to the payment of demurrage charges provided for in subdivision (a)(2) of this section until the demurrage charges have been paid.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 6, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., §§ 900, 901; Pope's Dig., §§ 1104, 1105; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1315.
Case Notes
Supersession by Commission Rules.
When a carrier files a demurrage tariff with the regulatory body to which power has been given by statutes passed subsequent to 1907 to prescribe demurrage rules and regulations, the rules contained in the tariff become effective upon the date specified therein, unless suspended by the regulatory body, without the necessity of any formal investigation, hearing or order of approval, and supersede the statutory demurrage rules contained in Acts 1907, No. 193. St. Louis-Sw. Ry. v. Farrell, 114 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Ark. 1953), appeal dismissed, 210 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1954).
23-10-417. Cars detained for fault of shipper — Demurrage charges.
-
- Cars detained or held at the point of shipment for want of proper shipping instructions or by reason of imperfect or excessive loading when the loading is done by the shipper shall be subject to a demurrage charge of five dollars ($5.00) per car per day or fraction of a day the cars are so detained or held.
- In case of imperfect or excessive loading, the shipper shall be notified thereof as early as practicable after the cars have been received from him or her, in which case, car service charges shall begin at the time of notification.
- No demurrage charge provided in this section shall be collected by the railroad company after the car has been removed from the point of shipment.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 7, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 902; Pope's Dig., § 1106; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1316.
23-10-418. Receipt and transport of freight — Time restraints.
- When freight in carloads or less is tendered to a railroad company and correct shipping instructions are given, the railroad agent must immediately receive the freight for shipment and issue bills of lading for it.
-
- Whenever shipments have been received as provided in subsection (a) of this section by any railroad company, they must be carried forward at the rate of not less than fifty (50) miles per day of twenty-four (24) hours, computing from 7:00 a.m. of the day following receipt of shipment.
- In computing the time of freight in transit, there shall be allowed twenty-four (24) hours at each point where transferring from one (1) railroad to another or rehandling of freight is involved. In all computation of time between shippers and carriers, Sundays and legal holidays are to be excluded.
- In the transportation of cattle, sheep, swine, and other animals, the carrier shall be governed by the provisions of the federal statutes in watering, feeding, and rest of the animals, and the delay shall be counted as free time.
- The period during which the movement of freight is suspended on account of accident or any cause not within the power of the railroad company to prevent shall be added to the free time allowed in this section and counted as additional free time.
- For failure to receive and transport shipments within the time prescribed, the railroad company so offending shall forfeit and pay to the shipper the sum of five dollars ($5.00) per car per day or fraction of a day on all carload freight, and one cent (1¢) per one hundred pounds (100 lbs.) per day or fraction of a day on freight in less than carloads, with a minimum charge of five cents (5¢) for any one (1) package, upon demand in writing by the shipper or another party whose interest is affected by the delay.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 2, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 896; Pope's Dig., § 1100; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1311.
Case Notes
Supersession by Commission Rules.
When a carrier files a demurrage tariff with the regulatory body to which power has been given by statutes passed subsequent to 1907 to prescribe demurrage rules and regulations, the rules contained in the tariff become effective upon the date specified therein, unless suspended by the regulatory body, without the necessity of any formal investigation, hearing or order of approval, and supersede the statutory demurrage rules contained in Acts 1907, No. 193. St. Louis-Sw. Ry. v. Farrell, 114 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Ark. 1953), appeal dismissed, 210 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1954).
23-10-419. Delivery of freight.
- Railroad companies shall deliver freight at their depots or warehouses or, in cases of shipments for track delivery, shall place loaded cars at an accessible place for unloading within twenty-four (24) hours after arrival, computing from 7:00 a.m. of the day following arrival of the cars. However, carload shipments for track delivery at local stations having not more than one (1) team track shall be placed at an accessible point for unloading by the conductor of the train on which the car arrives.
- The shipper or consignee shall be paid five dollars ($5.00) per car per day for each day or fraction of a day the delivery is so delayed.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 4, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 898; Pope's Dig., § 1102; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1313.
Case Notes
Supersession by Commission Rules.
When a carrier files a demurrage tariff with the regulatory body to which power has been given by statutes passed subsequent to 1907 to prescribe demurrage rules and regulations, the rules contained in the tariff become effective upon the date specified therein, unless suspended by the regulatory body, without the necessity of any formal investigation, hearing or order of approval, and supersede the statutory demurrage rules contained in Acts 1907, No. 193. St. Louis-Sw. Ry. v. Farrell, 114 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Ark. 1953), appeal dismissed, 210 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1954).
23-10-420. Notice to consignee of arrival of freight — Penalty for failure to give.
-
- Within twenty-four (24) hours after the arrival of a shipment, railroad companies shall give notice by mail or otherwise to the consignee of the arrival of the shipment, together with the weight and amount of freight charges due thereon.
- Where goods or freight in carload quantities arrive, the notice shall also contain identifying numbers, letters, and initials of the cars, and, if transferred in transit, the number and initials of the car in which originally shipped.
- Any railroad company failing to give such notice shall forfeit and pay to the shipper or other party whose interest is affected the sum of five dollars ($5.00) per car per day or fraction of a day's delay on all carload shipments and one cent (1¢) per one hundred pounds (100 lbs.) per day or fraction of a day on freight in less than carloads, with a minimum charge of five cents (5¢) for any one (1) package, after the expiration of the twenty-four (24) hours. However, not more than five dollars ($5.00) per day shall be charged for any one (1) consignment not in excess of a carload.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 3, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 897; Pope's Dig., § 1101; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1312.
Publisher's Notes. This section has been held to be an unconstitutional interference with interstate commerce insofar as interstate shipments are concerned by St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Edwards, 227 U.S. 265, 33 S. Ct. 262, 57 L. Ed. 506 (1913).
Case Notes
Damages.
Damages are recoverable for failure to notify a consignee of the arrival of a shipment. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Armstrong, 184 Ark. 1076, 44 S.W.2d 1093 (1932).
Interstate Commerce.
Inasmuch as Congress, through passage of the Hepburn Act, has provided penalties for a delay in delivery of interstate shipments to a consignee, this section is an unconstitutional interference with interstate commerce so far as interstate shipments are concerned. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Edwards, 227 U.S. 265, 33 S. Ct. 262, 57 L. Ed. 506 (1913).
Supersession by Commission Rules.
When a carrier files a demurrage tariff with the regulatory body to which power has been given by statutes passed subsequent to 1907 to prescribe demurrage rules and regulations, the rules contained in the tariff become effective upon the date specified therein, unless suspended by the regulatory body, without the necessity of any formal investigation, hearing or order of approval, and supersede the statutory demurrage rules contained in Acts 1907, No. 193. St. Louis-Sw. Ry. v. Farrell, 114 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Ark. 1953), appeal dismissed, 210 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1954).
23-10-421. Notice of arrival of freight — Free time.
-
- Legal notice as referred to in this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-420, and 23-10-422 — 23-10-431 may be either actual or constructive.
- Where the consignee or his or her agent is personally served with the notice of the arrival of freight at or before 6:00 p.m. of any day, free time begins at 7:00 a.m. on the day after the notice has been given.
-
- Constructive notice consists of posting notice by mail to the consignee.
- Where this mode of giving notice is adopted, there shall be forty-eight (48) hours' additional free time. However, in any case where notice of arrival is given by mail, the notice shall be by registered letter, and that notice shall date from the receipt of the registered letter.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 8, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 903; Pope's Dig., § 1107; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1317.
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this section requiring notice by registered letter have been held to be abrogated by tariffs filed with the commission by Spears v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 183 Ark. 945, 39 S.W.2d 727 (1931).
Case Notes
Registered Notice.
The requirement that notice of the arrival of freight shall be registered was abrogated by tariffs filed with the commission. Spears v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 183 Ark. 945, 39 S.W.2d 727 (1931).
Supersession by Commission Rules.
When a carrier files a demurrage tariff with the regulatory body to which power has been given by statutes passed subsequent to 1907 to prescribe demurrage rules and regulations, the rules contained in the tariff become effective upon the date specified therein, unless suspended by the regulatory body, without the necessity of any formal investigation, hearing or order of approval, and supersede the statutory demurrage rules contained in Acts 1907, No. 193. St. Louis-Sw. Ry. v. Farrell, 114 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Ark. 1953), appeal dismissed, 210 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1954).
23-10-422. Shipment to consignor's order — Notice.
When consignors ship goods consigned to order, but express in their bills of lading or shipping directions the name of the person to notify at the destination, it shall be the duty of the railroad company to give legal notice to that party in the same way and under the same rule as if the shipment had been made directly to him or her. However, when consignors do not comply with this condition, the railroad company shall give notice only to the consignors. At the expiration of free time, the carrier shall give notice thereof to the consignor.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 15, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 910; Pope's Dig., § 1114; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1324.
Case Notes
Notice.
A requirement in bill of lading that notice of arrival of shipment should be given to the consignee was not complied with by giving notice to the consignor. Missouri & N. Ark. R.R. v. United Farmers of Am., 173 Ark. 577, 292 S.W. 990 (1927).
23-10-423. Package freight unloaded by railroad — Storage charges.
-
All package freight unloaded by railroad companies in their depots and warehouses and all freight unloaded in the yard space of a railroad company in order to release cars and which has not been removed by the owner thereof from the custody of the railroad company within forty-eight (48) hours, computing from 7:00 a.m. of the day following legal notice of arrival, may be subject to the charge of storage for each day or fraction of a day it may remain in the custody of the railroad company, as follows:
- On less than carloads, not more than one cent (1¢) per one hundred pounds (100 lbs.) per day, or fraction of a day; and
- In carload quantities, not more than ten cents (10¢) per ton of two thousand pounds (2,000 lbs.) per day or fraction of a day, but not exceeding one dollar ($1.00) per car per day, or fraction of a day.
- In no case shall the amount so collected for storage of a less-than-carload shipment exceed the amount authorized to be charged as storage on a carload of similar freight for the same length of time when not unloaded from a car, as provided by § 23-10-424.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 9, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 904; Pope's Dig., § 1108; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1318.
23-10-424. Unloading cars — Free time — Demurrage charges — Extension of free time.
-
- Loaded cars containing fertilizers, hay, coal, coke, brick, sand, and lumber in covered cars and cars containing, in bulk, meat, potatoes, grain and grain products, or cottonseed and cottonseed hulls, taking track delivery, which are to be unloaded by consignee but, having been placed at an accessible point for unloading, are not unloaded within seventy-two (72) hours, computed from 7:00 a.m. of the day following the day legal notice of arrival is given, may be subject thereafter to a charge of demurrage of five dollars ($5.00) per car for each day or fraction of a day that they may remain loaded in possession of the railroad company.
- All other loaded cars taking track delivery to be unloaded by the consignee shall be limited to forty-eight (48) hours of free time.
-
- When, after placing cars as required in this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-423, and 23-10-425 — 23-10-431, the railroad company shall, during or after free time, temporarily remove all or any of them, or in any way obstruct the unloading of the cars, then the consignee shall not be chargeable with the delay caused thereby.
- When, on account of delay or irregularity in transportation, cars are bunched in transit and delivered to the consignee in numbers beyond his or her reasonable ascertained ability to unload within the free time prescribed in this section, he or she shall be allowed by the carrier such additional time as may be necessary to unload cars so in excess by the exercise of due and usual diligence on the part of the consignee.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 10, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 905; Pope's Dig., § 1109; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1319.
23-10-425. Loading or unloading — Additional free time when weather inclement.
Whenever the weather, during the period of free time, is so severe, inclement, or rainy that it is impossible or impracticable to secure means of loading or unloading freight, or when, from the nature of the goods, loading or unloading would cause injury or damage, then additional time shall be added to the free period, and no demurrage charges shall be allowed for the additional free time. This applies to the state of the weather during business hours.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 11, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 906; Pope's Dig., § 1110; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1320.
23-10-426. Loading or unloading — Extension of time when consignee or consignor at distance from depot.
A consignee or a consignor five (5) miles or more from the depot whose freight is destined to or from his or her place of business or residence so located shall not be subject to storage or demurrage charges allowed in this section, §§ 23-10-412 — 23-10-425, and 23-10-427 — 23-10-431 until a sufficient time has elapsed after notice for the consignee or consignor to remove or load the goods by the exercise of ordinary diligence. However, the time limit for loading or unloading shall not exceed five (5) days.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 12, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 907; Pope's Dig., § 1111; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1321.
23-10-427. Storage of freight after failure to unload — Charges.
Incoming carload freight coming under the provisions of §§ 23-10-425 and 23-10-426 may be stored by railroad companies in depots or warehouses at the expense of the owner if the freight is not removed before demurrage charges attach. However, the daily storage charge on the freight shall not exceed one dollar ($1.00) per day.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 13, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 908; Pope's Dig., § 1112; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1322.
23-10-428. Refusal of freight — Notice to consignor — Liability for demurrage.
- If a consignee refuses to accept freight tendered in pursuance of the bill of lading, the carrier charged with the duty of delivery shall give legal notice to the consignor of the refusal. If the consignor does not, within three (3) days thereafter, give directions for reshipment, unloading, or other disposition of the goods, he or she shall become liable to the carrier for storage on the goods, or demurrage upon the cars in which they are stored, to the same extent and at the same rates as such charges are, under like circumstances, imposed upon consignees who neglect or refuse, after notice of arrival, to remove freight of like character from the depots or cars of the carrier by this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-427, and 23-10-429 — 23-10-431.
- A consignee who has once refused to accept a consignment of goods shall not thereafter be entitled to receive the consignment of goods, except upon payment of all charges for storage or demurrage which have accrued.
- If the consignee of freight in carloads or less than carloads fails or neglects to remove the freight within three (3) days after the expiration of free time, then the carrier shall, through the agent at point of shipment, so notify the shipper unless the consignee has signified his or her acceptance of the property. The notice may either be served personally or given by mail.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 14, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 909; Pope's Dig., § 1113; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1323.
Case Notes
Applicability.
This action has no application where a carload of freight was shipped to shipper's order, where, on inquiry by the company's agent as to what disposition to make of it, the reply was to deliver to a certain third party. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Toll, 164 Ark. 327, 261 S.W. 652 (1924).
23-10-429. Employee demanding or receiving extra pay for furnishing car to shipper — Penalty.
- Any railroad employee who demands or receives from any shipper extra pay over and above the legal freight rate for placing or furnishing cars for the shipment of freight shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200). Each car so placed or furnished shall be deemed a separate offense.
- Any shipper or other person who gives or offers to give any such extra pay to any such employee shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200).
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 20, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 912; Pope's Dig., § 1116; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1327.
23-10-430. Recovery of demurrage, forfeitures, and charges.
All forfeitures, charges, and demurrage that accrue to either shipper or railroad company under this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, 23-10-409 — 23-10-429 and 23-10-431 may be recovered in any court having jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 19, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 911; Pope's Dig., § 1115; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1326.
23-10-431. Actions for damages for violations of §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-431 — Limitation.
- In all actions at law against any railroad company, its assignees, lessees, or other persons owning or operating any railroad in this state or partly in this state, for the violation of the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-430 regulating the transportation of freight, or in case any person or corporation, as defined in § 23-10-402, engaged as aforesaid shall not do or permit to be done any act, matter, or thing required to be done in this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-430, the person or corporation shall be held to pay to the person, firm, or corporation injured thereby the actual amount of damages so sustained, to be recovered by the person, firm, or corporation so damaged, in any court having jurisdiction of the amount where the person or corporation causing the damage can be found or has an agent or place of business.
-
- No such action shall be sustained unless brought within one (1) year after the cause of action accrued, or within one (1) year after the party complaining shall have come to the knowledge of his or her right of action. However, no railroad company, its assignees, lessees, or other persons owning or operating any railroad in this state or partly in this state shall have a right of action against any person, firm, or corporation when the person, firm, or corporation shall violate the provisions of any part of this section and §§ 23-10-402, 23-10-403, 23-10-405, 23-10-406, and 23-10-409 — 23-10-430 unless the suit is instituted within one (1) year of the violation.
- No action shall be brought after two (2) years from the time the right of action accrues.
- As many causes of action as may have accrued within the year to any one (1) person, firm, or corporation, including damages, forfeitures, demurrage, etc., may be joined in the suit or complaint.
History. Acts 1907, No. 193, § 21, p. 453; C. & M. Dig., § 913; Pope's Dig., § 1117; Acts 1939, No. 171, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1328.
Case Notes
Limitation of Actions.
This section limits the time within which suits may be instituted against a common carrier for failure to furnish freight cars to the statutory period. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Paul, 118 Ark. 375, 176 S.W. 327 (1915).
Consignee must sue carrier for failure to give notice of arrival of shipment within statutory period after cause of action accrued or within statutory period after consignee acquired knowledge of right of action. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Armstrong, 184 Ark. 1076, 44 S.W.2d 1093 (1932).
23-10-432. Duty to furnish cars — Reasonable time for requesting cars.
It shall be deemed, prima facie, a reasonable time within which to order cars that any shipper shall give notice thereof to the station agent at the place of shipment, or in his or her absence to the nearest station agent of the railroad company to which the application is made, three (3) days before a shipment of five (5) cars or fewer, and five (5) days for fewer than ten (10) but more than five (5) cars, and eight (8) days for ten (10) cars or more. It shall be the duty of the railroad companies to furnish their station agents with printed blanks upon which shippers may make application for their cars. However, nothing in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-433 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605 shall be construed to exempt any railroad company from the obligation to furnish cars for shipment without the written notice, but it shall only be subject to the penalties of §§ 23-10-434 — 23-10-437 for failure to furnish cars to shippers where notice thereof shall be given in writing or, in case of shipment of freight wholly between points in this state, then in accordance with the rules of the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 4, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1637; Pope's Dig., § 1958; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1308; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 148; 2019, No. 315, § 2403.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” at the end of the last sentence.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the last sentence.
23-10-433. Exceptions to duty to furnish or exchange cars.
- In no event shall any railroad company be required to furnish any cars to a connecting line except to exchange for other cars reasonably suitable for the transportation of freight.
- No railroad company shall be compelled to furnish its own cars to any other railroad company except upon reasonable security furnished to it to protect it from loss or destruction of, or damage to, such cars, and compensation for the use thereof.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 2, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1635; Pope's Dig., § 1956; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1306.
23-10-434. Liability for failure to furnish or exchange cars — Exceptions.
- Every railroad company that, in violation of any of the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432, 23-10-433, 23-10-435 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605, fails to furnish any cars for the shipment of any freight within a reasonable time or, in case of the shipment of freight between points within this state, within the time prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation if the department shall prescribe the time by rules as provided in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432, 23-10-433, 23-10-435 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605, and the company fails to do so within a reasonable time, or fails to receive and forward any loaded cars or to exchange cars as provided for in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432, 23-10-433, 23-10-435 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605, that company shall be liable to the shipper or other person injured or damaged thereby for all such injury and damages as may result to the shipper. The railroad company is also liable for all special damages of which it had notice at the time of the shipment or which occurs after written notice thereof, and shall be liable, in addition thereto, for an amount equal to a reasonable attorney's fee, in case suit is brought for recovery of such damages.
- In case of the failure or refusal to so furnish, within a reasonable time, any cars for the shipment of livestock, green fruit, vegetables, or other perishable freight, the railroad company shall be liable to the shipper for the damage caused thereby and a reasonable attorney's fee in case suit is brought to recover the damages.
- Every railroad company that fails to furnish cars or to exchange cars as required by the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432, 23-10-433, 23-10-435 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605 or by the rules of the department as provided in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432, 23-10-433, 23-10-435 — 23-10-437, and 23-12-605 shall be liable to the railroad company injured thereby for all such damages as may result to it and, in addition thereto, an amount equal to a reasonable attorney's fee in case of suit brought for the recovery of any damages.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 2, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1635; Pope's Dig., § 1956; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1306; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 149; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2404, 2405.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the first sentence of (a) and in (c).
23-10-435. Liability for cars of another railroad.
- Every railroad company using cars of another railroad company, or cars which have been delivered to it by the other railroad company, shall be liable to the party entitled thereto to pay for the reasonable use and hire thereof and for injury or damages to or destruction of the cars, while in its possession or under its control, for the amount of such injury. In the case of cars in the shipment of freight between points wholly within this state, the amount for the use or hire of the cars may be prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, except where the owners of the cars and the railway companies agree upon the compensation, in which case the amount so fixed shall govern.
- When any railroad company or owner of any car is dissatisfied with the amount fixed by the department for the use, hire, loss, or destruction of, or damage to, the cars, or when the railroad company which is liable therefor fails to pay for the use, hire, loss, or destruction of the cars, the department or person entitled thereto, or which is liable for the use, hire, loss, injury, or destruction of the cars, shall be entitled to establish the reasonable value thereof in a suit brought in any court of this state having jurisdiction of the parties and of the amount in controversy, and the court shall render such judgment as to it shall deem just and reasonable.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 2, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1635; Pope's Dig., § 1956; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1306; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 150.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-10-436. Penalty for gross negligence in not furnishing or exchanging cars — Fee of prosecuting attorney.
-
- Every railroad company which willfully, by its own gross negligence or by the gross negligence of its agents having charge and management of the matter of furnishing cars, fails or refuses to furnish or exchange cars as provided for in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432 — 23-10-435, 23-10-437, and 23-12-605 or to transport or deliver the cars within the time prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation as to freight carried between points wholly within this state, or if not so prescribed, then within a reasonable time, shall, in addition to other liabilities provided for in this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432 — 23-10-435, 23-10-437, and 23-12-605 forfeit to the State of Arkansas, for each of the violations, not less than one dollar ($1.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100).
- Each day of failure or neglect as to each car which the railroad company by willful or gross negligence fails or refuses to furnish or exchange shall be treated as a separate offense.
-
- Penalties are to be recovered in an action instituted by the department through the prosecuting attorney of the proper district.
- No such suit shall be dismissed or compromised without the consent of the court and the department.
-
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed a fee by the court not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected.
- If any prosecuting attorney neglects for fifteen (15) days after notice to bring suit, the department may employ some other attorney at law to bring the suit, who shall be allowed a fee therefor to be fixed by the court, not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount collected, and in such case the prosecuting attorney shall not interfere.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 3, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1636; Pope's Dig., § 1957; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1307; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 151.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
23-10-437. Intrastate freight — Rules.
-
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is authorized and empowered, as to all freight carried wholly within this state and the cars used therefor:
- To make and establish all needful rules, general and special, which may be different according to the circumstances and conditions of different railroads and localities and for different kinds and classes of freight and cars, providing for the time, place, and manner of demanding cars for or giving notice of shipment of such freight and the time, place, and manner and the order in which the cars shall be furnished to shippers for the purpose of shipping freight between points in this state; and
-
To prescribe rules for:
- The furnishing, exchanging, and interchanging of cars, loaded and empty, by railroad companies as between each other;
- The time, place, terms, and conditions upon which cars shall be furnished and interchange shall be made, and, in the absence of an agreement of such railroad companies, the reasonable compensation to be paid by each railroad company for the use, loss, injury, or destruction of the cars of another railroad company in the transportation of freight;
- The time within which and the manner by which railroad companies shall give notice or make demand upon each other for cars to be furnished by one railroad company in exchange for loaded cars or to have its cars returned, the reasonable free time to be allowed the shipper for the loading of cars without incurring liability for demurrage, and the free time which shall be allowed to the shipper or consignee in which to unload freight without incurring any liability for demurrage; and
- A schedule of reasonable demurrage charges, reciprocal or otherwise, for the use of cars, irrespective of damages or penalties provided in this subchapter, which may be different for different railroads and different traffic and localities to be paid by shippers for the detention or use of cars, either in loading or unloading or paid by the railroads for failing in a reasonable time to furnish cars or to make delivery of loaded cars, subject to the penalties and damages provided in §§ 23-10-432 — 23-10-436 and the rules with respect thereto.
- The department, whenever it may deem it necessary in order to secure the prompt transportation of freight and preservation of property, shall be authorized to prescribe the minimum speed at which freight shall be moved when being transported between points within this state, including the time for transfer and delivery between connecting railroads.
- It shall be the duty of every such railroad to conform to all the rules and orders of the department made in accordance with this section. The failure of any such railroad company to observe the rules of the department, or to comply with the provisions of this section and §§ 23-10-401, 23-10-432 — 23-10-436, and 23-12-605 as to freight carried wholly within this state, shall be deemed an abuse subject to correction by the department and shall subject the railroad company to the penalties provided in §§ 23-10-432 — 23-10-436.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 1, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1650; Pope's Dig., § 1971; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1305; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 152; 2019, No. 315, § 2406.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “Rules” in the section heading and made similar changes throughout the section.
23-10-438. Perishable freight — Duty to furnish cars — Exceptions — Penalty.
-
- When a shipper makes a written application to a station agent of a railroad company doing business in this state for cars, to be loaded with any kind of perishable freight such as fruit and vegetables, embraced in the tariff of the company, stating the character of the freight, the kind of cars wanted, and the final destination of the freight, the railroad company shall furnish cars, in the kind and quantity ordered, at the place of shipment, within twenty-four (24) hours from 7:00 p.m. on the day following the application.
- If refrigerator cars are ordered, they shall be furnished with bunkers well filled with ice, if so ordered by the shipper.
- When a future date is designated by the shipper on which he or she desires to make a shipment, giving not less than twenty-four (24) hours' notice, computing from 7:00 a.m. on the day following the application, the railroad company shall furnish cars on the day specified in the application. The station agent shall then give the party making the application a receipt showing the date of requisition, the number of cars, and the date the cars are to be furnished.
- For failure to comply with this section, the railroad companies so offending shall forfeit and pay to the shipper making the application, upon a claim being made in writing, duly verified as to amount of loss, double the damages he or she may have sustained by reason of the failure of the railroad companies to comply with this section and §§ 23-10-404, 23-10-439, and 23-10-440.
-
- This section shall not apply to railroads which are not public carriers.
- This section shall not apply in cases of strikes, wrecks that would hinder delivery of cars at the times and in the manner specified in this section, sudden congestion in traffic, washouts, and other sudden public calamities over which the railroad companies can exercise no control, but the burden shall be on the railroad company to prove the existence of any of these facts in justification of their failure to comply with this section.
History. Acts 1909, No. 233, § 1, p. 698; C. & M. Dig., § 931; Pope's Dig., § 1135; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1331.
Case Notes
Evidence.
In an action for damages for negligent delay in the transportation of perishable fruit, the erroneous admission of evidence of the defendant's settlement of similar claims was harmless where the undisputed evidence showed the carrier to have been negligent. United States Express Co. v. Rea & Co., 121 Ark. 284, 181 S.W. 888 (1915).
Cited: St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Wells, 81 Ark. 469, 99 S.W. 534 (1907).
23-10-439. Perishable freight — Time for loading — Demurrage charges.
- When cars have been delivered to the shipper as provided for by § 23-10-438, he or she shall have twenty-four (24) hours from 7:00 a.m. of the day following the receipt of the cars in which to load cars.
-
- After the expiration of the free time as provided for in this section, he or she shall forfeit to the railroad company the sum of five dollars ($5.00) per car per day for each day he or she shall hold the car.
- If the cars are not used by the shipper within the free time allowed in this section and he or she refuses to pay the five dollars ($5.00) per day provided for in this section, the railroad company may recover the cars and will not be compelled to furnish the shipper any more cars until he or she has fully paid all delinquent damages.
History. Acts 1909, No. 233, § 2, p. 698; C. & M. Dig., § 932; Pope's Dig., § 1136; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1332.
23-10-440. Forwarding perishable freight — Penalty for failure.
-
- Whenever freight of a character similar to that described in § 23-10-438 is tendered to a railroad company in carload lots or less, and the correct shipping instruction is given, the railroad agent must immediately receive the freight for shipment and issue bills of lading for it.
- When such shipments have been received by any railroad company, they shall be started on the first suitable train within twelve (12) hours and shall be carried forward at a rate of not less than two hundred (200) miles per day of twenty-four (24) hours.
- Any railroad company failing to comply with this section shall forfeit to the shipper double the damages he or she may sustain by reason of the failure.
- In cases of wrecks, washouts, strikes, and other calamities over which railroad companies have no control, this section shall not apply, but the burden shall be on the railroad company to prove the existence of any such facts to justify such a failure.
History. Acts 1909, No. 233, § 3, p. 698; C. & M. Dig., § 933; Pope's Dig., § 1137; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1333.
23-10-441. Shipper's pass on shipments of livestock or poultry.
- Whenever any railroad company or corporation doing business within the limits of this state receives and ships any livestock or poultry by the carload, the company or corporation shall, in consideration of the price paid for the car, pass the shipper or his or her employee to and from the point designated in the contract or bill of lading without further expense to the shipper.
- Any railroad company or corporation or officer, agent, or employee of any railroad company or corporation failing to comply with the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each offense.
History. Acts 1895, No. 51, §§ 1, 2, p. 64; C. & M. Dig., § 894; Pope's Dig., § 1098; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1335, 73-1336.
23-10-442. Shipments of sheep and hogs.
- All railroad companies, private companies, or individuals owning or operating a railroad in the State of Arkansas are required to furnish a sufficient number of double-decked cars for the shipment of sheep or hogs to supply the demand for such cars on their respective lines. They shall allow shippers to load both decks in the cars with sheep or hogs to the aggregate extent of twenty thousand pounds (20,000 lbs.). The cars, when so loaded, shall be received and transported by the railroad companies, private companies, or individuals as one (1) carload of stock.
- It shall not be lawful for the railroad companies, private companies, or individuals to charge or receive for the transportation of a double-decked car of sheep more than is charged by such companies or individuals for a carload of stock other than sheep.
- Should any railroad company, private company, or individuals owning or operating a railroad in the State of Arkansas refuse or neglect to furnish double-decked cars as provided in this section, it shall not be lawful for them to charge or receive for the transportation of a car of sheep or hogs more than one-half (½) the rate charged for the shipment of a carload of stock other than sheep or hogs.
History. Acts 1889, No. 67, §§ 1, 2, p. 83; 1895, No. 112, § 1, p. 166; C. & M. Dig., §§ 941-943; Pope's Dig., §§ 1145-1147; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1339 — 73-1341.
23-10-443. Shipments of grain.
- All persons and corporations owning or operating a railroad in the State of Arkansas are required to furnish cars and equip them with grain-tight doors for shipment of grain in bulk and by the carload.
- All persons and corporations owning or operating railroads in this state who furnish cars for shipment of grain in bulk and fail to equip them with grain-tight doors as required by subsection (a) of this section shall be liable for all loss of grain by leakage or loss in weight which shall occur after delivery of a carload of bulk grain to the railroad for shipment.
History. Acts 1919, No. 636, §§ 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., §§ 934, 935; Pope's Dig., §§ 1138, 1139; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1337, 73-1338.
23-10-444. Shipments of coal, corn, or cottonseed — Duty to weigh and furnish correct weight to consignee — Penalty.
- All railroads operating in this state are required to keep and maintain track or railroad scales at all stations or depots where as many as one hundred (100) cars of coal, corn, or cottonseed are received annually by the railroad.
- The railroads are required, at the request of the consignee of a carload of coal, to properly weigh each and every car after the car has reached its destination. The railroad shall furnish to each consignee, upon request, by a written certificate of the weighman, the correct weight of each carload of coal received by the consignee within one (1) day after the car has reached its destination.
- No consignee shall be required to pay any freight or other railroad charge until furnished with the weights, nor pay any greater amount of freight than is shown by the certificate.
- Any railroad in this state failing or refusing to comply with any of the provisions of this section shall be subject to a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500), to be paid to the county in which the point of destination lies, for every failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of this section. Each day upon which it may refuse or fail to comply with this section shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1907, No. 429, §§ 1, 2, p. 1153; C. & M. Dig., §§ 927, 928; Pope's Dig., §§ 1131, 1132; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1342, 73-1343.
23-10-445. Shipments of coal — Duty to weigh loaded cars prior to shipment and issue certificate of weight — Penalty.
- At all stations at which scales are required to be maintained for the weighing of coal, it shall be the duty of the railroad company to properly weigh each car of coal after the car has been loaded and to furnish to each shipper by written certificate of the weighman, within one (1) day after the car has been received by the company, correct weights of each car and of the contents of each car delivered to them by the shipper.
- The certificate of weight to be given to shippers as provided in subsection (a) of this section shall contain, in addition to the correct weight of the car and its contents, the date of delivery and the number of the car.
- Any railroad in this state failing or refusing to comply with any of the provisions of this section shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100) to be paid to the county for every failure or refusal. Each day upon which it may refuse or fail to comply with this section shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1903, No. 24, §§ 2, 3, 4, p. 36; 1903, No. 157, §§ 2-4, p. 275; C. & M. Dig., §§ 929, 930; Pope's Dig., §§ 1133, 1134; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1344 — 73-1346.
Chapter 11 Establishment and Organization of Railroads
Research References
ALR.
Measure and elements of damages or compensation for condemnation of public transportation system. 35 A.L.R.4th 1263.
Construction and application of rule requiring public use for which property is condemned to be “more necessary” or “higher use” than public use to which property is already appropriated — state takings. 49 A.L.R.5th 769.
Application of zoning regulations to government projects or activities. 53 A.L.R.5th 1.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 31: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 422, § 9: May 28, 1907.
Acts 1911, No. 87, § 16: approved Mar. 8, 1911. Emergency clause provided: “This law being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in force from and after its passage.”
23-11-101. Enforcement of laws or orders on complaint.
It is made the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, on complaint, to enforce by necessary order any or all laws of this state pertaining to railroads and express companies.
History. Acts 1907, No. 422, § 6, p. 1137; C. & M. Dig., § 1693; Pope's Dig., § 1996; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-126; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 153.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. For construction of this section, see § 23-4-601.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-11-102. Fees of domestic companies.
-
All railroad, street, interurban, or other transportation companies organized under the laws of this state shall pay the following incorporation fees:
- On all lines not exceeding twenty-five (25) miles in length, one hundred dollars ($100); and
- On lines exceeding twenty-five (25) miles in length, four dollars ($4.00) per mile for every additional mile the company proposes to construct or operate, and the company shall pay four dollars ($4.00) per mile for any increase by reason of construction.
- Every express company, sleeping car company, and private car company organized under the laws of this state shall pay to the Treasurer of State incorporation fees of one dollar ($1.00) per mile for every mile of railroad over which such a corporation proposes to do business in Arkansas.
History. Acts 1911, No. 87, §§ 6, 8; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1807, 1809; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-302, 73-303.
23-11-103. Railroads and express companies — Annual reports — Failure to report — Penalty.
- It is the duty of every person or corporation operating any railroad or express company in this state to make annual returns of the business of the railroad or express company to the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
-
- The returns shall embrace all receipts and expenditures of the railroad or express companies in this state and are to be made according to forms furnished by the department for that purpose.
- The returns shall be made within thirty (30) days after the end of each year to which they relate.
- The returns shall be sworn to by some officer of the railroad or express company having knowledge of the matters therein stated.
-
- Any person or corporation who fails or refuses to make the returns shall be liable to a penalty of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each day of such a failure or refusal.
- The penalty is to be recovered by action commenced in the name of the State of Arkansas in any court having jurisdiction of the amount, the action to be prosecuted as provided in this act.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 17, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1624; Pope's Dig., § 1946; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-138; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 154.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. As to the cumulative nature of the remedies given in Acts 1899, No. 53, see § 23-4-704.
For applicability of this section, see §§ 23-4-702 and 23-4-703.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “It is” for “It shall be” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1899, No. 53, codified as §§ 23-2-110, 23-2-414, 23-4-608, 23-4-701 — 23-4-720, 23-11-103, 23-11-104.
23-11-104. Report of department as to information regarding railroad companies.
-
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall ascertain as early as practicable the amount of money expended in the construction and equipment per mile of every railroad in Arkansas, the amount of money expended to procure the right-of-way, and the amount of money it would require to reconstruct the roadbed, track, and depots and to replace all the physical properties belonging to the railroad.
- The department shall also ascertain the amounts paid for salaries to the officers of the railroad, the wages paid to employees, and the operating expenses of each and every railroad in this state, including repairs and interest on indebtedness.
- When the information required by this section is obtained, it shall be communicated to the Attorney General by report. A duplicate of the report shall be filed with the Auditor of State for public use, and the information shall be printed, from time to time, in the annual report of the department.
History. Acts 1899, No. 53, § 27, p. 82; C. & M. Dig., § 1652; Pope's Dig., § 1973; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-139; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 155.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. As to the cumulative nature of the remedies given in Acts 1899, No. 53, see § 23-4-704.
For applicability of this section, see §§ 23-4-702 and 23-4-703.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
Cross References. Applicability of this section to express companies, § 23-4-702.
Subchapter 2 — Railroad Incorporation Act of 1959
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1893, No. 150, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 12: Apr. 9, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the state is losing tourism business due to increasing competition from other states; that a healthy tourism industry is essential to the economic well being of the state; that the incentive afforded by this act to motorcoach carriers can serve to attract tourism and provide a valuable economic stimulus to the economy of the state. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 6 et seq.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 30 et seq.
23-11-201. Title.
This subchapter shall be known as the “Railroad Incorporation Act of 1959”.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-301.1.
23-11-202. Definitions.
-
For purposes of this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Department” means the Arkansas Department of Transportation or such other department as may be created or established for the purpose of regulation of common carriers in the State of Arkansas; and
- “Railroad corporation” shall be deemed to include all corporations having as an object or purpose the operation, upon rails or any similar device, of rolling stock, railroad cars, engines, locomotives, motor cars, and other equipment of all types designed or intended to be operated upon rails; where such operation involves the movement or transportation of persons, goods, or property belonging to or being transported to or from any other person, firm, or corporation, and a charge, tariff, or levy is exacted as payment, reimbursement, or compensation for the movement or transportation; and where the source of power or means of locomotion is transmitted through or provided by an engine, locomotive, or other mechanical or electrical device moving or operating or designed to move upon rails or similar devices.
- The provisions of this subchapter shall not apply to the transportation of passengers by rail in scenic or excursion type service. Any individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership or association providing such a service shall be exempt from the jurisdiction of the department, provided that the operations are subject to the safety regulations and jurisdiction of the Federal Railroad Administration.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-301.2; Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 8; 2017, No. 707, § 156.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 1997 amendment added (3).
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
23-11-203. Articles of incorporation.
- The articles of incorporation of any contemplated railroad corporation shall contain all of the information prescribed for inclusion in the application to be filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation by § 23-11-204. However, it shall not be necessary that the articles contain a statement of the manner in which the public convenience, necessity, and interest will be served by the granting of the charter, nor shall it be necessary that a preliminary survey of the proposed roadway or route be attached to the articles.
- The articles shall contain and set forth, subject to the limitations imposed by law or the Arkansas Constitution, those powers which it is desired by the incorporators that the contemplated corporation shall exercise. However, the statement of powers may be general in nature, and a general statement of powers in the articles shall not have the effect of prohibiting the corporation from exercising those powers specifically granted by the law of this state, unless so provided by the articles.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-308.2; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 157.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-11-204. Formation of railroad corporation — Application — Contents.
Any number of persons, not fewer than three (3), being subscribers of the stock of any contemplated railroad corporation and desiring to form a railroad corporation under the laws of this state, may do so by first filing an application with the Arkansas Department of Transportation, setting forth the following information:
- The name of the proposed corporation. The corporate name must end with abbreviation “Inc.” or must include the word “corporation” or “incorporation” or may include the word “company” or the abbreviation “Co.” if that word or abbreviation is not immediately preceded by the word “and” or the abbreviation “&”;
- The purpose of the corporation;
- The duration of the corporation, which may be perpetual or limited;
- The name of its resident agent, which resident agent may be either an individual or a corporation, and the address of the resident agent must be shown with particularity;
-
If the corporation is to be authorized to issue:
-
Only one (1) class of stock, the total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue, and:
- The par value of each of the shares; or
- A statement that all the shares are to be without par value; or
-
More than one (1) class of stock, the total number of shares of all classes which the corporation shall have authority to issue, and:
- The number of the shares of each class thereof that are to have a par value and the par value of each share of each such class;
- The number of shares that are to be without par value; and
- A statement of all or any of the designations and the powers, preferences, and rights, and the qualifications and limitations or restrictions thereof which are permitted by the provisions of the laws of this state governing the issuance of stock by private corporations in respect to any classes of stock of the corporation and the fixing of which by means of the articles of incorporation is desired and an express grant of such authority as it may then be desired to grant to the board of directors to fix, by resolutions, such powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations, and restrictions that may be desired but which shall not be fixed by the articles;
-
Only one (1) class of stock, the total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue, and:
- The amount of paid-in capital with which the corporation will begin business. The amount shall not be less than three hundred dollars ($300);
- The name and post office address of each of the incorporators and a statement of the number of shares subscribed by each, which number shall not be less than one (1), and the class of shares for which each has subscribed;
- A statement, verified under oath by three (3) of the incorporators, setting forth the manner in which the public convenience, necessity, and interest will be served or promoted by the granting of a charter authorizing the establishment of the proposed corporation and construction or acquisition of the railroad, yards, shops, tracks, and other facilities proposed to be constructed or acquired by the corporation; and
- A preliminary survey of the proposed roadway or route of the line or tracks to be constructed or acquired by the corporation shall be attached to the application. The application shall set forth in detail the proposed location of all rights-of-way and other facilities of the corporation and the cities or other points through which, in which, or to which it proposes to establish its line or other facilities.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-301.3; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 158.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language.
23-11-205. Application for incorporation — Hearing — Order of department.
- Promptly after the filing of an application for the organization of a railroad corporation, the Arkansas Department of Transportation, under and in accordance with rules and regulations to be established by the department, shall set a date for a hearing upon the application and shall provide that notice of the hearing shall be given to all persons whose interest may be adversely affected by the granting of the application.
-
The department shall issue its order authorizing the granting of a charter to the proposed corporation if after the hearing the department finds that:
- A need exists for the formation of the railroad corporation;
- The public good and convenience will be served thereby; and
- The proposed financing of the corporation is adequate to permit and enable the corporation to provide all of the services and facilities proposed and to protect the public interest.
- A copy of the department's order, together with verified copies of the articles of incorporation, shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-308.1; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 159.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-11-206. Issuance of charter.
Upon the payment of the fees prescribed by law, the Secretary of State shall issue to the corporation a charter granting unto it perpetual existence in accordance with its articles of incorporation unless a limited term of existence shall be provided for in the articles.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-308.1.
23-11-207. Filing of papers — Effect.
- Certified copies of the articles of incorporation together with copies of the charter issued by the Secretary of State and the order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall be filed in the office of the county clerk of each county through which the proposed line shall be situated or into which the proposed line shall extend.
- Upon the filing of the articles in the office of the county clerk as provided in subsection (a) of this section, the corporation shall be subject to all liabilities otherwise provided by the law of this state except as such powers may be limited by the articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-308.1; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 160.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-11-208. Characteristics and powers generally of corporation.
When the charter and articles of incorporation shall have been filed as provided in §§ 23-11-205 and 23-11-207, the persons who shall have signed and acknowledged the articles of incorporation and their successors shall be a body politic and corporate by the name stated in the articles, and the corporation:
- Shall be capable of suing and being sued;
- May have a seal;
- Shall be capable in law of purchasing, holding, and conveying any real estate and personal property whatever which may be necessary or desirable for the business of the corporation, for the construction, maintenance, or acquisition of a railroad, and for the erection of all necessary buildings, yards, and appurtenances for the use of the railroad; and
- May receive, hold, enjoy, and convey any lands or interest in lands that may be given, granted, or donated to it.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-308.3.
23-11-209. Specific powers and liabilities.
Every such corporation shall possess the general powers and be subject to the general liabilities and restrictions expressed in the special powers following, that is to say:
- To cause such examinations and surveys by their officers, agents, and servants for the proposed railroad to be made as may be necessary for the selection of the most advantageous route for the railroad and for this purpose to enter upon lands or waters of any person, but with their officers, agents, and servants subject to responsibilities for all damages which they shall do thereto;
- To receive, hold, and take such voluntary grants and donations of real estate and other property as shall be made to the company to aid in the construction, maintenance, and accommodation of the railroad. However, real estate thus received by voluntary grant shall be held, used, and disposed of by the company only according to the terms of the grants;
- To purchase and, by voluntary grants and donations, receive and take and, by its officers, engineers and surveyors, and agents, to enter upon and take possession of and hold and use all such lands and real estate and other property as may be necessary for the construction and maintenance of its railroad and the stations, depots, and other accommodations necessary to accomplish the object for which the corporation is created, but not until the compensation to be made therefor, as agreed upon by the parties or ascertained as hereinafter provided, is paid to the owners thereof, or deposited as hereinafter directed, unless the consent of the owner is given to enter into possession;
- To lay out its road, not exceeding six (6) rods wide, and to construct the road, and, for the purpose of cuttings, embankments, and procurements of stone and gravel, the corporation may take as much more land, within the limits of the charter and in the manner provided hereinafter, as may be necessary for the proper construction and security of the road;
- To construct their road upon or across any stream of water, watercourse, road, highway, railroad, or canal which the route of the road shall intersect, but the corporation shall not fill up, change, or permanently obstruct the channel of any navigable stream or other stream of water or watercourse but shall cross the stream or watercourse by bridge, trestle, or culvert and leave the stream or watercourse open so that the water may at all times flow in the natural channel. When its bridge, trestle, or culvert is constructed, the corporation shall remove from the bed of the stream or watercourse any temporary obstruction placed therein by it which will interfere with the flow of the water and shall restore the stream or watercourse, road, or highway thus intersected to its former state, or as nearly as may be and so as not to have impaired its usefulness;
- To take, transport, carry, and convey persons and property and to receive tolls or compensation therefor;
- To erect and maintain all necessary and convenient buildings, stations, depots, yards, passing and switching facilities, fixtures, and machinery for the accommodation and use of their passengers, freight, and business and to take, obtain, and hold the lands necessary therefor;
- To regulate the time and manner in which passengers and property shall be transported and the tolls and compensation to be paid therefor, subject to the approval of the Arkansas Department of Transportation;
- To borrow money, at such rate of interest as the board of directors may determine, to be applied to the acquisition or construction of their railroad and all necessary and convenient buildings, stations, depots, yards, passing and switching facilities, and fixtures, to the purchase or other acquisition of equipment for use in connection with its business, engines, cars, and other rolling stock of every description, and to the refinancing of existing indebtedness and to no other purpose;
- To, at any time by means of subscription to the capital stock of any other railroad company or otherwise, aid the other company in the construction of its railroad, within or without the state, for the purpose of forming a connection to the other road, with the road owned by the company furnishing the aid. Any such railway company which may have built its road to the boundary line of the state may extend into the adjoining state and, for that purpose, may build or buy or lease a railroad in the adjoining state and operate the railroad and may own such real estate and other property in any adjoining state as may be convenient in operating the road, subject to approval by two-thirds (2/3) of its stockholders and the department under rules established by the department; and
- To make donations for the public welfare or for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 22, p. 290; 1893, No. 150, § 1, p. 263; C. & M. Dig., §§ 3976, 8450; Pope's Dig., §§ 4978, 11024; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-309; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 161; 2019, No. 315, § 2407.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (8).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the second sentence of (10).
Case Notes
Eminent Domain.
This section does not apply to lands sought to be condemned for stations and depots. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Faisst, 99 Ark. 61, 137 S.W. 815 (1911).
A railroad company is not entitled to condemn for depot purposes land which another railroad company had acquired in good faith for the same purpose although the latter had not filed its map and profile of its route. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Memphis, Dallas & Gulf R.R., 102 Ark. 492, 143 S.W. 107 (1912).
Public road cannot be laid out across land necessary for a railroad company's yards. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Sevier County, 171 Ark. 900, 286 S.W. 1035 (1926).
General Powers.
Railroad companies possess only those rights, powers or properties which the charters confer upon them, either expressly or as incidental to their existence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Paul, 64 Ark. 83, 40 S.W. 705 (1897), aff'd, 173 U.S. 404, 19 S. Ct. 419, 43 L. Ed. 746 (1899) (decision under prior law).
Rights-of-Way.
An agreement by one who has entered a homestead under the act of Congress, made before the entry was perfected, to convey to a railway company a right-of-way through such homestead and also to convey land for depot and other railroad purposes whenever he obtained the patent, having been acted upon by the railway company, will, upon the issuance of such patent, be specifically enforced as to the right-of-way and also as to so much of the land specified as was necessary for railroad purposes at the time of its appropriation or would be necessary in the immediate future. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Tapp, 64 Ark. 357, 42 S.W. 667 (1897).
Whether land appropriated by a railroad company within the limits of its right-of-way was necessary to the proper use and operation of its road was a matter to be determined by the railroad company. McKennon v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 104, 61 S.W. 383 (1901).
Where a railroad company wrongfully appropriates land for its right-of-way more than the statutorily allowed width, the owner can recover the excess in ejectment. McKennon v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 104, 61 S.W. 383 (1901).
A grant of a right-of-way did not convey growing timber thereon previously sold to another. Kendall v. J.I. Porter Lumber Co., 69 Ark. 442, 64 S.W. 220 (1901).
A right-of-way conveyed to a railway company, though an easement merely, gives to the company a right to exclusive possession for railroad purposes which will support an action in ejectment against one wrongfully in possession. Graham v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 569, 65 S.W. 1048 (1901).
Where a landowner granted railroad company a right-of-way over certain lands without specifying the width of the right-of-way granted, and the railroad company occupied a right-of-way about 30 feet in width and some time thereafter sought to extend its right-of-way to the statutory limit, the railroad company could not extend the limits of its right-of-way beyond the territory already occupied by it without a new grant from the owner of the land. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Stevenson, 125 Ark. 357, 188 S.W. 832 (1916).
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991).
23-11-210. Stockholders' first meeting.
- As soon as practicable after the charter and articles of incorporation shall have been filed in the office of the Secretary of State and in the offices of the county clerk as provided by other provisions of this subchapter, the subscribers of the articles of incorporation shall fix a time and place for a meeting of the stockholders to choose directors of the corporation.
-
- The meeting shall be held at such place within or without the State of Arkansas as shall be determined by the incorporators. Notice thereof shall be given to the stockholders of the corporation by notice directed to each stockholder at the last address of record on the stock records of the corporation unless waiver of notice thereof shall have been filed with the incorporators.
- The notice shall be given at least ten (10) days prior to the date set for the meeting.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-324.1.
23-11-211. Annual and special meetings of stockholders.
- Every railroad corporation incorporated under the laws of this state shall prescribe in its bylaws the time for holding an annual meeting of the stockholders of the corporation for the purpose of electing directors and the transaction of such other business as may be necessary or desirable.
- The meeting shall be held upon the date fixed by the bylaws at such time and place within or without the State of Arkansas as shall be determined by the board of directors.
- Notice of the meeting setting forth the time and place of the meeting shall be given to each stockholder at least ten (10) days in advance of the meeting by mailing notice in the United States mail to the stockholder at his or her last address of record on the stock records of the corporation.
-
- Special meetings of stockholders may be called at any time during the interval between annual meetings by a majority of the board of directors or by stockholders owning not less than one-third (1/3) of the stock and by giving notice to all stockholders in the manner provided for notice of annual meetings by subsection (c) of this section, at least twenty (20) days in advance of the date fixed for the meeting.
- When any special meeting is called, the particular object of the call shall be stated. If at any special meeting thus called a majority in value of the stockholders are not present in person or by proxy, then no business shall be transacted.
- Notice of any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be waived in writing.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-324.3.
23-11-212. Voting of shares generally.
-
- The owner of any share of any railroad corporation organized under the law of this state may vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders.
- The owner of record of the stock as reflected by the stock records of the corporation at the time of the meeting shall have the right to vote the stock.
- Every administrator, executor, guardian, or trustee who shall have filed with the secretary of the corporation evidence of his or her authority to act in regard thereto shall be allowed to represent the shares of stock in his or her hands at all meetings of the stockholders of the corporation and hold the stock as a stockholder.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 18, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 8433; Pope's Dig., § 11007; Acts 1959, No. 30, §§ 10, 16; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-324.3, 73-325.
23-11-213. Board of directors — Members.
- The directors of every railroad corporation shall have the power to make bylaws, and the bylaws shall provide for a board of directors composed of not fewer than three (3) persons.
-
- Directors shall be chosen at the stockholders' meeting by ballot and by a majority of the votes of the stockholders being present in person or by proxy.
- Every stockholder who is present, in person or by proxy, at the election or at any subsequent election of directors shall be entitled to vote the number of shares of stock which he or she owns for as many persons as there are directors to be elected, or to cumulate his or her shares so as to give one (1) candidate as many votes as the number of directors multiplied by the number of shares of stock which he or she owns shall equal, or to distribute them on the same principle among as many candidates as he or she shall determine.
- The directors shall serve for terms of one (1) year and until their successors are elected and qualified.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, §§ 9, 14; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-324.1, 73-328.1.
23-11-214. Board of directors — Meetings.
- Except as may be otherwise provided by law or by the bylaws, a majority of the board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
- The board of directors shall hold one (1) regular annual meeting within or without the State of Arkansas on the date fixed by the bylaws.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-328.1.
23-11-215. Board of directors — Powers generally.
The management of the affairs of the corporation shall be vested in the board of directors, and, subject only to the limitations provided by law or by its articles, the board shall have full control over the affairs of the corporation and may authorize the exercise of all of its corporate powers.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-328.1.
23-11-216. Board of directors — Issuance of bonds, certificates of indebtedness — Security.
In addition to the rights and powers conferred on railroad corporations by their charters and the laws of this state, the directors are authorized and empowered, by and with the consent or approval of a majority of the stockholders, to cause to be issued and executed, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness whenever deemed expedient and to secure the payment of the indebtedness by a mortgage or deed of trust or other encumbrance of all or any part of their charters, franchises, income, rights-of-way, materials, roadbeds, rails, railroads built and to be built, rolling stock, lands, and other corporate properties owned or afterward acquired.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 43, p. 290; Act of Apr. 29, 1873, § 4 (not published); C. & M. Dig., §§ 8449, 8553; Pope's Dig., §§ 11023, 11129; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-329.
23-11-217. Dividends — Declaration and payment by board of directors.
-
- The board of directors are also empowered to declare and pay dividends to the stockholders.
- Dividends may be declared and paid by the board of directors, either in cash, in tangible or intangible choses in action or property, or in stock, subject to such restrictions as may be contained in the articles of incorporation or the laws of this state relative to sources of funds for payment of dividends by private corporations.
- Nothing contained in this section shall prevent the stockholders of any corporation, or the directors thereof, from setting apart, out of any of the funds of the corporation available for dividends, a reserve or reserves for any proper purpose or from abolishing any such reserve.
- A director shall be fully protected when relying in good faith upon the books of account of the corporation or statements prepared by any of its officials as to the value and amount of the assets, liability, net earnings, net profits, or any other facts pertinent to the existence and amount of surplus or other funds from which dividends may properly be declared and paid.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 43, p. 290; Act of Apr. 29, 1873, § 4 (not published); C. & M. Dig., §§ 8449, 8553; Pope's Dig., §§ 11023, 11129; Acts 1959, No. 30, §§ 13, 18; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-329, 73-329.1.
23-11-218. Officers and committees of board of directors.
- The board of directors shall select the officers of the corporation.
-
There shall be:
- A president of the company, who shall be chosen by and from the directors;
- Such committees of the board of directors vested with such authority and powers as may be fixed by resolution of the board of directors or by the bylaws of the company; and
- Such subordinate officers of the company as may be designated by the bylaws and who may be elected or appointed as provided in the bylaws.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 10, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 8437; Pope's Dig., § 11011; Acts 1959, No. 30, §§ 14, 17; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-327, 73-328.1.
23-11-219. Subscription contracts for sale of stock.
Railroad corporations organized under the law of this state are authorized to enter into subscription contracts for the sale of their stock under such terms, conditions, and restrictions and subject to such liabilities relative thereto as are provided by law for such contracts by private corporations, except as such contracts may be restricted by the articles of incorporation or the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-324.2; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 162.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-11-220. Amendment of articles of incorporation.
- Amendments to the articles of incorporation of any railroad corporation incorporated under the law of this state shall be made only by the vote of a majority of the stockholders of the corporation.
-
- No amendment shall be voted upon unless and until notice of an intention to present the amendment to a meeting of the stockholders shall have first been served upon all stockholders of the corporation by mailing the notice through the United States mail directed to the stockholders at the address of record on the stock records of the corporation at least thirty (30) days prior to the date set for the meeting.
- The notice shall contain full information as to the proposed amendment.
- Waiver of notice of the meeting by all of the stockholders of the corporation and filed with the secretary of the corporation shall be deemed to be compliance with the requirements of this section for notice of the proposed amendment to the stockholders.
-
- No amendment of the articles of incorporation of a railroad corporation shall become effective unless and until the amendment has been first approved by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
- The department shall establish rules governing the procedure for conducting hearings and making such determinations as it shall deem advisable for the purpose of approving amendments to the articles of incorporation and charter of railroad corporations incorporated in this state.
- A fee of five dollars ($5.00) shall be paid to the Secretary of State for filing each amendment.
- After the adoption of the amendment and the approval of the amendment by the department as provided by subsection (c) of this section, copies of the amendment, together with a certified copy of the order of the department approving the amendment, shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State and in the office of the county clerk in each county in which the original articles are required to be filed by other provisions of this subchapter.
- It shall not be necessary to secure the approval of the department for a change of designation of resident agent of the corporation. Such a change may be made at any time by the board of directors by duly adopted resolution and the filing of copies of the change with the department, the Secretary of State, and the county clerk in each county in which the articles of incorporation are required to be filed by the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, §§ 7, 8; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-314.1, 73-314.2; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 163; 2019, No. 315, § 2408.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (c)(1).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (c)(2).
23-11-221. Dissolution or liquidation of railroad corporation.
- Railroad corporations organized under the laws of this state may be dissolved or liquidated, wholly or in part, after approval of the action by the Arkansas Department of Transportation in the manner provided by the law for dissolution or liquidation of business corporations organized under the laws of this state.
- Certified copies of the order of the department approving the dissolution or liquidation shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State and in the office of the county clerk in each county where the articles of incorporation are required to be filed.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-315.1; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 164.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-11-222. Corporations existing prior to June 11, 1959 — Application of subchapter — Extension of existence.
- This subchapter shall be applicable to all railroad corporations organized under the laws of this state, provided that each existing railroad corporation may, within two (2) years of June 11, 1959, file with the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the Secretary of State, and the county clerk of each county in which its articles of incorporation are then filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation adopted by not less than two-thirds (2/3) of its stockholders, at an annual or special meeting, setting forth the period of existence desired for the corporation.
- When the filings are completed, the corporation's existence shall be deemed extended according to the terms of the amendment. However, if any such corporation fails to file the amendment, then its charter shall expire at the time it would have expired had this subchapter not been adopted unless it is extended prior to the expiration in the manner provided by law for extension of railroad corporation charters.
History. Acts 1959, No. 30, § 23; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-335; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 165.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-11-223. Corporations existing prior to June 7, 1945 — Extension of charter.
- Upon the application of any railroad corporation chartered under the laws of this state prior to June 7, 1945, accompanied by a resolution of the board of directors of the railroad corporation, the Arkansas Department of Transportation is authorized to extend the charter of any such railroad corporation in accordance with the petition and the resolution of the board of directors of the railroad corporation, or on such terms as the department shall prescribe.
- If the petition is allowed, the department shall cause its approval to be endorsed upon the resolution presented with the petition, together with such restrictions as may be imposed by the department. The resolution shall be filed with the Secretary of State and certified in the same manner as prescribed by law with respect to the original articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1935, No. 146, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 10992; Acts 1945, No. 181, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-315; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 166.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1945, No. 181, § 4, provided, in part, that the primary purpose of the act was to abolish the State Board of Railroad Incorporation and to vest in the Arkansas Public Service Commission all powers and duties of the State Board of Railroad Incorporation and provided for the transfer of the property of the State Board of Railroad Incorporation to the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
Acts 1945, No. 181, § 4, provided, in part, that the primary purpose of the act was to abolish the State Board of Railroad Incorporation and to vest in the Arkansas Public Service Commission all powers and duties of the State Board of Railroad Incorporation and provided for the transfer of the property of the State Board of Railroad Incorporation to the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
The powers and duties of the Arkansas Public Service Commission as to railroads were transferred to the Arkansas Transportation Commission.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Subchapter 3 — Sale, Lease, or Consolidation
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1887, No. 80, § 7: effective on passage.
Acts 1887, No. 81, § 14: effective on passage.
Acts 1889, No. 34, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1889, No. 55, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1889, No. 116, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1901, No. 203, § 4: effective on passage.
Research References
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 156 et seq.
23-11-301. Authority of railroad to sell or lease road or property.
Every railroad corporation incorporated under the laws of this state whose road is wholly or in part constructed and operating is authorized to sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of the whole, or any part, of its roadways, and rights-of-way, with the franchises thereto belonging, and its other property to any connecting railroad company or to any railroad corporation organized under the laws of this state, upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the board of directors of the corporation and ratified by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the issued capital stock thereof, and is authorized to receive the bonds or stock of the purchasing corporation in whole or in part payment of the purchase.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 3, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8526; Pope's Dig., § 11102; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-401.
Cross References. Purchase or lease of parallel or competing line prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 4.
Case Notes
Liability of Purchaser.
A purchaser of the roadbed, property and franchises of a railroad company is not liable for its obligations, which are not liens upon the property. Sappington v. Little Rock, M.R. & T.R.R., 37 Ark. 23 (1881) (decision under prior law).
Where jetties were placed in river by railroad company for mutual protection of railroad's bridge and certain farmland, subsequent purchaser of railroad which never assumed control of jetties could not be held liable for failure to maintain such jetties. Fordyce v. Russell, 59 Ark. 312, 27 S.W. 82 (1894) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Daniels, 68 Ark. 171, 56 S.W. 874 (1900).
23-11-302. Authority to sell or lease road or property to connecting foreign railroad — Authority to acquire other railroads — Ratification.
- Subject to the approval thereof by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under such rules for procedure as it may establish and a determination that such action will be in the public interest, any railroad corporation in this state may sell or lease its road, property, and franchise to any other railroad corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of any other state or territory whose line of railroad shall so connect with the leased or purchased road by bridge, ferry, or otherwise as to practically form a continuous line of railroad.
- Any railroad corporation in this state may buy or lease or otherwise acquire any railroad with all the property, rights, privileges, and franchises thereto pertaining, or buy the stock and bonds, or guarantee the bonds of any railroad corporation incorporated or organized within or without this state whenever the roads of the companies form in the operation thereof a continuous line or lines.
- Before any such lease or sale is valid, it must be approved and ratified by persons holding or representing two-thirds (2/3) of the capital stock of each of the companies respectively, at a stockholders' meeting called for that purpose.
History. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, p. 43; C. & M. Dig., § 8508; Pope's Dig., § 11084; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-422; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 167; 2019, No. 315, § 2409.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a).
Cross References. Purchase or lease of parallel or competing line prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 4.
Case Notes
Liability of Lessor.
A railroad company which has its road leased to another company is not liable for stock killed by the lessee's train, however when judgment is obtained against lessee, it may be enforced by seizure and sale of road itself and lessor should be made party. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Daniels, 68 Ark. 171, 56 S.W. 874 (1900).
Liability of Purchaser.
A purchaser of the roadbed, property and franchises of a railroad company is not liable for its obligations, which are not liens upon the property. Sappington v. Little Rock, M.R. & T.R.R., 37 Ark. 23 (1881) (decision under prior law).
Where jetties were placed in river by railroad company for mutual protection of railroad's bridge and certain farmland, subsequent purchaser of railroad which never assumed control of jetties could not be held liable for failure to maintain such jetties. Fordyce v. Russell, 59 Ark. 312, 27 S.W. 82 (1894) (decision under prior law).
23-11-303. Construction, purchase, or lease of railroad in adjoining state authorized.
Any railway company which may have built its road to the boundary line of the state may extend into the adjoining state and for that purpose may build, buy, or lease a railroad in the adjoining state and operate the railroad. The company may own such real estate and other property in the adjoining state as may be convenient in operating the road.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 2, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8514; Pope's Dig., § 11090; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-414.
Cross References. Railroads authorized to connect at state line with railroads of other states, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 1.
23-11-304. Formation of connecting lines — Aid to construction of other railroad authorized.
Any railroad company heretofore incorporated or hereafter organized, in pursuance of law, may aid any other company at any time, by means of subscription to the capital stock of the other railroad company, or otherwise, in the construction of its railroad within or without the state for the purpose of forming a connection to the other road with the road owned by the company furnishing the aid.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 2, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8514; Pope's Dig., § 11090; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-414.
23-11-305. Consolidation when lines connect at state boundary line.
- Any railroad companies organized under the laws of this state whose roads connect at the boundary line of this state are authorized to consolidate and form one (1) company owning and controlling the consolidated line of road, with all the powers, rights, privileges, immunities, and franchises, and subject to all the obligations and liabilities, to the state or otherwise, which belonged to or rested upon either of the companies making the consolidation.
- In order to accomplish the consolidation, the companies interested may enter into a contract fixing the terms and conditions thereof.
-
- A certified copy of the articles of agreement with the corporate name assumed by the new company shall be filed with the Secretary of State, at which time the consolidation shall be considered duly consummated.
- A certified copy of the articles of agreement from the office of the Secretary of State shall be evidence of the consolidation.
- The boards of directors of the consolidating companies may then proceed to carry out the contract according to its provisions, calling in and cancelling all stock issued by the consolidating companies. The board of directors of the new company shall issue stock in the new company in lieu of the cancelled stock in accordance with the terms of consolidation.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 2, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8514-8516, 8519; Pope's Dig., §§ 11090-11092, 11095; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-409 — 73-412.
23-11-306. Consolidation of two or more railroad companies to effect continuous line.
- Any two (2) or more railroad companies in this state, existing under either general or special laws, owning railroads which are constructed wholly or in part and which, when completed and connected, will form one (1) continuous line of railroad continuing and running in the same general direction are authorized to consolidate their stock and make joint stock with any connecting railroad company whether connected within or without this state or whose roads shall connect at the boundary line of this state and form one (1) company owning and controlling the continuous line of road. The new company shall have all the powers, rights, privileges, franchises, and immunities, and be subject to all the obligations and liabilities to the state, or otherwise, which belonged to or rested upon either of the companies making the consolidation and shall be subject and liable to all the contracts theretofore entered into by either of the corporations.
- In order to accomplish such a consolidation, the companies interested may enter into a contract, fixing the terms and conditions, which shall first be ratified and approved by two-thirds (2/3) in interest of all the issued capital stock held in such companies or roads proposing to consolidate. The vote for consolidation shall be taken at a meeting of the stockholders regularly called for the purpose after giving sixty (60) days' notice of the meeting by advertisement in some daily or weekly newspaper printed and published in Little Rock, Arkansas, and such other newspapers elsewhere as the boards of directors of the companies may deem expedient.
- The boards of directors of the several companies may then proceed to carry out the contract according to its provisions, calling in the certificates of stock then outstanding in the several companies or roads and issuing certificates of stock in the new consolidated company under such corporate name as may have been adopted.
-
- The foregoing provisions of this section shall not be construed to authorize the consolidation of any railroad companies or roads except when, by such a consolidation, a continuous line of road is secured, running in the same continuous and general direction.
- Nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to authorize or permit the sale, lease, or consolidation of parallel or competing lines of railroad to and with each other.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 1, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8517, 8544, 8545, 8547; Pope's Dig., §§ 11093, 11120, 11121, 11123; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-404, 73-405, 73-407.
Cross References. Consolidation with parallel or competing line prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 4.
Case Notes
Effect of Consolidation.
Where two or more railroad companies unite to form a new company, the new company, unless restricted by law, succeeds to all the rights, privileges and immunities of the several companies forming it. Zimmer v. State, 30 Ark. 677 (1875) (decision under prior law).
The legal effect of a consolidation of railroad companies is to extinguish the constituent companies and create a new corporation with property, liabilities and stockholders derived from old companies which pass out of existence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Berry, 41 Ark. 509 (1883), aff'd, 113 U.S. 465, 5 S. Ct. 529, 28 L. Ed. 1055 (1885).
Tax Exemptions.
Immunity from taxation granted railroad does not pass to new company with which it becomes consolidated, unless statute granting immunity so clearly provides for its transfer as to leave no room for controversy. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Berry, 41 Ark. 509 (1883), aff'd, 113 U.S. 465, 5 S. Ct. 529, 28 L. Ed. 1055 (1885).
23-11-307. Consolidation with foreign corporation.
- Any corporation formed under the laws of this state and chartered thereby may consolidate with any corporation of any adjoining state in the manner provided by law.
- The consolidated corporation shall become, be, and remain a corporation of this state and amenable to its laws and courts.
-
- No such consolidation shall be effected except between corporations, the union of whose roads will make a continuous line.
- Nor shall any consolidated company own, control, operate, lease, purchase, or consolidate with any parallel or competing line.
History. Acts 1887, No. 80, § 6, p. 110; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8534, 8549; Pope's Dig., §§ 11110, 11125; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-413.
23-11-308. Bonds issued by leasing, purchasing, or consolidating corporation — Security for bonds.
- For the purpose of carrying out and executing any or all of the powers granted in §§ 23-11-301, 23-11-303 — 23-11-306, 23-11-309, and 23-11-315, bonds or other evidences of debt may be issued by any leasing, purchasing, or consolidating corporation, not inconsistent with the Arkansas Constitution.
- Mortgages or deeds of trust may be executed by the corporation on any or all of its real, personal, or mixed property and upon its roadbed, rights-of-way, cars, locomotives, and other rolling stock and equipment, its machinery, tools, implements, fuel, material, and income, either within or without this state, and on all other things or property held or to be acquired for the construction, operation, or repair of the railroad or for the repair or replacement of any other equipment or appurtenances as a part and parcel of the railroad and as constituting with the railroad one (1) property and a continuous railroad line in order to secure the payment of the bonds or other evidences of debt. Included in the property subject to the mortgages or deeds of trust shall be the franchise of acting as and being a corporation and all other franchises, rights, and privileges granted by this act or in any way appertaining to the corporations as aforesaid.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 4, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8529; Pope's Dig., § 11105; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-416.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1881, No. 43, codified as §§ 23-11-301, 23-11-303 — 23-11-306, 23-11-308, 23-11-309, 23-11-315, 23-11-403.
Case Notes
Mortgages.
The roadbed and rolling stock of a railroad may be sold as an entirety under a mortgage where debtor requests it, and it can be done without prejudice to the creditor. Southwestern Ark. & Indian Terr. R.R. v. Hays, 63 Ark. 355, 63 Ark. 355, 38 S.W. 665 (1897).
23-11-309. Stockholders' consent required for purchase of stock, lease, or consolidation.
No aid as provided in § 23-11-304 shall be furnished, nor shall any purchase, lease, subletting, consolidation, or arrangements be perfected, until:
- A meeting of the stockholders of all the companies, parties to the agreement, whereby a railroad in this state may be aided, purchased, leased, sublet, consolidated, or affected by such an arrangement has been called by the directors thereof, at such time and place and in such manner as the directors shall designate, after giving sixty (60) days' notice of the meeting by advertisement in some daily or weekly newspaper printed and published in Little Rock, Arkansas, and such other newspapers elsewhere as the board of directors shall deem expedient;
- The holders of two-thirds (2/3) of the issued capital stock of such companies have assented thereto in person or by proxy; and
- A certificate thereof signed by the president and secretary of the company or companies has been filed in the office of the Secretary of State.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 2, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8520; Pope's Dig., § 11096; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-415.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 43, as amended by an act of April 29, 1873, § 4 (not published), provided in part that all consolidations of companies or purchasers thereof previously made were legalized.
Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, provided in part that any agreement of any company existing under the laws of Arkansas or any other state to lease or buy a railroad and appurtenances or to buy the stock or bonds or to guarantee the bonds of any railroad company incorporated and organized in Arkansas, previously executed by the appropriate officers and ratified by two-thirds (2/3) of the stockholders of each of the companies, would be binding from the date of its execution.
23-11-310. Articles of consolidation or purchase — Amount of capital stock.
- Articles of consolidation or purchase shall be signed by a majority of the directors of the respective companies and shall be filed and recorded in the office of the Secretary of State.
- The articles of consolidation or purchase shall set forth the amount of the capital stock, the names of the officers of the companies thus formed, and all conditions, agreements, and stipulations in the premises.
- The amount of the capital stock of the company thus formed may be fixed at any amount not exceeding the aggregate sum authorized by the charter or articles of incorporation of the respective companies thus merging or amalgamating.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 43, p. 290; Act of Apr. 29, 1873, § 4 (not published); C. & M. Dig., § 8539; Pope's Dig., § 11115; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-417.
23-11-311. Control of parallel or competing line prohibited — Contracts, etc., void — Penalties.
-
- No railroad or the lessees, purchasers, or managers of any railroad shall consolidate the stock, property, or franchises of the corporation with, nor lease or purchase the works or franchises of, nor in any way control any other railroad owning or having under its control a parallel or competing line, nor shall any officer of such a railroad act as an officer of any other railroad owning or having control of a parallel or competing line;
- In all cases under this section, when demanded by either party, the question whether railroads are parallel or competing lines shall be decided by a jury.
-
- All acts or attempted acts of any railroad, or the lessees, purchasers, or managers of any railroad, in violation of any of the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be void.
- Any person or party aggrieved or affected by any such acts or attempted acts, whether stockholders or not, may bring an action against them in the circuit court of any county through which the railroad passes. The court shall have jurisdiction in the case and power to set aside any such acts or attempted acts as void, and to restrain and enjoin the acts or attempted acts and grant all other proper relief.
- Any officer of the railroad who violates subsection (a) of this section, by acting also as an officer of any other parallel or competing line of railroad, as therein prohibited, shall forfeit and pay not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) per day during the time he or she so violated subsection (a) of this section, to be recovered by civil action brought by like parties and in like manner, as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
History. Acts 1887, No. 81, §§ 2, 13, p. 113; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8533, 8535; Pope's Dig., §§ 11109, 11111; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1501, 73-1502.
Publisher's Notes. For definition of railroad or railroad corporation, see § 23-10-101.
For applicability of this section, see § 23-10-102.
Cross References. Consolidation or purchase, lease or control of parallel or competing line prohibited, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 4.
General Assembly to pass laws to correct abuses and prevent unjust discrimination and excessive rates, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 10.
23-11-312. Rights and privileges of consolidated and purchasing companies.
- When any two (2) railroad companies shall become consolidated under the laws of this state or when any railroad which has been wholly or partially constructed shall become the lawful purchaser or owner of another line which has not been constructed, the consolidated company, or company purchasing the unconstructed line, shall have all the rights, privileges, and franchises of the original companies and have the same length of time from the date of consolidation within which to comply with the requirements of Acts 1885, No. 104, §§ 1 and 2 [repealed], as was originally allowed to railroad companies under that act.
- Nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to exempt any railroad or extension or branch thereof from legislative control in the same manner and to the same extent as railroads organized under the general laws of this state.
History. Acts 1889, No. 116, § 2, p. 171; C. & M. Dig., § 8543; Pope's Dig., § 11119; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-418.
23-11-313. Debts of purchased or consolidated companies — Claims.
-
- Whenever any railroad company, corporation, or individual purchases any railroad from any other railroad company, corporation, or individual, the company, corporation, or individual purchasing shall take and hold the railroad subject to all debts, liabilities, and obligations of the company from which the road was purchased.
- Whenever any two (2) or more railroad companies shall be consolidated, the consolidated company shall be liable for all the debts, liabilities, and obligations of all the consolidated companies.
- All persons or corporations having claims against the purchasing company or individual under this section shall present the claims to the purchasing company or individual within twelve (12) months after receiving notice from the purchasing company or individual of the sale or be forever barred.
History. Acts 1889, No. 55, §§ 1, 2, p. 71; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8512, 8513; Pope's Dig., §§ 11088, 11089; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-419, 73-420.
Case Notes
Damages.
New company is liable for damages caused by vendor. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. McDonald, 175 Ark. 630, 299 S.W. 999 (1927).
Judicial Sales.
This section applies to private sales, and not to judicial sales. Kansas City S. Ry. v. King, 74 Ark. 366, 85 S.W. 1131 (1905).
Notice.
Actual notice is required. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Batesville & Winerva Tel. Co., 86 Ark. 300, 110 S.W. 1047 (1908).
23-11-314. Forfeiture of lease — Ouster.
-
The franchise and all charter rights whatsoever of any railroad company in and to all railroad, roadbed, bridge, depot, or other railroad property, as well as the possession of, and right to operate, which may have been acquired by the railroad under and by virtue of any lease, shall be forfeited and the railroad company ousted of its right thereunder to operate, possess, or control the railroad, if:
- The lease has not been made in conformity with the statute governing the making of such leases; or
- The lessee fails to maintain the property in good repair so as to afford safe and reasonably prompt facilities of travel to the public or fails to furnish reasonable shipping accommodations for freight to its patrons.
- This section may be enforced at the instance of the state by its Attorney General, by information in the nature of quo warranto or other proper suit in any court having jurisdiction.
- Whenever any railroad company, by the judgment of any court rendered in any suit instituted by the state, shall be ousted of the possession of or right to operate any railroad, bridge, depot, or other property leased to the company by any other railroad company, then the lessor shall immediately succeed to all the rights in and to the leased property had and enjoyed by it at the time of the execution of the lease, if the lessor has been in no way responsible for the acts upon which the judgment was based except in the making of the lease.
History. Acts 1901, No. 203, §§ 1-3, p. 368; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8550-8552; Pope's Dig., § 11126-11128; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-433 — 73-435.
Case Notes
Applicability.
This section is not retroactive. Louisiana & Nw. R.R. v. State, 75 Ark. 435, 88 S.W. 559 (1905).
Foreign Corporations.
Under this section, state may enforce forfeiture of lease made by a foreign railroad corporation. Louisiana & Nw. R.R. v. State, 75 Ark. 435, 88 S.W. 559 (1905).
23-11-315. Corporations formed to purchase or lease railroads — Stock issued in payment deemed fully paid shares.
- Subject to the provisions of Acts 1959, No. 30, corporations may be formed for the purpose of purchasing or leasing the whole or any part of any railroad, and that purpose or object shall be stated in the application and articles of incorporation.
- All shares of stock issued in payment of the purchase shall be deemed to be fully paid shares.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 3, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8527, 8528; Pope's Dig., §§ 11103, 11104; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-402.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1959, No. 30, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 23-11-201 — 23-11-222, 23-11-302, 23-11-306, 23-11-315, 23-11-402.
Subchapter 4 — Foreign Railroads
Effective Dates. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 4: effective on passage.
23-11-401. Authority to construct railroads in state.
Any railroad company existing under the laws of any other state or territory may extend and construct its railroad into or through this state.
History. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, p. 43; C. & M. Dig., § 8473; Pope's Dig., § 11047; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-421.
23-11-402. Purchase or lease of state roads — Exception.
Subject to approval thereof by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under such rules for procedure as it may establish and a determination that action will be in the public interest, any railroad corporation existing under the laws of any other state or territory may buy, lease, or otherwise acquire any railroad, the whole or part of which is in this state, with all the rights, privileges, and franchises thereto pertaining, or buy the stock and bonds, or guarantee the bonds of any railroad corporation incorporated or organized under the laws of this state whenever the roads of such companies shall form in the operation thereof a continuous line or lines. However, the road so purchased shall not be parallel or competing with the purchasing road.
History. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, p. 43; C. & M. Dig., § 8509; Pope's Dig., § 11085; Acts 1959, No. 30, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-423; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 168; 2019, No. 315, § 2410.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the first sentence.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the first sentence.
Case Notes
Cited: Missouri Pac. R.R. v. 55 Acres of Land, 947 F. Supp. 1301 (E.D. Ark. 1996).
23-11-403. Lessor and lessee of railroad subject to laws.
A corporation in this state leasing its road to a corporation of another state shall remain liable as if it operated the road itself, and a corporation of another state, being the lessee of a railroad in this state, shall likewise be held liable for the violation of any of the laws of this state and may sue or be sued in all cases, and for the same causes and in the same manner, as a corporation of this state might sue or be sued if operating its own road, but a satisfaction of any claim or judgment by either of the corporations shall discharge the other.
History. Acts 1881, No. 43, § 2, p. 79; C. & M. Dig., § 8522; Pope's Dig., § 11098; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-429.
Case Notes
Liability of Lessor.
A railroad company which has its road leased to another company is not liable for stock killed by the lessee's train, however when judgment is obtained against lessee, it may be enforced by seizure and sale of road itself and lessor should be made party. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Daniels, 68 Ark. 171, 56 S.W. 874 (1900).
Cited: Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Fitzhugh, 82 Ark. 179, 100 S.W. 1149 (1907).
23-11-404. Right to tax uncurtailed.
Nothing in §§ 23-11-302, 23-11-401, and 23-11-402 shall be held or construed as curtailing the right of state or counties through which a consolidated, leased, or purchased road may be located to levy and collect taxes upon the road and the rolling stock thereof, pro rata, in conformity with the provisions of the laws of this state upon that subject.
History. Acts 1889, No. 34, § 2, p. 43; C. & M. Dig., § 8511; Pope's Dig., § 11087; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-424.
Subchapter 5 — Land Grants
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1883, No. 26, § 6: effective on passage.
23-11-501. Grants for purpose of aiding in construction of railroads.
- Any person or corporation, public or private, who may wish to donate, grant, or devise any lands or other property for the purpose of aiding in the construction, building, or running of any railroad within this state, under the provisions of this act, may, by deed or otherwise, convey the lands or other property to the state for that purpose. The property shall then be held by the state for that purpose solely.
- The donor, grantor, or devisor may, at his or her discretion, designate the railroad company or association to which the lands or other property shall be appropriated.
- If the road or corporation is not completed within the time fixed by law, the land or property so donated shall revert back to the donor, grantor, or devisor.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 41, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8453, 8454; Pope's Dig., §§ 11027, 11028; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-501, 73-502.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1868, No. 71, codified as §§ 23-4-618, 23-4-619, 23-11-209, 23-11-212, 23-11-216, 23-11-217, 23-11-310, 23-11-501, 23-12-410, 23-12-411, 23-12-601, 23-12-805, 23-12-807.
Case Notes
Failure to Use Land.
Where a railway company purchased a tract of land for railroad purposes only and used a portion of it but failed to use the remainder for more than seven years during which time it was cultivated by the grantor and those holding under him, such nonuse will not, as to such remainder, operate as a forfeiture. Graham v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 569, 65 S.W. 1048 (1901).
Rights-of-Way.
An agreement by one who has entered a homestead under the act of Congress, made before the entry was perfected, to convey to a railway company a right-of-way through the homestead and to convey five acres thereof for depot and other railroad purposes whenever he obtained the patent, having been acted upon by the railway company, will, upon the issuance of such patent, be specifically enforced as to the right-of-way and to so much of the five acres specified as was necessary for railroad purposes at the time of its appropriation or would be necessary in the immediate future. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Tapp, 64 Ark. 357, 42 S.W. 667 (1897).
Whether land appropriated by a railroad company within the limits of its right-of-way was necessary to the proper use and operation of its road was a matter to be determined by the railroad company. McKennon v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 104, 61 S.W. 383 (1901).
A grant of a right-of-way did not convey growing timber thereon previously sold to another. Kendall v. J.I. Porter Lumber Co., 69 Ark. 442, 64 S.W. 220 (1901).
A right-of-way conveyed to a railway company, though an easement merely, gives to the company a right to exclusive possession for railroad purposes which will support an action in ejectment against one wrongfully in possession. Graham v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 69 Ark. 569, 65 S.W. 1048 (1901).
23-11-502. Lands forfeited upon failure to apply for and accept conveyance.
Any railroad company which becomes entitled to a conveyance of any lands from the state shall apply therefor and accept a conveyance from the state within six (6) months after completion of the act by which it became entitled to the conveyance. Any company which fails to do so within the time aforesaid shall forfeit all lands for which it fails to apply within such time.
History. Acts 1883, No. 26, § 2, p. 47; C. & M. Dig., § 8456; Pope's Dig., § 11030; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-504.
23-11-503. Forfeited lands revert to state.
All lands forfeited under the provisions of this section and §§ 23-11-502 and 23-11-505 shall revert to and belong to the State of Arkansas and shall be sold as other lands.
History. Acts 1883, No. 26, § 4, p. 47; C. & M. Dig., § 8458; Pope's Dig., § 11032; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-506.
23-11-504. Report of failure to accept or forfeiture of lands — Lands proclaimed subject to sale.
- The Commissioner of State Lands is charged with the duty of making inquiry and of reporting to the Governor all failures of any railroad company to make application and accept conveyance within the time specified in § 23-11-502. He or she shall report all failures with a list of the lands forfeited by the nonapplication.
- Upon receipt of the report, the Governor shall make proclamation that the lands have been forfeited and are subject to sale by the state.
History. Acts 1883, No. 26, § 5, p. 47; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8459, 8460; Pope's Dig., §§ 11033, 11034; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-507.
23-11-505. List of lands conveyed — Assessment.
- It shall be the duty of the Commissioner of State Lands, immediately upon the execution of any conveyance conveying lands to any railroad company, to make a list of the lands conveyed and send the list of the lands conveyed to the assessor of the county in which the lands are situated.
- The assessor shall at the next assessment assess the lands for taxation as the property of the railroad company in the same manner that other lands are assessed.
History. Acts 1883, No. 26, § 3, p. 47; C. & M. Dig., § 8457; Pope's Dig., § 11031; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-505.
Chapter 12 Operation and Maintenance of Railroads
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1887, No. 127, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1909, No. 163, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1921, No. 124, § 27: approved Feb. 15, 1921. Emergency declared.
Research References
ALR.
Motor carrier's liability for personal injury or death of passenger caused by debris, litter, or other foreign object on floor or seat of vehicle. 1 A.L.R.4th 1249.
Width or design of lateral space between passenger loading platform and car entrance affecting carrier's liability to passenger for injuries incurred from falling into space. 28 A.L.R.4th 748.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of third party's assault on or about carrier's vehicle or premises. 34 A.L.R.4th 1054.
Equipment and devices directly relating to passenger standing or seating safety in land carriers. 35 A.L.R.4th 1050.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of another passenger's assault. 43 A.L.R.4th 189.
Liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or at street or highway intersection. 66 A.L.R.4th 885.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance specifically criminalizing passenger misconduct on public transportation. 78 A.L.R.4th 1127.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Employer's liability to employee or agent for injury or death resulting from assault or criminal attack by third person. 40 A.L.R.5th 1.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
23-12-101. Sections 23-12-101 — 23-12-103 cumulative.
The provisions of this section and §§ 23-12-102 and 23-12-103 shall be regarded as cumulative, and nothing therein shall be so construed as to repeal any other act now in force, nor to in any way curtail or limit the powers and duties of the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1909, No. 163, § 2, p. 502; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-613n; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 169.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-12-102. Inspection of railroads by department.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall carefully examine the condition of the railroads of this state as often as the department considers necessary.
History. Acts 1909, No. 163, § 1, p. 502; C. & M. Dig., § 1633; Pope's Dig., § 1954; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-613; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 170.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” and substituted “the department considers” for “it deems it”.
23-12-103. Unsafe tracks, bridges, etc. — Inspection — Notice to railroad of necessary repairs, etc. — Failure to repair or to stop traffic — Liability for injuries — Penalties.
-
- It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation to inspect and examine the tracks, bridges, or other structures whenever it has reasonable grounds, either upon complaint or otherwise, to believe that any of the tracks, bridges, or other structures of any railroads in this state are in a condition that renders any of them dangerous or unfit for the transportation of passengers with reasonable safety.
- If, upon examination, in its opinion, any such tracks, bridges, or other structures or works are unfit for the transportation of passengers with reasonable safety, it shall be its duty to give to the superintendent or other executive officer of the company working or operating the defective tracks, bridges, or other structures notice of the condition thereof, and of the repairs necessary to place them in safe condition. The department may also order and direct the speed of trains over such dangerous and defective tracks, bridges, or other structures until the repairs are made and the time within which the repairs shall be made by the company.
-
- If any such superintendent or executive officer receiving the notice and order willfully neglects, for the period of two (2) days after receiving the notice and order, to direct the proper subordinate officers to move the passenger trains over the defective track, bridge, or other structure at the speed prescribed by the department, or if any engineer, conductor, or other employee of the company disobeys the order of the superintendent or officer whose duty it is to issue the order, then every such superintendent, conductor, engineer, or other employee shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in any sum not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) or be imprisoned in the county jail of the proper county for a period not exceeding one (1) year, or both, at the discretion of the court.
- In case the disregard of the instructions of the department shall cause any accident whereby human life shall be lost or passengers maimed or wounded, the superintendent of the company, and the engineer and conductor in charge of the train, shall severally be deemed guilty of a felony and upon conviction shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a period of not fewer than two (2) nor more than ten (10) years.
- The department shall have power to wholly stop the running of passenger trains over the defective track, bridge, or other structure.
- The department is required, in case any company fails to repair the track, bridge, or other structure within the time required, to give notice of the fact to the traveling public in some newspaper having a general circulation along the line of the railroad.
- The department may recover from the railroad company the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day that expires after the time fixed by the department for the repair of the defective track, bridge, or other structure for neglect to repair the same unless good and sufficient cause can be shown for the failure to repair the defective track, bridge, or other structure. Such sum may be recovered before any court having competent jurisdiction for the use and benefit of the State of Arkansas, after paying the costs of the advertisement herein provided for.
History. Acts 1909, No. 163, § 1, p. 502; C. & M. Dig., § 1633; Pope's Dig., § 1954; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-613; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 171.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” and made a stylistic change in (a)(1).
23-12-104. Number and frequency of trains and streetcars.
- If in the judgment of the Arkansas Department of Transportation any railroad corporation or street railroad corporation does not run trains enough or cars enough or possess or operate motive power enough reasonably to accommodate the passenger and freight traffic transported by or offered for transportation to it, or does not run its trains or cars with sufficient frequency or at reasonable or proper time, having regard to safety, or does not run any train or car upon a reasonable time schedule for the run, then, after a hearing either on its own motion or after complaint, the department shall have power to make an order directing any such railroad corporation or street railroad corporation to increase the number of its trains or of its cars or its motive power, or to change the time for starting its trains or cars, or to change the time schedule for the run of any train or car, or make any other suitable order that the department may determine reasonably necessary to accommodate and transport the passenger or freight traffic transported or offered for transportation.
- No railroad corporation, street railroad corporation, or common carrier shall abandon, take up, or cease to operate for the transportation of passengers or freight any line, or any portion of its line, which it may deem no longer necessary for the successful operation of its road and for the convenience of the public without first obtaining the permission and approval of the department.
- Nothing in this section shall authorize the department to make any order with reference to the amount of cars or motive power or with reference to the schedule or with reference to the operation or nonoperation of that part of any street railroad within the limits of any municipality of this state. It is the intention of this act that the jurisdiction as to such matters shall be elsewhere under this act delegated to municipal councils and city commissions of this state.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 10; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1632, 1651; Acts 1921, No. 124, § 7; Pope's Dig., §§ 1972, 2006; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-122; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 172.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Meaning of “this act”. The words “this act” probably refer to both Acts 1919, No. 571 and 1921, No. 124, which are codified as §§ 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104, 23-12-301, 23-12-302 and as §§ 14-200-110, 14-200-112, 23-1-114, 23-2-302, 23-2-309, 23-2-311, 23-2-313, 23-2-425, 23-3-113, 23-4-101, 23-4-104, 23-4-110, 23-12-104.
Case Notes
Reinstatement of Trains.
In a petition to compel a railroad company to reinstate passenger trains, a finding of the circuit court sustaining an order of the Railroad Commission giving the relief was sustained by the evidence. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Norris, 178 Ark. 940, 12 S.W.2d 915 (1929).
23-12-105. Attorney's fee taxed in suits for transportation violations.
In all actions at law or suits in equity against any railroad company, its assignees, lessees, or other persons owning or operating any railroad in this state, or partly therein, for the violation of any law regulating the transportation of freight or passengers by any such railroad, if the plaintiff recovers in any such action or suit he or she shall also recover a reasonable attorney's fee, to be taxed as part of the costs therein and collected as other costs may be by law collected.
History. Acts 1887, No. 127, § 1, p. 224; C. & M. Dig., § 851; Pope's Dig., § 1055; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-819.
Case Notes
Applicability.
The attorney's fee provided for in this section is not recoverable for carrying passenger beyond station. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Knight, 81 Ark. 429, 99 S.W. 684 (1907); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Evans, 94 Ark. 324, 126 S.W. 1058 (1910).
Attorney's fee is not to be taxed unless the action is for a violation of some statutory provision relating to the transportation of passengers or freight. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Tonn, 102 Ark. 20, 143 S.W. 577 (1912); Midland Valley R.R. v. Horton, 112 Ark. 125, 165 S.W. 266 (1914).
This section should be restricted to suits based upon a violation of some statute and not to suits involving issues of negligence and contributory negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Henry, 168 Ark. 146, 269 S.W. 51 (1925).
Attorney's fee cannot be recovered in suit by the passenger suffering injury caused by failure to stop at station which was not a regular designated stop. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Coxwell, 182 Ark. 145, 30 S.W.2d 209 (1930).
Subchapter 2 — Roadbeds and Rights-of-Way
Effective Dates. Acts 1891, No. 133, § 3: effective 60 days after passage.
Acts 1907, No. 250, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1909, No. 46, § 3: effective on passage.
Research References
ALR.
Liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or at street or highway intersection. 66 A.L.R.4th 885.
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 31 et seq.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 146 et seq.
23-12-201. Maintenance of right-of-way free from obstructions — Penalty.
-
- All railroad corporations operating in this state shall maintain their right-of-way at or around any railroad crossing of a public road or highway free from grass, trees, bushes, shrubs, or other growing vegetation which may obstruct the view of pedestrians and vehicle operators using the public highways.
- The maintenance of the right-of-way shall be for a distance of fifty feet (50') on each side of the centerline between the rails for the maintenance width and for a distance of one hundred yards (100 yds.) on each side of the centerline from the public road or highway for the maintenance length.
- Any railroad corporation failing or refusing to comply with the provisions of this section shall be subject to a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation.
History. Acts 1969, No. 464, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-631, 73-632; Acts 1993, No. 399, § 1.
Case Notes
Applicability.
Railroad crossing was not subject to the provisions of subdivision (a)(1), where it was located on a dirt road on private property, dead-ending at private pond, and not maintained by any governmental authority, nor the object of regular use by the public. Pittman v. Frazer, 129 F.3d 983 (8th Cir. 1997).
Preemption.
This section has not been preempted by federal law. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Mackey, 297 Ark. 137, 760 S.W.2d 59 (1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1067, 109 S. Ct. 2067, 104 L. Ed. 2d 632 (1989).
Punitive Damages.
Where railroad had allowed vegetation to remain overgrown at a crossing for more than 18 months prior to when a passenger in a garbage truck was severely injured in a collision with a train at that crossing, the railroad's noncompliance with this section regarding keeping the crossing clear could have resulted in liability for fines approaching up to $182,500 per year; hence, on appeal, the court held that punitive damages award was not excessive because it was comparable to such civil sanctions. Union Pac. R.R. v. Barber, 356 Ark. 268, 149 S.W.3d 325, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 940, 125 S. Ct. 320, 160 L. Ed. 2d 249 (2004).
Cited: Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Star City Gravel Co., 452 F. Supp. 480 (E.D. Ark. 1978); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Grider, 321 Ark. 84, 900 S.W.2d 530 (1995).
23-12-202. Permitting certain weeds to seed on right-of-way unlawful — Recovery of damages.
- It shall be unlawful for any railroad or railway company or corporation doing business in this state to permit any Johnson grass or Russian thistle to mature or go to seed upon any right-of-way owned, leased, or controlled by the railroad or railway company or corporation in this state.
-
- If it shall appear upon the suit of any person owning, leasing, or controlling land contiguous to the right-of-way of any such railroad or railway company, or corporation, that the railway or railroad company or corporation has permitted any Johnson grass or Russian thistle to mature or go to seed upon their right-of-way, the person so suing shall recover from the railroad or railway company or corporation the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) and any such additional sum as he or she may have been damaged by reason of the railroad or railway company or corporation permitting Johnson grass or Russian thistle to mature or go to seed upon their right-of-way.
- However, any owner of land or any person controlling land contiguous to the right-of-way of any such railroad or railway company or corporation who permits any Johnson grass or Russian thistle to mature or go to seed upon the land shall have no right to recover from the railroad or railway company or corporation, as provided for in this section.
History. Acts 1909, No. 46, §§ 1, 2, p. 102; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8503, 8504; Pope's Dig., §§ 11079, 11080; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-629, 73-630.
Case Notes
Construction.
The word “permit” as used in this section has been held to mean “to allow or suffer” and it implies that the owner did not attempt to prevent Johnson grass from maturing and going to seed. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Russell, 113 Ark. 552, 168 S.W. 1083 (1914).
23-12-203. Clearing right-of-way following derailment or wreck.
- Any railroad operating in this state shall be required to clear its right-of-way of debris and wrecked equipment within ninety (90) days following any derailment or train wreck.
- In the event any railroad fails to comply with this requirement the Arkansas Department of Transportation, upon petition of any ten (10) citizens, shall conduct a hearing for the purpose of determining the cause of the railroad's failure to comply with this requirement.
- The department is authorized to file suit in a court of competent jurisdiction for an order requiring the railroad's compliance with this section.
History. Acts 1971, No. 225, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-633; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 173.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b).
23-12-204. Drainage of roadbed — Penalty for noncompliance.
- Any railroad company or corporation conducting or operating a line or lines of road is required, and it is made the duty of any such company or corporation, to effectually drain their respective roadbeds in all cases where the lack of drainage has been produced by the construction of the road wherever they pass a station, or within two hundred yards (200 yds.) of a farmhouse or residence, by constructing ditches or underdrains, either parallel or at an angle with their roadbed, of sufficient width, depth, and capacity to carry off all the water rapidly.
-
- Any railroad company or corporation or any officer or agent or employee of any railroad company or corporation who shall knowingly and willfully violate the provisions of this section shall be liable to pay a penalty of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each and every offense. The costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee, are to be taxed by the court where the suit is heard on original action, by appeal or otherwise, and are to be recovered by a suit at law by the party aggrieved in any court of competent jurisdiction.
- Twenty (20) days' notice shall be given to the officer, agent, or employee, as the case may be, of any violation of this section, before a cause of action shall accrue.
History. Acts 1891, No. 133, §§ 1, 2, p. 222; 1907, No. 250, § 1, p. 588; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8480-8482; Pope's Dig., §§ 11054, 11055, 11056; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-627, 73-628.
Case Notes
Damages.
Railroad company is liable for damage to land when it cuts a natural embankment, though done to get rid of surface water on its right-of-way. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Manning, 181 Ark. 517, 26 S.W.2d 579 (1930).
Notice.
Written notice served upon a station agent nearest the location of the place to be drained statutorily required number of days before the suit was brought was sufficient compliance with this section. McAlister v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 107 Ark. 589, 156 S.W. 178 (1913).
Willfulness.
Where a railroad company permits water to stand on its roadbed for two years, it will be held to know the condition of its roadbed, and if it permits the water to stand after statutorily required notice to drain, it will be held to have acted willfully and with the intention to let the water remain. McAlister v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 107 Ark. 589, 156 S.W. 178 (1913).
23-12-205. Sale of certain abandoned rights-of-way to municipalities.
- The term “abandons” as used in this section shall not include the nonuse of rights-of-way of a railroad that is presently inactive as a result of the insolvency of the railroad company if there are on-going efforts by either the railroad company or any governmental unit or civic organization to rehabilitate the railroad for the purpose of reestablishing rail service in the area.
-
- When a railroad abandons a right-of-way which was acquired by eminent domain, and where there is a municipally owned natural gas pipeline buried thereon or there is a municipally owned natural gas pipeline buried on that railroad's right-of-way at a point within ten (10) miles of the abandoned right-of-way, the railroad shall offer to sell the abandoned right-of-way to the municipality at the fair market value of the right-of-way.
- If the municipality wishes to purchase the right-of-way, the municipality shall so notify the appropriate railroad representative and the railroad shall, within sixty (60) days after being so notified, establish the fair market value of the right-of-way and offer to sell it to the municipality.
- If the railroad fails to do so, the municipality may petition the circuit court for the appointment of three (3) appraisers to establish the fair market value of the right-of-way and for an order directing the railroad to offer to sell the right-of-way to the municipality for the fair market value established by the appraisers.
- An offer by a railroad to sell rights-of-way for the fair market value shall constitute a continuing offer granting the municipality the first right of refusal, and, in instances where a third party makes an offer to the railroad to purchase the abandoned right-of-way, the municipality shall have thirty (30) days from the date of offer by the third party to exercise its right of first refusal.
History. Acts 1985, No. 1002, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-509.
23-12-206. Rail line abandonment process.
- After an operator of a railroad within the State of Arkansas has filed a notice of rail line abandonment consistent with the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, and notice of the proposed rail line abandonment has been received by the Arkansas Economic Development Council, the council shall notify appropriate entities of the proposed abandonment.
-
-
Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a notice to abandon a rail line by an operator of a railroad within the State of Arkansas, the council shall notify in writing:
- All regional mobility authorities and all regional intermodal authorities that are directly affected by the proposed rail line abandonment within their areas of jurisdiction; and
- If no regional mobility authorities or regional intermodal authorities exist within the region to be affected by the proposed rail line abandonment, all mayors and county judges who are directly affected by the proposed rail line abandonment within their areas of jurisdiction.
- If there is an existing regional mobility authority or regional intermodal authority that is directly affected by a proposed rail line abandonment in their areas of jurisdiction, either or both of these authorities shall notify the council within ten (10) working days of the receipt of notice of the proposed rail line abandonment of their interest or lack of interest in obtaining or preserving the rail line proposed for abandonment.
-
If there is no existing regional mobility authority or regional intermodal authority in the area proposed for rail line abandonment, the affected mayors and county judges within the area of the proposed rail line abandonment shall notify the council within ten (10) working days of the receipt of notice of the proposed rail line abandonment of:
- Their lack of interest in obtaining and preserving the rail line proposed for abandonment;
- Their interest in obtaining or preserving through existing resources the rail line proposed for abandonment; or
- Their interest in forming a new regional mobility authority or regional intermodal authority, part of whose purpose would be to obtain or preserve the rail line proposed for abandonment.
- If the mayors or county judges, or both, in the areas directly affected by the proposed rail line abandonment respond indicating their intention to form a new regional mobility authority or regional intermodal authority, part of the purpose of which would be to obtain or preserve the rail line proposed for abandonment, the mayors or county judges are allowed not more than one hundred twenty (120) days from the notice of the proposed rail line abandonment to form a regional mobility authority or regional intermodal authority to obtain or preserve the rail line proposed for abandonment.
- Any costs associated with maintenance of the rail line proposed for abandonment shall be borne by the receiving party from the date of the notice of the proposed rail line abandonment until the ownership or preservation of the abandoned rail line has been determined.
-
Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a notice to abandon a rail line by an operator of a railroad within the State of Arkansas, the council shall notify in writing:
History. Acts 2007, No. 747, § 1; 2009, No. 164, § 2.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (a), inserted “line” following “rail” in two places, and made a stylistic change.
U.S. Code. The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, referred to in this section, is codified generally as 49 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., 49 U.S. C. § 10101 et seq.
23-12-207. Transfer of ownership or responsibility of railroad right-of-way.
- Any municipality, county, regional mobility authority, or regional intermodal authority may choose to operate or lease for operation any railroad right-of-way obtained or preserved from the abandonment of a rail line under § 23-12-206.
- Any municipality, county, regional mobility authority, or regional intermodal authority acquiring ownership of any railroad right-of-way obtained or preserved from the abandonment of a rail line under § 23-12-206 shall be responsible for any maintenance of the abandoned rail line.
History. Acts 2007, No. 747, § 1.
Subchapter 3 — Crossings and Switches
Cross References. Authority of railroad to connect with or cross other road, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 1.
Authority of State Highway Commission over operation and movement of trains, § 23-12-1001 et seq.
Effective Dates. Acts 1883, No. 89, § 5: effective on passage.
Acts 1893, No. 130, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1913, No. 272, § 4: Mar. 29, 1913.
Acts 1920 (3rd Ex. Sess.), No. 173, § 3: approved Feb. 18, 1920. Emergency declared.
Acts 1991, No. 1226, § 5: Apr. 10, 1991. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Eighth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that no railroad crossing for a street, road, or highway should be constructed or improved, or safety devices installed unless there is an objective review of the safety considerations conducted by the Arkansas State Highway Commission, that the Arkansas State Highway Commission should be given the exclusive jurisdiction over such matters, and that, without such studies, railroad crossing improvements and safety devices may be an unnecessary and wasteful expenditure of money. Therefore, in order to promote the most efficient use of funds for railroad crossing construction, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
ALR.
Governmental liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or at street or highway intersection. 22 A.L.R.4th 624.
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 99 et seq., § 134 et seq., § 263 et seq.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 278 et seq., § 719 et seq.
23-12-301. Railroad crossings to be under supervision of commission.
The State Highway Commission shall have exclusive power to:
- Determine and prescribe the manner, including the particular point, of crossing and the terms of installation, operation, maintenance, apportionment of expenses, use, and protection of each crossing of one (1) railroad by another railroad or street railroad by a railroad, so far as applicable;
- Alter or abolish any such crossing; and
- Require, where, in its judgment, it would be practical, a separation of grades of any such crossing and prescribe the terms upon which the separation shall be made and the proportions in which the expense of the alteration or abolition of the crossings or the separation of the grades shall be divided between the railroad or street railroad corporations affected or between the corporations and the state, county, municipality, or other public authority in interest.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 9; C. & M. Dig., § 1643; Pope's Dig., § 1964; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-121; Acts 1993, No. 399, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
23-12-302. Railroad switch connections to be permitted.
Every railroad company shall permit switch connections for intrastate business to be made with its tracks at suitable and safe points by other carriers or shippers upon such terms and conditions as the Arkansas Department of Transportation may prescribe whenever, in the judgment of the department, it can be done with reasonable safety and whenever the business to be offered by the connecting company or shipper justifies it.
History. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 9; C. & M. Dig., § 1642; Pope's Dig., § 1963; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-120; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 174.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1919, No. 571, § 32, provided, in part, that the provisions of the act were in addition to and supplemental to the statutes then in force.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
This section gives the commission no judicial function and it cannot determine the rights of two railroad companies under contract relating to joint use of a wye switch. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 156 Ark. 259, 245 S.W. 806 (1922).
23-12-303. Connections or crossings with other railroads — Compensation — Damages.
-
- Every railroad corporation created and organized under the laws of this state or created and organized under the laws of any other state or the United States and operating a railroad in this state shall have the power to cross, intersect, join, or unite its railroad with any other railroad at any point on its route and upon the grounds and right-of-way of the other railroad company with the necessary turnouts, sidings, and switches and other conveniences in furtherance of the object of its construction.
- Every railroad company whose railroad is or shall be crossed, joined, or intersected by any new railroad shall unite with the owners and corporation of the new railroad in forming the crossing, intersection, and connection and shall grant to the railroads so crossing, intersecting, or uniting all the necessary facilities for that purpose as aforesaid.
- If the two (2) corporations cannot agree upon the amount of compensation to be made for the purposes set forth in subsection (a) of this section or the points or manner of the crossing, junctions, or intersections, the compensation shall be ascertained and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in the same manner as provided for the ascertainment of damages for right-of-way for railroads.
- Any railroad company violating any of the provisions of this section shall forfeit and pay to the company injured thereby double the amount of damages which the injured company may have sustained, to be recovered in any court of competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1883, No. 89, §§ 1, 2, 4, p. 158; C. &. M. Dig., §§ 853, 3980, 3981, 8489, 8490, 8492; Pope's Dig., §§ 1057, 4982, 4983, 11063, 11064, 11066; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-609, 73-610, 73-804.
Publisher's Notes. Subsection (b) may be affected by § 23-12-301.
Acts 1883, No. 89, § 4, is also codified as § 23-12-602(d).
Cross References. Crossing of railroads by street railroads, § 14-335-102.
Railroads of mineral land owners, connections, § 15-56-504.
Case Notes
Damages.
A railroad company cannot claim as compensation for taking its land for right-of-way of another over its tracks, cost of maintaining a flagman, or the cost of stopping and starting trains at such crossing since such requirements are police regulations for which damages cannot be claimed. Cairo, T. & S.R.R. v. Ark. Short Line, 172 Ark. 317, 288 S.W. 715 (1926).
Where a railroad company seeks to condemn a right-of-way across the right-of-way of another company, the former may eliminate the element of damages for maintenance of such crossing by stipulating to maintain the same at its own expense. Cairo, T. & S.R.R. v. Ark. Short Line, 172 Ark. 317, 288 S.W. 715 (1926).
Obstructions.
The fact that a defendant railroad, in the exercise of its power to extend its road, constructed an extension to provide railroad facilities for certain industries in such manner as to obstruct the projected building of the petitioner's line did not make such construction wrongful nor authorize the imposition of the cost of constructing crossings for the petitioner over the defendant's line on the defendant. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Fort Smith & Van Buren Ry., 104 Ark. 344, 148 S.W. 531 (1912).
Point of Crossing.
This section did not authorize the courts to compel the petitioner to make the crossing at some other point. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Fort Smith & Van Buren Ry., 104 Ark. 344, 148 S.W. 531 (1912).
Preventing Crossing.
The only remedy of railroad company desiring to prevent condemnation of crossing over its right-of-way by another railroad is in a court of equity. Cairo, T. & S.R.R. v. Ark. Short Line, 172 Ark. 317, 288 S.W. 715 (1926).
Cited: Gregory v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 168 Ark. 469, 270 S.W. 621 (1925).
23-12-304. Inspection of road crossings by commission — Hearings and orders.
-
- It shall be the duty of the State Highway Commission, or any representative of it, to inspect any road or street crossing in this state, either on its own initiative or when its attention is called to it by any citizen.
- Upon a hearing the commission may make an order requiring the railroad company to protect the crossing in any manner which it considers just and reasonable, whether the crossings are at grade or over or under crossing and whether a public or private crossing.
-
- It shall further be the duty of the commission, or any representative thereof, to make a personal inspection of any designated place where it is desired that a road or street, either public or private, cross any railroad in this state.
- Upon ten (10) days' notice as required by law and after a public hearing, the commission may make such order as in its judgment shall be just and proper. The order may provide for a crossing at grade, over or under the railroad, and shall be enforced as other orders made by the commission.
- By applicable federal law, the United States Congress has declared that laws, rules, regulations, orders, and standards relative to railroad safety shall be nationally standard to the extent practicable and that each state shall conduct and maintain a survey of all crossings and assign priorities from a safety standpoint for appropriate improvements and protective devices. The commission has made the survey, given the crossings in Arkansas hazardous index ratings, and now administers the crossing safety program in Arkansas. In view of the above, the commission is hereby designated as the sole public body to deal with, and shall have exclusive jurisdiction over, the location and construction of new, and the improving and protecting of new and existing, street, road, and highway railroad crossings in Arkansas.
History. Acts 1913, No. 272, §§ 1-3; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1644, 1645; Pope's Dig., §§ 1965, 1966; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-621, 73-622, 73-622n; Acts 1991, No. 1226, § 1.
Case Notes
Alternative Methods.
The method described in this section for establishing crossings was not exclusive but was an alternative method. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Town of Bay, 180 Ark. 1040, 23 S.W.2d 968 (1930).
This section did not amend or repeal statute by which city councils were given authority to lay off streets and to require railroad companies to construct crossing on the streets where they passed across the line of the railroad. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. State ex rel. Craighead County, 182 Ark. 409, 31 S.W.2d 739 (1930).
Cited: St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Wallace, 217 Ark. 278, 229 S.W.2d 659 (1950).
23-12-305. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning penalties for failure to properly construct or maintain public road or railroad crossings, was repealed by Acts 1993, No. 726, § 7. The section was derived from Acts 1887, No. 72, §§ 1-5, p. 98; 1899, No. 6, § 1, p. 4; 1905, No. 36, § 1, p. 116; 1907, No. 340, § 1, p. 826; 1913, No. 89, §§ 1-5; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8483-8487; Pope's Dig., §§ 11057-11061; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-614 — 73-618. For current law, see § 23-12-1003.
23-12-306. Public roads to cross railroads at right angles.
- When any public road or highway is laid out, opened, repaired, or improved by authority of any general law of the state, by any special act of the General Assembly, by order of any county court, or in any other lawful manner, and the road or highway as promulgated shall cross or intersect any railroad right-of-way or track at grade, the commissioners of the road or highway, or such other authorities as may be engaged in the construction, repair, or improvement thereof, shall lay out and construct the road or highway so as to cross the railroad right-of-way and tracks at right angles. However, if the topography of the ground at any crossing will not reasonably permit the crossing to be constructed at right angles to the railroad right-of-way or track, then the road or highway crossing may be made as nearly at right angles to the railroad right-of-way and track as may be practicable.
- Failure of the commissioners or other authorities engaged in the construction, repair, or improvement of any road or highway to so lay out and provide for the construction of the crossings shall entitle and authorize any interested person or property owner to enjoin the construction of the road or highway crossing in any other manner.
History. Acts 1920 (3rd Ex. Sess.), No. 173, §§ 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., § 5225½; Pope's Dig., § 6940; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-619, 73-620.
23-12-307. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning trains obstructing crossings, was repealed by Acts 1993, No. 726, § 7. The section was derived from Acts 1907, No. 290, §§ 1, 2, p. 687; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8560, 8561; Pope's Dig., §§ 11136, 11137; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-718, 73-719. For current law, see § 23-12-1006.
23-12-308. Removal of fences for public convenience — Penalty for noncompliance.
- At all public crossings, at all places where the streets abut the railroad right-of-way, and at all other places where the public convenience demands it in all cities and incorporated towns, all railroads in this state shall remove all fences from such places in the cities and towns when the cities and towns shall demand the removal by ordinance.
-
- Thirty (30) days' notice shall be given the railroads of the passage of such an ordinance.
- All railroads thus notified shall remove the fences within sixty (60) days from the date notice is given.
- All railroads failing or refusing to comply with this section shall be guilty of an offense and shall be fined the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for every day intervening between the day of the expiration of the sixty (60) days and the removal of the fences.
History. Acts 1893, No. 130, §§ 1, 2, p. 228; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8474-8477; Pope's Dig., §§ 11048-11051; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-625, 73-626.
Subchapter 4 — Equipment — Safety Precautions
Cross References. General Assembly to provide for safety of passengers, Ark. Const., Art. 19, § 18.
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1893, No. 140, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 402, § 4: Jan. 1, 1908.
Acts 1907, No. 422, § 9: May 28, 1907.
Acts 1909, No. 53, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1911, No. 23, § 3: effective 90 days after passage.
Acts 1915, No. 74, § 4: June 30, 1915. Emergency declared.
Acts 1915, No. 220, § 4: approved Mar. 23, 1915. Emergency declared.
Acts 1951, No. 253, § 2: approved Mar. 19, 1951. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is declared by the General Assembly of Arkansas that the present laws relating to the lights on track motor cars are inadequate and that enactment of this bill will provided for the safety of those persons operating such equipment. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and that this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage.”
Research References
ALR.
Motor carrier's liability for personal injury or death of passenger caused by debris, litter, or other foreign object on floor or seat of vehicle. 1 A.L.R.4th 1249.
Width or design of lateral space between passenger loading platform and car entrance affecting carrier's liability to passenger for injuries incurred from falling into space. 28 A.L.R.4th 748.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Seating, equipment and devices directly relating to passengers' standing or seating safety in land carriers. 35 A.L.R.4th 1050.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 125 et seq., § 202 et seq.
Ark. L. Rev.
Torts — Negligence — Failure To Use Safety Devices On Mechanical Apparatus, 15 Ark. L. Rev. 212.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 769 et seq.
23-12-401. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning requirements of construction of engines, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 565. The section was derived from Acts 1917, No. 75, §§ 1-3, p. 338; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8587-8589; Pope's Dig., §§ 11165-11167; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-701 — 73-703.
23-12-402. Locomotives to have headlights of requisite candlepower.
- Any company, corporation, or officer of court, owning or operating a railroad over fifty (50) miles in length, which is in whole or in part within this state, shall be required to equip, maintain, and use on each and every locomotive being operated in road service in this state in the nighttime a headlight of power and brilliancy of one thousand five hundred (1,500) candlepower.
- Any company, corporation, or officer of court owning or operating a railroad over fifty (50) miles in length, which is in whole or in part within this state, violating the provisions of this section, shall be liable on conviction to a penalty of a fine of not less than three hundred dollars ($300) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each separate offense. The amount shall be recovered in a civil action in the name of the state.
- It is made the duty of any prosecuting attorney of any district in this state to enforce the provisions of this section when a complaint is properly filed in his or her office.
History. Acts 1907, No. 402, §§ 1-3, p. 1018; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8493-8495; Pope's Dig., §§ 11069-11071; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-704 — 73-706.
Case Notes
Applicability.
This section applies to a motor car used for transportation of passengers and operating on the railroad. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Bryant, 110 Ark. 444, 162 S.W. 51 (1913).
Negligence.
Evidence justified finding that injury was due to failure to equip engine with headlight of required candle power. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. White, 93 Ark. 368, 125 S.W. 120 (1910).
Railway is liable for injury to person under the lookout statute (§ 23-12-907) caused by negligence in failing to provide its locomotive with a proper headlight. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Bryant, 110 Ark. 444, 162 S.W. 51 (1913).
Noncompliance with this section constituted negligence. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Bryant, 110 Ark. 444, 162 S.W. 51 (1913); Jonesboro, Lake City & E.R.R. v. Gainer, 112 Ark. 477, 166 S.W. 571 (1914).
Cited: Harper v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 229 Ark. 348, 314 S.W.2d 696 (1958).
23-12-403. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning requirements of construction of caboose cars, was repealed by Acts 2005 No. 1994, § 566. The section was derived from Acts 1911, No. 418, §§ 1-4; C. & M. Dig., §§ 956-959; Pope's Dig., §§ 1160-1163; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-707 — 73-710.
23-12-404. Equipment required on track motor cars.
- No railroad company in this state shall use any track motor car for the transportation of its employees unless the motor car is equipped with a windbreaker, a red taillight, and an electric headlight of sufficient brilliancy to distinguish an object the size of a man at a distance of three hundred feet (300').
- Any company, corporation, or officer of court owning or operating a railroad of fifty (50) miles in length in whole or in part within this state violating the provisions of this section shall be liable on conviction to a penalty of a fine of not more than five dollars ($5.00) for each separate offense which shall be recovered in a civil action in the name of the state.
History. Acts 1951, No. 253, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-740.
23-12-405. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning first aid kits and drinking water requirements, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 567. The section was derived from Acts 1953, No. 130, §§ 1-4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-741 — 73-744.
23-12-406. Transportation of hazardous materials.
Any railroad transporting hazardous materials, as defined in the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, in this state must have on the train, in the possession of the train crew, documents which shall contain the following information regarding the hazardous material:
- Position in the train of the car containing the hazardous material;
- Number of the car containing the hazardous material;
- Description of the hazardous nature of the material, such as whether it is a corrosive or flammable liquid, gas, or solid; and
- A description of the quantity of the hazardous material.
History. Acts 1979, No. 651, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-745.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1979, No. 651, § 2, read:
“The provisions of this act shall be effective only after an administrative ruling is obtained, pursuant to the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, that this act is not preempted by the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.”
U.S. Code. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, referred to in this section, is codified primarily as 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq.
23-12-407. Repairs to cars to be done in state — Exceptions.
-
- All railroad corporations operating within the State of Arkansas and having their repair shops within the state shall, and are required to, repair, renovate, or build in the State of Arkansas, any and all defective or broken cars, coaches, locomotives, or other equipment owned or leased by the corporation in the State of Arkansas, when the rolling stock is within the State of Arkansas if the railway has been or is under an obligation to have proper facilities in the state to do the work.
-
- No railway shall be required to haul its disabled equipment a greater distance for repairs at a point within the State of Arkansas than would be necessary to reach their repair shop in another state.
- No railway company shall be permitted to haul for purposes of repair any disabled equipment by or past any shop owned or operated by the company where the disabled equipment can be repaired in order to reach some other repair shop at a greater distance for the purpose of repairing the disabled equipment.
-
- The provisions of this section shall not apply to companies having fewer than sixty (60) continuous miles of railroad in operation in this state.
- The provisions of this section shall not apply in cases of fires, floods, cyclones, or any such act of providence.
- Any railroad corporation, lessee, receiver, superintendent, or agent who shall violate any of the provisions of this section shall after conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction be liable to a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
- This section shall not be so construed as to require any railway corporation to violate the safety appliance laws of the United States Congress.
History. Acts 1915, No. 220, §§ 1-3; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8505-8507; Pope's Dig., §§ 11081-11083; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-731 — 73-733.
U.S. Code. The safety appliance laws referred to in this section were repealed by Act July 5, 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-272, § 7(b), 108 Stat. 1379. See now 49 U.S.C. § 20101 et seq.
23-12-408. Lights to be placed on switches.
- Any company, corporation, or officer of court or any person operating any line of railroad during the nighttime in this state shall be required to place and maintain sufficient lights during the nighttime on all its main line switches of the line of railroad so operated. Green lights shall indicate main line, and red lights shall indicate side tracks.
- Any company, corporation, or officer of court or any person operating any railroad in this state, who shall violate any of the provisions of this section, shall be liable on conviction to a penalty of a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100) for each separate offense. The penalty shall be recovered in a civil action in the name of the state.
History. Acts 1911, No. 23, §§ 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8496, 8497; Pope's Dig., §§ 11072, 11073; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-711, 73-712.
Case Notes
Civil Actions.
Action for recovery of penalty is a civil action since the section creates no public offense. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 107 Ark. 450, 155 S.W. 517 (1913).
Party.
The county is not a party to a suit under this section. Chicot County v. Matthews, 120 Ark. 505, 179 S.W. 1002 (1915).
Penalties.
Only one penalty can be recovered for all acts committed prior to commencement of the action. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 107 Ark. 450, 155 S.W. 517 (1913).
23-12-409. Signals and signboards required at tunnels.
-
- Every person, company, or corporation operating any railroad in this state or any receivers for any railroad company in this state are required to erect, operate, and maintain an automatic block signal system at all tunnels located upon their lines in this state.
- The block signal is to be located at least two thousand five hundred feet (2,500') from each end of the tunnel. It shall be constructed as to warn all approaching crews whenever a train is within the tunnel or within two thousand five hundred feet (2,500') of either end of the tunnel.
-
- The railroad companies, corporations, or receivers operating any railroad in this state shall erect and maintain a signboard within one (1) mile of each end of all tunnels located on their lines in this state in order to warn engine crews that they are approaching a tunnel.
- The signboard shall contain and display in large letters the following instruction: “ONE MILE TO TUNNEL — DANGER.”
- This section shall not apply to tunnels fewer than one thousand five hundred feet (1,500') in length.
- Any railroad company or corporation, person, or receiver for any company or railroad operating a railroad within this state who shall violate or fail to comply with the provisions of this section shall upon conviction be fined in any sum not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100). Each day of violation or failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1915, No. 74, §§ 1-3; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8498-8500; Pope's Dig., §§ 11074-11076; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-713 — 73-715.
23-12-410. Audible warning device to be sounded at crossing — Penalty and damages.
- To give warning of a train's approach, an audible warning device meeting standards prescribed by the Federal Railroad Administration shall be sounded at least one-quarter (¼) mile in advance of each location in Arkansas where a railroad crosses any public road, highway, or street or where any public road, highway, or street crosses any railroad and shall be sounded until the lead locomotive clears the crossing.
- Any railroad company failing to warn of the train's approach as required in this section shall be liable upon a finding of a violation for a fine of two hundred dollars ($200) for each occurrence. The penalty shall be recovered in a civil action in the name of the state.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 34, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8559, 8568a; Pope's Dig., § 11135; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-716; Acts 2001, No. 1804, § 1.
Amendments. The 2001 amendment substituted “Audible warning device” for “Bell or whistle” in the section heading and rewrote the section.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
For discussion of constitutionality under Constitution of 1868, see St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 55 Ark. 200, 17 S.W. 806 (1891); St. Louis, Ark. & Tex. Ry. v. State, 56 Ark. 166, 19 S.W. 572 (1892).
Purpose.
This section is intended to afford protection to any one at or near a road or street crossing, whether a traveler on the highway or not. Hines v. Johnson, 145 Ark. 592, 224 S.W. 989 (1920).
Construction.
Action under this section, although a civil action, is penal in nature and should be strictly construed. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 58 Ark. 39, 22 S.W. 918 (1893).
Appeals.
On appeal from judgment for plaintiff in railroad crossing death case where there was evidence, although contradicted, that statutory signals were not given, Supreme Court must assume that the signals were not given. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dennis, 205 Ark. 28, 166 S.W.2d 886 (1942).
Awareness of Approaching Train.
Where the plaintiffs, occupants of an automobile, with knowledge that a train was approaching, drove their car against the train, the exclusion of evidence that no signals were given by the trainmen was not error since the signals would have given the plaintiffs no further information. Tinsley v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 189 Ark. 530, 73 S.W.2d 473 (1934).
The object of this section is to warn travelers on the highway of the approach of the train, and when they have that knowledge without the signals being given, the fact becomes unimportant. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Moore, 199 Ark. 1035, 138 S.W.2d 384, cert. denied, 311 U.S. 646, 61 S. Ct. 19, 85 L. Ed. 2d 412 (1940).
Where warning signal in the middle of street gave motorist information of approaching train and loud noise of train could have been heard by him, failure to give statutory signal could not authorize recovery. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Carruthers, 204 Ark. 419, 162 S.W.2d 912 (1942).
The purpose of giving signals is to warn the traveler of the approach of a train, but when the traveler has this knowledge otherwise, warning signals cease to be factors. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dennis, 205 Ark. 28, 166 S.W.2d 886 (1942).
Plaintiffs could not recover for mental anguish where decedent saw the train approaching and walked in front of it, regardless of whether the statutory signals were sounded. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Baker, 233 Ark. 610, 346 S.W.2d 215 (1961).
Evidence.
Evidence held sufficient to justify finding that collision was caused by failure to give statutory signals. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Harden, 197 Ark. 899, 125 S.W.2d 466 (1939).
Evidence supported jury's finding that signals were not given and that a proper lookout was not kept by operatives of the train. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Magness, 206 Ark. 1081, 178 S.W.2d 493 (1944).
Evidence held sufficient to submit issues to jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Rogers, 206 Ark. 1052, 178 S.W.2d 667 (1944); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. McCarn, 212 Ark. 287, 205 S.W.2d 704 (1947).
Testimony of witnesses was sufficient for the jury to find the railroad guilty of actionable negligence. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Perryman, 213 Ark. 550, 211 S.W.2d 647 (1948).
Where plaintiffs drove truck upon railroad crossing and were unable to state affirmatively that bell of the locomotive was not ringing the court properly instructed a verdict in favor of the defendant railroad company. Haney v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 214 Ark. 673, 217 S.W.2d 610 (1949).
Testimony of persons of good hearing who are in a position to hear a bell ringing or whistle blowing that no such signal was given is positive rather than negative evidence. Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955).
Evidence was sufficient for jury to have awarded damages for wrongful death. Scoville v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 458 F.2d 639 (8th Cir. 1972).
Testimony of witnesses who were in a position where they should have heard the train's whistle and bell that they did not hear the train signals was not negative evidence and rendered a directed verdict error. Daniels v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R., 256 Ark. 874, 511 S.W.2d 175 (1974).
Evidence held insufficient to submit issues to jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Biddle, 293 Ark. 142, 732 S.W.2d 473 (1987) (Supp. Op.).
There was substantial evidence from which the jury could have found that the train crew failed to give the statutory signals. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. White, 302 Ark. 193, 788 S.W.2d 483 (1990).
Instructions.
For cases discussing instructions in personal injury actions involving violations of this section, see Hale & Scott v. Lusk, 128 Ark. 203, 193 S.W. 790 (1917); Hines v. Johnson, 145 Ark. 592, 224 S.W. 989 (1920); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Bode, 168 Ark. 157, 269 S.W. 361 (1925); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Robertson, 169 Ark. 957, 278 S.W. 357 (1925); Hovley v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 193 Ark. 580, 102 S.W.2d 845 (1937).
In action for damages received in collision between defendant's locomotive and automobile in which plaintiff was riding, instruction that signal should be given in approaching a crossing, and within 80 rods thereof, or within any distance under 80 rods traveled in approaching a crossing, was authorized by this statute. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Riley, 198 Ark. 372, 128 S.W.2d 1005 (1939); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. McCarn, 212 Ark. 287, 205 S.W.2d 704 (1947); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Sparks, 220 Ark. 412, 248 S.W.2d 371 (1952); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Shane, 225 Ark. 80, 279 S.W.2d 284 (1955).
Jury instruction, stating railroad is required to sound a bell or whistle on a locomotive at least a quarter mile from where the tracks cross any public road, was held to accurately reflect the law. Pittman v. Frazer, 129 F.3d 983 (8th Cir. 1997).
Judgments.
A judgment in favor of county for recovery of statutory penalty is not void, although it should have been rendered in favor of state or of an informer. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 55 Ark. 200, 17 S.W. 806 (1891).
Jury Questions.
Whether plaintiff, struck and injured by train at crossing, was guilty of contributory negligence was properly left to jury where plaintiff testified that he looked and listened for train before reaching track, but failed to see train because of some bushes. Arkansas Cent. Ry. v. Williams, 99 Ark. 167, 137 S.W. 829 (1911).
Where the evidence tended to prove that the plaintiff's intestate stopped his team near a crossing in front of an approaching train and that his mules became frightened and ran in front of the train which had given no signals, it was error to direct a verdict for the defendant railroad company; it being a question for the jury whether the intestate was negligent. Billingsley v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 136 Ark. 1, 206 S.W. 43 (1918).
In action against railroad company injuries to mules and damages to wagon struck at crossing, the question of whether signals were given was properly submitted to jury for consideration in determining whether railroad company was negligently operating the train when it ran over the team. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Call, 197 Ark. 225, 122 S.W.2d 178 (1938).
Issue held to be one of fact for the jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Troy, 198 Ark. 359, 128 S.W.2d 1002 (1939); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Edwards, 224 Ark. 124, 271 S.W.2d 935 (1954).
Evidence held sufficient to make question of contributory negligence one for the jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Howell, 198 Ark. 956, 132 S.W.2d 176 (1939).
Where there was testimony to effect that signals were not given, the question whether failure to give statutory signals was actionable negligence was a matter for the jury. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Perryman, 213 Ark. 550, 211 S.W.2d 647 (1948).
Contributory negligence, just as actionable negligence, is a question for the jury if substantial evidence be introduced on such issue. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Perryman, 213 Ark. 550, 211 S.W.2d 647 (1948).
In an action for damages to an automobile, resulting from a collision with a train at a public street crossing, the question as to whether proper signals were given, a proper lookout kept and whether view was obstructed as he approached the crossing was for the jury to decide. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Winter, 217 Ark. 148, 228 S.W.2d 1001 (1950).
Where the plaintiffs introduced substantial evidence supportive of their theory on the warning issue, it was a question for the jury whether the railroad was negligent in failing to sound the warning as required. Scoville v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 458 F.2d 639 (8th Cir. 1972).
Whether the train gave the necessary signal over the required distance was a fact question properly left to the jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Biddle, 293 Ark. 142, 732 S.W.2d 473 (1987).
Nature of Action.
Though this section contemplates recovery by civil action only, a judgment for recovery of penalty based upon pleading which is in form of indictment returned by grand jury is not open to collateral attack if such pleading is in substance a civil complaint prepared and signed by prosecuting attorney and so treated by trial court. State v. Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis R.R., 54 Ark. 546, 16 S.W. 567 (1891); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 55 Ark. 200, 17 S.W. 806 (1891).
The failure of a railroad company to give the required signals subjects it to a penalty to be recovered by a civil action brought by the prosecuting attorney in the name of the people and it is error to proceed with the case as a criminal action. Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis R.R. v. State, 63 Ark. 134, 37 S.W. 1047 (1896); Midland Valley R.R. v. State, 102 Ark. 431, 144 S.W. 915 (1912).
Negligence.
Where animal was killed on defendant's track within 100 feet of a public crossing and no signals were given, jury had right to infer that neglect contributed to injury, although defendant could not have discovered animals' danger in time to have avoided the killing. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Hendricks, 53 Ark. 201, 13 S.W. 699 (1890).
In action for injury caused by blowing of whistle of passing train while it was approaching crossing, such blowing of the whistle did not of itself constitute negligence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Copeland, 113 Ark. 60, 167 S.W. 71 (1914); Garner v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 210 Ark. 214, 195 S.W.2d 39 (1946).
In action to recover damages to a truck which was struck by a train at a public crossing, the driver had right to assume that railroad company would not be guilty of negligence in failing to give statutory signals. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Howell, 198 Ark. 956, 132 S.W.2d 176 (1939).
It is negligence for the operatives of a train to fail to give the signal required by statute, and this negligence defeats the right of the railroad company to recover damages sustained by train resulting from negligence of motorist running into it. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dawson, 205 Ark. 404, 168 S.W.2d 1105 (1943).
Where the testimony of plaintiffs own witness established that the bell was ringing continuously and the whistle was sounded at each crossing, there was no showing of negligence. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Thurman, 213 Ark. 840, 213 S.W.2d 362 (1948).
Failure to give statutory signals at a partly blind crossing amounted to negligence. Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955).
—Contributory and Comparative.
Contributory negligence does not prevent a recovery against a railroad company where it is of less degree than the negligence of the company, but such contributory negligence may be considered in determining the measure of damages, that is the amount of recovery shall be diminished in proportion to such contributory negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Magness, 206 Ark. 1081, 178 S.W.2d 493 (1944).
Motorist who admitted that he did not look for oncoming train during time he traveled from turn off on the highway until he reached within a few feet of track on which he was struck, a distance of between 60 and 74 feet, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, but his negligence did not equal railroad's negligence in failing to give signals. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Magness, 206 Ark. 1081, 178 S.W.2d 493 (1944).
Where size of verdict indicated that jury failed to take in account plaintiff's contributory negligence and did not reduce amount of recovery in proportion, the error may be corrected on appeal by reducing the recovery to the highest amount that a jury would be warranted in awarding on the facts before the Supreme Court. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Magness, 206 Ark. 1081, 178 S.W.2d 493 (1944).
In railroad crossing cases contributory negligence is not an absolute defense, but only a measuring and reducing defense. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Perryman, 213 Ark. 550, 211 S.W.2d 647 (1948).
Owners and Operators of Railroad.
A corporation operating a railroad is a corporation owning a railroad. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. State, 84 Ark. 409, 106 S.W. 199 (1907).
This section is applicable to a receiver operating a railroad in his capacity as receiver. Bush v. State, 128 Ark. 448, 194 S.W. 857 (1917).
This section applies to an individual who, as trustee, is operating the railroad. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Yelldell, 199 Ark. 343, 133 S.W.2d 642 (1939).
Parties.
Where action is prosecuted by informer in his own name, the error in not bringing the suit in the name of the state cannot be cured by amendment. St. Louis, Ark. & Tex. Ry. v. State, 56 Ark. 166, 19 S.W. 572 (1892).
Pleadings.
Complaint alleging that defendant unlawfully failed to ring a bell “and” to sound a whistle was bad as alleging defendant had failed to perform both acts and not excluding the possibility that one of the acts may have been performed. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 58 Ark. 39, 22 S.W. 918 (1893).
Though allegations did not in specific words allege a violation of this statute, but facts were alleged sufficient to establish that action was based upon its violation, allegations were sufficient to state cause of action. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Barham, 198 Ark. 158, 128 S.W.2d 353 (1939).
—Variance.
Where plaintiff alleged that at a certain time, the defendant, on a certain passenger train going south failed to ring a bell or sound a whistle and proved that the failure occurred on a certain freight train going north, there was not merely a variance, but a failure of proof. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 59 Ark. 165, 26 S.W. 824 (1894), superseded by rule as stated in, Bailey v. Matthews, 279 Ark. 117, 649 S.W.2d 175 (1983).
Where, in an action against a railroad company to recover the statutory penalty for failure to signal at a certain highway crossing, the evidence tends to show that the offense, if committed at all, was committed at a different crossing from that named in the complaint, the court should direct a verdict for the defendant. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 69 Ark. 363, 63 S.W. 804 (1901).
Proximate Cause of Injury.
Where the plaintiff was injured by being thrown from his wagon by reason of his horses becoming frightened by the approach of a train at a public crossing, the jury was warranted in finding that the failure to give the required signals was the proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff and that the giving of such signals would have apprised the plaintiff of the approach of the train. Louisiana & Ark. Ry. v. Nix, 94 Ark. 270, 126 S.W. 1076 (1910); Prescott & Nw. R.R. v. Franks, 111 Ark. 83, 163 S.W. 180 (1914).
Where the negligence of the defendant's trainmen in failing to give the statutory signals of the approach of a train to an established crossing was the cause of the plaintiff's injuries, the defendant will be liable if the plaintiff was not a trespasser nor guilty of contributory negligence. Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Graves, 96 Ark. 638, 132 S.W. 992 (1910); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Drew, 103 Ark. 374, 147 S.W. 50 (1912).
Sounding Bell or Whistle.
Railway companies are liable for all damages caused by their omission to ring a bell or sound a whistle as required by this section. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Hendricks, 53 Ark. 201, 13 S.W. 699 (1890).
A road, though not a county road, which was used regularly by the public for years and where the railroad had built a crossing, was a road at which signals were to be given. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Tomlinson, 78 Ark. 251, 94 S.W. 613 (1906).
In an action for the death of the plaintiff's intestate alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant's trainmen, it was not error to refuse to instruct that if the intestate heard the train whistle for the station no other signal were required, since the duty to signal was a continuing one. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Adams, 144 Ark. 609, 223 S.W. 26 (1920).
The duty to give signals is not relieved because a train is put in motion at a point less than 80 rods from the crossing, but they should be given while the train is approaching the crossing, whatever the distance. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Riley, 198 Ark. 372, 128 S.W.2d 1005 (1939).
The duty to ring the bell or blow the whistle exists even though the train is put in motion at a point less than eighty rods from the crossing, although in such a case the signals need only be given from the time the train is set in motion. Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955).
The duty to ring the bell or blow the whistle applies to switching operations. Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955).
In action for damages against railroad by plaintiff who sustained injuries when his truck ran into standing train at crossing, it was error to instruct jury on duty of railroad to ring bell or sound whistle, since statute does not require that signals be given after train has occupied the crossing. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Robinson, 228 Ark. 418, 308 S.W.2d 282 (1957).
Cited: Harper v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 229 Ark. 348, 314 S.W.2d 696 (1958); Union Pac. R.R. v. Sharp, 330 Ark. 174, 952 S.W.2d 658 (1997).
23-12-411. Warning boards required at crossings — Exception.
- Every railroad corporation in this state shall cause boards to be placed, well-supported by posts or otherwise, and constantly maintained across each public road or street where the public road or street is crossed by the railroad on the same level.
-
- The boards shall be elevated so as not to obstruct travel and to be easily seen by travelers.
- On each side of the boards shall be printed, in capital letters of at least the size of nine inches (9") each, the words, “RAILROAD CROSSING”.
- This section shall not apply to streets in cities or villages unless the corporation is required to put up the boards by the officers having charge of the streets.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 35, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 8488; Pope's Dig., § 11062; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-717; Acts 1993, No. 399, § 3.
Case Notes
Purpose.
The purpose of the sign required by this section is simply to give notice of an upcoming crossing. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Gray, 248 Ark. 640, 453 S.W.2d 54 (1970).
Deficiency of Sign.
Statutory deficiency of the sign is merely evidence of negligence which must be shown to be a proximate cause of alleged injuries. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Gray, 248 Ark. 640, 453 S.W.2d 54 (1970).
Instructions.
An instruction that if the railroad crossing signs at the crossing in question gave notice of the existence of the crossing in time for travelers to avoid entering a position of peril by the exercise of due care, a variation of such signs from the specifications of this section would not be evidence of negligence that was the proximate cause of the accident in question was not erroneous. Bussell v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 237 Ark. 812, 376 S.W.2d 545 (1964).
Placement.
Crossing signs are required to be placed where visibility is greatest, but not necessarily on both sides of the track. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Price, 182 Ark. 801, 33 S.W.2d 366 (1930).
Cited: Harper v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 229 Ark. 348, 314 S.W.2d 696 (1958).
23-12-412. Stock guards required when railroad passes through enclosure.
-
- It shall be the duty of all railroad companies organized under the laws of this state or any other state, which have constructed or may construct a railroad which may pass through or upon any enclosed lands of another, whether such lands were enclosed at the time of the construction of the railroad or were enclosed thereafter, upon receiving ten (10) days' notice in writing from the owner or agent of the lands to construct suitable and safe stock guards on either side of the enclosure where the railroad enters the enclosure and to keep the guards in good repair.
- The notice as provided in this subsection may be had by the persons aggrieved or their agent serving a written notice upon a station agent, or upon any person upon whom service may be had in the employ of the railroad company, or any officer thereof. Proof that the written notice was delivered as required in this subdivision (a)(2) shall be sufficient.
-
- Any railroad company failing to comply with the requirements of subdivision (a)(1) of this section shall be liable to the persons aggrieved thereby for the actual damages caused to the persons by reason of the failure of any railroad company to properly construct, keep, and maintain in good repair the stock guards.
- In addition to the actual damages, the railroad company shall be liable for a penalty of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100) for each offense.
- The penalty may be collected, together with the actual damages, by a civil suit in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
History. Acts 1893, No. 140, §§ 1, 2, p. 244; 1909, No. 53, §§ 1, 2, p. 135; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8478, 8479; Pope's Dig., §§ 11052, 11053; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-623, 73-624.
Case Notes
Construction.
Since this section is in derogation of the common law and penal in nature it must be strictly construed. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Stroupe, 237 Ark. 464, 373 S.W.2d 709 (1963).
Applicability.
Remedy conferred by the law is exclusive to the owners of enclosures and has no application to suit for damages sustained by others on account of negligent maintenance of cattle guard. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Miller, 185 Ark. 937, 50 S.W.2d 618 (1932).
Damages.
It was not necessary that the owner of the enclosure prove that he was actually damaged, though the amount of his recovery depended on the extent of the wrong he had suffered by the failure of the railroad to construct the cattle guards. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Ry. v. Pirtle, 68 Ark. 548, 60 S.W. 657 (1901).
No more damages could be recovered for injury for failure to construct than the penalty provided. Choctaw & Memphis R.R. v. Vosburg, 71 Ark. 232, 72 S.W. 574 (1903); St. Louis, Memphis & Se. Ry. v. Busick, 74 Ark. 589, 86 S.W. 674 (1905) (preceding decisions prior to 1909 amendment).
Enclosures.
The owner of land through which a railway runs has no right to give notice to the railroad company to erect stock guards until he has an enclosure through which the road runs. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry v. Hood, 67 Ark. 357, 55 S.W. 134 (1900).
This section applies wherever the railroad enters enclosed lands whether or not the company owns the fee in its right-of-way. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Fitzhugh, 82 Ark. 179, 100 S.W. 1149 (1907).
Section applies whether the fence enclosing the land be a lawful fence or not. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Hale, 82 Ark. 175, 100 S.W. 1148 (1907); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Warner, 86 Ark. 46, 109 S.W. 1013 (1908).
Evidence.
The evidence raised a question for the jury whether notice to a railroad to construct cattle guards had been given. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Ellis, 169 Ark. 682, 276 S.W. 996 (1925).
Fencing Right-of-Way.
Where a landowner agrees with a railroad company to accept a fence along the right-of-way in lieu of stock guards and the company complies with the contract within a reasonable time, it is not thereafter liable to the statutory penalty for failure to construct stock guards, but if the company does not comply with such agreement within a reasonable time, the landowner can treat the contract as rescinded and proceed as if no agreement had been made; and notice to build the stock guards is sufficient to apprise the company that the owner no longer considers the contract binding. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Crossen, 103 Ark. 613, 147 S.W. 48 (1912).
Instructions.
An instruction that the mere fact that animals occasionally passed over the stock guards was not sufficient evidence to establish the fact that the stock guards were unsuitable and unsafe was properly refused as it was a question for the jury whether the stock guards were as perfect and as well adapted for the purpose of turning stock as it is practicable to make it, in connection with the safe and prudent operation of the road. Choctaw & Memphis R.R. v. Goset, 70 Ark. 427, 68 S.W. 879 (1902).
An instruction that if the stock guard in which the plaintiff's horse was injured was defectively constructed so as not to effectively prevent stock from passing over same, then the jury should find for the plaintiff, was erroneous in making the railroad company an insurer that no cattle can pass the stock guard. St. Louis, Memphis & Se. Ry. v. Busick, 74 Ark. 589, 86 S.W. 674 (1905).
While, in a suit against a railroad to recover the statutory penalty for failure to construct a proper stock guard, whereby the plaintiff horse was injured, it was proper to admit proof of the horse's value as indicating a basis for the amount of penalty which the jury might award, it was error to instruct the jury to award the plaintiff compensatory damages if the stock guard was defectively constructed. St. Louis, Memphis & Se. Ry. v. Busick, 74 Ark. 589, 86 S.W. 674 (1905) (decision prior to 1909 amendment).
An instruction to effect that railway company is required to furnish “good and sufficient” stock guards is substantially in accord with statute requiring “suitable and safe” stock guards. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Greer, 90 Ark. 531, 119 S.W. 1121 (1909).
Notice.
In an action against a railroad company to recover the penalty for failure to repair cattle guards after notice, a constable's return of service of the statutory notice was insufficient to prove service. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Ry. v. Lowther, 68 Ark. 238, 57 S.W. 518 (1900).
A notice which apprises the railway company that stock guards are needed at plaintiff's enclosure, giving quarter section in which enclosure is located, is sufficient without describing enclosure with metes and bounds. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry v. Mendenhall, 71 Ark. 133, 71 S.W. 269 (1902); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Greer, 90 Ark. 531, 119 S.W. 1121 (1909).
Notice from tenant to repair stock guard was insufficient. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Adams, 84 Ark. 14, 106 S.W. 200 (1907) (decision prior to 1909 amendment).
The owner of a crop cannot recover damages for injury to his crop on account of the defective condition of a stock guard on the defendant's railroad where notice of defective condition was not given to the defendant. Hester v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 144 Ark. 340, 222 S.W. 356 (1920).
Parties.
A tenant is not a necessary party to an action against a railroad company for failure to construct a cattle guard. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Crossen, 103 Ark. 613, 147 S.W. 48 (1912).
Penalties.
Although landowner recovered one penalty, if he again notified railroad company to construct stock guard and it failed to do so, he could recover penalty second time. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Fitzhugh, 83 Ark. 481, 104 S.W. 175 (1907).
Public Crossings.
This section applies only to a railroad crossing and enclosure and does not require railroad to maintain stock guards at a public cattle crossing, and, railroad was under no duty to construct and maintain stock guards at crossing where only evidence offered by appellee was to the affect that he owned land on both sides of the railroad tracks and it was necessary to drive his cattle across the tracks at public crossing and there was no other substantial evidence that appellee was the owner of an enclosure bisected by the railroad. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Stroupe, 237 Ark. 464, 373 S.W.2d 709 (1963).
Cited: Arkansas M. Ry. v. Whitley, 54 Ark. 199, 15 S.W. 465 (1891); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Orsburn, 252 Ark. 872, 481 S.W.2d 356 (1972).
Subchapter 5 — Employees
Effective Dates. Acts 1903, No. 144, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 282, § 5: effective 30 days after passage.
Acts 1909, No. 299, § 3: Jan. 1, 1910.
Acts 1911, No. 261, § 3: July 1, 1911.
Acts 1953, No. 284, § 5: Mar. 11, 1953.
Acts 2019, No. 467, § 2: Mar. 14, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that railroad employees and safe and effective railroad management are essential to the day-to-day railroad transit operations of the state; that the Railway Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-432 mandated Federal Railroad Administration Certification for railroad employees; that using the Federal Railroad Administration certification as the standard identification required for any accidents or incidents involving railroads eliminates misinterpretations and sets both a standard for identification and understanding between law enforcement officers and other safety officers with railroad employees and members of railroad management; and that this act will convey how highly the State of Arkansas values its transportation infrastructure. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto”.
Research References
ALR.
Employer's liability to employee or agent for injury or death resulting from assault or criminal attack by third person. 40 A.L.R.5th 1.
Case Notes
Employees Protected.
Sections 23-12-501 — 23-12-507 apply to those employees only who are engaged in the operation of the road. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Ingram, 118 Ark. 377, 176 S.W. 692 (1915).
Sections 23-12-501 — 23-12-507 include every employee, who, when injured, was performing some work in the line of his duty directly connected with and incident to the use and operation of a railroad. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Brown, 195 Ark. 1060, 115 S.W.2d 1083 (1938).
Where an employee of a railroad company was injured while engaged in repairing a car by the slipping of a prizepole with which he was attempting to move a car wheel, such work did not expose the employee to those peculiar hazards which were incident to and connected with the physical operation and use of a line of railroad and the work in which he was engaged did not bring him within the protection of §§ 23-12-501 — 23-12-507. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Wiseman, 119 Ark. 477, 177 S.W. 1139 (1915).
23-12-501. Definitions for §§ 23-12-501 — 23-12-507.
As used in this section and §§ 23-12-502 — 23-12-507, unless the context otherwise requires, “common carrier by railroad” or “common carrier” shall be taken to embrace any company, association, corporation, or person managing, maintaining, operating, or in possession of a common carrier operating upon rails or tracks in whole or in part within this state whether as owner, contractor, lessee, mortgagee, trustee, assignee, or receiver.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 4; C. & M. Dig., § 7141; Pope's Dig., § 9127; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-917.
Case Notes
Common Carriers.
In order for one to constitute a common carrier, his business must be regular and customary and of a such a general and public nature that a person carrying it on is bound to convey goods of all persons indifferently who offer to pay for the transportation, and the definition was not enlarged so as to include logging railroads. Presson v. Vail Cooperage Co., 155 Ark. 424, 245 S.W. 14 (1922).
23-12-502. Construction of §§ 23-12-501 — 23-12-507.
Nothing in this section and §§ 23-12-501 and 23-12-503 — 23-12-507 shall be held to limit the duty of common carriers by railroad or impair the rights of their employees in the existing laws of the state.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 6; C. & M. Dig., § 7143; Pope's Dig., § 9129; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-919.
Case Notes
Cited: Murphy v. Province, 153 Ark. 240, 240 S.W. 421 (1922).
23-12-503. Liability for injury or death of employee generally.
Every common carrier by railroad in this state shall be liable for all damages to any person suffering injury while he or she is employed by the carrier or, in case of the death of the employee, to his or her personal or legal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of the employee; if none, then to the employee's parents; if none, then to the next of kin of the employee, for the injury or death resulting in whole or in part:
- From the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of the carrier;
- By reason of any insufficiency of clearance of obstructions; of strength of roadbed and tracks or structures, or machinery and equipment; of lights and signals in switching and terminal yards, or rules; and of number of employees to perform the particular duties with safety to themselves and their co-employees, or of any other insufficiency; or
- By reason of any defect, which defect is due to its negligence in its cars, engines, motors, appliances, machinery, tracks, roadbeds, boats, works, wharves, or other equipment.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 7138; Pope's Dig., § 9124; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-914; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2411.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (2).
Case Notes
Children.
Adult married daughter, not dependent upon her father, was not entitled to share in sum recovered for his death. Murphy v. Province, 153 Ark. 240, 240 S.W. 421 (1922).
Employees Protected.
Stacking planks on a flatcar was a railroad hazard and employees injured while performing such duties were protected by this section. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Brown, 195 Ark. 1060, 115 S.W.2d 1083 (1938).
Insufficiency of Clearance of Obstructions.
Phrase “any insufficiency of clearance of obstructions” means anything that would impede the safe operation of a train or impede the safety of anyone engaged in its operation, and no knowledge of any failure to perform this duty imposes upon the servant any assumption of risk. Kansas City & Memphis Ry. v. Huff, 116 Ark. 461, 173 S.W. 419 (1915).
23-12-504. Death or injury caused by defective cars, appliances, etc. — Presumption of knowledge — Prima facie evidence of negligence.
- If the employee of any common carrier shall receive any injury or shall be killed by reason of any defect in any cars, engines, motors, appliances, machinery, tracks, roadbeds, works, wharves, or other equipment owned, operated, or used by the common carrier, the common carrier shall be deemed to have had knowledge of the defect before and at the time the injury is sustained or death caused.
- When the fact of the defect shall be made to appear in the trial of any action in the courts of this state brought by the employee or his or her personal or legal representative against any common carrier for damages on account of injuries so received or death so caused, the fact of the defect shall be prima facie evidence of negligence on the part of the common carrier.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 2; C. & M. Dig., § 7139; Pope's Dig., § 9125; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-915.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Use of Presumption in Arkansas, 4 Ark. L. Rev. 128.
Case Notes
Actionable Defects.
Where deceased, a conductor employed on the defendant's railway, was killed on account of a defect in the defendant's track causing a derailment, the action was properly brought under this section. McCarty v. Nelson, 129 Ark. 280, 195 S.W. 689 (1917).
Presumptions.
This section does not raise a presumption in case an employee is injured by a moving train unless it is shown that the injury was caused by a defect in the appliances. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Cook, 100 Ark. 467, 140 S.W. 579 (1911).
Prima Facie Evidence.
Under this section the servant need only prove that he was injured by reason of a defective appliance to make a prima facie case. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Ingram, 124 Ark. 298, 187 S.W. 452 (1916), aff'd, 244 U.S. 647, 37 S. Ct. 741, 61 L. Ed. 1370 (1917).
23-12-505. Death or injury of employee — Contributory negligence.
- In all rights of action arising within, or by virtue of, this section and §§ 23-12-501 — 23-12-504, 23-12-506 and 23-12-507 for personal injury to an employee, or where an injury has resulted in his or her death, the fact that an employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery if the negligence of the employee was of a lesser degree than the negligence of the common carrier, its officers, agents, or employees.
- No employee who may be injured or killed shall be held to have been guilty of contributory negligence in any case where the violation by the common carrier or its officials, agents, or employees of any law enacted for the safety of employees or persons contributed to the injury or death of the employee.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 7140; Pope's Dig., § 9126; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-916.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Comparative Negligence, 9 Ark. L. Rev. 357.
Comparative Negligence — A Survey for Arkansas Lawyers, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 1.
The Arkansas Experience with Comparative Negligence, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 70.
Comparative Negligence in the Federal Courts, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 75.
Comparative Negligence in Arkansas: A “Before and After” Survey, 13 Ark. L. Rev. 89.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section does not deprive the railroad of equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Ingram, 118 Ark. 377, 176 S.W. 692 (1915).
Contributory Negligence.
In a suit instituted by an employee against a railway company for damages due to negligence, the defense of contributory negligence is available unless the carrier is more negligent than the servant or where the carrier is guilty of the violation of any law enacted for the safety of the employee which violation contributed to the injury sued for. Kansas City & Memphis Ry. v. Huff, 116 Ark. 461, 173 S.W. 419 (1915); McCarty v. Nelson, 129 Ark. 280, 195 S.W. 689 (1917).
Cited: Evans v. Blytheville, Leachville & Ark. S.R.R., 147 Ark. 28, 227 S.W. 257 (1921).
23-12-506. Death or injury of employee — No assumption of risk.
An employee shall not be held to have assumed the risk of his or her employment in any action arising out of any of the provisions of this section and §§ 23-12-501 — 23-12-505, and 23-12-507.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 7140; Pope's Dig., § 9126; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-916.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Comparative Negligence, 9 Ark. L. Rev. 357.
Comparative Negligence — A Survey for Arkansas Lawyers, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 1.
The Arkansas Experience with Comparative Negligence, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 70.
Comparative Negligence in the Federal Courts, 10 Ark. L. Rev. 75.
Comparative Negligence in Arkansas: A “Before and After” Survey, 13 Ark. L. Rev. 89.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section does not deprive the railroad of equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Ingram, 118 Ark. 377, 176 S.W. 692 (1915).
Cited: Evans v. Blytheville, Leachville & Ark. S.R.R., 147 Ark. 28, 227 S.W. 257 (1921).
23-12-507. Death or injury of employee — Contracts of employment or indemnity insurance no defense — Setoff by employer.
- No contract of employment, insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity for injury or death entered into by or on behalf of any employee nor the acceptance of any insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity by the person entitled thereto shall constitute any bar or defense to any action brought to recover damages for personal injuries to, or death of, the employees.
- However, upon the trial of the action, the defendant may set off therein any sum it has contributed toward any insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity that may have been paid to the injured employee, or, in case of death, to his or her personal or legal representative.
History. Acts 1911, No. 88, § 5; C. & M. Dig., § 7142; Pope's Dig., § 9128; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-918.
23-12-508. Railroads receiving hospital fees to provide hospital facilities in state — Penalty for noncompliance.
-
- Every railroad company or corporation operating railroads in this state that collects or receives hospital fees from their employees shall provide hospital facilities in this state of such capacity and equipment as will be sufficient for the care, needs, and accommodation of their sick or injured employees who are residents of this state.
- Any employees injured while in the service of any such railroad shall not be taken or sent out of the state for treatment.
- Any railroad company or corporation operating railroads in this state that shall violate any of the provisions of this section, shall be liable on conviction to a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each offense, each day to constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1909, No. 299, §§ 1, 2, p. 900; C. & M. Dig., § 7115; Pope's Dig., § 9101; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-912, 73-913.
23-12-509. Limit on hours of service on freight trains of persons running trains — Penalties for noncompliance — Liability for death or injury.
-
- Any company owning or operating a railroad over thirty (30) miles in length in whole or in part within this state shall not permit or require any conductor, engineer, fireman, brakeman, or any trainman on any train, who has worked in his or her respective capacity for sixteen (16) consecutive hours, to again be required to go on duty or perform any work until he or she has had at least eight (8) hours' rest, except in cases of wrecks or washout.
- However, at the expiration of the sixteen (16) hours' continuous service, the engineer and trainmen on any train which is at a distance not exceeding twenty-five (25) miles from any division terminal or destination point shall be permitted, if they so elect, to run the train into the division terminal or destination point. The additional service permitted under this subdivision (a)(2) shall not be so construed as to relieve any railroad corporation from liabilities incurred under subsection (c) of this section.
- Any railroad company or corporation knowingly violating any of the provisions of this section shall be liable to a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200) for the first offense. For any subsequent offense, it shall be liable for a penalty of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than three hundred dollars ($300). The monetary penalty shall be recovered in a civil action in the name of the state.
- In addition to the penalty prescribed in subsection (b) of this section, any corporation violating the provisions of this section shall not be permitted to interpose the defense of contributory negligence in the event of action being brought to recover for damages resulting from any accident which shall occur and by which injury shall be inflicted on any employee who may be detained in service more than sixteen (16) hours, notwithstanding that the negligence of the injured employee may have caused his or her own injury. Nor shall the defense of contributory negligence be interposed if the injury resulted in the death of the employee and the action is brought for the benefit of his or her next of kin.
- The provisions of this section shall not apply to passenger trains.
History. Acts 1903, No. 144, §§ 1-3, p. 245; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7077-7079; Pope's Dig., §§ 9059-9061; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-905 — 73-907.
Publisher's Notes. Hours of employment for interstate carriers and foreign railroads are regulated by federal law. See 49 U.S.C. § 21101 et seq.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Comparative Negligence, 9 Ark. L. Rev. 357.
Case Notes
Contributory Negligence.
Where employee worked overtime and was injured, defense of contributory negligence could not be set up. Kansas City & Memphis Ry. v. Huff, 116 Ark. 461, 173 S.W. 419 (1915).
Passenger Trains.
While this section does not apply to passenger trains it does apply to freight trains carrying passengers in the caboose. Kansas City & Memphis Ry. v. Huff, 116 Ark. 461, 173 S.W. 419 (1915).
23-12-510. Limit of hours on duty of telephone and telegraph operators for railroads — Penalties.
-
It shall be unlawful for any person, corporation, association, or their agents or officials operating a railroad within this state to permit any of the following to be on duty for more than eight (8) hours in any twenty-four (24) consecutive hours:
- Any telegraph or telephone operator who is engaged in the handling of trains by the use of the telegraph or telephone, reporting trains to each other and to the train dispatcher registering the trains, and operating one (1) or more train order signals;
- Telegraph or telephone levermen who manipulate lever machines in railroad yards, or on the main tracks out of the line, connecting sidetracks or switches; or
- Train dispatchers in its service whose duties pertain to the movement of cars, engines, or trains on its railroad by the use of the telegraph or telephone in dispatching or reporting trains, or receiving or transmitting train orders or messages directing the movement of trains as interpreted in this section.
-
- Any person, corporation, association, or their agents or officials that shall violate subsection (a) of this section shall pay a fine of five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation of this section.
- The fine mentioned in subdivision (b)(1) of this section shall be recovered by an action in the name of the State of Arkansas for the use of the state, who shall sue for it against the person, corporation, association, agent, or official violating this section. The suit is to be instituted in any court in this state having appropriate jurisdiction.
- The fine, when recovered, shall be paid without any deduction whatever to the State of Arkansas, for whose use the suit was instituted.
History. Acts 1907, No. 282, §§ 1-4, p. 656; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7080, 7081; Pope's Dig., §§ 9062, 9063; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-908 — 73-911.
23-12-511. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning drinking water furnished to maintenance-of-way employees — enforcement — penalties, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 568. The section was derived from Acts 1953, No. 284, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-920 — 73-922.
23-12-512. Blocks in frogs and guardrails required.
- Any company owning or operating any railroads in this state shall be required to place and maintain blocks of a sufficient size in all its frogs and guardrails to prevent employees from getting their feet caught therein.
- Any company owning and operating any railroad in this state violating the provisions of this section shall be liable on conviction to a penalty of a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each separate offense.
History. Acts 1911, No. 261, §§ 1, 2; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7118, 7120; Pope's Dig., §§ 9105, 9106; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-903, 73-904.
Case Notes
Enforcement.
The penalty may be enforced by criminal process. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 125 Ark. 40, 187 S.W. 1064 (1916).
Multiple Prosecutions.
The failure of a railroad company to maintain blocks in any or all of its frogs and guardrails in a certain county constitutes but a single offense for which one criminal prosecution can be brought, but other prosecutions can be brought if the railroad company continues to neglect to comply with this section. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 125 Ark. 40, 187 S.W. 1064 (1916).
23-12-513. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning shelter requirements where railroad equipment constructed or repaired, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 569. The section was derived from Acts 1905, No. 233, §§ 1, 2, p. 593; C. & M. Dig., §§ 7075, 7076; Pope's Dig., §§ 9057, 9058; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-901, 73-902.
23-12-514. Standard employee identification requirements — Findings — Definitions.
-
The General Assembly finds that:
- The services provided by railroads are essential to the functionality of the state;
- The legislature is obligated to provide standard identification requirements for railroad employees involved in a railroad accident or incident;
- The Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-432, mandated Federal Railroad Administration certification for railroad employees; and
- Providing standard identification requirements facilitates the investigation of railroad accidents or incidents for the investigating law enforcement officers or other safety officers.
-
As used in this section:
- “Federal Railroad Administration-certified conductor” means a conductor, switchman, brakeman, trainman, or fireman licensed and certified by the Federal Railroad Administration;
- “Federal Railroad Administration-certified engineer” means an engineer licensed and certified by the Federal Railroad Administration;
-
“Railroad accident or incident” means a collision or impact that:
- Occurs as a consequence of the flow of pedestrians, motor vehicles, or animals along the railroad system in the state; and
- Results in death, injury, or property damage; and
- “Railroad manager” means a railroad employee overseeing and assisting in the operation of railroad transit.
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (c)(2) of this section, a railroad employee involved in a railroad accident or incident shall not be required to present his or her driver's license for identification purposes to a law enforcement officer or other safety officer investigating the railroad accident or incident.
-
In lieu of a driver's license under subdivision (c)(1) of this section, Federal Railroad Administration certification may be presented to a law enforcement officer or other safety officer by a:
- Federal Railroad Administration-certified conductor;
- Federal Railroad Administration-certified engineer; or
- Railroad manager.
History. Acts 2019, No. 467, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Division A of Pub. L. No. 110-432, referred to in this section, is codified throughout Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Section 402(a) of the act, concerning certification of train conductors, is codified as 49 U.S.C. § 20163, and section 402(b)-(d) of the act, concerning certification of other employees, is codified as a note under 49 U.S.C. § 20162.
Subchapter 6 — Train Service Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1873, No. 71, § 5: effective on passage.
Acts 1883, No. 89, § 5: effective on passage.
Acts 1887, No. 76, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1905, No. 194, § 3: effective on passage.
Acts 1907, No. 149, § 6, as amended by Acts 1907, No. 338, § 6: June 1, 1907.
Acts 1909, No. 277, § 6: effective on passage.
Acts 1947, No. 89, § 3: Feb. 18, 1947. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas, the present law is inadequate to protect the citizens of this State in the event railroad corporations abandon and discontinue service; and whereas, unless immediate action is taken to prevent the sale of stock of railroad corporations which have abandoned their properties within the State of Arkansas the people served by such railroads will be irreparably damaged: Now, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1947, No. 90, § 3: approved Feb. 18, 1947. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas the present laws are inadequate to protect the citizens of this State depending upon railroads to furnish transportation; and whereas it is for the public convenience and necessity that all railroad service be provided without any interruptions, now, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage.”
Acts 1961, No. 203, § 4: Mar. 8, 1961. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined that present laws relating to the establishment, discontinuance, dualization, modification and maintenance of railroad train and agency service are inadequate, resulting in delay, inefficiency and waste detrimental to the public welfare and, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 181 et seq.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 719 et seq.
23-12-601. Trains to run on regular schedule — Accommodations for passengers — Damages for noncompliance.
- Every railroad corporation shall start and run their cars for the transportation of passengers and property at regular times, to be fixed by public notice.
-
- Every railroad corporation shall furnish sufficient accommodations for the transportation of all passengers and property as shall, within a reasonable time previous thereto, offer or be offered for transportation at the place of starting and the junctions of other railroads, and at sidings and stopping places established for receiving and discharging way passengers and freight.
- The railroad corporation shall take, transport, and discharge such passengers and property at, from, and to such places on the due payment of tolls, freight, or fare legally authorized therefor.
- In case of the refusal of the corporation, or its agents, to take and transport any passenger or property or to deliver the passenger or property, or either of them, at the regular or appointed time, the corporation shall pay to the party aggrieved all damages which shall be sustained thereby, with the costs of suit.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, §§ 31, 32, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., §§ 846, 847; Pope's Dig., §§ 1050, 1051; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-801, 73-802.
Case Notes
Damages.
Breach of contract to discharge passenger at station is not only a breach of contract but a tort for which a jury may award exemplary damages. Fordyce v. Nix, 58 Ark. 136, 23 S.W. 967 (1893).
Nominal damages only can be recovered by passenger carried beyond station, without circumstances of aggravation or personal injury, if there was nothing to show value of time lost or that any expense was incurred on account of delay. Texarkana & Fort Smith Ry. v. Anderson, 67 Ark. 123, 53 S.W. 673 (1899).
Evidence sufficient to find damage award excessive. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bragg, 69 Ark. 402, 64 S.W. 226 (1901).
Railroad failing to stop as agreed is liable in damages for any suffering and inconvenience occasioned thereby. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Coxwell, 182 Ark. 145, 30 S.W.2d 209 (1930).
Discharge at Improper Place.
A passenger who boards a freight train and surrenders a ticket entitling him to be carried to a certain station is entitled to recover damages when he is discharged from the train a mile before reaching such station as the carrier is bound at least to discharge him in the station yard at a place not unreasonably distant from the platform. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Neal, 66 Ark. 543, 51 S.W. 1060 (1899).
Failure to Alight from Stopped Train.
Railway company is not liable for injuries received in attempting to alight from moving train if the train stopped long enough at station to afford an opportunity, by use of reasonable diligence to alight from it while stationary. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Tankersley, 54 Ark. 25, 14 S.W. 1099 (1890).
Where passenger train was stopped at passenger's destination a sufficient time to permit passenger to get off and she failed to do so, she cannot recover damages because she was put off a short distance beyond her destination not at a usual stopping place. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Lewis, 69 Ark. 81, 61 S.W. 163 (1901).
Pleading.
Complaint in action for destruction of property due to failure to transport it held insufficient in that it failed to allege a tender of the property for shipment or its receipt by the defendant for shipment or a tender to or receipt by one of the defendant's authorized agents for shipment. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Lee, 69 Ark. 584, 65 S.W. 99 (1901).
Stopping of Trains.
Railroads have right to run trains which do not stop at all stations and it is duty of passenger to ascertain whether station of his destination is one of the stopping places, the mere taking up of the ticket for such destination by the conductor not obligating the conductor to stop the train at such station. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Atchison, 47 Ark. 74, 14 S.W. 468 (1885).
It is the railroad's duty to stop at regular stations sufficiently long enough for passengers to get off. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Person, 49 Ark. 182, 4 S.W. 755 (1887).
Refusal of railway company to designate as a flag station for its through trains, an unincorporated town, containing only a few houses, and situated within three miles of a regular station, was not an unreasonable regulation. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Adcock, 52 Ark. 406, 12 S.W. 874 (1889).
Where custom of trains to stop at a place misleads a person without fault into belief that it is a flag station, and relying on that custom buys a ticket to and from such place from an agent of railway who knows his intention, and fails to inform him that train does not stop there, company will be liable for failure of train to stop. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Adcock, 52 Ark. 406, 12 S.W. 874 (1889).
Tickets.
A rule of a railroad company forbidding freight conductors to permit passengers to ride on their trains from ticket stations without having provided themselves with tickets is reasonable. McCook v. Northrup, 65 Ark. 225, 45 S.W. 547 (1898).
23-12-602. Transfer of passengers, freight, and mail at crossings, intersections, etc. — Damages.
- Every railroad company operating a railroad in this state shall cause all freight and passenger trains running on its roads to stop at all points on its roads where another railroad crosses, joins, unites, or intersects. At those places the company shall take and receive on its trains all passengers, freight, and mail which the railroad so crossing, joining, or intersecting has for shipment at that point and shall carry the passengers, freight, and mail.
- The railroad shall also discharge all passengers, freight, and mail consigned to the point of crossing, intersection, or junction of the railroad and which is to be transported, carried, and conveyed on the railroad.
- No railroad company shall in any way discriminate against passengers or freight transported or conveyed by any intersecting railroad company.
- Any railroad company violating any of the provisions of this section shall forfeit and pay to the company injured thereby double the amount of damages which the injured company may have sustained. This amount shall be recovered in any court of competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1883, No. 89, §§ 3, 4, p. 158; C. & M. Dig., §§ 852, 853, 8491, 8492; Pope's Dig., §§ 1056, 1057, 11065, 11066; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-803, 73-804.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1883, No. 89, § 4, is also codified as § 23-12-303(c).
Cross References. Railroads required to receive each other's passengers, tonnage, and freight, Ark. Const., Art. 17, § 1.
Case Notes
Crossings.
Switch or transfer track is not a crossing within the meaning of this section. Gregory v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 168 Ark. 469, 270 S.W. 621 (1925).
23-12-603. Department may require passenger trains to stop at all stations — Exception.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation is empowered to require every company or person operating a railroad in Arkansas which runs and operates passenger trains to stop one (1) of its passenger trains each way every day at all regular stations where tickets are sold whether the station is a flag station or not.
- However, if the department after a hearing finds that adequate service for the carriage of passengers, mail, baggage, express, and newspapers between stations is or will be furnished and rendered daily by motor-propelled vehicles on highways, it shall have the power to authorize the railroad company to discontinue stopping the trains at stations.
History. Acts 1941, No. 297, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-807; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 175.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated the existing section as (a) and (b); and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-12-604. Duty to erect depot and stop passenger trains in cities and towns near state line — Exception — Penalty.
- Any railroad company owning or operating a line of railway in this state, passing through any city or incorporated town within one-half (½) mile of the state boundary line of this state, shall erect and maintain a suitable depot therein and shall stop all its passenger trains at this station.
-
- Any railroad company which fails, refuses, or neglects to build a suitable depot within ninety (90) days or shall fail to stop all its passenger trains as provided in subsection (a) of this section shall forfeit and pay a sum of money not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200), to be prosecuted in the name of the state by any citizen aggrieved or by the prosecuting attorney of the district. Each day's refusal or neglect shall constitute a separate offense.
- The sum when so recovered shall go to the school fund of the county in which the city or town is located.
- The prosecuting attorney shall be allowed twenty percent (20%) of the amount so received for his or her services.
- This section shall not apply where there is a depot within three hundred feet (300') of the opposite side of the line at which all passenger trains stop.
History. Acts 1887, No. 76, §§ 1, 2, p. 106; 1905, No. 194, §§ 1, 2, p. 501; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8469, 8470; Pope's Dig., §§ 11043, 11044; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-805, 73-806.
23-12-605. Union passengers or freight depots.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have power to require the building and maintaining of union passenger or freight depots, by two (2) or more railroads in any city of the first class or city of the second class in this state, when the business and conditions in the city justify or require such facilities.
- The making of any order for the erection and maintaining of any such union passenger or freight depots, or both, shall be prima facie evidence of the need for the facility and reasonableness of the requirement.
History. Acts 1909, No. 277, § 5, p. 814; C. & M. Dig., § 1648; Pope's Dig., § 1969; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-808; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 176.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Cross References. Definitions applicable to this section, § 23-10-401.
23-12-606. Stopping train within town limits upon petition — Facilities to be maintained — Enforcement — Damages — Penalty.
-
- When not fewer than fifty (50) citizens of any incorporated town in this state, situated on the line of any railroad run or operated within this state, shall make application in writing to the president of the railroad company, to the board of directors thereof, through its secretary, or to any receiver, mortgagee, trustee, contractor, or other officer running and operating the railroad company and having control thereof, it shall be the duty of the railroad company to stop all freight or passenger trains, at some point within the corporate limits of the town most convenient for the reception and handling and discharge of freight, the reception and discharge of passengers, and the reception and delivery of the mails and most convenient to accommodate the business of the town. The railroad company shall furnish, provide, and maintain for the town, and the business thereof, every facility and convenience furnished or provided for other towns of the same, or approximating the same, population situated on the line of the railroad.
- There shall be no unjust discrimination on the part of such companies, either in respect to the facilities and conveniences, or in respect to the freight and passenger charges of tariff upon the railroads, but the charges shall be equal and uniform, and as to such towns the same or any description of way passengers and freight shall not be subject to higher rates of charges than the lowest rates charged by the same line, at the same time, for the same service over any part of that line.
- Before any town may or can insist upon and compel the stoppage of trains, as provided in this section, the corporate authorities of the town shall provide and make tender to the railroad companies sufficient means to defray the reasonable expenses of grading a switch or sidetrack at the place of stopping for the use of the railroad company.
- The writ of mandamus may issue at the suit of any citizen of the town upon the failure of any such railroad company to stop its trains as provided in this section, and it may compel the company to comply with the requirements of this section.
- If any railroad company within this state violates any of the provisions of this section, the corporate authorities of any corporate town aggrieved, or any citizen thereof, may bring suit against the company for the reasonable damages sustained through the violations.
- Any railroad company violating, or failing or refusing to obey, the requirements of this section shall be liable to a fine of one hundred dollars ($100) for each day of failure or refusal to carry out the provisions of this section. The fine shall be recoverable before any court of competent jurisdiction. This fine shall be paid into the State Treasury for the benefit of the Public School Fund.
History. Acts 1873, No. 71, §§ 1-4, p. 169; C. & M. Dig., §§ 981-985; Pope's Dig., §§ 1185-1189; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-815 — 73-818.
Case Notes
Cited: St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. B'Shears, 59 Ark. 237, 27 S.W. 2 (1894); St. Louis & N. Ark. R.R. v. Crandell, 75 Ark. 89, 86 S.W. 855 (1905).
23-12-607. Petitions for establishment, discontinuance, modification, etc., of service — Authority of department.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is authorized, empowered, and required to hear and consider all petitions filed with it for establishment, discontinuance, enlargement, dualization, or modification of railroad train service, spurs, sidetracks, and platforms.
History. Acts 1907, No. 149, § 1, p. 356; 1907, No. 338, § 1, p. 821; C. & M. Dig., § 1638; Pope's Dig., § 1959; Acts 1961, No. 203, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-809; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 177.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1907, No. 149, § 5, as amended by Acts 1907, No. 338, § 5, provided, in part, that the act would not be construed to curtail or limit the powers and duties of the Railroad Commission. The powers and duties of the Railroad Commission were transferred to the Arkansas Transportation Commission.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Discontinuance of Service.
Railroad may apply for permission to discontinue ticket agency without obtaining a petition. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. R.R. Comm'n, 175 Ark. 425, 299 S.W. 761 (1927) (decision prior to 1961 amendment).
Petitions.
A petition emanating from at least 15 bona fide citizens residing in the territory sought to be affected, setting forth that they desire the establishment of a depot or station, or a discontinuance thereof at one point and a relocation of the same upon the right-of-way of any railway in the state, is sufficient to give the commission authority to act in the premises, whether the depot or station is precisely designated and defined or not. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bellamy, 113 Ark. 384, 169 S.W. 322 (1914) (decision prior to 1961 amendment).
Unauthorized Discontinuance.
The removal of a railroad spur by a railroad company without the consent of the Arkansas Transportation Commission violated this section and § 23-12-611. Moreover, there was no burden on the spur user to show that the services should again be made available to the public before the commission could require the railroad to replace the spur. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Even where both customers of a railroad spur have either closed or abandoned their warehouses before the railroad removed the spur, the railroad's actions were illegal in the absence of a petition, hearing and specific findings on the exact issue. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Where a railroad removes a railroad spur without complying with the requirements of this section, but a spur customer has not demonstrated any economic loss, the Arkansas Transportation Commission is not required to order the spur restored pending a hearing and decision on the necessity of removing the spur, since economic waste would result if the commission later granted the petition to discontinue the spur. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Cited: Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991); Potlatch Corp. v. Ark. City Sch. Dist., 311 Ark. 145, 842 S.W.2d 32 (1992).
23-12-608. Establishment, discontinuance, modification, etc., of service generally — Investigation of objects sought to be accomplished — Findings.
- Within thirty (30) days after the filing of a petition, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall proceed to make a personal inspection of the conditions complained of and investigate the objects sought to be accomplished by the petitioners. The department shall have the right and power to summon and swear witnesses. The summons shall be served by any sheriff, constable, or deputy having legal jurisdiction.
- The department shall determine the amount, degree, and character of construction, equipment, changes, and enlargements of stations and depots which should be supplied by the railroad, railroad company, its lessee, or operator. The department shall have the power and authority to require a reasonable train service for each and every such railroad station and depot within the State of Arkansas, and its finding shall be binding upon all such railroads within the State of Arkansas.
- The department shall file a copy of its findings and decrees with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the circuit clerk of the county wherein the decree is granted.
- The department shall serve notice upon the defendant railroad company by delivering a copy of its findings and decrees to the nearest local station agent and by sending by registered mail a copy to the superintendent, general manager, lessee, or operator of the railroad or railroad company.
History. Acts 1907, No. 149, §§ 2, 3, p. 356; 1907, No. 338, §§ 2, 3, p. 821; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1639, 1640; Pope's Dig., §§ 1960, 1961; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-810, 73-811; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 178.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. As to cumulative nature of Acts 1907, No. 149, see Publisher's Notes to § 23-12-607.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Evidence.
This section does not mean that evidence is to be heard which cannot be put into the record. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Stewart, 150 Ark. 586, 235 S.W. 1003 (1921).
Orders.
After an order of the commission requiring company to erect sheds for protection of passengers has been affirmed, it is immaterial that the order of the commission was not filed as required by this section. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. State, 179 Ark. 1128, 20 S.W.2d 878 (1929), cert. denied, 281 U.S. 735, 50 S. Ct. 249, 74 L. Ed. 1150 (1930).
23-12-609. Establishment, discontinuance, modification, etc., of service generally — Failure to comply with findings and mandate — Penalty.
- Any railroad, railroad company, lessee, or operator of the railroad company, which fails or refuses to comply with the findings, decrees, and mandates of the Arkansas Department of Transportation within the time specified therein, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
- The district prosecuting attorney shall bring the proceeding in any court having competent jurisdiction, and upon conviction the railroad, railroad company, lessee, or operator of the railroad company shall be fined in any sum not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100).
-
- Every day of the violation, refusal, failure, or neglect shall constitute a separate offense.
- However, no order for doing anything hereinabove provided shall be made by the department until all parties concerned shall receive ten (10) days' notice of the proposed change.
History. Acts 1907, No. 149, § 4, p. 356; 1907, No. 338, § 4, p. 821; C. & M. Dig., § 1641; Pope's Dig., § 1962; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-812; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 179.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. As to cumulative nature of Acts 1907, No. 149, see Publisher's Notes to § 23-12-607.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added the (a), (b), (c)(1) and (c)(2) designations; substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a); and, in (b), substituted “The district” for “It shall be proceeded against by the district”, inserted “shall bring the proceeding”, and inserted “the railroad, railroad company, lessee, or operator of the railroad company”.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section was not invalid because it made each day of failure or refusal to comply a separate offense. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 99 Ark. 1, 136 S.W. 938 (1911).
Cited: St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. State, 120 Ark. 182, 179 S.W. 342 (1915).
23-12-610. Petitions to establish, reestablish, or enlarge service.
A petition for establishment, reestablishment, or enlargement of railroad train service, spurs, sidetracks, and platforms shall be signed by at least twenty-five (25) qualified electors residing in the territory sought to be affected.
History. Acts 1907, No. 149, § 1, p. 356; 1907, No. 338, § 1, p. 821; C. & M. Dig., § 1638; Pope's Dig., § 1959; Acts 1961, No. 203, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-809.
Publisher's Notes. As to cumulative nature of Acts 1907, No. 149, see Publisher's Notes to § 23-12-607.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
A petition emanating from at least 15 bona fide citizens residing in the territory sought to be affected, setting forth that they desire the establishment of a depot or station, or a discontinuance thereof at one point and a relocation of the same upon the right-of-way of any railway in the state, is sufficient to give the commission authority to act in the premises, whether the depot or station is precisely designated and defined or not. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bellamy, 113 Ark. 384, 169 S.W. 322 (1914) (decision prior to 1961 amendment).
Cited: St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. State, 120 Ark. 182, 179 S.W. 342 (1915).
23-12-611. Discontinuance, dualization, or modification of agency station — Petitions to reestablish.
- Any railroad operating in this state may file with the Arkansas Department of Transportation a notice of discontinuance, dualization, or modification of any of its agency stations together with a statement certified by a proper officer of the railroad to the effect that the agency station had been operating at a financial loss according to standard accounting procedures for not less than one (1) year immediately preceding, or that operating economies would result consistent with public convenience and necessity.
- The agency station may be closed or modified ninety (90) days after the date of filing of the notice of discontinuance, dualization, or modification unless a petition for the reestablishment of the discontinued, dualized, or modified agency station, signed by at least twenty-five (25) qualified electors residing in the city, town, or political subdivision where the agency station is located, is filed with the department within sixty (60) days after the date of filing of the notice.
- The department is authorized, empowered, and required to hear and consider all petitions for the reestablishment of any agency station discontinued, dualized, or modified by the railroad under authority of this section. The hearing shall be held within sixty (60) days following filing of the petition for reestablishment and following thirty (30) days' written notice of the hearing to the railroad and petitioners.
- In determining whether an agency station should be discontinued, dualized, or modified, the standard to be employed is whether the railroad has operated the agency station at a financial loss according to standard accounting procedures for not less than one (1) year immediately preceding the filing of the notice of discontinuance, dualization, or modification, or whether operating economies would result therefrom.
History. Acts 1907, No. 149, § 1, p. 356; 1907, No. 338, § 1, p. 821; C. & M. Dig., § 1638; Pope's Dig., § 1959; Acts 1961, No. 203, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-809; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 180.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. As to cumulative nature of Acts 1907, No. 149, see Publisher's Notes to § 23-12-607.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
In General.
This section, which gives the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Commission the authority to regulate agency station closings, is preempted by the ICC Termination Act of 1995. 25 Residents v. Arkansas Hwy. & Transp. Comm'n, 330 Ark. 396, 954 S.W.2d 242 (1997).
Commission's Authority.
A petition emanating from at least 15 bona fide citizens residing in the territory sought to be affected, setting forth that they desire the establishment of a depot or station, or a discontinuance thereof at one point and a relocation of the same upon the right-of-way of any railway in the state, is sufficient to give the commission authority to act in the premises, whether the depot or station is precisely designated and defined or not. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bellamy, 113 Ark. 384, 169 S.W. 322 (1914) (decision prior to 1961 amendment).
Economies of Operation.
Where the applicant shows only the cost of operating the station to be closed without evidence of either the income of such station or the cost of performing the operations of that station elsewhere, the commission's determination that the applicant failed to prove any economies from the proposed closing is justified. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 247 Ark. 1044, 449 S.W.2d 198 (1970).
Evidence sufficient to find that the discontinuance of an agency station resulted in economies of operation consistent with public convenience and necessity. Caraway v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 248 Ark. 765, 453 S.W.2d 722 (1970).
Testimony fully supported the commission's findings that operating economies did not outweigh the inconvenience which would result from the closing of the station. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Arkansas Transp. Comm'n, 278 Ark. 353, 645 S.W.2d 944 (1983).
Operation at Loss.
A railroad was authorized to discontinue an agency station when a computation based upon standard railroad accounting procedure showed that the station had operated at a loss for one year preceding the filing of the notice of discontinuance. Caraway v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 248 Ark. 765, 453 S.W.2d 722 (1970).
Operation at Profit.
The fact that a station is being operated at a profit does not preclude the meeting of the requirements of this section for closing it. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 247 Ark. 1044, 449 S.W.2d 198 (1970).
Petition.
Railroad may apply for permission to discontinue ticket agency without obtaining a petition signed by 15 bona fide citizens residing in the territory affected. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ark. R.R. Comm'n, 175 Ark. 425, 299 S.W. 761 (1927) (decision prior to 1961 amendment).
Standard Accounting Procedures.
In a hearing on the proposed closing of a railroad agency station, testimony that the method of allocating revenues to the station and apportioning indirect expenses according to such revenues to determine operational gain or loss was standard procedure used many times by the railroad in presenting its exhibits on station closings in the state was not evidence that such allocation and determination were standard accounting procedures. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 243 Ark. 661, 420 S.W.2d 917 (1967).
Uncontradicted testimony of the railroad's witness that the allocation of 50% of revenue to origin and destination stations and the allocation of system expenses used by the railroad were standard railway accounting procedure was sufficient to sustain a finding that the railroad used standard accounting procedure. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n v. Kansas City S. Ry., 244 Ark. 912, 428 S.W.2d 83 (1968).
Unauthorized Discontinuance.
The removal of a railroad spur by a railroad company without the consent of the Arkansas Transportation Commission violated this section and § 23-12-607. Moreover, there was no burden on the spur user to show that the services should again be made available to the public before the commission could require the railroad to replace the spur. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Even where both customers of a railroad spur have either closed or abandoned their warehouses before the railroad removed the spur, the railroad's actions were illegal in the absence of a petition, hearing and specific findings on the exact issue. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Where a railroad removes a railroad spur without complying with the requirements of § 23-12-607, but a spur customer has not demonstrated any economic loss, the Arkansas Transportation Commission is not required to order the spur restored pending a hearing and decision on the necessity of removing the spur, since economic waste would result if the commission later granted the petition to discontinue the spur. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 274 Ark. 437, 625 S.W.2d 531 (1981).
Cited: St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. State, 120 Ark. 182, 179 S.W. 342 (1915); Arkansas Commerce Comm'n v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 247 Ark. 1032, 448 S.W.2d 950 (1970); Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 307 Ark. 363, 821 S.W.2d 7 (1991); Potlatch Corp. v. Ark. City Sch. Dist., 311 Ark. 145, 842 S.W.2d 32 (1992).
23-12-612. Abandonment of operations without authority — Stockholders to offer stock for sale — Penalty — Enforcement.
- When any railroad corporation organized under the laws of Arkansas and operating properties within the State of Arkansas abandons such operations for a period of thirty (30) days or more without specific authority from the regulatory bodies having jurisdiction thereof, the stockholders of the corporation shall offer for sale their stock in the railroad corporation within sixty (60) days of the abandonment. The offer shall be open for not fewer than one hundred twenty (120) days thereafter and shall be to any person, firm, or corporation at a price not exceeding the net investment of the stockholders of the corporation in the stock at the time of the abandonment or the fair net salvage value of the properties owned by the corporation at the time of the abandonment, whichever is less.
- Any stockholder of any such corporation who violates the terms of this section shall be fined in the sum of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000). Each day of such a violation shall constitute a separate offense.
- The Attorney General shall have authority to enforce this section in the name of the State of Arkansas by appropriate proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1947, No. 89, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-813.
23-12-613. Receiver appointed upon attempt to abandon.
- If any railroad corporation, manager, or receiver shall attempt to abandon any railroad, or part thereof, by failing to operate its trains, or to resume operation of its trains over its railroad, or part thereof, if the operation of trains has been abandoned, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall report the attempted abandonment to the Attorney General.
- The Attorney General shall, at once, file a suit in behalf of the state against that railroad corporation, manager, or receiver in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, or of any county through which the railroad passes. Suit shall be filed for the purpose of determining whether the corporation has abused its rights and privileges as a common carrier and granted by the State of Arkansas.
-
- If the court determines that the corporation, manager, or receiver has so failed or refused to carry out its obligations as a common carrier, then the court shall appoint a receiver for the purpose of operating the railroad and providing the service to the public.
- The receiver shall have no connection directly or indirectly with the railroad corporation, manager, or receiver prior to the time of his or her appointment, but he or she shall be a good business person and qualified to perform the duties of the receiver.
- The receiver shall collect freight and passenger rates as prescribed by law and shall do and perform any and all things necessary in the operation of the trains over the road and shall report to the court at such times as the court may direct.
History. Acts 1947, No. 90, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-814; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 181.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-12-614. Posting information regarding National Human Trafficking Resource Center Hotline.
A passenger train station governed by this subchapter shall post information about the National Human Trafficking Resource Center Hotline as required under § 12-19-102.
History. Acts 2013, No. 1157, § 9.
Subchapter 7 — Policing Trains
Cross References. Law enforcement officers, training and standards, § 12-9-101 et seq.
Effective Dates. Acts 1909, No. 44, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1973, No. 57, § 8: Feb. 6, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that there is a shortage of qualified law enforcement officers in this State; that the protection of passengers and employees of railroad companies and their property is a paramount interest of the citizens of this State; that the appointment of railroad policemen would help alleviate the shortage of law enforcement officials and would aid in the protection of the lives and property of the people of this State. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Research References
ALR.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance specifically criminalizing passenger misconduct on public transportation. 78 A.L.R.4th 1127.
23-12-701. Railroad police — Purpose — Appointment.
Any railroad company or corporation owning or operating a railroad in this state may appoint one (1) or more persons to be designated by the railroad company as a railroad police officer to aid and supplement the law enforcement agencies of this state in the protection of the persons and property of railroad passengers and employees and in the protection of railroad property. The appointment of any such person as a railroad police officer shall be subject to the approval of the Governor of this state.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-634.
23-12-702. Railroad police — Oath and bonds.
Before entering into the performance of his or her duties, every railroad police officer appointed shall take and subscribe an oath of office and enter into a surety bond in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000), payable to the State of Arkansas, conditioned for the faithful performance of his or her duties. The oath of office and the bond, with a copy of the commission, shall be filed with the Secretary of State.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-635.
23-12-703. Railroad police — Powers.
Each police officer shall have and exercise throughout the State of Arkansas the power to make arrests for the violation of any law on the property of the company, and to arrest persons, whether on or off the company's property, for the violation of any law on the company's property, under the same conditions under which deputy sheriffs or other peace officers may by law make arrests and shall have the authority to carry weapons for the reasonable purposes of the office of railroad police officer.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-636.
23-12-704. Railroad police — Jailing of persons arrested.
The keepers of jails in any county or municipality wherein a violation of the law occurs for which any arrest is made shall receive all persons arrested by railroad police officers, and persons so arrested shall have the same status as prisoners arrested by any other police officer.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-636.
23-12-705. Railroad police — Identification.
When on duty, every railroad police officer appointed shall have in his or her possession a badge and identification card identifying him or her as a member of the police department of the railroad company for which he or she is appointed. He or she shall exhibit the badge or identification card on demand and before making an arrest.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-637.
23-12-706. Railroad police — Compensation.
The compensation for railroad police officers shall be paid by the company for which they are respectively appointed.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-638.
23-12-707. Railroad police — Termination of powers.
When a company no longer requires the services of a railroad police officer, it shall file a notice to that effect with the Secretary of State. Thereupon, the powers of the police officer shall terminate.
History. Acts 1973, No. 57, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-639.
23-12-708. Drinking or drunkenness in public places — Arrests by railroad conductors.
-
- Every railroad conductor is authorized and empowered to exercise, in every county in this state through which the train in the charge of the conductor passes, all his or her common law and statutory powers for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of § 5-71-212, and to arrest offenders against any such provisions. In so doing, they shall be considered as acting for the state and not as employees of the railroad company.
- Arrests for offenses against such provisions may be made by the conductor without warrant. Persons so arrested shall be delivered by him or her to some justice of the peace, district court judge, sheriff, constable, or police officer at some station or place within the county in which the offense was committed, for trial as provided by law.
- If the train has passed from the county in which the offense was committed and for which the arrest shall have been made, then the conductor shall deliver the person so arrested to some officer of another county, and he or she shall be held and delivered to some officer of the county in which the offense was committed to be there held for trial as provided by law.
- When any railroad conductor, who is actually engaged in the discharge of his or her duty, makes a legal arrest under the provisions of this subsection, then and in that case the railroad company employing him or her shall not be liable for damages to the persons for the arrest.
- All conductors on trains running in this state are authorized and empowered to act in the capacity of peace officers on their respective trains in this state for the specific purpose only to arrest any and all persons on their respective trains that they find to be drunk or in an intoxicated condition and deliver those persons, together with the names of two (2) witnesses who are not railroad employees, to some peace officer at first available opportunity. The conductor is authorized and empowered to deputize any person or persons present to assist him or her in the performance of this duty.
History. Acts 1909, No. 44, § 3, p. 99; C. & M. Dig., §§ 946, 3358; Acts 1935, No. 108, § 11; Pope's Dig., §§ 1150, 4206, 14144; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 48-944, 73-1214.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Torts — Unprivileged Arrest as a Basis for False Imprisonment Action, 3 Ark. L. Rev. 485.
Case Notes
Liability for Arrest.
A railway company is not liable for the arrest of a sober passenger if the conductor honestly believed that he was drunk. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Hudson, 95 Ark. 506, 130 S.W. 534 (1910); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Waters, 105 Ark. 619, 152 S.W. 137 (1912); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Vaughan, 122 Ark. 436, 183 S.W. 980 (1916).
Liability for Failure to Arrest.
It is the duty of the conductor of a train to arrest and hand over to a peace officer drunken passengers on his train and where he fails to do so, the carrier will be liable in damages for an injury sustained by a fellow passenger in consequence thereof. Butler County R.R. v. Exum, 124 Ark. 229, 187 S.W. 329 (1916).
Subchapter 8 — Offenses Relating to Railroads
Effective Dates. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 45: effective on passage.
Acts 1875, No. 45, § 4: effective on passage.
Acts 1893, No. 77, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1905, No. 191, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1939, No. 55, § 1 (in part): effective on passage.
Research References
ALR.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance specifically criminalizing passenger misconduct on public transportation. 78 A.L.R.4th 1127.
C.J.S. 75 C.J.S., Railroads, § 1277 et seq.
23-12-801. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning improper language in waiting rooms or cars, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 570. The section was derived from Acts 1891, No. 17, § 5, p. 15; C. & M. Dig., § 965; Pope's Dig., § 1169; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1103.
23-12-802. Trespassers boarding trains.
Any person who shall board any passenger, freight, or other railway train, whether moving or standing still, for any purpose and without good faith intending to become a passenger thereon and with no lawful business thereon and with intent to obtain a free ride on the train, however short the distance, without the consent of the person or persons in charge thereof shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Upon conviction thereof that person shall be punished by a fine of not less than one dollar ($1.00) nor more than ten dollars ($10.00). However, no person shall be so arrested except at the request of an agent or employee of the railroad company.
History. Acts 1905, No. 191, § 1, p. 489; C. & M. Dig., § 8592; Pope's Dig., § 11170; Acts 1939, No. 55, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1104.
23-12-803. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning use of track as highway, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 571. The section was derived from Acts 1875, No. 45, § 3, p. 121; C. & M. Dig., § 8596; Pope's Dig., § 11174; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1109.
23-12-804. Discharge of firearms or throwing objects at railroad or street car.
If any person wantonly, maliciously, or mischievously discharges firearms or throws stones, sticks, clubs, or other missiles at, into, or against any locomotive, railroad car, or street car on any railroad, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. On conviction the person shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than three (3) months, or by both a fine and imprisonment.
History. Acts 1893, No. 77, § 1, p. 144; C. & M. Dig., § 8597; Pope's Dig., § 11175; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1110.
23-12-805. Willful interference with railroads — Damages.
- If any person shall willfully do or cause to be done any act whatever, whereby any building, construction, or work of any railroad corporation in this state, or any engine, machine, structure, or any matter or thing appertaining to the corporation shall be stopped, obstructed, injured, impaired, weakened, or destroyed, the persons so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall forfeit and pay to the corporation so injured, etc., treble the amount of damages sustained by means of such an offense.
- All penalties imposed by this section may be sued for by the prosecuting attorney and in the name of the people of the State of Arkansas in any court of this state having competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, §§ 37, 38, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., §§ 8576, 8593; Pope's Dig., §§ 11154, 11171; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1105, 73-1106.
Case Notes
Nature of Proceeding.
Action to recover penalty is a civil proceeding. Midland Valley R.R. v. State, 102 Ark. 431, 144 S.W. 915 (1912).
Picket Lines.
This section is aimed at physical obstructions or other conduct endangering lives or property and is not applicable to a picket line by railroad track leading to struck plant, which picket line the railroad employees refused to cross. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. United Brick & Clay Workers Union Local No. 602, 218 Ark. 707, 238 S.W.2d 945 (1951).
Cited: State v. Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis R.R., 54 Ark. 546, 16 S.W. 567 (1891).
23-12-806. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning animals killed on railroad and the penalty for disposition of carcass without notice, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 572. The section was derived from Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1102.
23-12-807. Engineer or conductor intoxicated.
While in charge of a locomotive engine running upon any railroad in this state or while acting as the conductor of any cars on any railroad in this state, if any person shall be intoxicated, he or she shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and punished accordingly.
History. Acts 1868, No. 71, § 36, p. 290; C. & M. Dig., § 8590; Pope's Dig., § 11168; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1101.
Case Notes
Cited: Fordyce v. Nix, 58 Ark. 136, 23 S.W. 967 (1893).
Subchapter 9 — Liability for Injuries
Effective Dates. Acts 1911, No. 284, § 2: effective on passage.
Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 18: Sept. 14, 1961. Emergency clause provided: “It has been determined by the General Assembly that considerable confusion exists with respect to the defense of contributory negligence in this State, and with respect to the duties of railroads in this State regarding persons and property on the tracks of such railroads; that such confusion must be clarified immediately in order that justice may be properly administered in this State; and that only by the immediate passage of this Act may such confusion be clarified. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 62, § 4: Sept. 14, 1961. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby ascertained and declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that there is a lack of uniformity in the application of the defense of contributory negligence in certain causes of action in this State so that much confusion arises in the trial thereof and, accordingly, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in full force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Research References
ALR.
Motor carrier's liability for personal injury or death of passenger caused by debris, litter, or other foreign object on floor or seat of vehicle. 1 A.L.R.4th 1249.
Width or design of lateral space between passenger loading platform and car entrance affecting carrier's liability to passenger for injuries incurred from falling into space. 28 A.L.R.4th 748.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of third party's assault on or about carrier's vehicle or premises. 34 A.L.R.4th 1054.
Seating, equipment and devices directly relating to passengers' standing or seating safety in land carriers. 35 A.L.R.4th 1050.
Liability of land carrier to passenger who becomes victim of another passenger's assault. 43 A.L.R.4th 189.
Liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or at street or highway intersection. 66 A.L.R.4th 885.
Coverage under all-risk insurance. 30 A.L.R.5th 170.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Employer's liability to employee or agent for injury or death resulting from assault or criminal attack by third person. 40 A.L.R.5th 1.
Am. Jur. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, § 215 et seq.
C.J.S. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, § 829 et seq.
75 C.J.S., Railroads, § 959 et seq.
23-12-901. Legislative intent.
It is the intent and purpose of this section and §§ 23-12-902 — 23-12-910 and 23-12-912 to reenact those provisions of law relating to railroads which were repealed by Acts 1961, No. 170 [repealed], and to place railroads on an equal basis with other persons, firms, and corporations with respect to comparative negligence.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1102n.
Case Notes
Cited: Wood v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 112 F.3d 306 (8th Cir. 1997).
23-12-902. Liability for injury to persons or property generally.
All railroads which are built and operated in whole or in part of this state shall be responsible for all damages to persons and property done or caused by the running of trains in this state.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1001.
Case Notes
Applicability.
Former similar section did not apply to street railways. Little Rock Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Newman, 77 Ark. 599, 92 S.W. 864 (1906); Geren v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 99 Ark. 226, 137 S.W. 1100 (1911) (preceding decisions under prior law).
In an action brought under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, former similar section had no application. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Smith, 179 Ark. 1015, 19 S.W.2d 1102 (1929) (decision under prior law).
This section does not apply to buses. Hot Springs St. Ry. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 693, 354 S.W.2d 278 (1962).
Damages.
For discussion of the measure of damages, see Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Barker, 33 Ark. 350 (1878); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S.R.R. v. Cantrell, 37 Ark. 519 (1881) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Injuries Caused by Running of Train.
The presumption of negligence which arises upon proof of an injury caused by the running of trains does not apply where a person was scalded by one of the trainmen engaged in wetting coal in the tender while the train was standing still. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Cooksey, 70 Ark. 481, 69 S.W. 259 (1902) (decision under prior law).
Permitting steam to escape while starting or preparing to start a train resulting in injury is an act of running the train. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Young, 175 Ark. 487, 299 S.W. 750 (1927) (decision under prior law).
A railroad's negligence in operating a train which caused injury to a person in an automobile exercising ordinary care creates liability, although the train did not strike the motor vehicle and injury was caused by swerving of vehicle to avoid train. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Watt, 186 Ark. 86, 52 S.W.2d 634 (1932) (decision under prior law).
Loss of an eye caused by a hot cinder thrown from a passing locomotive was an injury by the operation of a train within the meaning of this section and railroad company has burden to show that it was not negligent. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Rance, 192 Ark. 532, 93 S.W.2d 317 (1936) (decision under prior law).
If an injury is shown by the evidence to have been caused by the running of the train, a presumption arises that it was caused by the negligence of the railroad company, but before this presumption can be indulged there must be some evidence that the injury was caused by the operation of the train and absent such evidence, either direct or circumstantial, railroad company is entitled to a directed verdict. Lowden v. Scott, 192 Ark. 887, 95 S.W.2d 630 (1936) (decision under prior law).
Instructions.
For cases discussing instructions in cases involving injuries caused by running of trains, see Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Blewitt, 65 Ark. 235, 45 S.W. 548 (1898); Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Sanders, 69 Ark. 619, 65 S.W. 428 (1901); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Henry, 168 Ark. 146, 269 S.W. 51 (1925); Nelson v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 172 Ark. 1053, 292 S.W. 120 (1927); Hovley v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 193 Ark. 580, 102 S.W.2d 845 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Beard, 198 Ark. 346, 128 S.W.2d 697 (1939); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ross, 199 Ark. 182, 133 S.W.2d 29 (1939); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Mangum, 199 Ark. 767, 136 S.W.2d 158 (1940); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Hovley, 199 Ark. 853, 137 S.W.2d 231 (1940); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Miller, 200 Ark. 414, 139 S.W.2d 248 (1940) (preceding decisions under prior law); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Boley, 251 Ark. 964, 477 S.W.2d 468 (1972).
Negligence.
A railway company is liable where, by needlessly and negligently blowing its whistle in a city, it so frightened a horse that he ran away and injured his driver. Weil v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 64 Ark. 535, 43 S.W. 967 (1898) (decision under prior law).
Where a mule, frightened by the approach of a train, ran into a culvert and was injured by a fall, the trainmen were not negligent in failing to stop the train before the injury occurred if they could not have foreseen, as a natural and probable consequence of not stopping, that the mule would have attempted to go on the trestle and be injured. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bragg, 66 Ark. 248, 50 S.W. 273 (1899) (decision under prior law).
Although it was proved that the engineer was keeping a careful lookout and that the animal came upon the track from behind a box car too close to the engine for him to check the train, where there was also evidence that at the time of the killing, the train was running through a populous town at a high and unusual rate of speed and that it had approached within 80 rods of a street crossing without having given either of the statutory signals, it was error to direct verdict for defendant. Ford v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 66 Ark. 363, 50 S.W. 864 (1899) (decision under prior law).
Evidence held sufficient to justify a finding that horse was injured through the negligence of the railway company. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Wilson, 66 Ark. 414, 50 S.W. 995 (1899) (decision under prior law).
Plaintiffs in action against railroad for injuries and death resulting from collision at crossing are not required to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the accident was wholly a result of defendant's negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Creekmore, 193 Ark. 722, 102 S.W.2d 553 (1937) (decision under prior law).
Fact that truck was damaged by operation of train and lack of proof of negligence of its owner does not render the railroad company absolutely liable under the provisions of this statute where railroad presented evidence of lack of negligence on its part. Crain v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 206 Ark. 465, 176 S.W.2d 145 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Negligence of railroad based on failure of engineer to apply brakes upon seeing cattle close to tracks was an issue for the jury. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 221 Ark. 404, 253 S.W.2d 349 (1952) (decision under prior law).
—Presumption.
The killing or injury of animal being shown or admitted, the presumption is that it was done by the train and resulted from want of care, but this presumption may be repelled by proof. Little Rock & F.S.R.R. v. Payne, 33 Ark. 816 (1878); Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Henson, 39 Ark. 413 (1882); Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Jones, 41 Ark. 157 (1883); St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Basham, 47 Ark. 321, 1 S.W. 555 (1886) (decision under prior law).
Prima facie evidence of negligence found. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Miles, 40 Ark. 298 (1883); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Neely, 63 Ark. 636, 40 S.W. 130 (1897); Scullin v. Vining, 127 Ark. 124, 191 S.W. 924 (1917); Batte v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 131 Ark. 568, 199 S.W. 907 (1917); Davis v. Parish, 160 Ark. 338, 254 S.W. 837 (1923) (decision under prior law).
Where dead or injured animal is found near railroad track, there was no legal presumption that it was killed or injured on the track or by a train. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. v. Sageley, 56 Ark. 549, 20 S.W. 413 (1892); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Parks, 60 Ark. 187, 29 S.W. 464 (1895) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where an injury is caused by the operation of a train, a prima facie case of negligence is made out against the company. Barringer v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 73 Ark. 548, 85 S.W. 94 (1905); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Evans, 80 Ark. 19, 96 S.W. 616 (1906); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Standifer, 81 Ark. 275, 99 S.W. 81 (1907); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Pitcock, 82 Ark. 441, 101 S.W. 725 (1907); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Davis, 83 Ark. 217, 103 S.W. 603 (1907); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Briggs, 87 Ark. 581, 113 S.W. 644 (1908); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Fambro, 88 Ark. 12, 114 S.W. 230 (1908); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Puckett, 88 Ark. 204, 114 S.W. 224 (1908); R.H. Oliver & Son v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 89 Ark. 466, 117 S.W. 238 (1909); El Dorado & Bastrop Ry. v. Knox, 90 Ark. 1, 117 S.W. 779 (1909); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Rhoden, 93 Ark. 29, 123 S.W. 798 (1909); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Pollock, 93 Ark. 240, 123 S.W. 790 (1909); St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Carr, 94 Ark. 246, 126 S.W. 850 (1910); Chitwood v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 104 Ark. 38, 148 S.W. 278 (1912); Evins v. St. Louis & S.F.R.R., 104 Ark. 79, 147 S.W. 452 (1912), superseded by statute as stated in, Kansas City S. Ry. v. Beaty, 239 Ark. 187, 388 S.W.2d 79 (1965); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Chamberlain, 105 Ark. 180, 150 S.W. 157 (1912); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Blaylock, 117 Ark. 504, 175 S.W. 1170 (1915); Huckaby v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 119 Ark. 179, 177 S.W. 923 (1915); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Bostic, 121 Ark. 295, 180 S.W. 988 (1915); Meeks v. Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown R.R., 168 Ark. 966, 272 S.W. 360 (1925); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Foltz, 182 Ark. 941, 33 S.W.2d 51 (1930); Jones v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 202 Ark. 333, 150 S.W.2d 742 (1941) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Killing a dog by the operation of a train raises a presumption of negligence on the part of the railroad company. Nelson v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 160 Ark. 568, 255 S.W. 10 (1923); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Greene, 177 Ark. 217, 6 S.W.2d 26 (1928) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where it is shown that an injury is caused by the operation of a train, negligence is presumed; but, after evidence is introduced, the jury must find according to the evidence and their verdict must be supported by the evidence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Overton, 194 Ark. 754, 109 S.W.2d 435 (1937), overruled in part, Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956) (decision under prior law).
—Rebuttal of Presumption.
Evidence sufficient to rebut presumption of negligence. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Turner, 41 Ark. 161 (1883); Memphis & L.R. Ry. v. Shoecraft, 53 Ark. 96, 13 S.W. 422 (1890); Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry. v. King, 66 Ark. 439, 51 S.W. 319 (1899); Davis v. Porter, 153 Ark. 375, 240 S.W. 1077 (1922) (preceding decisions under prior law).
In an action for stock killing where the plaintiff relied solely upon the statutory presumption of negligence from a killing on the defendant's track, the jury may find for the plaintiff on such presumption, although the defendant's engineer testified that the killing was unavoidable, if his testimony was improbable or inconsistent. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Chambliss, 54 Ark. 214, 15 S.W. 469 (1891) (decision under prior law).
Where, in an action against a railway company for killing a cow, the engineer testifies that the animal came upon the track on the fireman's side and that, by reason of a curve in the track, the witness did not see it in time to avoid killing it, the railway company, to rebut the statutory presumption of negligence, must also show that the fireman was not guilty of negligence. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Russell, 64 Ark. 236, 41 S.W. 807 (1897) (decision under prior law).
Evidence sufficient to overcome prima facie case of negligence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Landers, 67 Ark. 514, 55 S.W. 940 (1900) (decision under prior law).
Evidence insufficient to overcome prima facie case of negligence. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Costello, 68 Ark. 32, 56 S.W. 270 (1900) (decision under prior law).
Once the killing of an animal by a train is established there is a presumption that railroad is negligent which can only be overcome by testimony by the railroad that it was not negligent. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 221 Ark. 404, 253 S.W.2d 349 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Practice of continuing train at full speed after animals were sighted on the track unless a full stop could be made before reaching animals did not as a matter of law absolve the railroad company from the presumption of negligence that arises from this section and the failure to moderate the train's speed may be a basis for, or a factor supporting the view that the statutory presumption has not been indisputably overcome. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Smith, 225 Ark. 587, 283 S.W.2d 860 (1955) (decision under prior law).
The statute was not to be taken literally for it merely created a presumption that the damage was done from want of care but that presumption could have been repelled by proof to the contrary. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Boley, 251 Ark. 964, 477 S.W.2d 468 (1972).
When a passenger being carried on a train is injured without fault of his own, there is a legal presumption of negligence which carrier must remove by proof. George v. St. Louis, Iron Montain & S. Ry., 34 Ark. 613 (1879) (decision under prior law).
Proof that the plaintiff's dogs were killed by the defendant's train raised a presumption of negligence and the burden was on the railroad company to show that it was guilty of no negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Chase, 180 Ark. 857, 23 S.W.2d 256 (1930) (decision under prior law).
Evidence that an injury was caused by the operation of a train makes a prima facie case of negligence against the company operating the train and the burden is on the company to rebut this presumption. Davis v. Hareford, 156 Ark. 67, 245 S.W. 833 (1922), cert. denied, 262 U.S. 745, 43 S. Ct. 521, 67 L. Ed. 1211 (1923), appeal dismissed, 265 U.S. 571, 44 S. Ct. 458, 68 L. Ed. 1184 (1924); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Cole, 181 Ark. 780, 27 S.W.2d 992 (1930) (decision under prior law).
When one is shown to have been injured by the operation of a train there is a presumption of negligence and the burden is then upon the railroad company to produce some evidence to the contrary, but such presumption cannot be considered by the jury as evidence after the railroad company produces evidence to the contrary and the jury must then pass upon the question of negligence from all the evidence introduced. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dalby, 199 Ark. 49, 132 S.W.2d 646 (1939); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ross, 199 Ark. 182, 133 S.W.2d 29 (1939); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Mangum, 199 Ark. 767, 136 S.W.2d 158 (1940) (preceding decisions under prior law).
In action for damages for injury received when hot cinder struck plaintiff in the eye while rightfully on railroad depot platform, burden was on railroad to overcome prima facie case of negligence made by plaintiff. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Miller, 200 Ark. 414, 139 S.W.2d 248 (1940) (decision under prior law).
Evidence that passenger was injured while attempting to alight from train, by moving or jerking of the train, made a prima facie case of negligence and it then devolved upon the railroad company to show that it was not guilty of negligence and directed verdict for defendant at the conclusion of plaintiff's testimony was error. Jones v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 202 Ark. 333, 150 S.W.2d 742 (1941) (decision under prior law).
Where damage to property is shown to have been caused by the operation of a train, a prima facie case of negligence is made against the railroad company and the burden shifts to it to show that it was not negligent. Crain v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 206 Ark. 465, 176 S.W.2d 145 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Passengers.
Passenger on a railroad on drover's pass is a passenger for hire and has same rights as if he had bought ticket. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Miles, 40 Ark. 298 (1883) (decision under prior law).
Where one enters a train such as a through freight which he knows or has reason to believe is not intended to carry passengers and on which the rules of the company forbid passengers to ride, he is not a passenger in the legal sense but he is a trespasser and cannot recover damages for injuries received while on the train unless they have been wilfully or wantonly inflicted by servants of the railway company. Kruse v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 97 Ark. 137, 133 S.W. 841 (1911) (decision under prior law).
The relation of carrier and passenger exists where a person rides upon a local freight train with the conductor's consent without paying fare. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Whitacre, 103 Ark. 332, 147 S.W. 58 (1912) (decision under prior law).
Pleading.
In an action against a railway company for killing stock, the plaintiff should be required to state with as much definiteness and certainty as possible the time and direction and kind of train and the particular point where the injuries occurred, in order that the defendant may be enabled to make his defense and avoid the necessity of subpoenaing an unnecessary number of witnesses. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Smith, 66 Ark. 278, 50 S.W. 502 (1899) (decision under prior law).
Property.
Dogs are personal property for the negligent killing of which a railway company is liable. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Stanfield, 63 Ark. 643, 40 S.W. 126, 40 S.W. 126 (1897); Nelson v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 160 Ark. 568, 255 S.W. 10 (1923) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Standard of Care.
Railway carriers of passengers are bound to utmost diligence which human skill and foresight can effect, and if injury occurs by reason of slightest omission in regard to highest perfection of all appliances of transportation or mode of management at time of injury, carrier is responsible. George v. St. Louis, Iron Montain & S. Ry., 34 Ark. 613 (1879); Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Miles, 40 Ark. 298 (1883) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Railways are bound to use ordinary prudence, foresight and caution to avoid injury to persons or property on or near their tracks, and ordinary care varies with the circumstances and subject matter endangered and is such care as persons of ordinary prudence would use in similar circumstances. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Freeman, 36 Ark. 41 (1880) (decision under prior law).
In actions against a railroad for killing stock, the onus is put on the defendant to show due care, affirmatively. Memphis & Little Rock R.R. v. Jones, 36 Ark. 87 (1880); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Vincent, 36 Ark. 451 (1880); Kansas City, S. & M.R.R. v. Summers, 45 Ark. 295 (1885) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Railroad is only required to use reasonable care and diligence to be determined according to the nature and magnitude of the injury to be avoided. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Vincent, 36 Ark. 451 (1880) (decision under prior law).
It is the duty of an engineer of a railroad train to keep a constant and careful lookout for stock upon the track; and although stock be wrongfully there, yet he must use ordinary care and diligence to discover and avoid injury to it or the company will be liable for the injury done to it. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Finley, 37 Ark. 562 (1881) (decision under prior law).
It is not always necessary that engineer should stop train, or slacken its speed on discovering stock on track, if he endeavors to drive them off by sounding his whistle reasonably believing they may leave track in time. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Trotter, 37 Ark. 593 (1881) (decision under prior law).
Ordinary care in management of trains is measure of vigilance which law exacts of railroad companies to avoid injuries to domestic animals. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Holland, 40 Ark. 336 (1883) (decision under prior law).
There is no duty upon a railway company requiring it to fence its right-of-way. St. Louis, Ark. & Tex. Ry. v. Knott, 54 Ark. 424, 16 S.W. 9 (1891); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Ferguson, 57 Ark. 16, 20 S.W. 545 (1892) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where a railway company permits cotton seed to accumulate on or about its tracks, it is under obligation to maintain reasonable care to prevent injury to stock attracted thereby, and where an animal while feeding on such seed is killed by a train, the burden is upon the company to show that its servants used proper care to avoid the injury. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Dick, 52 Ark. 402, 12 S.W. 785 (1890) (decision under prior law).
In action for the killing of a mare by a train at a public crossing railroad had burden to establish compliance with requirement as to the giving of signals and the keeping of a proper lookout and that they were in the exercise of ordinary care at the time of the accident. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Mobley, 192 Ark. 396, 91 S.W.2d 611 (1936) (decision under prior law).
Trains.
Engine and tender is a train. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Blewitt, 65 Ark. 235, 45 S.W. 548 (1898) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Little Rock Port Auth. v. McCain, 296 Ark. 130, 752 S.W.2d 44 (1988).
23-12-903. Parties to actions for personal injuries.
When any adult person is wounded by railroad trains running in this state, he or she may sue in his or her own name. When the person wounded is a minor, the father, if living, or if the father is not living, then the mother, or if neither parent is living, then the guardian may sue for and recover such damages as the court or jury trying the case may assess.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1003.
Case Notes
Administrators.
Former similar section gave the administrator the right to recover damages for the negligent killing of his intestate by a railroad train. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Townsend, 41 Ark. 382 (1883) (decision under prior law).
Evidence.
In an action by a parent for negligent killing of his son, evidence of the poverty of the parent and dependence upon the son for support is admissible. Little Rock, Miss. River & Tex. Ry. v. Leverett, 48 Ark. 333, 3 S.W. 50 (1886) (decision under prior law).
Injuries to Minor.
Where suits for injuries to minor was brought by next friend instead of by persons enumerated in former similar section, motion to dismiss was properly refused where minor reached his majority and asked leave to prosecute the action in his own name since two causes of action accrue, one to the parent for the loss he suffers, and one to the minor for his personal injuries. Sibley v. Ratliffe, 50 Ark. 477, 8 S.W. 686 (1887) (decision under prior law).
23-12-904. Personal injury, property damage, or death — Contributory negligence no complete defense.
In all suits against railroads for personal injury, property damage, or death caused by the running of trains in this state, contributory negligence shall not prevent a recovery where the negligence of the person so injured, damaged, or killed is of a lesser degree than the negligence of the officers, agents, servants, or employees of the railroad causing the injury, damage, or death complained of. However, where contributory negligence is shown on the part of the person injured, damaged, or killed, the amount of the recovery shall be diminished in proportion to the contributory negligence.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1004.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Comparative Negligence in Arkansas: A “Before and After” Survey, 13 Ark. L. Rev. 89.
Case Notes
Applicability.
Former section had no application to suits against individuals. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Yandell, 209 Ark. 569, 191 S.W.2d 592 (1946) (decision under prior law).
Degree of Contributory Negligence.
Contributory negligence does not bar recovery of damages for an injury or death where the negligence of the person injured or killed is of less degree than that of the employees of the defendant. Davis v. Scott, 151 Ark. 34, 235 S.W. 407 (1921); Powell v. Jonesboro, Lake City & E. Ry., 166 Ark. 252, 266 S.W. 78 (1924); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Brown, 182 Ark. 722, 32 S.W.2d 633 (1930); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dotson, 195 Ark. 286, 111 S.W.2d 566 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Davis, 197 Ark. 830, 125 S.W.2d 785 (1939); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Hovley, 199 Ark. 853, 137 S.W.2d 231 (1940); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. King, 200 Ark. 1066, 143 S.W.2d 55 (1940) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Contributory negligence held sufficient to bar recovery. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. McClinton, 178 Ark. 73, 9 S.W.2d 1060 (1928); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Price, 199 Ark. 346, 133 S.W.2d 645 (1939); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Howard, 204 Ark. 253, 161 S.W.2d 759 (1942); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Carruthers, 204 Ark. 419, 162 S.W.2d 912 (1942); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dawson, 205 Ark. 404, 168 S.W.2d 1105 (1943); Lloyd v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 207 Ark. 154, 179 S.W.2d 651 (1944) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where the injured person's negligence is greater in degree than that of the train operatives, no recovery can be had. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Williams, 180 Ark. 413, 21 S.W.2d 611 (1929) (decision under prior law).
Though comparative negligence is a matter of jury's determination, there must be substantial evidence to sustain a verdict that a railroad's negligence was of a higher degree than motorist's negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Price, 199 Ark. 346, 133 S.W.2d 645 (1939) (decision under prior law).
Testimony held insufficient to support finding that plaintiff's negligence was of less degree than that of the operatives of the train. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. King, 200 Ark. 1066, 143 S.W.2d 55 (1940) (decision under prior law).
If contributory negligence is of less degree than the negligence of the company, it can only be considered in determining the amount of damages. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Beasley, 205 Ark. 688, 170 S.W.2d 667 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Evidence held sufficient to submit issue of whether driver's alleged negligence was of a lesser degree than that of the railroad. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Beasley, 205 Ark. 688, 170 S.W.2d 667 (1943) (decision under prior law).
To justify a verdict for plaintiff the jury would have to find that defendant was negligent in maintenance or operation of its trains at a crossing and that the alleged contributory negligence of the plaintiff was of less degree than the negligence of the defendant. Hawkins v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 217 Ark. 42, 228 S.W.2d 642 (1950) (decision under prior law).
—Diminution of Damages.
If contributory negligence is less than that of the trainmen recovery is diminished in proportion to contributory negligence. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Kirkpatrick, 155 Ark. 632, 245 S.W. 35 (1922) (decision under prior law).
Automobile driver's contributory negligence in collision with train at crossing was no bar to recovery and was properly submitted to the jury for a diminution of the damages he may have suffered. Louisiana & Ark. Ry. v. O'Steen, 194 Ark. 1125, 110 S.W.2d 488 (1937) (decision under prior law).
When both railroad company and engineer were sued for injuries received at crossing, and jury returned a verdict in favor of engineer but against railroad company it indicated that railroad and engineer were guilty of negligence, and that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence barring recovery against engineer but permitting recovery against railroad and under such circumstances it was duty of jury to diminish damages recovered against railroad in proportion to the negligence of plaintiff. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Yandell, 209 Ark. 569, 191 S.W.2d 592 (1946) (decision under prior law).
In railroad crossing cases contributory negligence is not an absolute defense. If the railroad was guilty of actionable negligence greater than the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, then it is for the jury to diminish the recovery in proportion to such contributory negligence. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Perryman, 213 Ark. 550, 211 S.W.2d 647 (1948) (decision under prior law).
Evidence.
Evidence sustained finding that injuries were occasioned by negligence of railroad. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Elvins, 176 Ark. 737, 4 S.W.2d 528 (1928) (decision under prior law).
Evidence held sufficient to make a case for the jury. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. McKamy, 180 Ark. 1095, 25 S.W.2d 5 (1930) (decision under prior law).
Evidence sufficient to find that court should have told the jury, as a matter of law, that the negligence of the plaintiffs was not of less degree than that of the railroad company. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Davis, 197 Ark. 830, 125 S.W.2d 785 (1939) (decision under prior law).
Judgment against railroad for injuries to motorist at crossing was not erroneous, even though plaintiff stopped and looked at a point where his vision was obstructed, where there was testimony sufficient to support finding that railroad was negligent for not giving warning of train's approach by ringing the bell or blowing the whistle and testimony would have sustained a larger verdict than the one recovered. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Walden, 207 Ark. 437, 181 S.W.2d 24 (1944) (decision under prior law).
Evidence sufficient to find that negligence of plaintiff was as a matter of law at least equal to defendant's negligence, thereby barring plaintiff's recovery of punitive and compensatory damages. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Kinard, 299 F.2d 829 (8th Cir. 1962).
Instructions.
An instruction in an action based on former section permitting a recovery unless the injured person's contributory negligence was the sole cause of the injury was erroneous. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Horn, 168 Ark. 191, 269 S.W. 576 (1925) (decision under prior law).
An instruction following former section with reference to contributory negligence of an automobile passenger injured by defendant's train was proper. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Ransom, 182 Ark. 701, 32 S.W.2d 436 (1930) (decision under prior law).
Instruction which would determine liability upon proposition that plaintiffs, in order to recover, must have been free from negligence, was properly refused. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Powell, 196 Ark. 834, 120 S.W.2d 349 (1938) (decision under prior law).
Questions for Court or Jury.
Whether the negligence of a motorist whose car was struck at a crossing was of a less degree than that of the railroad company was a question for the jury. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. French, 181 Ark. 777, 27 S.W.2d 1021 (1930) (decision under prior law).
Legal sufficiency of evidence on question of relative degree of negligence is a question of law for the court. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Davis, 197 Ark. 830, 125 S.W.2d 785 (1939) (decision under prior law).
Question of sufficiency of testimony to support finding that plaintiff's negligence in action for personal injuries against railroad is of less degree than that of the defendant is ordinarily one of fact for the jury, but cases may arise where the question becomes one of the legal sufficiency of the testimony to support the finding made, and that is a question of law for the court. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. King, 200 Ark. 1066, 143 S.W.2d 55 (1940); Lloyd v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 207 Ark. 154, 179 S.W.2d 651 (1944).
Where plaintiff and defendant were both negligent, it was question of fact for jury whether defendant's negligence was of less degree than that of the railroad company. Thompson v. Boswell, 166 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1948); Hawkins v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 217 Ark. 42, 228 S.W.2d 642 (1950).
In an action for damages to an automobile, resulting from a collision with a train at a public street crossing, the question to whether proper signals were given, a proper lookout kept and whether view was obstructed as he approached the crossing was for the jury to decide. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Winter, 217 Ark. 148, 228 S.W.2d 1001 (1950) (decision under prior law).
Running of Trains.
Permitting steam to escape while starting or preparing to start a train resulting in injury is an act of running the train. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Young, 175 Ark. 487, 299 S.W. 750 (1927) (decision under prior law).
Suit by Railroad.
Former section did not change the law affecting the right of a railroad company to recover damages for injury to which its own negligence contributed, and contributory negligence on its part will defeat its right to recover. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Dawson, 205 Ark. 404, 168 S.W.2d 1105 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Horace v. St. Louis Sw. R.R., 489 F.2d 632 (8th Cir. 1974).
23-12-905. Service of process upon agent of railroad company.
Service by process of summons issued by any court under the provisions of this section and §§ 23-12-901 — 23-12-904, 23-12-910, and 23-12-912 shall be by serving a copy of the summons on any agent of the railroad company sued at any depot house in the county where suit is brought.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1008.
23-12-906. Levy and sale of railroad property under execution.
The property of any railroad company may be levied on and sold under an execution issued on a judgment for damages under this section and §§ 23-12-901 — 23-12-905, 23-12-910, and 23-12-912 in the same manner and under the same rules governing other judgments at law.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1009.
23-12-907. Duty of persons running trains to keep lookout — Contributory negligence no bar to recovery of damages.
-
- It shall be the duty of all persons running trains in this state upon any railroad to keep a constant lookout for all persons, including licensees and trespassers, and property upon the track of any and all railroads.
- If any person or property is killed or injured by the neglect of any employee of any railroad to keep a lookout, the company owning or operating any railroad or its agents, servants, and employees shall be liable and responsible to the person injured for all damages resulting from neglect to keep a lookout.
-
- In any action brought for failure to keep a lookout, contributory negligence shall not bar recovery of damages for any injury, property damage, or death where the negligence of the person injured or killed is of a lesser degree than the negligence of the employee or employees in charge of the train of the company.
- In all such actions accruing for negligence resulting in personal injuries or wrongful death or injury to property, the contributory negligence shall not prevent a recovery where any negligence of the person so injured, damaged, or killed is of a lesser degree than any negligence of the person, firm, or corporation causing the damage. However, where contributory negligence is shown on the part of the person injured, damaged, or killed, the amount of the recovery shall be diminished in proportion to such contributory negligence.
- The legislative intent of this section is to place railroads upon a parity with all other persons, firms, and corporations in the matter of contributory negligence.
History. Acts 1891, No. 125, § 1; 1911, No. 284, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 8568; Pope's Dig., § 11144; repealed by Acts 1961, No. 170, § 4; reen. 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 62, §§ 1, 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1002, 73-1002n.
Case Notes
Purpose.
The original lookout statute was to overcome cases which held that the railroad company was under no duty to keep a lookout for trespassers. Bond v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 233 Ark. 32, 342 S.W.2d 473 (1961).
Applicability.
The lookout statute has no application to a case where the plaintiff, a passenger, was injured while attempting to board a passenger train after the same had stopped. Dillahunty v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 119 Ark. 392, 178 S.W. 420 (1915).
Section applies in case of damage to personal property as well as to personal injuries. Huff v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 170 Ark. 665, 280 S.W. 648 (1926); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 180 Ark. 453, 21 S.W.2d 858 (1929).
Section has no application in an action for the wrongful death of an employee under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Skipper, 174 Ark. 1083, 298 S.W. 849 (1927), cert. denied, 276 U.S. 629, 48 S. Ct. 322, 72 L. Ed. 740 (1928).
This section applies not only to public railroads involved in interstate commerce but also to private railroads operating on their own premises. Wood v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 112 F.3d 306 (8th Cir. 1997).
Burden of Proof.
It is the duty of railroad companies to keep a lookout for stock on a track and the burden is on it to show that such lookout was kept. Prescott & Nw. Ry. v. Brown, 74 Ark. 606, 86 S.W. 809 (1905).
Plaintiffs in action against railroad for injuries and death resulting from collision at crossing are not required to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the accident was wholly a result of defendant's negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Creekmore, 193 Ark. 722, 102 S.W.2d 553 (1937).
Where the railroad offered the testimony of the engineer, saying he did keep a lookout and there was no substantial evidence to the contrary, the burden of proof of a lookout was established. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Thurman, 213 Ark. 840, 213 S.W.2d 362 (1948).
Where evidence showed conclusively that railroad's employees maintained a constant lookout in accordance with this section and there was no substantial evidence in the record to the contrary, the burden of proof on the railroad was discharged, and the court erred in submitting the case to the jury. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Spencer, 231 Ark. 221, 328 S.W.2d 858 (1959).
The burden of proof is upon a railroad company to establish that the duty to keep a constant lookout has been performed. Overstreet v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 195 F. Supp. 542 (W.D. Ark. 1961).
Contributory Negligence.
Contributory negligence was a defense to actions under this section. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Tucka, 95 Ark. 190, 129 S.W. 541 (1910); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Adams, 98 Ark. 222, 135 S.W. 814 (1911).
The duty of either a traveler or trespasser to exercise care for his own safety when crossing railway tracks was not changed by 1911 amendment and contributory negligence on part of traveler or trespasser is still a valid defense unless, notwithstanding contributory negligence, operatives of train discover or in the exercise of ordinary care should discover the presence and peril of person injured in time to avoid injuring him. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Murphy, 125 Ark. 507, 188 S.W. 1180 (1916) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
Where, if the trainmen had kept a lookout they might have discovered the injured person's peril in time to have prevented the injury, contributory negligence of the injured person is no defense. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Horn, 168 Ark. 191, 269 S.W. 576 (1925); Gregory v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 168 Ark. 469, 270 S.W. 621 (1925); Baldwin v. Brim, 192 Ark. 252, 91 S.W.2d 255 (1936); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Nelson, 195 Ark. 883, 115 S.W.2d 872 (1938); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Lemons, 198 Ark. 1, 127 S.W.2d 120 (1939); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Eubanks, 200 Ark. 483, 139 S.W.2d 413 (1940) (preceding decisions prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
Section abolishes contributory negligence as a defense to a failure to comply with its provisions and such a defense has no place under the doctrine of discovered peril. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Barham, 198 Ark. 158, 128 S.W.2d 353 (1939).
Evidence sufficient to find that contributory negligence was not a defense. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Brummett, 201 Ark. 53, 143 S.W.2d 555 (1940).
Contributory negligence of plaintiff does not bar recovery if court finds from substantial testimony that if a proper lookout had been kept by train operators, plaintiff's peril could have been discovered in time to have prevented the injury by the exercise of reasonable care after such discovery. Overstreet v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 195 F. Supp. 542 (W.D. Ark. 1961) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
In actions brought for recovery under this section, prior to amendment contributory negligence of the plaintiff could be pleaded as a defense by the railroad company; however, since the 1911 amendment, the Supreme Court has consistently held that contributory negligence was no defense to actions under the Lookout Statute. Bond v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 233 Ark. 32, 342 S.W.2d 473 (1961).
Duties of Railroad.
This section imposes liability not only in cases of discovered peril, but in those instances also where, by the exercise of reasonable care, the peril might have been discovered. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 154 Ark. 413, 242 S.W. 813 (1922); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Taylor, 200 Ark. 1, 137 S.W.2d 747 (1940); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Beasley, 205 Ark. 688, 170 S.W.2d 667 (1943).
The duty of train operators to give warning of their approach and to keep a lookout for automobiles is equal with the duty of automobile operators to keep a lookout for trains upon approaching railroad tracks, which historically have been described by the courts as in themselves warnings of danger. Overstreet v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 195 F. Supp. 542 (W.D. Ark. 1961).
—Discovery of Peril.
A railway company would not be liable for personal injuries to a licensee upon its property when it appeared that the railway engineer saw the plaintiff in a place of safety, and the engineer will not be required to anticipate that the plaintiff was unaware of the approach of the train or that he would suddenly attempt to go upon the track. Todd v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 106 Ark. 390, 153 S.W. 602 (1913).
The duty of trainmen to take precautions begins when they discover that a traveler approaching the tracks will not act in a prudent manner. Blytheville, Leachville & Ark. S. Ry. v. Gessell, 158 Ark. 569, 250 S.W. 881 (1923); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ward, 195 Ark. 966, 115 S.W.2d 835 (1938).
There is no duty upon the part of train operative, when 1,500 feet away, even if they had seen railroadman walking on straight stretch of track, to assume that he would not step aside. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Campbell, 200 Ark. 1056, 143 S.W.2d 9 (1940).
The operators of a train have the right to assume that a traveler approaching a railroad track will act in response to the dictates of ordinary prudence and the instinct of self-preservation, and will, in fact, stop before placing himself in peril and the duty of the railroad employees to take precaution begins only when it becomes apparent that the traveler at the crossing will not do so. Bond v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 233 Ark. 32, 342 S.W.2d 473 (1961).
Under this section, a member of a train crew keeping a lookout has the right to assume that an approaching motorist will stop instead of placing himself in a position of peril in the path of a moving train. Shibley v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 533 F.2d 1057 (8th Cir. 1976).
—Lookout.
The statutory requirement that railroads shall keep a constant lookout for persons and property upon their tracks applies to railroad switch yards as well as other places and is for the benefit of employees as well as others. Little Rock & Hot Springs W.R.R. v. McQueeney, 78 Ark. 22, 92 S.W. 1120 (1906); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Morris, 80 Ark. 528, 98 S.W. 363 (1906); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Graham, 83 Ark. 61, 102 S.W. 700 (1907); Fort Smith & W. Ry. v. Messek, 96 Ark. 243, 131 S.W. 686 (1910); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Curcio, 164 Ark. 350, 261 S.W. 896 (1924).
The duty to keep a lookout for stock on the track is not imposed upon all the members of a train crew and may be discharged by a lookout kept by a single member of the crew, provided he is in a position to do so as effectively as another member of the crew. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Cone, 111 Ark. 309, 163 S.W. 1170, 163 S.W. 1170 (1914); Taylor v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 116 Ark. 47, 171 S.W. 1182 (1914).
This section includes the implied duty to equip the locomotive with a headlight sufficient to enable the engineer to keep a proper lookout. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Gunn, 112 Ark. 401, 166 S.W. 568 (1914).
This section casts upon trainmen the duty to use ordinary care to discover travelers or property on a highway approaching the train, whether they are upon the track or not. Bush v. Brewer, 136 Ark. 246, 206 S.W. 322 (1918).
It is the duty of the railroad company to keep an efficient lookout, and if the person on the train is so situated that it is impossible to ascertain whether persons are in danger of being hit by moving cars, it then becomes the duty of the company to keep such a lookout as would discover them. Kelly v. DeQueen & E.R.R., 174 Ark. 1000, 298 S.W. 347 (1927).
Though it is not necessary that both the engineer and the fireman keep a lookout, yet the railroad company is required to keep an efficient lookout on the train and whenever it would be useless for the engineer to do so, it is the duty of the fireman to keep a lookout. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Edwards, 178 Ark. 732, 14 S.W.2d 230 (1928).
It is the duty of an engineer to keep a lookout at a railroad crossing, not only on the track, but also such as would enable him to see objects near or approaching the track. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Greene, 177 Ark. 217, 6 S.W.2d 26 (1928).
Ordinarily the duty devolves particularly upon the engineer to keep the lookout, but where he is not in a position to keep an effective lookout, it is the duty of the fireman or other members of the crew to keep the lookout. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Edwards, 178 Ark. 732, 14 S.W.2d 230 (1928); Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955).
It is the duty of the engineer and fireman to keep a lookout on the right-of-way as well as on the track ahead so as to enable them to see objects near, or approaching the track. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Mobley, 192 Ark. 396, 91 S.W.2d 611 (1936).
Duty imposed by this section applies anywhere on the track and not at crossings only. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Manion, 196 Ark. 981, 120 S.W.2d 715 (1938).
Under this section persons operating a train not only owe the duty to keep a lookout but if they discover a person on the track it then becomes their duty to exercise reasonable care not to injure him. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Manion, 196 Ark. 981, 120 S.W.2d 715 (1938).
The fact that the drivers of two automobiles were negligent and caused a collision on the railroad crossing, did not excuse the railroad company from complying with this section. Bond v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 233 Ark. 32, 342 S.W.2d 473 (1961).
Testimony of the train's engineer that he could not see driver's van and he did not know that the train had struck the van until the brakeman brought it to his attention, demonstrated substantial evidence that the railroad was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout. Union Pac. R.R. v. Sharp, 330 Ark. 174, 952 S.W.2d 658 (1997).
Elements of Action.
In order that a railroad company may be held liable for personal injuries to a person on its track, the jury must find that the railroad's employees by exercising ordinary care saw or could have seen that the plaintiff was in a perilous position in time to have avoided injuring him. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. McMichael, 115 Ark. 101, 171 S.W. 115 (1914).
Where a trespasser is killed on a railroad track, there is no presumption of negligence on the part of the railroad but the plaintiff must show a failure to keep a lookout and that if a proper lookout had been kept the railroad could by the exercise of reasonable care have avoided the injury. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Spillers, 117 Ark. 483, 175 S.W. 517 (1915); Baldwin v. Clark, 189 Ark. 1140, 76 S.W.2d 967 (1934).
To make issuable case for jury under this section, plaintiff must establish that the injuries occurred by reason of the operation of a train, that injuries would not have occurred had a proper lookout been kept, and, had such lookout been kept, the peril of the injured party could have, by the exercise of ordinary care, been discovered in time to have avoided the injury. Baldwin v. Brim, 192 Ark. 252, 91 S.W.2d 255 (1936).
In order for one to recover damages he must prove facts and circumstances from which the jury might reasonably infer that the danger might have been discovered and the injury avoided if an efficient lookout had been kept and the burden to make such proof rests upon the party seeking to recover. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Sheppard, 194 Ark. 619, 109 S.W.2d 109 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Maxwell, 194 Ark. 938, 109 S.W.2d 1254 (1937).
The finding of an injured body or damaged property, in circumstances justifying a belief that such injury or damage was caused by a train, is not sufficient, alone, to fix liability, but there must be evidence that if a proper lookout had been kept the presence of deceased in a perilous position on or near the track could have been discovered in time to prevent the killing. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ross, 194 Ark. 877, 109 S.W.2d 1246 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Severe, 202 Ark. 277, 150 S.W.2d 42 (1941); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Gilstrap, 206 Ark. 297, 174 S.W.2d 941 (1943).
Evidence.
For cases discussing sufficiency of evidence in particular circumstances, see St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Rhoden, 93 Ark. 29, 123 S.W. 798 (1909); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Jones, 124 Ark. 523, 187 S.W. 436 (1916); Bush v. Brewer, 136 Ark. 246, 206 S.W. 322 (1918); Davis v. Scott, 151 Ark. 34, 235 S.W. 407 (1921); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Williams, 180 Ark. 413, 21 S.W.2d 611 (1929); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Grady, 188 Ark. 302, 65 S.W.2d 539 (1933); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Pace, 193 Ark. 484, 101 S.W.2d 447 (1937); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Brunner, 193 Ark. 937, 104 S.W.2d 214 (1937); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Sheppard, 194 Ark. 619, 109 S.W.2d 109 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Maxwell, 194 Ark. 938, 109 S.W.2d 1254 (1937); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Thompson, 195 Ark. 665, 113 S.W.2d 720 (1938), overruled in part, Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Hill, 197 Ark. 53, 121 S.W.2d 869 (1938); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Hood, 199 Ark. 520, 135 S.W.2d 329 (1939); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Taylor, 200 Ark. 1, 137 S.W.2d 747 (1940); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Campbell, 200 Ark. 1056, 143 S.W.2d 9 (1940); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Merrell, 200 Ark. 1061, 143 S.W.2d 51 (1940); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Boyd, 201 Ark. 696, 146 S.W.2d 535 (1941); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Severe, 202 Ark. 277, 150 S.W.2d 42 (1941); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Beasley, 205 Ark. 688, 170 S.W.2d 667 (1943); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Magness, 206 Ark. 1081, 178 S.W.2d 493 (1944); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Caple, 207 Ark. 52, 179 S.W.2d 151 (1944); Thompson v. Boswell, 166 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1948); Haney v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 214 Ark. 673, 217 S.W.2d 610 (1949); Southern Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 133 F. Supp. 92 (W.D. Ark. 1955); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Shane, 225 Ark. 80, 279 S.W.2d 284 (1955); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956); Wagnon v. Kansas City S. Ry., 204 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Ark. 1962); Sherman v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 238 Ark. 554, 383 S.W.2d 881 (1964); Commercial Nat'l Bank v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 631 F.2d 563 (8th Cir. 1980).
An engineer's employment does not carry with it authority to make admissions, subsequent to the injury, as to how the accident happened which are binding on the company. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Vernon, 162 Ark. 226, 258 S.W. 126 (1924).
The jury may not capriciously disregard testimony of engineer and fireman as to lights and lookout contradicted only by inferences based upon speculation. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ross, 194 Ark. 877, 109 S.W.2d 1246 (1937).
Credibility of witness who testified as to distance within which operators could have stopped train which struck and killed person on tracks was for the jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956).
A court cannot arbitrarily disregard the testimony of either the engineer or the fireman to the effect that they were keeping a proper lookout under this section, and their testimony must be accepted unless contradicted by other credible evidence, direct or circumstantial. Overstreet v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 195 F. Supp. 542 (W.D. Ark. 1961).
Instructions.
For discussion of instructions in cases brought under this section, see Louisiana & Ark. Ry., 127 Ark. 323, 192 S.W. 174 (1917); Kansas City S. Ry. v. Whitley, 139 Ark. 255, 213 S.W. 369 (1919); Hines v. Meador, 145 Ark. 356, 224 S.W. 742 (1920); Baldwin v. Brim, 192 Ark. 252, 91 S.W.2d 255 (1936); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. White, 192 Ark. 350, 91 S.W.2d 277 (1936); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Call, 197 Ark. 225, 122 S.W.2d 178 (1938); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Byrd, 206 Ark. 369, 175 S.W.2d 564 (1943); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Caple, 207 Ark. 52, 179 S.W.2d 151 (1944); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Frye, 214 Ark. 92, 214 S.W.2d 495 (1948); St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Willingham, 177 F.2d 167 (8th Cir. 1949); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956); Bond v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 233 Ark. 32, 342 S.W.2d 473 (1961); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Harelson, 238 Ark. 452, 382 S.W.2d 900 (1964); Shibley v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry., 533 F.2d 1057 (8th Cir. 1976).
Persons or Property Protected.
This section is not for the protection of coemployees while operating trains. Choctaw, Okla. & Gulf R.R. v. Doughty, 77 Ark. 1, 91 S.W. 768 (1905); Fletcher v. Freeman-Smith Lumber Co., 98 Ark. 202, 135 S.W. 827 (1911).
The operatives of a railway train are required to keep a lookout for trespassers and all others upon its tracks and is liable for any negligence resulting in an injury to such person, notwithstanding the contributory negligence of the injured party. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Bryant, 110 Ark. 444, 162 S.W. 51 (1913).
Where plaintiff, an employee of the defendant railway company, who had nothing to do with the operation of its trains was struck by a moving train and was injured, it was the defendant's duty to keep a constant lookout for persons upon its track and the burden was on the defendant to show that a constant lookout was maintained. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Staples, 111 Ark. 129, 163 S.W. 514 (1914).
Where a railroad company permits camp cars for workmen to be so placed that the workmen must necessarily use the railroad tracks in going to and from the camp cars, the workmen so using the tracks are not trespassers and the railroad company owes them the statutory duty of keeping an efficient lookout. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Drumright, 112 Ark. 452, 166 S.W. 938 (1914).
A railroad company is required to maintain a lookout for persons on its track and it will be liable for an injury to a drunken trespasser if its servants could have discovered his peril by the keeping of a proper lookout in time to have avoided injuring him. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry v. Elrod, 116 Ark. 514, 173 S.W. 836 (1915).
Where deceased, a brakeman, received fatal injuries when the engine upon which he was riding collided with a moving engine of another railway company, the case was covered by the lookout statute and such other railway company was liable, it appearing that the operatives of its engine failed to maintain the lookout for danger required by the statute and that the accident could have been averted if a proper lookout had been kept. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Scott, 123 Ark. 94, 184 S.W. 65 (1916).
It is the duty of persons running trains upon any railroad to keep a lookout for dead persons lying on the track, as well as for other persons or property. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. White, 192 Ark. 350, 91 S.W.2d 277 (1936).
That person killed while attempting to cross switch track by crawling under refrigerator car was a trespasser and guilty of negligence would not prevent recovery under this section. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Sheppard, 194 Ark. 619, 109 S.W.2d 109 (1937).
Injured party may recover all the damages resulting from failure to keep a lookout notwithstanding contributory negligence even if injured party was a trespasser. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Manion, 196 Ark. 981, 120 S.W.2d 715 (1938).
This section is intended to afford protection to those who might unwittingly, though carelessly or negligently, enter upon danger zones at or near railroad tracks and particularly at intersections or grade crossings and even trespassers are protected by it. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Nelson, 195 Ark. 883, 115 S.W.2d 872 (1938).
Child, in walking along the railroad tracks, is at most a licensee and the duty that the operatives of a train owe her are measured by this section. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Caple, 207 Ark. 52, 179 S.W.2d 151 (1944).
The fact that a person was a trespasser or licensee at the time he was struck and killed did not bar recovery when there was evidence that the danger could have been discovered and death averted by the trainman had a proper lookout been kept. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Fikes, 211 Ark. 256, 200 S.W.2d 97 (1947).
Pleading.
Though allegations did not in specific words allege a violation of this section, but facts were alleged sufficient to establish that action was based upon its violation, allegations were sufficient to state cause of action under this section. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Barham, 198 Ark. 158, 128 S.W.2d 353 (1939).
Presumptions and Prima Facie Evidence.
When the plaintiff has proved facts and circumstances from which the jury might infer that his property has been injured on account of the operation of a train and that the danger might have been discovered and injury avoided if a lookout had been kept, then he had made out a prima facie case and the burden was on the defendant to show that a lookout was kept as required by this section. Central Ry. v. Lindley, 105 Ark. 294, 151 S.W. 246 (1912); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Gibson, 107 Ark. 431, 155 S.W. 510 (1913); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Gibson, 113 Ark. 417, 168 S.W. 1129 (1914) (preceding decisions prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
If a person is killed while on the tracks of a railway by the running of a train and such person would not have been killed had the required lookout been kept, this section makes such failure to keep a lookout the proximate cause of the death, no matter by what cause or under what conditions the party killed may have been upon the tracks. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Champion, 108 Ark. 326, 157 S.W. 408 (1913) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
Where a dog is killed by the operating of a train by actually coming in contact with it, the prima facie case of negligence thus made out is not changed by the lookout statute. Taylor v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 116 Ark. 47, 171 S.W. 1182 (1914).
Where there was nothing but conjecture as to the manner in which deceased was killed by the train and there was positive evidence that engineer and fireman were keeping a lookout, but neither of them saw the deceased nor was aware that they had struck him, it could not be conclusively presumed that deceased was walking on or near the track and that negligence alone was responsible for the fact that his presence was not discovered. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Ross, 194 Ark. 877, 109 S.W.2d 1246 (1937).
Evidence that justifies a finding that deceased was killed by defendant's train raises a presumption of negligence and the burden is on the railroad company to show that a proper lookout was kept. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Crick, 182 Ark. 312, 32 S.W.2d 815 (1930); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Thompson, 195 Ark. 665, 113 S.W.2d 720 (1938), overruled in part, Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Vaughan, 225 Ark. 848, 286 S.W.2d 6 (1956) (preceding decisions prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
In action for death against a railroad company where body was found outside the rails in such condition that reasonable minds would agree death was caused by a train, absent direct evidence showing how the death occured, presumption arising from fact that body was found beside the railroad ended when railroad introduced evidence that lookout statute had not been violated. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Penny, 200 Ark. 69, 137 S.W.2d 934 (1940) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
In action for death of trespasser whose body was found near or on the track, when testimony has been offered, sufficient to sustain a reasonable inference that the danger could have been discovered had the efficient lookout required by law been kept, the burden devolves upon the railroad company to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that such a lookout had been kept. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Severe, 202 Ark. 277, 150 S.W.2d 42 (1941); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Radley, 209 Ark. 532, 191 S.W.2d 467 (1946) (preceding decisions prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
When an injury is caused by the operation of a railway train a prima facie case of negligence is made out against the company and the burden rests on the company to show that it was not guilty of such negligence. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Shane, 225 Ark. 80, 279 S.W.2d 284 (1955) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
The only effect of the inference of negligence created when injury is caused by operation of the train is to cast upon the railway company the duty of producing some evidence to the contrary and when that is done the inference is at an end and the question of negligence is one for the jury upon all the evidence. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Shane, 225 Ark. 80, 279 S.W.2d 284 (1955) (decision prior to 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.) reenactment and amendment).
Proximate Cause.
The evidence demonstrated that regardless of whether the train's crew kept a lookout the train could not have stopped in time or slowed enough to avoid the collision, therefore, the train crew's failure to keep a lookout was not the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. Lovett ex rel. Lovett v. Union Pac. R.R., 201 F.3d 1074 (8th Cir. 2000).
Right of Way.
Arkansas law does not require trains to yield the right of way to automobiles crossing the tracks at highway crossings. Overstreet v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 195 F. Supp. 542 (W.D. Ark. 1961).
Trains.
An engine and tender are a train. Fort Smith & W. Ry. v. Messek, 96 Ark. 243, 131 S.W. 686 (1910).
A motor car run by a railroad company for the purpose of carrying passengers over its line of railroad is a train within the meaning of the lookout statute. Central Ry. v. Lindley, 105 Ark. 294, 151 S.W. 246 (1912).
Section does not apply to handcars or motor driven handcars. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Mitchell, 115 Ark. 339, 171 S.W. 895 (1914); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Jones, 182 Ark. 405, 31 S.W.2d 524 (1930).
Section does not apply to street railways. Bain v. Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co., 116 Ark. 125, 172 S.W. 843 (1915).
Section applies to interurban railways. Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Phillips, 136 Ark. 310, 206 S.W. 453 (1918).
Cited: St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Roddy, 110 Ark. 161, 161 S.W. 156 (1913); Harper v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 229 Ark. 348, 314 S.W.2d 696 (1958); Horace v. St. Louis Sw. R.R., 489 F.2d 632 (8th Cir. 1974); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Pennington, 261 Ark. 650, 553 S.W.2d 436 (1977); Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Star City Gravel Co., 452 F. Supp. 480 (E.D. Ark. 1978).
23-12-908. Killing or injuring livestock — Notice — Damages recoverable on failure to advertise.
-
- Whenever any stock, such as horses, cows, hogs, sheep, etc., are killed, wounded, or injured by railroad trains running in this state, then the conductor or engineer on the train doing the damage shall cause the station master or overseer at the nearest station house to the killing or wounding to post within one (1) week thereafter, and to keep posted for twenty (20) days thereafter, at the nearest station house and nearest depot house, a true and correct description of the stock which was killed or wounded, giving a true and correct description of the color, marks, brands, and other natural descriptions which may assist in identifying the stock and in giving the time when and place where killed or wounded.
- On the failure to advertise any stock so killed or wounded as provided in subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the owner shall recover double damages for all stock killed and not advertised.
-
- The railroad shall pay the owner of the stock within thirty (30) days after notice is served on the railroad by the owner. Failure to do so shall entitle the owner to double the amount of damages awarded him or her by any jury trying the cause, and a reasonable attorney's fee.
- If the owner of the stock killed or wounded brings suit against the railroad after the thirty (30) days have expired and the jury trying the cause gives the owner a lesser amount of damage than he or she sues for, then the owner shall recover only the amount given him or her by the jury and shall not be entitled to recover any attorney's fees.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1005.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Former section concerning injury to livestock, if construed as authorizing the recovery of double damages in cases where amount recovered in suit was less than amount claimed from railroad prior to suit, would be unconstitutional. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Wynne, 224 U.S. 354, 32 S. Ct. 493, 56 L. Ed. 799 (1912) (decision under prior law).
Former section concerning injury to livestock was not invalid as denying due process of law as applied to a case in which the justice of the plaintiff's demand is fully established in the suit following the refusal to pay. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Anderson, 233 U.S. 325, 34 S. Ct. 599, 58 L. Ed. 983 (1914) (decision under prior law).
Bringing Suit.
To recover double damages the statute explicitly states that the owner of the stock “shall bring suit against such railroad after the thirty days have expired.” Lovegrove v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 245 Ark. 1021, 436 S.W.2d 798 (1969).
Burden of Proof.
Burden of proof is on plaintiff to prove omission to post notice. Kansas City, S. & M.R.R. v. Summers, 45 Ark. 295 (1885) (decision under prior law).
Where body of horse was found outside right-of-way fence, it was incumbent on plaintiff to establish that horse was killed by train before presumption fixed by former section identical to § 23-12-910 would apply. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Briner, 213 Ark. 18, 209 S.W.2d 106 (1948) (decision under prior law).
In suit for damages for death of dogs struck by train, where testimony of engineer as to his ability to stop was such as to overcome the presumption arising from the killing, it was necessary for the plaintiff to offer some proof of negligence in order to prevail. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Reeves, 217 Ark. 33, 231 S.W.2d 103 (1950) (decision under prior law).
Double Damages.
Supreme Court would not reverse a case whether the double damages were assessed by the jury or only single damages were assessed and doubled by the court. Memphis & Little Rock R.R. v. Carlley, 39 Ark. 246 (1882) (decision under prior law).
The right to recover double damages and attorney's fees in a stock killing case is dependent on the plaintiff recovering the entire amount sued for. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Johnson, 186 Ark. 887, 56 S.W.2d 576 (1933) (decision under prior law).
For double damages to be awarded the complaint must allege failure to post notice, delay in payment of claim, and contain a prayer for double damages and the burden of proof thereof is on the plaintiff. Lovegrove v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 245 Ark. 1021, 436 S.W.2d 798 (1969).
Instructions.
Instruction that if animal was permitted to enter right-of-way because of negligence of defendant in failing to keep fence in repair and was struck by one of defendant's trains, defendant would be liable and “you will find for the plaintiff” was erroneous since such facts did not create a conclusive presumption of negligence but only a rebuttable presumption of negligence. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Briner, 213 Ark. 18, 209 S.W.2d 106 (1948) (decision under prior law).
Notice of Claim.
Notice of claim to station agent was sufficient. Lusk v. Blevins, 130 Ark. 378, 197 S.W. 854 (1917) (decision under prior law).
Posting Notice.
Killing must be posted though the owner had actual knowledge of the killing. Memphis & Little Rock R.R. v. Carlley, 39 Ark. 246 (1882); St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Castleberry, 98 Ark. 441, 136 S.W. 284 (1911) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Posting of notice at station house of railroad in any public place where it could be seen was a sufficient compliance with former section and proof that no advertisement of killing of animal was posted at nearest station house, either at place where such notices usually are placed or in front of the building will, in the absence of evidence that there are other places suitable for posting, justify finding of jury that no notice was posted. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Wright, 57 Ark. 327, 21 S.W. 476 (1893) (decision under prior law).
Proof that no notice was posted by 6:30 p.m. of the seventh day after the killing of a mule was not sufficient to establish railroad's liability for the penalty, since time for posting did not expire until midnight of the seventh day. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Markham, 66 Ark. 297, 50 S.W. 516 (1899) (decision under prior law).
23-12-909. Killing or injuring livestock — Actions.
Any person owning in his or her own right or having a special ownership in any horses, mules, cattle, or other stock killed or wounded by any railroad trains running in this state may sue the company running the trains for the damages sustained by the killing or wounding in any court having jurisdiction of the amount of damages in the county where the killing or wounding occurred, at any time within twelve (12) months after the killing or wounding occurred, and recover such damages as the court or jury trying the case may assess.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1006.
Case Notes
Applicability.
Former section did not apply to injuries resulting from fright. Earl v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 84 Ark. 507, 106 S.W. 675 (1907); Central Ry. v. Lindley, 105 Ark. 294, 151 S.W. 246 (1912) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where a horse was killed when it ran into a trestle but it was neither alleged nor proved that it was struck by a train, former section had no application. Jonesboro, Lake City & E.R.R. v. Kilgore, 138 Ark. 308, 211 S.W. 167 (1919) (decision under prior law).
Former section had no application to killing a dog. El Dorado & Bastrop Ry. v. Knox, 90 Ark. 1, 117 S.W. 779 (1909); Nelson v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 160 Ark. 568, 255 S.W. 10 (1923) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Parties Who May Sue.
Where a horse was hired to a person who agreed to return it in good condition and while it was in his possession it was killed by a train, he could maintain an action for its value making the owner a party. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Biggs, 50 Ark. 169, 6 S.W. 724 (1887) (decision under prior law).
One who has a special ownership in an animal killed by a railway train is empowered to recover its full value. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Taylor, 57 Ark. 136, 20 S.W. 1083 (1893) (decision under prior law).
Venue.
Even though justice's transcript fails to show venue in action for damages for stock killed by train, it may be proved in circuit court on appeal. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Lindsay, 55 Ark. 281, 18 S.W. 59 (1892) (decision under prior law).
An action for stock killed by a railroad train must be brought in the county in which the animal was killed. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Jamison, 70 Ark. 346, 68 S.W. 28 (1902) (decision under prior law).
Proof that a mule was killed by the defendant's train between the county seat and a town judicially known to be in the county of the venue sufficiently established that the killing was done in the county. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. James, 70 Ark. 387, 68 S.W. 153 (1902) (decision under prior law).
An action against a railroad company for killing stock in Indian Territory was transitory in nature and could be enforced wherever jurisdiction could be had on the defendant company. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Ingram, 80 Ark. 269, 97 S.W. 55 (1906) (decision under prior law).
23-12-910. Killing or injuring livestock — Prima facie evidence — Burden of proof.
The killing of stock on any railroad track shall be prima facie evidence that it was done by the trains, and the onus to prove the reverse will be on the railroad company.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1007.
23-12-911. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning killing or injuring livestock, and claims agent, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 573. The section was derived from Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, §§ 11, 12; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1010, 73-1011.
23-12-912. Killing or injuring livestock — Arbitration.
-
- When any livestock are killed or wounded by any railroad train, the company or the party damaged may propose to the other to arbitrate the amount of damages.
- On agreement to arbitrate the amount of damage, each party shall choose one (1) referee from the vicinity where the damages occurred. In case of disagreement, these two (2) referees shall select a third referee, who shall be sworn to truly assess the damages.
- When any two (2) of the referees agree, they shall reduce their findings to writing, sign it in duplicate, and deliver one (1) copy to the railroad company or agent and the other copy to the party damaged.
-
- On payment of the award of damages by the railroad within thirty (30) days, the railroad shall be forever released from all further damages, but on failing to do so, the railroad shall pay to the party damaged double the amount of the value of the animal so killed or double the amount of damages awarded on account of the wounding of any animal.
- In all cases where any award has been made by and under the provisions of subsection (a) of this section and the railroad company fails to comply with the award within thirty (30) days, as prescribed in subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the party damaged shall have the right to bring his or her action before any court in the county having competent jurisdiction, where any such stock may have been killed or wounded, for the actual damages he or she may have sustained on account of the killing or wounding of any such stock. The court or jury trying any such cause shall give judgment in favor of the party damaged double the value of the animal so killed or double the amount of damages awarded.
- In case the party injured refuses to abide by the award and fails to recover a greater amount than was awarded, he or she shall pay the railroad a reasonable attorney's fee, to be fixed by the court.
History. Acts 1961 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 61, §§ 13, 14; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1012, 73-1013.
23-12-913. Liability for fires.
- All corporations, companies, or persons engaged in operating any railroad wholly or partly in this state shall be liable for the destruction of, or injury to, any real or personal property, which may be caused by fire resulting from the negligence of the corporations, companies, or persons or resulting from the negligent operation of any locomotive, engine, machinery, train, car, or other thing used upon the railroad or resulting from, or caused by, the negligence of any employee, agent, or servant of the corporation, company, or person in the discharge of his or her duty as such upon or in the operation of the railroad.
- The owner of any real or personal property which is destroyed or injured in the manner set forth in subsection (a) of this section may recover all such damage to the property by suit in any court, in the county where the damage occurred, having jurisdiction of the amount of the damage.
History. Acts 1955, No. 320, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1015.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Absolute Liability in Arkansas, 8 Ark. L. Rev. 83.
Liability of Railroads for Fires Caused by Negligence — Venue, 9 Ark. L. Rev. 388.
Case Notes
Note. A former similar section made railroad liable regardless of negligence while this section makes the railroad liable for negligent actions. This should be taken into consideration in reading the following decisions under prior law.
Actionable Fires or Injuries. Attorney's Fees. Burden of Proof. Defenses. Evidence. Instructions. Negligence. Railroads.
Actionable Fires or Injuries.
Former similar section applied only to fires communicated by locomotives or other instrumentalities used in movement of trains and did not apply to fires caused by the burning of buildings used in connection with the operation of its trains. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Thomas, 97 Ark. 287, 133 S.W. 1030 (1911) (decision under prior law).
A railroad company was liable for damage caused by fire whether the fire was caused by the operation of its trains, or by the acts of its servants in permitting fire to escape while burning off its right-of-way. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Cecil, 171 Ark. 34, 283 S.W. 1 (1926) (decision under prior law).
Where farmer of his own initiative assisted section crew in extinguishing fire on his premises, occasioned by sparks from a passing locomotive, railroad was not liable for injuries sustained by him where he adopted his own method of fighting the fire and used his own judgment without interference from any of railroad's employees. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Benham, 192 Ark. 35, 89 S.W.2d 928 (1936) (decision under prior law).
Railroad company leasing warehouse under contract providing for exemption from liability for destruction by fire was not liable for destruction of warehouse and contents where lease was still in effect. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Barnes, 197 Ark. 199, 121 S.W.2d 896 (1938) (decision under prior law).
A railroad was not liable where there was no evidence to logically show that the operations of its equipment or employees caused the fire, or that it was negligent in not discovering the fire and using reasonable efforts in abatement. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Harris, 224 Ark. 848, 276 S.W.2d 686 (1955) (decision under prior law).
Attorney's Fees.
Allowance of attorney's fees on motion of successful plaintiff after verdict had been returned was proper though complaint did not pray for attorney's fee. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Campbell, 206 Ark. 657, 177 S.W.2d 174 (1944) (decision under prior law).
In action against railroad for destruction of property, fire insurance company intervening as subrogee of plaintiff was not entitled to allowance for attorney's fee since part of former similar section relating to allowance of attorney's fee required a strict construction, and, when so construed, not more than one attorney's fee could be allowed. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Campbell, 206 Ark. 657, 177 S.W.2d 174 (1944) (decision under prior law).
If lessee from railroad allows plaintiffs to store personal property on leased premises, and plaintiffs sue the railroad for loss of their goods, as result of a fire, and recover only half of amount of loss, plaintiffs are still entitled to recover their attorney fees. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. Travis Insulation Co., 215 Ark. 868, 223 S.W.2d 765 (1949) (decision under prior law).
Burden of Proof.
When testimony showed there was a fire immediately after train had passed and no evidence of fire before it passed, plaintiffs made a prima facie case of negligence and burden then shifted to railroad company to prove itself free of negligence. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Beaty, 239 Ark. 187, 388 S.W.2d 79 (1965).
Defenses.
Where property injured was on defendant's right-of-way, it was necessary for defendant to plead fact that plaintiffs were trespassers if it desired to use such fact as a defense. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Cooper & Ross, 120 Ark. 595, 180 S.W. 203 (1915) (decision under prior law).
Evidence.
In action against railway to recover damages caused by destruction of plaintiff's property by fire, evidence that house was discovered to be on fire a few minutes after engine passed, in absence of any other explanation of fire's origin, justified finding that fire was caused by sparks from engine and raised presumption of negligence. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Dawson, 77 Ark. 434, 92 S.W. 27 (1906) (decision under prior law).
Where cotton was destroyed by fire while stored on defendant's platform awaiting shipment, evidence tending to prove that defendant's employees left a pile of cross ties burning at specified distance from platform with wind blowing in that direction and that sparks were seen to fly, together with lack of evidence pointing to any other source of fire, was sufficient to sustain finding that fire was communicated from cross ties. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Clements, 82 Ark. 3, 99 S.W. 1106 (1907) (decision under prior law).
Where property situated near a railroad track is destroyed by fire soon after a locomotive has passed, the inference may be drawn that the fire was caused by sparks from the locomotive; it is not essential that the evidence should exclude all possibility of another origin; it is sufficient if all the facts and circumstances in evidence fairly warrant the conclusion that the fire did not originate from some other cause. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. Cobbs, 151 Ark. 207, 235 S.W. 995 (1921); Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. v. National Fire Ins. Co., 151 Ark. 218, 235 S.W. 1006 (1921) (preceding decisions under prior law).
Where proof shows that property near railroad track was discovered to be on fire shortly after train had passed, and there was no proof of any other origin of the fire, it may be inferred that fire was caused by sparks from locomotive of passing train. Cairo, T. & S.R.R. v. Brooks, 112 Ark. 298, 166 S.W. 167 (1914) (decision under prior law).
Testimony was competent to refute defendant's contention that none of its engines would emit sparks. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Campbell, 206 Ark. 657, 177 S.W.2d 174 (1944) (decision under prior law).
Where evidence tended to establish that meadow on appellee's farm, which adjoined right-of-way of appellant, caught fire shortly after one of appellant's trains had passed, that fire first caught near right-of-way and then spread to other parts of farm, that defendant's section hands were summoned to fight fire and one of them testified that a certain train started the fire, and no other cause of the fire was suggested, it was sufficient for jury to find for plaintiff. Missouri & Ark. Ry. v. Treece, 210 Ark. 63, 194 S.W.2d 203 (1946) (decision under prior law).
Evidence to effect that fire was observed on right-of-way shortly after train passed, that train was using its brakes as it passed and that train had brakes of cast iron which had tendency to spark was sufficient to support verdict against railway company in suit for damages from fire. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Story, 239 Ark. 458, 390 S.W.2d 124 (1965).
Instructions.
It was error to instruct jury that an absolute duty was imposed on railway to supply its locomotives with best improved appliances in use and to keep them in good condition since extent of its duty was the exercise of reasonable care in providing and maintaining such appliances. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Dawson, 77 Ark. 434, 92 S.W. 27 (1906); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Thompson-Hailey Co., 79 Ark. 12, 94 S.W. 707 (1906); St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Clements, 82 Ark. 3, 99 S.W. 1106 (1907) (preceding decisions under prior law).
It was improper for court to charge jury that no presumption arises that fire originated from one of defendant's engines or trains merely from fact that fire occurred soon after engine or train passed the point. Union Seed & Fertilizer Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 121 Ark. 585, 181 S.W. 898 (1916) (decision under prior law).
In action based on former similar section, it was improper to charge jury on question of contributory negligence. Union Seed & Fertilizer Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry., 121 Ark. 585, 181 S.W. 898 (1916) (decision under prior law).
Negligence.
Under this section it is necessary for plaintiff to allege and prove negligence on part of railroad company to recover for damages resulting from fire. Kansas City S. Ry. v. Story, 239 Ark. 458, 390 S.W.2d 124 (1965).
Railroads.
The term “railroad” referred to railroads only that were operated by corporations, companies or individuals as common carriers. Valley Lumber Co. v. Westmoreland Bros., 159 Ark. 484, 252 S.W. 609 (1923) (decision under prior law).
Former similar section did not apply to railroads operated only in connection with an industrial enterprise. Helena Sw. R.R. v. Coolidge, 169 Ark. 552, 275 S.W. 896 (1925) (decision under prior law).
Subchapter 10 — Railroad Safety and Regulatory Act of 1993
Effective Dates. Acts 1995, No. 668, § 6: Mar. 17, 1995. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the time-frames for investigations and procedures regarding the maintenance or obstruction of railroad crossings, which cross any public road, highway or street in this State, as such time-frames currently exist in Arkansas Code Annotated Sections 23-12-1005(a) and 23-12-1008(a), are unrealistic from a practical standpoint and have imposed an undue burden both on the State and the railroad companies in meeting such time-frames when a complaint is filed with the State Highway Commission against a railroad company, that the amendments contained in this act will provide more realistic time-frames and will relieve such undue burdens; that only by the immediate effectiveness of this act may the aforementioned problems be solved; and that the provisions of this act are essential to the continued operation of state government. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-12-1001. Title.
This subchapter may be referred to as the “Railroad Safety and Regulatory Act of 1993”.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 2.
23-12-1002. Jurisdiction.
The State Highway Commission administers the railroad crossing safety program in Arkansas and has heretofore been designated by the General Assembly as the sole public body to deal with and has been given exclusive jurisdiction concerning the location, construction, improvement, and protection of railroad crossings in Arkansas. It is in the public's interest and safety that uniformity be established in other matters pertaining to the maintenance of railroad crossings and the operation and movement of trains in this state.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 1.
23-12-1003. Maintenance of crossings of public roads and railroads — Failure to comply — Penalties.
The State Highway Commission is hereby designated as the sole public body to deal with and is hereby given exclusive jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to the maintenance of any location where any railroad crosses any public road, highway, or street in this state or where any public road, highway, or street crosses any railroad.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 3.
Cross References. Crossings, construction and repair, § 27-67-214.
Case Notes
Applicability.
Former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) clearly covered crossings outside, as well as inside, corporate limits. Dena Constr. Co. v. Burlington N.R.R., 297 Ark. 547, 764 S.W.2d 419 (1989).
Actions.
Action against railroad company to recover penalty for failure to construct a crossing at a public road was properly brought in name of state for use of county. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State, 85 Ark. 561, 109 S.W. 545 (1908).
In addition to tort liability, former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) provided for a penalty against the railroad if it failed to maintain the crossing as specified. Union Pac. R.R. v. State ex rel. Faulkner County, 316 Ark. 609, 873 S.W.2d 805 (1994).
Compensation.
Former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) did not contemplate that a railroad company should be compensated either for constructing a crossing or for keeping it in repair. St. Louis Sw. Ry. v. Royall, 75 Ark. 530, 88 S.W. 555, 88 S.W. 555 (1905); Kansas City S. Ry. v. City of Mena, 123 Ark. 323, 185 S.W. 290 (1916).
Construction of Railroad.
A railroad is “constructed” within meaning of former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) when track is ready for trains to pass over, and railroad must then construct crossing even though further work remains to be done on the railroad. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. State ex rel. Boone County, 88 Ark. 338, 114 S.W. 703 (1908).
Damages.
A railroad company is liable for damages to a property owner caused by the destruction of a bridge at a highway crossing thereby rendering a landowner's property less accessible. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Swafford, 186 Ark. 631, 55 S.W.2d 85 (1932).
Duty of Railroad.
A railroad company in building and maintaining a bridge across a ditch dug by it at a highway crossing was bound to use reasonable skill and diligence in providing against the ordinary dangers of travel; and if rails, guards or barriers be reasonably necessary for that purpose and practicable, it is its duty to construct and maintain them in the places needed. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Aven, 61 Ark. 141, 32 S.W. 500 (1895).
The 1913 amendment to former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) had the effect of imposing upon the railway company the same duty to erect crossings over streets in cities and towns as previously existed with respect to roads and highways. Kansas City S. Ry. v. City of Mena, 123 Ark. 323, 185 S.W. 290 (1916); Dena Constr. Co. v. Burlington N.R.R., 297 Ark. 547, 764 S.W.2d 419 (1989).
It is the duty of every railroad company to properly construct and maintain crossings over all public highways on the line of its road in such a manner that the same shall be safe and convenient to travelers, so far as it can do so without interfering with the safe operation of the road. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Howell, 198 Ark. 956, 132 S.W.2d 176 (1939).
Duty of railway company to maintain safe crossings extends to embankments constructed as necessary approaches to the railroad track. Shane v. Kansas City S. Ry., 121 F. Supp. 426 (W.D. Ark. 1954).
Duty of railroad to improve roadways where they intersect tracks is restricted by § 27-67-214 to area of road between tracks and to end of cross ties. Untiedt v. St. Louis Sw. Ry., 246 Ark. 941, 440 S.W.2d 251 (1969).
Jurisdiction.
Penal statutes neither give nor oust jurisdiction in chancery. Union Pac. R.R. v. State ex rel. Faulkner County, 316 Ark. 609, 873 S.W.2d 805 (1994).
Where the remedy at law under former § 23-12-305 (see now this section) was fully adequate, the chancery court was wholly without subject matter jurisdiction, despite a request for an injunction. Union Pac. R.R. v. State ex rel. Faulkner County, 316 Ark. 609, 873 S.W.2d 805 (1994).
Jury Question.
Evidence tending to show that railroad company's duty to maintain the crossing in safe condition was not performed, presented question for jury. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Howell, 198 Ark. 956, 132 S.W.2d 176 (1939).
Laches.
In a suit to recover from a railroad company the statutory penalty for failure to construct a suitable crossing of its track at a public highway, possession of the right-of-way for seven years is not a bar where such possession is only that as is ordinarily taken by railways for the purpose of enabling them to construct their track and operate their trains thereon. State ex rel. Craighead County v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry., 54 Ark. 608, 16 S.W. 657 (1891).
Liability.
A county and not a railroad company was liable for the construction of the approaches to the railroad's roadbed of a public highway laid out after the railroad was constructed. Prairie County v. Fink, 65 Ark. 492, 47 S.W. 301 (1898) (decision prior to 1899 amendment to former § 23-12-305).
Under a prior similar provision a railroad company was liable for injuries to persons or property caused by its negligence in constructing or maintaining crossings or bridges where railroad crossed a public highway. Payne v. Stockton, 147 Ark. 598, 229 S.W. 44 (1921).
Approaches or embankments reasonably necessary to enable crossings or bridges to be used are part of the crossing for which railroad company will be liable for negligent maintenance. Payne v. Stockton, 147 Ark. 598, 229 S.W. 44 (1921).
Obstructions of Road.
Property owner could enjoin obstruction of road. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Taylor, 130 Ark. 64, 196 S.W. 930 (1917).
Penalties.
There was no taking of defendant's property without due process of law, in enforcing the statutory daily penalty against the railroad, pending appeal of another case, in which the town's authority to require the crossing was being tested by appeal. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. v. State ex rel. Craighead County, 182 Ark. 409, 31 S.W.2d 739 (1930).
Spur Track.
An industrial spur track which a railroad company undertook to control and maintain was a part of its road and it was liable for damages to an automobile caused by a defective highway crossing. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Meyer, 186 Ark. 810, 56 S.W.2d 169 (1933).
23-12-1004. Powers and duties.
- The State Highway Commission shall make such investigation and studies as it deems necessary to properly exercise the jurisdiction hereby conferred and shall involve Arkansas counties, municipalities, and railroads operating within this state and unions representing railroad employees.
- Pursuant to rules providing for an opportunity of notice and hearing, the commission shall promulgate appropriate rules pertaining to the maintenance of railroad crossings of state, county, city, or municipal streets and highways.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 3; 2019, No. 315, § 2412.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (b) twice.
23-12-1005. Inadequate action or unreasonable refusal — Action on complaint.
-
-
- Prior to any request by a state, municipal, or county official for sanctions against any railroad company for violation of any rule promulgated pursuant to this subchapter, the state, municipal, or county official shall state the claim or complaint in writing by certified mail to the registered agent of the railroad company in question.
-
- Within forty-five (45) days after the receipt of the written claim or complaint by the railroad company, the railroad company shall respond to the claim or complaint, stating with specificity the corrective action taken, any corrective or remedial action planned and the time for its completion, or the reason for any refusal on the part of the railroad to correct the situation.
- This response shall be in writing to the complaining official by certified mail.
-
- In the event the issue is not then resolved to the satisfaction of the complaining official, the official shall notify the State Highway Commission in writing.
-
- Within sixty (60) days after receipt of the complaint, the commission shall hold a hearing on the complaint.
- Notice of the hearing shall be given the railroad and the complainant at least twenty (20) days before the hearing.
- After appropriate notice and hearing on the complaint and within twenty (20) days after the hearing, the commission or its designated representative shall determine the adequacy of the railroad's action or the reasonableness of its refusal under the circumstances.
-
- If the commission makes a finding of inadequate action or unreasonable refusal on the part of the railroad based on information presented at a hearing before the commission or before a designated representative of the commission, the railroad company charged with the violation shall be subject to a penalty of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per occurrence, the penalty to be assessed by the commission.
-
- The decision of the commission may be appealed to the circuit court of the county in which the violation occurred at any time within thirty (30) days after the decision is rendered.
- Provided, the decision of the commission shall be final unless appealed as authorized herein.
-
-
- If the state owns the highway where the questioned crossing is located, all moneys recovered under the provisions of this section shall be placed into the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund.
- All other moneys recovered under this section shall be divided equally between the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund and the general, road, or highway fund of the county or municipality which owns the highway, road, or street where the questioned crossing is located.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 3; 1995, No. 668, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2413.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(1)(A).
23-12-1006. Operation and movement of trains — Regulations, penalties, and enforcement.
The State Highway Commission is hereby designated as the sole public body to deal with, and is hereby given exclusive jurisdiction over, all matters pertaining to the operation and movement of trains within this state including, but not limited to, the obstruction of any public highway, road, street, or other railroad crossing or public property by a standing train.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 4.
23-12-1007. Investigations — Rules.
-
- The State Highway Commission shall make such investigations as it deems necessary, or as requested by state, municipal, or county officials, to properly exercise the exclusive jurisdiction hereby conferred and pursuant to required notice and hearing shall promulgate all necessary orders or rules concerning train operation, train movement, permissible standing time for trains, and all other related matters.
- The investigation of crossings shall include, but is not limited to, the reasonable availability or use of other crossings by vehicular or pedestrian traffic, the frequency and necessity of use of the railroad crossing by railroad trains and vehicular and pedestrian traffic, the restriction of emergency and law enforcement vehicles using the crossing, and the hours of frequent use of the crossing.
- In the investigation, the commission shall seek the advice of Arkansas counties, municipalities, railroads operating within this state, and unions representing railroad employees.
- Provided, unless and until the commission by order or rule provides otherwise, it is unlawful for any corporation, company, or person owning or operating any railroad trains in the state to permit a standing train to obstruct any public highway, road, street, or other railroad crossing for more than ten (10) minutes.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2414.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Rules” for “Regulations” in the section heading and made similar changes in (a)(1) and (b).
23-12-1008. Unlawful delay — Action on complaint.
-
-
- Prior to any request by a state, municipal, or county official for sanctions against a railroad company for violation of this section and §§ 23-12-1006 and 23-12-1007, the state, municipal, or county official shall state the claim or complaint in writing, by certified mail, to the registered agent of the railroad company in question.
-
- Within forty-five (45) days after the receipt of the written claim or complaint by the railroad company, the railroad company shall respond to the claim or complaint stating with specificity the reasons for obstructing a crossing for an unlawful period of time.
- This response shall be in writing to the complaining official by certified mail.
-
- In the event the issue is not then resolved to the satisfaction of the complaining official, the official shall notify the State Highway Commission in writing and shall enclose a copy of the complaint and response.
-
- Within sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice, the commission shall hold a hearing on the complaint.
- Notice of the hearing shall be given the railroad and the complainant at least twenty (20) days before the hearing.
- The commission or its designated representative, after an appropriate notice and hearing on the complaint, shall determine whether the obstruction was for an unlawful period of time under the circumstances.
-
- If the commission makes such a finding of unlawful delay based on information presented at a hearing before the commission or before its designated representative, the railroad company charged with the violation shall be subject to a penalty to be imposed by the commission of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) per occurrence.
-
- The decision of the commission may be appealed to the circuit court of the county in which the violation occurred at any time within thirty (30) days after the decision is rendered.
- Provided, the decision of the commission shall be final unless appealed as authorized herein.
-
- After the initial ten-minute period or such other period as may be prescribed by rule of the commission, each ten-minute period or other period as may be prescribed by rule of the commission that the crossing is obstructed by a standing train shall constitute a separate offense, and penalties may be imposed accordingly.
-
- If the crossing where a violation occurs is located within the boundaries of a city or town, one-half (½) of the moneys recovered under the provisions of this section and §§ 23-12-1006 and 23-12-1007 shall be placed in the general fund or street fund of the municipality and one-half (½) of the funds shall be placed in the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund.
- All other moneys recovered under the provisions of this section shall be divided equally between the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund and the general road fund of the county in which the violation occurred.
History. Acts 1993, No. 726, § 4; 1995, No. 668, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2415.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (b) twice.
Chapter 13 Motor Carriers
Research References
ALR.
Carrier's public duty exception to absolute or strict liability arising out of carriage of hazardous substances. 31 A.L.R.4th 658.
Measure and elements of damages or compensation for condemnation of public transportation system. 35 A.L.R.4th 1263.
Provision of transportation services, by party not in that business, as common carriage subject to regulation by state regulatory control. 87 A.L.R.4th 638.
Recovery of punitive damages for injuries resulting from transport, handling, and storage of toxic or hazardous substances. 39 A.L.R.5th 763.
Validity, construction, and application of state statute giving carrier lien of goods for transportation and incidental storage charges. 45 A.L.R.5th 227.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1927, No. 99, § 14: Mar. 4, 1927. Emergency clause provided: “There being no adequate provisions of law for the regulation and control of the persons, corporations and associations coming within the provisions of this Act, and this Act being deemed of immediate importance and emergency existing within the meaning of the Constitution, therefore, this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1929, No. 62, § 12: approved Feb. 27, 1929. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby ascertained and declared that many motor vehicles now being operated for hire are not subject to the provision of existing statutes and that the operation of such vehicles without proper regulation is a menace to the traveling public and to all who patronize such vehicles, therefore, the immediate operation of this act is essential for the safety, protection and convenience of the people and an emergency is declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 2015, No. 572, § 2: Mar. 20, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that motor carriers are often required to sign or accept transportation contracts that require motor carriers or their insurers to indemnify one (1) or more parties or third-party beneficiaries to the transportation contract for negligent, reckless, intentional, malicious, willful, or wanton acts or omissions regardless of which entity is actually at fault or otherwise responsible; that while indemnity agreements involving motor carriers are compatible with public policy in many contexts, clarification of the law by this act is necessary to ensure that motor carriers are not forced to assume liabilities for actions over which they have little or no control; that the indemnity provisions prohibited by this act violate public policy because they eliminate the incentive for the indemnitee to take reasonable precautions to avert risky behavior that may lead to accidents or other losses; and that this act is immediately necessary because these indemnity provisions are causing hardship to the motor carrier industry and threatening the safety of workers associated with or affected by the motor carrier industry by forcing motor carriers to assume contractual responsibility for acts or omissions over which they have little or no control and by discouraging safe practices by the entities that contract with motor carriers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-13-101. Use of motor carrier safety improvement — Worker status unchanged — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
-
“Motor carrier safety improvement” means any device, equipment, software, technology, procedure, training, policy, program, or operational practice intended and primarily used to improve or facilitate:
- Compliance with traffic safety or motor carrier safety laws;
- Motor vehicle safety;
- The safety of an operator of a motor vehicle; or
- The safety of a third-party public roadway user; and
- “Worker status” means the classification under any state law of a motor vehicle driver who engages in the transportation of property for compensation as an agent, employee, jointly employed employee, borrowed servant, or independent contractor for a motor carrier.
-
“Motor carrier safety improvement” means any device, equipment, software, technology, procedure, training, policy, program, or operational practice intended and primarily used to improve or facilitate:
- The deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement by, or as required by, a motor carrier or its related entity, including by contract, does not, in whole or in part, affect, impact, or change the worker status of a driver.
History. Acts 2019, No. 782, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. Former § 23-13-101, concerning hours of duty and rest period of drivers, penalties, and exceptions, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1691, § 1. The section was derived from Acts 1931, No. 157, §§ 1-3; Pope's Dig., §§ 3450-3452; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1744 — 73-1746; Acts 1993, No. 1212, § 1.
23-13-102. Inspection of licensees — Employment of inspectors — Restraining operations.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall have the right to employ one (1) or more inspectors as may be needed for the purpose of making inspections of licensees from time to time.
- If any person, firm, or corporation is operating without complying with the provisions of this act, then the Attorney General or any interested party may institute suit in any circuit court where service on the defendant may be had, restraining the further operation of motor vehicles by the person, firm, or corporation until the provisions of this act are complied with.
- Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to relieve any motor vehicle carrier from any rule imposed by law or lawful authority.
History. Acts 1927, No. 99, §§ 11, 13; Pope's Dig., § 2029; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1728, 73-1728n; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 182; 2019, No. 315, § 2416.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1927, No. 99 has been repealed or superseded with the exception of this section. However, Acts 1955, No. 397, § 28, specifically provided that the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act is cumulative to this section.
Case Notes
Cited: Messina v. Galutza, 178 Ark. 608, 11 S.W.2d 468 (1928).
23-13-103. Municipalities may not tax.
No city or town shall impose any tax or license upon any motor vehicle carrier licensed under the provisions of this act.
History. Acts 1929, No. 62, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1729.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1929, No. 62, § 11, provided, in part, that nothing contained in this section would be construed to relieve any motor vehicle carrier from any regulation imposed by law or lawful authority.
Acts 1955, No. 397, § 28, provided, in part, that subchapter 2 of this chapter would be cumulative to the provisions of this section.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1929, No. 62, has been repealed or rendered obsolete with the exception of this section. However, Acts 1955, No. 397, § 28, specifically provided that the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act is cumulative to this section.
Cross References. Motor carriers, authority of municipalities to tax and regulate, § 14-57-201.
Case Notes
Effect on Cities.
Cities are forbidden to charge a license fee on vehicles owned by a licensed carrier. City of Little Rock v. Black Motor Lines, 208 Ark. 498, 186 S.W.2d 665 (1945).
23-13-104. Notice of cancellation or termination of insurance policy on leased motor vehicles.
Prior to the cancellation or termination of any liability, cargo, or property and casualty insurance policies issued on leased motor carriers, particularly motor carriers using tractor-trailor rigs, notice of the cancellation or termination shall be mailed or delivered by the insurer to the named insured, to any lienholder or loss payee named in the policy, and to any lessee registered with the insurer.
History. Acts 1989, No. 646, § 1.
23-13-105. Certain indemnity provisions void — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “Gas” means all natural gas, including casing-head gas and all other hydrocarbons not defined as oil in this section;
-
“Motor carrier” means:
- An individual or entity that is engaged in the transportation of property for compensation by motor vehicle; and
- An agent, employee, servant, or independent contractor of the individual or entity described in subdivision (a)(2)(A) of this section;
-
“Motor carrier transportation contract” means an express or implied contract, agreement, or understanding entered into, renewed, modified, or extended on or after March 20, 2015, that covers:
- Transportation of property for compensation or hire by a motor carrier;
- Entrance on property by the motor carrier for the purpose of loading, unloading, delivering, or transporting property for compensation or hire; or
- Services that are incidental to an activity described in subdivision (a)(3)(A) or subdivision (a)(3)(B) of this section, including without limitation brokerage services or the storage of property;
- “Oil” means crude petroleum oil and other hydrocarbons, regardless of gravity, which are produced at the well in liquid form by ordinary production methods and which are not the result of condensation of gas after it leaves the reservoir;
- “Operator” means the person who has the right as an owner or by agreement with an owner to enter upon the lands of another for the purposes of exploring, drilling, and developing for the production of brine, oil, gas, and all other petroleum hydrocarbons;
- “Person” means an individual, corporation, association, partnership, receiver, trustee, guardian, executor, administrator, fiduciary, federal agency, or representative of any kind; and
- “Promisee” means the promisee specified in the motor carrier transportation contract and each agent, employee, servant, and independent contractor directly responsible to the specified promisee.
- A provision, clause, covenant, or agreement contained in, collateral to, or affecting a motor carrier transportation contract to be performed all or in part in Arkansas that purports to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless, or that has the effect of indemnifying, defending, or holding harmless, the promisee from or against any liability for loss or damage resulting from the negligent, reckless, intentional, malicious, willful, or wanton acts or omissions of the promisee is against the public policy of the State of Arkansas and is void and unenforceable.
-
This section does not apply to:
- The Uniform Intermodal Interchange and Facilities Access Agreement administered by the Intermodal Association of North America or other agreements providing for the interchange, use, or possession of intermodal chassis or other intermodal equipment;
- A contract of insurance between a motor carrier and its insurance carrier;
-
An indemnity clause entered into as part of a settlement agreement in which a motor carrier and any of its agents, employees, contractors, affiliates, assigns, and insurers are to be indemnified, defended, or otherwise held harmless as to any pending or future claim of:
- Another party to or a third-party beneficiary of the settlement agreement; or
- A lienholder, alleged tortfeasor, or other allegedly responsible party; or
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (c)(4)(B) of this section, the provision of work or services of any kind to an operator or other person directly related to activities or operations stemming from the exploration, production, processing, gathering, or movement of oil or gas, including without limitation the hauling, movement, or transportation of people, oil, gas, goods, supplies, equipment, facilities, structures, water, fluids, chemicals, waste, or other materials on or off one (1) or more sites where any exploration or production operations have been, are, or will be occurring.
- The activities and operations described in subdivision (c)(4)(A) of this section shall not include the transportation by motor carrier of refined petroleum products for purposes unrelated to the exploration, drilling, or production of oil or gas.
- Notwithstanding any choice-of-law provision to the contrary, the law of Arkansas relating to indemnity as embodied in this section shall apply to and govern every motor carrier transportation contract to be performed all or in part within the State of Arkansas.
History. Acts 2015, No. 572, § 1.
Subchapter 2 — Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, 1955
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 28, provided, in part, that this subchapter would be cumulative to the provisions of §§ 23-13-102, 23-13-103 and 23-13-301 — 23-13-310, and amendatory to Acts 1941, No. 367 (superseded). The section further provided that any and all rights or privileges granted or obtained pursuant to Acts 1941, No. 367 (superseded) or any acts predecessor thereto and which were in full force and effect on March 29, 1955 shall be preserved and maintained.
The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23 and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No 153, §§ 2, 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Cross References. Licenses and permits, removal of disqualification for criminal offenses, § 17-1-103.
Preambles. Acts 1957, No. 343 contained a preamble which read:
“Whereas, Act 213 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1953 provides in substance that an applicant for a motor vehicle license in Arkansas must submit a receipt or statement by the tax collector from the county or counties in which his property is located that all taxes due on personal property owned by the applicant have been paid and that upon failure to submit such evidence, no motor vehicle license shall be issued until taxes are paid; and
“Whereas, many out-of-state motor carriers engaged in interstate transportation of property and/or passengers over Arkansas highways, assessed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission under provisions of Sections 84-601, 84-602, 84-603, 84-604, 84-605, 84-606 and 84-610, Arkansas Statutes, 1947, Annotated, fail or refuse to pay the Commissioner of Revenues of Arkansas the ad valorem tax on the assessed value of the carrier operating property in Arkansas as found and fixed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission; and
“Whereas, such failure or refusal of those out-of-state carriers to pay their fair share of the ad valorem tax is inequitable and unfair to regulated motor carriers domiciled in Arkansas who must have a certificate showing that they have paid all taxes due and payable on all personal property in Arkansas before a motor vehicle license can be issued;
“Now, therefore….”
Acts 1963, No. 89 contained a preamble which read:
“Whereas, it is desirable to more clearly define the status of certain motor carriers operating under certificates of convenience and necessity of the Arkansas Commerce Commission in territory subsequently annexed by municipalities;
“Now, therefore….”
Effective Dates. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 29: Mar. 29, 1955. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and declared that present laws regulating motor carriers are inadequate to protect the public interest and to preserve an adequate public transportation system, so that this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act shall take effect on its passage and approval.”
Acts 1957, No. 343, § 4: approved Mar. 27, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that an immediate need exists for improved methods of tax collection from certain motor carriers; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1961, No. 191, § 3: Mar. 7, 1961. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and declared that present laws limiting the number of contracts which are permitted for contract carriers and failing to limit the total mileage for operation of contract carriers are inadequate to protect the public interest and to preserve an adequate public transportation system, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act shall take effect on its passage and approval.”
Acts 1963, No. 89, § 3: Feb. 27, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the laws of this State are not clear with respect to the operation of motor vehicles under certificates of convenience and necessity of the Arkansas Commerce Commission in territory subsequently annexed by municipalities, and that immediate clarification of said act is necessary in order to prevent irreparable harm to carriers operating under such certificates of convenience and necessity. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1971, No. 175, § 4: Feb. 26, 1971. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that haulers of gravel, rock, dirt, processed asphalt, rip-rap, quarried stone, crushed stone and similar materials are currently covered by the Motor Carrier Act, and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the status of haulers of such materials under the Motor Carrier Act. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 468, § 2: Mar. 17, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the present law prescribing application fees for motor carriers engaged in interstate commerce is in conflict with regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission, and that there is an urgent need to comply with laws of the United States of America. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 565, § 8: July 1, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Fourth General Assembly that the annual assessment fees, miscellaneous fees, permit fees, penalties and fines collected as provided by law by the Arkansas Transportation Commission in performance of its regulatory duties should properly be designated as general revenues of the State of Arkansas and that delay in effecting such designation would jeopardize the continued financial support of necessary State services. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety is hereby declared to be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1983.”
Acts 1985 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 23, § 3 and No. 29, § 3: June 26, 1985. Emergency clauses provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that Act 438 of 1985 amended Section 1 of Act 74 of 1983 to exempt from the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act of 1955 the transportation of petroleum products and ethylene glycol antifreeze by Arkansas companies using vehicles licensed in the State of Arkansas; that the Act is subject to litigation based on its application to Arkansas companies only; that in order to assure the validity of Act 438 of 1985 this Act amends Section 1 of Act 74 of 1983 to eliminate the limitation that its exemptions apply only to Arkansas companies; and that since the validity of Act 438 of 1985 will remain in doubt until this Act goes into effect this Act should be given immediate effect. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1991, No. 33, § 5: July 1, 1991. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Eighth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that subdivision (a)(3) of Arkansas Code 23-13-206 is incompatible with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; that unless subdivision (a)(3) of Arkansas Code 23-13-206 is amended, the federal funds received by the State for highway safety programs of this State will be in jeopardy; that such federal funds are essential to the highway safety programs of this State, in particular federal funds received by the State under the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) which funds are utilized in assisting the monitoring and enforcement of the safety of trucks on this State's highways, roads, and streets; and that in the event of an extension of the Regular Session, the delay in the effective date of this act beyond July 1, 1991, could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of this essential highway safety program. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991.”
Acts 1991, No. 297, § 5: July 1, 1991. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Eighth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that Arkansas Code § 23-13-255 is incompatible with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; that unless Arkansas Code § 23-13-255 is amended, the federal funds received by the State for highway safety programs of this State will be in jeopardy; that such federal funds are essential to the highway safety programs of this State, in particular federal funds received by the State under the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) which funds are utilized in assisting the monitoring and enforcement of the safety of trucks on this State's highways, roads, and streets; and that in the event of an extension of the Regular Session, the delay in the effective date of this act beyond July 1, 1991, could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of this essential highway safety program. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1991.”
Acts 1992 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 35, § 5: Mar. 10, 1992. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act is necessary to conform Arkansas Code Annotated § 23-13-232(c) to the federal bankruptcy laws because it does not contain an exceptive provision for circumstances where the interstate authority is being transferred by a common carrier that has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws and is subject to constitutional challenge. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 1022, § 5: Apr. 12, 1993. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Ninth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the amendments contained in this Act providing fines for operators of certain motor vehicles convicted of possession or use of any “Controlled Substance” or any intoxicating liquor while operating such vehicles are necessary for the purposes of ensuring that this State law is compatible with federal laws and regulations concerning motor carrier safety and only by the immediate effectiveness of this Act may such compatibility be expeditiously accomplished. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 1027, § 4: Oct. 1, 1993.
Acts 1995, No. 746, § 7: Mar. 23, 1995. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eightieth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the U. S. Congress through its passage of P.L. 103-305 has largely pre-empted state regulation of intrastate transportation of property with regard to prices, routes, and services; that Congress through its passage of P.L. 103-311 has pre-empted state regulation of intrastate fares for the transportation of passengers by bus by the interstate motor carriers of passengers over a route authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission; that this federal pre-emption eliminated the asset value of any certificates of authority or permits held by certain types of motor carriers on December 31, 1994; that certain regulatory functions such as insurance requirements, financial fitness, and safety of operations were not pre-empted; and that since the passage of these federal laws, there has been much confusion and misunderstanding among the motor carriers as to those matters pre-empted from regulation by the state of Arkansas and to those matters not pre-empted. Therefore, in order to eliminate the confusion and misunderstanding of the intrastate regulation as soon as possible, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1997, No. 1026, § 6: Apr. 2, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that confusion and disagreement have arisen regarding the enforcement of the safety of operation and equipment regulations of the State Highway Commission with regard to the presentation of certain documents by operators of heavy commercial vehicles and the authority of the enforcement officers of the Commission to place out of service drivers who have either refused to present the required documents or have exceeded the maximum amount of driving time, without any type of rest, in violation of such rules and regulations and, consequently, unless placed out of service at that time, creating an extreme safety hazard to the traveling public; and that it is the purpose of this act to clarify the law to insure that this safety hazard is prevented and that until this act becomes effective such confusion may continue to arise. Additionally, it is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the owners and operators of certain types of equipment, which equipment is moved on the highways under special permit from the State Highway Commission generally in a limited number of counties for special uses, are frequently unable to cross county lines, even for a short distance, without procuring an additional permit from that Commission; that there are times when this has created a hardship to the welfare of the citizens of the state, particularly after the onset of severe storms or other disaster; that until this act becomes effective such hardship will continue to exist and it is the intent of this act to abate such hardships. It is further found and determined by the General Assembly that only by the immediate effectiveness of this act may such problems be solved or abated. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 1117, § 4: Apr. 7, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that requiring a motor carrier or broker to report annually to the Arkansas Highway Commission creates an unjustified burden on the motor carrier or broker operating in the State of Arkansas; that other provisions of Arkansas law require a motor carrier or broker to report annually to other authorities; and that this act is immediately necessary because these dual reporting requirements are duplicative and need to be eliminated to reduce the duplication of government efforts. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 1121, § 2: Apr. 7, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that enforcement officers of the Arkansas Highway Commission are required to enforce the federal motor carrier safety laws and the rules and regulations of the Arkansas Highway Commission with respect to motor carrier safety of operations and equipment; that the enforcement officers must have the authority to stop and require the drivers of commercial vehicles to exhibit and submit for inspection all documents required to be carried in vehicles engaged in interstate or intrastate commerce, including bills of lading, waybills, invoices, or other evidences of the character of the lading being transported in those vehicles; and that this act is immediately necessary because that authority is lacking in current law. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2007, No. 232, § 4: Mar. 9, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that in August 2005 the United States Congress enacted the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005; that the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005 is to replace the single state registration program on or before January 1, 2007; that the deadline has passed and Arkansas has not yet had an opportunity to respond to this law due to its biennial legislative sessions; and that there is an immediate need for implementation of the provisions of this act to ensure that Arkansas is in compliance with the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005 to prevent the loss of funding. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Motor Carriers, 7 Ark. L. Rev. 369.
Case Notes
Compliance.
The Motor Carrier Act is not essentially a criminal law; its violations are punishable either by civil penalties or by fines for misdemeanors only. Carroll v. State, 276 Ark. 160, 634 S.W.2d 99 (1982).
Cited: Southwestern Transp. Co. v. King, 240 Ark. 309, 399 S.W.2d 276 (1966); Wallis v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Co., 261 Ark. 622, 550 S.W.2d 453 (1977); Mack v. Wilkerson, 304 Ark. 114, 801 S.W.2d 26 (1990).
23-13-201. Title.
This subchapter may be cited as the “Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, 1955”.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1754.
Case Notes
Cited: Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-202. Purpose.
It is declared that it is necessary in the public interest to regulate transportation by motor carriers in such manner as to:
- Recognize and preserve the inherent advantages of and foster sound economic conditions in such transportation and among such carriers;
- Promote adequate, economical, and efficient service by motor carriers and reasonable charges therefor, without unjust discriminations, undue preferences or advantages, and unfair or destructive competitive practices;
- Develop and preserve a highway transportation system properly adapted to the needs of the commerce of the State of Arkansas and the national defense; and
- Cooperate with the United States Government, other departments of the State of Arkansas, regulatory bodies of other states and the duly authorized officials thereof, and with any organization of motor carriers in the administration and enforcement of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1755.
Case Notes
Compliance.
Where only one of carriers, protesting issuance of certificate of public convenience and necessity to another carrier, served area in which service was authorized under certificate and the one carrier who served that area did not serve the entire area, issuance of such certificate was not contrary to this section. Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956).
Cited: Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-203. Definitions.
-
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Broker” means any person not included in the term “motor carrier” and not a bona fide employee or agent of any motor carrier. A “broker”, as principal or agent, sells or offers for sale any transportation subject to this subchapter, or negotiates for, or holds himself or herself or itself out by solicitation, advertisement, or otherwise as one who sells, provides, furnishes, contracts, or arranges for such transportation;
- “Certificate” means a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under authority of the laws of the State of Arkansas to common carriers by motor vehicle;
- “Commercial zone” means any municipality within this state together with that area outside the corporate limits of any municipality which is prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished] as a commercial zone;
- “Common carrier by motor vehicle” means any person who or which undertakes, whether directly or indirectly, or by lease of equipment or franchise rights, or any other arrangement, to transport passengers or property or any classes of property for the general public by motor vehicle for compensation whether over regular or irregular routes;
- “Contract carrier by motor vehicle” means any person not a common carrier included under subdivision (a)(4) of this section who or which, under individual contracts or agreements, and whether directly or indirectly or by lease of equipment or franchise rights or any other arrangements, transports passengers or property by motor vehicle for compensation;
- [Repealed.]
- “Highway” means the public roads, highways, streets, and ways in the State of Arkansas;
-
-
“Household goods carrier” means any motor carrier transporting:
- Personal effects and property used or to be used in a dwelling when it is a part of the equipment or supply of the dwelling;
- Furniture, fixtures, equipment, and the property of stores, offices, museums, institutions, hospitals, or other establishments when they are a part of the stock, equipment, or supply of the stores, offices, museums, institutions, hospitals, or other establishments; and
- Articles, including objects of art, displays and exhibits, voting machines and tabulating machines, including the auxiliary machines or component parts as are necessary to the performance of a complete tabulating process, including, but not limited to, punches, sorters, computers, verifiers, collators, reproducers, interpreters, multipliers, wiring units, and control panels and spare parts therefor, which because of the unusual nature or value require specialized handling and equipment usually employed in moving household goods.
-
- The household goods carriers shall continue to be regulated by the Arkansas Department of Transportation in accordance with this subchapter and all rules made and promulgated by the department.
- Provided, a household goods carrier upon application with the department shall not be required to prove that the proposed services or operations are required by the present or future public convenience and necessity, nor shall the rates of such household goods carriers be subject to regulation by the department;
-
“Household goods carrier” means any motor carrier transporting:
- “Interested parties” includes, in all cases, all carriers operating over the routes or any part thereof or in the territory involved in any application for a certificate of convenience and necessity or a permit, or any application to file or change any schedule or rates, charges, fares, or any rule or practice, and such other parties as the department may deem interested in the particular matter;
- “Irregular route” means that the route to be used by a motor carrier is not restricted to any specific highways within the area the motor carrier is authorized to serve;
- “Lease” means, as used in connection with the term “motor vehicle”, the rental of a motor vehicle by a lessor to a lessee, except to an authorized carrier, with nothing furnished except necessary maintenance;
- “License” means a license issued under this subchapter to a broker;
- “Motor carrier” includes both a common carrier by motor vehicle and a contract carrier by motor vehicle and any person performing for-hire transportation service without authority from the department;
- “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used upon the highways in the transportation of passengers or property or any combination thereof determined by the department, but it does not include any vehicle, locomotive, or car operated exclusively on rails;
- “Occasional” means the transportation of persons or property where an emergency exists at the time or place and no authorized service is immediately available;
- “Permit” means a permit issued under authority of the laws of the State of Arkansas to contract carriers by motor vehicle;
- “Person” means any individual, firm, copartnership, corporation, company, association, or joint-stock association and includes any trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal representative thereof;
- “Private carrier” means any person engaged in the transportation by motor vehicle upon public highways of persons or property, or both, but not as a common carrier by motor vehicle or a contract carrier by motor vehicle and includes any person who transports property by motor vehicle, where the transportation is incidental to or in furtherance of any commercial enterprise of the person, which enterprise is one other than transportation; and
- “Regular route” means a fixed, specific, and determined course to be traveled by a motor carrier's vehicles rendering service to, from, or between various points, localities, or municipalities in this state.
- The “services” and “transportation” to which this subchapter applies includes all vehicles operated by, for, or in the interest of any motor carrier irrespective of ownership or of contract, express or implied, together with all facilities and property operated or controlled by any such carrier and used in the transportation of passengers or property or in the performance of any service in connection therewith.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1758; Acts 1995, No. 746, § 2; 2017, No. 707, § 183; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2417, 2418.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (a)(6).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a)(8)(B)(i); and deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (a)(9).
Case Notes
Brokers.
The term “broker” does not apply to the casual operator of a motor car who arranges with a passenger for transportation, but if he brings the two together and they make the arrangement for transportation, he is a broker. Duck v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 203 Ark. 488, 158 S.W.2d 24, appeal dismissed, 316 U.S. 641, 62 S. Ct. 946, 86 L. Ed. 1727 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Common Carriers.
Motorbus operated over state highway for compensation was a common carrier. Morgan v. Fielder, 194 Ark. 719, 109 S.W.2d 922 (1937) (decision under prior law).
One who operated a vehicle regularly over a designated route and who incidentally accepted passengers and exacted compensation for transporting them was a common carrier. Kelly v. State, 197 Ark. 1175, 128 S.W.2d 265 (1939) (decision under prior law).
Truck transportation company which was to carry less than carload lots of freight and merchandise for a particular railroad with which it had a contract was a common carrier and not a contract carrier. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Search of the cargo of defendant's commercial truck pursuant to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act did not violate the Fourth Amendment because warrantless inspections of commercial trucks advanced a substantial governmental interest and were necessary, and the Act provided a permissible warrant substitute as its reach was limited to certain commercial vehicles under this section and §§ 23-13-204 and 23-13-206; it provided notice to commercial truck drivers of the possibility of a roadside inspection by a designated enforcement officer under § 23-13-217; it limited the scope of the enforcement officers' inspections to an examination solely for regulatory compliance under § 23-13-217(c)(1), (c)(1)(B); and although the Act did not designate specific times when the enforcement officers could conduct inspections, such a limitation would render the entire inspection scheme unworkable and meaningless. United States v. Ruiz, 569 F.3d 355 (8th Cir. 2009).
Contract Carriers.
Where driver-owners leased trucks to one engaged in business of leasing trucks to industrial concerns under agreement, which provided that owners were to drive trucks for industrial concerns, driver-owners were contract carriers within the meaning of this section. Public Serv. Comm'n v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 219 Ark. 553, 244 S.W.2d 147 (1951), aff'd, 344 U.S. 157, 73 S. Ct. 204, 97 L. Ed. 168 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Where equipment lease agreement between furniture manufacturing company as lessee and nonresident owner and operator as lessor provided for payment on mileage basis that truck-tractor was used in lessee's business, costs of operation or any damages to be borne by lessor, with lessee having the right to designate routes, the lessor was a contract carrier and not a private carrier and was required to hold a permit or a certificate of convenience and necessity from Arkansas Public Service Commission. Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 988, 77 S. Ct. 1282, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1142 (1957).
In a decision under former A.S.A. § 73-1758, an interstate carrier of livestock, who hauled exclusively for one company, qualified as a contract carrier subject to Arkansas motor carrier law. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. States, 940 F.2d 1179 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1032, 112 S. Ct. 874, 116 L. Ed. 2d 778 (1992).
Private Carrier.
Hotel van used to transport hotel guests to a nearby restaurant was a private carrier within the meaning of subdivision (a)(18) of this section, not a common carrier as defined in subdivision (a)(5), and the driver of the van had not breached the duty of ordinary care due passengers of a common carrier by parking the van away from the curb outside the restaurant or by failing to assist the guest in alighting from the van. Crenshaw v. Doubletree Corp., 81 Ark. App. 157, 98 S.W.3d 836 (2003).
Public Carriers.
Public carrier was defined to include taxicabs, drays and ambulances. Merchants Transf. & Whse. Co. v. Gates, 180 Ark. 96, 21 S.W.2d 406 (1929) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Home Ins. Co. v. Covington, 255 Ark. 409, 501 S.W.2d 219 (1973); Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986); Transport Co. v. Champion Transp., Inc., 298 Ark. 178, 766 S.W.2d 16 (1989).
23-13-204. Applicability of subchapter.
- The provisions of this subchapter, except as specifically limited in this subchapter, shall apply to the transportation of passengers or property by motor carriers over public highways of this state and the procurement of, and provisions of, facilities for such transportation.
- Provided, nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed to authorize the regulation of intrastate fares for the transportation of passengers by bus by an interstate motor carrier of passengers over any routes authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished].
- Provided, further, nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed to abrogate the laws of this state or any authority of the State Highway Commission with regard to the routing of hazardous materials.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1756; Acts 1995, No. 746, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Search of the cargo of defendant's commercial truck pursuant to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act did not violate the Fourth Amendment because warrantless inspections of commercial trucks advanced a substantial governmental interest and were necessary, and the Act provided a permissible warrant substitute as its reach was limited to certain commercial vehicles under this section and §§ 23-13-203 and 23-13-206; it provided notice to commercial truck drivers of the possibility of a roadside inspection by a designated enforcement officer under § 23-13-217; it limited the scope of the enforcement officers' inspections to an examination solely for regulatory compliance under § 23-13-217(c)(1) and (c)(1)(B); and although the Act did not designate specific times when the enforcement officers could conduct inspections, such a limitation would render the entire inspection scheme unworkable and meaningless. United States v. Ruiz, 569 F.3d 355 (8th Cir. 2009).
Cited: Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-205. Interstate commerce unaffected by subchapter.
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to interfere with the exercise by agencies of the United States Government of its power of regulation of interstate commerce.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1757.
23-13-206. Exemptions.
-
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to include:
-
-
Motor vehicles:
- Employed solely in transporting schoolchildren and teachers to or from school; and
-
Used in carrying:
- Set-up houses;
- Ordinary livestock;
- Unprocessed fish, including shellfish;
- Unprocessed agricultural commodities;
- Baled cotton;
- Cottonseed;
- Cottonseed meal;
- Cottonseed hulls;
- Cottonseed cake;
- Rice hulls;
- Rice bran;
- Rice mill feed;
- Rice mill screenings;
- Soybean meal; and
- Commercial fertilizer, but not including the component parts used in the manufacture thereof.
- However, carriers of such exempt commodities and passengers shall be subject to safety of operation and equipment standards provisions prescribed or hereafter prescribed by the State Highway Commission.
- Additionally, for-hire carriers of such exempt commodities shall file with the commission evidence of security for the protection of the public in the same amount and to the same extent as nonexempt carriers, as provided in § 23-13-227;
-
Motor vehicles:
-
- Taxicabs or other motor vehicles performing a bona fide taxicab service.
- “Bona fide taxicab service”, as employed in this section, means and refers only to service rendered by motor-driven vehicles having a seating capacity not in excess of six (6) passengers and used for the transportation of persons for hire, which vehicles are owned and operated by a person, firm, or corporation authorized by the governing authorities of municipalities to conduct a taxicab business over or upon the streets and public ways;
- Any private carrier of property and motor vehicles employed in the hauling of gravel, rock, dirt, bituminous mix materials, riprap, quarried stone, crushed stone, and similar materials, and any movements and services performed by wreckers and wrecker services. Provided, all of the above private carriers, motor vehicles, and wrecker and wrecker services shall be subject to the provisions prescribed, including all rules made and promulgated pursuant to this subchapter, with respect to safety of operation and equipment standards;
-
Trolley buses operated by electric power or other buses furnishing local passenger transportation similar to street railway service, unless and to the extent that the commission shall from time to time find that such an application is necessary to carry out the policy of this subchapter as to safety of operation or standards of equipment, apply to:
-
- The transportation of passengers or property wholly within a municipality or between contiguous municipalities or within a commercial zone, as defined in § 23-13-203, adjacent to, and commercially a part of, any such municipalities, except when the transportation is under a common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage, or shipment to or from a point outside such municipalities or zone, and provided that the motor carrier engaged in such transportation of passengers over regular or irregular routes is also lawfully engaged in the intrastate transportation of passengers over the entire length of the routes in accordance with the laws of this state.
- The rights, duties, and privileges of any motor carrier previously granted a certificate of convenience and necessity by the commission to operate in, through, to, or from municipalities or in, through, to, or from a commercial zone or territory contiguous to a municipality shall not be impaired or abridged by reason of the subsequent annexation of the municipality or territory by another municipality, and any such motor carrier shall remain subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and control of the commission; or
-
The occasional or reciprocal transportation of passengers or property for compensation:
- By any person not engaged in transportation by motor vehicle as a regular occupation or business, except when such transportation is sold, offered for sale, provided, procured, or furnished or arranged for;
- By any person who holds himself or herself or itself out as one who sells or offers for sale transportation wholly or partially subject to this subchapter, or negotiates for, or holds himself or herself or itself out, by solicitation, advertisements, or otherwise, as one who sells, provides, furnishes, contracts, or arranges for such transportation; or
- By any person or his or her or its agent, servant, or employee who regularly engages in the exempt transportation of passengers for hire;
-
- Motor vehicles controlled and operated by an agricultural cooperative association as defined in § 2-2-101 et seq. and §§ 2-2-201, 2-2-202, and 2-2-401 — 2-2-428 or any similar act of another state or by the United States Agricultural Marketing Act, as amended, or by a federation of such cooperative associations, if the federation possesses no greater powers or purposes than cooperative associations so defined;
- Motor carriers of property, except household goods carriers. Provided, the motor carriers of property shall be subject to all safety of operation and equipment standards provisions prescribed by the commission. Provided, further, all motor carriers of property shall be subject to the provisions of §§ 23-13-252 and 23-13-265 and all rules and regulations made and promulgated by the commission with respect to financial fitness and insurance requirements;
-
- The transportation of passengers by private or public motor carrier either under contract or by cooperative agreement with the State of Arkansas when the transportation is provided exclusively in connection with, or as a result of, federally or state-funded assistance programs serving the public need.
- Provided, the motor carriers shall be subject to the provisions prescribed, including all rules made and promulgated pursuant to this subchapter, with respect to safety of operation and equipment standards; and
- The transportation of passengers in a private vehicle with a maximum seating capacity of fifteen (15) passengers, including the driver, provided the transportation is for the purposes of vanpooling or carpooling.
-
-
In addition, the following are declared to be exempt from this subchapter except to the extent that the vehicles transporting the following products shall be subject to the safety and equipment standards of the commission:
-
The transportation of live poultry, unmanufactured products of poultry, and related commodities. Poultry, unmanufactured products of poultry, and related commodities include the following:
- Additives, such as injected butter, gravy, seasoning, etc., in an amount not in excess of five percent (5%) by weight, sold in or along with uncooked poultry;
- Advertising matter, in reasonable amounts, transported along with poultry and poultry products;
- Blood of poultry from which corpuscles have been removed by centrifugal force;
-
Carcasses:
- Raw, in marble-size chunks;
- Cut up, raw;
- Cut up, precooked or cooked;
- Breaded or battered;
- Cut up, precooked or cooked, marinated, breaded, or battered;
- Deboned, cooked or uncooked; and
- Deboned, cooked or uncooked, in rolls or diced;
- Dinners, cooked;
- Dressed;
- Eggs, albumen, liquid;
- Eggs, albumen, liquid, pasteurized;
- Eggs, dried;
- Eggs, frozen;
- Eggs, liquid, whole or separated;
- Eggs, oiled;
- Eggs, omelet mix consisting of fresh broken eggs and milk with minute amounts of salt and pepper and seasoning, packaged;
- Eggs, powder, dried;
- Eggs, shelled;
- Eggs, whites;
- Eggs, whole, with added yolks, dried;
- Eggs, whole, with added yolks;
- Eggs, whole standardized by substraction of whites;
- Eggs, yolks, dried;
- Eggs, yolks, liquid;
- Eggs, yolks;
- Fat, as removed from poultry, not cooked;
- Feathers;
- Feathers, ground or feather meal;
- Feathers, ground, combined with dehydrated poultry offal;
- The transportation of livestock and poultry feed including all materials or supplementary substances necessary or useful to sustaining the life or promoting the growth of livestock or poultry, if such products, excluding products otherwise exempt under this section, are transported to a site of agricultural production or to a business enterprise engaged in the sale to agricultural producers of goods used in agricultural production;
- The transportation of sawdust, wood shavings, and wood chips; and
- The transportation of ethylene glycol antifreeze, gasoline, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, kerosene, aviation gasoline, and jet fuel.
-
The transportation of live poultry, unmanufactured products of poultry, and related commodities. Poultry, unmanufactured products of poultry, and related commodities include the following:
-
- Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, the transportation of passengers by motor vehicle shall continue to be regulated by the commission.
- Provided, a carrier of passengers, which carrier proposes strictly charter services or charter operations for the transportation of passengers, upon application with the commission, shall not be required to prove that the proposed charter services or charter operations are required by the present or future public convenience and necessity.
(AA) Offal, including blood and natural by-products of the killing and processing of poultry for market;
(BB) Picked;
(CC) Rolled in batter but uncooked;
(DD) Rolls, containing sectioned and deboned poultry, cooked;
(EE) Sticks, cooked;
(FF) Stuffed; and
(GG) Stuffing, packed with, but not in, bird;
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 5; 1963, No. 89, § 1; 1963, No. 220, § 1; 1971, No. 175, § 1; 1971, No. 335, § 1; 1983, No. 74, § 1; 1985, No. 438, § 1; 1985 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 23, § 1; 1985 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 29, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1758, 73-1758.1; Acts 1991, No. 33, § 1; 1991, No. 296, § 1; 1995, No. 746, § 2; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2419, 2420.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the second sentence of (a)(3) and in (a)(7)(B).
U.S. Code. The Agricultural Marketing Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1141 et seq.
Case Notes
Bus Lines.
Where a bus line operated on regular schedules between separate municipalities in the same county, they were not exempt from obtaining a “certificate of convenience and necessity.” Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd. v. White Bus Co., 213 Ark. 342, 210 S.W.2d 314 (1948) (decision under prior law).
Interstate Commerce.
Action of state commission in requiring owner-drivers of company shipping roofing products over highways of state to obtain permits did not impose a burden on interstate commerce. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Wood, 344 U.S. 157, 73 S. Ct. 204, 97 L. Ed. 168 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Search of the cargo of defendant's commercial truck pursuant to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act did not violate the Fourth Amendment because warrantless inspections of commercial trucks advanced a substantial governmental interest and were necessary, and the Act provided a permissible warrant substitute as its reach was limited to certain commercial vehicles under §§ 23-13-203, 23-13-204, and this section; it provided notice to commercial truck drivers of the possibility of a roadside inspection by a designated enforcement officer under § 23-13-217; it limited the scope of the enforcement officers' inspections to an examination solely for regulatory compliance under § 23-13-217(c)(1) and (c)(1)(B); and although the Act did not designate specific times when the enforcement officers could conduct inspections, such a limitation would render the entire inspection scheme unworkable and meaningless. United States v. Ruiz, 569 F.3d 355 (8th Cir. 2009).
Non-Fare Rides.
Former similar provisions were not intended to prevent owners of motor vehicles along a route from inviting and allowing their neighbors to ride with them, if no charge was made. R.K. Adams Bus Line v. Faulk, 202 Ark. 541, 150 S.W.2d 944 (1941) (decision under prior law).
Public Carriers.
Public carrier was defined to include taxicabs, drays and ambulances. Merchants Transf. & Whse. Co. v. Gates, 180 Ark. 96, 21 S.W.2d 406 (1929) (decision under prior law).
Taxicabs.
One operating a taxicab in a city who occasionally goes outside of the city to deliver passengers was not within the provisions of former similar act. State v. Haynes, 175 Ark. 645, 300 S.W. 380 (1927) (decision under prior law).
A taxicab driver could not be convicted for operating a taxi without a certificate for convenience because the Arkansas Public Service Commission had held that it was without jurisdiction to issue regulations with regard to taxicabs. Marshall v. State, 211 Ark. 380, 200 S.W.2d 491 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Zones Adjacent to City.
When the legislature referred to a “zone adjacent to and commercially a part” of a city, it meant that area lying immediately adjoining on all sides the corporate limits of such city and inhabited by people who trade and in most cases, work in such city, rather than an area that would include separate municipalities. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd. v. White Bus Co., 213 Ark. 342, 210 S.W.2d 314 (1948) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Home Ins. Co. v. Covington, 255 Ark. 409, 501 S.W.2d 219 (1973); Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-207. Regulation by department.
The regulation of the transportation of passengers or property by motor carriers over the public highways of this state, the procurement thereof, and the provisions of facilities is vested in the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1756; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 184.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment deleted “therefor” following “facilities”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986); Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. States, 940 F.2d 1179 (8th Cir. 1991).
23-13-208. General duties and powers of department.
It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation:
- To regulate common carriers by motor vehicle as provided in this subchapter. To that end, the department may establish reasonable requirements with respect to continuous and adequate service and transportation of baggage and express. It may establish reasonable requirements with respect to uniform systems of accounts, records, and reports, preservation of records, and safety of operation and equipment which shall conform as nearly as may be consistent with the public interest to the systems of accounts, records, and reports and the requirements as to the preservation of records and safety of operation and equipment now prescribed or which from time to time may be prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished] for common carriers by motor vehicles engaged in interstate or foreign commerce;
- To regulate contract carriers by motor vehicle as prescribed by this subchapter. To that end, the department may establish reasonable requirements with respect to uniform systems of accounts, records, and reports, preservation of records, and safety of operation and equipment now prescribed or which may from time to time be prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission [abolished] for contract carriers by motor vehicles engaged in interstate or foreign commerce;
- To regulate private carriers, as defined in this subchapter, with respect to safety of their operations and equipment;
- To regulate brokers as provided in this subchapter. To that end, the department may establish reasonable requirements with respect to licensing, financial responsibility, accounts, records, reports, operations, and practices of any such persons;
- To avail itself of the assistance of any of the several research agencies of the United States Government and of any agency of this state having special knowledge of any such matter, for the purpose of carrying out the provisions pertaining to safety;
- To administer, execute, and enforce all other provisions of this subchapter, to make all necessary orders in connection therewith, and to prescribe rules and procedures for such administration; and
- Upon complaint in writing to the department by any person, state board, organization, or body politic, or upon the department's own initiative without complaint, to investigate whether any motor carrier or broker has failed to comply with any provisions of this subchapter or with any requirements thereof. If the department finds upon investigation that the motor carrier or broker has failed to comply therewith, the department shall issue appropriate order to compel the carrier or broker to comply therewith. Whenever the department is of the opinion that any complaint does not state reasonable grounds for investigation and action on its part, it may dismiss that complaint.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1759; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 185; 2019, No. 315, § 2421.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (6).
Case Notes
Jurisdiction.
Commission had jurisdiction to regulate common carriers, but not private carriers. Mason v. Intercity Term. Ry., 158 Ark. 542, 251 S.W. 10 (1923) (decision under prior law).
Rules and Regulations.
Inasmuch as the Arkansas Transportation Commission has authority to promulgate rules and regulations governing the operation of carriers, it is not necessary that the Arkansas Transportation Commission adduce evidence at hearings on proposed regulations; the burden of proof is on the company contesting the regulations to show they are unreasonable. Household Goods Carriers v. Ark. Transp. Comm'n, 262 Ark. 797, 562 S.W.2d 42 (1978).
There is no conflict between regulations promulgated by the Arkansas Transportation Commission and the Uniform Commercial Code inasmuch as § 4-7-103 provides that regulatory state statutes are controlling. Household Goods Carriers v. Ark. Transp. Comm'n, 262 Ark. 797, 562 S.W.2d 42 (1978).
Taxicabs.
Since the Arkansas Public Service Commission disclaimed jurisdiction to issue regulations concerning taxicabs, a taxicab driver could not be convicted for operating a taxi without a certificate of convenience and necessity. Marshall v. State, 211 Ark. 380, 200 S.W.2d 491 (1947) (decision under prior law).
23-13-209. Mandatory injunction — Requirement that department take jurisdiction.
Where the Arkansas Department of Transportation, in respect to any matter arising under this subchapter, has issued a negative order solely because of a supposed lack of power, any party in interest may file a bill of complaint in the Pulaski County Circuit Court. The court, if it determines that the department has the power, may force by writ of mandatory injunction the department to take jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 186.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-210. Hearings before department.
- Any matter arising in the administration of this subchapter concerning which a hearing is required shall be heard by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
- A decision of the majority of the members of the department shall constitute its decision.
- The department may assign or refer the matter to an employee or board of employees for hearing and written report and recommended order, and the department shall review and may determine the matter upon the record theretofore made.
- All hearings shall be held in the office of the department except that if in the discretion of the department circumstances justify it, hearings may be held at any place in the state.
- The members of the department, the secretary thereof, and employees designated by the department to hold hearings shall have the power to administer oaths and to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, tariffs, contracts, agreements, and documents and to take testimony by deposition, relating to any matter under consideration.
- In connection with any proceedings under this subchapter in which a hearing is required, or is deemed necessary by the department, not less than ten (10) days' notice shall be afforded, except in hearings provided for in § 23-13-224. Opportunity for intervention by interested parties in connection with any such proceeding shall be afforded.
-
- The department or its designated employees are authorized to confer with or hold joint hearings with any authorities of the United States or any state, or any department of the State of Arkansas, in connection with any matter arising in any proceeding under this subchapter.
- This department is also authorized to avail itself of the cooperation, services, records, and facilities of such authorities as fully as may be necessary in the enforcement of any provision of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 187.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-211. Appeals — Entitlement.
Any final order made under this subchapter is subject to the same right of appeal by any party to the proceedings as is provided by § 23-2-425, in respect to appeals from the order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 188.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “is subject” for “shall be subject” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Appeals to Supreme Court.
On appeal from a judgment of the circuit court affirming an order of the corporation commission granting a certificate of convenience and necessity, Supreme Court is required to hear the matter de novo and to render such judgment as the testimony would warrant, and finding of corporation commission should be affirmed unless it appears to be contrary to a preponderance of the testimony. Potashnick Truck Serv. v. Missouri & Ark. Transp. Co., 203 Ark. 506, 157 S.W.2d 512 (1942) (decision under prior law).
On appeal from judgment of circuit court sustaining order of corporation commission granting permit to transport freight over designated routes, it was the duty of the Supreme Court to try the case de novo on the record made before the commission and the circuit court. Potashnick Local Truck Sys. v. Fikes, 204 Ark. 924, 165 S.W.2d 615 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Right to Appeal.
Former similar section gave parties protesting order granting certificate of convenience and necessity the absolute right of appeal and reference to other statutes related to the proceedings or manner of perfecting the appeal. Potashnick Local Truck Sys. v. Fikes, 204 Ark. 924, 165 S.W.2d 615 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Scope of Review.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is a fact-finding body and its findings of fact will not be upset by the courts unless the findings are clearly against the weight of the evidence. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-212. Appeals — Notice.
Upon the filing of a motion for appeal, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall forthwith serve notice of the appeal upon all parties to the proceeding appealed from.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 189.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-213. Appeals — Stay of operating authority pending appeal.
If the party appealing desires to stay the beginning of the operating authority granted by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the party shall file with the motion for appeal a bond, with surety thereon approved by the Pulaski County Circuit Court. The bond shall be conditioned that the appealing party will pay to the party in whose favor the order appealed from operates all damages which the party may suffer by reason of the stay of operation under the order in the event the orders shall be affirmed or sustained upon final adjudication. The operating authority granted by the department shall be stayed until the matter has been finally adjudicated.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 190.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-214. Appeals — Transcripts.
- Where any appeal is taken, as provided in §§ 23-13-211 — 23-13-215 or by other statutes with regard to appeals from orders of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the secretary of the department shall cause to be prepared, for use on the appeal, an accurate and true copy of the record of proceedings before the department, which shall contain only such portions of the record as shall be designated by the person taking such appeal in the notice of appeal filed.
- Thereupon, the secretary of the department shall certify the transcript as a true and accurate copy of the record of proceedings on appeal from the department.
- The transcript shall be prepared in conformity with the rules of the Supreme Court and of the Pulaski County Circuit Court regarding the filing of transcripts in civil cases, and the original record of proceedings before the department shall remain on file with the department.
- When there are designated for inclusion in the transcript of the record exhibits which, because of their form, nature, or bulk, cannot be conveniently copied, then the department may order, upon proper application made by the party taking the appeal, that the original exhibits be appended to the secretary's transcript of the record. The exhibits may be removed from the offices of the department for the purpose of filing with the transcript on appeal.
-
- The party filing a motion for an appeal shall pay to the secretary of the department the amount of the cost of preparing the transcript of the proceedings before the transcript is deposited with the clerk of the Pulaski County Circuit Court.
- All fees received by the department in payment for the preparation of transcripts of proceedings under this subchapter shall be computed at the rate of fifty cents (50¢) for each sheet and shall be paid into the State Treasury by the department to the account of the fund from which appropriations are made for the support of the department.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 191.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-215. Appeals — Filing fees.
The secretary of the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall immediately notify the party filing the motion for appeal the date of the deposit of the transcript with the clerk of the Pulaski County Circuit Court. Within ten (10) days from the date of the deposit of the transcript, the party shall pay to the clerk of the court the required filing fee.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; 1959, No. 267, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 192.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-216. Agent for service of process, notices, or orders.
-
- It shall be the duty of every motor carrier to file with the Arkansas Department of Transportation a designation in writing of the name and post office address of a person maintaining a residence within this state upon whom or which service of notices or orders may be made under this subchapter. The designation may from time to time be changed by like writing similarly filed.
- Service of process or orders in proceedings under this subchapter shall be made upon a carrier by personal service upon the person so designated by it or by registered mail addressed to the designated person at the address filed.
-
- Service of notices of hearings shall be by United States mail and publication one (1) time in a newspaper of general circulation in Pulaski County.
- In default of designation of an agent for service of process, service of any notice or order may be made by posting in the office of the secretary of the department.
- Whenever notice is given by mail as provided in this section, the date of mailing shall be considered as the time when notice is served.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1774; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 193.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
Case Notes
Cited: Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986).
23-13-217. Enforcement officers.
- The State Highway Commission shall name and designate enforcement officers charged with the duty of policing and enforcing the provisions of this subchapter.
- The enforcement officers shall have authority to enforce § 27-50-308 and the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act, § 5-65-101 et seq., and shall have authority to make arrests for violation of any of the provisions of this subchapter, orders, rules, and regulations of the commission and to serve any notice, order, or subpoena issued by any court, the commission, its secretary, or any employee authorized to issue same, and to this end shall have full authority with jurisdiction within the entire State of Arkansas.
-
-
For the purpose of determining whether any motor vehicle or the operator of that vehicle is in compliance with the rules and regulations of the commission with respect to safety of operations and equipment or any other provision of this chapter, provided the operator is engaged in intrastate or interstate movements on the highways, roads, and streets of this state and the operator or vehicle is subject to the rules and regulations, the enforcement officers shall be authorized to:
- Require the operator of the vehicle to stop, exhibit, and submit for inspection all documents required to be carried in that vehicle or by that operator pursuant to the regulations regarding the operator or operators of that vehicle, including, but not limited to, the operator or driver's duty status or hours-of-service records, bills of lading, waybills, invoices, or other evidences of the character of the lading being transported in the vehicle, as well as all records required to be carried by the regulations concerning that vehicle;
- Inspect the contents of the vehicle for the purpose of comparing the contents with bills of lading, waybills, invoices, or other evidence of ownership or of transportation for compensation; and
- Require the operator to submit the vehicle for a safety inspection pursuant to the rules and regulations, if deemed necessary by the officers.
- If the operator does not produce sufficient or adequate documents regarding his or her operation of the vehicle in conformance with the rules and regulations or is determined by the officers to be out of compliance with the rules and regulations, in addition to any other action that may be taken by the officers pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter, the officers shall be authorized to immediately place that operator out of service in accordance with the rules and regulations.
-
- If the operator does not produce sufficient or adequate documents regarding the vehicle in conformance with the rules and regulations, the vehicle is determined by the officers to be out of compliance with the rules and regulations.
- If the operator refuses to submit the vehicle to a safety inspection in conformance with the rules and regulations or if the officer or officers determine the vehicle is unsafe for further operation following a safety inspection in accordance with the rules and regulations, in addition to any other action that may be taken by the officers pursuant to this subchapter, the officers shall be authorized to immediately place that vehicle out of service in conformance with the rules and regulations.
-
For the purpose of determining whether any motor vehicle or the operator of that vehicle is in compliance with the rules and regulations of the commission with respect to safety of operations and equipment or any other provision of this chapter, provided the operator is engaged in intrastate or interstate movements on the highways, roads, and streets of this state and the operator or vehicle is subject to the rules and regulations, the enforcement officers shall be authorized to:
- It shall be the further duty of the enforcement officers to impound any books, papers, bills of lading, waybills, and invoices that would indicate the transportation service being performed is in violation of this subchapter, subject to the further orders of the court having jurisdiction over the alleged violation.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1760; Acts 1989, No. 306, § 1; 1997, No. 1026, § 1; 2003, No. 1121, § 1; 2015, No. 299, § 31.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment substituted “State Highway Commission” for “Arkansas Transportation Commission” in (a); inserted present (c); and redesignated former (c) and (d) as present (d) and (e), respectively.
The 2003 amendment inserted “or any other provision of this chapter” in (c)(1); and inserted “bills of lading, waybills, invoices, or other evidences of the character of the lading being transported in the vehicle” in (c)(1)(A); inserted present (c)(1)(B) and redesignated former (c)(1)(B) as present (c)(1)(C); deleted former (d) and redesignated former (e) as present (d); and made minor stylistic and related changes.
The 2015 amendment inserted “or BWI” in (b).
Case Notes
Inspection of Vehicles.
Where enforcement officers had grounds for a reasonable belief that the defendant's tractor-trailer rig was being operated in violation of the Motor Carrier Act, and the officers, without a warrant, “inspected” or “searched” the contents of the rig, there was no basis for questioning the validity of such routine inspection, which turned up a quantity of drugs, the inspection accomplished its proper administrative function and the fact that a criminal prosecution resulted did not vitiate the procedure or invalidate the statute. Carroll v. State, 276 Ark. 160, 634 S.W.2d 99 (1982).
There is no authority under this section to make a “routine check” of vehicle; rather it clearly recites that authorization to make a stop is dependent on a reasonable belief that a vehicle is in violation. Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
Court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence where the defendant was stopped for a safety check and a drug dog alerted to drugs; the inspection officer had the right to search the truck for safety reasons and the driver admitted he had a radar detector. Willoughby v. State, 76 Ark. App. 329, 65 S.W.3d 453 (2002).
Search of the cargo of defendant's commercial truck pursuant to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act did not violate the Fourth Amendment because warrantless inspections of commercial trucks advanced a substantial governmental interest and were necessary, and the Act provided a permissible warrant substitute as its reach was limited to certain commercial vehicles under §§ 23-13-203, 23-13-204, and 23-13-206; it provided notice to commercial truck drivers of the possibility of a roadside inspection by a designated enforcement officer under this section; it limited the scope of the enforcement officers' inspections to an examination solely for regulatory compliance under subdivisions (c)(1) and (c)(1)(B) of this section; and although the Act did not designate specific times when the enforcement officers could conduct inspections, such a limitation would render the entire inspection scheme unworkable and meaningless. United States v. Ruiz, 569 F.3d 355 (8th Cir. 2009).
Cited: Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956); Purolator Courier Corp. v. Arkansas Air Courier, 289 Ark. 455, 712 S.W.2d 892 (1986); United States v. Belcher, 288 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir. 2002).
23-13-218. Certificate of public convenience and necessity — Requirement.
No common carrier by motor vehicle subject to the provisions of this subchapter shall engage in any operation on any public highway in this state unless there is in force with respect to such a carrier a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation authorizing such an operation.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1761; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 194.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Motor Freight Line v. Missouri Pac. Freight Transp. Co., 230 Ark. 587, 326 S.W.2d 820 (1959).
23-13-219. Certificate of public convenience and necessity — Application and fees.
- Applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity shall be made in writing to the Arkansas Department of Transportation, be verified under oath, shall be in such form, contain such information, and be accompanied by proof of service upon such interested parties as the department by rule shall require.
- Every application shall be accompanied by certified check made payable to the department for the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00). The funds shall be collected by the department to be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 8; 1983, No. 565, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1761; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 195; 2019, No. 315, § 2422.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Motor Freight Line v. Missouri Pac. Freight Transp. Co., 230 Ark. 587, 326 S.W.2d 820 (1959).
23-13-220. Certificate of public convenience and necessity — Issuance — Notice and hearing.
-
- Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, a certificate of public convenience and necessity shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor, authorizing the whole or any part of the operations covered by the application if it is found that the applicant is fit, willing, and able properly to perform the service proposed and to conform to the provisions of this subchapter and the requirements and rules of the Arkansas Department of Transportation thereunder, and that the proposed service, to the extent to be authorized by the certificate, is or will be required by the present or future public convenience and necessity; otherwise the application shall be denied. The burden of proof shall be upon the applicant.
- However, no such certificate shall be issued to any common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle for operations over other than regular routes, and between fixed termini, except as the carrier may be authorized to engage in special or charter operations.
- No certificate shall be issued by the department except upon a hearing held at least twenty (20) days after the service of notice to interested parties of its time and place.
-
In granting applications for certificates, the department shall take into consideration:
- The reliability and financial condition of the applicant and his or her sense of responsibility toward the public;
- The transportation service being maintained by any railroad, street railway, or motor carrier;
- The likelihood of the proposed service being permanent and continuous throughout twelve (12) months of the year;
- The effect which such proposed transportation service may have upon other forms of transportation service; and
- Any other matters tending to show the necessity or want of necessity for granting the application.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1762; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 196; 2019, No. 315, § 2423.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
The 2019 amendment substituted “requirements and rules” for “requirements, rules, and regulations” in (a)(1).
Case Notes
Appellate Review.
Appeals from the Transportation Regulatory Board are reviewed de novo, and its findings will not be disturbed unless they are against the preponderance of the evidence; if the evidence is evenly balanced, the board's view must prevail. Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Stone, 301 Ark. 323, 783 S.W.2d 860 (1990).
Authority of Commission.
Former similar provision did not grant a monopoly nor did it intend to permit competition not required by the public convenience and necessity and those were questions of fact for the determination of the commission subject to review by the courts. Potashnick Truck Serv. v. Missouri & Ark. Transp. Co., 203 Ark. 506, 157 S.W.2d 512 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Question as to which of several applicants should have a permit to operate over designated roads is a matter within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Corporation Commission. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Mathis Bus Line, 205 Ark. 255, 168 S.W.2d 392 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Burden of Proof.
Petitioner had burden to make affirmative showing that the public convenience and necessity required the issuance of the permit. Potashnick Truck Serv. v. Missouri & Ark. Transp. Co., 203 Ark. 506, 157 S.W.2d 512 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Traditionally, the criteria for establishing the need for common carriers have been broader in terms and scope than the requirements for granting permits for contract carriers. Therefore, the burden of establishing the need for the restricted authority sought by contract carriers has consistently been less than that required for the broader authority of a common carrier; the common carrier serves the public at large while the contract carrier is restricted to serving the contracting parties. Transport Co. v. Champion Transp., Inc., 298 Ark. 178, 766 S.W.2d 16 (1989).
Unless an applicant can prove both requirements stated in subdivision (a)(1), the board must deny the application. Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Stone, 301 Ark. 323, 783 S.W.2d 860 (1990).
Discontinued Routes.
Permit to operate bus line over part of route covered by permit to another who had discontinued its service with the consent of the commission was properly granted. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 201 Ark. 895, 148 S.W.2d 644 (1941) (decision under prior law).
Existing Services.
A certificate for transportation of freight over designated routes may not be granted where there is existing service in operation over the route applied for, unless the service is inadequate, or additional service would benefit the general public, or unless existing carrier has been given an opportunity to furnish such additional service as may be required. Potashnick Local Truck Sys. v. Fikes, 204 Ark. 924, 165 S.W.2d 615 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Certificate of convenience and necessity to operate bus line between certain points, already sufficiently served by existing facilities, except for passengers connecting at those points, was improperly granted where relief could have been obtained by the readjustment of schedules. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Gray, 205 Ark. 62, 167 S.W.2d 636 (1943) (decision under prior law).
A certificate of public convenience may not be issued to a carrier where there is an existing service over the route applied for, unless the service is inadequate, or additional service would be beneficial to the public, or where existing carrier has failed to furnish such additional service. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Batesville Truck Line, 214 Ark. 448, 216 S.W.2d 857 (1949) (decision under prior law).
Where only one of carriers, protesting issuance of certificate of public convenience and necessity to another carrier, served the area in which service was authorized under the certificate and the one carrier who served the area did not serve the entire area, issuance of the certificate was not contrary to this section. Hoskins v. Melton, 226 Ark. 336, 289 S.W.2d 884 (1956).
Improvement of Service.
That existing motor carrier improved its service since application by another for certificate of public convenience and necessity justifies denial of application because existing carrier should be given opportunity to improve its service before granting new application. Taylor v. Black Motor Lines, 204 Ark. 1, 160 S.W.2d 859 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Where there is ample evidence that the present service is inadequate, that the additional service would benefit the general public, and that the existing carriers have been given an opportunity for more than five years to furnish such additional service and have failed to do so, the existence of either of these factors would be sufficient to show public convenience and necessity as envisioned by statute. Southwestern Transp. Co. v. King, 240 Ark. 309, 399 S.W.2d 276 (1966).
Public Convenience and Necessity.
Evidence not sufficient to show that public service and necessity required additional passenger service. Missouri Pac. R.R. v. Williams, 201 Ark. 895, 148 S.W.2d 644 (1941) (decision under prior law).
While rights of those already in the transportation field must be taken into account in a proceeding to obtain certificate, the paramount consideration is always the interests of the public. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Permit granted applicant by the Arkansas Public Service Commission to operate intrastate as a common carrier of household goods was sustained by showing that the applicant was able, willing to perform the service, and that there was a need for such additional service which would benefit the general public. Washington Transf. & Storage Co. v. Harding, 229 Ark. 546, 317 S.W.2d 18 (1958).
Where an application for removal of a restriction imposed by the commission was in reality an application for additional or new carrier authority and the applicant failed to prove the proposed new service was required by public convenience and necessity such application was properly denied. Arkansas Motor Freight Line v. Missouri Pac. Freight Transp. Co., 230 Ark. 587, 326 S.W.2d 820 (1959).
Rights of Permit Holders.
No carrier may have any vested right, by reason of its license, to the exclusive use of the highways for any given period; but a carrier granted a license to operate over a given route has a legal right to oppose the granting of a license to another carrier over the same route, by showing that a duplication of service would not serve the public convenience. Schulte v. Southern Bus Line, Inc., 211 Ark. 200, 199 S.W.2d 742 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Violation of Regulations.
Common carrier who flagrantly violates the board's regulations by knowingly performing moves outside the commercial zone without proper authorization is not fit pursuant to subdivision (a)(1) and should not be rewarded with the granting of a certificate for public convenience and necessity. Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Stone, 301 Ark. 323, 783 S.W.2d 860 (1990).
Cited: Torrans v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 246 Ark. 930, 440 S.W.2d 558 (1969).
23-13-221. Certificate of public convenience and necessity — Terms and conditions.
-
-
Any certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under this subchapter shall specify:
- The service to be rendered and the route over which;
- The fixed termini, if any, between which;
- The intermediate and off-route points, if any, at which; and
- In case of operations not over specified routes or between fixed termini, the territory within which the motor carrier is authorized to operate.
-
- At the time of issuance and from time to time thereafter, there shall be attached to the exercise of the privileges granted by the certificate such reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations as the public convenience and necessity may from time to time require, including terms, conditions, and limitations as to the extension of the routes of the carrier and such terms and conditions as are necessary to carry out, with respect to the operations of the carrier, the requirements established by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under this subchapter.
- However, no terms, conditions, or limitations shall restrict the right of the carrier to add to his or her or its equipment and facilities over the routes, between the termini, or within the territory specified in the certificate as the development of the business and the demands of the public shall require.
-
Any certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under this subchapter shall specify:
- A common carrier by motor vehicle operating under any such certificate may occasionally deviate from the route over which, or the fixed termini between which, it is authorized to operate under the certificate under such general or special rules as the department may prescribe.
- Any common carrier by motor vehicle transporting passengers under a certificate issued under this subchapter may transport to any place within the state special or chartered parties under such rules as the department may prescribe.
- A certificate for the transportation of passengers may include authority to transport, in the same vehicle with the passengers, newspapers, baggage of passengers, express, or mail, or authority to transport baggage of passengers in a separate vehicle.
- No certificate issued under this subchapter shall confer any proprietary or property rights in the use of the public highways.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, §§ 9, 10; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1762, 73-1763; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 197; 2019, No. 315, § 2424.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated (a)(2) as (a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B); and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(2)(A).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b) and (c).
Case Notes
Correction of Certificate.
Commission was authorized to correct certificate to allow carrier to transport household goods, heavy machinery and general commodities where certificate as originally issued was restricted to transportation of property. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Johnson, 221 Ark. 157, 252 S.W.2d 814 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Proceeding instituted by commission on its own motion to correct certificate was a continuation of old proceeding and not a new cause of action. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Johnson, 221 Ark. 157, 252 S.W.2d 814 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Interstate Commerce.
Action of state commission in requiring owner-drivers of company shipping roofing products over highways of state to obtain permits did not impose a burden on interstate commerce. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Wood, 344 U.S. 157, 73 S. Ct. 204, 97 L. Ed. 168 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Restrictions.
Where application was for truck route to supplement rail transportation of freight, order should limit service to shipments that move partly by rail and partly by truck. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Rights of Permit Holders.
No carrier may have any vested right, by reason of its license, to the exclusive use of the highways for any given period; but a carrier granted a license to operate over a given route has a legal right to oppose the granting of a license to another carrier over the same route, by showing that a duplication of service would not serve the public convenience. Schulte v. Southern Bus Line, Inc., 211 Ark. 200, 199 S.W.2d 742 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Routes.
An order of the commission issuing a certificate to a carrier to operate over eight designated routes with authority to tack these routes at points of intersection and to service intermediate points along these routes was valid where the carrier and its predecessor in ownership had been servicing the points involved over a period of forty years. Red Line Transf. & Storage Co. v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 248 Ark. 515, 452 S.W.2d 650 (1970).
Cited: Torrans v. Arkansas Commerce Comm'n, 246 Ark. 930, 440 S.W.2d 558 (1969).
23-13-222. Permits for contract carriers — Requirement.
No person shall engage in the business of a contract carrier by motor vehicles over any public highways in this state unless there is in force with respect to the carrier a permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation authorizing such persons to engage in such business.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1764; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 198.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
Case Notes
Contract Carriers.
Where industrial concern leased trucks from owners through a third party by means of a double lease, owners who drove trucks for industrial concern were required to obtain permits as contract carriers, since double lease plan was not bona fide but was a clever plan to evade regulation by Arkansas Public Service Commission. Public Serv. Comm'n v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 219 Ark. 553, 244 S.W.2d 147 (1951), aff'd, 344 U.S. 157, 73 S. Ct. 204, 97 L. Ed. 168 (1952) (decision under prior law).
Where equipment lease agreement between furniture manufacturing company as lessee and nonresident owner and operator as lessor provided for payment on mileage basis that truck-tractor was used in lessee's business, costs of operation or any damages to be borne by lessor, with lessee having the right to designate routes, the lessor was a contract carrier and not a private carrier and was required to hold a permit or a certificate of convenience and necessity from the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 988, 77 S. Ct. 1282, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1142 (1957).
23-13-223. Permits for contract carriers — Application and fees.
- Applications for permits for contract carriers by motor vehicles shall be made to the Arkansas Department of Transportation in writing, be verified under oath, and shall be in such form, contain such information, and be accompanied by proof of service upon such interested parties as the department by rule may require.
- Every application shall be accompanied by a certified check made payable to the department for the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00). The funds shall be collected by the department to be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 11; 1983, No. 565, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1764; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 199; 2019, No. 315, § 2425.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a).
23-13-224. Permits for contract carriers — Issuance.
- Subject to this subchapter, a permit for a contract carrier by motor vehicle shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor authorizing in whole or in part the operations covered by the applications, if it is found that the applicant is fit, willing, and able to properly perform the service of a contract carrier by motor vehicle and to conform to the provisions of this subchapter and the lawful requirements and rules of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, and the proposed operation, to the extent authorized by the permit, will promote the public interest and the policy declared in § 23-13-202; otherwise the application shall be denied.
- No permit shall be issued by the department except upon a hearing at least twenty (20) days after service of notice to interested parties of the time and place thereof.
-
In granting applications for permits, the department shall take into consideration:
- The reliability and financial condition of the applicant and his or her sense of responsibility toward the public;
- The transportation service being maintained by any railroad, street railway, or motor carrier;
- The likelihood of the proposed service being permanent and continuous throughout twelve (12) months of the year and the effect which the proposed transportation service may have upon existing transportation service; and
- Any other matters tending to show the necessity or want of necessity for granting the application.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1764; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 200; 2019, No. 315, § 2426.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “requirements and rules” for “requirements, rules, and regulations” in (a).
Case Notes
Burden of Proof.
Traditionally, the criteria for establishing the need for common carriers have been broader in terms and scope than the requirements for granting permits for contract carriers. Therefore, the burden of establishing the need for the restricted authority sought by contract carriers has consistently been less than that required for the broader authority of a common carrier; the common carrier serves the public at large while the contract carrier is restricted to serving the contracting parties. Transport Co. v. Champion Transp., Inc., 298 Ark. 178, 766 S.W.2d 16 (1989).
23-13-225. Permits for contract carriers — Terms and conditions — Contracts for services.
- The State Highway Commission shall specify in the permit for a contract carrier by motor vehicle the business of the contract carrier covered thereby and the scope thereof. The commission shall attach to the permit, at the time of issuance, and from time to time thereafter, such reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations consistent with the character of the holder as a contract carrier as are necessary to carry out, with respect to the operations of such a carrier, the requirements established by the commission under this subchapter.
-
- The commission shall not issue any permit which will authorize any contract carrier to have in effect, at any one time, more than six (6) contracts, such contracts to be filed with and approved by the commission prior to granting of such authority.
- When any contract expires, the commission shall be given notice thereof, and if any new contract is substituted or added, the contract shall be filed with and approved by the commission before operation thereunder.
- No permit issued under this subchapter shall confer any proprietary or property rights in the use of public highways.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 11; 1961, No. 191, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1764; Acts 1993, No. 1020, § 1.
23-13-226. Dual operation.
No person shall at the same time hold under this subchapter a certificate as a common carrier and permit as a contract carrier authorizing operation for the transportation of property by motor vehicle over the same route or within the same territory, unless for good cause shown the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall find that the certificate and permit will promote the public interest and the policy declared in § 23-13-202.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1765; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 201.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-13-227. Certificates and permits — Security for the protection of the public.
- No certificate or permit shall be issued to a motor carrier or remain in force unless the carrier complies with such reasonable rules as the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall prescribe governing the filing and approval of surety bonds, policies of insurance, qualification as a self-insurer or other securities or agreements in such reasonable amount as the department may require, conditioned to pay, within the amount of the surety bonds, policies of insurance, qualifications as a self-insurer or other securities or agreements, any final judgment recovered against the motor carrier for bodily injuries to or the death of any person resulting from the negligent operation, maintenance, or use of motor vehicles under the certificate or permit or for loss or damage to the property of others.
-
- In its discretion and under such rules as it shall prescribe the department may require any such common carrier to file a surety bond, policies of insurance, qualifications as a self-insurer, or other securities or agreements, in a sum to be determined by the department, to be conditioned upon the carrier making compensation to shippers or consignees for all property belonging to shippers or consignees and coming into the possession of such carriers in connection with its transportation service.
- Any carrier which may be required by law to compensate a shipper or consignee for any loss, damage, or default for which a connecting motor common carrier is legally responsible shall be subrogated to the rights of the shipper or consignee under any such bond, policies, or insurance or other securities or agreements, to the extent of the sum so paid, plus any court costs and reasonable attorney's fees paid by the carrier in defending any action brought thereon by the shipper or consignee.
- The reasonable rules of the department authorized by this section shall conform as nearly as may be consistent with the public interest to those rules made by the United States Surface Transportation Board from time to time with respect to surety for the protection of the public by motor carriers engaged in interstate or foreign commerce.
- Any motor carrier who has qualified as a self-insurer in accordance with the rules of the United States Surface Transportation Board governing motor carriers engaged in interstate or foreign commerce shall be prima facie deemed qualified as a self-insurer in the State of Arkansas.
- In any action against any motor carrier operating under the provisions of this subchapter, whether in law or equity, the insurer, insurance company, or obligor in any policy of insurance or bond given by the carrier in compliance with this section shall not be joined as a party to the suit and shall not be a proper party thereto.
- Upon any motor carrier's failure to pay any final judgment rendered against it, the judgment creditor may maintain an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the insurer, insurance company, or obligor in any policy of insurance, or bond, or obligation, filed under this section, to compel payment of the judgment.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1768; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 202; 2019, No. 315, § 2427.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), deleted “and regulations” following “rules” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b)(1), (c), and (d).
Case Notes
Joinder.
Former provision similar to subsection (e) did not permit a joinder of insurer and insured as defendants in an action for personal injury or property damage. National Mut. Cas. Co. v. Blackford, 200 Ark. 847, 141 S.W.2d 54 (1940) (decision under prior law).
Policies of Insurance.
Exclusion of coverage in insurance policy for bodily injury to occupant of vehicle was void to the extent it was contrary to state public policy, evidenced by Arkansas Transportation Commission rule that common carriers carry at least $25,000 of bodily injury coverage; the exclusion remained valid as to amounts over the minimum coverage required by the rule. Canal Ins. Co. v. Ashmore, 126 F.3d 1083 (8th Cir. 1997).
Cited: Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Ferrell, 234 Ark. 581, 353 S.W.2d 353 (1962).
23-13-228. Transportation of persons or property in interstate commerce on public highways unlawful without adequate surety.
It is declared unlawful for any motor carrier to use any of the public highways of this state for the transportation of persons or property in interstate commerce unless there is in force with respect to the motor carrier adequate surety for the protection of the public.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 25; 1977, No. 468, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1778; Acts 1993, No. 1027, § 1; 2007, No. 232, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 1, provided: “Findings. It is found by the General Assembly that the United States Congress has enacted the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., replacing the single state registration system with the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement. In order to fully implement the requirements of the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005 the amendments to the Arkansas Code in this act are necessary.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1993, No. 1027, § 3, provided:
“In accordance with and pursuant to the provisions of this Act and the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 11506 and the regulations issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant thereto, the Chairman of the Arkansas State Highway Commission and the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration, or their designees, are authorized and empowered to enter into any agreements or arrangements with other states and to take all action they deem necessary or proper to ensure that the amendments made by this Act are effectuated by October 1, 1993. If any provision of this Act or any regulation issued thereunder is inconsistent with federal laws or regulations, such federal laws or regulations shall prevail solely to the extent of the conflict.”
Case Notes
Cited: Bullard v. Crown Coach Co., 248 Ark. 739, 453 S.W.2d 712 (1970).
23-13-229. Temporary authority.
- To provide motor carrier service for which there is an urgent and immediate need to, from, or between points within a territory having no motor carrier service deemed capable of meeting that need, the Arkansas Department of Transportation in its discretion and without hearing or other proceeding may grant temporary authority for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days for the service by common or contract carrier, as the case may be. Satisfactory proof of the urgent and immediate need shall be made by affidavit or other verified proof, as the department shall prescribe.
- The temporary authority shall be granted only upon payment of a filing fee in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) and compliance with the requirements of §§ 23-13-227 and 23-13-244. The filing fees shall be collected by the department to be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
- After the temporary authority is granted, the department shall notify any carrier already authorized to perform all or any part of the service so authorized temporarily. Upon application in writing by the carrier, the department shall hold such hearings and make such further determination with respect to such temporary authority as the public interest shall require.
- The grant of temporary authority shall not be extended for any cause.
- Issuance of such temporary authority shall create no presumption that corresponding permanent authority will be granted thereafter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 6; 1983, No. 565, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1759; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 203.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-13-230. Brokers — Licenses — Rules for protection of public.
-
- A person shall not for compensation sell or offer for sale transportation subject to this subchapter; make any contract, agreement, or arrangement to provide, procure, furnish, or arrange for such transportation; or hold himself or herself or itself out by advertisements, solicitation, or otherwise as one who sells, provides, procures, contracts, or arranges for such transportation unless that person holds a broker's license issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation to engage in such transactions.
- In the execution of any contract, agreement, or arrangement to sell, provide, procure, furnish, or arrange for such transportation, it shall be unlawful for such a person to employ any carrier by motor vehicle who or which is not the lawful holder of an effective certificate or permit issued as provided in this subchapter.
- The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any carrier holding a certificate or a permit under the provisions of this subchapter or to any bona fide employee or agent of such a motor carrier, so far as concerns transportation to be furnished wholly by such a carrier or jointly with other motor carriers holding like certificates or permits or with a common carrier by railroad, express, or water.
- A brokerage license shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor, authorizing the whole or any part of the operations covered by the application, if it is found that the applicant is fit, willing, and able properly to perform the service proposed and to conform to the provisions of this subchapter and the requirements and rules of the department thereunder and that the proposed service, to the extent authorized by the license, will promote the public interest and policy declared in this subchapter; otherwise the application shall be denied.
- The department shall prescribe reasonable rules for the protection of travelers or shippers by motor vehicle, to be observed by any person holding a brokerage license. No such license shall be issued or remain in force unless the person shall have furnished a bond or other security approved by the department, in such form and amount as will insure financial responsibility and the supplying of authorized transportation in accordance with contracts, agreements, or arrangements therefor.
- The department and its agents shall have the same authority as to accounts, reports, and records, including inspection and preservation thereof, of any person holding a brokerage license issued under the provisions of this section, that they have under this subchapter with respect to motor carriers subject thereto.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1766; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 204; 2019, No. 315, § 2428.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “A person shall not” for “No person shall”, deleted “shall” preceding “make any contract”, deleted “shall” preceding “hold himself”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment substituted “requirements and rules” for “requirements, rules, and regulations” in (b); and deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the first sentence of (c).
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Provisions of former similar section were valid restrictions in relation to the use of the highways in the exercise of the police powers. Duck v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 203 Ark. 488, 158 S.W.2d 24, appeal dismissed, 316 U.S. 641, 62 S. Ct. 946, 86 L. Ed. 1727 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Former similar section was not invalid even though it may incidentally affect interstate commerce. Duck v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 203 Ark. 488, 158 S.W.2d 24, appeal dismissed, 316 U.S. 641, 62 S. Ct. 946, 86 L. Ed. 1727 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Former similar section was not unconstitutional on ground it discriminates against a broker and is not applicable to casual transportation by one not so engaged as a regular business, since being applicable to all persons engaged in the travel bureau business it is not discriminating. Duck v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 203 Ark. 488, 158 S.W.2d 24, appeal dismissed, 316 U.S. 641, 62 S. Ct. 946, 86 L. Ed. 1727 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Interstate Commerce.
That transportation of passengers in motor cars may be arranged for points outside the state does not make a travel bureau's business one of interstate commerce. Duck v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 203 Ark. 488, 158 S.W.2d 24, appeal dismissed, 316 U.S. 641, 62 S. Ct. 946, 86 L. Ed. 1727 (1942) (decision under prior law).
State Policy.
It is the state's policy to regulate transportation agencies. Southeast Ark. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Ark. Corp. Comm'n, 204 Ark. 1023, 166 S.W.2d 262 (1942) (decision under prior law).
23-13-231. Certificates, permits, and licenses — Effective dates.
Certificates, permits, and licenses shall be effective from the date specified therein and shall remain in effect until terminated as provided in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 14; 1983, No. 579, § 1; 1983, No. 602, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1767.
Case Notes
Cited: Washington Transf. & Storage Co. v. Harding, 229 Ark. 546, 317 S.W.2d 18 (1958); Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., 256 Ark. 1054, 511 S.W.2d 651 (1974).
23-13-232. Certificates, permits, and licenses — Transfer, assignment, etc.
- Certificates, permits, and licenses shall not be assigned, transferred, or hypothecated in any manner, nor shall the operation under any such permit, certificate, or license be leased without authority of the Arkansas Department of Transportation and on written application, and after ten (10) days' notice, to parties in interest and hearing.
- The transfer, lease, assignment, or hypothecation of the permits, certificates, or licenses shall not be authorized when the department finds the action will be inconsistent with the public interest or will have the effect of destroying competition or creating a monopoly, nor where it appears that reasonably continuous service under the authority or that part of the authority granted by the permit, certificate, or license which is sought to be transferred has not been rendered prior to the application for transfer, assignment, or hypothecation.
-
- All applications for transfer must be made on proper forms prescribed by the department.
- There must be attached to such application for a transfer of a certificate, permit, or license a joint affidavit executed by the vendor and vendee certifying that all accrued taxes, station rents, wages of employees, and all other indebtedness incident to the vendor's operation have been paid in full or, if such is not the case, will be assumed by the vendee. Provided, the provisions of this subsection shall not apply in any respect to either the vendor or the vendee, where the vendor has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws and is transferring the authority as part of a reorganization or liquidation under an order directing the sale entered under the federal bankruptcy laws.
- Every such application for the transfer of a certificate or permit shall be accompanied by a certified check or money order in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) made payable to the department. The funds shall be collected by the department to be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 14; 1983, No. 565, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1767; Acts 1992 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 35, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 205.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Case Notes
Necessity of Commission's Approval.
Attempted sale of a half interest in certificate of convenience and necessity to operate bus line was invalid, since not conditioned on the approval of the Corporation Commission and its approval was neither sought nor obtained. Gregory v. Lewis, 205 Ark. 68, 167 S.W.2d 499 (1943) (decision under prior law).
While the transfer of a certificate and the lease of operating rights to interstate and intrastate highway routes are duly authorized by the statute, the transfer of lease is ineffective without the approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Blagg v. Strickland Transp. Co., 222 Ark. 303, 258 S.W.2d 894 (1953) (decision under prior law).
Reasonably Continuous Service.
Where a small motor carrier with relatively modest assets held itself in readiness to render service, advertised its existence and accepted whatever business was offered, the commission was justified in finding that the certificate was not dormant and that the carrier's service had been reasonably continuous so that the carrier was not precluded from selling its business. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Howard, 224 Ark. 1011, 278 S.W.2d 118 (1955) (decision under prior law).
Evidence sufficient to find that a certificate of convenience and necessity was not dormant because of owner's failure to render reasonably continuous service. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Utilization of Certificate.
Contention that to permit sale of motor carrier's franchise would result in a more active utilization of the franchise so as to take business away from other established carriers so as to result in deterioration in the service theretofore rendered and that the public thereby would suffer could not be raised upon petition to sell the business, such questions being of the nature that should have been raised upon original application for the certificate. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Howard, 224 Ark. 1011, 278 S.W.2d 118 (1955) (decision under prior law).
In proceeding upon application to sell motor carrier business, question of whether there was a need for the whole range of facilities that might be available under the charter could not be raised nor could the carrier be required to show that it had fully utilized the possibilities lying at its disposal. Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Howard, 224 Ark. 1011, 278 S.W.2d 118 (1955) (decision under prior law).
Failure of protestants against the transfer of a certificate of convenience and necessity on the ground that it was dormant for failure to give reasonably continuous service for several years to seek the revocation of the certificate during such period could well be the basis of an inference by the commission that such protestants' anxiety about the transferee was the prospect of a more active utilization of the certificate. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Cited: Washington Transf. & Storage Co. v. Harding, 229 Ark. 546, 317 S.W.2d 18 (1958); Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., 256 Ark. 1054, 511 S.W.2d 651 (1974).
23-13-233. Certificates, permits, and licenses — Amendment, revocation, and suspension.
-
Any certificates, permits, or licenses, upon application of the holder thereof and in the discretion of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, may be amended or revoked, in whole or in part, or may upon complaint or on the department's own initiative, after notice and hearing, be suspended, changed, or revoked, in whole or in part, for:
- Willful failure to comply with any provision of this subchapter, with any lawful order or rule of the department promulgated thereunder, or with any term, condition, or limitation of the certificate, permit, or license;
- Failure to render reasonably continuous service in the transportation of all of the commodities authorized to be transported over all of the routes authorized to be traversed;
- Failure to file a complete annual motor carrier report pursuant to Acts 1927, No. 129, as amended; or
- Failure to timely pay ad valorem property taxes.
- It is the intent of this section to require the department to suspend or revoke, after notice and hearing as hereafter provided, all or such part of the authority granted by any certificate which is not exercised reasonably continuously.
- No certificate, permit, or license shall be revoked, except under application of the holder or violation of § 23-13-227, unless the holder thereof willfully fails to comply within a reasonable time, not less than thirty (30) days, to be fixed by the department, with a lawful order of the department commanding obedience to the provisions of this subchapter, or to the rules of the department, or to the terms, conditions, or limitation of such certificate, permit, or license found by the department to have been violated by the holder.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 14; 1983, No. 579, § 1; 1983, No. 602, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1767; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 206; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2429, 2430.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1927, No. 129, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 26-2-102, 26-24-102 — 26-24-122, 26-26-1301 — 26-26-1306, 26-26-1601 — 26-26-1613, 26-27-201 — 26-27-204.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “order or rule” for “order, rule, or regulation” in (a)(1); and deleted “or regulations” following “rules” in (c).
Case Notes
Failure to Commence Operations.
Holder of certificate of public convenience and necessity who made no attempt to begin operations until approximately 80 days beyond the last day of a 45-day extension, and these operations were no more than token operations, was not entitled to statutory period within which to comply with the commission's order before cancellation of his permit for failure to operate. Santee v. Arkansas Corp. Comm'n, 205 Ark. 1, 166 S.W.2d 672 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Notice and Hearing.
Order of Corporation Commission canceling carrier's permit made without statutory notice or hearing following an authorized suspension of service, and a subsequent order based upon former void order, was not res judicata of carrier's right to restoration of his permit to operate as common carrier of passengers. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Mathis Bus Line, 205 Ark. 255, 168 S.W.2d 392 (1943) (decision under prior law).
Reasonably Continuous Service.
Evidence sufficient to find that a certificate of convenience and necessity was not dormant because of owner's failure to render reasonably continuous service. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Failure of protestants against the transfer of a certificate of convenience and necessity on the ground that it was dormant for failure to give reasonably continuous service for several years to seek the revocation of the certificate during such period could well be the basis of an inference by the commission that such protestants' anxiety about the transferee was the prospect of a more active utilization of the certificate. Fisher v. Branscum, 243 Ark. 516, 420 S.W.2d 882 (1967).
Cited: Washington Transf. & Storage Co. v. Harding, 229 Ark. 546, 317 S.W.2d 18 (1958); Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., 256 Ark. 1054, 511 S.W.2d 651 (1974).
23-13-234. Operation without certificate or permit prohibited — Violation of terms, conditions, etc., of certificate, permit, or license prohibited.
-
- Any motor carrier using the highways of this state without first having obtained a permit or certificate from the Arkansas Department of Transportation, as provided by this subchapter, or who, being a holder thereof, violates any term, condition, or provision thereof shall be subject to a civil penalty to be collected by the department, after notice and hearing, in an amount not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
- If the penalty is not paid within ten (10) days from the date of the order of the department assessing the penalty, twenty-five percent (25%) thereof shall be added to the penalty.
- Any amounts collected from the penalties provided for under this subsection shall be deposited by the department into the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
-
- Any person required by this subchapter to obtain a certificate of convenience and necessity as a common carrier or a permit as a contract carrier and operates as such a carrier without doing so shall be guilty of a violation. Upon conviction, he or she shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for the first such offense and not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each subsequent offense.
- Each day of the violation shall be a separate offense.
-
- Any person violating any other provision or any term or condition of any certificate, permit, or license, except as otherwise provided in § 23-13-258, shall be guilty of a violation and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars ($100) for the first offense and not more than five hundred dollars ($500) for any subsequent offense.
- Each day of the violation shall constitute a separate offense.
- In addition thereto, the person shall be subject to the civil penalties provided in subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; 1971, No. 532, § 1; 1983, No. 565, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 148; 2017, No. 707, § 207.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted “violation” for “misdemeanor” in (b)(1) and (c)(1).
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
Case Notes
Taxicabs.
A taxicab driver could not be convicted for operating a taxi without a certificate for convenience because the Arkansas Public Service Commission had held that it was without jurisdiction to issue regulations with regard to taxicabs. Marshall v. State, 211 Ark. 380, 200 S.W.2d 491 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-235. Annual fees charged carriers — Remittance — Disposition of funds.
-
- From each common or contract carrier of passengers or property, there shall be collected an annual fee for the registration of insurance. The annual registration fee to be collected from each common or contract carrier of passengers or property holding only a certificate or permit issued pursuant to this subchapter shall be five dollars ($5.00) for each bus, truck, or truck-tractor of the carrier to be operated in this state.
- The annual registration fee for the registration of insurance to be collected from any other carrier, including a carrier holding a certificate or permit issued by the United States Surface Transportation Board, on behalf of the State of Arkansas shall be collected under the base state registration program and shall be five dollars ($5.00) per motor vehicle.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall also collect fees under the base state registration program on behalf of and for all other participating states of travel from all carriers based in the State of Arkansas. All fees collected on behalf of other participating states shall be collected in the amount required by that state and remitted to that state under the rules adopted by the United States Surface Transportation Board.
- All fees as set out in this section shall be due and payable on or before January 1 of each year to cover the ensuing calendar year. However, the fees to be collected from the holders of temporary authority shall be due and payable before the authority is first exercised.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the payment of more than the fees for each bus, truck, or truck-tractor so used as set out in subsection (a) of this section, but the fee shall be paid annually for each motor vehicle, as the term “motor vehicle” is defined in rules of the United States Surface Transportation Board.
- Failure on the part of any person or carrier to pay the annual registration fees as provided in this section shall be a violation of this subchapter, and upon conviction the person or carrier shall be punished as provided in § 23-13-257.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 26; 1957, No. 343, § 1; 1983, No. 565, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1779; Acts 1993, No. 1027, § 2; 2017, No. 707, § 208; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2431, 2432.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Interstate Commerce Commission, referred to in this section, was abolished in 1995.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1993, No. 1027, § 3, provided:
“In accordance with and pursuant to the provisions of this Act and the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 11506 and the regulations issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant thereto, the Chairman of the Arkansas State Highway Commission and the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration, or their designees, are authorized and empowered to enter into any agreements or arrangements with other states and to take all action they deem necessary or proper to ensure that the amendments made by this Act are effectuated by October 1, 1993. If any provision of this Act or any regulation issued thereunder is inconsistent with federal laws or regulations, such federal laws or regulations shall prevail solely to the extent of the conflict.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(3).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the second sentence of (a)(3) and in (c).
23-13-236. Common carriers — Duties as to transportation of passengers and property — Rates, charges, rules, etc.
-
It shall be the duty of every common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle:
- To establish reasonable through routes with other common carriers and to provide safe and adequate service, equipment, and facilities for the transportation of passengers;
- To establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable individual and joint rates, fares, and charges, and just and reasonable rules and practices relating thereto and relating to the issuance, form, and substance of tickets; the carrying of personal, sample, and excess baggage; the facilities for transportation; and all other matters relating to or connected with the transportation of passengers; and
- In case of joint rates, fares, and charges, to establish just, reasonable, and equitable divisions thereof as between the carriers participating therein which shall not unduly prefer or prejudice any of the participating carriers.
-
It shall be the duty of every common carrier of property by motor vehicle:
- To provide safe and adequate service, equipment, and facilities for the transportation of property; and
- To establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable rates, charges, and classifications and just and reasonable rules and practices relating thereto, and relating to the manner and method of presenting, marking, packing, and delivering property for transportation, the facilities for transportation, and all other matters relating to or connected with the transportation of property.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2019, No. 315, §§ 2433, 2434.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a)(2) and (b)(2).
23-13-237. Common carriers — Rates, fares, and charges to be just and reasonable — Unreasonable preferences or advantages prohibited.
- All charges made for any service rendered or to be rendered by any common carrier by motor vehicle engaged in the transportation of passengers or property as provided in § 23-13-236, or in connection therewith, shall be just and reasonable. Every unjust and unreasonable charge for such a service or any part thereof is prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
- It shall be unlawful for any common carrier by motor vehicle to make, give, or cause any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, port, gateway, locality, region, district, territory, or description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever or to subject any particular person, gateway, locality, region, district, territory, or description of traffic to any unjust discrimination or any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever.
- This shall not be construed to apply to discrimination, prejudices, or disadvantages to the traffic of any other carrier of whatever description.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769.
Case Notes
Discretion of Commission.
Where no one appeared in opposition to the requested rate increase by a common carrier and where the commission's expert witness supported the full increase, although pertinent, neither should be controlling, as the commission had the duty to exercise its independent discretion to protect the interests of the public. Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 270 Ark. 831, 606 S.W.2d 575 (1980).
Rules and Regulations.
Since the common-law liability of a carrier for loss of baggage may be limited by contract supported by consideration, the General Assembly may direct the commission to prescribe rules concerning such liability so long as such rules are not legislative, but only measures in the administrative plan. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co. v. Ellis, 210 Ark. 958, 198 S.W.2d 196 (1946) (decision under prior law).
23-13-238. Common carriers — Rates, fares, rules, etc. — Complaints.
Any person, state board, organization, or body politic may make complaint in writing to the Arkansas Department of Transportation that any rate, fare, charge, classification, rule, or practice in effect or proposed to be put into effect is or will be in violation of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 209; 2019, No. 315, § 2435.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made a similar change in the section.
23-13-239. Common carriers — Rates, fares, rules, etc. — Determination by department.
-
- Whenever, after hearing, upon complaint, or in an investigation on its own initiative, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall be of the opinion that any individual or joint rate, fare, or charge, demanded, charged, or collected by any common carriers by railroad, express, or water for transportation, or that any classification, rule, or practice whatsoever of the carriers affecting the rate, fare, or charge or the value of the service thereunder, is or will be unjust or unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, or unduly preferential, or unduly prejudicial, it shall determine and prescribe the lawful rate, fare, or charge or the maximum or minimum rate, fare, or charge thereafter to be observed, or the lawful classification, rule, or practice thereafter to be made effective.
- Whenever deemed by it to be necessary or desirable in the public interest, after hearing, upon complaint, the department shall establish through routes and joint rates, fares, charges, rules, or practices applicable to the transportation of passengers by common carriers by motor vehicle or establish the maximum or minimum rates, fares, or charges to be charged and the terms and conditions under which the through routes shall be operated.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall empower the department to prescribe or in any manner regulate the rate, fare, or charge for interstate transportation or for any service connected therewith.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 210; 2019, No. 315, § 2436.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made similar changes in (a)(1) and (a)(2).
23-13-240. Common carriers — Rates, charges, rules, etc. — Establishment and division of joint rates, charges, etc.
-
- Common carriers of property by motor vehicle may establish reasonable through routes and joint rates, charges, and classifications with other such carriers or with common carriers by railroad or express or water.
- Common carriers of passengers by motor vehicle may establish reasonable through routes and joint rates, fares, or charges with common carriers by railroad or water.
- In case of joint rates, fares, or charges, it shall be the duty of the carriers parties thereto to establish just and reasonable rules and practices in connection therewith and to establish just, reasonable, and equitable divisions thereof as between the carriers participating therein which shall not unduly prefer or prejudice any participating carriers.
-
- Whenever, after hearing, upon complaint or upon its own initiative the Arkansas Department of Transportation is of the opinion that the divisions of joint rates, fares, or charges, applicable to the transportation of passengers or property by common carriers by motor vehicle, or by such carriers in conjunction with common carriers by railroad, express, or water, are or will be unjust, unreasonable, inequitable, or unduly preferential or prejudicial as between the carriers parties thereto, whether agreed upon by such carriers, or any of them, or otherwise established, the department shall by order prescribe the just, reasonable, and equitable divisions thereof to be received by the several carriers.
- In cases where the joint rate, fare, or charge was established pursuant to a finding or order of the department, the department may also by order determine what would have been the just, reasonable, and equitable divisions thereof to be received by the several carriers and require adjustment to be made in accordance therewith.
- The order of the department may require the adjustment of divisions between the carriers, in accordance with the order, from the date of filing the complaint or entry of order of investigation or such other date subsequent as the department finds justified. In the case of joint rates described by the department, the order as to divisions may be made effective as a part of the original order.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 211; 2019, No. 315, § 2437.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (c)(1).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading; and substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (b).
23-13-241. Common carriers — Schedules, rules, etc., affecting rates, fares, etc. — Hearings — Suspension proceedings.
- Whenever any schedule stating a new individual or joint rate, fare, charge, or classification for the transportation of passengers, or by any such carrier in conjunction with a common carrier or carriers by railroad, express, or water, or any rule or practice affecting the rate, fare, or charge, or the value of the service thereunder is filed with the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the department is authorized and empowered to enter upon a hearing concerning the lawfulness of the rate, fare, or charge, or the lawfulness of a rule or practice, upon the complaint of any interested party or upon its own initiative, at once, if the department so orders, without answer or other formal pleading by the interested carrier or carriers, but upon reasonable notice.
-
- Pending the hearing and the decision thereon, the department from time to time may suspend the operations of the schedule and defer the use of the rate, fare, or charge or such rule or practice for a period of thirty (30) days by filing with the schedule and delivering to the carriers affected thereby a statement in writing of its reasons for the suspension.
- If the proceeding has not been concluded and a final order made within the thirty-day period, the department from time to time, by order, may extend the period of suspension, but not for a longer period in the aggregate than ninety (90) days beyond the time when it would otherwise go into effect. The department may make the order with reference thereto as would be proper in a proceeding instituted after it had become effective.
- If the proceeding has not been concluded and an order made within the period of suspension, the proposed change, or rate, fare, or charge or classification, rule, or practice shall go into effect at the end of the period.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 212; 2019, No. 315, § 2438.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (a) twice, and in (b)(1) and (c).
Case Notes
Discretion of Commission.
Where no one appeared in opposition to the requested rate increase by a common carrier and where the commission's expert witness supported the full increase, although pertinent, neither should be controlling, as the commission had the duty to exercise its independent discretion to protect the interests of the public. Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 270 Ark. 831, 606 S.W.2d 575 (1980).
23-13-242. Common carriers — Rates, charges, rules, etc. — Factors of reasonableness or justness.
-
In the exercise of its power to prescribe just and reasonable rates for the transportation of passengers or property by common carrier by motor vehicle, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall give due consideration, among other factors, to:
- The inherent advantages of transportation by carriers to the effect of rates upon the movement of traffic by the carriers;
- The need, in the public interest, of adequate and efficient transportation service by the carriers at the lowest cost consistent with the furnishing of the service; and
- The need of revenues sufficient to enable the carriers, under honest, economical, and efficient management, to provide the service.
-
- In any proceeding to determine the justness or reasonableness of any rate, fare, or charge of any common carrier, there shall not be taken into consideration or allowed as evidence or elements of value of the property of the carrier, either goodwill, earning power, or the certificate under which the carrier is operating.
- In applying for and receiving a certificate under this subchapter, any common carrier shall be deemed to have agreed to the provisions of this subsection on its own behalf and on behalf of all transferees of the certificate.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 213.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
Case Notes
Discretion of Commission.
Where no one appeared in opposition to the requested rate increase by a common carrier and where the commission's expert witness supported the full increase, although pertinent, neither should be controlling, as the commission had the duty to exercise its independent discretion to protect the interests of the public. Moore v. Arkansas Transp. Co., 270 Ark. 831, 606 S.W.2d 575 (1980).
23-13-243. Sections 23-13-236 — 23-13-242 cumulative.
Nothing in §§ 23-13-236 — 23-13-242 shall be held to extinguish any remedy or right of action not inconsistent therewith.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1769.
23-13-244. Tariffs of common carriers by motor vehicle.
-
- Whenever an applicable tariff has not already been prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, every common carrier by motor vehicle shall file with the department and shall keep open to public inspection at all times tariffs showing all the rates, fares, and charges for transportation, and all services in connection therewith, of passengers or property between points on its own route and points on the route of any other common carrier, or on the routes of any common carrier by railroad, express, or water, when a through route and joint rate shall have been established.
- The rates, fares, and charges shall be stated in terms of lawful money of the United States.
- The tariffs required by this section shall be published, filed, and posted in such form and manner and shall contain such information as the department by rule shall prescribe.
- The department is authorized to reject any tariff filed with it which is not in consonance with this subchapter and with its rules. Any tariff so rejected by the department shall be void, and its use shall be unlawful.
-
- No common carrier by motor vehicle shall charge, demand, collect, or receive a greater, lesser, or different compensation for transportation, or for any service in connection therewith, between the points enumerated in the tariff, than those rates, fares, and charges specified in the tariffs in effect at the time.
- No such carrier shall refund or remit in any manner or by any device, directly or indirectly, or through any agent or broker or otherwise any portion of the rates, fares, or charges so specified, nor shall that carrier extend to any person any privilege or facilities for transportation except as are specified in its tariff.
-
- No change shall be made in any rate, fare, charge, or classification, or the value of the service thereunder, specified in any effective tariff of a common carrier by motor vehicle except after thirty (30) days' notice of the proposed change filed and posted in accordance with subsection (a) of this section.
- The notice shall plainly state the change proposed to be made and the time when the change will take effect.
- The department, in its discretion and for good cause shown, may allow such change upon notice less than that specified in this section or may modify the requirements of this section with respect to posting and filing of tariffs either in particular instances or by general order applicable to special or peculiar circumstances or conditions.
- No common carrier by motor vehicle, unless otherwise provided by this subchapter, shall engage in the transportation of passengers or property unless the rates, fares, and charges upon which the passengers or property are transported by the carrier have been prescribed, or filed and published in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1770; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 214; 2019, No. 315, § 2439.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(3) and made a similar change in the first sentence of (a)(4).
Case Notes
Commission-Ordered Rates.
Evidence sufficient to find that order of Commerce Commission establishing rates and affirmance thereof by circuit court were based on ample evidence and were proper under the circumstances. Southeast Ark. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Ark. Corp. Comm'n, 204 Ark. 1023, 166 S.W.2d 262 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Contract Carriers.
Corporation commission was not required to establish minimum rates affecting contract carrier at the same time it fixed, established and put into effect rates affecting truckload movement by common carrier truck lines. Southeast Ark. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Ark. Corp. Comm'n, 204 Ark. 1023, 166 S.W.2d 262 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Motor Carrier for Railroad.
Fact that truck transportation company which was to carry freight for railroad would not itself file rate schedule or issue bills of lading, did not make its operation in violation of law since the charges would be those fixed by the approved tariff of the railroad and the railroad would issue a bill of lading. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716 (1947) (decision under prior law).
Powers of Commission.
Former similar act was cumulative of the provision of former acts empowering Corporation Commission to fix or approve rates, and it gave power to the commission to initiate and prescribe rates applicable to truckload movements by common motor carriers. Southeast Ark. Freight Lines, Inc. v. Ark. Corp. Comm'n, 204 Ark. 1023, 166 S.W.2d 262 (1942) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Stroud v. Pulaski County Special School Dist., 244 Ark. 161, 424 S.W.2d 141 (1968).
23-13-245. Contract carriers — Schedule of minimum rates and charges, rules, and practices — Requirement — Filing, posting, and publishing required.
- It shall be the duty of every contract carrier by motor vehicle to establish and observe reasonable minimum rates and charges for any service rendered or to be rendered in the transportation of passengers or property or in connection therewith and to establish and observe reasonable minimum rates, fares, and charges.
- It shall be the duty of every contract carrier by motor vehicle to file with the Arkansas Department of Transportation and to publish and keep open for public inspection, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, schedules containing the minimum rates or charges of the carrier actually maintained and charged for the transportation of passengers or property and any rule or practice affecting such rates or charges and the value of the service thereunder.
- No contract carrier, unless otherwise provided by this subchapter, shall engage in the transportation of passengers or property unless the minimum charges for the transportation by the carrier have been published, filed, and posted in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 215; 2019, No. 315, § 2440.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (b), substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made a similar change in (b).
23-13-246. Contract carriers — Schedule of minimum rates and charges, rules, and practices — Adherence to schedule required — Exceptions.
- No contract carrier by motor vehicle shall demand, charge, or collect a less compensation for the transportation than the charges filed in accordance with § 23-13-245, as affected by any rule or practice so filed, or may be prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation from time to time.
- It shall be unlawful for any contract carrier, by the furnishing of special services, facilities, or privileges, or by any other device whatsoever, to charge, accept, or receive less than the minimum charges so filed or prescribed.
- However, any contract carrier, or any class or group thereof, may apply to the department for the relief from the provisions of § 23-13-245, and the department after hearing may grant such relief to such extent and for such time, and in such manner as in its judgment is consistent with the public interest and the transportation policy declared in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 216; 2019, No. 315, § 2441.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made a similar change in (a).
23-13-247. Contract carriers — Schedule of minimum rates and charges, rules and practices — Notice of proposed changes.
- No reduction shall be made in any charge of a contract carrier by motor vehicle either directly or by means of any change in any rate, rule, or practice affecting the charge or the value of services thereunder except after thirty (30) days' notice of the proposed change filed in the manner and form set forth in § 23-13-245. However, in its discretion and for good cause shown, the Arkansas Department of Transportation may allow such a change upon less notice or modify the requirements of § 23-13-245 with respect to posting and filing of the schedules, either in particular instances or by general order applicable to special or peculiar circumstances or conditions.
- The notice shall plainly state the change proposed to be made and the time when the change will take effect.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 217; 2019, No. 315, § 2442.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading; and substituted “rule” for “regulation” in the first sentence of (a).
23-13-248. Contract carriers — Complaints.
All complaints shall state fully the facts complained of, and the reason for the complaints, and shall be made under oath.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771.
23-13-249. Contract carriers — Schedule of rules, etc., affecting rates, fares, etc. — Hearings — Suspension proceedings.
- Whenever a contract carrier by motor vehicle files with the Arkansas Department of Transportation any schedule stating a charge for a new service or a reduced charge directly, or by means of any rule or practice, for transportation of passengers or property, the department may enter upon a hearing concerning the lawfulness of such charge or such rule or practice upon complaint of interested parties or upon its own initiative at once, and if it so orders, without answer or other formal pleading by the interested party, but upon reasonable notice.
- Pending the hearing and the decision thereon, the department from time to time may suspend the operations of the schedule and defer the use of the charge, or the rule or practice for a period of thirty (30) days, by filing such schedules and delivering to the carrier affected thereby a statement in writing of its reasons for the suspension.
- If the proceeding has not been concluded and a final order made within the thirty-day period, the department from time to time may extend the period of suspension by order, but not for a longer period in the aggregate than ninety (90) days beyond the time when it would otherwise go into effect.
-
- After the hearing, whether completed before or after the charge, rule, or practice goes into effect, the department may make such order with reference thereto as would be proper in a proceeding instituted after it had become effective.
- If the proceeding has not been concluded and an order made therein within the period of suspension, the proposed change in any rule or practice shall go into effect at the end of such a period.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 218; 2019, No. 315, § 2443.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “a contract” for “any contract”, substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”, and substituted “may enter” for “is authorized and empowered to enter”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” in (a) twice, and in (b), (d)(1), and (d)(2).
23-13-250. Contract carriers — Schedule of minimum rates and charges, rules and practices — Establishment by department.
- Whenever, after hearing, upon complaint or upon its own initiative, the Arkansas Department of Transportation finds that any minimum rate or charge of any contract carrier by motor vehicle, that any rule or practice of any such carrier affecting the minimum rate or charge, or that the value of the service thereunder for the transportation of passengers or property or in connection therewith contravenes the transportation policy declared in this subchapter, or is in contravention of any provision of this subchapter, the department may prescribe such just and reasonable minimum rates, charges, rules, or practices as in its judgment may be necessary or desirable in the public interest and desirable to promote the policy and will not be in contravention of any provision of this subchapter.
- The minimum rate or charge, or such rule or practice so prescribed by the department, shall give no advantage or preference to any carrier in competition with any common carrier by motor vehicle subject to this subchapter, which the department may find to be undue or inconsistent with the public interest and the transportation policy declared in this subchapter.
- The department shall give due consideration to the cost of services rendered by contract carriers and to the effect of the minimum rate or charge, or such rule or practice, upon the movement of traffic by such carriers.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 17[18]; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1771; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 219; 2019, No. 315, § 2444.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made similar changes throughout the section.
23-13-251. Collection of rates and charges.
- A common carrier by motor vehicle shall not deliver or relinquish possession at destination of any freight transported by it until all tariff rates and charges thereon have been paid except under such rules as the Arkansas Department of Transportation from time to time may prescribe to govern the settlement of all such rates and charges, including rules for weekly or monthly settlement and those to prevent unjust discrimination or undue preference or prejudice.
- However, the provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit any such carrier from extending credit in connection with rates and charges on freight transported to the United States, for any department, bureau, or agency thereof, for any state or territory, or political subdivision thereof, or for the District of Columbia.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 23; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1776; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 220; 2019, No. 315, § 2445.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “A common” for “No common”, inserted “not” following “shall”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” twice in (a).
Case Notes
Uniform Commercial Code.
There is no conflict between regulations promulgated by the Arkansas Transportation Commission and the Uniform Commercial Code inasmuch as § 4-7-103 provides that regulatory state statutes are controlling. Household Goods Carriers v. Ark. Transp. Comm'n, 262 Ark. 797, 562 S.W.2d 42 (1978).
23-13-252. Receipts or bills of lading.
- Every carrier of property by motor vehicle subject to the provisions of this subchapter which receives property for transportation within this state shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor.
- The form of the receipt or bill of lading shall be prescribed by the Arkansas Department of Transportation and shall conform as nearly as may be consistent with the public interest to the receipt or bill of lading prescribed for interstate carriers of property under the Interstate Commerce Act [repealed], as amended.
- The rights and liabilities of the shippers, consignors, consignees, and carriers, whether originating carriers, intermediate carriers, or delivering carriers, shall be those defined by Section 20, Subsection 11 of Part I of the Interstate Commerce Act [repealed], as amended.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1772.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
U.S. Code. Section 20, Subsection 11 of Part I of the Interstate Commerce Act, referred to in this section and formerly codified as 49 U.S.C. § 20(11), was repealed by Pub. L. No. 95-473.
23-13-253, 23-13-254. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning reports by motor carriers and failure to file the reports, were repealed by Acts 2003, No. 1117, §§ 1, 2. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-13-253. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1773.
23-13-254. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775.
23-13-255. Access to property, equipment, and records.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation or its duly authorized agents at all times shall have access to all lands, buildings, or equipment of motor carriers and private carriers used in connection with their operation and also to all pertinent accounts, records, documents, and memoranda kept or required to be kept by motor carriers and private carriers.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1773; Acts 1991, No. 297, § 1.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey — Criminal Procedure, 10 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 149.
Case Notes
Stopping of Vehicles.
State failed to show that stopping of vehicle was justified under U.S. Const. Amend. 4. Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-256. Identification of equipment.
It shall be unlawful for any common or contract carrier by motor vehicle to operate any vehicle upon the highways of this state unless there is painted, or otherwise firmly affixed, to the vehicle on both sides thereof, the name of the carrier and the certificate or permit number of the carrier. The characters composing the identification shall be of sufficient size to be clearly distinguishable at a distance of at least fifty feet (50') from the vehicle.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 24; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1777.
Case Notes
Cited: Dominguez v. State, 290 Ark. 428, 720 S.W.2d 703 (1986).
23-13-257. Violations by carriers, shippers, brokers, etc., or employees, agents, etc. — Penalties.
Any person, whether a carrier, shipper, consignee, or broker, or any officer, employee, agent, or representative thereof who shall knowingly offer, grant, or give or solicit, accept, or receive any rebate, concession, or discrimination in violation of any provision of this subchapter; who by means of any false statement or representation, or by the use of any false or fictitious bill, bill of lading, receipt, voucher, roll, account, claim, certificate, affidavit, deposition, lease, or bill of sale, or by any other means or device shall knowingly assist, suffer, or permit any persons, natural or artificial, to obtain transportation of passengers or property subject to this subchapter for less than the applicable fare, rate, or charge; who shall knowingly by any such means or otherwise fraudulently seek to evade or defeat rules as in this subchapter is provided for motor carriers or brokers; or who shall violate any of the rules, including safety rules, prescribed or hereafter prescribed by the State Highway Commission pursuant to the provisions of Title 23 of this Code, shall be guilty of a violation. Upon conviction, that person, unless otherwise provided in this chapter, shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars ($500) for the first offense and not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for any subsequent offense.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 1993, No. 1023, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 455; 2019, No. 315, § 2446.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment deleted “and willfully” preceding “assist, suffer” and “by any such means” and substituted “violation” for “misdemeanor.”
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” three times in the first sentence.
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-258. Operation of motor vehicle while in possession of, consuming, or under influence of any controlled substance or intoxicating liquor prohibited — Definition.
-
-
Any person operating or being in physical control of a motor vehicle, which motor vehicle is susceptible at the time of such operation or physical control to any rules of the State Highway Commission regarding the safety of operation and equipment of that motor vehicle, who commits any of the following acts shall be guilty of a violation and upon conviction for the first offense shall be subject to a fine of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000):
- Operating or being in physical control of such a motor vehicle if he or she possesses, is under the influence of, or is using any controlled substance;
- Operating or being in physical control of such a motor vehicle if he or she possesses, is under the influence of, or is using any other substance that renders him or her incapable of safely operating a motor vehicle; or
-
- Consumption of or possession of an intoxicating liquor, regardless of its alcoholic content, or being under the influence of an intoxicating liquor while in physical control of such a motor vehicle.
- However, no person shall be considered in possession of an intoxicating liquor solely on the basis that an intoxicating liquor or beverage is manifested and being transported as part of a shipment.
- Upon the second and subsequent convictions, that person shall be subject to a fine of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
-
Any person operating or being in physical control of a motor vehicle, which motor vehicle is susceptible at the time of such operation or physical control to any rules of the State Highway Commission regarding the safety of operation and equipment of that motor vehicle, who commits any of the following acts shall be guilty of a violation and upon conviction for the first offense shall be subject to a fine of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000):
- As used in this section, “controlled substance” shall have the same meaning ascribed to that term in the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, § 5-64-101 et seq., and the rules issued pursuant to the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, § 5-64-101 et seq.
- This section does not abrogate any of the provisions of the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act, § 5-65-101 et seq., and any person violating subsection (a) of this section who may be charged with a violation of the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act, § 5-65-101 et seq., shall be charged with a violation of the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act, § 5-65-101 et seq., rather than with a violation of this section.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; 1971, No. 532, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 1993, No. 1022, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 149; 2015, No. 299, § 32; 2019, No. 315, § 2447.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted “violation” for “misdemeanor” in (a)(1).
The 2015 amendment, in (c), substituted “This section does not” for “Nothing in this section is intended to”, inserted “or BWI” throughout, and deleted “any of the provisions of” preceding “subsection (a)”.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (a)(1) and in (b).
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-259. Lessor to unauthorized persons deemed motor carrier.
Any person who, by lease or otherwise, permits the use of a motor vehicle by other than a carrier holding authority from the Arkansas Department of Transportation and who furnishes in connection therewith a driver, either directly or indirectly, or in any manner whatsoever exercises any control, or assumes any responsibility over the operation of the vehicle, during the period of the lease or other device, shall be deemed a motor carrier.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Case Notes
Contract Carriers.
Where equipment lease agreement between furniture manufacturing company as lessee and nonresident owner and operator as lessor provided for payment on mileage basis that truck-tractor was used in lessee's business, costs of operation or any damages to be borne by lessor, with lessee having the right to designate routes, the lessor was a contract carrier and not a private carrier and required to hold a permit or a certificate of convenience and necessity from the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 988, 77 S. Ct. 1282, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1142 (1957).
23-13-260. Violations of subchapter — Jurisdiction of cases.
The several circuit, justice of the peace, and district courts of this state shall have jurisdiction in cases involving alleged violations of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775.
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-261. Injunction against violation of subchapter, rules, etc., or terms and conditions of certificate, permit, or license.
If any motor carrier or broker operates in violation of any provision of this subchapter, except as to the reasonableness of rates, fares, or charges, and the discriminatory character thereof, or any rule, requirement, or order thereunder, or of any term or condition of any certificate, permit, or license, the Arkansas Department of Transportation or its duly authorized agent may apply to the Pulaski County Circuit Court or to any circuit court of the State of Arkansas where the motor carrier operates for the enforcement of the provision of this subchapter, or of the rule, requirement, order, term, or condition, and enjoining upon it or them obedience thereto.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2448.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and made similar changes in the section.
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-262. Actions to recover penalties.
- An action to recover a penalty under §§ 23-13-234 and 23-13-257 — 23-13-264 or to enforce the powers of the Arkansas Department of Transportation under this subchapter or any other law may be brought in any circuit court in this state in the name of the State of Arkansas, on relation to the department, and shall be commenced and prosecuted to final judgment by the counsel to the department.
- In any such action, all penalties incurred up to the time of commencing the action may be sued for and recovered therein.
- The commencement of an action to recover a penalty shall not be or be held to be a waiver of the right to recover any other penalty.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; 1983, No. 565, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 2003, No. 1117, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2003 amendment deleted “23-13-254” following “23-13-234” in (a).
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-263. Lien declared to secure payment of fines and penalties.
To secure the payment of the fines and penalties provided for in this subchapter, a lien is declared and established upon the property of any person who has violated the provisions hereof and upon the property of any motor carrier whose agent, servant, or employee has violated the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775.
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-264. Disposition of forfeited bonds and fines.
One-half (½) of the amount of forfeited bonds and one-half (½) of the fines collected for violations of this subchapter shall be remitted by the tenth day of each month to the Administration of Justice Funds Section of the Office of Administrative Services of the Department of Finance and Administration on a form provided by that office for deposit into the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
History. Acts 1955, No. 397, § 22; 1983, No. 565, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1775; Acts 2005, No. 1934, § 15.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment rewrote this section.
Case Notes
Cited: Robinson v. Woodard, 227 Ark. 102, 296 S.W.2d 672 (1956).
23-13-265. Exempt motor carrier to possess annual receipt.
-
- It is declared unlawful for any motor carrier of property who is exempt from certain provisions of this subchapter pursuant to § 23-13-206(a)(6) to use any of the public highways of this state for the transportation of property for hire in intrastate commerce without possessing a copy of an annual receipt from the State Highway Commission permitting those operations.
- Copies of the annual receipt shall be made and maintained in the cab of the power unit of each motor vehicle operated over the highways of this state while transporting property for hire intrastate.
-
- Every application for a permit for the transportation of property by a carrier shall be in writing on a form to be specified by the commission.
-
The application shall contain and be accompanied by the following:
- The name and trade name, if any, and address or location of the principal office or place of business of the applicant;
- A statement giving full information concerning the ownership, reasonable value, and physical condition of vehicles and other property to be used by the applicant in the intrastate operations;
- A full and complete financial statement giving detailed information concerning the financial condition of the applicant;
- Proof of public liability insurance in the amounts set out in all rules made and promulgated by the commission;
- In the event the motor carrier did not hold a valid certificate or permit authorizing intrastate transportation by motor vehicle in this state on December 31, 1994, remittance of a processing fee in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00);
- Remittance of an insurance filing fee in the amount of five dollars ($5.00) for each motor vehicle, truck, or truck-tractor, to be operated in the State of Arkansas in intrastate operations;
-
- Remittance of a copy of the motor carrier's latest United States Department of Transportation safety rating or, in the event the carrier has not been given a safety rating, a signed notarized statement indicating the company's intention to comply with all United States Department of Transportation safety regulations.
- At any time as may be practical, a physical inspection of the equipment may be made by the Arkansas Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Department of Transportation;
- At the option of the applicant, the motor carrier may request that any and all laws, regulations, or other provisions relating to uniform cargo liability rules, uniform bills of lading and receipts for property being transported, uniform cargo credit rules, or antitrust immunity for joint line rates or routes, classification, and mileage guides, apply to the carrier; and
- Any other information that may be required by the commission.
-
- Every motor carrier of property complying to the satisfaction of the commission with the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be issued a receipt for the current year indicating the name of the motor carrier's company, the principal place of business of the carrier, and the number of motor vehicles to be operated in Arkansas.
-
- Copies of the receipt shall be made by the motor carrier and shall be maintained in the power unit of each motor vehicle operated over the highways of Arkansas while transporting property for hire intrastate.
- The receipt shall be presented by the driver of the motor vehicle for inspection by any authorized government personnel.
- Failure to carry the receipt and maintain adequate proof of public liability insurance shall subject the motor carrier to the civil and criminal penalties and fines as are authorized by this subchapter.
-
- Every motor carrier of property which held a valid certificate or permit authorizing intrastate transportation by motor vehicle in the state on December 31, 1994, shall continue to be authorized to transport property for hire in the state and shall be issued an annual receipt after complying with the provisions of subdivisions (a)(3)(B)(iv), (vi), (viii), and (ix) of this section. Provided, neither the previously held certificate, the previously held permit, nor any annual receipt issued pursuant to this section shall have any asset value.
- Every motor carrier of property initially complying with all the provisions of subsection (a) of this section to the satisfaction of the commission and issued an annual receipt shall thereafter be issued an annual receipt upon complying with subdivisions (a)(3)(B)(iv), (vi), (viii), and (ix) of this section.
- The annual fee required by subdivision (a)(3)(B)(vi) of this section shall not be required for each motor vehicle if the motor carrier of property otherwise remits the proper annual registration fees to the commission pursuant to § 23-13-235, or the motor carrier of property otherwise remits the proper annual registration fees for the benefit of the State of Arkansas to the motor carrier's base state.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section to the contrary, the commission shall have the authority to periodically review the motor carrier's fitness and shall have the authority to suspend or revoke the annual receipt or other credential granting the right of the motor carrier to operate intrastate if the motor carrier is determined by the commission to be unfit or unsafe, or fails to maintain adequate public liability insurance.
- The commission shall have the authority to make and promulgate rules for the implementation of this section.
- All fees received by the commission pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be deposited with the Treasurer of State and classified as general revenues for distribution and usage as provided by the laws of this state; provided, one and one-half percent (1.5%) of all the funds so deposited shall be classified as special revenues and transferred by the Treasurer of State on the last business day of each month in which they are deposited to the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund to be utilized by the Arkansas Department of Transportation for the purpose of administering this subchapter.
History. Acts 1995, No. 746, § 3; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2449, 2450.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a)(3)(B)(iv) and (f).
Subchapter 3 — Complaint Proceedings
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1939, No. 315, provided that nothing in this subchapter should be construed as repealing Acts 1927, No. 99 or any amendment thereto.
Acts 1955, No. 397, § 28, provided, in part, that the provisions of subchapter 2 of this chapter would be cumulative to the provisions of this subchapter.
Effective Dates. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 17: approved Mar. 15, 1939. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of motor vehicles are insufficient and inadequate, and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-13-301. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Department” means the Arkansas Department of Transportation;
- “Motor vehicle” means any automobile, truck, trailer, semitrailer, tractor, motor bus, or other self-propelled or motor-driven vehicle used upon any of the public highways of the state for the purpose of transporting persons or property; and
- “Person” means and includes any individual, firm, copartnership, corporation, company, or association or their lessees, trustees, or receivers.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, §§ 1-4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1730 — 73-1733.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
As codified, this section contained additional language that read as follows: “(2) ‘Commissioner’ means one of the commissioners of the Arkansas Transportation Commission;”
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No 153, §§ 2 and 3, have rendered that language obsolete, and it has accordingly been decodified.
23-13-302. Authority of department.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation may, in all matters within its jurisdiction, issue subpoenas, subpoenas duces tecum, and all necessary process in proceedings pending before the department; may administer oaths, examine witnesses, compel the production of records, books, papers, files, documents, contracts, correspondence, agreements, or accounts necessary for any investigation being conducted; and may certify official acts.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1736; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 221.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-13-303. Commencement of action before department.
- Upon any complaint in writing being made by any person, or by the Arkansas Department of Transportation on its own motion, setting forth any act or thing done or omitted to be done by any person in violation, or claimed violation, of any provision of § 23-13-102 or of any order or rule of the department, the department shall enter the complaint upon its docket.
-
- The department shall immediately serve a copy of the complaint upon each defendant, together with a notice directed to each defendant requiring that the matter complained of be answered in writing within ten (10) days of the date of service of the notice.
- However, the department in its discretion may require particular cases to be answered within a shorter time, and the department for good cause shown may extend the time in which an answer may be filed.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1734; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 222.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added the (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2) designations; substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a); and substituted “The department” for “It” in (b)(1).
23-13-304. Service of process and notices.
- All process issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall extend to all parts of the state.
- Any process, together with the services of all notices issued by the department, as well as copies of complaints, rules, and orders of the department, may be served by a member of the Division of Arkansas State Police or any person authorized to serve process issued out of courts of law or by registered mail as the department may direct.
- In the event any process is directed to any nonresident who is authorized to do business in this state, the process may be served upon the agent designated by the nonresident for the service of process, and service upon the agent shall be as sufficient and as effective as if served upon the person himself or herself.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, §§ 10, 11; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1739, 73-1740; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 223; 2019, No. 315, § 2451.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules, and orders” for “rules, orders, and regulations” in (b).
23-13-305. Time and place of hearing.
Upon the filing of the answer provided for in § 23-13-303, the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall set a time and place for the hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be served not less than ten (10) days before the time set therefor unless the department finds that public necessity requires the hearing at an earlier date.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1735; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 224.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-13-306. Findings and order of department — Time for taking effect.
-
- After the conclusion of any hearing, the Arkansas Department of Transportation within sixty (60) days shall make and file its findings and order, with its opinion, if any.
- Its findings shall be in sufficient detail to enable any court in which any action of the department is involved to determine the controverted questions presented by the proceeding.
- A copy of the order certified under the seal of the department shall be served upon the person against whom it runs or his or her attorney, and notice thereof shall be given to the other parties to the proceedings or their attorneys.
-
- The order shall take effect and become operative within fifteen (15) days after the service thereof unless otherwise provided.
- If, in the judgment of the department, an order cannot be complied with within fifteen (15) days, the department may grant and prescribe such additional time as in its judgment is reasonably necessary to comply with the order. On application and for good cause shown, it may extend the time for compliance fixed in the order.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1741; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 225.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(1).
Case Notes
Adequacy of Findings.
Commission's order held adequate to permit a de novo review. Batesville Truck Lines v. Arkansas Freightways, Inc., 286 Ark. 116, 689 S.W.2d 553 (1985).
While subsection (2) requires findings in sufficient detail to enable any court to determine the controverted questions presented by the proceeding, there is no requirement of a correlation between the testimony and the findings, the findings need only detail and discuss the testimony of the witnesses. Lee's Trucking, Inc. v. Transport Co., 303 Ark. 444, 798 S.W.2d 59 (1990).
Cited: Carroll v. State, 276 Ark. 160, 634 S.W.2d 99 (1982); Jones Truck Lines v. Camden-El Dorado Express Co., 282 Ark. 50, 665 S.W.2d 867 (1984).
23-13-307. Revocation of license, permit, or certificate.
- In the event the Arkansas Department of Transportation finds that the defendant is guilty upon any complaint filed and proceeding had, and that the provisions of § 23-13-102 or the rules or orders of the department have been willfully and knowingly violated and that a motor vehicle was used in the violation, the department shall forthwith deliver a certified copy of its findings and order to the Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration.
- It shall be the duty of the secretary to forthwith revoke and take up the license plates issued upon any vehicles used in the violations. This penalty shall apply to the vehicles used in the violation regardless of whether the vehicle was being used by the violator by reason of special ownership, ownership, lease, or otherwise.
- In addition to the penalty set forth in subsection (b) of this section, if the violator holds a permit or certificate issued by the department authorizing it to engage in the transportation of persons or property for hire, then the permit or certificate may also be revoked by the department.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1742; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 226; 2019, No. 315, § 2452; 2019, No. 910, § 3507.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” throughout the section.
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (a).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration” for “Director of the Department of Finance and Administration” in (a).
23-13-308. Appeal to Pulaski County Circuit Court.
Any person aggrieved by any findings and order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation may appeal to the Pulaski County Circuit Court in the way and manner provided for appeals from the department.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1743; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 227.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-13-309. Order or subpoena of department enforceable upon application to court.
In case of failure on the part of any person to comply with any lawful order of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, or with any subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, or to testify concerning any matter on which he or she may be lawfully interrogated, any court of record of general jurisdiction or a judge thereof upon application of the department may compel obedience by proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of the requirements of a subpoena issued from the court, or of the refusal to testify therein.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1737; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 228.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-13-310. Witness fees and costs.
- Witnesses who are summoned before the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall be paid the same fees and mileage as are paid to witnesses in courts of record.
- Any party to a proceeding at whose instance a subpoena is issued and served shall pay the costs incident thereto and the fees for mileage of all his or her witnesses.
History. Acts 1939, No. 315, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1738; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 229.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Subchapter 4 — Passengers
23-13-401 — 23-13-406. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 574. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-13-401. Acts 1959, No. 81, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1783.
23-13-402. Acts 1959, No. 81, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1783.
23-13-403. Acts 1959, No. 81, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1780.
23-13-404. Acts 1959, No. 81, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1780, 73-1781.
23-13-405. Acts 1959, No. 81, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1782.
23-13-406. Acts 1937, No. 124, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 6925; Acts 1943, No. 180, § 5; 1973, No. 253, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1751.
Subchapter 5 — Motorcoach Carrier Incentive Program
23-13-501 — 23-13-506. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter, concerning the Motorcoach Incentive Act of 1999, was repealed by Acts 2009, No. 1330, § 32. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-13-501. Acts 1999, No. 233, § 1.
23-13-502. Acts 1999, No. 233, § 2.
23-13-503. Acts 1999, No. 233, § 3.
23-13-504. Acts 1999, No. 233, § 4.
23-13-505. Acts 1999, No. 233, § 5.
23-13-506. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 6; 1999, No. 233, § 6.
Former §§ 23-13-501 — 23-13-505, concerning the legislative determination, definitions, and application for and amount of incentive payments in the Motorcoach Carriers Incentive Act of 1997, were repealed by Acts 1999, No. 233, § 7. They were derived from the following sources:
23-13-501. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 1.
23-13-502. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 2.
23-13-503. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 3.
23-13-504. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 4.
23-13-505. Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 5.
23-13-507. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning rules and regulations, was repealed by Acts 1999, No. 233, § 8. The section was derived from Acts 1997, No. 1187, § 7.
Subchapter 6 — Registration of Motor Carriers Engaged in Interstate Commerce
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 1, provided: “Findings. It is found by the General Assembly that the United States Congress has enacted the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., replacing the single state registration system with the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement. In order to fully implement the requirements of the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005 the amendments to the Arkansas Code in this act are necessary.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 4: Mar. 9, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that in August 2005 the United States Congress enacted the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005; that the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005 is to replace the single state registration program on or before January 1, 2007; that the deadline has passed and Arkansas has not yet had an opportunity to respond to this law due to its biennial legislative sessions; and that there is an immediate need for implementation of the provisions of this act to ensure that Arkansas is in compliance with the Uniform Carrier Registration Act of 2005 to prevent the loss of funding. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-13-601. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Broker” means a person other than a motor carrier or an employee or agent of a motor carrier that as a principal or an agent sells, offers for sale, negotiates for, or holds itself out by solicitation, advertisement, or otherwise as selling, providing, or arranging for transportation by motor carrier for compensation;
-
“Commercial motor vehicle” means a self-propelled or towed vehicle used on the highways in commerce principally to transport passengers or cargo if the vehicle:
- Has a gross vehicle weight rating or gross vehicle weight of at least ten thousand one pounds (10,001 lbs.), whichever is greater;
- Is designed to transport more than ten (10) passengers including the driver; or
- Is used in transporting material found by the United States Secretary of Transportation to be hazardous under 49 U.S.C. § 5103, as it existed on January 1, 2007, and transported in a quantity requiring placarding under regulations prescribed by the secretary under 49 U.S.C. § 5103, as it existed on January 1, 2007;
-
“Freight forwarder” means a person holding itself out to the general public other than as a pipeline, rail, motor, or water carrier to provide transportation of property for compensation and in the ordinary course of its business:
- Assembles and consolidates, or provides for assembling and consolidating, shipments and performs or provides for break-bulk and distribution operations of the shipments;
- Assumes responsibility for the transportation from the place of receipt to the place of destination; and
-
- Uses for any part of the transportation a carrier subject to jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2007.
- “Freight forwarder” does not include a person using transportation of an air carrier subject to 49 U.S.C. § 40101 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2007;
- “Leasing company” means a lessor that is engaged in the business of leasing or renting for compensation motor vehicles without drivers to a motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder;
- “Motor carrier” means a person providing commercial motor vehicle transportation for compensation; and
-
“Motor private carrier” means a person other than a motor carrier transporting property by commercial motor vehicle when:
- The transportation is interstate commerce as provided in 49 U.S.C. § 13501, as it existed on January 1, 2007;
- The person is the owner, lessee, or bailee of the property being transported; and
- The property is being transported for sale, lease, rent, or bailment or to further a commercial enterprise.
History. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 2.
23-13-602. Registration with a base state required.
Foreign and domestic motor carriers, motor private carriers, leasing companies, brokers, and freight forwarders shall not operate in interstate commerce in this state without:
- Being registered with a base state; and
- Paying all fees as required under the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq.
History. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 2; 2009, No. 164, § 3.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment added the subsection designations, deleted “as in effect on January 1, 2007” following “et seq.” in (2), and made related changes.
U.S. Code. The Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, referred to in this section, enacted 49 U.S.C. §§ 14504a and 49 U.S.C. § 14506 and amended 49 U.S.C. §§ 13902, 13905, 13906, and 13908.
23-13-603. Implementation and administration duties.
- The Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration has oversight over the implementation and administration of the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq.
-
The secretary is vested with the following powers and has the following duties:
- To promulgate such regulations as are necessary to participate in the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement;
- To collect and remit such fees as determined by the Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors;
- To cooperate with the various law enforcement agencies to ensure compliance with and enforcement of the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., and regulations; and
- To do all things necessary, pursuant to the state and federal law, to enable this state to participate in the Unified Carrier Registration Agreement.
History. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 2; 2009, No. 164, § 4; 2019, No. 910, §§ 3508, 3509.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (b)(3), deleted “as in effect on January 1, 2007” following “et seq.” and made a related change and a minor stylistic change.
The 2019 amendment substituted “Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration” for “Director of the Department of Finance and Administration” in (a); and substituted “secretary” for “director” in the introductory language of (b).
U.S. Code. The Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, referred to in this section, enacted 49 U.S.C. §§ 14504a and 49 U.S.C. § 14506 and amended 49 U.S.C. §§ 13902, 13905, 13906, and 13908.
23-13-604. Registration fees.
- Any fees collected by the Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration under this section shall be classified as special revenues and shall be deposited into the State Treasury.
-
Upon receipt of the funds and if not prohibited by the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., the Treasurer of State shall:
- Deduct three percent (3%) of the funds as a charge by the state for its services as specified in this section; and
- Credit the three percent (3%) to the Constitutional Officers Fund and the State Central Services Fund, as defined in the Revenue Classification Law, § 19-6-101 et seq., or to any successor State Treasury fund or funds established by law to replace the Constitutional Officers Fund and the State Central Services Fund.
-
The net amount of the fees collected by the secretary under this section shall be:
- Transferred by the Treasurer of State on the last business day of each month to the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund; and
- Distributed and expended in the manner directed by the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., for the payment of expenses incurred by the Arkansas Department of Transportation for motor carrier law enforcement and safety operations.
History. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 2; 2009, No. 164, § 5; 2017, No. 707, § 230; 2019, No. 910, §§ 3510, 3511.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment redesignated (b) and (c); deleted “as in effect on January 1, 2007” following “et seq.” in the introductory language of (b); inserted “§ 4301 et seq.” in (c)(2); and made related changes.
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (c)(2).
The 2019 amendment substituted “Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration” for “Director of the Department of Finance and Administration” in (a); and substituted “secretary” for “director” in the introductory language of (c).
U.S. Code. The Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, referred to in this section, enacted 49 U.S.C. §§ 14504a and 49 U.S.C. § 14506 and amended 49 U.S.C. §§ 13902, 13905, 13906, and 13908.
23-13-605. Violation — Enforcement — Penalties.
-
- A person who is subject to the Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-59, § 4301 et seq., and who uses the highways of this state without first registering in accordance with this subchapter is guilty of a violation.
- The Division of Arkansas State Police, the Arkansas Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Department of Transportation, and local authorities may enforce this subsection.
-
A person who is found guilty or enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere under this section shall be ordered to pay a fine of:
- For a first offense, not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or more than five hundred dollars ($500); and
- For a second or subsequent offense, not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
-
- Fifty percent (50%) of the amount of the fines imposed and collected under this section shall be remitted by the tenth day of each month to the Administration of Justice Funds Section on a form provided by the Division of Administrative Services for deposit into the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
- Fifty percent (50%) of the amount of the fines imposed and collected under this section shall remain in the jurisdiction in which the violation occurred.
History. Acts 2007, No. 232, § 2; 2009, No. 164, § 6; 2017, No. 707, § 231.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment redesignated the section; deleted “as in effect on January 1, 2007” following “et seq.” in (a)(1), and substituted “this subsection” for “subsection (a) of this section” in (a)(2); and made related changes.
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(2).
U.S. Code. The Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, referred to in this section, enacted 49 U.S.C. §§ 14504a and 49 U.S.C. § 14506 and amended 49 U.S.C. §§ 13902, 13905, 13906, and 13908.
Subchapter 7 — Transportation Network Company Services Act
Research References
ALR.
Liability and Regulation of Ride-Sharing Services Using Social Media. 6 A.L.R.7th Art. 1 (2015).
23-13-701. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Transportation Network Company Services Act”.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-702. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Digital network” means any online-enabled application, software, website, or system offered or utilized by a transportation network company that enables the prearrangement of rides with transportation network company drivers;
-
“Personal vehicle” means a vehicle that is used by a transportation network company driver in connection with providing a prearranged ride and is:
- Owned, leased, or otherwise authorized for use by the transportation network company driver; and
- Not a taxicab, limousine, or for-hire vehicle;
-
- “Prearranged ride” or “transportation network services” means the provision of transportation by a transportation network company driver to a rider, beginning when a transportation network company driver accepts a ride requested by a rider through a digital network controlled by a transportation network company, continuing while the transportation network company driver transports a requesting rider, and ending when the last requesting rider departs from the personal vehicle.
-
“Prearranged ride” or “transportation network services” does not include transportation provided using a:
- Taxicab service as defined in § 14-57-301 et seq.;
- Motor carrier service under the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, 1955, § 23-13-201 et seq.; or
- Street hail service;
-
- “Transportation network company” means a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, or other entity licensed under this subchapter and operating in this state that uses a digital network to connect transportation network company riders to transportation network company drivers who provide prearranged rides.
- “Transportation network company” does not include a company that controls, directs, or manages the personal vehicles or transportation network company drivers that connect to the company's digital network, except when agreed to by written contract;
-
“Transportation network company driver” means an individual who:
- Receives connections to potential passengers and related services from a transportation network company in exchange for payment of a fee to the transportation network company; and
- Uses a personal vehicle to provide services for riders matched through a digital network controlled by a transportation network company; and
- “Transportation network company rider” or “rider” means an individual or a person who uses a transportation network company's digital network to connect with a transportation network company driver who provides a prearranged ride to a rider in the driver's personal vehicle between points chosen by the rider.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1; 2015, No. 1267, § 1.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote the section.
23-13-703. Commercial vehicle registration not required.
A transportation network company driver:
- Is not required to register the motor vehicle used for transportation network company services as a commercial or for-hire motor vehicle; and
- May conduct transportation network company services with a standard, noncommercial driver's license and is not required to obtain a “P” endorsement or any other endorsement on the transportation network company driver's license.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-704. Transportation network company permit required.
- An individual or entity shall not operate a transportation network company in this state without first having obtained a permit to operate a transportation network company from the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
-
The commission shall:
- Issue forms for a transportation network company to demonstrate that it meets all requirements of this subchapter to obtain a permit; and
-
Issue a transportation network company permit to an applicant that:
- Meets all qualifications of this subchapter; and
- Pays an annual permit fee of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) to the commission.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-705. Agent for service of process.
A transportation network company shall maintain an agent for service of process under the Model Registered Agents Act, § 4-20-101 et seq.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-706. Fare charged for transportation network company services.
- A transportation network company may charge a fare for transportation network company services.
-
If a fare is charged, the transportation network company shall disclose to passengers on the transportation network company's website, digital network, or within its software application:
- The fare calculation method for transportation network company services;
- Applicable rates charged for transportation network company services; and
- The option to receive an estimated fare before the passenger enters the transportation network company driver's motor vehicle.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-707. Identification of transportation network company drivers and motor vehicles.
Before a passenger enters the transportation network company driver's motor vehicle, the transportation network company website, digital network, or software application used by the transportation network company to arrange the transportation network company service shall display:
- A picture of the transportation network company driver; and
- The license plate number of the motor vehicle the transportation network company driver will use to provide the transportation network company service.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-708. Electronic receipt.
Within a reasonable time after transportation network company services end, a transportation network company shall transmit an electronic receipt to the passenger that lists:
- The origin and destination of the trip;
- The total time and distance of the trip; and
- An itemization of the total fare paid, if any.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-709. Insurance requirements.
-
-
On and after July 22, 2015, a transportation network company driver or a transportation network company on the driver's behalf shall maintain primary automobile insurance that:
- Recognizes that the driver is a transportation network company driver and covers the driver while the driver is logged on to the transportation network company's digital network while the driver is engaged in a prearranged ride or while the driver otherwise uses a vehicle to provide transportation network services;
-
- Provides primary automobile liability insurance in the amount of at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for death and bodily injury per person, one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for death and bodily injury per incident, and twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for property damage while a participating transportation network company driver is logged on to the transportation network company's digital network and is available to receive transportation requests but is not engaged in a prearranged ride.
-
The coverage requirements described in subdivision (a)(1)(B)(i) of this section may be satisfied by any combination of:
- Automobile insurance maintained by the transportation network company driver; or
- Automobile insurance maintained by the transportation network company;
-
- Provides primary automobile liability insurance coverage of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) for death, bodily injury, and property damage while a transportation network company driver is engaged in a prearranged ride.
-
The coverage requirements described in subdivision (a)(1)(C)(i) of this section may be satisfied by any combination of:
- Automobile insurance maintained by the transportation network company driver; or
- Automobile insurance maintained by the transportation network company.
- If insurance maintained by a driver under subdivision (a)(1)(B) or subdivision (a)(1)(C) of this section has lapsed or does not provide the required coverage, the insurance maintained by a transportation network company shall provide the coverage required under this subsection beginning with the first dollar of a claim, and the insurer has the duty to defend the claim.
- Coverage under an automobile insurance policy maintained by the transportation network company shall not be dependent on a personal automobile insurer's first denial of a claim, nor shall a personal automobile insurance policy be required to first deny a claim.
- Insurance required under this subsection may be placed with an insurer authorized to do business in this state or with a surplus-lines insurer eligible under § 23-65-305.
- Insurance that satisfies the requirements of this subsection shall be deemed to satisfy the financial responsibility requirement for a motor vehicle under § 27-22-101 et seq. and the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, § 27-19-101 et seq.
-
- A transportation network company driver shall carry proof of coverage satisfying subdivision (a)(1)(B) or subdivision (a)(1)(C) of this section with him or her during his or her use of a motor vehicle in connection with a transportation network company's digital network.
- In the event of an accident, a transportation network company driver shall provide insurance coverage information required under subdivision (a)(6)(A) of this section to the directly interested parties, automobile insurers, and investigating police officers upon request under the Arkansas Voluntary Enhanced Security Driver's License and Identification Card Act, § 27-16-1201 et seq.
- Upon a request under subdivision (a)(6)(B) of this section, a transportation network company driver shall also disclose to directly interested parties, automobile insurers, and investigating police officers whether he or she was logged on to the transportation network company's digital network or was on a prearranged ride at the time of the accident.
-
On and after July 22, 2015, a transportation network company driver or a transportation network company on the driver's behalf shall maintain primary automobile insurance that:
-
A transportation network company shall disclose in writing to transportation network company drivers the following before they are allowed to accept a request for a prearranged ride on the transportation network company's digital network:
- The insurance coverage, including the types of coverage and the limits for each coverage, that the transportation network company provides while the transportation network company driver uses a personal vehicle in connection with a transportation network company's digital network; and
- That the transportation network company driver's own automobile insurance policy might not provide any coverage while the transportation network company driver is logged on to the transportation network company's digital network and is available to receive prearranged ride requests or is engaged in a prearranged ride, depending on the terms of the insurance policy.
-
- Insurers that write automobile insurance in this state may exclude any and all coverage afforded under the owner's insurance policy for any loss or injury that occurs while a transportation network company driver is logged on to a transportation network company's digital network or while a transportation network company driver provides a prearranged ride.
-
The right to exclude all coverage under subdivision (c)(1) of this section may apply to any coverage included in an automobile insurance policy, including without limitation:
- Liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage;
- Personal injury protection coverage as described in § 23-89-202;
- Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage;
- Medical payments coverage;
- Comprehensive physical damage coverage; and
- Collision physical damage coverage.
- An exclusion permitted under subdivision (c)(2) of this section shall apply notwithstanding any requirement under § 27-22-101 et seq. and the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, § 27-19-101 et seq.
- An automobile insurer that excludes the coverage described in subsection (a) of this section shall have no duty to defend or indemnify any claim expressly excluded thereunder.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall be deemed to invalidate or limit an exclusion contained in a policy, including any policy in use or approved for use in Arkansas prior to the enactment of this subchapter, that excludes coverage for vehicles used to carry persons or property for a charge or available for hire by the public.
- This section does not imply or require that a personal automobile insurance policy provide coverage while a transportation network company driver is logged on to the transportation network company's digital network, while the transportation network company driver is engaged in a prearranged ride, or while the transportation network company driver otherwise uses a motor vehicle to provide transportation network services.
- This section does not preclude an insurer from providing coverage for the transportation network company driver's motor vehicle, if it so chose to do so by contract or endorsement.
-
- An automobile insurer that excludes the coverage described in subdivision (c)(2) of this section shall have no duty to defend or indemnify any claim expressly excluded thereunder.
- This section does not invalidate or limit an exclusion contained in an insurance policy, including any policy in use or approved for use in this state before July 22, 2015, that excludes coverage for a vehicle used to carry a person or property for a charge or available for hire by the public.
- An automobile insurer that defends or indemnifies a claim against a transportation network company driver that is excluded under the terms of its policy shall have a right of contribution against other insurers that provide automobile insurance to the same transportation network company driver in satisfaction of the coverage requirements of subsection (a) of this section at the time of loss.
- In a claims coverage investigation, a transportation network company and any insurer potentially providing coverage under subsection (a) of this section shall cooperate to facilitate the exchange of relevant information with directly involved parties and any insurer of the transportation network company driver, if applicable, including the precise times that a transportation network company driver logged on and off of the transportation network company's digital network in the twelve-hour period immediately preceding and in the twelve-hour period immediately following the accident and disclose to each other a clear description of the coverage, exclusions, and limits provided under any automobile insurance policy maintained under subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1; 2015, No. 1267, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. In reference to the term “the enactment of this subchapter”, Acts 2015, No. 1050, was signed by the Governor on April 4, 2015, and became effective on July 22, 2015.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote the section.
23-13-710. Insurer disclosure requirements.
Before a transportation network company driver is allowed to accept a request for transportation network company services on the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application, the transportation network company shall disclose in writing to the transportation network company drivers:
- The motor vehicle liability insurance coverage and limits of liability that the transportation network company provides while the transportation network company driver uses a personal motor vehicle in connection with a transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application; and
- That the transportation network company driver's own motor vehicle liability insurance policy may not provide coverage while the transportation network company driver uses a motor vehicle for transportation network company services.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-711. Exclusions — Claim investigations.
-
-
A private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance policy may exclude coverage against all loss from liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle:
- While the motor vehicle is being used to provide transportation network company services; and
- While a transportation network company driver is logged on to the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application.
-
An exclusion of coverage under subdivision (a)(1) of this section may apply to any coverage included in a private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance policy, including without limitation:
- Liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage;
- Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage;
- Medical payments coverage;
- Comprehensive physical damage coverage;
- Collision physical damage coverage; and
- Coverage under § 23-89-202.
-
A private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance policy may exclude coverage against all loss from liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle:
- A private passenger motor vehicle liability insurer that properly excludes coverage under subsection (a) of this section does not have a duty to defend or indemnify a loss.
- The failure to pay or receive a suggested donation set by a transportation network company does not constitute the charitable carrying or transportation of persons.
-
In a claims coverage investigation, a transportation network company and its insurer shall:
- Cooperate with the private passenger motor vehicle liability insurer that insures the motor vehicle that the transportation company network driver uses to provide transportation network company services; and
- Within ten (10) business days of receiving a request for information from a private passenger motor vehicle liability insurer, provide to the private passenger motor vehicle liability insurer information, including the precise times that a transportation network company driver logged on and off of the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application within the twenty-four (24) hours immediately preceding the accident being investigated.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-712. Drug or alcohol use prohibited.
-
A transportation network company shall:
- Implement a zero-tolerance policy prohibiting the use of drugs or alcohol while a transportation network company driver is providing transportation network company services or is logged into the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application, but is not providing transportation network company services; and
- Provide notice on its website, digital network, and software application of the zero-tolerance policy and its procedures to report a complaint about a transportation network company driver with whom a passenger was matched and whom the passenger reasonably suspects was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the time that transportation network company services were provided.
-
- Upon receipt of a passenger complaint under this section, the transportation network company shall immediately suspend the transportation network company driver's access to the transportation network company's website, digital network, and software application, and shall conduct an investigation into the reported incident.
- The suspension shall last until the investigation is completed.
- The transportation network company shall maintain records relevant to a complaint under this section for at least two (2) years from the date the complaint is received by the transportation network company.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-713. Driver requirements.
-
Before permitting an individual to act as a transportation network company driver on its website, digital network, or software application, a transportation network company shall:
- Require the individual to submit an application to the transportation network company that includes information regarding the individual's address, age, driver's license, driving history, motor vehicle registration, motor vehicle liability insurance coverage, and other information required by the transportation network company;
-
Conduct, or have a third party conduct, a state and national criminal background check for each applicant that includes searching:
- A multistate and multijurisdictional criminal records locator or other similar commercial nationwide database with validation of primary source searches; and
- The National Sex Offender Registry database; and
- Obtain and review the individual's driving history.
-
A transportation network company shall not permit an individual to act as a transportation network company driver on its website, digital network, or software application who at the time of submitting an application:
- Has had more than three (3) moving violations or has had one (1) major violation within the previous three (3) years, including without limitation attempting to evade the police, reckless driving, or driving on a suspended or revoked license;
- Has been convicted within the past seven (7) years of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, fraud, a sexual offense, using a motor vehicle to commit a felony, or a crime involving property damage, theft, acts of violence, or acts of terror;
- Is a match in the National Sex Offender Registry database;
- Does not possess a valid driver's license;
- Does not possess proof of registration for the motor vehicle or motor vehicles to be used to provide transportation network company services;
- Does not possess proof of motor vehicle liability insurance coverage for the motor vehicle or motor vehicles to be used to provide transportation network company services; or
- Is not at least nineteen (19) years of age.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-714. Compliance with motor vehicle safety and emissions requirements.
- A transportation network company shall not allow a transportation network company driver to accept trip requests through the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application unless the motor vehicle that the transportation network company driver will use to provide transportation network company services meets the state's motor vehicle safety and emissions requirements for a private motor vehicle or the safety and emissions requirements for a private motor vehicle of the state in which the motor vehicle is registered.
-
- A transportation network company shall verify that an initial safety inspection of a motor vehicle used as a transportation network company motor vehicle is conducted by a mechanic within ninety (90) days of beginning service.
- The inspection shall be performed or supervised by a mechanic certified by the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence.
-
A safety inspection conducted under this subsection shall include a check of the following motor vehicle equipment to ensure that the equipment is safe and in proper operating condition:
- Foot brakes;
- Emergency parking brake;
- Suspension and steering mechanisms;
- Windshield;
- Rear window and other glass;
- Windshield wipers;
- Headlights;
- Taillights;
- Turn indicator lights;
- Brake lights;
- Front seat adjustment mechanism;
- Doors, including the opening, closing, and locking mechanisms;
- Horn;
- Speedometer;
- Bumpers;
- Muffler and exhaust system;
- Tires, including their condition and tread depth;
- Interior and exterior rear view mirrors; and
- Safety belts for driver and passengers.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-715. Street hails prohibited.
A transportation network company driver shall not solicit or accept a passenger who hails the transportation network company driver from the street.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-716. Cash trips prohibited.
- A transportation network company shall adopt a policy prohibiting solicitation or acceptance of cash payments from passengers and notify transportation network company drivers of the policy.
- Transportation network company drivers shall not solicit or accept cash payments from passengers.
- A payment for transportation network company services shall be made only electronically using the transportation network company's digital network or software application.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-717. Nondiscrimination — Accessibility.
- A transportation network company shall adopt a policy of nondiscrimination with respect to passengers and potential passengers and notify transportation network company drivers of its policy.
- Transportation network company drivers shall comply with all applicable laws regarding nondiscrimination against passengers or potential passengers.
- Transportation network company drivers shall comply with all applicable laws to accommodate service animals.
- A transportation network company shall not impose additional charges for providing services to a person with a physical disability because of the disability.
-
- A transportation network company shall provide a passenger an opportunity to indicate whether he or she requires a wheelchair-accessible motor vehicle.
- If a transportation network company cannot arrange wheelchair-accessible transportation network company service in any instance, it shall direct the passenger to an alternate provider of wheelchair-accessible service, if available.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-718. Records — Inspection.
-
A transportation network company shall maintain:
- Individual trip records for at least one (1) year from the date each trip was provided;
- Transportation network company driver records for at least one (1) year from the date a transportation network company driver was active on the transportation network company's website, digital network, or software application; and
- Any other records required by this subchapter.
- In response to a specific complaint, the Arkansas Public Service Commission or its employees or duly authorized agents may inspect records held by a transportation network company that are needed to investigate or resolve the complaint.
-
- No more than annually as determined by rule of the commission, the commission or its employees or duly authorized agents may in a mutually agreed-upon setting inspect or, if inspection is not feasible, be provided copies of records required to be maintained by a transportation network company under this subchapter that are necessary to ensure public safety.
- The inspection of records under subdivision (c)(1) of this section shall be on an audit rather than a comprehensive basis.
-
-
Records obtained by the commission under this subchapter pertaining to transportation network company services, transportation network company drivers, or transportation network company drivers' motor vehicles:
- Are not subject to disclosure to a third party by the commission; and
- Are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq.
- Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting the applicability of any other exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq., to any other records obtained by the commission under this subchapter.
-
Records obtained by the commission under this subchapter pertaining to transportation network company services, transportation network company drivers, or transportation network company drivers' motor vehicles:
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2453.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c)(1).
23-13-719. Status of transportation network company drivers — Workers' compensation coverage not applicable.
-
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a transportation network company driver is an independent contractor and not the employee of the transportation network company if:
- The transportation network company does not prescribe specific hours during which a transportation network company driver must be logged into the transportation network company's website, digital platform, or software application;
- The transportation network company imposes no restrictions on the transportation network company driver's ability to utilize a website, digital network, or software application of other transportation network companies;
- The transportation network company does not assign a transportation network company driver a particular territory in which transportation network company services may be provided;
- The transportation network company does not restrict a transportation network company driver from engaging in any other occupation or business; and
- The transportation network company and transportation network company driver agree in writing that the transportation network company driver is an independent contractor of the transportation network company.
- A transportation network company that complies with subsection (a) of this section is not required to provide workers' compensation coverage for a transportation network company driver that is classified as an independent contractor under this section.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-720. Exclusive authority.
-
- Transportation network companies and transportation network company drivers are governed exclusively by this subchapter and any rules promulgated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission consistent with this subchapter.
- This subchapter does not limit the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the Division of Arkansas State Police, the Attorney General, other state agencies, law enforcement, and local governments within this state from enforcing state and federal laws or regulations of general applicability that apply to transportation network companies and transportation network company drivers.
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this section, a county, municipality, or other local entity shall not tax or license a transportation network company, a transportation network company driver, or a motor vehicle used by a transportation network company driver if the tax or license relates to providing transportation network company services or subjects a transportation network company to any type of rate, entry, operational, or other requirement of the county, municipality, or other local entity.
-
A municipal airport commission created under the Airport Commission Act, § 14-359-101 et seq., or a regional airport authority created under the Regional Airport Act, § 14-362-101 et seq., may impose tolls and fees as authorized by §§ 14-359-109 and 14-362-109 upon a:
- Transportation network company;
- Transportation network company driver; or
- Motor vehicle used by a transportation network company driver.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 232; 2017, No. 954, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment by No. 707 substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(2).
The 2017 amendment by No. 954 redesignated former (b) as (b)(1), and added (b)(2); and added “Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this section” in (b)(1).
23-13-721. Penalties.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission may levy a fine not to exceed:
- One thousand dollars ($1,000) for a violation of this subchapter; and
- Five thousand dollars ($5,000) for a knowing violation of this subchapter.
-
To determine the amount of the fine, the commission shall consider relevant factors, including without limitation:
- The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the transportation network company charged with the violation;
- The severity of the violation;
- The good faith of the transportation network company charged with the violation in attempting to achieve compliance with this subchapter after being notified of the violation; and
- Any history of previous violations of this subchapter by the transportation network company charged with the violation.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
23-13-722. Rules.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission may promulgate rules to implement this subchapter.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1050, § 1.
Chapter 14 Arkansas Air Commerce Act
Research References
Am. Jur. 8A Am. Jur. 2d, Aviation, § 27 and § 60 et seq.
C.J.S. 2A C.J.S., Aeronautics, § 14 and § 177 et seq.
23-14-101. Title.
This chapter shall be known and cited as the “Arkansas Air Commerce Act”.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-421.
23-14-102. Definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Air commerce” means the carriage by aircraft of persons or property, or any class or classes thereof, including express, for compensation or hire in intrastate commerce in this state, including the carriage by aircraft of persons or property which move partly by aircraft and partly by other forms of transportation;
- “Aircraft” means any contrivance invented, used, or designed for the navigation of or flight in the air;
- “Common carrier by aircraft” means any person that holds itself out to the general public, whether directly or indirectly or by a lease or any other arrangement, over regular routes, to engage in air commerce. It shall include any person that, under individual contracts or agreements, engages in regular operation of one (1) or more aircraft for the transportation of passengers or property for compensation;
- [Repealed.]
- “Overcharges” means charges for transportation service in excess of those applicable thereto under the tariffs lawfully on file with the department;
- “Person” means any individual, firm, copartnership, corporation, company, association, joint-stock association, or body politic and includes any trustee, receiver, assignee, or other similar representative thereof; and
- The “services” and “transportation” to which this chapter applies includes all aircraft operated by, for, or in the interest of any common carrier by aircraft irrespective of ownership or of contract, express or implied, together with all facilities and property operated or controlled by any such carrier and used in air commerce or in the performance of any service in connection therewith.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-401; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 233.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (4).
23-14-103. Exemptions.
Nothing in this chapter shall apply to or be construed or held to apply to:
- The transportation or handling of United States mail; or
- Any common carrier by aircraft which the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall by order determine to be engaged mainly and principally in interstate commerce and whose intrastate business is incidental to its interstate business, if the department finds that its operations are conducted pursuant to a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Federal Aviation Administration or any other governmental agency successor thereto.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, §§ 2, 8A; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 74-402, 74-409; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 234.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (2).
23-14-104. Penalties.
- A person, including any officer, agent, or employee of a corporation, that violates any provision of this chapter or fails to comply with any order, decision, or rule issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
- Each day's violation of this chapter or any of the terms or conditions of any such order, decision, or rule shall constitute a separate offense.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-419; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 326; 2017, No. 707, § 235; 2019, No. 315, § 2454.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “A person” for “Every person”, substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”, and substituted “is guilty” for “shall be guilty”.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a) and (b).
23-14-105. Compliance with chapter required.
No person shall engage in air commerce except in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-403.
23-14-106. Control, supervision, and regulation by department.
A person engaging in air commerce is declared to be subject to control, supervision, and regulation by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-403; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 236.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “A person” for “Every person” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-107. Duties and powers of department.
- Administration and Enforcement. It shall be the duty of the Arkansas Department of Transportation to administer the provisions of this chapter, and to that end the department shall have authority to make and amend such general or special rules and regulations and to issue such orders as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
- Jurisdiction Over Common Carriers by Aircraft. So far as may be necessary for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this chapter, the department shall have general supervision and regulation of and jurisdiction and control over common carriers by aircraft.
- Complaints and Investigation. The department may investigate, either upon complaint or upon its own initiative, as to whether any common carrier by aircraft has failed to comply with any provision of this chapter or with any order, rule, regulation, or requirement issued or established pursuant thereto and after notice and hearing take appropriate action to compel compliance therewith.
- Joint Hearings and Cooperation. The department is authorized to confer with or to hold joint hearings with any authorities of any state or of the United States Government, having jurisdiction with respect to matters involving common carriers by aircraft, in connection with any matter arising under this chapter. The department is also authorized to avail itself of the cooperation, services, records, and facilities of such authorities as fully as may be practicable in the enforcement or administration of any provision of this chapter.
- Interstate Rates and Service. When the interstate rates, fares, charges, or classifications of common carriers by aircraft affecting the commerce of this state are, in the opinion of the department, excessive or discriminatory or are levied or laid in violation of the Act of the United States Congress entitled “Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938” [repealed], approved June 23, 1938, and the acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, or are in conflict with the rulings, orders, or regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction thereof, or when those services are, in the opinion of the department, inadequate, unsatisfactory, or discriminatory, the department may apply by petition to the authorities having jurisdiction thereof for relief and may present to those authorities all facts coming to the department's knowledge as to violations of the rulings, orders, or regulations of those authorities, or as to violations of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 [repealed] or acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto.
- Administrative and Judicial Procedure. The procedure of the department in administering this chapter and of the courts in all matters arising under this chapter shall be the same as established by the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, 1955, § 23-13-201 et seq., wherever practicable.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 4; 1985, No. 257, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-404; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 237.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
U.S. Code. The Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, referred to in this section, has been repealed. For current law, see 49 U.S.C. § 40101 et seq.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Administrative Law in Arkansas, 4 Ark. L. Rev. 107.
23-14-108. Pecuniary interest by employees prohibited.
No member of the Arkansas Department of Transportation or any employee of the department appointed or employed in the administration of this chapter shall in any manner have a pecuniary interest in, own any securities of, or hold any position with any common carrier by aircraft.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-404; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 238.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-109. Certificates required.
No person shall engage in the business of a common carrier by aircraft unless there is in force a certificate issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation authorizing the person to engage in that business.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-405; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 239.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-110. Certificates — Application — Notice and hearings.
- Applications for certificates shall be made in writing to the Arkansas Department of Transportation, shall be verified under oath, and shall be in such form and contain such information and be accompanied by proof of service upon such interested parties as the department shall by rule require.
-
- Upon the filing of an application for a certificate, the department shall give due notice thereof to such persons and by such means as the department may by rule determine.
- Any interested person may file with the department a protest or memorandum of opposition to or in support of the issuance of a certificate.
- A public hearing shall be held on the application if the applicant or any person having a substantial interest in the proceeding shall so request within such time as the department shall by rule provide.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-406; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 240; 2019, No. 315, § 2455.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a), (b)(1), and (c).
23-14-111. Temporary certificates.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation may grant temporary certificates without notice or hearing upon such terms and conditions as the department may prescribe, but not for a period exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-407; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 241.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-112. Certificates — Security for protection of public required.
No certificate shall be issued to a common carrier by aircraft or remain in force unless the carrier complies with such reasonable rules as the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall prescribe governing the filing and approval of surety bonds, policies of insurance, qualifications as a self-insurer, or other securities or agreements, in such reasonable amount and conditioned as the department may require.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-414; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 242; 2019, No. 315, § 2456.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
23-14-113. Certificates — Evidence of compliance with other laws required.
No certificate shall be issued to any person to operate as a common carrier by aircraft unless the applicant submits evidence satisfactory to the Arkansas Department of Transportation showing that it will comply with the provisions of the laws of the United States and the lawful rules, regulations, and orders thereunder respecting safety of operations, rules, and the provisions of the laws of Arkansas with respect to the right to use such airports, air lanes, and aircraft as may be necessary in order properly to conduct the proposed operations and observe proper standards of safety in the operation or navigation of aircraft.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-407.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
23-14-114. Issuance of certificates.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation, subject to §§ 23-14-109 and 23-14-111 — 23-14-113, shall issue a certificate authorizing the whole or any part of the operation covered by an application for a certificate if it finds that the applicant is fit, willing, and able to perform the operation properly and to conform to the provisions of this chapter and the rules and requirements of the department hereunder and that the operation and the performance thereof by the applicant is required by the public convenience and necessity.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-407; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 243; 2019, No. 315, § 2457.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules”.
23-14-115. Certificates — Terms and conditions.
Each certificate issued pursuant to this chapter shall set forth specifically the privileges granted thereby, together with the effective date and the duration thereof.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-408.
23-14-116. Certificates — Transfer or lease.
Any certificate may be transferred or leased subject to the approval of the Arkansas Department of Transportation and under such reasonable rules as may be prescribed by the department.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-412; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 244; 2019, No. 315, § 2458.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
23-14-117. Certificates — Modification, suspension, or revocation.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation after due notice and hearing may alter, amend, modify, suspend, or revoke any certificate previously granted where the public interest so demands.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-410; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 245.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-118. Rates and service generally.
Every common carrier by aircraft shall furnish reasonable and adequate service and facilities at just and reasonable rates as shall be determined by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-416; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 246.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-119. Extension of service.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation after due notice and hearing may require any certificate holder to extend its existing service as required by the public convenience and necessity.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-411; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 247.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-120. Abandonment or discontinuance of service.
No common carrier by aircraft shall abandon or discontinue any route or part thereof for which a certificate has been issued by the Arkansas Department of Transportation, unless upon the application of the common carrier the department finds after notice and opportunity for hearing the abandonment or discontinuance to be in the public interest.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-413; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 248.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-121. Tariffs.
- Filing. A common carrier by aircraft shall file with the Arkansas Department of Transportation, print, and make available to the public tariffs showing all rates, fares, and charges for air commerce between points served by it, and between points served by it and points served by any other common carrier by aircraft when through-air commerce service and rates have been established, and all classifications, rules, regulations, practices, and services in connection with such commerce. The tariffs shall be filed in such manner and form as shall be prescribed by the department.
- Observance. No common carrier by aircraft shall charge, demand, collect, or receive a greater or lesser or different compensation for air commerce, or for any service in connection therewith, than the rates, fares, and charges specified in its currently effective tariffs.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-415; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 249.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “A common carrier” for “Every common carrier”, and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-122. Free or reduced-rate transportation.
-
Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit common carriers by aircraft, under such terms and conditions as the Arkansas Department of Transportation may prescribe, from issuing or interchanging tickets or passes for free or reduced-rate transportation to:
- Their directors, officers, and employees and their immediate families;
- Witnesses and attorneys attending any legal investigation in which the carrier is interested;
- Persons injured in aircraft accidents and physicians and nurses attending such persons; and
- Any person or property with the object of providing relief in cases of general epidemic, pestilence, or other calamitous visitation.
- The members of the department and its employees when in the performance of their official duties under this chapter shall have the right to pass free of charge on all common carriers by aircraft as defined in this chapter.
- No such carrier shall provide free or reduced-rate transportation to any other persons or under any other circumstances.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-415; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 250.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
23-14-123. Change in tariff, charge, rule, regulation, etc. — Approval by department.
-
- A change shall not be made in any rate, fare, or charge, or any classification, rule, regulation, or practice affecting the rate, fare, or charge, or the value of the service thereunder, specified in any effective tariff of any common carrier by aircraft, except upon approval of the Arkansas Department of Transportation and the rules and regulations prescribed by it.
- If the proposed change is not acted upon by the department within thirty (30) days from the filing date thereof, the change shall become effective at the expiration of the thirty-day period.
- The department is empowered to suspend any proposed new rate upon notice to the carrier for a period not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days pending investigation by the department as to the reasonableness of such a proposed rate. However, this subsection shall not apply to any initial tariff filed by the carrier.
- At any hearing involving any change in any tariff, classification, rule, regulation, practice, or service of a common carrier by aircraft, the burden of proof to show that the changed tariff, classification, rule, regulation, practice, or service is just and reasonable shall be upon the carrier.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, §§ 14, 15; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 74-415, 74-416; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 251.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “A change shall not” for “No change shall” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-14-124. Regulation of securities and liens — Liability of state.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation is empowered to supervise, regulate, restrict, and control the issuance of stock, stock certificates, bonds, notes, and other evidences of indebtedness by common carriers by aircraft incorporated under the laws of Arkansas and the creation of liens on property in this state by carriers incorporated under the laws of other states.
- All securities issued without approval of the department as provided for in this section shall be void.
- This section shall not apply to the issuance of any securities payable at periods of not more than twelve (12) months from the date thereof.
- No provision in this chapter and no deed or act done or performed under or pursuant to this chapter shall be construed to obligate the State of Arkansas to pay or guarantee, in any manner whatsoever, any securities issued under the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-418; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 252.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-14-125. Accounts, records, and reports.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation is empowered to require annual and other periodic reports from any common carrier by aircraft covering any or all operations or business.
- The department may also require any common carrier by aircraft to file with it a true copy of each or any contract, agreement, understanding, or arrangement between the carrier and any other carrier or person in relation to any traffic affected by the provisions of this chapter.
- The department shall prescribe the forms of any and all accounts, records, and memoranda to be kept by common carriers by aircraft, including the accounts, records, and memoranda of the movement of traffic, as well as of the receipts and expenditures of money.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-417; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 253.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-14-126. Access to and examination of property and records.
- The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall at all times have access to all lands, buildings, and equipment of any common carrier by aircraft and to all accounts, records, and memoranda, including all documents, papers, and correspondence, now or hereafter existing and kept or required to be kept by such carriers.
- The department may employ special agents or auditors, who shall have authority under the orders of the department to inspect and examine any and all such lands, buildings, equipment, accounts, records, and memoranda.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-417; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 254.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-14-127. Emergency landings or takeoffs.
No common carrier by aircraft shall be deemed to have violated any term, condition, or limitation of its certificate by landing or taking off during an emergency at a point not named in its certificate, or by operating during an emergency between terminal and intermediate points other than those specified in its certificate.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-408.
23-14-128. Fees.
- Application Fees. The following application fees shall be paid to the Arkansas Department of Transportation at the time of filing an application:
- Disposition of Fees Collected. All fees or sums collected by the department under the provisions of this chapter shall be deposited with the Treasurer of State and credited to the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund.
Application for certificate $25.00 Application for transfer of certificate 25.00 Application for duplicate certificate 5.00 Filing rate schedule 2.50 Certified copies of all documents 15¢ for each folio Uncertified copies of all documents 10¢ for each folio Filing annual reports 5.00
Click to view form.
History. Acts 1945, No. 252, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 74-420; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 255.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language of (a).
Chapter 15 Pipeline Companies
Research References
ALR.
Construction and application of rule requiring public use for which property is condemned to be “more necessary” or “higher use” than public use to which property is already appropriated — state takings. 49 A.L.R.5th 769.
Application of zoning regulations to government projects or activities. 53 A.L.R.5th 1.
Am. Jur. 61 Am. Jur. 2d, Pipelines, § 1 et seq.
Ark. L. Rev.
Note, Hillard v. Stephens: Interpretation of Market Price Royalty Provisions in Natural Gas Leases, 36 Ark. L. Rev. 312.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Cross References. Conditions precedent to operation in state by foreign pipeline companies, § 23-3-108.
Preambles. Acts 1967, No. 170 contained a preamble which read:
“Whereas, the production of commercial fertilizer is rapidly becoming one of Arkansas' largest industries; and
“Whereas, Arkansas has the abundance of natural resources in the form of gas, water, et cetera to enable her to become the leading commercial fertilizer producing state in our nation; and
“Whereas, in order to stimulate and expedite the construction of new and expanded commercial fertilizer manufacturing plants and facilities in Arkansas, it has been found and determined that pipelines are essential for economical, efficient and rapid transportation of commercial fertilizer, substances and materials from plant to plant and from plant to market; and
“Whereas, the largest market for commercial fertilizer is in the states comprising the wheat and corn belts; and
“Whereas, the growth and development of the commercial fertilizer industry in Arkansas will create employment opportunities in our State that are not presently available and cannot otherwise be provided;
“Now, therefore….”
Effective Dates. Acts 1921, No. 239, § 3: approved Mar. 3, 1921. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared, and this act shall take effect and be in force immediately after its passage.”
Acts 1957, No. 175, § 3: Mar. 6, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is declared by the General Assembly of Arkansas that the proper protection of all users of natural gas present and future, and the desirable development of commerce and industry in this State requires the constant and continued exploration for and maintenance of adequate natural gas supplies and reserves, both within and without this State by natural gas utility companies operating in this State, and that such activities are of vital importance to the economic well-being of the State; that the allowance as an operating expense of the fair value or reasonable market price of company-produced gas will constitute a necessary and desirable incentive for the immediate and continuous activities resulting in the maintenance and increase of needed natural gas supplies and reserves; and that this Act will provide substantial encouragement for such activities and growth and is necessary for the public peace, health, welfare and safety. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1967, No. 170, § 5: Feb. 28, 1967. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the transportation of ammonia and other substances and materials comprising commercial fertilizer or used in manufacturing commercial fertilizer is essential to stimulate and expedite the construction of new and expanded commercial fertilizer manufacturing plants and facilities in Arkansas that will create employment opportunities not presently available. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
23-15-101. Common carriers — Eminent domain.
- All pipeline companies operating in this state are given the right of eminent domain and are declared to be common carriers, except pipelines operated for conveying natural gas for public utility service.
- The procedure to be followed in the exercise of the right shall be the same as prescribed in § 18-15-1201 et seq. relating to railroad companies, telegraph companies, and telephone companies.
History. Acts 1921, No. 239, §§ 1, 2; Pope's Dig., §§ 5081, 5082; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1901, 73-1902.
Publisher's Notes. Former §§ 23-15-101 and 23-15-102 have been revised and combined as § 23-15-101 pursuant to instructions from the Arkansas Code Revision Commission.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Malcolm N. Means, Note: Private Pipeline, Public Use?: Linder v. Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corp., Smith v. Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corp., and Arkansas's Eminent Domain Jurisprudence, 64 Ark. L. Rev. 809 (2011).
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Thomas A. Daily & W. Christopher Barrier, Still Fugacious After All These Years: A Sequel to the Basic Primer on Arkansas Oil and Gas Law, 35 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 357 (2013).
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section was constitutional as applied and did not violate Ark. Const. Art. 2, § 22, where it granted a private gas company the right of eminent domain to construct and maintain a natural gas pipeline over private land and the gas company operated the pipeline as a common carrier, giving the public the equal right to use the pipeline. Linder v. Ark. Midstream Gas Servs. Corp., 2010 Ark. 117, 362 S.W.3d 889 (2010).
This section did not violate Ark. Const. Art. 2, § 22 because it had not granted the power of eminent domain to a pipeline company for a private use; the pipeline was available to multiple natural gas producers and was to be operated by the pipeline company as a common carrier so that the public had equal rights to its use. Smith v. Ark. Midstream Gas Servs. Corp., 2010 Ark. 256, 377 S.W.3d 199 (2010).
Authority to Condemn.
An Arkansas corporation wholly owned by a foreign partnership each member of which was duly qualified to conduct business in the state was properly granted power to condemn a pipeline easement pursuant to this section. Young v. Energy Transp. Sys., 278 Ark. 146, 644 S.W.2d 266 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1105, 104 S. Ct. 1606, 80 L. Ed. 2d 135 (1984).
Company.
The word company within this section is used in the generic sense; to accept the contention that the word company is to be read as corporation would be a strained interpretation. Young v. Energy Transp. Sys., 278 Ark. 146, 644 S.W.2d 266 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1105, 104 S. Ct. 1606, 80 L. Ed. 2d 135 (1984).
23-15-102. [Transferred.]
Publisher's Notes. See Publisher's Notes, § 23-15-101.
23-15-103. Gas rates.
All gas lines or companies operating within the state who render a domestic or general service to the public in the furnishing and sale of gas are required to buy or furnish from the lowest or most advantageous market. Failure to do so shall deprive them of the difference in price between the market price and the price at which the purchase is made.
History. Acts 1921, No. 239, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 5081; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1901.
Case Notes
Commission's Authority.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission has no authority to discard the rate-base method in favor of the field-price method in determining the net profits a public utility can earn in this state. Acme Brick Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 436, 299 S.W.2d 208 (1957).
Company.
The word company within this section is used in the generic sense; to accept the contention that the word company is to be read as corporation would be a strained interpretation. Young v. Energy Transp. Sys., 278 Ark. 146, 644 S.W.2d 266 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1105, 104 S. Ct. 1606, 80 L. Ed. 2d 135 (1984).
Cited: SEECO, Inc. v. Hales, 341 Ark. 673, 22 S.W.3d 157 (2000); Brandon v. Arkansas W. Gas Co., 76 Ark. App. 201, 61 S.W.3d 193 (2001).
23-15-104. Rates and charges of natural gas utilities — Determination.
In determining and regulating the rates and charges of a natural gas utility company, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall allow as an operating expense of the natural gas utility company, for natural gas produced by it, the fair value or reasonable market price of the natural gas at the point at which the gas is delivered into the transmission system of the natural gas utility company in or within the vicinity of the field or fields where produced.
History. Acts 1957, No. 175, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1903.
Case Notes
Actions by Taxpayers.
Tort action brought by ratepayers impermissibly encroached on the exclusive authority of the public service commission to fix rates. Cullum v. Seagull Mid-South, Inc., 322 Ark. 190, 907 S.W.2d 741 (1995).
Effect of Section.
The effect of this section was to disassociate the company-owned oil and gas production properties from all consideration in connection with rate-making. The result of this section was that the rate payable by gas customers would in no way be affected by the success or failure of the oil companies; therefore, it would be immaterial to the companies' customers whether the companies' stockholders pay taxes on the oil production properties or not or whether they take depletion allowance. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Evidence.
Commission's adjustment of company's capital structure would have to be set aside for want of any substantial evidence to support it. Arkansas W. Gas Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 266 Ark. 668, 588 S.W.2d 424 (1979).
Fair Field Prices.
The commission acted lawfully under authority of this section in allowing the company a “fair field” price, the method for determining the price being the fair value or reasonable market price of such natural gas at the point at which the gas is delivered into the transmission system of the company or within the vicinity of the field or fields where produced. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Validity of Rates.
The commission did not act arbitrarily in fixing the minimum monthly service charge per meter, although it would appear to be discriminatory to some of the towns, since the commission had a right to consider in arriving at a minimum figure that figure which would enhance the development and general welfare of the entire state. City of El Dorado v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 235 Ark. 812, 362 S.W.2d 680 (1962).
Cited: Taylor v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 793 F.2d 189 (8th Cir. 1986).
23-15-105. Pipeline companies authorized to transport ammonia and other components of fertilizer.
- Pipeline companies operating in this state as common carriers and companies operating pipelines in this state for conveying natural or artificial gas for public utility service may transport by pipeline ammonia and other substances and materials composing commercial fertilizer, or used in manufacturing commercial fertilizer, when specifically authorized to so do by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
-
- Applications for authority to operate under subsection (a) of this section shall be heard and determined by the department.
- Appeals from the department's orders in such matters shall be granted pursuant to § 23-2-211.
- The department shall make such reasonable rules as may be necessary to administer this section.
- All companies authorized by the department to operate under subsection (a) of this section are given the right of eminent domain. The procedure to be followed in the exercise of this right shall be the same as prescribed in § 18-15-1201 et seq. relating to railroad companies, telegraph companies, and telephone companies.
History. Acts 1967, No. 170, §§ 1-4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1904 — 73-1907; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 256; 2019, No. 315, § 2459.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (c).
Subchapter 2 — Arkansas Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1971
A.C.R.C. Notes. References to “this subchapter” in §§ 23-15-201 — 23-15-216 may not apply to § 23-15-217 which was enacted subsequently.
Effective Dates. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 11: Mar. 15, 1971. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that there is an immediate need to establish a system for minimum safety standards for the transportation of natural and other gas by pipe line, and that only by the immediate passage of this Act may such standards be established, and therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 877, § 3: Apr. 4, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventieth General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that without charging the fees provided for herein the Utility Safety Division of the Public Service Commission will have insufficient funds to maintain its operation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 778, § 5: Mar. 29, 1993. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that without charging and collecting the annual assessment fees provided for herein, the Pipeline Safety Program of the Public Service Commission will not have sufficient funds to maintain its operation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1999, No. 1048, § 7: Apr. 1, 1999. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-second General Assembly that confusion exists concerning the proper state agency to have jurisdiction over natural gas production facilities and that the confusion has subjected natural gas production companies to conflicting jurisdictions of the Oil and Gas Commission and the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Therefore, in order to promote the most efficient regulation of natural gas production facilities and remove any conflict as to jurisdiction, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-15-201. Title.
This subchapter may be cited as the “Arkansas Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1971”.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1908.
23-15-202. Purpose.
It is the purpose of this subchapter to empower the Arkansas Public Service Commission to submit a satisfactory certification pursuant to Section 5 of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, and to otherwise protect the public peace, health, and safety of the citizens of this state.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1916; Acts 1991, No. 793, § 1.
U.S. Code. Section 5 of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, referred to in this section, is codified as 49 U.S.C. §§ 60105 — 60107.
23-15-203. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Gas” means natural gas, flammable gas, or gas which is toxic or corrosive;
- “Interstate transmission facilities” means pipeline facilities used in the transportation of gas which are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 717 — 717z;
- “Municipality” means a city, county, or any other political subdivision of a state;
- “Person” means an individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, corporation, association, state, municipality, cooperative association, or joint-stock association and includes any trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal representative thereof;
-
“Petroleum refinery” means an industrial or manufacturing facility or plant primarily engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through the processing of petroleum crude oil that is subject to:
- The United States Environmental Protection Agency Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart GGG or successor regulations;
- The United States Environmental Protection Agency chemical accident prevention provisions set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 68, Subparts A, B, D, E, F, G, and H or successor regulations; and
- The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations governing process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119 or successor regulations;
- “Pipeline facilities” includes, without limitation, pipe, pipe rights-of-way, and any equipment facility or building used in the transportation of gas or the treatment of gas during the course of transportation of gas, but rights-of-way as used in this subchapter does not authorize the commission to prescribe the location or routing of any pipeline facility;
- “Production facilities” includes, without limitation, piping or equipment used in the production, extraction, recovery, lifting, stabilization, separation, or treatment of natural gas or associated storage or measurement from the wellhead to a meter where the gas is transferred to a custodian other than the well operator for gathering or transport, commonly known as a “custodial transfer meter”;
- “Production process” means the extraction of gas from the geological source of supply to the surface of the earth, thence through the lines and equipment used to treat, compress, and measure the gas between the wellhead and the meter where it is either sold or delivered to a custodian other than the well operator for gathering and transport to a place of sale, sometimes called a “custodial transfer meter”; and
-
- “Transportation of gas” means the gathering, transmission, or distribution of gas by pipeline or the storage of gas in or through any pipeline facilities other than interstate transmission facilities as defined in this section.
- “Transportation of gas” shall not include production facilities or the production process.
- “Transportation of gas” shall include the gathering, transmission, or distribution of natural gas containing one hundred (100) or more parts per million of hydrogen sulfide from the custodial transfer meter through any pipeline, rural or nonrural, to and through any pipeline facility that removes hydrogen sulfide, except that portion of such a pipeline or pipeline facility that is located within the fenced boundary of a petroleum refinery.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1909; Acts 1991, No. 793, § 2; 1999, No. 1048, § 1; 2001, No. 153, § 1; 2009, No. 452, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The amendment to § 23-15-203 by Acts 1999, No. 1048, § 1 omitted the following phrase in the third sentence in subdivision (9) (formerly subdivision (3)):
“similar populated area which the Arkansas Public Service Commission may define.” As the phrase was omitted from § 23-15-203 without being stricken through on the act, it is not clear whether the omission of the phrase by the General Assembly was intentional.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment, substituted “an” for “any” in (5); in (9), inserted the present second sentence, substituted “from the custodial transfer meter” for “ from the wellhead”; inserted present (7) and (8) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; deleted “including any facility which removes hydrogen sulfide from gas” following “during the course of transportation” and deleted “other than hydrogen sulfide facilities” from the end of (6).
The 2001 amendment inserted (6) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; inserted “of gas” following “transportation” in (7); and rewrote former (9) as present (10).
The 2009 amendment, in (10)(A), substituted “the” for “its” and inserted “of gas”; deleted (10)(B)(ii), substituted “‘Transportation of gas’ shall” for “However, it shall specifically” in (10)(C); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
U.S. Code. Subpart GGG of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, referred to in this section, is codified as 40 C.F.R. § 60.590 et seq.
Subparts A, B, D, E, F, G, and H of 40 C.F.R. Part 68, referred to in this section, are codified as 40 C.F.R. § 68.1 et seq., 40 C.F.R. § 68.65 et seq.
23-15-204. General powers of commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission may:
- Advise, consult, contract, and cooperate with any agency of the federal government, the State of Arkansas, or any other state in projects of common interest of the regulations of safety of pipeline facilities and transportation of gas and administer the authority delegated to the commission by contract with the federal government or any agency thereof including the authority to participate in the enforcement of federal standards applicable to interstate transmission facilities, as defined in § 23-15-203, as an agent of any agency of the state or federal government; and
- Accept, receive, apply for, or administer grants or other funds or gifts from public or private agencies, including the federal government, or from any other person.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1910.
Case Notes
In General.
The Public Service Commission is vested with the authority to adjudicate individual disputes involving public rights that the Commission is charged by law to administer; public rights that the Commission may adjudicate are those arising from the public utility statutes enacted by the General Assembly, and the lawful rules, regulations, and orders entered by the Commission in the execution of the statutes. Southwestern Glass Co. v. Arkansas Okla. Gas Corp., 325 Ark. 378, 925 S.W.2d 164 (1996).
The Public Service Commission has the authority to regulate safety concerns accompanying construction and maintenance of a proposed private gas line. Southwestern Glass Co. v. Arkansas Okla. Gas Corp., 325 Ark. 378, 925 S.W.2d 164 (1996).
23-15-205. Safety standards.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission by order may promulgate, amend, enforce, waive, and repeal minimum safety standards for the transportation of gas and pipeline facilities.
-
- These standards may apply to the design, installation, inspection, testing, construction, extension, operation, replacement, and maintenance of pipeline facilities.
- The state safety standards shall be practicable and designed to meet the needs for pipeline safety.
-
In prescribing the safety standards, the commission shall consider:
- Relevant available pipeline safety data;
- Whether such standards are appropriate for the particular type of pipeline transportation;
- The reasonableness of any proposed standard; and
- The extent to which such standards will contribute to the public safety.
- Safety regulations promulgated for gas pipeline facilities or the transportation of gas shall be consistent with federal law and with rules and regulations promulgated under authority of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, as amended.
- Standards affecting the design, installation, construction, initial inspection, and initial testing shall not be applicable to pipeline facilities in existence on the date such standards are adopted.
- Whenever the commission finds a particular facility to be hazardous to life or property, it shall be empowered to require the person operating the facility to cease such operation or to take steps necessary to remove the hazards.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1910; Acts 1991, No. 793, § 3; 1999, No. 1048, § 2; 2013, No. 1343, § 1.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote (e).
The 2013 amendment deleted “pursuant to the provisions of the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., for purposes of this subchapter only” following “order” in (a).
U.S. Code. The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, referred to in this section, is codified as 49 U.S.C. § 60101 et seq.
Case Notes
Injunction.
Construction of proposed private gas line, which would physically cross a public gas line but would not otherwise be in conflict or inconsistent with the city's public use of the dedicated easement and right-of-way, not enjoined. Southwestern Glass Co. v. Arkansas Okla. Gas Corp., 325 Ark. 378, 925 S.W.2d 164 (1996).
23-15-206. Reports, records, etc., to be maintained — Access by commission.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission may require persons subject to this subchapter to maintain record maintenance, reporting, and inspection.
- Each person who engages in the transportation of gas or who owns or operates pipeline facilities shall establish and maintain such records, make such reports, and provide such information as the commission may reasonably require to enable it to determine whether the person has acted or is acting in compliance with this subchapter and the standards established under this subchapter.
- Each person who engages in the transportation of gas or who owns or operates pipeline facilities upon request of an officer, employee, or agent authorized by the commission shall permit such officer, employee, or agent to inspect books, papers, records, and documents, relevant to determining whether such person has acted or is acting in compliance with this subchapter and the standards established pursuant to this subchapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1910.
23-15-207. Inspections and investigations generally.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission may make inspections and investigations consistent with this subchapter and conduct investigations of pipeline failures whenever needed, and in connection therewith, enter private or public property at all reasonable times.
- The results of investigations shall be reduced to writing if any enforcement action is contemplated and a copy thereof furnished to the operator of the pipeline facilities or transportation of gas facilities inspected or investigated before any enforcement action is initiated.
- The commission is authorized to conduct inspections and investigations other than those in § 23-15-206 as may be necessary to aid in the enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter and the standards established pursuant to this subchapter. In doing so, it may obtain possession of any pipe or any part of a pipeline facility for analysis, inspection, or testing.
-
For purposes of enforcement of this subchapter, officers, employees, or agents authorized by the commission, upon presenting appropriate credentials to the individual in charge, are authorized:
- To enter upon pipeline facilities at reasonable times; and
- To inspect such facilities at reasonable times and within reasonable limits and in a reasonable manner.
- Each inspection shall be commenced and completed with reasonable promptness.
- The commission may furnish the appropriate prosecuting attorney or the Attorney General any information obtained indicating noncompliance with such standards for appropriate action.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1910.
23-15-208. Inspection and maintenance plans.
- Each person who engages in the transportation of gas or who owns or operates pipeline facilities not subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Natural Gas Act shall file with the Arkansas Public Service Commission a plan for inspection and maintenance of each pipeline facility owned or operated by the person and any changes in the plan in accordance with rules prescribed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission by rule may also require persons who engage in the transportation of gas or who own or operate pipeline facilities subject to the provisions of this subchapter to file such plans for approval.
- If at any time the Arkansas Public Service Commission finds that the plan is inadequate to achieve safe operation, the Arkansas Public Service Commission after notice and opportunity for a hearing shall require the plan to be revised.
- The plan required by the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall be practicable and designed to meet the need for pipeline safety.
-
In determining the adequacy of the plan, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall consider:
- Relevant available pipeline safety data;
- Whether the plan is appropriate for the particular type of pipeline transportation;
- The reasonableness of the plan; and
- The extent to which the plan will contribute to public safety.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1911; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2460.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a) and made a similar change in (b).
U.S. Code. The Natural Gas Act referred to in this section is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq.
23-15-209. Compliance and waiver.
-
Each person who engages in the transportation of gas or who owns or operates pipeline facilities shall:
- At all times after the date any applicable safety standard established under this subchapter takes effect, comply with the requirements of such standard;
- File and comply with a plan of inspection and maintenance required by § 23-15-208; and
- Permit access to or copying of records, make reports or provide information, and permit entry or inspection, as required under §§ 23-15-206 and 23-15-207.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission, pursuant to the provisions of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, may waive compliance with a safety standard.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1912.
U.S. Code. The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-481, referred to in this section, is codified as 49 U.S.C. § 60101 et seq.
23-15-210. Confidentiality of information obtained by commission — Exception.
- All information reported to or otherwise obtained by the Arkansas Public Service Commission or its representative pursuant to the provisions hereof, which information contains or relates to a trade secret referred to in 18 U.S.C. § 1905, shall be considered confidential for the purpose of that section, except that the information may be disclosed to other officers or employees concerned with carrying out this subchapter or when relevant in any proceeding under this subchapter.
- Nothing in this section shall authorize the withholding of information by the commission, or any officer, employee, or agent under its control, from the duly authorized committees of the General Assembly.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1910.
23-15-211. Civil penalty — Compromise — Proceedings.
-
A person who violates a provision of § 23-15-209 or a rule issued under this subchapter is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed:
- Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) for each day that the violation persists; and
- Two million dollars ($2,000,000) for any related series of violations.
- Any such civil penalty may be compromised by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- In determining the amount of the penalty or the amount agreed upon in compromise, the appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the person charged, the gravity of the violation, and the good faith of the person charged in attempting to achieve compliance, after notification of a violation, shall be considered.
- Proceedings under this section shall be subject to the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq.
- Any penalty imposed under this section, if not promptly paid to the commission, shall be recovered with interest thereon from the date of the order in a civil action brought by the commission.
- Any civil penalty collected and imposed under this section shall be paid to the secretary of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, §§ 6, 8; 1975, No. 877, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1913, 73-1915; Acts 1991, No. 793, § 4; 1995, No. 713, § 1; 2005, No. 539, § 1; 2013, No. 1343, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2461.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment, in (a), substituted “one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)” for “twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000)” and “one million dollars ($1,000,000)” for “five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).”
The 2013 amendment added subdivision designations in (a); substituted “Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000)” for “one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)” in (a)(1); and substituted “Two million dollars ($2,000,000)” for “However, the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000)” in (a)(2) and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in the introductory language of (a).
23-15-212. Injunction and jurisdiction.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to the provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, shall have the right to file suit to restrain violations of this subchapter, including the restraint of transportation of gas or the operation of a pipeline facility, or to enforce standards established hereunder upon petition by the commission or by the appropriate prosecuting attorney or the Attorney General on behalf of the State of Arkansas.
- Whenever practicable, the commission shall give notice to any person against whom an action for injunctive relief is contemplated and afford him or her an opportunity to present his or her views and, except in the case of a knowing and willful violation, shall afford him or her reasonable opportunity to achieve compliance. However, the failure to give such notice and afford such opportunity shall not preclude the granting of appropriate relief.
- Actions under subsection (a) of this section and § 23-15-211 may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction in any county wherein any act or transaction constituting the alleged violation occurred or in the county wherein is located the principal place of business of any defendant. Process in such cases may be served in any manner provided by law.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1914.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1935, No. 324, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
23-15-213. Tort liability.
Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the common law or statutory tort liability of any person.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1912.
23-15-214. Fees — Definition.
-
- There is levied and charged and shall be collected by the Arkansas Public Service Commission an annual assessment fee against each natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator subject to the provisions of this subchapter to provide for the cost of operating the pipeline safety program of the commission.
- Each natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator shall pay the annual assessment fee authorized in this section for the pipeline safety program, which shall be in addition to any assessment fee authorized by § 23-3-110. This annual assessment, together with any assessment fee charged under § 23-3-110, shall not exceed in any year an amount in excess of that which could be charged and collected pursuant to § 23-3-110.
- All annual assessment fees levied under this section shall be in addition to all property, franchise, license, or other taxes, fees, or charges prescribed by law.
-
- Except for natural gas pipeline facilities consisting of fewer than fifty (50) miles, the annual assessment fee shall be levied and charged in an amount which shall be equivalent to that proportion of the total pipeline safety program's costs that each natural gas pipeline transporter's, owner's, or operator's miles of natural gas pipeline in Arkansas, not including service lines in distribution systems, bear to the total number of miles of natural gas pipeline in Arkansas of all natural gas pipeline transporters, owners, or operators who are subject to the provisions of this section.
- Each natural gas transporter, owner, or operator of natural gas pipeline facilities totaling fewer than fifty (50) miles shall pay an annual assessment fee equal to fifteen ten-thousandths (.0015) times the total cost of operating the pipeline safety program of the commission for the assessment year.
- Each natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator ceasing to engage in activities subject to the provisions of this subchapter during any calendar year shall pay to the commission within fifteen (15) days of ceasing such activities all assessments then owing, and shall at the same time file with the commission a statement of the number of its miles of natural gas pipeline in Arkansas for the current year and for the previous year if it has not theretofore been filed.
-
- The calculation of annual assessment fees will be based on the pipeline miles reported to the Office of Pipeline Safety of the Arkansas Public Service Commission on or before March 15 of each year.
- After determining the amount of the annual assessment imposed by this section, the commission, annually on or before June 1, shall prepare and transmit to each natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator a statement of the assessment due for the cost of operating the pipeline safety program of the commission.
- Thereafter, on or before June 30, each natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator who was billed under subdivision (c)(2) of this section shall pay to the secretary of the Arkansas Public Service Commission any annual assessment fee due under this section.
- In the event any natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator shall fail or refuse to pay the annual assessment fee provided for in this section on or before June 30, the commission shall add to the annual assessment fee a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) thereof and certify the amount of the delinquent tax and penalty to the Attorney General for collection.
-
For purposes of this section, the term “natural gas pipeline transporter, owner, or operator”:
- Shall mean any individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, corporation, association, state, municipality, cooperative association, joint-stock association, or any business segment thereof, and includes any trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal representative who engages in the transportation of natural gas in Arkansas or who owns or operates natural gas pipeline facilities in Arkansas; and
- Shall not include the owner or operator of a master-metered facility.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 8; 1975, No. 877, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1915; Acts 1991, No. 793, § 5; 1993, No. 778, § 1; 2001, No. 766, § 1; 2013, No. 1343, § 3.
Amendments. The 2001 amendment deleted “as amended” following “§ 23-3-110” in (a)(2); substituted “shall pay” for “shall” and “file with the commission … Arkansas” for “file with the commission an operating statement”; rewrote (a)(4), (c)(1) and (d); and made minor stylistic changes throughout.
The 2013 amendment substituted “March 15” for “February 15” in (c)(1).
23-15-215. Legislative intent concerning § 23-15-214.
- It is the purpose and intent of the General Assembly in enacting § 23-15-214 to specifically authorize the Arkansas Public Service Commission to make assessments upon interstate pipelines operating within this state and to provide funds to initiate and carry out an effective gas pipeline safety inspection program in order to properly protect the public health and safety of the citizens of this state.
-
In enacting this section, the General Assembly is aware that:
- Recent federal court decisions have specifically upheld the right of states to impose safety assessments upon interstate pipelines;
- The United States Department of Transportation has recently designated the commission as its agent for inspection of interstate pipeline facilities located in Arkansas;
- The Sixty-Ninth General Assembly, in House Concurrent Resolution No. 95, specifically recognized and declared that the commission can provide effective public safety inspections of interstate gas transmission facilities at far less cost than this service can be provided by federal inspectors and that the future safety of the residents of the State of Arkansas requires the support of the General Assembly to ensure a safety inspection program for such pipelines located in Arkansas; and
- Legislation enacted by the United States Congress authorizes federal funds for reimbursement of up to fifty percent (50%) of the annual cost to the state which initiates such a program.
History. Acts 1975, No. 877, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1915n.
23-15-216. Disposition of funds.
On receipt of the fees, charges, and penalties provided for in this subchapter, the secretary of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall pay the fees, charges, and penalties into the State Treasury. The amounts received by the Treasurer of State shall be credited by him or her as special revenues and designated as the “Public Service Commission Utility Safety Fund”, which will be a separate fund account established by the Treasurer of State.
History. Acts 1971, No. 285, § 8; 1975, No. 877, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1915.
23-15-217. Jurisdiction of commission over natural gas pipeline inspections.
-
The Office of Pipeline Safety of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall continue its administration of and shall continue to conduct safety inspections for any natural gas pipeline facilities which contain one hundred (100) or more parts per million of hydrogen sulfide which by this act or any other act of the General Assembly are transferred to or placed under the jurisdiction of the Oil and Gas Commission until the earlier of such time as:
- The Oil and Gas Commission receives certification from the United States Department of Transportation to administer and conduct the required safety inspections;
- The Oil and Gas Commission has obtained the appropriate equipment to conduct the required inspections; and
- The Oil and Gas Commission has established inspection criteria equal to, but not less stringent than, that currently in force for the facilities in question as set out in the Arkansas Gas Pipeline Code, or one (1) year from April 1, 1999.
- Prior to the Oil and Gas Commission's assuming exclusive jurisdiction over any natural gas pipeline facility which contains one hundred (100) or more parts per million of hydrogen sulfide transferred to it by this act or any other act of the General Assembly, there shall be a joint inspection by the Office of Pipeline Safety of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and the Oil and Gas Commission of all natural gas pipeline facilities which contain one hundred (100) or more parts per million of hydrogen sulfide, the exclusive jurisdiction over administration and safety inspections which is being transferred from the Office of Pipeline Safety of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to the Oil and Gas Commission to ensure that, at that point in time when transfer occurs, the compliance status of the pipelines is documented and the responsibility for bringing any pipeline code violations into compliance shall rest with the Oil and Gas Commission.
History. Acts 1999, No. 1048, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. References to “this subchapter” in §§ 23-15-201 — 23-15-216 may not apply to this section which was enacted subsequently.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1999, No. 1048, codified as §§ 23-15-203, 23-15-205, and 23-15-217.
Chapter 16 Miscellaneous Provisions Relating To Carriers
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 9: Mar. 9, 1949. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that certain public utilities now subject to regulation by the Arkansas Public Service Commission are required by law to pay certain fees to the Commission while other public utilities which are equally subject to regulation by the Commission are exempt from the payment of such fees. It is further found and declared to be just and equitable that each public utility subject to regulation by the Commission should bear its fair proportion of the expenses incident to such regulation. There is urgent need for more rigid enforcement of the safety rules and regulations on the highways of this state, particularly as they relate to the motor carrier laws, rules and regulations pertaining thereto. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from and after the date of its passage and approval.”
23-16-101. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
- “Other carriers” means all persons, firms, and corporations, other than rail carriers as defined in this section, which were subject to regulation by the former Arkansas Transportation Commission before the enactment of Acts 1945, No. 40, together with all persons, firms, and corporations that perform similar services in Arkansas.
- “Other carriers” includes common carriers by aircraft as defined under the Arkansas Air Commerce Act, § 23-14-101 et seq.; and
- “Rail carrier” means all persons, firms, and corporations engaged in the business of common carrier of freight and passengers by rail in Arkansas and which are subject to regulation by the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-268; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 257; 2019, No. 391, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (1).
The 2019 amendment deleted “unless the context otherwise requires” following “subchapter” in the introductory language; deleted former (1), which was previously repealed; redesignated former (2) and (3) as (1) and (2); substituted “former Arkansas Transportation Commission before” for “department prior to” in (1)(A); substituted “includes” for “shall also include” in (1)(B); substituted “Arkansas Department of Transportation” for “department” in (2); and made a stylistic change.
23-16-102. Subchapter cumulative.
This subchapter shall be construed as being cumulative as to the terms and provisions of Acts 1935, No. 324, Acts 1945, No. 40, and the Arkansas Air Commerce Act, § 23-14-101 et seq., except as otherwise provided in § 23-3-109.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-274.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1935, No. 324, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
Acts 1945, No. 40, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 23-2-101, 23-2-103 — 23-2-105, 23-2-108, 23-2-109, 23-2-403, 23-2-406, 23-2-407, 23-2-409, 23-2-413, 23-2-418, 23-3-109, 23-3-110.
23-16-103. Annual certified statement of gross revenue.
-
- Annually, during the month of March, every rail carrier and other carrier subject to regulation by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under the laws of Arkansas shall prepare and transmit to the department a certified statement of the gross revenues from its operations in Arkansas for the preceding calendar year ending December 31.
- No deduction shall be made from such gross revenues on account of any payments, expenses, or uncollectible accounts, except refunds occasioned by errors or overcharges.
- Upon receipt of the certified statement, the department shall determine the total gross revenues in Arkansas of each and all of the rail carriers and the total gross revenues in Arkansas of each and all of the other carriers.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-270; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 258.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), deleted “which is” preceding “subject to” and substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”.
23-16-104. Annual fee collected from carriers.
- There is levied and charged and there shall be collected annually from each rail carrier subject to regulation by the Arkansas Department of Transportation under the laws of Arkansas a fee in an amount equivalent to that proportion of the total rail carrier cost that the gross revenues in Arkansas of each of the rail carriers bear to the total gross revenues in Arkansas of all of the rail carriers. However, the fee to be collected annually from each of the rail carriers shall not exceed in any year an amount exceeding two-fifths of one percent (2/5 of 1%) of the gross revenues in Arkansas of each respective rail carrier.
- There is levied and charged and there shall be collected annually from each other carrier which is subject to regulation by the department under the laws of Arkansas a fee in an amount which shall be equivalent to that proportion of the total other carrier costs that the gross revenues in Arkansas of each of the other carriers bear to the total gross revenues in Arkansas of all of the other carriers. However, the fee to be collected annually from each of the other carriers shall not exceed in any year an amount exceeding two-fifths of one percent (2/5 of 1%) of the gross revenues in Arkansas of each respective other carrier.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, §§ 4, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-271, 73-272; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 259.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Publisher's Notes. With respect to fees charged carriers subject to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, § 23-13-201 et seq., this section may be affected by § 23-13-235.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in the first sentence of (a), deleted “which is” preceding “subject to”, substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department”, and deleted “which shall be” following “an amount”.
23-16-105. Statement of fees due from rail carriers — Payment — Delinquent penalty.
- After determining the amount of the fee due to be paid by each of the rail carriers, the Arkansas Department of Transportation, annually on or before August 15, shall prepare and transmit to each of the rail carriers a statement of the fees due for rail carrier costs during the preceding fiscal year.
- Thereafter, on or before August 31 of each year, each of the rail carriers shall pay to the department all fees shown to be due by the statements.
- On receipt of the fees and charges provided for in this subchapter, the department shall deposit the fees and charges with the Treasurer of State, and the amount so received by the Treasurer of State shall be classified by the Treasurer of State as special revenues and transferred, by the Treasurer of State on the last business day of the month such amounts are deposited, to the State Highway and Transportation Department Fund, there, notwithstanding the provisions of any law to the contrary, to be utilized by the department for the purposes of administering the laws of this state which the State Highway Commission and the department are responsible for administering with regard to rail carriers and for the construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of highways and bridges in the state highway system.
- In the event any rail carrier fails or refuses to pay the fees provided for in this subchapter on or before August 31 of each year, the department shall add to such fee a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) thereof and certify the amount of the delinquent fee and penalty to the Attorney General for collection.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-273; Acts 1993, No. 725, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 260.
Publisher's Notes. With respect to fees charged carriers subject to the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, § 23-13-210 et seq., this section may be affected by § 23-13-235.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
23-16-106. Record of cost of operation kept.
-
The Arkansas Department of Transportation shall designate one (1) of its officers or employees who is familiar with cost accounting methods to keep a separate and accurate record of that part of the cost of operation and maintenance of the department having to do with matters relating to the regulation of:
- Rail carriers, which costs are hereinafter referred to as “rail carrier costs”; and
- Other carriers, which costs are hereinafter referred to as “other carrier costs”.
-
In a similar manner to that set forth in subsection (a) of this section, an officer or employee of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall keep an accurate record of that part of the cost of operation and maintenance of the commission having to do with matters relating to:
- Public utilities, other than rail carriers, and other carriers which are subject to regulation by the commission; and
- The Tax Division of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1949, No. 262, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-269; Acts 2017, No. 707, § 261.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, references in this section to the Arkansas Transportation Commission have been changed to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The Arkansas Transportation Commission was abolished and replaced by the Transportation Regulatory Board and the Transportation Safety Agency pursuant to Acts 1987, No. 572. However, Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 67, § 23, and Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, §§ 2 and 3, abolished the board and the agency and transferred their powers, functions, and duties to the State Highway Commission and the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, respectively.
Acts 1989 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 153, § 2, provided, in part: “Wherever the words ‘Arkansas Transportation Commission’ or ‘Transportation Safety Agency’ are used in any provision of the Code, the Acts of Arkansas or any statute, directive, rule or regulation, they shall be hereafter held and taken to mean the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.”
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a).
Subchapter 2 — Employee Bonds
Effective Dates. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 5: approved Apr. 7, 1911. Emergency declared.
23-16-201. Penalty.
Any person, officer, manager, company, corporation, association, or firm who violates any of the provisions of this subchapter shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 4; C. & M. Dig., § 7124; Pope's Dig., § 9110; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2104; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 229.
Amendments. The 2005 amendment rewrote this section.
23-16-202. Bonds, contracts, etc., in violation of subchapter void.
Any bond, contract, or undertaking made in violation of the provisions of the subchapter shall be void.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 4; C. & M. Dig., § 7124; Pope's Dig., § 9110; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2104.
23-16-203. Sureties.
No common carrier authorized to do business in this state, when requiring of an employee that he or she give a bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever, shall require as surety thereon any person not a resident of this state. Nor shall any common carrier accept as surety any company, corporation, or association unless the company, corporation, or association is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas or who shall have designated an agent residing within this state upon whom service of legal process may be had as provided by law for foreign corporations doing business in this state and shall also have in this state a general office in which it shall require that every bond or undertaking shall be approved, if approved and cancelled, and where a complete record thereof shall be kept.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 2; C. & M. Dig., § 7122; Pope's Dig., § 9108; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2102.
23-16-204. Employer not to select sureties.
No common carrier authorized to do business in this state, when requiring of an employee that he or she give it a bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever, shall require the employee to have the bond or undertaking executed by any particular person, company, corporation, association, or firm or by any one (1) or more of any number of such persons, companies, corporations, associations, or firms named by the common carrier as surety.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 7121; Pope's Dig., § 9107; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2101.
23-16-205. Term of bond or undertaking.
Every bond or undertaking of any nature whatsoever given by an employee of any common carrier authorized to do business in this state shall be made to cover a definite term.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 7123; Pope's Dig., § 9109; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2103.
23-16-206. Rejection of bond or undertaking.
No common carrier shall reject any bond or undertaking for any reason other than the financial insufficiency of the bond or undertaking.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 7121; Pope's Dig., § 9107; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2101.
23-16-207. Cancellation of bond.
- No such bond or undertaking shall be cancelled without the consent of all parties thereto, except for a breach of one (1) or more of the conditions thereof.
-
- Any such employee who has given a bond or undertaking and upon the breach of any of the conditions thereof by the other party or parties thereto shall have the power to cancel the bond or undertaking by giving the surety or sureties thereon and the common carrier for the benefit of whom the bond or undertaking has been made at least ten (10) days' notice in writing, setting out in full the reason for cancelling the bond or undertaking.
- The notice is to be signed by the employee and sworn to by him or her in this state before any officer authorized to administer oaths.
- Any such notice to a company, corporation, or association may be served by leaving the notice with any person upon whom service of legal process upon such a company, corporation, or association may be had.
-
- Any surety on any such bond or undertaking, upon the breach of any of the conditions thereof by the common carrier employee for whom the bond or undertaking has been made, shall have power to cancel the bond or undertaking by giving the employee at least ten (10) days' notice in writing setting out in full the reason for cancelling the bond or undertaking.
- The notice is to be signed by an agent or manager of the surety, then a resident of this state and then authorized to approve or disapprove similar bonds or undertakings for the surety, and is to be sworn to by the person signing the notice in this state before an officer authorized to administer oaths.
- Nothing in the cancellation of the bond shall affect any right of action accruing to any person upon the breach of a contract.
History. Acts 1911, No. 166, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 7123; Pope's Dig., § 9109; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2103.
Subchapter 3 — Uninsured Motorist Liability Insurance
Effective Dates. Acts 1987, No. 590, § 6: Apr. 4, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the escalating costs of automobile liability insurance premiums for the political subdivisions and municipalities of the State of Arkansas drain the financial resources of these local governments and that financial problems of local governments threaten the delivery of vital services to the citizens of this State and that by self-insuring their motor vehicles local governments may relieve themselves of this financial burden. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
23-16-301. Definitions.
- As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “common carrier” means any person, firm, or corporation which undertakes, either directly or indirectly, to transport members of the general public as passengers for compensation whether over regular or irregular routes.
- For the purposes of this subchapter and subject to the terms and conditions of coverage, the term “uninsured motor vehicle” shall be deemed to include an insured motor vehicle where the liability insurer thereof is unable to make payment with respect to the legal liability of its insured within the limits specified therein because of insolvency.
History. Acts 1975, No. 893, §§ 1, 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-2401, 73-2403.
Research References
ALR.
Applicability of Uninsured or Underinsured Motorist Statutes to Self-Insurers, 32 A.L.R.7th Art. 3 (2018).
Case Notes
Common Carrier.
The Central Arkansas Transit Authority is a common carrier as defined in this section and is therefore subject to the requirements of liability under §§ 23-16-302 and 27-19-605. Salley v. Central Ark. Transit Auth., 326 Ark. 804, 934 S.W.2d 510 (1996).
23-16-302. Uninsured motorist liability insurance — Carriage required — Amount.
Every common carrier, as defined by § 23-16-301, shall carry uninsured motorist liability insurance or shall become a self-insurer, in not less than the limits described in § 27-19-605, for the protection of passengers and operators of the common carrier who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles because of bodily injury, sickness, or disease including death, resulting therefrom.
History. Acts 1975, No. 893, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2402; Acts 1987, No. 590, § 2.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey — Insurance, 10 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 587.
Case Notes
Applicability.
The Central Arkansas Transit Authority is a common carrier as defined in § 23-16-301 and is therefore subject to the requirements of liability under this section and § 27-19-605. Salley v. Central Ark. Transit Auth., 326 Ark. 804, 934 S.W.2d 510 (1996).
23-16-303. Insolvency protection application — Amount not limited.
- An insurer's insolvency protection shall be applicable only to accidents occurring during a policy period in which its insured's uninsured motorist coverage is in effect where the liability insurer of the tortfeasor becomes insolvent within one (1) year after such an accident.
- Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to prevent any insurer from affording insolvency protection under terms and conditions more favorable to its insureds than is provided in this section.
History. Acts 1975, No. 893, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2404.
23-16-304. Payment — Subrogation.
In the event of payment to any person under the coverage required by this subchapter and subject to the terms and conditions of the coverage, the insurer making the payment shall be entitled to the proceeds of any settlement or judgment, to the extent of the payment, resulting from the exercise of any rights of recovery of the person against any person or organization legally responsible for the bodily injury for which the payment is made, including the proceeds recoverable from the assets of the insolvent insurer.
History. Acts 1975, No. 893, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2405.
Subchapter 4 — Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation Act
23-16-401. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation Act”.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-402. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Eligible telecommunications carrier” has the same meaning as provided in § 23-17-403;
- “Lifeline Assistance Program” means the federally mandated Lifeline Assistance Program that provides certain discounts on monthly service for qualified telephone subscribers; and
- “Link Up America” means the federally mandated Link Up America program through the Federal Communications Commission that helps qualified low-income consumers to connect or hook up to the telephone network.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-403. Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation — Creation — Board of directors.
- There is created the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation.
-
The corporation shall be governed by a seven-member board of directors appointed by the Governor as follows:
- Three (3) board members shall be consumers; and
- Four (4) board members shall be representatives of eligible telecommunications carriers.
-
- The Governor shall appoint representatives of eligible telecommunications carriers after consulting representatives of eligible telecommunications carriers.
- The appointments made by the Governor under subdivision (c)(1) of this section shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate.
- The initial appointments shall be for terms that will result in two (2) board members serving a one-year term, two (2) board members serving a two-year term, and three (3) board members serving a three-year term. All successors shall serve three-year terms.
- The Governor shall designate one (1) of the board members to preside over the initial meeting of the board, at which meeting the board shall elect a president, a secretary, and such other officers as it deems appropriate.
- Members of the board shall serve without compensation but may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses. However, no corporate money shall be used for out-of-state travel expenses.
- All vacancies on the board shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointments.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1; 2015, No. 1100, § 55.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment redesignated former (c) as (c)(1); in (c)(1), substituted “appoint” for “choose” and “after consulting” for “from a list of three (3) names for each position submitted by”; and added (c)(2).
23-16-404. Board of directors — Attendance at meetings required.
- In order to ensure broad representation and a quorum, all members of the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation have a responsibility to attend all regular or special meetings of the board.
-
- A board member shall be subject to removal from the board if the member fails to present to the Governor a satisfactory excuse for his or her absence.
- Unexcused absences from three (3) successive regular meetings without attending any intermediary-called special meetings shall constitute sufficient cause for removal.
-
Removal of board members shall be in accordance with the following:
-
- Within thirty (30) days after each regular board meeting, the secretary of the board shall give written notice to the Governor of any member who has been absent from three (3) successive regular meetings without attending any intermediary-called special meetings.
- The secretary's notice to the Governor shall include a copy of all meeting notices and attendance records for the past year.
- Failure by the secretary to submit the notices and documentation required by this subchapter shall be considered cause for removal by the Governor in accordance with the procedures set forth at § 25-17-210;
- Within sixty (60) days after receiving the notice and supporting documentation from the secretary, the Governor shall notify the board member in writing of the Governor's intent to remove the member for cause. This notice shall suffice for the notice required in § 25-17-210(a);
- Within twenty (20) days after the date of the Governor's notice, the board member may request an excused absence as provided by this subchapter or may file notice with the Governor's office that the member disputes the attendance records and the reasons therefor;
- The Governor shall grant an excuse for illness of the member when verified by a written sworn statement by the attending physician or other proper excuse as determined by the Governor; and
- If no rebuttal is received or other adequate documentation submitted within twenty (20) days after the date of the Governor's notice, the board member may be removed in accordance with the provisions set forth in § 25-17-210.
-
- Any board member referred to the Governor because of excessive absences under the provisions of this subchapter shall not be entitled to any expense reimbursement for travel to or attendance at any subsequent meeting until the board receives notification from the Governor that the member has been excused for the absences.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-405. Assessment on eligible telecommunications carriers.
-
- The Board of Directors of the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall levy assessments on all eligible telecommunications carriers participating in the verification program not to exceed ten cents (10¢) per subject access line per month in order to fund the services provided by the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation.
- Participation in the verification program shall be available only for eligible telecommunications carriers having a customer access base of fifteen thousand (15,000) or fewer.
- The board may adjust the assessment in January of each year, but at no time shall the assessment exceed ten cents (10¢) per subject access line per month.
- The assessment shall not be levied on more than one hundred (100) access lines at any single customer location.
-
- The assessment may be collected by an eligible telecommunications carrier from its customers and transmitted monthly to the board, and the board shall deposit the assessment into a financial institution authorized to accept public funds.
- The assessment shall appear on the bills of customers as a combined total with the assessment by the Arkansas Deaf and Hearing Impaired Telecommunications Services Corporation under § 25-29-103. The item on the bill shall identify both assessments by name.
- The assessments levied by the corporation shall not be considered a tax and shall not be affected by any laws of this state governing taxation, nor shall the assessments be subject to any state or local tax or franchise fee.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-406. Option to participate or cease participation.
- An eligible telecommunications carrier may elect not to participate under this subchapter without the need for approval by the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation if the eligible telecommunications carrier files notice with the corporation within one hundred twenty (120) days after August 12, 2005.
-
-
If approved by the corporation:
- A participating eligible telecommunications carrier may cease participation under this subchapter; and
- A nonparticipating eligible telecommunications carrier may begin participation under this subchapter.
- Applications to participate or cease participation shall be accepted at times approved by the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation.
-
If approved by the corporation:
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-407. Powers and duties of corporation.
-
- The Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall provide services to verify eligibility under the Lifeline Assistance Program for individuals for whom other governmental entities do not verify the data. If another governmental entity provides verification, the corporation shall not duplicate the verification.
- The corporation may provide services to verify eligibility under the Link Up America program for individuals for whom other governmental entities do not verify the data. If another governmental entity provides verification, the corporation shall not duplicate the verification.
-
The corporation shall:
- Have perpetual succession as a body politic and corporate, adopt bylaws for the regulation of the affairs and the conduct of its business, and prescribe rules and policies in connection with the performance of its functions and duties;
- Adopt an official seal and alter it at pleasure;
- Sue and be sued in its own name and plead and be impleaded;
- Make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers and functions of the authority under this subchapter, including contracts with persons, firms, corporations, and others;
- Purchase insurance; and
- Do all other acts and things necessary, convenient, or desirable to carry out the purposes of this subchapter and to exercise the powers granted to it by this subchapter.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2462.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (b)(1).
23-16-408. Staff — Real property — Debt.
- The Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall not employ any person as a salaried employee but shall rely upon volunteers and professional services obtained by contract.
- No corporate asset may be used to purchase or lease any real property, nor is the corporation authorized to incur any indebtedness.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-409. Corporate offices.
The Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation may maintain an office at such location as it deems suitable.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-410. Annual audit.
The Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall be audited annually in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and file a copy of the audit with the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee and the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-411. Articles of incorporation.
Within thirty (30) days after the first meeting of the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation, the board shall cause articles of incorporation to be filed with the Secretary of State.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-412. Purchase of telecommunications services.
The purchase of verification services by the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall be by competitive bid using procedures substantially similar to the Arkansas Procurement Law, § 19-11-201 et seq.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
23-16-413. Annual report.
The Board of Directors of the Arkansas Lifeline Individual Verification Effort Corporation shall transmit an annual report of its activities to the Legislative Council, the Governor, and the Arkansas Public Service Commission. The annual report shall be filed by March 31 of each year.
History. Acts 2005, No. 2289, § 1.
Subchapter 5 — Safe Transportation of Railroad Employees by Contract Carriers Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 2, Feb. 26, 2009. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that safety issues have arisen where the contract carrier that transports railroad employees have operated under less than ideal circumstances; that by establishing standards in state law that are consistent with federal law, railroad employees will be provided transportation that complies with recognized safety standards; and that this act is immediately necessary to ensure the safe transportation of railroad employees by contract carriers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-16-501. Title.
This subchapter shall be known as and may be cited as the “Safe Transportation of Railroad Employees by Contract Carriers Act”.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-502. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Contract carrier” means a passenger contract carrier that for compensation transports railroad employees with a vehicle designed or used to transport eight (8) persons or less, including the driver; and
-
- “On-duty time” means all time at a terminal, facility, or other property of a contract carrier or on any public property waiting to be dispatched.
- “On-duty time” includes time spent inspecting, servicing, or conditioning the vehicle, unless the driver has been relieved from duty by the contract carrier.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-503. Driver qualification file.
-
- A contract carrier shall maintain a driver qualification file for each driver it employs.
- The driver qualification file may be combined with the personnel file of the employee.
-
The driver qualification file shall include:
- A certificate of physical examination conducted by a physician every two (2) years that certifies the physical ability of the driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle;
- Documentation that establishes that the driver's driving record has been reviewed at least one (1) time per year;
- Documentation related to the driver's violation of motor vehicle laws or ordinances, if applicable;
- Other documentation related to the driver's qualification or ability to drive a motor vehicle;
- The driver's application for employment as provided under 49 C.F.R. § 391.21;
- Responses from previous employers, if required by the current employer; and
- A certificate of the driver's road test or a copy of the current driver's license.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-504. Driver disqualification and limitations.
- A driver is disqualified from driving for a contract carrier under this subchapter if the driver has committed two (2) or more serious traffic violations under § 27-16-401 within a three-year period.
-
-
A contract carrier shall not allow or require a driver to drive or remain on duty for more than:
- Ten (10) hours after eight (8) consecutive hours off-duty;
- Fifteen (15) hours of combined on-duty time and drive time since last obtaining eight (8) consecutive hours of off-duty time; or
- Seventy (70) hours of on-duty and drive time in any period of eight (8) consecutive days.
- After twenty-four (24) hours off-duty, a driver begins a new seven (7) consecutive day period, and on-duty time is reset to zero (0).
- A transport vehicle driver who encounters an emergency and cannot, because of that emergency, safely complete a transportation assignment within the ten-hour maximum driving time permitted under this section may drive and be permitted or required to drive a transport motor vehicle for not more than two (2) additional hours in order to complete that transportation assignment or to reach a place offering safety for the occupants of the transport motor vehicle and security for the transport motor vehicle if the transportation assignment reasonably could have been completed within the ten-hour period absent the emergency.
-
A contract carrier shall not allow or require a driver to drive or remain on duty for more than:
-
A contract carrier shall maintain and retain for a period of six (6) months accurate time records that show:
- The time the driver reports for duty each day;
- The total number of hours of on-duty time for each driver for each day;
- The time the driver is released from duty each day; and
- The total number of hours driven each day.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-505. Driver testing.
-
- Before a driver performs any duties for a contract carrier, the driver shall undergo testing for alcohol and controlled substances as provided under 49 C.F.R. § 40 and 49 C.F.R. § 382, as in effect on January 1, 2009.
-
A driver is qualified to drive for a contract carrier if:
- The alcohol test result under subdivision (a)(1) of this section indicates an alcohol concentration of zero (0); and
- The controlled substances test result from the medical review officer as defined under 49 C.F.R. § 40.3, as in effect on January 1, 2009, indicates a verified negative test result.
-
A driver is disqualified from driving for a contract carrier if:
- The alcohol test result and the controlled substances test result are not in compliance with subdivision (a)(2) of this section;
- The driver refuses to provide a specimen for an alcohol test result or the controlled substances test result, or both; or
- The driver submits an adulterated specimen, a diluted positive specimen, or a substituted specimen on an alcohol test result or the controlled substances test result that is performed.
-
-
As soon as practicable after an accident involving a motor vehicle owned or operated by a contract carrier, the contract carrier shall test each surviving driver for alcohol and controlled substances if:
- The accident involved the loss of human life; or
-
The driver received a citation for a moving traffic violation arising from the accident and the accident involved:
- Bodily injury to a person who immediately received medical treatment after the accident; or
- Disabling damage that required the motor vehicle to be towed from the accident scene by one (1) or more motor vehicles as a result of the accident.
- If alcohol testing and controlled substances testing cannot be completed as soon as possible but no later than thirty-two (32) hours after the accident, the records shall be submitted to the Arkansas Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Department of Transportation.
-
As soon as practicable after an accident involving a motor vehicle owned or operated by a contract carrier, the contract carrier shall test each surviving driver for alcohol and controlled substances if:
-
- A common carrier or the employer of a driver of a common carrier shall maintain records of the alcohol testing and controlled substances testing of drivers for five (5) years.
- The records shall be maintained in a secure location.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 262.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b)(2).
23-16-506. Vehicle inspection.
- A contract carrier shall inspect or cause to be inspected a motor vehicle that it operates for passenger transportation.
-
- If a contract carrier uses a commercial motor vehicle for passenger transportation, the contract carrier shall perform an inspection on the commercial motor vehicle and its components at least one (1) time in every twelve-month period in compliance with the rules promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation as provided under 49 C.F.R. § 396.17, Appendix G.
- The inspection under this subsection shall be performed by an individual who is qualified to perform the inspection as prescribed in 49 C.F.R. § 396.19, as in effect on January 1, 2009.
- A contract carrier shall require each of its drivers to complete a written motor vehicle report upon completion of each day's work on the motor vehicle that the driver operated as prescribed under 49 C.F.R. § 396.11, as in effect on January 1, 2009.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-507. Maintenance and repair program.
- A contract carrier shall establish a maintenance and repair program to include at least weekly inspections under this section.
- A contract carrier's maintenance and repair program shall include checking parts and accessories for safety and proper operation at all times, including the items under subsection (c) of this section, and overall cleanliness of the motor vehicle.
-
A motor vehicle used by a contract carrier shall have:
- Tires with sufficient tread as prescribed under 49 C.F.R. § 393.75, as in effect on January 1, 2009;
- A spare tire that is fully inflated;
- A secured location for personal baggage, including proper restraints;
- Fully operational seatbelts for all passenger seats;
- If the weather requires it, traction devices, studs, or chains;
- A heater and air conditioner that are properly working with properly working fans; and
- An emergency road kit that contains at least a tire inflating aerosol can, flares or reflective triangles, jumper cables, and a fire extinguisher.
- A motor vehicle shall not be operated in a condition that is likely to cause an accident or mechanical breakdown.
-
- A contract carrier shall maintain records for its maintenance and repair program for each motor vehicle.
-
The records shall include:
- Identifying information for the motor vehicle to include the vehicle identification number, make, year manufactured, and company identification number if one is provided;
- Owner information if the contract carrier is not the owner of the vehicle; and
- The history of inspections, repairs, and maintenance that describe the activity and the date the activity was performed.
-
- Except as provided under subdivision (e)(3)(B) of this section, the records under this subsection shall be maintained by the contract carrier at its place of business for one (1) year.
- If the motor vehicle leaves the contract carrier's control, the records under this subsection shall be maintained by the contract carrier at its place of business for six (6) months.
- A contract carrier and its officers, drivers, agents, and employees who are concerned with the inspection or maintenance of motor vehicles shall comply with and be knowledgeable of the contract carrier's maintenance and repair program under this section.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
23-16-508. Access to facilities and records.
A contract carrier shall allow an employee of the Arkansas Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Department of Transportation or its designee access to:
- A facility to determine compliance with this subchapter; and
- Records or information related to an accident investigation under this subchapter.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 263.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in the introductory language.
23-16-509. Liability protection.
A contract carrier or a third party that contracts on behalf of a railroad shall obtain and maintain an insurance policy of five million dollars ($5,000,000) for each motor vehicle that transports railroad employees.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1; 2009, No. 637, § 1.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted “or a third party that contracts on behalf of a railroad” and substituted “($5,000,000)” for “(5,000,000).”
23-16-510. Penalties.
-
- A person who knowingly violates a provision of this subchapter is liable to the state for a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation.
- Each day that a violation continues is a separate offense.
- The Arkansas Highway Police Division of the Arkansas Department of Transportation shall assess penalties for violations under this subchapter by written notice to the violator.
-
To determine the amount of the penalty, the Arkansas Department of Transportation or its designee shall evaluate:
- The nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation;
- The degree of culpability, history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and effect on the ability to continue to do business of the person found to have committed a violation; and
- Other circumstances as justice may require.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1; 2017, No. 707, § 264.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (b) and (c).
23-16-511. Right of railroad to contract.
- This subchapter is not intended to limit and shall not be construed as limiting the right of a railroad to contract with a contract carrier that certifies to the railroad that it is in compliance with the provisions of this subchapter or any applicable federal requirements.
- The railroad is entitled to rely on a contract carrier's certification that it is operating in compliance with this subchapter without further inquiry.
History. Acts 2009, No. 243, § 1.
Chapter 17 Telephone and Telegraph Companies
Research References
ALR.
Validity and construction of statutes or ordinances regulating telephone answering services. 35 A.L.R.3d 1430.
Telephone company's liability for disclosure of number or address of subscriber holding unlisted number. 1 A.L.R.4th 218.
Liability of telephone company for injury resulting from condition or location of telephone booth. 17 A.L.R.4th 1308.
Construction and application of state statutes authorizing civil cause of action by person whose wire or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of statute. 33 A.L.R.4th 506.
State regulation of radio paging service. 44 A.L.R.4th 216.
Mistakes in or omissions from directory: liability of telephone company for. 47 A.L.R.4th 882.
Placement, maintenance, or design of standing utility pole as affecting private utility's liability for personal injury resulting from vehicle's collision with pole within or beside highway. 51 A.L.R.4th 602.
Telephone services obtained by unauthorized use of another's telephone number — state cases. 61 A.L.R.4th 1197.
Allowing telephone call recipient to ascertain number of telephone from which call originated, as violation of right to privacy, wiretapping statute, or similar protections. 9 A.L.R.5th 553.
Liability of owners of wires, poles, or structures struck by aircraft for resulting injuries or damage. 49 A.L.R.5th 659.
Am. Jur. 74 Am. Jur. 2d, Telecom., § 1 et seq.
Ark. L. Rev.
Case Notes — Constitutional Law — Control of Community Antenna Systems, 11 Ark. L. Rev. 93.
C.J.S. 86 C.J.S., Telecom., § 2 et seq.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Halbert, Municipal Law—Utility Franchise Fees—True Nature of Levy Immaterial When City Possesses Statutory Authority. City of Little Rock v. AT&T Communications, Inc., 318 Ark. 616, 888 S.W.2d 290 (1994), 18 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 259.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Cross References. Filing of security interests by transmitting utilities, § 4-19-104.
Recovery from customers of public utilities of costs of advertising, § 23-4-207.
Effective Dates. Identical Acts 1994 (1st Ex. Sess.), Nos. 6 and 7, § 10: Mar. 4, 1994. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Ninth General Assembly that the decision of the Arkansas Court of Appeals in AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Little Rock has created uncertainty and confusion concerning the ability of municipalities to assess franchise fees as a term or condition for the use of public rights-of-way; that the immediate implementation of this Act is necessary to eliminate this uncertainty and confusion and to reconfirm the authority of municipalities to levy franchise fees. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act, being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2001, No. 1769, § 2: Apr. 18, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is found the determined by the General Assembly that it is important that Arkansans have access to government, business, and to others; that there is a need to establish a calling plan in order to enable Arkansans to have better access to government, business, and others; that this act provides for such a plan; and that this act needs to become effective immediately so that the Arkansas Public Service Commission may begin the process of promulgating regulations. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2001, No. 1824, § 3: Apr. 18, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that calling plans are needed in order to enhance or improve calling between communities of interest and to assist citizens to call their county seats; that this act authorizes the development of special terminating access agreements to encourage calling plans; that clarification of Arkansas Universal Service Fund matters in timely fashion will enhance the likelihood of the development of special terminating access agreements; and that in order to assist customers of the eligible telecommunications carriers, this act should become effective immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2011, No. 173, § 3: July 1, 2011. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act provides for the creation of a surcharge upon commercial mobile radio service providers per subject telephone number per month to support the Telecommunications Equipment Fund, and that the optimal time to implement this surcharge is at the beginning of the state's fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2011.”
Acts 2013, No. 442, § 30: Mar. 19, 2013. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that 911 emergency service is essential to protect the lives, health, and welfare of the state's residents in emergency situations; that 911 service is not available in many rural areas of the state; that the assessment and funding provisions of this act should be implemented immediately to accomplish the purposes of this act; and that this act is necessary to expand the benefits of the 911 emergency system to all residents of the state for their immediate protection. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 1074, § 3: Apr. 16, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the practice of illegal robocalls from telemarketers and from others seeking to perpetrate scams on the public to mislead and defraud the public is growing; that addressing misleading and fraudulent spoofing of telephone calls will protect the lives, health, and welfare of the state's residents; and that this act is immediately necessary because the Arkansas Public Service Commission should be immediately authorized to adopt and implement appropriate rules as provided in this act. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto”.
23-17-101. Right to construct, operate, and maintain lines — Damages for occupation of property.
-
-
Any person or corporation organized by virtue of the laws of this state or of any other state of the United States or by virtue of the laws of the United States, for the purpose of transmitting intelligence by magnetic telegraph or telephone, or other system of transmitting intelligence which is the equivalent of telephone or telegraph and which may be invented or discovered, may construct, operate, and maintain the telegraph, telephone, or other lines necessary for the speedy transmission of intelligence:
- Along and over the public highways and streets of the cities and towns of this state;
- Across and under the waters and over any lands or public works belonging to this state;
- On and over the lands of private individuals;
- Upon, along, and parallel to any of the railroads or turnpikes of this state; and
- On and over the bridges, trestles, or structures of the railroads.
- However, the ordinary use of the public highways, streets, works, railroads, bridges, trestles, or structures and turnpikes shall not be obstructed thereby, nor shall the navigation of the waters be impeded.
-
Any person or corporation organized by virtue of the laws of this state or of any other state of the United States or by virtue of the laws of the United States, for the purpose of transmitting intelligence by magnetic telegraph or telephone, or other system of transmitting intelligence which is the equivalent of telephone or telegraph and which may be invented or discovered, may construct, operate, and maintain the telegraph, telephone, or other lines necessary for the speedy transmission of intelligence:
- Just damages shall be paid to the owners of the lands, railroads, and turnpikes by reason of the occupation of the lands, railroads, and turnpikes by the telegraph or telephone corporations.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall limit the authority of municipalities to impose franchise fees pursuant to § 14-200-101.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 1, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 3989; Pope's Dig., § 4991; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1801; Acts 1994 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 6, § 5; 1994 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 7, § 5.
Publisher's Notes. Identical Acts 1994 (1st Ex. Sess.) Nos. 6 and 7, § 1, provided:
“LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.
(a) In the State of Arkansas, municipalities are granted jurisdiction and authority over the use and control of the public rights-of-way within the corporate limits of the municipality, to the extent that such jurisdiction does not conflict with state or federal statutes or regulations.
“(b) This historic authority has included the right to assess franchise fees for the privilege of the use of such rights-of-way and of providing utility service to the public.
“(c) On numerous occasions, the courts of the State of Arkansas have referred to this right to assess franchise fees against public utilities. For example, in Hot Springs Electric Light Co. v. Hot Springs, 70 Ark. 300 (1902), the Arkansas Supreme Court expressly stated that cities may assess a franchise fee as a condition for the use of public rights-of-way.”
Identical Acts 1994 (1st Ex. Sess.) Nos. 6 and 7, § 2, provided:
“STATEMENT OF POLICY. It is, and historically has been, the policy of the State of Arkansas to permit municipalities, as one means of raising revenues, to assess municipal franchise fees against public utilities for the privilege of providing utility services to the public and of using public rights-of-way, including streets, highways, or other public places of any kind whatsoever within municipal boundaries and such franchise fees have not been considered to be within the scope of A.C.A. § 26-73-103 so as to require a vote of the electorate.
“It is also the policy of the State that nothing in this Act shall amend or adversely impact the terms and provisions of an existing franchise agreement between a municipality and a public utility entered into pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-54-704, A.C.A.§ 14-200-101, or any other enabling legislation relating to franchise fees in effect at the time of the agreement.”
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section is constitutional. St. Louis & S.F.R.R. v. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co., 121 F. 276 (8th Cir. 1903).
Constitutional provision that no property or right-of-way shall be appropriated to the use of any corporation until full compensation therefor is made to the owner does not inhibit the grant of any use of the state's property except upon compensation. Ark. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 206 Ark. 1099, 178 S.W.2d 1002 (1944).
Ordinances.
City ordinance that required telephone company to pay certain fees for the privilege of using the city's public streets, and also levied a $.004 per minute charge on all long distance telephone calls that were billed to a city service address, was a franchise and fee ordinance and authorized by law. City of Little Rock v. AT&T Communications, 318 Ark. 616, 888 S.W.2d 290 (1994).
Railroad Right-of-Way.
Where a telephone company has without objection constructed its line along a railroad tract so as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad, the railroad is not authorized to remove such line from its right-of-way and is liable in damages for so doing. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & S. Ry. v. Batesville & Winerva Tel. Co., 80 Ark. 499, 97 S.W. 660 (1906).
Rights of Landowners.
A landowner could not evict a telephone company from a highway because damages for the taking of his land had not been paid, but was limited to an action for damages. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Biddle, 186 Ark. 294, 54 S.W.2d 57 (1932).
Use of Highways.
Operator of a threshing machine which broke the telephone company's wires in going from the road to a field was not entitled to injunctive relief under his cross bill since telephone company's wires were maintained at a height of over ten feet from the ground. Ahrent v. Sprague, 139 Ark. 416, 214 S.W. 68 (1919).
Telephone companies are authorized to construct and operate lines over highways, provided the highways are not thereby obstructed and the landowners are paid just damages. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Biddle, 186 Ark. 294, 54 S.W.2d 57 (1932).
A telephone line is a public utility clothed with the power of eminent domain and given free use of state's highways. Ark. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 206 Ark. 1099, 178 S.W.2d 1002 (1944).
Cited: Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Fayetteville, 271 Ark. 630, 609 S.W.2d 914 (1980); International Paper Co. v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs., 202 F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Ark. 2002).
23-17-102. Railroads may operate telegraphs and telephones — Authority.
Any railroad company incorporated by the laws of or operating lines of railroad within this state, upon filing its assent to this section and §§ 23-17-101, 23-17-103 — 23-17-108, and 23-17-113 in the office of the Secretary of State, shall thereby become clothed with the rights, powers, and duties provided for telegraph and telephone companies.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 12, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 10248; Pope's Dig., § 14257; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1802.
Case Notes
Cited: LaCost v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 134 Ark. 92, 203 S.W. 586 (1918).
23-17-103. Condemnation proceedings upon failure to secure right-of-way.
In the event that the telegraph or telephone companies upon application to such individuals, railroads, or turnpike companies fail to secure a right-of-way by consent, contract, or agreement, then the telegraph or telephone corporation shall have the right to proceed to procure the condemnation of the property, lands, rights, privileges, and easements in the manner prescribed by law for taking private property for right-of-way for railroads, as provided by § 18-15-1201 et seq.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 2, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 3990; Pope's Dig., § 4992; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1803.
23-17-104. Right of entry for construction — Liability for damages.
Wherever any telegraph or telephone company desires to construct its lines on or along the lands of individuals, on the right-of-way and structures of any railroads, or upon and along any turnpike, the telegraph or telephone company by its agents may have the right to peacefully enter upon the lands, structures, or right-of-way and survey, locate, and lay out its lines thereon, being liable, however, for any damage that may result by reason of such acts.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 3, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 3991; Pope's Dig., § 4993; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1804.
Case Notes
Cited: Sebastian Lake Devs., Inc. v. United Tel. Co., 240 Ark. 76, 398 S.W.2d 208 (1966).
23-17-105. Contract for exclusive privileges prohibited.
No telegraph or telephone corporation organized by virtue of the laws of this state or doing business in this state by virtue of the laws of any other state, or of the United States, shall have the power to contract with the owners of lands or the right in lands, or with any person or corporation, for the rights to erect, operate, or maintain telegraph, telephone, or other lines or works for the speedy transmission of intelligence over his or her or its lands, privileges, rights, or easements to the exclusion of other persons or corporations authorized to erect and operate lines and works for speedy transmission of intelligence.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 4, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 10241; Pope's Dig., § 14250; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1805.
23-17-106. Priority of dispatch of messages — Confidentiality.
-
- In consideration of the right-of-way over the public property conceded in this section and §§ 23-17-101 — 23-17-105, 23-17-107 , 23-17-108, and 23-17-113, every telephone corporation in the case of war, insurrection, or civil commotion of any kind and for the arrest of criminals shall give immediate dispatch at the usual rates of charge to any message connected therewith of any officer of the state or of the United States.
- Any officer or agent of a telephone company who fails or refuses to carry out the provisions of the preceding subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor.
-
- All other messages, including those received from other telephone companies, shall be transmitted in order of their delivery, correctly and without unreasonable delay, and shall be strictly confidential. However, arrangements may be made with the publishers of newspapers for the transmission of intelligence of general and public interest.
- Any officer or agent of a telephone company who willfully violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
- The telephone company so violating this section is liable in damages to the party aggrieved.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, §§ 5-8, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., §§ 10242-10245; Pope's Dig., §§ 14251-14254; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1806 — 73-1809; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 204.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Damages — Nominal, Compensatory, and Punitive — For Failure to Render Phone Service, 7 Ark. L. Rev. 400.
23-17-107. Interception of message — Injuring equipment — Penalty.
If any person without authority intercepts a dispatch or message transmitted by telephone or willfully destroys or injures any telephone pole, wire, cable, or fixture, he or she is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 9, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 10246; Pope's Dig., § 14255; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1810; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 204.
23-17-108. Refusal to transmit message — Penalty.
Every telegraph and telephone company doing business in this state, under a penalty of five hundred dollars ($500) for each and every refusal to do so, must transmit over its wires to localities on its lines for any individual, corporation, or other telegraph or telephone company such messages, dispatches, or correspondence as may be tendered to it by, or to be transmitted to, any individual, corporation, or other telegraph or telephone companies at the price customarily asked and obtained for the transmission of similar messages, dispatches, or correspondence without discrimination as to charges or promptness. The penalty prescribed in this section shall be recoverable in any court through proper form of law, one-half (½) of which shall go to the prosecutor and one-half (½) to the state.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 10, p. 176; C. & M. Dig., § 10247; Pope's Dig., § 14256; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1811.
Case Notes
Exceptions.
This section does not apply to telegraph companies engaged only in interstate and governmental business, pursuant to the act of Congress. Western Union Tel. Co. v. State, 82 Ark. 309, 101 S.W. 748 (1907).
Jurisdiction.
A justice of the peace has no jurisdiction of a suit to recover this penalty. B & O Tel. Co. v. Lovejoy, 48 Ark. 301, 3 S.W. 183 (1887).
Limitations on Liability.
The stipulation in the printed blanks for messages that “the company will not be liable for damages in any case when the claim is not presented in writing within sixty days after sending the message,” does not exempt the company from the penalty of this section, if not complied with. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Cobbs, 47 Ark. 344, 1 S.W. 558 (1886).
Liability for an action for damages may be so limited by stipulation on printed blanks requiring claim to be made within certain time. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Dougherty, 54 Ark. 221, 15 S.W. 468 (1891).
Messages to Be Transmitted.
It is the duty of the telegraph company to send message reporting conduct of railway employee, although it may refuse to transmit a message that is obscene, slanderous, blasphemous, profane, indecent or the like. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Lillard, 86 Ark. 208, 110 S.W. 1035 (1908).
Telegraph company is liable for refusal of agent to transmit message to company official, complaining of conduct of company employee. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Franklin, 114 Ark. 469, 169 S.W. 234 (1914).
Willfulness.
This section provides a penalty only for a willful or intentional refusal to transmit a message but not for a mere negligent omission to transmit or deliver a message. Frauenthal v. Western Union Tel. Co., 50 Ark. 78, 6 S.W. 236 (1887); State v. Western Union Tel. Co., 76 Ark. 124, 88 S.W. 834 (1905); State v. Western Union Tel. Co., 101 Ark. 600, 142 S.W. 1149 (1912).
23-17-109. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning telegraph companies, divulging contents of a message and willful refusal to transmit or deliver a message — penalty, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 575. The section was derived from Acts 1868, No. 25, § 3, p. 81; C. & M. Dig., § 10250; Pope's Dig., § 14259; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1812.
23-17-110. Telegraph companies — Schedule of rates.
In order to ascertain what the regular charges of such companies are, all telegraph companies doing business in this state are required to keep in all their offices in this state a schedule of the regular rates charged by them, which shall be open to the inspection of any person interested therein.
History. Acts 1897, No. 53, § 3, p. 72; C. & M. Dig., §§ 873, 10250a; Pope's Dig., §§ 1077, 14260; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1404.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1897, No. 53, § 3, is also codified as § 23-4-604(a).
Cross References. Applicability of Acts 1899, No. 53, § 23-4-702.
Rate schedules, filing, § 23-4-105.
23-17-111. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning overcharge by telegraph operators, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 576. The section was derived from Acts 1897, No. 53, §§ 2, 4, p. 72; C. & M. Dig., §§ 874, 10250a; Pope's Dig., §§ 1078, 14260; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1403, 73-1405.
23-17-112. Damages for mental anguish.
- All telegraph companies doing business in this state shall be liable in damages for mental anguish or suffering even in the absence of bodily injury or pecuniary loss for negligence in receiving, transmitting, or delivering messages.
- In all actions under this section, the jury may award such damages as it concludes resulted from the negligence of the telegraph company.
- Nothing contained in this section shall abridge the rights and remedies now provided by law against telegraph companies, and the rights and remedies provided for by this section shall be in addition to those now existing.
History. Acts 1903, No. 68, §§ 1-3, p. 123; C. & M. Dig., § 10249; Pope's Dig., § 14258; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-1813 — 73-1815.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Torts — Recovery for Mental Disturbance Absent Physical Impact, 16 Ark. L. Rev. 303.
Recovery for Mental Anguish of Survivors in Wrongful Death Action, 18 Ark. L. Rev. 161.
Note, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress — Escaping the Impact Rule in Arkansas, 35 Ark. L. Rev. 533.
Case Notes
Defenses.
It is no defense to an action under this statute that the contract was entered into on a Sunday. Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Lee, 79 Ark. 448, 96 S.W. 148 (1906).
Where a telegraph company receives a message for transmission on Sunday, it is no defense to an action for damages for failure to deliver the same promptly that its wires were down between the place of sending and of receiving the message and that its lineman refused to repair the break because it was Sunday. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hearn, 110 Ark. 176, 161 S.W. 1025 (1913).
Evidence.
Evidence held insufficient to permit recovery. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Mulkey, 118 Ark. 201, 176 S.W. 120 (1915).
Federal Control.
Where the negligent act complained of was committed while the defendant's telegraph lines were under the control and operation of the United States government, the defendant was not liable for damages for mental anguish and suit cannot be maintained under this section. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Davis, 142 Ark. 304, 218 S.W. 833 (1920).
Grounds for Recovery.
There may be a recovery for failure to deliver message which would have relieved mental anguish or suffering. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hollingsworth, 83 Ark. 39, 102 S.W. 681 (1907).
There may be recovery only for mental suffering connected with real ills, sorrows and griefs of life and not mental suffering over suppositions or imaginary conditions. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Shenep, 83 Ark. 476, 104 S.W. 154 (1907).
There can be recovery only where there has been negligence in “receiving, transmitting or delivering a message.” Western Union Tel. Co. v. Crenshaw, 93 Ark. 415, 125 S.W. 420 (1910).
There can be no recovery where slowness of delivery delayed a funeral only a few hours. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Bangs, 94 Ark. 44, 125 S.W. 1012 (1910).
If son would not have attended mother's funeral if the message announcing her death had been delivered promptly, he cannot recover damages for mental anguish for delay in its delivery. Tharpe v. Western Union Tel. Co., 94 Ark. 530, 127 S.W. 730 (1910).
There can be no recovery where the ground relied on by the plaintiff is intangible, visionary and remote. Howard v. Western Union Tel. Co., 106 Ark. 559, 153 S.W. 803 (1913).
There could be no recovery for negligence in handling a message concerning a last illness and death unless the plaintiff proves that she could and would have attended the death bed or funeral if the message had been delivered and therefore that she was deprived of such right and privilege by the negligence of such company who handled the message. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Baltz, 175 Ark. 167, 299 S.W. 377 (1927).
Interstate Messages.
There can be no recovery for mental anguish suffered for failure to deliver a telegraph message when the message is an interstate one. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Johnson, 115 Ark. 564, 171 S.W. 859 (1914); Western Union Tel. Co. v. Holder, 117 Ark. 210, 174 S.W. 552 (1915); Western Union Tel. Co. v. Culpepper, 120 Ark. 319, 179 S.W. 494 (1915); Western Union Tel. Co. v. Standridge, 207 Ark. 959, 183 S.W.2d 602 (1944). But see, Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ford, 77 Ark. 531, 92 S.W. 528 (1906); Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Lee, 79 Ark. 448, 96 S.W. 148 (1906).
While there can be no recovery for mental anguish suffered by a plaintiff by reason of a telegraph company's failure to deliver a message promptly, where the same was an interstate message, still, where the proof shows the defendant to have been negligent, the company may be liable under its rules as approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Simpson, 117 Ark. 156, 174 S.W. 232 (1915).
There can be no recovery on interstate message for mental anguish even though defendant is a railroad operating a telegraph line. LaCost v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry., 134 Ark. 92, 203 S.W. 586 (1918).
Jury Questions.
In an action for the negligent delay in delivering a telegram, it was not error to submit to the jury the question of whether the addressee was entitled to damages for mental anguish because she was thereby deprived of being with her daughter to comfort her on account of the loss of her baby, the company having notice of the relationship of the addressee to the deceased child. Western Union Tel. Co. v. McMullin, 98 Ark. 347, 135 S.W. 909 (1911).
Limitation of Liability.
A telegraph company may by contract limit its liability for negligence in the delivery of an interstate telegraph message. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Compton, 114 Ark. 193, 169 S.W. 946 (1914).
Persons Entitled to Sue.
The addressee of a telegraph message is a party to the contract which is made for his benefit and he may sue for a breach thereof. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Compton, 114 Ark. 193, 169 S.W. 946 (1914).
One whose name is not mentioned in a telegram and whose interest in the subject matter is not brought to the carrier's attention in a way that would cause a prudent person to believe that an injury could result from the carrier's mistake has no cause of action under this section. Wills v. Western Union Tel. Co., 208 Ark. 524, 186 S.W.2d 934 (1945).
Special Damages.
This section does not change the rule requiring notice of special damage. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hogue, 79 Ark. 33, 94 S.W. 924 (1906).
Telegraph Companies.
This section applies to any corporation or association doing a public telegraph business. Arkansas & La. Ry. v. Stroude, 77 Ark. 109, 91 S.W. 18 (1905).
Telephone Companies.
There can be no recovery against telephone company for mental anguish. Southern Tel. Co. v. King, 103 Ark. 160, 146 S.W. 489 (1912).
Cited: Wills v. Western Union Tel. Co., 208 Ark. 524, 186 S.W.2d 934 (1945); Beaty v. Buckeye Fabric Finishing Co., 179 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. Ark. 1959).
23-17-113. Telephone service to be supplied without discrimination — Complaint to commission.
-
- Every telephone company doing business in this state and engaged in a general telephone business shall supply all applicants for telephone connection and facilities without discrimination or partiality, within ten (10) days after written demand therefor, if the applicants comply or offer to comply with the reasonable rules of the company.
- No telephone company shall impose any condition or restriction upon any applicant that is not imposed impartially upon all persons or companies in similar situations. Nor shall the company discriminate against any individual or company engaged in lawful business by requiring as a condition for furnishing the facilities that they shall not be used in the business of the applicant or otherwise.
- Upon failure of any telephone company to comply with the written demand for telephone connection and facilities, the applicant may file a complaint with the Arkansas Public Service Commission under the provisions of § 23-3-119. The commission may make such temporary and final orders relative to the furnishing of such connection and facilities as the facts may justify.
History. Acts 1885, No. 107, § 11, p. 176; 1913, No. 95, § 1, p. 346; C. & M. Dig., § 10251; Pope's Dig., § 14261; Acts 1955, No. 120, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1816; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2463.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a)(1).
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Damages — Nominal, Compensatory, and Punitive — For Failure to Render Phone Service, 7 Ark. L. Rev. 400.
Case Notes
Construction.
Acts 1935, No. 324 did not repeal § 23-17-113 requiring telephone company to furnish uniform service to all applicants and providing penalty for its violation. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Matlock, 195 Ark. 159, 111 S.W.2d 500 (1937).
This section is highly penal and should be strictly construed. Lee v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 203 Ark. 859, 158 S.W.2d 933 (1942) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Company Rules and Regulations.
A telephone company is only required to furnish service to applicants who comply with its reasonable regulations. Smith v. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co., 109 Ark. 35, 158 S.W. 975 (1913).
Whether the rules of a telephone company are reasonable is a question for the court. Smith v. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co., 109 Ark. 35, 158 S.W. 975 (1913).
A telephone company may make reasonable rules and regulations governing application for service and where such rules require a payment in advance by the applicant and he has knowledge thereof, nothing but a tender will be a sufficient observance of the rule. Smith v. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co., 109 Ark. 35, 158 S.W. 975 (1913).
It is a reasonable rule for a telephone company to require that the telephone where long distance calls originate shall be responsible for the payment of the charges therefor and the company has the right to enforce such rule. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Sharp & White, 118 Ark. 541, 177 S.W. 25 (1915).
A telephone company could not require a customer to surrender a claim for statutory penalties as a condition upon which it would render service to the customer. Southeast Ark. Tel. & Power Co. v. Allen, 191 Ark. 520, 87 S.W.2d 35 (1935) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
A telephone company has the right to make all reasonable rules and regulations for the operation and control of its business, and those who deal with it must comply with such reasonable rules and regulations, but the telephone company has not unlimited authority to announce a rule the effect of which would result in reducing, impairing or rendering an inferior service with the same appliances and facilities used in rendering the standard or regular service, and thereby defeat the effect of regulatory statutes. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Lee, 200 Ark. 318, 140 S.W.2d 132, appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42, 85 L. Ed. 386 (1940).
Company's rules if not reasonable may not be regarded as enforceable or as affecting the rights of those who deal with the telephone company. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Lee, 200 Ark. 318, 140 S.W.2d 132, appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42, 85 L. Ed. 386 (1940).
Any interpretation of rules adopted by telephone company which permits discriminations or apparently furnishes an excuse therefor by way of defense to an action under this section is in violation of this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Lee, 200 Ark. 318, 140 S.W.2d 132, appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42, 85 L. Ed. 386 (1940) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Company's rule held to be a classification without a sound basis, and an unwarranted, unjust and unfair discrimination. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Lee, 200 Ark. 318, 140 S.W.2d 132, appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42, 85 L. Ed. 386 (1940).
Demands for Service.
Form and substance of application for service prepared by the company's agent upon a blank furnished by the company must be held to have been sufficient. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Matlock, 195 Ark. 159, 111 S.W.2d 500 (1937).
Requirement that a written demand for service to be made is to put the telephone company on notice that applicant is applying for service and if the same is not furnished the applicant will hold the company liable for the statutory penalty. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Hutton, 203 Ark. 969, 160 S.W.2d 201 (1942) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Contract for telephone service signed by user was not such a notice of a demand for service as contemplated by this section and where service called for by contract was furnished but was not that desired, written notice demanding that desired service should be made if recovery is sought under this section. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Hutton, 203 Ark. 969, 160 S.W.2d 201 (1942) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Ten-day demand for service is notice that penalty will be sought if demand is refused. Dobbs v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 798, 249 S.W.2d 988 (1952) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Directory Listings.
Telephone company cannot set forth facilities as directory and alphabetical listing of subscribers to be available to subscribers and then furnish them to some and deny them to others. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Matlock, 195 Ark. 159, 111 S.W.2d 500 (1937).
Discrimination.
Evidence sufficient to find that refusal by telephone company to install service at ordinary rate was a discrimination subjecting company to penalties provided by this statute. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Lee, 200 Ark. 318, 140 S.W.2d 132, appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S. Ct. 42, 85 L. Ed. 386 (1940) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Phone company which required deposits of $5 to $50 before installing phones in community did not discriminate against plaintiff where it demanded $25 deposit before installing a phone for plaintiff since husband living with plaintiff had failed to pay a partnership account. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Bateman, 223 Ark. 432, 266 S.W.2d 289 (1954).
Refusal of Service.
Since collection of public utility rates by legal process is practically prohibitive, a telephone company would not be subject to penalties for refusing to render service to a subscriber who is delinquent on past rates and who refuses to pay in advance in accordance with an established rule uniformly enforced. Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Danaher, 238 U.S. 482, 35 S. Ct. 886, 59 L. Ed. 1419 (1915) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Repeal.
This section was not repealed by act creating Department of Public Utilities (now Arkansas Public Service Commission). Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Matlock, 195 Ark. 159, 111 S.W.2d 500 (1937).
Cited: Yancey v. Batesville Tel. Co., 81 Ark. 486, 99 S.W. 679 (1907); Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Murphy, 100 Ark. 546, 140 S.W. 720 (1911); Montgomery v. Southwestern Ark. Tel. Co., 110 Ark. 480, 161 S.W. 1060 (1913); Southwestern Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fendley, 123 Ark. 197, 184 S.W. 424 (1916); Rice Belt Tel. Co. v. Malcolm, 131 Ark. 227, 199 S.W. 76 (1917); Clemens v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 133 Ark. 574, 203 S.W. 16 (1918); Dobbs v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 220 Ark. 798, 249 S.W.2d 988 (1952).
23-17-114, 23-17-115. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning renting to other companies to transmit messages and maximum monthly rental for telephone instruments, were repealed by Acts 1997, No. 1311, § 1. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-17-114. Acts 1885, No. 130, § 2, p. 208; C. & M. Dig., § 10253; Pope's Dig., § 14263; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1818.
23-17-115. Acts 1885, No. 130, § 1, p. 208; C. & M. Dig., § 10252; Pope's Dig., § 14262; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1817.
23-17-116. Fee for initiation of residential telephone service to be payable in installments.
- The fee or charge imposed by any telephone company doing business in this state for the initiation of local telephone service at a residential location, but not including contributions in aid of construction, if any, shall be billed to the residential customer in equal monthly installments over a period of six (6) months at the option of the customer if the total installation charges exceed one hundred dollars ($100).
- If the total installation charges exceed fifty dollars ($50.00) but do not exceed one hundred dollars ($100), the residential customer shall at the option of the customer be billed in equal monthly installments over a period of three (3) months.
History. Acts 1983, No. 810, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1821; Acts 1997, No. 915, § 1.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment added “if the total installation … period of three (3) months” following “option of the customer.”
23-17-117, 23-17-118. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning recovery of excessive charges prohibited and fees of foreign telephone, telegraph, and pipeline companies doing intrastate business, were repealed by Acts 1997, No. 1311, § 1. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-17-117. Acts 1885, No. 130, § 3, p. 208; C. & M. Dig., § 10254; Pope's Dig., § 14264; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1819.
23-17-118. Acts 1911, No. 87, § 5, p. 48; C. & M. Dig., § 1806; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-1820.
23-17-119. Surcharges to provide telecommunications for deaf and hearing impaired — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “Commercial mobile radio service” means the same as defined at § 12-10-303; and
- “Prepaid wireless telephone service” means the same as defined at § 12-10-303.
-
-
To fund the equipment distribution program established by § 20-79-401 et seq., the Arkansas Public Service Commission may impose a surcharge of up to:
- Two-hundredths of a dollar ($0.02) per subject access line per month; and
- Two-hundredths of a dollar ($0.02) per working subject telephone number per month.
-
Surcharges imposed by the commission under subdivisions (b)(1)(A) and (B) of this section shall:
- Be identical; and
- Not apply to prepaid wireless telephone service.
-
To fund the equipment distribution program established by § 20-79-401 et seq., the Arkansas Public Service Commission may impose a surcharge of up to:
- The surcharges levied under this section shall be collected by the local exchange carriers and commercial mobile radio service providers from their customers and remitted to the Department of Finance and Administration for deposit as special revenues into the State Treasury to the credit of the Telecommunications Equipment Fund for the equipment distribution program under § 20-79-401 et seq.
- If revenues collected under this section exceed the costs of operating the program established by § 20-79-401 et seq., and if the excess at any time equals a three-year average of expenditures under this section and § 20-79-401 et seq., then the collection of the surcharge shall cease until one-half (½) of the surplus has been exhausted.
History. Acts 1995, No. 501, § 4; 2011, No. 173, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 1997, No. 1080, § 14, provided, in part, that “to the extent any provisions of this act conflict with any provisions of Act 501 of 1995 the provisions of Act 501 shall prevail.”
Amendments. The 2011 amendment added present (a) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; rewrote present (b); and, in (c), deleted “access line” preceding “surcharges”, inserted “and commercial mobile radio service providers”, substituted “remitted to the Department of Finance and Administration for deposit” for “deposited”, and deleted “created in § 19-6-482” following “Telecommunications Equipment Fund”.
23-17-120. Establishment of calling plans.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission by rule shall establish calling plans in telephone exchanges in the state.
- The commission shall determine the size of exchanges that will be eligible for the calling plan.
-
- The commission may establish end-user charges for the plan in an amount not to exceed two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per month per access line to be applied in the affected exchanges. In addition the commission may establish usage-based charges or other end-user charges as appropriate to fund the plan.
- The plan shall be funded by customer charges under subdivision (b)(1) of this section and by the Arkansas Calling Plan Fund established by § 23-17-404(e).
- The plan may vary among telephone exchanges based on factors determined by the commission.
- In establishing the calling plan, the commission shall consider basic local exchange rates, calling scopes, the ability of customers to call the county seat, access to industry and business, the cost of providing the calling plan, and the availability of funding from the Arkansas Calling Plan Fund.
- The plan provided to different telephone exchanges may vary in minutes in the plan and the cost to customers for the plan and may be either mandatory or optional plans.
- Any mandatory plan shall be subject to approval through a balloting process by the customers of the exchanges that would be subject to the monthly end-user charge associated with the proposed plan. A minimum of fifty-one percent (51%) of the ballots returned must be in favor of the proposed calling plan in order for the proposed calling plan to be implemented.
-
- Incumbent local exchange carriers shall not be entitled to Arkansas Universal Service Fund [superseded] recovery for lost toll revenues associated with the implementation of these calling plans.
- In establishing the plans, the commission is required to ensure that all costs to incumbent local exchange carriers of implementing such plans, including, but not limited to, lost toll and access revenues, network and equipment costs, and costs incurred to terminate associated plan traffic are fully compensated by the combination of end-user charges and funds provided to each incumbent local exchange carrier from the Arkansas Calling Plan Fund.
- Lost toll revenues shall be determined by a two-month study of actual toll usage and revenues for traffic on the proposed route.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1769, § 1; 2013, No. 442, § 29; 2019, No. 315, § 2464.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Arkansas Universal Service Fund, referred to in this section, has been superseded by the Arkansas High Cost Fund. See § 23-17-404.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment substituted “§ 23-17-404(e)” for “§ 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)” in (b)(2).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(1).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
23-17-121. Agreements for special terminating access rates or plans.
- Two (2) or more eligible telecommunications carriers may enter into an agreement under this section for special terminating access rates or plans between exchanges of the parties to the agreement. The agreement is conditioned upon the approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
-
The commission may approve the agreement only if the commission determines that:
- The agreement is needed to enhance or improve calling between communities of interest or to assist citizens to call their county seat;
- The agreement is in the best interest of the customers of the eligible telecommunications carriers;
- The special terminating access rate or plan recovers the cost of providing the service; and
- The agreement does not detrimentally impact the customers of other telecommunications carriers in Arkansas.
-
- The approval may provide for special terminating access rates that shall be available only to the companies entering into the agreement.
- No other company may take advantage of the special access rates. In all other instances, the filed-rate doctrine shall continue to apply.
- Any reduced revenue or additional costs caused by the agreement shall not be recovered from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund [superseded].
History. Acts 2001, No. 1824, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Arkansas Universal Service Fund, referred to in this section, has been superseded by the Arkansas High Cost Fund. See § 23-17-404.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
23-17-122. Annual certification — Definition.
- As used in this section, “provider” means an entity that provides a telecommunications service, a Voice over Internet Protocol, commonly known as “VoIP”, service, a commercial radio service, or a similar service.
- Beginning July 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, a provider shall file with the Arkansas Public Service Commission documentation demonstrating that the provider has implemented current and applicable technologies to identify and block telecommunications that violate § 4-88-107(a)(11), § 4-88-108(a), § 4-99-108(c), or § 4-99-302(b), as applicable, taking into consideration applicable state and federals laws, federal regulations, and costs.
-
- The commission shall promulgate rules necessary to implement this section.
-
-
When adopting the initial rules to implement this section, the final rule shall be filed with the Secretary of State for adoption under § 25-15-204(f):
- On or before July 1, 2020; or
- If approval under § 10-3-309 has not occurred by July 1, 2020, as soon as practicable after approval under § 10-3-309.
- The commission shall file the proposed rule with the Legislative Council under § 10-3-309(c) sufficiently in advance of July 1, 2020, so that the Legislative Council may consider the rule for approval before July 1, 2020.
-
When adopting the initial rules to implement this section, the final rule shall be filed with the Secretary of State for adoption under § 25-15-204(f):
- The commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine all complaints regarding a provider's compliance with this section.
- A provider filing documentation under subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section until the provider is subject to a final order issued by the commission finding the provider has failed to implement current and applicable technologies according to subsection (b) of this section.
History. Acts 2019, No. 677, § 9; 2019, No. 1074, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2019, No. 677, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.
“(a) The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The citizens of this state are being negatively affected by illegal robocalls from telemarketers and from others seeking to perpetrate scams on them;
“(2) While these illegal robocalls are frustrating for most, the robocalls are costly and dangerous for far too many Arkansans;
“(3) An alarming number of illegal robocalls originate from scammers using automatic telephone dialing systems to send out thousands of phone calls per minute with fictitious or misleading names or telephone numbers displaying on unsuspecting consumers' telephone caller identification service;
“(4) These scammers are engaging in insidious schemes and targeting seniors and other vulnerable groups by soliciting personal information such as credit or debit card information and Social security numbers;
“(5) Displaying fictitious or misleading names or telephone numbers, or “spoofing”, is the predominant means by which a robocaller protects their identities and entices consumers to answer the telephone; and
“(6) Spoofing is the gateway for illegal robocalls and scams.
“(b) It is the intent of the General Assembly:
“(1) To protect the citizens of this state from being spoofed by receiving illegal robocalls from telemarketers and from others seeking to perpetrate scams on unsuspecting or vulnerable citizens;
“(2) To provide the citizens of this state who use a caller identification service with accurate information about the identities and locations of callers;
“(3) To encourage telecommunications providers to swiftly implement technologies that will allow telecommunications providers to identify and stop illegal calling practices; and
“(4) That this act be construed as broadly as possible to ensure that the citizens of this state are protected from the negative impact of illegal robocalls and to ensure that scammers and complicit telecommunications providers are held criminally accountable”.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment added (a) and (c) through (e); designated the former section as (b); and, in (b), substituted “Beginning July 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, a provider shall file with” for “No later than June 30 annually, a telecommunications provider may seek a determination by”, inserted “documentation demonstrating” and deleted “telecommunications” preceding the second occurrence of “provider”.
Subchapter 2 — Rural Telecommunications Cooperative Act
Effective Dates. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 41: approved Feb. 9, 1951. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that there are many rural areas, as herein defined, in the State of Arkansas without local telephone service; that the federal government has made provision for the financing of cooperative nonprofit corporations for the purpose of furnishing telephone service to said areas; that there is an urgent demand from those living in said areas for telephone service; that there is no provision for the organizing of such corporations for said purpose; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, an emergency is therefore declared, and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1969, No. 395, § 3: Apr. 11, 1969. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that rural telephone cooperatives furnish a service that is competitive with other telephone companies that are required to pay the various State taxes; that the State of Arkansas is in need of additional funds to continue to pay for essential governmental services; that the State of Arkansas is losing millions of dollars in revenues through various exemptions and conclusions contained in the various tax laws of this State; and that only by the passage of this Act can this situation be remedied. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1989, No. 438, § 4: Mar. 9, 1989. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Business Corporation, enacted in 1987 establishes general standards for directors, defines director conflict of interest and permits directors to conduct meetings through the use of any means of communication; and that the Arkansas Business Corporation Act does not apply to a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in telephone service; and that the adoption of standards for directors, the defining of director conflict of interest and the authority for directors to conduct meetings through the use of any means of communication would be in the best interest of the membership of a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in telephone service; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1997, No. 316, § 19: Feb. 28, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that many provisions of the Rural Telephone Cooperative Act are archaic and obsolete; that the Rural Telephone Cooperative Act should be modified to mesh with the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996; that some provisions of the present Rural Telephone Cooperative Act are an impediment to providing the best service to the customers; that financing of the rural telecommunications coops is especially hampered by some of the obsolete provisions; that this act will update the Rural Telephone Cooperative Act and provide needed flexibility to the cooperatives. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective thirty (30) days after the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 1999, No. 946, § 23: Mar. 29, 1999. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-second General Assembly that due to the significant changes in the telecommunications industry and the federal laws and regulations applicable thereto, state law should be changed to reflect the new environment; that it is in the best interest of the public for member-owned telecommunications cooperatives to have greater flexibility to maintain and preserve the commitment to universal availability of reasonably affordable telecommunications services; that competition and growth in the telecommunications industry are affected by demographics and population density and therefore telecommunications cooperatives serving high cost rural areas often have needs that are different from telecommunications providers serving only urban areas; and that this act will grant rural telecommunications cooperatives more flexibility, and thereby enhance their services to their members. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Mathews, Corporate Statutes—Which One Applies?, 13 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 84.
Case Notes
Cited: Incorporated Town of Emerson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 20, 295 S.W.2d 778 (1956); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968).
23-17-201. Title.
This subchapter may be cited as the “Rural Telecommunications Cooperative Act”.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1601; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 1.
23-17-202. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Acquire” means and includes construct, acquire by purchase, lease, devise, gift, or other modes of acquisition;
- “Board” means a board of directors of a corporation organized under this subchapter;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Cooperative” means a corporation organized and operating pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter;
- “Federal agency” includes the United States and any department, administration, commission, board, bureau, office, establishment, agency, authority, or other instrumentality of the United States;
- “Member” means an incorporator of a cooperative and each person thereafter lawfully admitted to and retaining membership therein;
- “Municipality” means any incorporated city or town of this state;
- “Obligations” includes bonds, notes, debentures, interim certificates, or receipts and all other evidences of indebtedness issued by a cooperative. However, obligations shall not include amounts represented by capital stock, certificates of membership, or amounts due as patronage profits;
- “Person” includes any natural person, firm, association, corporation, business trust, or partnership;
- “Rural area” means any area within this state which is located outside the boundaries of any incorporated or unincorporated city, town, or village having a population in excess of two thousand five hundred (2,500) inhabitants according to the last preceding federal census;
- “State agency” includes the State of Arkansas and any department, administration, commission, board, bureau, office, establishment, agency, authority, instrumentality, or any political subdivision of the State of Arkansas;
- “Telecommunications company” means any person, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other entity that offers telecommunications services to the public for compensation; and
- “Telecommunications service” means the offering to the public for compensation the transmission of voice, data, or other electronic information at any frequency over any part of the electromagnetic spectrum, notwithstanding any other use of the associated facilities. Such term does not include radio and television broadcast or distribution services or the provision or publishing of yellow pages, regardless of the entity providing such services or services to the extent that such services are used in connection with the operation of an electric utility system owned by a government entity.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1602; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 2; 1997, No. 316, § 1.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment rewrote (12) and (13).
Case Notes
Cited: Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968); International Paper Co. v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs., 202 F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Ark. 2002).
23-17-203. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning subchapter extended to other corporations, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 316, § 2. The section was derived from Acts 1951, No. 51, § 35; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1635; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 3.
23-17-204. Purpose of cooperative.
Cooperative nonprofit membership corporations either with or without capital stock may be organized under this subchapter for the purpose of furnishing telecommunications service and other services to the widest practicable number of users of such services.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1603; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 4; 1999, No. 946, § 1.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “and other services” for “in rural areas” and “such services” for “the service.”
23-17-205. Powers of cooperative.
Any cooperative created under the provisions of this subchapter shall have power to:
- Sue and be sued in its corporate name;
- Have perpetual existence unless limited for a shorter term in its articles of incorporation;
- Adopt and use a corporate seal and to alter it;
- Furnish, improve, and expand telecommunications service to its members, to federal and state agencies, and to other persons;
- Construct, purchase, lease as lessee, or otherwise acquire, and to improve, expand, install, equip, maintain, and operate, and to sell, assign, convey, lease as lessor, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of or encumber telecommunications lines, facilities or systems, lands, buildings, structures, plant and equipment, exchanges, and any other real or personal property, tangible or intangible, which are necessary or appropriate to accomplish any purpose of the cooperative authorized by this subchapter;
- Connect and interconnect its telecommunications lines, facilities, or systems with telecommunications lines, facilities, or systems owned and operated by other telecommunications companies or cooperatives;
- Make its facilities available to persons furnishing telecommunications services within or without this state;
- Purchase, lease as lessee, or otherwise acquire, and to use and exercise, and to sell, assign, convey, pledge, or otherwise dispose of, or encumber franchises, rights, privileges, licenses, and easements;
- Fix membership fees, issue membership certificates, and issue nonvoting shares of stock;
- Borrow money and otherwise contract indebtedness, to issue and guarantee notes, bonds, and other evidences of indebtedness, and secure the same by mortgage, pledge, deed of trust, or security deed, or any other encumbrances upon any or all of its then-owned or after-acquired real or personal property, assets, franchises, or revenues;
- Construct, maintain, and operate telecommunications equipment, lines, facilities, and systems along, upon, under, and across publicly owned lands, easements, rights-of-way, and public thoroughfares, including, without limitation, all roads, highways, streets, alleys, bridges, and causeways, subject, however, to the same requirements and limitations with respect to the use or occupancy of such thoroughfares and lands as are imposed by the laws of this state on telecommunications companies;
- Exercise the power of eminent domain in the manner and to the same extent as provided by the laws of this state for the exercise of such power by telecommunications companies;
- Adopt, and from time to time, amend, or repeal bylaws;
- Make any and all contracts necessary, convenient, or appropriate for the full exercise of the powers herein granted;
- Accept gifts or grants of money, services, or property, real or personal; and
- Do or perform any other acts and things which may be necessary, convenient, or appropriate to accomplish any purpose of the cooperative authorized by this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1604; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 5; 1997, No. 316, § 3.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment deleted the former last sentence of (4); rewrote (6).
Case Notes
Cited: Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968).
23-17-206. Jurisdiction of commission.
Cooperatives doing business in this state pursuant to this subchapter shall be subject to the general jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Jurisdiction shall be exercised by the commission in the same manner and to the same extent as provided by law for the regulation, supervision, or control of telecommunications companies, subject, however, to all the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 32; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1632; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 6.
Case Notes
Cited: Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968).
23-17-207. Incorporators.
Any three (3) or more natural persons of the age of twenty-one (21) or more who are residents of this state may act as incorporators of a cooperative to be organized under this subchapter by executing articles of incorporation as provided in § 23-17-210.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1605.
23-17-208. Cooperative names.
The words “telecommunications cooperative” or “telephone cooperative” shall not be used in the corporate names of corporations organized under the laws of this state or authorized to do business herein, other than cooperatives organized pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1607; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 7.
23-17-209. Articles of incorporation — Contents.
-
The articles of incorporation shall state:
- The name of the cooperative. The name shall include the words “Telephone Cooperative” or “Telecommunications Cooperative”, and the abbreviation “Inc.”;
- The purpose for which the cooperative is formed;
- The names and addresses of the incorporators who shall serve as directors and manage the affairs of the cooperative until its first annual meeting of members or until their successors are elected and qualified;
- The number of directors, not fewer than five (5), to be elected at the annual meeting of members;
- The address of its principal office and the name and address of its agent upon whom process may be served;
- The terms and conditions upon which persons shall be admitted to membership and retain membership in the cooperative;
-
If a cooperative desires to issue nonvoting shares of stock:
- The total number of the shares of stock which may be issued and the par value of each share;
- The fixed or maximum rates of dividends on the par value of the shares of stock and whether dividends shall be cumulative;
- Whether the shares of stock may be issued to members only or to members and nonmembers; and
- The maximum number of the shares of stock which may be owned by any person and the terms and conditions upon which the shares of stock may be transferred, redeemed, or retired. No shares of stock shall be issued except for cash or for property at its fair value in an amount equal to the par value of the shares of stock; and
- Any provision not inconsistent with law, which the incorporators may choose to insert, for the regulation of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the cooperative.
- It shall not be necessary to set forth in the articles of incorporation any of the corporate powers enumerated in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1606; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 8.
23-17-210. Articles of incorporation — Execution, filing, and recording.
- Duplicate originals of the articles of incorporation shall be signed by the incorporators and acknowledged before an officer authorized by the laws of this state to take acknowledgments to deeds and conveyances. These duplicate originals shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State.
-
If the Secretary of State finds that the articles of incorporation conform to law and when the fees prescribed by this subchapter have been paid, he or she shall:
- Endorse on the originals the word “filed” and the month, day, and year of the filing;
- File one (1) of the originals in his or her office and deliver the other to the incorporators; and
- Issue a certificate of incorporation to the incorporators.
- The incorporators shall file for record a copy of the original articles of incorporation bearing the filing of the Secretary of State.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1608; Acts 1997, No. 316, § 4.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment deleted “in the office of the county clerk of the county in which the principal office of the cooperative in this state is located” from the end of (c).
23-17-211. Articles of incorporation — Amendment.
- Any cooperative organized under this subchapter, from time to time and as desired, may amend its articles of incorporation in any respect. However, only such provisions shall be inserted by amendment that could be lawfully and properly inserted in original articles of incorporation at the time of making the amendment.
-
Every amendment shall be made and effected in the manner following:
- The board of directors of the cooperative shall adopt a resolution setting forth the amendment proposed, declaring its advisability, and calling a meeting of the members entitled to vote for the consideration thereof at the meeting, of which notice shall be given in the manner provided in § 23-17-217;
- If it appears that a majority of the members voting have voted at an annual meeting in favor of the amendment, the cooperative shall make under its corporate seal and the hand of its president or vice president and secretary or assistant secretary a verified certificate setting forth the amendment in full;
- Duplicate originals of the certificate, so verified, shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State, and one (1) of the duplicate originals bearing the filing by the Secretary of State shall be recorded in the office of the county clerk in the same manner as required in § 23-17-210 in regard to certified copies of original articles of incorporation; and
- Upon the filing of the certificate with the Secretary of State, the charter of the cooperative shall be deemed to be amended accordingly.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1609; Acts 1997, No. 316, § 5.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment deleted former (b)(2) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; and substituted “that a majority of the members voting have voted at an annual meeting” for “that not less than a majority of the members entitled to vote have voted” in present (b)(2).
23-17-212. Certificate of incorporation.
- Upon the issuance of a certificate of incorporation by the Secretary of State, the corporate existence of the cooperative shall begin.
- The certificate of incorporation shall be conclusive evidence, except as against the state, that all conditions required to be performed by the incorporators have been complied with and that the cooperative has been incorporated under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1610.
23-17-213. Organizational meeting.
- After the issuance of the certificate of incorporation, an organizational meeting shall be held at the call of a majority of the incorporators for the purpose of adopting bylaws and electing officers and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
- The incorporators calling the meeting shall give at least three (3) days' notice thereof by mail to each incorporator. The notice shall state the time and place of the meeting.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1611.
23-17-214. Bylaws.
-
- The power to make, alter, amend, or repeal the bylaws of the cooperative shall be vested in the board of directors, subject to amendment by the members at an annual meeting.
-
- The board shall not change, alter, amend, or repeal a provision of the bylaws adopted by the members except upon a unanimous vote of the directors in favor of the change, alteration, amendment, or repeal.
- If the directors change, alter, amend, or repeal a bylaw provision under this section, the bylaw provision shall remain effective unless the change, alteration, amendment, or repeal of the bylaw provision is presented by the members at the next annual or special meeting of the board.
- If the members at the next annual or special meeting of the board do not vote to ratify the directors' action in changing, altering, amending, or repealing the bylaw provision in question, the bylaw provision in question shall be deleted from the bylaws, and the bylaw provision in question shall revert, effective the day after the members' meeting, to the wording that was in place immediately before the directors changed, altered, amended, or repealed the bylaw provision.
- The bylaws may contain any provisions for the regulation and management of the affairs of the cooperative not inconsistent with law or the articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1612; Acts 1997, No. 316, § 6; 1999, No. 946, § 2; 2009, No. 761, § 1.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment repealed (c).
The 1999 amendment rewrote (a)(2).
The 2009 amendment subdivided (a)(2), inserted “or repeal” or variant throughout the subdivision, substituted “remain effective unless the change, alteration, amendment, or repeal of the bylaw provision is presented by the members at the next annual or special meeting of the board” for “be submitted to the members of the cooperative at their next annual or special meeting” in (a)(2)(B), substituted “next annual or special meeting of the board” for “meeting” in (a)(2)(C) and made minor stylistic changes throughout (a).
23-17-215. Qualifications of members.
Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, the articles of incorporation of a cooperative, and the bylaws of a cooperative, a cooperative's board shall have the authority to determine the qualifications for membership in the cooperative and to establish and from time to time modify procedures pursuant to which persons may become or remain members, as well as procedures for terminating a person's membership in the cooperative. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, no person may become or remain a member of a cooperative who does not subscribe to telecommunications service supplied by the cooperative.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1613; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 9; 1999, No. 946, § 3.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote the section.
23-17-216. Membership fees and capital credits.
- When a member of a cooperative has paid the membership fee in full, a certificate of membership shall be issued to the member.
- Memberships in the cooperative and the certificates thereof shall be nontransferable and nonassignable.
- Membership may be cancelled upon the resignation, expulsion, dissolution, change in ownership, or death of the member or by the death or divorce of either party to a joint membership, if joint memberships are provided for in the bylaws.
- The membership fee shall not be refunded.
- Cooperatives shall not pay capital credits to a member, former member, patron, or former patron while the cooperative has outstanding and unpaid obligations in excess of ten percent (10%) of its net assets. The board of directors in its discretion may authorize payment of any capital credits allocated to deceased former members or patrons as provided in the bylaws. If the outstanding and unpaid obligations of the cooperative are less than ten percent (10%) of the cooperative's net assets based upon the cooperative's consolidated balance sheet as of the close of the cooperative's most recently audited fiscal year, the board shall have the discretion to pay previously allocated capital credits in any amount or manner the board deems appropriate.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1618; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 10; 1999, No. 946, § 4; 2007, No. 1579, § 1.
23-17-217. Meetings of members.
- Meetings of members may be held at such place as may be designated by the board. In the absence of any such provision, all meetings shall be held in the principal office of the cooperative in this state.
- Annual meetings of the members shall be held at such time as may be designated by the board. Failure to hold the annual meeting at the designated time shall not work forfeiture or dissolution of the cooperative.
- Special meetings of the members may be called by the president, or by the board of directors, and shall be called by the president upon petition signed by not less than ten percent (10%) of all the members.
- Written or printed notice, containing the place, day, and hour of the meeting of members and, in case of special meeting, the purpose for which the meeting is called, shall be delivered not fewer than five (5) days nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, to each member of record entitled to vote as a member at the meeting. If mailed, the notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mails, with postage prepaid, in a sealed envelope addressed to the member at his or her address as it appears on the records of the cooperative.
- Each member present in person at any meeting shall be entitled to one (1), and only one (1), vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the members, but voting by mail or proxy may be provided for in the bylaws. Notwithstanding, the bylaws may require each member to vote in person on certain matters.
-
- Unless the bylaws prescribe the presence of a greater percentage of the number of members for a quorum, a quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings of the members of the cooperative shall be ten percent (10%) of all members, and, of a cooperative having more than five hundred (500) members, a quorum shall be not fewer than fifty (50) members. However, in the event a cooperative is unable to attain a quorum at its annual meeting, the board of directors in the next annual meeting or in a notice of special meeting may declare that the number of members present at the meeting shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting business.
- If less than a quorum is present at any meeting, a majority of those present in person or by proxy may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, §§ 14-17; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1614 — 77-1617; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 11; 1997, No. 316, § 7; 1999, No. 946, §§ 5, 6.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment substituted “designated by the board” for “provided in the bylaws” in (a) and (b); and substituted “ten percent (10%)” for “one-tenth ( 1 / 10 )” in (c).
The 1999 amendment, in (d), substituted “five (5) days” for “ten (10) days” and “sixty (60) days” for “thirty (30) days”; and rewrote the last sentence in (f)(1).
23-17-218. Board of directors generally.
- The business affairs of a cooperative shall be managed by a board of directors consisting of not fewer than five (5) in number, which shall exercise all the powers of a cooperative except those which are conferred upon the members by this subchapter, by the articles of incorporation, by its certificate of incorporation, or by the bylaws of the cooperative.
- Each of the directors shall be a member of the cooperative.
-
- The bylaws shall prescribe the number of directors, their qualifications other than those prescribed in this subchapter, the manner of holding meetings of the board of directors, and the manner of electing successors to directors who resign, die, are removed, or otherwise are incapable of acting.
- The bylaws may also provide for the removal of directors from office and for the election of their successors.
- The directors shall be members of the cooperative and shall be entitled to such compensation, benefits, and reimbursement for expenses actually and necessarily incurred.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, §§ 19, 20; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1619, 77-1620; Acts 1991, No. 552, § 1; 1999, No. 946, § 7.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment, in (d), added “benefits,” deleted “by them as may be provided in the bylaws” and made minor punctuation changes.
23-17-219. Board of directors — Elections — Term of office — Vacancies.
- The directors of a cooperative shall hold office until their terms expire or until their successors are elected and qualified.
-
- At each annual meeting or, in case of failure to hold the annual meeting as specified in the bylaws, at a special meeting called for that purpose, the members shall elect directors to hold office for the term for which they are elected and until their successors have been elected and qualified.
- Instead of electing all of the directors annually, the bylaws may provide for staggered terms of no longer than nine (9) years for each director if approved at a meeting of the members.
- Any vacancy occurring in the board shall be filled by the remaining directors. Such persons so elected to fill a vacancy shall serve until the board of directors shall call for an election to elect a successor, and until the successor has been elected and qualified.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, §§ 20, 21; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1620, 77-1621; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 12; 1999, No. 946, § 8.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment, in (b)(2), substituted “nine (9) years” for “six (6) years” and added “if approved at a meeting of the members.”
23-17-220. Board of directors — Meetings.
- Meetings of the board of directors, regular or special, shall be held at such place and upon such notice as the bylaws may prescribe.
-
- Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any regular meeting of the board of directors need be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of the meeting.
- The notice of a special meeting of the board shall state the purpose of and the business to be transacted at the meeting.
-
- A majority of the board of directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business unless a greater number is required by the articles of incorporation or by the bylaws.
- The act of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the board unless the act of a greater number is required by the articles of incorporation or by the bylaws.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, §§ 22, 23; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1622, 77-1623; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 13.
23-17-221. Officers, agents, and employees.
-
-
- The board of directors shall elect a president, a vice president, a secretary, and a treasurer, and one (1) person may be elected to the office of secretary-treasurer.
- The board of directors may elect such other officers as it deems necessary.
- The powers, duties, and terms of office of the foregoing officers shall be provided for in the bylaws.
-
- The board of directors may appoint such other officers, agents, and employees as it deems necessary and fix their powers, duties, and compensation.
- Any officer, agent, or employee elected or appointed by the board of directors subject to any contracts validly entered into by the cooperative may be removed by it whenever, in its judgment, the best interests of the cooperative will be served.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 25; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1625; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 14; 1993, No. 327, § 1.
23-17-222. Executive committee.
- By its bylaws, any cooperative may provide for an executive committee to be elected from and by its board of directors.
- To such committee may be delegated the management of the current and ordinary business of the cooperative and such other duties as the bylaws may prescribe, but the designation of the committee and the delegation of authority thereto shall not operate to relieve the board of directors or any member thereof of any responsibility imposed upon it or him or her by this subchapter.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 26; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1626.
23-17-223. Waiver of notice of meeting.
- Any person entitled to notice of a meeting may waive notice in writing either before or after the meeting.
- If any person attends a meeting, his or her attendance shall constitute a waiver of notice of the meeting, unless the person participates therein solely to object to the transaction of any business because the meeting has not been lawfully called or convened.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 24; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1624.
23-17-224. Consolidation.
-
- Any two (2) or more cooperatives may enter into an agreement subject to the approval by the required authorities, if any, for the consolidation of the cooperatives.
- The agreement shall set forth the terms and conditions of the consolidation, the name and the proposed consolidated cooperative, the number of its directors, which shall be not fewer than five (5), the time of the annual meeting and election, and the names of at least five (5) persons to be directors until the first annual meeting.
- Unless otherwise provided in the bylaws of either of the proposed consolidating cooperatives, if the agreement is approved by the votes of a majority of the members of each cooperative present in person or by proxy at any regular meeting, or at any special meeting of its members called for that purpose, the directors named in the agreement shall sign and acknowledge as incorporators articles of consolidation conforming substantially to the original articles of incorporation of the cooperatives organized under this subchapter.
- The articles of consolidation shall be executed, acknowledged, filed, and recorded in the same manner as the articles of incorporation of a cooperative organized under this subchapter.
- As soon as the Secretary of State shall have accepted the articles of consolidation for filing and recording and issued a certificate of consolidation, the proposed consolidated cooperative described in the articles as its designated name shall be and become a body corporate with all of the powers of a cooperative as originally organized hereunder.
- All of the rights, privileges, immunities, and franchises, and all real and personal property, including, without limitation, applications for membership, all debts due on whatever account, and all other choses in action of each of the consolidating cooperatives shall be deemed to be transferred to and vested in the new cooperative without further act or deed.
- The new cooperative shall be responsible and liable for all of the liabilities and obligations of each of the consolidating cooperatives. Any claim existing or actions or proceeding pending by or against any of the consolidating cooperatives may be prosecuted as if the consolidation had not taken place, but the new cooperative may be substituted in its place.
- Neither the rights of creditors nor any liens upon the property of any of the consolidating cooperatives shall be impaired by the consolidation.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 28; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1628; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 15; 1997, No. 316, § 8.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment substituted “required authorities, if any” for “Arkansas Public Service Commission” in (a)(1).
23-17-225. Dissolution.
- Any cooperative may dissolve by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the members present at any regular meeting or at any special meeting of its members called for that purpose or by the vote required in the bylaws, whichever requires the greater number.
- A certificate of dissolution shall be signed by the president or vice president, attested by the secretary, certifying to the dissolution and stating that they have been authorized to execute and file the certificate by votes cast in person by a majority of the members of the cooperative.
- A certificate of dissolution shall be executed, acknowledged, filed, and recorded in the same manner as the original articles of incorporation of a cooperative organized under this subchapter.
- As soon as the Secretary of State accepts the certificate of dissolution for filing and recording and issues a certificate of dissolution, the cooperative shall be deemed to be dissolved.
- Immediately upon the filing of the certificate with the Secretary of State, the board of directors shall cause notice of the dissolution and winding-up proceedings to be mailed to each known creditor of and claimant against the cooperative and shall publish a copy of the notice of dissolution for one (1) week in a newspaper of bona fide circulation published in the county wherein the home office of the cooperative is located.
- However, the cooperative shall continue for the purpose of collecting its assets and paying, satisfying, and discharging any outstanding obligations, and for the purpose of doing all other acts required to adjust and wind up its business affairs, and may sue and be sued in its corporate name.
-
Any assets remaining after all obligations of the cooperative have been satisfied or discharged, or their payment provided for, shall be used:
- In redeeming outstanding shares of capital stock, if any, at the par value thereof, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon;
- In redeeming certificates of memberships; and
- In paying to members and patrons of the cooperative, at the time of the filing of the certificate of dissolution, pro rata patronage profits.
-
- Any cooperative which purports to have been incorporated or reincorporated as the result of a consolidation under this subchapter but which has not complied with all the requirements for regular corporate existence, nevertheless may file a certificate of dissolution in the same manner as a validly existing cooperative.
- A certificate of dissolution in such a case shall be authorized, executed, and filed in the same manner and shall have the same effect as is provided for validly existing cooperatives. The cooperative shall distribute its assets in the same manner as is provided for validly existing cooperatives.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 29; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1629; Acts 1997, No. 316, § 9; 1999, No. 946, § 9.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment rewrote (a).
The 1999 amendment added “or by the vote required in the bylaws, whichever requires the greater number” at the end of (a).
23-17-226. Filing fees.
The Secretary of State shall charge and collect for:
- Filing articles of incorporation and issuing a certificate of incorporation — ten dollars ($10.00);
- Filing articles of amendment and issuing a certificate of amendment — ten dollars ($10.00);
- Filing articles of consolidation and issuing a certificate with respect to consolidation — ten dollars ($10.00); and
- Filing a certificate of dissolution — one dollar ($1.00).
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 30; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1630.
23-17-227. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning certificates of public convenience and necessity, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 316, § 10. The section was derived from Acts 1951, No. 51, § 32; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1632; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 16; 1997, No. 77, § 13.
23-17-228. Nonprofit operation.
- Each cooperative shall be operated on a nonprofit basis for the mutual benefit of its members and patrons.
-
- The bylaws of a cooperative or its contracts with members and patrons shall contain provisions consistent with § 23-17-229 relative to the disposition of revenues and receipts as may be necessary and appropriate to establish and maintain its nonprofit cooperative character.
- In the case of a cooperative authorized to issue shares of stock, the bylaws and contracts shall provide that no moneys shall be paid, except after the declaration or payment of dividends on the outstanding shares of stock in accordance with the certificate of incorporation of the cooperative, and the bylaws or contracts shall otherwise be consistent with cooperatives' obligations in respect to the shares of stock.
- Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, the articles of incorporation of the cooperative, and the bylaws of the cooperative, the cooperative's board of directors shall have the authority to determine the qualifications for a person to be considered a “patron” of the cooperative.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 27; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1627; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 17; 1999, No. 946, § 10.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (c).
23-17-229. Use of revenues.
The revenues of the cooperative shall be devoted to:
- The payment of operating and maintenance expenses, the rendition of efficient service, and the creation of adequate depreciation reserves sufficient to maintain the investment in facilities;
- The payment of the principal and interest on outstanding obligations;
- The payment of dividends on stock issued and outstanding, if any;
- The creation of such reserves for improvements, construction, and contingencies as the board from time to time may prescribe; and
- Any other purposes authorized by law.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 27; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1627; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 18.
23-17-230. Taxation — Exemptions.
Cooperatives formed under this subchapter shall continue to be exempt from all other excise taxes of whatsoever kind or nature except the Arkansas gross receipts tax under the Arkansas Gross Receipts Act of 1941, § 26-52-101 et seq., and the Arkansas compensating tax under the Arkansas Compensating Tax Act of 1949, § 26-53-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 31; 1969, No. 395, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1631; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 19.
23-17-231. Mortgage, pledge, or other disposition of property.
- The board of directors of a cooperative shall have full power and authority, without authorization by the members thereof, to authorize the execution and delivery of leases, mortgages, or deeds of trust of, or by pledge or encumbering of, any or all of the property, assets, rights, privileges, licenses, franchises, and permits of the cooperative whether already acquired or to be acquired, and wherever situated, as well as the revenues thereof, all upon such terms and conditions as the board of directors shall determine, to secure any indebtedness of the cooperative to the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof or to acquire another cooperative formed and operated under this subchapter.
- A cooperative may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or a substantial portion of its property unless the sale or other disposition is authorized by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds (2/3) of all the members of the cooperative.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 33; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1633; Acts 1997, No. 316, § 11; 1999, No. 946, § 11.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment rewrote this section.
The 1999 amendment added “or to acquire another cooperative formed and operated under the Rural Telecommunications Cooperative Act” at the end of (a); and made stylistic changes.
23-17-232. Recordation of mortgages — Effect thereof.
- Any mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument executed by a cooperative which affects real and personal property and which is recorded in the real property records in any county in which the property is located or is to be located shall have the same force and effect as if the mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument were also recorded, filed, or indexed, as provided by law in the proper office in the county, as a mortgage of personal property.
-
- All after-acquired property of the cooperative described or referred to as being mortgaged or pledged in any mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument shall become subject to the lien thereof immediately upon the acquisition of the property by the cooperative, whether or not the property was in existence at the time of the execution of the mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument.
- The recordation of such mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument shall constitute notice and otherwise have the same effect with respect to the after-acquired property as it has under the laws relating to recordation, with respect to property owned by the cooperative at the time of the execution of the mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument and therein described or referred to as being mortgaged or pledged thereby.
- The lien upon personal property of any mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument after recordation thereof shall continue in existence and of record for the period of time specified therein without the refiling thereof, or the filing of any renewal certificate, affidavit, or other supplemental information required by the laws relating to the renewal, maintenance, or extension of liens upon personal property.
History. Acts 1997, No. 917, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1997, No. 316 repealed this section; however, Acts 1997, No. 917, specifically reenacted the section.
The former section was derived from Acts 1951, No. 51, § 37; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1637.
23-17-233. Nonliability of members and shareholders for debts of cooperatives.
No member or shareholder shall be liable or responsible for any debts of the cooperative, and the property of the members and shareholders shall not be subject to execution therefor.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 34; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1634.
23-17-234. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning connection, interconnection, etc., of lines, facilities, and systems, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 316, § 13. The section was derived from Acts 1951, No. 51, § 32; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1632; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 20.
23-17-235. Liabilities of connecting companies or cooperatives.
No cooperative shall be liable for damage resulting from loss, interruption, or diminished quality of service due to earthquake, flood, storm, infestation, pestilence, civil insurrection, act of war, act of terrorism, software or hardware failure, malfunction, or error, or any cause beyond the control of the cooperative.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 38; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1638; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 21; 1999, No. 946, § 12.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote this section.
23-17-236. Construction standards.
- Construction of telecommunications lines and facilities by a telecommunications company or cooperative as a minimum requirement shall comply with the standards of the National Electrical Safety Code of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in effect at the time of the construction or requirements set up by the Arkansas Public Service Commission. Construction shall be in such manner and according to such specifications as will avoid interference with, or hazards to, existing telecommunications lines, facilities, or systems. In any litigation in a court of record, any violation by a telecommunications company or cooperative of the National Electrical Safety Code or requirements established by the commission shall merely be evidence of negligence.
- If a cooperative places or utilizes any telecommunications line, cable, or facility over, upon, or under lands owned or occupied by a nongovernmental entity with eminent domain rights under Arkansas law, the nongovernmental entity shall be entitled to just compensation of ten cents (10¢) per linear foot traversed on such entity's land. The reasonableness of the just compensation for use of the nongovernmental entity's land shall be presumed. This presumption shall be rebuttable, but in no event shall the just compensation paid by the cooperative exceed the diminution in value of the land traversed resulting from the use.
-
Whenever a cooperative shall have placed any telecommunications line, cable, or facility upon, under, or above private lands, as title shall be reflected in the deed records of the county in which the lands lie, no entity having power of eminent domain shall exercise the power or conduct roadway expansion, relocation activities, or roadside excavation activities in such a manner as to reasonably require relocation of the telecommunications line, cable, or facility unless:
- The written consent of the cooperative is first obtained; or
- The cooperative is paid the reasonable cost of replacing and relocating the line, cable, or facility. The payment shall be considered just compensation to the cooperative.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 39; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1639; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 22; 1999, No. 946, § 13.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (b) and (c); added last sentence in present (a); and made stylistic changes.
Case Notes
Cited: Incorporated Town of Emerson v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 227 Ark. 20, 295 S.W.2d 778 (1956); Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968); Stoltze v. Arkansas Valley Elec. Coop. Corp., 354 Ark. 601, 127 S.W.3d 466 (2003).
23-17-237. Limitation of actions.
No suit shall be brought against any telecommunications company or cooperative by the reason of the installation, use, or maintenance of telecommunications lines, poles, equipment, or fixtures on any real property, or within any right-of-way of any public way, unless it is commenced within two (2) years after the cause of action has accrued.
History. Acts 1951, No. 51, § 36; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1636; Acts 1989, No. 437, § 23; 1997, No. 316, § 14; 1999, No. 946, § 14.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment inserted “installation or.”
The 1999 amendment inserted “use.”
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Constitutionality of section sustained. Core v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 847 F.2d 497 (8th Cir. 1988).
Applicability.
The limitation of this section applies to actions against privately owned telephone companies as well as to those against telephone cooperatives. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968).
This section clearly applies to suits arising from maintenance of existing telephone facilities, but not to a suit based upon an alleged trespass for the purpose of installing an underground cable. Mabry v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 270 Ark. 845, 606 S.W.2d 373 (Ct. App. 1980).
Accrual of Action.
An action against a telephone company for laying and maintaining a buried cable across plaintiff's land accrued when the cable was installed where the evidence showed that the location of the cable was marked by three signs and that any purchaser examining the land would have discovered them. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 245 Ark. 624, 433 S.W.2d 833 (1968).
Duty to Detect.
Ignorance of the boundaries of plaintiff's property did not act to toll the statute of limitations to the detriment of the telephone company whose underground cable was clearly marked and its presence known to the complaining parties. The law imposes a duty upon a purchaser of property to diligently determine the boundaries of his property so as to detect any possible encroachment by entities such as the telephone company. Core v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 673 F. Supp. 974 (W.D. Ark. 1987), aff'd, 847 F.2d 497 (8th Cir. 1988).
Cited: International Paper Co. v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs., 202 F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Ark. 2002).
23-17-238. Indemnification of directors, officers, employees, or agents — Insurance.
-
- A cooperative shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, other than an action by or in the right of the cooperative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the cooperative or is or was serving at the request of the cooperative as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against judgments, fines, expenses, including attorney's fees, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with such an action, suit, or proceeding, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the cooperative and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
- The termination of any action, suit, or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the cooperative and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.
- A cooperative shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the cooperative to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the cooperative or is or was serving at the request of the cooperative as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorney's fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the defense or settlement of such an action or suit if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the cooperative, except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which the person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the cooperative, unless and only to the extent that the circuit court or the court in which the action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the circuit court or such other court shall deem proper.
- To the extent that a director, officer, employee, or agent of a cooperative has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit, or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or in defense of any claim, issue, or matter therein, he or she shall be indemnified against expenses, including attorney's fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection therewith.
-
Any indemnification under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, unless ordered by a court, shall be made by the cooperative only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee, or agent is proper in the circumstances because he or she has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section. Such a determination shall be made:
- By the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such an action, suit, or proceeding;
- If such a quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or
- By the members.
- Expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or proceeding may be paid by the cooperative in advance of final disposition of such an action, suit, or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by the cooperative as authorized in this section. The expenses incurred by other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the board of directors deems appropriate.
- The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by or granted pursuant to the other subsections of this section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of members or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in his or her official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such an office.
- The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this section shall continue, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee, or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such a person.
-
A cooperative shall have power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the cooperative, or is or was serving at the request of the cooperative as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the cooperative would have the power to indemnify him or her against such liability under the provisions of this section.
-
(1) For purposes of this section, references to:
- “The cooperative” shall include, in addition to the resulting cooperative, and constituent corporation, including any constituent of a constituent, absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers, and employees or agents, so that any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the constituent corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under the provisions of this section with respect to the resulting or surviving cooperative as he or she would have with respect to the constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued;
- “Other enterprises” shall include employee benefit plans;
- “Fines” shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to an employee benefit plan; and
- “Serving at the request of the cooperative” shall include any service as a director, officer, employee, or agent of the cooperative which imposes duties on, or involves services by, the director, officer, employee, or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries.
-
(1) For purposes of this section, references to:
(2) A person who acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner “not opposed to the best interests of the cooperative” as referred to in this section.
History. Acts 1989, No. 438, § 1; 1999, No. 946, § 15.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “cooperative” for “corporation” throughout this section.
23-17-239. Standards of conduct for directors — Actions taken without board meeting — Conflicts of interest — Definition.
-
A director shall discharge his or her duties as a director, including his or her duties as a member of a committee:
- In good faith;
- With the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and
- In a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the cooperative.
-
In discharging his or her duties, a director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:
- One (1) or more officers or employees of the cooperative whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;
- Legal counsel, public accountants, engineers, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence; or
- A committee of the board of directors of which he or she is not a member, if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
- A director is not acting in good faith if he or she has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted by subsection (b) of this section unwarranted.
- Unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, action required or permitted by this chapter to be taken at a board of directors' meeting may be taken without a meeting if the action is taken by all members of the board. The action must be evidenced by one (1) or more written consents describing the action taken, signed by each director, and included in the minutes or filed with the corporate records reflecting the action taken.
- Action taken under this section is effective when the last director signs the consent, unless the consent specifies a different effective date. A consent signed under this section has the effect of a meeting vote and may be described as such in any document.
-
-
A “conflict-of-interest transaction” is a transaction with the cooperative in which a director of the cooperative has direct or indirect interest. A conflict-of-interest transaction is not voidable by the cooperative solely because of the director's interest in the transaction if any one (1) of the following is true:
- The material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were disclosed or known to the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors and the board of directors or committee authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction;
- The material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were disclosed or known to the members entitled to vote and they authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction; or
- The transaction was fair to the cooperative.
-
For purposes of this section, a director of the cooperative has an indirect interest in a transaction and it should be considered by the board of directors of the cooperative if:
- Another entity in which he or she has a material financial interest or in which he or she is a general partner is a party to the transaction; or
- Another entity of which he or she is a director, officer, or trustee is a party to the transaction.
- For purposes of subdivision (f)(1)(A) of this section, a conflict-of-interest transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors on the board of directors, or on the committee, who have no direct or indirect interest in the transaction, but a transaction may not be authorized, approved, or ratified under this section by a single director. If a majority of the directors who have no direct or indirect interest in the transaction vote to authorize, approve, or ratify the transaction, a quorum is present for the purpose of taking action under this subsection. The presence of, or a vote cast by, a director with a direct or indirect interest in the transaction does not affect the validity of any action taken under subdivision (f)(1)(A) of this section if the transaction is otherwise authorized, approved, or ratified as provided in this subsection.
- For purposes of subdivision (f)(1)(B) of this section, a conflict-of-interest transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified if it receives the vote of a majority of the members entitled to vote under this subsection. Proxies voted under the control of a director who has a direct or indirect interest in the transaction, and proxies voted under the control of an entity described in subdivision (f)(2)(A) of this section, may not be counted in a vote of members to determine whether to authorize, approve, or ratify a conflict-of-interest transaction under subdivision (f)(1)(B) of this section. The vote of those members, however, is counted in determining whether the transaction is approved under other sections of this chapter. A majority of the members, whether or not present, that are entitled to vote on the transaction under this subsection constitutes a quorum for the purpose of taking action under this section.
-
A “conflict-of-interest transaction” is a transaction with the cooperative in which a director of the cooperative has direct or indirect interest. A conflict-of-interest transaction is not voidable by the cooperative solely because of the director's interest in the transaction if any one (1) of the following is true:
History. Acts 1989, No. 438, § 1; 1999, No. 946, § 16.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “cooperative” for “corporation” throughout this section.
23-17-240. Unclaimed capital credits and stock.
-
When a cooperative formed under this subchapter declares capital credits and any capital credit which remains unclaimed one (1) year after notice of the capital credit was transmitted to the last known address of the beneficiary of the credit:
- The cooperative shall not be liable for the credit; and
- The credit shall not be deemed unclaimed or abandoned property under § 18-28-201 et seq.
-
-
When a cooperative formed under this subchapter has issued shares of stock and subsequent to that time has declared by providing notice to all shareholders of record that the cooperative is redeeming the stock by repurchase, then one (1) year after the notice has been sent to the last known address of all shareholders of record:
- The cooperative shall not be liable for the redemption or repurchase value of the stock; and
- The stock not redeemed and repurchased shall have no value or rights in the cooperative.
- The stock shall not be deemed unclaimed or abandoned property under § 18-28-201 et seq.
-
When a cooperative formed under this subchapter has issued shares of stock and subsequent to that time has declared by providing notice to all shareholders of record that the cooperative is redeeming the stock by repurchase, then one (1) year after the notice has been sent to the last known address of all shareholders of record:
- References in the Rural Telecommunications Cooperative Act, § 23-17-201 et seq., to “this subchapter” and references in § 23-17-101 et seq. to “this chapter” shall be deemed to also reference this section.
History. Acts 1995, No. 898, § 1; 1999, No. 946, § 17; 2009, No. 761, § 2.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (b); and, in present (a), deleted “telephone” prior to “cooperative,” deleted “beginning at” twice; and made stylistic changes.
The 2009 amendment subdivided (a) and deleted “the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act” following “under” in (a)(2); inserted (b) and redesignated the subsequent subsection accordingly; deleted “23-17-242” following “§ 23-17-201” in (c); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
23-17-241. Opting out of underground damage coverage.
- Any cooperative established under this subchapter may opt out of coverage under the Arkansas Underground Facilities Damage Prevention Act, § 14-271-101 et seq., by providing written notice to the Arkansas Public Service Commission by first class mail.
- Any references in this section and §§ 23-17-201 — 23-17-240 and 23-17-242 to “this subchapter” and any references in § 23-17-101 et seq. to “this chapter” shall be deemed to also reference this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 316, § 15; 1999, No. 946, § 18.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote this section.
23-17-242. Cooperative acquiring another cooperative.
Any cooperative organized prior to January 1, 1979, under the provisions of this subchapter may enter into an agreement with any other cooperative so organized for one of the cooperatives to acquire the other cooperative, subject to the following provisions:
- Any agreement between cooperatives for one to acquire another shall be in writing and shall set forth the terms and conditions of the acquisition;
- Unless otherwise provided in the bylaws of either of the cooperatives who are party to such an agreement, the agreement shall be approved on behalf of the cooperative being acquired upon majority vote of the members of the cooperative being acquired present in person or by proxy at any regular meeting of the members, or at any special meeting of the members called for the purpose of voting on the agreement. The agreement shall only be approved on behalf of the acquiring cooperative upon majority vote of the directors of the acquiring cooperative;
- The acquiring cooperative may elect to form a wholly owned subsidiary corporation, or utilize an existing wholly owned subsidiary corporation, which subsidiary need not itself be a cooperative, to own and operate the cooperative being acquired. The validity of the acquisition shall not be affected by the fact that legal title to the cooperative being acquired is taken in the name of a wholly owned subsidiary by the acquiring cooperative; and
- Neither the rights of creditors nor the liens upon the property of either the acquiring cooperative or the cooperative being acquired shall be impaired by the acquisition.
History. Acts 1999, No. 946, § 19.
Subchapter 3 — Universal Telephone Service Act
23-17-301. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Universal Telephone Service Act”.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2601.
23-17-302. Legislative findings and declarations.
The General Assembly finds and declares that changes in pricing for telephone services mandated by the Federal Communications Commission and made necessary by the divestiture of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company from American Telephone and Telegraph Company will cause significant increases in the cost of local exchange telephone service which could force some local exchange telephone customers to discontinue service. The public interest requires that the extent of such rate increases be ameliorated by the creation of a statewide fund that will partially offset such rate increases. The purpose of the fund created by this subchapter is to ensure a smooth and nondisruptive transition from the present pricing system to the system dictated by the Federal Communications Commission and the divestiture and to ensure that rates for local telephone service are at reasonable levels.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2602.
Publisher's Notes. The divestiture referred to in this section occurred effective January 1, 1984.
23-17-303. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Interexchange carriers” includes persons, corporations, or other organizations which provide communications services which interconnect with local exchanges under provisions of the interstate and intrastate access charges tariffs and may include such other persons, corporations, or organizations engaged in interexchange communication services as the commission may find necessary for the successful administration of the fund established in § 23-17-304;
- “Interexchange communication services” means all services whereby interexchange carriers transmit voice, data, or other messages within Arkansas, whether or not the transmission is at any point on the facilities of a local exchange carrier; and
- “Local exchange carriers” means persons, corporations, or other organizations which provide local exchange telephone service as defined by the commission.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2603.
23-17-304. Universal Telephone Service Fund created — Contents.
- There is created the Universal Telephone Service Fund to be established by assessing upon all interexchange carriers operating in this state a charge on interexchange communication services based on usage, revenue, volume, or other appropriate factors.
-
- The amount of the charge shall be determined by the Arkansas Public Service Commission after notice and hearing.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall coordinate the development of the structure and level of the charge, as well as the support to be provided through the Universal Telephone Service Fund, with the interstate Universal Service Fund or similar arrangement established by the Federal Communications Commission so that the Universal Telephone Service Fund is not administered inconsistently with the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund or similar arrangements.
- The amounts shall be remitted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission under such reasonable rules as the Arkansas Public Service Commission may prescribe and shall be deposited by the Arkansas Public Service Commission into an account, separate from all other funds, designated as the “Universal Telephone Service Fund”.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2604; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2465.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (c).
23-17-305. Conditional effective date.
The Universal Telephone Service Fund shall be effective on the date the interstate Universal Service Fund or similar arrangement is established by the Federal Communications Commission unless the Arkansas Public Service Commission, prior to that date and after hearing, finds that the circumstances upon which this subchapter is predicated have so substantially changed as to render the Universal Telephone Service Fund unnecessary or impracticable.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2607.
23-17-306. Allocation of fund.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall allocate the Universal Telephone Service Fund among all local exchange carriers operating in Arkansas in such a manner as to moderate the disruptive effects of changes in methods of pricing of telephone services and to hold prices of local exchange telephone service to levels which will ensure, insofar as it is feasible to do so, that a maximum number of subscribers may maintain affordable local telephone service.
- The allocation shall be made after a hearing at which all local exchange carriers and other interested parties may be heard and may be modified or adjusted by the commission, after hearing, at any time circumstances indicate a need for such modification.
- The commission by rule may establish standard guidelines for allocation methodology.
- The entire fund, after reasonable costs of administration are applied, shall be allocated among the local exchange carriers.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2605; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2466.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (c).
23-17-307. Administration of fund.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission may collect, administer, and distribute the Universal Telephone Service Fund, itself, or it may delegate to a trustee or other agent acting under its supervision the administration and distribution of the fund upon such conditions and security as the commission may require.
History. Acts 1983, No. 483, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2606.
Subchapter 4 — Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 2013
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 16: Feb. 4, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-first General Assembly that: (I) It is in the public interest to maintain and preserve the commitment of universal availability of reasonably affordable telecommunications services; (II) Competition and growth in the telecommunications industry are affected by demographics and population density. Therefore, telecommunications providers serving high-cost rural areas often have needs that are different from those of telecommunications providers serving only urban areas. Accordingly, the regulatory framework established by this Act seeks to recognize and accommodate the unique factors faced by telecommunications companies serving high-cost rural areas in addition to providing all local exchange carriers with additional regulatory options to assist them in providing telecommunications services and technological advances to their customers; and, (III) It is essential that the State of Arkansas immediately revise its existing regulatory regime for the telecommunications industry to ensure that it is consistent with and complementary to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2001, No. 907, § 4: effective Aug. 1, 2002 by its own terms.
Acts 2001, No. 1771, § 2: Apr. 18, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that some areas of the state are not served by wire line services of an eligible telecommunications carrier; that extension of facilities in order to make service available to unserved citizens is a vital health and safety issue; that it is immediately necessary to establish a grant program for extension of facilities. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2001, No. 1842, § 2: Became law without Governor's signature. Apr. 20, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that there is an immediate need for the amendment of the Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool to assure the preservation and advancement of universal availability of telephone service at rates that are reasonable and affordable. Such action is in the best interest of the public, in that such will assure the continued support of basic local telephone service on an equitable and nondiscriminatory basis and at rates that are reasonable and affordable. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 1788, § 10: Apr. 22, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas, that lowering and stabilizing the carrier common line rate will promote lower telephone toll rates for Arkansas residents and will encourage economic development; that this act is immediately necessary to implement the administrative changes necessary to reduce the carrier common line rate by January 1, 2004; and that any delay in the effective date of this act could create an undue burden upon Arkansas citizens and could work irreparable harm upon the efficient provision of telecommunications services throughout Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2007, No. 385, § 10: Mar. 19, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that there is an immediate need for the amendment of the Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 1997 to ensure compliance with federal law and regulations and to continue to encourage growth and competition; that any delay in the effective date of this act. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2013, No. 442, § 30: Mar. 19, 2013. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that 911 emergency service is essential to protect the lives, health, and welfare of the state's residents in emergency situations; that 911 service is not available in many rural areas of the state; that the assessment and funding provisions of this act should be implemented immediately to accomplish the purposes of this act; and that this act is necessary to expand the benefits of the 911 emergency system to all residents of the state for their immediate protection. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2017, No. 419, § 2: July 1, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that federal law requires a change in the Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 2013; that the regulation of eligible telecommunications carriers under state law must be updated in order to comply with federal law; and that this act is necessary to avoid a potential conflict between state and federal law concerning regulation of eligible telecommunications carriers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2017”.
Acts 2019, No. 198, § 4: Feb. 26, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that reliable high speed broadband service is essential to a community's success; that reliable high speed broadband is not available in many rural areas of the state; and that this act is immediately necessary to expand the benefits of reliable high speed broadband to all residents of the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto”.
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-17-401. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 2013”.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 1; 2013, No. 442, § 1.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment substituted “shall be known and may be cited” for “may be referred to and cited” and “2013” for “1997”.
23-17-402. Legislative findings.
It is the intent of the General Assembly in enacting this subchapter to:
- Provide for a system of regulation of telecommunications services, consistent with the federal act, that assists in implementing the national policy of opening the telecommunications market to competition on fair and equal terms, modifies outdated regulation, eliminates unnecessary regulation, and preserves and advances universal service;
- Recognize that a telecommunications provider that serves high-cost rural areas or exchanges faces unique circumstances that require special consideration and funding to assist in preserving and promoting universal service;
-
Recognize that the:
- Widespread and timely deployment of broadband infrastructure is vital to the economic, educational, health, and social interests of Arkansas and its citizens; and
- Arkansas High Cost Fund has enabled eligible telecommunications carriers to accelerate and promote the incremental extension and expansion of broadband services and other advanced services in rural or high-cost areas of the state beyond what would normally occur, and broadband services are now available in dozens of new communities to thousands of Arkansans who otherwise would not have access to broadband services and its benefits;
-
- Recognize differences between the small and large incumbent local exchange carriers, that there are customer-owned telephone cooperatives and small locally owned investor companies, and that it is appropriate to provide incentives and regulatory flexibility to allow incumbent local exchange carriers that serve the rural areas to provide existing services and to introduce new technology and new services in a prompt, efficient, and economical manner.
- The General Assembly finds that the Arkansas Public Service Commission, when promulgating rules and regulations, should take into consideration the differences in operating conditions in the large and small incumbent local exchange carriers and the burdens placed on small carriers because of regulation; and
-
- Recognize that in areas of the state served by electing companies, telecommunications connections utilizing unregulated technologies such as wireless and Voice over Internet Protocol greatly outnumber traditional wireline connections that remain regulated by the commission.
- The General Assembly finds that the removal of quality-of-service regulation of wireline services provided in the competitive exchanges of electing companies will serve to encourage private-sector investment in the telecommunications marketplace.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 2; 2011, No. 290, § 1; 2011, No. 594, § 1.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment by No. 290 inserted (3) and (4) [now (3)(A) and (B)] and redesignated former (3) as (5) [now (4)]; and substituted “Arkansas Public Service Commission” for “commission” in (5)(B) [now (4)(B)].
The 2011 amendment by No. 594 added (3) and redesignated former (3) as (4); substituted “Arkansas Public Service Commission” for “commission” in (4)(B); and added (5).
23-17-403. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Access line” means a communications facility extending from a customer's premises to a serving central office comprising a subscriber line and, if necessary, a trunk facility;
-
“Access minute”, unless otherwise defined by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, means the measurement of usage to provision communications between:
- A customer premises and an interexchange carrier's point of interconnection with a local exchange carrier's network for the completion of end-user calls to the public switched network for the origination and termination of interexchange long distance traffic; and
- A customer premises and another LEC's point of termination with a local exchange carrier's network for the completion of end-user calls to the public switched network for the origination and termination of interexchange long distance traffic;
-
- “Affiliate” means any entity that, directly or indirectly, owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or that is under common ownership or control with another entity.
- For the purpose of this definition, “owns or controls” means holding at least a majority of the outstanding voting power;
- “AICCLP member” means an ILEC that is eligible to be a member of the AICCLP after December 31, 2003, and that has not terminated its membership under § 23-17-416(f)(2);
-
- “AICCLP rate adjustment” means the local service rate adjustment, determined by the AICCLP administrator, that may be charged by each AICCLP member to its customers to recover a portion of its carrier common line net revenue requirement.
-
- For any AICCLP member that is eligible to be a member of the AICCLP as of January 1, 2004, for whom the sum of the residential local exchange rate and extended area service additive is higher than the average residential local exchange rate for all members eligible to be members as of January 1, 2004, the monthly AICCLP rate adjustment shall be the lesser of fifty cents (50¢) or an amount that yields the total monthly carrier common line net revenue requirement per access line.
- For any AICCLP member that is eligible to be a member of the AICCLP as of January 1, 2004, for whom the sum of its residential local exchange rate and extended area service additive is lower than the average residential local exchange rate for all members eligible to be members as of January 1, 2004, the monthly AICCLP rate adjustment shall be the lesser of seventy-five cents (75¢) or an amount that yields the total monthly carrier common line net revenue requirement per access line.
- If the amount due to an AICCLP member under § 23-17-416(h) is limited due to the annual one million three hundred thousand dollar ($1,300,000) cap under § 23-17-416(e)(8)(B)(i) and if the member's AICCLP rate adjustment and the amount due to the AICCLP member under § 23-17-416(h) do not allow the member to recover its common line net revenue requirement, the member may charge an additional amount for local rates to recover its carrier common line net revenue requirement;
- “Annual unseparated unlimited loop requirement” means a financial algorithm calculated annually by NECA and USAC that includes all the loop investment, expenses, and other loop costs of providing service within the study area of an eligible telecommunications carrier;
- “Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool” or “AICCLP” means the unincorporated organization of the providers of Arkansas telecommunications services, authorized by the commission and by state law, whose purpose is to manage billing, collection, and distribution of the carrier common line revenue requirements;
- “Arkansas intrastate telecommunications services revenues” means the revenues of all carriers that are not ILECs, that are derived from end-users for telecommunications within Arkansas and telecommunications services provided within Arkansas, including messages that are switched or otherwise temporarily transported outside of Arkansas in the process of delivering the message within Arkansas;
- “Average schedule company” means a company that uses a proxy established from a formula using the average costs of a group of companies rather than using the company's specific costs in reporting to NECA;
-
“Basic local exchange service” means the service provided to the premises of residential or business customers composed of the following:
- Voice-grade access to the public switched network, with ability to place and receive calls;
- Touch-tone service availability;
- Flat-rate residential local service and business local service;
- Access to emergency services (911/E911) where provided by local authorities;
- Access to basic operator services;
- A standard white-page directory listing;
- Access to basic local directory assistance;
- Access to long distance toll service providers; and
- The minimum service quality as established and required by the commission on February 4, 1997;
- “Carrier common line net revenue requirement” means the monthly variable funding requirement of an AICCLP member, which is calculated as the sum of the member's intrastate carrier common line revenue requirement, the member's terminating carrier common line expense based on its per-minute terminations on other ILECs, the member's Arkansas Calling Plan Fund and Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund expense, and the member's share of AICCLP administrative fees, minus the sum of the carrier common line revenue, based on per-minute terminations received from other ILECs, carrier common line revenue received from underlying carriers for originating and terminating access minutes, the AICCLP rate adjustment, and the fixed ILEC retail billed minutes of use expense based on the data development period determination of average monthly retail billed minutes of use expense of the member;
- “Commercial mobile service” means cellular, personal communications systems and any service regulated pursuant to Part 20 of the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, 47 C.F.R. Part 20, or any successor provisions;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Competing local exchange carrier” or “CLEC” means a local exchange carrier that is not an incumbent local exchange carrier;
-
“Data development period” means the time period in which the AICCLP members and initial exiting ILECs shall obtain relevant data necessary to:
- Calculate the fixed amounts of retail billed minutes-of-use expense and to test and obtain reliability of the billing and reporting systems to be used by the AICCLP; and
- Calculate the fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall for members required to exit the pool on December 31, 2003;
- “Electing company” means a local exchange carrier that elects to be regulated pursuant to §§ 23-17-406 — 23-17-408;
- “Eligible telecommunications carrier” or “ETC” means the local exchange carrier determined in accordance with § 23-17-405;
- “Embedded investment” means the amount of investment in a telephone plant that has already been made by an incumbent local exchange carrier as of February 4, 1997;
- “Exiting ILEC” means an ILEC that terminates its membership in the AICCLP under § 23-17-416(f);
-
“Extended area service” means an unlimited local service provided to the customer at a fixed rate that:
- Is mandated by the commission at the election of customers within a local exchange area;
- Provides one-way or two-way calling between basic local exchange service customers within the local exchange area of one (1) or more incumbent local exchange carriers; and
- Is not included as part of basic local exchange service;
- “Facilities” means any of the physical elements of the telephone plant that are needed to provide or support telecommunications services, including switching systems, cables, fiber optic and microwave radio transmission systems, measuring equipment, billing equipment, operating systems, billing systems, ordering systems, and all other equipment and systems that a telecommunications service provider uses to provide or support telecommunications services;
- “FCC” means the Federal Communications Commission;
- “Federal act” means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended;
- “Fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall” means the total annual funding requirement of an ILEC that must exit the AICCLP under § 23-17-416(f)(1), which is calculated as the sum of an ILEC's intrastate carrier common line revenue requirement, the ILEC's terminating carrier common line expense based on its per-minute terminations on other ILECs, and the ILEC Arkansas Calling Plan Fund and Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund expense, minus the sum of the carrier common line revenue, based on per-minute terminations received from other ILECs, carrier common line revenue received from underlying carriers for originating and terminating access minutes, and the fixed ILEC retail billed minutes of use expense based on the data development period determination of average monthly retail billed minutes of use expense of the ILEC;
- “Fixed ILEC retail billed minutes of use expense” means the fixed determination of the average retail billed minutes-of-use expense paid to the AICCLP by the ILEC based upon the ILEC's three-month average retail billed minutes-of-use expense during its applicable data development period, as determined under § 23-17-416(h), exclusive of any retail billed minutes-of-use expense associated with retail billed minutes of uses provided by a toll reseller of an underlying carrier that is an ILEC;
- “Government entity” includes without limitation all Arkansas state agencies, commissions, boards, authorities, and all Arkansas public educational entities, including school districts, and political subdivisions, including incorporated and unincorporated cities and towns and all institutions, agencies or instrumentalities of municipalities, and county governments;
- “ILEC Arkansas Calling Plan Fund and Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund expense” means the charge assessed against an ILEC in proportion to the AICCLP credits that were eliminated by former § 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)(iv)(b);
- “ILEC intrastate carrier common line revenue requirement” means the fixed annual payment that each ILEC was entitled to receive from the AICCLP, before any offsets or adjustments, as provided in the Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool tariff, as it existed before January 1, 2004;
- “Incumbent local exchange carrier” or “ILEC” means, with respect to a local exchange area, a local exchange carrier, including successors and assigns, that is certified by the commission and was providing basic local exchange service on February 8, 1996;
- “Interconnected VoIP service” has the meaning defined by 47 C.F.R. 9.3, as it existed on January 1, 2013;
- “Interstate access charge pools” means the system, currently administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., wherein participating local exchange carriers pool billed interstate access revenues;
- “Local exchange area” means the geographic area, approved by the commission, encompassing the area within which a local exchange carrier is authorized to provide basic local exchange services and switched-access services;
- “Local exchange carrier” or “LEC” means a telecommunications provider of basic local exchange service and switched-access service. The term does not include commercial mobile service providers;
- “Local switching support” means funding to assist high-cost companies in recovering the costs of switching intrastate calls;
- “National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.,” or “NECA” means a corporation by that name or its successor that performs various administrative functions and procedural duties prescribed to it by the FCC and others;
- “Network element” means a facility or equipment used in the provision of a telecommunications service. The term also includes features, functions, and capabilities that are provided by means of the facility or equipment, including subscriber numbers, databases, signaling systems, and information sufficient for billing and collection or used in the transmission, routing, or other provision of a telecommunications service;
- “Resale” means the purchase of services by one (1) local exchange carrier from another local exchange carrier for the purpose of reselling those services directly or indirectly to an end-user customer;
- “Rural telephone company” means a local exchange carrier defined as a rural telephone company in the federal act as of February 4, 1997;
- “Special intrastate ILEC revenue” means the revenue a toll reseller pays to an ILEC when the ILEC provides toll services to the toll reseller;
- “Study area” means a geographic area designated by the FCC and used by NECA or USAC for calculation of cost per loop within the geographic area's boundaries for federal high-cost loop support;
- “Switched-access service” means the provision of communications between a customer premise and an interexchange carrier's point of interconnection with a local exchange carrier's network for the completion of end-user calls to the public switched network for the origination or termination of interexchange long distance traffic;
- “Telecommunications provider” means any person, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other entity that offers telecommunications services to the public for compensation;
- “Telecommunications Providers Rules” or “TPRs” means those rules applicable to telecommunications providers that have been adopted by the commission;
-
- “Telecommunications services” means the offering to the public for compensation the transmission of voice, data, or other electronic information at any frequency over any part of the electromagnetic spectrum, notwithstanding any other use of the associated facilities.
- The term does not include radio and television broadcast or distribution services, or the provision or publishing of yellow pages, regardless of the entity providing the services, or services to the extent that the services are used in connection with the operation of an electric utility system owned by a government entity;
-
- “Tier one company” means any incumbent local exchange carrier that, together with its Arkansas affiliates that are also incumbent local exchange carriers, provides basic local exchange services to greater than one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) access lines in the State of Arkansas on February 4, 1997.
- Changes in designation of an incumbent local exchange carrier, or portions thereof, as a tier one company or non-tier one company may be effected by prior approval from the commission pursuant to § 23-17-411(i);
- “Toll reseller” means a carrier that resells intrastate telecommunications services that are provided to the carrier by an underlying carrier;
-
- “Total customer access base” means the total of all eligible telecommunications carrier customer access lines within Arkansas of an entity that directly or indirectly owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with another entity.
- For the purposes of subdivision (47)(A) of this section, “own” means to own an equity interest or the equivalent thereof of more than ten percent (10%);
- “Underlying carrier” means a facilities-based CLEC or an interexchange carrier, other than an ILEC, that originates and terminates intrastate interexchange calls on the public switched network directly or through resale to a toll reseller or an ILEC that provides the toll services used by a toll reseller;
- “Universal service” means those telecommunications services that are defined and listed in the definition of basic local exchange service until changed by the commission pursuant to § 23-17-404(e)(2)(A);
- “Universal Service Administration Company” or “USAC” means a corporation under that name or its successor that performs various administrative and procedural duties prescribed to it by the FCC and others;
- “Wire center” means the location of one (1) or more local switching systems, a point at which end user's loops within a defined geographic area converge;
- “Wireless ETC” means a wireless eligible telecommunications carrier that is a commercial mobile service provider; and
- “Wireline ETC” means a wireline eligible telecommunications carrier that is a local exchange carrier.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 3; 2003, No. 1764, § 1; 2003, No. 1788, §§ 1-6; 2007, No. 385, §§ 2, 3; 2013, No. 442, §§ 2-5; 2019, No. 198, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 385, § 1, provided:
“Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The development of an administratively streamlined universal service fund based upon high cost support is important public policy;
“(2) It is administratively efficient to use financial data submitted by eligible telecommunications companies to federal agencies, made under penalty of law, and when appropriate, cost proxies, for the high-cost support mechanism, to be called the ‘Arkansas High Cost Fund’, thereby eliminating the need for extensive financial review and the high administrative costs created by such reviews;
“(3) A five-year transition from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund to the Arkansas High Cost Fund is important public policy due to the shift from a revenue replacement fund based upon current changes to a high-cost fund using financial data that is two (2) or more years old;
“(4) Due to the complex nature and ever-changing administration of telecommunications at the federal level, potential changes in how access charges are collected could disrupt support for eligible telecommunications companies serving rural areas;
“(5) Eligible telecommunications company members of the AICCLP are more adversely affected by sudden changes in regulation, access charges, and statutory changes; and”
The reference in subdivision (27) of this section to § 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)(iv) (b) is obsolete. Former subdivision (e)(4)(D) of § 23-17-404 was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 442.
Acts 2019, No. 198, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.
“(a) The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) Arkansas is second-to-last in providing broadband internet to households, businesses, or other locations; and
“(2) A lack of reliable broadband can impact a community's success, including access to educational opportunities, healthcare opportunities, public safety, agriculture, and economic development opportunities.
“(b) It is the intent of the General Assembly to provide Arkansans with access to high quality voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services, resulting in increased educational opportunities, healthcare opportunities, and economic development opportunities and ensuring all Arkansans have equal access to the services they can use to improve their quality of life, their community, and this state”.
Publisher's Notes. Part 20 of the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, 47 C.F.R. Part 20, referred to in this section, is codified as 47 C.F.R. 20.1 et seq.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment repealed former (3) and (49); inserted “or ‘ETC’” in the definition for “Eligible telecommunications carrier”; and added the definition for “Interconnected VoIP service”.
The 2019 amendment inserted “without limitation” and “and unincorporated” in (26).
U.S. Code. The Communications Act of 1934, referred to in this section, is codified generally as 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.
Case Notes
Switched-access service.
Service provided by a telephone company to incumbent local exchange carriers was switched-access service, notwithstanding that the telephone company was not an interLATA carrier, as local exchange carriers can be interexchange carriers. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 69 Ark. App. 323, 13 S.W.3d 197 (2000).
23-17-404. Preservation and promotion of universal service.
-
- The Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF) is established by this section in order to promote and assure the availability of universal service at rates that are reasonable and affordable and to provide for reasonably comparable services and rates between rural and urban areas.
- The AHCF shall provide funding to an eligible telecommunications carrier that provides basic local exchange services and other supported services using its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and another carrier's facilities by the eligible telecommunications carrier within its study area.
- The AHCF shall be designed to provide predictable, sufficient, and sustainable funding to eligible telecommunications carriers serving rural or high-cost areas of the state.
- The AHCF shall also be used to accelerate and promote the incremental extension and expansion of broadband services and other advanced services in rural or high-cost areas of the state beyond what would normally occur and support the Lifeline Assistance Program to eligible low-income customers.
-
- The AHCF is to provide a mechanism to restructure the present system of telecommunication service rates in the state as provided herein, and all telecommunications providers, except as prohibited by federal law, shall be charged for the direct and indirect value inherent in the obtaining and preserving of reasonable and comparable access to telecommunications services in the rural or high-cost areas. The value and utility of access to and interconnection with the public switched network will be lessened if the rural or high-cost areas do not have comparable access and subscribership.
-
-
- This AHCF charge for all telecommunications providers shall be proportionate to each provider's Arkansas intrastate retail telecommunications service revenues.
- If the AHCF administrator determines or receives a petition from two-thirds (2/3) of the AHCF participants stating that the Arkansas intrastate retail telecommunications services revenues are inadequate to fully fund the AHCF requirements, the AHCF administrator shall notify the Arkansas Public Service Commission and the commission shall open a docket that will develop and implement a plan to fully fund the AHCF requirements.
- Because customers of the telecommunications providers that would pay the AHCF charge receive the benefits of a universal network, the telecommunications providers may surcharge their customers to recover the AHCF charges paid by the telecommunications provider. Therefore, the AHCF charge is not a tax and is not affected by state laws governing taxation.
- For the purpose of assessing mobile telecommunications services, the AHCF administrator shall continue to assess only Arkansas intrastate retail telecommunications service revenues and only to the extent such revenues may be considered located in the State of Arkansas in accordance with the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act, Pub. L. No. 106-252.
-
For purposes of assessing interconnected VoIP service, to the extent permitted by federal law the funding from each contributing carrier shall be based on:
- The total retail-billed Arkansas intrastate interconnected VoIP service revenues; or
- The Federal Communications Commission's decision In the Matter of Universal Service Contribution Methodology, FCC 10-185, released November 5, 2010, or another assessment methodology as required by federal law.
-
-
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall delegate to a trustee, the “AHCF administrator”, the administration, collection, and distribution of the AHCF within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the adoption of rules and procedures to implement the AHCF.
-
In evaluating responses to request for proposals for the AHCF administrator's position, the commission shall consider and give material weight to the applicant's:
- Familiarity with Arkansas ETCs, Arkansas access rates, AICCLP history and procedures, and AHCF and AUSF history and procedures; and
- Personal availability to provide information and assistance to the General Assembly, telecommunications providers, and members of the public.
-
- The AHCF administrator shall enforce and implement all rules and directives governing the funding, collection, and eligibility for the AHCF.
-
As soon as practicable after the AHCF administrator is designated, he or she shall:
- Promptly notify all Arkansas ETCs of the availability of AHCF support and accept requests for AHCF support from Arkansas ETCs; and
-
Review and determine the accuracy and appropriateness of each request and advise the entity requesting the funds of his or her determination, including:
- Eligibility for support;
- The uncapped amount of support available; and
- The actual support available after implementation of fund cap limitations.
- The affected parties shall have thirty (30) days to request reconsideration by the commission of the AHCF administrator's determination, and the commission after notice and hearing, if requested, shall issue its opinion on the reconsideration within thirty (30) days after the request of reconsideration unless continued by the commission.
- Persons aggrieved by the commission's opinion shall have the right to appeal the opinion in accordance with law.
-
-
- The AHCF administrator periodically shall establish and notify each telecommunications provider of the AHCF charge levels required to be paid by the telecommunications provider.
- Any telecommunications provider that without just cause fails to pay the AHCF charge that is due and payable pursuant to this section after notice and opportunity for hearing shall have its authority to do business as a telecommunications provider in the State of Arkansas revoked by the commission.
- The AHCF charge shall not be subject to any state or local tax or franchise fees.
-
After reasonable notice and hearing, the commission shall establish rules and procedures necessary to implement the AHCF. The commission shall implement the AHCF and make AHCF funds available to eligible telecommunications carriers beginning the first calendar month after one hundred fifty (150) days after March 19, 2007. In establishing and implementing the AHCF, the commission shall adhere to the following instructions and guidelines:
-
- AHCF funding shall be provided directly to eligible telecommunications carriers.
-
- Except in an exchange in which the electing company is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services under § 23-17-408(c), for an ETC to receive funds from the AHCF, the ETC shall agree to be subject to and comply with all telecommunications provider rules adopted by the commission, unless the commission finds the technology used by the ETC to provide telecommunications service makes a rule inapplicable.
- Except in any exchange in which the electing company is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services pursuant to § 23-17-408(c), each ETC shall be subject to all TPRs concerning application for service, refusing service, deposits, notices before disconnect, late payment penalties, elderly and handicapped protection, medical need for utility services, delayed payment agreements, and extended due dates.
- If an ETC seeks to participate in the AHCF program as a new funding recipient, the funding category applicable to the ETC shall be determined by the total customer access base of the ETC on the date of the application;
-
- The commission shall provide a report to the Legislative Council by October 31 of the year prior to a regular session of the General Assembly detailing any recommended changes to the universal service list of requirements that are to be supported by the AHCF. This list may be approved by the General Assembly, and if approved, the AHCF support to ETCs may be adjusted, due to the approved changes, to reflect an increase or decrease in the size of the AHCF by increasing or decreasing the overall financial cap on the AHCF to recover the cost of additions or revisions to the universal service list concurrent with any such revisions to the list of universal services identified in § 23-17-403.
- In considering revisions to the universal service list, the commission shall consider the need for the addition or removal of a service to the list in order to maintain end-user rates for universal services that are reasonably comparable between urban and rural areas or to reflect changes in the type and quality of telecommunications services considered essential by the public as evidenced, for example, by those telecommunication services that are purchased and used by a majority of single-line urban customers.
- A rate case proceeding or earning investigation or analysis shall not be required or conducted in connection with the recovery of the cost of additions or revisions or in connection with the administration of the AHCF;
-
-
- The AICCLP members shall charge the rate under subdivision (e)(3)(B) of this section to underlying carriers.
- The ILECs shall charge a reciprocal rate to other ILECs.
- The commission may review the accuracy of the reciprocal rates and the per-access minute carrier common line rate charged under subdivision (e)(3)(B) of this section.
- If the AICCLP fails to provide an ILEC's carrier common line net revenue requirement, the ILEC may obtain concurrent recovery of the revenue loss from basic local exchange rates, intrastate access rate adjustments, or a combination thereof. Any recovery of revenue loss under this subdivision (e)(3)(A)(iv) shall not be subject to the caps on local rates under § 23-17-412.
-
- Through June 30, 2013, except as provided in this subdivision (e)(3)(B) and subdivisions (e)(4)(A) and (B) of this section, the intrastate carrier common line charges billed to ILECs and underlying carriers shall be determined at the rate of one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) per intrastate access minute, exclusive of the amounts specified for funding the Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund and the Arkansas Calling Plan Fund. However, ILECs that are not AICCLP members may charge at a rate that is less than one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) and may recover the difference between the actual rate charged and one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) as allowed under § 23-17-416(b)(3).
- Beginning July 1, 2013, except as provided in this subdivision (e)(3)(B) and subdivisions (e)(4)(A) and (B) of this section, the intrastate carrier common line charges billed to ILECs and underlying carriers shall be determined at the rate of one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) per originating intrastate access minute. However, ILECs that are not AICCLP members may charge at a rate that is less than one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) per originating intrastate access minute and may recover the difference between the actual rate charged and one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) as allowed under § 23-17-416(b)(3);
-
-
-
-
- There is created an allocation of AHCF funds to be known as the “Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund”.
- A maximum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per year of AHCF funds shall be allocated to fund the Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund to assist in the extension of telecommunications facilities to citizens not served by the wire line facilities of an eligible telecommunications carrier.
-
- There is created an AHCF allocation to be known as the “Arkansas Calling Plan Fund”.
- The Arkansas Calling Plan Fund shall receive a maximum of four million five hundred thousand dollars ($4,500,000) per year to assist in funding the provision of calling plans in telephone exchanges in the state.
-
- There is created an AHCF allocation to be known as the “Arkansas 911 Rural Enhancement Program Fund”.
-
The Arkansas 911 Rural Enhancement Program Fund shall receive a maximum of three million dollars ($3,000,000) per year to:
- Advance the goals of universal service and help ensure that rural areas within the State of Arkansas have access to 911 services that are comparable to 911 services in urban areas within the state; and
-
Provide funding to:
- The statewide Smart911 system established in Acts 2012, No. 213;
- The SmartPrepare System; and
- 911 administrative systems for emergency management under the Arkansas Emergency Services Act of 1973, § 12-75-101 et seq.
-
-
-
- The Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund, the Arkansas Calling Plan Fund, and the Arkansas 911 Rural Enhancement Program Fund shall be paid through the Arkansas High Cost Fund.
- Payments made under subdivision (e)(4)(B)(i)(a) of this section may exceed and are in addition to the limit provided by subdivision (e)(4)(E)(ii)(a) of this section.
- The AICCLP board, with the assistance of the administrator, shall allow recipients and payors to correct any errors concerning the AICCLP settlement process for corrections that are for the time period after December 31, 2003.
-
-
- An ETC may receive support from the AHCF in accordance with this subdivision (e)(4)(C) and subdivisions (e)(4)(D) and (E) of this section.
-
-
The formula is as follows for ETCs with fewer than five hundred thousand (500,000) access lines or customers:
- The AHCF administrator shall determine the support for High Cost Loop Support by using the most current annual filing of annual unseparated unlimited loop revenue requirement cost per loop of the ETC's study area as developed each year by NECA and filed with USAC. For an ETC not submitting such information, the ETC shall submit equivalent information to the administrator for the administrator to calculate as to cost per loop for wireline or per customer for commercial mobile service providers. Unless the commission determines otherwise, the raw financial data submitted to the administrator to establish an alternate cost per loop shall be treated as confidential;
- The AHCF administrator shall then subtract the per-loop federal high-cost loop support as developed each year by NECA and filed with USAC of the ETC's study area or alternatively the total high-cost loop support per loop or per customer as calculated by the AHCF administrator with data provided by the ETC;
- The AHCF administrator shall also subtract the amount of three hundred forty-four dollars and forty cents ($344.40) per loop, due to the responsibility of each ETC to fund through local rates and other revenue such as AICCLP revenue requirements and access charges, to fund a significant portion of their cost per loop. Alternatively, the AHCF administrator shall subtract three hundred forty-four dollars and forty cents ($344.40) per loop or customer from ETCs not reporting loops and loop cost to NECA;
- The AHCF administrator shall determine the high-cost support for each ETC by subtracting these reductions as set forth in this formula from the annual unseparated unlimited loop revenue requirement and apply it to the total number of loops in the ETC's study area as of December 31 of the preceding year that are eligible for support for federal universal service. As to ETCs not reporting loops within its study area, the AHCF administrator shall apply the reductions to the total number of loops or customers of the ETC eligible for support for federal universal service as of December 31 of the preceding year; and
- The remaining balance, if positive as to each ETC, shall be the ETC's loop support element to support an ETC's high cost loops. As to ETCs funded based upon customers, the remaining balance, if positive, shall be called the “customer support element”.
-
- The AHCF administrator shall determine local switching support (LSS) of each ETC using the most current annual financial data submitted to NECA and calculated by USAC and applying the following procedure:
- The AHCF administrator then shall multiply the available high-cost support for each eligible wire center by the number of lines reported to the AHCF administrator by the carrier as of December 31 of the preceding year. Eligible wire centers shall be wire centers with three thousand (3,000) access lines or less as of March 19, 2007; and
- The total of the calculations by the AHCF administrator for all eligible wire centers shall be the high-cost support available to the ETC, as limited by cap restrictions.
-
The formula is as follows for ETCs with fewer than five hundred thousand (500,000) access lines or customers:
- For each ETC that does not have an individually calculated local switching support amount, the AHCF administrator shall calculate a local switching support amount by using an average of all ETCs within its size group that have an established local switching amount;
- The AHCF administrator shall then divide the total LSS revenue requirement for each ETC by the total number of loops in the ETC's study area as of December 31 of the preceding year that are eligible for support for federal universal service;
- The AHCF administrator shall then calculate the local switching support (LSS) to be recovered by multiplying the total LSS revenue requirement per loop as calculated in subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii)(b)(1)(D) of this section by fifteen percent (15%); and
-
The sum of subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii)(b)(1)(E) of this section as to each ETC, if positive, shall be the ETC's local switching support element.
- Based on the fully allocated cost of the affected ETCs; and
- Effective as of the next annual determination process date, as established by the commission.
-
- For ETCs with five hundred thousand (500,000) lines or more on or after December 31, 2010, support shall be determined using the following procedure:
- The support provided by the AHCF shall be calculated as an annual amount paid in equal monthly payments and recalculated annually by the AHCF administrator in compliance with this section and the commission's rules and procedures.
- In the event that an element used to determine AHCF support is materially changed or eliminated, the AHCF administrator shall use an equivalent or similar element in calculating the AHCF support in subdivisions (e)(4)(C)(ii) and (iii) of this section.
-
-
-
- The commission shall establish by rule a grant program to make grants available to eligible telecommunications carriers for the extension of facilities to citizens who are not served by wire line services of an eligible telecommunications carrier. Grants may be requested by an eligible telecommunications carrier or citizens who are not served, or both.
- The commission shall delegate to a trustee the administration, collection, and distribution of the Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund in accordance with the rules and procedures established by the commission. The trustee shall enforce and implement all rules and directives governing the funding, collection, and eligibility for the Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund.
-
- In establishing rules for the grant program, the commission shall consider demonstrated need, the length of time the citizens have not been served, the households affected, the best use of the funds, and the overall need for extensions throughout the state.
- The commission may require each potential customer to be served by the extension of facilities to pay up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250) of the cost of extending facilities.
- The plan shall be funded by customer contributions and by the Extension of Telecommunications Facilities Fund established by subdivision (e)(4)(A)(i)(a) of this section;
-
-
-
Three million dollars ($3,000,000) shall be transferred annually from the AHCF to the Division of Emergency Management on a quarterly basis for the Arkansas 911 Rural Enhancement Program Fund to fund:
- The statewide Smart911 system in the amount of six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) annually;
- The SmartPrepare system in the amount of two hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($225,000) annually;
- The 911 administration system for emergency management under the Arkansas Emergency Services Act of 1973, § 12-75-101 et seq., in the amount of one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($175,000) annually; and
- Arkansas counties for 911 public safety answering points in the amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) annually.
-
-
Funding for counties under subdivision (e)(6)(A)(iv) of this section shall be transferred based on county population and distributed as follows:
- The twenty-five (25) least-populated counties shall receive equal portions of fifty percent (50%) of the available funds;
- The next twenty-five (25) least-populated counties shall receive equal portions of thirty-five percent (35%) of the available funds; and
- The remaining twenty-five (25) counties shall receive equal portions of fifteen percent (15%) of the available funds.
- County population shall be calculated based on current data from the Geography Division of the United States Bureau of the Census; and
-
Funding for counties under subdivision (e)(6)(A)(iv) of this section shall be transferred based on county population and distributed as follows:
-
Three million dollars ($3,000,000) shall be transferred annually from the AHCF to the Division of Emergency Management on a quarterly basis for the Arkansas 911 Rural Enhancement Program Fund to fund:
-
-
- The commission shall provide quarterly reports to the Legislative Council. The reports shall include without limitation the number of requests for grants, the number of grants awarded, the amount awarded, and the number of additional customers served.
- The commission shall notify members of the General Assembly of grants made in their districts.
- To allow time for potential applicants to request grants, no grants shall be awarded for three (3) months after the effective date of the rules establishing the program.
-
-
(A)(i) The AHCF administrator shall use the most current trued up local switching support amount that has been calculated by NECA and submitted to USAC annually for each ETC within its size group.
(ii) An ETC that does not submit the information required by subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1)(A)(i) of this section shall submit equivalent information to the AHCF administrator for the AHCF administrator to calculate a local switching support amount.
(B) The AHCF administrator shall calculate the local switching support factor for each ETC's study area by taking the 1996 weighted dialed equipment minute factor as supplied in the NECA submission of 1999 Network Data Management — Usage filed on March 1, 2001, with the FCC and subtracting the 1996 interstate dialed equipment minute factor as supplied in the NECA submission of 1999 network usage data filed on March 1, 2001, with the FCC. This result shall be called the “local switching support factor”. For each ETC that does not have an individually calculated weighted dialed equipment minute factor and an interstate dialed equipment minute factor, the AHCF administrator shall calculate a weighted dialed equipment minute factor and an interstate dialed equipment minute factor by using an average of all ETCs within its size group that have an established weighted dialed equipment minute factor and an interstate dialed equipment minute factor;
(C) The AHCF administrator shall then calculate the total LSS revenue requirement for each ETC by dividing the local switching support amount calculated in subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1)(A) of this section by the local switching support factor as calculated in subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1)(B) of this section;
(2) If a request for support is made by an ETC that does not have switching support calculated by NECA, the commission shall develop a proxy method to be used to calculate such an ETC's local switching support. The sum of the calculation for each ETC from the proxy method, if positive, shall be the ETC's local switching support element.
(c)(1) For ETCs with AHCF support based on loops, the AHCF administrator shall determine each ETC's local loop support by multiplying the number of loops of the ETC as of December 31 of the preceding year that are eligible for federal universal service support by the ETC's loop support element, if applicable, and the AHCF administrator shall determine the ETC's local switching support by multiplying the number of loops of the ETC as of December 31 of the preceding year that are eligible for federal universal service support by the ETC's local switching support element. The AHCF administrator shall determine the uncapped AHCF support for each ETC by adding the sum of the ETC's total loop support, if any, and the ETC's total local switching support, if any.
(2) For ETCs with AHCF support based on customers, the AHCF administrator shall determine the ETC's customer support element by multiplying the number of customers of the ETC as of December 31 of the preceding year who are eligible for federal universal service support by the ETC's customer support element, if applicable, and the AHCF administrator shall determine the ETC's local switching support by multiplying the number of customers of the ETC as of December 31 of the preceding year who are eligible for federal universal service support by the ETC's local switching support element. The AHCF administrator shall determine the uncapped AHCF support for the ETC by adding the sum of the ETC's total loop support, if any, and the ETC's total local switching support, if any.
(3)(A) If the AHCF administrator determines that the changes in publicly available elements used to calculate loop support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (a)(1) of this section or local switching support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1) of this section cause an under-recovery of more than ten percent (10%) of support by ETCs with a total customer access base or total customer base of fewer than fifteen thousand (15,000) lines or customers participating in the AHCF, then the AHCF administrator shall promptly notify the commission.
(B) Once notified, the commission shall open a rule-making docket to replace the eliminated, frozen, or modified elements that are causing the under-recovery used to calculate loop support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (a)(1) of this section or local switching support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1) of this section.
(C) Until alternate elements are adopted by the commission, the AHCF administrator shall use the previous determinations as used during the year immediately preceding the year the elements were eliminated to calculate loop support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (a)(1) of this section or local switching support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1) of this section.
(D) Upon commission adoption of the replacement elements, the commission shall order the AHCF administrator to incorporate those replacement elements into the previously existing method used by the AHCF administrator to calculate loop support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (a)(1) of this section or local switching support under subdivision (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1) of this section. The calculations shall be:
(1) Using the FCC's synthesis model available from USAC or an equivalent replacement model, the AHCF administrator shall take the ETC's average monthly per-line cost for each eligible wire center and subtract the FCC cost model benchmark. The result of the line cost minus the benchmark is the available per-line high-cost support available for that wire center;
(D)(i) The AHCF administrator shall calculate each ETC's support by first calculating each ETC's uncapped AHCF support.
(ii) If the total calculated support to all ETCs within a size group is less than the capped amount of the size group's part of the total AHCF, each ETC within the size group shall be entitled to its total calculated AHCF support.
(E)(i) (a)(1)(A) The AHCF administrator shall apply the cap on the total AHCF and upon the specific size groups established within the AHCF annually.
(B) If total support due a size group does not exceed that size group's AHCF cap, the AHCF administrator shall pay that size group's full AHCF support amount.
(2) If total support, using the AHCF formula for recipients of the specific size group exceeds the cap, the administrator shall determine the amount that the total calculated AHCF support exceeds that size group's cap.
(b)(1) To reduce each size group's authorized support to conform to the size group's cap, the AHCF administrator shall determine total calculated AHCF support to each ETC within the size group.
(2) The AHCF administrator shall then use the total calculated support due all ETCs within the size group as the denominator and the amount the size group's AHCF calculation exceeds the cap as the numerator.
(3) The administrator shall then subtract from each ETC's total calculated support a pro rata portion, using the fraction established herein to reduce AHCF funding to the capped amount, based upon each ETC's total calculated support, to reduce the size group's support level to the capped AHCF amount.
(ii) (a) Except as provided in subdivision (e)(4)(B) of this section, funds available for distribution to ETCs from the AHCF shall not exceed and are capped at thirty-nine million eight hundred thousand dollars ($39,800,000) per year. Cost of administrating the AHCF shall first be deducted from the total capped fund before allocation of funding to the ETCs. The annual period to be used by the AHCF administrator to adjust support levels and upon which to apply any cap shall be on the calendar year. In addition to the total fund cap, the funds available from the AHCF shall also be capped based upon size groups using access lines for loop-based ETCs and customers for customer-based ETCs. Size grouping is used to ensure funds are targeted to areas most needing high-cost assistance. For the purpose of calculating the size grouping caps, total customer access base shall be used for loop-based ETCs and total customers for customer-based ETCs.
(b) For all ETCs with a total customer access base or total customer base of five hundred thousand (500,000) or more access lines or customers on or after December 31, 2010, the size group cap shall be twelve and five-tenths percent (12.5%) of the total capped fund.
(c) For all ETCs with a total customer access base or total customer base of one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) or more access lines or customers and fewer than five hundred thousand (500,000) access lines or customers on December 31, 2010, the size group cap shall be twelve and five-tenths percent (12.5%) of the total capped fund.
(d) For all ETCs with a total customer access base or total customer base of fifteen thousand (15,000) or more access lines or customers and fewer than one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) access lines or customers on December 31, 2010, the size group cap shall be two percent (2%) of the total capped fund.
(e) For all ETCs with a total customer access base or total customer base of fewer than fifteen thousand (15,000) access lines or customers, the size group cap shall be seventy-three percent (73%) of the total capped fund;
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 4; 2001, No. 907, § 4; 2001, No. 1771, § 1; 2001, No. 1842, § 1; 2003, No. 1788, § 7; 2007, No. 385, §§ 1, 4; 2011, No. 290, §§ 2-4; 2011, No. 594, § 2; 2013, No. 442, §§ 6-18; 2019, No. 315, § 2467.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2005, No. 2017, § 16, provided:
“To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to maintain and reduce Arkansas Universal Service Fund (AUSF) administrative expenses and avoid mandating changes in telecommunications services that could increase AUSF assessments which would result in higher AUSF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2007, No. 385, § 1, provided:
“Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The development of an administratively streamlined universal service fund based upon high cost support is important public policy;
“(2) It is administratively efficient to use financial data submitted by eligible telecommunications companies to federal agencies, made under penalty of law, and when appropriate, cost proxies, for the high-cost support mechanism, to be called the ‘Arkansas High Cost Fund’, thereby eliminating the need for extensive financial review and the high administrative costs created by such reviews;
“(3) A five-year transition from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund to the Arkansas High Cost Fund is important public policy due to the shift from a revenue replacement fund based upon current changes to a high-cost fund using financial data that is two (2) or more years old;
“(4) Due to the complex nature and ever-changing administration of telecommunications at the federal level, potential changes in how access charges are collected could disrupt support for eligible telecommunications companies serving rural areas;
“(5) Eligible telecommunications company members of the AICCLP are more adversely affected by sudden changes in regulation, access charges, and statutory changes; and”
Acts 2007, No. 785, § 15, provided:
“ARKANSAS UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas Universal Service Fund (AUSF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AUSF assessments which would result in higher AUSF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2009, No. 823, § 12, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2010, No. 31, § 12, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2011, No. 577, § 14, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2012, No. 191, § 14, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2013, No. 463, § 14, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Acts 2014, No. 220, § 12, provided: “ARKANSAS HIGH COST FUND. To ensure that telecommunications rates are reasonable and affordable, the Arkansas Public Service Commission should take all reasonable steps necessary to reduce the Arkansas High Cost Fund (AHCF), and avoid mandating any additional charges or expenses for telecommunications services that could increase AHCF assessments which would result in higher AHCF surcharges to customers.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2001, No. 907, § 4 provided, in part, that its amendment of this section would be effective August 1, 2002.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment by No. 290 added (e)(4)(C)(ii) (c)(3) ; inserted “on or after December 31, 2010” in (e)(4)(C)(iii) (a) and (e)(4)(E)(ii) (b) ; and inserted “on December 31, 2010” in (e)(4)(E)(ii) (c) and (d)
The 2011 amendment by No. 594 subdivided (e)(1)(B); added “Except in an exchange ... services under § 23-17-408(c)” at the beginning of (e)(1)(B)(i); and substituted “Except in any exchange in which the electing company is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services pursuant to § 23-17-408(c)” for “In any event” in (e)(1)(B)(ii).
The 2013 amendment, in (a)(2), substituted “shall” for “will” and inserted “and other supported services”; added (b)(2)(A)(ii); added (b)(2)(D); inserted “AHCF and” in (c)(1)(B)(i); deleted former (c)(2)(B)(ii) (b) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; deleted “all phase in reductions and” preceding “fund cap” in (c)(2)(B)(ii) (c) ; deleted (d)(1)(B) and (C); deleted the last two sentences from (d)(1); added (e)(1)(B)(iii); rewrote (e)(3), (e)(4)(A) and (e)(4)(B); rewrote (e)(4)(C)(i); inserted (e)(4)(C)(ii) (b)(1)(A)(ii) ; rewrote (e)(4)(C)(ii) (c)(3)(A) ; in (e)(4)(C)(ii) (c)(3)(B) , inserted “frozen, or modified” and “that are causing the under-recovery”; deleted (e)(4)(C)(v) and (e)(4)(C)(v) (a) through (e) ; redesignated (e)(4)(C)(v) (f) as present (e)(4)(D) and added subdivision designations; deleted former (e)(4)(D); rewrote (e)(4)(E); inserted (e)(6); redesignated (e)(5)(D) and (E) as (e)(7)(A) and (B); and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in the first sentence of (e)(5)(A)(i) and made a similar change in (e)(5)(B)(i).
U.S. Code. The Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act, Pub. L. No. 106-252, referred to in this section, is codified generally as 4 U.S.C. § 116 et seq.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Tax Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 613.
Case Notes
In General.
The court rejected the contention that Acts 1997, No. 77 could not be considered as a “new” or “existing” directive because those terms only include statutes that existed before or after the passage of Act 77; common sense dictates that a statute is either new or existing, and if the legislature had intended that no provision of Act 77 could be considered a directive that triggered funding of the Arkansas Universal Service Fund, it could have included such language (decided under former version of statute). AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 67 Ark. App. 177, 994 S.W.2d 494 (1999), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 344 Ark. 188, 40 S.W.3d 273 (2001).
Base Year.
The “twelve months preceding” language in subdivision (e)(4)(C) of this section is not couched in terms of a calendar year; the commission's determination of the base test year was contrary to its earlier decision finding that the toll pool was vacated on passage of Acts 1997, No. 77 (decided under former version of statute). AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 344 Ark. 188, 40 S.W.3d 273 (2001).
Toll Pool Revenue Replacement Claims.
The requesting incumbent local exchange carriers' toll pool revenue replacement claims qualified for reimbursement under subdivision (e)(4)(B) of this section since their revenue reductions were the result of changes caused by new or existing federal or state regulatory or statutory directives (decided under former version of statute). AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 344 Ark. 188, 40 S.W.3d 273 (2001).
Cited: Alltel Ark., Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 70 Ark. App. 421, 19 S.W.3d 634 (2000).
23-17-405. Eligible telecommunications carrier.
- The incumbent local exchange carrier, its successors and assigns, that owns, maintains, and provides facilities for universal service within a local exchange area on February 4, 1997, shall be the eligible telecommunications carrier within the local exchange area.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission, consistent with 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(2), after reasonable notice and hearing, may designate other telecommunications providers to be eligible for federal Universal Service Fund or AHCF support under the following conditions:
-
- The other telecommunications provider accepts the responsibility to provide service in response to any reasonable request from customers in an incumbent local exchange carrier's local exchange area using its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and resale of another carrier's services.
- High-cost support under this section will not begin until the telecommunications provider offers to provide service in response to all reasonable requests for service from customers in its service area;
- The telecommunications provider may only receive funding for services provided in the eligible telecommunications carrier's study area using its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and another carrier's facilities;
- The telecommunications provider will not receive AHCF funding at a level higher than the level of funding received by the incumbent local exchange carrier in the same area;
- The telecommunications provider advertises the availability and the charges for the services, using media of general distribution; and
- It is determined by the commission that the designation is in the public interest.
-
-
- In exchanges, wire centers, census blocks, or other areas where the commission has designated more than one (1) eligible telecommunications carrier, the commission shall permit a local exchange carrier to relinquish its designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in any such area, consistent with 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(4), upon a finding that at least one (1) eligible telecommunications carrier serves the area.
-
In an area in which a local exchange carrier has relinquished its eligible telecommunications carrier designation, the local exchange carrier may:
- Continue providing services, including universal services; and
-
- Discontinue providing services, including universal services.
- If a local exchange carrier discontinues providing basic local exchange service under subdivision (c)(2)(B)(i) of this section, the carrier shall notify affected customers in writing at least ninety (90) days before discontinuing the service.
-
-
- For the entire area served by a rural telephone company, excluding tier one companies, for the purpose of the AHCF and the federal Universal Service Fund, there shall be only one (1) wireline eligible telecommunications carrier which shall be the incumbent local exchange carrier that is a rural telephone company.
- Multiple wireless eligible telecommunications carriers may be designated in areas served by rural telephone companies.
- The rural telephone company may elect to waive its right to be the only wireline eligible telecommunications carrier within the local exchange area by filing notice with the commission.
-
-
To provide universal services, an eligible telecommunications carrier may use:
- Commercial mobile services;
- Voice over Internet Protocol; and
- Any other technology that provides service that is the functional equivalent of commercial mobile services or Voice over Internet Protocol.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 5; 2007, No. 385, § 5; 2009, No. 191, § 1; 2013, No. 442, § 19; 2017, No. 419, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 385, § 1, provided:
“Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The development of an administratively streamlined universal service fund based upon high cost support is important public policy;
“(2) It is administratively efficient to use financial data submitted by eligible telecommunications companies to federal agencies, made under penalty of law, and when appropriate, cost proxies, for the high-cost support mechanism, to be called the ‘Arkansas High Cost Fund’, thereby eliminating the need for extensive financial review and the high administrative costs created by such reviews;
“(3) A five-year transition from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund to the Arkansas High Cost Fund is important public policy due to the shift from a revenue replacement fund based upon current changes to a high-cost fund using financial data that is two (2) or more years old;
“(4) Due to the complex nature and ever-changing administration of telecommunications at the federal level, potential changes in how access charges are collected could disrupt support for eligible telecommunications companies serving rural areas;
“(5) Eligible telecommunications company members of the AICCLP are more adversely affected by sudden changes in regulation, access charges, and statutory changes; and”
Amendments. The 2009 amendment rewrote (e).
The 2013 amendment added (c)(2).
The 2017 amendment, in (c)(1), substituted “In exchanges, wire centers, census blocks, or other areas” for “In exchanges or wire centers”, inserted “in any such area”, and substituted “serves” for “will continue to serve”; in the introductory language of (c)(2), inserted “local exchange” preceding “carrier” twice, substituted “has relinquished its” for “is not an”, and inserted “designation”; and substituted “If a local exchange carrier discontinues providing basic local exchange service” for “If a carrier discontinues providing a service” in (c)(2)(B)(ii).
Effective Dates. Acts 2017, No. 419, § 2: July 1, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that federal law requires a change in the Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 2013; that the regulation of eligible telecommunications carriers under state law must be updated in order to comply with federal law; and that this act is necessary to avoid a potential conflict between state and federal law concerning regulation of eligible telecommunications carriers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2017.”
23-17-406. Electing companies.
- Any incumbent local exchange carrier may elect to have the rates, terms, and conditions for its telecommunications services determined pursuant to the provisions of this section.
- An incumbent local exchange carrier shall file a notice of its intent with the Arkansas Public Service Commission to be an electing company and to be regulated pursuant to this section and §§ 23-17-407 and 23-17-408.
-
- Upon such a filing, all rates, terms, and conditions for the services provided by that incumbent local exchange carrier contained in the tariffs and end-user contracts that were in effect on the date twelve (12) months prior to the date of election under this section shall be deemed just and reasonable.
- However, nothing herein shall restrict any customer's right to complain to the commission regarding quality of service or the commission's right to enforce any quality of service rules and standards which are equally imposed on all telecommunications providers.
-
- A rural telephone company, excluding tier one companies, which elects to be regulated pursuant to this section may terminate that election by filing a notice with the commission.
- Upon terminating that election, the rural telephone company for a period of five (5) years from the date of the termination notice under this subsection may not elect thereafter to be regulated under this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 6.
23-17-407. Regulation of rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access service of electing companies — Definition.
-
- The rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services that were in effect in the date twelve (12) months prior to the date of filing of a notice of election by a local exchange carrier pursuant to § 23-17-406 shall be the maximum that the electing local exchange carrier may charge for the services for a period of three (3) years after the date of filing, excluding rate increases ordered by the Arkansas Public Service Commission pursuant to § 23-17-404.
-
- An electing company may decrease or, subsequent to a decrease, increase up to the rate that was effective at the time of election pursuant to this section.
- The rate changes shall be effective immediately, without commission approval, by filing a tariff or notice with the commission.
-
-
After the expiration of the three-year period, the rates for basic local exchange services and switched-access services, excluding the intrastate carrier common line charge, may be adjusted by the electing company filing a price list with the commission, as long as:
- The rates remain at or below the inflation-based rate cap; or
- The rate increase results from the provision of extended area services required as the result of customer election under commission rules.
- Inflation shall be measured by the year-over-year percent change in the gross domestic product price index calculated by the United States Department of Commerce, or any successor to the index.
- The electing company is authorized to adjust the rate cap for each basic local exchange service and switched-access service by seventy-five percent (75%) of this inflation measure, adjusted for exogenous changes specified in subsection (e) of this section, and excluding rate increases ordered by the commission pursuant to § 23-17-404.
- The rate cap may only be adjusted one (1) time each twelve (12) months beginning at the expiration of the three-year period after the date of initial filing to be regulated pursuant to this section and §§ 23-17-406 and 23-17-408.
-
After the expiration of the three-year period, the rates for basic local exchange services and switched-access services, excluding the intrastate carrier common line charge, may be adjusted by the electing company filing a price list with the commission, as long as:
- As long as an electing company is in compliance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section, such rates are deemed just and reasonable.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if, at any time following the date of election pursuant to this section, another telecommunications provider is providing basic local exchange service or switched-access service within an electing company's local exchange area, the electing company within any exchange of the electing company in which another telecommunications provider is providing these services may commence determining its rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services in the same manner that it determines its rates for services other than basic local exchange service and switched-access service, pursuant to § 23-17-408(c).
- As used in this section, the term “exogenous change” means a cumulative impact on a local exchange carrier's intrastate regulated revenue, expenses, or investment of more than three percent (3%) over a twelve-month period, that is attributable to changes in federal, state, or local government mandates, rules, regulations, or statutes.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 7; 2003, No. 1764, § 3; 2007, No. 385, § 6.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 385, § 1, provided:
“Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The development of an administratively streamlined universal service fund based upon high cost support is important public policy;
“(2) It is administratively efficient to use financial data submitted by eligible telecommunications companies to federal agencies, made under penalty of law, and when appropriate, cost proxies, for the high-cost support mechanism, to be called the ‘Arkansas High Cost Fund’, thereby eliminating the need for extensive financial review and the high administrative costs created by such reviews;
“(3) A five-year transition from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund to the Arkansas High Cost Fund is important public policy due to the shift from a revenue replacement fund based upon current changes to a high-cost fund using financial data that is two (2) or more years old;
“(4) Due to the complex nature and ever-changing administration of telecommunications at the federal level, potential changes in how access charges are collected could disrupt support for eligible telecommunications companies serving rural areas;
“(5) Eligible telecommunications company members of the AICCLP are more adversely affected by sudden changes in regulation, access charges, and statutory changes; and”
Case Notes
Applicability.
The statute applied to a tariff which set a specific traffic-sensitive per-minute-of-use rate for access provided by a telephone company to other incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), but further provided that, if the other ILECs charge the telephone company a higher rate for similar traffic, the telephone company would charge that ILEC a reciprocal rate equal to the rate charged by that ILEC to the telephone company. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 69 Ark. App. 323, 13 S.W.3d 197 (2000).
23-17-408. Regulatory framework for electing companies.
- The earnings of an electing company shall not be subject to rate of return or rate-base monitoring or regulation, and the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not consider rate of return, rate base, or the earnings of an electing company in connection with rate changes made pursuant to this section or § 23-17-407.
- An electing company is authorized to determine and account for its investments, revenues, and expenses, including depreciation expenses, pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles.
-
- An electing company may increase or decrease its rates for telecommunications services other than basic local exchange service and switched-access services and establish rates for new services by filing a tariff or a price list with the commission.
- The rates shall not require commission approval.
- The tariff or price list shall be effective upon filing or at a future time as the electing company shall designate.
- So long as rates for services are in accordance with this section and § 23-17-407, the rates are deemed just and reasonable.
- Any service that is not a telecommunications service is not subject to commission regulation, and rates for the services need not be filed with the commission.
- An electing company may package any of its services with any other service it or its affiliates offer, with or without a discount, provided that services whose rates are capped under § 23-17-407 may be purchased separately at the rate which is capped in accordance with § 23-17-407.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 8.
23-17-409. Authorization of competing local exchange carriers.
-
-
- Consistent with the federal act and the provisions of § 23-17-410, the Arkansas Public Service Commission is authorized to grant certificates of convenience and necessity to telecommunications providers authorizing them to provide telecommunications services, including basic local exchange service or switched-access service, or both, to an incumbent local exchange carrier's local exchange area if and to the extent that the applications otherwise comply with state law, designate the geographic areas proposed to be served by the applicants, and the applicants demonstrate that they possess the financial, technical, and managerial capacity to provide the competing services.
- No telecommunications provider shall operate as a CLEC in this state without first obtaining from the commission a certificate of public convenience and necessity.
- Competing local exchange carriers shall be required to maintain a current tariff or price list with the commission and to make prices and terms of service available for public inspection.
- Retail prices of competing local exchange carriers shall not require prior review or approval by the commission.
-
-
- Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b)(2) and (b)(5) of this section, a government entity may not provide, directly or indirectly, basic local exchange, voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services.
- After reasonable notice to the public and a public hearing, a government entity owning an electric utility system or television signal distribution system may provide, directly or indirectly, voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services and make any telecommunications capacity or associated facilities that the government entity now owns, or may construct or acquire, available to the public upon terms and conditions as may be established by the government entity's governing authority, except the government entity may not use the telecommunications capacity or associated facilities to provide, directly or indirectly, basic local exchange service.
- Any restriction contained in this subsection shall not be applicable to the provision of telecommunications services to the extent the telecommunications services are used solely for 911, E911, or other emergency and law enforcement services, or for the provision of data, broadband, or non-entertainment video telecommunications services or facilities by or to a medical institution or an institution of higher education to its students, faculty, staff, or patients, as the provision of the telecommunications services or facilities relates to academic, research, and healthcare information technology applications under the Arkansas Information Systems Act of 1997, § 25-4-101 et seq.
- This section does not prohibit a government entity from purchasing voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services, directly or indirectly, from a private provider through a contract administered and services managed by the Division of Information Systems under the Arkansas Information Systems Act of 1997, § 25-4-101 et seq.
- After reasonable notice to the public, a government entity may, on its own or in partnership with a private entity, apply for funding under a program for grants or loans to be used for the construction, acquisition, or leasing of facilities, land, or buildings used to deploy broadband service in unserved areas, as defined under the terms of the granting or lending program, and if the funding is awarded, then provide, directly or indirectly, voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services to the public in the unserved areas.
- A governmental entity that operates an electric utility system may deny any telecommunications provider access to its electric utility poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis when there is insufficient capacity and for reasons of safety, reliability, and generally applicable engineering purposes.
-
- Except to the extent required by the federal act and this subchapter, the commission shall not require an incumbent local exchange carrier to negotiate resale of its retail telecommunications services, to provide interconnection, or to sell unbundled network elements to a competing local exchange carrier for the purpose of allowing the competing local exchange carrier to compete with the incumbent local exchange carrier in the provision of basic local exchange service.
- Promotional prices, service packages, trial offerings, or temporary discounts offered by the local exchange carrier to its end-user customers are not required to be available for resale.
- The prices for unbundled network elements shall include the actual costs, including an allocation of joint and common costs and a reasonable profit.
- As provided in 47 U.S.C. §§ 251 and 252, the commission's authority with respect to interconnection, resale, and unbundling is limited to the terms, conditions, and agreements pursuant to which an incumbent local exchange carrier will provide interconnection, resale, or unbundling to a CLEC for the purpose of the CLEC's competing with the incumbent local exchange carrier in the provision of telecommunications services to end-user customers.
-
- As permitted by the federal act, the commission shall approve resale restrictions that prohibit resellers from purchasing retail local exchange services offered by a local exchange carrier to residential customers and reselling those retail services to nonresidential customers, or aggregating the usage of multiple customers on resold local exchange services, or any other reasonable limitation on resale to the extent permitted by the federal act.
- The wholesale rate of any existing retail telecommunications services provided by local exchange carriers that are not exempt from 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) and that are being sold for the purpose of resale shall be the retail rate of the service less any net avoided costs due to the resale.
- The net avoided costs shall be calculated as the total of the costs that will not be incurred by the local exchange carrier due to its selling the service for resale less any additional costs that will be incurred as a result of selling the service for the purpose of resale.
- Incumbent local exchange carriers shall provide competing local exchange carriers, at reasonable rates, nondiscriminatory access to operator services, directory listings and assistance, and 911 service only to the extent required in the federal act.
-
- The commission shall approve any negotiated interconnection agreement or statement of generally available terms filed pursuant to the federal act unless it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the agreement or statement does not meet the minimum requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 251.
- In no event shall the commission impose any interconnection requirements that go beyond those requirements imposed by the federal act or any interconnection regulations or standards promulgated under the federal act.
- In the event the commission is requested to arbitrate any open issues pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 252, the parties to the arbitration proceeding shall be limited to the persons or entities negotiating the agreement.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 9; 2003, No. 1788, § 8; 2011, No. 1050, § 1; 2013, No. 1133, § 3; 2019, No. 198, § 3; 2019, No. 910, § 6252.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2019, No. 198, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.
“(a) The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) Arkansas is second-to-last in providing broadband internet to households, businesses, or other locations; and
“(2) A lack of reliable broadband can impact a community's success, including access to educational opportunities, healthcare opportunities, public safety, agriculture, and economic development opportunities.
“(b) It is the intent of the General Assembly to provide Arkansans with access to high quality voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications services, resulting in increased educational opportunities, healthcare opportunities, and economic development opportunities and ensuring all Arkansans have equal access to the services they can use to improve their quality of life, their community, and this state”.
Amendments. The 2003 amendment redesignated former (a)(1) as present (a)(1)(A); inserted “telecommunications services, including” following “provide” in (a)(1)(A); and added (a)(1)(B).
The 2011 amendment, in (b)(1), inserted “Except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section” and “voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunication”; in (b)(2), inserted “provide, directly or indirectly, voice, data, broadband, video, or wireless telecommunications service, and” and “construct or” preceding “acquire”; rewrote (b)(3); and added (b)(4).
The 2013 amendment inserted “(2)” following “subdivision (b)” in (b)(1).
The 2019 amendment by No. 198 substituted “otherwise provided in subdivisions (b)(2) and (b)(5)” for “provided in subdivision (b)(2)”, and “telecommunications services” for “telecommunication service” in (b)(1); in (b)(2), substituted the first occurrence of “government” for “governmental”, “services” for “service”, the second occurrence of “the government entity” for “it”, the “the government entity’s” for “its”, deleted “hereafter” preceding “construct”, and inserted the second occurrence of “associated”; in (b)(3), substituted “to the extent the telecommunications services are” for “or facilities to the extent”, inserted “of the telecommunications services or facilities”; substituted “government” for “governmental” in (b)(4); added (b)(5); and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Division of Information Systems” for “Department of Information Systems” in (b)(4).
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Justin C. Mankin, Comment: A Call for Competitive Broadband Reform in Arkansas, 68 Ark. L. Rev. 829 (2015).
23-17-410. Competing local exchange carriers in service areas of rural telephone companies.
- A rural telephone company shall not have any duty to negotiate terms and conditions of or to enter into any agreement for the provision to any other telecommunications provider of interconnection with the rural telephone company's network as provided by 47 U.S.C. §§ 251(c) and 252, including access to its network elements on an unbundled basis, resale of any telecommunications service that the rural telephone company provides at retail to subscribers, or physical collocation, unless and until a telecommunications provider has made a bona fide request to the rural telephone company for the services and the Arkansas Public Service Commission has determined, in accordance with the federal act, that the rural telephone company must fulfill the request.
-
With regard to a rural telephone company that is not also a tier one company, the commission may only determine that the rural telephone company must fulfill such a request if after reasonable notice and hearing it is established by clear and convincing evidence that:
- The request is not unduly economically burdensome;
- The request is technically feasible; and
- The request is consistent with the protection of universal service and the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
-
The commission shall not conclude that clear and convincing evidence exists, as required in subsection (b) of this section, unless the commission has, among other relevant matters, concluded that granting the requested relief will not result in significant adverse impact on any of the following:
- The customers of the incumbent local exchange carrier serving the area;
- The incumbent local exchange carrier's continuing ability to provide its customers adequate service at reasonable rates;
- The incumbent local exchange carrier's ability to continue to meet eligible carrier obligations;
- Statewide average toll rates;
- Customers' cost of telephone service;
- The goals of universal service;
- The quality of service provided to customers;
- The incumbent local exchange carrier's ability to attract capital and incur debt at reasonable rates and the ability to sustain a sufficient revenue stream to pay existing debt;
- The ability of the exchange to support more than one (1) local exchange carrier; and
- The interest of all ratepayers.
- If no order granting the request is entered by the commission within one hundred twenty (120) days after notice of the request has been filed, the request is denied.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 10.
23-17-411. Regulatory reform.
-
Regarding the earnings, rates of return, or rate-base calculation of any electing company, any incumbent local exchange carrier that has filed notice in accordance with § 23-17-412, or any competing local exchange carrier, and provided that all such companies and carriers otherwise comply with the applicable ratemaking provisions of this subchapter, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not:
- Require the filing of any financial report, statement, or other document for the purpose of reviewing, monitoring, or regulating rate base, earnings, or rates of return; or
- Conduct any investigation of rate base, earnings, or rates of return.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of this subchapter, a rate group reclassification of an exchange from one (1) rate group to another occurring as a result of access line growth or loss of exchange access arrangements shall be allowed by the commission on request of a local exchange carrier.
- Consistent with the policy of telecommunications competition that is implemented with this subchapter, other than the commission's promulgation of rules required by this subchapter, the commission shall promulgate no new rule that increases regulatory burdens on telecommunications service providers, except upon a showing that the benefits of such rule are clear and demonstrable and substantially exceed the cost of compliance by the affected telecommunications service providers.
- Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after February 4, 1997, the commission shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to identify and repeal all rules relating to the provision of telecommunications service which are inconsistent with, have been rendered unnecessary by, or have been superseded by either this subchapter or the federal act.
- Not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after February 4, 1997, the commission shall revise its rules so that they apply, except as expressly provided in this subchapter, equally to all providers of basic local exchange service. All future rule changes promulgated by the commission shall apply equally to all providers of basic local exchange service.
-
- In order to eliminate outdated, unnecessary, and burdensome laws and rules, electing companies, incumbent local exchange carriers filing notice under § 23-17-412, and competing local exchange carriers shall not be subject to the requirements of §§ 23-2-304(a)(1), (7), and (8), 23-2-306, 23-2-307, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112, 23-3-114, 23-3-118, 23-3-119(a)(2), 23-3-201, 23-3-206, 23-3-301 — 23-3-316, 23-4-101 — 23-4-104, 23-4-107, 23-4-109, 23-4-110, 23-4-201(d), 23-4-401 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-419, and 23-17-113, or the commission's rules implementing the statutes.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the commission shall have no jurisdiction to impose any quality of service rules and standards or reporting, including without limitation the commission's telecommunications providers rules, on any telecommunications provider in any exchange in which an electing company is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services under § 23-17-408(c).
- If an electing company that is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services under § 23-17-408(c), a competing local exchange carrier, or an interexchange carrier posts on a publicly accessible website its generally available prices and terms of service for telecommunications services, the electing company, competing local exchange carrier, or interexchange carrier is not required to file or maintain with the commission any tariff or price list setting forth the rates, rentals, charges, privileges, facilities, rules, regulations, or forms of contract for telecommunications services.
- An electing company that is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services under § 23-17-408(c) may elect to be exempt from any requirement to offer a calling plan under § 23-17-120.
-
-
Except as provided in this subchapter with respect to universal services, the commission does not have jurisdiction to regulate:
- Commercial mobile services or commercial mobile service providers;
- Voice over Internet Protocol services; or
- Voice over Internet Protocol providers.
-
This subsection does not apply to:
- The provisions of this subchapter concerning universal services;
- An entity's obligations under sections 251 and 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.; or
- A right granted to an entity by sections 251 and 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.
-
Except as provided in this subchapter with respect to universal services, the commission does not have jurisdiction to regulate:
- The commission shall establish reasonable cost proxies, which rural telephone companies, excluding tier one companies, may use without producing company-specific cost studies, when cost studies would otherwise be required. Use of these proxies or the adoption of approved rates of non-rural telephone companies by rural telephone companies, excluding tier one companies, shall be deemed adequate proof of such rural telephone company costs.
- The commission may reclassify an incumbent local exchange carrier as a tier one company or a non-tier-one company only upon petition by the incumbent local exchange carrier in connection with an increase or decrease in the number of the carrier's access lines in the state.
-
- The unauthorized change of a customer's service to another telecommunications service provider is prohibited.
-
To protect customers from any unauthorized changes in their choice of telecommunications service providers, no local exchange carrier shall honor a request by any person other than the customer to change the provider of intrastate long distance or local exchange service to the customer in the state, except:
- Where the request is placed by a local or long distance company that has provided to the local exchange carrier a letter of agency containing clear and conspicuous disclosure of the change signed by the customer authorizing the change;
- Where the customer affected by the change calls a toll-free number established by the company requesting the change to confirm the request for the change made in response to a contact initiated by the local exchange or long distance company requesting the change; or
- Where the commission otherwise expressly authorizes.
- Any telecommunications carrier that violates the verification procedures described in this subsection and collects charges for telecommunications services from the customer shall be liable to the carrier previously selected by the customer in an amount equal to all charges paid by the subscriber after the violation in accordance with the procedures that the commission may prescribe.
- The commission is also authorized to impose civil penalties, not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) for any such violation.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 11; 2011, No. 594, § 3; 2013, No. 442, §§ 20-22; 2013, No. 1098, §§ 1, 2; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2468, 2469.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to § 1-2-207, subdivision (f)(3) is set out as added by Acts 2013, No. 1098, § 1, rather than as added by Acts 2013, No. 442, § 21. As added by Acts 442, § 21, subdivision (f)(3) read as follows: “(3) If an electing company that is authorized under § 23-17-407(d) to determine the rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access services under § 23-17-408(c) posts on a publicly accessible Internet website its generally available prices and terms of service for basic local exchange service and switched-access services, the electing company is not required to file or maintain with the commission any tariff or price list setting forth the rates, rentals, charges, privileges, facilities, rules, regulations, or forms of contract for telecommunications services.”
Amendments. The 2011 amendment added (f)(2).
The 2013 amendment by No. 442 inserted “and 23-17-113” in (f)(1); added (f)(3) and (f)(4); designated part of (g) as (g)(1); in the introductory language of (g), added “The commission” to the beginning and substituted “the commission does not have” for “shall have no”; and added (g)(2) and (3).
The 2013 amendment by No. 1098 added (f)(3); redesignated the introductory language of (g) and (g)(1) through (3) as the introductory language of (g)(1) and (g)(1)(A) through (C); and added (g)(2).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (c) and (d); deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (c); and, in (f)(1), substituted the first occurrence of “rules” for “regulations” and deleted “and regulations” following the second occurrence of “rules”.
Case Notes
Tax Assessments.
The termination of the Public Service Commission's traditional regulatory authority over commercial mobile service providers did not result in the termination of the commission's tax assessment power over utilities. Southwestern Bell Mobile Sys. v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 73 Ark. App. 222, 40 S.W.3d 838 (2001).
23-17-412. Optional alternative regulation of eligible telecommunications companies.
-
- Telephone companies that file notice with the Arkansas Public Service Commission of an election to be regulated in accordance with the provisions of this section are authorized to determine and account for their respective revenues and expenses, including depreciation expenses, pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles and, except as provided in this section, shall be subject to regulation only in accordance with this section and shall not be subject to any rate review or rate of return regulation by the commission.
- The companies shall file rate lists for their telecommunications services which rates shall be effective upon filing, except the rates for basic local exchange services and switched-access services, which rates shall be effective upon compliance and in accordance with the procedures in this section.
- Any service that is not a telecommunications service is not subject to regulation by the commission, and rates for the services need not be filed with the commission.
- On the effective date of an election pursuant to this section, the tariffed rates of a company electing to be subject to the provisions of this section are deemed just and reasonable and shall continue to be deemed just and reasonable as long as any increases in the company's tariffed rates are in accordance with the provisions of this section.
-
- The company may increase its basic local exchange service rates after sixty (60) days' notice to all affected subscribers.
- Rates for basic local exchange services may be reduced and be effective immediately upon filing or at a later time specified in the filing.
-
Notice by the company to its subscribers shall be by regular mail and may be included in regular subscriber billings and shall include the following:
- A schedule of the proposed basic local exchange service rate change;
- The effective date of the proposed basic local exchange service rate change; and
- An explanation of the right of the subscriber to petition the commission for a public hearing on the rate increase and the procedure necessary to petition.
-
The subscriber petitions provided for in this section shall be prepared as follows:
-
Form.
-
The petition shall be headed by a caption, which shall contain:
- The heading, “The Arkansas Public Service Commission”;
- The name of the company or cooperative seeking a change in basic local exchange service rates; and
- The relief sought.
- A petition substantially in compliance with the form set forth in this subsection shall not be deemed invalid due to minor errors in its form;
-
The petition shall be headed by a caption, which shall contain:
-
Body. The body of the petition shall consist of three (3) numbered paragraphs, if applicable, as follows:
- Allegations of Facts. The allegations of facts shall be stated in the form of ultimate facts, without unnecessary detail, upon which the right to relief is based. The allegations shall be stated in numbered subparagraphs as necessary for clarity;
- Relief Sought. The petition shall contain a brief statement of the amount of the change in basic local exchange service rates that is objected to or other relief sought; and
- Petitioners. The petition shall contain the name, address, telephone number, and signature of each subscriber signing the petition. Only the subscriber in whose name the telephone service is listed shall be counted as a petitioner. Every signature must be dated and shall have been affixed to the petition within sixty (60) days preceding its filing with the commission.
-
Form.
-
- Exclusive of basic local exchange service rate changes pursuant to § 23-17-404, the commission shall have authority to review basic local exchange service rates set by the company only upon a formal petition that complies with subsection (d) of this section and that is signed by at least fifteen percent (15%) of all affected subscribers.
- If a proper petition is presented to the commission within sixty (60) days after the date of notice of the rate change was sent to affected subscribers, the commission shall accept and file the petition and, upon reasonable notice, may suspend the rates and charges at issue during the pendency of the proceedings and reinstate the rates and charges previously in effect and shall hold and complete a hearing thereon within ninety (90) days after filing to determine if the rates as proposed are just and reasonable.
- Within sixty (60) days after close of the hearing, the commission may enter an order adjusting the rates and charges at issue, except that the commission may not set any rate or charge below the basic local exchange service rates in effect at the time the new rate at issue was proposed.
- A company subject to this section shall not increase its rates without the approval of the commission for six (6) months after the date the commission enters the order.
- If the commission fails to enter any order within sixty (60) days after the close of the hearing, the petition shall be deemed denied and the rates and charges shall be deemed approved for all purposes, including the purposes of appeal.
- Rates for switched-access services of companies that are subject to this section shall be determined pursuant to § 23-17-407 except as provided in subsection (l) of this section and § 23-17-404.
- A company subject to this section may at any time file an application with the commission requesting the commission to prescribe just and reasonable rates for the company. Any rate so set may thereafter be adjusted as provided in this section.
- Nothing herein shall restrict any customer's right to complain to the commission regarding quality of service or the commission's authority to enforce quality-of-service rules and standards that are equally imposed on all telecommunications providers.
-
-
-
The commission on its own motion may review basic local exchange service rates of any company subject to this section if the company has increased the rates by more than the greater of fifteen percent (15%) or two dollars ($2.00) per access line per month within any consecutive twelve-month period, excluding rate increases:
- Ordered by the commission pursuant to § 23-17-404;
- Resulting from the provision of extended area services required as the result of customer election under commission rules;
- Resulting from ETC increases in response to the Federal Communications Commission benchmark legislation, rules, or procedures; or
- Necessary to meet a local rate threshold for purposes of receiving maximum support from a federal universal support mechanism or program.
-
Unless a company provides an affidavit to the Arkansas Public Service Commission stating the separately identified language requirements of this subdivision (i)(1)(B) would cause a hardship based on the billing system limitations of the company:
- A local service rate increase under subdivision (i)(1)(A)(iii) of this section may be identified separately on the customer's bill with descriptive language as increases mandated to comply with the Federal Communications Commission benchmark legislation rules; and
- The Federal Communication Commission's Access Recovery Charge may be identified separately with appropriate descriptive language on the customer's bill.
-
The commission on its own motion may review basic local exchange service rates of any company subject to this section if the company has increased the rates by more than the greater of fifteen percent (15%) or two dollars ($2.00) per access line per month within any consecutive twelve-month period, excluding rate increases:
- The commission shall hold and complete a hearing on the rates within ninety (90) days after first giving notice of the hearing to the company to determine if the rates as proposed are just and reasonable.
- Within sixty (60) days after close of the hearing, the commission may enter an order adjusting the rates and charges at issue, except that the commission may not require the company to set any rate or charge below the greater of the rates in effect at the time of the filing of the increase or the actual cost of providing such service as established by evidence received at the hearing.
- In the order, the commission may order a refund of amounts collected in excess of the rates and charges as approved at the hearing, which may be paid as a credit against billings for future services.
- If the commission fails to enter any order within sixty (60) days after the close of the hearing, the rates and charges shall be deemed approved for all purposes, including for purposes of appeal.
-
-
- For purposes of this section, the commission may not require a company that is subject to this section to set its rates below the actual cost of the company providing the service.
- If requested by the company, the actual cost shall be determined to include a ratable portion of administrative expenses and overhead incurred by the company in its operations and the appropriate amortization of previously deferred accounting costs.
- No telephone company subject to this section may change its basic local exchange service rates within ninety (90) days after entry of a final order adjusting the rate pursuant to subsections (g) and (i) of this section.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if at any time following the notice provided under this section another telecommunications provider is providing basic local exchange service or switched-access service within a local exchange area of the company subject to this section, the company that is subject to this section may determine its rates for basic local exchange service and switched-access service within any exchange in which another telecommunications provider is providing these services in the same manner that it determines its rates for other services pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.
- A telephone company electing to be regulated in accordance with this section may package any of its services with any other service it or its affiliates offer, with or without a discount, provided that basic local exchange services and switched-access services may be purchased separately at the rates that are established in accordance with this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 77, § 12; 2003, No. 1764, § 2; 2007, No. 385, §§ 7-9; 2013, No. 442, § 23.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2007, No. 385, § 1, provided:
“Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) The development of an administratively streamlined universal service fund based upon high cost support is important public policy;
“(2) It is administratively efficient to use financial data submitted by eligible telecommunications companies to federal agencies, made under penalty of law, and when appropriate, cost proxies, for the high-cost support mechanism, to be called the ‘Arkansas High Cost Fund’, thereby eliminating the need for extensive financial review and the high administrative costs created by such reviews;
“(3) A five-year transition from the Arkansas Universal Service Fund to the Arkansas High Cost Fund is important public policy due to the shift from a revenue replacement fund based upon current changes to a high-cost fund using financial data that is two (2) or more years old;
“(4) Due to the complex nature and ever-changing administration of telecommunications at the federal level, potential changes in how access charges are collected could disrupt support for eligible telecommunications companies serving rural areas;
“(5) Eligible telecommunications company members of the AICCLP are more adversely affected by sudden changes in regulation, access charges, and statutory changes; and”
Amendments. The 2013 amendment redesignated former (i)(1) as (i)(1)(A); redesignated former (i)(1)(A) and (i)(1)(B) as (i)(1)(A)(i) and (i)(1)(A)(ii); added (i)(1)(A)(iii) and (i)(1)(A)(iv); and added (i)(1)(B).
23-17-413. Optional provision of database to vendors.
In order to assign the place of primary use for mobile telecommunications services pursuant to the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act, Pub. L. No. 106-252, the Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration may choose whether to furnish vendors with a database that matches addresses with taxing jurisdictions or to allow vendors to employ an enhanced zip code of at least nine (9) digits in lieu of providing a database.
History. Acts 2001, No. 907, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 3512.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration” for “Director of the Department of Finance and Administration”.
U.S. Code. The Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act, Pub. L. No. 106-252, referred to in this section, is codified as 4 U.S.C. §§ 116-123.
23-17-414. Extended area service.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall promulgate rules that enable customers in a local exchange service area to petition the commission directly or by a resolution of the customers' quorum court or other local governing body to request that an incumbent local exchange carrier provide extended area service.
-
-
The rules relating to the provision of extended area service shall include:
- The procedure by which customers may petition the commission for an election on the provision of extended area service;
- A description of the information required for the commission to verify that the rate to be charged for providing extended area service will be just and reasonable and to verify that the rate includes an incumbent local exchange carrier's revenue that is replaced by extended area service revenue;
- Notice requirements to customers regarding the rate, terms, and conditions under which extended area service would be provided as a result of a scheduled election under subsection (a) of this section; and
- The procedure for conducting an election under subsection (a) of this section and for determining whether extended area service will be provided as a result of the election.
- After the initial election and adoption of extended area service, no subsequent change in the rate charged for the provision of extended area service shall be effective unless adopted under the commission's rules promulgated to implement this section.
-
The rules relating to the provision of extended area service shall include:
- If the affected customers vote in favor of instituting or renewing extended area service under this section, the carrier shall implement extended area service at a rate that is consistent with subdivision (b)(1)(B) of this section.
History. Acts 2003, No. 1764, § 4.
23-17-415. Reporting of originating intrastate interexchange telephone numbers.
- Where technically feasible, any telecommunications provider whose customer originates or forwards an intrastate interexchange message to be terminated over the public switched telecommunications network in Arkansas shall transmit the jurisdictionally appropriate telephone number of the originating party sending the message to the terminating telecommunications provider.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall investigate complaints alleging violations of this section filed under § 23-3-119 and may obtain sufficient information to determine the correct jurisdiction of any message associated with alleged violations of this section.
- If the commission determines that the jurisdictionally appropriate telephone number has not been transmitted as required by this section, the telecommunications provider against whom the complaint was filed shall demonstrate that it had a legitimate business purpose for not transmitting the jurisdictionally appropriate telephone number or that it was technically infeasible for the provider to transmit the number.
-
- If the commission determines that a telecommunications provider has violated this section, the commission shall determine the amount of underpayment to any telecommunications provider as a result of the violation and shall order the violating telecommunications provider to make payment under the applicable tariff or interconnection agreement, including any penalties specified therein.
- If no penalties are specified under either the applicable tariffs or interconnection agreements, the commission shall assess a civil sanction against the violating telecommunications provider consistent with state law.
History. Acts 2003, No. 1766, § 1.
23-17-416. Arkansas intrastate carrier common line.
-
-
- Except as provided in § 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)(i)(b) , through June 30, 2013, intrastate carrier common line charges billed to ILECs and underlying carriers shall be determined at the rate of one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) per intrastate access minute.
- Except as provided in § 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)(i)(b) , beginning July 1, 2013, intrastate carrier common line charges billed to ILECs and underlying carriers shall be determined at the rate of one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) per originating intrastate access minute.
- The carrier common line charge is not a tax and is not affected by state laws governing taxation.
-
-
- Each underlying carrier's monthly payment to the AICCLP shall include the sum of the underlying carrier's share of the AICCLP's net revenue requirement that has been adjusted to reflect the originating intrastate revenue requirement of each AICCLP member and the AICCLP administrative expenses.
- Each underlying carrier's monthly payment to the AICCLP shall be based upon the underlying carrier's proportionate share of Arkansas intrastate telecommunications services revenues and special intrastate ILEC revenues to the total Arkansas intrastate telecommunications services revenue and special intrastate ILEC revenues of all underlying carriers.
-
-
- An exiting ILEC that experiences a fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall for its carrier common line net revenue requirements may recover the shortfall through increases in local rates based on the total customer access base of the exiting company.
- AICCLP members shall recover their carrier common line net revenue requirement by AICCLP rate adjustment and through the AICCLP.
- If the fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall is distributed throughout the total customer access base, then each independent ILEC within the total customer access base shall receive from the distribution its share of the shortfall.
- An exiting ILEC that seeks to recover its carrier common line revenue shortfall is not required to recover equally from each class of customers.
-
- An exiting ILEC may recover its fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall from any intrastate rate other than access charges.
- Any AICCLP member may recover its AICCLP rate adjustment from any intrastate rate other than access charges.
- An exiting ILEC that reduces its carrier common line charge of one and sixty-five hundredths cents (1.65¢) may recover the shortfall through increases in local rates.
-
- This section shall not limit a carrier's ability to adjust its rates under § 23-17-406, § 23-17-407, or § 23-17-408.
- This section shall not limit a carrier's ability to increase its local rates under § 23-17-412.
- Any AICCLP rate adjustment charge shall not limit an AICCLP member's ability to adjust rates under § 23-17-412.
-
- No toll reseller shall be required to pay to an ILEC or to the AICCLP any portion of an underlying carrier's common line net revenue obligation unless the ILEC is the toll reseller's underlying carrier.
- Unless agreed to otherwise between the toll reseller and the ILEC, if an ILEC is a toll reseller's underlying carrier, then the toll reseller shall report the special intrastate ILEC revenue to the administrator and shall pay all amounts due the AICCLP for the revenue.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall adopt all rules relating to the membership, operation, management, and administration of the AICCLP as it will be constituted after December 31, 2003.
- The commission may adopt rules under subdivision (c)(1) of this section after it appoints the members of the Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool Advisory Procedural Board and selects an AICCLP administrator.
- The commission may terminate a carrier's certificate of convenience and necessity if the carrier fails to comply with AICCLP procedures or fails to make a payment due under this section.
-
- The commission shall choose an AICCLP administrator on or before June 1, 2003.
- The administrator shall manage the collection and distribution of the carrier common line net revenue requirements in accordance with the rules and procedures established by the commission and consistent with this section.
- The administrator shall enforce and implement all rules and directives governing the funding, collection, and eligibility for the AICCLP membership.
-
- The administrator shall determine the total monthly amount due to the AICCLP from AICCLP members, exiting ILECs, and underlying carriers, based upon the sum of the monthly carrier common line net revenue requirement of AICCLP members and the AICCLP administrative fees.
-
- On or before June 30, 2013, the administrator shall change the AICCLP tariff on file with the Arkansas Public Service Commission to reflect only the originating intrastate revenue requirements for each AICCLP member based on the Federal Communications Commission's order In the Matter of Connect America Fund et al., FCC 11-161, released November 18, 2011, providing that the intrastate carrier common line terminating access rate chargeable by telecommunications carriers shall be set at the interstate rate for carrier common line terminating access.
- To properly administer the AICCLP, the administrator shall subtract the terminating intrastate revenue requirement amount that should have been transferred to the FCC ICC-CAF funding from the intrastate revenue requirements listed in the AICCLP tariff to ensure that the funding for the amounts attributed to the AICCLP member's intrastate revenue requirement represent only the originating portion of the revenue requirement.
- The administrator shall provide monthly and annual reports to the commission concerning the operation of the AICCLP.
- Any information considered proprietary by the administrator shall be treated as confidential unless the commission determines that the administrator erred in the determination.
- The AICCLP administrator and the Arkansas Universal Service Fund [superseded] administrator may share confidential information to determine the amounts due or the accuracy of information submitted by ILECs and underlying carriers.
-
- Any ILEC that was designated as a non-tier one ILEC under Acts 1997, No. 77, as of December 31, 1997, and had fewer than fifty thousand (50,000) access lines as of December 31, 1997, shall be eligible to be a member of the AICCLP beginning January 1, 2004.
-
- Based on its total customer access base, the maximum that a non-tier one company under subdivision (e)(8)(A) of this section may draw shall be one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) annually.
- If a non-tier one company under subdivision (e)(8)(A) of this section is entitled to receive more than one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) annually, then the administrator shall assess a prorated charge to each ILEC associated with the total customer access base that is based upon the ILEC's proportionate share of the total net revenue requirement of all ILECs within the total customer base.
-
- Beginning January 1, 2004, no ILEC that had a total customer access base of more than fifty thousand (50,000) access lines as of December 31, 1997, shall be a member of AICCLP.
- An ILEC that had a total customer access base of fifty thousand (50,000) or fewer access lines as of December 31, 1997, may terminate its membership in the AICCLP after sixty (60) days' notice to the commission and the administrator and may not thereafter again become a member of the AICCLP.
-
- If an ILEC terminates its membership in the AICCLP after January 1, 2004, its total customer access base must exit the pool as a single unit.
- If an ILEC terminates its membership in the AICCLP after January 1, 2004, its fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall shall be calculated using relevant data from the data development period identified in subdivision (h)(4)(B) of this section.
-
- The administrator shall determine the amounts to be paid to AICCLP members on a monthly basis and shall determine any fixed or varying amounts due the pool from AICCLP members, exiting ILECs, and underlying carriers.
- The administrator shall provide notice to AICCLP members, other ILECs, and underlying carriers concerning calculations related to each entity and shall bill all carriers for any amounts due the pool.
- The administrator shall use the appropriate data development period to determine the calculations for AICCLP members' carrier common line net revenue requirement.
-
- Except for AICCLP members exiting the pool after January 1, 2004, the data development period for all ILECs shall be the ILECs' billing months of June, July, and August 2003.
- If an AICCLP member exits the AICCLP after January 1, 2004, its data development period to determine the ILEC's fixed carrier common line revenue shortfall shall be the three-month period immediately preceding its exit.
- No later than the twenty-second day or the next business day thereafter of July 2003, if the twenty-second day falls on a weekend or holiday, and no later than the twenty-second day or the next business day of each month thereafter, if the twenty-second day falls on a weekend or holiday, each underlying carrier and AICCLP member shall report to the administrator its previous month's data necessary for AICCLP calculations.
-
- On December 31, 2003, and the last business day of each month thereafter, the administrator shall cause notice to be sent to each underlying carrier, AICCLP member, and exiting ILEC the amount due, based on the previous month's data as submitted to the administrator.
- Each underlying carrier, AICCLP member, and exiting ILEC shall remit payment due under subdivision (j)(1) of this section to the administrator by no later than the last business day of the following month.
- The administrator shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that AICCLP members receive payment of their monthly net carrier common line revenue requirement by February 10, 2004, and by the tenth day of each month thereafter.
History. Acts 2003, No. 1788, § 9; 2013, No. 442, §§ 24-27.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Arkansas Universal Service Fund, referred to in this section, has been superseded by the Arkansas High Cost Fund. See § 23-17-404.
The references in this section to § 23-17-404(e)(4)(D)(i) (b) are obsolete. Former subdivision (e)(4)(D) of § 23-17-404 was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 442.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote (a), (b)(1), (e)(4), and (h)(4).
23-17-417. Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool Advisory Procedural Board.
- The Arkansas Intrastate Carrier Common Line Pool Advisory Procedural Board is not a government entity under Arkansas law and shall not be considered a government entity for any purpose.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall adopt all rules relating to the operation of the board that are reasonably necessary to implement this section.
-
The board shall serve in an advisory capacity and may:
- Propose tariffs and rules to the commission;
- Propose amendments to its procedures for the operation, administration, and audit of the AICCLP;
- Advise the commission on other matters reasonably related to the operation of the AICCLP and the board;
- Meet by teleconference or by other technological means; and
- Provide recommendations and reports to the commission.
-
The board shall be composed of two (2) representatives of underlying carriers and five (5) representatives of ILECs who are members of the AICCLP as follows:
- The two (2) underlying carriers' representatives shall be the first two (2) willing representatives of the largest underlying carriers, as determined by the AICCLP administrator, based upon the carriers' portion of the Arkansas intrastate telecommunications service revenues and special intrastate ILEC revenues;
-
- The commission shall determine the appropriate underlying carrier and ILEC member representatives on or before June 1 of each year.
- The commission shall approve any ILEC representative if the proposed representative's name is submitted by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of all ILEC members of the AICCLP for any open ILEC position on the board; and
-
- The five (5) ILEC representatives of AICCLP members shall be willing representatives of ILECs who are members of the AICCLP.
-
- The five (5) ILEC representatives will serve staggered five-year terms with the terms to be determined by lot at the first meeting of the board.
- A representative may serve unlimited terms.
- No ILEC or underlying carrier may be represented by more than one (1) board member.
- The board shall begin operations as of the date the commission appoints the first administrator.
History. Acts 2003, No. 1788, § 9.
23-17-418. Arkansas High Cost Fund — Programs — Assessments — Funding.
-
The Arkansas High Cost Fund administrator shall:
- On March 19, 2013, begin making assessments to ensure proper funding to program participants; and
- Ninety (90) days after March 19, 2013, begin making distributions to eligible participants.
-
- On the first day of the calendar quarter after March 19, 2013, the administrator shall use previous calculations of the annual determination and recalculate the support for all participants in the fund based on the revised cap.
- The difference between the recalculation and the current administrator's determination shall be known as the “transitional funding cap”.
- The transitional funding cap shall be transitioned from being unfunded to funded.
- If the effective date of payment of any part of the transitional funding cap occurs on a date that is not the beginning of a calendar year, the partial calendar year shall be prorated for the purpose of payment of the transitional funding cap for the remainder of the calendar year.
- Annually beginning January 1, 2014, the administrator shall determine the fund support during the annual determination process as described in § 23-17-404(e)(4)(C)(ii)(a) and pay the fund's eligible telecommunications carrier participants.
History. Acts 2013, No. 442, § 28.
Subchapter 5 — Small Wireless Facility Deployment Act
Effective Dates. Identical Acts 2019, Nos. 797 and 999, § 2: Sept. 1, 2019.
23-17-501. Legislative findings and intent.
-
The General Assembly finds that:
- The deployment of small wireless facilities and other next-generation wireless and broadband network facilities is a matter of federal and statewide concern and interest;
- Wireless and broadband products and services are a significant and continually growing part of the state's economy, and accordingly, encouraging the development of strong and robust wireless and broadband communications networks throughout the state is integral to the state's economic competitiveness;
-
Rapid deployment of small wireless facilities will serve numerous important statewide goals and the public policy of:
- Meeting growing consumer demand for wireless data;
- Increasing competitive options for communications services available to the state's residents; and
- Promoting the ability of the state's citizens to communicate with other citizens and with their state and municipalities, and promoting public safety;
- Small wireless facilities, including facilities commonly referred to as “small cells” and distributed antenna systems are often deployed most effectively in a public right-of-way;
- To meet the key objectives of this subchapter and federal law, wireless service providers must have access to public rights-of-way and the ability to attach to infrastructure located in public rights-of-way to increase the density of the wireless service providers' networks and provide next-generation wireless services;
- Rates and fees for the permitting and deployment of small wireless facilities in public rights-of-way and on authority infrastructure, including poles, throughout the state, consistent with federal law, is reasonable and will encourage the deployment of robust next-generation wireless and broadband networks for the benefit of citizens throughout the state;
-
The procedures, rates, and fees in this subchapter are:
- Consistent with federal law and multiple ordinances adopted by municipalities throughout the state;
- Fair and reasonable when viewed from the perspective of the state's citizens and the state's interest in having robust, reliable, and technologically advanced wireless and broadband networks; and
- Reflective of a balancing of the interests of the wireless providers deploying new facilities and the interests of authorities in recovering their costs of managing access to the public rights-of-way and the attachment space provided on authority infrastructure in the public rights-of-way;
- Municipalities are the custodians of public rights-of-way, and public property within the public rights-of-way, within the limits of their respective jurisdictions;
- Municipalities may adopt ordinances and regulations governing the use, construction, development, and appearance of public and private property within their respective jurisdictions; and
-
Municipalities recognize the economic and social value of data connectivity and desire to encourage wireless infrastructure investment by providing a fair and predictable process for the deployment of small wireless facilities within the public rights-of-way in a manner that is:
- Safe;
- Compatible with and complementary to the provision of services by the municipality and others lawfully using the rights-of-way; and
- Consistent with the aesthetic standards of the municipality.
- It is the intent of the General Assembly that the operation of small wireless facilities is a matter of statewide concern and interest.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-502. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Small Wireless Facility Deployment Act”.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-503. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Affiliate” means an entity that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another party;
- “Antenna” means communications equipment that transmits or receives an electromagnetic radio frequency signal in the provision of wireless service;
-
- “Antenna equipment” means equipment, switches, wiring, cabling, power sources, shelters, or cabinets associated with an antenna, located at the same fixed location as the antenna, and when collocated on a structure is mounted or installed at the same time as the antenna.
-
“Antenna equipment” does not include:
- The structure or improvements on, under, or within which the equipment is collocated; or
- Wireline backhaul facilities, coaxial or fiber optic cable that is between structures, or coaxial or fiber optic cable that is otherwise not immediately adjacent to or directly associated with an antenna;
- “Antenna facility” means an antenna and associated antenna equipment;
- “Applicable codes” means uniform electrical reliability, building, fire, electrical, plumbing, or mechanical codes, as adopted by a recognized national code organization, or local amendments to the codes that are of general application, or local ordinances that are of general application, that address public health, safety, or welfare and are consistent with this subchapter;
- “Applicant” means a person who submits an application as or on behalf of a wireless provider;
-
“Application” means a request submitted by an applicant to an authority for a permit:
- To collocate small wireless facilities; or
- To install, modify, or replace a pole on which a small wireless facility is or will be collocated in the right-of-way;
-
-
“Authority” means a county, a municipality, a subdivision, or instrumentality thereof, including without limitation:
- A public utility district;
- An irrigation district; or
- A municipal electric utility.
- “Authority” does not include a state court having jurisdiction over an authority;
-
“Authority” means a county, a municipality, a subdivision, or instrumentality thereof, including without limitation:
- “Authority pole” means a pole owned, managed, or operated by or on behalf of an authority;
-
- “Collocate” or “collocate on” means the placement, mounting, replacement, or modification of a small wireless facility on, or of ground-mounted antenna equipment adjacent to, a structure.
- “Collocate” or “collocate on” includes collocated ground-mounted antenna equipment as a small wireless facility if it meets the requirements of subdivision (25)(A)(iii)-(vi) of this section and the associated facilities on the adjacent structure meet the requirements of subdivision (25)(A)(i)-(vi) of this section;
-
“Communications service” means:
- A cable service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522(6), as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- A telecommunications service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(53), as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- An information service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(24), as it existed on January 1, 2019; or
- Wireless service;
-
“Communications service provider” means:
- A cable operator, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- A provider of information service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(24), as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- A telecommunications carrier, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(51); or
- A wireless provider;
-
“Control” means the direct or indirect:
- Ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the equity;
- Ability to direct at least fifty percent (50%) of voting power; or
- Ability otherwise to direct management policies;
- “Controlled-access facility” means a highway or street as described in § 27-68-102;
- “Decorative pole” means an authority pole that is specifically designed and placed for aesthetic purposes and on which limited appurtenances or attachments, such as a small wireless facility, lighting, specially designed informational or directional signage, or temporary holiday or special event attachments, have been placed or are permitted to be placed according to nondiscriminatory authority rules or codes;
- “Facility” means an antenna facility or a structure that is used for the provision of wireless service;
- “Fee” means a onetime, nonrecurring charge;
-
“Historic district” means a group of buildings, properties, or sites that are:
- Listed in the National Register of Historic Places or formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places, according to Section VI.D.1.a.i-v of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act Review Process, 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Appendix C, as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- A historic district designated under the Historic Districts Act, § 14-172-201 et seq.; or
- A historic district otherwise designated under a local ordinance as of January 1, 2019;
-
“Micro-wireless facility” means a wireless facility that:
- Is not larger in dimension than twenty-four inches (24") in length, fifteen inches (15") in width, and twelve inches (12") in height;
- Has an exterior antenna that is no longer than eleven inches (11"); and
- Is not placed any farther than ten feet (10') down the span as measured from the side of the pole;
- “Permit” means an authorization, written or otherwise, required by an authority to perform an action or initiate, continue, or complete a project for the deployment of wireless service at a specified location;
- “Person” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, trust, authority, or other entity or organization;
-
- “Pole” means a pole in a right-of-way that may be used by or for wireline communications, electric distribution, lighting, traffic control, signage, or a similar function or for collocation of small wireless facilities.
- “Pole” does not include a wireless support structure or an electric transmission structure;
- “Rate” means a recurring charge;
-
- “Right-of-way” means an area on, below, or above a public utility easement, roadway, highway, street, sidewalk, alley, or similar property.
- “Right-of-way” does not include a federal interstate highway, controlled-access facility, or a public utility easement that does not authorize the deployment sought by the wireless provider;
-
-
“Small wireless facility” means a wireless facility that meets all of the following specifications:
-
The facility:
- Is mounted on a structure fifty feet (50') or less in height, including the antennas;
- Is mounted on a structure no more than ten percent (10%) taller than other adjacent structures; or
- Does not extend an existing structure on which it is located to a height of more than fifty feet (50') or by more than ten percent (10%), whichever is greater;
- Each antenna associated with the deployment, excluding associated antenna equipment, is no more than three cubic feet (3 cu. ft.) in volume;
- All other wireless equipment associated with the structure, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any preexisting associated equipment on the structure, is no more than twenty-eight cubic feet (28 cu. ft.) in volume;
- The facility does not require antenna structure registration under 47 C.F.R. Part 17, as it existed on January 1, 2019;
- The facility is not located on tribal lands, as defined in 36 C.F.R. 800.16(x), as it existed on January 1, 2019; and
- The facility does not result in human exposure to radio frequencies in excess of the applicable safety standards specified in 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), as it existed on January 1, 2019.
-
The facility:
-
“Small wireless facility” does not include:
- The structure or improvements on, under, or within which the equipment is located or collocated or to which the equipment is attached; and
- Any wireline backhaul facility or coaxial or fiber optic cable that is between wireless support structures or utility poles, or that is otherwise not immediately adjacent to or directly associated with a particular antenna;
-
“Small wireless facility” means a wireless facility that meets all of the following specifications:
- “Structure” means a pole or wireless support structure, whether or not it has an existing antenna facility, that is used or to be used for the provision of wireless service;
- “Technically feasible” means that by virtue of engineering or spectrum usage the proposed placement for a small wireless facility, or its design, concealment measures, or site location, can be implemented without a material reduction in the functionality of the small wireless facility;
- “Wireless infrastructure provider” means a person or an affiliate thereof, including a person authorized to provide communications service in the state, that builds or installs facilities for the provision of wireless service, but that is not a wireless service provider;
- “Wireless provider” means a wireless infrastructure provider or a wireless service provider;
- “Wireless service” means any service using licensed or unlicensed spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or mobile, provided to the public;
- “Wireless service provider” means a person who provides wireless service;
-
-
“Wireless support structure” means a structure, including:
- A monopole;
- A tower, either guyed or self-supporting;
- A billboard;
- A building; or
- Any other existing or proposed structure designed to support or that is capable of supporting small wireless facilities, other than a structure designed solely for the collocation of small wireless facilities.
- “Wireless support structure” does not include a pole; and
-
“Wireless support structure” means a structure, including:
- “Wireline backhaul facility” means an aboveground or underground facility used to transport communications services from a wireless facility to a network.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-504. Exclusive arrangements.
An authority shall not enter into an exclusive arrangement with a person for use of the right-of-way for the collocation of small wireless facilities or the installation, operation, marketing, modification, maintenance, or replacement of poles for the collocation.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-505. Use of rights-of-way by wireless provider.
- Subject to this subchapter, a wireless provider shall have the right, as a permitted use not subject to zoning review or approval, to collocate, maintain, modify, operate, and replace small wireless facilities and to install, maintain, modify, and replace poles it owns or manages or, with the permission of the owner, a third party's pole, associated with a small wireless facility, along, across, upon, and under the right-of-way.
- Small wireless facilities and associated poles shall be installed and maintained as to not obstruct or hinder the usual travel or public safety of the right-of-way or the usage of the right-of-way by utilities.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-506. Requirements — Height limits — Standards.
-
Each new or modified pole installed in the right-of-way for the purpose of the collocation of small wireless facilities shall not exceed the greater of:
- Fifty feet (50') in height above ground level; or
- Ten percent (10%) taller than the tallest existing pole in place in the same right-of-way as of September 1, 2019, within three hundred feet (300') of the new or modified pole.
- A new small wireless facility in the right-of-way shall not extend more than ten percent (10%) above the existing structure on which it is located or fifty feet (50') above ground level, whichever is greater.
- A wireless provider shall have the right to collocate a wireless facility and install, maintain, modify, and replace a pole that exceeds the height limits required under subsection (a) of this section along, across, upon, and under the right-of-way, subject to this section and any applicable zoning regulations.
- A wireless provider shall not install a small wireless facility or pole in a historic district without complying with the requirements of general application for structures within the historic district.
- A wireless provider may replace decorative poles when necessary to deploy a small wireless facility so long as the replacement reasonably conforms to the design of the original decorative pole.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-507. Damage and repair — Replacements — Abandonment — Removal.
-
- A wireless provider shall repair all damage to the right-of-way directly caused by the activities of the wireless provider in the right-of-way and return the right-of-way to its functional and aesthetic equivalence before the damage under the competitively neutral, reasonable requirements and specifications of the authority.
- If the wireless provider fails to make the repairs required by the authority within a reasonable time after written notice, the authority may make those repairs and charge the applicable party the actual and reasonable documented cost, including overhead, of the repairs.
-
- A wireless provider is not required to replace or upgrade an existing pole except for reasons of structural necessity or compliance with applicable codes.
- A wireless provider may, with the permission of the pole owner, replace or modify existing poles, but any such replacement or modification shall substantially conform to the design aesthetics of the pole being modified or replaced.
-
- A wireless provider shall notify the authority at least thirty (30) days before the wireless provider's abandonment of a small wireless facility.
- If the wireless provider fails to remove the abandoned small wireless facility within ninety (90) days after the notice, the authority may undertake the removal and recover the actual and reasonable documented cost, including overhead, of the removal from the wireless provider, or its successors or assigns.
-
- An authority may order the removal of a small wireless facility or associated pole in the right-of-way that violates § 23-17-505, § 23-17-506, or applicable codes.
- The authority shall provide written notice of the violation to the owner of the small wireless facility at least thirty (30) days before removal to afford the owner the opportunity to conduct repairs or removal or otherwise remedy the violation.
-
- If the authority determines that a wireless provider's activity in a right-of-way under this subchapter creates an imminent risk to public safety, the authority may provide written notice to the wireless provider and demand that the wireless provider address the risk.
- If the wireless provider fails to reasonably address the risk within twenty-four hours of the written notice, the authority may take or cause to be taken action to reasonably address the risk and charge the wireless provider the reasonable documented cost of the actions.
-
-
A wireless provider shall not collocate a small wireless facility or install, modify, or replace a pole in the right-of-way that:
- Materially interferes with the safe operation of traffic control equipment;
- Materially interferes with sight lines or clear zones for transportation or pedestrians;
- Materially interferes with compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, or similar federal or state standards regarding pedestrian access or movement; or
- Fails to comply with applicable codes.
-
- For an authority that requires permits under § 23-17-510, compliance with these criteria will be determined during the permitting process.
- An authority that does not require a permit under § 23-17-510 shall provide at least thirty (30) days' notice of and a reasonable opportunity to cure a violation of subdivision (e)(1) of this section.
-
A wireless provider shall not collocate a small wireless facility or install, modify, or replace a pole in the right-of-way that:
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Americans with Disabilities Act, referred to in this section, is codified primarily as 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
23-17-508. Aesthetic standards.
- An authority that has adopted an ordinance under § 14-17-209 or § 14-56-416 may adopt and enforce standards that govern the aesthetic appearance of small wireless facilities and associated poles to ensure coordinated, adjusted, and harmonious development, as provided in this section.
-
Aesthetic standards adopted by an authority for small wireless facilities and associated poles shall meet the following requirements:
-
The aesthetic standards shall be:
- Reasonable, in that they are technically feasible and reasonably directed to avoiding or remedying unsightly or out-of-character deployments;
- No more burdensome than those applied to other types of utility and communications infrastructure deployments; and
- Objective and published at least ninety (90) days in advance of the filing of an application under this subchapter;
- Any design or concealment measures are not considered a part of the small wireless facility for purposes of the size parameters in the definition of “small wireless facility”; and
- An authority may deny an application for not complying with aesthetic requirements only if the authority finds that the denial does not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless service.
-
The aesthetic standards shall be:
-
An authority may prohibit wireless providers from installing poles in the right-of-way in areas where the authority has required that all communications and electric lines be placed underground, if:
- The authority has required all electric and communications lines to be placed underground by a date certain that is three (3) months before the submission of the application;
- Any poles the authority allows to remain shall be made available to wireless providers for the collocation of small wireless facilities, and may be replaced by a wireless provider to accommodate the collocation of small wireless facilities, in compliance with this subchapter;
- A wireless provider may install a new pole in the designated area that otherwise complies with this section when it is not able to provide wireless service by collocating on a remaining structure; and
-
-
For small wireless facilities installed before an authority adopts requirements that communications and electric lines be placed underground, an authority adopting the requirements shall:
- Permit a wireless provider to maintain the small wireless facilities in a place on any pole not required to be removed, subject to any applicable pole attachment agreement with the pole owner; or
- Permit the wireless provider to replace an existing pole within fifty feet (50') of the prior location.
- An authority may require wireless providers to comply with reasonable and nondiscriminatory horizontal spacing requirements of general application for new poles and ground-mounted small wireless facilities, but the requirements shall not prevent a wireless provider from serving any location.
-
For small wireless facilities installed before an authority adopts requirements that communications and electric lines be placed underground, an authority adopting the requirements shall:
-
- When a wireless provider applies to install a new pole in the right-of-way in an area zoned for residential use, the authority may propose an alternative location in the right-of-way within one hundred feet (100') of the location stated in the application, and the wireless provider shall use the authority's proposed alternative location unless the location imposes technical limits or significant additional costs.
- The wireless provider shall certify that it has made the determination in good faith, based on the assessment of a licensed engineer, and the wireless provider shall provide a written summary of the basis for the determination.
- Aesthetic standards shall be effective after approval by ordinance, resolution, or rule of the governing body of the authority.
-
-
The board of zoning adjustment of an authority may:
- Hear appeals of the decision of the administrative officers in respect to the enforcement and application of the aesthetic standards, and may affirm or reverse, in whole or in part, the decision of the administrative officers; and
- Hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the aesthetic standards and grant the variances only when it is necessary to avoid the prohibition of wireless service or otherwise comply with the law.
- Decisions of the board in respect to subdivision (f)(1) of this section shall be subject to appeal only to a court of record having jurisdiction.
-
The board of zoning adjustment of an authority may:
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-509. Collocation on authority poles.
- This section applies to activities of a wireless provider collocating small wireless facilities on authority poles in the authority's right-of-way or in a right-of-way controlled by the Arkansas Department of Transportation located within an authority.
-
- A person owning, managing, or controlling authority poles in the right-of-way shall not enter into an exclusive arrangement with any person for the right to attach to the poles.
- A person who purchases or otherwise acquires an authority pole is subject to the requirements of this section.
- An authority shall allow the collocation of small wireless facilities on authority poles on nondiscriminatory terms and conditions using the process in § 23-17-510.
- The rate to collocate on authority poles is provided in § 23-17-511.
-
-
- As part of an application to collocate a small wireless facility on an authority pole, the wireless provider shall submit make-ready design drawings and work descriptions that enable the pole to support the requested collocation by the wireless provider, including pole replacement if necessary.
- An authority may amend the make-ready design drawings and work to comply with applicable codes before the issuance of a permit to the extent reasonably necessary.
- The rates, fees, and terms and conditions for the make-ready work to collocate on an authority pole shall be nondiscriminatory, competitively neutral, and commercially reasonable and shall comply with this subchapter.
- The authority shall not require more make-ready work than required to meet applicable codes or industry standards nor may the fees for make-ready work include costs related to preexisting or prior damage or noncompliance.
-
- An authority may require replacement of an authority pole only if the collocation would make the authority pole structurally unsound.
- The authority may require that the replaced authority pole have the same functionality as the pole being replaced.
- If the authority pole is replaced, the authority shall take ownership of the new pole and operate authority fixtures on the pole.
-
- Make-ready fees charged by an authority may include the amount the authority pays a professional engineer registered in Arkansas to review the wireless provider's make-ready work plans.
- Fees for make-ready work shall not include any revenue or contingency-based consultant's fees or expenses of any kind.
-
Within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the application filed to collocate on an authority pole, the authority shall elect to:
- Perform the make-ready work necessary to enable the pole to support the requested collocation by a wireless provider and provide a good-faith estimate for the work, including pole replacement, if necessary; or
- Authorize the wireless provider to perform the make-ready work.
-
- The authority shall complete make-ready work it elects to perform, including any pole replacement, within sixty (60) days of written acceptance of the good-faith estimate of the applicant.
- If the authority electing to perform the make-ready work has not completed the work within sixty (60) days after the written acceptance and deposit of the good-faith estimate by the applicant, the applicant may demand a return of any deposited funds and proceed with the make-ready work as described in subdivision (e)(1)(A) of this section, using authorized, qualified contractors approved by the authority with the authorization not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed.
-
-
- An authority may reserve space on an authority pole for future public safety or transportation uses in a documented and approved plan in place at the time an application is filed.
- A reservation of space shall not preclude placement of a pole or collocation of a small wireless facility.
- If replacement of the authority's pole is necessary to accommodate the collocation of the small wireless facility and future use, the wireless provider shall pay for the replacement of the authority pole, and the replaced pole shall accommodate future use.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-510. Permits.
-
-
This section applies to all permits required for the collocation of small wireless facilities and to the permitting of the installation, modification, and replacement of associated poles by a wireless provider that:
- Is in an authority's right-of-way; or
- Is in a right-of-way controlled by the Arkansas Department of Transportation located within the jurisdiction of an authority if the application is for collocation on an authority pole or if the authority has adopted aesthetic standards under § 23-17-508.
- A permit issued under subdivision (a)(1)(B) of this section remains subject to the rules of the department.
-
This section applies to all permits required for the collocation of small wireless facilities and to the permitting of the installation, modification, and replacement of associated poles by a wireless provider that:
- Except as provided in this subchapter, an authority shall not prohibit, regulate, or charge for the collocation of small wireless facilities or the installation, modification, or replacement of associated poles that may be permitted in this section.
- An authority may require an applicant to obtain one (1) or more permits to collocate small wireless facilities or to install a new, modified, or replacement pole associated with a small wireless facility as provided in §§ 23-17-505 – 23-17-507, provided the permits are of general applicability and do not apply exclusively to small wireless facilities.
-
An authority shall receive and process applications subject to the following requirements:
- An authority shall not directly or indirectly require an applicant to perform services or provide goods unrelated to the permit, such as in-kind contributions to the authority, including without limitation reserving fiber, conduit, or space on the applicant's pole for the authority;
-
An authority may require an applicant to submit the information and fees stated in subdivisions (d)(2)(A)-(J) of this section for a permit for a deployment in the authority's right-of-way or on an authority pole in the right-of-way controlled by the department located within an authority and may only require an applicant to submit the information and fees stated in subdivisions (d)(2)(A)-(C) of this section and subdivision (d)(2)(J) of this section for deployments of or on poles that are not owned by the authority located in the right-of-way controlled by the department located within an authority:
- Identification of the applicant;
- A map or description of the location of the facilities;
- An illustration that shows the final appearance of the facilities;
- Engineering drawings of the facilities to be installed, including required make-ready work to be performed;
- Electrical load information;
- Pole loading calculations;
- Worker safety information related to small-wireless-facility installation;
- Evidence of bonding, if required;
- Evidence of insurance, if required; and
- Required application fees;
-
An authority shall not require:
- The collocation of small wireless facilities on any specific pole or category of poles or require multiple antenna facilities on a single pole;
- The use of specific pole types or configurations when installing new or replacement poles; or
- The underground placements of small wireless facilities that are, or are designated in an application, to be pole-mounted or ground-mounted;
- An authority shall not limit the collocation of small wireless facilities by minimum horizontal separation distance requirements from existing small wireless facilities, poles, or wireless support structures;
- The applicant shall attest that the small wireless facilities will be operational for use by a wireless service provider within one (1) year after the permit issuance date, unless the authority and the applicant agree to extend this period or delay is caused by lack of commercial power, communications, transportation facilities to the site, or any other factors outside of the applicant's control;
-
- Within ten (10) days of receiving an application, an authority shall determine and notify the applicant in writing whether the application is complete.
- If an application is incomplete, the authority shall specifically identify the missing information in writing.
- The processing deadline in subdivision (d)(7) of this section shall restart at zero (0) on the date the applicant provides the missing information identified under subdivision (d)(6)(B) of this section to complete the application;
-
-
Applications shall be processed on a nondiscriminatory basis within:
- Sixty (60) days of receipt of an application for the collocation of a small wireless facility; and
- Ninety (90) days for an application to install, modify, or replace a pole on which a small wireless facility is or will be collocated.
- The processing deadline may be tolled by agreement of the applicant and the authority.
- If an authority fails to act on a complete application within the applicable deadline, the application shall be deemed to be approved ten (10) days after written notice is provided by the applicant to the authority that the time period for acting on the application has lapsed;
-
Applications shall be processed on a nondiscriminatory basis within:
-
An authority may deny a proposed collocation of a small wireless facility or the installation, modification, or replacement of a pole in its right-of-way that meets the requirements in § 23-17-506(a)-(c) only if authorized under subdivision (d)(9) of this section or subdivision (d)(10) of this section or the proposed deployment:
- Materially interferes with the safe operation of traffic control equipment;
- Materially interferes with sight lines or clear zones for transportation or pedestrians;
- Materially interferes with compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, or similar federal or state standards regarding pedestrian access or movement;
- Fails to comply with applicable codes; or
- Fails to comply with § 23-17-506(d) and (e) and § 23-17-508;
- An authority may deny a proposed collocation of a small wireless facility on an authority pole in a right-of-way controlled by the department located within the authority that meets the requirements in § 23-17-506 only if the proposed collocation meets the criteria in subdivision (d)(8)(A) of this section or subdivision (d)(8)(D) of this section or fails to comply with aesthetic standards adopted in an ordinance under § 23-17-508;
- An authority may deny a proposed collocation of a small wireless facility or the installation, modification, or replacement of a pole in a right-of-way controlled by the department located within the authority that meets the requirements in § 23-17-506 only if the proposed deployment fails to comply with aesthetic standards adopted in an ordinance under § 23-17-508;
-
- The authority shall document the basis for a denial, including the specific code, rule, or statutory authority on which the denial is based, and send the documentation to the applicant on or before the day the authority denies an application.
- The applicant may cure the deficiencies identified by the authority and resubmit the application within thirty (30) days of the denial without paying an additional application fee.
- The authority shall approve or deny the revised application within thirty (30) days of resubmission and limit its review to the deficiencies cited in the denial;
-
-
- An applicant seeking to collocate small wireless facilities within the jurisdiction of a single authority shall be allowed at the applicant's discretion to file a batched application for small wireless facilities and associated poles and receive a single permit for the collocation of multiple small wireless facilities and the placement of associated poles.
- However, the denial of one (1) or more small wireless facilities in a batched application shall not delay processing of any other small wireless facilities or poles in the same consolidated application.
- Batched applications shall be collectively processed according to the procedures in this section.
- A consolidated application that includes new pole deployments shall be subject to a ninety-day time frame for approval;
-
-
- Installation or collocation for which a permit is granted under this section shall be completed within one (1) year after the permit issuance date unless the authority and the applicant agree to extend this period or a delay is caused by circumstances beyond the applicant's control.
- Approval of an application authorizes the applicant to undertake the installation or collocation;
- Subject to applicable relocation requirements and the applicant's right to terminate at any time, the applicant shall operate and maintain the small wireless facilities and any associated poles covered by the permit for a period of not less than ten (10) years, which shall be renewed for equivalent durations so long as the small wireless facilities comply with the criteria stated in subdivision (d)(8) of this section; and
-
An authority shall not institute, either expressly or de facto, a moratorium on:
- Filing, receiving, or processing applications; or
- Issuing permits or other approvals, if any, for the collocation of small wireless facilities or the installation, modification, or replacement of associated poles.
-
-
An authority shall not require an application for:
- Routine maintenance;
- The replacement of small wireless facilities with small wireless facilities that are substantially similar or the same size or smaller; or
- The installation, placement, maintenance, operation, or replacement of a micro-wireless facility that is suspended on cables that are strung between existing poles and that complies with the applicable codes.
- However, an authority may require a permit for work that requires excavation or closure of sidewalks or vehicular lanes within the right-of-way for the activities.
- A permit shall be issued to the applicant on a nondiscriminatory basis upon terms and conditions applied to any other person's activities in the right-of-way that requires excavation, closing of sidewalks, or vehicular lanes.
-
An authority shall not require an application for:
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Americans with Disabilities Act, referred to in this section, is codified primarily as 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
23-17-511. Fees and rates.
- This section shall govern an authority's rates and fees for use of authority poles and the placement of a small wireless facility or associated poles.
- An authority shall not require a wireless provider to pay any rates, fees, or compensation to the authority or other person other than what is expressly authorized by this subchapter for the right to use or occupy a right-of-way, for collocation of small wireless facilities on or in structures in the right-of-way, or for the installation, maintenance, modification, and replacement of associated poles in the right-of-way.
-
Application fees for a permit shall be nondiscriminatory and shall not collectively exceed the following:
- One hundred dollars ($100) for each small wireless facility; or
- Two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for the installation, modification, or replacement of a pole together with the collocation of an associated small wireless facility in the right-of-way.
-
- Except as described in § 23-17-510(e), a wireless provider shall pay an authority compensation for use of the right-of-way, an annual rate of up to thirty dollars ($30.00) per small wireless facility.
- A wireless provider shall pay an authority compensation for collocation of small wireless facilities on authority poles an annual rate of up to two hundred forty dollars ($240) for each authority pole.
- A wireless provider is not required to pay an authority compensation for micro-wireless facilities that are suspended on cables strung between existing utility poles in the right-of-way as long as the wireless provider compensates the authority through other licenses or franchises held directly or through one (1) of the wireless provider's affiliates for the placement of the suspension cables in the right-of-way.
- The rates under this section, together with a onetime application fee, shall be the total compensation that the wireless provider is required to pay the authority for the deployment of small wireless facilities in the right-of-way and any associated poles.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-512. Local authority.
-
- Subject to this subchapter and applicable federal law, an authority may continue to exercise zoning, land use, planning, and permitting authority within its territorial boundaries with respect to wireless support structures, including the enforcement of applicable codes.
- An authority shall not have or exercise any jurisdiction or authority over the design, engineering, construction, installation, or operation of a small wireless facility located in an interior structure or upon the site of a campus, stadium, or athletic facility not owned or controlled by the authority, other than to require compliance with applicable codes.
- This subchapter does not authorize the state or any political subdivision, including an authority, to require small wireless facility deployment or to regulate wireless service.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-513. Arkansas Public Service Commission — Jurisdiction over pole attachments.
- This subchapter does not limit, abrogate, or supersede the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, or any rule or order of the commission concerning pole attachments under § 23-4-1001 et seq., or any agreement of a public utility pole owner and attacher related to the rates, terms, and conditions for a pole attachment.
-
This subchapter does not authorize:
- Any attachment or installation to or on an electric-cooperative-owned pole;
- Any attachment or installation within a nonpublic right-of-way acquired by an electric cooperative; or
- Use of an electric-cooperative-owned line, duct, conduit, similar structure, or equipment of any type.
-
This subchapter does not authorize:
- Any attachment or installation to or on an investor-owned electric-utility-owned pole;
- Any attachment or installation within a nonpublic right-of-way acquired by an investor-owned electric public utility; or
- Use of an investor-owned electric-public-utility-owned line, duct, conduit, similar structure, or equipment of any type.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-514. Implementation.
-
- An authority may adopt an ordinance that makes available to wireless providers rates, fees, and other terms that comply with this subchapter.
- Subject to the other provisions of this section, in the absence of an ordinance or agreement that substantially implements this subchapter and until such an ordinance is adopted or agreement is reached, if at all, a wireless provider may collocate small wireless facilities and install associated poles under the requirements of this subchapter.
- An authority shall not require a wireless provider to enter into an agreement to implement this subchapter, but such agreements are permissible if voluntary and nondiscriminatory.
- Ordinances and agreements implementing this subchapter are public or private arrangements and are matters of legitimate and significant statewide concern.
-
- A provision of an agreement or ordinance with an effective date before September 1, 2019, that does not fully comply with this subchapter shall apply only to small wireless facilities and associated poles that were operational before September 1, 2019, and shall be deemed invalid and unenforceable beginning on the one hundred eighty-first day after September 1, 2019.
- To the extent an agreement or ordinance, or part thereof, is invalid under subdivision (c)(1) of this section, small wireless facilities and associated poles that became operational before September 1, 2019, under the agreement or ordinance, may remain installed and be operated under the requirements of this subchapter.
-
- An agreement or ordinance with an effective date of September 1, 2019, or later that applies to small wireless facilities and associated poles is invalid and unenforceable unless it fully complies with this subchapter.
- In the absence of an ordinance or agreement that complies with this subchapter, a wireless provider may install and operate small wireless facilities and associated poles in the right-of-way under the requirements of this subchapter.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-515. Dispute resolution.
- A court of competent jurisdiction shall have jurisdiction to determine disputes arising under this subchapter.
-
Pending resolution of a dispute concerning rates for collocation of small wireless facilities on authority poles in the right-of-way, the authority owning or controlling the structure shall allow the collocating person to collocate at annual rates of no more than:
- Thirty dollars ($30.00) per small wireless facility for use of the right-of-way; and
- An annual rate of up to two hundred forty dollars ($240) for each authority pole used for the collocation of small wireless facilities, with rates to be trued up upon final resolution of the dispute.
- Any disputes, wherever filed, shall be pursued according to accelerated docket or complaint procedures, if available.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-516. Indemnification, insurance, and bonding.
- An authority may adopt reasonable indemnification, insurance, and bonding requirements related to the deployment of small wireless facilities and associated poles under this subchapter.
-
- An authority may require a wireless provider to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the authority and its officers, agents, and employees against any claims, demands, damages, lawsuits, judgments, costs, liens, losses, expenses, and attorney's fees resulting from the installation, construction, repair, replacement, operation, or maintenance of poles, small wireless facilities, or attachments to authority poles to the extent directly caused by the negligence of the wireless provider, its contractors, subcontractors and their officers, employees, or agents.
- A wireless provider has no obligation to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless an authority or its officers, agents, or employees against any liabilities or losses due to or caused by the sole negligence of the authority or its employees or agents.
-
- An authority may require a wireless provider to have in effect insurance coverage against the claims, demands, damages, lawsuits, judgments, costs, liens, losses, expenses, and attorney's fees described in subsection (b) of this section, so long as the authority imposes similar requirements on other right-of-way users and the requirements are reasonable and nondiscriminatory, and provided that an authority does not require a wireless provider to obtain insurance naming the authority or its officers and employees as additional insureds.
-
- A wireless provider with net assets of at least five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000), including the assets of its affiliates, may self-insure as to any required coverage.
- An authority may require reasonable proof that the wireless provider is eligible under subdivision (c)(2)(A) of this section to self-insure.
- A wireless provider shall immediately notify each authority in which the wireless provider has obtained permits of any change in its self-insured status as to any coverage required under this subsection, and of any change in the ability of the wireless provider to cover the losses specified in subdivision (c)(1) of this section.
-
- An authority may adopt bonding requirements for small wireless facility collocations if the authority imposes similar requirements in connection with other right-of-way users.
-
The purpose of the bonds shall be to:
- Provide for the removal of abandoned or improperly maintained small wireless facilities, including those that an authority determines need to be removed to protect public health, safety, or welfare; and
- Recoup rates or fees that have not been paid by a wireless provider in over twelve (12) months, so long as the wireless provider has received reasonable notice from the authority of any of the noncompliance listed above and an opportunity to cure.
-
- Bonding requirements shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) per small wireless facility.
- For wireless providers with multiple small wireless facilities within the jurisdiction of a single authority, the total bond amount across all facilities may not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), which amount may be combined into a single bond instrument.
- An authority may waive bonding requirements for a wireless provider that already maintains bonding for other operations.
-
An authority shall not require a cash bond, unless either of the following applies:
- The wireless provider has failed to obtain or maintain a bond required under this section; or
- The surety has defaulted or failed to perform on a bond given to the authority on behalf of the wireless provider.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
23-17-517. Overlapping jurisdiction of management of right-of-way.
- In an area where more than one (1) authority may assert jurisdiction over a right-of-way, only the authority controlling the smallest geographic territory shall be authorized to adopt standards under § 23-17-508, issue permits under § 23-17-510, or require the payment of fees under § 23-17-511.
- This section does not restrict the authority of the Arkansas Department of Transportation over the location of a facility in a right-of-way controlled by the department.
History. Acts 2019, No. 797, § 1; 2019, No. 999, § 1.
Chapter 18 Light, Heat, And Power Utilities
Research References
ALR.
Exemption from sales or use tax of water, oil, gas, other fuel, or electricity provided for residential purposes. 15 A.L.R.4th 269.
Validity of preferential utility rates for elderly or low-income persons. 29 A.L.R.4th 615.
Placement, maintenance, or design of standing utility pole as affecting private utility's liability for personal injury resulting from vehicle's collision with pole within or beside highway. 51 A.L.R.4th 602.
Liability of electric utility to nonpatron for interruption or failure of power. 54 A.L.R.4th 667.
Public utility's right to recover cost of nuclear power plants abandoned before completion. 83 A.L.R.4th 183.
Public service commission's implied authority to order refund of public utility revenues. 41 A.L.R.5th 783.
Liability of owners of wires, poles, or structures struck by aircraft for resulting injuries or damage. 49 A.L.R.5th 659.
Constitutionality, construction, and application of state and local public-utility gross-receipts-tax statutes — modern cases. 58 A.L.R.5th 187.
Am. Jur. 27A Am. Jur. 2d, Energy and Power Sources, § 143 et seq.
C.J.S. 29 C.J.S., Electricity, § 1 et seq.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Cross References. Tax exemption for electricity to low-income households, § 26-52-416.
Effective Dates. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 71: approved Apr. 2, 1935. Emergency clause provided: “It is found that the statutes of this state for the regulation of public utilities are insufficient, inadequate, and do not afford to the public, or the public utilities, of the state, speedy and adequate relief from excessive or insufficient rates, and that many of the rates of public utilities operating in this state are not what they should be, thereby entailing a grave injustice on the public or the utilities; and that this act is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety; an emergency is therefore declared and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.”
Acts 1957, No. 103, § 5: Feb. 27, 1957. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby ascertained and determined by the General Assembly that certain areas near incorporated cities and towns are in urgent need of additional electric facilities and in order to encourage the immediate construction of the necessary electric facilities and for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety this Act shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and approval.”
Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Acts 1985, No. 328, § 7: Mar. 12, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Commission's ability to regulate public power utilities will be substantially impaired unless all matters relating to construction of power generating facilities outside this State are approved by said Commission and, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its approval and passage.”
Acts 1985, No. 918, § 7: Apr. 15, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the commission's ability to regulate public power utilities will be substantially impaired unless all matters relating to construction of power generating facilities outside this State are approved by said Commission and, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its approval and passage.”
Acts 2001, No. 324, §§ 4, 6: effective Oct. 1, 2003 by their own terms.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 20: Feb. 20, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-third General Assembly that the timetable established by the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 for its implementation does not offer enough time to properly implement the act; that this act modifies that timetable to provide for adequate time for the implementation; that some provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 will go into effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is designed to postpone those implementation dates; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act will not go into effect until after provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act are already effective which would result in confusion, if not chaos. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2007, No. 648, § 2: Mar. 28, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the rates paid by customers of public utilities have been affected and will continue to be affected in a manner that is burdensome to the families of Arkansas and harmful to economic development because of the actions of public utilities and that the Arkansas Public Service Commission needs to be immediately authorized to require public utilities to withdraw from system wide planning in order to protect Arkansas customers from higher public utility costs. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2015, No. 1002, § 4: Apr. 2, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that some actions by a governmental unit reduce the value of real property; that the property owners now are not being compensated for that reduction in value; and that this act is immediately necessary because the inequity needs to be eliminated as soon as possible. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Utilities, 8 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 611.
23-18-101. Areas of service.
- Notwithstanding any provisions of law or the terms of any certificate of convenience and necessity, franchise, permit, license, or other authority granted to a public utility or electric cooperative corporation by the state or a municipality, no public utility or electric cooperative corporation shall furnish or offer to furnish electric service at retail and not for resale in any area allocated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission to another electric cooperative corporation or public utility.
- No later than ninety (90) days after February 21, 2003, the commission shall commence a rulemaking proceeding to identify and to repeal or amend all rules adopted by the commission to facilitate, or in anticipation of, retail electric competition that are inconsistent with, have been rendered unnecessary by, or have been superseded by this act.
History. Acts 1935, No. 324, § 41; Pope's Dig., § 2104; Acts 1957, No. 103, § 3; 1967, No. 234, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-240; 2003, No. 204, § 10; 2019, No. 315, § 2470.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2003 amendment inserted the subsection (a) designation and added (b).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 2003, No. 204, codified as §§ 4-9-102, 4-9-109, 4-9-301, 23-2-304, 23-3-102, 23-3-201, 23-4-209, 23-18-subch. 1 note, 23-18-101, 23-18-103, 23-18-104, 23-18-106, 23-18-107, 23-18-511, 23-18-519.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission correctly refused jurisdiction to decide whether this section violates the antimonopoly provision in Ark. Const., Art. 2, § 19. Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992), aff'd, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
Petitioner could challenge the constitutionality of this statute in a declaratory judgment action. Lincoln v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 40 Ark. App. 27, 842 S.W.2d 51 (1992), aff'd, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
Complaint Properly Dismissed.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission did not err in dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a complaint attempting to declare this section unconstitutional. Lincoln v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 313 Ark. 295, 854 S.W.2d 330 (1993).
Distribution of Electricity.
Arkansas follows the “place and purpose of use” analysis rather than place of delivery of electric current in cases involving distribution of electricity in exclusive service areas. Great Lakes Carbon Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 31 Ark. App. 54, 788 S.W.2d 243 (1990).
Where the place and purpose of the use of the electricity to be consumed by the plaintiff was by facilities located wholly within an electric cooperative corporation's territory, that undisputed fact alone, in light of this section, required that the electric cooperative corporation be afforded the opportunity to furnish electrical service to the plaintiff. Great Lakes Carbon Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 31 Ark. App. 54, 788 S.W.2d 243 (1990).
Implied Repeal.
This section was not impliedly repealed by § 14-116-401 since the purpose of that section was to enable cooperation with federal programs to provide a means of water distribution through publicly created nonprofit bodies. Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp., 261 Ark. 919, 554 S.W.2d 308 (1977).
Municipal Utilities.
This section did not apply to prevent a municipal utility from taking facilities, customers, and property in an area annexed by a city, as a municipality or a municipal improvement district is not a “public utility” within the meaning of the statute. Craighead Elec. Coop. Corp. v. City Water & Light Plant, 278 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002).
Right Exclusive.
Court's finding that the water company had a certificate of convenience and necessity giving it the exclusive right to sell water in its allocated territory was supported by a great preponderance of the evidence. City of Van Buren v. 64-71 Highway Water Co., 270 Ark. 466, 605 S.W.2d 419 (1980).
Cited: Summers Appliance Co. v. George's Gas Co., 244 Ark. 113, 424 S.W.2d 171 (1968).
23-18-102. Agreements between rural cooperatives and other electric suppliers permitted.
Nothing in this section or §§ 23-3-201, 23-18-101, 23-18-301, 23-18-308, or 23-18-331 shall be construed to prohibit or prevent a rural electric cooperative corporation and another supplier of electric service from entering into and carrying out a voluntary agreement for the exchange of facilities.
History. Acts 1957, No. 103, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-240.1.
23-18-103. Purchase of electricity from affiliated company — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “Affiliated company” means any business entity which is owned wholly or partly by an electric utility or which wholly or partly owns an electric utility, or any business entity which is owned by another business entity which wholly or partly owns an electric utility; and
- “Electric utility” means an electric utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- Without the prior approval of the commission, no electric utility shall enter into any agreement for the purchase of electricity from an affiliated company.
- Any agreement entered into in violation of this section shall be void.
- The commission shall promulgate such rules as are necessary to implement this section.
- This section shall apply to agreements entered into on or after June 28, 1985.
History. Acts 1985, No. 173, §§ 1-5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-278 — 73-278.4; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 7; 2001, No. 324, §§ 3, 4; 2003, No. 204, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2471.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 7, which repealed this section effective January 1, 2002, was repealed by Acts 2001, No. 324, § 3.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 4, which repealed this section effective October 1, 2003, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 204, § 4.
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (d).
23-18-104. Construction of power-generating facilities outside the state.
- No public utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall commence construction of any power-generating facility to be located outside the boundaries of this state without the express written approval of the commission.
- Any public utility proposing such construction shall render adequate written notice to the commission of its intent in order that the commission may conduct any germane inspection, investigation, public hearing, or take any other action deemed appropriate by the commission.
- Failure on the part of any public utility to obtain prior approval of the commission, as established in this section, shall constitute grounds for disallowance by the commission of all costs and expenses associated with the construction and subsequent operation of the facility when computing the utility's cost of service for purposes of any rate-making proceedings.
- Any electric utility which does not own in whole or in part another electric utility and which is not owned in whole or in part by a holding company and which derives less than twenty-five percent (25%) of its total revenues from Arkansas customers is exempt from the provisions of this section.
History. Acts 1985, No. 328, §§ 1-4; 1985, No. 918, §§ 1-4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-279 — 73-279.3; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 8; 2001, No. 324, §§ 5, 6; 2003, No. 204, § 5.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 8, which repealed this section effective January 1, 2002, was repealed by Acts 2001, No. 324, § 5.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 6, which repealed this section effective October 1, 2003, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 204, § 5.
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
23-18-105. Use of Arkansas-mined coal.
-
To the extent that it is technically, economically, and environmentally feasible, all electric utilities in Arkansas providing electric power for sale to consumers in Arkansas and generating electric power from coal-fired plants located in Arkansas shall burn a mixture of coal that contains a minimum of:
- Three percent (3%) Arkansas-mined coal as calculated on a British Thermal Unit (BTU) basis from January 1, 1988, until December 31, 1988;
- Six percent (6%) Arkansas-mined coal as calculated on a British Thermal Unit (BTU) basis from January 1, 1989, until December 31, 1989; and
- Ten percent (10%) Arkansas-mined coal as calculated on a British Thermal Unit (BTU) basis each calendar year after January 1, 1990.
-
-
- No electric utility shall be required to comply with this section if to do so would result in increasing the cost of electricity to its consumers over the cost incurred to serve them under existing or alternative coal purchase arrangements.
-
Types of increased costs to be considered in addition to the cost of the coal include, but are not limited to:
- Plant modifications;
- Additional coal-handling facilities;
- Additional environmental cost necessary to burn Arkansas coal; or
- Any other costs or penalties which may be incurred as a result of burning Arkansas coal.
- No public utility shall be required to comply with this section if to do so would result in the utility exceeding any of its state or federal air quality emission standards or any other conditions of its environmental permits.
- No public utility shall be required to comply with the provisions of this section if to do so would result in the utility being unable to fulfill any existing contractual commitments for the purchase of coal or result in the purchase of a quantity of Arkansas coal above the amount the utility can utilize.
-
- It shall be the responsibility of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to enforce compliance with the requirements of this section.
History. Acts 1987, No. 553, §§ 1-3.
23-18-106. Regulation of resource planning, asset acquisition, and alternative retail services.
-
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have the authority to adopt rules under which electric utilities shall seek commission review and approval of the processes, actions, and plans by which the utilities:
- Engage in comprehensive resource planning;
- Acquire electric energy, capacity, and generation assets; or
- Utilize alternative methods to meet their obligations to serve Arkansas retail electric customers.
- With regard to electric cooperatives formed under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., to the extent that an electric distribution cooperative purchases electricity from an electric generation and transmission cooperative pursuant to a wholesale power contract, the authority granted to the commission by subdivisions (a)(1) and (2) of this section shall not extend to the electric distribution cooperative to the extent of such purchases but shall only extend to the electric generation and transmission cooperative.
- Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to any transaction involving the acquisition of generation assets, which is closed and finalized prior to the adoption of the rules authorized in subsection (a) of this section, or within one (1) year after February 21, 2003, whichever comes later, and which is the subject of an order or ruling of any federal or state regulatory agency issued on or before January 1, 2003.
-
-
- Reasonable and prudent costs incurred in compliance with subsection (a) of this section and in compliance with the provisions of § 23-3-201 et seq. and the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, § 23-18-501 et seq., shall be eligible for recovery in the rates of any electric utility making such an acquisition, subject to final approval by the commission.
- When the utility establishes that the costs were incurred in compliance with subsection (a) of this section, a rebuttable presumption is established that the costs were reasonable and prudent and incurred in the public interest.
- Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of § 23-4-103.
-
-
The commission may require an electric public utility that is owned by a public utility holding company, as defined by section 1262 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, and engages in centralized system-wide resource planning to withdraw from centralized system-wide resource planning if:
- The commission determines that centralized system-wide resource planning is not in the public interest; and
- The electric public utility's withdrawal from centralized system-wide resource planning is not otherwise prohibited by law.
History. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 11; 2007, No. 648, § 1; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2472, 2473.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the introductory language of (a) and in (c).
U.S. Code. Section 1262 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, referred to in this section, is compiled as 42 U.S.C. § 16451.
23-18-107. Ratemaking policies for cost of acquisition or construction of incremental resources.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission may adopt ratemaking policies appropriate to allow utilities to recover from their customers the reasonable and prudent costs and a reasonable return associated with the acquisition or construction by electric utilities of incremental resources.
- Nothing in this section shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of § 23-4-103.
History. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 11.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Cross References. Rates, rules, and regulations to be reasonable, § 23-4-103.
23-18-108. Eminent domain for transmission lines — Market value — Definition.
-
As used in this section, “electric utility” means an electric utility that:
- Is not a municipally owned utility system;
- Is under the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- Primarily transmits electricity and does not generate or distribute electricity; and
- Has not been directed or designated to construct an electric transmission facility by a regional transmission organization.
- If an electric utility acquires land from a private property owner through eminent domain for purposes of a transmission line, then the electric utility shall compensate the private property owner at three (3) times the market value of the property taken by eminent domain.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1002, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2015, No. 1002, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings.
“The General Assembly finds that:
“(1) From time to time, state and local regulatory programs have the effect of reducing the market value of private property;
“(2) When state and local regulatory programs reduce the market value of private property and do not abate through their implementation a public nuisance affecting the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare, it is fair and appropriate that the state or the locality compensate the property owner for the loss in market value of the property caused by the implementation of the regulatory program;
“(3) Compensation to the property owner is also fair and appropriate in cases involving regulatory programs that abate a public nuisance when the property owner did not contribute to the public nuisance, did not acquire the property knowing of the public nuisance, or did not acquire the property under circumstances in which the property owner should have known about the public nuisance based upon prevailing community standards; and
“(4) In order to establish a fair and equitable compensation system to address these stated public policy concerns and findings, the General Assembly should establish a compensation system.”
23-18-109. Power purchase agreement — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “Power purchase agreement” means an agreement between a generator of electricity and a utility for the sale of electricity, generation capacity, or ancillary products to the utility; and
- “Utility” means an electric utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- A utility may enter into a power purchase agreement.
-
A utility shall not enter into a power purchase agreement for a term of more than five (5) years or recover the cost of the power purchase agreement in rates unless the commission finds that:
- The cost of the power purchase agreement is reasonable and prudent;
- The power purchase agreement will provide savings for retail customers as compared to other generation and power supply options over the term of the power purchase agreement;
- The power purchase agreement is required by public convenience and necessity;
- The power purchase agreement is necessary to supplement or replace the utility's existing generation sources; and
- Approval of the power purchase agreement is in the public interest.
- After making the findings required under subsection (c) of this section, the commission may enter an order approving the power purchase agreement and providing for the utility to recover the costs of the power purchase agreement over the term of the power purchase agreement.
-
-
- If the commission approves a power purchase agreement under this section, the commission may authorize the utility to recover an additional sum as determined by the commission in recognition of the unique characteristics of the power purchase agreement if the commission finds that including the additional sum is in the public interest.
- However, an additional sum is not appropriate if the generator party to the power purchase agreement is an affiliate of the utility.
-
In determining the additional sum allowed under subdivision (e)(1) of this section, the commission may consider:
- The risks of the power purchase agreement;
- A commensurate return on the power purchase agreement as would be allowed for an equivalent investment in a power plant;
-
- An equitable sharing of any savings between the utility and the retail customers of the utility.
- However, the retail customers' share shall not be less than seventy-five percent (75%); and
-
Any other reasonable mechanisms for determining the additional sum that:
- Are in the public interest;
- Equitably balance the interests of the utility and the retail customers of the utility; and
- Provide results that are comparable to the criteria described in subdivision (e)(2)(B) or subdivision (e)(2)(C) of this section.
- If the commission authorizes an additional sum under this subsection, the utility shall recover the additional sum over the entire term of the power purchase agreement in the same manner as it recovers the cost of the power purchase agreement as long as electricity, generation capacity, or ancillary products are being delivered in accordance with the terms of the power purchase agreement.
-
- This section does not apply to an electric cooperative corporation established under the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq.
History. Acts 2015, No. 1088, § 1.
Subchapter 2 — Electric Cooperatives Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Research References
Am. Jur. 27A Am. Jur. 2d, Energy and Power Sources, §§ 134, 150.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Mathews, Corporate Statutes—Which One Applies?, 13 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
23-18-201. Jurisdiction of commission generally.
Electric cooperative corporations generating, manufacturing, purchasing, acquiring, transmitting, distributing, selling, furnishing, and disposing of electric power and energy in this state pursuant to the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, § 23-18-301 et seq., shall be subject to the general jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission in the same manner and to the same extent as provided by law for the regulation, supervision, or control of public utilities except as provided in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1967, No. 234, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.1.
Case Notes
Wholesale Rates.
The Public Service Commission's assertion of jurisdiction over the wholesale rates charged by a customer-owned rural power cooperative to its member retail distributors does not offend either the Supremacy Clause or the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution nor was such state regulation preempted by the Federal Power Act or the Rural Electrification Act. Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
23-18-202. Jurisdiction of commission — Exemptions.
- The jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall not extend to loans made or guaranteed by the Rural Electrification Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture [superseded], the Federal Financing Bank, or such other agency or instrumentality as may be established by the United States Government for those purposes, nor shall it extend to loans made or guaranteed by the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation.
- No approval shall be required from the commission for borrowings, loan contracts, notes, mortgages, or guarantees to which the Rural Electrification Administration, the Federal Financing Bank, or such other agency or instrumentality described above, or the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation or CoBank ACB is a party, nor shall approval be required for borrowings, loan contracts, notes, mortgages, or guarantees from other public or private sources which are secured by a mortgage held in common with or guaranteed by the Rural Electrification Administration, the Federal Financing Bank, or such other agency or instrumentality described above, or the National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation or CoBank ACB.
History. Acts 1967, No. 234, § 2; 1981, No. 353, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.2; Acts 2009, No. 789, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Rural Electrification Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture, referred to in this section, has been superseded by the Rural Utilities Service of the United States Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-354.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted “or CoBank ACB” in two places in (b).
Case Notes
Utility Rates.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission was not bound to set rates based on the contract between the telephone company and the Rural Electrification Administration (REA); otherwise, any utility could, by simply contracting with the REA, divest the Arkansas Public Service Commission of control over utility rates. Walnut Hill Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 17 Ark. App. 259, 709 S.W.2d 96 (1986).
23-18-203. Commission rules shall not conflict with United States Government regulations.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall make no rules affecting electric cooperative corporations in matters of accounting, recordkeeping, or fiscal management in conflict with regulations which have been, or shall be, promulgated by the Administrator of the Rural Electrification Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture [superseded] or such other agency or instrumentality described in § 23-18-202.
History. Acts 1967, No. 234, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-202.3; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2474.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Rural Electrification Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture, referred to in this section, has been superseded by the Rural Utilities Service of the United States Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-354.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the section heading and in the section.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375, 103 S. Ct. 1905, 76 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1983).
Subchapter 3 — Electric Cooperative Corporation Act
Cross References. Liability for torts, § 4-30-118.
Effective Dates. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 38: approved Mar. 25, 1937. Emergency clause provided: “It is determined that there are many rural areas in this state that are now without electric energy, and the passage of this act will permit farmers in these areas to secure electric energy. It is therefore determined that the passage of this act is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of a large number of residents in this state, and an emergency is declared to exist and this act shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.”
Acts 1955, No. 32, § 2: Feb. 3, 1955. Emergency clause provided: “There is need for additional electric, generation, transmission and distribution facilities within the State of Arkansas and in order to encourage the construction of the necessary electric facilities and for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety this act shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and approval.”
Acts 1967, No. 234, § 8: July 1, 1967.
Acts 1989, No. 287, § 4: Mar. 1, 1989. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, enacted in 1987 establishes general standards for directors, defines director conflict of interest and permits directors to conduct meetings through the use of any means of communication; and that the Arkansas Business Corporation Act does not apply to a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in rural electrification; and that the adoption of standards for directors, the defining of director conflict of interest and the authority for directors to conduct meetings through the use of any means of communication would be in the best interest of the membership of a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in rural electrification; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1989, No. 288, § 4; Mar. 1, 1989. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, enacted in 1987, permits the indemnification of directors, officers, employees or agents of a corporation; and that the Arkansas Business Corporation Act does not apply to a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in rural electrification; and that the power to indemnify directors, officers, employees or agents would be in the best interest of the membership of a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in rural electrification. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and that this Act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2003, No. 334, § 2: Mar. 6, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that Arkansas law does not specifically exclude unclaimed capital credits of electric cooperatives from the laws governing unclaimed property; that the General Assembly has excluded the unclaimed capital credits of other cooperative organizations from the laws governing unclaimed property; that the obligation to report and deliver unclaimed capital credits places an undue economic burden on electric cooperative corporations and their members; and that this act is immediately necessary to relieve the electric cooperatives and their members of this financial burden. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 27A Am. Jur. 2d, Energy and Power Sources, §§ 134, 150.
23-18-301. Title.
This subchapter may be cited as the “Electric Cooperative Corporation Act”.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 2315; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1101.
23-18-302. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Acquire” means and includes to construct or acquire by purchase, lease, devise, gift, or other mode of acquisition;
- “Board” means a board of directors of a corporation organized under this subchapter;
- “Corporation” means a corporation organized pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter;
- “Federal agency” includes the United States and any department, administration, commission, board, bureau, office, establishment, agency, authority, or instrumentality of the United States;
- “Member” means the incorporators of a corporation and each person thereafter lawfully admitted to membership therein;
- “Obligations” includes bonds, notes, debentures, interim certificates or receipts, and all other evidences of indebtedness issued by a corporation; and
- “Person” includes any natural person, firm, association, corporation, business trust, partnership, federal agency, state or political subdivision thereof, or any body politic.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 2316; Acts 1955, No. 85, § 1; 1957, No. 103, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1102; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 11.
Publisher's Notes. As to the transfers of authority to and from the Department of Public Utilities and its subsequent abolition, see Publisher's Notes to Chapter 2 of this title.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment repealed (8), concerning the definition of “rural area.”
Case Notes
Construction with Other Laws.
A municipal utility could take facilities, customers, and property in an area annexed by a city, notwithstanding that former subdivision (8), now repealed, stood for the general proposition that an electric cooperative could not be ousted from its assigned area, as § 14-207-103 specifically allowed a municipal utility to condemn the facilities, distribution properties, and customers of an electric cooperative. Craighead Elec. Coop. Corp. v. City Water & Light Plant, 278 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002).
Rural Areas.
Authority of cooperative serving rural area adjacent to city expired as to that portion of rural area taken into city limits as result of expansion of city. Farmers Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 220 Ark. 652, 249 S.W.2d 837 (1952) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Cited: State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
23-18-303. Construction.
This subchapter shall be construed liberally. The enumeration of any object, purpose, power, manner, method, or thing shall not be deemed to exclude like or similar objects, purposes, powers, manners, methods, or things.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 35; Pope's Dig., § 2349; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1135.
23-18-304. Other laws inapplicable.
This subchapter is complete in itself and shall be controlling. The provisions of any other law of this state, except as provided in this subchapter, shall not apply to a corporation organized under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 37; Pope's Dig., § 2351; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1136.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Mathews, Corporate Statutes—Which One Applies?, 13 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 84.
23-18-305. Extension of subchapter to other corporations.
Any cooperative or nonprofit corporation or association organized under any other law of this state for the purpose of engaging in rural electrification and existing prior to the passage of this act may amend its articles of incorporation so as to comply with this subchapter by a majority vote of the members present in person or by proxy at a meeting called for that purpose.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 34; Pope's Dig., § 2348; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1134.
Publisher's Notes. In reference to the term “passage of this act,” Acts 1937, No. 342, § 38, provided that the act would be in full force and effect from and after its passage. The act was signed by the Governor on March 25, 1937.
23-18-306. Purposes of cooperatives.
-
Organization. Cooperative, nonprofit membership corporations may be organized under this subchapter for the purpose of any one (1) or more of the following:
- The furnishing of electricity to persons;
- Assisting in the wiring of the premises of persons in rural areas or the acquisition, supply, or installation of electrical or plumbing equipment therein; and
- The furnishing of electricity, wiring facilities, or electrical or plumbing equipment or services to any other corporation organized under this subchapter or to the members thereof.
- Powers. Once properly organized pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, a corporation may engage in any other lawful business activity directly or through one (1) or more affiliates, which its board of directors determines to be beneficial to its members or nonmembers.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 2317; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1103; 1999, No. 1556, § 12.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 19, provided:
“Nothing in Arkansas Code § 23-19-104, as added by this Act, or Sections 11 through 16 of this act shall affect any litigation pending on the effective date of this act.”
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (b); substituted “electricity” for “electric energy” in (a)(1) and (a)(3); added “Organization” as the catchline in (a); in (a), deleted “engaging in rural electrification by” following “purpose of” and “methods” following “following” at the end; deleted “in rural areas who are not receiving central station service” following “persons” in (a)(1); and made stylistic changes.
Case Notes
Legislative Intent.
While it was the legislative intent that the corporation should operate without profits to its members, it was nonetheless contemplated that the corporation should make and collect charges against its individual members, in the nature of rates, fees or rents, for electric energy sufficient for the corporation's equipment and to keep it in operation. McCarroll v. Ozark Rural Elec. Coop. Corp., 201 Ark. 329, 146 S.W.2d 693 (1940).
23-18-307. Powers of corporation.
Each corporation shall have power:
- To sue and be sued, complain, and defend in its corporate name;
- To have perpetual succession unless a limited period of duration is stated in its articles of incorporation;
- To adopt a corporate seal which may be altered at pleasure and to use it or a facsimile thereof, as required by law;
- To generate, manufacture, purchase, acquire, accumulate, transmit, distribute, sell, furnish, and dispose of electric power and energy;
- To construct, erect, purchase, lease as lessee, and in any manner acquire, own, hold, maintain, operate, sell, dispose of, lease as lessor, exchange, and mortgage plants, buildings, works, machinery, supplies, equipment, apparatus, and generation, transmission, and distribution facilities or systems as it deems necessary, convenient, or useful;
- To enter into sale or interchange agreements for surplus power and energy with any and all other persons, business entities, or public bodies or agencies. The electric power and energy may be resold at wholesale or retail and may be sold or disposed of by the other party to the agreement as provided in the contract or agreement;
- To assist its members only to wire their premises and install therein electrical and plumbing fixtures, machinery, supplies, apparatus, and equipment of any and all kinds and character. In connection therewith and for such purposes, each such corporation may purchase, acquire, lease, sell, distribute, install, and repair electrical and plumbing fixtures, machinery, supplies, apparatus, and equipment of any and all kinds and character and receive, acquire, endorse, pledge, hypothecate, and dispose of notes, bonds, and other evidences of indebtedness;
- To furnish to other corporations organized under this subchapter, or to the members thereof, electric energy, wiring facilities, and electrical and plumbing equipment and services convenient or useful;
- To acquire, own, hold, use, exercise, and, to the extent permitted by law, to sell, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, and in any manner dispose of franchises, rights, privileges, licenses, rights-of-way, and easements necessary, useful, or appropriate;
- To purchase, receive, lease as lessee, or in any other manner acquire, own, hold, maintain, sell, exchange, and use any and all real and personal property or any interest therein;
- To borrow money and otherwise contract indebtedness, to issue its obligations therefor, and to secure the payment thereof by mortgage, pledge, or deed of trust of all or any of its property, assets, franchises, revenues, or income;
- To sell and convey, mortgage, pledge, lease as lessor, and otherwise dispose of all or any part of its property and assets;
- In connection with the acquisition, construction, improvement, operation, or maintenance of its lines, to use any highway or any right-of-way, easement, or other similar property right, or any tax-forfeited land owned or held by the state or any political subdivison thereof;
- To have and exercise the right of eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring rights-of-way and other properties necessary or useful in the construction or operation of its properties and in the manner now provided by the condemnation laws of this state for acquiring private property for public use;
- To accept gifts or grants of money, services, or property, real or personal;
- To make any and all contracts necessary or convenient for the exercise of the powers granted in this subchapter;
- To fix, regulate, and collect rates, fees, rents, or other charges for electric energy and any other facilities, supplies, equipment, or services furnished by the corporation;
- To conduct its business and have offices within or without this state;
- To elect or appoint officers, agents, and employees of the corporation and to define their duties and fix their compensation;
- To make and alter bylaws, not inconsistent with the articles of incorporation or with the laws of this state, for the administration and regulation of the affairs of the corporation;
- To do and perform, either for itself or its members, or for any other corporation organized under this subchapter, or for the members thereof, any and all acts and things, and to have and exercise any and all powers as may be necessary, convenient, or appropriate to effectuate the purpose for which the corporation is organized;
-
-
- To indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against judgments, fines, expenses, including attorney's fees, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with such action, suit, or proceeding, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
- The termination of any action, suit, or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful; and
- A corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise against expenses, including attorney's fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which the person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the circuit court or the court in which the action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the circuit court or such other court shall deem proper.
- To the extent that a director, officer, employee, or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit, or proceeding referred to in subdivisions (22)(A) and (B) of this section, or in defense of any claim, issue, or matter therein, he or she shall be indemnified against expenses, including attorney's fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection therewith.
-
Any indemnification under subdivisions (22)(A) and (B) of this section, unless ordered by a court, shall be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee, or agent is proper in the circumstances because he or she has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in subdivisions (22)(A) and (B) of this section. Such a determination shall be made:
- By the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit, or proceeding;
- If such a quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or
- By the members.
- Expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of final disposition of such an action, suit, or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in this section. Such expenses incurred by other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the board of directors deems appropriate.
- The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by or granted pursuant to the other subsections of this section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of members or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in his or her official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such an office.
- A corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise against any liability asserted against him or her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him or her against such liability under the provisions of this section.
- Unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, the indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this section shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee, or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of the person.
-
-
For purposes of this section, references to:
- “The corporation” shall include, in addition to the resulting corporation and constituent corporation, including any constituent of a constituent, absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers, and employees or agents so that any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the constituent corporation or is or was serving at the request of the constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under the provisions of this section with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as he or she would have with respect to the constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued;
- “Other enterprises” shall include employee benefit plans;
- “Fines” shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to an employee benefit plan; and
- “Serving at the request of the corporation” shall include any service as a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, the director, officer, employee, or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries.
- A person who acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner “not opposed to the best interests of the corporation” as referred to in this section; and
-
For purposes of this section, references to:
-
- To engage in any lawful business activity.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 2318; Acts 1955, No. 32, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1104; Acts 1989, No. 288, § 1; 1999, No. 1556, §§ 13-15.
Publisher's Notes. Subdivision (22)(I)(i) (a) is set out above exactly as enacted.
Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 19, provided:
“Nothing in Arkansas Code § 23-19-104, as added by this Act, or Sections 11 through 16 of this act shall affect any litigation pending on the effective date of this act.”
Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote (4) and (6); and added (23).
Case Notes
Liability.
Where the electric cooperative had properly construed its wires, it was not liable for interference by induction caused to antiquated telephone system. Ozarks Rural Elec. Co-op. Corp. v. Oliphant, 201 Ark. 234, 144 S.W.2d 41 (1940).
Sales to Federal Agencies.
Electric cooperative corporation cannot sell electricity to federal agency, since federal agency is not a member of a cooperative. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co., 221 Ark. 638, 255 S.W.2d 674 (1953) (decision prior to 1955 amendment).
Cited: McCastlain v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 243 Ark. 506, 420 S.W.2d 893 (1967).
23-18-308. Jurisdiction of commission.
All corporations organized under this subchapter shall be in all respects subject to the jurisdiction, supervision, regulation, and control of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to the same extent and in the same manner as a public utility, except as otherwise specifically provided by law.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 31; Pope's Dig., § 2345; Acts 1955, No. 85, § 2; 1957, No. 103, § 2; 1967, No. 234, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1131.
Case Notes
Cited: Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939); State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
23-18-309. Incorporators.
Any three (3) or more natural persons of the age of twenty-one (21) or more, residents of this state, may act as incorporators of a corporation to be organized under this subchapter by executing articles of incorporation as provided in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 2319; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1105.
Case Notes
Cited: State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
23-18-310. Cooperative names.
The words “electric cooperative” shall not be used in the corporate name of corporations organized under the laws of this state, or authorized to do business in this state, other than those organized pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 2321; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1107.
23-18-311. Articles of incorporation.
-
The articles of incorporation shall state:
- The name of the corporation. The name shall include the words “Electric Cooperative” and the word “Corporation”, “Incorporated”, “Inc.”, or “Company”. The name of the corporation shall be such as to distinguish it from any other corporation organized and existing under the laws of this state;
- The purpose for which the corporation is formed;
- The names and addresses of the incorporators who shall serve as directors and manage the affairs of the corporation until its first annual meeting of members, or until their successors are elected and qualify;
- The number of directors, not fewer than three (3), to be elected at the annual meetings of members;
- The address of its principal office and the name and address of its agent upon whom process may be served;
- The period of duration of the corporation, which may be perpetual;
- The terms and conditions upon which persons shall be admitted to membership and retain membership in the corporation, but if expressly so stated, the determination of such matters may be reserved to the directors by the bylaws; and
- Any provisions, not inconsistent with law, which the incorporators may choose to insert for the regulation of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the corporation.
- It shall not be necessary to set forth in the articles of incorporation any of the corporate powers enumerated in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 2320; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1106.
Case Notes
Principal Offices.
Electric cooperative corporation which by its articles designated certain county as its “principal office” and did maintain an office there was entitled to file suit in that county for damages to its truck even though it maintained another office in another county where articles had never been amended for purpose of changing its official residence though such action had been contemplated. Woodruff Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Weis Butane Gas Co., 221 Ark. 686, 255 S.W.2d 420 (1953).
23-18-312. Articles of incorporation — Execution — Filing and recording.
- The original copy of the articles of incorporation shall be signed by the incorporators and acknowledged before any officer authorized by the law of this state to acknowledge the execution of deeds and conveyances.
- The original copy of the articles of incorporation shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State.
-
If the Secretary of State finds that the articles of incorporation conform to law and when the fees prescribed by this subchapter have been paid, he or she shall:
- Endorse on the original copy the word “FILED”, and the month, day, and year of the filing thereof;
- File the original in his or her office; and
- Issue a certificate of incorporation to the incorporators.
- The incorporators shall file for recording a certified copy of the articles of incorporation in the office of the county clerk in the county in which the principal office of the corporation in this state is located.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 2322; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1108.
23-18-313. Articles of incorporation — Amendment.
-
- A corporation may amend its articles of incorporation by a majority vote of the members who are present in person or by proxy at any regular meeting or at any special meeting of its members called for that purpose.
- The power to amend shall include the power to accomplish any desired change in the provisions of its articles of incorporation and to include any purpose, power, or provision which would be authorized to be included in original articles of incorporation if executed at the time the amendment is made.
-
- Articles of amendment signed by the president or vice president and attested by the secretary certifying to the amendment and its lawful adoption shall be executed, acknowledged, filed, and recorded in the same manner as the original articles of incorporation of a corporation organized under this subchapter.
- As soon as the Secretary of State has accepted the articles of amendment for filing and recording and issued a certificate of amendment, the amendment shall be in effect.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 26; Pope's Dig., § 2340; Acts 1953, No. 198, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1126.
Case Notes
Cited: Woodruff Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Weis Butane Gas Co., 221 Ark. 686, 255 S.W.2d 420 (1953).
23-18-314. Certificate of incorporation.
- Upon the issuance of a certificate of incorporation by the Secretary of State, the corporate existence of the corporation shall begin.
- The certificate of incorporation shall be conclusive evidence, except as against the state, that all conditions precedent required to be performed by the incorporators have been complied with and that the corporation has been incorporated under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 9; Pope's Dig., § 2323; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1109.
23-18-315. Correction of defects of organization.
In the event any corporation has filed defective articles of incorporation or has failed to do all things necessary to perfect its corporate organization, it nevertheless may file corrected articles of incorporation or amend the original articles and do and perform all acts and things necessary in the premises for the correction of such defects. The action so taken shall be valid and binding upon all persons concerned. The capacity of the corporation to file corrected articles of incorporation or amendments to the original articles or to do and perform all acts and things necessary in the premises shall not be questioned.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 33; Pope's Dig., § 2347; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1133.
23-18-316. Organizational meeting — Notice.
- After the issuance of the certificate of incorporation, an organizational meeting shall be held at the call of a majority of the incorporators for the purpose of adopting bylaws and electing officers and for the transaction of such other business as properly may come before the meeting.
- The incorporators calling the meeting shall give at least three (3) days' notice thereof by mail to each incorporator. This notice shall state the time and place of the meeting, but notice may be waived in writing.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 10; Pope's Dig., § 2324; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1110.
23-18-317. Bylaws.
- The power to make, alter, amend, or repeal the bylaws of the corporation shall be vested in the board of directors.
- The bylaws may contain any provisions for the regulation and management of the affairs of the corporation not inconsistent with law or the articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 2325; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1111.
23-18-318. Members.
-
- All persons proposed to be served by a corporation shall be eligible to membership in a corporation.
- No person other than the incorporators shall be, become, or remain a member of a corporation unless the person shall use or agree to use electric energy or, as the case may be, the facilities, supplies, equipment, and services furnished by a corporation.
- A corporation organized under this subchapter may become a member of another such corporation and may avail itself fully of the facilities and services thereof.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 12; Pope's Dig., § 2326; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1112; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 16.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 19, provided that:
“Nothing in Arkansas Code § 23-19-104, as added by this Act, or Sections 11 through 16 of this act shall affect any litigation pending on the effective date of this act.”
Amendments. The 1999 amendment, in (a)(1), deleted “in rural areas” following “persons” and “who are not receiving central station service” following “corporation.”
Case Notes
Directors.
A person who uses the services furnished by the corporation is qualified as a director under § 23-18-321. State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
Federal Agencies.
Electric cooperative corporation cannot sell electricity to federal agency, since federal agency is not a member of a cooperative. Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co., 221 Ark. 638, 255 S.W.2d 674 (1953) (decision prior to 1955 amendment to § 23-18-307).
23-18-319. Certificate of membership.
- When a member of a corporation has paid the membership fee in full, a certificate of membership shall be issued to the member.
- Memberships in the corporation and the certificates shall be nontransferable.
- The certificate of membership shall be surrendered to the corporation upon the resignation, expulsion, or death of the member.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 16; Pope's Dig., § 2330; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1116.
23-18-320. Meetings of members.
- Meetings of members may be held at such place as may be provided in the bylaws. In the absence of any such provision, all meetings shall be held in the principal office of the corporation in this state.
- An annual meeting of the members shall be held at such time as may be provided in the bylaws. Failure to hold the annual meeting at the designated time shall not work forfeiture or dissolution of the corporation.
- Special meetings of the members may be called by the president, by the board of directors, by a petition signed by not less than one-tenth (1/10) of all the members, or by such other officers or persons as may be provided in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws.
-
- Written or printed notice stating the place, day, and hour of the meeting of members and, in the case of a special meeting, the purposes for which the meeting is called shall be delivered not fewer than (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, by or at the direction of the president or the secretary or the officers or persons calling the meeting, to each member of record entitled to vote at the meeting. If mailed, the notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited into the United States mails in a sealed envelope addressed to the member at his or her address as it appears on the records of the corporation with postage thereon prepaid.
- Notice of meetings of members may be waived in writing.
- Each member present shall be entitled to one (1) and only one (1) vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of members, but voting by proxy or by mail may be provided for in the bylaws.
- Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws, a majority of the members present in person or represented by proxy shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of members, but if voting by mail is provided for in the bylaws, members so voting shall be counted as if present.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, §§ 13-15, 17; Pope's Dig., §§ 2327-2329, 2331; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1113 — 77-1115, 77-1117.
23-18-321. Board of directors.
-
- The business and affairs of a corporation shall be managed by a board of directors, not fewer than three (3) in number, which shall exercise all the powers of the corporation, except such as are conferred upon the members by this subchapter, by the articles of incorporation, or by the bylaws of the corporation.
-
A director shall discharge his or her duties as a director, including his or her duties as a member of a committee:
- In good faith;
- With the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and
- In a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation.
-
In discharging his or her duties, a director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:
- One (1) or more officers or employees of the corporation whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;
- Legal counsel, public accountants, engineers, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence; or
- A committee of the board of directors of which he or she is not a member if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
- A director is not acting in good faith if he or she has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted by subdivision (a)(3) of this section unwarranted.
- A director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to take any action, if he or she performed the duties of his or her office in compliance with this section.
- The bylaws may prescribe qualifications for directors.
- The directors shall be members of the corporation and shall be entitled to such compensation and reimbursement for expenses actually and necessarily incurred by them as may be provided in the bylaws.
- The directors, other than those named in the certificate of incorporation to serve until the first annual meeting of members, shall be elected annually, or as otherwise provided in the bylaws, by the members.
- Any vacancy occurring in the board and any directorship to be filled shall be filled, as provided in the bylaws, by persons who shall serve until directors may be regularly elected as provided for in this subchapter.
-
- Meetings of the board, regular or special, shall be held at such place and upon such notice as the bylaws may prescribe.
- Attendance of a director at any meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of the meeting, except where a director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.
- Neither the business to be transacted at nor the purpose of any regular or special meeting of the board of directors need be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of such a meeting.
- Unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, action required or permitted by this chapter to be taken at a board of directors' meeting may be taken without a meeting if the action is taken by all members of the board. The action must be evidenced by one (1) or more written consents describing the action taken, signed by each director, and included in the minutes or filed with the corporate records reflecting the action taken.
- Action taken under this section is effective when the last director signs the consent, unless the consent specifies a different effective date. A consent signed under this section has the effect of a meeting vote and may be described as such in any document.
-
- A majority of the board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business unless a greater number is required by the articles of incorporation or the bylaws.
- The act of the majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the board unless the act of a greater number is required by the articles of incorporation or the bylaws.
-
-
- A conflict-of-interest transaction is a transaction with the corporation in which a director of the corporation has direct or indirect interest.
-
A conflict-of-interest transaction is not voidable by the corporation solely because of the director's interest in the transaction if any one (1) of the following is true:
- The material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were disclosed or known to the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors and the board of directors or committee authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction;
- The material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were disclosed or known to the members entitled to vote and they authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction; or
- The transaction was fair to the corporation.
-
For purposes of this section, a director of the corporation has an indirect interest in a transaction and it should be considered by the board of directors of the corporation if:
- Another entity in which he or she has a material financial interest of, in which he or she is a general partner, is a party to the transaction; or
- Another entity of which he or she is a director, officer, or trustee, is a party to the transaction.
- For purposes of subdivision (h)(1)(A) of this section, a conflict-of-interest transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors on the board of directors or on the committee who have no direct or indirect interest in the transaction, but a transaction may not be authorized, approved, or ratified under this section by a single director. If a majority of the directors who have no direct or indirect interest in the transaction vote to authorize, approve, or ratify the transaction, a quorum is present for the purpose of taking action under this subsection. The presence of, or a vote cast by, a director with a direct or indirect interest in the transaction does not affect the validity of any action taken under subdivision (h)(1)(A) of this section if the transaction is otherwise authorized, approved, or ratified as provided in this subsection.
- For purposes of subdivision (h)(1)(B) of this section, a conflict-of-interest transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified if it receives the vote of a majority of the members entitled to vote under this subsection. Proxies voted under the control of a director who has a direct or indirect interest in the transaction, and proxies voted under the control of an entity described in subdivision (h)(2)(A) of this section may not be counted in a vote of members to determine whether to authorize, approve, or ratify a conflict-of-interest transaction under subdivision (h)(1)(B) of this section. The vote of those members, however, is counted in determining whether the transaction is approved under other sections of this chapter. A majority of the members, whether or not present, that are entitled to vote on the transaction under this subsection constitutes a quorum for the purpose of taking action under this section.
-
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, §§ 18-22; Pope's Dig., §§ 2332-2336; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 77-1118 — 77-1122; Acts 1989, No. 287, § 1.
Case Notes
Qualifications.
This section does not authorize members to adopt bylaws imposing limitations upon the qualifications of directors beyond the scope of the subchapter. State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
Directors who were members of corporation and who used the service of the corporation were qualified to serve notwithstanding that they resided in a community not served by the corporation where the bylaws provided that a director should be a “bona fide resident” of the area served. State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
23-18-322. Executive committee.
- Any corporation by its bylaws may provide for an executive committee to be elected from and by its board of directors.
- The management of the current and ordinary business of the corporation and such other duties as the bylaws may prescribe may be delegated to the committee, but the designation of the committee and the delegation thereto of authority shall not operate to relieve the board of directors, or any member thereof, of any responsibility imposed upon it or him or her by this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 24; Pope's Dig., § 2338; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1124.
23-18-323. Officers, agents, and employees.
- The board may elect from its number a chair, a secretary, and such vice chairpersons as it deems necessary. The powers, duties, term of office, and compensation shall be provided for in the bylaws.
-
- The board may appoint a chief executive officer, president, or manager, a treasurer, who may be the same person elected to the office of secretary, and such vice presidents as it deems necessary. The powers, duties, term of office, and compensation of the foregoing officers shall be provided for by the board of directors.
- The chief executive officer, president, or manager may be an elected member of the board or an ex officio member of the board as provided for in the bylaws. Such an officer may be a member of an executive committee, if one is created by the corporation and the officer is an elected member of the board. Otherwise, the officer may be an ex officio member of an executive committee as provided for in the bylaws.
- The board shall appoint such other officers, agents, and employees as it deems necessary and fix their powers, duties, and compensation.
- Any officer, agent, or employee elected or appointed by the board may be removed by it whenever in its judgment the best interests of the corporation will be served.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 23; Pope's Dig., § 2337; Acts 1981, No. 355, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1123.
23-18-324. Consolidation.
-
- Any two (2) or more corporations may enter into an agreement for the consolidation of the corporations.
- The agreement shall set forth the terms and conditions of the consolidation, the name of the proposed consolidated corporation, the number of its directors, not fewer than three (3), the time of the annual meeting and election, and the names of at least three (3) persons to be directors until the first annual meeting.
- If such an agreement is approved by the votes of a majority of the members of each corporation present in person or by proxy at any regular meeting or at any special meeting of its members called for that purpose, the directors named in the agreement shall sign and acknowledge as incorporators articles of consolidation conforming substantially to original articles of incorporation of a corporation organized under this subchapter.
-
- The articles of consolidation shall be executed, acknowledged, filed, and recorded in the same manner as the original articles of incorporation of a corporation organized under this subchapter.
- As soon as the Secretary of State shall have accepted the articles of consolidation for filing and recording and issued a certificate of consolidation, the proposed consolidated corporation, described in the articles under its designated name, shall be and become a body corporate, with all the powers of a corporation as originally organized under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 27; Pope's Dig., § 2341; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1127.
23-18-325. Dissolution.
- Any corporation may dissolve by majority vote of the members present in person or by proxy at any regular meeting or at any special meeting of its members called for that purpose.
- A certificate of dissolution shall be signed by the president or vice president and attested by the secretary certifying to the dissolution and stating that they have been authorized to execute and file the certificate by vote cast in person or by proxy by a majority of the members of the corporation.
- A certificate of dissolution shall be executed, acknowledged, filed, and recorded in the same manner as the original articles of incorporation of a corporation organized under this subchapter.
- As soon as the Secretary of State has accepted the certificate of dissolution for filing and recording and issued a certificate of dissolution, the corporation shall be deemed to be dissolved.
-
- However, the corporation shall continue for the purpose of paying, satisfying, and discharging any existing liabilities or obligations, collecting or liquidating its assets, and doing all other acts required to adjust and wind up its business and affairs. The corporation may sue and be sued in its corporate name.
- Any assets remaining after all liabilities or obligations of the corporation have been satisfied or discharged shall be distributed pro rata among the members of the corporation at the time of the filing of the certificate of dissolution.
-
- Any corporation which purports to have been incorporated or reincorporated under this subchapter but which has not complied with all of the requirements for legal corporate existence may nevertheless file a certificate of dissolution in the same manner as a validly existing corporation.
- The certificate of dissolution, in such a case, may be authorized by a majority of the incorporators or directors at a meeting called by any incorporator upon ten (10) days' notice mailed to the last known post office address of each incorporator or director and held at the principal office of the corporation named in the articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 28; Pope's Dig., § 2342; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1128.
23-18-326. Filing fees.
The Secretary of State shall charge and collect for:
- Filing articles of incorporation and issuing a certificate of incorporation — ten dollars ($10.00);
- Filing of articles of amendment and issuing a certificate of amendment — ten dollars ($10.00);
- Filing articles of consolidation and issuing a certificate with respect to consolidation — ten dollars ($10.00); and
- Filing articles of dissolution — one dollar ($1.00).
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 29; Pope's Dig., § 2343; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1129.
23-18-327. Nonprofit operation — Use of revenues.
-
Each corporation shall be operated without profit to its members, but the rates, fees, rents, or other charges for electric energy and any other facilities, supplies, equipment, or services furnished by the corporation shall be sufficient at all times:
- To pay all operating and maintenance expenses necessary or desirable for the prudent conduct of its business and the principal of and interest on the obligations issued or assumed by the corporation in the performance of the purpose for which it was organized; and
- For the creation of reserves.
- The revenues of the corporation shall be devoted first to the payment of operating and maintenance expenses and the principal and interest on outstanding obligations. Thereafter, the revenues shall be devoted to such reserves for improvement, new construction, depreciation, and contingencies as the board may from time to time prescribe.
- Revenues not required for the purposes set forth in subsection (b) of this section shall be returned from time to time to the members on a pro rata basis according to the amount of business done with each during the period either in cash, in abatement of current charges for electric energy, or otherwise as the board determines, but return may be made by way of general rate reduction to members if the board so elects.
- If a corporation organized under this subchapter declares a capital credit and any capital credit remains unclaimed after notice thereof was transmitted to the last known address of the beneficiary of the unclaimed capital credit, the unclaimed capital credit shall not be deemed unclaimed or abandoned property under § 18-28-201 et seq.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 25; Pope's Dig., § 2339; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1125; Acts 2003, No. 334, § 1.
Amendments. The 2003 amendment added (d).
Case Notes
Claim Dismissed for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies.
When an electric cooperative's customers alleged the utility failed to refund patronage capital to the customers, the customers' claims were properly dismissed due to the customers' failure to seek relief from the Arkansas Public Service Commission because (1) it was alleged that the cooperative violated a duty to pay capital credits “on a reasonable and systematic basis,” (2) the main relief sought was a refund of those credits, (3) the commission had primary jurisdiction over claims that the cooperative violated this section and was authorized by § 23-3-119(d) to order appropriate prospective relief, and (4) the customers' claims were not private damage claims based on tort, contract, or property law. Capps v. Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp., 2011 Ark. 48, 378 S.W.3d 148 (2011).
When an electric cooperative's customers who were Missouri residents alleged the utility failed to refund patronage capital to the customers, the customers' claims were properly dismissed due to the customers' failure to seek relief from the Arkansas Public Service Commission because (1) the customers did not allege a claim under Missouri law, and (2) the claims were based on an alleged failure of the cooperative to comply with Arkansas law, specifically this section. Capps v. Carroll Elec. Coop. Corp., 2011 Ark. 48, 378 S.W.3d 148 (2011).
23-18-328. Taxation.
Electric cooperative corporations organized and formed pursuant to this subchapter shall be subject to the provisions of the Arkansas Gross Receipts Act of 1941, § 26-52-101 et seq., and the Arkansas Compensating Tax Act of 1949, § 26-53-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1969, No. 119, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1130.1.
23-18-329. Annual license fee.
Corporations formed pursuant to this subchapter shall pay annually, on or before July 1, to the Secretary of State a fee of ten dollars ($10.00) for each one hundred (100) members or fraction thereof.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 30; Pope's Dig., § 2344; Acts 1941, No. 414, § 1; 1969, No. 119, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1130.
Case Notes
Cited: McCarroll v. Ozark Rural Elec. Coop. Corp., 201 Ark. 329, 146 S.W.2d 693 (1940); McCain v. Farmers Electric Co-operative Corp., 206 Ark. 15, 172 S.W.2d 933 (1943).
23-18-330. Exemptions from Arkansas Securities Act.
Whenever any corporation organized under this subchapter shall have borrowed money from any federal agency, the obligations issued to secure the payment of such money shall be exempt from the provisions of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq. The provisions of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq., shall not apply to the issuance of membership certificates by any corporation organized under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 32; Pope's Dig., § 2346; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1132; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 17.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “the Arkansas Securities Act, as amended. The provisions of the Arkansas Securities Act shall not apply to the issuance of membership certificates by any corporation organized under this subchapter” for “the Securities Act, Acts 1947, No. 397, as amended [repealed], neither shall the provisions of that act apply to the issuance of membership certificates” at the end; and made stylistic changes.
23-18-331. Service in incorporated areas.
-
- The inclusion by incorporation, annexation, or otherwise of any portion of a rural area assigned to corporations within the limits of an incorporated or unincorporated city, town, or village, regardless of its population, shall not in any respect impair or affect the rights of the corporations under their certificates of convenience and necessity to continue and extend electric service in the included areas.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the corporations shall be entitled to continue and extend service therein under the same terms and conditions as those contained in the franchise or indeterminate permit of any other supplier of electric service in the city, town, or village the same as though it were a party to the franchise or indeterminate permit.
-
- A corporation which serves an area within the limits of any municipality under the terms of this subchapter shall as to that area be subject in all respects to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to the same extent and in the same manner as it is subject to such jurisdiction in areas outside the limits of municipalities.
- Any such city, town, or village shall have the same authority to impose taxes, charges, or fees in respect to the business of a corporation conducted within the corporate limits of such city, town, or village as it has in respect to business conducted by other suppliers of electric service.
- Nothing in this section shall in any manner restrict or impair the right of any municipality to acquire, construct, expand, maintain, or operate any electric generation, transmission, or distribution facilities within the corporate limits of the city, town, or village in Arkansas as such limits may now exist or as such limits may exist upon the extension or expansion of the city limits of the city, town, or village.
History. Acts 1937, No. 342, § 31; Pope's Dig., § 2345; Acts 1955, No. 85, §§ 2, 3; 1957, No. 103, § 2; 1967, No. 234, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 77-1131; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 18.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1957, No. 103, § 4, provided that nothing in that act would be construed to prohibit or prevent a rural electric cooperative corporation and another supplier of electric service from entering into and carrying out a voluntary agreement for the exchange of facilities.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment deleted (c) and redesignated the remaining subsection accordingly; substituted “assigned to corporations” for “as defined in this subchapter” in (a)(1); in (b)(1), substituted “corporation” for “rural electric cooperative” and “it is subject to such jurisdiction in areas outside the limits of municipalities” for “a commercial electric utility serving within the municipality.”
Cross References. Agreements between cooperatives and other electric suppliers, § 23-18-102.
Other suppliers prohibited from furnishing electricity in areas served by cooperatives, § 23-18-101.
Case Notes
In General.
For discussion of purpose and constitutionality of former provision allowing commission to provide compensation for annexed territory, see Woodruff Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 234 Ark. 118, 351 S.W.2d 136 (1961).
Cited: Department of Pub. Utils. v. McConnell, 198 Ark. 502, 130 S.W.2d 9 (1939); State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Betts, 211 Ark. 591, 201 S.W.2d 590 (1947).
Subchapter 4 — Waterpower Companies
Effective Dates. Acts 1929, No. 246, § 2: approved Mar. 27, 1929. Emergency clause provided: “Immediate construction of hydroelectric dams in the State of Arkansas being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and this act shall be in force and effect immediately after its passage.”
23-18-401. Waterpower a part of public domain.
All waterpower in this state suitable for the purpose of producing power for all lawful purposes is, and is declared to be, inherent in and a part of the public domain. It shall vest in and be for the use of the State of Arkansas and the people thereof for its and their use and benefit.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 14473; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2001.
23-18-402. Erection of dams to develop electric power.
- Any person or corporation organized under the laws of this state for the purpose of producing power for any lawful purpose, who or which has procured a charter from this state for the development and operation of electric power plants from waterpower and owns a natural, practical dam site, or has secured from the United States a license, permit, or authority to erect a dam upon land or a dam site owned by the United States, shall have the right to erect a dam across any navigable or nonnavigable river in this state at that point for the purpose of developing electric power.
- When the person or company is ready to begin the construction of his or her or its dam, it shall file a survey with the Secretary of State and with the county clerk of the counties in which the lands pertaining to the waterpower are situated. This survey shall show the location of his or her or its principal power dam site, or the stream above the power dam and the lands necessary for the development of the waterpower, with an estimate and the engineer's report of the cost of his or her or its dam, spillways, power plant, and all machinery to be used in generating the power, to be verified later by report of actual cost of construction.
- Any person or corporation owning or controlling any dam as provided in this subchapter may be required, in the discretion of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, to construct and keep open a chute over the dam or construction sufficient for the passage of fish either ascending or descending the river or watercourse.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, §§ 2-4; Pope's Dig., §§ 14474-14476; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-2002 — 73-2004.
23-18-403. Application for permit to use power — Compensation.
- When a person or corporation is ready to proceed with the construction of his or her or its dam, he or she or it shall present to the Arkansas Public Service Commission his or her or its application for a permit to use the power.
- Upon a hearing of the application, the commission may grant to the person or corporation a permit to erect the dam and use the power, and the commission shall fix a minimum and maximum compensation per horsepower to be received by the corporation for the use of the power so generated.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 14476; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2004.
Case Notes
Mandamus.
Mandamus will not lie to compel state board to grant franchise. Ouachita Power Co. v. Donaghey, 106 Ark. 48, 152 S.W. 1012 (1912) (decision under prior law).
23-18-404. Limitation on time to begin work — Time allowed to coincide with federal licenses.
- All charters and permits granted under this subchapter shall be void unless construction has begun within four (4) years from the date of the permit and has been completed within four (4) years from the date of commencement of construction.
- Whenever the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission grants a final license providing for the development of any waterpower or hydroelectric power project in this state, which license limits the time for commencing construction or for the completion of the project or any part thereof, the Arkansas Public Service Commission is authorized to grant licenses, franchises, and permits with the same limitations as to time for the commencing, construction, or completion of any of the waterpower or hydroelectric power projects and to amend any grants, licenses, franchises, or permits that may have been previously granted or issued to any applicant by the Arkansas Public Service Commission so as to agree in the matter of time and condition with any federal licenses covering the same waterpower or hydroelectric project.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 17; Pope's Dig., § 14489; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2018.
Case Notes
Extension of Time.
Commission was not authorized to extend time within which water power company could erect its dam. State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Railroad Comm'n, 109 Ark. 100, 158 S.W. 1076 (1913) (decision under prior law).
23-18-405. Damages for land taken — Assessment by court.
In case any person or corporation building any dam shall not agree with the owners of any lands used for the purpose of the dam or flooded thereby, the court shall assess the damages for the land flooded or taken and also the consequential damages to any lands necessary to the use of the lands taken or flooded and owned by the parties whose lands are taken and flooded.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 14479; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2007.
23-18-406. Eminent domain generally.
- In order to enable the corporation to carry out the purpose of this section, §§ 23-18-401 — 23-18-405, and 23-18-408 — 23-18-410, the state's power of eminent domain is conferred upon it, insofar as it is necessary to enable it to condemn land overflowed above its dam, and for spillways, dams, cofferdams, powerhouses, and substations, and to condemn lands for right-of-way for viaducts and for electric transmission of power generated to points of its utilization.
-
- In all cases where the corporation fails to obtain by agreement with the owner of the property the right to overflow or use such lands or the right-of-way for viaducts and electric transmission lines, it may apply by petition to the circuit court in the counties in which the property is situated to have the damages for the overflowed lands or rights-of-way assessed, giving the owner of the property at least ten (10) days' notice in writing of the time and place where the petition will be heard.
- If the owner of the property is a nonresident of the state, the notice shall be given by publication as provided in civil cases.
- In case proceedings are had against infants or persons of unsound mind, it shall be the duty of the court to appoint a guardian ad litem, who shall represent their interest for all purposes.
- The petition as nearly as may be shall describe the lands to be overflowed or taken for right-of-way for viaducts and electric transmission lines and shall be sworn to.
- It shall be the duty of the court to impanel a jury of twelve (12) persons, as in other civil cases, to ascertain the amount of compensation which the corporation shall pay, and the matter shall proceed and be determined as other civil cases.
- In all cases where damages have been assessed, it shall be the duty of the corporation to deposit with the clerk of the court or to pay to the owners the amount so assessed and to pay such costs as may be adjudged against it within thirty (30) days after the assessment, whereupon it shall be lawful for the corporation to enter upon the lands and proceed with the work of developing the waterpower.
- Where the determination of questions in controversy in the proceeding is likely to retard the progress of the work, the court or the judge in vacation shall designate an amount of money to be deposited by the corporation, subject to the order of the court, and for the purpose of making the compensation when the amount thereof has been assessed, as provided in this section, and the judge shall designate the place of the deposit. Whenever the deposit shall be made, it shall be lawful for the corporation to enter upon the lands and to proceed with its work prior to the assessment and payment of damages for the use thereof.
- In all cases where the corporation fails to pay or deposit the amount of damages assessed as provided in this section within thirty (30) days after such demand, it shall forfeit all rights in the premises.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, §§ 9-16; Pope's Dig., §§ 14481-14488; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-2009 — 73-2016.
23-18-407. Eminent domain — Railroad in connection with use or construction of dam.
- Where it becomes expedient or necessary to acquire a right-of-way for the purpose of constructing a railroad for use in connection with or to facilitate the construction of the dam, every company authorized to construct hydroelectric dams in the State of Arkansas shall have the power to enter upon, condemn, and appropriate the lands, rights-of-way, easements, and property of persons, firms, or corporations.
- The method or manner of making its survey, laying out its right-of-way, and acquiring its right-of-way, either by contract or condemnation, shall be the same as now provided by law in case of the exercise of the right of eminent domain by telegraph, telephone, and railroad companies.
- It shall be subject to the same duties and liabilities and shall have the same rights as prescribed by law with reference to railroads.
- This section shall not be so construed as to authorize the condemnation of public streets or highways.
History. Acts 1929, No. 246, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 5060; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2017.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1929, No. 246, § 1, is also codified as § 18-15-510.
23-18-408. Power for public use — Sale to private parties.
- The power shall be for public use and shall be sold to private parties desiring it in the order of their application and upon equal terms.
- The power shall be furnished by the person or corporation or its principal powerhouse or central station.
- The power may be applied directly by water or through the instrumentality of electricity or such other agencies as the person or corporation may elect.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 14477; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2005.
23-18-409. Terms and conditions for use of power — Rental — Exception.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall grant to any person or corporation the right to take and use such power described in this subchapter under the condition that every person or corporation taking and using the power shall pay an annual rental into the State Treasury for the benefit and use of the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund. This annual rental shall be equal to the rental charged by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on such horsepower under its regulations in force at the time the permit is granted by the state. However, if the waterpower is taxable by the federal government under license granted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, no further rental shall be assessed by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 14480; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2008.
23-18-410. Tax on power used exclusively for taker's purposes.
If any person or corporation taking or using the power shall elect to use the power exclusively for its own use in manufacturing or other purposes named in this subchapter, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall assess the tax for taking and using the power on the basis of power so taken and used, with the power to be charged for as if it had been sold to private consumers.
History. Acts 1927, No. 121, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 14478; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-2006.
Subchapter 5 — Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2001, No. 324, §§ 8, 10: effective Oct. 1, 2003, by their own terms.
Acts 2001, No. 324, § 20: Feb. 20, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-third General Assembly that the timetable established by the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 for its implementation does not offer enough time to properly implement the act; that this act modifies that timetable to provide for adequate time for the implementation; that some provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999 will go into effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is designed to postpone those implementation dates; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act will not go into effect until after provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act are already effective which would result in confusion, if not chaos. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 19: Feb. 21, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the Eighty-fourth General Assembly that certain provisions of the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, as amended by Act 324 of 2001, for the implementation of retail electric competition may take effect prior to ninety-one (91) days after the adjournment of this session; that this act is intended to prevent such implementation; and that unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act may not go into effect until further steps have been taken toward retail electric competition, which the General Assembly has found not to be in the public interest. The General Assembly further finds that uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the Electric Consumer Choice Act during the ninety (90) days following the adjournment of this session and uncertainty regarding the recovery of reasonable generation costs, could discourage electric utilities from acquiring additional generation resources; that retail electric customers will require such resources; and that this act, in Section 11 and elsewhere, provides procedures to facilitate the acquisition of these resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2007, No. 658, § 6: Mar. 28, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that in the immediate future the United States Secretary of Energy may designate portions of Arkansas as a national interest electric transmission corridor; that such a designation could result in the federal preemption of state law; and that this act is necessary to provide a means for the construction of transmission facilities that are less onerous than under federal law. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2011, No. 910, § 13: Apr. 1, 2011. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that recent decisions by the Arkansas Court of Appeals and the Arkansas Supreme Court have pointed out the need for the General Assembly to clarify its intentions regarding the certification and authorization of the location, financing, construction, and operation of major utility facilities; and that this act is immediately necessary to provide for the continued economic development of the state and the orderly and efficient development of essential energy resources. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 8: Apr. 2, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that a recent decision of the Arkansas Court of Appeals has interpreted Act 310 of 1981 in a manner that is inconsistent with the interpretation of the Arkansas Public Service Commission; that this inconsistency impairs public utilities in their recovery, through an interim rate surcharge, of all investments and expenses that are not already included in the public utilities' currently effective rates and that were reasonably incurred by the public utilities as a direct result of legislative or administrative rules, regulations, or requirements relating to the protection of the public health, safety, or the environment; and that this act is immediately necessary to facilitate the timely recovery of investments and expenses so that public utilities may provide services to consumers in this state in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective manner. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Garrett O’Brien, Comment: One-Stop Certification: The Turk Plant and Understanding Arkansas’s Major Utility Facility Siting Certification Process, 63 Ark. L. Rev. 579 (2010).
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
DeSimone, Survey of Property Law, 3 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 286.
23-18-501. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act”.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 1; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.
23-18-502. Legislative findings — Intent — Purpose.
-
- The General Assembly finds and declares that there is at present and will continue to be a growing need for electric and gas public utility services that will require the construction of major new facilities.
- It is recognized that the facilities cannot be built without affecting in some way the physical environment in which the facilities are located and without the expenditure of massive amounts of capital.
- It is also recognized that the future economic development of the state requires the ready availability of public utility energy resources to serve industrial, commercial, and residential customers.
- The General Assembly further finds that it is essential to the public interest to minimize any adverse effect upon the environment and upon the quality of life of the people of the state that the new facilities might cause and to minimize the economic costs to the people of the state of obtaining reliable, clean, safe, and adequate energy supplies.
-
- The General Assembly further finds that laws and practices relating to the location, financing, construction, and operation of the utility facilities should provide for the protection of environmental values, encourage the development of alternative renewable and nonrenewable energy technologies that are energy-efficient, and take into account the total cost to society of the facilities, including without limitation the cost of providing safe, reliable, and cost-effective energy resources.
-
- Without further clarification, present laws may result in undue costly delays in new construction, may encourage the development of energy technologies that are relatively inefficient, and may increase costs, which will eventually be borne by the people of the state in the form of higher utility rates.
- Interpretations of existing laws could threaten the ability of utilities to meet the needs of the people of the state for economical and reliable utility service, and thus, the existing laws require further clarification.
- Furthermore, the General Assembly finds that there should be provided an adequate opportunity for individuals, groups interested in energy and resource conservation and the protection of the environment, state and regional agencies, local governments, and other public bodies to participate in timely fashion in decisions regarding the location, financing, construction, and operation of major utility facilities.
-
- The General Assembly, therefore, declares that it is the purpose of this subchapter to provide an exclusive forum with primary and final jurisdiction, except as provided in §§ 23-18-505 and 23-18-506, for the expeditious resolution of all matters concerning the location, financing, construction, and operation of a major utility facility in a single proceeding to which access will be open to individuals, groups, state and regional agencies, local governments, and other public bodies to enable them to participate in these decisions.
- The matters identified in subdivision (e)(1) of this section that were formerly under the jurisdiction of multiple state, regional, and local agencies are declared to be of statewide interest.
- It is the intent of the General Assembly to provide for the expeditious and efficient review of the siting of major utility facilities.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 2; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.1; Acts 2011, No. 910, § 1.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment added (a)(3); in (c)(1), substituted “provide for the protection of” for “be strengthened to protect” and inserted “including without limitation the cost of providing safe, reliable, and cost-effective energy resources”; inserted “Without further clarification” in (c)(2)(A); deleted “and practices” following “laws” in (c)(2)(A) and (c)(2)(B); in (c)(2)(B), inserted “Interpretations of” at the beginning and “and thus, the existing laws require further clarification” at the end; inserted “utility” near the end of (d); in (e)(1), substituted “an exclusive forum with primary and final jurisdiction” for “a forum with exclusive and final jurisdiction” and substituted “a major utility facility” for “electric generating plants and electric and gas transmission lines and associated facilities”; substituted “identified in subdivision (e)(1) of this section that were formerly” for “presently” in (e)(2); and added (f).
Case Notes
Purpose.
In enacting the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, the legislature's intent focused on regulating public utilities' construction of new facilities. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Proceedings.
Arkansas Public Service Commission erred in granting a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need to a power company for the construction of a facility under the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act, § 23-18-501 et seq., where it erroneously resolved the need for the facility in a separate Needs Docket. Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2010 Ark. 221, 384 S.W.3d 477 (2010).
23-18-503. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Applicant” means the utility or other person making application to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need;
-
- “Commence to construct” means any clearing of land, excavation, or other action that would adversely affect the natural environment of the site or route of a major utility facility.
-
“Commence to construct” does not include:
- Changes needed for temporary use of sites or routes for nonutility purposes; or
- Uses in securing survey or geological data, including necessary borings to ascertain foundation conditions;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Energy-efficient” means economical in the use of energy;
- “Energy resource declaration-of-need proceeding” means a utility-specific proceeding conducted by the Arkansas Public Service Commission under §§ 23-18-106 and 23-18-107 and the rules adopted thereunder to determine the need for additional energy supply and transmission resources by a public utility;
-
“Major utility facility” means:
- An electric generating plant and associated transportation and storage facilities for fuel and other facilities designed for or capable of operation at a capacity of fifty megawatts (50 MW) or more;
-
For the sole purpose of requiring an environmental impact statement under this subchapter, an electric transmission line and associated facilities including substations of:
- A design voltage of one hundred kilovolts (100 kV) or more and extending a distance of more than ten (10) miles; or
- A design voltage of one hundred seventy kilovolts (170 kV) or more and extending a distance of more than one (1) mile; or
- For the sole purpose of requiring an environmental impact statement under this subchapter, a gas transmission line and associated facilities designed for or capable of transporting gas at pressures in excess of one hundred twenty-five pounds per square inch (125 psi) and extending a distance of more than one (1) mile except gas pipelines devoted solely to the gathering of gas from gas wells constructed within the limits of any gas field as defined by the Oil and Gas Commission;
- “Merchant generator” means a person or entity, including an affiliate of a public utility, engaged directly or indirectly through one (1) or more affiliates, that is in the business of owning or operating all or part of a facility for generating electric energy and selling electric energy at wholesale;
- “Merchant transmission provider” means a person or entity that owns or operates facilities used for the transmission of electric energy and whose rates or charges are not subject to the jurisdiction of the commission;
- “Municipality” means any county or municipality within the state;
- “National interest electric transmission corridor” means an area of the state found by the United States Secretary of Energy to be experiencing electric energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion and therefore designated as a national interest electric transmission corridor by the United States Secretary of Energy under the authority granted by section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58;
- “Nonrenewable energy technology” or “nonrenewable energy sources” means any technology or source of energy that depends upon the use of depletable fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal;
- “Person” includes an individual, group, firm, partnership, corporation, cooperative association, municipality, government subdivision, government agency, local government, or other organization;
- “Public utility” or “utility” means a person engaged in the production, storage, distribution, sale, delivery, or furnishing of electricity or gas, or both, to or for the public, as defined in § 23-1-101(9)(A)(i) and (B), but does not include an exempt wholesale generator as defined in § 23-1-101(5);
- “Regional transmission organization” means an entity approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to plan and operate facilities for the transmission of electric energy within a designated region; and
- “Renewable energy technology” means any technology or source of energy that is not depletable, including without limitation solar, wind, biomass conversion, hydroelectric, or geothermal.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 3; 1977, No. 866, § 1; 1979, No. 245, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.2; Acts 1999, No. 1322, § 2; 2007, No. 658, § 1; 2011, No. 910, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2475.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment inserted (2)(B) and present (5) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; substituted “(125 psi)” for “(125 lbs. psi)” in (6)(C); and, in (15), substituted “including without limitation” for “such as” and inserted “hydroelectric”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (5).
U.S. Code. Section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, referred to in subdivision (10), is compiled as 16 U.S.C. § 824p.
Case Notes
Major Utility Facility.
Because this section defines the terms “public utility” and “utility” identically, the definition of “major utility facility” reads as “major [public] utility facility.” Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Public Utility.
A determinative characteristic of a public utility is that of service to, or readiness to serve, an indefinite public, or a portion of the public. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
It is not the number of customers served which is determinative of public utility status, but rather whether a personal company holds itself out to serve all who wish to avail themselves of the service. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Cited: Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2009 Ark. App. 511, 324 S.W.3d 697 (2009).
23-18-504. Exemptions — Waiver.
-
This subchapter does not apply to a major utility facility:
- For which, before July 24, 1973, an application for the approval of the major utility facility was made to any federal, state, regional, or local governmental agency that possesses the jurisdiction to consider the matters prescribed for finding and determination in § 23-18-519(a) and (b);
- For which, before July 24, 1973, the Arkansas Public Service Commission issued a certificate of convenience and necessity or otherwise approved the construction of the major utility facility;
- Over which an agency of the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction;
- A majority of which is owned by one (1) or more exempt wholesale generators as defined in § 23-1-101(5); or
- That is a major utility facility for generating electric energy, if the majority of the major utility facility is owned by any person, including without limitation a public utility that will not recover the cost of the major utility facility in rates subject to regulation by the commission.
-
-
- A person intending to construct a major utility facility excluded or exempted from this subchapter may elect to waive the exclusion or exemption by delivering notice of the waiver to the commission.
- The filing of an application by a public utility under § 23-18-511 is not a notice of waiver or an election to waive an exclusion or exemption.
- The responsibility for determining whether a proposed major utility facility is exempt from the requirements of this subchapter is within the primary and exclusive jurisdiction of the commission.
- Upon the commission's receipt of the notice of an election to waive the exclusion or exemption, this subchapter shall thereafter apply to each major utility facility identified in the notice.
-
- A public utility owning a minority interest in an exempt major utility facility shall not be entitled to recover its costs of ownership or operation in rates subject to the jurisdiction of the commission without first obtaining the right to own and operate a portion of the major utility facility under a certificate of public convenience and necessity under §§ 23-3-201 — 23-3-206.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 4; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.3; Acts 1999, No. 1322, § 3; 2011, No. 910, § 3.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment added (a)(5); and made stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment in (a)(1), inserted “major utility” preceding “facility” and substituted “that” for “which agency”; in (a)(2), inserted “major utility”; substituted “A majority of which is owned” for “That is owned” in (a)(4); rewrote (a)(5); substituted “a major utility facility” for “any utility facility” in (b)(1)(A); inserted (b)(1)(B) and (b)(1)(C); rewrote (b)(2); and added (c).
23-18-505. Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act unaffected by subchapter.
Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be deemed to amend the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, §§ 8-4-101 — 8-4-106, 8-4-201 — 8-4-229, and 8-4-301 — 8-4-313.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 19; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.18.
23-18-506. Division of Environmental Quality's and Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission's jurisdiction unaffected by subchapter.
-
This subchapter does not affect the:
- Jurisdiction of the Division of Environmental Quality or the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission with respect to water and air pollution control or other matters within the jurisdiction of the division or the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission; and
- Requirement that a person apply for and obtain a permit from the division as provided by the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, § 8-4-101 et seq.
- This subchapter does not confer upon the Arkansas Public Service Commission any authority or jurisdiction conferred by law upon the division or the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission.
- Notwithstanding the exemption provisions of § 23-18-504, each major utility facility constructed in Arkansas is subject to the environmental rules and regulations of the state and federal regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the air, water, and other environmental impacts associated with the major utility facility.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 19; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.18; Acts 1999, No. 1164, § 179; 2011, No. 910, § 4; 2019, No. 910, § 3241.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Pollution Control and Ecology.”
The 2011 amendment inserted “and Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission's” in the section heading; subdivided the section as (a) and (b); inserted “or the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission” twice in (a)(1) and in (b); and added (c).
The 2019 amendment substituted “Division” for “Arkansas Department” in the section heading and in (a)(1); and substituted “division” for “department” in (a) and (b).
23-18-507. Authority of commission — Legislative intent.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall be deemed to confer upon the Arkansas Public Service Commission power or jurisdiction to regulate or supervise the rates, service, or securities of any person not otherwise subject to the Arkansas Public Service Commission's jurisdiction.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission, in the discharge of its duties under this subchapter or any other act, is authorized to make joint investigations, hold joint hearings in or outside the state, and to issue joint or concurrent orders in conjunction or concurrence with any official or agency of any other state or of the United States, whether in the holding of such investigations or hearings or in the making of such orders the Arkansas Public Service Commission functions under agreements or compacts between states or under the concurrent power of states to regulate interstate commerce, or as an agency of the United States, or otherwise.
- In the discharge of its duties under this subchapter, the Arkansas Public Service Commission is further authorized to negotiate and enter into agreements or compacts with agencies of other states, pursuant to any consent of the United States Congress, for cooperative efforts in certification, construction, financing, operation, and maintenance of major utility facilities in accord with the purposes of this subchapter and for the enforcement of the respective state laws regarding them.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission is deemed to be the agency of the State of Arkansas that shall be the member of any regional hearing authority or commission created by the terms of any compact between Arkansas and other states or between Arkansas and the United States otherwise concerning the implementation of this subchapter, except as may be provided by §§ 23-18-505 and 23-18-506.
- It is the intent of the General Assembly to confer upon the Arkansas Public Service Commission, under this subchapter, broad rulemaking authority adequate to enable it to comply with any requirements imposed by state or federal legislation dealing with the subject matter of this subchapter upon state-administered certification programs and to enable it to comply with any state or federal requirements for facilitating the issuance of tax-exempt bonds should their issuance be authorized.
-
- Under §§ 23-18-106 and 23-18-107 and the rules adopted thereunder, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may determine the need for additional energy supply and transmission resources by public utilities in an energy resource declaration-of-need proceeding.
- A determination of need under subdivision (f)(1) of this section shall be deemed the basis for the need for the construction of a major utility facility to be sited and constructed under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, §§ 14, 18; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-276.13, 73-276.17; Acts 2011, No. 910, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 2476.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment added (f).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (f)(1).
23-18-508. Rules.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall have and is granted the power and authority to make and amend from time to time after reasonable notice and hearing reasonable rules establishing exemptions from some or all of the requirements of this subchapter for the construction, reconstruction, or expansion of any major utility facility which is unlikely to have major adverse environmental or economic impact by reason of length, size, location, available space, or right-of-way on or adjacent to existing utility facilities, and similar reasons.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 4; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.3; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2477.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “Rules” in the section heading and made a similar change in the section.
23-18-509. Employees of commission.
The Arkansas Public Service Commission is empowered to employ additional consultants to assist it as it deems necessary for an adequate appraisal of the applications for certificates of environmental compatibility and public need.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 17; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.16.
23-18-510. Certificate of environmental compatibility and public need — Requirement — Exceptions.
-
- Except for persons exempted as provided in subsection (c) of this section and § 23-18-504(a) and § 23-18-508, a person shall not begin construction of a major utility facility in the state without first obtaining a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need for the major utility facility from the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
- The replacement or expansion of an existing transmission facility with a similar facility in substantially the same location or the rebuilding, upgrading, modernizing, or reconstruction for the purposes of increasing capacity shall not constitute construction of a major utility facility if no increase in width of right-of-way is required.
- An entity, including without limitation a person, public utility, utility, regional transmission organization, municipality, merchant transmission provider, merchant generator, or other entity, whether regulated or not by the commission, shall not begin construction of an electric transmission line and associated facilities, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(B), within a national interest electric transmission corridor without first obtaining a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need for the facility from the commission.
-
This subchapter does not require a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need or an amendment of such a certificate for:
- Reconstruction, alteration, or relocation of a major utility facility that must be reconstructed, altered, or relocated because of the requirements of a federal, state, or county governmental body or agency for purposes of highway transportation, public safety, or air and water quality; or
- An electric transmission line and associated facilities including substations of a design voltage of one hundred kilovolts (100 kV) or more to be constructed or operated by a municipal electric utility system that is located within the territorial limits of the municipal electric utility system.
- An entity granted a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need pursuant to subsection (b) of this section shall have the right of eminent domain as provided by Arkansas law for the limited purpose of constructing the certificated electric transmission line and associated facilities, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(B), to the extent that the facility is located within a national interest electric transmission corridor.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 4; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.3; Acts 2007, No. 658, § 2; 2013, No. 1133, § 4.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote the section.
Case Notes
Applicability.
The legislature intended the Utility Facility Environmental and Economic Protection Act to apply only to public utilities. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Private Entities.
The construction of a private pipeline required no certificate of environmental compatibility and public need, as it was not a major public utility facility. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
23-18-511. Application for certificate — Contents generally.
An applicant for a certificate shall file with the Arkansas Public Service Commission a verified application in the form required by the commission and containing the following information:
- A general description of the location and type of the major utility facility proposed to be built;
- A general description of any reasonable alternate location or locations considered for the proposed facility;
- A statement of the need and reasons for construction of the facility, including, if applicable, a reference to any prior commission action in an energy resource declaration-of-need proceeding determining the need for additional energy supply or transmission resources by the public utility;
- A statement of the estimated costs of the major utility facility and the proposed method of financing the construction of the major utility facility;
-
- A general description of any reasonable alternate methods of financing the construction of the major utility facility and a description of the comparative merits and detriments of each alternate financing method considered.
- If at the time of filing of the application the federal income tax laws and the state laws would permit the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to finance the construction of the proposed major utility facility for the applicant by a state financing agency, the application shall also include a discussion of the merits and detriments of financing the major utility facility with the bonds;
- An analysis of the projected economic or financial impact on the applicant and the local community in which the major utility facility is to be located as a result of the construction and the operation of the proposed major utility facility;
- An analysis of the estimated effects on energy costs to the consumer as a result of the construction and operation of the proposed major utility facility;
-
-
An exhibit containing an environmental impact statement that fully develops the six (6) factors listed in subdivision (8)(B) of this section, treating in reasonable detail such considerations, if applicable, as:
-
The proposed major utility facility's direct and indirect effect on the following in the area in which the major utility facility is to be located:
- The ecology of the land, air, and water environment;
- Established park and recreational areas; and
- Any sites of natural, historic, and scenic values and resources of the area in which the major utility facility is to be located; and
- Any other relevant environmental effects.
-
The proposed major utility facility's direct and indirect effect on the following in the area in which the major utility facility is to be located:
-
The environmental impact statement shall state:
- The environmental impact of the proposed action;
- Any adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided;
- A description of the comparative merits and detriments of each alternate location considered for the major utility facility;
- For generating plants, the energy production process considered;
- A statement of the reasons why the proposed location and production process were selected for the major utility facility; and
- Any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources that would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented;
-
An exhibit containing an environmental impact statement that fully develops the six (6) factors listed in subdivision (8)(B) of this section, treating in reasonable detail such considerations, if applicable, as:
- The interstate benefits expected to be achieved by the proposed construction or modification of an electric transmission line and associated facilities, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(B), that is located within a national interest electric transmission corridor; and
- Such other information of an environmental or economic nature as the applicant may consider relevant or as the commission may by rule or order require.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 5; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.4; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 9; 2001, No. 324, §§ 7, 8; 2003, No. 204, §§ 12, 13; 2007, No. 658, § 3; 2009, No. 164, § 7; 2011, No. 910, § 6; 2013, No. 1133, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 2478.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2001, No. 324, § 7, repealed the amendment by Acts 1999, No. 1556 that was to become effective January 1, 2002. The 1999 amendment would have added exceptions in (3), (4), (5)(A) and (7), and inserted a new subdivision.
Acts 2003, No. 204, §§ 12 and 13, repealed the amendment by Acts 2001, No. 324, § 8, that was to become effective October 1, 2003. The 2001 amendment would have added exceptions in (3), (4), (5)(A) and (7); and inserted a new subdivision which read:
“In the case of a major utility facility as defined by § 23-18-503(5)(B), the effect of the proposed facility on competition for the sale of electric generation in the state or region.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (9), substituted “as described in” for “as defined by,” and inserted “that is located.”
The 2011 amendment inserted “major utility” preceding “facility” throughout the section; inserted “including ... by the public utility” in (3); inserted “the following in the area in which the major utility facility is to be located” in (8)(A)(i); inserted “considered for the major utility facility” in (8)(B)(iii); and, in (9), substituted “an electric transmission line and associated facilities” for “a major electric transmission facility” and substituted “§ 23-18-503(6)(B)” for “§ 23-18-503(5)(B)”.
The 2013 amendment substituted “six (6)” for “four (4)” in (8)(A).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (10).
Case Notes
Proceedings.
There was a lack of substantial evidence supporting the Arkansas Public Service Commission's determination that there was a basis of the need for an ultra-supercritical, pulverized coal-fired plant where the environmental impact statement failed to sufficiently address alternatives in reasonable detail, evidence of alternative locations, alternative energy production processes, alternative fuels, or carbon dioxide emissions was lacking, and evidence upon which the Commission could have made findings on the nature of the probable economic impact of the facility was lacking. Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2010 Ark. 221, 384 S.W.3d 477 (2010).
23-18-512. Application for certificate — Filing fees.
An initial filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500) shall accompany each application for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 5; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.4.
23-18-513. Application for certificate — Service or notice of application.
-
Each application for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need shall be accompanied by proof of service of a copy of the application on:
- The mayor of each municipality;
- The county judge;
- The chair of the county planning board, if any;
- Any head of a governmental agency charged with the duty of protecting the environment or of planning land use, upon which the Arkansas Public Service Commission has by rule or order directed that service be made, in the area in which any portion of such facility is to be located, both as primarily and as alternatively proposed;
- Each member of the General Assembly in whose district the facility or any alternative location listed in the application is to be located;
- The office of the Governor; and
-
The director or other administrative head of the following state agencies or departments:
- Division of Environmental Quality;
- Department of Health;
- Arkansas Economic Development Commission;
- Arkansas Department of Transportation;
- Arkansas State Game and Fish Commission;
- Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission;
- Any state agency which may have the authority to assist in financing the applicant's facility;
- Any other state agency or department which manages or has jurisdiction over state-owned lands on which all or part of the proposed utility facility is to be or may be located;
- Department of Finance and Administration;
- State Energy Conservation and Policy Office [abolished];
- Attorney General; and
- Any other state agency or department designated by Arkansas Public Service Commission rule or order; and
- Proof that a copy of the application has been made available for public inspection at all public libraries in each county in which the proposed utility facility is to be or may be located.
- The copy of the application shall be accompanied by a notice specifying the date on or about which the application is to be filed and a notice that interventions or limited appearances must be filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission within thirty (30) days after the date set forth as the date of filing, unless good cause is shown pursuant to § 23-18-517.
-
- Each application shall also be accompanied by proof that written notice specifying the date on or about which the application is to be filed and the date that interventions or limited appearances must be filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission, unless good cause is shown pursuant to § 23-18-517, has been sent by certified mail to each owner of real property on the proposed route selected by the utility on which a major utility facility is to be located or constructed.
- The written notice required by this subsection shall be directed to the address of the owner of the real property as it appears on the records in the office of the county sheriff or county tax assessor for the mailing of statements for taxes as provided in § 26-35-705.
-
-
Each application shall also be accompanied by proof that public notice of the application was given to persons residing in municipalities and counties entitled to receive notice under subsection (a) of this section by the publication in a newspaper having substantial circulation in the municipalities or counties of:
- A summary of the application;
- A statement of the date on or about which it is to be filed; and
- A statement that intervention or limited appearances shall be filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission within thirty (30) days after the date stated in the notice, unless good cause is shown under § 23-18-517.
-
- For purposes of this subsection, an environmental impact statement submitted as an exhibit to the application need not be summarized, but the published notice shall include a statement that the impact statements are on file at the office of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and available for public inspection or are available electronically on the Arkansas Public Service Commission's website.
- The applicant shall also cause copies of the environmental impact statement to be furnished to at least one (1) of its local offices, if any, in the counties in which any portion of the major utility facilities are to be located, both as primarily or as alternatively proposed, to be there available for public inspection.
- The published notice shall contain a statement of the location of the local offices described in subdivision (d)(2)(B) of this section and the times the impact statements will be available for public inspection.
-
Each application shall also be accompanied by proof that public notice of the application was given to persons residing in municipalities and counties entitled to receive notice under subsection (a) of this section by the publication in a newspaper having substantial circulation in the municipalities or counties of:
- Inadvertent failure of service on or notice to any of the municipalities, counties, governmental agencies, or persons identified in subsections (a) and (c) of this section may be cured pursuant to orders of the Arkansas Public Service Commission designed to afford such persons adequate notice to enable their effective participation in the proceedings.
- In addition, after filing, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may require the applicant to serve notice of the application or copies thereof, or both, upon such other persons and file proof thereof, as the Arkansas Public Service Commission may deem appropriate.
- Where any personal service or notice is required in this section, the service may be made by any officer authorized by law to serve process, by personal delivery, or by certified mail.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 5; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.4; Acts 1997, No. 540, § 88; 1999, No. 1164, § 180; 1999, No. 1351, § 1; 2011, No. 910, § 7; 2017, No. 707, § 265; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2479, 2480; 2019, No. 910, § 3242.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The State Energy Conservation and Policy Office referred to in this section was abolished by Acts 1979, No. 255 and the powers, duties & functions transferred to the Arkansas Dept. of Energy; and Acts 1981, No. 7 abolished the Dept. of Energy and transferred its assets to the Arkansas Energy Office, which is within the Arkansas Economic Development Commission.
Amendments. The 1997 amendment substituted “Department of Economic Development” for “Department of Industrial Development” in (a)(7)(C).
The 1999 amendment by No. 1164 substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Pollution Control and Ecology”; and made stylistic changes.
The 1999 amendment by No. 1351 added (a)(8); inserted present (c) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; and made stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment added “or are available electronically on the commission's website” at the end of (d)(2)(A); inserted “major utility” in (d)(2)(B); and inserted “described in subdivision (d)(2)(B) of this section” in (d)(2)(C).
The 2017 amendment substituted “Department of Transportation” for “State Highway and Transportation Department” in (a)(7)(D).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(4) and (a)(7)(L).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Division of Environmental Quality” for “Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality” in (a)(7)(A).
23-18-514. Application for certificate — Commentary by state agencies — Deficiency letters.
-
- Promptly after the filing of an application for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need, the staff of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall invite comments from all state agencies entitled to service under § 23-18-513 as to the adequacy of applicant's statements.
- The invitation to comment shall advise the state agencies that comments must be received within sixty (60) days of the date of mailing or delivery thereof, unless an agency requests for cause a longer period for consideration.
-
- Upon review of the comments, if any, if the staff shall determine that the applicant failed to include or adequately develop any relevant environmental or economic aspect of the facility, it shall issue a deficiency letter pointing out in detail all such specific deficiencies in the statements.
- The deficiency letter shall be prepared and served upon the applicant as promptly as possible and in no event later than twenty (20) days before the date set for the public hearing.
- The applicant shall promptly respond to any deficiency letter, and the public hearing shall be deferred unless the applicant has responded prior thereto to any deficiency letter.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 5; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.4.
23-18-515. Amendment of certificates.
- Upon application by an applicant, a certificate issued under this subchapter may be amended as provided in this section or in accordance with such simplified procedures as the Arkansas Public Service Commission may establish by reasonable rules.
- An application for an amendment of a certificate shall be in such form and contain such information as the commission shall prescribe.
-
- Notice of such an application shall be given as set forth in § 23-18-513(a)-(c).
- Any party which files an application for an amendment of a certificate shall serve copies thereof on each party to the original proceedings.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, §§ 4-6; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-276.3 — 73-276.5; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2481.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (a).
23-18-516. Hearing on application or amendment.
-
- Upon receipt of an application complying with §§ 23-18-511 — 23-18-514, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall promptly fix a date for the commencement of a public hearing thereon, which date shall be not fewer than forty (40) days nor more than one hundred eighty (180) days after the receipt of the application, and shall conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as practicable.
- The testimony presented at such hearing may be presented in writing or orally, provided that the commission may make rules designed to exclude repetitive, redundant, or irrelevant testimony.
-
- On an application for an amendment of a certificate, the commission shall hold a hearing in the same manner as a hearing is held on an application for a certificate if the commission affirmatively finds from the application, within thirty (30) days from the date of filing, that the proposed change in the facility would result in any material increase in any environmental or economic impact of the facility or that a substantial change will occur in the location of all or a portion of the facility other than as provided in the alternates set forth in the original application.
- If the commission does not make such a finding by order within thirty (30) days after filing the application for amendment, the amendment shall become effective and the certificate shall be deemed to be amended as requested.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 6; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.5; Acts 2007, No. 658, § 4.
23-18-517. Parties to certification proceedings.
-
The parties to a certification proceeding shall include:
- The applicant;
- Each municipality, county, and government agency or department or other person entitled to receive service of a copy of the application under § 23-18-513(a) if it has filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission a notice of intervention as a party within thirty (30) days after service; or
-
A person residing in a municipality or county that is entitled to receive service of a copy of the application under § 23-18-513(a) or any domestic nonprofit corporation formed in whole or in part to promote conservation or natural beauty, to promote energy conservation, to protect the environment, personal health, or other biological values, to represent commercial and industrial groups, or to promote the orderly development of the areas in which the facility is to be located if the:
- Person or organization has an interest that may be directly affected by the commission's action;
- Interest is not adequately represented by other parties; and
- Person or corporation has petitioned the commission for leave to intervene as a party within thirty (30) days after the date given in the public notice as the date of filing the application.
-
- Any person may make a limited appearance in the proceeding by filing a verified statement of position within thirty (30) days after the date given in the public notice as the date of filing the application.
- No person making a limited appearance shall be a party or shall have the right to receive further notice or to cross-examine witnesses on any issue outside the scope of its statement of position.
- The person making a limited appearance is subject to being called for cross-examination only on the subject matter of the statement of position by the applicant or other party. If the person fails to appear for cross-examination, if called, the statement of position may be stricken from the record at the discretion of the commission.
- Every notice of intervention and petition to intervene shall be in writing and shall comply with all procedural rules of the commission, and shall contain clear and concise statements of the nature of the right or interest of the petitioner or intervenor in the proceeding, the specific objections of the petitioner or intervenor to the applicant's proposal, the grounds and issues of fact and law upon which petitioner or intervenor wishes to be heard, and any other reasonable information which may be required by rule or order of the commission.
- For good cause shown, the commission may grant a petition for leave to intervene as a party or to make a limited appearance and to participate in subsequent phases of the proceeding, filed by any person who failed to file a timely notice of intervention or petition for leave to intervene, as the case may be, whose interests the commission finds are not otherwise adequately represented by another party and whose participation will not delay the proceedings, if the intervention or limited appearance is filed and served at least ten (10) days in advance of the date the hearing on the application is scheduled to commence.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 7; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.6; Acts 2009, No. 752, § 1; 2011, No. 910, § 8.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment consolidated (a)(3) and (a)(4) and made related changes.
The 2011 amendment substituted “§ 23-18-513(a)” for “§ 23-18-513(a) and (b)” in (a)(2) and (a)(3); and subdivided (a)(3).
23-18-518. Conduct of hearing.
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall hold a hearing, unless waived by the parties, on an application filed under § 23-18-511.
- A record shall be made of the hearing and of all testimony taken and the cross-examination thereon.
- Rules of the commission shall apply to the proceeding.
- The commission may provide for the consolidation of the representation of parties having similar interests.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 8; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.7; Acts 2015, No. 1000, § 7.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added (a) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; and substituted “Rules of the commission” for “Rules of evidence as specified by the Arkansas Public Service Commission” in present (c).
23-18-519. Decision of commission — Modifications of application.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission shall render a decision upon the record either granting or denying the application as filed or granting it upon such terms, conditions, or modifications of the location, financing, construction, operation, or maintenance of the major utility facility as the commission may deem appropriate.
- The record may include by reference the findings of the commission in an energy resource declaration-of-need proceeding that the utility needs additional energy supply resources or transmission resources.
-
The commission shall not grant a certificate for the location, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of a major utility facility, either as proposed or as modified by the commission, unless it finds and determines:
-
- The basis of the need for the major utility facility.
- In determining the basis of the need for the major utility facility, the commission may rely upon the commission's determination in an energy resource declaration-of-need proceeding that the utility needs additional energy supply resources or transmission resources;
- That the major utility facility will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
- The nature of the probable environmental impact of the major utility facility;
- That the major utility facility represents an acceptable adverse environmental impact, considering the state of available technology, the requirements of the customers of the applicant for utility service, the nature and economics of the proposal, any state or federal permit for the environmental impact, and the various alternatives, if any, and other pertinent considerations;
- The nature of the probable economic impact of the major utility facility;
- That the major utility facility financing method either as proposed or as modified by the commission represents an acceptable economic impact, considering economic conditions and the need for and cost of additional public utility services;
- In the case of an electric transmission line, that the major utility facility is not inconsistent with plans of other electric systems serving the state that have been filed with the commission;
- In the case of a gas transmission line, that the location of the line will not pose an undue hazard to persons or property along the area to be traversed by the line;
- That the energy efficiency of the major utility facility, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(A), has been given significant weight in the decision-making process;
- That the location of the major utility facility as proposed conforms as closely as practicable to applicable state, regional, and local laws and regulations issued thereunder, except that the commission may refuse to apply all or part of any regional or local law or regulation if it finds that, as applied to the proposed major utility facility, the law or regulation is unreasonably restrictive in view of the existing technology, factors of cost or economics, or the needs of consumers whether located inside or outside of the directly affected government subdivisions;
- The interstate benefits expected to be achieved by the proposed construction or modification of an electric transmission line and associated facilities, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(B), that is located within a national interest electric transmission corridor; and
- That any conditions attached to a certificate for the construction or modification of an electric transmission line and associated facilities, as described in § 23-18-503(6)(B), that is located within a national interest electric transmission corridor do not interfere with reduction of electric transmission congestion in interstate commerce or render the project economically infeasible.
-
-
- If the commission determines that the location or design of all or a part of the proposed major utility facility should be modified, it may condition its certificate upon the modification, provided that the municipalities, counties, and persons residing therein affected by the modification shall have been given reasonable notice thereof, if the persons, municipalities, or counties have not previously been served with notice of the application.
- If the commission requires in the case of a transmission line that a portion thereof shall be located underground in one (1) or more areas, the commission, after giving appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard to affected ratepayers, shall have the power and authority to authorize the adjustment of rates and charges to customers within the areas where the underground portion of the transmission line is located in order to compensate for the additional costs, if any, of the underground construction.
-
- If the commission determines that financing of all or part of the proposed major utility facility should be modified, it may condition its certificate upon the modification.
- If at the time of filing the application or within sixty (60) days thereafter, the federal income tax laws and the state laws would permit the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to finance the construction of the proposed major utility facility for the applicant and if the commission determines that financing the major utility facility with such tax-exempt bonds would be in the best interests of the people of the state, the commission, after giving appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard to the parties, shall have the power and authority to require by order or rule that the major utility facility be financed in such manner as may be provided elsewhere by law.
- A copy of the decision and any order issued therewith shall be served upon each party within sixty (60) days after the conclusion of each hearing held under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 9; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.8; Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 10; 2001, No. 324, §§ 9, 10; 2003, No. 204, §§ 14, 15; 2007, No. 658, § 5; 2009, No. 164, § 8; 2011, No. 910, § 9; 2013, No. 1133, § 6; 2019, No. 315, § 2482.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2001, No. 324, § 9, repealed the amendment by Acts 1999, No. 1556 that was to become effective January 1, 2002. The 1999 amendment added exceptions in (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(8), and rewrote (b)(6).
Acts 2003, No. 204, §§ 14 and 15, repealed the amendment by Acts 2001, No. 324, § 10, that was to become effective October 1, 2003. The 2001 amendment added exceptions in (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(6), and rewrote (b)(9) to read:
“In the case of a major utility facility as defined by § 23-18-503(5)(B), the effect of the proposed facility on competition for the sale of electric generation in the state or regions.”
Acts 2003, No. 204, § 16, provided:
“Nothing in this act shall alter or diminish the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority under otherwise applicable law.”
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (b)(11) and (12), substituted “described” for “defined,” and inserted “(5)(B), that is.”
The 2011 amendment inserted (a)(2) and (b)(1)(B); inserted “major utility” preceding “facility” throughout the section; inserted “any state or federal permit for the environmental impact” in (b)(4); substituted “an electric transmission line and associated facilities” for “a major electric transmission facility” in (b)(11) and (b)(12); and substituted “§ 23-18-503(6)(B)” for “§ 23-18-503(5)(B)” in (b)(11) and (b)(12).
The 2013 amendment inserted “as described in § 23-18-503(6)(A)” in (b)(9).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (d)(2).
Case Notes
Proceedings.
There was a lack of substantial evidence supporting the Arkansas Public Service Commission's determination that there was a basis of the need for an ultra-supercritical, pulverized coal-fired plant where the environmental impact statement failed to sufficiently address alternatives in reasonable detail, evidence of alternative locations, alternative energy production processes, alternative fuels, or carbon dioxide emissions was lacking, and evidence upon which the Commission could have made findings on the nature of the probable economic impact of the facility was lacking. Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2010 Ark. 221, 384 S.W.3d 477 (2010).
23-18-520. Findings of fact required.
- In rendering a decision on the application for a certificate, the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall issue and serve an order upon all parties. This order shall include or be accompanied by findings of fact stating its reasons for the action taken.
- If the commission has found that any regional or local law or regulation which would be otherwise applicable is unreasonably restrictive pursuant to § 23-18-519(b)(10), it shall state in its order the reasons therefor.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 10; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.9.
23-18-521. Issuance of certificate — Effect.
- A certificate to construct and operate a major utility facility may be issued only under this subchapter.
-
- A certificate issued under this subchapter to an applicant is in lieu of and exempts the applicant from the requirements of obtaining a certificate of convenience and necessity under § 23-3-201 et seq.
- A certificate issued under this subchapter entitles the applicant to a permit under § 23-3-501 et seq. without any further notice or hearing if the applicant has filed with the Arkansas Public Service Commission the consent or authorization required by § 23-3-504(7) and paid the damages stated in § 23-3-501 et seq.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, §§ 4, 9; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 73-276.3, 73-276.8; Acts 2011, No. 910, § 10.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment inserted “to construct and operate a major utility facility” in (a); and subdivided (b).
23-18-522. Compliance with certificate required.
Any facility, with respect to which a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need is required, shall thereafter be located, financed, constructed, operated, and maintained in conformity with the certificate and any terms, conditions, and modifications contained therein.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 4; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.3.
23-18-523. Transfer of certificates.
Subject to the approval of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, a certificate may be transferred to a person who agrees to comply with the terms, conditions, and modifications contained therein. It shall also be transferable by operation of law to any receiver, trustee, or other similar assignee under a mortgage, deed of trust, or similar instrument.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 4; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.3.
23-18-524. Rehearing — Judicial review.
- Any party aggrieved by any decision issued on an application for a certificate may apply for a rehearing as provided in §§ 23-2-401 and 23-2-421 — 23-2-424.
- Any party aggrieved by the final decision of the Arkansas Public Service Commission on rehearing may obtain judicial review thereof in accordance with the provisions of §§ 23-2-401 and 23-2-421 — 23-2-424.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 11; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.10.
Case Notes
Cited: Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2010 Ark. 221, 384 S.W.3d 477 (2010).
23-18-525. Jurisdiction of courts.
Except as stated in §§ 23-18-505, 23-18-506, and 23-18-524, a court of this state does not have jurisdiction to:
- Hear or determine an issue, case, or controversy concerning a matter that was or could have been determined in a proceeding under this subchapter before the Arkansas Public Service Commission; or
- Stop or delay the financing, construction, operation, or maintenance of a major utility facility except to enforce compliance with this subchapter or the provisions of a certificate issued under this subchapter after the exhaustion of administrative remedies before the commission.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 12; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.11; Acts 2011, No. 910, § 11.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment subdivided the section; and added “after the exhaustion of administrative remedies before the commission” in (2).
23-18-526. Powers of local governments and state agencies.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no municipality, local government unit, or state department or agency, except the Division of Environmental Quality as set out in § 23-18-506, may require any approval, consent, permit, certificate, or other condition for the construction, operation, or maintenance of a major utility facility authorized by a certificate issued pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter. Nothing in this subchapter shall prevent the application of state laws for the protection of employees engaged in the construction, operation, or maintenance of the major utility facility.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 13; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.12; Acts 1999, No. 1164, § 181; 2019, No. 910, § 3243.
Amendments. The 1999 amendment substituted “Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Pollution Control and Ecology.”
The 2019 amendment substituted “Division of Environmental Quality” for “Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality” in the first sentence.
23-18-527. Cooperation of state agencies.
All state agencies and departments entitled to service under § 23-18-513(a) and (b) are directed to cooperate with and render assistance to the Arkansas Public Service Commission in discharging its responsibilities under this subchapter.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 17; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.16.
23-18-528. Eminent domain.
-
- As used in this section, the word “land” shall include any estate or interest therein.
- Whenever a certificate has been issued to an applicant for the construction of any major utility facility under the provisions of this subchapter and the applicant is unable to reach agreement with the owner of land to construct, operate, maintain, and obtain reasonable access to the major utility facility in accordance with the certificate, it may acquire the land by the exercise of the power of eminent domain in a state court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district in which the land is located.
-
The petition shall contain or have annexed thereto:
- A statement of the authority under which and the use for which the land is taken;
- A description of the land taken sufficient for the identification thereof;
- A statement of the estate or interest in the land taken for such a use;
- A statement that a certificate has been issued to the petitioner; and
- A statement of the sum of money estimated by the utility to be just compensation for the land taken.
- In the event the property sought to be condemned is owned by one (1) person and is situated in more than one (1) county, the petition may be filed in the court of any county where a part of the property may be located.
-
- After the filing of the petition and upon the deposit in court of a sum determined by the court to be sufficient to secure compensation to the owner of the property or interest therein sought to be condemned, the court shall immediately enter an order finding title to the land in fee simple absolute, or such less estate or interest therein as is prayed in the petition, to be vested in the applicant. The land or interest therein shall be deemed to be condemned and taken for the use of the applicant. The right to just compensation for the same fee or for such lesser interest as may be taken shall vest in the person entitled thereto.
- However, any taking of lands in fee simple absolute under the authority granted in this section shall be limited to taking for electric generating plant sites and substation sites, compressor station sites, and meter station sites only. Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing a utility to take fee simple title to lands for gas or electric transmission line or distribution line rights-of-way purposes.
- The compensation shall be determined by a jury pursuant to § 18-15-506.
- Upon the filing of a petition, the court shall have power to fix the time within which and the terms upon which the party in possession shall be required to surrender possession to the applicant.
- The court shall have power to make such orders in respect of encumbrances, liens, rents, taxes, assessments, insurance, and such other charges, if any, as shall be just and equitable.
- No appeal in the proceeding or any bond or undertaking given therein shall operate to prevent or delay the vesting of title to the land in the applicant.
- The right to exercise the power of eminent domain and to take possession and title in advance of final judgment in the proceeding and all powers delegated in this section shall be in addition to any right, power, or authority conferred by any other laws of the state or of franchises, contracts, or agreements and shall not be construed as abrogating, limiting, or modifying any such right, power, authority, franchise, contract, or agreement.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 16; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.15.
Cross References. Eminent domain, § 18-15-101 et seq.
Case Notes
In General.
A public utility's right to condemn private property is governed by this section, Ark. Const. Art. 12, § 9, and § 18-15-503. Ark. Power & Light Co. v. Potlatch Forest, Inc., 288 Ark. 525, 707 S.W.2d 317 (1986).
Construction.
Statutes delegating the power of eminent domain are strictly construed in favor of the landowners because the power is in derogation of a common right. Loyd v. Southwest Ark. Utils. Corp., 264 Ark. 818, 580 S.W.2d 935 (1979).
Applicability.
The legislature intended this section to apply only to public utilities. Arkansas Charcoal Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 299 Ark. 359, 773 S.W.2d 427 (1989).
Outside Right-of-Way.
Where the public utility sought the right to cut, trim, or remove “danger trees” growing outside of its right-of-way that could potentially endanger its transmission line, and the landowner would be deprived of its customary use and practice of tree farming on the property on which the “danger trees” would be cut since it would be unable to grow trees in the area outside the right-of-way, the public utility had to specifically describe, condemn, and pay just compensation for the right to cut, trim, or remove trees that could potentially endanger the transmission line. Ark. Power & Light Co. v. Potlatch Forest, Inc., 288 Ark. 525, 707 S.W.2d 317 (1986).
Where the public utility had ample access to its right-of-way without the necessity of crossing the lands of the landowner, since there were numerous existing public roads on the landowner's lands which crossed the right-of-way, it had to specifically describe, condemn, and pay just compensation for any alternate routes of reasonable access. Ark. Power & Light Co. v. Potlatch Forest, Inc., 288 Ark. 525, 707 S.W.2d 317 (1986).
Right of Access.
The only right of access granted by this section is the right to acquire a right-of-way or reasonable access. Loyd v. Southwest Ark. Utils. Corp., 264 Ark. 818, 580 S.W.2d 935 (1979).
Cited: Edwards v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 683 F.2d 1149 (8th Cir. 1982); Edwards v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 287 Ark. 403, 700 S.W.2d 52 (1985).
23-18-529. Forecasts of loading and resources — Reports.
-
- Each public utility shall annually furnish to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for its review a report containing a forecast of loads and resources and describing the major utility facilities which, in the judgment of the utility, will be required to supply system demands during the forecast period.
- The forecast shall cover a period of at least two (2) calendar years next succeeding the date of the report, and such additional longer-range forecast reports as the commission may find necessary and may require by rule from time to time.
- All such reports shall be available to public inspection. A copy of any report shall be furnished by the commission to any municipality, county, or government agency charged with the duty of protecting the environment or the duty of planning land use if that agency requests a copy of such a report in writing.
- The report shall be in such form and shall contain such information as may be reasonably prescribed by the commission by rule.
- Pursuant to this section, the commission may also require each public utility to furnish from time to time reports concerning actions taken by the utility to encourage the conservation of energy by its customers.
History. Acts 1973, No. 164, § 15; 1977, No. 866, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 73-276.14; Acts 2019, No. 315, §§ 2483, 2484.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (a)(2) and (a)(4).
23-18-530. Treatment of major utility facility generating plant.
Except as provided under § 23-18-504(a), electric utility systems or facilities owned by a municipal electric consolidated authority created under the Arkansas Municipal Electric Utility Interlocal Cooperation Act of 2003, § 25-20-401 et seq., shall be subject to this subchapter.
History. Acts 2003, No. 366, § 7; 2007, No. 475, § 1.
23-18-531, 23-18-532. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. These sections, concerning powers of an authority and regulation of an authority, were repealed by Acts 2007, No. 475, §§ 2, 3. The sections were derived from the following sources:
23-18-531. Acts 2003, No. 366, § 7; 2005, No. 1962, § 105.
23-18-532. Acts 2003, No. 366, § 7
Subchapter 6 — Arkansas Renewable Energy Development Act of 2001
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, No. 1026, § 3: January 1, 2008.
23-18-601. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and cited as the “Arkansas Renewable Energy Development Act of 2001”.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1781, § 1.
23-18-602. Legislative findings and declarations.
- Net energy metering encourages the use of renewable energy resources and renewable energy technologies by reducing utility interconnection and administrative costs for small consumers of electricity. More than thirty (30) other states have passed similar laws or regulations in support of net energy metering programs. Increasing the consumption of renewable resources promotes the wise use of Arkansas's natural energy resources to meet a growing energy demand, increases Arkansas's use of indigenous energy fuels while reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels, fosters investments in emerging renewable technologies to stimulate economic development and job creation in the state, including the agricultural sectors, reduces environmental stresses from energy production, and provides greater consumer choices.
- Arkansas has actively encouraged the manufacture of new technologies in the state through promotion of the Arkansas Emerging Technology Development Act of 1999, § 15-4-2101 et seq. [repealed]. Net metering would help to further attract energy technology manufacturers, to provide a foothold for these technologies in the Arkansas economy, and to make it easier for customer access to these technologies.
- Therefore, the General Assembly finds that it is in Arkansas's long-term interest to adopt this subchapter.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1781, § 2.
23-18-603. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
“Avoided cost” means:
- For an electric utility other than a municipal utility, the costs to an electric utility of electric energy or capacity, or both, that, but for the generation from the net-metering facility or facilities, the utility would generate itself or purchase from another source, as determined by a commission consistent with § 23-3-701 et seq.; or
- For a municipal utility, the definition provided by the governing body of the municipal utility;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission or other appropriate governing body for an electric utility as defined in subdivision (3) of this section;
- “Electric utility” means a public or investor-owned utility, an electric cooperative, or any private power supplier or marketer that is engaged in the business of supplying electric energy to the ultimate consumer or any customer classes within the state;
-
- “Municipal utility” means a utility system owned or operated by a municipality that provides electricity.
-
“Municipal utility” includes without limitation a:
- Utility system managed or operated by a nonprofit corporation under § 14-199-701 et seq.; and
- Utility system owned or operated by a municipality or by a consolidated utility district under the General Consolidated Public Utility System Improvement District Law, § 14-217-101 et seq.;
- “Net excess generation” means the amount of electricity as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate that a net-metering customer has fed back to the electric utility that exceeds the amount of electricity as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate used by that customer during the applicable period determined by a commission;
- “Net metering” means measuring the difference in amount of electricity as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate supplied by an electric utility to a net-metering customer and the electricity generated by a net-metering customer and fed back to the electric utility over the applicable period determined by a commission;
-
“Net-metering customer” means a customer of an electric utility that:
- Is an owner of a net-metering facility;
-
Leases a net-metering facility subject to the following limitations:
- A lease shall not permit the sale of electric energy measured in kilowatt hours or electric capacity measured in kilowatts between the lessor and lessee; and
- A lease shall not include any charge per kilowatt hour or any charge per kilowatt; or
- Is a government entity or other entity that is exempt from state and federal income tax, and that, for the sole purpose of this subchapter, obtains electric energy from a net-metering facility under a service contract qualifying for safe-harbor protection as provided under 26 U.S.C. § 7701(e)(3)(A), as in effect on July 24, 2019;
-
“Net-metering facility” means a facility for the production of electric energy that:
- Uses solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass resources to generate electricity, including, but not limited to, fuel cells and micro turbines that generate electricity if the fuel source is entirely derived from renewable resources;
-
Has a generating capacity of not more than:
- The greater of twenty-five kilowatts (25 kW) or one hundred percent (100%) of the net-metering customer's highest monthly usage in the previous twelve (12) months for residential use;
- For customers of electric utilities, one thousand kilowatts (1,000 kW) for use other than residential use unless otherwise allowed by a commission under § 23-18-604; or
- For customers of a municipal utility, the limits established by the governing body of the municipal utility under § 23-18-605;
- Is located in Arkansas;
- Can operate in parallel with an electric utility's existing transmission and distribution facilities;
- Is intended primarily to offset part or all of the net-metering customer requirements for electricity; and
-
- May include an energy storage device that is configured to receive electric energy solely from a net-metering facility.
- The capacity of an energy storage device shall not be used to calculate the capacity limits listed in subdivision (8)(B) of this section if the energy storage device is configured to receive electric energy solely from a net-metering facility;
-
“Quantifiable benefits” means the:
-
Reasonably demonstrated costs that:
- Are related to the provision of electric service and based on the utility's most recent cost-of-service study filed with the commission; and
- Will be avoided by the utility by the use of net metering;
- Monetary value provided to a utility by the use of net metering as specified by a market mechanism, if any, of the regional transmission organization of which the electric utility is a member; and
- Monetary value provided to a utility by the use of net metering as specified by a market mechanism, if any, that measures utility distribution system benefits; and
-
Reasonably demonstrated costs that:
- “Renewable energy credit” means the environmental, economic, and social attributes of a unit of electricity, such as a megawatt hour, generated from renewable fuels that can be sold or traded separately.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1781, § 3; 2007, No. 1026, § 1; 2015, No. 827, § 1; 2019, No. 464, § 1.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote (6)(B).
The 2019 amendment inserted (1) and redesignated former (1) and (2) as (2) and (3); deleted “municipal utility” following “electric cooperative” in (3); inserted (4) and redesignated former (3) through (5) as (5) through (7); inserted “as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable” twice in (5) and once in (6); added “determined by a commission” at the end of (5) and (6); in (6), substituted “difference in amount of” for “difference between”, inserted “to a net metering customer”, and deleted “billing” preceding “period”; rewrote (7); redesignated former (6) as (8); rewrote (8)(B)(ii) and inserted (8)(B)(iii); inserted (8)(F) and (9); redesignated former (7) as (10); and made stylistic changes.
23-18-604. Commission authority — Definition.
- An electric utility shall allow net-metering facilities to be interconnected using a standard meter capable of registering the flow of electricity in two (2) directions.
-
Following notice and opportunity for public comment, a commission:
- Shall establish appropriate rates, terms, and conditions for net metering;
-
For net-metering customers who receive service under a rate that does not include a demand component, may:
- Require an electric utility to credit the net-metering customer with any accumulated net excess generation as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate in the next applicable billing period and base the bill of the net-metering customer on the net amount of electricity as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate that the net-metering customer has received from or fed back to the electric utility during the billing period;
-
Take the following actions if those actions are in the public interest and doing so will not result in an unreasonable allocation of or increase in costs to other utility customers:
- Separately meter the electric energy, measured in kilowatt hours, supplied by the electric utility to the net-metering customer and the electric energy, measured in kilowatt hours, that is generated by the net-metering customer's net-metering facility that is fed back to the electric utility at any time during the applicable billing period;
- Apply the commission-approved retail rate to all kilowatt hours that are supplied by the electric utility to a net-metering customer by the electric utility during the applicable period determined by a commission;
- Apply the avoided cost of the electric utility plus any additional sum determined under subdivision (b)(2)(B)(iv) of this section to all kilowatt hours supplied to the electric utility by a net-metering customer, during the period determined by a commission, which shall be credited to the total bill of the net-metering customer in a dollar value; and
- The additional sum added to the avoided cost of the electric utility may be applied after the demonstration of quantifiable benefits by the net-metering customer and shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the avoided cost of the electric utility;
-
Authorize an electric utility to assess a net-metering customer that is being charged a rate that does not include a demand component a per-kilowatt-hour fee or charge to recover the quantifiable direct demand-related distribution cost of the electric utility for providing electricity to the net-metering customer that is not:
- Avoided as a result of the generation of electricity by the net-metering facility; and
- Offset by quantifiable benefits; or
- Take other actions that are in the public interest and do not result in an unreasonable allocation of costs to other utility customers;
-
Shall require that net-metering equipment be installed to accurately measure the electricity:
- Supplied by the electric utility to each net-metering customer; and
- Generated by each net-metering customer that is fed back to the electric utility over the applicable billing period;
- May authorize an electric utility to assess a net-metering customer a greater fee or charge of any type, if the electric utility's direct costs of interconnection and administration of net metering outweigh the distribution system, environmental, and public policy benefits of allocating the costs among the electric utility's entire customer base;
- For net-metering customers who receive service under a rate that does not include a demand component, shall require an electric utility to credit a net-metering customer with the amount of any accumulated net excess generation as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate in the next applicable billing period;
- Except as provided in subdivision (b)(9) of this section, for net-metering customers who receive service under a rate that includes a demand component, shall require an electric utility to credit the net-metering customer with any accumulated net excess generation in the next applicable billing period and base the bill of the net-metering customer on the net amount of electricity that the net-metering customer has received from or fed back to the electric utility during the billing period;
- May expand the scope of net metering to include additional facilities that do not use a renewable energy resource for a fuel if so doing results in distribution system, environmental, or public policy benefits;
-
Shall provide that:
-
- The amount of the net excess generation credit as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate remaining in a net-metering customer's account at the close of a billing cycle shall not expire and shall be carried forward to subsequent billing cycles indefinitely.
- However, for net excess generation credits older than twenty-four (24) months, a net-metering customer may elect to have the electric utility purchase the net excess generation credits in the net-metering customer's account at the electric utility's avoided cost, plus any additional sum determined under this section, if the sum to be paid to the net-metering customer is at least one hundred dollars ($100).
-
An electric utility shall purchase at the electric utility's avoided cost, plus any additional sum determined under this section, any net excess generation credit remaining in a net-metering customer's account when the net-metering customer:
- Ceases to be a customer of the electric utility;
- Ceases to operate the net-metering facility; or
- Transfers the net-metering facility to another person; and
- A renewable energy credit created as the result of electricity supplied by a net-metering customer is the property of the net-metering customer that generated the renewable energy credit; and
-
-
May allow a net-metering facility with a generating capacity that exceeds the limits provided under § 23-18-603(8)(B)(ii) or § 23-18-603(8)(B)(iii) of up to twenty thousand kilowatts (20,000 kW) if:
-
For any net-metering facility with a generating capacity of less than five thousand kilowatts (5,000 kW):
- The net-metering facility is not for residential use;
- Increasing the generating capacity limits for individual net-metering facilities results in distribution system, environmental, or public policy benefits or allowing an increased generating capacity for the net-metering facility would increase the state's ability to attract businesses to Arkansas; and
- Allowing an increased generating capacity for the net-metering facility is in the public interest; or
-
For any net-metering facility with a generating capacity of greater than five thousand kilowatts (5,000 kW):
- The net-metering facility is not for residential use;
- Increasing the generating capacity limits for individual net-metering facilities results in distribution system, environmental, or public policy benefits or allowing an increased generating capacity for the net-metering facility would increase the ability of the state to attract business to Arkansas;
- Allowing an increased generating capacity for the net-metering facility does not result in an unreasonable allocation of costs to other utility customers; and
- Allowing an increased generating capacity for the net-metering facility is in the public interest; and
-
For any net-metering facility with a generating capacity of less than five thousand kilowatts (5,000 kW):
-
- Shall allow the net-metering facility of a net-metering customer who has submitted a standard interconnection agreement, as referred to in the rules of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, to the electric utility after July 24, 2019, but before December 31, 2022, to remain under the rate structure in effect when the net-metering contract was signed, for a period not to exceed twenty (20) years, subject to approval by a commission.
- A net-metering facility under subdivision (b)(10)(A) of this section remains subject to any other change or modification in rates, terms, and conditions.
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (c)(2) of this section, an electric utility shall separately meter, bill, and credit each net-metering facility even if one (1) or more net-metering facilities are under common ownership.
-
-
- At the net-metering customer's discretion, an electric utility may apply net-metering credits from a net-metering facility to the bill for another meter location if the net-metering facility and the separate meter location are under common ownership within a single electric utility's service area.
- Subdivision (c)(2)(A)(i) of this section does not apply if more than two (2) customers that are governmental entities or other entities that are exempt from state and federal income tax defined under § 23-18-603(7)(C) co-locate at a site hosting the net-metering facility.
- Net excess generation shall be credited first to the net-metering customer's meter to which the net-metering facility is physically attached.
- After applying net excess generation under subdivision (c)(2)(B) of this section and upon request of the net-metering customer under subdivision (c)(2)(A) of this section, any remaining net excess generation shall be credited to one (1) or more of the net-metering customer's meters in the rank order provided by the net-metering customer.
-
- A person who acts as a lessor or service provider as described in § 23-18-603(7)(B) or § 23-18-603(7)(C) shall not be considered a public utility as defined in § 23-1-101.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1781, § 4; 2007, No. 1026, § 2; 2013, No. 1221, § 1; 2015, No. 827, §§ 2-6; 2019, No. 464, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The reference in subdivision (b)(6) to “subdivision (b)(9) of this section” is incorrect. The intended reference appears to be “subdivision (b)(8) of this section”.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote (b)(1) and present (b)(6); in (b)(4), deleted “or may increase the peak limits for individual net-metering facilities” following “for a fuel” and “desirable” following “results in”; and inserted (b)(5) and redesignated the remaining subdivision accordingly.
The 2015 amendment substituted “a commission” for “the Arkansas Public Service Commission” in the introductory language of (b); rewrote (b)(1); substituted “generating capacity” for “peak” in (b)(5); rewrote (b)(6); added (b)(7); and added (c) and (d).
The 2019 amendment substituted “net metering” for “net-metering contracts, including” in (b)(1); deleted (b)(1)(A); inserted (b)(2) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; substituted “Shall require” for “A requirement” in (b)(3); in (b)(5), added “For net-metering customers who receive service under a rate that does not include a demand component” and inserted “the amount of”; inserted “as measured in kilowatt hours or kilowatt hours multiplied by the applicable rate” in (b)(5) and (b)(8); inserted (b)(6) and redesignated former (b)(4) as (b)(7); deleted former (b)(5); redesignated former (b)(6) as (b)(8); inserted “amount of the” in the introductory language of (b)(8)(A)(i); substituted “plus any additional sum determined under this section” for “estimated annual average avoided cost rate for wholesale energy” in (b)(8)(A)(ii) and (iii); redesignated former (7) as (9) and rewrote; and added (10); deleted (c); redesignated former (d) as (c); redesignated former (c)(2)(A) as (c)(2)(A)(i) and inserted (c)(2)(A)(ii); added (d); updated internal references; and made stylistic changes.
23-18-605. Municipal utilities.
- A municipal utility shall allow net-metering facilities to be interconnected according to the ordinances, rules, or regulations established by the governing body of the municipal utility.
- The governing body of a municipal utility may elect to follow procedures under § 23-18-604 or may adopt ordinances, rules, or regulations establishing the rates, terms, and conditions allowing the interconnection of net-metering facilities, including generation facilities and energy storage devices, whether owned or leased by a customer or operated by a third party on behalf of a customer.
- The governing body of a municipal utility may limit the generating capacity of a net-metering facility to less than twenty-five kilowatts (25 kW) for residential customers or three hundred kilowatts (300 kW) for nonresidential customers only after the governing body finds that the capacity limit is necessary for reliable utility operations or the public health, safety, or welfare.
- The governing body of a municipal utility shall not establish a rate or fee that reduces the value of electric energy from a net-metering facility to below the avoided cost of the municipal utility.
- For customers who receive service under a rate that includes a demand component, the governing body of the municipal utility shall require a municipal utility to credit a net-metering customer with any accumulated net excess generation in the next applicable billing period and base the bill of the customer on the net amount of electricity that the net-metering customer has received from or fed back to the municipal utility during the billing period.
History. Acts 2019, No. 464, § 3.
Subchapter 7 — Arkansas Clean Energy Development Act
23-18-701. Legislative findings and declaration of purpose.
- The General Assembly finds that it is in the public interest to require all electric and natural gas public utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission to consider clean energy and the use of renewable energy resources as part of any resource plan or natural gas procurement plan.
- The purpose of this subchapter is to ensure that all electric and natural gas public utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission will consider clean energy and the use of renewable resources as a part of any resource plan or natural gas procurement plan.
History. Acts 2007, No. 755, § 1; 2011, No. 735, § 1.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment inserted “all” in (a); and inserted “and natural gas” and “or natural gas procurement plan” in (a) and (b).
23-18-702. Public utilities required to consider clean energy resources.
All electric and natural gas public utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the Arkansas Public Service Commission shall consider clean energy and the use of renewable resources as part of any resource plan or natural gas procurement plan.
History. Acts 2007, No. 755, § 1; 2011, No. 735, § 2.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment deleted “Electric” at the beginning of the section heading; and inserted “and natural gas” and “or natural gas procurement plan”.
23-18-703. Authority of commission.
-
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission may consider, propose, develop, solicit, approve, implement, and monitor measures by electric and natural gas public utilities subject to its jurisdiction that cause the electric and natural gas public utilities to incur costs of service and investments that utilize, generate, or involve clean energy resources or renewable energy resources, or both.
-
- The commission may encourage or require electric and natural gas public utilities subject to its jurisdiction to consider clean energy or renewable energy resources, or both, as part of any resource plan or natural gas procurement plan.
-
If the commission approves the use of a clean energy resource or renewable energy resource in the form of a biofuel by an electric or natural gas public utility in a manner that displaces an energy equivalent of fossil fuels, the use of the clean energy resource or renewable energy resource may:
- Be included as part of the electric or natural gas public utility's energy efficiency or conservation program under the Energy Conservation Endorsement Act of 1977, § 23-3-401 et seq.; and
- Apply toward the satisfaction of the electric or natural gas public utility's energy efficiency or conservation goals established by the commission or by law.
- After proper notice and hearings, the commission may approve any clean energy resource or renewable energy resource that it determines to be in the public interest.
- If the commission determines that the cost of a clean energy resource or renewable energy resource is in the public interest, the commission may allow the affected electric or natural gas public utility to implement a temporary surcharge or utilize an existing commission-approved cost-recovery mechanism to recover the appropriate costs of such a resource until the implementation of new rate schedules in connection with the electric or natural gas public utility's next general rate filing in which such costs can be included in the electric or natural gas public utility's base rate schedules or for continued recovery through an approved appropriate tariff.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as limiting or diminishing the authority of the commission to order, require, promote, or engage in any other energy resource practices or procedures.
History. Acts 2007, No. 755, § 1; 2009, No. 164, § 9; 2011, No. 735, § 3.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “electric public utilities” for “companies” in (a)(1); inserted “electric public” preceding “utility’s” twice in (a)(4); and made minor stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment inserted “and natural gas” twice in (a)(1); inserted “or natural gas procurement plan” at the end of (a)(2)(A); inserted (a)(2)(B); and, in (a)(4), inserted “or natural gas” three times, inserted “or utilize an existing commission-approved cost-recovery mechanism”, substituted “recover the appropriate costs” for "recover a portion of the costs”, and added “or for continued recovery through an approved appropriate tariff” at the end.
Subchapter 8 — Broadband Over Power Lines Enabling Act
23-18-801. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Broadband Over Power Lines Enabling Act”.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-802. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter and §§ 14-200-101, 18-15-503, 18-15-504, and 18-15-507:
- “Broadband affiliate” or “affiliate” means an entity that is at least ten percent (10%) owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the electric utility formed to provide regulated or nonregulated broadband services;
- “Broadband Internet service provider” means an entity that provides Internet broadband services to others on a wholesale basis or to end-use customers on a retail basis;
- “Broadband operator” means an entity that owns or operates a broadband system on the electric power lines and related facilities of an electric utility;
- “Broadband services” means the provision of regulated or nonregulated connectivity to a high-speed, high-capacity transmission medium that can carry signals from multiple independent network carriers over electric power lines and related facilities, whether above or below ground;
- “Broadband system” means the materials, equipment, and other facilities installed to facilitate the provision of broadband services;
- “Electric delivery system” means the power lines and related facilities used by an electric utility to deliver electric energy;
- “Electric utility” means a public utility as defined under § 23-1-101 that produces, generates, transmits, delivers, or furnishes electricity to or for the public for compensation;
- “Nonregulated broadband services” means broadband services and technologies that are not provided for the operational performance of an electric utility, including without limitation, the provision of broadband services at wholesale or at retail; and
-
“Regulated broadband services” means broadband services and technologies that are used and useful for the operational performance and service reliability of an electric utility, including without limitation:
- Automated meter reading;
- Real-time system monitoring;
- Remote service control;
- Outage detection and restoration;
- Predictive maintenance and diagnostics; and
- Monitoring and enhancement of power quality.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-803. Permissible broadband systems.
- An electric utility, an affiliate of an electric utility, or a person unaffiliated with an electric utility may own, construct, maintain, and operate a broadband system and provide broadband services on an electric utility's electric delivery system consistent with the requirements of this subchapter.
- This subchapter does not require an electric utility to implement a broadband system, provide broadband services, or allow others to install broadband facilities or use the electric utility's facilities to provide broadband services.
- An electric utility, a broadband affiliate, or a broadband operator may elect to install and operate a broadband system on part or all of its electric delivery system in any part or all of its certificated service territory.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-804. Ownership and operation of broadband system.
-
An electric utility may:
- Own or operate a broadband system on the electric utility's electric delivery system;
- Allow an affiliate to own or operate a broadband system on the electric utility's electric delivery system;
- Allow an unaffiliated entity to own or operate a broadband system on the electric utility's electric delivery system;
- Provide broadband service, including without limitation, Internet service over a broadband system; and
- Allow an affiliate or unaffiliated entity to provide broadband service, including without limitation, Internet service over a broadband system.
- The electric utility shall determine which broadband Internet service providers may have access to broadband capacity on the broadband system.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-805. Jurisdiction.
-
Except as provided in this subchapter, neither the state nor any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state has jurisdiction over:
- An electric utility's ownership or operation of a broadband system; or
- The provision of broadband services by the electric utility, a broadband affiliate, or a broadband operator.
- Nothing in this subchapter shall interfere with the Arkansas Public Service Commission's authority to regulate public utilities pursuant to § 23-2-301 et seq.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
Case Notes
Private Property Rights.
Circuit court erred in dismissing the property owners' complaint against an electric company and in finding that the Arkansas Public Service Commission had primary jurisdiction of the case; there was no dispute that the company had a right to use its own existing lines to transmit broadband services, but the owners' issue was with the company's entry onto their land to install completely new lines for broadband services without just compensation or an assessment of damages for the increased interference. The circuit court had exclusive, original jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving private-property rights and damages for inverse condemnation and increased interference. Stanley v. Ozarks Elec. Coop. Corp., 2019 Ark. App. 560, 591 S.W.3d 322 (2019).
23-18-806. Fees and charges.
- An electric utility may charge a broadband affiliate, an unaffiliated broadband Internet service provider, or a broadband operator for the costs of the construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of the broadband system of the broadband affiliate, unaffiliated broadband Internet service provider, or broadband operator.
-
- The costs incurred by an electric utility to own, operate, construct, and maintain a broadband system and to provide broadband services on its electric delivery system either by itself or through a broadband affiliate or broadband operator shall be allocated to the electric utility's accounts between regulated broadband services and nonregulated broadband services in accordance with applicable accounting principles and standards.
-
-
Costs allocated to nonregulated broadband services:
- Are outside the scope of an electric utility's providing of electric service to the public;
- Shall not be recoverable through its rates for the providing of electric service; and
- Are not subject to the jurisdiction of the state or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state.
- Revenues received by an electric utility attributable to the providing of nonregulated broadband services shall not be included as revenues to the electric utility for purposes of establishing its rates for the providing of electric service.
-
Costs allocated to nonregulated broadband services:
-
- If all or part of a broadband system is installed on poles or other structures of a telephone utility and the broadband operator is unaffiliated with the electric utility that owns the electric delivery system, before installing equipment the unaffiliated broadband operator shall enter into the customary agreement used by the telephone utility for access to the electrical delivery system and shall pay the telephone utility an annual fee consistent with the usual and customary charges for access to the space occupied by that portion of the broadband system.
- If all or part of a broadband system is installed on poles or other structures of a telephone utility and the broadband operator is an electric utility or broadband affiliate, the existing contract governing placement of the electric utility's attachments on poles or other structures shall apply and no additional annual fee or approval shall be required if the broadband system is installed within the space allocated for electric service under the contract.
-
An electric utility shall not:
- Charge an affiliate under this section an amount less than the electric utility would charge an unaffiliated entity for the same item or class of items; or
- Pay an affiliate under this section an amount more than the affiliate would charge an unaffiliated entity for the same item or class of items.
- A transaction between an electric utility and an affiliate and allocations between an electric utility account and a nonutility account with respect to broadband services and broadband systems are subject to this subchapter.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-807. Reliability of electric systems maintained.
- An electric utility that installs or operates or permits the installation or operation of a broadband system on its electric delivery system shall employ all reasonable measures to ensure that the operation of the broadband system does not interfere with or diminish the reliability of the electric utility's electric delivery system.
- If a disruption in the provision of electric service occurs, the electric utility shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the retail electric delivery service tariff.
- The provision of broadband services shall be at all times secondary to the reliable provision of electric delivery services.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, § 1.
23-18-808. Compliance with federal law.
- A broadband operator shall comply with all applicable federal laws, including those protecting licensed spectrum users from interference by broadband systems.
- To the extent required by Federal Communications Commission rules, the operator of a radio frequency device shall discontinue using a radio frequency device that causes harmful interference.
History. Acts 2007, No. 739, §§ 1, 5.
Subchapter 9 — Arkansas Electric Utility Storm Recovery Securitization Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 6: Apr. 1, 2009. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that due to recent devastating ice storms in the state resulting in large storm recovery costs which could be securitized and financed under the provisions of this act, there is an immediate need to authorize the securitization financing for storm recovery costs, which may lower the financing costs or mitigate the impact on rates in comparison to traditional utility financing or other traditional utility recovery methods thereby benefitting customers. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-18-901. Short title — Purpose.
- This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Arkansas Electric Utility Storm Recovery Securitization Act”.
- The purpose of this subchapter is to enable Arkansas electric utilities, if authorized by a financing order issued by the Arkansas Public Service Commission, to use securitization financing for storm recovery costs, which may lower the financing costs or mitigate the impact on rates in comparison with traditional utility financing or other traditional utility recovery methods thereby benefitting customers. The storm recovery bonds will not be public debt. The proceeds of the storm recovery bonds shall be used for the purposes of recovering storm recovery costs solely as set forth in a financing order issued by the commission to encourage and facilitate the rebuilding of utility infrastructure damaged by storms. Securitization financings for storm recovery costs are hereby recognized to be a valid public purpose. Federal tax laws and revenue procedures expressly require that certain state legislation be enacted in order for such transactions to receive certain federal tax benefits. The General Assembly finds a public need to promote such securitization financings by providing clear and exclusive methods to create, transfer, and encumber interests in storm recovery property as defined in this subchapter. This need can be met by providing in this subchapter such methods and by establishing that any conflict between the rules governing sales, assignments, or transfers of, or security interests or other encumbrances of any nature upon intangible personal property under other Arkansas laws and the methods provided in this subchapter, including without limitation with regard to creation, perfection, priority, or enforcement, shall be resolved in favor of the rules and methods established in this subchapter with regard to storm recovery property.
-
The intent of this subchapter is to provide benefits to Arkansas customers by allowing an Arkansas electric utility, if authorized by a financing order, to achieve certain tax and credit benefits of financing storm recovery costs on a similar basis with utilities in other states. This subchapter addresses certain property, security interests, and other matters to ensure that the financial, state income tax, state franchise tax, and federal income tax benefits of financing storm recovery costs through securitization are available in Arkansas. Financing orders issued under this subchapter shall not be considered as or deemed to be single issue ratemaking. The beneficial income tax and credit characteristics that may be achieved include the following:
- Treating the storm recovery bonds as debt of the electric utility for state and federal income tax purposes;
- Treating the storm recovery charges as gross income to the electric utility recognized under the utility's usual method of accounting for income taxes, rather than recognizing gross income upon the receipt of the financing order or the receipt of cash in exchange for the sale of the storm recovery property or the issuance of the storm recovery bonds;
- Avoiding the recognition of debt on the electric utility's balance sheet for certain credit and regulatory purposes by reason of the storm recovery bonds;
- Treating the sale, assignment, or transfer of the storm recovery property by the electric utility as a true sale for state law and bankruptcy purposes; and
- Avoiding any adverse impact of the financing on the electric utility's credit rating.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-902. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Ancillary agreement” means any bond, insurance policy, letter of credit, reserve account, surety bond, swap arrangement, hedging arrangement, liquidity or credit support arrangement, or other financial arrangement entered into in connection with the issuance of storm recovery bonds;
- “Assignee” means any legal or commercial entity, including but not limited to, a corporation, statutory trust, limited liability company, partnership, limited partnership, or other legally recognized entity to which an electric utility sells, assigns, or transfers, other than as security, all or a portion of its interest in or right to storm recovery property. The term also includes any legal or commercial entity to which an assignee sells, assigns, or transfers, other than as security, all or a portion of its interest in or right to storm recovery property;
- “Commission” means the Arkansas Public Service Commission;
- “Electric utility” means any person or any combination of persons, or lessees, trustees, and receivers of such person, now or hereafter owning or operating for compensation in this state equipment or facilities for producing, generating, transmitting, distributing, selling, or furnishing electricity to or for the public at retail in this state including an electric cooperative corporation generating or transmitting electricity;
-
“Financing costs” means:
- Interest, discounts, and acquisition, defeasance, or redemption premiums that are payable on storm recovery bonds;
- Any payment required under an ancillary agreement and any amount required to fund or replenish reserve or other accounts or subaccounts established under the terms of any indenture, ancillary agreement, or other financing documents pertaining to storm recovery bonds;
- Any other cost related to issuing, supporting, repaying, and servicing storm recovery bonds, including, but not limited to, servicing fees, billing or other information system programming costs, accounting and auditing fees, trustee fees and expenses, legal fees and expenses, consulting fees and expenses, administrative fees and expenses, placement and underwriting fees and expenses, independent director and manager fees and expenses, capitalized interest, rating agency fees and expenses, stock exchange listing and compliance fees and expenses, and filing fees, including costs related to obtaining the financing order;
- Any income taxes and license or other fees imposed on the revenues generated from the collection of storm recovery charges or otherwise resulting from the collection of storm recovery charges, in any such case whether paid, payable, or accrued;
- Any gross receipts, franchise, use, and other taxes or similar charges including, but not limited to, regulatory assessment fees, in any such case whether paid, payable, or accrued, imposed upon the electric utility, any assignee, or any financing party with respect to the receipt of storm recovery charges or the issuance of storm recovery bonds; and
- Any other costs, charges, and amounts approved by the commission in a financing order;
-
“Financing order” means an order of the commission adopted upon petition of an electric utility and pursuant to § 23-18-903 which, among other things, allows for:
- The issuance of storm recovery bonds;
- The imposition, collection, and periodic adjustments of storm recovery charges;
- The creation of storm recovery property; or
- The sale, assignment, or transfer of storm recovery property to an assignee;
- “Financing party” means any holder of storm recovery bonds and any trustee, collateral agent, or other person acting for the benefit of holders of storm recovery bonds;
- “Financing statement” has the same meaning as that provided in the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq.;
- “Secured party” means a financing party in favor of which an electric utility or its direct or indirect successors or assignees creates a security interest in all or any portion of its interest in or right to storm recovery property. A secured party may be granted a security interest in storm recovery property under this subchapter and a security interest in other collateral subject to the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., in one (1) security agreement;
- “Security interest” means a pledge, hypothecation, or other encumbrance of or other right over any portion of storm recovery property created by contract to secure the payment or performance of an obligation;
- “Storm” means, individually or collectively, a named tropical storm, a named hurricane, a tornado, an ice or snow storm, a flood, an earthquake or other significant weather event or a natural disaster that occurred during the calendar year 2009 or thereafter;
- “Storm recovery activity” means any activity or activities by or on behalf of an electric utility in connection with the restoration of service associated with electric power outages affecting customers of an electric utility as the result of a storm or storms, including, but not limited to, all internal and external labor costs and all costs related to mobilization, staging, and construction, reconstruction, replacement, or repair of electric generation, transmission, or distribution facilities;
- “Storm recovery bonds” means bonds, debentures, notes, certificates of beneficial interest, certificates of participation, certificates of ownership, or other evidences of indebtedness or ownership that are issued pursuant to or in connection with an indenture, contract, ancillary agreement, or other agreement of an electric utility or an assignee pursuant to a financing order, the proceeds of which are used directly or indirectly to provide, recover, finance, or refinance commission-approved storm recovery costs, financing costs, and costs to replenish or fund a storm recovery reserve to such level as the commission may authorize in a financing order, and which are secured by or payable from storm recovery property. If certificates of beneficial interest or certificates of participation or ownership are issued, references in this subchapter to principal, interest, or premium shall be construed to refer to comparable amounts under those certificates;
- “Storm recovery charges” means the amounts authorized by the commission to recover, finance, or refinance storm recovery costs, financing costs, and the costs to create, fund, or replenish a storm recovery reserve, including, but not limited to, through the issuance and repayment of storm recovery bonds. Such charges shall be imposed on all customer bills and collected by an electric utility or its successors or assignees, or a collection agent. Such charges shall be nonbypassable charges that are separate and apart from the electric utility's base rates and shall be paid by all existing and future customers receiving transmission or distribution service, or both, from the electric utility or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules as provided in the financing order. An individual customer's monthly storm recovery charges shall be based upon the customer's then current monthly billing determinants;
- “Storm recovery costs” means, at the option and request of the electric utility and as approved by the commission pursuant to § 23-18-903, reasonable and necessary costs, including costs expensed, charged to self-insurance reserves, capitalized, or otherwise financed, that are incurred, including costs incurred prior to April 1, 2009, or expected to be incurred by an electric utility in undertaking a storm recovery activity. Such costs shall be net of applicable insurance proceeds and, where determined appropriate by the commission, shall include adjustments for normal capital replacement and operating costs, lost revenues, or other potential offsetting adjustments. Storm recovery costs shall include carrying costs, at simple interest which shall accrue at a rate equal to the electric public utility's last approved rate-base rate of return, from the date on which the storm recovery costs were incurred until the date that storm recovery bonds are issued or until storm recovery costs are otherwise recovered. Storm recovery costs shall also include the costs of retiring or purchasing any indebtedness or equity relating to or associated with storm recovery activities, including accrued interest, premium and other fees, costs, and charges related thereto. Storm recovery costs shall also include the costs to create or fund any storm recovery reserves or to replenish any shortfall in any storm recovery reserves;
-
“Storm recovery property” means:
- All rights and interests of an electric utility or the direct or indirect successors or assignees of the electric utility under a financing order, including the right to impose, bill, collect, and receive storm recovery charges authorized in the financing order and to obtain periodic adjustments to such charges as provided in the financing order; and
- All revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money, or proceeds arising from the rights and interests specified in subdivision (16)(A) of this section, regardless of whether such revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds are imposed, billed, received, collected, or maintained together with or commingled with other revenues, collections, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds;
- “Storm recovery reserve” means an electric utility's storm cost reserve account established pursuant to § 23-4-112; and
- “Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions” means § 4-9-101 et seq.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-903. Financing orders.
-
An electric utility may petition the Arkansas Public Service Commission for a financing order. For each petition, the electric utility shall:
- Describe the storm recovery activities that the electric utility has undertaken or proposes to undertake and describe the reasons for undertaking the activities;
- Set forth the known storm recovery costs and estimate the costs of any storm recovery activities that are not completed or for which the costs are not yet known as identified and requested by the electric utility;
- Set forth the level of the storm recovery reserve that the utility proposes to establish or replenish and has determined would be appropriate to recover through storm recovery bonds and is seeking to so recover and such level that the utility is funding or will seek to fund through other means, together with a description of the factors and calculations used in determining the amounts and methods of recovery;
- Indicate whether the electric utility proposes to finance all or a portion of the storm recovery costs and storm recovery reserve using storm recovery bonds. If the electric utility proposes to finance a portion of such costs, the electric utility shall identify that portion in the petition;
- Estimate the financing costs related to the storm recovery bonds;
- Estimate the storm recovery charges necessary to pay in full as scheduled the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the proposed storm recovery bonds and related financing costs until the legal final maturity date of such proposed storm recovery bonds;
- Estimate any cost savings from or demonstrate how rate impacts to customers would be mitigated as a result of financing storm recovery costs with storm recovery bonds in comparison with traditional utility financing or other traditional utility recovery methods;
- File with the petition direct testimony supporting the petition; and
- Facilitate a timely audit of all capital costs included within the storm recovery costs proposed to be financed by storm recovery bonds.
-
-
- Proceedings on a petition submitted pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall begin with a petition by an electric utility and shall be disposed of in accordance with the commission's rules promulgated pursuant to the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., except that the provisions of this section, to the extent applicable, shall control.
- Within seven (7) days after the filing of a petition, the commission shall publish a case schedule, which schedule shall place the matter before the commission on an agenda that will permit a commission decision no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the date the petition is filed.
- No later than one hundred thirty-five (135) days after the date the petition is filed, the commission shall issue a financing order or an order rejecting the petition. The commission shall issue a financing order authorizing financing of reasonable and prudent storm recovery costs, the storm recovery reserve amount determined appropriate by the commission, and financing costs if the commission finds that the issuance of the storm recovery bonds and the imposition of storm recovery charges authorized by the order are reasonably expected to result in lower overall costs or to mitigate rate impacts to customers as compared with traditional utility financing or other traditional utility recovery methods. Any determination of whether storm recovery costs are reasonable and prudent shall be made with reference to the general public interest in and the scope of effort required to provide the safe and expeditious restoration of electric service.
-
In a financing order issued to an electric utility, the commission shall:
- Specify the amount of storm recovery costs and the level of storm recovery reserves, taking into consideration, to the extent the commission deems appropriate, any other methods used to recover these costs, and describe and estimate the amount of financing costs which may be recovered through storm recovery charges, and specify the period over which such costs may be recovered;
- Determine that the proposed structuring, expected pricing, and financing costs of the storm recovery bonds are reasonably expected to result in lower overall costs or would mitigate rate impacts to customers as compared with traditional utility financing or other traditional utility recovery methods;
- Provide that, for the period specified pursuant to subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section, the imposition and collection of storm recovery charges authorized in the financing order shall be nonbypassable and paid by all customers receiving transmission or distribution service, or both, from an electric utility or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules as provided in the financing order. An individual customer's monthly storm recovery charges shall be based upon the customer's then-current monthly billing determinants;
- Determine what portion, if any, of the storm recovery reserves must be held in a funded reserve and any limitations on how the reserve may be held, accessed, or used;
- Include a formula-based mechanism for making expeditious periodic adjustments in the storm recovery charges that customers are required to pay under the financing order and for making any adjustments that are necessary to correct for any projected overcollection or undercollection of the charges or to otherwise ensure the timely payment as scheduled of storm recovery bonds and financing costs and other required amounts and charges payable in connection with the storm recovery bonds;
- Specify the storm recovery property that is or shall be created in favor of an electric utility or its successors or assignees and that shall be used to pay or secure storm recovery bonds and financing costs;
- Specify the degree of flexibility to be afforded to the electric utility in establishing the terms and conditions of the storm recovery bonds, including, but not limited to, repayment schedules, interest rates, and other financing costs;
- Provide the method by which storm recovery charges shall be allocated among the customer classes;
- Provide that after the final terms of an issuance of storm recovery bonds have been established and prior to the issuance of storm recovery bonds, the electric utility shall determine the resulting initial storm recovery charge in accordance with the financing order and such initial storm recovery charge shall be final and effective upon the issuance of such storm recovery bonds without further commission action; and
- Include any other conditions that the commission considers appropriate and that are not otherwise inconsistent with this section.
-
- After the issuance of a financing order, the electric utility retains sole discretion regarding whether to cause the storm recovery bonds to be issued, including the right to defer or postpone such sale, assignment, transfer, or issuance, provided that the storm recovery bonds, other than refunding bonds, may not be issued later than two (2) years from the date the financing order becomes final and nonappealable, or such later date as provided in the financing order, and provided further, that nothing herein shall prevent the electric utility, prior to the end of such two-year period, from abandoning the issuance of storm recovery bonds under the financing order, if this is in the best interest of ratepayers, by filing with the commission a statement of abandonment and the reasons therefore. Nothing herein limits the rights of the electric utility to recover its storm recovery costs under normal ratemaking should the storm recovery bonds not be issued.
- At the request of an electric utility, the commission may commence a proceeding and issue a subsequent financing order that provides for the refinancing, retiring, or refunding of storm recovery bonds issued pursuant to the original financing order if the commission finds that the subsequent financing order satisfies all of the criteria specified in subsection (b) of this section. Effective on retirement of the refunded storm recovery bonds and the issuance of new storm recovery bonds, the commission may adjust the related storm recovery charges accordingly or establish substitute storm recovery charges. Any such financing order shall be issued within one hundred twenty (120) days of the application of an electric utility therefor.
- All financing orders by the commission shall be operative and in full force and effect from the date of issuance by the commission.
- An aggrieved party or intervenor may within fifteen (15) days after the financing order or a supplemental order made by the commission becomes effective, or within fifteen (15) days from the date an application for rehearing is deemed to be denied as provided in § 23-2-422, file in the Court of Appeals a petition setting forth the particular cause of objection to the order complained of. Inasmuch as delay in the determination of the appeal of a financing order may delay the issuance of storm recovery bonds thereby diminishing savings to customers which might be achieved if such bonds were issued as contemplated by a financing order, all such cases shall be given precedence over all other civil cases in the court and shall be heard and determined as speedily as possible.
- A financing order issued to an electric utility may provide that creation of the electric utility's storm recovery property pursuant to subdivision (b)(2)(F) of this section is conditioned upon, and shall be simultaneous with, the sale or other transfer of the storm recovery property to an assignee and the pledge of the storm recovery property to secure storm recovery bonds.
- If the commission issues a financing order, the electric utility shall file with the commission at least annually a request for administrative approval applying the formula-based true-up mechanism to make the adjustments described in subdivision (b)(2)(E) of this section. The review of such a request shall be limited to determining whether there is any mathematical error in the application of the formula-based mechanism relating to the appropriate amount of any projected over-collection or undercollection of storm recovery charges and the amount of an adjustment. Such adjustments shall ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to provide for the payment of principal, interest, acquisition, defeasance, financing costs, or redemption premium and other fees, costs, and charges in respect of storm recovery bonds approved under the financing order. Within fifteen (15) days after receiving an electric utility's request pursuant to this subsection, the commission shall either administratively approve the request or inform the electric utility of any mathematical errors in its calculation. If the commission informs the utility of mathematical errors in its calculation, the utility may correct its error and refile its request. The time frames previously described in this subsection shall apply to a refiled request.
- Subsequent to the earlier of the transfer of storm recovery property to an assignee or the issuance of storm recovery bonds authorized thereby, a financing order is irrevocable, and except as provided in subsections (d) and (h) of this section, the commission may not amend, modify, or terminate the financing order by any subsequent action or reduce, impair, postpone, terminate, or otherwise adjust storm recovery charges approved in the financing order.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2485.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b)(1)(A).
23-18-904. Exceptions to commission jurisdiction.
- If the Arkansas Public Service Commission issues a financing order to an electric utility pursuant to this section, the commission may not, in exercising its powers and carrying out its duties regarding any matter within its authority pursuant to this chapter, consider the storm recovery bonds issued pursuant to the financing order to be the debt of the electric utility other than for federal and state income tax purposes, consider the storm recovery charges paid under the financing order to be the revenue of the electric utility for any purpose, or consider the storm recovery costs or financing costs specified in the financing order to be the costs of the electric utility, nor may the commission determine any action taken by an electric utility which is consistent with the financing order to be unjust or unreasonable.
- The commission may not order or otherwise directly or indirectly require an electric utility to use storm recovery bonds to finance any project, addition, plant, facility, extension, capital improvement, equipment, or any other expenditure. The commission may not refuse to allow an electric utility to recover costs for storm recovery activities in an otherwise permissible and reasonable fashion, or refuse or condition authorization or approval of the issuance and sale by an electric utility of securities or the assumption by it of liabilities or obligations, solely because of the potential availability of storm recovery financing.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-905. Storm recovery property.
- All storm recovery property that is specified in a financing order shall constitute an existing, present intangible property right or interest therein, notwithstanding that the imposition and collection of storm recovery charges depend on the electric utility to which the financing order is issued performing its servicing functions relating to the collection of storm recovery charges and on future electricity consumption. Such property shall exist whether or not the revenues or proceeds arising from the property have been billed, have accrued, or have been collected and notwithstanding the fact that the value or amount of the property is or may be dependent on the future provision of service to customers by the electric utility or its successors or assignees and the future consumption by customers of electricity.
- Storm recovery property specified in a financing order shall continue to exist until the storm recovery bonds issued pursuant to the financing order are indefeasibly paid in full and all financing costs of the bonds have been paid in full.
- All or any portion of storm recovery property specified in a financing order issued to an electric utility, if storm recovery bonds are to be issued, shall be sold, assigned, or transferred to a successor or an assignee, including an affiliate or affiliates of the electric utility created for the limited purpose of acquiring, owning, or administering storm recovery property or issuing storm recovery bonds under the financing order. All or any portion of storm recovery property may be encumbered by a security interest to secure storm recovery bonds issued pursuant to the financing order, amounts payable to financing parties and to counterparties under any ancillary agreements, and other financing costs. Each such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, or pledge made by or security interest granted by an electric utility or affiliate of an electric utility or assignee is considered to be a transaction in the ordinary course of business.
- The description of storm recovery property being sold, assigned, or transferred to an assignee in any sale agreement, purchase agreement, or other transfer agreement, being encumbered, granted, or pledged to a secured party in any security agreement, pledge agreement, or other security document, or indicated in any financing statement is only sufficient if such description or indication refers to the specific financing order that created the storm recovery property and states that such agreement or financing statement covers all or part of such storm recovery property described in such financing order. A description of storm recovery property in a financing statement shall be sufficient if it refers to the financing order creating the storm recovery property. This subsection applies to all purported sales, assignments, or transfers of and all purported grants of liens or security interests in storm recovery property, regardless of whether the related sale agreement, purchase agreement, other transfer agreement, security agreement, pledge agreement, or other security document was entered into, or any financing statement was filed, before or after April 1, 2009.
- If an electric utility defaults on any required payment of charges arising from storm recovery property specified in a financing order, the court specified in § 23-18-903(f) upon application by an interested party and without limiting any other remedies available to the applying party shall order the sequestration and payment of the revenues arising from the storm recovery property to the financing parties or their representatives. Any such order shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding any reorganization, bankruptcy, or other insolvency proceedings with respect to the electric utility or its successors or assigns.
- The interest of a transferee, purchaser, acquirer, assignee, or secured party in storm recovery property specified in a financing order is not subject to setoff, counterclaim, surcharge, or defense by the electric utility or any other person or in connection with the reorganization, bankruptcy, or other insolvency of the electric utility, its successors or assignees, or any other entity.
- Any successor to an electric utility, whether pursuant to any reorganization, bankruptcy, or other insolvency proceeding or whether pursuant to any merger or acquisition, sale, or other business combination or transfer by operation of law, as a result of electric utility restructuring or otherwise, shall perform and satisfy all obligations of, and have the same rights under a financing order as, the electric utility under the financing order in the same manner and to the same extent as the electric utility, including collecting and paying to the person entitled to receive them, the revenues, collections, payments, or proceeds of the storm recovery property.
- Storm recovery bonds shall be nonrecourse to the credit or any assets of the electric utility other than the storm recovery property as specified in the financing order and any rights under any ancillary agreement.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-906. Sale.
The sale, assignment, or transfer of storm recovery property is governed by this section. All of the following apply to a sale, assignment, or transfer under this section:
- The sale, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer of storm recovery property by an electric utility to an assignee that the parties have in the governing documentation expressly stated to be a sale or other absolute transfer is an absolute transfer and true sale of, and not a pledge of or security interest in, the transferor's right, title, and interest in, to, and under the storm recovery property, other than for federal and state income tax purposes. For all purposes other than federal and state income tax purposes, the parties' characterization of a transaction as a sale of an interest in storm recovery property shall be conclusive that the transaction is a true sale and that ownership has passed to the party characterized as the purchaser, regardless of whether the purchaser has possession of any documents evidencing or pertaining to the interest. After such a transaction, the storm recovery property is not subject to any claims of the transferor or the transferor's creditors, other than creditors holding a prior security interest in the storm recovery property perfected under subdivision (4) of this section;
-
The characterization of the sale, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer as a true sale or other absolute transfer under subdivision (1) of this section and the corresponding characterization of the assignee's property interest is not affected by:
- Commingling of amounts arising with respect to the storm recovery property with other amounts;
- The retention by the transferor of a partial or residual interest, including an equity interest or entitlement to any surplus, in the storm recovery property, whether direct or indirect, or whether subordinate or otherwise;
- Any recourse that the assignee may have against the transferor, except that any such recourse shall not be created, contingent upon, or otherwise occurring or resulting from the inability or failure of one (1) or more of the transferor's customers to timely pay all or a portion of the storm recovery charge;
- Any indemnifications, obligations, or repurchase rights made or provided by the transferor, except that such indemnity or repurchase rights shall not be based solely upon the inability or failure of a transferor's customers to timely pay all or a portion of the storm recovery charge;
- The transferor acting as the collector of the storm recovery charges or the existence of any contract that authorizes or requires the electric utility, to the extent that any interest in storm recovery property is sold or assigned, to contract with the assignee or any financing party that it will continue to operate its system to provide service to its customers, will collect amounts in respect of the storm recovery charges for the benefit and account of such assignee or financing party, and will account for and remit such amounts to or for the account of such assignee or financing party, including pursuant to a sequestration order authorized by this subchapter;
- The contrary or other treatment of the sale, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer for tax, financial reporting, or other purposes;
- The granting or providing to holders of the storm recovery bonds of a preferred right to the storm recovery property or credit enhancement by the electric utility or its affiliates with respect to the storm recovery bonds; or
- The status of the assignee as a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary or other affiliate of the electric utility. The separate identity of any assignee of storm recovery property which is a subsidiary or affiliate of the electric utility shall not be disregarded due to the fact that the assignee and the electric utility share any one (1) or more incidents of control, including common managers, officers, directors, members, accounting or administrative systems, consolidated tax returns, or office space, that the assignee may be a disregarded entity for tax purposes, that the utility caused the formation of the assignee, that a contract by the utility and the assignee described in subdivision (2)(E) of this section exists, that the assignee has no other business other than pertaining to the storm recovery property, that the capitalization of the assignee is limited to amounts required for compliance with certain applicable federal income tax laws and revenue procedures, or that other factors used in applying a single business enterprise test to juridical persons are present;
- Any right that an electric utility has in the storm recovery property prior to its pledge, sale, or transfer or any other right of an electric utility created under this subchapter or created in the financing order and assignable under this section or assignable pursuant to a financing order shall be property in the form of a contract right. Transfer of an interest in storm recovery property to an assignee is enforceable only upon the later of the issuance of a financing order, the execution and delivery of transfer documents to the assignee in connection with the issuance of storm recovery bonds, and the receipt of value. An enforceable transfer of an interest in storm recovery property to an assignee other than a security interest shall be perfected against all third parties, including subsequent judicial or other lien creditors, when a notice of that transfer has been given by the filing of a financing statement in accordance with subdivision (4) of this section. The transfer shall be perfected against third parties as of the date of filing;
- Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, financing statements required to be filed under this section shall be filed, indexed, and maintained in the same manner and in the same system of records maintained for the filing of financing statements under the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq. The filing of such a financing statement with the Secretary of State shall be the only method of perfecting a sale, assignment, or transfer of storm recovery property. The sale, assignment, or transfer of an interest in storm recovery property perfected by filing a financing statement is effective against the customers owing payment of the storm recovery charges, creditors of the transferor, subsequent transferees, and all other third persons notwithstanding the absence of actual knowledge of or notice to the customers of the sale, assignment, or transfer. No continuation statement need be filed to maintain such perfection;
-
The priority of the conflicting ownership interests of assignees in the same interest or rights in any storm recovery property is determined as follows:
- Conflicting perfected interests or rights of assignees rank according to priority in time of perfection;
- A perfected interest or right of an assignee has priority over a conflicting unperfected interest or right of an assignee; and
- A perfected interest or right of an assignee has priority over a person who becomes a lien creditor after the perfection of such assignee's interest or right; and
- The priority of a sale, assignment, or transfer perfected under this section is not impaired by any later modification of the financing order or storm recovery property or by the commingling of funds arising from storm recovery property with other funds. Any other security interest that may apply to those funds, other than a security interest perfected under § 23-18-907 shall be terminated when those funds are transferred to a segregated account for the assignee or a financing party. If storm recovery property has been transferred to an assignee or financing party, any proceeds of that property shall be held for and delivered to the assignee or financing party by any collector as a fiduciary.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-907. Security interests.
- The Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., does not apply to storm recovery property or any right, title, or interest of a utility, assignee, or financing party therein except to the extent specified in this subchapter. In addition, such right, title, or interest pertaining to a financing order including, but not limited to, the associated storm recovery property including any revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds of or arising from storm recovery charges pursuant to such order, shall not be deemed proceeds of any right or interest other than of the financing order and the storm recovery property arising from the financing order. All revenues and collections resulting from storm recovery property shall constitute proceeds only of the storm recovery property arising from the financing order.
- Except to the extent provided in this subchapter with respect to filings of financing statements or control of deposit accounts or investment property as original collateral, the creation, attachment, granting, perfection, and priority of security interests in storm recovery property to secure storm recovery bonds is governed solely by this subchapter and not by the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq.
-
-
A security interest in storm recovery property is valid and enforceable against the electric utility and its successor or an assignee and third parties and attaches to storm recovery property only after all of the following conditions are met:
- The issuance of a financing order;
- The execution and delivery of a security agreement, indenture, or other agreement with a financing party relating to the granting of a security interest in connection with the issuance of storm recovery bonds; and
- The receipt of value for the storm recovery bonds.
- A security interest attaches to storm recovery property when all of the foregoing conditions have been met, unless the security agreement expressly postpones the time of attachment.
-
A security interest in storm recovery property is valid and enforceable against the electric utility and its successor or an assignee and third parties and attaches to storm recovery property only after all of the following conditions are met:
- A security interest in storm recovery property is perfected when it has attached and when the applicable financing statement describing the storm recovery property as provided in § 23-18-905(d) has been filed with the Secretary of State. The interest of a secured party is not perfected unless a financing statement sufficient under this subchapter and otherwise in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., is filed, and after perfection the secured party's interest continues in the storm recovery property and all proceeds of such storm recovery property, whether or not billed, accrued, or collected, and whether or not deposited into a deposit account and however evidenced; provided however that a security interest granted by the issuer of and securing storm recovery bonds held by a secured party having control of a segregated deposit account or securities account as original collateral into which revenues, collections, or proceeds of storm recovery property are deposited or credited may be perfected by control as provided in subsection (e) of this section. A security interest in proceeds of storm recovery property is a perfected security interest if the security interest in the storm recovery property was perfected under this subchapter. Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, financing statements required to be filed pursuant to this section shall be filed, indexed, and maintained in the same manner and in the same system of records maintained for the filing of financing statements under the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq. The filing of such a financing statement shall be the only method of perfecting a lien or security interest on storm recovery property except as provided in this subsection. No continuation statement need be filed to maintain such perfection.
- A perfected security interest in storm recovery property and all proceeds of such storm recovery property, whether or not billed, accrued, or collected, and whether or not deposited into a deposit account and however evidenced, shall have priority over a conflicting lien of any nature in the same collateral property, except a security interest is subordinate to the rights of a person that becomes a lien creditor before the perfection of such security interest. A security interest in storm recovery property which qualifies for priority over a conflicting security interest or lien also has priority over the conflicting security interest or lien in proceeds of the storm recovery property. The relative priority of a perfected security interest of a secured party is not adversely affected by any lien or security interest in a deposit account of the electric utility that is a collector and into which the revenues are deposited. The priority of a security interest perfected under this section is not defeated or impaired by any later modification of the financing order or storm recovery property or by the commingling of funds arising from storm recovery property with other funds. Any other security interest, other than a prior security interest perfected under this subchapter, that may apply to those funds shall be terminated as to all funds transferred to a segregated account for the benefit of an assignee or a financing party or to an assignee or financing party directly. The perfection by control, the effect of perfection by control, and the priority of a security interest granted by the issuer of and securing storm recovery bonds held by a secured party having control of a segregated deposit account or securities account as original collateral into which revenues, collections, or proceeds of storm recovery property are deposited or credited shall be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., including the choice of law rules in §§ 4-9-301 — 4-9-307.
- If a default or termination occurs under the terms of the storm recovery bonds, the secured party may foreclose on or otherwise enforce the security interest in any storm recovery property as if it were a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq. A secured party holding a security interest in storm recovery property shall be entitled to exercise all of the same rights and remedies as are available to a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., to the same extent as if those rights and remedies were set forth in this subchapter. A court may order that amounts arising from storm recovery property be transferred to a separate account of the secured party for the financing parties' benefit, to which their security interest shall apply. On application by or on behalf of a secured party to the court of this state specified in this subsection, such court shall order the sequestration and payment to the financing parties of revenues arising from the storm recovery property.
- A security interest created under this subchapter may provide for a security interest in after-acquired collateral. A security interest granted under this subchapter is not invalid or fraudulent against creditors solely because the grantor or the electric utility as collector or servicer has the right or ability to commingle the collateral or proceeds, or collect, compromise, enforce, and otherwise deal with collateral.
-
Any action arising under the provisions of this subchapter to enforce a security interest in any security interest governed by this subchapter or in any storm recovery property, or which otherwise asserts an interest in, or a right in, to, or against any storm recovery property, wherever located or deemed located, shall be brought in the Pulaski County Circuit Court.
- The priority of the conflicting interests of secured parties in the same interest or rights in any storm recovery property is determined as follows:
- Conflicting perfected interests or rights of secured parties rank according to priority in time of perfection. Priority dates from the time a filing covering the interest or right is made in accordance with this section and the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq.;
- A perfected interest or right of a secured party has priority over a conflicting unperfected interest or right of an assignee; and
- A perfected interest or right of a secured party has priority over a person who becomes a lien creditor after the perfection of such secured party's interest or right.
(j) The priority of a lien and security interest in storm recovery property perfected under this section is not impaired by any later modification of the financing order or storm recovery property or by the commingling of funds arising from storm recovery property with other funds. Any other security interest that may apply to the storm recovery property shall be terminated when those funds are transferred to a segregated account for the assignee or a financing party. If storm recovery property has been transferred to an assignee or financing party, any proceeds of that storm recovery property shall be held in trust for the assignee or financing party.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-908. Choice of law — Conflicts.
- The law governing the validity, enforceability, attachment, perfection, priority, exercise of remedies, and venue with respect to the sale, assignment, or transfer of an interest or right or the creation of a security interest in any storm recovery property shall be exclusively the laws of this state, without applying this state's law on conflicts of laws and notwithstanding any contrary contractual provision. The validity, enforceability, attachment, perfection, priority, and exercise of remedies with respect to the sale, assignment, or transfer of an interest or right or the creation of a security interest in any storm recovery property shall be governed by this subchapter, and solely to the extent not addressed by this subchapter, by the Uniform Commercial Code — Secured Transactions, § 4-9-101 et seq., and other laws of this state.
- In the event of conflict between this subchapter and any other law regarding the attachment, creation, perfection, the effect of perfection, or priority of, and sale, assignment, or transfer of, or security interest in, storm recovery property, or the exercise of remedies with respect thereto, this subchapter shall govern to the extent of the conflict.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-909. Storm recovery bonds not public debt — Legal investments.
- Storm recovery bonds are not a debt or a general obligation of the state or any of its political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities and are not a charge on their full faith and credit. An issue of storm recovery bonds does not, directly or indirectly or contingently, obligate the state or any agency, political subdivision, or instrumentality of the state to levy any tax or make any appropriation for payment of the bonds, other than for paying storm recovery charges in their capacity as consumers of electricity. All storm recovery bonds authorized by a financing order by the Arkansas Public Service Commission must contain on the face thereof a statement to the following effect:
- Storm recovery bonds shall be legal investments for all governmental units, financial institutions, insurance companies, fiduciaries, and other persons that require statutory authority regarding legal investment.
“Neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of Arkansas is pledged to the payment of the principal of, or interest on, this bond.”
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-910. Tax treatment.
The Arkansas state income tax treatment of the following events will conform to the federal income tax treatment of such events:
- The electric utility's receipt of a financing order that creates storm recovery property for the benefit of the electric utility;
- The electric utility's receipt of cash or other valuable consideration in exchange for its transfer of the storm recovery property to an affiliate which is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the electric utility; and
- The electric utility's receipt of cash or other valuable consideration in exchange for storm recovery bonds issued by the financing party.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-911. State pledge — Definition.
- For purposes of this section, the term “bondholder” means a person who holds, owns, or is the beneficial holder or owner of a storm recovery bond.
-
-
The state and its agencies, including the Arkansas Public Service Commission, pledge to and agree with bondholders, the owners of the storm recovery property, and other financing parties that the state will not:
- Alter the provisions of this section which make the storm recovery charges imposed by a financing order irrevocable, binding, and nonbypassable charges;
- Take or permit any action that impairs or would impair the value of storm recovery property; or
- Except as allowed under this section, reduce, alter, or impair storm recovery charges that are to be imposed, collected, and remitted for the benefit of the bondholders and other financing parties until any and all principal, interest, premium, financing costs and other fees, expenses, or charges incurred, and any contracts to be performed in connection with the related storm recovery bonds have been paid and performed in full.
- Nothing in this subsection shall preclude limitation or alteration if full compensation is made by law for the full protection of the storm recovery charges collected pursuant to a financing order and of the holders of storm recovery bonds and any assignee or financing party entering into a contract with the electric utility.
-
The state and its agencies, including the Arkansas Public Service Commission, pledge to and agree with bondholders, the owners of the storm recovery property, and other financing parties that the state will not:
- Any person or entity that issues storm recovery bonds may include the pledge specified in subsection (b) of this section in the bonds and related documentation.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
23-18-912. Assignee or financing party not an electric utility.
An assignee or financing party shall not be considered an electric utility or person providing electric service by virtue of engaging in the transactions described in this subchapter.
History. Acts 2009, No. 729, § 1.
Subchapter 10 — Regulation of Electric Demand Response Act
23-18-1001. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Regulation of Electric Demand Response Act”.
History. Acts 2013, No. 1078, § 1.
23-18-1002. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
-
“Aggregator of retail customers” means a person that aggregates demand response from retail customers for the purpose of marketing, selling, or marketing and selling the aggregated demand response:
- To an electric public utility; or
- Into a wholesale electricity market.
-
“Aggregator of retail customers” does not include:
- An electric public utility to the extent that it engages in demand response programs or demand response aggregation activities with the retail customers in its own service territory as certificated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission; or
- A municipally owned electric utility or consolidated municipal utility improvement district to the extent that it engages in demand response programs or demand response aggregation activities with the retail customers in its own service territory; and
-
“Aggregator of retail customers” means a person that aggregates demand response from retail customers for the purpose of marketing, selling, or marketing and selling the aggregated demand response:
-
-
“Demand response” means a reduction in the consumption of on-peak or off-peak electric energy by a retail customer served by an electric public utility or a municipally owned electric utility or consolidated municipal utility improvement district relative to the retail customer's expected consumption in response to:
- Changes in the price of electric energy to the retail customer over time; or
- Incentive payments designed to induce lower consumption of electric energy.
- “Demand response” includes demand response resources capable of providing demand response.
-
“Demand response” means a reduction in the consumption of on-peak or off-peak electric energy by a retail customer served by an electric public utility or a municipally owned electric utility or consolidated municipal utility improvement district relative to the retail customer's expected consumption in response to:
History. Acts 2013, No. 1078, § 1.
23-18-1003. Authority to regulate demand response.
-
The marketing, selling, or marketing and selling of demand response within the State of Arkansas by electric public utilities or aggregators of retail customers to retail customers or by electric public utilities, aggregators of retail customers, or retail customers into wholesale electricity markets is subject to regulation by:
- The Arkansas Public Service Commission under Acts 1935, No. 324, as amended; or
- The local governing authority in the case of a municipally owned electric utility or a consolidated municipal utility improvement district.
-
The commission:
- May establish the terms and conditions for the marketing, selling, or marketing and selling of demand response by electric public utilities or aggregators of retail customers to retail customers or by electric public utilities, aggregators of retail customers, or retail customers into wholesale electricity markets; and
- Shall not regulate demand response investments or demand response actions of a retail customer on the customer's side of the electric meter.
History. Acts 2013, No. 1078, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1935, No. 324, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 14-200-101, 14-200-103 — 14-200-108, 14-200-111, 23-1-101 — 23-1-112, 23-2-301, 23-2-303 — 23-2-308, 23-2-310, 23-2-312, 23-2-314 — 23-2-316, 23-2-402, 23-2-404 [repealed], 23-2-405, 23-2-408, 23-2-410 — 23-2-412, 23-2-414 — 23-2-421, 23-2-426, 23-2-428, 23-2-429, 23-3-101 — 23-3-107, 23-3-112 — 23-3-115, 23-3-118, 23-3-119, 23-3-201 — 23-3-206, 23-4-102, 23-4-103, 23-4-105 — 23-4-109, 23-4-205, 23-4-402 — 23-4-405, 23-4-407 — 23-4-418, 23-4-620 — 23-4-634, 23-18-101.
23-18-1004. Marketing or selling of demand response prohibited.
The marketing, selling, or marketing and selling of demand response into wholesale electricity markets by an aggregator of retail customers or by a retail customer is prohibited unless the Arkansas Public Service Commission or the governing authority of a municipally owned electric utility or a consolidated municipal utility improvement district determines that the marketing, selling, or marketing and selling of demand response into wholesale electricity markets by aggregators of retail customers or by retail customers is in the public interest.
History. Acts 2013, No. 1078, § 1.
Chapter 19 Cable and Video Communications
Publisher's Notes. Former Chapter 19, concerning the Electric Consumer Choice Act of 1999, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 204, § 18. The former chapter was derived from the following sources:
23-19-101. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, § 11.
23-19-102. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-103. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, § 12.
23-19-104. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-105. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-106. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-107. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, §§ 13, 14.
23-19-108. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-109. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 20.
23-19-201. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-202. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-203. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-204. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-205. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, § 15.
23-19-301. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, § 16.
23-19-302. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-303. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-304. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-401. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-402. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, § 17.
23-19-403. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-404. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1; 2001, No. 324, §§ 18, 19.
23-19-501. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-502. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-601. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-602. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-603. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-604. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-605. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-606. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-607. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-608. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-609. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-610. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-611. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-612. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-613. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-614. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-615. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
23-19-616. Acts 1999, No. 1556, § 1.
Effective Dates. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 3: Mar. 6, 2013. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that perhaps the lack of uniformity in the laws governing video service providers is inequitable to certain citizens and government entities; that this act establishes uniform regulation of video service providers and a simplified process for the issuance of a state franchise that will encourage entry of new video service providers to the state marketplace; and that this act is immediately necessary because it ensures uniform regulation of video service providers, assures equality of treatment of video service providers, and encourages new video service providers to enter the state. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
[Reserved]
Subchapter 2 — Arkansas Video Service Act
23-19-201. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Arkansas Video Service Act”.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-202. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Access to video service” means the capability of a video service provider to provide video service at a household address irrespective of whether a subscriber has ordered the service or the service is provided at the address;
-
“Books and records” includes without limitation:
- Records kept in the regular course of business and that are not limited to accounting records;
- Billing detail records; and
- Tax billing detail records;
- “Cable service” means the same as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522, as it existed on January 1, 2013;
- “Certificate of franchise authority” means a certificate issued by the Secretary of State to a video service provider under this subchapter;
-
-
- “Franchise” means the same as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522, as it existed on January 1, 2013.
- A certificate of franchise issued under § 23-19-203 shall constitute a franchise for the purpose of 47 U.S.C. § 542, as it existed on January 1, 2013.
- “Franchise” also means any agreement between a video service provider and a political subdivision under which a video service provider is authorized or otherwise permitted to provide video service in the political subdivision;
-
- “Franchising entity” means this state or a city or county in this state authorized by state or federal law to grant a franchise;
- “Governing body” means the city council or the county quorum court of a political subdivision;
- “Incumbent video service provider” means a person that provides cable or video service and holds a franchise issued by a political subdivision before July 1, 2013;
-
“Nonincumbent video service provider” means:
- A person authorized under this subchapter to provide video service in an area in which video service is being provided by an incumbent video service provider;
- A person authorized under this subchapter to provide service in a geographical area in which on July 1, 2013, there was no incumbent video service provider providing video service; or
- Any other person that provides video service after March 6, 2013, that is not an incumbent video service provider;
- “Political subdivision” means a city, county, or other governmental entity of the state having maintenance and operation responsibility over the public rights-of-way in a geographical area for which a franchise or certificate of franchise authority has been issued by a franchising entity;
- “Public rights-of-way” means the area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, public sidewalk, alley, waterway, or utility easement dedicated for compatible uses;
- “Service area” means contiguous geographical territory in the state where a video service provider may provide video service under a certificate of franchise authority;
- “Service tier” means a category of video service provided by a video service provider to a subscriber and for which a separate rate is charged by the video service provider;
-
- “Subscriber” means a person in this state that buys video service.
- “Subscriber” does not include a person that buys video service for resale and that, on resale, is required to pay a video service provider fee under this subchapter or under the terms of a franchise with a political subdivision;
-
-
“Video service” means the delivery of video programming to subscribers in which:
- The video programming is generally considered comparable to video programming delivered to viewers by a television broadcast station, cable service, or digital television service, without regard to the technology used to deliver the video service, including Internet protocol technologies; and
- The service is provided primarily through equipment or facilities located in whole or in part in, on, under, or over any public right-of-way.
-
“Video service” includes cable service and video service delivered by a community antenna television system but excludes video programming:
- Provided to persons in their capacity as subscribers to commercial mobile service as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 332(d), as it existed on January 1, 2013; or
- Provided as part of and via a service that enables end users to access content, information, electronic mail, or other services offered over the public Internet;
-
“Video service” means the delivery of video programming to subscribers in which:
- “Video service provider” means a provider of video service, including without limitation a cable service provider, an incumbent video service provider, and a nonincumbent video service provider; and
- “Video service provider fee” means the amount paid by a video service provider to a political subdivision under § 23-19-206.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-203. Franchising authority — Application for certificate of franchise authority — Modification of service areas — Term of certificate of franchise authority and termination of certificate of franchise authority.
-
After June 30, 2013:
-
A person shall not act as a video service provider within the state unless the person:
- Is providing video service under a franchise from a political subdivision in effect on March 6, 2013, or a subsequent renewal of the franchise;
-
Elects to:
- Negotiate a franchise with a political subdivision that establishes the terms and conditions applicable to that person to provide video service within the jurisdictional boundaries of the political subdivision and has been issued a franchise from the political subdivision for such a purpose; or
- Adopt the terms and conditions of an existing franchise issued by a political subdivision to an incumbent video service provider providing video service within the same service area and that has been issued a franchise from the political subdivision authorizing the video service provider to provide video services within the political subdivision under the same terms and conditions as the franchise issued to an incumbent video service provider in the political subdivision; or
- Has been granted a certificate of franchise authority to do business in the state by the Secretary of State as authorized in this subchapter; and
-
A franchise between a political subdivision and a video service provider described in subdivision (a)(1)(A) or subdivision (a)(1)(B) of this section expires on the earlier of:
- Ten (10) years from the date the franchise was effective; or
- The original expiration date of the franchise.
-
A person shall not act as a video service provider within the state unless the person:
-
-
- This subchapter does not prohibit a person from holding a franchise issued by a political subdivision and holding a certificate of franchise authority issued by the Secretary of State for a different service area.
- Except as permitted under this section, a video service provider shall not hold a franchise issued by a political subdivision and a certificate of franchise authority issued by the Secretary of State for the same service area.
- An incumbent video service provider may submit an application for a certificate of franchise authority for a service area in which the incumbent video service provider has an existing franchise from a political subdivision for the service area, and upon the granting of a certificate of franchise authority to the incumbent video service provider, the incumbent video service provider's franchise from the political subdivision shall no longer be of any force or effect.
- In each service area in which an incumbent video service provider provides video service, the incumbent video service provider has sole discretion to determine whether or not to apply for a certificate of franchise authority or continue to provide service under an existing franchise issued by a political subdivision.
-
-
An applicant seeking a certificate of franchise authority shall:
-
Submit an application to the Secretary of State that provides:
- The name of the applicant;
- The address of the applicant's principal place of business in the state;
- The names of the applicant's principal executive officers;
- The designated Arkansas representative for the applicant;
- Identification of the political subdivisions or parts of political subdivisions constituting the service areas in which the applicant intends to provide video service; and
- The date on which the applicant intends to begin providing video service in the service area described in the application;
-
Provide verification from an officer, general partner, or managing member of the applicant that:
- The applicant has filed with the Federal Communications Commission the applicable forms needed by the Federal Communications Commission in advance of offering video service in this state;
- The applicant is legally, financially, and technically qualified to provide video service; and
-
- The applicant has and maintains with one (1) or more companies licensed to do business in the state comprehensive general liability insurance coverage and automobile liability insurance coverage.
- The insurance policy shall require that the insurance carrier pay on behalf of the applicant, up to a limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily or personal injury, death, or property damage or loss as a result of any one (1) occurrence or accident, regardless of the number of persons injured or the number of claimants, arising out of the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission of the applicant, or the applicant's employees or agents.
- A certificate of automobile liability self-insurance issued to the applicant and maintained under § 27-19-107 satisfies the liability insurance coverage requirements of this subsection; and
- Submit the filing fee required under § 23-19-204.
-
Submit an application to the Secretary of State that provides:
-
Upon receipt of an application for a certificate of franchise authority under this section, the Secretary of State shall:
- Notify the applicant within thirty (30) days after receipt of the application whether the application needs additional information or is complete;
- Issue a certificate of franchise authority within fifteen (15) days after the application is complete; and
- Provide written notice of a certificate of franchise authority within fifteen (15) days after issuance of a certificate of franchise authority to the governing body of each political subdivision located in the service area designated in the application for a certificate of franchise authority.
-
- A holder of a certificate of franchise authority may change the boundaries of an existing service area authorized under the certificate of franchise authority by filing written notice of the modification with the Secretary of State with the filing fee required under § 23-19-204.
- The boundary modifications are effective on the date the written notice is filed with the Secretary of State.
- Such modifications shall not extend the term of the certificate of franchise authority as established in subsection (h) of this section.
-
- A certificate of franchise authority is transferrable.
-
To transfer a certificate of franchise authority, the successor shall:
- File an application containing the information required in subsection (c) of this section; and
- Acknowledge with the Secretary of State that the successor shall provide notice to the political subdivision with jurisdiction concerning the public rights-of-way to be used to undertake operation and maintenance of video facilities under an approved certificate of franchise authority.
- A notice of transfer is approved once received by the Secretary of State.
- The holder of a certificate of franchise authority may terminate the certificate of franchise authority by submitting a written notice to the Secretary of State and an affected political subdivision.
-
A certificate of franchise authority is:
- Nonexclusive;
- Valid for an initial term of ten (10) years, subject to changes in federal law; and
- Renewable for additional ten-year periods for video service providers in compliance with the requirements of subsection (c) of this section.
- To the extent required for the purposes of 47 U.S.C. §§ 521 — 561, as it existed on January 1, 2013, the state shall constitute the franchising authority for video service providers in the state.
- The duties of the Secretary of State under this subchapter are ministerial. The Secretary of State shall not condition or limit a certificate of franchise authority by imposing on the holder of a certificate of franchise authority any obligations or requirements that are not authorized by this subchapter.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-204. Certificate of franchise authority — Fees.
The fees for a certificate of franchise authority to be collected by the Secretary of State include:
- An application filing fee of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) that includes the cost of issuance of a certificate of franchise authority by the Secretary of State; and
- A fee of one hundred dollars ($100) for accepting an amendment to a certificate of franchise authority or providing a notice required by this subchapter.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-205. Use of public rights-of-way by holder of certificate of franchise authority.
- A video service provider has the rights, powers, and duties provided for telephone and telegraph companies under §§ 23-17-101 — 23-17-105.
- To enable the provision of video service, a political subdivision shall allow the holder of a certificate of franchise authority to install, construct, and maintain facilities in the public rights-of-way over which the political subdivision has jurisdiction.
- A political subdivision shall provide the holder of a certificate of franchise authority with open, comparable, nondiscriminatory, and competitively neutral access to the public rights-of-way in its jurisdiction.
- This subchapter does not exempt a video service provider from compliance with all lawful political subdivision land use regulations, including without limitation zoning laws, building permit requirements, pole attachment agreements, street cut permits, and other permits required for the use of a political subdivision's right-of-way.
-
- In order to construct, maintain, or remove facilities necessary to provide video services, a video service provider may peacefully enter upon the right-of-way of a political subdivision.
- A video service provider is liable for any damage that may result from exercising a right under subdivision (e)(1) of this section.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-206. Video service provider fee — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
- “City subscriber” means a subscriber whose service address is in the jurisdictional limits of a city;
- “County subscriber” means a subscriber whose service address is outside the jurisdictional limits of a city;
-
- “Gross revenue” shall be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and means all consideration of any kind or nature, including without limitation cash, credit, property, and in-kind contributions, services, or goods derived by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority from the operation of the video service provider's network to provide video service within the political subdivision.
-
“Gross revenue” includes all consideration paid to the holder of a certificate of franchise authority and its affiliates only to the extent that the holder of a certificate of franchise authority or its affiliates are acting as a provider of video service under this subchapter, which includes the following:
- All fees charged to subscribers for any video services provided by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority;
- Any fee imposed on the holder of a certificate of franchise authority by this subchapter that is passed through and paid by subscribers, including without limitation the video service fee;
- Compensation received by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority or its affiliates that is derived from the operation of the holder of a certificate of franchise authority's network to provide video service with respect to commissions that are paid to the holder of a certificate of franchise authority as compensation for promotion or exhibition of any products or services on the holder of certificate of franchise authority's network, including “home shopping” or a similar channel under subdivision (a)(3)(C)(v) of this section; and
- A pro rata portion of all revenue derived by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority or its affiliates under compensation arrangements for advertising derived from the operation of the holder of a certificate of franchise authority's network to provide the video service within a political subdivision under subdivision (a)(3)(B)(iii) of this section. The allocation is based on the number of subscribers in the political subdivision divided by the total number of subscribers in relation to the relevant regional or national compensation arrangement. Advertising commissions paid to third parties shall not be netted against advertising revenue included in gross revenue. Revenue of an affiliate derived from the affiliate's provision of video service is gross revenue to the extent the treatment of such revenue as revenue of the affiliate and not of the holder of a certificate of franchise authority has the effect, whether intentional or unintentional, of evading the payment of fees that would otherwise be paid to the political subdivision. In no event shall revenue of an affiliate be gross revenue to the holder of a certificate of franchise authority if such revenue is otherwise subject to fees to be paid to the political subdivision.
-
“Gross revenue” does not include:
- Any revenue not actually received even if billed, such as bad debt;
- Nonvideo service revenues received by any affiliate or any other person in exchange for supplying goods or services used by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority to provide video service;
- Refunds, rebates, or discounts made to subscribers, leased-access providers, or a political subdivision;
- Any revenues from services classified as nonvideo service under federal law, including without limitation revenue received from telecommunications services, revenue received from information services but not excluding video services, and any other revenues attributed by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority to nonvideo service according to Federal Communications Commission rules, regulations, standards, or orders;
- Any revenue paid by subscribers to home shopping programmers directly from the sale of merchandise through any home shopping channel offered as part of the video services but not excluding any commissions that are paid to the holder of a certificate of franchise authority as compensation for promotion or exhibition of any products or services on the holder of a certificate of franchise authority's network, such as a “home shopping” or a similar channel;
- The sale of video services for resale in which the purchaser is required by this subchapter to collect the fees from the purchaser's customer. This subchapter is not intended to limit state's rights under 47 U.S.C. § 542(h);
- The provision of video services to customers at no charge, including without limitation the provision of video services to public institutions, public schools, or governmental entities;
- Any tax of general applicability imposed upon the holder of a certificate of franchise authority or upon subscribers by a city, state, federal, or any other governmental entity and required to be collected by the holder of a certificate of franchise authority and remitted to the taxing entity, including sales and use tax, gross receipts tax, excise tax, utility users' tax, public service tax, communication taxes, and fees not imposed by this subchapter;
- Any foregone revenue from the holder of a certificate of franchise authority's provision of free or reduced cost video services to any person, including without limitation employees of the holder of a certificate of franchise authority, to the political subdivision and other public institutions or other institutions. However, any foregone revenue that the holder of a certificate of franchise authority chooses not to receive in exchange for trades, barters, services, or other items of value is included in gross revenue;
- Sales of capital assets or sales of surplus equipment that are not used by the purchaser to receive video services from the holder of a certificate of franchise authority;
- Directory or Internet advertising revenue, including yellow pages, white pages, banner advertisement, and electronic publishing; and
- Reimbursement by programmers of marketing costs incurred by the holder of a franchise for the introduction of new programming that exceeds the actual costs; and
- “Provider's network” means the optical spectrum wavelengths, bandwidth, or other current or future technological capacity used for the transmission of video programming over wireline directly to subscribers within the geographic area within the political subdivision as designated by the provider in its franchise.
- A video service provider offering video service in a political subdivision under a certificate of franchise authority shall pay to the political subdivision where it provides video service a video service provider fee as may be required by the political subdivision under this section.
-
The video service provider's fee is:
- Paid to the political subdivision where video service is provided quarterly, forty-five (45) days after the close of each calendar quarter;
- Computed as a percentage of gross revenue; and
- Beginning on the first day after the forty-fifth day after the close of the previous calendar quarter, simple interest at a rate equal to that for judgments shall apply to video service provider fee payments past due.
-
The political subdivision shall not require:
- Except as otherwise provided in this section or § 23-19-205, any additional fee or charge from the video service provider; or
- The use of a different calculation method.
-
- The video service provider fee is a percentage of gross revenue and determined by the political subdivision.
-
- If there is an incumbent video service provider providing video service in the political subdivision, the video service provider shall pay an amount equal to the percentage of gross revenue paid by an incumbent video service provider or five percent (5%), whichever is less.
- If there is not an incumbent video service provider having a franchise agreement with the political subdivision or if a political subdivision has not previously established and assessed a fee to an incumbent video service provider, the political subdivision may establish the video service provider fee in an amount not in excess of five percent (5%) of the gross revenue.
- The percentage of gross revenue shall apply equally to all video service providers in the political subdivision, regardless of whether they provide video service under a local franchise or a certificate of franchise authority. However, a fee shall not be imposed on any video service customer except pursuant to a valid franchise or pursuant to a certificate of franchise authority.
-
- A political subdivision shall provide ninety (90) days' notice to a video service provider operating in the political subdivision before establishing, increasing, or lowering a video service provider fee.
- A video service provider fee or a change to the percentage level of an existing fee is not effective until ninety (90) days after the notice required in this subsection is given to the video service provider.
-
Payment of the fees required in this section shall accompany a written report that:
- Identifies the amount of gross revenues received from subscribers for the provision of video service to subscribers; and
- Allows for a proper compliance review by the political subdivision.
-
- A political subdivision may conduct an audit of a video service provider to ensure proper and accurate payment of the video service provider fee.
-
To conduct an audit, the political subdivision shall:
- Provide reasonable advance written notice;
- Audit the video service provider not more than one (1) time in a calendar year; and
- At its discretion, review the books and records at the location in the jurisdiction where the books and records are kept or consent to review copies of the books and records provided electronically.
- The political subdivision and the video service provider are responsible for their respective costs of the audit.
- Payment of an undisputed amount or refund due to the political subdivision or the video service provider is required within sixty (60) days after it is recognized, plus the interest as computed on civil judgments.
- The video service provider shall keep business records showing any gross revenue, even if there is a change in ownership, for at least three (3) years after the revenue is recognized by the video service provider in its books and records.
- A video service provider may identify and collect the amount of the video service provider fee as a separate line item on the regular bill of each subscriber.
-
- Any city annexing lands shall notify a video service provider in writing of any such annexation, including a description of the territory annexed.
- Beginning the first day of the calendar quarter occurring after the video service provider has received at least ninety (90) days' notice of annexation of customers into the city's corporate limits, subscribers within the annexed territory shall be considered city subscribers for purposes of this section.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-207. Prohibited activity — Remedies for noncompliance.
- A video service provider shall not deny access to video service to any group of potential residential subscribers based on the income of the residents in the local area in which such a group resides.
- A franchising authority or political subdivision shall not impose on a video service provider any build-out or other requirements for the construction, placement, or installation of facilities used to provide video services.
-
- If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the holder of a certificate of franchise authority is not in compliance with this subchapter, the court shall order the holder of the certificate of franchise authority to cure the noncompliance within a reasonable time.
- If the holder of a certificate of franchise authority fails to cure the noncompliance as ordered by a court under subdivision (c)(1) of this section, the court may remedy the noncompliance.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-208. Customer service standards.
- A video service provider shall comply with the customer service requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 76.309(c), as it existed on January 1, 2013.
-
- A video service provider shall maintain a local or toll-free number for customer service contact.
-
- A video service provider shall implement an informal process for handling political subdivision or customer inquiries, billing issues, service issues, and other complaints.
- If an issue is not resolved through the informal process under subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section, a political subdivision may request a confidential, nonbinding mediation with the video service provider, with the costs of the mediation to be shared equally between the political subdivision and the video service provider.
-
- A video service provider shall notify customers in writing of a change in rates, programming services, or channel positions as soon as possible.
- Written notice shall be given to subscribers at least thirty (30) days in advance of the change if the change is within the control of the video service provider.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-209. Designation and use of channel capacity for public, educational, or governmental use — Definition.
- As used in this section, “public, education, and government access channels”, also known as “PEG channels”, means channels used for noncommercial local interest programming.
-
-
A video service provider, on the date that it first provides video service to a subscriber in the service area of a political subdivision or within a reasonable time, shall:
- Designate a sufficient amount of capacity on its video service network to allow PEG channels for noncommercial programming; and
- Designate a sufficient amount of capacity on its network to allow up to three (3) PEG channels or channels equal in number to those that have been activated by an incumbent video service provider, if any, on the date that the video service provider first provides video service to a subscriber in a political subdivision, whichever is less.
-
- A political subdivision served by an incumbent video service provider that opts to provide service under a certificate of franchise authority issued under § 23-19-203 is entitled to PEG channels under this section.
- If the political subdivision was not served by an incumbent video service provider, the video service provider shall provide one (1) PEG channel for the use of the political subdivision.
- A political subdivision may waive its rights to a PEG channel.
-
A video service provider, on the date that it first provides video service to a subscriber in the service area of a political subdivision or within a reasonable time, shall:
-
-
A video service provider is responsible for:
- The transmission of the programming on each channel to subscribers; and
- Providing one (1) point of connectivity to each PEG channel distribution point in the political subdivision to be served.
-
A video service provider may:
- Provide PEG channels on a service tier subscribed to by more than fifty percent (50%) of a video service provider's subscribers;
- Consolidate PEG channels to a single channel location; and
- Provide PEG channels through an application on a menu or as a choice on an assigned channel.
-
A video service provider shall not:
- Change a channel location assigned to a PEG channel without providing written notice to the affected political subdivision at least thirty (30) days before the date on which the change is to become effective; or
- Be required to provide an institutional network or equivalent capacity on its video service network.
-
When technically and economically possible, a video service provider shall:
- Use reasonable efforts to interconnect its video network to share PEG channel programming with other video service providers through direct cable, microwave link, satellite, or other reasonable method of connection;
- Negotiate in good faith to provide interconnection of PEG channels; and
- If requesting to interconnect its video network to share PEG channel programming with another video service provider, pay for the cost of the interconnection.
-
A video service provider is responsible for:
-
- The operation, production, and content of any programming aired on a PEG channel is solely the responsibility of the public, educational, and governmental agencies receiving the benefit of the capacity.
-
The entity producing the PEG channel programming and sending it to the video service provider shall ensure that transmissions, content, or programming to be sent to the video service provider is:
- Provided in a manner that is capable of being accepted and sent by the video service provider over its video service network without alteration or change in the content or transmission signal; and
- Compatible with the technology or protocol used by the video service provider to deliver its video service.
- Governmental entities utilizing PEG channels shall make the programming available to video service providers providing service in the governmental entity's jurisdiction in a nondiscriminatory manner.
- The governmental entity providing programming for use on a channel designated for public, education, and government access use may request a change of the point of connectivity but shall pay the video service provider for costs associated with the change of the point of connectivity.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
23-19-210. Applicability of other laws.
- The General Assembly intends that this subchapter be consistent with the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013.
- Except as otherwise stated in this subchapter, this subchapter shall not be interpreted to prevent a video service provider, a political subdivision, or a franchising entity from entering into a negotiated franchise agreement with a political subdivision or seeking clarification of its rights and obligations under federal or state law or to exercise a right or authority under federal or state law.
- This subchapter does not limit, abrogate, or supersede Title 23, Chapter 17, of this Code regarding telecommunications service in the state, and does not require a telephone corporation to get a certificate of franchise authority or local authorization under this subchapter to permit the telephone corporation to construct, upgrade, operate, or maintain its telecommunications system to provide telecommunications service.
- The regulation of a person holding a certificate of franchise authority issued under this subchapter shall be exclusive to the Secretary of State as provided under this subchapter.
- A person holding a certificate of franchise, with respect to any political subdivision identified by the video service provider in its application or modifications filed under § 23-19-203, shall not be required to obtain any authorization, permit, franchise, or license from, or pay another fee or franchise tax to, or post bond in any political subdivision of this state to engage in the business or perform any service authorized under this subchapter.
History. Acts 2013, No. 276, § 2.
Chapters 20-29 [RESERVED.]
[RESERVED]
Subtitle 2. Financial Institutions And Securities
Chapter 30 General Provisions
23-30-101. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, defining “bank,” was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3. The section was derived from Acts 1913, No. 113, § 10; C. & M. Dig., § 674; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 17; Pope's Dig., § 705; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-112; Acts 1987, No. 491, § 2.
For present law, see § 23-45-102.
Chapter 31 State Bank Department and State Banking Board
23-31-101 — 23-31-406. [Repealed.]
A.C.R.C. Notes. The amendments to §§ 23-31-302 and 23-31-303 by Acts 1997, No. 250, are deemed to be superseded by the repeal of Chapters 30-34 by Acts 1997, No. 89. For the resolution of multiple legislation affecting a section, see §§ 1-2-207 and 1-2-303.
Publisher's Notes. This chapter was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3. The chapter was derived from the following sources:
23-31-101. Acts 1981, No. 835, § 1; 1983, No. 730, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-420, 67-421.
23-31-201. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 665; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 685; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-101.
23-31-202. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 2; C. & M. Dig., § 666; Pope's Dig., § 696; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-102.
23-31-203. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 667; Pope's Dig., § 697; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-103.
23-31-204. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 5, 6; 1917, No. 139, § 14, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., §§ 669, 670, 8693; Acts 1927, No. 46, § 1; Pope's Dig., §§ 699, 701; Acts 1967, No. 178, § 1; 1975, No. 924, § 1; 1981, No. 832, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-105, 67-109.
23-31-205. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 6; C. & M. Dig., § 670; Pope's Dig., § 699; Acts 1967, No. 178, § 1; 1969, No. 179, § 22; 1975, No. 924, § 1; 1981, No. 832, § 1; 1985, No. 886, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-109, 67-109n; Acts 1987, No. 491, § 1.
23-31-206. Acts 1947, No. 397, § 3; 1951, No. 35, §§ 1, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-106, 67-106.4.
23-31-207. Acts 1951, No. 35, § 2; 1955, No. 151, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-106.1.
23-31-208. Acts 1951, No. 35, § 3; 1955, No. 151, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-106.2.
23-31-209. Acts 1951, No. 35, § 4; 1955, No. 151, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-106.3.
23-31-210. Acts 1951, No. 35, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-106.4.
23-31-211. Acts 1955, No. 151, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-106.6.
23-31-212. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 7; C. & M. Dig., § 671; Pope's Dig., § 702a; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-107.
23-31-213. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 7; C. & M. Dig., § 671; Acts 1929, No. 102, § 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 702a, 761; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-107, 67-108.
23-31-214. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 8; C. & M. Dig., § 672; Pope's Dig., § 703; Acts 1947, No. 397, § 3; 1951, No. 35, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-106, 67-110.
23-31-215. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 9; C. & M. Dig., § 673; Pope's Dig., § 704; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-111.
23-31-301. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-206.
23-31-302. Acts 1933, No. 60, §§ 1, 2, 4; Pope's Dig., §§ 686, 687, 689; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 20; 1983, No. 131, §§ 1-3; 1983, No. 135, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 6-623 — 6-625, 67-201, 67-201.1, 67-202, 67-203; Acts 1997, No. 250, § 218.
23-31-303. Acts 1980 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 3, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-201.2, 67-201.3; Acts 1997, No. 250, § 219.
23-31-304. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 690; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-204.
23-31-305. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 688; Acts 1959, No. 465, § 1; 1983, No. 731, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-205.
23-31-401. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207.
23-31-402. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207.
23-31-403. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207.
23-31-404. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207.
23-31-405. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207; Acts 1991, No. 892, § 2.
23-31-406. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 13; 1973, No. 489, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-207.
For present law, see Chapter 46 of this title.
Chapter 32 General Provisions
A.C.R.C. Notes. The amendment of § 23-32-715 by Acts 1997, No. 540, is deemed to be superseded by the repeal of Chapters 30-34 by Acts 1997, No. 89. For the resolution of multiple legislation affecting a section, see §§ 1-2-207 and 1-2-303.
Publisher's Notes. Former Chapter 32, concerning the Bank Holding Company Subsidiary Trust Company Formation Act of 1989, was repealed in its entirety by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3. The chapter was derived from the following sources:
23-32-101. Acts 1969, No. 309, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-358.
23-32-102. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 64], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 12; Pope's Dig., § 749; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-321.
23-32-201. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 11; C. & M. Dig., § 675; Pope's Dig., § 706; Acts 1961, No. 223, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-301; Acts 1991, No. 892, § 1.
23-32-202. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 12; C. & M. Dig., § 676; Pope's Dig., § 707; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-302.
23-32-203. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 13; 1917, No. 139, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 677; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 2; 1923, No. 627, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 708; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303; Acts 1993, No. 1219, § 28.
23-32-204. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 13; 1917, No. 139, § 1; C. & M. Dig., § 677; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 2; 1923, No. 627, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 708; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303.
23-32-205. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303.1.
23-32-206. Acts 1969, No. 179, §§ 2, 3, 10; 1977, No. 639, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-303.2 — 67-303.4.
23-32-207. Acts 1969, No. 179, §§ 11, 12; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-303.5, 67-303.6.
23-32-208. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 17; C. & M. Dig., § 681; Acts 1929, No. 102, § 1; 1931, No. 252, § 12; 1933, No. 69, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 825; Acts 1941, No. 104, § 1; 1955, No. 150, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-307.
23-32-209. Acts 1903, No. 135, § 3, p. 228; C. & M. Dig., § 748; Pope's Dig., § 858; Acts 1947, No. 173, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-323.
23-32-210. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 18; C. & M. Dig., § 682; Pope's Dig., § 713; Acts 1949, No. 261, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-308.
23-32-211. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-308.1.
23-32-212. Acts 1917, No. 139, §§ 8, 9, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., §§ 732, 733; Pope's Dig., §§ 775, 776; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-316, 67-317.
23-32-213. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-307.1.
23-32-214. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-307.2.
23-32-215. Acts 1965, No. 76, §§ 1-4; 1967, No. 166, § 1; 1968 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 19, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-353 — 67-356.
23-32-216. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 36; C. & M. Dig., § 702; Pope's Dig., § 728; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-312.
23-32-217. Acts 1933 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 15, §§ 2, 2A; Pope's Dig., §§ 806, 807; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-313, 67-314.
23-32-218. Acts 1935, No. 130, § 1; 1937, No. 325, §§ 1-3; Pope's Dig., §§ 729, 813; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-315.
23-32-219. Acts 1929, No. 102, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 712; Acts 1963, No. 519, § 1; 1969, No. 179, § 23; 1973, No. 512, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-309.2 — 67-309.4, 67-318; Acts 1987, No. 491, § 4.
23-32-220. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303.7.
23-32-221. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303.8.
23-32-222. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 19; C. & M. Dig., § 683; Pope's Dig., § 714; Acts 1965, No. 432, § 1; 1969, No. 179, § 6; 1981, No. 501, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-303.9, 67-309.
23-32-223. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-303.10.
23-32-224. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 19; C. & M. Dig., § 683; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 12; 1913, No. 113, [§ 63], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 3; Pope's Dig., §§ 714, 744; Acts 1965, No. 432, § 1; 1969, No. 179, §§ 16, 23; 1973, No. 512, § 1; 1981, No. 501, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-309 — 67-309.2, 67-310; Acts 1987, No. 491, §§ 3, 4; 1993, No. 154, § 1; 1993, No. 982, § 1; 1995, No. 80, § 1.
23-32-225. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 19; C. & M. Dig., § 683; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 12; Pope's Dig., § 714; Acts 1965, No. 432, § 1; 1981, No. 501, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-309; Acts 1987, No. 491, § 3.
23-32-226. Acts 1933, No. 23, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 823; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-311.
23-32-227. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 14, 15; C. & M. Dig., §§ 678, 679; Pope's Dig., §§ 709, 710; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-304, 67-305.
23-32-228. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 16; C. & M. Dig., § 680; Pope's Dig., § 711; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-306; Acts 1991, No. 892, § 3.
23-32-301. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2109.
23-32-302. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2108.
23-32-303. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 3; 1983, No. 435, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2110; Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 3; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 3; 1989, No. 702, § 1; 1995, No. 606, § 1.
23-32-304. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2115.
23-32-305. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 9; 1983, No. 435, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2116.
23-32-306. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2111.
23-32-307. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 7; 1983, No. 435, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2114.
23-32-308. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2112; Acts 1993, No. 187, § 1; 1995, No. 606, § 3.
23-32-309. Acts 1983, No. 128, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2113.
23-32-401. Acts 1939, No. 320, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-324, 67-325.
23-32-402. Acts 1939, No. 320, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-327.
23-32-403. Acts 1939, No. 320, §§ 3, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-326, 67-328.
23-32-404. Acts 1939, No. 320, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-329.
23-32-501. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-330; Acts 1991, No. 339, §§ 1, 2.
23-32-502. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 2; 1955, No. 245, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-331.
23-32-503. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 3; 1973, No. 460, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-332; Acts 1991, No. 339, § 3.
23-32-504. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 5; 1973, No. 460, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-334.
23-32-505. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-337.
23-32-506. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 7; 1983, No. 869, § 7; 1985, No. 605, § 1; 1985, No. 995, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-336; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 1.
23-32-507. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-335.
23-32-508. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-339.
23-32-509. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-338.
23-32-601. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.
23-32-602. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.2; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-603. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.1; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-604. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.3; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-605. Acts 1953, No. 349, § 7; 1983, No. 869, § 7; 1985, No. 605, § 1; 1985, No. 995, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-336; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-606. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.4; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-607. Acts 1983, No. 869, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-368.5; Acts 1987, No. 962, § 2.
23-32-701. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 20; C. & M. Dig., § 684; Pope's Dig., § 715; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 17; 1973, No. 319, § 1; 1975, No. 362, § 3; 1985, No. 877, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-501, 67-501.1; Acts 1991, No. 633, § 1; 1993, No. 644, § 1; 1995, No. 400, § 1.
23-32-702. Acts 1903, No. 135, § 2, p. 228; C. & M. Dig., § 747; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 10; Pope's Dig., § 857; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-322.
23-32-703. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 29; C. & M. Dig., § 695; Pope's Dig., § 722; Acts 1985, No. 605, § 2; 1985, No. 995, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-502.
23-32-704. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 65] as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 14; Pope's Dig., § 750; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-503.
23-32-705. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 34; C. & M. Dig., § 700; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 18; 1931, No. 252, § 11; 1933, No. 23, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 821; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-540.
23-32-706. Acts 1955, No. 244, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-547.
23-32-707. Acts 1967, No. 143, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-547.1, 67-547.2.
23-32-708. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 17; 1985, No. 877, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-501.1.
23-32-709. Acts 1917, No. 139, § 10; C. & M. Dig., § 734; Pope's Dig., § 777; Acts 1985, No. 471, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-505, 67-505.1.
23-32-710. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 69], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 15; Pope's Dig., § 751; Acts 1949, No. 194, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-541 — 67-543.
23-32-711. Acts 1967, No. 112, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-553.
23-32-712. Acts 1921, No. 465, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 787; Acts 1975, No. 216, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-516.
23-32-713. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 66], as added by Acts 1921, No. 496, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 752; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-504.
23-32-714. Acts 1985, No. 508, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1656 — 67-1658.
23-32-715. Acts 1985, No. 507, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1659, 67-1660.
23-32-716. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 67], as added by Acts 1921, No. 496, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 757; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-522; Acts 1997, No. 540, § 46.
23-32-717. Acts 1995, No. 610, §§ 1-3.
23-32-801. Acts 1919, No. 339, § 3; C. & M. Dig., § 740; Pope's Dig., § 783; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-320.
23-32-802. Acts 1971, No. 186, §§ 1, 2, 4, 5; 1973, No. 318, § 1; 1980 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 8, § 1; 1983, No. 729, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-401, 67-401.1, 67-401.3, 67-401.4.
23-32-803. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 27, 28; C. & M. Dig., §§ 693, 694; Pope's Dig., §§ 720, 721; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-407, 67-408.
23-32-901. Acts 1931, No. 252, §§ 1, 2; Pope's Dig., § 816; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 18; 1977, No. 815, § 1; 1985, No. 837, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-507.
23-32-902. Acts 1931, No. 252, §§ 1, 2; Pope's Dig., § 816; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 18; 1973, No. 520, § 1; 1975, No. 362, §§ 1, 2; 1981, No. 831, §§ 1, 2; 1985, No. 837, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-507; Acts 1989, No. 500, §§ 1, 2; 1991, No. 893, § 1; 1993, No. 919, § 1.
23-32-903. Acts 1931, No. 252, §§ 1, 2; Pope's Dig., § 816; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-507.
23-32-904. Acts 1931, No. 252, § 5; 1937, No. 3, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 820; Acts 1943, No. 140, § 1; 1975, No. 216, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-512, 67-513.
23-32-905. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 30; C. & M. Dig., § 696; Acts 1931, No. 252, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 723; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-506; Acts 1987, No. 901, § 1.
23-32-906. Acts 1931, No. 252, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 817; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-509; Acts 1987, No. 789, § 1.
23-32-907. Acts 1931, No. 252, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 819; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-511.
23-32-908. Acts 1977, No. 746, §§ 1, 2; 1983, No. 143, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-556, 67-557; Acts 1988 (3rd Ex. Sess.), No. 30, § 1.
23-32-909. Acts 1955, No. 376, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-548.
23-32-910. Acts 1935, No. 48, § 1; 1937, No. 138, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 811; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-514.
23-32-911. Acts 1945, No. 36, § 1; 1945, No. 245, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-515.
23-32-912. Acts 1967, No. 176, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-554.
23-32-913. Acts 1991, No. 805, § 1.
23-32-1001. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 35; C. & M. Dig., § 701; Pope's Dig., § 727; Acts 1965, No. 421, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-519.
23-32-1002. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 35; C. & M. Dig., § 701; Pope's Dig., § 727; Acts 1965, No. 421, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-519.
23-32-1003. Acts 1933, No. 61, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 798; Acts 1941, No. 347, § 1; 1947, No. 396, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-524; Acts 1987, No. 769, § 1; 1991, No. 668, § 1; 1992 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 50, § 1.
23-32-1004. Acts 1965, No. 45, §§ 1-3; 1967, No. 503, § 1; 1981, No. 833, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-549 — 67-551.
23-32-1005. Acts 1965, No. 78, § 1; 1983, No. 843, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-552.
23-32-1006. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 68] as added by Acts 1921, No. 496, § 13; Pope's Dig., § 758; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-523.
23-32-1007. Acts 1973, No. 488, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-555.
23-32-1008. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 33; C. & M. Dig., § 699; Pope's Dig., § 725; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-536.
23-32-1009. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 691; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-525.
23-32-1010. Acts 1933, No. 96, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 800; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-526.
23-32-1011. Acts 1933, No. 96, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 801; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-527.
23-32-1012. Acts 1933, No. 96, §§ 3, 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 802, 804; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-528, 67-530.
23-32-1013. Acts 1933, No. 96, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 803; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-529.
23-32-1014. Acts 1933 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 15, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 805; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-531.
23-32-1015. Acts 1987, No. 513, §§ 1-6.
23-32-1101. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 40; C. & M. Dig., § 706; Pope's Dig., § 733; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-409.
23-32-1102. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 37, 38; C. & M. Dig., §§ 703, 704; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 2; Pope's Dig., §§ 730, 731; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-410, 67-411.
23-32-1103. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 39; 1917, No. 139, § 3, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 705; Pope's Dig., § 732; Acts 1979, No. 830, § 1; 1981, No. 680, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-413; Acts 1993, No. 186, § 1.
23-32-1104. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 694; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-418.
23-32-1105. Acts 1917, No. 139, § 13, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 737; Pope's Dig., § 780; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-417.
23-32-1106. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 39, 42; 1917, No. 139, § 3, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., §§ 705, 708; Pope's Dig., §§ 732, 735; Acts 1979, No. 830, § 1; 1981, No. 680, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-413, 67-414.
23-32-1107. Acts 1919, No. 339, § 2; C. & M. Dig., § 739; Pope's Dig., § 782; Acts 1941, No. 108, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-419; Acts 1995, No. 467, § 1.
23-32-1108. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 43; C. & M. Dig., § 709; Pope's Dig., § 736; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-415.
23-32-1109. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 39; 1917, No. 139, § 3, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 705; Pope's Dig., § 732; Acts 1979, No. 830, § 1; 1981, No. 680, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-413.
23-32-1110. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 49; 1917, No. 139, § 4, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 715; Acts 1929, No. 102, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 760; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-416.
23-32-1111. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 41; C. & M. Dig., § 707; Pope's Dig., § 734; Acts 1979, No. 831, § 1; 1985, No. 604, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-412; Acts 1995, No. 468, § 1.
23-32-1201. Acts 1973, No. 228, § 1; 1985, No. 607, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-359; Acts 1987, No. 920, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 2; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 2; 1995, No. 606, § 2.
23-32-1202. Acts 1973, No. 228, §§ 2, 6; 1983, No. 256, § 1; 1985, No. 103, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-360, 67-364; Acts 1987, No. 539, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 4; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 4; 1991, No. 892, § 4.
23-32-1203. Acts 1973, No. 228, § 2; 1985, No. 607, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-360; Acts 1987, No. 920, § 2; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 5; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 5; 1991, No. 892, §§ 5, 6.
23-32-1204. Acts 1973, No. 228, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-361; Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 6; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 6.
23-32-1205. Acts 1973, No. 228, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-363.
23-32-1206. Acts 1973, No. 228, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-362.
23-32-1207. Acts 1983, No. 256, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-360.1.
23-32-1208. Acts 1975, No. 396, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-366.
23-32-1209. Acts 1973, No. 15, §§ 1, 2; 1985, No. 531, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-352.2, 67-352.2n.
23-32-1210. Acts 1989, No. 511, § 1.
23-32-1301. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.
23-32-1302. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.10.
23-32-1303. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.1.
23-32-1304. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.5.
23-32-1305. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.7.
23-32-1306. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.2.
23-32-1307. Acts 1977, No. 643, §§ 4, 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-367.3, 67-367.4.
23-32-1308. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.9.
23-32-1309. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.6.
23-32-1310. Acts 1977, No. 643, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-367.8.
23-32-1311. Acts 1995, No. 859, § 1.
23-32-1401. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2302.
23-32-1402. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2301.
23-32-1403. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2306.
23-32-1404. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2303.
23-32-1405. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2305.
23-32-1406. Acts 1981, No. 893, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2304.
23-32-1501. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1501.
23-32-1502. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1505.
23-32-1503. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 1; 1965, No. 422, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1501.
23-32-1504. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 2; 1965, No. 422, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1502.
23-32-1505. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1503.
23-32-1506. Acts 1955, No. 349, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1504.
23-32-1601. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2001.
23-32-1602. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2002.
23-32-1603. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2003.
23-32-1604. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2004.
23-32-1605. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2005.
23-32-1606. Acts 1967, No. 243, §§ 6, 8; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-2006, 67-2008.
23-32-1607. Acts 1967, No. 243, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2007.
23-32-1701. Acts 1985, No. 954, § 1.
23-32-1702. Acts 1985, No. 954, § 2.
23-32-1703. Acts 1985, No. 954, § 4.
23-32-1704. Acts 1985, No. 954, § 3.
23-32-1801. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess), No. 2, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess), No. 12, § 1.
23-32-1802. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 1.
23-32-1803. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 1; 1991, No. 892, § 7.
23-32-1804. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 1.
23-32-1805. Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 1; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 2.
23-32-1901. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 1.
23-32-1902. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 2; 1995, No. 1322, § 1.
23-32-1903. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 3; 1995, No. 1322, § 2.
23-32-1904. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 4; 1995, No. 1322, § 3.
23-32-1905. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 5; 1995, No. 1322, § 4.
23-32-1906. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 6; 1995, No. 1322, § 5.
23-32-1907. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 7; 1995, No. 1322, § 6.
23-32-1908. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 8; 1995, No. 1322, § 7.
23-32-1909. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 9; 1995, No. 1322, § 8.
23-32-1910. Acts 1989, No. 195, § 10.
23-32-2001. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 1.
23-32-2002. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 2.
23-32-2003. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 3.
23-32-2004. Acts 1993, No. 1016, §§ 4, 5.
23-32-2005. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 6.
23-32-2006. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 7.
23-32-2007. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 8.
23-32-2008. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 9.
23-32-2009. Acts 1993, No. 1016, § 12.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
[Reserved.]
Publisher's Notes. As to the 1997 repeal of former chapter 32, see the Publisher's Note at the beginning of this chapter.
Subchapter 2 — Powers and Duties of Financial Institutions Generally
Publisher's Notes. As to the 1997 repeal of former chapter 32, see the Publisher's Note at the beginning of this chapter.
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 78, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 79, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 80, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 81, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 82, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 83, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 86, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 87, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 138, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 2003, No. 860, § 16: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the flow of development capital funds into and within the state has been and continues to be, insufficient to support the growth of businesses and infrastructure development; that as a result of the lack of available capital sources, the state has suffered economic losses because of the inability to compete with other states in providing capital resources for business and infrastructure development; that this legislation will stimulate the flow of private capital and long-term loan funds that are vital to the sound financing of businesses and will encourage growth, expansion, and modernization through the reinstatement of tax credits; that unless an adequate program to encourage private capital investment is undertaken, the state will suffer further irreparable loss as a result of the continued inability to support business and infrastructure development, and from the lost opportunities for economic expansion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be effective on July 1, 2003.”
23-32-201. Investment in obligations issued pursuant to Farm Credit Act of 1971.
It shall be lawful for all savings and loan associations and insurance companies doing business in the State of Arkansas and for all trustees, guardians of the estates of minors and insane persons, executors, or administrators to invest their funds in notes, bonds, debentures, or other similar obligations issued by the Federal Land Banks, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, or banks for cooperatives or any other obligations issued pursuant to the provisions of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 and acts amendatory thereto.
History. Acts 1997, No. 83, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Farm Credit Act of 1971, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C.S. § 2001 et seq.
23-32-202. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning investment in and loans to capital development companies, was repealed by Acts 2017, No. 426, § 10. The section was derived from Acts 1997, No. 82, § 1; 2003, No. 860, § 11.
23-32-203. Loans secured by liens on agricultural lands.
- Any person obtaining a loan secured by a lien on real estate in this state which is used primarily for agricultural or livestock purposes shall have the privilege of prepaying the loan in multiples of one hundred dollars ($100) during any one (1) year following the first anniversary date of the loan, on interest-paying dates, provided the prepayment plus required payments does not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the initial principal amount of the loan.
-
The privilege shall not be cumulative, and the borrower shall have no further prepayment privilege except that the borrower may, at any time, prepay the principal balance of the loan with accrued interest thereon plus prepayment fees in amounts not exceeding the following:
- Five percent (5%) of the unpaid principal balance if prepaid during the first year;
- Four percent (4%) of the unpaid principal balance if prepaid during the second year;
- Three percent (3%) of the unpaid principal balance if prepaid during the third year;
- Two percent (2%) of the unpaid principal balance if prepaid during the fourth year;
- One percent (1%) of the unpaid principal balance if prepaid during the fifth year; and
- No penalty if prepaid more than five (5) years after the date of the note creating the debt.
-
- This section shall apply only to loans secured by a lien on real estate used primarily for agricultural or livestock purposes.
- This section shall not apply to any mortgage, deed of trust, note, or other instrument evidencing indebtedness if the instrument contains a statement in boldface type that this section does not apply and if the lender or agent of the lender points out and explains the provisions to the borrower and the borrower signs a statement on the instrument that the section has been explained and that the borrower agrees.
- Any lender or other person applying or attempting to apply more restrictive prepayment requirements, or otherwise violating this section, shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and shall be punished accordingly.
- In addition to the criminal penalties provided in subsection (d) of this section, any lender or other person applying or attempting to apply more restrictive prepayment requirements or otherwise violating this section shall forfeit all unmatured interest and principal on the loan and shall be liable for reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the debtor as a result of the lender's violation of this section.
- Any payment of interest or principal made by the debtor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the debtor's rights provided by this section or any other law.
History. Acts 1997, No. 81, § 1.
23-32-204. Sale of certain mortgage loans.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any savings and loan association or insurance company organized under the laws of this state which has as one (1) of its principal purposes the making or purchasing of loans secured by real estate mortgages is authorized to:
- Sell such mortgage loans to the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Government National Mortgage Association, or any other corporation chartered by an act of Congress for such purposes, or any successor thereof;
- In connection therewith, make payments of any capital contributions required pursuant to law in the nature of subscriptions for stock of the entities described in subdivision (1) of this section;
- Receive stock evidencing such capital contributions; and
- Hold or dispose of such stock.
History. Acts 1997, No. 80, § 1.
23-32-205. Loans under Servicemen's Readjustment Act.
-
In applying to loans made under the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, any restrictions of any character imposed by the laws of the State of Arkansas upon loans which state-chartered lending institutions may make, purchase, or otherwise acquire, no consideration whatsoever shall be given:
- Any loan or loan obligation which is wholly guaranteed or insured by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, under Title III of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 or for the insurance or guaranty of which the administrator has issued his or her binding commitment; or
-
If any loan or loan obligation be guaranteed or insured only in part under the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944:
- That portion of the loan or loan obligation so guaranteed or insured by the administrator; and
- That portion of the loan or loan obligation that may be guaranteed or insured by the United States or by any department, bureau, or agency thereof, including any corporation which, or the capital stock of which, is owned by the United States Government.
-
As used in this section, “restrictions of any character” includes:
- Restrictions on the aggregate amount of loans which any lending institution may lawfully make to any one (1) borrower; and
- Restrictions on the duration of the loan or the time or manner of repayment.
- As used in this section, “state-chartered lending institutions” includes building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, and other institutions and organizations authorized to make loans in this state.
History. Acts 1997, No. 79, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, referred to in this section, was repealed and reenacted by Public Law No. 85-857 and is codified as 38 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq.
23-32-206. Casualty insurance — Replacement cost coverage.
- A savings and loan association, financial institution, national bank, mortgage company, or any public or private mortgagee doing business in this state, when making a mortgage loan, may not require as a condition or term of the mortgage that the mortgagor purchase casualty insurance on property which is the subject of the mortgage in an amount in excess of the fair market value of the buildings or appurtenances on the mortgaged premises.
- This section shall not be construed as limiting the right of the mortgagor to purchase replacement cost coverage on the property which is the subject of the mortgage.
History. Acts 1997, No. 138, § 1.
23-32-207. Deposits and withdrawals — Accounts and certificates of deposit in two or more names.
Checking accounts and savings accounts may be opened and certificates of deposit may be issued by any federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, in the names of two (2) or more persons, either minor or adult, or a combination of minor and adult. Checking accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit shall be held and payable as follows:
-
- Unless a written designation to the contrary is made to the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, when a deposit has been made or a certificate of deposit purchased in the names of two (2) or more persons and in form to be paid to any of the persons so named, or the survivors of them, the deposit or certificate of deposit and any additions thereto made by any of the persons named in the account shall become the property of those persons as joint tenants with the right of survivorship.
- The deposit or certificate of deposit, together with all interest thereon, shall be held for the exclusive use of the persons so named and may be paid to any of those persons or to the survivors after the death of any of those persons. The payment shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge of the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association for all payments made on account of the deposit or certificate of deposit;
-
- If the person opening the account or purchasing the certificate of deposit designates in writing to the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association that the account or the certificate of deposit is to be held in joint tenancy or in joint tenancy with right of survivorship, or that the account or certificate of deposit shall be payable to the survivor or survivors of the persons named in the account or certificate of deposit, then the account or certificate of deposit and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
- The account or certificate of deposit may be paid to or on the order of any one (1) of those persons during their lifetime unless a contrary written designation is given to the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, or to or on the order of any one (1) of the survivors of them after the death of any one (1) or more of them.
- The opening of the account or the purchase of the certificate of deposit in this form shall be conclusive evidence in any action or proceeding to which either the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association or the surviving party is a party of the intention of all of the parties to the account or certificate of deposit to vest title to the account or certificate of deposit, and the additions thereto, in the survivor.
- The payment shall be a valid and sufficient release of the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association for all payments made on account of the deposit or certificate of deposit;
- If an account is opened or a certificate of deposit is purchased in the names of persons who denominate themselves to the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association as husband and wife, whether or not they are at that time husband and wife, then the account or certificate of deposit and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as tenants by the entirety. Upon the death of one (1) of those persons, the account shall be payable to the survivor;
-
- If persons open or hold an account or a certificate of deposit in a form indicating that the account or certificate of deposit is a tenants in common account or certificate of deposit, then the account or certificate of deposit and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as tenants in common. The federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, upon receipt of a specific written notice addressed to it of the death of either party, shall pay upon the written order of the survivor, to the survivor, his or her pro rata part of the account or certificate and to the estate of the deceased owner, the deceased's pro rata part of the account or certificate.
- However, the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association may pay the entire account or certificate of deposit and all additions thereto upon the receipt or acquittance of either party to the account or certificate, prior to receipt of a specific written notice of death, unless there has been filed with the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association a written designation that more than one (1) signature is required to deal with the account.
- In the absence of any written designation to the contrary filed with the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, all tenants in common accounts shall be deemed to be owned pro rata by the persons named in the account;
- If an account is opened or a certificate of deposit is purchased in the name of two (2) or more persons, whether as joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenants in common, or otherwise, a federally or state-chartered savings and loan association shall pay withdrawal requests, accept pledges of the account or certificate of deposit, and otherwise deal in any manner with the account or certificate of deposit. This may be done upon the direction of any one (1) of the persons named therein, whether the other persons named in the account or certificate of deposit are living or not, unless one (1) of the persons named therein shall, by written instructions delivered to the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association, designate that the signature of more than one (1) person shall be required to deal with the account or certificate of deposit;
-
- If a person opens or holds an account or certificate of deposit in a form indicating that, on the death of the person named as holder, the account or certificate of deposit shall be paid to or held by another person, then the account or certificate of deposit and any balance thereof which exists from time to time shall be held as a payment on death account or certificate of deposit unless otherwise agreed between the person opening the account or purchasing the certificate of deposit and the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association.
- The payment shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge of the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association for all payments made on account of the account or certificate of deposit;
- Upon the death of the holder of the account or certificate of deposit, the persons designated by him or her and who have survived him or her shall be the owners of the account or certificate as joint tenants with right of survivorship if more than one (1). Any payment made by the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association to any of those persons shall be a complete discharge of the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association as to the amount paid;
- No federally or state-chartered savings and loan association paying any survivor in accordance with the provisions of this section shall thereby be liable for any estate, inheritance, or succession taxes which may be due this state;
- During his or her lifetime, the person to whom such an account or certificate of deposit is issued may change the designation of any of the persons who are to be holders at his or her death, by a written direction accepted by the federally or state-chartered savings and loan association; and
- The terms “designate in writing”, “written designation”, “designate”, “designates”, “designation”, or “designated” shall not be construed to require that the depositor or purchaser affix his or her signature to an instrument.
History. Acts 1997, No. 78, § 1.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Isabelle V. Taylor, Comment: Creditor Rights and the Missing Link in the Arkansas Trust Code: Is Death Strong Enough “To Break the Chain?”, 65 Ark. L. Rev. 433 (2012).
Case Notes
Absence of Fraud.
Trial court did not err in overruling heirs' objections to an executor's accounting for a grandmother's estate because in the absence of fraud, the executor, as the surviving joint tenant of the bank accounts on which a grandmother and her husband had included the executor as a joint tenant with right of survivorship, owned the accounts by operation of law; the heirs failed to present sufficient evidence to warrant the imposition of a construction trust on the proceeds of the joint accounts because there was scant evidence that the executor made a false promise to the grandmother. Williams v. Davis, 2009 Ark. App. 850, 373 S.W.3d 381 (2009).
23-32-208. Sharing of customer-bank communication terminals.
-
- An agreement to share a customer-bank communication terminal, as defined by § 23-32-1301(2) [repealed], shall not prohibit, limit, or restrict the right of a financial institution from charging a customer-bank communication terminal usage fee.
- The usage fee shall not exceed two dollars ($2.00) or two percent (2%) of the gross amount of the transaction, whichever is less, and may only be imposed if imposition of the fee is disclosed at a time and in a manner that allows a user to terminate or cancel the transaction without incurring the usage fee.
-
- For purposes of this section, “usage fee” is a fee charged by a customer-bank communication terminal owner on transactions by a holder of a foreign bank card.
- For purposes of this section, a “foreign bank card” is a card eligible for use in a customer-bank communication terminal, which card is not issued by the customer-bank communication terminal owner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 86, § 1.
23-32-209. Misleading actions or use of words by unauthorized persons.
-
- All persons except those described in subdivision (a)(2) of this section are prohibited from using in this state as a portion of or in connection with their place of business their name or title or in reference to themselves in their stationery or advertising the following words or phrases, alone or in combination with any other word or phrase: “bank”, “banker”, “bankers”, “banking”, “federal reserve”, “trust company”, “trust”, “savings and loan”, “credit union”, “building and loan”, or any other word or phrase that tends to induce the belief that the party using it is authorized to engage in the business of a bank, trust company, savings and loan association, or credit union.
- The prohibitions contained in subdivision (a)(1) of this section shall not apply to those persons that discharge the burden of proving their authority to use the words or phrases described in subdivision (a)(1) of this section under the laws of this or another state or of the United States.
- All persons except those described in subdivision (a)(2) of this section are prohibited from doing or soliciting business in this state substantially in the manner or so as to induce the belief that the business in whole or in part is that of a bank, savings bank, trust company, credit union, or savings and loan association, either by the sale of contract or of shares of its capital stock upon partial or installment payments thereof, by the receipt of money, savings, dues, or other deposits or by the issuance of certificates of deposit or certificates of investment of money, savings, or dues.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed as preventing the use of the word “bankers” in combination with other words in connection with the place of business, name, and title of any finance or investment company operated in connection with, as a subsidiary to, or having joint offices with a bank or trust company in this state if the bank or trust company is subject to the supervision of the Bank Commissioner and if the bank or trust company has the word “bankers” alone or in combination with other words in its name or title.
- Each violation of subsection (a) of this section shall constitute a Class A misdemeanor.
- It is declared to be public policy that this law be liberally construed in favor of its enforcement.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any person to engage in any activity not otherwise authorized under Arkansas law.
- “Person”, when used in this section, means an individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, estate, limited liability company, or other unincorporated association or any other legal or commercial entity.
History. Acts 1997, No. 87, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 353.
23-32-210. Request for stop payment on electronic funds transfer.
- Any financial institution doing business in this state shall stop payment of any electronic funds transfer from a customer's account upon receipt, at least three (3) business days prior to the scheduled transfer, of a written stop-payment order from the customer or any person authorized to draw upon the account describing the transfer with reasonable certainty.
- If the written stop-payment order purports to stop all future electronic funds transfers to a particular payee, then the financial institution may require the customer to provide written confirmation that the payee has been informed of the revocation of authority within fourteen (14) days of the delivery of the stop-payment order. In the event the customer fails to provide the confirmation, if required by the financial institution, then the stop-payment order shall cease to be effective at the end of the fourteen-day confirmation period.
-
- For the purposes of this section, “electronic funds transfer” means any transaction in which funds are transferred from a customer's account to a third-party payee primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Electronic funds transfers” may include automated clearing house debits, wire transfers through the Federal Reserve System or any private network, or other paperless, electronic methods of funds transfer, regardless of whether the transaction is initiated by the customer or the payee.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1723, § 1.
Subchapter 3 — Surety Bond Exemption Act
Publisher's Notes. As to the 1997 repeal of former Chapter 32, see the Publisher's Note at the beginning of this chapter.
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 9: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
23-32-301. Title.
This subchapter may be known as the “Surety Bond Exemption Act”.
History. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 1.
23-32-302. Purpose.
The purpose of this subchapter is to exempt state and federal savings and loan associations from being required to furnish security in the form of cash, bond, or otherwise, ensuring proper performance of their duties and obligations in the business transactions set forth in § 23-32-304. This purpose is based on the premise that savings and loan associations are so thoroughly governed by state and federal law, rule, and regulation that there is an insignificant risk of such an institution’s being unable to adequately compensate an injured or damaged party.
History. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 2.
23-32-303. Applicability of other laws.
The law defining savings and loan associations' formation, structure, and operation shall apply to this subchapter except as provided in this subchapter.
History. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 3.
23-32-304. Construction.
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to:
- Prevent a state or federal savings and loan association from electing or agreeing to furnish bond at its own cost;
- Prevent any other party of interest, desiring protection in a business transaction with a state or federal savings and loan association, from electing to secure and pay for a bond covering the state or federal savings and loan association to the benefit of such a party to the transaction; and
-
Amend or repeal any law pertaining to:
- Corporate surety or indemnity bonds covering directors, officers, or employees of a state or federal savings and loan association;
- Foreign corporations, associations, or institutions not authorized to do business in this state;
- Actions available against state or federal savings and loan associations for injury or damage; and
- Bonding requirements involving fiduciary activities of a guardian, executor, administrator, personal representative, trustee, agent, or other fiduciary under the Probate Code or under any other laws covering fiduciary activities.
History. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 4.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Probate Code referred to in this section is codified throughout Title 28. See Publisher's Note to § 28-1-101.
23-32-305. Exemption from posting bond in certain transactions.
-
Except when the dollar amount of responsibility assumed exceeds its net capital and surplus, no state or federal savings and loan association, chartered or licensed to do business in this state, shall be required to furnish fidelity, surety, or performance bond, called “bond” in this subchapter, in business transactions involving:
- Garnishment;
- Replevin;
- Foreclosure; and
- Forcible entry and detainer.
- At the beginning of any proceeding in all such business transactions, the state or federal savings and loan association shall, upon request, furnish to each party to the transaction a copy of its most recent statement of financial condition.
History. Acts 1997, No. 84, § 5.
Subchapter 4 — Foreign Investor Companies
Publisher's Notes. As to 1997 repeal of former Chapter 32, see the Publisher's Note at the beginning of this chapter.
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 10: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
23-32-401. Definition.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “investor companies” means all banks, mutual savings associations, mutual savings banks, mutual savings fund societies, trust funds, foundations, pension trusts, or lending agencies, all the capital stock of which is owned by one (1) or more mutual savings banks or mutual savings fund societies.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 1.
23-32-402. Application.
No provision in this subchapter shall apply to any corporation except those corporations included in § 23-32-401.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 2.
23-32-403. Transactions not considered engaging in business.
Without excluding other activities which may not constitute transaction of, or engaging in, business in this state, investor companies which are engaged in investing in loans secured by real estate and which are not chartered or domesticated in this state and do not engage in a general banking business in this state shall not be considered to be transacting or engaging in business in this state under the law of this state by reason of carrying on in this state any one (1) or more of the following activities:
- The acquisition of, or participation in, loans secured by mortgages or deeds of trust on real property situated in Arkansas pursuant to commitment arrangements or agreements made prior to or following the origination or creation of the loans;
- The ownership, modification, renewal, extension, transfer, or foreclosure of such loans, or the acceptance of substitute or additional obligors thereon;
- The maintaining or defending of actions or suits relative to such loans, mortgages, or deeds of trust;
- The maintenance of bank accounts in Arkansas in connection with the collection or servicing of such loans;
- The making, collection, and servicing of such loans through an Arkansas agent or agency engaged in the business of servicing real estate loans for investors;
- The taking of deeds to the mortgaged property either in lieu of foreclosure or for the purpose of transferring title either to the Federal Housing Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or other governmental agency;
- The acquisition of title to property under foreclosure sale or from the owner in lieu of foreclosure;
- The management, rental, maintenance, and sale or the operating, maintaining, renting, or otherwise dealing with, selling, or disposing of real property acquired under foreclosure sale or by agreement in lieu thereof; or
- The physical inspection and appraisal of property in Arkansas as security for deeds of trust or mortgage negotiations for the purchase of such loans.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 3.
23-32-404. Consent to service of process on Secretary of State.
- All investor companies, except national banking institutions and state-chartered banks subject to federal regulation, acting either in their own behalf or acting as trustee for trust funds, foundations, pension funds, or related investors, must, before purchasing mortgage notes, mortgages, or deeds of trust, file a statement with the Secretary of State constituting him or her as their agent for service.
- The statement shall contain the address of the investor company and shall be signed by the president, secretary, general manager, trustee, or other person charged with the administration of the funds of the investor company.
- It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State, upon service of process, to forward all such process forthwith by registered mail to the address shown on the statement of the appropriate investor company.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 4.
23-32-405. Authority to sue and be sued.
The investor companies may sue or be sued in this state in relation to the mortgage notes, mortgages, or deeds of trust, and service may be had on the Secretary of State when an investor company is a defendant. The venue of the actions shall be in the county of the residence of any party to the suit, unless otherwise provided by law, except that when land is involved, the venue shall be in the county where the land or any part of it is located.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 5.
23-32-406. Transaction of general business not authorized.
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as authorizing investor companies to transact the general business of a chartered bank or trust company, or any business in this state, except as herein provided.
History. Acts 1997, No. 88, § 6.
Subchapter 5 — Agency Designation on Certificates of Deposit
Publisher's Notes. As to the 1997 repeal of former Chapter 32, see the Publisher's Note at the beginning of this chapter.
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 13: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 goes into effect on May 31, 1997; that the law addressed by this act was repealed by the Arkansas Banking Act of 1997 for technical purposes; that this act will reenact that law with necessary changes; and that this act must go into effect on May 31, 1997, in order to correlate with the Banking Act of 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
23-32-501. Definitions.
In this subchapter:
- “Account” means a contract of deposit between a depositor and a financial institution, and includes a checking account, savings account, certificate of deposit, and share account;
- “Agent” means a person authorized to make account transactions for a party;
- “Beneficiary” means a person named as one to whom sums on deposit in an account are payable on request after the death of all parties or for whom a party is named as trustee;
- “Devisee” means any person designated in a will to receive a testamentary disposition of real or personal property;
- “Financial institution” means an organization authorized to do business under state or federal laws relating to financial institutions, and includes a savings bank, building and loan association, savings and loan company or association, and credit union;
- “Party” means a person who, by the terms of an account, has a present right, subject to request, to payment from the account other than as a beneficiary or agent;
- “Payment” of sums on deposit includes withdrawal, payment to a party or third person pursuant to check or other request, and a pledge of sums on deposit by a party, or a setoff, reduction, or other disposition of all or part of an account pursuant to a pledge;
- “Person” means an individual, a corporation, an organization, or other legal entity; and
- “Personal representative” includes an executor, administrator, successor personal representative, special administrator, and persons who perform substantially the same function under the law governing their status.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 1.
23-32-502. Scope of subchapter.
- This subchapter applies to accounts in this state.
-
This subchapter does not apply to:
- An account established for a partnership, joint venture, or other organization for a business purpose;
- An account controlled by one (1) or more persons as an agent or trustee for a corporation, unincorporated association, or charitable or civic organization; or
- A fiduciary or trust account in which the relationship is established other than by the terms of the account.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 2.
23-32-503. Forms.
A contract of deposit that substantially contains the following form establishes an agency account, and the account is governed by the provisions of this subchapter applicable to agency accounts:
AGENCY (POWER OF ATTORNEY) DESIGNATION Agents may make account transactions for parties but have no ownership or rights at death unless named as POD beneficiaries. [To Add Agency Designation To Account, Name One Or More Agents]. [Select One and Initial]: AGENCY DESIGNATION SURVIVES DISABILITY OR INCAPACITY OF PARTIES AGENCY DESIGNATION TERMINATES ON DISABILITY OR INCAPACITY OF PARTIES
Click to view form.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 3.
23-32-504. Designation of agent.
- Unless the terms of an agency designation provide that the authority of the agent terminates on disability or incapacity of a party, the agent's authority survives disability and incapacity. The agent may act for a disabled or incapacitated party until the authority of the agent is terminated.
- Death of the sole party or last surviving party terminates the authority of an agent.
- An agent in an account with an agency designation has no beneficial right to sums on deposit.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 4.
23-32-505. Payment to designated agent.
On request of an agent under an agency designation for an account, a financial institution may, unless it actually knows that the authority of agency has terminated, pay to the agent sums on deposit in the account.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 5.
23-32-506. Payment to minor.
If a financial institution is required or permitted to make payment pursuant to this subchapter to a minor designated as a beneficiary, payment may be made pursuant to the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, § 9-26-201 et seq.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 6.
23-32-507. Discharge.
-
- Payment made pursuant to this subchapter in accordance with an agency of account discharges the financial institution from all claims for amounts so paid, whether or not the payment is consistent with the beneficial ownership of the account as between parties, beneficiaries, or their successors.
- Payment may be made whether or not a party, beneficiary, or agent is disabled, incapacitated, or deceased when payment is requested, received, or made.
-
- Protection under this section does not extend to payments made after a financial institution has received written notice from a party, or from the personal representative, surviving spouse, or heir or devisee of a deceased party, to the effect that payments in accordance with the terms of the agency account should not be permitted, and the financial institution has had a reasonable opportunity to act on it when payment is made.
- Unless the notice is withdrawn by the person giving it, the successor of any deceased party must concur in a request for payment if the financial institution is to be protected under this section.
- Unless a financial institution has been served with process in an action or proceeding, no other notice or other information shown to have been available to the financial institution affects its right to protection under this section.
- A financial institution that receives written notice pursuant to this section or otherwise that has reason to believe that a dispute exists as to the rights of the parties may refuse, without liability, to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agency account.
- Protection of a financial institution under this section does not affect the rights of parties in disputes between themselves or their successors concerning the beneficial ownership of sums on deposit in agency accounts or payments made from agency accounts.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 7.
23-32-508. Setoff.
Without qualifying any other statutory right to setoff or lien and subject to any contractual provision, if a party is indebted to a financial institution, the financial institution has a right to setoff against the agency account. The amount of the agency account subject to setoff is the proportion to which the party is, or immediately before death was, beneficially entitled or, in the absence of proof of that proportion, an equal share with all parties.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 8.
23-32-509. Effect on other laws.
This subchapter is supplemental to all laws pertaining to the deposit of funds in financial institutions.
History. Acts 1997, No. 85, § 9.
Chapter 33 Insolvency and Liquidation
23-33-101 — 23-33-406. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This chapter was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3. The chapter was derived from:
23-33-101. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 51; C. & M. Dig., § 717; Acts 1931, No. 252, § 13; Pope's Dig., § 763; Acts 1939, No. 10, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-604.
23-33-102. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 70], as added by Acts 1921, No. 496, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 753; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-603.
23-33-103. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 52; 1917, No. 139, § 5, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 718; Pope's Dig., § 764; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-605.
23-33-104. Acts 1969, No. 179, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-631; Acts 1987, No. 963, §§ 1, 2; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 9; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 9.
23-33-105. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 50; C. & M. Dig., § 716; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 5; 1923, No. 627, § 17; Pope's Dig., § 762; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-601.
23-33-106. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 46; C. & M. Dig., § 712; Pope's Dig., § 739; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-602.
23-33-201. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 53; 1917, No. 139, § 6, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 719; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 4; 1933, No. 61, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 765; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-607.
23-33-202. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 45; C. & M. Dig., § 711; Pope's Dig., § 738; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-606.
23-33-203. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 54; 1917, No. 139, § 7, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 722; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 5; 1929, No. 102, § 4; Pope's Dig., §§ 767, 768; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-608, 67-609.
23-33-204. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 56; C. & M. Dig., § 724; Pope's Dig., § 770; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-613.
23-33-205. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 55; C. & M. Dig., § 723; Acts 1933, No. 61, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 769; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-612.
23-33-206. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 53; 1917, No. 139, § 6, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 719; Acts 1921, No. 496, § 4; 1933, No. 61, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 765; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-607.
23-33-207. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 60; C. & M. Dig., § 728; Pope's Dig., § 772; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-619.
23-33-208. Acts 1933, No. 23, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 824; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-620.
23-33-209. Acts 1939, No. 199, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-616 — 67-618.
23-33-210. Acts 1933, No. 61, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 799; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-614.
23-33-211. Acts 1933, No. 61, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 799; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-615.
23-33-212. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 55; C. & M. Dig., § 723; Acts 1933, No. 61, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 769; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-612.
23-33-213. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 56; C. & M. Dig., § 724; Pope's Dig., § 770; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-613.
23-33-214. Acts 1933 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 15, § 3A; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-622.
23-33-301. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 71], as added by Acts 1927, No. 107, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 742; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-610.
23-33-302. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 71], as added by Acts 1927, No. 107, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 742; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-610.
23-33-303. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 71], as added by Acts 1927, No. 107, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 742; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-610.
23-33-304. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 72], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 743; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-611.
23-33-305. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 71], as added by Acts 1927, No. 107, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 742; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-610.
23-33-306. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 54, 56; 1917, No. 139, § 7, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., §§ 722, 724; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 768, 770; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-609, 67-613.
23-33-307. Acts 1913, No. 113, §§ 54, 56; 1917, No. 139, § 7, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., §§ 722, 724; Acts 1923, No. 627, § 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 768, 770; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-609, 67-613.
23-33-308. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 71], as added by Acts 1927, No. 107, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 742; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-610.
23-33-309. Acts 1933 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 15, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 808; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-621.
23-33-310. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 57; C. & M. Dig., § 725; Pope's Dig., § 771; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-623.
23-33-401. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, § 1; 1937, No. 208, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 791; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-624.
23-33-402. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, § 5; 1937, No. 208, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 795; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-628.
23-33-403. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, §§ 2, 3; 1937, No. 208, §§ 2, 3; Pope's Dig., §§ 792, 793; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-625, 67-626.
23-33-404. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, § 4; 1937, No. 208, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 794; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-627.
23-33-405. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 796; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-629.
23-33-406. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 5, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 797; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-630.
For present law, see Chapter 49 of this title.
Chapter 34 Miscellaneous Violations of Banking Laws
23-34-101 — 23-34-112. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This chapter was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3. The chapter was derived from:
23-34-101. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 73], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 6; 1931, No. 35, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 700; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-701.
23-34-102. Acts 1929, No. 98, §§ 1, 2; Pope's Dig., §§ 789, 790, 1023, 1024; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-702, 67-703.
23-34-103. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 73], as added by Acts 1923, No. 627, § 6; 1931, No. 35, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 700; Acts 1969, No. 179, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-701.
23-34-104. Acts 1917, No. 139, § 12, p. 748; C. & M. Dig., § 736; Pope's Dig., § 779; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-711.
23-34-105. Acts 1913, No. 113, [§ 74], as added by Acts 1921, No. 496, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 754; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-704.
23-34-106. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 44; C. & M. Dig., § 710; Pope's Dig., § 737; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-705.
23-34-107. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 10; Pope's Dig., § 693; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-706.
23-34-108. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 24; C. & M. Dig., § 688; Pope's Dig., § 716; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-707.
23-34-109. Acts 1901, No. 7, § 1, p. 18; C. & M. Dig., § 729; Pope's Dig., § 773; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-708.
23-34-110. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 47; C. & M. Dig., § 713; Pope's Dig., § 740; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-709.
23-34-111. Acts 1913, No. 113, § 48; C. & M. Dig., § 714; Pope's Dig., § 741; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-710.
23-34-112. Acts 1933, No. 60, § 9; Pope's Dig., § 692; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-713.
For present law, see Chapter 50 of this title.
Chapter 35 Credit Unions
Research References
ALR.
Authority of credit union to engage in “share-draft” business. 14 A.L.R.4th 1355.
Ark. L. Rev.
Electronic Funds Transfer and “Competitive Equality”: A Doctrine That Does Not Compute, 32 Ark. L. Rev. 347.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1182, § 6: Feb. 11, 1976. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that Act 530 of 1975 amending various sections of Act 132 of 1971 was inconsistent and contained errors; in addition, due to the unique loan services offered by a credit union to its members, it is in the best interest of the citizens of the State of Arkansas to maintain the stability of credit unions; that for such continued stability to be assured, it is necessary to protect the rights and proprietary interests of each member in each credit union so as to encourage continued investment and insure that no loss will be incurred by each depositor; that Federal insurance of depositor accounts in State-chartered credit unions is not presently mandatory but that it is in the public interest and for the protection of depositors that each State-chartered credit union have Federal insurance of accounts; that it is in the best interest of the public and each State-chartered credit union that a reasonable time be allowed in which each State-chartered credit union should obtain Federal insurance of depositors accounts and that this Act should be given effect immediately to accomplish these purposes. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 995, § 6: Apr. 14, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of the case Ricarte v. State, CR 86-31, a question has arisen over the validity of Act 1182 of the Extended Session of 1976; that this Act is a reenactment of the former law; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the state of the law on this issue. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 1 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 1 et seq.
23-35-101. Definition and purpose of credit union or central credit union.
A credit union or central credit union is a cooperative nonprofit association, incorporated in accordance with the provisions of this chapter for the twofold purpose of encouraging thrift among its members and creating a source of credit at fair and reasonable rates of interest. A credit union or central credit union provides an opportunity for its members to use and control their own money in order to improve their economic and social condition.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-901, 67-902.
23-35-102. Operation of central credit unions.
- A central credit union may be organized and operated as provided in this chapter.
- A central credit union shall be designated by use of the term “central” in its official name. A credit union not conforming to the requirements for a central credit union shall not use the term “central” in its official name.
- A central credit union shall be subject to all the provisions of this chapter. Specific provisions setting forth the operation of central credit unions shall take precedence over other provisions of this chapter if those specific provisions are inconsistent with other parts of this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 2; 1975, No. 530, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-902.
23-35-103. Taxation.
A credit union shall be deemed an institution for savings and, together with all accumulations therein, shall not be subject to taxation except as to real estate owned. The shares of a credit union shall not be subject to a stock transfer tax when issued by the corporation or when transferred from one (1) member to another.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 35; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-935.
23-35-104. Insurance of accounts.
- Each credit union organized under this chapter shall obtain insurance of member share and deposit accounts under the provisions of Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act.
- A credit union which has been denied a commitment for insurance of its share and deposit accounts shall either dissolve or merge with another credit union which is insured under Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 2; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1182, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-902; reen. Acts 1987, No. 995, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 995, § 1. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
U.S. Code. Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1781 et seq.
Research References
ALR.
Construction and Application of Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 (FCUA) (12 U.S.C. §§ 1751 to 1795k). 89 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 357 (2014).
Subchapter 2 — Supervision
Effective Dates. Acts 1979, No. 85, § 3: Feb. 9, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined by the General Assembly that federal associations doing business in this State have and will have an unfair competitive advantage over credit unions chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bld. & L. Asso., § 3 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., §§ 5, 6.
23-35-201. Credit Union Division — State Credit Union Supervisor — Staff.
There is created under the State Securities Department a Credit Union Division which shall be administered by the State Credit Union Supervisor. The Securities Commissioner, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, shall act as State Credit Union Supervisor. The supervisor, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, shall appoint such administrative assistants and examiners as may be necessary to assist in the performance of his or her duties under this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 41; 1985, No. 936, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-941; Acts 2019, No. 910, § 571.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment inserted “in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce” twice; and substituted “administrative assistants” for “assistants, secretaries” in the second sentence.
23-35-202. Authority of State Credit Union Supervisor — Rules and regulations.
- All state-chartered credit unions shall be supervised and regulated by the State Credit Union Supervisor acting pursuant to the authority delegated by this chapter. The supervisor shall be responsible for the enforcement of this chapter and the credit union bylaws, and he or she shall have the authority to adopt rules governing credit unions in a manner consistent with this chapter and other statutes of Arkansas.
-
The supervisor may, irrespective of any limitations in this chapter and subject to other Arkansas law, make reasonable rules authorizing a credit union to exercise any of the powers conferred upon a federally chartered credit union doing business in this state which is subject to the regulations of the National Credit Union Administration, if the supervisor finds that the exercise of the power:
- Serves the public convenience and advantage; and
-
Equalizes and maintains the quality of competition between state-chartered credit unions and federally chartered credit unions. This includes, but it is not limited to:
- The offering of the various types of accounts offered by federal credit unions;
- Designation of the legal relationships of an account holder;
- Adoption of any dividend paying date or other procedure or practice of paying dividends;
- Adoption of any business practice, procedure, method, or system authorized for federal credit unions; and
- The making of any loan or investment that a federal credit union doing business in this state is authorized to make.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 40; 1979, No. 85, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-940; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2486.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the second sentence of (a).
23-35-203. Annual examination of credit unions.
- The State Credit Union Supervisor shall cause each credit union to be examined annually. Each credit union and all of its officers and agents shall be required to give representatives of the supervisor full access to all books, papers, securities, records, and other sources of information under their control. For the purpose of the examination, the representatives shall have power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, compel the giving of testimony, and require the submission of documents.
- A report of this examination shall be forwarded to the credit union after the completion of the examination. The report shall be reviewed at the next monthly meeting of the board of directors of the credit union and a reply, if requested by the supervisor, shall be forwarded by the board by the date requested by the supervisor.
- For the purpose of these examinations, each credit union shall pay an examination fee based upon the cost of performing the examination. Each credit union shall bear a proportionate share of the expenses of the supervisor, in accordance with schedules adopted by the supervisor.
- If there is any violation of this section by a credit union, the supervisor may fine a credit union ten dollars ($10.00) per day for ten (10) days. If the violation has not been corrected by the tenth day, he or she may take any action he or she deems necessary and appropriate under the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 33; 1975, No. 530, §§ 19, 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-933.
23-35-204. Reports — Penalty for failure to file.
- Credit unions subject to the provisions of this chapter shall report to the State Credit Union Supervisor annually, on or before February 1, on forms supplied by him or her for that purpose. Additional reports may be required by the supervisor, as is deemed necessary.
-
- If any report remains in arrears for more than fifteen (15) days, a fine of five dollars ($5.00) for each day the report remains in arrears shall be levied against the offending credit union.
- If the report is not returned within thirty (30) days of the due date, the supervisor may, after written notice to the president of the credit union of his or her intention to do so, suspend or revoke the certificate of approval, take possession of the business and property of the credit union, and order its dissolution in accordance with § 23-35-704.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 30; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-930.
23-35-205. Annual supervision fee.
Each credit union subject to the provisions of this chapter shall pay an annual supervision fee which shall be determined by the State Credit Union Supervisor. The fees must be reasonably related to the administrative cost of supervisory services required under this chapter and shall be determined after notice and an opportunity to be heard is given to the credit unions affected.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 31; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-931.
Subchapter 3 — Organization
Effective Dates. Acts 1979, No. 206, § 9: Feb. 23, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined by the General Assembly that federal associations doing business in this State now have an unfair competitive advantage over credit unions chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage and that this Act is designed to accomplish this purpose and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 6 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 9 et seq.
23-35-301. Procedure for obtaining charter.
-
Any seven (7) or more residents of the State of Arkansas, of legal age, who have a common bond referred to in § 23-35-401 may organize a credit union and become charter members thereof by:
-
Executing duplicate copies of the articles of incorporation, which shall state:
- The name, which shall include the words “credit union” and which shall be different from the name of any other existing credit union, and the town or city wherein the proposed credit union is to have its principal place of business;
- The term of existence of the credit union, which shall be perpetual;
- The par value of the shares of the credit union, which shall be in one (1) class of five-dollar multiples of not less than five dollars ($5.00) nor more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00);
- The names and addresses of the subscribers to the articles of incorporation, and the number of shares subscribed by each; and
- That the credit union shall have the power to exercise such incidental powers as shall be necessary or requisite to enable it to carry on effectively the business for which it is incorporated;
- Preparing and adopting duplicate copies of bylaws for the general government of the credit union, consistent with the provisions of this chapter; and
- Forwarding the required charter fee, the articles of incorporation, and the bylaws to the State Credit Union Supervisor.
-
Executing duplicate copies of the articles of incorporation, which shall state:
-
- The supervisor shall have the authority to investigate the application for charter to determine whether the proposed credit union meets the objectives of this chapter.
- The determination for the approval of the application for charter shall be under such rules as shall be adopted by the supervisor. These rules shall give account to the number of potential members, their stability of employment or membership in the association comprising the common bond of membership, and the economic characteristics of the proposed common bond.
- If the supervisor determines that the proposed credit union does not meet these objectives, the charter application shall be denied. If the fee, articles of incorporation, and bylaws conform to the statute, he or she shall issue a certificate of approval of the articles and return a copy of the bylaws and the articles to the applicant, which shall be preserved in the permanent files of the credit union.
- The determination for the approval of the application for charter of a central credit union shall be made by the supervisor after an investigation as to the need for the credit union and upon satisfying himself or herself that the objectives of this chapter are met.
- The subscribers for a credit union charter shall not transact any business until formal approval of the charter has been received.
- In order to simplify the organization of credit unions, the supervisor shall cause to be prepared a form of articles of incorporation and a form of bylaws, consistent with this chapter, which may be used by credit union incorporators for their guidance.
- The minimum paid-in capital with which a credit union may begin business shall not be less than five thousand dollars ($5,000).
- The supervisor shall determine that a firm commitment to insure share and deposit accounts has been issued under the provisions of Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act before a charter application can be issued.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 2; 1975, No. 530, §§ 1, 2; 1985, No. 936, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-902; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2487.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” twice in (b)(2).
U.S. Code. Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1781 et seq.
Research References
ALR.
Construction and Application of Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 (FCUA) (12 U.S.C. §§ 1751 to 1795k). 89 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 357 (2014).
23-35-302. Amendments to articles of incorporation and bylaws.
- The articles of incorporation and the bylaws may be amended as provided in the bylaws.
-
- Amendments to the articles of incorporation and to the bylaws shall be submitted in writing to the State Credit Union Supervisor.
- Amendments shall become effective upon approval in writing by the supervisor and payment of the appropriate fee to the appropriate state agency.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-903.
23-35-303. Board of directors and committees generally.
- The business affairs of the credit union shall be managed by a board of directors of not fewer than five (5) directors, a credit committee of not fewer than three (3) members, and a supervisory committee of not fewer than three (3) members, all to be elected at the annual members' meeting by and from the members.
- All members of the board and of the committees shall hold office for such terms as the bylaws may provide.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 11; 1975, No. 530, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-911.
23-35-304. Duties of board of directors.
- The board of directors of the credit union shall be responsible for general management of the affairs, funds, and records of the credit union and shall meet as often as necessary, but not less than once each month.
-
The board shall:
- Act upon applications for membership, or appoint and authorize an executive committee or a membership officer from among the members of the credit union, other than the treasurer, an assistant treasurer, or a loan officer, to approve applications for membership under such conditions as the board may prescribe. The committee or membership officer so authorized shall submit to the board, at each monthly meeting, a list of approved or pending applications for membership received since the previous monthly meeting, together with such other related information as the bylaws or the board may require. The membership officer shall not have the authority to disapprove any application for membership;
- Purchase a blanket fidelity bond covering the officers, employees, members of official committees, attorneys at law, and other agents, with protection against loss caused by dishonesty, burglary, robbery, larceny, theft, holdup, forgery, alteration of instruments, misplacement or mysterious disappearance, and for faithful performance of duty, and, if applicable, building insurance, liability insurance, and such other insurance as is necessary for the operation and the protection of the credit union and its members. The State Credit Union Supervisor shall prescribe in his or her rules and regulations the amount of minimum bond coverage required for all credit unions according to their asset categories;
- Determine the rate of interest, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, which shall be charged on loans; the rate of interest refund, if any, to be paid to borrowing members; the qualifications for participation, and the manner of computation and payment. The interest rebates are to be paid from the credit balance of the retained earnings account;
- Declare dividends as provided by this chapter;
- Limit the number of shares which may be owned by a member, not to exceed the maximum amount insured under Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act;
- Fill vacancies, occurring between annual meetings, in the board, credit committee, and supervisory committee until the election, or appointment and qualification, of successors;
- Determine the maximum amount, both secured and unsecured, which may be loaned to any one (1) member;
- Have charge of the investment of surplus funds of the credit union as provided by this chapter;
- Authorize the employment of such persons as may be necessary to carry on the business of the credit union and determine the compensation of employees and the treasurer;
- Authorize the conveyance of property;
- Borrow or lend money to carry on the functions of the credit union;
- Perform such other duties as the members may require;
- Designate depositories for the funds of the credit union;
- Suspend any or all members of the credit and supervisory committees for failure to perform their duties upon unanimous approval by the board;
- Establish and provide for compensation of loan officers appointed by the credit committee and compensation of auditing assistance requested by the supervisory committee;
- Suspend any officer, director, or committee member from his or her official position for failure to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings without cause or for otherwise failing to perform any of the duties required of him or her as an official, but only after he or she has been given reasonable notice of a meeting for suspension and an opportunity to be heard on the charges; and
- Perform or authorize any action consistent with this chapter not specifically reserved for the members by the bylaws or this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 13; 1975, No. 530, §§ 8-10; 1979, No. 206, § 4; 1985, No. 936, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-913.
U.S. Code. Title II of the Federal Credit Union Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1781 et seq.
Research References
ALR.
Construction and Application of Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 (FCUA) (12 U.S.C. §§ 1751 to 1795k). 89 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 357 (2014).
23-35-305. Officers — Selection, term, and oath.
- Within ten (10) days following the organizational meeting and each annual meeting, the directors of the credit union shall elect from their own number a chief executive officer who may be designated as chair or president of the board, vice chair or vice president, a treasurer, and a secretary, of whom the last two (2) may be the same individual. The board of directors may employ an officer in charge of operations whose title shall be either president or general manager or, in lieu thereof, the board of directors of the credit union may designate the treasurer or an assistant treasurer to be in active charge of the affairs of the credit union.
- Within ten (10) days after election or appointment to any position, each person so elected or appointed shall execute an oath of office by which he or she agrees to accept and to diligently and faithfully carry out the duties and responsibilities of the position to which he or she has been elected or appointed and not to negligently or willfully violate, or permit to be violated, any provision of this chapter or the bylaws of the credit union.
- The president and secretary shall execute a certificate of election which shall set forth the names and addresses of the officers, directors, and committee members elected or appointed.
- The oath of office and the certificates of election shall be executed on forms prepared by the Credit Union Division, and one (1) copy of each shall be filed with the division within twenty (20) days after the election or appointment.
- The terms of the officers shall be for one (1) year or until their successors are chosen and have been duly qualified.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 12; 1979, No. 206, § 3; 1985, No. 936, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-912.
23-35-306. Credit committee — Loan officers.
-
- The credit committee of the credit union shall be responsible for general supervision of all loans to members.
- The credit committee shall not be composed of any person who is a member of the board of directors of the credit union or of the supervisory committee.
- It shall be the duty of the credit committee to review all applications for loans, to ascertain whether the loans would be for a provident and productive purpose and would benefit the applicant, to determine whether the security offered is sufficient, and to determine whether the terms of the application are proper.
- The credit committee shall meet as often as may be required, after due notice has been given to each member thereof, but not less than once a month. The credit committee shall keep a record of all meetings and shall make a report to the members at the annual meeting.
-
- The credit committee may appoint one (1) or more loan officers to act under the supervision of the credit committee, and these loan officers may make loans without the necessity for a meeting of, or approval by, any members of the credit committee.
- No more than one (1) member of the credit committee may serve in the position of loan officer.
- No individual shall have authority to disburse funds of the credit union for any loan which has been approved by him or her in his or her capacity as loan officer.
- Each loan officer shall, within ten (10) days of the filing of each loan application received by him or her from another member or by referral from another officer, furnish to the credit committee a full report of the application.
- All applications for loans not approved by a loan officer shall be considered and acted upon by the credit committee.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 15; 1975, No. 530, § 12; 1985, No. 936, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-915.
23-35-307. Supervisory committee.
-
The supervisory committee of the credit union shall make or cause to be made, at least annually:
- An examination of the affairs of the credit union, including an audit of its books;
- A report of its annual examination to the board of directors of the credit union; and
- An audit, a report of which shall be submitted to members at the next annual meeting of the credit union.
- The supervisory committee shall cause the passbooks and accounts of the members to be verified with the records of the treasurer at least once a year. The term “passbook” shall include any book, statement of accounts, or other pertinent or related record.
- The supervisory committee may suspend, by a unanimous vote, any officer of the credit union or any member of the credit committee or of the board, until the next members' meeting, which shall not be less than seven (7) days nor more than fourteen (14) days after the suspension. At the meeting, the suspension shall be acted upon by the members.
- The supervisory committee may call, by a majority vote, a special meeting of the members to consider any violation of this chapter, the charter, the bylaws, or any practice of the credit union deemed by the committee to be unsafe or unauthorized.
- Any member of the supervisory committee may be suspended by the board, upon majority vote. The members shall decide, at a meeting held not less than seven (7) days nor more than fourteen (14) days after the suspension, whether the suspended committee member shall be removed from or restored to the supervisory committee.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 17; 1979, No. 206, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-917.
23-35-308. Compensation of officers, directors, committee members, and employees.
- No officer, director, or committee member of the credit union, other than the treasurer whom the board of directors of the credit union has specifically appointed or contracted to actively work in the credit union, may be compensated, directly or indirectly, for his or her services as such. This shall not be construed to prevent reimbursement of directors and committee members for actual expenses they may incur in carrying out the duties of their office.
- The compensation to be paid to the treasurer and to the employees who are authorized by the board shall be established by the board at its monthly meetings or in the annual budget allocations.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 18; 1985, No. 936, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-918.
Subchapter 4 — Membership
Effective Dates. Acts 1979, No. 206, § 9: Feb. 23, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined by the General Assembly that federal associations doing business in this State now have an unfair competitive advantage over credit unions chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage and that this Act is designed to accomplish this purpose and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 16 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 31 et seq.
23-35-401. Membership requirements.
- The membership of a credit union shall be limited to and consist of the subscribers to the articles of incorporation and such other persons, having the common bond set forth in the bylaws, as have been admitted as members, have paid the entrance fee as provided in the bylaws, have prescribed and paid for one (1) or more shares, and have complied with such other requirements as the articles of incorporation and bylaws may specify.
-
-
Credit union organizations, other than central credit unions, shall be limited to:
- Groups having a common bond of occupation;
- Associations;
- Residents within a well-defined neighborhood, community, or rural district;
- Employees of a common employer, or an affiliate of a subsidiary of a common employer;
- Members of a bona fide fraternal, religious, cooperative, labor, rural, educational, or similar organization; and
-
- Members of the immediate family of such persons.
- “Members of the immediate family” shall include the wife, husband, children, parents, grandparents, and grandchildren of a member.
- Societies and associations composed of individuals who are eligible for membership may be admitted to membership in the same manner and under the same conditions as individuals but may not borrow in excess of their shareholdings.
-
Credit union organizations, other than central credit unions, shall be limited to:
-
Membership in credit unions organized as central credit unions shall be limited to:
- Credit unions organized under this chapter and federally chartered credit unions located in Arkansas;
-
A member of a credit union organized under this chapter or a federally chartered credit union located in Arkansas, if the credit union of which he or she is a member agrees to the membership and will provide an affidavit that at the time the member applies for membership in a central credit union the member has:
- Reached the loan limit at his or her own credit union, and the credit union of which he or she is a member will substantiate in writing the member's loan credibility under such rules and forms as the State Credit Union Supervisor shall prescribe;
- Reached the maximum share limit at his or her own credit union; or
- Reached the maximum share limit at his or her own credit union which is covered by life savings insurance, and the central credit union also provides life savings insurance;
-
- With the approval of the supervisor, employees of an employer with insufficient employees to form and conduct the affairs of a separate credit union and persons in the field of membership of liquidating credit unions and the immediate families of those persons.
- In making his or her determination under this subsection, the supervisor may disregard the common bond requirements of this chapter if he or she finds that the affiliation would benefit the members and be consistent with the purposes of this chapter.
- If the membership of a liquidating credit union is seeking to merge with a central credit union under the provisions of this subdivision (c)(3), all provisions of § 23-35-701 shall apply except for the common bond requirements.
- Each employer or liquidating credit union whose employees or members are approved as members of a central credit union shall be specifically named in the common bond section of the bylaws;
- Employees of the credit union;
- Current members of the credit union if it is converting to a central credit union; and
- Employees of the Arkansas Credit Union League.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 7; 1975, No. 530, §§ 5, 6; 1979, No. 206, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-907.
23-35-402. Nonliability of members.
The members of the credit union shall not be personally or individually liable for the payment of debts of the credit union.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-919.
23-35-403. Meetings — Voting.
- The annual meeting and special meetings shall be held at the time, place, and in the manner indicated in the bylaws.
- At all meetings each member shall have but one (1) vote, irrespective of his or her shareholdings. No member may vote by proxy, but a society or association having membership in the corporation may be represented and vote by one (1) of its members or shareholders, provided that person has been duly authorized by the governing board of the society or association.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-910.
23-35-404. Expulsion of members.
- A member of a credit union may be expelled by the board of directors of the credit union, but only after he or she has been given an opportunity to be heard regarding the purpose of the expulsion. A written notice of this hearing, setting forth the time, place, and date for the meeting, shall be forwarded to the member by the board together with the charges which serve as the basis for the expulsion.
-
The member may be expelled for:
- Failure to meet the conditions of his or her membership;
- Failure to carry out his or her obligations to the credit union;
- Conviction of a felony;
- Neglect or refusal to comply with the laws and bylaws under which the credit union operates;
- Habitual neglect to pay obligations;
- Insolvency; or
- Bankruptcy.
- If the board votes to expel the member, he or she shall remain liable for any sums owed to the credit union for loans or other purposes.
- The credit union may require sixty (60) days' written notice to withdraw shares or deposits by the member, as funds become available.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-908.
Subchapter 5 — Shares
Effective Dates. Acts 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1182, § 6: Feb. 11, 1976. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that Act 530 of 1975 amending various sections of Act 132 of 1971 was inconsistent and contained errors; in addition, due to the unique loan services offered by a credit union to its members, it is in the best interest of the citizens of the State of Arkansas to maintain the stability of credit unions; that for such continued stability to be assured, it is necessary to protect the rights and proprietary interests of each member in each credit union so as to encourage continued investment and insure that no loss will be incurred by each depositor; that Federal insurance of depositor accounts in State-chartered credit unions is not presently mandatory but that it is in the public interest and for the protection of depositors that each State-chartered credit union have Federal insurance of accounts; that it is in the best interest of the public and each State-chartered credit union that a reasonable time be allowed in which each State-chartered credit union should obtain Federal insurance of depositors accounts and that this Act should be given effect immediately to accomplish these purposes. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 995, § 6: Apr. 14, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of the case Ricarte v. State, CR 86-31, a question has arisen over the validity of Act 1182 of the Extended Session of 1976; that this Act is a reenactment of the former law; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the state of the law on this issue. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 22 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 31 et seq.
23-35-501. Shares generally — Liens on shares.
- A “share” is a term applied to each five dollars ($5.00), but not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00), standing to the share account of a member.
- The shares of stock of a credit union shall all be common shares of one (1) class and shall have a par value of five-dollar multiples of not less than five dollars ($5.00) nor more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per share.
- No certificate shall be issued to denote ownership of a share in a credit union.
- Shares may be subscribed, paid for, and transferred in such manner as the bylaws may prescribe.
- The credit union shall have and may exercise a lien on the shares of any member for any sum due the credit union from the member or for any loan endorsed by him or her .
- When the share balance of a member is reduced to less than one (1) fully paid share by the member's action and remains below that amount for a period of one (1) year or longer after the member has received actual notice of that fact, it may be absorbed by a late or service charge upon authorization of the board of directors of the credit union.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 19; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), 1182, § 3; 1985, No. 936, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-919; reen. Acts 1987, No. 995, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 995, § 3. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
23-35-502. Shares in name of minor.
- Shares may be issued in the name of a minor, if permitted by the articles of incorporation. These shares may be withdrawn by the minor, and payments made on the withdrawals shall be valid.
- No minor under sixteen (16) years of age shall be entitled to vote in the meetings of the members either personally or through his or her parent or guardian, nor may he or she become a director or committee member until he or she shall have reached legal age.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-922.
23-35-503. Shares issued in trust.
- Shares may be issued in the name of a member in trust for a beneficiary, including a minor, but no beneficiary, unless a member in his or her own right, may be permitted to vote, obtain loans, hold office, or be required to pay an entrance fee.
- Payment of part or all of the shares issued in trust to the member shall, to the extent of the payment, discharge the liability of the credit union to the member and the beneficiary, and the credit union shall be under no obligation to see the application of the payment.
- In the event of the death of the member, and if shares are so issued or held and the credit union has been given no other written evidence of the existence or terms of any trust, the shares and any dividends or interest thereon shall be paid to the beneficiary.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 23; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-923.
23-35-504. Joint tenancy in shares and accounts.
A member may designate any person to hold shares and thrift club accounts with him or her in joint tenancy with the right of survivorship, but no joint tenant, unless a member in his or her own right, shall be permitted to vote, obtain loans, or hold office. Payment of part or all of the joint accounts to any of the joint tenants shall, to the extent of the payment, discharge the liability to all.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-921.
Subchapter 6 — Operation
Effective Dates. Acts 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1182, § 6: Feb. 11, 1976. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that Act 530 of 1975 amending various sections of Act 132 of 1971 was inconsistent and contained errors; in addition, due to the unique loan services offered by a credit union to its members, it is in the best interest of the citizens of the State of Arkansas to maintain the stability of credit unions; that for such continued stability to be assured, it is necessary to protect the rights and proprietary interests of each member in each credit union so as to encourage continued investment and insure that no loss will be incurred by each depositor; that Federal insurance of depositor accounts in State-chartered credit unions is not presently mandatory but that it is in the public interest and for the protection of depositors that each State-chartered credit union have Federal insurance of accounts; that it is in the best interest of the public and each State-chartered credit union that a reasonable time be allowed in which each State-chartered credit union should obtain Federal insurance of depositors accounts and that this Act should be given effect immediately to accomplish these purposes. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1979, No. 206, § 9: Feb. 23, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined by the General Assembly that federal associations doing business in this State now have an unfair competitive advantage over credit unions chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage and that this Act is designed to accomplish this purpose and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 995, § 6: Apr. 14, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that because of the case Ricarte v. State, CR 86-31, a question has arisen over the validity of Act 1182 of the Extended Session of 1976; that this Act is a reenactment of the former law; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify the state of the law on this issue. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 42 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 66 et seq.
23-35-601. Powers generally.
A credit union shall have power to:
- Make contracts;
- Sue and be sued in the name of the credit union;
- Adopt and use a common seal and alter it at pleasure;
- Purchase, hold, and dispose of property necessary or incidental to its operations;
- Require the payment of an entrance or membership fee by any applicant admitted to membership;
- Receive from its members payments on shares, which shall include the right to conduct Christmas clubs, vacation clubs, and other such thrift organizations within the membership;
- Lend its funds to its members as provided in this chapter;
- Purchase insurance on the lives of its members in an amount equal to their respective share and loan balances or any or all of them;
- Borrow from any source in an aggregate amount not exceeding sixty percent (60%) of the share balances;
- Invest surplus funds as provided in this chapter;
- Make deposits in checking or similar type of accounts in state-chartered and federally chartered banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, and credit unions, which accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished], or the National Credit Union Administration;
- Hold membership in other credit unions organized under this chapter or other acts, in the Arkansas Credit Union League, and in other organizations composed of credit unions;
- Declare dividends as provided in this chapter;
- Impress a lien upon the shares and accumulation of dividends and interest of any member to the extent of any loans made to him or her directly or indirectly, or on which he or she is surety, and for any dues or charges payable by him or her;
- Change its place of business in Arkansas with written notice to the State Credit Union Supervisor; and
- Exercise the powers granted corporations organized under the laws of Arkansas and such additional incidental powers as may be necessary or requisite to enable it to promote and effectively carry on its purposes.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 5; 1975, No. 530, §§ 3, 4; 1985, No. 936, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-905.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
23-35-602. Christmas and other thrift clubs.
Christmas clubs, vacation clubs, and other thrift clubs, if provided for the use of members, shall be operated in accordance with such rules as the board of directors of the credit union may prescribe.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-920; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2488.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules”.
23-35-603. Loans and extensions of credit in advance.
- A credit union may loan to members for a provident or productive purpose and upon such security as the bylaws may provide and as the credit committee or loan officer shall approve.
-
- No loan shall bear an interest rate to exceed the highest lawful rate permitted under the Constitution of the State of Arkansas.
- No credit union shall charge the borrower anything of value in connection or in association with the loan, other than repayment of the unpaid principal balance and interest. However, on loans secured by real estate a credit union may charge a loan origination fee not to exceed three percent (3%) of the original principal balance of the loan. A borrower may be charged for the cost of appraisals and credit investigations. If permitted by the bylaws, the borrowing members may be charged for the cost of the filing fees on security instruments in connection with the transaction.
- Every application for a loan shall be made upon a form, which the credit committee has prescribed and the board of directors of the credit union has approved, which shall state at least the purpose for which the loan is desired, the security, if any, offered, the amount of the loan being applied for, and any other information which may be required to determine the financial ability of the applicant to repay the loan.
- Every loan shall be evidenced by a written instrument.
-
- No unsecured loan shall be made to any member in an aggregate amount in excess of three thousand dollars ($3,000).
- No secured loan shall be made to any member in an aggregate amount in excess of ten percent (10%) of the credit union's total assets.
- No loan shall be made to any member if, in the aggregate, the balances of the secured and unsecured loans outstanding to that member exceed ten percent (10%) of the total assets of the credit union.
- Secured and unsecured loans made against joint accounts shall be included in the aggregate and shall not be allocated to each joint tenant in determining the loan amounts set forth in this subsection.
- If the State Credit Union Supervisor in his or her discretion determines that the ten percent (10%) limit as set out in this subsection is operating to the detriment of a credit union, he or she may by rule or order reduce the ten percent (10%) limit.
-
- No loan shall be made unless it has been approved by a loan officer or has received approval of a majority of the members of the credit committee in conformity with the other provisions of this chapter.
- A loan or aggregate of loans to a director or member of the supervisory or credit committee of the credit union making the loan which exceeds six thousand dollars ($6,000) plus pledged shares shall be approved by a majority of the credit committee and a majority of the board members present. No member of the board or the credit committee may take part in the consideration of his or her loan application.
-
- Loans may be granted to members of the credit union, secured by a first or second mortgage on real estate. The aggregate of the loans shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the market value of the real estate which is set forth in an appraisal prepared by an independent qualified real estate appraiser. The loans shall also provide for substantially equal monthly payments for insurance premiums and taxes assessed against the security. The total outstanding balance of all first mortgage loans on real estate shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the outstanding shares of the credit union.
-
For purposes of this subsection and applicable rules:
- “Appraisal” means an objective estimate of value based upon a physical examination and evaluation which shall disclose the market value of the security offered by use of the market sales approach which shall be supported by an analysis of comparable properties in the immediate area. The market value shall also be supported by use of the cost and income appraisal methods if conditions warrant and shall include documentation of the purchase price of the property offered as security;
- “Independent qualified real estate appraiser” means a person who is experienced in the appraisal of the type of real estate being offered as security, who is actively engaged in real estate appraisal work and whose qualifications are demonstrated by membership in a national professional appraisal organization, or who is licensed to appraise in the state in which the real estate is located, or who is acceptable as an appraiser by an insuring or guaranteeing agency of the federal or state government and who has no present or contemplated future interest in the property being appraised; and
- “Market value” means the highest price which real property will bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus.
-
- A credit union may make any loan insured by any federal program on terms set out in the applicable federal legislation, and that insurance shall be deemed adequate security.
-
- In addition to generally accepted types of security, the endorsement of a note by a guarantor or assignment of shares or wages, in a manner consistent with the laws of Arkansas, shall be deemed security within the meaning of this chapter.
- For purposes of this subsection and applicable rules a “guarantor” means one who enters into an enforceable guaranty agreement and provides current financial statements showing a net worth free of homestead and subject to execution in an amount at least equal to the amount of the loan.
- The guaranty agreement and the financial statements must be presented to the credit committee of the credit union for consideration and then placed in the file of the borrower.
- The adequacy of all securities shall be within the determination of the credit committee or loan officer, subject to the provisions of this chapter and the bylaws.
- A member may receive a loan in installments or in one (1) sum, and he or she may pay the whole or any part of this loan on any day in which the credit union office is open for business.
- The credit committee may approve an extension of credit in advance, upon its own motion or upon application by a member, and loans may be granted to the member within the limits of the extension of credit. When an extension of credit has been approved, applications for loans need no further consideration as long as the aggregate obligation does not exceed the limits of the extension of credit. The credit committee shall review all extensions of credit at least once a year, and any extension of credit shall expire if the member becomes more than ninety (90) days delinquent in his or her obligations to the credit union.
- No director, member of the credit or supervisory audit committee, or credit union employee shall cosign, endorse, or act as a guarantor for any borrower from the credit union.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 16; 1975, No. 530, §§ 13-15; 1975 (Extended Sess., 1976), No. 1182, § 2; 1979, No. 206, § 5; 1985, No. 936, §§ 8-11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-916; Acts 1987, No. 750, § 1; reen. 1987, No. 995, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was reenacted by Acts 1987, No. 995, § 2. Acts 1987, No. 834, provided that 1987 legislation reenacting acts passed in the 1976 Extended Session should not repeal any other 1987 legislation and that such other legislation would be controlling in the event of conflict.
23-35-604. Investment of funds.
Funds not used in loans to members may be invested:
- In capital shares, obligations, or preferred stock issues of any agency or association organized either as a stock company, mutual association, or membership corporation, provided that the membership or stockholdings, as the case may be, of the agency or association are confined or restricted to credit unions or organizations of credit unions and provided that the purposes for which the agency or association is organized are designed to service or otherwise assist credit union operations;
- In obligations of the State of Arkansas or any subdivision thereof;
- In obligations of the United States or securities fully guaranteed as to principal and interest thereby;
- In shares of a cooperative society organized under local or national cooperative laws, in an amount not exceeding ten percent (10%) of the shares and surplus of the credit union;
- In any investment legal for fiduciaries, savings banks, or trust companies in Arkansas;
- In loans to other credit unions, in an amount not to exceed thirty-three and one-third percent (331/3%) of the shares and unimpaired surplus of the lending credit union; and
- In an aggregate amount not exceeding twenty-five percent (25%) of the allocations to the reserve fund, in any agency or association of the type described in subdivision (1) of this section, provided the purposes of any such agency or association are designed to assist in establishing and maintaining liquidity, solvency, and security in credit union operations.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 25; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-925.
23-35-605. Reserves.
-
At the end of each accounting period, the gross income shall be determined. From this amount, there shall be set aside, as a regular reserve against losses on loans and against such other losses as may be specified in rules prescribed under this chapter, sums in accordance with the following schedule:
-
A credit union in operation for more than four (4) years and having assets of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or more shall set aside:
- Ten percent (10%) of gross income until the regular reserve shall equal four percent (4%) of the total of outstanding loans and risk assets; then
- Five percent (5%) of gross income until the regular reserve shall equal six percent (6%) of the total of outstanding loans and risk assets;
- A credit union in operation less than four (4) years or having assets of less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shall set aside ten percent (10%) of gross income until the regular reserve shall equal seven and one-half percent (7½%) of the total of outstanding loans and risk assets; and
- Whenever the regular reserve falls below the stated percent of the total of outstanding loans and risk assets, it shall be replenished by regular contributions in such amounts as may be needed to maintain the stated reserve goals.
-
A credit union in operation for more than four (4) years and having assets of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or more shall set aside:
- The State Credit Union Supervisor may decrease the reserve requirement set forth in subsection (a) of this section when, in his or her opinion, a decrease is necessary or desirable. The supervisor may also require special reserves to protect the interests of members either by rule or for an individual credit union in any special case.
- The reserve fund shall belong to the credit union and shall be used to meet all losses from uncollectable loans and shall not be distributed except on liquidation of the credit union or in accordance with a plan approved or ordered by the supervisor.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 26; 1979, No. 206, § 7; 1985, No. 936, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-926; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2489.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (a); and substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (b).
23-35-606. Inability to contact members — Transfer of funds to reserves.
-
- If a credit union is unable to contact a member, beneficiary, or other person by first class mail at the last address shown on the records of the credit union, and if such inability continues for a period of more than three (3) years, then all shares, accounts, dividends, interest, and other sums due to or standing in the name of the member, beneficiary, or other person may, by action of the board of directors of the credit union, be credited to accounts payable, and thereafter no dividends or interest will accrue thereto.
- The member shall have the right to reclaim any such sums by proper judicial proceedings commenced within an additional four (4) years after the action by the board.
- This section shall not apply to shares, accounts, dividends, interest, and other sums due to or standing in the name of two (2) or more persons unless the credit union is unable to contact any of those persons in the manner and during the period specified in this section.
- Nothing contained in this section shall exempt a credit union from the Arkansas Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, § 18-28-201 et seq.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 24; 1975, No. 530, § 16; 1985, No. 936, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-924.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The former Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, referred to in this section, was repealed, with the exception of what will be current § 18-28-230, and replaced by the enactment of the Unclaimed Property Act by Acts 1999, No. 850.
23-35-607. Dividends — Definition.
- At such intervals as the board of directors of the credit union may authorize and after provision for required reserves, the board may declare, pursuant to such rules as may be issued by the State Credit Union Supervisor, a dividend to be paid at different rates on different types of shares and at different rates and maturity dates in the case of share certificates.
-
- Dividend credit may be accrued on various types of shares and share certificates as authorized by the board.
- Dividend credit for a month may be accrued on shares which are or become fully paid up during the first fifteen (15) days of that month.
- No dividends shall be paid on shares which are withdrawn during the dividend period.
-
- No dividend shall be declared or paid at a time when the credit union is insolvent or when the payments thereof would render the credit union insolvent.
-
Insolvency shall be determined by the supervisor to have occurred when:
- A credit union cannot meet its obligations as they come due in the normal course of business; or
- Considering the credit union's assets and liabilities, the net recoverable assets, if made immediately available, would not be sufficient to discharge the credit union's obligations to its creditors and members.
-
As used in this subsection, “net recoverable assets” means all assets of the credit union as reflected in a balance sheet which has been prepared using generally accepted accounting principles less the following:
- Any uncollectible or unrecoverable asset;
- Ten percent (10%) of the unpaid balances of all loans delinquent more than two (2) months but less than six (6) months, twenty-five percent (25%) of the unpaid balances of all loans delinquent from six (6) months to less than twelve (12) months, eighty percent (80%) of the unpaid balances of loans delinquent twelve (12) months but less than sixteen (16) months, and one hundred percent (100%) of the unpaid balances of all loans delinquent sixteen (16) months or more.
- Each individual who has met the requirements for membership shall be entitled to, and paid, a dividend on his or her fully paid shares as declared by the board.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 27; 1975, No. 530, § 17; 1979, No. 206, § 8; 1985, No. 936, §§ 16-18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-927; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2490.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a).
23-35-608. Reduction of assets.
When the losses of a credit union resulting from a depreciation in value of its loans or investments, or otherwise, exceed its undivided earnings and reserve fund so that the estimated value of its assets is less than the total amount due the shareholders, the credit union may by a majority vote of the entire membership order a reduction in the shares of each of its shareholders to divide the loss proportionately among the members. If thereafter the credit union shall realize from its assets a greater amount than was fixed by the order of reduction, the excess shall be divided among the shareholders whose assets were reduced, but only to the extent of the reduction.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 28; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-928.
23-35-609. Fiscal year.
The fiscal year of all credit unions subject to the provisions of this chapter shall end on December 31.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-909.
23-35-610. Establishment of subsidiary offices.
- A credit union shall have the power to establish offices at locations other than its main office if the maintenance of those offices is reasonably necessary to furnish services to its membership. No additional offices shall be established to serve persons who are not entitled to membership, as defined in the common bond provision of the articles of incorporation, and who would not be entitled to services of the credit union at its main office.
- All books of account shall be maintained at the main office of the credit union.
- The State Credit Union Supervisor shall grant prior written approval for the establishment of subsidiary offices. He or she shall have the authority to issue notice and hold a public hearing to determine if the establishment of the subsidiary office or offices is necessary and in the best interests of the credit union.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 39; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-939.
23-35-611. Records.
- All credit union records shall be kept for a period of five (5) years from the date of making them or from the date of the last entry thereon.
- No credit union shall be required to make receipt for payment except as may be provided in the bylaws, nor shall it be necessary to endorse a note showing date of payments or balance due.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 32; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-932.
Subchapter 7 — Merger, Conversion, or Dissolution
Effective Dates. Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., §§ 13-15 and § 98 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 129 et seq.
23-35-701. Merger.
- Any credit union other than a central credit union may, with the approval of the State Credit Union Supervisor, merge with any other credit union under the existing charter of the other credit union, pursuant to any plan agreed upon by the majority of the board of directors of each credit union joining in the merger and approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of each credit union present at the meetings of members duly called for that purpose. The supervisor may waive the common bond requirement of this chapter for merging credit unions if he or she determines that good cause has been shown for waiving the requirement and that the merger is consistent with the purposes of this chapter.
-
-
After agreement by the directors and approval by the members of each credit union, the president and secretary of each credit union shall execute a certificate of merger, which shall set forth all of the following:
- The time and place of the meeting of the board of directors at which the plan was agreed upon;
- The vote in favor of adoption of the plan;
- A copy of the resolution or other action by which the plan was agreed upon;
- The time and place of the meeting of the members at which the plan agreed upon was approved;
- The vote by which the plan was approved by the members; and
- Such other provisions as set by rule or order of the supervisor.
- The certificates and a copy of the plan of merger agreed upon shall be forwarded to the supervisor and, if approved, returned to the merging credit unions.
-
After agreement by the directors and approval by the members of each credit union, the president and secretary of each credit union shall execute a certificate of merger, which shall set forth all of the following:
- Upon any such merger so effected, all property, property rights, and interests of the merged credit union shall vest in the surviving credit union without deed, endorsement, or other instrument of transfer. All debts, obligations, and liabilities of the merged credit union shall be deemed to have been assumed by the surviving credit union under whose charter the merger was effected.
- This section shall be construed, whenever possible, to permit a credit union chartered under any other act to merge with one subject to the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 29; 1975, No. 530, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-929.
23-35-702. Conversion to or from federal credit union.
The State Credit Union Supervisor shall issue rules to permit the conversion of a credit union operating under this chapter to a federal credit union and the conversion of a federal credit union to a credit union operating under this chapter.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 36; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-936; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2491.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations”.
23-35-703. Voluntary dissolution.
A credit union may elect to dissolve voluntarily and wind up its affairs in the following manner:
- The board of directors of the credit union shall adopt a resolution recommending that the credit union be dissolved voluntarily and directing that the question of dissolution be submitted to a regular or special meeting of the members;
- After the adoption of the resolution to voluntarily dissolve, no receipts shall be accepted nor withdrawals permitted from its share or deposit accounts, nor shall any loans be made nor any dividends declared nor paid pending final determination by its membership on the voluntary dissolution;
- At a meeting called to consider the matter, a majority of the entire membership may vote to dissolve the credit union, provided a notice of the meeting was mailed to the members of the credit union at least ten (10) days prior thereto. Any member not present at the meeting may, within the next twenty (20) days, vote in favor of dissolution by signing a statement in a form approved by the State Credit Union Supervisor, and the vote shall have the same force and effect as if cast at the meeting;
- The credit union shall thereupon immediately cease to do business, except for the purpose of liquidation; and
- The president and the secretary of the credit union shall, within five (5) days following the meeting, notify the supervisor of intention to liquidate and shall include a list of the names and addresses of the directors and officers of the credit union.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 38; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-938.
23-35-704. Suspension of operations — Involuntary liquidation.
- If it shall appear that any credit union is bankrupt or insolvent, that it has willfully violated any of the provisions of this chapter, or that it is operating in an unsafe or unsound manner, the State Credit Union Supervisor shall issue an order temporarily suspending the credit union's operations. The board of directors of the credit union shall be given notice by registered mail of the suspension, which notice shall include a list of the reasons for the suspension and a list of the specific violations of this chapter.
- Upon receipt of the suspension notice, the credit union shall immediately cease all operations.
- The directors of the credit union shall then file a reply to the suspension notice with the supervisor within fifteen (15) days. They may request a hearing to present a plan of corrective actions proposed if they desire to continue operations, or they may request that the credit union be declared insolvent and that a liquidating agent be appointed.
-
- If the credit union fails to answer the suspension notice or request a hearing, the supervisor may then revoke the credit union's charter, appoint a liquidating agent, and liquidate the credit union in accordance with § 23-35-705.
-
- If the supervisor, after issuing notice of suspension and providing opportunity for a hearing, rejects the credit union's plan to continue operations, the supervisor may issue a notice of involuntary liquidation and appoint a liquidating agent.
- The credit union may request a stay of execution of this action by appealing to the circuit court of the jurisdiction in which the credit union is located.
- Involuntary liquidation may not be ordered prior to following the suspension procedures outlined in this section.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, §§ 37, 38; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-937, 67-938.
23-35-705. Procedure for liquidation or dissolution.
- The credit union shall continue in existence for the purposes of discharging its debts, collecting and distributing its assets, and doing all acts required in order to wind up its business, and it may sue and be sued for the purpose of enforcing its debts and obligations until its affairs are fully adjusted.
-
The board of directors of the credit union, or in the case of involuntary dissolution the liquidating agent, shall, after applying each member's share or deposit account against any loan or debt owed the credit union by that member, use the assets of the credit union to pay:
- Expenses incidental to liquidation, including any surety bond that may be required;
- Any liability due nonmembers; and
- Savings club accounts as provided in this chapter.
- Assets then remaining shall be distributed to the members proportionately to the shares held by each member as of the date dissolution was voted or ordered.
- As soon as the board or liquidating agent determines that all assets from which there is a reasonable expectancy of realization have been liquidated and distributed as set forth in this section, they shall execute a certificate of dissolution on a form prescribed by the State Credit Union Supervisor and file the certificate with him or her.
- The credit union shall be subject to examination by the supervisor in accordance with its schedules.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 38; 1985, No. 936 § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-938.
Subchapter 8 — Prohibited Practices
Effective Dates. Acts 1979, No. 206, § 9: Feb. 23, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined by the General Assembly that federal associations doing business in this State now have an unfair competitive advantage over credit unions chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage and that this Act is designed to accomplish this purpose and should be given effect immediately. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 936, § 22: Emergency failed to pass. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Credit Union Act does not provide for sufficient capitalization for newly chartered credit unions and does not give credit unions sufficient real estate lending authority. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from the date of its passage and approval.”
23-35-801. Misleading conduct or use of words “credit union”.
-
It is unlawful for any person, corporation, copartnership, or association except a credit union subject to the provisions of this chapter or the Federal Credit Union Act to:
- Use a name or title containing the words “credit union” or any derivation thereof;
- Represent themselves in their advertising as a credit union; or
- Otherwise conduct business as a credit union.
- Any person who willfully violates this section shall be guilty of a Class D felony and may be permanently enjoined from such conduct.
- The State Credit Union Supervisor may institute and prosecute actions in his or her own name in the circuit court of any county having jurisdiction, to seek any judicial remedy necessary to enforce the provisions of this section.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-904; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 433.
U.S. Code. The Federal Credit Union Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1751 et seq.
Research References
ALR.
Construction and Application of Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 (FCUA) (12 U.S.C. §§ 1751 to 1795k). 89 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 357 (2014).
23-35-802. Commission or compensation for sale of shares, grant of loans, etc.
No credit union shall pay or receive any commission or compensation for securing members, for the sale of its shares, or for the granting of loans to its members or to other credit unions except for loan origination fees which are specifically provided for in § 23-35-603.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 6; 1979, No. 206, § 1; 1985, No. 936, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-906.
23-35-803. Prohibited actions by officers, directors, agents, etc.
-
- It is unlawful for any officer, director, committee member, agent, employee, or loan officer of a credit union to permit a loan to be made to a nonmember or to participate in a loan to a nonmember.
- It is unlawful for any corporation, officer, director, member, committee member, agent, employee, or loan officer of a credit union to receive either directly or indirectly the proceeds of a credit union loan made in the name of another person, corporation, or credit union with the purpose to avoid compliance with this chapter.
- Any person who willfully violates this subsection shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and shall be primarily liable to the credit union for the amount thus illegally loaned.
- The illegality of such a loan shall be no defense in any action of the credit union to recover on the loan.
-
- It is unlawful for any officer, director, committee member, agent, or employee of a credit union to make or subscribe to false entries or exhibit a false or fictitious paper, instrument, or security to a person authorized to examine the credit union books and records.
- Any person who willfully violates this subsection shall be guilty of a Class D felony.
-
- It is unlawful for any officer, director, committee member, agent, or employee of a credit union to receive payments on shares knowing the credit union is insolvent.
- Any person who willfully violates this subsection shall be guilty of a Class C felony.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 14; 1975, No. 530, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-914; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 444.
23-35-804. Compensation of directors or committee members.
- With the exception of the treasurer of the credit union whom the board of directors of the credit union has specifically appointed or contracted to actually work in the credit union, no director or member of a credit committee or supervisory committee may receive compensation for performing the duties or responsibilities of the board or committee position to which the person was elected or appointed.
- For purposes of this section, the term “compensation” specifically excludes reasonable and proper costs incurred by or on behalf of an official whether on a reimbursement basis or paid directly by the credit union in carrying out the responsibilities of the position.
History. Acts 1971, No. 132, § 6; 1979, No. 206, § 1; 1985, No. 936, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-906.
23-35-805. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning false reports about credit union, was repealed by Acts 2019, No. 252, § 1, effective July 24, 2019. The section was derived from Acts 1971, No. 132, § 34; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-934.
Chapter 36 Industrial Loan Institutions
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1971, Nos. 369 and 734 provided that no industrial loan institutions should be incorporated under this chapter after the effective dates of the acts but that this chapter should remain unrepealed and in effect for the limited purpose of allowing the Bank Commissioner to regulate preexisting industrial loan institutions. In addition, Acts 1971, No. 734, provided that this chapter would remain unrepealed and in effect for the purpose of enabling those institutions to continue in operation under the provisions of this chapter. Both acts contained effective date provisions which would be invalid under the decisions in Arkansas Tax Comm'n v. Moore, 103 Ark. 48, 145 S.W. 199 (1912) and Cunningham v. Walker, 198 Ark. 928, 132 S.W.2d 24 (1939); accordingly, both took effect on July 19, 1971.
Effective Dates. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 21: became law without Governor's signature, Mar. 3, 1941. Emergency clause provided: “Whereas, there are not at the present time the necessary laws providing for the proper regulation by the State Bank Commissioner of corporations, firms and individuals operating as industrial loan institutions and such regulation by the State Bank Commissioner is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and morals of this state; an emergency is declared to exist and this act shall be and shall become effective from and after its passage.”
Acts 1981, No. 580, § 3: Mar. 18, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found that the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-221) and interpretations of the Federal Reserve System will for the first time impose reserve requirements on “industrial loan institutions” which are not members of the Federal Reserve System and will increase reserve requirements for such “industrial loan institutions” substantially above those which are presently required under Arkansas law, the effect of which will be to place “industrial loan institutions” at a great competitive disadvantage, without corresponding public benefits, and may threaten the continued existence of “industrial loan institutions.” Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 71, § 3: Feb. 19, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that present law does not provide an adequate procedure for the liquidation of an industrial loan institution; that this Act authorizes the Bank Commissioner to liquidate industrial loan institutions; that until this Act becomes effective there will be no adequate mechanism for providing for such liquidation, and therefore this Act should go into effect immediately. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
C.J.S. 9 C.J.S., Banks and Banking, § 1044 et seq.
23-36-101. Definition.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “industrial loan institution” means any corporation organized under the general corporation laws of this state, which is engaged in lending money, to be paid in weekly, monthly, or other periodical installments or principal sums, as a business. However, this definition shall not be construed to include building and loan associations, commercial banks or savings banks, trust companies, credit unions, pawnbrokers, agricultural or livestock pools, rural credit unions, or farmers cooperative societies.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1001.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 3, provided, in part, that institutions operating prior to March 3, 1941, under authorization of the State Banking Department, could apply, within 30 days after March 3, 1941, for a certificate of authority to operate under the provisions of this chapter. If the application was approved by the Bank Commissioner, the institution would become an industrial loan institution subject to the provisions of this chapter.
Case Notes
Cited: Capital Funds, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 582 (8th Cir. 1965).
23-36-102. Stock ownership.
At least two-thirds (2/3) of the stock of an industrial loan institution shall be owned by bona fide residents of the State of Arkansas.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1009.
23-36-103. Directors.
- At least three-fourths (¾) of the number of directors of any industrial loan institution shall be residents of the county in which the city is located in which an industrial loan institution is organized or becomes active under this chapter.
- Every director shall own and hold unencumbered not less than five hundred dollars ($500) par value of the capital stock of the industrial loan institution.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1009.
23-36-104. Corporate title.
- Every corporation authorized by the Bank Commissioner to operate pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be known as an industrial loan institution and shall use the words “industrial loan institution” as part of its corporate title or in connection with its corporate title.
- All persons, firms, associations, and corporations, except those which discharge the burden of proving their authority under the laws of another state or the United States, are prohibited from using in this state, as a portion of or in connection with their office or other place of business, or in reference to themselves on their stationery or in their advertising, any of the words or phrases, alone or in combination with any other word or phrase, “industrial loans”, “industrial plan of loans”, “industrial lending”, or the word “plan” in connection with any system of loaning money which would in any way tend to induce the belief that the party using it is authorized to engage in business as an industrial loan institution under the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, §§ 3, 10; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1003, 67-1010.
Case Notes
Compliance with Requirements.
Evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the company was entitled to a certificate authenticating its existence as an industrial loan company. Sherman v. Hallmark Loan & Inv. Corp., 249 Ark. 964, 462 S.W.2d 840 (1971).
Engaging in Banking Business.
This section creates a clear distinction between industrial loan companies and banks under Arkansas law and merely performing some banking functions does not constitute engaging in the banking business. Capital Funds, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 582 (8th Cir. 1965).
23-36-105. Supervision by Bank Commissioner.
- Every institution transacting the business of an industrial loan institution as defined by this chapter, whether as a separate business or in connection with any other business, under the laws of and within this state, shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter and shall be under the supervision of the Bank Commissioner.
- The commissioner may make, at any time and from time to time, any examinations of the affairs of securities affiliates or other affiliates of industrial loan institutions which are necessary to disclose fully the relations between the industrial loan institutions and their affiliates and the effect of the rules promulgated by the commissioner on the affairs of the industrial loan institutions.
- The commissioner shall exercise control of and supervision over industrial loan institutions doing business under this chapter. It shall be his or her duty to execute and enforce, through the state bank examiners and any other agents appointed for that purpose, all laws relating to industrial loan institutions as defined by this chapter.
- For the more complete and thorough enforcement of the provisions of this chapter, the commissioner is empowered to promulgate any rules and instructions, not inconsistent with this chapter, which may, in his or her opinion, be necessary to carry out the provisions of the laws relating to industrial loan institutions as defined in § 23-36-101 and which may be further necessary to ensure safe and conservative management of industrial loan institutions under his or her supervision to provide adequate protection for the interest of creditors, depositors, and stockholders in their relations with the institutions.
- All industrial loan institutions doing business under the provisions of this chapter shall conduct their business in a manner consistent with all laws relating to industrial loan institutions and all rules and instructions that may be promulgated or issued by the commissioner.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1008; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2492.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (b); and deleted “regulations” following “rules” in (d) and (e).
Case Notes
Cited: Capital Funds, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 582 (8th Cir. 1965).
23-36-106. Statement on call.
- Every industrial loan institution operating under the supervision of the Bank Commissioner shall make to the commissioner, whenever required by him or her, a statement of its assets and liabilities at the close of business on the day designated, which day shall be prior to the call of the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall give no notice to any person whatever of the date on which he or she will call for the statement.
- The report shall be verified by the oath of either the president, vice president, cashier, or secretary of the institution, and, in addition thereto, it shall be attested to by not fewer than two (2) directors.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1017.
23-36-107. Examinations and fees.
-
-
Every industrial loan institution shall pay to the Bank Commissioner, within ten (10) days after notice from the commissioner, in the months of January and July of each year, a fixed fee of fifteen dollars ($15.00). In addition thereto, the industrial loan institution shall pay the commissioner a sum, ascertained according to the following scale:
- A sum equal to one-fiftieth percent (1/50%) of the assets of the industrial loan institution, as shown by the last call report of the condition of the industrial loan institution, up to and including the first two million dollars ($2,000,000) of its assets, determined as aforesaid; plus
- One one-hundredth percent (1/100%) on the next one million dollars ($1,000,000) of assets, determined as aforesaid; plus
- One two-hundredth percent (1/200%) of the next one million dollars ($1,000,000) of assets, determined as aforesaid; plus
- One five-hundredth percent (1/500%) upon all assets, determined as aforesaid, in excess of four million dollars ($4,000,000).
- The minimum amount thus payable shall not be less than thirty dollars ($30.00).
-
Every industrial loan institution shall pay to the Bank Commissioner, within ten (10) days after notice from the commissioner, in the months of January and July of each year, a fixed fee of fifteen dollars ($15.00). In addition thereto, the industrial loan institution shall pay the commissioner a sum, ascertained according to the following scale:
- The commissioner may, at his or her discretion, examine every industrial loan institution in the state two (2) times annually or more often if, in his or her opinion, it is necessary. For any examination made in excess of two (2), industrial loan institutions so examined shall pay an additional assessment equal to the January assessment of the year in which the excess examination is made.
- The assessments provided for in this section may be reduced by the commissioner if they, with other fees received by the State Bank Department, produce a greater sum than is required to pay the expenses of the department. They may be increased if not sufficient in connection with other fees received as aforesaid to defray the expenses of the department.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1016.
23-36-108. Powers generally.
- Industrial loan institutions shall be empowered to purchase, sell, discount, or negotiate bonds, notes, or other choses in action and issue, as evidence therefor, investment certificates, contracts, or agreements under any descriptive name. They may bear such interest, if any, as their terms may provide and may require the payment to the industrial loan institution of such amounts, from time to time, as their terms may provide. The industrial loan institution may permit the withdrawal or cancellation of amounts paid upon the bonds, notes, or other choses in action, in whole or in part, from time to time, and may credit amounts thereon upon such conditions as may be set forth therein.
- The industrial loan institution shall have the right to lend money upon the collateral deposit of, and the compliance of the borrowers with the terms of, any investment certificate, contract, or agreements issued under subsection (a) of this section.
- All industrial loan institutions operating under the provisions of this chapter shall so distinguish their operations and so qualify them as not to perform any of the functions of a commercial bank, savings bank, or trust company, outside of the specific authority provided for their operation under this chapter.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, §§ 3-5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1003 — 67-1005.
Case Notes
Engaging in Banking Business.
This section creates a clear distinction between industrial loan companies and banks under Arkansas law and merely performing some banking functions does not constitute engaging in the banking business. Capital Funds, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 582 (8th Cir. 1965).
Cited: Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Chandler, 218 Ark. 966, 239 S.W.2d 1009 (1951); Capital Funds, Inc. v. SEC, 348 F.2d 582 (8th Cir. 1965).
23-36-109. Loan limits.
The total liabilities to any industrial loan institution of any person, corporation, company, or firm for money borrowed, including in the liabilities of the company or firm the liabilities of the several members thereof, shall at no time exceed twenty percent (20%) of the actually paid-up capital and surplus of the industrial loan institution. However, the discount of bona fide bills of exchange or acceptances drawn against actually existing values and the discount of commercial or business paper actually owned by the person, corporation, company, or firm negotiating them shall not be considered money so borrowed.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1006.
23-36-110. Loans insured by federal government.
-
Subject to any rules which the Bank Commissioner finds to be necessary and proper, industrial loan institutions are authorized:
- To make loans and advances of credit and purchases of obligations representing loans and advancement of credit which are insured by the Federal Housing Administrator and to obtain such insurance;
- To make any loans secured by mortgages on real property which the administrator insures or makes a commitment to insure and to obtain such insurance; and
- To purchase, invest in, and dispose of notes or bonds secured by mortgage or deed of trust which the administrator has insured or made a commitment to insure in debentures issued by the administrator or in securities issued by the national mortgage associations.
- No law of this state prescribing the nature, amount, or form of security, or requiring security upon which such loans or advances of credit may be made, or prescribing or limiting the period for which loans or advances of credit may be made shall be deemed to apply to loans and advances of credit, or purchases made pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1014; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2493.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (a).
23-36-111. Prohibited loans.
No industrial loan institution shall make any loans directly or indirectly to its officers or directors or to any employee, nor make any loans on capital stock of its own issue.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1018.
23-36-112. Late charge for default in payment.
Industrial loan institutions are authorized under this chapter to impose a late charge of five cents (5¢) for each default of the payment of one dollar ($1.00), or a fraction thereof, at the time any periodical installment upon a certificate assigned as collateral security for the payment of a loan, under § 23-36-108, after payment becomes due. The late charges shall not be cumulative.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1012.
23-36-113. Reserves.
- All industrial loan institutions shall establish, as a reserve against the choses in action, investment certificates, contracts, or agreements, described in § 23-36-108, not less than fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of the indebtedness thus created.
-
- Not less than twenty percent (20%) of this reserve shall be in cash in the actual possession of the industrial loan institution or on demand deposit in approved state or national banks located in Arkansas and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
- The remaining portion of the reserve shall be invested in Treasury bills or certificates of deposit of not more than six (6) months' maturity, in repurchase agreements, in bankers' acceptances, or in federal funds.
- However, choses in action, investment certificates, contracts, or agreements issued under § 23-36-108 and held by the industrial loan institution as security for its own loans cannot be considered as an indebtedness for which a reserve must be maintained under this section.
- An industrial loan institution shall be given credit against the reserve requirements created as authorized by this chapter for any reserve funds held as required by the laws or regulations of the federal government.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 13; 1981, No. 580, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1013.
23-36-114. Deposit of funds.
No industrial loan institution shall deposit any of its funds in any banking corporation unless the corporation has been designated as a depository by vote of a majority of directors, or of the executive committee, exclusive of any director who is an officer, director, or trustee of the depository so designated, present at any duly called meeting at which a quorum is in attendance.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1007.
23-36-115. Dividends.
An industrial loan institution operating under this chapter may, under proper authority from the board of directors of the industrial loan institution, declare a dividend of so much of the net profits of the industrial loan institution, after providing for all expenses, losses, reserves, interest, and taxes accrued or due by the industrial loan institution, as they shall judge expedient. However, before any dividend is declared, not less than one-tenth (1/10) of the net profits of the industrial loan institution for the preceding one-half (½) year or for the period covered by the dividend shall be carried to a surplus fund, until the surplus fund shall amount to fifty percent (50%) of the par value of the common stock of the industrial loan institution.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1015.
23-36-116. Authority of Bank Commissioner to take charge.
-
The Bank Commissioner may forthwith take possession of the business and property of any industrial loan institution to which this chapter is applicable whenever it shall appear that the industrial loan institution:
- Has violated its charter or any laws applicable thereto;
- Is conducting its business in an unauthorized or unsafe manner;
- Is in an unsafe and unsound condition to transact its business;
- Has an impairment of its capital stock;
- Has refused to pay its certificates of indebtedness, investment contracts, or agreements to pay in accordance with the terms upon which the certificates of indebtedness, investment contracts, or agreements to pay were issued;
- Has become otherwise insolvent;
- Has neglected or refused to comply with the terms of a duly issued lawful order of the commissioner; or
- Has refused to submit its records, affairs, and concerns for inspection and examination to a duly appointed or authorized examiner of the commissioner, upon proper demand.
-
- On taking charge of the property and affairs of any industrial loan institution, the commissioner shall immediately give notice of that fact to all corporations, firms, individuals, and public or quasi-public bodies holding any of the industrial loan institution's assets.
- No corporation, firm, individual, or public or quasi-public body, whether within or without this state, shall have a lien or charge against any of the assets for any payment, advance, or clearance, or for any liability incurred after taking charge.
-
The commissioner may permit the resumption of business by any industrial loan institution of which charge has previously been taken upon the conditions in each instance as may be approved by him or her. All laws setting forth the contingencies for the commissioner’s taking charge of industrial loan institutions are directory and discretionary, not mandatory. In the exercise in any instance of his or her discretion in respect thereof, the commissioner shall take into consideration and give weight according to his or her best judgment to the various factors involved or to be affected thereby, including:
- The interest of the present and prospective depositors of the respective industrial loan institution;
- The locality wherein it has its place of business;
- Other industrial loan institutions in the same or other localities of this state; and
- The local or general economic or financial conditions at the time being prevailing.
-
- Upon taking charge of any industrial loan institution, the commissioner shall immediately be vested at law and in equity with the sole, exclusive, and unconditional ownership and title in himself or herself, his or her successors in office, and assigns of all the property and assets of the industrial loan institution, whether the property and assets are situated within this state or elsewhere.
- The ownership and title in the commissioner is to be free from and unaffected by any levy, judgment, attachment, or other lien obtained thereafter as against the property of the industrial loan institution through legal proceedings and free from and unaffected by any equity arising in favor of or obtained by third persons after the commissioner has taken charge, but subject to any and all equities in favor of third persons that have arisen or been obtained as against any of the property or assets prior to the taking charge by the commissioner.
-
- All levies, judgments, attachments, or other liens obtained through legal or equitable proceedings in this state or elsewhere as against any industrial loan institution organized under the laws of this state, or any of its property, at any time within thirty (30) days prior to the taking charge by the commissioner, shall be null and void in case the commissioner takes charge of the property and affairs of the industrial loan institution.
- The property affected by such a levy, judgment, attachment, or other liens so obtained shall be immediately wholly discharged and released from the liens and shall pass to the commissioner as a part of the estate of the industrial loan institution.
- Nothing contained in this section shall have the effect to impair or destroy the title obtained by the levy, judgment, attachment, or other lien of a bona fide purchaser for value who shall have acquired the levy, judgment, attachment, or other lien without notice or reasonable cause for inquiry of the imminence of the taking charge by the commissioner.
-
-
Upon the taking charge of any industrial loan institution, the commissioner shall proceed to:
- Liquidate its affairs;
- Institute, maintain, and defend suit and other proceedings in the courts of this state or elsewhere;
- Enforce in this state or elsewhere, if necessary, the liabilities of the stockholders; and
- Upon the order empowered to be made by the circuit court of the county wherein the industrial loan institution had its place of business, sell, compound, or exchange any or all bad or doubtful debts of the estate and, on like order, sell or exchange any or all of the real, personal, or mixed property of the estate in such manner and upon such terms and considerations as to any sale, composition, or exchange as specified in the order.
- Any sale shall be public or private as specified in the order for the sale, and the sale or exchange of real property shall be subject to confirmation respectively by the court.
-
Upon the taking charge of any industrial loan institution, the commissioner shall proceed to:
-
- The commissioner, under his or her hand and official seal, may appoint one (1) or more special deputy commissioners as agent or agents to assist him or her in the duty of liquidation and distribution of the assets of any insolvent industrial loan institution.
- The certificate of appointment shall be in duplicate, with one (1) copy to be filed in the office of the commissioner and the other copy in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the industrial loan institution or trust company was located.
- The commissioner may from time to time authorize a special deputy to perform the duties connected with the liquidation and distribution as he or she may deem proper.
-
- The commissioner may employ such counsel and procure expert assistance and advice as may be necessary in the liquidation and distribution of the assets and may retain such of the officers or employees as he or she may deem necessary.
- The commissioner shall cause notice to be given by advertisement in such newspapers as he or she may direct, weekly for four (4) consecutive weeks, calling on all persons who may have claims against the estate to present the claim to him or her and make legal proof of the claim at a place and at a time to be fixed by the commissioner in the notice.
- If the commissioner doubts the justice or the validity of any claim, he or she may reflect the doubts and serve notice of the rejection upon the claimant either by depositing the notice in the mail or personally. An action upon a claim so reflected must be brought within six (6) months after service.
- The commissioner may apply for the declaration of a first dividend to creditors at any time after the expiration of the published notice and of the further ten (10) days' notice to creditors.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1011; Acts 1987, No. 71, § 1; 2003, No. 1185, § 264.
23-36-117. Classification of creditors — Payment of claims.
- All creditors of an industrial loan institution of which the commissioner has taken charge are classifiable either as secured creditors, prior creditors, or general creditors.
-
- A secured creditor shall be a creditor who has security for his or her debt upon the property of the industrial loan institution of a nature to be assignable under this chapter or who owns a debt for which some endorser, surety, or other person secondarily liable for the industrial loan institution has security upon the industrial loan institution's property to the extent, in both instances, of the value of the security.
- The value of the security of a secured creditor shall be determined by converting the security into money according to the terms of the agreement pursuant to which the security was delivered to the creditor or, in the absence of applicable terms of the agreement by the creditor and the Bank Commissioner, by agreement, arbitration, compromise, or litigation as the circuit court may direct. The expense of the conversions by the creditor and the commissioner shall be borne as the court may direct.
-
-
A prior creditor shall be:
- An employee, laborer, or clerk of the industrial loan institution, as and to the extent provided by this section;
- The commissioner, as to deposits made by him or her in the industrial loan institution as depository for the moneys of another industrial loan institution or bank of which he or she has taken charge, to the extent of the deposits;
- A prior creditor who is such by virtue of an act of Congress applicable to the industrial loan institution, as and to the extent provided by that act or to the extent provided in this section;
- The owner of a special deposit expressly made as a special deposit in the industrial loan institution, evidenced by a writing signed by the industrial loan institution at the time and which it was not permitted to use in the course of its regular business;
- The beneficiary of an express trust, distinguished from a constructive trust, a resulting trust, or a trust ex maleficio, of which the industrial loan institution was the trustee and which was evidenced by a writing signed by the industrial loan institution at the time;
- The owner of the proceeds of a collection made by the industrial loan institution and not remitted by it, or of which its remittance has not been paid, when the collection was made otherwise than by honoring a check or other order upon the industrial loan institution or by a charge against the account of the depositor of the industrial loan institution, and the collection has had a distinctive identity in the hands of the industrial loan institution, has actually increased its cash assets, and has not resulted in merely shifting the liability upon its books from one of its creditors to another or new creditor; and
- The owner of a remittance of the industrial loan institution, the proceeds of a collection made by the industrial loan institution by honoring a check or other upon itself, or by a charge against the account of its depositor, although the collection has not had a distinctive identity in the hands of the industrial loan institution, has not actually increased its cash assets, and has resulted in merely shifting the liability upon its books from one (1) of its creditors to another or new creditor in instances in which the remittance has been presented with due diligence for payment to the industrial loan institution or its drawee and is not paid, and when the instrument collected cannot be returned by the commissioner to the person who had transmitted it to the industrial loan institution for collection, the instrument having been surrendered by the industrial loan institution for collection in such manner prior to the commissioner's taking charge.
-
- It is made the duty of the commissioner to reverse the entries upon the books of the industrial loan institution as to all collections made in all instances where the unpaid remittance has been so presented with due diligence and where the instrument remains in the industrial loan institution unsurrendered.
- By this reversal of entries, the instrument shall be deemed to be from its inception unpaid; thereupon, the commissioner shall return the instrument to the person who transmitted it to the industrial loan institution, which return shall be in extinguishment to the extent thereof of the remittance.
- It is made unlawful for any officer or agent of any industrial loan institution organized under the laws of this state to surrender any instrument for the purpose of enabling a preference to be secured thereby under any of the provisions of this section, irrespective of any knowledge of or participation in such purpose by the person claiming or receiving the preference.
-
- All prior creditors, as defined in this section, except only employees, laborers, and clerks of the industrial loan institution and the commissioner and prior creditors under an act of Congress, who shall be paid in full out of any assets of the industrial loan institution available after the payment of the expenses of administration, shall have priority to the extent that they respectively may specifically identify their property in its original or traceable form into the hands of the commissioner and, if unable to so identify the property, to the extent that the assets in the hands of the commissioner, in the form of the lowest amount of cash on hand, exclusive of deposits in other industrial loan institutions and all other assets remaining in the industrial loan institution continuously after their respective priorities arose, when necessarily increased by the property, the cash on hand being deemed to have been so increased to the extent of any priorities which may be acquired under subdivision (c)(1)(G) of this section.
- If the cash on hand is not sufficient to pay all prior creditors in full, the amount shall be prorated among them.
- Beyond the extent of the priority of any prior creditor respectively and insofar as his or her priority to that extent cannot be paid in full, but not otherwise, the creditors shall be general creditors of the industrial loan institution.
-
A prior creditor shall be:
- All creditors not classified in this section as secured or prior creditors of the industrial loan institution, including the State of Arkansas and any of its subdivisions, shall be general creditors.
- Creditors whose claims are unliquidated may liquidate the claims in such manner as the court may direct.
History. Acts 1941, No. 111, § 11; 1987, No. 71, § 1.
Chapter 37 Savings And Loan Associations
A.C.R.C. Notes. References to “this chapter” in the text of subchapters 1-7 of this chapter may not apply to subchapter 8, which was enacted subsequently.
Publisher's Notes. By virtue of the definition of “association” in § 23-37-101, most of the provisions of this chapter govern building and loan associations as well as savings and loan associations. However, many earlier provisions specifically governing building and loan associations have never been repealed and can be found in chapter 38 of this title.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Electronic Funds Transfer and “Competitive Equality” A Doctrine That Does Not Compute, 32 Ark. L. Rev. 347.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 531, § 16: Mar. 21, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board and the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Supervisor do not sufficiently define such authority and that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board and Supervisor in the proper administration of their duties as to defining in a reasonable manner the time allowed for an association to commence business from the effective date of its grant of authority, as to the fees presently charged by the Board and Supervisor and as to general regulatory matters under the review of the Board and Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 1 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 1 et seq.
23-37-101. Definitions.
-
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Association” means a corporation carrying on the business of a savings and loan association or a building and loan association under a charter issued by the State of Arkansas;
- “Board” means the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] duly appointed and acting pursuant to the terms of this chapter;
- “Broker” means a person, firm, or corporation who acts for or on behalf of any foreign savings and loan association or its agents, in soliciting or receiving applications for or funds for a savings account in any foreign savings and loan association;
- “Federal association” means a savings and loan association incorporated pursuant to the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933, whose principal business office is located within the territorial limits of this state;
- “Foreign association” means an association chartered under the laws of another state or a federal association organized in another state, but does not mean a federal association organized in this state;
- “Mutual association” means an association that does not have issued an outstanding permanent capital stock and whose affairs are managed by a board of directors elected by the members;
- “Savings account” means that part of the savings liability of an association which is credited to a member by reason of the investment of funds in the association other than permanent capital stock;
- “Stock association” means an association that has issued an outstanding permanent capital stock and whose affairs are managed by a board of directors elected by the holders of the permanent capital stock; and
- “Supervisor” means the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations acting and appointed pursuant to the terms of this chapter.
- The board may by rule define other terms used in this chapter and by the savings and loan industry.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 1; 1979, No. 361, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1801.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
U.S. Code. The Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1461 et seq.
Case Notes
Cited: West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 553 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1977).
23-37-102. Acts 1963, No. 227, controlling.
Insofar as the provisions of this act are inconsistent with the provisions of any other law affecting savings and loan associations or building and loan associations, the provisions of this act shall control.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 62; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1862.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1963, No. 227, codified as §§ 23-37-101 — 23-37-104, 23-37-106, 23-37-107, 23-37-201 — 23-37-214, 23-37-301 — 23-37-315, 23-37-401, 23-37-403, 23-37-405, 23-37-406, 23-37-501 — 23-37-512, 23-37-601 — 23-37-603, 23-37-701 — 23-37-705.
23-37-103. Authority to do business as savings and loan association.
-
From and after March 13, 1963, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, company, association, fiduciary, partnership, or corporation, by whatever name called, except banks, to do business as a savings and loan association or a building and loan association within this state or to maintain any office in this state for the purpose of doing such business, except:
- Associations organized under the laws of this state and subject to this chapter; and
- Federal associations chartered to do business in this state.
- Any person, firm, or corporation, by whatever name known, except banks, which accepts funds from the public in the form of savings accounts, deposits, certificates of deposit, or similar evidences of indebtedness, and a substantial part of whose business is the making of loans on the security of real estate, shall be subject to all of the laws of this state governing the operation of a savings and loan or building and loan association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 57; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1857.
23-37-104. Preexisting associations.
- The name, rights, powers, privileges, and immunities of every corporation incorporated in this state prior to March 13, 1963, and authorized under the laws of this state to carry on the business of a building and loan association or savings and loan association shall be governed, controlled, construed, extended, limited, and determined by the provisions of this act to the same extent and effect as if the corporation had been incorporated pursuant hereto.
- The articles of incorporation or association, certificate of incorporation, or charter, however entitled, bylaws and constitution, or other rules of every such corporation made or existing prior to March 13, 1963, are modified, altered, and amended to conform to the provisions of this act, with or without the issuance or approval by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations of conformed copies of those documents. These documents are declared void to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this act.
- However, the obligations of any such existing corporation, whether between the corporation and its members, or any of them, or any other person, or any valid contract between the members of the corporation, or between the corporation and any other person, existing at the time this act takes effect, shall not be in any way impaired by the provisions of this act.
- With the exceptions mentioned in subsection (c) of this section, every such corporation shall possess the same rights, powers, privileges, and immunities as if chartered under this act and shall be subject to the duties, liabilities, disabilities, and restrictions conferred and imposed by this act, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in its certificate of incorporation, bylaws, constitution, or rules.
- All obligations to the corporation contracted prior to March 13, 1963, shall be enforceable by it and in its name, and demands, claims, and rights of action against the corporation may be enforced against it as fully and completely as they might have previously been enforced.
- The existing charter of any association formed pursuant to Acts 1929, No. 128, or any other law of this state, is confirmed and shall be deemed to be valid and outstanding to the same extent as if issued pursuant to this act.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 56; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1856.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1929, No. 128, referred to in this section, is codified as 23-38-101, 23-38-102, 23-38-201 — 23-38-207, 23-38-209 — 23-38-214, 23-38-216, 23-38-217, 23-38-220, 23-38-302 — 23-38-304, 23-38-307, 23-38-401 — 23-38-404.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-37-102.
23-37-105. Arkansas Business Corporation Act applicable to stock savings and loan associations.
Hereafter the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-26-101 et seq., shall be applicable to permanent stock savings and loan associations created or operating under the provisions of Acts 1963, No. 227, and those savings and loan associations shall enjoy the same powers and privileges and be subject to the same duties, restrictions, and liabilities as other corporations, except so far as the same may be limited or enlarged by the provisions of Acts 1963, No. 227. If any provision of Acts 1963, No. 227, conflicts with the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-26-101 et seq., the provisions of Acts 1963, No. 227, shall govern.
History. Acts 1971, No. 110, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1864.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1963, No. 227, referred to in this section, is codified as §§ 23-37-101 — 23-37-104, 23-37-106, 23-37-107, 23-37-201 — 23-37-214, 23-37-301 — 23-37-315, 23-37-401, 23-37-403, 23-37-405, 23-37-406, 23-37-501 — 23-37-512, 23-37-601 — 23-37-603, 23-37-701 — 23-37-705.
Cross References. Arkansas Business Corporation Act of 1987, § 4-27-101 et seq.
23-37-106. Federal savings and loan associations.
Unless federal laws or regulations provide otherwise, federal associations and the members thereof, incorporated pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, shall possess all of the rights, powers, privileges, benefits, immunities, and exemptions that are provided for associations under this act. The making of any sections of this act specifically applicable to federal associations shall not be construed as making other sections of the act inapplicable to federal associations.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 61; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1861.
Meaning of “this act”. See note to § 23-37-102.
U.S. Code. The Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1461 et seq.
Research References
ALR.
Preemption Issues Arising Under Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, 12 USCS § 1461 et seq.13 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 161.
23-37-107. Fees.
The Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations shall collect in advance, and the person or association so served shall pay, the following fees and charges:
-
In charter application proceedings:
- For filing an application for charter, one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500);
- For filing a protest to an application for charter, one thousand dollars ($1,000) from each protestant; and
- For filing a petition for rehearing, seven hundred fifty dollars ($750);
- For filing and approval of an amendment to bylaws or articles of incorporation, twenty-five dollars ($25.00);
-
-
An annual fee, payable at the time the annual report of the association is filed, equal to:
- Two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each one million dollars ($1,000,000) of assets or fraction thereof, up to two million dollars ($2,000,000);
- One hundred dollars ($100) on each one million dollars ($1,000,000) of assets or fraction thereof, over two million dollars ($2,000,000) and less than five million dollars ($5,000,000); and
- Fifty dollars ($50.00) on each one million dollars ($1,000,000) of assets or fraction thereof, over five million dollars ($5,000,000).
- No association chartered under the laws of this state shall be subject to any privilege, occupation, or franchise taxes for transacting business throughout the state.
- In no event shall any association pay an annual fee in excess of five thousand dollars ($5,000);
-
An annual fee, payable at the time the annual report of the association is filed, equal to:
- For each extraordinary examination ordered by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], a fee of one hundred dollars ($100) per day for each examiner for each and every day the examiner is absent from the office of the supervisor for the purpose of making the examination. In addition, the person or association shall pay the actual hotel and traveling expenses of the authorized examiner to and from Little Rock;
- For filing a petition for conversion and verified minutes evidencing a conversion or plan of merger or consolidation, a fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250);
- For filing a certificate of dissolution, a fee of one hundred dollars ($100);
- For filing a copy of a charter of a federal savings and loan association, a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00);
- The supervisor is authorized, in his or her discretion, to charge a fee of not exceeding ten dollars ($10.00) upon each application for his or her approval or the approval of the board, as provided by this chapter;
- For each certificate of the supervisor authenticating any document or other instrument, a fee of two dollars fifty cents ($2.50), plus two dollars ($2.00) for each page of the document or instrument;
- For issuing a broker's license or for the annual renewal of a broker's license, a fee of five hundred dollars ($500);
- For a request for a special meeting of the board, one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500);
- For each examination of an association by an authorized examiner from the office of the supervisor, a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day for each examiner for each and every day the examiner is absent from the office of the supervisor for the purpose of making the examination. In addition, the person or association shall pay the actual hotel and traveling expenses of the authorized examiner to and from Little Rock;
-
In branch office or other service facility application proceedings:
- For filing an application for a branch office or other service facility, two hundred fifty dollars ($250);
- For filing a protest to an application for a branch office or other service facility, five hundred dollars ($500) from each protestant;
- Upon the filing of one (1) or more protests, two hundred fifty dollars ($250) from the applicant; and
- For filing a petition for rehearing, seven hundred fifty dollars ($750); and
- In any proceeding before the board or the supervisor regarding any application, the applicant shall pay all costs of having the proceedings transcribed, and, if the proceedings are transcribed, the applicant shall furnish the original copy of the transcript to the supervisor.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 54; 1975, No. 531, §§ 5-11; 1979, No. 361, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1854.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
23-37-108. Associations subject to gross receipts and compensating taxes.
All savings and loan associations organized pursuant to the laws of this state and doing business in this state and all federal savings and loan associations doing business in this state shall be subject to the Arkansas Gross Receipts Act of 1941, § 26-52-101 et seq., and the Arkansas Compensating Tax Act of 1949, § 26-53-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1969, No. 352, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1863.
Subchapter 2 — Supervision
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 292, § 8: Mar. 12, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws governing the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board do not sufficiently define the authority of such Board, that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board in the proper administration of its duties and that existing fees paid by savings and loan associations to the Supervisor of savings and loan associations are inadequate and insufficient to defray the costs of the services performed by the Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1980 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 13, § 3: Jan. 1, 1980. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that there is presently no authority for the appointment of a special member of the State Savings and Loan Board to serve upon disqualification of a regular member and that it is in the best interest of all persons concerned that specific authority be provided for such appointments. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981, No. 444, § 6: Mar. 12, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that confusion exists regarding several statutes relating to the administrative functions of the Supervisor of the Savings and Loan Board and a conflict between the Building and Loan Act and the Savings and Loan Act and that such confusion is detrimental to the welfare of the citizens of this State and that this Act is immediately necessary to eliminate such confusion. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 131, § 6 and No. 135 § 6: Feb. 10, 1983. Emergency clauses provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that state boards and commissions exist for the singular purpose of protecting the public health and welfare; that citizens over 60 years of age represent a significant percentage of the population; that it is necessary and proper that the older population be represented on such boards and commissions; that the operations of the boards and commissions have a profound effect on the daily lives of older Arkansans; and that the public voice of older citizens should not be muted as to questions coming before such bodies. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 785, § 3: Apr. 3, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Savings and Loan Act requires quarterly meetings of the Board, regardless of need, therefore causing undue hardship for Board members and causing unnecessary expense to the Board; and that such designation of the location of the meetings to be held in Little Rock has resulted in undue hardship on distant members of the Board. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1997, No. 250, § 258: Feb. 24, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that Act 1211 of 1995 established the procedure for all state boards and commissions to follow regarding reimbursement of expenses and stipends for board members; that this act amends various sections of the Arkansas Code which are in conflict with the Act 1211 of 1995; and that until this cleanup act becomes effective conflicting laws will exist. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governer, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 11 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., §§ 5, 6.
23-37-201. Regulatory agencies generally.
All associations subject to this chapter shall be supervised and regulated, and the provisions of this chapter shall be enforced by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, acting pursuant to the authority delegated by this chapter.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 47; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1847; Acts 1997, No. 258, § 1.
23-37-202. Disclosure of information.
It shall be unlawful for any member of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, or any employee of the state to divulge any information concerning an association acquired in the discharge of their duties under this chapter, except:
- Information that is contained in any published report issued by any association;
- Information as to the condition of any association requested by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished], any Federal Home Loan bank, or the savings and loan association departments of any other state; or
- When directed by a court of competent jurisdiction to give information or evidence concerning an association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1803.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section were abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entities have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
23-37-203. [Repealed.]
A.C.R.C. Notes. The amendment of this section by Acts 1997, No. 250, is deemed to be superseded by the repeal of this section by Acts 1997, No. 258. See §§ 1-2-207 and 1-2-303.
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the Savings and Loan Association Board creation and members, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, § 2. The section was derived from Acts 1963, No. 227, §§ 5-7; 1973, No. 292, § 1; 1979, No. 361, § 3; 1980 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 13, §§ 1, 2; 1981, No. 444, § 1; 1983, No. 131, §§ 1-3; 1983, No. 135, §§ 1-3; 1985, No. 785, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 6-623 — 6-625, 67-1805 — 67-1807; Acts 1997, No. 250, §§ 220, 221.
23-37-204. Records of hearings and decisions.
The Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations shall maintain permanent records of all hearings and decisions.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1808; Acts 1997, No. 258, § 3.
23-37-205. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning powers and duties of the Savings and Loan Association Board, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, § 4. The section was derived from Acts 1963, No. 227, §§ 8, 10, 12; 1979, No. 361, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1808, 67-1810, 67-1812.
23-37-206. Division of Savings and Loan Associations — Supervisor — Staff.
- There is created a Division of Savings and Loan Associations of the State Securities Department which shall be administered by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
-
- The Securities Commissioner, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, shall act as Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations. He or she may appoint an assistant securities commissioner responsible for financial institutions to act as the Assistant Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations and perform all duties delegated by the commissioner.
- The supervisor, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, shall appoint any other assistants, secretaries, and examiners who may be necessary to assist in the performance of his or her duties under this chapter.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 2; 1979, No. 361, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1802; Acts 2019, No. 910, § 572.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment inserted “in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce” in (b)(1) and (b)(2).
23-37-207. Supervisor's powers and duties generally.
- The Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations shall have general supervision of associations doing business in this state and shall be charged with the execution of the laws of this state relating to those associations.
-
In order to fulfill his or her responsibilities, the supervisor shall have the following powers, duties, limitations, and functions:
- He or she shall have all the rights, powers, and privileges heretofore vested in the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] and be subject to all duties to which the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] was heretofore subject;
- He or she shall, in such coordination with the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and other federal and state regulatory authorities as he or she deems appropriate, provide for the orderly examination and supervision of associations regulated by this chapter. All federal records, documents, and examinations received by the supervisor are not public unless released by the appropriate federal agency; and
- He or she, or any designated assistant, shall hear all applications for charters for new associations, all protested applications for new branches, those matters concerning a protested move of the home office or a branch office, any conversion application by an association, and all other administrative matters under this chapter. Administrative decisions of the supervisor are subject to appeal as set forth in § 23-37-214.
-
- The supervisor, after public hearing, notice of which has been given to every association in the state, shall have power and authority to issue rules governing the operation of associations in a manner consistent with this chapter and other applicable Arkansas laws. In addition, he or she shall have the power to make and promulgate any forms which are necessary for the administration of this chapter.
- These rules may from time to time be amended, modified, or repealed by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] and shall have uniform application to all associations subject to the provisions of this chapter.
- Any person affected or who may be affected by an action of the supervisor shall be given the opportunity of appearing and presenting evidence before the supervisor.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, §§ 2, 12; 1979, No. 361, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1802, 67-1812; Acts 1997, No. 258, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 2494.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of the Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the first sentence of (c)(1) and in (c)(2).
23-37-208. Supervisor's investigatory powers.
- For the purpose of any investigation, examination, inquiry, or proceeding under this chapter, the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations or any officer designated by the supervisor may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses or documents, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers or correspondence, memoranda, agreements, or other documents which the supervisor deems relevant or material to the inquiry or examination.
- In case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any person, the Pulaski County Circuit Court, upon application by the supervisor, may issue to the person an order requiring him or her to appear before the supervisor or the officer designated by him or her, there to produce documentary evidence if so ordered or to give evidence concerning the examination, investigation, or inquiry. Failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as a contempt of court.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 49; 1979, No. 361, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1849; Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 3.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment deleted “or the Building and Loan Association Act, § 23-38-101 et seq.” following “under this chapter” in (a).
23-37-209. Communications from supervisor — Manner of sending.
Every approval or rejection by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations given pursuant to provisions of this chapter and every communication having the effect of an order or instruction to any association shall be sent by certified mail to the affected association, addressed to the president at the home office of the association, and shall be presented to the board of directors of the association at its next regular meeting, or at a special meeting called for that purpose, and noted in the minutes of the meeting.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1804.
23-37-210. Annual audit and examination.
-
- The affairs of every association subject to this chapter shall be examined and audited periodically by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
- However, the audit and examination may be performed jointly by the supervisor and either the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], a Federal Home Loan bank, or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished]. The supervisor shall accept the examination and audit, in whole or in part, of either the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], a Federal Home Loan bank, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished], or an independent certified public accountant, provided the examination and audit are made available to the supervisor. Federal records, documents, and examinations received by the supervisor are not public unless released by the appropriate federal agency.
- The report of the examinations, any letters of comment, and the audit shall be filed with the supervisor.
- The supervisor or his or her authorized representative shall have free access to all books and records of an association.
- Whenever in the judgment of the supervisor the condition of an association renders it necessary or expedient to make extra or additional examinations or audits, the supervisor shall cause the additional work to be done, and the association shall pay the cost of it.
- Every report of examination or audit shall be presented by the president of the association to its board of directors at their next regular meeting, or at a special meeting called for that purpose, and noted in the minutes thereof.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 49; 1979, No. 361, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1849.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section were abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entities have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
23-37-211. Accounting practices.
Every association shall use those forms and observe those accounting principles and practices which the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, with the approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], may require from time to time.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 48; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1848.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-212. Cease and desist orders, injunctions, etc.
-
- If after notice from the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, an association continues to violate a section of this chapter or the rules or is engaging in an unsafe and unsound practice, then the supervisor may issue a cease and desist order to discontinue the practice.
- If ninety (90) days after the cease and desist order has been entered the association continues to violate this chapter or the rules, then the supervisor may impose a civil fine of up to one hundred dollars ($100) per day until the violation or unsafe and unsound practice ceases.
- All fines collected by the supervisor will be transferred to the general revenues of the State of Arkansas.
-
- Whenever it appears to the supervisor, upon sufficient grounds or evidence satisfactory to him or her, that any person has engaged or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of this chapter or any rule or order hereunder, he or she may summarily order the person to cease and desist from that act or practice. The order shall be effective for not more than twenty (20) days, during which time the supervisor may apply to the Pulaski County Circuit Court to enjoin the act or practice and to enforce compliance with this chapter or any rule or order hereunder.
- However, the supervisor may, without issuing a cease and desist order, apply directly to the Pulaski County Circuit Court for the aforesaid relief.
- Upon a proper showing, a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or writ of mandamus shall be granted and a receiver or conservator may be appointed for the defendant or the defendant's assets.
- The court may not require the supervisor to post bond.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 49; 1963, No. 227, § 70, as added by Acts 1979, No. 361, § 13; 1979, No. 361, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1849, 67-1869.
Case Notes
Cited: Guaranty Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 794 F.2d 1339 (8th Cir. 1986).
23-37-213. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning appeal to the Savings and Loan Association Board from action of supervisor, was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, § 6. The section was derived from Acts 1963, No. 227, § 9; 1979, No. 361, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1809.
23-37-214. Appeal from decision of board.
- Any person affected by any action, decision, or order of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] may, within thirty (30) days after a written copy of the action, decision, or order has been mailed to that person, appeal as a matter of right to the Pulaski County Circuit Court by filing written notice of appeal in that court and by filing a copy of the notice with the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
- Upon filing of the notice of appeal, the court shall have full jurisdiction, shall determine whether the appeal shall operate as a stay of the order, decision, or action appealed from, and shall have the right at any time thereafter to issue any other temporary or preliminary orders which it may deem proper until final judgment is rendered.
- Within thirty (30) days after the filing of a notice of appeal in his or her office, the supervisor shall make, certify, and deposit in the office of the clerk of the court a full and complete transcript of all proceedings had before the board and of all evidence before the board in the matter and of all files of the supervisor therein.
- As soon as reasonably possible after receipt of the transcript, evidence, and files, the Pulaski County Circuit Court shall review the action of the board appealed from. The appeal shall be upon the basis of the record so presented. In any such review the findings of the board as to the facts, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.
- After hearing the appeal, the court may affirm, modify, or reverse the order or action of the board in whole or in part or remand the action to the board for further proceedings in accordance with the court's direction, including the taking of additional evidence.
- Costs shall be awarded as in civil actions.
- An appeal may be taken to the Supreme Court from a judgment of the circuit court, as in other civil cases.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1811.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Case Notes
Full Jurisdiction.
Words “full jurisdiction” do not mean exclusive jurisdiction which is unimpaired by the Administrative Procedure Act (§ 25-15-201 et seq.). Ark. Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. Corning Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 252 Ark. 264, 478 S.W.2d 431 (1972).
Scope of Review.
The substantial evidence rule governs the Supreme Court's review of action of the Savings and Loan Association Board in granting a charter to a new association. Morrilton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 243 Ark. 627, 420 S.W.2d 923 (1967).
Substantial Evidence.
Where there was substantial evidence in the record to support the board's granting a charter the findings of the board that a charter should be granted is upheld. Heber Springs Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Cleburne County Bank, 240 Ark. 759, 402 S.W.2d 636 (1966).
Where application for savings and loan charter met all requisites except for those of § 23-37-310(a)(3), board's action of refusing the charter was upheld on the “substantial evidence” test. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Bd. v. Southerland, 256 Ark. 445, 508 S.W.2d 326 (1974).
Cited: Piggott State Bank v. State Banking Bd., 242 Ark. 828, 416 S.W.2d 291 (1967).
Subchapter 3 — Organization
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 292, § 8: Mar. 12, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws governing the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board do not sufficiently define the authority of such Board, that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board in the proper administration of its duties and that existing fees paid by savings and loan associations to the Supervisor of savings and loan associations are inadequate and insufficient to defray the costs of the services performed by the Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 531, § 16: Mar. 21, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board and the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Supervisor do not sufficiently define such authority and that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board and Supervisor in the proper administration of their duties as to defining in a reasonable manner the time allowed for an association to commence business from the effective date of its grant of authority, as to the fees presently charged by the Board and Supervisor and as to general regulatory matters under the review of the Board and Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 350, § 4: Mar. 3, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-First General Assembly, Regular Session 1977, that there are property rights and savings and loan associations and communities affected that could be irreparably damaged if there is a delay in the enactment and the effective date of this law; and further that it is essential to fair play and justice that this Act take effect and be in force from the date of its approval. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 6 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 9 et seq.
23-37-301. Application for charter.
-
Application for a charter for a savings and loan association may be made by ten (10) or more citizens of this state, hereinafter referred to as “incorporators”, by tendering to the supervisor, along with the prescribed filing fee, an application consisting of the following:
-
Two (2) copies of the articles of incorporation for the proposed association stating:
- The name and the site of the principal office of the association;
- The names and addresses of the incorporators;
- The name and address of the resident agent for service of process on the association;
- The term of the corporate existence, which may be either perpetual or limited to a fixed number of years;
- Whether the association will carry on its business as a mutual association or as a permanent stock association; and
- For a permanent stock association, the number of shares of permanent stock authorized and the par value of each share;
-
A statement as to:
- The amount, if any, of permanent stock which has been subscribed and paid for at the time of filing;
- The names and addresses of the subscribers and the amount subscribed by each;
- The names, addresses, and amounts of savings accounts which have been subscribed; and
- The amount of paid-in surplus or expense fund with which the association will commence business;
- Two (2) copies of the bylaws under which the association proposes to operate;
- The names and addresses of the chair of the incorporators, the proposed members of the board of directors, and the proposed officers; and
- Any other information in regard to the proposed association and its operation which may be required by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
-
Two (2) copies of the articles of incorporation for the proposed association stating:
- The articles of incorporation and all statements of fact tendered to the supervisor in connection with an application for charter shall be subscribed and sworn to under the sanction of an oath, or such affirmation as is by law equivalent to an oath, made before an officer authorized to administer oaths.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1816.
Case Notes
Application.
Where a first application for incorporation fully met all statutory requirements as to stock and savings account subscriptions, but the application was turned down for other reasons, a second application, which duplicated of the first as to subscriptions to stock and savings accounts with the names and amounts subscribed of three of the original subscribers who had withdrawn crossed out, a new and additional separate subscription contract was not necessary where those remaining met all statutory requirements. White County Guar. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Searcy Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 241 Ark. 878, 410 S.W.2d 760 (1967).
23-37-302. Capitalization requirements generally.
The capitalization of a proposed stock or mutual association shall be in accordance with rules established by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished]. In establishing its requirements, the board may consider those requirements established by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished], but its requirements may not be greater than those prescribed by that corporation.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 19; 1979, No. 361, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1819; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2495.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the first sentence.
Case Notes
Stock Subscriptions.
In the formation of a savings and loan association, unlike the formation of some business corporations of another class, the amount subscribed for permanent capital stock in savings and loan association stock subscriptions must be paid in before an application is approved. White County Guar. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Searcy Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 241 Ark. 878, 410 S.W.2d 760 (1967).
23-37-303. Permanent capital stock.
- The charter of an association may provide for the issuance of permanent capital stock. The permanent capital stock, when issued, may not be retired or withdrawn, except as provided in this section, until all liabilities of the association shall have been satisfied in full, including the withdrawal value of all savings accounts.
- Permanent capital stock must be fully paid in cash in advance of issuance, and the association may not make any loans against the shares of the stock.
- Shares of permanent capital stock may have a par value of not less than one dollar ($1.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100) each.
- An association authorized to issue capital stock must have, at all times, issued and outstanding, an amount thereof equal in par value to the minimum capital requirements set out in § 23-37-302 or two and one-half percent (2½%) of its gross assets, whichever is greater, but no association shall be required to have more than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) of par value of the stock outstanding.
- Associations whose savings accounts are insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] may retire a part of any permanent capital stock issued prior to March 13, 1963, when the associations are authorized to do so by majority vote at any annual meeting of their stockholders, or any special meeting of their stockholders called for such a purpose. However, the basis of the retirement shall have been first approved by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations and by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished].
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1818.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Case Notes
Payment.
The permanent capital stock of a savings and loan association must be fully paid for in cash in advance of the issuance. White County Guar. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Searcy Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 241 Ark. 878, 410 S.W.2d 760 (1967).
23-37-304. Permanent stock associations — Paid-in surplus requirements.
As a prerequisite to the approval of any application for a permanent stock association, the incorporators must show to the satisfaction of the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations a paid-in surplus of not less than one-third (1/3) of the aggregate amount of the permanent capital stock required by this chapter. The paid-in surplus may be used in lieu of earnings to pay organization and operating expenses, dividends on savings accounts, and to meet any loss reserve requirements.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1820.
23-37-305. Permanent stock associations — Initial subscriptions to savings accounts.
As a prerequisite to approval of any application for a proposed permanent stock association, the incorporators must show, to the satisfaction of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], subscribed savings accounts from individuals in the aggregate number and amount which, in the opinion of the board, will justify the initial successful operation of the association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 30; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1830.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Case Notes
In General.
The incorporators must show to the satisfaction of the board that a sufficient number of individuals have agreed to open savings accounts in sufficient amounts which in the opinion of the board will justify the initial successful operation of the association. White County Guar. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Searcy Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 241 Ark. 878, 410 S.W.2d 760 (1967).
23-37-306. Mutual associations — Expense fund requirement.
- In addition to the savings account subscriptions required by this chapter, the incorporators of a mutual association must show to the satisfaction of the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations that an expense fund has been subscribed and paid in to the credit of the proposed association equal to not less than one-third (1/3) of the required savings accounts, from which expense fund the expenses of organizing the association and its operating expenses, in addition to such dividends as may be declared and paid or credited to its savings account holders, may be paid until such time as its earnings are sufficient to pay them.
- The amount so contributed to the expense fund shall not constitute a liability of the association except as provided in this section.
-
- The contributions may be repaid pro rata to the contributors from the net earnings of the association after provision for required loss reserve and payment of dividends declared on savings accounts.
- In case of a liquidation of an association before contributions to the expense fund have been repaid, any contributions to the expense fund remaining unexpended after payment of all creditors, the expenses of liquidation, and the withdrawal value of all savings accounts shall be paid pro rata to the contributors.
- Contributors to the expense fund shall be paid dividends, and for such purposes their contributions shall be considered as savings accounts of the association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1822.
23-37-307. Bylaws.
In addition to any provisions which may be adopted by the incorporators and approved by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, the bylaws of every association shall provide:
- For an annual meeting of the membership of the association, or of the owners of permanent capital stock, for the purpose of electing directors;
- For not fewer than five (5) nor more than twenty-one (21) members of the board of directors;
- For not less than ten (10) days' written notice to all members, or holders of permanent capital stock, of any special meeting of the association. Provided, no notice of an annual meeting of an association shall be required;
- For a term of office not to exceed one (1) year for each member of the board of directors; and
- For the amendment of the bylaws, with the approval of the supervisor, by a majority of the members present, or holders of permanent capital stock, at any annual or special meeting of the association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 17; 1975, No. 531, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1817.
23-37-308. Insurance of accounts.
No association chartered under this chapter shall carry on the business of a savings and loan association in this state until it has filed with the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations satisfactory evidence that its savings accounts are insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] or other similar agency or corporation of the United States.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 31; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1831.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
This section is a valid delegation of legislative authority. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
Evidence of Insurance.
The evidence of insurance required by this section is not a prerequisite to the granting of a charter, but only to the carrying on of business, and the lack of such insurance offered as ground for objection to the granting of a charter is a premature objection. Morrilton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 243 Ark. 627, 420 S.W.2d 923 (1967).
Legislature's Authority.
The legislature has the power to require insurance on savings and loan accounts under the police power of the state. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
Cited: West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 553 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1977); Turner v. Woodruff, 286 Ark. 66, 689 S.W.2d 527 (1985).
23-37-309. Hearings on charter applications.
When a proper application for a charter has been filed, the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations shall hold a public hearing on the application, after giving not less than twenty (20) days' written notice of the date and time of hearing to each existing association or federal association in the state. The notice shall be made promptly after the filing of an application. At the hearing, any interested party may appear, present evidence, and be heard for or against the application.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 23; 1973, No. 292, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1823; Acts 1997, No. 258, § 7.
23-37-310. Approval or denial of application for charter.
-
The Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] shall not approve any charter application unless the incorporators establish and the board shall have affirmatively found from the data furnished with the application, the evidence adduced at the hearing, and the official records of the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations that:
- All the prerequisites for the approval of a charter set forth in this chapter have been complied with;
- The character, responsibility, and general fitness of the persons who are named in the articles of incorporation and who will serve as directors and officers of the association are such as to command confidence and warrant belief that the business of the proposed association will be honestly and efficiently conducted in accordance with the intent and purpose of this chapter and the proposed association will have qualified full-time management;
- There is a public need for the proposed association, and the volume of business in the area in which the proposed association will conduct its business is such as to indicate a successful operation;
- The operation of the proposed association will not unduly harm any other existing association, federal savings and loan association, or other financial institution; and
-
- The proposed association will be independent of the other financial institutions.
- Those persons named in the articles of incorporation as directors and officers do not have affiliations with any financial institutions or other businesses closely related to the savings and loan association business which would affect the independence of the proposed association.
- The directors are representative of the community.
-
- If the board so finds, its findings shall be stated in writing, and the supervisor shall endorse the approval of the board on the proposed articles of incorporation and bylaws, whereupon the proposed association shall be a corporate body and may exercise the powers of a savings and loan association as set forth in this chapter.
- A copy of the articles of incorporation of the association bearing the approval of the supervisor shall be filed in the office of the supervisor, with the Secretary of State, and with the county clerk of the county in which the home office of the association is located.
- If the board does not make the findings as required by subsection (a) of this section, it shall issue a written statement of its grounds for refusal. This statement shall be promptly mailed to the chair of the incorporators by certified mail.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, §§ 24, 25; 1973, No. 292, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1824, 67-1825.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Case Notes
Compliance with Section.
Where the record disclosed that there was substantial evidence for the board's finding that this section had been complied with, the granting of a charter by the board must be upheld. Heber Springs Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Cleburne County Bank, 240 Ark. 759, 402 S.W.2d 636 (1966).
Findings of Board.
Failure of the board to make specific findings of underlying facts in support of its denial of application for charter by savings and loan association necessitated remand to the board for further proceeding, since requirement for such a finding of underlying facts could not be waived by litigant, its purpose being to inform reviewing courts. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass’n Board v. Central Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 256 Ark. 846, 510 S.W.2d 872, 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1550 (1974).
In order to determine the need for a new office of a savings and loan association the board's order must contain facts, figures or computations which form the basis for the order. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 257 Ark. 985, 521 S.W.2d 542 (1975).
Orders of the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board authorizing the establishment of a new institution which merely paraphrase the statute and do not contain an explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the finding were insufficient. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 257 Ark. 985, 521 S.W.2d 542 (1975).
The board's order establishing a new savings and loan association office should have contained findings relating to the basis for an amount of the savings and loan potential, the sources from which the savings and loans would be derived, the amount of savings and loans required to support the applicant, the loss of savings and loan which might be suffered by other existing financial institutions and other underlying facts. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 257 Ark. 985, 521 S.W.2d 542 (1975).
Grounds for Denial.
Contention that a branch bank could be more economically operated than a new association was not a statutory ground for denying a charter. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. Corning Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 253 Ark. 987, 490 S.W.2d 460 (1973).
Where there was substantial evidence that a proposed savings and loan business would not be a successful operation the denial of the application by the savings and loan board was upheld. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Bd. v. Southerland, 256 Ark. 445, 508 S.W.2d 326 (1974).
Public Need.
Where only ground for denial of application was no public need and the evidence on behalf of the application was sufficient to show a public need while the evidence in opposition was mere conclusions without sufficient basis in fact, the application should have been granted. Izard v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 239 Ark. 670, 393 S.W.2d 245 (1965).
Evidence held sufficient to sustain a finding that a new association in the area was needed. Morrilton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 243 Ark. 627, 420 S.W.2d 923 (1967).
Board's finding that proposed association would not succeed and that there was an absence of public need was held not to be supported by substantial evidence. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. Corning Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 253 Ark. 987, 490 S.W.2d 460 (1973).
Evidence showing increase in time deposits in the county and increase in mortgages by savings and loan institutions outside the county secured by residential property within the county supported finding that evidence did not support board's denial of savings and loan company's application for a charter. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. Grant County Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 256 Ark. 858, 510 S.W.2d 863 (1974).
Qualified Full Time Management; Directors and Officers.
Testimony that the persons who would serve as officers and directors of the applicant association planned to employ an experienced full-time manager was sufficient to sustain a finding that the character, responsibility, and general fitness of such persons was such as to warrant belief that the association would have qualified full time management. Morrilton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 243 Ark. 627, 420 S.W.2d 923 (1967).
Where some of the directors had no ties with any bank and one unnamed director, the managing officer, had no ties to any local bank, and where they had attained successful careers in their respective professions, being representative of the community, the board was justified in finding that the proposed directors, successful in their own right, would be independent and conscientious in their new responsibilities in preserving their own interest as the paramount interest of the public. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Union Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 257 Ark. 199, 515 S.W.2d 75 (1974).
An order authorizing the establishment of a new office of a savings and loan association which states that the managing officer will not be employed until the supervisor of the board determines that he is qualified is in violation of this section since the board is the one that must make the finding of qualification and not the supervisor. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 257 Ark. 985, 521 S.W.2d 542 (1975).
The Savings and Loan Association Board is not required to make a specific finding that the charter applicant will have qualified, full-time management but only that the character, responsibility, and general fitness of the proposed directors and officers be such as to warrant a belief that the proposed association will have qualified, full-time management. First State Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd., 261 Ark. 482, 549 S.W.2d 274 (1977).
Standard of Review.
The reviewing court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the board and must affirm the board unless it finds no substantial evidence to support the board. Arkadelphia Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Mid-South Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 265 Ark. 860, 581 S.W.2d 345 (1979).
The question of whether the board's action on a charter application was arbitrary and capricious is a narrow one, more restrictive than the “substantial evidence” test, and is only applicable where the board decision is not supported on any rational basis; to set aside a board decision on that basis, it must be willful and unreasoning and in disregard of the facts and circumstances of the case. Arkadelphia Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Mid-South Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 265 Ark. 860, 581 S.W.2d 345 (1979).
Cited: First State Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Bd., 257 Ark. 599, 518 S.W.2d 507 (1975); West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 553 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1977); Bank of Yellville v. First Am. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 276 Ark. 292, 634 S.W.2d 122 (1982).
23-37-311. Failure to commence business — Cancellation of charter.
- Within one (1) year after the date of the action of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] granting the charter, the association shall furnish satisfactory evidence to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations that it has commenced business. If the order of the board granting the charter of any action regarding insurance of its accounts is appealed to one (1) or more state or federal courts, the association shall show proof that it has commenced business within one (1) year after the conclusion of the litigation.
-
- If any association fails to commence business within the one-year period and the supervisor so finds after notice and hearing, he or she shall enter an order cancelling the charter unless good cause is shown for the failure, in which event the supervisor shall grant a reasonable extension of time for commencing business, not to exceed two (2) years, to give the association the opportunity to overcome the cause for delay.
- No charter shall be cancelled during the pendency of any litigation in any state or federal court regarding the charter, the operation, or the insurance of the accounts of a savings and loan association.
- The supervisor shall file a copy of any order cancelling a savings and loan association charter with the Secretary of State and with the county clerk of the county in which the home office of the association is located.
- Parties other than the affected association shall not be heard regarding any extension of time of an association's charter. However, any party which appeared before the board protesting the granting of the charter shall, upon written request, be notified of the determination of the supervisor on the extension request.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 26; 1975, No. 531, § 3; 1977, No. 350, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1826.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1977, No. 350, § 2, provided that the act should apply to all savings and loan associations which were granted charters but had not yet commenced business as of March 3, 1977, and as to which orders cancelling their charters had not become final.
Case Notes
Commencement of Business.
This section does not deal with the granting of charters but deals with the revocation of charters for failure to commence business, and procurement of an indemnity bond or paying annual fees are not specified as prerequisites for commencing business. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
Discretion of Supervisor.
It was an abuse of the supervisor's discretion not to grant an extension but rather cancel the charter of an association that had qualified in all respects other than procurement of deposit insurance from Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, where the association had suit pending to require issuance of such insurance. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
Cited: West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 553 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1977).
23-37-312. Amendment of charter and bylaws.
By resolution adopted by a majority vote of its members if a mutual association, or by its stockholders if a permanent stock association, at any annual meeting or special meeting called for that purpose, any association may amend its articles of incorporation or bylaws in any manner not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter. However, before the amendments become effective, they must be filed with, and approved by, the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 27; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1827.
23-37-313. Changes in name, location, etc.
-
No association shall, without the prior approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] or Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations:
- Establish any branch office other than the principal office stated in its articles of incorporation;
- Move any principal office or branch office of the association beyond two (2) miles of its original location; or
- Change its name.
-
- When approval is applied for, the supervisor shall give written notice, as required by this chapter and the rules of the board, to every state or federal association whose home office is located in the same county or whose home office is in a county adjoining the county in which the home office of the petitioning association is located.
- If no protest is received within the time set forth by this chapter and by the board in its rules, the supervisor may approve or deny the establishment or move of any branch office, move of a home office, or a change of name.
- An association may not move its home office from the county in which its home office was originally located.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 29; 1975, No. 531, § 4; 1979, No. 361, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1829.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Pitts, Interstate Banking and State Wide Branching in Arkansas: Act 12 of the 76th Arkansas General Assembly, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 457.
23-37-314. Indemnity bonds of directors, officers, and employees.
- Every association shall maintain on file with the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations an effective blanket indemnity bond with a corporate surety protecting the association from loss by or through any fraud, dishonesty, forgery or alteration, larceny, theft, embezzlement, robbery, burglary, holdup, wrongful or unlawful abstraction, misappropriation, or any other dishonest or criminal action or omission by any director, officer, or employee of the association.
- Associations which employ collection agents, who for any reason are not covered by a bond as required in subsection (a) of this section, shall provide for the bonding of each collection agent in an amount equal to at least twice the average monthly collection of the agent. Collection agents shall be required to make settlement with the association at least monthly. No bond coverage will be required of any agent which is a bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or an institution insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished].
- The amounts and forms of the bonds and sufficiency of the surety thereupon shall be approved by the supervisor. All of the bonds shall provide that a cancellation thereof either by the surety or the insured shall not become effective unless and until thirty (30) days' notice in writing first shall have been given to the supervisor, unless he or she approves the cancellation earlier.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 33; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1833.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Sav. & Loan Ass'n Bd. v. West Helena Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 260 Ark. 326, 538 S.W.2d 560 (1976).
23-37-315. Corporate name.
-
- The name of every new association organized under this chapter shall include either the words “savings and loan association” or “building and loan association”.
- These words shall be preceded by appropriate descriptive words approved by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished].
- An ordinal number may not be used as a single descriptive word preceding the words “savings and loan association” or “building and loan association” unless such words are followed by the words “of ,” the blank being filled by the name of the town, city, or county in which the association has its home office.
- The words “national”, “federal”, “United States”, “insured”, “guaranteed”, or any form thereof, separately or in any combination thereof with other words or syllables, may not be used as part of the corporate name of an association organized under this chapter.
- A charter shall not be granted to a proposed association having the same name as any other association or federal savings and loan association authorized to do business in this state or a name so nearly resembling it as to be calculated to deceive, except an association formed by a reincorporation, reorganization, or consolidation of other associations, or upon the sale of the property or franchise of an association.
- No person, firm, company, association, fiduciary, partnership, or corporation, either domestic or foreign, unless authorized to do business in this state under the provisions of this chapter, shall do business under any name or title which indicates, or reasonably implies, that the business is the character or the kind of business carried on or transacted by an association, or which is calculated to lead any person to believe that the business is that of an association.
- Upon application by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations or by any affected association, a court of competent jurisdiction may issue an injunction to restrain any such entity from violating or continuing to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 28; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1828.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-316. Standards of conduct.
-
A director of a state-chartered savings and loan association or federal savings bank shall discharge his or her duties as a director, including his or her duties as a member of any committees:
- In good faith;
- With the care an ordinary prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and
- In a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the savings and loan association or federal savings bank.
-
In discharging his or her duties, a director shall be entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:
- One (1) or more officers or employees of the savings and loan association whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in matters presented;
- Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence; or
- A committee of the board of directors of which he or she is not a member, if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
- A director is not acting in good faith if the director has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance on the information or data described in subsection (b) of this section unwarranted.
- A director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to take any action, if he or she performed the duties of his or her office in compliance with this section.
History. Acts 1993, No. 990, § 1.
Subchapter 4 — Operation Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1967, No. 144, § 2: Feb. 24, 1967. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and declared by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that federal savings and loan associations operating in this State have been authorized to pay special dividends, variable dividends and to adopt dividend policies that are not authorized for savings and loan associations chartered under the laws of Arkansas; that the difference in dividend policies of state and federal savings and loan associations is unduly restrictive on state savings and loan associations, and that this situation is to the detriment of public health, safety and welfare, and that only by the immediate operation of this act can these conditions be alleviated. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the public health, peace and safety shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1969, No. 242, § 2: Mar. 12, 1969. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and determined that federal associations doing business in this State have and will have an unfair competitive advantage over associations chartered by this State and that it is imperative to immediately remove such unfair competitive advantage. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 531, § 16: Mar. 21, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board and the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Supervisor do not sufficiently define such authority and that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board and Supervisor in the proper administration of their duties as to defining in a reasonable manner the time allowed for an association to commence business from the effective date of its grant of authority, as to the fees presently charged by the Board and Supervisor and as to general regulatory matters under the review of the Board and Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 595, § 4: Mar. 28, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of Arkansas savings and loan associations to act as trustees under the so called “Keough Act” is ambiguous and that said associations should have such authority to act immediately and that therefore an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1981, No. 444, § 6: Mar. 12, 1981. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that confusion exists regarding several statutes relating to the administrative functions of the Supervisor of the Savings and Loan Board and a conflict between the Building and Loan Act and the Savings and Loan Act and that such confusion is detrimental to the welfare of the citizens of this State and that this Act is immediately necessary to eliminate such confusion. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 10 and No. 12, § 10: July 15, 1988. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that changes in the banking industry, and changes in the Federal banking laws, make it immediately necessary to amend the banking laws of this state to permit Arkansas banking institutions to maintain their competitive position with banks in the region and to make available a supply of funds needed for the community, business and economic expansion of this state through regional reciprocal interstate banking; that amendments to the branch banking laws of the state are immediately necessary to authorize county-wide branch banking and to provide for the orderly expansion of branch banking, after a period of time, outside the county, and to authorize statewide branch banking after a defined period of time; that clarification is needed with respect to existing laws of this state relating to state-chartered savings and loan associations; that clarification of the laws governing the authority of the Bank Commissioner to make orderly and sound decisions related to failed and failing banks if necessary to protect the public of this state against financial losses; and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary for the clarification of the banking laws to preserve the safety and soundness of the Arkansas state banking system. Therefore an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety should be in force and effective as follows: Section 1 of this Act shall be effective the earlier of (i) January 1, 1989, or (ii) the date on which a state or states having twenty percent (20%) or more of the total deposits of Banks within the Region, excluding Arkansas, have enacted and have in effect statutes which permit Arkansas Bank Holding Companies to acquire Banks and Bank Holding Companies in such state, whichever occurs sooner. For purposes of this Section, the total deposits of Banks within the Region shall be determined by the Bank Commissioner of the State of Arkansas by reference to the Spring 1988 issue of Polk's World Bank Directory, published by R. L. Polk and Company. The remaining Sections of this Act shall be effective immediately upon its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 42 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 66 et seq.
23-37-401. Powers commensurate with federal associations.
Irrespective of any limitations contained in this chapter, the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations may adopt rules authorizing or empowering any association chartered or operating under the provisions of this chapter to:
- Pay or give any premium or other concession for the opening or increasing of a savings account to the same extent that the payment of premiums or the granting of other concessions may be authorized for a federal association doing business in this state;
- Designate the legal relationship between the association and the holder of a savings account with the association and the name to be given the savings account in any advertising or public description of the savings account to the same extent that those designations and legal relationships are authorized for a federal association doing business in this state;
- Adopt any dividend or interest paying date or other procedure or practice with respect to the paying of interest or dividends authorized for a federal association doing business in this state;
- Adopt any business practice, procedure, method, or system authorized by a federal association doing business in this state, except nothing herein will permit an extension of a state savings and loan association's branching authority beyond the limitations of state law; and
- Make any loan or investment that a federal association doing business in this state is authorized to make.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 58; 1969, No. 242, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1858; Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 8; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 8; 2001, No. 1553, § 35; 2019, No. 315, § 2496.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the introductory language.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Pitts, Interstate Banking and State Wide Branching in Arkansas: Act 12 of the 76th Arkansas General Assembly, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 457.
Case Notes
Effect of Section.
This section and rules adopted thereunder clearly place state savings and loan associations on the same footing as federally chartered associations doing business in this state. Schulte v. Benton Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 279 Ark. 275, 651 S.W.2d 71 (1983).
Practices Authorized for Federal Associations.
Since federally chartered associations may enforce due on sale clauses in cases without the requirement of showing that the security is impaired, it follows that state associations are duly empowered to do the same. Schulte v. Benton Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 279 Ark. 275, 651 S.W.2d 71 (1983).
23-37-402. Authority to act as trustee for certain trusts.
- A savings and loan association created pursuant to the laws of the United States or the State of Arkansas may act as trustee, and may receive reasonable compensation for so acting, of any trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan which qualifies or qualified for specific tax treatment under § 401(d) or § 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 if the funds of the trust are invested only in savings accounts or deposits in the association or in obligations or securities issued by the association. However, no association may invest any trust funds in its own common or preferred stock.
- All funds held in a fiduciary capacity by any association may be commingled for appropriate purposes of investment, but individual records shall be kept by the fiduciary for each participant and shall show in proper detail all transactions engaged in under the authority of this section.
- A savings and loan association within this state acting pursuant to this section shall not be deemed to be acting as an investment adviser within the meaning of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1975, No. 595, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1867, 67-1868.
U.S. Code. Sections 401(d) and 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, referred to in this section, are codified as 26 U.S.C. §§ 401(d) and 408(a).
Cross References. Deposit of trust funds, § 28-69-206.
23-37-403. Dividends.
-
- After providing for payment of the expenses of operation of the association and for the required minimum transfer to its general loss reserves on each closing day as prescribed by the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations, the board of directors of an association may declare a dividend on savings accounts of record on the last business day of March, June, September, and December. The dividends shall be payable as of the dividend date or at a later date not more than thirty (30) days following the dividend date.
- Dividends shall be declared on the withdrawal value of each savings account at the beginning of the dividend period, plus additions thereto made during the dividend period less amounts withdrawn, which for dividend purposes shall be deducted from the latest previous additions thereto, computed at the declared rate for the time invested.
- For dividend purposes, the date of investment shall be the date fixed by the board of directors of an association with the approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] which shall be not later than thirty (30) days after or prior to the date of actual receipt by the association of an account or an addition to an account.
- Dividends shall be credited to savings accounts on the books of the association unless the association shall have agreed to pay dividends on all or any part of any savings account in cash.
- All savings account holders shall participate equally in dividends pro rata to the withdrawal value of their savings accounts; no association shall be required to pay or credit dividends on accounts of ten dollars ($10.00) or less.
- With the approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], a savings and loan or building and loan association operating under authority of the statutes of Arkansas may pay to the holders of its savings accounts any rate of dividend, or bonus, or special dividend, or classify its savings accounts for the purpose of paying a differential or variable dividend, or adopt any other dividend policy that is authorized for federal associations operating in this state, irrespective of any limitation contained in this chapter or other laws of this state.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 60; 1967, No. 144, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1860, 67-1860.1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-404. Branch offices.
- The Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations in either a protested or an unprotested application shall not approve the application for an association to open a branch unless the association satisfactorily establishes that the volume of business in the proposed service area for the branch office is such as to indicate a successful operation.
-
An association shall furnish satisfactory evidence to the supervisor that it has opened a branch office for business within one (1) year from:
- The date the granting of authority for the opening of the branch office is approved by the Supreme Court if the matter is appealed to the Supreme Court; or
- The date on which the time period for perfecting an appeal from a decision of the supervisor or a lower court approving the granting of authority for opening of the branch office expires.
-
- If any association fails to open the branch office for business within the one-year period as required by subsection (b) of this section and the supervisor so finds after notice and hearing, the supervisor shall enter an order cancelling the authority for opening of the branch office for business unless good cause is shown for the failure, in which event the supervisor shall grant a reasonable extension of time for opening the branch office for business, not to exceed one (1) year, to give the association an opportunity to overcome the cause for the delay.
-
- Parties other than the affected association shall not be heard regarding any extension of authority for opening a branch office.
- However, any party that appeared before the supervisor protesting the granting of authority for opening the branch office for business shall be notified upon written request of the determination of the supervisor on the extension request.
-
- If any association closes a branch office and the branch office remains closed for one (1) year, the supervisor after notice and hearing shall enter an order cancelling the authority for continued operation of that branch unless good cause is shown for the failure to continue operation. In this event the supervisor shall grant a reasonable extension of time for reopening the branch for business, not to exceed one (1) year.
- Parties other than the affected association shall not be heard regarding any extension of time to reopen the closed branch.
-
Any association legally chartered by the proper state authority may establish one (1) or more full service branches, provided that its supervisory authority approves, in the following locations:
- Anywhere within the county in which the establishing savings and loan association's principal office is located;
- In addition to the provision of subsection (d) of this section, after December 31, 1993, anywhere within any counties contiguous to the county in which its principal office is located; and
- After December 31, 1998, anywhere within this state.
-
- Without regard to the exceptions for location of a branch of an association as provided in this section, an association may purchase the business and assets and assume the liabilities of or merge or consolidate with another association located in any incorporated city or town within this state and operate the acquired association as a branch, provided that a branch shall not be established pursuant to purchase, merger, or consolidation with another association should either association have a de novo charter.
-
- As used in this section, “de novo charter” means a charter for an association that has been in existence for less than ten (10) years.
- However, a de novo charter does not include a charter that is issued in connection with the acquisition of assets and liabilities from a predecessor financial institution that is acquired through federal or state regulatory action.
- Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to prevent any association from retaining branch locations, wherever located, in operation prior to June 30, 1988.
History. Acts 1975, No. 531, §§ 12, 13; 1979, No. 361, §§ 11, 12; 1981, No. 444, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1865, 67-1866; Acts 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 2, § 7; 1988 (4th Ex. Sess.), No. 12, § 7; 2001, No. 1553, § 36.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Derden, Survey of Arkansas Law: Administrative Law, 2 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 157.
Pitts, Interstate Banking and State Wide Branching in Arkansas: Act 12 of the 76th Arkansas General Assembly, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 457.
Survey, Banks and Banking, 14 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 277.
Case Notes
Evidence.
Evidence sufficient to find that trial court erred in reversing board's decision approving the establishment of the branch office. Northwest Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Fayetteville Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 262 Ark. 840, 562 S.W.2d 49 (1978).
Cited: White County Guar. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. F & M Bank, 262 Ark. 893, 562 S.W.2d 582 (1978).
23-37-405. Membership charges prohibited.
- No association shall directly or indirectly charge any membership, admission, withdrawal, or any other fee or sum of money for the privilege of becoming, remaining, or ceasing to be a member of the association, except charges upon the making or modification of a loan.
- No association shall charge any member any sum of money by way of fine or penalty for any cause, except for charges made against borrowers for defaults or prepayments.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 34; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1834.
23-37-406. Payment of commission on sale of stock.
An association shall pay no fee, commission, or other remuneration to any person for the sale of its permanent capital stock without prior approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished].
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 32; 1981, No. 444, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1832.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Subchapter 5 — Savings Accounts
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 74 et seq.
23-37-501. Accounts of minors.
- An association and any federal association may accept savings accounts from any minor, as the sole and absolute owner of the savings account, and receive payments thereon by or for the owner, and pay withdrawals, accept pledges to the association, and act in any other manner with respect to the accounts on the order of the minor.
- Any payment or delivery of rights to a minor, or a receipt or acquittance signed by a minor shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge of the association for the payment so made or delivery of rights. The receipt, acquittance, pledge, or other action taken by the minor shall be binding upon the minor with like effect as if he or she were of full age and legal capacity. However, if either parent or guardian of the minor advises an association in writing that the minor shall not have unrestricted authority to deal with his or her savings account, during the minority of the minor, the minor shall not be authorized to deal with his or her savings account except with the joinder of a parent or guardian.
- In the event of the death of the minor, the receipt or acquittance of one (1) parent or the guardian of the minor shall be valid and sufficient discharge of the association.
- With respect to a minor under twelve (12) years of age, the receipt, acquittance, pledge, or other action required by the association may be taken by one (1) parent or the person standing in loco parentis to the minor.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 37; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1837.
23-37-502. Accounts in the names of two or more persons.
Savings accounts may be opened in any association or a federal association in the names of two (2) or more persons, either minor or adult, or a combination of minor and adult, and the savings accounts may be held as follows:
-
- If the person opening the savings account fails to designate in writing the type of account intended, or if he or she designates in writing to the association that the account is to be a “joint tenancy” account or a “joint tenancy with right of survivorship” account, or that the account shall be payable to the survivors of the persons named in the account, then the account and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
- These savings accounts may be paid to or on the order of any one (1) of the persons during his or her lifetime, unless a contrary written designation is given the association, or to or on the order of any one (1) of the survivors of them after the death of any one (1) or more of them.
- The opening of the account in this form shall be conclusive evidence in any action or proceeding to which either the association or the surviving parties is a party, of the intention of all of the parties to the account to vest title to the account and the additions thereto in the survivors.
- No association paying any survivor in accordance with the provisions of this section shall thereby be liable for any estate, inheritance, or succession taxes which may be due this state;
- If the savings account is opened in the names of persons who designate themselves to the association as husband and wife, whether or not they are at the time in fact husband and wife, then the account and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as tenants by the entirety. Upon the death of one (1) of the persons, the account shall be payable to the survivor;
- If the person opening a savings account designates in writing to the association that the account is to be a “tenants in common” account, then the account and all additions thereto shall be the property of those persons as tenants in common. The association, upon receipt of a specific written notice addressed to the association of the death of either party shall pay, upon the written order of the survivor, to the survivor, his or her pro rata part of the account and to the estate of the deceased owner, the deceased's pro rata part of the account. However, the association may pay the entire account and all additions thereto upon the receipt or acquittance of either party to the account prior to the time that a specific written notice of death is received as provided herein unless there has been filed with the association a written designation that more than one (1) signature is required to deal with the account. In the absence of any written designation to the contrary filed with the association, all tenants in common accounts shall be deemed to be owned pro rata by the persons named in the account;
- If a savings account is opened in the name of two (2) or more persons, whether as joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenants in common, or otherwise, an association shall pay withdrawal requests, accept pledges of the account, recognize the granting of proxies to vote as members of the association, and otherwise deal in any manner with the account upon the direction of any one (1) of the persons named in the account, whether the other persons named in the account are living or not, unless one (1) of the persons named in the account shall, by written instructions delivered to the association, designate that the signature of more than one (1) person shall be required to deal with the savings account; or
-
If a person opening or holding a savings account shall execute and file with the association a designation that on the death of the person named as holder the account shall be paid to or held by another person, the account and any balance thereof which exists from time to time shall be held as a payment on death account and unless otherwise agreed between the persons opening the account and the association:
- Upon the death of the holder of the account, the persons designated by him or her and who have survived him or her shall be the owners of the account as joint tenants with right of survivorship, if more than one (1). Any payment made by the association to any of those persons shall be a complete discharge of the association as to the amount paid;
- The person to whom the account is issued may change during his or her lifetime the designation of any of the persons who are to be holders at his or her death, by a written direction accepted by the association;
- The person to whom the account is issued may pledge, withdraw, or receive payment. Any payment made by the association shall be a complete discharge as to the amount paid.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 38; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1838.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Joint Tenancy — Right of Survivorship — “Four Unities,” 23 Ark. L. Rev. 136.
Tenancies by the Entirety — An Estate Planner's Dilemma (A Study of Unintended Result), 23 Ark. L. Rev. 44.
Note, The Creation of Joint Tenancy in Bank Accounts: The Old, the New, and the Uncertain, 44 Ark. L. Rev. 199.
Isabelle V. Taylor, Comment: Creditor Rights and the Missing Link in the Arkansas Trust Code: Is Death Strong Enough “To Break the Chain?”, 65 Ark. L. Rev. 433 (2012).
Case Notes
Note.
For cases discussing deposits in two or more names under Acts 1937, No. 260, § 1, as amended (superseded), see Black v. Black, 199 Ark. 609, 135 S.W.2d 837 (1940)Questioned byNall v. Duff, 305 Ark. 5, 805 S.W.2d 63 (1991); Harbour v. Harbour, 207 Ark. 551, 181 S.W.2d 805 (1944); Pye v. Higgason, 210 Ark. 347, 195 S.W.2d 632 (1946); Powell v. Powell, 222 Ark. 918, 263 S.W.2d 708 (1954); Vincent v. Vincent, 224 Ark. 449, 274 S.W.2d 772 (1955); Tesch v. Miller, 227 Ark. 74, 296 S.W.2d 392 (1956); Park v. McClemens, 231 Ark. 983, 334 S.W.2d 709 (Ark. 1960); McGuire v. Benton State Bank, 232 Ark. 1008, 342 S.W.2d 77 (1961); Von Tungeln v. Chapman, 233 Ark. 219, 343 S.W.2d 782 (1961); Beyer v. Pope, 236 Ark. 443, 366 S.W.2d 716 (1963); Ratliff v. Ratliff, 237 Ark. 191, 372 S.W.2d 216 (1963); Robertson v. Phillips, 240 Ark. 221, 398 S.W.2d 889 (1966)Questioned byZunamon v. Stevenson, 247 Ark. 248, 445 S.W.2d 102 (Ark. 1969); Dalton v. Eyestone, 240 Ark. 1032, 403 S.W.2d 730 (1966); Cook v. Bevill, 246 Ark. 805, 440 S.W.2d 570 (1969); Haseman v. Union Bank, 262 Ark. 803, 562 S.W.2d 45 (1978); Boling v. Gibson, 266 Ark. 310, 584 S.W.2d 14 (1979).
Applicability.
This section governs the disposition of joint accounts established after its effective date. Harris v. Searcy Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 241 Ark. 520, 408 S.W.2d 602 (1966).
Amendment.
Section 23-32-1005 did not amend this section. Snow v. Martensen, 257 Ark. 937, 522 S.W.2d 371 (1975).
Assignment of Funds.
Depositor had prima facie right, under terms of this section, to assign funds in joint account. Pine Bluff Nat'l Bank v. Parker, 253 Ark. 966, 490 S.W.2d 457 (1973).
Where the bank reported the account to be in the name of the debtor, accepted the assignment of the account and caused the secured party to release its collateral, the appellee was liable to pay to secured party an amount equal to the garnishment. Pine Bluff Nat'l Bank v. Parker, 253 Ark. 966, 490 S.W.2d 457 (1973).
Constructive Trust.
Constructive trust held properly imposed upon funds. Savage v. McCain, 21 Ark. App. 50, 728 S.W.2d 203 (1987).
Creditor's Rights.
A third party may execute against a spouse's interest in a tenancy by the entirety, subject to the other spouse's continued rights of possession and survivorship, and interest in one-half of the rents and profits. Morris v. Solesbee, 48 Ark. App. 123, 892 S.W.2d 281 (1995).
Designation of Beneficiary.
Since the depositor still retained the original certificate of deposit in her possession at the time of her death, it cannot be said that she intended to follow through with a change in beneficiaries, where the association never accepted the change in beneficiaries, and therefore the necessary documents to effect the transfer were never completed. Wilson v. White, 265 Ark. 444, 578 S.W.2d 577 (1979).
In the absence of a depositor meeting the minimum statutory requirements, his intent concerning designation of the beneficiary is no longer controlling in the creation of an account. Rascoe v. Rascoe, 265 Ark. 371, 578 S.W.2d 892 (1979).
Designation of Payee on Death.
A proxy card in the name of “J.D. Nolen, payable in case of death to Thucie Nolen,” appointing the president of the association as the holder's proxy to vote in meetings of the association, signed by J.D. Nolen, was sufficient designation under subdivision (5) of this section. Cupp v. Pocahontas Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 242 Ark. 566, 414 S.W.2d 596 (1967).
In order for a savings account in a bank or savings and loan association to be payable on the depositor's death to a third person, the depositor must designate in writing that the account is so payable. McDonald v. Treat, 268 Ark. 52, 593 S.W.2d 462 (1980).
A certificate of deposit in the name of a husband payable on death to his wife was properly awarded to the husband's estate upon his death where his wife had predeceased him since survival of the designated beneficiary is a requirement under subdivision (5) of this section. Luecke v. Mercantile Bank, 286 Ark. 304, 691 S.W.2d 843 (1985).
Joint Tenancy.
One who changes his account to a joint account does not hereby give a vested interest in the account to a joint tenant, and thus he may later change the account back to his on name. Beyer v. Pope, 236 Ark. 443, 366 S.W.2d 716 (1963) (decision under prior law).
Where the daughter of the deceased owner of funds opened an account in the names of deceased and herself there was insufficient evidence to establish a joint tenancy with rights of survivorship where there was no showing that the deceased was ever aware of the transaction or consented to the opening of the account, did not sign the signature card and died 5 days after the opening of said account. Snow v. Martensen, 257 Ark. 937, 522 S.W.2d 371 (1975).
When the decedent and another signed certificates of deposits creating a joint tenancy with a right of survivorship the proceeds of the certificates belonged to the survivor and not to decedent's estate notwithstanding the fact that the original proceeds used to purchase the certificates belonged to the decedent alone and new signature cards were not resigned when the certificates matured and new certificates purchased. Penn v. Penn, 284 Ark. 562, 683 S.W.2d 930 (1985).
Sister's reliance on a presumption under this section that opening a savings account in the name of two or more persons was evidence that both parties intended to vest title in the account to the survivor upon the death of the other was misplaced because such reliance ignored a trial court's finding that a signature card to an account held in her brother's name was ambiguous with regard to ownership of the account as it listed her brother as the account owner but contained both his signature and the sister's signature; the trial court did not err in finding an ambiguity and considering extrinsic evidence. Bolding v. Norsworthy, 101 Ark. App. 88, 270 S.W.3d 394 (2007), review denied, — Ark. —, — S.W.3d —, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 290 (May 1, 2008).
Pay-On-Death Designations.
Statute-based precedents, including this section, § 23-37-502, and § 23-81-116 do not undermine Coley v. English, 235 Ark. 215, 357 S.W.2d 529 (1962), or similar cases; only the state supreme court can say whether the now-ready availability of pay-on-death designations, insurance products, and other legally effective transfers of future and contingent interests in property has so eroded the line of cases exemplified by Coley that the common law has changed. Miller v. Cothran, 102 Ark. App. 61, 280 S.W.3d 580 (2008).
Person Opening Account.
The words “person opening the account” as used in subsection (1) of this section means the person who owns the money with which the account is being opened in the names of more than one person. Snow v. Martensen, 257 Ark. 937, 522 S.W.2d 371 (1975).
Restoration of Funds.
Where an officer of the savings and loan association testified that the association did not have any document signed by the decedent indicating how the account was to be paid out upon her death, the probate court properly found that the payment of funds to one niece was improper and that the funds had to be restored to the decedent's estate, despite the claims of the recipient of the funds, inter alia, that the documents signed by the decedent with respect to two other accounts were sufficient to indicate that she was to receive this account. McDonald v. Treat, 268 Ark. 52, 593 S.W.2d 462 (1980).
Writing Required.
The requirement of a written designation means that the depositor must affix his signature to an instrument stating his intention. McDonald v. Treat, 268 Ark. 52, 593 S.W.2d 462 (1980).
Cited: Cook v. Bevill, 246 Ark. 805, 440 S.W.2d 570 (1969); Willey v. Murphy, 247 Ark. 839, 448 S.W.2d 341 (1969); Gibson v. Boling, 274 Ark. 53, 622 S.W.2d 180 (1981); Jones v. Robinson, 297 Ark. 580, 764 S.W.2d 610 (1989).
23-37-503. Accounts of fiduciaries.
- An association or a federal association may accept savings accounts in the name of any administrator, executor, custodian, guardian, trustee, or other fiduciary, with or without the designation of the name of the beneficiary or the court order creating the fiduciary relationship. The fiduciary shall have power to vote as a member, to open and make additions to, and to withdraw from the savings account in whole or in part.
-
- The payment or delivery of rights to the fiduciary or a receipt or acquittance signed by the fiduciary to whom any payment or delivery of rights is made shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge of an association.
- If the savings account is in the name of more than one (1) fiduciary, the payment to only one (1) fiduciary or a receipt or acquittance signed by only one (1) fiduciary to whom any payment is made shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge of an association for the payment so made, unless the written savings agreement filed with the association provides otherwise.
- Unless the written agreement or court order filed with the association at the time an account is opened by a fiduciary provides otherwise, the association may make loans on the security of the savings account, pay withdrawals to the fiduciary personally or as directed by him or her, and otherwise deal with the account, in whole or in part, without regard to any notice to the contrary, as directed by the fiduciary, so long as the fiduciary is living, or if two (2) or more fiduciaries are designated, so long as one (1) fiduciary is living.
- Whenever a person holding an account in a fiduciary capacity dies and no written notice or order of the circuit court of the revocation or termination of the fiduciary relationship has been given to the association and the association has no written notice of an order of the circuit court of any other disposition of the beneficial estate, the withdrawal value of the account and dividends thereon or other rights relating thereto may, at the option of the association, be paid or delivered, in whole or in part, to the beneficiary, and the association shall have no further liability therefor.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 40; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1840.
Case Notes
Construction.
This section is in derogation of the common law and is to be strictly construed. Carmichael v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 264 Ark. 657, 574 S.W.2d 651 (1978).
Fiduciary Capacity.
The authorization of a pledge of a certificate or account by one of two joint tenants is inapplicable where pledge of a fiduciary account to secure a loan to the fiduciary fails to mention his guardianship capacity, no order of court authorized it, and no record indicates the loan was made for the benefit of the ward; rather the legislature did not intend the savings and loan to participate in the guardian's self-dealing to the detriment of the ward and cannot offset the guardian's debt from a joint deposit, owed to the ward at the guardian's death. Carmichael v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 264 Ark. 657, 574 S.W.2d 651 (1978).
Nature of Institutions.
For the purpose of this section, there is no difference between banks and savings and loan institutions. Carmichael v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 264 Ark. 657, 574 S.W.2d 651 (1978).
23-37-504. Accounts of deceased nonresidents.
-
When a savings account is held in any association or federal association by a person residing in another state or country, the account, together with additions thereto and earnings thereon, or any part thereof, may be paid to the administrator or executor appointed in the state or country where the account holder resided at the time of death if the administrator or executor has furnished the association with:
- Authenticated or certified copies of his or her letters; and
- An affidavit by the administrator or executor that, to his or her knowledge, no letters then are outstanding in this state and no petition for letters is pending on the estate in this state, and that there are no creditors of the estate in this state.
- Upon payment or delivery to the representative after receipt of the affidavit and authenticated copies, the association shall be released and discharged to the same extent as if the payment or delivery had been made to a legally qualified resident executor or administrator, and the association shall not be required to see to the application or disposition of the property.
- No action at law or in equity shall be maintained against the association for payment made in accordance with this section.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 42; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1842.
23-37-505. Withdrawals generally.
- Any savings account holder may, at any time, present a written application for withdrawal of all or any part of his or her savings account except to the extent the account may be pledged to the association or to another person on the books of the association.
-
- An association may pay, in full, each and every withdrawal request as presented, without requiring that written application therefor be made.
- At any time the board of directors of an association finds it to be in the best interest of the association, the board may, by proper resolution, require a written notice of not exceeding sixty (60) days before paying withdrawals, in which event no withdrawal request shall be paid until the expiration of the time for giving notice fixed by the board of directors.
- Upon the same day the resolution to require notice is made effective, the association shall notify the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations by telephone or telegraph that the resolution is in effect.
-
- In the event the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] makes an affirmative finding that a period of great financial stress or other emergency exists, either generally or in a specific locality in this state, or for a specific association, it may, with the approval of the Governor, restrict the right of an association to pay withdrawals, to the extent and in the manner which the board finds necessary or desirable for the protection of savings account holders and other creditors of the association.
- Any restriction on the withdrawals from an association may, with like approval, be at any time and from time to time extended, renewed, or modified.
- Any restriction shall be binding upon any association from the time the order of the board imposing the restriction is served on the affected association.
- The action of the board shall be a complete defense to any action or suit brought against any association on account or by reason of the observance or compliance with the restriction on withdrawals.
- The board may make and promulgate any rules which shall be required for the conduct of the business of an association for which withdrawals have been restricted pursuant to this subsection, with a view to the protection of the rights of the savings account holders, creditors, and members of the association, both with respect to savings account holders, creditors, and members who were such at the date of the restriction on withdrawals and those becoming savings account holders, creditors, or members after the restrictions have been imposed.
- While an application for withdrawals remains in effect and unpaid, no loan shall be made by an association secured by the pledge of a savings account.
- An application for withdrawal may be cancelled, in whole or in part, at any time by the holder of a savings account.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 35; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1835; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2497.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (c)(5).
23-37-506. Conflicting claims to accounts.
In the event an association is given notice that conflicting claims of whatever kind and nature exist to the ownership or right to withdraw a savings account, the association may, at its option, without liability, withhold paying any withdrawals from the account until it receives a written withdrawal request executed by all the claimants to the savings account.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 39; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1839.
23-37-507. Damages for refusal to pay withdrawal request.
In the event an association wrongfully and without legal right refuses to pay a withdrawal request for a savings account, the owner of the savings account shall be entitled to recover damages from the association equal to interest at the legal rate prescribed by the laws of this state from the date the withdrawal request was refused. The owner shall not be entitled to recover from the association any special damages of whatever kind or nature.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 46; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1846.
23-37-508. Power of attorney.
An association or a federal association may recognize, or continue to recognize, the authority of an attorney in fact authorized in writing to manage or to make withdrawals, either in whole or in part, from a savings account until it receives written notice of the revocation of the authority of the attorney in fact or until it receives written notice of the death or adjudication of incompetency of the owner of the savings account.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 41; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1841.
23-37-509. Lien on account of borrower — Pledge of third party's account as security on loan.
- Every association operating under this chapter or any federal association shall have a lien, without further agreement or pledge, upon all savings accounts owned by any borrower, or savings accounts subject to withdrawal by any borrower, to secure the payment of any indebtedness of the borrower to the association. Upon default on any loan, the association may, without notice to or consent of the borrower, cancel on its books all or any part of those savings accounts and apply the withdrawal value of the accounts in payment of any indebtedness of the borrower to the association.
- An association may, by written instrument, waive its lien, in whole or in part, on any savings accounts.
- An association may take the pledge of savings accounts of the association owned by a person other than the borrower as security or additional security for any loan made or purchased by the association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 36; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1836.
23-37-510. Validity of release or acquittance by officers of corporation or association.
A release or acquittance signed by either the president or the secretary of any corporation or any unincorporated association, whether foreign, domestic, charitable, public, or private, or signed by any person purporting to be the president or secretary of the corporation, who opens a savings account in the name of the corporation, shall constitute a valid and sufficient release of any association to the extent of any payment or delivery of rights or property made by the association to a corporation or unincorporated association upon the written direction of the president or secretary unless there has been filed with the association a copy of a resolution of the board of directors or other governing body of the corporation or unincorporated association designating other officers or agents of the corporation or unincorporated association who have the power to act for the corporation or unincorporated association with respect to the savings account.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 45; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1845.
23-37-511. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning accounts as security for bonds, was repealed by Acts 2009, No. 461, § 1. The section was derived from Acts 1963, No. 227, § 44; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1844.
23-37-512. Legal investments in accounts.
- Administrators, executors, guardians, trustees, and other fiduciaries, business corporations, insurance companies and charitable or educational corporations or associations, banks, credit unions, and all other financial institutions, and any person acting as custodian under the Uniform Securities Ownership by Minors Act, § 9-26-301 et seq., are specifically authorized and empowered to invest funds held by them in savings accounts of any association or of any federal association.
- Trustees of any pension, profit, profit-sharing, or retirement trust for employees of any public or private corporation and any person having the care, custody, or control of any funds held for a pension or retirement plan, system, or trust for the employees of this state, or any political subdivision of this state, are specifically authorized and empowered to invest funds held by them in savings accounts of any association or of any federal association to the extent that the savings account does not exceed an amount equal to the sum of all reserve accounts except specific or valuation reserves, undivided profits, surplus, and capital stock, but not including the proceeds of capital notes, debentures, or similar obligations.
- The provisions of this section are supplemental to any and all other laws relating to and declaring what shall be legal investments for the persons, corporations, organizations, and officials referred to in this section.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 43; 1979, No. 361, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1843.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1977, No. 793, § 11, provided, in part, that after July 1, 1977 the authority of public retirement systems to invest in savings accounts, pursuant to this section, should be construed to authorize the making of such investments only in accordance with procedures established by § 24-3-101 et seq., with respect to the four systems governed by those sections.
Subchapter 6 — Foreign Associations
Effective Dates. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 122 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 149 et seq.
23-37-601. Operation in city on state line.
A savings and loan association doing business in a state adjoining this state, in a city or incorporated town which borders on a city or incorporated town in this state and which is divided by a state line other than a navigable stream, may conduct its business in this state if it satisfies all the conditions for the conduct of its business in the adjoining state involved, without further qualification under this chapter. However, in the conduct of its business in this state, it shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 59; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1859.
23-37-602. Agents, brokers, etc., generally.
Unless acting as an agent for and on behalf of an association, no person, firm, or corporation shall, in this state, unless then licensed therefor pursuant to this chapter:
- Act or hold himself or herself out as an agent, broker, or solicitor for others of savings accounts for foreign savings and loan associations;
- Advertise in this state for the placing of savings accounts in foreign savings and loan associations; or
- Collect, receive, or transmit any funds or take applications for the opening of savings accounts in any foreign savings and loan association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1813.
23-37-603. Broker's license.
- Application for a broker's license shall be made to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations by the applicant and signed and sworn to by the applicant. The form of the application shall be prescribed by the supervisor and shall require full answers to any questions which may reasonably be necessary to determine the applicant's identity, residence, personal history, business record, experience, and other facts required by the supervisor to determine whether the applicant meets the qualifications for the license applied for.
- All applications shall be accompanied by the applicable license fee.
- As a prerequisite to issuing a broker's license, the applicant shall file with the supervisor a bond, in the form prescribed by the supervisor. This bond shall be in the principal amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) with a corporate surety, conditioned on the faithful performance of the applicant's duties as a broker and the payment of all claims arising out of the performance by the applicant of his or her duties as a broker. The bond shall remain in full force and effect so long as the broker's license is outstanding.
- The supervisor shall promptly issue licenses applied for to persons qualified therefor in accordance with this section. The license shall state the name and address of the licensee, the date of issue, and shall provide for a termination on January 31 of each year.
-
For the protection of the people of this state, the supervisor shall not issue, continue, or permit to exist any broker's license except in compliance with this chapter, and as to any person not possessing the following qualifications:
- The person must be of legal age;
- The person must be of good character;
- The person must have filed with the supervisor a bond pursuant to the terms of this section; and
- The person must have filed with the supervisor copies of all advertisements which the broker proposes to use in this state.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, §§ 14, 15; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1814, 67-1815.
Subchapter 7 — Conversion, Merger, Etc.
Effective Dates. Acts 1939, No. 343, § 7: approved Mar. 16, 1939. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and declared to be a fact that there is urgent need for legislation permitting the free investment by married women, minors, and fiduciaries in the shares, share accounts, or accounts of building and loan associations and providing for the appointment of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation as a receiver, and permitting financial institutions of this state to invest their funds in the obligations and securities issued pursuant to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act and Title IV of the National Housing Act, and that there is an urgent need for additional funds to provide home loans for the people of this state, and for enlarging operations and financing the same and in marketing securities of public institutions engaged in such enterprises and that this act will have a beneficial effect in the premises and that the foregoing needs are so urgent as to justify this emergency clause, and that it is consequently necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety that this Act shall become effective without delay. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act shall be in force and effect from and after its passage.”
Acts 1963, No. 227, § 65: Mar. 13, 1963. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the existing statutes regulating savings and loan associations are incomplete, that full and complete regulation of savings and loan associations is necessary to protect investors and existing associations and that the immediate passage of this act is necessary to correct such situation. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 292, § 8: Mar. 12, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws governing the Arkansas Savings and Loan Association Board do not sufficiently define the authority of such Board, that such condition has greatly handicapped the Board in the proper administration of its duties and that existing fees paid by savings and loan associations to the Supervisor of savings and loan associations are inadequate and insufficient to defray the costs of the services performed by the Supervisor; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 13 Am. Jur. 2d, Bldg. & L. Asso., § 13 et seq.
C.J.S. 12 C.J.S., Bldg. & L. Asso., § 144 et seq.
23-37-701. Conversion of state association into federal association.
- Any association subject to this chapter may convert itself into a federal savings and loan association in accordance with the provisions of Section 5 of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, upon a majority vote of the members or stockholders at an annual meeting or any special meeting called to consider that action.
- A copy of the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the members or stockholders,verified by the affidavit of the secretary, shall be filed in the office of the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations within ten (10) days after the date of the meeting. A sworn copy of the proceedings of the meeting, when so filed, shall be presumptive evidence of the holding and action of the meeting.
- Within three (3) months after the date of the meeting, the association shall take such action, in the manner prescribed and authorized by the laws of the United States, as shall make it a federal savings and loan association.
-
- There shall be filed with the supervisor a copy of the charter issued to the federal savings and loan association by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished] or a certificate showing the organization of the association as a federal savings and loan association, certified by the secretary or assistant secretary of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished].
- A copy of the charter, or of the certificate, shall be filed by the association with the Secretary of State and with the county clerk of the county in which the home office of the association is located.
- Upon the grant to any association of a charter by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], the association receiving the charter shall cease to be an association incorporated under this chapter and shall no longer be subject to the supervision and control of the supervisor and the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished].
- Upon the conversion of any association into a federal savings and loan association, the corporate existence of the association shall not terminate, but the federal association shall be deemed to be a continuation of the entity of the association so converted, and all property of the converted association, including its rights, titles, and interests in and to all property of whatever kind, whether real, personal, or mixed, and things in action, and every right, privilege, interest, and asset of any conceivable value or benefit then existing, or pertaining to it, or which would inure to it, shall immediately by operation of law, and without any conveyance or transfer, and without any further act or deed, remain and be vested in and continue and be the property of the federal association into which the state association has converted itself. The federal association shall have, hold, and enjoy the same, in its own right, as fully and to the same extent as the same was possessed, held, and enjoyed by the converting association. The federal association, as of the time of the taking effect of the conversion, shall continue to have and succeed to all the rights, obligations, and relations of the converting association.
- All pending actions and other judicial proceedings to which the converting state association is a party shall not be deemed to have abated or to have been discontinued by reason of the conversion, but may be prosecuted to final judgment, order, or decree in the same manner as if the conversion into the federal association had not been made. The federal association resulting from the conversion may continue the action in its corporate name as a federal association, and any judgment, order, or decree may be rendered for or against it which might have been rendered for or against the converting state association theretofore involved in the judicial proceedings.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 50; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1850.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
U.S. Code. Section 5 of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1464.
23-37-702. Conversion of federal association into state association.
- Upon the approval of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], or other applicable federal authority, any federal association may convert itself into an association under this chapter upon a majority vote of the members of the federal association cast at an annual meeting or any special meeting called to consider that action.
- Copies of the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of members, verified by affidavit of the secretary, shall be filed in the office of the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations. The verified copies of the proceedings of the meeting when so filed shall be presumptive evidence of the holding and action of the meeting.
-
- At the meeting at which conversion is voted upon, the members shall approve bylaws and adopt articles of incorporation and elect the directors who shall be the directors of the state-chartered association after conversion takes effect, provided that the terms and conditions of a conversion may provide for the directors of the federal association to serve as directors of the converted state-chartered association.
- Copies of the bylaws and articles of incorporation adopted at the meeting, verified by affidavit of the secretary, shall be filed with the office of the supervisor.
-
- If the bylaws and articles of incorporation are in conformity with the provisions of this chapter, and if a consent or acquiescence in the conversion by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished] or other applicable authority is filed with the supervisor, he or she shall endorse his or her approval on the articles of incorporation together with the following statement:
- Upon the supervisor's endorsement of approval, the former federal association shall be an association incorporated under the provisions of this chapter as a direct successor to the federal association.
- All the provisions regarding property and other rights contained in § 23-37-701 shall apply, in reverse order, to the conversion of a federal association into an association incorporated under this chapter so that the state-chartered association shall be a continuation of the corporate entity of the converting federal association and continue to have all of its property and rights.
“This association is incorporated by conversion from a federal savings and loan association.”
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 51; 1973, No. 292, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1851.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
23-37-703. Conversion of mutual association into stock association.
- With the approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], any mutual association may convert into a stock association under this chapter upon a majority vote of the members of the mutual association at an annual or any special meeting called to consider that action.
-
Prior to the meeting of the members to consider conversion from a mutual association to a stock association, the board of directors of the mutual association shall file with the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations a petition for authority to convert, which shall set forth:
- The proposed bylaws and articles of incorporation of the stock association;
- The details of the plan for conversion;
- The form of the notice that will be given to members of the mutual association of the meeting to consider conversion and the time and manner in which the notice will be given;
- The preemptive rights to subscribe to permanent capital stock in the stock association that will be granted to members;
- The manner in which permanent capital stock in the stock association will be sold and distributed;
- The manner of computing the interest of each member in the general and special reserves of the mutual association; and
- Any other information applicable to the conversion which the supervisor may by rule prescribe.
-
Upon the filing of a petition for authority to convert from a mutual association to a stock association, the board shall hold a hearing on the petition and shall issue its certificate of preliminary approval, if the board finds:
- The plan for conversion proposed in the petition is fair and equitable to the members of the mutual association;
- The notice to the members of the meeting to consider the plan of conversion fairly sets out the rights and obligations of the members under the plan;
- Under the plan for conversion, each member of the association is given the right to subscribe on a pro rata basis to his or her interest in the mutual association to stock in the resultant stock association, provided, fractional shares shall not be required to be issued;
- The plan of conversion makes adequate provision for the payment to each member of his or her pro rata interest in any excess special or general reserves of the mutual association;
- The conversion to a stock association will not impair the mutual association's financial condition or its ability to pay withdrawals of savings accounts or other creditors;
- The converted stock association would meet the requirements under this chapter for the granting of an original certificate of incorporation to a stock association under this chapter; and
- Not more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the outstanding permanent stock of the converted association, upon conversion, will be owned directly or beneficially by any one (1) individual.
-
- Upon receipt of a certificate of preliminary approval, the board of directors of the mutual association shall call a meeting of the members to consider the plan of conversion.
- Notice of the meeting shall be given in the form and manner prescribed by the order of the board.
- A copy of the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the members, and copies of the articles of incorporation and bylaws adopted by the members, verified by the affidavit of the secretary of the association, shall be filed in the office of the supervisor and shall be presumptive evidence of the holding and actions of the meeting.
-
- Upon the filing of the documents and the receipt of evidence satisfactory to the supervisor that the plan of conversion approved by the board has been implemented, the supervisor shall endorse his or her approval on the articles of incorporation of the proposed stock association, whereupon the stock association shall become and be deemed to be a stock association under this chapter.
- A copy of the articles of incorporation, bearing the endorsement of approval by the supervisor, shall be filed with the Secretary of State and with the county clerk of the county in which the home office of the association is located.
- Upon the conversion from a mutual association to a stock association, the corporate existence of the association shall not terminate, but the stock association shall be deemed to be a continuation of the entity of the former mutual association. All the provisions regarding property and other rights contained in § 23-37-701 shall apply to the conversion of a mutual association to a stock association so that the stock association shall be a continuation of the corporate entity of the former mutual association and continue to have all of its property and rights.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 52; 1973, No. 292, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1852; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2498.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (b)(7).
23-37-704. Contemporaneous conversion from federal mutual to state stock association.
- A federal association may file with the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] a joint petition for authority to convert from a federal association to a state-chartered association and contemporaneously to convert from a mutual association to a stock association.
- Pursuant to the provisions of § 23-37-703, the board may hold a hearing on the petition and issue its certificate of preliminary approval to a contemporaneous conversion from a federal association to a state-chartered stock association.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 52; 1973, No. 292, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1852.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-705. Reorganization, merger, consolidation, or sale of assets.
- Pursuant to a plan adopted by the board of directors and approved by the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] as being equitable to the members or stockholders of the association and as not impairing the usefulness and success of other properly conducted associations in the vicinity, an association shall have power to reorganize, or to merge or consolidate with, or to sell all or a portion of its assets to another association or a federal association.
- The plan of reorganization, merger or consolidation, or sale shall be approved by a majority vote of the members or stockholders of the affected associations cast at an annual meeting or at any special meeting called to consider such an action.
- In all cases, the corporate continuity of the resulting corporation shall possess the same incidents as that of an association which has converted in accordance with this chapter.
History. Acts 1963, No. 227, § 53; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1853.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Case Notes
Consent of Shareholders.
A merger without consent of shareholders holding majority of shares in each contracting association is void. El Dorado Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Union Sav. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 189 Ark. 858, 75 S.W.2d 399 (1934) (decision under prior law).
23-37-706. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] as receiver.
- The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] is authorized and empowered to act, without bond, as receiver or liquidator of any building and loan or savings and loan association, hereinafter referred to as an “insured association”, which has the insurance protection provided by Title IV of the National Housing Act and which shall have been taken over for liquidation pursuant to the provisions of the laws of this state.
-
- The appropriate state authority having the right to appoint a receiver or liquidator of the insured association, in the event of the taking over of the insured association for liquidation, shall tender to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] the appointment as receiver or liquidator thereof, and, if the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] accepts the appointment, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] shall have and possess all the powers and privileges provided by the laws of this state with respect to a receiver or liquidator of a savings and loan association, its investors, depositors, and other creditors and shall be subject to all duties of a receiver or liquidator.
- In addition, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] shall have all the rights, privileges, and powers conferred upon it by federal statutes.
- The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] may make loans on the security of, or may purchase at public or private sale, and bid at any receiver's sale, and liquidate or sell, any part of the assets of the association of which it is the receiver, and, in the event of the purchase of the assets, it shall bid for and pay a fair and reasonable price.
- Whether or not the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] shall serve as receiver or liquidator of an insured association, whenever it shall pay or make available for payment the liabilities of an insured association in liquidation which are insured by it, it shall be subrogated, upon the surrender and transfer to it of any share, share account, or account insured by it with respect to that share, share account, or account. However, the surrender and transfer of the share account or account shall not affect any right which the transferor thereof may have in any portion of the share, share account, or account which is uninsured or any right to participate in the distribution of the net proceeds remaining from the disposition of the assets of the insured association. The rights of the investors in, and creditors of, the insured association shall be determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of the laws of this state.
- Upon the acceptance by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] of appointment as a receiver or liquidator, possession of, and title to, all the assets, business, and property of the insured association of every kind and nature shall pass to, and be vested in, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished] as receiver or liquidator.
History. Acts 1939, No. 343, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-857.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
U.S. Code. Title IV of the National Housing Act, referred to in this section, was codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1724 et seq. [repealed].
Case Notes
Cited: Guaranty Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd., 794 F.2d 1339 (8th Cir. 1986).
Subchapter 8 — Regional Savings and Loan Act of 1987
A.C.R.C. Notes. References to “this chapter” in the text of subchapters 1-7 of this chapter may not apply to this subchapter which was enacted subsequently.
Effective Dates. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 13: July 1, 1987.
23-37-801. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Regional Savings and Loan Act of 1987”.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 1.
23-37-802. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
“Acquire”, as applied to an association or a savings and loan holding company, means any of the following actions or transactions:
- The merger or consolidation of an association with another association or with a savings and loan holding company;
- The acquisition of the direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of another association or savings and loan holding company if, after the acquisition, the acquiring association or savings and loan holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than ten percent (10%) of any class of voting shares of the acquired association or savings and loan holding company;
- The direct or indirect acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of another association or savings and loan holding company; or
- The taking of any other action that would result in the direct or indirect control of another association or savings and loan holding company;
-
“Arkansas association” means an association organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas or under the laws of the United States and which:
- Has its principal place of business in Arkansas;
- If controlled by an organization, the organization is either an Arkansas association, southern region association, Arkansas savings and loan holding company, or a southern region savings and loan holding company; and
- Has more than eighty percent (80%) of its total deposits, other than deposits located in branch offices pursuant to § 23-37-811(a), in its branch offices located in one (1) or more of the southern region states;
-
“Arkansas savings and loan holding company” means a savings and loan holding company which has:
- Its principal place of business in Arkansas;
- Total deposits of its southern region association subsidiaries and Arkansas association subsidiaries that exceed eighty percent (80%) of the total deposits of all association subsidiaries of the savings and loan holding company other than those association subsidiaries held under § 23-37-811(a);
- “Association” means a mutual or capital stock savings and loan association, savings association, building and loan association, or savings bank chartered under the laws of any one of the states or by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], pursuant to the Home Owner's Loan Act of 1933, and whose deposits are eligible to be insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation [abolished];
- “Board” means the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished];
-
“Branch office” means any office at which an association accepts deposits. The term “branch office” does not include:
- Unmanned automatic teller machines, point-of-sale terminals, or similar unmanned electronic banking facilities at which deposits may be accepted;
- Offices located outside the United States; and
- Loan production offices, representative offices, service corporation offices, or other offices at which deposits are not accepted;
- “Company” means any company under the Savings and Loan Holding Company Amendments of 1967;
- “Control” means that which is set forth in the Savings and Loan Holding Company Amendments of 1967;
- “Deposits” means, with respect to an association, withdrawable or repurchaseable shares, investment certificates, deposits, or other savings accounts in an association held by individuals, partnerships, corporations, the United States Government, states and political subdivisions of the United States, and other entities, exclusive of deposits by foreign governments and foreign official institutions, and by other associations. Determination of deposits must be made by reference to regulatory reports of condition or similar reports filed by the association with applicable state or federal regulatory authorities;
- “Federal association” means an association chartered by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished] pursuant to § 5 of the Home Owner's Loan Act of 1933;
- “Principal place of business” of an association means the state in which the aggregate deposits of the association are the largest. For the purposes of this section, the principal place of business of a savings and loan holding company is the state where the aggregate deposits of the association subsidiaries of the holding company are the largest;
- “Savings and loan holding company” means that which is set forth in the Savings and Loan Holding Company Amendments of 1967;
- “Service corporation” means any corporation, the majority of the capital stock of which is owned by one (1) or more associations and which engages, directly or indirectly, in any activities similar to activities which may be engaged in by a service corporation in which an association may invest under the laws of one (1) of the states or under the laws of the United States;
-
“Southern region association” means an association other than an Arkansas association organized under the laws of one (1) of the southern region states or under the laws of the United States and which:
- Has its principal place of business only in a southern region state other than Arkansas;
- If controlled by an organization, the organization is either a southern region association or a southern region savings and loan holding company; and
- Has more than eighty percent (80%) of its total deposits other than deposits located in branch offices pursuant to § 23-37-811(a) in its branch offices located in one (1) or more of the southern region states;
-
“Southern region savings and loan holding company” means a savings and loan holding company which has:
- Its principal place of business in a southern region state other than Arkansas;
- Total deposits of its southern region association subsidiaries and Arkansas association subsidiaries that exceed eighty percent (80%) of the total deposits of all association subsidiaries of the savings and loan holding company other than those association subsidiaries held under § 23-37-811(a);
- “Southern region states” means the states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and the District of Columbia;
- “State” means any one (1) of the states of the Union or the District of Columbia;
- “State association” means an association organized under the laws of one (1) of the states; and
- “Subsidiary” means that which is set forth in the Savings and Loan Holding Company Amendments of 1967.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 2; 1987, No. 825, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section were abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entities have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
U.S. Code. The Home Owner's Loan Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1461 et seq. The Savings and Loan Holding Company Amendments of 1967 were codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1730a [repealed].
23-37-803. Penalties and remedies.
- In the event any association or savings and loan holding company consummates an acquisition that is prohibited by this subchapter, the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] shall require the association or savings and loan holding company to divest itself within two (2) years of its direct or indirect ownership or control of all Arkansas associations or Arkansas savings and loan holding companies.
- The board shall have the power to enforce the prohibitions contained in these sections through the imposition of fines and penalties, the issuance of cease and desist orders, and such other remedies as are provided by law.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 11.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-804. Acts requiring prior approval of the board.
With the prior approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] in accordance with § 23-37-807(a) and upon receipt of approval from all other applicable state and federal regulatory authorities having approval authority over the transaction:
- A company may become an Arkansas savings and loan holding company;
-
An Arkansas savings and loan holding company may acquire:
- An Arkansas association or other Arkansas savings and loan holding company;
- A southern region association or a southern region savings and loan holding company; and
- An association or savings and loan holding company having association offices which are located outside of the southern region as authorized under § 23-37-811(a);
- A southern region savings and loan holding company may acquire a southern region savings and loan holding company having an Arkansas association subsidiary;
- An Arkansas state association may acquire a southern region association; and
- A southern region association may acquire an Arkansas state association.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-805. Acts requiring prior approval of federal authorities.
With the prior approval of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished] and other applicable federal authorities in accordance with their approval authority over the transaction and without the necessary approval of the board except for the requirements under § 23-37-810:
- An Arkansas federal association may acquire a southern region association; and
- A southern region association may acquire an Arkansas federal association.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 4.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
The Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
23-37-806. Savings and loan holding company acquisitions not requiring prior approval.
-
Without any prior approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished], a southern region savings and loan holding company having an Arkansas association subsidiary may acquire:
- A southern region savings and loan holding company that does not have an Arkansas association subsidiary;
- A southern region association that does not have any branch offices in Arkansas; or
- To the extent authorized in § 23-37-811(a), an association or savings and loan holding company having association offices which are located outside the southern region.
- The southern region savings and loan holding company shall notify the board at least thirty (30) days prior to the consummation of the proposed transaction. The notification requirements of this section are satisfied by furnishing the board with a copy of the completed application seeking approval for the proposed transaction which is filed with the federal savings and loan regulatory authority.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 5.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-807. Applications to the board for approval.
-
Whenever an application is filed as required under § 23-37-806, or if approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] pursuant to this section is required under § 23-37-810, the board shall approve the transaction if it is otherwise approved as required by applicable laws, and if, in addition:
- The laws of the state in which the southern region association or southern region savings and loan holding company, as applicable, filing the application has its principal place of business permit Arkansas associations and Arkansas savings and loan holding companies, as applicable, to acquire associations and savings and loan holding companies in that state;
- Under the laws of the state where it has its principal place of business, the southern region association or southern region savings and loan holding company filing the application could be acquired by the Arkansas association or Arkansas savings and loan holding company, as applicable; and
- Each Arkansas association sought to be acquired directly or indirectly in the proposed transaction has been in existence and continuously operated as an association for a period of five (5) years or more prior to the date the application for approval of the transaction was filed with the board. This requirement does not prohibit a southern region association or southern region savings and loan holding company from acquiring all or substantially all of the ownership of an Arkansas association organized solely for the purpose of facilitating the acquisition of an Arkansas association in existence and continuously operated as an association for the requisite five-year period.
- The board shall rule on any application requiring approval under this section not later than ninety (90) days following the date of acceptance of a completed application seeking approval of the proposed transaction. If the board fails to rule on the application within the requisite ninety-day period, the proposed transaction is approved.
- The applicant is entitled to notice and a hearing contesting the denial by the board of any application.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 6.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
23-37-808. Permissible nondisqualified acquisitions.
A southern region association, a southern region savings and loan holding company, an Arkansas association, or an Arkansas savings and loan holding company may acquire or control, and does not cease to be a southern region association, a southern region savings and loan holding company, an Arkansas association, or Arkansas savings and loan holding company, respectively, by virtue of its acquisition or control of an association or savings and loan holding company other than as expressly permissible under §§ 23-37-806 and 23-37-807 if:
- Immediately following the consummation of the acquisition, the Arkansas association, Arkansas savings and loan holding company, southern region association, or southern region savings and loan holding company qualifies as such; and
- The association or savings and loan holding company making the application complies with the approval and notification requirements in §§ 23-37-806 and 23-37-807.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 7.
23-37-809. Prohibited acquisitions.
- Except as specifically permitted under § 23-37-812, no Arkansas association, Arkansas savings and loan holding company, southern region association, or southern region savings and loan holding company having an Arkansas association subsidiary may acquire an association or savings and loan holding company which is not either an Arkansas savings and loan holding company or a southern region savings and loan holding company or an association which is not either an Arkansas association or a southern region association.
- Except as expressly permitted by federal law, no association which is not either an Arkansas association or a southern region association and no savings and loan holding company which is not either an Arkansas savings and loan holding company or a southern region savings and loan holding company may acquire an Arkansas association, an Arkansas savings and loan holding company, or a southern region savings and loan holding company controlling an Arkansas association.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 8.
23-37-810. Acquirer of an Arkansas association or Arkansas savings and loan holding company subject to Arkansas laws.
Any southern region association or southern region savings and loan holding company which directly or indirectly acquires an Arkansas association or an Arkansas savings and loan holding company is subject to all the laws of this state relating to the acquisition, ownership, expansion, and operation of Arkansas associations and Arkansas savings and loan holding companies.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 9.
23-37-811. Registration of association — Reports — Rules.
- Each Arkansas association, Arkansas savings and loan holding company, southern region association controlling an Arkansas association, and southern region savings and loan holding company controlling an Arkansas association which engages in a transaction which requires approval of the Savings and Loan Association Board [abolished] pursuant to § 23-37-807 shall, within thirty (30) days after approval of the transaction, initially register and file annually with the board forms prescribed by the board. These forms shall include such information with respect to the financial condition and operations, management, and relations between applicable associations and savings and loan holding companies, and related matters, as the board may consider necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of these sections.
- To the extent authorized by law, the board may make examinations of each association or savings and loan holding company required to be registered pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and any service corporation of the association, the cost of which must be assessed against and paid by the association.
- The board may enter into cooperative and reciprocal agreements with the association and savings and loan holding company regulatory authorities of any state or of the United States for the periodic examination of associations and savings and loan holding companies that are required to be registered under the provisions of subsection (a) of this section and may accept reports of examinations and other records from the authorities in lieu of conducting its own examinations.
- The board may establish rules to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 10; 2019, No. 315, § 2499.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Savings and Loan Association Board referred to in this section was repealed by Acts 1997, No. 258, and its powers and duties were given to the Supervisor of Savings and Loan Associations.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (d).
23-37-812. Determination of total deposits.
For purposes of this subchapter, the total deposits of savings and loan associations within the region shall be determined by reference to the records of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board [abolished], Washington D.C.
History. Acts 1987, No. 45, § 13.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Chapter 38 Building and Loan Associations — Miscellaneous Provisions
Publisher's Notes. Chapter 37 of this title contains provisions governing savings and loan associations and building and loan associations. Pursuant to § 23-37-102, the provisions of Acts 1963, No. 227, which constitute the majority of chapter 37, would control over any provisions of this chapter which are inconsistent therewith.
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
23-38-101, 23-38-102. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 4. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-38-101. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 4a, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 1; 1929, No. 128, §§ 5-7; 1931, No. 236, §§ 2, 3; Pope's Dig., §§ 979-982; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-801 — 67-804.
23-38-102. Acts 1929, No. 128, §§ 28, 29; 1931, No. 236, § 13; Pope's Dig., §§ 1005, 1006; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-842, 67-843; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 150.
Subchapter 2 — Organization and Operation
23-38-201 — 23-38-220. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 4. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-38-201. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 13; Pope's Dig., § 989; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-816.
23-38-202. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 15; Pope's Dig., § 991; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-822.
23-38-203. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 9; Pope's Dig., § 984; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-819.
23-38-204. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 983; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-818.
23-38-205. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 19; 1931, No. 236, § 10; Pope's Dig., § 995; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-811.
23-38-206. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 14; Pope's Dig., § 990; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-817.
23-38-207. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 27a, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 12; Pope's Dig., § 1004; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-814.
23-38-208. Acts 1933, No. 54, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 1036; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-825.
23-38-209. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 44, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 17; Pope's Dig., § 1021; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-826.
23-38-210. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 11; 1931, No. 60, § 1; 1935, No. 40, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 985; Acts 1939, No. 343, § 2; 1955, No. 149, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-830.
23-38-211. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 11a, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 986; Acts 1955, No. 149, § 3; 1961, No. 73, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-831.
23-38-212. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 37; Pope's Dig., § 1015; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-833.
23-38-213. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 33; Pope's Dig., § 1010; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-834.
23-38-214. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 34; 1931, No. 236, § 14; Pope's Dig., § 1011; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-835.
23-38-215. Acts 1933, No. 54, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 1038; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-838.
23-38-216. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 40; Pope's Dig., § 1018; Acts 1939, No. 169, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-836.
23-38-217. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 34a, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 15; Pope's Dig., § 1012; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-837.
23-38-218. Acts 1935, No. 128, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 1043; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-847.
23-38-219. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 11, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1028; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-839.
23-38-220. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 32; Pope's Dig., § 1009; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-863.
Subchapter 3 — Liquidation
23-38-301 — 23-38-307. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 4. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-38-301. Acts 1933, No. 54, § 1; Pope's Dig., § 1035; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-848.
23-38-302. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 23; Pope's Dig., § 999; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-849.
23-38-303. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 24; 1931, No. 236, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 1000; Acts 1985, No. 1043, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-850.
23-38-304. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 24; 1931, No. 236, § 11; Pope's Dig., § 1000; Acts 1985, No. 1043, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-850.
23-38-305. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 10, §§ 1-4, 6; Pope's Dig., §§ 1029-1032, 1034; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-851 — 67-854, 67-856.
23-38-306. Acts 1932 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 10, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 1033; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-855.
23-38-307. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 11c, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 987; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-832.
Subchapter 4 — Prohibited Practices
23-38-401 — 23-38-404. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter was repealed by Acts 2013, No. 1144, § 4. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-38-401. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 43, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 16; Pope's Dig., § 1020; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-864.
23-38-402. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 31; Pope's Dig., § 1008; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-865; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 151.
23-38-403. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 45, as added by Acts 1931, No. 236, § 18; Pope's Dig., § 1022; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-866; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 434.
23-38-404. Acts 1929, No. 128, § 30; Pope's Dig., § 1007; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-867; Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 445.
Chapter 39 Mortgage Loan Companies and Loan Brokers
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
23-39-101 — 23-39-105. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter, concerning general provisions, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 554, § 2. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-39-101. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2201.
23-39-102. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 2; 1981, No. 225, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2202; Acts 1993, No. 437, § 1.
23-39-103. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2222.
23-39-104. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2220.
23-39-105. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2221.
Subchapter 2 — Supervision
23-39-201 — 23-39-206. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter, concerning supervision, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 554, § 2. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-39-201. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2209.
23-39-202. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2215.
23-39-203. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2210.
23-39-204. Acts 1977, No. 806, §§ 11-13; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-2211 — 67-2213.
23-39-205. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 23; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2223.
23-39-206. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2216.
Subchapter 3 — Registration and Operation
23-39-301 — 23-39-309. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This subchapter, concerning registration and operation, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 554, § 4. The subchapter was derived from the following sources:
23-39-301. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2219.
23-39-302. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 3; 1981, No. 225, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2203.
23-39-303. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 4; 1981, No. 225, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2204.
23-39-304. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2206; Acts 1999, No. 362, § 1.
23-39-305. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 7; 1985, No. 932, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2207.
23-39-306. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 5; 1979, No. 673, § 1; 1983, No. 792, § 1; 1985, No. 932, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2205; Acts 1987, No. 446, § 1; 1995, No. 785, § 1; 1997, No. 537, § 1; 1999, No. 362, § 2.
23-39-307. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2208; Acts 1999, No. 362, § 3.
23-39-308. Acts 1977, No. 806, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-2214.
23-39-309. Acts 1977, No. 806, §§ 17, 18; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-2217, 67-2218; Acts 1999, No. 362, § 4.
Subchapter 4 — Prohibition of Advance Fee Loan Brokerage
23-39-401. Definitions.
For purposes of this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Advance fee” means any consideration which is assessed or collected prior to the closing of a loan by a loan broker;
- “Affiliate” means any person who, directly or indirectly, through one (1) or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person;
- “Borrower” means a person obtaining or desiring to obtain a loan of money, a credit card, or a line of credit;
- “Closing of a loan” means completion of the final steps of the transaction, except for the payment of consideration for loan services provided, whereby the borrower has full access to and use of the benefits of the loan of money, a credit card, or a line of credit;
-
-
“Loan broker” means any person not exempt under subdivision (5)(B) of this section who:
- For or in expectation of consideration arranges, attempts to arrange, or offers to fund a loan of money, a credit card, or a line of credit;
- For or in expectation of consideration assists or advises a borrower in obtaining or attempting to obtain a loan of money, a credit card, a line of credit, or related guarantee, enhancement, or collateral of any kind or nature;
- Acts for or on behalf of a loan broker for the purpose of soliciting borrowers; or
- Holds himself or herself out as a loan broker.
-
The following persons or entities shall not be considered loan brokers under subdivision (5)(A) of this section:
-
If licensed by and subject to regulation or supervision of any agency, commission, or department of the United States or of the State of Arkansas, and if engaged in the permitted activity granted pursuant to their license, permit, or registration or with express written authority for the activity from the regulatory or supervising agency:
- Bank;
- Savings and loan association;
- Trust company;
- Credit union;
- Investment company;
- Industrial loan company;
- Securities broker-dealer, agent, or investment adviser;
- Real estate broker or sales associate;
- Attorney;
- Federal Housing Administration or Department of Veterans Affairs approved lender;
- Credit card company;
- Mortgage loan company;
- Mortgage loan broker;
- Public utility;
- Insurance company or agent; or
- Motor vehicle manufacturer or dealer;
- Subsidiaries of licensed or chartered consumer loan companies, banks, or savings and loan associations are not loan brokers;
- A person extending or arranging credit, or offering to extend or arrange credit, to a partnership or corporation exclusively for commercial or business purposes;
- A depository financial institution chartered or licensed by an agency, commission, or department of another state, if the funds on deposit with the institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
- An affiliate of a person listed in subdivision (5)(B)(iii) of this section; or
- A bona fide seller or lessor of goods, services, or interests in real estate in a transaction in which the seller or lessor extends, arranges, or offers to extend or arrange credit that is to be used exclusively for financing the purchase or lease or for services performed by an independent third party directly related to the purchase or lease. A transaction shall not be exempt under this subdivision (5)(B)(vi) if the purchaser or lessee receives, or is to receive, a cash advance or consolidation loan in addition to the financing; and
-
If licensed by and subject to regulation or supervision of any agency, commission, or department of the United States or of the State of Arkansas, and if engaged in the permitted activity granted pursuant to their license, permit, or registration or with express written authority for the activity from the regulatory or supervising agency:
-
“Loan broker” means any person not exempt under subdivision (5)(B) of this section who:
- “Principal” means any officer, director, partner, joint venturer, branch manager, or other person with similar managerial or supervisory responsibilities for a loan broker.
History. Acts 1993, No. 140, § 1; 1995, No. 598, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. As originally enacted by Acts 1993, No. 140, this section began:
“The definitions set forth in this provision are for purposes of this Act and are not intended to alter the definitions which apply to the Mortgage Loan Company and Loan Broker Act as set forth in Arkansas Code § 23-39-102.”
Case Notes
Loan Broker.
The definition of “loan broker” does not alter any definitions which apply to the Mortgage Loan Company and Loan Broker Act. Hicks v. Madden, 322 Ark. 223, 908 S.W.2d 90 (1995).
23-39-402. Nonexclusive remedy.
Nothing in this subchapter limits the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.
History. Acts 1993, No. 140, § 5.
23-39-403. Liability of loan broker's principal.
A principal of a loan broker shall be liable under this subchapter to the same extent as the loan broker himself or herself for any actions on behalf of the loan broker, or the loan broker's agents or employees, which violate this subchapter.
History. Acts 1993, No. 140, § 3.
23-39-404. Prohibited acts.
It shall be unlawful for a loan broker to:
- Assess or collect an advance fee from a borrower to provide services as a loan broker; or
- Make or use unfair, false, misleading, or deceptive representations or to omit any material fact in the offer or sale of the services of a loan broker, or to engage, directly or indirectly, in any act that operates or would operate as an unfair, false, misleading, or deceptive representation in his or her business dealings.
History. Acts 1993, No. 140, § 2.
23-39-405. Remedies and penalties.
-
- A violation of any of the provisions of this subchapter shall constitute an unfair or deceptive act or practice as defined by the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, § 4-88-101 et seq.
- All remedies, penalties, and authority granted to the Attorney General under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, § 4-88-101 et seq., shall be available to him or her for the enforcement of this subchapter.
- In any action brought by the Attorney General pursuant to this subsection, the Attorney General may also recover on behalf of borrowers the amounts specified under subsection (b) of this section.
-
- A borrower may bring an action against the loan broker, its principals, employees, or agents, and against the surety bond, or trust account, if any, of the loan broker as a result of a violation of this subchapter.
-
The action shall be brought in the county in which the solicitation was made, and the court shall award:
- An amount of three (3) times the amount paid by the borrower for the loan services or one thousand dollars ($1,000), whichever is greater;
- Incidental and consequential damages; and
- Costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
- A permanent injunction, judgment, or order of the court obtained by the Attorney General pursuant to this section shall be prima facie evidence in an action brought under this section that the defendant used or employed a method, act, or practice declared unlawful by this subchapter.
- A person bringing an action under this section shall bring the action within one (1) year after any action brought by the Attorney General has been terminated or two (2) years after the violation occurred, whichever is later.
-
- Any person who knowingly commits a practice defined as unlawful by this subchapter shall be guilty of a Class D felony and, upon conviction in the circuit court of any county in this state in which any portion of the unlawful practice occurred, shall be subject to punishment accordingly.
- If the person is a corporation, the penalties of this subsection also apply to a director, officer, or individual agent of a corporation who knowingly authorizes, orders, or performs an act in violation of this subchapter without regard to penalties imposed on the corporation.
History. Acts 1993, No. 140, § 4; 1995, No. 598, § 2.
Subchapter 5 — Fair Mortgage Lending Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 5: January 1, 2004.
Acts 2003 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 26, § 3: Dec. 31, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that as a result of the Arkansas Supreme Court decision, Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 351 Ark. 31, 91 S.W.3d 472 (2002), additional revenue is necessary for the improvement of public schools, to provide all Arkansas children an adequate education, and to equalize funding for schools and teachers; that without additional revenue, the state will be unable to fulfill its constitutional duty to provide an adequate and equitable education to Arkansas children; that certain unintended and unnecessary restrictions on commercial lending in the state will occur as a result of the passage of Act 554 of the 84th General Assembly, Regular Session, which becomes effective January 1, 2004, and such unintended and unnecessary restrictions will slow the growth of and constrict the economy of the state, and thus reduce state revenues, and that this act is immediately necessary as it will avoid reduction of needed revenue for the support and improvement of public schools. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2005, No. 1679, § 5: Apr. 5, 2005. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the requirement of three (3) years' experience for branch managers and their on-site physical presence at the branch for which they are designated as manager creates a hardship resulting in the lack of ability of some companies to become licensed in this state; and that this act is immediately necessary because the provisions of this act relaxing these requirements will increase the ability of companies to effectively manage their branch offices. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-39-501. Title.
This subchapter may be referred to as the “Fair Mortgage Lending Act”.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2003 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, Fair Mortgage Lending Act, 26 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 479.
23-39-502. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Applicant” means a person that has applied to become licensed under this subchapter as a loan officer, transitional loan officer, mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
- “Branch manager” means the individual who is in charge of the business operations of one (1) or more branch offices of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
-
“Branch office” means a location that is separate and distinct from the licensee's principal place of business and includes a net branch or any location from which business is conducted under the license or in the name of the mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer:
- The address of which appears on business cards, stationery, or advertising used by the licensee in connection with business conducted under this subchapter at the branch office;
- At which the licensee's name, advertising, promotional materials, or signage suggests that mortgage loans are originated, solicited, accepted, negotiated, funded, or serviced or from which mortgage loan commitments or interest rate guarantee agreements are issued; or
- Which, due to the actions of any employee, associate, loan officer, or transitional loan officer of the licensee, may be construed by the public as a branch office of the licensee where mortgage loans are originated, solicited, accepted, negotiated, funded, or serviced or from which mortgage loan commitments or interest rate guarantee agreements are issued;
- “Commissioner” means the Securities Commissioner and includes the commissioner's designees;
-
- “Control” means the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of a company, whether through ownership of securities, by contract, or otherwise.
-
A person is presumed to control a company if the person:
- Is a director, general partner, or executive officer of the company;
- Directly or indirectly has the right to vote twenty-five percent (25%) or more of a class of a voting security of the company or has the power to sell or direct the sale of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of a class of voting securities of the company;
- In the case of a limited liability company, is a managing member of the limited liability company; or
- In the case of a partnership, has the right to receive upon dissolution or has contributed ten percent (10%) or more of the capital of the partnership;
- “Control affiliate” means a partnership, corporation, trust, limited liability company, or other organization that directly or indirectly controls or is controlled by the applicant;
- “Control person” means an individual who directly or indirectly exercises control over the applicant;
- “Employee” means an individual who is licensed with or employed by a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer, whether by employment contract, agency, or other arrangement and regardless of whether the individual is treated as an employee for purposes of compliance with the federal income tax laws;
-
- “Exempt person” means a person not required to be licensed as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer under this subchapter.
-
“Exempt person” includes any of the following:
- An employee of a licensee whose responsibilities are limited to clerical and administrative tasks for his or her employer and who does not solicit borrowers, accept applications, or negotiate the terms of loans on behalf of the employer;
- An agency or corporate instrumentality of the federal government or any state, county, or municipal government granting mortgage loans under specific authority of the laws of any state or of the United States;
- A trust company or industrial loan company chartered under the laws of Arkansas;
- A small-business investment corporation licensed under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. § 661 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011;
- A real estate investment trust as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 856, as it existed on January 1, 2011;
- A state or federally chartered bank, an operating subsidiary of a state-chartered bank regulated by the State Bank Department, a savings bank, a savings and loan association, or a credit union, the accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Administration;
- An agricultural loan organization that is subject to licensing, supervision, or auditing by the Farm Service Agency, Commodity Credit Corporation, Rural Development Housing and Community Facilities Programs, Farm Credit Administration, or the United States Department of Agriculture;
-
A nonprofit corporation that:
- Qualifies as a nonprofit entity under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
- Is not primarily in the business of soliciting or brokering mortgage loans; and
- Makes or services mortgage loans to promote home ownership or home improvements for the disadvantaged;
-
- A licensed real estate agent or broker who is performing those activities subject to the regulation of the Arkansas Real Estate Commission.
- Notwithstanding subdivision (9)(B)(ix)(a) of this section, “exempt person” does not include a real estate agent or broker who receives compensation of any kind in connection with the referral, placement, or origination of a mortgage loan;
-
A person who engages in seller-financed transactions or who as a seller of real property receives mortgages, deeds of trust, or other security instruments on real estate as security for a purchase money obligation if:
- The person does not receive from or hold on behalf of the borrower any funds for the payment of insurance or taxes on the real property; and
- The seller does not sell the liens or mortgages in the secondary market other than to affiliated or subsidiary persons;
-
An individual or husband and wife who provide funds for investment in loans secured by a lien on real property on his or her or their own account and who do not:
- Charge a fee or cause a fee to be paid for any service other than the normal and scheduled rates for escrow, title insurance, and recording services; and
- Collect funds to be used for the payment of any taxes or insurance premiums on the property securing the loans;
- An attorney licensed in Arkansas rendering legal services to his or her client, when the conduct that would subject the attorney to the jurisdiction of this subchapter is ancillary to the provision of the legal services offered;
- A person performing any act under order of any court;
- A person acting as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer for any person located in Arkansas, if the mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer has no office or employee in Arkansas and the real property that is the subject of the mortgage is located outside of Arkansas;
- An officer or employee of an exempt person described in subdivisions (9)(B)(ii)-(xiv) of this section if acting in the scope of employment for the exempt person; and
-
A manufactured or modular home retailer and its employees if:
- The manufactured or modular home retailer or its employees perform only administrative or clerical tasks on behalf of a person required to be licensed under this subchapter; or
-
The manufactured or modular home retailer and its employees:
- Do not receive compensation or financial gain for engaging in loan officer activities that exceeds the amount of compensation or financial gain that could be received in a comparable cash transaction for a manufactured home;
- Disclose to the consumer in writing any corporate affiliation with a mortgage banker;
- Provide referral information for at least one (1) unaffiliated creditor if the manufactured or modular home retailer has a corporate affiliation with a mortgage banker and the mortgage banker offers a recommendation; and
-
- Do not directly negotiate loan terms with the consumer or lender.
- As used in subdivision (9)(B)(xvi)(b)(4)(A) of this section, “loan terms” includes rates, fees, and other costs;
- Negotiates or offers to negotiate the terms or conditions of a mortgage loan; or
- Issues or offers to issue mortgage loan commitments or interest rate guarantee agreements to borrowers;
- “Licensee” means a loan officer, transitional loan officer, mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer that is licensed under this subchapter;
-
-
“Loan officer” means an individual other than an exempt person described in subdivision (9) of this section who in exchange for compensation as an employee of or who otherwise receives compensation or remuneration from a mortgage broker or a mortgage banker:
- Solicits or offers to solicit an application for a mortgage loan;
- Accepts or offers to accept an application for a mortgage loan;
- Negotiates or offers to negotiate the terms or conditions of a mortgage loan;
- Issues or offers to issue a mortgage loan commitment or interest rate guarantee agreement; or
- Provides or offers to provide modification of a mortgage loan.
-
“Loan officer” does not include:
- An individual who performs clerical or administrative tasks in the processing of a mortgage loan at the direction of and subject to the supervision and instruction of a licensed loan officer;
- An underwriter if the individual performs no activities under subdivision (11)(A) of this section; or
- An individual who is solely involved in extensions of credit relating to timeshare plans, as that term is defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(53D), as it existed on January 1, 2011;
-
“Loan officer” means an individual other than an exempt person described in subdivision (9) of this section who in exchange for compensation as an employee of or who otherwise receives compensation or remuneration from a mortgage broker or a mortgage banker:
- “Make a mortgage loan” means to close a mortgage loan, to advance funds, to offer to advance funds, or to make a commitment to advance funds to a borrower under a mortgage loan;
- “Managing principal” means a person who meets the requirements of § 23-39-508 and who agrees to be primarily responsible for the operations of a licensed mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
- “Mortgage banker” means a person who engages in the business of making mortgage loans for compensation or other gain;
-
“Mortgage broker” means a person who for compensation or other gain or in the expectation of compensation or other gain and, regardless of whether the acts are done directly or indirectly, through contact by telephone, by electronic means, by mail, or in person with the borrowers or potential borrowers:
- Accepts or offers to accept an application for a mortgage loan;
- Solicits or offers to solicit an application for a mortgage loan;
-
“Mortgage loan” means a loan primarily for personal, family, or household use that is secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, reverse mortgage, or other equivalent consensual security interest encumbering:
- A dwelling as defined in section 1602(w) of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011; or
- Residential real estate upon which is constructed or intended to be constructed a dwelling;
-
“Mortgage servicer” means a person that receives or has the right to receive from or on behalf of a borrower:
- Funds or credits in payment for a mortgage loan; or
- The taxes or insurance associated with a mortgage loan;
- “Operating subsidiary” means a separate corporation, limited liability company, or similar entity in which a national or state bank, savings and loan association, or credit union, the accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Administration, maintains more than fifty percent (50%) voting rights, a controlling interest, or otherwise controls the subsidiary and no other party controls more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting rights or a controlling interest in the subsidiary;
- “Person” means an individual, partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, corporation, association, or other group engaged in joint business activities, however organized;
- “Principal place of business” means a stationary construction consisting of at least one (1) enclosed room or building in which negotiations of mortgage loan transactions of others may be conducted in private or in which the primary business functions of the licensee are conducted;
- “Reverse mortgage” means a nonrecourse loan that pays a homeowner loan proceeds drawn from accumulated home equity;
- “Transitional loan officer” means an individual who, in exchange for compensation as an employee of, or who otherwise receives compensation or remuneration from, a mortgage broker or a mortgage banker, is authorized to act as a loan officer subject to a transitional loan officer license;
-
“Transitional loan officer license” means a license that:
- Is issued to an individual who is employed by a mortgage banker or mortgage broker licensed under this subchapter;
- Is limited to a term of no more than one hundred twenty (120) days; and
- Is not subject to reapplication, renewal, or extension by the commissioner; and
- “Unique identifier” means a number or other identifier assigned by protocols established by the automated licensing system approved by the commissioner.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 1; 2009, No. 731, §§ 1-5; 2011, No. 894, §§ 1-4; 2013, No. 1167, §§ 1-4; 2019, No. 200, §§ 1-8.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (9)(B), deleted (9)(B)(iv), (9)(B)(xiv), and (9)(B)(xvii), redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly, inserted “as it existed on January 1, 2009” in (9)(B)(iv) and (9)(B)(v), in (9)(B)(vii) substituted “Farm Service Agency” for “United States Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service” and “Rural Development Housing & Community Facilities Programs” for “Rural Housing Administration,” substituted “(9)(B)(ix)(a)” for “(9)(B)(x)(a) in (9)(B)(ix)(b), substituted “(9)(B)(ii)-(xiv)” for “(9)(B)(ii)-(xvi) in (9)(B)(xv), inserted (9)(B)(xvi); in (11), deleted “licensed under this subchapter” in (11)(A), inserted (11)(B)(iii), and redesignated the remaining text of (11)(B) accordingly; rewrote (16); deleted former (18), which defined “nonresidential mortgage loan”; added (21) and (22); and made related changes.
The 2011 amendment substituted “January 1, 2011” for “January 1, 2009” in (9)(B)(iv), (9)(B)(v), (11)(B)(iii), and (16)(A).
The 2013 amendment, in (9)(B)(vi), inserted “an operating subsidiary of a state-chartered bank regulated by the State Bank Department, a” and deleted “or any of their operating subsidiaries” from the end; substituted “An attorney licensed in Arkansas … provision of the legal services offered” for “at law rendering services in the performance of his or her duties as an attorney at law” in (9)(B)(xii); added (11)(A)(v); and inserted “or has the right to receive” in (17).
The 2019 amendment inserted “transitional loan officer” in (1), in (3)(C), in (9)(A), and in (10); substituted “twenty-five percent (25%)” for “ten percent (10%)” twice in (5)(B)(ii); rewrote (9)(B)(xvi); substituted “§ 23-39-508” for “§ 23-39-505” in (13); added (22) and (23); redesignated former (22) as (24); and made stylistic changes.
23-39-503. License required — Licensee records.
- It is unlawful for any person located in Arkansas other than an exempt person to act or attempt to act, directly or indirectly, as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, loan officer, transitional loan officer, or mortgage servicer without first obtaining a license from the Securities Commissioner under this subchapter.
- It is unlawful for any person other than an exempt person to act or attempt to act, directly or indirectly, as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, loan officer, transitional loan officer, or mortgage servicer with any person located in Arkansas without first obtaining a license from the commissioner under this subchapter.
- It is unlawful for any person other than an exempt person to employ, to compensate, or to appoint as its agent any person to act as a loan officer unless the loan officer is licensed as a loan officer or a transitional loan officer under this subchapter.
-
-
- The license of a loan officer terminates when the loan officer's employment by or relationship with a mortgage broker or mortgage banker licensed under this subchapter terminates.
- A transitional loan officer license terminates when the transitional loan officer's employment by or relationship with a mortgage broker or mortgage banker licensed under this subchapter terminates.
- When a loan officer or a transitional loan officer ceases to be employed by a mortgage broker or mortgage banker licensed under this subchapter or ceases to act as a loan officer or as a transitional loan officer, the mortgage broker or mortgage banker with which the person was affiliated or by which that person was employed shall notify the commissioner in writing within thirty (30) days from the date on which the loan officer or the transitional loan officer ceased to be employed or ceased activities as a loan officer or as a transitional loan officer.
-
- A licensee that does not comply with subdivision (d)(2) of this section shall pay a late fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for failure to timely notify the commissioner.
- The late fee may be waived, in whole or in part, at the sole discretion of the commissioner and for good cause shown.
- A loan officer or a transitional loan officer shall not be employed simultaneously by more than one (1) mortgage broker or mortgage banker licensed under this subchapter.
-
- Each mortgage broker and mortgage banker licensed under this subchapter shall maintain a list of all loan officers and all transitional loan officers employed by the mortgage broker or mortgage banker and who engage or attempt to engage in business with any person in Arkansas.
- No person other than an exempt person shall hold himself or herself out as a mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer unless the person is licensed in accordance with this subchapter.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2003 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 26, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 2; 2009, No. 731, § 6; 2019, No. 200, § 9.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment redesignated former (a)(1) as present (a); deleted (a)(2) and (a)(3); and rewrote (d)(2).
The 2009 amendment rewrote (d)(3)(A).
The 2019 amendment inserted “transitional loan officer” in (a) and (b); inserted “or a transitional loan officer” in (c) and (d)(4); rewrote (d)(1) and (2); inserted “and all transitional loan officers” in (e); and inserted “or transitional loan officer” in (f).
23-39-504. Rulemaking authority.
The Securities Commissioner may adopt any rules that he or she deems necessary to:
- Carry out the provisions of this subchapter;
- Provide for the protection of the borrowing public; and
- Provide any requirements necessary for the State of Arkansas to participate in a multistate automated licensing system; and
- Instruct mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, mortgage servicers, loan officers, and transitional loan officers in interpreting this subchapter.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 3; 2019, No. 200, § 10.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment added (3), redesignated former (3) as present (4), and made related changes.
The 2019 amendment substituted “loan officers, and transitional loan officers” for “and loan officers” in (4).
23-39-505. Qualifications for licensure — Issuance.
-
- A person desiring to obtain a license as a loan officer, transitional loan officer, mortgage banker, mortgage broker, or mortgage servicer shall make written application for licensure to the Securities Commissioner in the form prescribed by the commissioner.
- The commissioner may approve by rule or order a limited license with limitations, qualifications, or conditions.
- The application may require that the information be submitted in an electronic format.
-
In addition to any other information required under this subchapter or rules adopted by the commissioner, the application shall contain information the commissioner deems necessary and shall include the following:
- The applicant's name, address, and Social Security number;
-
The applicant's form of business and place of organization, including without limitation:
- A copy of the applicant's organizational and governance documents; and
- If the applicant is a foreign entity, a copy of the certificate of authority from the Secretary of State;
-
- The applicant's proposed method of and locations for doing business, if applicable.
- The applicant's proposed method of doing business shall include whether the applicant is proposing to be licensed as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
-
- The qualifications, business history, and financial condition of the applicant and a managing principal of the applicant.
-
The qualifications and business history of persons under subdivision (a)(4)(D)(i) of this section shall include:
- A description of an injunction or administrative order, including a denial to engage in a regulated activity by any state or federal authority that had jurisdiction over the applicant;
- A conviction of a misdemeanor involving fraudulent dealings or moral turpitude or relating to any aspect of the mortgage industry, the securities industry, the insurance industry, or any other activity pertaining to financial services;
- A felony conviction; and
- Fingerprints for submission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and any governmental agency or entity authorized to receive fingerprints for a state, national, and international criminal background check; and
- A disclosure of a beneficial interest in an affiliated industry business held by the applicant or by a principal, officer, director, or employee of the applicant.
-
In addition to meeting the requirements imposed by the commissioner under subsection (a) of this section, each individual applicant for licensure as a loan officer shall:
- Be at least eighteen (18) years of age;
-
- Have received a high school diploma or a high school equivalency diploma approved by the Adult Education Section.
- Subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section does not apply to an individual who is licensed as a loan officer on July 1, 2007;
- Have satisfactorily completed any educational and testing requirements as the commissioner may by rule or order impose; and
-
Furnish to the commissioner or through an automated licensing system, information concerning the applicant's identity and background, including:
- Fingerprints for submission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and any governmental agency or entity authorized to receive fingerprints for a state, national, and international criminal background check; and
-
Personal history and experience in a form prescribed by the automated licensing system and the commissioner, including the submission of authorization for the automated licensing system and the commissioner to obtain:
- An independent credit report from a consumer reporting agency described in section 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011; and
- Information related to any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding by a governmental jurisdiction.
-
Each applicant for licensure as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer shall comply with the following requirements at the time of application and at all times thereafter:
- If the applicant is a sole proprietor, the applicant shall have at least three (3) years of experience in mortgage lending or other experience or competency requirements as the commissioner may adopt by rule or order;
- If the applicant is a general or limited partnership, at least one (1) of its general partners shall have the experience as described in subdivision (c)(1) of this section;
- If the applicant is a corporation, at least one (1) of its principal officers shall have the experience as described in subdivision (c)(1) of this section; and
- If the applicant is a limited liability company, at least one (1) of its managers shall have the experience as described under subdivision (c)(1) of this section.
- Each applicant shall identify in its application one (1) person meeting the requirements of subsection (c) of this section to serve as the applicant's managing principal.
-
Each applicant for initial licensure shall pay a filing fee of:
- Seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) for the principal place of business of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
- One hundred dollars ($100) for each branch office of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer; and
- Fifty dollars ($50.00) for each loan officer.
-
-
Each mortgage broker, mortgage banker, and mortgage servicer shall post a surety bond in an amount:
- Based upon loan activity during the previous year;
- Not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); and
- As prescribed by rule or order of the commissioner.
- The surety bond shall be in a form satisfactory to the commissioner.
- Every bond shall provide for suit on the bond by any person who has a cause of action under this subchapter.
- The aggregate liability of the surety shall not exceed the principal sum of the bond.
- A surety bond shall cover claims for at least five (5) years after the licensee ceases to provide mortgage services in this state or longer if required by the commissioner.
-
Each mortgage broker, mortgage banker, and mortgage servicer shall post a surety bond in an amount:
-
An applicant filing for licensure as a mortgage banker or mortgage servicer shall file with the commissioner as part of his or her application audited financial statements that reflect that the applicant has a net worth of at least twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) and are:
- Prepared by an independent certified public accountant;
-
Prepared according to:
- Generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board; or
- International financial reporting standards promulgated by the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and the International Accounting Standards Board;
- Accompanied by an opinion acceptable to the commissioner; and
- Dated within fifteen (15) months preceding the date on which the application is filed.
- Any general partner, manager of a limited liability company, or officer of a corporation who individually meets the requirements under subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed to have met the qualifications for licensure as a loan officer upon filing a written application with the commissioner in the form prescribed by the commissioner and payment of the applicable fee.
- Each principal place of business and each branch office of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer licensed under this subchapter shall obtain a separate license.
-
Except as set forth in § 23-39-503(d), each license issued by the commissioner under this subchapter expires at the close of business on December 31 of the calendar year unless the license is:
- Previously surrendered by the licensee and the surrender is accepted by the commissioner;
- Abandoned by the licensee as provided in § 23-39-506;
- Suspended or revoked by the commissioner; or
-
Terminated if the temporary authority granted to a transitional loan officer has expired due to:
- The end of a one hundred twenty (120) day period; or
- The individual's having received a loan officer license under this subchapter.
- Licenses issued under this subchapter are not transferable.
-
- Control of a licensee shall not be acquired through a stock or equity purchase, transfer of interest, or other device without the prior written consent of the commissioner.
-
A person seeking to acquire control of a licensee, at least thirty (30) days before the proposed change of control, shall:
- Pay the commissioner a fee of one hundred dollars ($100);
-
Submit to the commissioner:
- The information required under subdivision (a)(4)(D) of this section;
- The proposed transaction documents; and
- Any other information deemed relevant by the commissioner; and
- Submit financial statements according to subsection (g) of this section, if a licensee holds a mortgage banker or mortgage servicer license.
- [Repealed.]
- The commissioner may refuse to give written consent if he or she finds that any of the grounds for denial, revocation, or suspension of a license under § 23-39-514 are applicable to the person seeking to acquire control of a license.
-
- Failure to notify the commissioner at least thirty (30) days before the proposed change of control shall result in a late fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
-
- An application filed with the commissioner may be withdrawn upon written request of the applicant delivered to the commissioner at any time before the granting of the license.
- However, if a notice of intent to deny the application has been sent to the applicant, the applicant shall not withdraw the application except upon the written direction of the commissioner.
-
- Unless a proceeding has been commenced to suspend or revoke the license, a license may be surrendered by a licensee by filing a written request to surrender the license in a form acceptable to the commissioner.
- The surrender of the license becomes effective upon acceptance by the commissioner.
-
Notwithstanding a surrender or termination of a license and acceptance of the surrender or termination by the commissioner, if a licensee or any person acting on behalf of the licensee has knowingly violated any provision of this subchapter or any rule or order promulgated or issued under this subchapter:
- A proceeding may be commenced at any time within one (1) year following the effective date of the surrender or termination of the license; and
- An order may be entered revoking the license as of a date before the acceptance of the surrender or termination of the license.
-
To issue a loan officer license, the commissioner shall find that:
-
The applicant has:
- Never had a loan officer license revoked in a governmental jurisdiction;
- [Repealed.]
- Demonstrated sufficient financial responsibility, character, and general fitness to command the confidence of the community and to warrant a determination that the loan officer will operate honestly, fairly, and efficiently within the purposes of this subchapter; and
- Complied with the prelicensing education and testing requirements of subdivision (b)(3) of this section; and
- The applicant's employer has met the surety bond requirement of subdivision (f)(1) of this section.
-
The applicant has:
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 4; 2009, No. 164, § 10; 2009, No. 731, §§ 7-17; 2011, No. 894, §§ 5-8; 2015, No. 1115, § 29; 2017, No. 669, §§ 1-3; 2019, No. 200, §§ 11-17; 2019, No. 910, § 2348.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 2009, No. 164, § 21, the amendment of § 23-39-505(g) by Acts 2009, No. 164, § 10, is superseded by the amendment of § 23-39-505(g) by Acts 2009, No. 731, § 13.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment added (b)(2); redesignated former (b)(2) as present (b)(3); substituted “Except as provided in § 23-39-517, each” for “Each” in (e); redesignated former (g) as present (g)(1); deleted “mortgage broker” following “banker” in (g)(1); redesignated former (g)(1) through (g)(4) as present (g)(1)(A) through (g)(1)(D); substituted “fifteen (15)” for “twelve (12)” in (g)(1)(D); added (g)(2); inserted “and § 23-39-517” in (j); inserted “at least thirty (30) days before the proposed change of control” in (l)(2); added (m) and (n); and made related changes.
The 2009 amendment by No. 164 redesignated (g), and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2009 amendment by No. 731, in (a)(3), inserted (a)(3)(C)(ii) and redesignated the remaining text of (a)(3)(C) accordingly, inserted “and financial condition” in (a)(3)(D)(i), and rewrote (a)(3)(E); inserted (b)(4); rewrote (e); in (f), rewrote (f)(1), inserted “and loan officers employed by the licensee” in two places in (f)(2), deleted (f)(6); deleted (g)(2) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; deleted (i)(2) and (i)(3), redesignated the remaining subdivision, and substituted “place of busiess” for “office”; rewrote (j); inserted (l)(4); inserted (o); and made related changes.
The 2011 amendment inserted (a)(2) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; rewrote present (a)(4)(B); inserted “any managing principal” in (a)(4)(D)(i); substituted “that had jurisdiction over the applicant” for “to which the person is, has been, or has sought to be subject” in (a)(4)(D)(ii) (a) ; substituted “January 1, 2011” for January 1, 2009” in (b)(4)(B)(i); rewrote (l)(2)(B); inserted (l)(2)(C) and redesignated the remaining subdivision accordingly; and rewrote the introductory language of (o).
The 2015 amendment substituted “high school equivalency diploma approved by the Department of Career Education” for “general educational development certificate” in (b)(2)(A).
The 2017 amendment substituted “a managing principal of the applicant” for “any partner, officer, director, any person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, any managing principal, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant” at the end of (a)(4)(D)(i); added (a)(4)(D)(ii) (d) ; substituted “Each” for “In addition to the requirements under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, each” in the introductory language of (c); and rewrote (f).
The 2019 amendment by No. 200 inserted “transitional loan officer” in (a)(1); inserted “rule or” in (a)(2); substituted “copy” for “certified copy” in (a)(4)(B)(i); rewrote (g)(2); added (j)(4); repealed (l)(2)(D) and (o)(1)(B); and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Adult Education Section of the Division of Workforce Services” for “Department of Career Education” in (b)(2)(A).
U.S. Code. Section 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, referred to in subsection (b) of this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(p).
23-39-506. License renewal — Termination.
-
A licensed mortgage broker, mortgage banker, and mortgage servicer wishing to renew a license shall:
- File a renewal application with the Securities Commissioner in the form prescribed by the commissioner between November 1 and December 31 of the calendar year;
- Present proof to the commissioner that the surety bond required in § 23-39-505(f)(1) is still in effect; and
- Pay the commissioner an annual renewal fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350) for the licensee's principal place of business and one hundred dollars ($100) for each of the licensee's branch offices.
- The failure of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer to timely file a renewal application shall subject the licensee to a late fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
Each licensed loan officer wishing to renew a license shall:
- File an application with the commissioner in the form prescribed by the commissioner between November 1 and December 31 of the calendar year;
- Comply with the continuing education requirements as required by rules promulgated by the commissioner; and
- Pay an annual renewal fee of fifty dollars ($50.00).
- The failure of a loan officer to timely file a renewal application shall subject the loan officer to a late fee of fifty dollars ($50.00).
-
-
- A late fee assessed under subsection (b) or subsection (d) of this section shall be in addition to the renewal application fee under subsection (a) or subsection (c) of this section.
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
-
-
The commissioner may consider an application and a license to be abandoned and surrendered and may require the licensee to comply with the requirements for the initial issuance of a license under this subchapter in order to continue in business if the licensee:
- Fails to file a renewal application within fifteen (15) days after the date the renewal application is due;
- Unreasonably fails to remedy any deficiency in an application within thirty (30) days following the sending of written notice to the licensee; or
- Unreasonably fails to deliver additional information or documents to the commissioner within thirty (30) days following the sending of written notice to the licensee.
-
For purposes of this subdivision (e)(2), notice shall be complete upon:
- Deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address of the licensee listed in the application; or
- Delivery through an automated licensing system approved by the commissioner.
-
The commissioner may consider an application and a license to be abandoned and surrendered and may require the licensee to comply with the requirements for the initial issuance of a license under this subchapter in order to continue in business if the licensee:
- The commissioner shall not reissue a license for which a late fee has accrued as a result of a person's failure to timely file a renewal application unless the late fee has been paid or waived by the commissioner for good cause.
-
-
- A mortgage banker or a mortgage servicer shall submit audited financial statements to the commissioner within ninety (90) days after the end of the mortgage banker's or mortgage servicer's fiscal year.
-
The audited financial statements submitted to the commissioner under subdivision (f)(1) of this section shall:
- Reflect that the mortgage banker or mortgage servicer has a net worth of at least twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000); and
- Comply with the requirements of § 23-39-505(g)(1)-(3).
-
- Failure to timely submit audited financial statements to the commissioner shall result in a late fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 5; 2009, No. 731, § 18; 2011, No. 894, §§ 9, 10; 2019, No. 200, § 18.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment substituted “Except as provided in § 23-39-517, each” for “Each” in (a); redesignated former (a)(1) and (a)(2)(A) as present (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B); in (a)(1)(B), substituted “A mortgage banker or a mortgage servicer shall also submit” for “Submit” and substituted “mortgage banker's or mortgage servicer's” for “licensee's”; substituted “mortgage banker or mortgage servicer” for “applicant” in (a)(1)(B)(i); rewrote (a)(1)(B)(ii); redesignated former (a)(1)(B) as present (a)(1)(C) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; rewrote (a)(1)(C); substituted “Except as provided in § 23-39-517, each” for “Each” in (c); added (c)(2); redesignated former (e)(2) as present (e)(2)(A); rewrote (e)(2); and made related changes.
The 2009 amendment rewrote (a); substituted “one hundred dollars ($100)” for “twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each day, up to a maximum of sixty (60) days, that the renewal application is late” in (b); in (c), deleted “Except as provided in § 23039-517” in the introductory language and substituted “between November 1 and December 1 of the calendar year” for “no later than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of the license” in (c)(1); subdivided (e); substituted “fifteen (15)” for “sixty (60)” in (e)(2)(A)(i), inserted (e)(2)(B)(ii) and redesignated accordingly; added (f); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment deleted former (a)(2) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; and substituted “December 31” for “December 1” in (c)(1).
The 2019 amendment substituted “Comply with” for “Certify that the applicant has complied with” in (c)(2).
23-39-507. Continuing education.
- In addition to the other licensing requirements under this subchapter, the Securities Commissioner may adopt rules to require continuing education of licensees under this subchapter for the purpose of enhancing the professional competence and professional responsibility of mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, mortgage servicers, and loan officers and may condition the renewal of a license upon compliance with the commissioner's rules.
-
The rules under subsection (a) of this section may include criteria for:
- The content of continuing education courses;
- Accreditation of continuing education sponsors and programs;
- Accreditation of videotape or other audiovisual programs;
- Computation of credit;
- Special cases and exemptions;
- General compliance procedures; and
- Sanctions for noncompliance with the continuing education requirements.
- Annual continuing professional education requirements shall be determined by the commissioner but shall not exceed eight (8) credit hours within a one-year period.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1.
23-39-508. Managing principals and branch managers.
-
- Each mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer licensed under this subchapter shall have a managing principal who operates the business under that person's full charge, control, and supervision.
-
The managing principal shall:
- Have at least three (3) years of experience in mortgage lending; or
- Meet the experience and competency requirements prescribed by rule or order of the Securities Commissioner.
- Any individual licensee who operates as a sole proprietorship shall be considered a managing principal for the purposes of this subchapter.
- The managing principal for a licensee may also serve as the branch manager of one (1) or more of the licensee's branch offices.
-
- Each branch office of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer licensed under this subchapter shall have a designated branch manager who is in charge of and who is responsible for the business operations of a branch office.
- Each branch manager of a mortgage broker or mortgage banker must be licensed as a loan officer.
- Each mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer licensed under this subchapter shall file a form as prescribed by the Securities Commissioner indicating the licensee's designation of managing principal and branch manager for each branch and each individual's acceptance of the responsibility as managing principal or branch manager.
- Each mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer licensed under this subchapter shall notify the commissioner within thirty (30) days of any change in its managing principal or branch manager designated for each branch.
-
- A mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer that does not comply with this section shall pay a late fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
- The commissioner may revoke or suspend the license of any mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer who fails to pay any late fee assessed under subdivision (g)(1) of this section.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 6; 2009, No. 731, § 19.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment redesignated former (a) as present (a)(1) and added (a)(2).
The 2009 amendment substituted “of two hundred fifty dollars ($250)” for “equal to ten dollars ($10.00) for each day that he or she fails to notify the commissioner of the violation, not to exceed six hundred dollars ($600)” in (g)(1), and made minor stylistic changes in (g)(2) and (g)(3).
23-39-509. Offices — Address changes — Location of records.
- A mortgage broker, mortgage banker, and mortgage servicer shall maintain a principal place of business.
- A mortgage broker, mortgage banker, and mortgage servicer shall identify the location in which the licensee's books, records, and files pertaining to mortgage loan transactions are maintained.
- The Securities Commissioner by rule may impose terms and conditions under which the records and files shall be maintained, including if the records must be maintained in this state.
- A principal place of business or branch office from which a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer conducts mortgage loan activity or business shall be a physical address. Mortgage loan activity or business includes without limitation the address appearing on business cards, stationery, promotional materials, or advertising.
-
- A mortgage banker, mortgage broker, or mortgage servicer shall report a change of address of the principal place of business, a branch office, or a location in which the files pertaining to mortgage loan transactions are maintained within thirty (30) days after the change.
-
- A licensee that does not comply with subdivision (e)(1) of this section shall pay a late fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
- The commissioner may revoke or suspend the license of a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer who fails to pay a late fee assessed under subdivision (e)(2) of this section.
-
A mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer that ceases to do business in this state shall:
- Notify the commissioner within thirty (30) days after the mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer ceases to do business in this state that the mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer has ceased to do business in this state; and
- Provide the commissioner the address where all records pertaining to loans made or serviced in this state will be maintained for the period of time required by this subchapter or rule of the commissioner.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 1; 2007, No. 748, § 7; 2009, No. 731, § 20; 2011, No. 894, § 11.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment added (e).
The 2009 amendment substituted “of two hundred fifty dollars ($250)” for “equal to ten dollars ($10.00) for each day that he or she fails to notify the commissioner, up to a maximum of six hundred dollars ($600)” in (d)(2)(A), and made minor stylistic changes in (d)(2)(B).
The 2011 amendment substituted “the licensee's books” for “all of the books” in (b); deleted “relating to borrowers in Arkansas” following “loan transactions” in (b) and present (e)(1); and inserted present (d) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.
23-39-510. Licensee duties.
-
In addition to duties imposed by other statutory or common law, a person required to be licensed under this subchapter shall:
- Safeguard and account for any money received for, from, or on behalf of the borrower;
- Follow reasonable and lawful instructions from the borrower;
- Act with reasonable skill, care, and diligence;
- Make reasonable efforts with lenders with whom a mortgage broker regularly does business to secure a loan that is reasonably advantageous to the borrower considering all the circumstances, including the rates, charges, and repayment terms of the loan and the loan options for which the borrower qualifies with such lenders;
- Include the full name, address, and telephone number of the licensee in all solicitations and advertisements; and
-
- Provide the Securities Commissioner with a quarterly report of mortgage activity.
- The commissioner may designate by rule or order the information to be provided in the quarterly report.
-
At the time a mortgage servicer accepts assignment of servicing rights for a mortgage loan in this state, the mortgage servicer shall disclose to the borrower the following:
- Any notice required by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974, 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017, or by regulations promulgated thereunder; and
- A notice in a clear and conspicuous form and content that the mortgage servicer is licensed in Arkansas and that complaints about the mortgage servicer may be submitted to the commissioner.
- The unique identifier of a person soliciting or originating a mortgage loan shall be clearly shown on all mortgage loan application forms, solicitations, advertisements, business cards, websites, and any other document or medium established by rule or order of the commissioner.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2009, No. 731, § 21; 2011, No. 894, § 12; 2017, No. 669, § 4.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment added (b), redesignated the introductory language as (a), inserted (a)(5), and made related changes.
The 2011 amendment inserted “mortgage” preceding “broker” in (a)(4); inserted (a)(6); and substituted “commissioner” for “Securities Commissioner” in (b).
The 2017 amendment inserted present (b) and redesignated former (b) as (c).
23-39-511. Records — Escrow funds or trust accounts.
-
The Securities Commissioner shall keep a list of all applicants for licensure under this subchapter that includes:
- The applicant's name;
- The date of application;
- The applicant's place of residence; and
- Whether the license was granted or refused.
-
- The commissioner shall keep a current roster showing the names and places of business of all licensees that shows their respective loan officers and their respective transitional loan officers.
-
The roster under subdivision (b)(1) of this section shall:
- Be kept on file in the office of the commissioner;
- Contain information regarding all orders or other actions taken against the licensees and other persons; and
- Be open to public inspection.
- Every licensee shall make and keep the accounts, correspondence, memoranda, papers, books, and other records as prescribed in rules adopted by the commissioner.
-
- If the information contained in any document filed with the commissioner is or becomes inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, the licensee shall file a correcting amendment to the information contained in the document within thirty (30) days from the date on which the change takes place.
-
- Any licensee that does not comply with subdivision (d)(1) of this section shall pay a late fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
- All or part of the late fee may be waived by the commissioner for good cause.
-
- A licensee shall maintain in a segregated escrow fund or trust account any funds that come into the licensee's possession but that are not the licensee's property and which the licensee is not entitled to retain under the circumstances.
- The escrow fund or trust account under subdivision (e)(1) of this section shall be held on deposit in a federally insured financial institution.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 2; 2009, No. 731, § 22; 2019, No. 200, § 19.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “two hundred fifty dollars ($250)” for “ten dollars ($10.00) for each day that he or she fails to file a correcting amendment, up to a maximum of six hundred dollars ($600)” in (d)(2)(A), and made minor stylistic changes in (d)(2)(B).
The 2019 amendment inserted “and their respective transitional loan officers” in (b)(1); and deleted “loan officers” following “licensees” in (b)(2)(B).
23-39-512. Public inspection of records — Exceptions.
-
- Unless otherwise specified in this section, all information filed with the Securities Commissioner shall be available for public inspection.
- The information contained in or filed with any application or report may be made available to the public under any rules the commissioner prescribes that are consistent with state or federal law governing the disclosure of public information.
-
Except for reasonably segregable portions of information and records that by law would be made routinely available to a party in litigation with the commissioner, the commissioner shall not publish or make available the following information:
- Information contained in reports, summaries, analyses, letters, or memoranda arising out of, in anticipation of, or in connection with an examination or inspection of the books and records of any person or any other investigation;
-
Interagency or intra-agency memoranda or letters, including:
- Generally, records that reflect discussions between or consideration by the commissioner or members of the staff of the State Securities Department or the staff of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department, or both, of any action taken or proposed to be taken by the commissioner or by any members of the staff of the State Securities Department or the staff of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department; and
- Specifically, reports, summaries, analyses, conclusions, or any other work product of the commissioner or of attorneys, accountants, analysts, or other members of the commissioner's staff, prepared in the course of an inspection of the books or records of any person whose affairs are regulated by the commissioner or prepared otherwise in the course of an examination or investigation or related litigation conducted by or on behalf of the commissioner;
-
Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, including:
- Information concerning all employees of the State Securities Department or the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department and information concerning persons subject to regulation by the State Securities Department; and
- Personal information about employees of mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, mortgage servicers, loan officers, or transitional loan officers reported to the commissioner under the State Securities Department's rules concerning registration of those persons;
-
-
Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that production of the records would:
- Interfere with enforcement proceedings;
- Deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication; or
- Disclose the identity of a confidential source.
-
The commissioner may also withhold investigatory records that would:
- Constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
- Disclose investigative techniques and procedures; or
- Endanger the life or physical safety of law enforcement personnel.
-
Investigatory records under this section include:
- All documents, records, transcripts, correspondence, and related memoranda and work products concerning examinations and other investigations and related litigation as authorized by law that pertain to or may disclose the possible violations by any person of any provision of any of the statutes or rules administered by the commissioner; and
- All written communications from or to any person confidentially complaining or otherwise furnishing information respecting the possible violations, as well as all correspondence and memoranda in connection with the confidential complaints or information;
-
Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that production of the records would:
- Information contained in or related to examinations, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions or mortgage lenders;
-
- Financial records of mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, mortgage servicers, loan officers, or transitional loan officers, obtained during or as a result of an examination by the State Securities Department.
- However, when a record under this subchapter is required to be filed with the commissioner as part of an application for license, annual renewal, or otherwise, the record, including financial statements prepared by certified public accountants, shall be public information unless sections of the information are bound separately and are marked “confidential” by the mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer upon its submission.
- Information under subdivision (6)(B) of this section bound separately and marked “confidential” shall be considered nonpublic until ten (10) days after the commissioner has given the mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer notice that an order will be entered declaring the material public.
- If the mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer believes the commissioner's order is incorrect, the mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer may seek an injunction from the Pulaski County Circuit Court ordering the State Securities Department to hold the information as nonpublic pending a final order from a court of competent jurisdiction if the order of the commissioner is appealed under applicable law;
- Trade secrets obtained from any person; or
- Any other records that are required to be closed to the public and are not considered open to public inspection under the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq., or under other law.
- This section does not prevent the commissioner from sharing with other state or federal law enforcement authorities, regulatory authorities, or self-regulatory organizations authorized by law any information that the commissioner may have or may obtain in aid of the enforcement of this subchapter or any other state or federal law.
-
- Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, the requirements of any federal or state law regarding privacy or confidentiality of any information or material provided to an automated licensing system under this subchapter and any privilege arising under federal or state law, including the rules of any federal or state court with respect to the information or material, shall continue to apply to the information or material after the information or material has been disclosed to the automated licensing system.
- The information or material provided to an automated licensing system under this subchapter may be shared with a state or federal regulatory official with mortgage industry oversight authority without the loss of privilege or the loss of confidentiality protections provided by federal or state law.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2009, No. 731, §§ 23, 24; 2019, No. 200, §§ 20, 21; 2019, No. 315, § 2500; 2019, No. 910, §§ 573, 574.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (b), deleted “other than an agency” following “party” in the introductory language, subdivided (b)(2), and deleted “except those that by law would routinely be made to a party other than an agency in litigation with the commissioner” at the end of (b)(2)(B); added (c) and (d); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment by No. 200 inserted “or transitional loan officer” and “or transitional loan officers” throughout (b)(3) and (b)(6).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “statutes or rules” for “statutes, rules, or regulations” in (b)(4)(C)(i).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910, in (b)(2)(A), inserted “of the State Securities Department or the staff of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department” twice, and made stylistic changes, inserted “or the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department” in (b)(3)(A), and substituted “State Securities Department” for “department's” in (b)(3)(B).
23-39-513. Prohibited activities.
In addition to the other activities that are prohibited under this subchapter, it is unlawful for any person other than a person described in § 23-39-502(9)(B)(vi) in the course of any mortgage loan transaction or activity:
- To misrepresent or conceal any material fact or make any false promise likely to influence, persuade, or induce an applicant for a mortgage loan or a borrower to take a mortgage loan or to pursue a course of misrepresentation through agents or otherwise;
- To improperly refuse to issue a satisfaction or release of a mortgage;
- To fail to account for or to deliver to any person any funds, documents, or other thing of value obtained in connection with a mortgage loan, including money provided by a borrower for a real estate appraisal or a credit report, that the mortgage banker, mortgage broker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer is not entitled to retain;
- To pay, receive, or collect, in whole or in part, any commission, fee, or other compensation for brokering a mortgage loan in violation of this subchapter, including a mortgage loan brokered or solicited by any unlicensed person other than an exempt person;
- To advertise mortgage loans, including rates, margins, discounts, points, fees, commissions, or other material information without disclosing the lengths of the loans, whether the interest rates are fixed or adjustable, and any other material limitations on the loans;
- To fail to disburse funds in accordance with a written commitment or agreement to make or service a mortgage loan;
-
In connection with the advertisement, solicitation, brokering, making, servicing, purchase, or sale of any mortgage loan, to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business that:
- Is not in good faith or fair dealing;
- Is misleading or deceptive; or
- Constitutes a fraud upon any person;
-
- To broker or make a residential mortgage loan that contains a penalty for prepayment if the prepayment is made after the expiration of the thirty-six-month period immediately following the date on which the loan was made.
-
A penalty for prepayment under subdivision (8)(A) of this section made within the thirty-six-month period shall not exceed any of the following amounts:
- Three percent (3%) of the principal loan amount remaining on the date of prepayment if the prepayment is made within the first twelve-month period immediately following the date the loan was made;
- Two percent (2%) of the principal loan amount remaining on the date of prepayment if the prepayment is made within the second twelve-month period immediately following the date the loan was made; or
- One percent (1%) of the principal loan amount remaining on the date of prepayment if the prepayment is made within the third twelve-month period immediately following the date the loan was made;
-
- To influence or attempt to influence through coercion, extortion, or bribery the development, reporting, result, or review of a real estate appraisal sought in connection with a mortgage loan.
-
This subdivision (9) does not prohibit a mortgage broker or mortgage banker from asking the appraiser to do one (1) or more of the following:
- Consider additional appropriate property information;
- Provide further detail, substantiation, or explanation for the appraiser's value conclusion; or
- Correct errors in the appraisal report;
- To broker or make a refinancing of a residential mortgage loan when the refinancing charges additional points and fees, within a twelve-month period after the original loan agreement was signed, unless the refinancing results in a reasonable, tangible net benefit to the borrower, considering all of the circumstances surrounding the refinancing;
- To broker, make, or service a mortgage loan in violation of any federal law or any law of this state;
- To engage in practices that are dishonest or unethical in the mortgage industry;
- To unreasonably fail to deliver or provide information or documents promptly to the commissioner upon written request or to knowingly withhold, abstract, remove, mutilate, destroy, or secrete any books, records, computer records, or other information;
- To unreasonably fail to supervise the branches, loan officers, transitional loan officers, and employees of the mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
- To fail to make payments in a timely manner from an escrow account held for the borrower to pay insurance, taxes, and other charges concerning the mortgage property without good cause, and the failure to pay results in late penalties or other negative activity;
-
To place hazard, homeowners, or flood insurance on a mortgaged property:
- Without providing prior written notice to the borrower;
- If the mortgage servicer knows or has reason to know that adequate insurance coverage already exists; or
- In an amount that unreasonably exceeds the value of the insurable improvements or the last-known coverage amount or policy limits of insurance; or
-
- To fail to refund to the borrower unearned premiums paid by or charged to a borrower for hazard, homeowners, or flood insurance placed by a mortgage banker or mortgage servicer if reasonable proof is available or provided that the borrower had or obtained coverage in effect resulting in the unnecessary placement of forced insurance.
- The borrower shall receive a refund of excess premium funds taken from the borrower when reasonable proof is provided within twelve (12) months of the forced placement.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2003 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 26, § 2; 2005, No. 1679, § 3; 2007, No. 748, § 8; 2009, No. 164, § 11; 2009, No. 731, § 25; 2011, No. 720, § 1; 2011, No. 894, §§ 13-15; 2013, No. 1167, § 5; 2019, No. 200, §§ 22, 23.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment substituted “§ 23-39-502(9)(B)(vii)” for “§ 23-39-502(6)(B)(vii)” in the introductory paragraph; added (13) and (14); and made related changes.
The 2009 amendment by No. 164 redesignated (8)(B)(i), inserted “Any of the following amounts,” and made related changes.
The 2009 amendment by No. 731 inserted “or to knowingly withhold, abstract, remove, mutilate, destroy or secrete any books, records, computer records, or other information” in (13).
The 2011 amendment substituted “§ 23-39-502(9)(B)(vi)” for “§ 23-39-502(9)(B)(vii)” in the introductory language; in (8)(B), deleted “the greater of” following “exceed” in the introductory language, deleted former (8)(B)(i) and (8)(B)(ii), and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; and inserted “or service” in (11).
The 2013 amendment added (15) through (17).
The 2019 amendment inserted “or transitional loan officer” in (3); and inserted “transitional loan officers” in (14).
23-39-514. Disciplinary authority.
-
The Securities Commissioner by order may deny, suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew a license of a licensee or applicant under this subchapter or may restrict or limit the activities relating to mortgage loans of any licensee or any person who owns an interest in or participates in the business of a licensee if the commissioner finds that:
- The order is in the public interest; and
-
Any of the following circumstances apply to the applicant, licensee, or any partner, member, manager, officer, director, loan officer, transitional loan officer, managing principal, or any person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant or licensee. The person:
- Has filed an application for a license that as of its effective date or as of any date after filing contained any omission or statement that in light of the circumstances under which it was made is false or misleading with respect to any material fact;
- Has violated or failed to comply with any provision of this subchapter, any rule adopted by the commissioner, or any order of the commissioner issued under this subchapter or under Acts 1977, No. 806;
-
Has pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to or has been found guilty in a domestic, foreign, or military court of:
- A felony;
- An offense involving breach of trust, moral turpitude, money laundering, or fraudulent or dishonest dealing within the past ten (10) years; or
- An offense involving mortgage lending, any aspect of the mortgage industry, or any aspect of the securities industry, the insurance industry, or any other activity pertaining to financial services;
- Is permanently or temporarily enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice involving any aspect of the mortgage industry, the securities business, the insurance business, or any other activity pertaining to financial services;
-
Is the subject of an order of the commissioner:
- Denying, suspending, revoking, restricting, or limiting that person's license as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, transitional loan officer, securities broker-dealer, securities agent, investment adviser, or investment adviser representative; or
- Directing that person to cease and desist from an activity regulated by the commissioner, including any order entered pursuant to Acts 1977, No. 806;
- Is the subject of an order, including a denial, suspension, or revocation of authority to engage in a regulated activity by any other state or federal authority to which the person is, has been, or has sought to be subject, entered within the past five (5) years, including without limitation the mortgage industry;
- Has been found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have charged or collected any fee or rate of interest or made or brokered any mortgage loan with terms or conditions or in a manner contrary to Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 60;
- Does not meet the qualifications or the financial responsibility, character, or general fitness requirements under § 23-39-505 or any bond or net worth requirements under this subchapter;
- Has been the executive officer or controlling shareholder or owned a controlling interest in any mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer that has been subject to an order or injunction described in subdivisions (a)(2)(D)-(G) of this section; or
-
- Has failed to pay the proper filing fee, renewal fee, or any late fee under this subchapter.
- The commissioner may enter a denial order against a person under this subsection when the person has failed to pay the proper filing fee, renewal fee, or any late fee under this subchapter, but the commissioner shall vacate the order when all fees have been paid.
-
- The commissioner by order may impose a civil penalty upon a licensee or any partner, officer, director, member, manager, or other person occupying a similar status or performing a similar function on behalf of a licensee for any violation of this subchapter, a rule under this subchapter, or an order of the commissioner.
- The civil penalty shall not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation under subdivision (b)(1) of this section by a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer.
-
- The commissioner by order may summarily postpone or suspend the license of a licensee pending final determination of any proceeding under this section.
- Upon entering the order, the commissioner shall promptly notify the applicant or licensee that the order has been entered and the reasons for issuing the order.
- The applicant or licensee may contest the order by delivering a written request for a hearing to the commissioner within thirty (30) days from the date on which notice of the order is sent by the commissioner to the address of the licensee on file with the commissioner by first class mail, postage prepaid.
- The commissioner shall schedule a hearing to be held within thirty (30) days after the commissioner receives a timely written request for a hearing, unless the hearing is postponed for a reasonable amount of time at the request of the licensee.
- If a licensee does not request a hearing and the commissioner does not order a hearing, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner.
- If a hearing is requested or ordered by the commissioner, after notice of and opportunity for hearing, the commissioner may modify or vacate the order or extend it until final determination.
-
The commissioner by summary order may cancel a license or application if the commissioner finds that a licensee or applicant for a license:
- Is no longer in existence;
- Has ceased to do business as a loan officer, transitional loan officer, mortgage broker, mortgage banker, or mortgage servicer;
- Is subject to an adjudication of mental incompetence or to the control of a committee, conservator, or guardian; or
- Cannot be located after a reasonable search.
-
- In addition to other powers under this subchapter, upon finding that any action of a person is in violation of this subchapter, the commissioner may summarily order the person to cease and desist from the prohibited action.
-
- Upon entering the order under subdivision (e)(1) of this section, the commissioner shall promptly notify the person that the order has been entered and state the reasons for the order.
- The person may contest the cease and desist order by delivering a written request for a hearing to the commissioner within thirty (30) days from the date on which notice of the order is sent by the commissioner to the last known address of the person by first class mail, postage prepaid.
- The commissioner shall schedule a hearing to be held within a reasonable amount of time after the commissioner receives a timely written request for a hearing.
- If the person does not request a hearing and the commissioner does not order a hearing, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner.
- If a hearing is requested or ordered, after notice of and opportunity for hearing, the commissioner may modify or vacate the order or make it permanent.
-
-
A person shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each violation of the commissioner's cease and desist order committed after entry of the order if:
- The person subject to the cease and desist order fails to appeal the order in accordance with § 23-39-515 or if the person appeals and the appeal is denied or dismissed; and
- The person continues to engage in the prohibited action in violation of the commissioner's order.
- The commissioner may file an action requesting the civil penalty under subdivision (e)(3)(A) of this section with the Pulaski County Circuit Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction.
- The penalties of this section apply in addition to, but not in lieu of, any other provision of law applicable to a person for the person's failure to comply with an order of the commissioner.
-
A person shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each violation of the commissioner's cease and desist order committed after entry of the order if:
- Unless otherwise provided, any action, hearing, or other proceeding under this subchapter shall be governed by the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq.
- If the commissioner has grounds to believe that any person has violated the provisions of this subchapter or that facts exist that would be the basis for an order against a licensee or other person, the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, at any time, may investigate or examine the loans and business of the licensee and examine the books, accounts, records, and files of any licensee or other person relating to the complaint or matter under investigation.
-
-
The commissioner or the commissioner's designee may:
- Administer oaths and affirmations;
- Issue subpoenas to require the attendance of and to examine under oath all persons whose testimony the commissioner deems relevant to the person's business; and
- Issue subpoenas to require the production of any books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, agreements, or other documents or records that the commissioner considers relevant or material to the inquiry.
-
- In case of contumacy by or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any person, the Pulaski County Circuit Court, upon application by the commissioner, may issue an order requiring the person to appear before the commissioner or the officer designated by the commissioner, to produce documentary evidence if so ordered, or to give evidence touching the matter under investigation or in question.
- Failure to obey the order of the court may be punished by the court as a contempt of court.
-
-
The assertion that the testimony or evidence before the commissioner may tend to incriminate or subject a person to a penalty or forfeiture shall not excuse the person from:
- Attending and testifying;
- Producing any document or record; or
- Obeying the subpoena of the commissioner or any officer designated by the commissioner.
- However, no person may be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which the person is compelled, after claiming a privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that the person testifying is not exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury or contempt committed while testifying.
-
The assertion that the testimony or evidence before the commissioner may tend to incriminate or subject a person to a penalty or forfeiture shall not excuse the person from:
-
The commissioner or the commissioner's designee may:
-
- From time to time and with or without cause, the commissioner may conduct examinations of the books and records of any applicant or licensee in order to determine the compliance with this subchapter and any rules adopted under this subchapter.
- The applicant or licensee shall pay a fee for each examination under subdivision (i)(1) of this section, not to exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per examiner for each day or part of a day during which any examiners are absent from the office of the commissioner for the purpose of conducting the examination.
- In addition, the applicant or licensee may be required to pay the actual hotel and traveling expenses of the examiner traveling to and from the office of the commissioner while the examiner is conducting an examination under subdivision (i)(1) of this section.
- If the commissioner finds that the managing principal, branch manager, loan officer, or transitional loan officer of a licensee had knowledge of, or reasonably should have had knowledge of, or participated in any activity that results in the entry of an order under this section suspending or withdrawing the license of a licensee, the commissioner may prohibit the managing principal, branch manager, loan officer, or transitional loan officer from serving as a managing principal, branch manager, loan officer, or transitional loan officer for any period of time the commissioner deems appropriate.
-
All orders shall contain written findings of fact and conclusions of law. Except for orders entered under subdivisions (c)(1) and (e)(1) of this section, before entering an order under this section, the commissioner shall provide:
- Prior notice to the licensee or person who is the subject of the order; and
- An opportunity for hearing.
- This section does not prohibit or restrict the informal disposition of a proceeding or allegations that might give rise to a proceeding by stipulation, settlement, consent, or default in lieu of a formal or informal hearing on the allegations or in lieu of the sanctions authorized by this section.
-
-
If it appears upon sufficient grounds or evidence satisfactory to the commissioner that any person or licensee has engaged in or is about to engage in any act or practice that violates this subchapter or any rule adopted or order issued under this subchapter or that the assets or capital of any licensee are impaired or the licensee's affairs are in an unsafe condition, the commissioner may:
- Refer the evidence which is available concerning violations of this subchapter or any rule or order issued under this subchapter to the appropriate prosecuting attorney or regulatory agency, that with or without the reference may institute the appropriate criminal or regulatory proceedings under this subchapter; and (B)(i) Summarily order the licensee or person to cease and desist from the act or practice under subdivisions (c)(1) and (e)(1) of this section and apply to the Pulaski County Circuit Court to enjoin the act or practice and to enforce compliance with this subchapter or any rule or order issued under this subchapter, or both.
- Upon proper showing, the court shall grant a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or writ of mandamus.
-
The commissioner may also seek and upon proper showing the appropriate court shall grant any other ancillary relief that may be in the public interest, including:
- The appointment of a receiver, temporary receiver, or conservator;
- A declaratory judgment;
- An accounting;
- Disgorgement;
- Assessment of a fine in an amount of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation; and
- Any other relief as may be appropriate in the public interest.
- The court may not require the commissioner to post a bond.
-
If it appears upon sufficient grounds or evidence satisfactory to the commissioner that any person or licensee has engaged in or is about to engage in any act or practice that violates this subchapter or any rule adopted or order issued under this subchapter or that the assets or capital of any licensee are impaired or the licensee's affairs are in an unsafe condition, the commissioner may:
(ii) However, without issuing a cease and desist order, the commissioner may apply directly to the Pulaski County Circuit Court for injunctive or other relief.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1; 2005, No. 1679, § 4; 2007, No. 748, §§ 9, 10; 2009, No. 731, §§ 26, 27; 2011, No. 894, § 16; 2013, No. 1167, § 6; 2019, No. 200, §§ 24-27; 2019, No. 315, § 2501.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment added “unless the hearing is postponed for a reasonable amount of time at the request of the licensee” and made a related change in (c)(4); substituted “person” for “licensee” in (d)(2)(B); and substituted “a reasonable amount of time” for “thirty (30) days” in (d)(2)(C).
The 2009 amendment, in (a)(2)(C), inserted “in a domestic, foreign, or military court” in the introductory language, and inserted “money laundering” in (a)(2)(C)(ii); substituted “Issue subpoenas to require” for “Require” in (g)(1)(C); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment inserted “restricting, or limiting” in (a)(2)(E)(i); inserted present (d) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; and substituted “may be required to pay” for “shall pay” in present (i)(3).
The 2013 amendment inserted “summary” in the introductory language of (d).
The 2019 amendment by No. 200 inserted “transitional loan officer” or “or transitional loan officer” in the introductory language of (a)(2), (a)(2)(E)(i), (b)(2), (d)(2) and three times in (j).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in the introductory language of (m)(1); and deleted “regulation” following “rule” in the introductory language of (m)(1)(A) and (m)(1)(B)(i).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1977, No. 806, codified as §§ 23-39-101 — 23-39-105 [repealed], 23-39-201 — 23-39-206 [repealed], 23-39-301 — 23-39-309 [repealed], 23-42-102, 23-42-301.
23-39-515. Review of order of the commissioner.
-
- Any person aggrieved by a final order of the Securities Commissioner may obtain a review of the order by filing in the Pulaski County Circuit Court within sixty (60) days after the entry of the order a written petition praying that the order be modified or set aside in whole or in part.
-
- A copy of the petition shall be served upon the commissioner, after which the commissioner shall certify and file in court a copy of the filing and evidence upon which the order was entered.
- When a petition under subdivision (a)(1) of this section has been filed, the court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, modify, enforce, or set aside any order of the commissioner in whole or in part, except that a court may not set aside a summary order entered by the commissioner when the subject of the order has not requested a hearing before the commissioner as provided in § 23-39-514(c)(1) or (d)(1).
-
- The findings of the commissioner as to the facts are conclusive if supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence.
- If either party applies to the court for leave to submit additional material evidence and shows to the satisfaction of the court that there were reasonable grounds for failure to submit the evidence in the hearing before the commissioner, the court may order the additional evidence to be taken before the commissioner and to be submitted upon the hearing before the commissioner in any manner and upon any condition as the court considers to be proper.
- After consideration of the additional evidence, the commissioner may modify his or her findings and order and shall file in the court the additional evidence together with any modified or new findings or order.
- Unless specifically ordered by the court, the commencement of proceedings under subsection (a) of this section does not operate as a stay of the commissioner's order.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1.
23-39-516. Criminal penalty.
- It is unlawful for any person to make or cause to be made in any document filed with the Securities Commissioner or in any proceeding under this subchapter any statement that is, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, false or misleading in any material respect.
-
-
A person is guilty of a Class B felony if he or she:
- Willfully violates any provision of this subchapter, except subsection (a) of this section;
- Willfully violates subsection (a) of this section knowing the statement to be false or misleading in any material respect; or
- Willfully violates any rule under this subchapter or any order of the commissioner.
- Each transaction involving the unlawful making or brokering of a mortgage loan is a separate offense.
-
A person is guilty of a Class B felony if he or she:
- No person may be imprisoned for violation of any order of the commissioner unless the person had actual knowledge of the order.
- The commissioner may refer any available evidence concerning violations of this subchapter or any rule or order issued under this subchapter to the appropriate prosecuting authority who, with or without the reference, may institute the appropriate criminal proceedings under this subchapter.
- This subchapter does not limit the power of the state to punish any person for any conduct that constitutes a crime under any statute or common law.
History. Acts 2003, No. 554, § 1.
23-39-517. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning transition, was repealed by Acts 2011, No. 894, § 17. The section was derived from Acts 2007, No. 748, § 11.
23-39-518. Cooperation with other regulatory agencies.
-
The Securities Commissioner may:
- Enter into an arrangement, agreement, or other working relationship with federal, state, or self-regulatory authorities, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, or a subsidiary of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors to file and maintain documents in a multistate automated licensing system or other central depository system;
- Waive or modify in whole or in part by rule or by order any requirement of this subchapter if necessary to implement this section; and
- Establish new requirements under this subchapter to carry out the purpose of this section.
- It is the intent of this section that the commissioner be provided the authority to reduce duplication of filings, reduce administrative costs, and establish uniform procedures, forms, and administration with other states and federal authorities.
-
- The commissioner may permit or require initial and renewal registration filings required under this subchapter to be filed with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, a subsidiary entity owned by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or another entity maintaining or operating a multistate automated licensing system.
- The applicant or the licensee shall pay any fee charged for the applicant or the licensee to participate in the automated licensing system.
-
The commissioner may accept uniform procedures and forms designed to:
- Implement a multistate automated licensing system;
- Implement a uniform national mortgage lending regulatory system; or
- Facilitate common practices and procedures among the states.
-
- If the State of Arkansas joins a multistate automated licensing system for mortgage industry participants pursuant to this section, the commissioner may require a criminal background investigation of each applicant seeking to become licensed under this subchapter as a mortgage broker, mortgage banker, mortgage servicer, loan officer, or transitional loan officer.
- The criminal background investigation may include a fingerprint examination and may be conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Division of Arkansas State Police, or an equivalent state or federal law enforcement department or agency.
- The information obtained by the background investigation may be used by the commissioner to determine the applicant's eligibility for licensing under this subchapter.
- The fee required to perform the criminal background investigation shall be borne by the license applicant.
-
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, information obtained or held by the commissioner under this subsection:
- May be disclosed when necessary in any proceeding under this subchapter;
- May be provided to other state agencies participating in the multistate automatic licensing system;
- Shall be considered privileged and confidential; and
- Shall not be available for examination except by the affected applicant for licensure or his or her authorized representative, or by the person whose license is subject to sanctions or his or her authorized representative.
- No record, file, or document shall be removed from the custody of the Identification Bureau of the Division of Arkansas State Police.
- Any information made available to the affected applicant for licensure or to the person whose license is subject to sanctions shall be information pertaining to that person only.
- Rights of privilege and confidentiality established in this section shall not extend to any document created for purposes other than the background check.
- The commissioner may adopt rules to fully implement the provisions of this section.
History. Acts 2007, No. 748, § 11; 2009, No. 731, § 28; 2019, No. 200, § 28; 2019, No. 315, § 2502.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “Financial Industry Regulatory Authority” for “National Association of Securities Dealers” in (c)(1).
The 2019 amendment by No. 200 inserted “or transitional loan officer” in (e)(1).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (e)(9).
Chapter 40 Arkansas Prepaid Funeral Benefits Law
Effective Dates. Acts 1985, No. 888, § 26: July 1, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Seventy-Fifth General Assembly that the amendments to Revenue Stabilization Law are essential to the continued operation of State government; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1985. Provided, however, that Sections 18, 20 and 21 of this Act shall become effective from and after the passage and approval of this Act.”
Acts 1995, No. 852, § 16: July 1, 1995. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the responsibility for the regulation of the sale of prepaid funeral benefits should be transferred from the Arkansas Securities Commissioner and Arkansas Securities Department to the Arkansas Insurance Commissioner; that the orderly transfer of such responsibilities can be best accomplished by causing such transfer to take effect at the beginning of the next fiscal year in order to comport with the appropriations for the next fiscal year for the Arkansas Securities Department and Arkansas Insurance Department. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1995.”
Acts 1997, No. 372, § 15: Mar. 16, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that Arkansas Code 23-40-116 requires all organizations which sell contracts for prepaid funeral benefits to file annual reports and submit annual report fees on or before March 15th of each year; that this act modifies the annual report fee schedule and should therefore become effective on March 16, 1997; and unless this emergency clause is adopted the provisions of this act will not become effective until several months after March 16, 1997. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective March 16, 1997.”
Acts 1999, No. 881, § 28: Mar. 25, 1999. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-second General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the present funeral pre-need laws, employee leasing firm laws, and other insurance laws are inadequate to protect the public. In pertinent part, the changes to the Insurance Code needed to assure the stability of funding for the Fraud Investigation Division of the Department must be enacted in the laws of this state well before the new fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999. The changes to authorized appropriations, as well as changes to the disability (health) insurance laws on individuals to conform to the federal laws on group policies with guaranteed renewability require immediate adoption; and unless this emergency clause is adopted, this act might not become effective until after the beginning of the next fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2001, No. 1043, § 8: July 1, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that the Constitution of the State of Arkansas prohibits the appropriation of funds for more than a two (2) year period; that the effectiveness of this act on July 1, 2001 is essential to the operation of the agency for which the appropriations in this act are provided, and that in the event of an extension of the regular session, the delay in the effective date of this act beyond July 1, 2001 could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of essential governmental programs. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 2001.”
Acts 2003, No. 1473, § 74: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act includes technical corrects to Act 923 of 2003 which establishes the classification and compensation levels of state employees covered by the provisions of the Uniform Classification and Compensation Act; that Act 923 of 2003 will become effective on July 1, 2003; and that to avoid confusion this act must also effective on July 1, 2003. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2003.”
Acts 2005, No. 506, § 54: Mar. 2, 2005. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the laws of this state as to insurance regulation and the Governmental Bonding Board, among others, are inadequate for the protection of the public, and the immediate passage of this act is necessary in order to provide for the adequate protection of the public. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2015, No. 904, § 8: Apr. 1, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that prepaid funeral organizations that are operating in this state may be in jeopardy of suffering from financial distress and may not be able to fulfill its outstanding prepaid funeral contracts; that the threat to an insured's benefits under a prepaid funeral contract is a real possibility if a prepaid funeral organization fails and that may have immense consequences; that by providing the Insurance Commissioner the authority to assist a failing or delinquent prepaid funeral organization, the insured or contract beneficiary is better protected concerning benefits; and that this act is immediately necessary because if a prepaid funeral organization fails, an insured or contract beneficiary is in danger of losing benefits or may be harmed if the prepaid funeral organization fails. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Former similar act which was enacted for the prevention of fraud was not an unwarranted and unlawful exercise of the police power. Reserve Vault Corp. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 1011, 356 S.W.2d 225 (1962) (decision under prior law).
Former act governing prepaid funeral expenses was not an unconstitutional impairment of contract between vault company and its salesmen for commissions earned prior to its passage, as such prohibitions did not prevent a proper exercise by the state of its police power under Ark. Const., Art. 2, § 17 and U.S. Const., Art. 1, § 10. Reserve Vault Corp. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 1011, 356 S.W.2d 225 (1962) (decision under prior law).
Where former similar act bore on its face clear indication that it was designed to prevent fraud, the fact that there was no charge of fraud against present ownership of company selling funeral vaults on a prepayment plan has no bearing on determining its constitutionality. Reserve Vault Corp. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 1011, 356 S.W.2d 225 (1962) (decision under prior law).
23-40-101. Short title.
This chapter shall be known as the “Arkansas Prepaid Funeral Benefits Law”.
History. Acts 1995, No. 852, § 12.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Former § 23-40-101 has been renumbered as § 23-40-103 by the Arkansas Code Revision Commission.
23-40-102. Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the regulation of the sale of prepaid funeral benefits by the Insurance Commissioner.
History. Acts 1995, No. 852, § 12.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Former § 23-40-102 has been renumbered as § 23-40-104.
As enacted, this section provided an effective date of July 1, 1995, and ended:
“and to amend various provisions of Ark. Code Ann. 23-40-101 et seq. All the responsibilities of the State Securities Commissioner and Arkansas Securities Department for the regulation of the sale of prepaid funeral benefits shall cease and such responsibilities shall be assumed by the State Insurance Commissioner. On July 1, 1995 all records, books, files, reports, documents, moneys and all things pertaining to the regulation of prepaid funeral benefits shall be transferred to the State Insurance Commissioner. All forms for the sale of prepaid funeral benefits, all trust agreements and arrangements and all documents presently in use which have been previously approved by the Securities Commissioner shall continue to be approved until otherwise determined by the Insurance Commissioner pursuant to a proper rule or order.”
23-40-103. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
- “Annuity funding” means contract proceeds that are used by a seller to purchase an annuity contract that names the seller as the beneficiary of the annuity contract, the proceeds of which shall be used to pay for the funeral benefits specified in a prepaid contract, or the purchaser may elect to purchase an annuity contract directly from an insurance carrier and either name the seller as the policy beneficiary or assign the death benefits to the seller to fund the prepaid funeral benefits contract;
- “Cash accommodation items” means flowers, honorariums, death certificates, sales taxes, grave opening and closing, cemetery charges, and other items incidental to the funeral and disposition of the beneficiary which are to be furnished or provided by a third party at the time of death;
- “Contract beneficiary” means any natural person designated in a prepaid funeral benefits contract upon whose death funeral services or funeral merchandise, or both, shall be performed, provided, or delivered;
-
- “Contract funding methods” means contract proceeds.
-
“Contract funding methods” includes:
- Annuity funding;
- Insurance funding; and
- Trust funding;
- “Contract price” means the aggregate moneys to be paid and the aggregate stated value of all other direct or indirect consideration to be assigned by purchasers of prepaid funeral benefits as provided in the contract, exclusive of any finance charge;
- “Contract proceeds” means the portion of the contract price collected by the seller from a contract for the sale of prepaid funeral benefits;
- “Insurance funding” means contract proceeds that are used by a seller to purchase a life insurance policy or certificate on the life of a contract beneficiary that names the seller as the beneficiary of the life insurance policy or certificate, the indemnity from which shall be used to pay for the funeral benefits specified in the prepaid contract, or the purchaser may elect to purchase a life insurance policy or certificate directly from an insurance carrier, and then either name the seller as the life insurance policy beneficiary or assign the death benefits to the seller to fund the prepaid funeral benefits contract;
- “Licensee” or “permittee” means a person holding a valid permit or license issued pursuant to this chapter;
- “Liquid investments” means investments which can be sold at cost or greater, liquidated without penalty, and collected within five (5) banking days;
-
“Net investment income” means:
- All revenue and earnings of the trust fund, including, but not limited to, interest, dividends, and capital gains; minus
- Investment expenses, trustee's fees, capital losses, and all revenue and earnings on cash accommodation funds;
- “Net worth” means the difference between the applicant's total assets and total liabilities as reflected in a balance sheet prepared according to accounting principles and procedures approved by the Insurance Commissioner;
- “Nonguaranteed prepaid contract” means a prepaid contract for the selection of merchandise or services that does not guarantee the price of the merchandise or services at the time of need;
-
“Nonspecified prepaid contract” means a prepaid contract that:
- Does not select specific funeral merchandise or funeral services when the contract is executed;
- Permits the selection of funeral merchandise or funeral services at the time of need; and
- Applies contract funds to the cost of funeral merchandise or funeral services selected at the time of need;
-
- “Prearrangement” means an arrangement whereby a person, for himself or herself or on behalf of some other person, makes arrangement for funeral and burial services prior to the death of the person, without consideration and without an agreement or itemization specifying any particular service or merchandise, or the cost thereof, through the assignment or transfer, including the conditions that the assignor or transferor may choose to impose, of ownership to a licensee of an insurance policy or annuity contract, or proceeds thereof, or by the designation of a licensee as beneficiary of any such insurance policy or annuity contract.
- An assignment of an insurance policy or annuity or the proceeds thereof to a funeral home or the designation of a funeral home as beneficiary as described in subdivision (14)(A) of this section is not a prepaid funeral benefits contract;
-
- “Prepaid funeral benefits contract” or “prepaid contract” means a contract or agreement for the prepayment and sale in this state of funeral services or funeral merchandise, including without limitation caskets, grave vaults, and all other articles of merchandise and services incidental to funeral services, at an agreed-upon price, to be delivered at an undetermined future date depending upon the death of the contract beneficiary.
- “Prepaid funeral benefits contract” or “prepaid contract” includes a nonguaranteed prepaid contract and a nonspecified prepaid contract.
- “Prepaid funeral benefits contract” or “prepaid contract” does not include a prearrangement;
- “Seller” means the organization selling prepaid funeral benefits or owning any interest in any contract for prepaid funeral benefits pursuant to this chapter;
- “Surplus” means the funds or other property in excess of the undistributed net investment income and aggregate contract proceeds held in the trust fund;
- “Trust funding” means the depositing of contract proceeds into a trust account by a seller until such time as the funds are needed to pay for benefits specified in the prepaid funeral benefits contract; and
- “Trustee” means a state or national bank or savings and loan association in this state, or, in the reasonable discretion of the commissioner upon the terms and conditions that he or she may require, a securities brokerage firm licensed and in good standing with appropriate state and federal regulatory authorities.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1713; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 1; 1997, No. 372, §§ 1-3; 2013, No. 476, §§ 1, 2; 2015, No. 904, §§ 1, 2; 2019, No. 521, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-101. Former § 23-40-103 has been renumbered as § 23-40-105.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment redesignated former (10) as (10)(A) [now (12)(A)]; in (10)(A) [now (12)(A)], inserted “without limitation” following “including” and deleted “It does not include a prearrangement” at the end; added (10)(B) and (10)(C) [now (12)(B) and (C)]; and added the definition for “Nonspecified prepaid contract.”
The 2015 amendment inserted “nonguaranteed prepaid contract and a” in present (12)(B); and added the definition for “Nonguaranteed prepaid contract.”
The 2019 amendment deleted “unless the context otherwise requires” following “chapter” in the introductory language; added (1), (4), (7) and (18), and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; substituted “prepared according to accounting” for “prepared in accordance with accounting” in (11); and substituted “subdivision (14)(A) of this section” for “subdivision (11)(A) of this section” in (14)(B).
23-40-104. Arkansas Insurance Code not affected.
Except as provided in § 23-40-112(h)(2), this chapter shall not apply to any licensed insurance company or alter or affect any provisions of the Arkansas Insurance Code.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1727; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 1; 2019, No. 500, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-102. Former § 23-40-104 has been renumbered as § 23-40-106.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Insurance Code, referred to in this section, was originally enacted by Acts 1959, No. 148. Acts 1959, No. 148 is codified as set out in the note following § 23-60-101.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Except as provided in § 23-40-112(h)(2)” for “Nothing in” and inserted “not”.
23-40-105. Burial associations exempted.
Nothing in this chapter shall apply to organizations or associations operating in this state as burial associations pursuant to § 23-78-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1715; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-103. Former § 23-40-105 has been renumbered as § 23-40-108.
23-40-106. Violations — Penalties.
-
- An officer, director, agent, or employee of an organization subject to this chapter who makes, or attempts to make, a contract in violation of this chapter, or refuses to allow an inspection of the organization's records shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the county jail for at least six (6) months and not more than twelve (12) months, or by both fine and imprisonment.
-
-
An officer, director, agent, or employee of an organization is guilty of a Class D felony if the officer, director, agent, or employee:
- Collects contract proceeds on cash-funded prepaid funeral contracts and fails to deposit the proceeds with a trustee as required under § 23-40-114; or
- Collects proceeds on insurance-funded or annuity-funded contracts, or both, and fails to forward the proceeds to the insurance company or the third-party administrator within twenty (20) business days.
- A person convicted of a violation of § 23-40-114 shall be ordered to pay restitution to persons aggrieved by the violation.
- Restitution shall be ordered in addition to a fine or imprisonment.
-
An officer, director, agent, or employee of an organization is guilty of a Class D felony if the officer, director, agent, or employee:
- Each violation of any provision of this chapter shall be deemed a separate offense and prosecuted individually.
- The Criminal Investigation Division shall have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute any officer, director, agent, or employee of any organization who collects contract proceeds on cash-funded prepaid funeral contracts and fails to deposit such funds with a trustee as required under § 23-40-114.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1725; Acts 1999, No. 1249, § 3; 2001, No. 1043, § 1; 2017, No. 283, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-104.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “at least six (6) months” for “not fewer than six (6) months” and made stylistic changes; and rewrote (a)(2).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
23-40-107. Division of Prepaid Funeral Benefits — State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund.
- The Insurance Commissioner shall be responsible for the regulation of the sale of prepaid funeral benefits, and there is hereby established the Division of Prepaid Funeral Benefits within the State Insurance Department. This division shall be funded annually by the fees required to be paid by organizations subject to this chapter, which shall be placed in trust and disbursed pursuant to this chapter.
- There is hereby established on the books of the Treasurer of State, the Auditor of State, and the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State a fund to be known as the “State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund” to be used to pay the expenses of the State Insurance Department in the discharge of its regulation of prepaid funeral benefits contracts.
- No money shall be appropriated from this fund for any purpose other than to pay for personal services, operating expenses, maintenance and operations, and support of and improvements to the division, except as provided in § 23-40-119(f).
- The fund established pursuant to this section shall be administered, disbursed, and invested under the direction of the commissioner and the Treasurer of State.
- All income derived through the investment of the fund, including, but not limited to, interest and dividends, shall be credited as investment income to the fund.
- All income derived through grants, refunds, and gifts to the fund shall be credited as income to the fund.
- All moneys deposited to the fund shall not be subject to any deduction, tax, levy, or any other type of assessment, except as provided in this chapter.
- All fees required to be paid by licensees pursuant to this chapter shall be deposited into the fund for the support, operation, and maintenance of the division and, when paid into the State Treasury by the commissioner, shall be maintained by the Treasurer of State as the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund, separate from all other funds, and available only for the payment of the expenses of the division, except as provided in § 23-40-119(f).
- Upon proper voucher from the commissioner, the Auditor of State shall issue his or her warrant on the Treasurer of State in payment of all salaries and other expenses incurred by the division, or for any reparations awarded under § 23-40-119(f) in the administration of this chapter.
- However, as needed, the commissioner shall transfer from the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund to the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund a sum or sums sufficient to administer and provide reparations to persons as provided under § 23-40-119(d)(1)(A) and (f)(1).
History. Acts 1995, No. 852, § 12; 1997, No. 372, § 4; Acts 1999, No. 1249, § 2; 2001, No. 1043, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Former § 23-40-107 has been renumbered as § 23-40-110.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
23-40-108. Administration.
- This chapter shall be administered by the Insurance Commissioner.
- The commissioner is authorized to prescribe reasonable rules concerning keeping and inspection of records, the filing of contracts and reports, and all other matters incidental to the orderly administration of this chapter.
- The commissioner is authorized to employ the personnel necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and to fix their compensation within the amounts made available by appropriation.
- The commissioner may make and promulgate reasonable rules for the administration of this chapter and for the purpose of carrying out the intent hereof.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, §§ 4, 14; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1716, 67-1726; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2503.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-105. Former § 23-40-108 has been renumbered as § 23-40-111.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b) and (d).
Case Notes
Rules and Regulations.
The rule-making authority given to the Securities Commissioner under former similar section did not authorize the promulgation of a rule or regulation that was not authorized or was contrary to the laws of this state. Arkansas Sec. Dep't v. Roller Funeral Home, 263 Ark. 123, 562 S.W.2d 611 (1978) (decision under prior law).
23-40-109. Permit required.
- Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, society, association, or other entity, hereinafter called an “organization”, desiring to sell prearranged or prepaid funeral services or funeral merchandise, including caskets, grave vaults, and all other articles of merchandise incidental to funeral services, in this state under a sales contract providing for prepaid disposition or funeral benefits or merchandise to be delivered at an undetermined future date depending upon the death of a contracting party, hereinafter called “prepaid funeral benefits”, or any organization desiring to purchase an interest in, or assume the liability of, any contract for prepaid funeral benefits, shall obtain a permit from the Insurance Commissioner authorizing the transaction of this type of business before entering into any such agreement or contract and prior to accepting money, property, or any other direct or indirect consideration and shall first apply for and obtain a prepaid funeral benefits permit or license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
- An organization desiring to sell prepaid funeral benefits or otherwise own any interest in any contract for prepaid funeral benefits shall file proof of ownership of an establishment which is in the business of providing the funeral goods or services to be contracted for and proof that the establishment is duly authorized and licensed to do such business in the State of Arkansas.
- It shall be unlawful to sell prepaid funeral benefits unless the seller holds a valid, current permit at the time the contract is made.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1714; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-106. Former § 23-40-109 has been renumbered as § 23-40-112.
23-40-110. Application for initial or renewed permit.
- Each organization desiring to sell prepaid funeral benefits or any organization desiring to purchase an interest in or assume the liability of any contract for prepaid funeral benefits shall file an application for a permit with the Insurance Commissioner. Each initial and renewal application for a permit shall contain such information which the commissioner by rule shall reasonably prescribe.
- Each applicant shall, at the time of the application, pay a filing fee of three hundred dollars ($300) for the initial application and two hundred dollars ($200) for a renewal application.
- Permits shall expire on June 1 of each year, unless a renewal application is filed with and approved by the commissioner prior to the permit expiration date. Each organization which has discontinued the sale of prepaid funeral benefits, but which still has outstanding contracts, shall obtain a renewal of its permit until all those contracts have been performed or otherwise fully discharged. No filing fee shall be prorated.
-
- Each applicant for a permit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall, as of a date not preceding thirty (30) days of the application date, have a net worth in an amount equal to the greater of five thousand dollars ($5,000) or three percent (3%) of the aggregate contract price of all contracts for prepaid funeral benefits outstanding and unfulfilled as of the end of the preceding calendar year, up to a maximum net worth of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).
- Each applicant shall, at the time of application, file a sworn and notarized certification of net worth form stating that the applicant satisfies the net worth requirements of this chapter, in a format as prescribed by the commissioner, as evidence that the applicant has, at a minimum, the required net worth.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1717; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 4; 1997, No. 372, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 2504.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-107. Former § 23-40-110 has been renumbered as § 23-40-113.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (a).
23-40-111. Issuance of permit — Cancellation or denial.
-
- The Insurance Commissioner may issue a permit conditioned upon satisfactory completion of all requirements of this chapter prior to the applicant's offering for sale or selling prepaid funeral benefits.
- In addition, prior to the issuance of either an initial or renewal permit, the applicant must be deemed by the commissioner to be competent, trustworthy, and financially responsible to engage in the sale of prepaid funeral contracts in this state.
-
-
The commissioner may deny an initial application for failure to meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section or for the applicant's failure to comply with any material provision of this chapter or any valid rule that the commissioner has prescribed, after:
- Thirty (30) days' notice to the applicant or permittee setting forth the grounds for the cancellation, the denial of application for initial permit, or refusal to renew; and
- A hearing if the applicant or permittee requests a hearing.
-
After notice to the licensee and after a hearing, the commissioner may suspend any permit under this chapter for up to thirty-six (36) months or may revoke or refuse to continue any permit under this chapter if the commissioner finds that:
- The licensee has failed to comply with any material provision of this chapter or any valid rule or order that the commissioner has prescribed;
- The licensee has obtained its permit through misrepresentation or fraud;
- An officer, director, or owner of the licensee has improperly withheld, misappropriated, or converted any moneys or properties received in the course of prepaid funeral contracts business to the licensee's own use;
- An officer, director, or owner of the licensee has been found to have committed any unfair trade practice or fraud during the course of prepaid funeral contracts business;
- The licensee has failed to provide a written response after receipt of a written inquiry from the commissioner or his or her representative as to transactions under the license within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof unless the commissioner or his or her representative knowingly waives the timely response requirement in writing;
- The licensee has refused to be examined or produce any of his or her accounts, records, and files for examination or has failed to cooperate with the commissioner in an investigation when requested by the commissioner or his or her representative; or
- The licensee is in violation of any grounds under § 23-40-114(a) sufficient to subject the organization to delinquency proceedings.
-
- If the commissioner finds that one (1) or more grounds exist for the suspension or revocation of any license, the commissioner may impose upon the licensee an administrative penalty in the amount of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation.
- If the commissioner finds willful misconduct or willful violation on the part of the licensee, the commissioner may impose upon the licensee an administrative penalty of up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation.
- In addition to either penalty imposed under subdivision (b)(3)(A) or subdivision (b)(3)(B) of this section, the commissioner may also order restitution of actual losses to affected persons.
- If the commissioner finds in his or her order that the public health, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, the commissioner may summarily suspend any license issued by him or her but shall promptly hold an administrative hearing regarding the suspension.
-
-
Upon notice and hearing, if the commissioner finds that the licensee has violated a provision of the prepaid funeral benefits laws of this state or any rule or order of the commissioner and that the licensee has previously violated provisions of the prepaid funeral benefits laws of this state or any rule or order of the commissioner, the commissioner may:
- Take judicial notice of previous orders against the licensee; and
- Enhance or increase the penalties ordered in the current proceeding against the licensee.
-
The commissioner may enter an order under subdivision (b)(5)(A) of this section by:
- The commissioner's own order; or
- An order entered with the consent of the parties.
- The commissioner shall incorporate a finding under subdivision (b)(5)(A) of this section in any order issued under this subdivision (b)(5).
-
Upon notice and hearing, if the commissioner finds that the licensee has violated a provision of the prepaid funeral benefits laws of this state or any rule or order of the commissioner and that the licensee has previously violated provisions of the prepaid funeral benefits laws of this state or any rule or order of the commissioner, the commissioner may:
-
The commissioner may deny an initial application for failure to meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section or for the applicant's failure to comply with any material provision of this chapter or any valid rule that the commissioner has prescribed, after:
- Any person aggrieved by the action of the commissioner may appeal therefrom to any state court of competent jurisdiction.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, §§ 5, 7; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1717, 67-1719; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 4; 1999, No. 347, § 1; 2003, No. 987, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2505.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-108. Former § 23-40-111 has been renumbered as § 23-40-114.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulation” following “rule” in the introductory language of (b)(1) and in (b)(2)(A); and deleted “regulation” following “rule” twice in the introductory language of (b)(5)(A).
23-40-112. Prepaid funeral benefits contracts.
-
- The Insurance Commissioner shall approve forms for prepaid funeral benefits contracts.
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (a)(2)(B) of this section, a nonguaranteed prepaid contract or a nonspecified prepaid contract shall be approved if the prepaid contract provides the contract holder with interest or earnings during the term of the prepaid contract.
- If a prepaid contract is canceled under § 23-40-122, the seller may retain the accumulated interest on the deposit or the cash surrender value of the insurance policy used to purchase the prepaid contract in excess of the amount paid by the purchaser.
- The commissioner by rule may establish additional requirements for a nonguaranteed prepaid contract or a nonspecified prepaid contract.
-
- Prepaid funeral benefits contracts shall be in writing.
- A prepaid contract for specified benefits shall set forth the specific merchandise and services to be provided by the seller and the prepaid contract price.
-
- A nonguaranteed prepaid contract for specified benefits shall state that the prepaid contract is not guaranteed.
-
A nonguaranteed prepaid contract may:
- State the specific merchandise and services to be provided by the seller; and
- Name the prepaid contract price.
-
- All forms for prepaid funeral benefits contracts shall contain the provisions incidental to the orderly administration of this chapter as set forth in the rules prescribed by the commissioner.
- A prepaid contract form shall not be used without prior approval of the commissioner.
-
-
- A seller of a prepaid contract for specified benefits shall furnish to the buyer the merchandise and services as stated in the prepaid contract at the prepaid contract price regardless of the cost of the merchandise or services at the date of the contract beneficiary's death.
- A nonguaranteed prepaid contract shall state that the prepaid contract price is not guaranteed.
-
- However, the seller shall not be required to furnish at the prepaid contract price other items incidental to the funeral and disposition of the beneficiary that are clearly identified in the prepaid contract as cash accommodation items.
- The seller may charge the difference between the cash accommodation fund balance, including accrued interest, and the market price of the cash accommodation items as of the date of the beneficiary's death.
- If the total funds on deposit exceed the market price of the cash accommodation items, the seller shall return the excess to the buyer or his or her estate.
-
- The seller shall not be entitled to enforce a prepaid contract made in violation of this chapter, but the purchaser, or his or her heirs, or his or her legal representative shall be entitled to recover all amounts paid to the seller under any prepaid contract made in violation of this chapter.
-
- This chapter does not prohibit the assignment or transfer of insurance contracts as consideration for prepaid funeral benefits furnished in accordance with this chapter or the designation of an organization licensed pursuant to this chapter as beneficiary of a funeral expense or other insurance policy.
- Such an assignment, transfer, or designation shall not be deemed to be a prepaid contract.
- The prepaid contract shall contain a provision in substantially the following form:
-
-
Each seller shall provide advance written notice to the prepaid contract purchaser that the seller intends to procure a single payment whole life insurance policy or annuity on the contract beneficiary to fund the prepaid funeral benefit contract for less money than the total amount of the cash payment if:
- The prepaid funeral benefits contract was originally intended by the contract purchaser to be fully paid in cash; and
- The amount of the single premium payment to the insurer by the seller is less than the cash payment provided to the seller by the contract purchaser.
-
- Within three (3) business days from the receipt of a notification of death of a contract beneficiary and a request for verification of benefits by an owner, beneficiary, or assignee, or the authorized representative of the owner, beneficiary, or assignee, an insurer shall verify the benefits for a contract beneficiary under a whole life insurance policy or annuity.
- The verification of benefits under subdivision (h)(2)(A) of this section shall include without limitation:
- The commissioner shall promulgate rules regarding verification of benefits under subdivision (h)(2)(A) of this section.
- The commissioner may impose a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) for each failure to provide the verification required under this subdivision (h)(2) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) in the aggregate.
-
Each seller shall provide advance written notice to the prepaid contract purchaser that the seller intends to procure a single payment whole life insurance policy or annuity on the contract beneficiary to fund the prepaid funeral benefit contract for less money than the total amount of the cash payment if:
- Whether the deceased is a covered person under the policy or annuity; (ii) The death benefit amount under the policy or annuity; and (iii) Whether the policy or annuity is in the contestability period.
“NOTICE: If this contract is irrevocable and you choose to transfer this contract to a substitute provider, the entire amount of the contract will not be transferred, the seller may collect a fee that includes the cost of transferring the contract, and you may have to pay more to obtain 100% of the services provided for in the contract.”
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, §§ 2, 4; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1714, 67-1716; Acts 1995, No. 852, §§ 4, 12; 2003, No. 987, § 3[2]; 2013, No. 476, § 3; 2015, No. 880, § 1; 2015, No. 904, §§ 3-5; 2019, No. 500, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-109. Former § 23-40-112 has been renumbered as § 23-40-115.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 987 did not contain a Section 2.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote the section heading; rewrote (a); substituted “Prepaid funeral benefits contracts shall” for “All contracts for sale of prepaid funeral benefits must” in (b)(1); substituted “A prepaid contract for specified benefits shall” for “and must” in (b)(2), inserted “prepaid” in (b)(2), (c)(1), (d), (e) and (h); in (c)(1), deleted “of sales contracts” following “forms” and inserted “contracts”; substituted “A prepaid contract for specified benefits” for “All contracts for sale of prepaid funeral benefits” in (d)(1) and added subdivision designations in (d)(2); substituted “of this chapter” for “hereof” in (e); and deleted “the provisions” twice in (f)(1).
The 2015 amendment by No. 880 inserted “the seller may collect a fee that includes the cost of transferring the contract” in (g).
The 2015 amendment by No. 904, in (a)(2)(A), added “Except as provided in subdivision (a)(2)(B) of this section, a nonguaranteed prepaid contract or” and deleted “if the nonspecified prepaid contract is not canceled under § 23-40-122” from the end; deleted “nonspecified” preceding “prepaid contract” twice in (a)(2)(A) and twice in (a)(2)(B); inserted “nonguaranteed prepaid contract or a” in (a)(2)(C); added (b)(3); designated former (d)(1) as (d)(1)(A); in (d)(1)(A), added “A seller of,” deleted “provide that the seller shall” following “shall,” and inserted “contract” preceding “beneficiary’s”; and added (d)(1)(B).
The 2019 amendment redesignated (h) as (h)(1) and former (h)(1) and (h)(2) as (h)(1)(A) and (h)(1)(B); and added (h)(2).
Case Notes
Contract Terms.
Where seller's contract provided that the purchaser or someone acting for him agreed to notify the seller immediately upon death and seller would have a specified minimum notice prior to delivery of a grave vault, delivery was conditioned upon a demand made pursuant to a death and was subject to former similar act. Reserve Vault Corp. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 1011, 356 S.W.2d 225 (1962) (decision under prior law).
The inclusion of “service and merchandise-only” clauses in pre-need contracts is not void as against public policy. Guaranty Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Denver Roller, Inc., 313 Ark. 128, 854 S.W.2d 312 (1993).
Amendments to §§ 23-71-111 and 23-78-112 preclude strict enforcement of “service and merchandise-only” clauses in both burial certificates and insurance policies; however, no legislative action as yet has been taken to amend subdivision (d)(1) of this section, which provides that sellers of pre-need contracts may contract to provide merchandise and services. Guaranty Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Denver Roller, Inc., 313 Ark. 128, 854 S.W.2d 312 (1993).
23-40-113. Change of ownership.
-
The seller shall apply for change of ownership or control when:
- The seller transfers all or a portion of the interest in any contract for prepaid funeral benefits;
- The seller transfers one (1) or more of its establishments for providing funeral goods or services;
-
All or a portion of the equity ownership of a seller has been transferred which will result in a change of:
- The controlling interest of a seller when the seller is a corporation;
- Ownership of a seller when the seller is other than a corporation;
- The seller transfers all of its business assets relating to providing funeral goods or services; or
- The seller terminates its business of providing funeral goods or services.
-
At least fifteen (15) days prior to the proposed occurrence of an event described in subsection (a) of this section, the seller shall file a verified change of ownership application with the Insurance Commissioner which shall contain the following:
- The name and address of the seller;
- The name and address of the organization proposing to acquire property of the seller, hereinafter referred to as the “transferee”;
- A description of the property and of the proposed transaction, as set forth in subsection (a) of this section;
- An accounting of the trust fund and all outstanding contracts, which accounting shall contain all the information required in the annual report, prepared as of a date within thirty (30) days of the required application filing date;
- Any required documents or amendments thereto relating to the trust fund;
- A copy of any notice proposed to be sent to the contract buyers after the transfer;
- A filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500); and
- Any other information which may reasonably be required by the commissioner pursuant to rule or order.
-
The commissioner shall approve the seller's application for change of ownership by written authorization if:
- The transferee or transferees set forth in the application hold a valid, current permit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;
- The accounting required is complete, accurate, and reflects the trust fund whole and intact; and
- All required information and documents are filed with and approved by the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall have the authority by rule or order to waive or reduce any or all of the requirements contained in subsection (b) of this section as not being necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of the contract buyers.
- The seller, or interest therein, shall remain liable for all funds and transactions to the effective date of the transfer. The commissioner shall recover from the seller, for the benefit and protection of contract buyers, all contract proceeds which the seller has not properly accounted for and deposited into the trust fund.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1718; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 5; 1997, No. 372, § 6; 1999, No. 881, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-110. Former § 23-40-113 has been renumbered as § 23-40-116.
23-40-114. Trust funds — Creation — Deposits, withdrawals, and transfers of funds.
- All contract proceeds collected under contracts for prepaid funeral benefits, including funds collected under contracts entered into before June 28, 1985, shall be deposited with a trustee within twenty (20) business days after receipt of proceeds, to be held, invested, and administered in a trust fund for the benefit and protection of the contract purchasers pursuant to this chapter.
- Each trust fund shall be created by a letter or written agreement which shall be filed with and approved by the Insurance Commissioner prior to placement of funds.
- The seller may deposit money or property as surplus at any time.
- The commissioner shall prescribe by regulation proper affidavits and forms for the withdrawal of funds from the trust fund.
- The commissioner shall first approve and authorize in writing any transfer of funds from an existing trustee to a proposed new trustee if the proposed new trustee meets the requirements of this chapter and the rules promulgated thereunder.
- The licensee shall file a request for a transfer of funds, together with a filing fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and any other information required by rule.
- This section shall not apply to the proceeds of insurance policies or contracts, and it shall not be necessary to establish a trust for the payment of such proceeds to the beneficiary designated in the policy or contract or the assignee or transferee thereof.
- [Repealed.]
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1720; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 6; 1997, No. 372, § 7; 2001, No. 1043, § 3; 2003, No. 987, § 4[3]; 2015, No. 904, § 6; 2019, No. 315, § 2506.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-111. Former § 23-40-114 has been renumbered as § 23-40-117.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 987 did not contain a Section 2.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment repealed (h).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (e), and deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (f).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Requirement that all moneys collected be placed in a trust fund did not make former similar provision confiscatory rather than regulatory nor prohibit the operation of this type of business. Reserve Vault Corp. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 1011, 356 S.W.2d 225 (1962) (decision under prior law).
23-40-115. Trust funds — Investments.
-
The trustees shall invest the trust fund only in the following:
- Demand deposits, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, and all other accounts that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
- Bonds and obligations that are insured by, fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, and due from the United States Government or any of its agencies, including the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Government National Mortgage Association, and any repurchase obligations that are secured by any of the foregoing;
-
The following bonds or obligations:
-
- Corporate, state, municipal, or political subdivision bonds or obligations that at the time of purchase are rated A or better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or A or better by Standard & Poor's rate services.
- The Insurance Commissioner by rule may permit the continued investment in a bond purchased in compliance with subdivision (a)(3)(A)(i) of this section that is subsequently downgraded for the time and in the amounts established by the commissioner; and
-
- Bonds of any school district in this state.
- However, no more than thirty percent (30%) of the total trust assets may be invested in such school district bonds; and
-
-
- Mutual funds or common trust funds whose portfolio is made up of investments that are described in subdivisions (a)(1)-(3) of this section.
- Investments described in subdivisions (a)(2) and (3) and subdivision (a)(4)(A) of this section shall be purchased and held by the trustee that has trust powers under a trust agreement filed with and approved by the commissioner.
-
The trustee shall maintain the trust fund in a manner consistent with the following investment policies:
- The trust fund shall contain at all times liquid investments having a cost basis not less than thirty percent (30%) of the total contract proceeds disbursed from the trust fund as described in § 23-40-116(1)-(3) during the preceding calendar year;
-
- An investment shall not be sold, exchanged, or liquidated at less than its cost if it would result in the aggregate cost basis of the trust fund minus undistributed net investment income being less than the aggregate amount of contract proceeds held in the trust fund.
- However, this prohibition shall not apply if the seller contemporaneously deposits with the trustee a sum of money or other property in an amount equal to the loss realized upon the sale, exchange, or liquidation of the investment;
-
- For cash-funded trust contracts, the portion of the contract proceeds collected for cash accommodation items pursuant to the terms of a contract shall be deposited into a separate account which shall be clearly identified as “cash accommodation funds” and shall state the name of the contract buyer.
- All income earned on the cash accommodation funds shall become a part of the principal of the respective accounts; and
- For insurance-funded or annuity-funded contracts, if nonguaranteed cash accommodation items are included in the contract total, the entire amount may be included in the purchase premium of the insurance or annuity policy used to fund the contract if a proration calculation is used to identify the portion of the accrued interest income that is associated with the nonguaranteed portion of the contract.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1720; Acts 1993, No. 406, § 1; 1995, No. 852, § 7; 2013, No. 476, §§ 4, 5; 2017, No. 283, § 2; 2019, No. 391, § 3.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-112. Former § 23-40-115 has been renumbered as § 23-40-118.
The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation referred to in this section was abolished by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment, in (a)(1)(C)(i) (a) , substituted “that at the time of purchase” for “which” and “A or better” for “AA or better” twice; added (a)(1)(C)(i) (b) ; and repealed (b)(1).
The 2017 amendment deleted (b)(1) and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; added the (A) and (B) designations in (b)(2) and (3); added “For cash-funded trust contracts” in (b)(3)(A); added present (b)(4); and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment redesignated (a)(1) as (a), and redesignated the remaining subdivisions in (a) and internal references accordingly; deleted “or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation” from the end of (a)(1); added the introductory language in (a)(3); inserted “Investors Service, Inc.” in (a)(3)(A)(i), substituted “and” for “or” at the end of (a)(3)(ii); in (a)(3)(B)(ii), deleted “Provided” from the beginning and inserted “district” preceding “bonds”; and rewrote (a)(4)(B).
23-40-116. Trust funds — Disbursements.
The trustee shall disburse money or other property from the trust fund only as follows:
- Upon the death of the contract beneficiary and upon proper proof and documentation being submitted to and approved by the Insurance Commissioner, or pursuant to such other method as may be permitted under valid rules adopted by the commissioner, in which event the contract proceeds shall be paid to the seller;
- Upon cancellation of the prepaid contract pursuant to § 23-40-122 and upon proper proof and documentation being submitted to and approved by the commissioner, or pursuant to such other method as may be permitted under valid rules adopted by the commissioner;
- Upon the breach of contract by either party, in which event the contract proceeds shall be paid according to a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; or
- Upon the withdrawal of net investment income or surplus by the seller, which may be made at any time and from time to time.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1720; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 8; 2019, No. 315, § 2507.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-113. Former § 23-40-116 has been renumbered as § 23-40-119.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (1) and (2).
23-40-117. Trust funds — Exemption from attachment, etc.
- All contract proceeds held in trust pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and all income derived therefrom shall be exempt from attachment, garnishment, execution, and claims of creditors, receivers, or trustees in bankruptcy. The trust fund shall not be seized, taken, appropriated, or applied to pay any debt or liability of the seller by any legal or equitable process or by operation of law.
- The seller shall notify the Insurance Commissioner within ten (10) days upon the filing of bankruptcy or upon becoming insolvent. Upon receipt of notification, the commissioner shall notify the trustee of the trust fund, and all income earned after that date shall be held in trust by the trustee and disbursed only upon the direction of the commissioner.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1721; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 9.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-114. Former § 23-40-117 has been renumbered as § 23-40-120.
23-40-118. Agent for deposit of contract proceeds.
- Each organization subject to this chapter shall designate an agent or agents, either by names of the individuals or by titles of their offices or positions, who shall be responsible for the deposit of contract proceeds collected under contracts for prepaid funeral benefits. The organization shall notify the Insurance Commissioner of the designation within ten (10) days after it becomes subject to this chapter and shall also notify the commissioner of any change in the designation within ten (10) days after the change occurs.
- If any person acting on behalf of the seller collects any contract proceeds under a contract for prepaid funeral benefits and fails to deliver it within ten (10) days after collection to a designated agent, or if any designated agent fails to deposit the contract proceeds within twenty (20) days after receipt of proceeds, he or she shall be punished as prescribed in § 23-40-106(a)(2).
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1722; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 10; 2001, No. 1043, § 4.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-115. Former § 23-40-118 has been renumbered as § 23-40-121.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
23-40-119. Annual report and fee.
-
Each organization shall file an annual report and an annual report fee with the Insurance Commissioner on or before March 15 of each year in such form as the commissioner may require, showing the:
- Names or account numbers, or both, of all persons with whom contracts for prepaid funeral benefits have been made prior to January 1 of that year that had not been fully discharged on January 1;
- Date of contract;
- Name of the trustee holding the trust fund; and
- Amount in the trust fund under each contract on the preceding December 31.
- If any officer of any organization fails or refuses to file an annual report or to cause it to be filed within thirty (30) days after he or she has been notified by the commissioner that the report is due and has not been received, then, upon a finding of such failure by a court of competent jurisdiction, he or she shall be guilty of a violation.
-
- Effective on and after March 15, 1997, the annual report fee shall be based on the total amount of aggregate contracts for prepaid funeral benefits outstanding and unfulfilled as of December 31 of each year and shall be payable at the time the annual report is filed.
- The fee shall be based on the following schedule and shall be payable to the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund:
-
-
-
- (a) Effective for all prepaid funeral benefits contracts executed on and after April 1, 1997, each licensee selling a prepaid funeral benefits contract shall remit to the State Insurance Department a one-time, per-contract fee of not less than five dollars ($5.00) for each prepaid funeral benefits contract, including any amendments thereto, entered into by the licensee, whether cash or trust funded or funded by an insurance policy or annuity contract, unless the per-contract fees are otherwise eliminated or suspended by the commissioner pursuant to a rule.
- On and after July 1, 2001, the commissioner shall then transfer from each per-contract fee remitted to the department, into the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund pursuant to this act a portion of the fee in an amount to be determined by rules of the commissioner and thereafter to be administered by the commissioner with advice from the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Board, pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
- The per-contract fees shall be remitted quarterly to the department for each quarter of the calendar year with a quarterly fee form as prescribed by the commissioner.
- The fees shall be remitted to the department no later than forty-five (45) days after each quarter.
-
-
-
- On and after July 1, 2001, the commissioner may by rule eliminate, reduce, suspend, or increase the per-contract fee or the portion of the per-contract fee allotted to the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund.
- The per-contract fee may be charged to the purchaser of the contract.
- Any fee so charged and collected shall not be included in the term “contract proceeds” as defined in § 23-40-103(6) and shall not be subject to the deposit requirements of § 23-40-114(a).
-
-
-
- Absent the commissioner's approval of an extension for good cause shown, licensees failing to timely report and pay any administrative and financial regulations fees to the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund may be subject to a penalty of up to one hundred dollars ($100) per day for each day of delinquency, payable to the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund.
- The commissioner shall deposit all administrative and financial regulation fees and any penalties assessed under this section directly into the fund as special revenues.
-
-
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 23-40-107, if there are any unused funds from fees collected from organizations under subsections (c) and (d) of this section not disbursed for personal services, operating expenses, maintenance and operations, and support and improvements for the Division of Prepaid Funeral Benefits, such excess funds, if any, may be transferred to the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund to provide reparations to purchasers of prepaid funeral contracts who have purchased cash-funded prepaid funeral contracts from organizations that have been:
- Declared insolvent by a state or federal court of competent jurisdiction; or
- Determined by either the commissioner or a state or federal court of competent jurisdiction to have fund account deficiencies.
- Purchasers of prepaid funeral contracts requesting any discretionary relief from the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund after July 1, 2001, may include the contract holder or his or her surviving family representative or such other person as described in rules of the department.
- The commissioner may by rule describe the procedures, claim forms, qualifications, and process of filing a claim for aggrieved purchasers desiring to make a claim for reparations from any excess funds.
- No purchaser is provided in this section with any administrative right or legal or equitable right to any funds collected from fees collected under this section to satisfy any judgment or economic loss of the purchaser from a prepaid funeral organization, except to the extent that the commissioner, in his or her discretion, has set aside funds to provide discretionary relief to purchasers of prepaid funeral contracts from insolvent prepaid funeral organizations or those organizations with trust fund account shortages, and subject to limits of the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund and the claimant's actual contract payments made, excluding additional damages or interest or other equitable relief, or noneconomic damages.
-
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 23-40-107, if there are any unused funds from fees collected from organizations under subsections (c) and (d) of this section not disbursed for personal services, operating expenses, maintenance and operations, and support and improvements for the Division of Prepaid Funeral Benefits, such excess funds, if any, may be transferred to the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund to provide reparations to purchasers of prepaid funeral contracts who have purchased cash-funded prepaid funeral contracts from organizations that have been:
AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PREPAID FUNERAL BENEFITS FEE DUE STATE CONTRACTS IN ARKANSAS OF ARKANSAS Up to $250,000 $200.00 Over $250,001 to $500,000 $250.00 $500,001 to $1,000,000 $500.00 $1,000,001 to $2,500,000 $1,000.00 $2,500,001 to $5,000,000 $2,000.00 $5,000,001 to $10,000,000 $3,000.00 $10,000,001 to $20,000,000 $4,000.00 $20,000,001 to $40,000,000 $5,000.00 Over $40,000,001 $6,000.00
Click to view table.
(b) However, the per-contract fees once eliminated or suspended by rule of the commissioner may be reinstated by subsequent rule of the commissioner adopted upon a public hearing at a later date upon the commissioner's determination that these fees are essential and necessary to the operation of the Division of Prepaid Funeral Benefits of the State Insurance Department.
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1723; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 11; 1997, No. 372, §§ 8, 9; 1999, No. 1249, § 1; 2001, No. 1043, §§ 5, 6; 2005, No. 1994, § 152; 2017, No. 283, § 3; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2508, 2509.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-116.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (e)(1), inserted “up to” and substituted “State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund” for “fund” following “payable to the”.
The 2019 amendment deleted “or regulation” following “rule” in (d)(1)(A)(i) (a) and in (d)(2)(A)(i); deleted “and regulation” following “rule” in (d)(1)(A)(i) (b) and (f)(3); and deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (d)(1)(A)(ii) and (f)(2).
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 2001, No. 1043, codified as §§ 23-40-106, 23-40-107, 23-40-114, 23-40-118, 23-40-119, 23-40-125.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
23-40-120. Records required — Examination.
- Each organization which has outstanding contracts for prepaid funeral benefits shall maintain within this state any records which the Insurance Commissioner may require to enable him or her to determine whether the organization is complying with the provisions of this chapter.
-
- The records shall be subject to examination by the commissioner, or his or her representatives, as often as he or she deems advisable and not less frequently than every three (3) years. However, the commissioner shall determine the date of original examination without regard to the date of the original permit.
- Each permittee examined shall pay the actual meals, hotel, and traveling expenses of each authorized examiner from Little Rock and return. The expenses shall be prorated if more than one (1) examination is made on an examination trip.
-
-
All working papers, recorded information, documents, and copies produced by, obtained by, or disclosed to the commissioner or any other person in the course of an examination made under this chapter:
- Shall be treated as confidential;
- Are not subject to subpoena; and
- May not be made public by the commissioner or any other person, except to the extent provided in § 23-61-205.
-
All working papers, financial statement analyses, ratio calculations, and any other materials produced by State Insurance Department financial examiners or analysts, or documents submitted or disclosed to the department by an insurer in response to a request from a department financial examiner or analyst during the course of reviewing or investigating the financial solvency, condition, or affairs of the organization:
- Shall be treated as confidential;
- Are not subject to subpoena; and
- May not be made public by the commissioner or any other person, except to the extent provided in § 23-61-205.
- A recipient of information under this section other than the commissioner or department personnel must agree in writing to provide the confidential treatment required by this section prior to receiving the information, unless the prior written consent of the company to which the information pertains has been obtained.
-
All working papers, recorded information, documents, and copies produced by, obtained by, or disclosed to the commissioner or any other person in the course of an examination made under this chapter:
History. Acts 1985, No. 156, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1724; Acts 1995, No. 852, § 11; 1999, No. 881, § 3; 2005, No. 506, § 6.
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was formerly codified as § 23-40-117.
23-40-121. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning the State General Services Fund Account, was repealed by Acts 1999, No. 881, § 4. The section was derived from Acts 1985, No. 156, § 14; 1985, No. 888, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1726.
23-40-122. Cancellation or transfer.
-
A purchaser may cancel or transfer a prepaid contract under this section, whether revocable or irrevocable, or whether cash-funded or funded by insurance or an annuity, at any time before performance of the contract by the seller, under the following conditions:
-
In the case of a cash-funded or trust-funded prepaid contract:
- Before the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser is entitled to receive a refund of not less than one hundred percent (100%) of all sums paid to the seller by the purchaser, not to exceed the contract price;
- After death, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser or his or her representative is entitled to receive one hundred percent (100%) of the amount paid to the seller by the purchaser, not to exceed the contract price; or
- If the prepaid contract is irrevocable, the purchaser shall not have the right to a refund of any funds paid by him or her or proceeds paid to the seller but shall have the right to change the provider of the contract services and merchandise to a substitute provider, in which event the seller shall transfer to the substitute provider not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the amount paid to the seller by the purchaser, not to exceed the contract price;
-
In the case of a prepaid contract funded by life insurance:
- Before the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser shall have the right to receive not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the cash surrender value of the policy used to fund the prepaid contract, not to exceed the premium paid by the purchaser;
- After the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser or his or her designee is entitled to receive not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the policy proceeds paid to the seller, not to exceed the original face amount of the policy; or
-
- Before the death of the contract beneficiary, if the contract is irrevocable, the prepaid contract purchaser shall not have the right to a refund of any funds paid to the seller but shall have the right to change the provider of the prepaid contract services and merchandise to a substitute provider, in which event the seller shall assign or transfer to the substitute provider, as directed by the contract owner, the life insurance policy used to fund the prepaid contract or funds in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the cash surrender value of the policy used to fund the prepaid contract, not to exceed the premium paid by the purchaser.
- After the death of the contract beneficiary, the seller shall transfer to the substitute provider not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the policy proceeds paid to the seller, not to exceed the original face amount of the policy; or
-
In the case of a prepaid contract funded by an annuity:
- Before the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser is entitled to receive a refund of not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the annuity value, not to exceed the premium paid by the purchaser for the annuity funding the prepaid contract;
- After the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is revocable, the purchaser or his or her designee is entitled to receive not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the annuity proceeds received by the seller, not to exceed the premium paid by the purchaser; or
-
- Before the death of the contract beneficiary, if the prepaid contract is irrevocable, the purchaser shall not have the right to a refund of any funds paid to the seller but shall have the right to change the provider of the prepaid contract services and merchandise to a substitute provider, in which event the seller shall assign or transfer to the substitute provider, as directed by the contract owner, the annuity policy used to fund the prepaid contract, which shall be in an amount of not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the annuity value, not to exceed the premium paid by the purchaser.
- After the death of the contract beneficiary, the seller shall transfer to the substitute provider not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the annuity proceeds received by the seller, not to exceed the premiums paid by the purchaser.
-
In the case of a cash-funded or trust-funded prepaid contract:
-
- A seller or funding life insurance company may collect a fee for the transfer or cancellation of a prepaid contract to a substitute provider.
- The Insurance Commissioner by rule shall establish the fee for a transfer or cancellation of a prepaid contract under subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
-
-
- In the case of cancellations, reassignments, or transfers, a seller is entitled to retain any accrued interest income on a cash-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract that is being transferred to a substitute provider.
- On an insurance-funded or annuity-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract that is being transferred to a substitute provider, a seller shall be entitled to retain any accrued interest income on the policy used to fund the insurance-funded or annuity-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract from the policy inception date up to the reassignment or transfer date.
- A substitute provider shall be entitled to retain any accrued interest income on the funding mechanism from the completion date of the reassignment or transfer.
-
History. Acts 1995, No. 852, § 12; 2003, No. 987, § 5[4]; 2015, No. 880, § 2; 2019, No. 521, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 987 did not contain a Section 2.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added “or transfer” in the section heading; substituted “Before” for “Prior to” and “is” for “shall be” throughout; inserted the (a) designation; in the introductory language of (a), deleted “as provided” following “prepaid contract” and substituted “under” for “subject to”; and added (b).
The 2019 amendment added (c).
23-40-123. Delinquency proceedings.
-
If it appears upon sufficient grounds or evidence satisfactory to the Insurance Commissioner that a person or a licensee has engaged in or is about to engage in an act or a practice that violates this chapter or a rule adopted or an order issued under this chapter or that the assets or capital of a licensee are impaired or the licensee's affairs are in an unsafe condition, then the commissioner may order summarily a person or a licensee to cease and desist and take control of and administer the prepaid funeral benefits contracts business operations of a licensee that sells prepaid funeral benefits, if the commissioner finds:
- It is in the public interest necessary to ensure the orderly and proper handling of outstanding prepaid funeral benefits contracts to protect the interest and rights of active contract holders upon a revocation, suspension, or a lapse of a prepaid funeral benefits permit;
- It is necessary to prevent loss, waste, dissipation, theft, or conversion of assets that are required by law to be held and used for the benefit and protection of the purchasers of prepaid funeral benefits contracts under this chapter;
- The seller failed to deposit or remit moneys according to § 23-40-114(a);
- The seller has misappropriated, converted, illegally withheld, or refused to pay on demand any moneys entrusted to the seller that belong to a beneficiary under a prepaid funeral benefits contract; or
- The seller refused an examination by the commissioner.
-
- If the commissioner determines that immediate action is required to protect the public health, safety, or welfare of the holders of the prepaid funeral benefits contracts, the commissioner may issue an order to a licensee to cease and desist prepaid funeral benefits contracts operations.
-
An order issued under subdivision (b)(1) of this section shall:
- State the findings that the commissioner relied upon that required emergency action; and
- Provide the licensee with a reasonable amount of time as determined by the commissioner to respond or appeal an order issued under subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
- A licensee and any named party immediately shall be served with notice and a copy of the order.
-
The order issued under subdivision (b)(1) of this section may:
- Direct the commissioner or his or her designee to take possession, custody, and control of the property, books, accounts, documents, and other records of the licensee as to its prepaid funeral benefits contracts operations; or
-
Require the commissioner or his or her designee to limit the disruption to the operations of the licensee by:
- Prohibiting a licensee from making a disbursement or withdrawal from the licensee's trust fund;
- Making a disbursement from the trust fund for any valid claim;
- Procuring a substitute provider that is licensed under this chapter to service the prepaid funeral benefits contracts;
- Terminating or modifying a trust fund agreement; or
- Authorizing the commissioner to bring and prosecute a suit in the name of the commissioner that may be necessary to collect debts or preserve assets and property for the benefit of creditors and any interested person.
- The commissioner shall maintain control of the licensee until the order is modified or vacated by the commissioner.
- The commissioner may order a licensee to relinquish any property of the licensee in connection with prepaid funeral benefits contracts to the State Insurance Department.
-
The commissioner may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for an order to appoint him or her, in an official capacity, as receiver of the licensee to conserve, rehabilitate, or liquidate a prepaid funeral benefits contract, if:
-
A licensee:
- Has not maintained trust funds from prepaid funeral benefit contracts under § 23-40-114;
- Is impaired or insolvent;
- Refuses to submit its books, records, accounts, or affairs to an examination by the commissioner;
- Has refused to be examined under oath concerning the affairs of the licensee or any officer, director, or manager of the licensee refuses to be examined; or
- Has failed to file the licensee's annual report within the time and according to the insurance laws of this state and does not have an adequate explanation for failure to file the annual report after written demand by the commissioner; or
- The commissioner has reasonable cause to believe that there has been embezzlement, misappropriation, or other wrongful misapplications or use of trust funds or fraud affecting the ability of the licensee to perform its obligations under prepaid funeral benefits contracts sold or assumed by the licensee.
-
A licensee:
- Circuit courts shall have original jurisdiction of all delinquency proceedings under this chapter, and any such court is authorized to make all necessary or appropriate orders to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
- The venue of delinquency proceedings against a licensee shall be in the Pulaski County Circuit Court.
- Delinquency proceedings instituted under this chapter shall not constitute the sole and exclusive method of liquidating, rehabilitating, or conserving a licensee, and a court shall not entertain a petition for the commencement of such proceedings unless the petition is filed in the name of the state on the relation of the commissioner.
-
- The commissioner shall commence any such proceeding by application to the court for an order directing the licensee to show cause why the commissioner should not have the relief prayed for in the application.
- On the return of the order to show cause, and after a full hearing, the court shall either deny the application or grant the application, together with such other relief as the nature of the case and the interests of the prepaid contracts purchaser, contract beneficiaries, or the public may require.
- An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from an order granting or refusing rehabilitation, liquidation, or conservation, and from every other order in delinquency proceedings having the character of a final order as to the particular portion of proceedings embraced therein.
History. Acts 1997, No. 372, § 10; 2015, No. 904, § 7.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment added (a) and (b); rewrote and redesignated former (a) as (c); and redesignated former (b)-(f) as (d)-(h).
23-40-124. Compliance.
Compliance with this act shall be required for all licensees on and after March 16, 1997.
History. Acts 1997, No. 372, § 11.
Meaning of “this act”. Acts 1997, No. 372, codified as §§ 23-40-103(3), (14), (15)(A), (C), and (19),, 23-40-107, 23-40-110(b), 23-40-113(b)(7), 23-40-114(f), 23-40-119(c)-(e), 23-40-123, and 23-40-124.
23-40-125. Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund — Created — Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Board — Established.
- There is established within the State Insurance Department Prepaid Trust Fund an account to be known as the “Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Fund”, hereinafter “fund”.
- No money is to be appropriated from this fund for any purpose except for expenses and payment of claims of the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program at the direction of the Insurance Commissioner and the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Board.
- The fund shall be invested under the direction of the commissioner and the Treasurer of State, with advice from the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State as needed from time to time.
-
- All income derived through investment of the fund, including, but not limited to, fees, interest, and dividends shall be credited as investment income to the fund and deposited therein.
- All income derived from fund transfers, subrogation awards, grants, orders or judgments of restitution, refunds, voluntary reimbursements or restitution, and gifts shall be credited as investment income to the fund and deposited therein.
- Further, all moneys deposited into the fund shall not be subject to any deduction, tax, levy, or any other type of assessment except as may be provided in this subchapter.
-
- The fund shall be administered by the commissioner, with advice from the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Board, hereinafter “board”.
- The purpose of the fund is to reimburse purchasers of preneed funeral contracts who have suffered financial loss as a result of the impairment, insolvency, business interruption, or improper inactivity of a prepaid funeral organization licensed in this state under this chapter.
-
- From the fee for each preneed funeral contract as required by § 23-40-119(d)(1)(A) and from any funds transferred to the fund pursuant to § 23-40-119(f)(1), the commissioner with board advice and consultation shall administer the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program.
- The commissioner may suspend fees or unused funds transfers or deposits into the fund at any time and for any period for which the commissioner determines that a sufficient amount is available to meet likely disbursements and to maintain an adequate reserve in compliance with a rule of the commissioner.
-
The commissioner with board assistance shall adopt procedures governing management of the fund, the presentation and processing of applications for reimbursement, and subrogation or assignment of the rights of any reimbursed applicant.
-
(1) The commissioner may expend moneys in the fund for the following purposes:
- To make reimbursements on approved applications; and
- To pay related expenses involved in operating the program as permitted under state law.
-
- Each member of the board may serve up to two (2) consecutive four-year terms.
- Vacancies on the board shall be filled for the remaining period of the term by a majority vote of the remaining board members, subject to approval of the commissioner.
- In approving selections to the board, the commissioner shall consider, among other things, whether all member licensees are fairly represented.
-
(1) The commissioner may expend moneys in the fund for the following purposes:
(2) Reimbursements from the fund shall be made only to the extent to which such losses are not bonded or otherwise covered, protected, or reimbursed, and only after the applicant has complied with all applicable rules of the fund.
(j)(1) The commissioner shall investigate all applications made and may reject or allow the claims, in whole or in part, to the extent that moneys are available in the fund.
(2) The commissioner may approve one (1) application that includes more than one (1) reparation claim for the benefit of purchasers of prepaid contracts of a licensee ordered liquidated under § 23-40-123, as part of a plan to arrange for another licensee to assume the obligations of the licensee being liquidated, if:
(A) The commissioner finds that the plan is reasonable and is in the best interests of the contract beneficiaries; and
(B) The plan is approved by a court.
(k)(1) In the event reimbursement is made to an applicant under this section, the commissioner, on behalf of the state, shall be subrogated in the reimbursed amount and may bring any action the commissioner deems advisable for the program against any person, including a prepaid licensee.
(2) The commissioner may enforce any claims that the program, on behalf of the state, may have for restitution or otherwise and may employ and compensate consultants, agents, legal counsel, accountants, and any other persons that the commissioner deems appropriate. Payments shall be made from the fund for such services.
(l)(1) There is created the Prepaid Funeral Contracts Recovery Program Board.
(2)(A) Members of the board shall consist of no fewer than five (5) nor more than nine (9) members of various licensed Arkansas prepaid funeral organizations, including one (1) consumer member selected from the Arkansas public at large.
(B) The members of the board shall be selected by member licensees, subject to approval of the commissioner.
(m)(1) The board shall assist the commissioner and come under the immediate supervision of the commissioner and shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the laws of this state.
(2) The fund, as well as board action, shall be subject to examination and regulation by the commissioner.
(3)(A) The board shall prepare and submit to the commissioner each year, not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the program's fiscal year, a financial report in a form approved by the commissioner and a report of program activities during the preceding fiscal year.
(B) Upon request of a licensed prepaid funeral organization in this state, the commissioner shall provide the member prepaid funeral organization with a copy of the report.
(n) There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action of any nature shall arise against any member of the board, the commissioner, or his or her representatives, agents, or employees for any act or omission by them in the performance of their powers and duties under this chapter, or in its administration, dispensation, handling, or collection of funds for the program.
History. Acts 2001, No. 1043, § 7; 2003, No. 987, § 6[5]; 2003, No. 1473, § 50; 2019, No. 315, § 2510.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Pursuant to Acts 2003, No. 1473, § 72, the amendment of § 23-40-125 by Acts 2003, No. 987, § 6, supersedes the amendment of § 23-40-125 by Acts 2003, No. 1473, § 50. As a result, Acts 2003, No. 1473, § 51, is also superseded. Acts 2003, No. 1473, § 51, deleted subsections (l)-(n) and enacted the language in those subsections as a new code section.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 2003, No. 987 did not contain a Section 2.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulation” following “rule” in (g)(2).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 577.
23-40-126. Unfair competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices prohibited — Penalties.
An unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice under §§ 23-66-206(1)-(4), 23-66-206(6)-(8), and 23-66-207 — 23-66-213 in the sale of a prepaid funeral benefits contract is a violation of this chapter and may be punished under this chapter or the Trade Practices Act, § 23-66-201 et seq.
History. Acts 2009, No. 538, § 1.
Chapter 41 Sale of Checks
23-41-101 — 23-41-122. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This chapter, concerning the Sale of Checks Act, was repealed by Acts 2007, No. 1595, § 2, with the exception of § 23-41-116, which was repealed by Acts 1987, No. 447, § 12. The chapter was derived from the following sources:
23-41-101. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1901.
23-41-102. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1902; Acts 1987, No. 447, §§ 1-3.
23-41-103. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1904; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 4.
23-41-104. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1921; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 17.
23-41-105. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 20; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1920.
23-41-106. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1913.
23-41-107. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1919.
23-41-108. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1917; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 16.
23-41-109. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 18; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1918.
23-41-110. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1903; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 3; 2003, No. 852, § 1.
23-41-111. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1905; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 5.
23-41-112. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1906; Acts 1987, No. 447, §§ 5, 6.
23-41-113. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 7; 1975, No. 875, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1907; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 7.
23-41-114. Acts 1965, No. 124, §§ 8, 9; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1908, 67-1909; Acts 1987, No. 447, §§ 8, 9.
23-41-115. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1909; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 9.
23-41-116. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1912.
23-41-117. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1910; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 10.
23-41-118. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1915.
23-41-119. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1911; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 11.
23-41-120. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1913; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 13.
23-41-121. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1914; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 14.
23-41-122. Acts 1965, No. 124, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1916; Acts 1987, No. 447, § 15.
Chapter 42 Arkansas Securities Act
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2014, No. 269, § 7, provided:
“QUARTERLY REPORTS. The Securities Department shall on a quarterly basis provide to the Arkansas Legislative Council or Joint Budget committee a report of all funds received or any external fund transactions recognized or required through court orders or settlement agreements. The report shall include:
“a) The case name of the court order or settlement agreement.
“b) The amount of funds received or transaction recognized or required by the Securities Department for each court order or settlement agreement.
“c) A plan for disbursement of the received funds. If funds received from a court order or settlement agreement are expended for any purpose, including investor education and enforcement activities, the report must itemize specific activities subject to the exclusions provided in Ark. Code Ann. 25-1-403(1)(B). The report shall also itemize the specific investor education and enforcement activities funded for the Securities Department.
“d) An explanation of whether the funds received or transactions recognized or required from a court order or settlement are directed to a specific entity, and if so, the Securities Department shall provide a summary of input regarding the drafting of the court order or settlement agreement.
“e) A report of the rationale for disbursing funds to a specific entity if the Securities Department receives funds from a court order or settlement agreement that does not require disbursement of funds to a specific entity.
“f) A report of current balances of all unappropriated fund holdings received by court order or settlement agreement by the Securities Department.
“g) The quarterly reports shall be provided no later than the 15thday of the month immediately following the end of each quarter.
“The provisions of this section shall be in effect only from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015.”
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 29, provided, in part, that all effective registrations under prior law, all administrative orders relating to such registrations, and all conditions imposed upon such registrations remain in effect so long as they would have remained in effect if the act had not been passed and that they would be considered to have been filed, entered, or imposed under the act, but are governed by prior law. The section further provided for the judicial review of all administrative orders for which review proceedings had not been instituted prior to the effective date of the act; and that prior law would govern certain suits, actions, etc., which were pending or initiated on the basis of facts or circumstances occurring before the effective date of the act, and would apply to certain offers or sales made within one year after the effective date after the act.
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 173, § 27: April 11, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the enactment of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 on October 11, 1996 effectively preempted portions of the Arkansas Securities Act, and that because of such enactment, portions of the Arkansas Securities Act are in conflict with federal law. That in order to protect the Arkansas citizens who invest in and are affected by the securities markets, it is necessary that regulation under the Arkansas Securities Act be uniform with both federal law and the laws of other states. It is necessary that this protection begin immediately, except for the portions of the Arkansas Securities Act pertaining to investment advisers which should begin on April 11, 1997. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval except for the portions hereof pertaining to investment advisers, which portions shall be in full force and effect from and after April 11, 1997.”
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Arkansas Securities Act of 1959, 13 Ark. L. Rev. 323.
Investment Securities: Article VIII, 16 Ark. L. Rev. 98.
Securities Regulation of Real Estate Programs, 27 Ark. L. Rev. 651.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Note: A Definition of “Investment Contracts” and Equitable Defenses to Suit for Rescission for Nonregistration Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 1 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 366.
Bell, Real Estate and Unconventional Securities Concepts Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 3 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 75.
Note, Securities Law — Partnerships — Adoption of an Expansive Test for Defining a Security.Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987), 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 369.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Person not engaged in interstate commerce cannot attack Blue Sky Law on ground that it is a burden on interstate commerce. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
State may inquire into the condition of corporations without violating the provisions of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
Purpose.
The Arkansas Securities Act was passed primarily for the purpose of protecting members of the public who might invest in offerings by promoters of securities. McMullan v. Molnaird, 24 Ark. App. 126, 749 S.W.2d 352 (1988).
Bank Commissioner.
A city bank, which objected to state banking board's grant of application for a charter for a new bank in the city, was without standing to complain that the Bank Commissioner acted unlawfully in assuming supervision and enforcement of the Arkansas Securities Act with respect to stock in the proposed bank. Bank of Glenwood v. Arkansas State Banking Bd., 260 Ark. 677, 543 S.W.2d 761 (1976).
Commodity Options.
The Arkansas Securities Act does not govern commodity options since that field has been preempted by the federal government. International Trading, Ltd. v. Bell, 262 Ark. 244, 556 S.W.2d 420 (1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 956, 98 S. Ct. 3068, 57 L. Ed. 2d 1120 (1978).
Compliance with Chapter.
This chapter will not be construed to permit an issuer or dealer to solicit sales at will in Arkansas without complying with this chapter so long as an act entirely within his control, such as placing the proceeds in a bank account or issuing stock certificates, was performed at or from another state. Smith v. State, 266 Ark. 861, 587 S.W.2d 50, 1979 Ark. App. LEXIS 378 (Ct. App. 1979), cert. denied, Smith v. Arkansas, 445 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1082, 63 L. Ed. 2d 321 (1980).
A promoter cannot avoid the requirements of the Securities Act by simply labeling or calling his enterprise a joint venture when in fact such transaction was something different. Smith v. State, 266 Ark. 861, 587 S.W.2d 50, 1979 Ark. App. LEXIS 378 (Ct. App. 1979), cert. denied, Smith v. Arkansas, 445 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1082, 63 L. Ed. 2d 321 (1980).
Damages.
This chapter tracks federal law and, therefore, if the damages awarded are good under the federal securities acts, they also are good under this chapter. Farley v. Henson, 11 F.3d 827 (8th Cir. 1993).
Securities.
State Securities Commissioner did not have a statutory basis to seek an injunction to prevent defendants from performing certain acts in regard to carrying on their business of tutoring applicants for license as broker-dealers under the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board since none of the acts are in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly. Bell v. Investment Training Inst., Inc., 271 Ark. 663, 609 S.W.2d 919 (1981).
Transactions whereby buyer exercised option to purchase 100% of stock in car paint business involved the sale and purchase of securities under the terms of the Arkansas Securities Act. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Cited: Vanderboom v. Sexton, 294 F. Supp. 1178 (W.D. Ark. 1969); Vanderboom v. Sexton, 422 F.2d 1233 (8th Cir. Ark. 1970); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972); Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977); Ballentine v. Ballentine, 275 Ark. 212, 628 S.W.2d 327 (1982); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985).
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30: July 1, 1959.
Acts 1961, No. 248, § 11: July 1, 1961.
Acts 1971, No. 131, § 9: Feb. 22, 1971. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities has become extremely complex and is in need of stricter regulation to assure that the purchasers of securities receive the protection that they deserve; that it is necessary for the Securities Commissioner to have the authority to immediately issue a stop order denying, suspending or revoking the effectiveness of a registration statement under certain conditions; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to curtail the total number of violations; and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Act 1973, No. 47, § 20: Feb. 1, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the field of securities is in need of stricter regulation to assure the public that they receive the protection they deserve; that the filing fee for filing a registration statement is inadequate; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to deter the total number of violations and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be declared; therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 697, § 4: Apr. 3, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the interrelationship between the Arkansas Securities Act and the Arkansas Savings and Loan Act are unclear; and that the Arkansas Securities Commissioner acting as Securities Commissioner and also as Arkansas Savings and Loan Supervisor must have a clarification of his authority in each area; and that therefore an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 844, § 16: Apr. 4, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the filing fees are inadequate; that exemptions are necessary for certain types of securities; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 493, § 21: Mar. 18, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that securities transactions always involve a relationship of trust and usually involve fiduciary obligations. This relationship facilitates the cover-up of felonies committed under the securities laws. This act being necessary for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this State, it is effective from and after its passage and approval, and it applies to all schemes or courses of conduct continuing past its effective date; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 806, § 25: Mar. 28, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of the Arkansas Securities Commissioner provide a duplicity of regulation which creates undue burden upon mortgage loan companies and loan brokes while at the same time not being in the public interest, and it is found that this Act will eliminate much of such duplicity and provide adequate protection of the public; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 836, § 29: Mar. 25, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the ability of the State of Arkansas to become part of a national Central Registration Depository System will be beneficial to the citizens of the State and applicants for registration and provide substantial cost savings to the securities industry and that Arkansas' entry into the System was scheduled to be soon. This Act being necessary for the additional protection and savings for the citizens of this State which will be afforded by entry into the System, it is effective from and after its passage and approval; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 885, § 4: Mar. 28, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and declared that the exclusion of stock splits, reverse stock splits, or changes in par value from the application of the Arkansas Securities Act is a matter of uncertainty which requires immediate clarification. This Act is immediately necessary in order to facilitate the execution of such reclassifications of securities without registration or exemption under the Arkansas Securities Act. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 776, § 5: Apr. 7, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and it is declared by the General Assembly that an urgent need exists to define the term “farm cooperative” in order to clarify which organizations are eligible for an exemption from registration under the Arkansas Securities Act (Act No. 254 of the Acts of Arkansas of 1959), as amended, of certain securities issued by farm cooperatives, and that immediate passage of this Act is necessary to provide such clarification. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 1147, § 1705: Jan. 1, 1994.
Research References
ALR.
Heightened Pleading Requirements for Alleging Securities Fraud-Post-Iqbal/Twombly — First Circuit Cases, 31 A.L.R. Fed. 3d Art. 11 (2018).
Am. Jur. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secur. Reg. St., § 1 et seq.
C.J.S. 79 C.J.S. Supp., Secur. Reg., § 188 et seq.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey—Securities, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 255.
23-42-101. Title.
This chapter may be cited as the “Arkansas Securities Act”.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 27; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1261.
Research References
Ark. L. Notes.
Goforth, Treatment of LLC Membership Interests Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 1998 Ark. L. Notes 33.
Case Notes
Cited: Foster v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 902 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir. 1990); Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
23-42-102. Definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
-
“Agent” means an individual, other than a broker-dealer, who:
- Represents a broker-dealer or issuer in effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of securities; or
- Supervises individuals who effect or attempt to effect purchases or sales of securities for a broker-dealer.
-
“Agent” does not include an individual who represents:
-
An issuer in:
- Effecting transactions in a security exempted by § 23-42-503(a)(1)-(4) or (a)(8) and any other transactions in a security exempted by other subdivisions or subsections of § 23-42-503 which the Securities Commissioner may by rule or order prescribe;
- Effecting transactions exempted by § 23-42-504 unless otherwise required by § 23-42-504;
-
Effecting transactions in covered securities exempted by:
- Section 18(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(3), concerning sales to qualified purchasers;
- Section 18(b)(4)(E) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(E), concerning sales of securities exempt under section 3(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a); or
- Rule or order of the commissioner;
- Effecting transactions with existing employees, partners, or directors of the issuer if no commission or other remuneration is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any person in this state; or
- Effecting transactions involving a reorganization or any other individual assisting the issuer or any other constituent party in the process of the reorganization, so long as the individual is not employed for the primary purpose of obtaining or soliciting proxies, consents, or other required means of approval from the security holders of the issuer or any other constituent party to the reorganization and receives no compensation other than his or her regular salary and reimbursement for actual expenses, if any, incurred in good faith in the course of such duties or activities;
-
A broker-dealer in effecting a transaction for a customer in this state if:
- Such a transaction is effected on behalf of a customer that, for thirty (30) days prior to the day of the transaction, maintained an account with the broker-dealer;
- The individual is not ineligible to register with this state for any reason;
- The individual is registered with a registered securities association and at least one (1) state;
- The broker-dealer with which the individual is associated is registered with this state;
-
- The transaction is effected by the individual:
- For purposes of subdivision (1)(B)(ii)(e)(1)(B) of this section, each of up to three (3) individuals who are designated to effect transactions during the absence or unavailability of the assigned individual for a customer may be treated as such an assigned individual; and
-
The transaction is effected within the period beginning on the date on which the individual files with the commissioner an application for registration and ending on the earlier of:
- Sixty (60) days after the date the application is filed; or
- The time at which the commissioner notifies the individual that he or she has denied the application for registration or has stayed the pendency of the application for cause; or
-
A person who is a registered broker-dealer in a state other than Arkansas who does not:
- Have a place of business in this state; and
- Effect securities transactions with more than three (3) persons in this state during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months as described in subdivision (3)(B)(iv) of this section.
-
An issuer in:
- A partner, officer, or director of a broker-dealer or issuer, or a person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, is an agent only if he or she otherwise comes within this definition;
-
“Agent” means an individual, other than a broker-dealer, who:
-
- “Branch office” means any location other than the main office of a broker-dealer or investment adviser where an agent or representative regularly conducts business on behalf of the broker-dealer or investment adviser.
- “Branch office” includes a location that is held out as an office where an agent or representative regularly conducts business on behalf of a broker-dealer or investment advisor.
-
“Branch office” does not include:
- A location that is established solely for customer service or back-office-type functions where no sales activities are conducted and that is not held out to the public as a branch office;
-
A location that is the primary residence of the agent or representative if:
- Only agents or representatives who reside at the location and are members of the same immediate family conduct business at the location;
- The location is not held out to the public as an office and the agent or representative does not meet with customers at the location;
- Neither customer funds nor securities are handled at the location;
- The agent or representative is assigned to a designated branch office and the designated branch office is reflected on all business cards, stationery, advertisements, and other communications to the public by the agent or representative;
- The correspondence of the agent or representative and communications with the public are subject to the supervision of the broker-dealer or investment adviser with which the agent or representative is associated;
- Electronic communications, including email, are made through the electronic system of the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
- All orders for securities are entered through the designated branch office or an electronic system established by a broker-dealer that is reviewable at the branch office;
- Written supervisory procedures pertaining to supervision of activities conducted at the residence are maintained by the broker-dealer or investment adviser; and
- A list of the residence locations is maintained by the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
-
-
A location other than a primary residence that:
- Is used for a securities or investment advisory business for less than thirty (30) business days in any one (1) calendar year; and
- Satisfies the requirements of subdivisions (2)(C)(ii)(b)-(h) of this section.
- As used in this subdivision (2)(C)(iii), “business day” does not include a day in which the agent or representative spends at least four (4) hours at the designated branch office of the agent or representative during the hours that the designated branch office is normally open for business;
-
A location other than a primary residence that:
- An office of convenience that is not held out to the public as an office where associated persons occasionally and exclusively by appointment meet with customers;
- A location that is used primarily to engage in nonsecurities activities and from which the agent or representative effects no more than twenty-five (25) securities transactions in any one (1) calendar year, if any advertisement or sales literature identifying the location also provides the address and telephone number of another location from which the agent or representative conducting business at the location is directly supervised;
- The floor of a registered national securities exchange where a broker-dealer conducts a direct access business with public customers; or
- A temporary location established in response to the implementation of a business continuity plan;
-
- “Broker-dealer” means a person engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of others or for his or her own account.
-
“Broker-dealer” does not include:
- An agent;
- An issuer;
- A bank, savings institution, savings and loan association, or trust company;
-
A person that has no place of business in this state if:
-
The person effects transactions in this state exclusively with or through:
- The issuers of the securities involved in the transactions;
- Other broker-dealers; or
- Banks, savings institutions, savings and loan associations, trust companies, insurance companies, investment companies as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, pension or profit-sharing trusts, or other financial institutions or institutional buyers, whether acting for themselves or as trustees; or
-
The person:
- Is registered under the securities law of the state in which it has a principal place of business;
- Is registered or not required to be registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
-
Does not effect transactions with more than three (3) persons in this state during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months other than transactions with:
- The issuer of a security involved in the transaction;
- Another broker-dealer; or
- A bank, a savings institution, a savings and loan association, a trust company, an insurance company, an investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, a pension or profit-sharing trust, or another financial institution or institutional buyer, whether acting for itself or as a trustee; and
-
The person effects transactions in this state exclusively with or through:
-
A person that is a resident of Canada and has no office or other physical presence in this state, if the person:
-
Only effects or attempts to effect transactions in securities:
- With or through the issuers of the securities involved in the transactions, broker-dealers, banks, savings institutions, trust companies, insurance companies, qualified purchasers as defined by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, investment companies as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, pension or profit-sharing trusts, or other financial institutions or institutional buyers, whether acting for themselves or as trustees;
- With or for a person from Canada that is temporarily present in this state if the person and the person from Canada had a bona fide business-client relationship before the person from Canada entered this state; or
- With or for a person from Canada that is present in this state and has transactions that are in a self-directed tax advantaged retirement plan in Canada of which the person is the holder or contributor;
- Files a notice in the form of the person's current application required by the jurisdiction in which the person's main office is located and a consent to service of process;
- Is a member of a self-regulatory organization or stock exchange in Canada;
- Maintains the person's provincial or territorial registration and the person's membership in good standing in a self-regulatory organization or stock exchange;
- Discloses to the person's clients in this state that the person is not subject to the full regulatory requirements of this chapter; and
- Is not in violation of § 23-42-507;
-
Only effects or attempts to effect transactions in securities:
- “Commissioner” means the Securities Commissioner;
- “Covered security” means any security described as a covered security in section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933;
- [Repealed.]
- “Fraud”, “deceit”, and “defraud” are not limited to common-law deceit;
- “Guaranteed” means guaranteed as to payment of principal, interest, or dividends;
-
- “Investment adviser” means any person that, for compensation, engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities, or that, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities.
- “Investment adviser” includes a financial planner or other person that, as an integral component of other financially related services, provides or holds himself, herself, or itself out as providing investment advice to others for compensation and as part of a business.
-
“Investment adviser” does not include:
- A bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or trust company;
- A lawyer, accountant, engineer, or teacher whose performance of these services is solely incidental to the practice of his or her profession;
- A broker-dealer whose performance of these services is solely incidental to the conduct of his or her business as a broker-dealer and who receives no special compensation for them;
- A publisher of any bona fide newspaper, news column, newsletter, news magazine, or business or financial publication or service of general, regular, and paid circulation, whether communicated in hard copy form, by electronic means, or otherwise, that does not consist of the rendering of advice on the basis of the specific investment situation of each client;
-
A person who has no place of business in this state if:
- His or her only clients in this state are other investment advisers, broker-dealers, banks, savings institutions, trust companies, insurance companies, investment companies as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, pension or profit-sharing trusts, or other financial institutions or institutional buyers, whether acting for themselves or as trustees; or
- During the preceding twelve-month period he or she has had fewer than six (6) clients who are residents of this state, other than those persons specified in subdivision (9)(C)(v)(a) of this section; or
- Any person not within the intent of this subdivision (9) as the commissioner may by rule or order designate;
-
“Issuer” means every person who issues or proposes to issue any security, except that:
- With respect to certificates of deposit, voting-trust certificates, or collateral-trust certificates, or with respect to certificates of interest or shares in an unincorporated investment trust not having a board of directors or persons performing similar functions or of the fixed, restricted management, or unit type, the term “issuer” means the persons performing the acts and assuming the duties of depositor or manager pursuant to the provisions of the trust or other agreement or instrument under which the securities are issued;
- In the case of an unincorporated association which provides by its articles for limited liability of any or all of its members, or in the case of a trust, committee, or other legal entity, the trustees or members thereof shall not be individually liable as issuers of any security issued by the association, trust, committee, or other legal entity;
- With respect to equipment-trust certificates or like securities, the term “issuer” means the person by whom the equipment or property is used or is to be used;
- With respect to fractional undivided interests in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, the term “issuer” means the owner of the right or of any whole or fractional interest in the right who creates fractional interests therein for the purpose of the offering; and
-
For life settlement contracts, “issuer” means:
- For a fractional or pooled interest in a life settlement contract, the person that creates for the purpose of sale the fractional or pooled interest; and
- For a life settlement contract that is not fractionalized or pooled, the person effecting the transaction with the investor in the contract, but does not include a broker-dealer or agent of a broker-dealer;
- “Main office” means the principal place of business of a broker-dealer or an investment adviser from which the officers, partners, or managers of the broker-dealer or investment adviser direct, control, and coordinate the activities of the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
- “Nonissuer” means not directly or indirectly for the benefit of the issuer;
- “Person” means an individual, a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a joint-stock company, a trust where the interests of the beneficiaries are evidenced by a security, an unincorporated organization, a government, or a political subdivision of a government;
-
“Representative” means any partner, officer, director of an investment adviser, or a person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, or other individual employed by or associated with an investment adviser, except clerical or ministerial personnel, who for compensation:
- Makes any recommendation or otherwise renders advice regarding securities;
- Manages accounts or portfolios of clients;
- Determines which recommendation or advice regarding securities should be given; or
- Supervises employees who perform any of the foregoing;
-
-
- “Sale” or “sell” includes every contract of sale of, contract to sell, or disposition of, a security or interest in a security for value.
- “Offer” or “offer to sell” includes every attempt or offer to dispose of, or solicitation of an offer to buy, a security or interest in a security for value.
- Any security given or delivered with, or given as a bonus on account of, any purchase of securities or any other thing is considered to constitute part of the subject of the purchase and to have been offered and sold for value.
- A purported gift of assessable stock is considered to involve an offer and sale.
- Every other sale or offer of a warrant or right to purchase or subscribe to another security of the same or another issuer, as well as every sale or offer of a security which gives the holder a present or future right or privilege to convert into another security of the same or another issuer, is considered to include an offer of the other security.
-
The terms defined in this subdivision (15) do not include:
- Any bona fide pledge or loan;
- Any stock dividend, whether the corporation distributing the dividend is the issuer of the stock or not, if nothing of value is given by stockholders for the dividend other than the surrender of a right to a cash or property dividend when each stockholder may elect to take the dividend in cash or property or in stock;
- Any stock split, reverse stock split, or change in par value which involves the substitution of a security of an issuer for another security of the same issuer; or
- Any act incident to a judicially approved reorganization in which a security is issued in exchange for one (1) or more outstanding securities, claims, or property interests, or partly in such an exchange and partly for cash;
-
- “Securities Act of 1933”, “Securities Exchange Act of 1934”, “Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935”, “Investment Advisers Act of 1940”, and “Investment Company Act of 1940” mean the federal statutes of those names, as amended;
-
-
“Security” means any:
- Note;
- Stock;
- Treasury stock;
- Bond;
- Debenture;
- Evidence of indebtedness;
- Certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement;
- Collateral-trust certificate;
- Preorganization certificate or subscription;
- Transferable share;
- Investment contract;
- Variable annuity contract;
- Life settlement contract or fractionalized or pooled interest in a life settlement contract;
- Voting-trust certificate;
- Certificate of deposit for a security;
- Certificate of interest or participation in an oil, gas, or mining title or lease or in payments out of production under such a title or lease; or
- In general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security” or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing.
- Except as set forth in subdivision (17)(A)(xiii) of this section, “security” does not include any insurance or endowment policy or annuity contract or variable annuity contract issued by any insurance company; and
-
“Security” means any:
- “State” means any state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(A) To which the customer was assigned for fourteen (14) days prior to the day of the transaction; and
(B) Who is registered with a state in which the customer was a resident or was present for at least thirty (30) consecutive days during the one-year period prior to the transaction. Except that, if the customer is present in this state for thirty (30) or more consecutive days or has permanently changed his or her residence to this state, this subdivision (1)(B)(ii) shall not be applicable unless the individual files with the commissioner an application for registration within ten (10) calendar days of the later of the date of the transaction or the date of the discovery of the presence of the customer in this state for thirty (30) or more consecutive days or the change in the customer's residence.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 13; 1961, No. 248, § 6; 1963, No. 479, § 2; 1973, No. 47, §§ 10, 11; 1975, No. 697, § 2; 1975, No. 844, § 6; 1977, No. 493, §§ 4, 5; 1977, No. 806, § 24A; 1983, No. 836, §§ 13, 26; 1983, No. 885, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1247; Acts 1987, No. 776, § 1; 1993, No. 1147, § 1802; 1995, No. 845, § 1; 1997, No. 173, § 1; 2001, No. 468, §§ 1, 2; 2009, No. 534, § 1; 2011, No. 338, § 1; 2011, No. 339, §§ 1-3; 2013, No. 460, §§ 1-3; 2017, No. 668, §§ 4-6; 2019, No. 110, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1993, No. 1147, § 1809, provided: “All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this act are hereby repealed.”
Amendments. The 2009 amendment added (2) and (11).
The 2011 amendment by No. 338 rewrote (3).
The 2011 amendment by No. 339 inserted (1)(A)(ii); and substituted “life settlement contracts” for “viatical contracts” or variant throughout (10)(E) and in (17)(A)(xiii).
The 2013 amendment substituted “or” for “and” at the end of (1)(A)(i); rewrote (1)(B)(i)( c ); and added “for compensation” at the end of (14).
The 2017 amendment substituted “Section 18(b)(4)(E)” for “Section 18(b)(4)(D)” in (1)(B)(i) (c)(2) ; added (1)(B)(iii); and repealed (6).
The 2019 amendment redesignated the former first and second sentences of (9) as (9)(A) and (9)(C), respectively; inserted “and as part of a regular business” in (9)(A); inserted (9)(B); redesignated former (9)(A) through (9)(F) as (9)(C)(i) through (9)(C)(vi); substituted “Any person” for “Such other persons” in (9)(C)(vi); and made a stylistic change.
U.S. Code. The Securities Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was codified as 15 U.S.C. § 79 et seq. [repealed]. Its replacement is codified at 42 U.S.C. § 16451 et seq. The Investment Company Act of 1940 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq.
The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq. The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq. The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was codified as 15 U.S.C. § 79 et seq. [repealed]. Its replacement is codified at 42 U.S.C. § 16451 et seq. The Securities Act of 1933 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq.
Research References
ALR.
State Regulation of Viatical Life Insurance Programs, Viatical Settlements, and Viatical Investments. 28 A.L.R.6th 281.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey—Securities, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 255.
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
Frances S. Fendler & A. Heath Abshure, Private Civil Liability Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 125 (2016).
Case Notes
Agents.
In effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of securities an individual is an agent, though issuer neither employs nor asks the person to solicit purchasers, where issuer is aware of promotional activities and does not attempt to curtail them. Quick v. Woody, 295 Ark. 168, 747 S.W.2d 108 (1988).
Former employer did not violate § 23-42-106(c) by gathering information and answering questions about an investment opportunity offered by a purchaser of his company; his conduct did not rise to the level of an overt promotion because he did not participate in an investment meeting, and bonus money offered by the former employer was not earmarked for investment purposes. Therefore, he was not acting as an agent of the new company. Bristow v. Mourot, 99 Ark. App. 386, 260 S.W.3d 733 (2007).
Bond counsel who prepared disclosure documents for the bond underwriter was not shown to have materially aided in the sale of the bonds such as to be liable as the seller's agent under § 23-42-106(c) because there was no proof to establish that bond counsel represented the seller in the seller's effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of the bonds or that bond counsel supervised individuals who were effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of the bonds for the seller. First Ark. Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., 2013 Ark. 159, 427 S.W.3d 47 (2013).
Broker-Dealers.
A broker-dealer is one engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities, according to the definition of this section and an isolated transaction does not constitute one a broker-dealer. Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969).
Issuers.
Under this section, there is not considered to be any issuer with respect to certificates of interest or participation in oil, gas, or mining titles or leases, or in payments out of production from such titles or leases. Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969).
Offer or Offer to Sell.
Because an option to purchase a security is an interest in the security, a corporation, by agreeing to grant an individual an option to purchase stock, made the individual an offer and, for the purposes of the then existing version of § 23-42-504(a)(9), all subsequent payments to escrow account and other subsequent transactions between the parties and involving the exercise of the option were “transactions pursuant to an offer” as contemplated by former subdivision (10)(B) of this section. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Sale.
Sale of a unit in a partnership constituted the sale of a security within the meaning of this section. Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987).
Securities.
The agreement between the parties to form a nonprofit corporation, from which they each expected to make a profit, was not a security. Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971).
Where interests in an apartment complex were sold to investors as a “tax shelter,” but where the risk of loss of money actually invested was placed squarely on the investors, who were thereby mere passive contributors of risk capital, the joint venture interests constituted securities. Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977).
Five elements determine whether a given transaction involves the sale of a “security”: (1) the investment of money or money's worth; (2) in a venture; (3) the expectation of some benefit to the investor as a result of the investment; (4) the contribution towards the risk capital of the venture; and (5) the absence of direct control over the investment or policy. Smith v. State, 266 Ark. 861, 587 S.W.2d 50, 1979 Ark. App. LEXIS 378 (Ct. App. 1979), cert. denied, Smith v. Arkansas, 445 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1082, 63 L. Ed. 2d 321 (1980); First Fin. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. E.F. Hutton Mtg. Corp., 652 F. Supp. 471 (W.D. Ark. 1987), aff'd, 834 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. Ark. 1987); Carder v. Burrow, 327 Ark. 545, 940 S.W.2d 429 (1997).
A bank's 100% participation interest in an unsecured note held by another bank was not a security under subdivision (12) of this section. Union Nat'l Bank v. Farmers Bank, 786 F.2d 881 (8th Cir. 1986).
Mortgages purchased by savings and loan association held not to constitute securities. First Financial Federal Sav. & Loan Asso. v. E.F. Hutton Mortg. Corp., 834 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. Ark. 1987).
Regardless of the label on a document, the underlying economic substance of a security is an arrangement where the investor is a mere passive contributor of risk capital to a venture in which he has no direct or managerial control. Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987).
Certificates of interest or participation in oil leases are included in the legislative definition of securities required to be registered. McMullan v. Molnaird, 24 Ark. App. 126, 749 S.W.2d 352 (1988).
Loan participations held not securities within the meaning of this section. Grand Prairie Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., 298 Ark. 542, 769 S.W.2d 20 (1989).
The sale of a fractional percentage of a “working interest” in an oil lease constitutes the sale of a security. Hogg v. Jerry, 299 Ark. 283, 773 S.W.2d 84 (1989).
Stock involved in the alleged merger of two companies was not a security within the meaning of this section. Cook v. Wills, 305 Ark. 442, 808 S.W.2d 758 (1991).
Circuit court erred in granting summary judgment to the solicitors; while the notes at issue did not meet the test for securities announced in Smith v. State, 266 Ark. 861, 587 S.W.2d 50 (Ark. App. 1979), the all-inclusive nature of the test in Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977), is better suited to the purposes of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq., and the circuit court did not mention Schultz and failed to consider the sophistication of the parties, a factor that was prominent in prior cases. Waters v. Millsap, 2015 Ark. 272, 465 S.W.3d 851 (2015).
Cited: Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974); International Trading, Ltd. v. Bell, 262 Ark. 244, 556 S.W.2d 420 (1977); Wilkins v. M & H Fin., Inc., 476 F. Supp. 212 (E.D. Ark. 1979); Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979); Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
23-42-103. Applicability.
-
-
Sections 23-42-106, 23-42-108, 23-42-109, 23-42-212, 23-42-301(a), 23-42-501, and 23-42-507 apply to persons who sell or offer to sell when:
- An offer to sell is made in this state; or
- An offer to buy is made and accepted in this state.
-
Sections 23-42-212, 23-42-301(a), and 23-42-507 apply to persons who buy or offer to buy when:
- An offer to buy is made in this state; or
- An offer to sell is made and accepted in this state.
-
For the purpose of this section, an offer to sell or to buy is made in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offer:
- Originates from this state; or
- Is directed by the offeror to this state and received at the place to which it is directed or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed offer.
-
-
For the purpose of this section, an offer to buy or to sell is accepted in this state when acceptance:
- Is communicated to the offeror in this state; and
- Has not previously been communicated to the offeror, orally or in writing, outside this state.
- Acceptance is communicated to the offeror in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offeree directs it to the offeror in this state reasonably believing the offeror to be in this state and it is received at the place to which it is directed or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed acceptance.
-
For the purpose of this section, an offer to buy or to sell is accepted in this state when acceptance:
-
An offer to sell or to buy is not made in this state when:
- The publisher circulates, or there is circulated on his or her behalf, in this state any bona fide newspaper or other publication of general, regular, and paid circulation which is not published in this state, or which is published in this state but has had more than two-thirds (2/3) of its circulation outside this state during the past twelve (12) months; or
- A radio or television program originating outside this state is received in this state.
-
Sections 23-42-106, 23-42-108, 23-42-109, 23-42-212, 23-42-301(a), 23-42-501, and 23-42-507 apply to persons who sell or offer to sell when:
- Sections 23-42-307, 23-42-301(c), as well as § 23-42-212, so far as investment advisers are concerned, apply when any act instrumental in effecting prohibited conduct is done in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 26; 1983, No. 836, § 21; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1260; Acts 1999, No. 363, § 1.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislation of the 1983 General Assembly, Business Law, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 607.
Case Notes
General Partnerships.
The mere fact that an investment takes the form of a general partnership does not insulate it from the reach of this chapter. Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987).
Cited: Billings v. Investment Trust, 309 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1962).
23-42-104. Criminal penalties.
- Any person who knowingly violates § 23-42-507 shall be guilty of the offense of “securities fraud”. Securities fraud is a Class B felony.
- Any person who knowingly violates § 23-42-501 shall be guilty of the offense of “felony offer or sale of unregistered and nonexempt securities”. Felony offer or sale of unregistered and nonexempt securities is a Class D felony.
- Any person who negligently violates § 23-42-501 shall be guilty of the offense of “offer or sale of unregistered and nonexempt securities”. Offer or sale of unregistered and nonexempt securities is a Class A misdemeanor.
- Any person who knowingly violates any rule or order of the Securities Commissioner shall be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. No person may be imprisoned for a violation of any rule or order of which that person did not have actual knowledge.
- Any person who knowingly engages in any unlawful conduct prohibited by this chapter, except as provided in subsection (a), subsection (b), subsection (c), or subsection (d) of this section, shall be guilty of a Class D felony.
- “Purposely”, “knowingly”, “recklessly”, “negligently”, and the classes of felonies and misdemeanors set forth in this section shall be as defined and have such penalties as set forth in the Arkansas Criminal Code.
- Nothing in this chapter limits the power of the state to punish any person for any conduct which constitutes a crime by statute or common law.
- The provisions of subsection (e) of this section shall not apply to any violation of § 23-42-509.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 21; 1961, No. 248, § 8; 1971, No. 131, § 5; 1973, No. 47, § 16; 1977, No. 493, § 12; 1979, No. 754, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1255; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 3.
Meaning of “Arkansas Criminal Code”. See note to § 5-1-101.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Note, Promissory Demand Notes: Investor Protection or Peril, Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 42 Ark. L. Rev. 1075.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Former act that provided for punishment of corporation by fine did not constitute cruel and inhuman punishment. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
Included Offenses.
Conviction of a person charged under subsection (a) of this section with violation of § 23-42-501, who defended on the ground that he had obtained an exemption for the security sold under § 23-42-504(a), was not sustained by evidence that the defendant sold the security to persons who were not on the list of offerees filed with the securities commissioner in compliance with a rule of the commissioner, such sales being violations only of subsection (b) of this section, which was not an included offense within subsection (a) of this section. Gaskin v. State, 244 Ark. 541, 426 S.W.2d 407 (1968).
Cited: Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970); Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972); Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
23-42-105. Prosecution of criminal offenses.
-
-
Prosecutions for offenses described in § 23-42-104 must be commenced within the following periods of limitation:
- Felonies — five (5) years from the date of the occurrence; and
- Misdemeanors — one (1) year from the date of the occurrence.
- The five-year felony and one-year misdemeanor period of limitation does not begin to run until after the commission of the last overt act in the furtherance of a scheme or course of conduct.
-
Prosecutions for offenses described in § 23-42-104 must be commenced within the following periods of limitation:
-
For the purposes of venue for any civil or criminal action under this chapter, any violation of this chapter or of any rule or order promulgated hereunder shall be considered to have been committed in:
- Any county in which any act was performed in furtherance of the transaction which violated this chapter;
- Any county in which the principal or an aider or abettor initiated or acted in furtherance of a course of conduct;
- Any county from which any violator gained control or possession of any proceeds of the violation or of any books, records, documents, or other material or objects which were used in furtherance of the violation; or
- Any county from which or into which the violator directed any postal, telephonic, electronic, or other communication in furtherance of the violation.
- The Securities Commissioner may refer such evidence as is available concerning violations of this chapter or any rule or order hereunder to any appropriate prosecuting authority.
History. Acts 1959, No. 245, § 21; 1961, No. 248, § 8; 1977, No. 493, § 13; 1979, No. 754, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1255; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2511.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “regulation” following “rule” in the introductory language of (b).
Case Notes
Statute of Limitations.
The evidence of defendant's actions in offering stock in a company that he founded on a fraudulent premise constituted the “last overt act in the furtherance of a scheme or course of conduct,” which culminated in the sale of the stock and tolled the five-year statute of limitations. Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997).
Cited: Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970); Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972); Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
23-42-106. Civil liability — Definitions.
-
-
A person is liable to a buyer of a security if the person offers or sells the security:
- In violation of § 23-42-212(b), § 23-42-301, or § 23-42-501(1) or (2), a rule or order of the Securities Commissioner under § 23-42-502 which requires the affirmative approval of sales literature before it is used, or any condition imposed under § 23-42-403(d), § 23-42-404(g), or § 23-42-404(i); or
- By means of an untrue statement of a material fact or a failure to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statement made, in the light of circumstances under which it is made, not misleading, the buyer not knowing of the untruth or omission, and the seller not sustaining the burden of proof that the seller did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the untruth or omission.
-
In a successful action under subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the buyer may recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees plus:
- Upon tender of the security, the consideration paid for the security and interest at six percent (6%) per year from the date of payment, less the amount of any income received from owning the security; or
-
- Damages if the buyer no longer owns the security.
- Damages are the amount that would be recoverable upon a tender of the security less the value of the security when the buyer disposed of the security plus interest at six percent (6%) per year from the date of disposition of the security.
-
A person is liable to a buyer of a security if the person offers or sells the security:
-
-
A person is liable to a seller of a security if the person buys the security:
- In violation of § 23-42-301, § 23-42-307, § 23-42-507, or § 23-42-508; or
- By means of an untrue statement of a material fact or a failure to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which it is made, not misleading, the seller not knowing of the untruth or omission, and the buyer not sustaining the burden of proof that the buyer did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the untruth or omission.
-
-
In a successful action under subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the seller may recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees plus:
-
Upon tender of the consideration the seller received in a transaction under subdivision (b)(1) of this section:
- The security; or
- The security plus any income or other distributions in cash or other property received directly or indirectly by the purchaser; or
-
- Damages together with interest at six percent (6%) per year from the date of purchase.
- Damages may include out-of-pocket losses or losses for the benefit of the bargain.
-
Upon tender of the consideration the seller received in a transaction under subdivision (b)(1) of this section:
- A tender made under subdivision (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section only requires notice in writing of the present ability to pay the amount tendered and willingness to take the security for the amount specified.
-
In a successful action under subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the seller may recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees plus:
-
A person is liable to a seller of a security if the person buys the security:
-
-
A person that directly or indirectly receives consideration for providing investment advice to another party:
-
In violation of § 23-42-301 is liable to the other party for:
- The consideration paid for the advice;
- Interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per year from the date of payment;
- Costs; and
- Reasonable attorney's fees; or
-
By employing a device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the other party or by engaging in an act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the other party is liable to the other party for:
- The consideration paid for the advice plus interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per year from the date of payment;
- Damages caused by the fraudulent or deceitful conduct less the amount of any income received as a result of the fraudulent or deceitful conduct;
- Costs; and
- Reasonable attorney's fees.
-
In violation of § 23-42-301 is liable to the other party for:
-
Subdivision (c)(1) of this section does not apply to a broker-dealer or its agents if:
- The investment advice provided is solely incidental to transacting business as a broker-dealer; and
- Special compensation is not paid for the investment advice.
-
A person that directly or indirectly receives consideration for providing investment advice to another party:
-
- A secondary offender has joint and several liability with a right of contribution for the actions of a primary offender unless the secondary offender satisfies the burden of proving that the secondary offender did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the existence of the actions of the primary offender that give rise to liability under this section.
-
As used in subdivision (d)(1) of this section:
- “Primary offender” means a person that is liable under subsection (a), subsection (b), or subsection (c) of this section; and
-
“Secondary offender” means:
- A person that controls a primary offender;
- A partner, officer, or director of a primary offender and any other person occupying a similar status or performing a similar function with respect to the primary offender;
- An employee of a primary offender who materially aids in the actions of a primary offender that give rise to liability under this section; and
- A broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or investment adviser representative that materially aids in the actions of a primary offender that give rise to liability under this section.
- A tender required by this section may be made at any time before entry of judgment.
- Every cause of action under this section survives the death of a person who might have been a plaintiff or defendant.
- A person may not sue under this section unless the action is instituted within three (3) years after the violation occurred.
-
A buyer shall not sue under this section:
- If the buyer received a written offer, before suit and at a time when the buyer owned the security, to refund the consideration paid together with interest at six percent (6%) per year from the date of payment less the amount of any income received on the security, and the buyer failed to accept the offer within thirty (30) days of its receipt; or
- If the buyer received such an offer before suit and at a time when the buyer did not own the security unless the buyer rejected the offer in writing within thirty (30) days of its receipt.
- A person who has made or engaged in the performance of a contract in violation of this chapter or any rule or order of the commissioner, or who has acquired any purported right under the contract with knowledge of the facts by reason of which its making or performance was in violation may not sue on the contract.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 22; 1971, No. 131, § 6; 1973, No. 47, § 17; 1977, No. 493, §§ 14, 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1256; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 2; 1997, No. 173, § 2; 1999, No. 1225, § 1; 2013, No. 460, § 4; 2017, No. 668, §§ 7-11.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote the section.
The 2017 amendment, substituted “the buyer not knowing of the untruth or omission, and the seller not sustaining the burden of proof that the seller did not know” for “if the buyer does not know of the untruth or omission and meets the burden of proof that he or she did not know” in (a)(1)(B); rewrote (b)(1) and (b)(2)(B); redesignated part of (c)(1)(A) as (c)(1)(A)(i) through (iv); substituted “Reasonable attorney’s fees” for “a reasonable attorney’s fee” twice in (c); substituted “by engaging” for “engages” in the introductory language of (c)(1)(B); substituted “the primary offender” for “a primary offender” near the end of (d)(1); substituted “A buyer shall not” for “A person may not” in the introductory language of (h); and made stylistic changes.
Research References
ALR.
Heightened Pleading Requirements for Alleging Securities Fraud-Post-Iqbal/Twombly — First Circuit Cases, 31 A.L.R. Fed. 3d Art. 11 (2018).
Ark. L. Rev.
Note, Promissory Demand Notes: Investor Protection or Peril, Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 42 Ark. L. Rev. 1075.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Paulson, Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Law, 2 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 161.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Survey—Securities, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 255.
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Annual Survey of Caselaw, Business Law, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 885.
Frances S. Fendler & A. Heath Abshure, Private Civil Liability Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 125 (2016).
Case Notes
Construction.
This section is remedial, not punitive, and is to be liberally construed in favor of investors. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Subsection (c) expressly creates two types of secondary liability for securities fraud: control person liability and aiding and abetting liability. Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 937 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, Ernst & Young v. Reves, 502 U.S. 1092, 112 S. Ct. 1165 (1992), aff'd, Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 113 S. Ct. 1163 (1993).
Purpose.
It was not the intent of the Arkansas Securities Act to allow the law to be used by sophisticated brokers and dealers for promotional projects, thereby reaping consultant benefits, sales commissions, and other benefits, without fully complying with the requirements of the law. Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979).
Agent.
Former employer did not violate subsection (c) of this section by gathering information and answering questions about an investment opportunity offered by a purchaser of his company; his conduct did not rise to the level of an overt promotion because he did not participate in an investment meeting, and bonus money offered by the former employer was not earmarked for investment purposes. Therefore, he was not acting as an agent of the new company. Bristow v. Mourot, 99 Ark. App. 386, 260 S.W.3d 733 (2007).
Bond counsel who prepared disclosure documents for the bond underwriter was not shown to have materially aided in the sale of the bonds such as to be liable as the seller's agent under subsection (c) of this section because there was no proof to establish that bond counsel represented the seller in the seller's effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of the bonds or that bond counsel supervised individuals who were effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of the bonds for the seller. First Ark. Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., 2013 Ark. 159, 427 S.W.3d 47 (2013).
Applicable Law.
Contract for sale of securities made in Arkansas involving the use of the mails to clear check given by buyer to seller in the transaction was governed both by federal rule and by the civil liability created under this section for purposes of action wherein buyer sought recovery against seller under both for alleged fraud in the transaction. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
A broad-scale, uninsured, unregulated investment program, such as the sale of co-op demand notes, requires a measure of protection for the public such as might be obtained through registration, with civil liability imposed for fraud or misleading statements, the failure to submit oneself to registration, and oversight; therefore, the purchasers of co-op demand notes had a cause of action where they alleged that they were defrauded by being told that the corporation's financial picture was healthier than it was. Robertson v. White, 633 F. Supp. 954 (W.D. Ark. 1986). But see Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 110 S. Ct. 945, 108 L. Ed. 2d 47 (1990), rehearing denied, 494 U.S. 1092, 110 S. Ct. 1840, 108 L. Ed. 2d 968 (1990).
Burden of Proof.
The fact that the co-op sold unregistered securities makes a prima facie case against the directors; the plaintiffs do not have to prove that the directors knowingly and willfully trespassed the law. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Upon the showing of a sale of a security, the burden shifts to the seller to show that the security was either registered or exempt from the Arkansas Securities Act, or that the buyer is estopped from claiming civil damages. McMullan v. Molnaird, 24 Ark. App. 126, 749 S.W.2d 352 (1988).
Contribution.
The district court's error in not submitting accounting firm's contribution claim against its client's Board of Directors to the jury, even though the firm might have had a colorable claim for contribution against the directors, created no miscarriage of justice as it was clear that much of the blame for the fraud in the case was properly placed on the firm. Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 937 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, Ernst & Young v. Reves, 502 U.S. 1092, 112 S. Ct. 1165 (1992), aff'd, Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 113 S. Ct. 1163 (1993).
Control of Sale.
Bond counsel who prepared disclosure documents for the bond underwriter was not shown to have controlled the sale of the bonds and was not liable to the purchasers under subsection (c) of this section because there was no proof that bond counsel directed the management and policies of the seller. First Ark. Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., 2013 Ark. 159, 427 S.W.3d 47 (2013).
Disclosures, Misstatements, Etc., of Material Facts.
Plaintiff's omission to disclose the existence of liabilities which did not appear on the balance sheet amounted to an omission to state a material fact. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
Notwithstanding the arm's length nature of the transaction, plaintiff was under a duty not to intentionally or negligently make false representations to defendant with respect to material facts and not to intentionally or negligently fail to disclose material facts to defendant. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
Where bonds given by two defendants had no value and one of the defendants had knowledge of this fact but represented the bonds to be as good as gold and that he wanted to purchase them from the second defendant, who he alleged had furnished them when, in fact, he had furnished them himself, the first defendant was liable under the securities act for the misrepresentation. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
Where buyer was found to have been the moving party when he exercised option to buy 100% of stock, and he did so against the advice of his accountant and even certain of issuer's employees, buyer failed to demonstrate that he purchased the securities “by means of” any material misstatements on issuer's part. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Misrepresentations or omissions under the Arkansas blue-sky law are actionable if either intentionally or negligently made. F & M Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners Ltd. Partnership, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).
Duty to Register Securities.
Since the law of this state imposes an absolute duty on directors to register securities prior to sale, blame for not registering securities cannot be shifted to the securities department investigators and enforcers. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Ignorance of a duty to register securities, or to procure their exemption, can in no way excuse the failure to do so; the only conceivable excuse under the “lack of knowledge” defense would be if the director affirmatively believed that the securities were registered, and even then, this section demands that such mistaken knowledge be not the product of negligence, and the director bears the burden of proving that he was not so negligent. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Investment company and related entities were not entitled to summary judgment on the investor's claim under the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq., because an issue remained concerning whether or not the securities at issue actually met the requirements for exemption under federal law. Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
Investor's motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendants' liability for failure to register under the Arkansas Security Act, § 23-42-101 et seq. was denied because there were issues remaining concerning whether or not defendants were exempt from the state registration as a “covered security” under federal law; the fact that defendants did not file a Federal Form D did not, by itself, preclude defendants from asserting that the securities they sold were exempt. Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
Evidence.
Activities supported finding that defendant materially aided in the sale of securities. Quick v. Woody, 295 Ark. 168, 747 S.W.2d 108 (1988).
Accounting firm materially aided in sale of demand notes, where (1) demand notes were sold by means of untrue statements or omissions of material facts based on the firm's audit; (2) the buyers did not know of the untrue statments or the omissions; (3) the untrue statements or the omissions originated with the firm; (4) the firm knew that the statements were being communicated to the buyers, and that they were material, being of the kind and nature that a reasonable person would foreseeably rely on; and (5) the firm knew the statements were false when it made them. Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 937 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, Ernst & Young v. Reves, 502 U.S. 1092, 112 S. Ct. 1165 (1992), aff'd, Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 113 S. Ct. 1163 (1993).
Evidence held sufficient to show that a transaction between the plaintiff and a corporation was an ordinary secured commercial loan between the parties, not the sale of a security for the purposes of establishing liability under this section. Carder v. Burrow, 327 Ark. 545, 940 S.W.2d 429 (1997).
Investors claimed that the notes sold by a trader to the investors were securities and a broker-dealer helped the trader by providing an avenue for further investing the funds the trader had procured from the investors; however, there was nothing in the complaint alleging that the broker-dealer aided, assisted, or was in any way involved in the trader's sale of the promissory notes. Because the complaint was devoid of any allegations which might establish the broker-dealer materially aided the trader's sale of the promissory notes, the district court correctly concluded the investors failed to state a claim against the broker-dealer for a violation of this section. Benton v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 524 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 2008).
Jurisdiction.
In an action against alleged illegal sale of securities based primarily upon allegations of fraud seeking cancellation of other instruments, contracts and restitution, the equity jurisdiction was properly assumed and exercised, even though the lower court might have had concurrent jurisdiction and some of the relief sought as incident to the action might have been of a purely legal nature. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley, 257 Ark. 278, 517 S.W.2d 210 (1975).
Liability of Partners, Officers, etc.
A defendant was not relieved, by taking over the indemnity from another defendant, from civil liability under the Securities Act for fraud in his own misrepresentation as to the value of worthless bonds. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
A partner who had made misrepresentations concerning the value of corporate bonds given for the purchase of real estate was not released from statutory liability under the Arkansas Securities Act by the release of the second partner from liability to reimburse the sellers of the real estate if the bonds were dishonored. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
The provision of this section that an employee, broker or agent must materially aid in the sale before he becomes liable is not applicable to partners. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
In an action against illegal sale of securities seeking contributions from vice president, the vice president sustained burden of proving that he did not know, and in exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the existence of the facts by reason of which their liability was alleged to exist. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley, 257 Ark. 278, 517 S.W.2d 210 (1975).
One cannot delegate responsibility to his lawyer when a securities violation is alleged; one doing so is liable and is left with an action for contribution against his counsellor. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Agent materially aided in the sale of the securities and liability thus attached. Hogg v. Jerry, 299 Ark. 283, 773 S.W.2d 84 (1989).
Major investor who later became the chief financial officer (CFO) of the company was potentially liable to another investor for violation of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq., and was not entitled to summary judgment as the CFO was an officer of the company at a time that the investor gave a portion of his money for investment in the company; further, even before the CFO became an officer, he was a majority shareholder and exerted significant influence over company decisions. Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
Limitations of Actions.
Any action on the bond or securities posted in lieu thereof must be brought within statutory period from the date of the sale or act upon which the suit is based. Wells v. Hill, 239 Ark. 979, 396 S.W.2d 946 (1965).
Fraudulent concealment of a misrepresentation of the value of the stock sold or traded did not toll the limitations period of subsection (f) of this section. Martin v. Pacific Ins. Co., 245 Ark. 122, 431 S.W.2d 239 (1968).
The limitations period of this section applied to a violation of § 10 of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j) and the limitation began to run when the fraud, with due diligence on the part of the investors, should have been discovered. Vanderboom v. Sexton, 422 F.2d 1233 (8th Cir. Ark. 1970).
In the absence of any indication that the legislature intended to make the extensions of the statute of limitations by the 1973 amendment retroactive, the longer statute of limitations was applicable only to causes of action arising after the 1973 act became effective; therefore, a civil action for an illegal sale of securities was barred where the sale was made prior to the effective date of the 1973 amendment, but suit was not commenced until after the expiration of the statute of limitations prior to the 1973 amendment. Morton v. Tullgren, 263 Ark. 69, 563 S.W.2d 422 (1978).
The five-year limitation in this section applies to federal securities fraud claims under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 77b et seq.). Pinney v. Edward D. Jones & Co., 718 F. Supp. 1419 (W.D. Ark. 1989).
Persons Entitled to Recover.
Buyer of securities was not entitled to relief under this section or under federal rule of section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, where, as a knowledgeable businessman, he entered into speculative stock purchase transaction and recklessly or negligently failed to ascertain the correct financial information concerning the corporation, the securities of which he was purchasing prior to his tendering back the stock to the seller. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
Where there was no evidence that the vice president made any representations to any of the purchasers or that he had any knowledge of the facts by reason of which any contract was made in violation of this section, that did not constitute preponderance of evidence that the vice president was barred from recovery. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley, 257 Ark. 278, 517 S.W.2d 210 (1975).
Remedies.
Party was not entitled to rescission of the agreement nor to full restitution where the agreement was not held to be a security. Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971).
Where an action is brought and sustained both under the Securities Act and common law fraud, punitive damages are recoverable. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
Where no motion to transfer the action brought in equity to law was made, when there was adequate remedy at law, such remedy was waived by the failure to move. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley, 257 Ark. 278, 517 S.W.2d 210 (1975).
Although plaintiff may have been more learned, experienced, and intelligent than the average man, defendant had vast knowledge of and dealt at great length in matters governed by security laws; therefor, where the units defendant sold plaintiff were not registered as required, plaintiff could recover his purchase price, less income received from the units while he held them. Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979).
Findings of district court provided a strong indication that buyer lacked both the sophistication and the inside information that could operate to bar relief to him as an insider and controlling person, and therefore, equitable defenses against the rescission of the stock sale were not available against him. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Purchasers were not entitled to damages for corporation's failure to register stock; the purchasers could rescind the sale as they still owned the stock, but the corporation's failure to register the stock as promised was not a basis for fraud that also warranted monetary damages. Peacock v. 21st Century Wireless Group, Inc., 285 F.3d 1079 (8th Cir. 2002).
Seller.
Bond counsel's failure in preparing the disclosure documents for the bond underwriter to directly disclose the superior purchase mortgage encumbering the property pledged as security for the bonds did not constitute a sale by bond counsel of a security by means of an untrue statement of material fact because the bonds were issued by the municipal improvement district and sold through the underwriter; bond counsel was not a seller and, as it was not alleged that bond counsel was a seller, bond counsel could not be liable under subsection (a) of this section. First Ark. Bank & Trust v. Gill Elrod Ragon Owen & Sherman, P.A., 2013 Ark. 159, 427 S.W.3d 47 (2013).
Tender.
Tender held sufficient to permit allowance of an attorney's fee under this section. Pacific Ins. Co. v. Martin, 242 Ark. 621, 414 S.W.2d 594 (1967).
Refusal by plaintiff of the tender of a defendant to pay the face amount of the bonds less an amount due from plaintiff did not entitle defendant to a directed verdict where the amount tendered was not sufficient to cover the liability of the defendant for interest and attorney's fees. Mitchell v. Beard, 256 Ark. 926, 513 S.W.2d 905 (1974).
Validity of Purchaser's Notes.
The Arkansas Securities Act does not render notes given by a purchaser, in transaction in which seller has violated this section, absolutely void as to holders in due course. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
Cited: Arkansas Real Estate Co. v. Fullerton, 232 Ark. 713, 339 S.W.2d 947 (1960); Central Invs., Inc. v. Polk, 239 Ark. 165, 388 S.W.2d 381 (1965); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977); Ballentine v. Ballentine, 275 Ark. 212, 628 S.W.2d 327 (1982); LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 585 F. Supp. 753 (E.D. Ark. 1984); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987); Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 856 F.2d 52 (8th Cir. Ark. 1988); Dingler v. T.J. Raney & Sons, 708 F. Supp. 1044 (W.D. Ark. 1989); New Equity Sec. Holders Comm. ex rel. Golden Gulf, Ltd. v. Phillips, 97 B.R. 492 (E.D. Ark. 1989); Robertson v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, 732 F. Supp. 979 (E.D. Ark. 1990); Smith v. Leonard, 310 Ark. 782, 840 S.W.2d 167 (Ark. 1992); BNL Equity Corp. v. Pearson, 340 Ark. 351, 10 S.W.3d 838 (2000).
23-42-107. Consent to service of process.
-
-
- Every applicant for registration under this chapter, every person making a notice filing, and every issuer for whom a registration, exemption from registration, or notice filing is required under this chapter, shall file with the Securities Commissioner, in the form which he or she prescribes by rule, an irrevocable consent appointing the commissioner or his or her successor in office to be his or her attorney to receive service of any lawful process in any noncriminal suit, action, or proceeding against him or her or his or her successor, executor, or administrator which arises under this chapter or any rule or order hereunder after the consent has been filed, with the same force and validity as if served personally on the person filing the consent.
- However, this shall not apply to applicants, persons making notice filings, and issuers who have a place of business in Arkansas, have qualified to do business in Arkansas with the Secretary of State, and have either an agent for service of process or have executed a consent appointing the Secretary of State agent for service of process, or who may otherwise be subject to service of process.
- A person who has filed a consent appointing the commissioner in connection with a previous registration or notice filing need not file another when renewing a registration or notice filing.
-
Service may be made by leaving a copy of the process in the office of the commissioner, but it is not effective unless:
- The plaintiff, who may be the commissioner in a suit, action, or proceeding instituted by him or her, immediately sends notice of the service and a copy of the process by mail with proof of service to the defendant or respondent at his or her last address on file with the commissioner; and
- The plaintiff's affidavit of compliance with this subsection is filed in the case on or before the return day of the process, if any, or within such further time as the court allows.
-
-
- When any person, including any nonresident of this state, engages in conduct prohibited or made actionable by this chapter or any rule or order hereunder and he or she has not filed a consent to service of process under subsection (a) of this section, and personal jurisdiction over him or her cannot otherwise be obtained in this state, that conduct shall be considered equivalent to his or her appointment of the commissioner or his or her successor in office to be his or her attorney to receive service of any lawful process in any noncriminal suit, action, or proceeding against him or her or his or her successor executor or administrator which grows out of that conduct and which is brought under this chapter or any rule or order hereunder, with the same force and validity as if served on him or her personally.
-
Service may be made by leaving a copy of the process in the office of the commissioner, and it is not effective unless:
- The plaintiff, who may be the commissioner in a suit, action, or proceeding instituted by him or her, forthwith sends notice of the service and a copy of the process by mail with proof of service to the defendant or respondent at his or her last known address or takes other steps which are reasonably calculated to give actual notice; and
- The plaintiff's affidavit of compliance with this subsection is filed in the case on or before the return day of the process, if any, or within such further time as the court allows.
- When process is served under this section, the court, or the commissioner in a proceeding before him or her, shall order such continuance as may be necessary to afford the defendant or respondent reasonable opportunity to defend.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 26; 1963, No. 479, § 5; 1983, No. 836, §§ 18, 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1260; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 4.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislation of the 1983 General Assembly, Business Law, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 607.
Case Notes
Restricted Consent.
Defendant corporation's consent to service in Arkansas restricted to suits and actions commenced against it for any cause arising out of a sale or offer of sale by it was not broad enough to cover plaintiffs' cause of action based on fraud by virtue of forgery of stock certificates and the alleged resulting breach of defendant's fiduciary duty in cancelling or transferring the stock represented by such certificates, which alleged acts occurred after the completed sale, outside Arkansas, and before plaintiffs became residents of Arkansas. Billings v. Investment Trust, 309 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1962) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Billings v. Investment Trust, 309 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1962).
23-42-108. Rights and remedies cumulative.
The rights and remedies provided by this chapter are in addition to any other rights that may exist at law or in equity.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 22; 1977, No. 493, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1256.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Paulson, Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Law, 2 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 161.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Case Notes
Cited: Arkansas Real Estate Co. v. Fullerton, 232 Ark. 713, 339 S.W.2d 947 (1960); Central Invs., Inc. v. Polk, 239 Ark. 165, 388 S.W.2d 381 (1965); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977); Ballentine v. Ballentine, 275 Ark. 212, 628 S.W.2d 327 (1982); LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 585 F. Supp. 753 (E.D. Ark. 1984); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987).
23-42-109. Waiver of compliance void.
Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to waive compliance with any provision of this chapter or any rule or order under this chapter is void.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 22; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1256.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Paulson, Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Law, 2 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 161.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Case Notes
Statute Did Not Void Agreement Provision.
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that this section did not void a paragraph in the agreement acknowledging that the stockholder had been provided with or permitted access to all information that he deemed material to making an informed decision about selling his stock. Davis v. Davis, 2016 Ark. App. 33, 480 S.W.3d 878 (2016).
Cited: Arkansas Real Estate Co. v. Fullerton, 232 Ark. 713, 339 S.W.2d 947 (1960); Central Invs., Inc. v. Polk, 239 Ark. 165, 388 S.W.2d 381 (1965); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977); Ballentine v. Ballentine, 275 Ark. 212, 628 S.W.2d 327 (1982); LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 585 F. Supp. 753 (E.D. Ark. 1984); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Casali v. Schultz, 292 Ark. 602, 732 S.W.2d 836 (1987); Tanenbaum v. Agri-Capital, Inc., 885 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1989).
23-42-110. False or misleading statements unlawful.
It is unlawful for any person to make or cause to be made, in any document filed with the Securities Commissioner or the commissioner's designee or in any proceeding under this chapter, any statement which is, at the time in light of the circumstances under which it is made, false or misleading in any material respect.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 16; 1983, No. 836, § 16; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1250.
Case Notes
License Applications.
On license application for securities agent, failure to disclose correct employment history, previous revocation of license and misdemeanor conviction constitutes violation. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
Cited: Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
Subchapter 2 — Administration
Effective Dates. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30: July 1, 1959.
Acts 1961, No. 248, § 11: July 1, 1961.
Acts 1973, No. 471, § 8: July 1, 1973.
Acts 1975, No. 844, § 16: Apr. 4, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the filing fees are inadequate; that exemptions are necessary for certain types of securities; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 493, § 21: Mar. 18, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that securities transactions always involve a relationship of trust and usually involve fiduciary obligations. This relationship facilitates the cover-up of felonies committed under the securities laws. This act being necessary for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this State, it is effective from and after its passage and approval, and it applies to all schemes or courses of conduct continuing past its effective date; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 836, § 29: Mar. 25, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the ability of the State of Arkansas to become part of a national Central Registration Depository System will be beneficial to the citizens of the State and applicants for registration and provide substantial cost savings to the securities industry and that Arkansas' entry into the system is scheduled to be soon. This Act being necessary for the additional protection and savings for the citizens of this State which will be afforded by entry into the System, it is effective from and after its passage and approval; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 939, § 12: Apr. 15, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the occurrence of new types of securities being made available to investors in combination with the proliferation of unregulated security advisors offering their services to the investing public indicate an immediate need for additional regulatory scrutiny of the securities and the practice of offering security advice; that this Act grants the Securities Commissioner the necessary flexibility to deal with these situations and should be given immediate effect in order to adequately protect the citizens of the State of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, Nos. 659 and 850, § 9: Mar. 24, 1993. Emergency clauses provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the provisions of this act are of critical importance to the state's ability to continue the duties, responsibilities, and functions of the State Securities Department. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 2011, No. 294, § 11: July 1, 2011. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly, that the Constitution of the State of Arkansas prohibits the appropriation of funds for more than a one (1) year period; that the effectiveness of this Act on July 1, 2011 is essential to the operation of the agency for which the appropriations in this Act are provided, and that in the event of an extension of the legislative session, the delay in the effective date of this Act beyond July 1, 2011 could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of essential governmental programs. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 2011.”
Acts 2013, No. 438, § 3: July 1, 2013. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the effectiveness of this Act on July 1, 2013 is essential to the operation of programs supported by funds deposited into and contained in the Securities Department Fund, and that in the event of the extension of the legislative session, the delay in the effective date of this Act beyond July 1, 2013 could work irreparable harm upon the proper administration and provision of essential governmental programs. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 2013.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
Research References
Am. Jur. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secur. Reg. St., § 86 et seq.
C.J.S. 79 C.J.S. Supp., Secur. Reg., § 222 et seq.
23-42-201. Administration by Securities Commissioner — Conflicts of interest.
-
- This chapter shall be administered by the Securities Commissioner, who shall be appointed by the Governor and who shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor.
- The commissioner shall report to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce.
-
- There is created within the Department of Commerce the State Securities Department.
- The State Securities Department shall have all the powers and duties assigned pursuant to Acts 1983, No. 691, and all subsequent delegations of authority.
- No person shall serve in the State Securities Department or in the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department in any capacity who engages in any activities regulated under the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, §§ 18, 30; 1961, No. 248, § 10; 1973, No. 471, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1252, 67-1262; Acts 2019, No. 910, § 575.
Publisher's Notes. The provisions of this chapter were originally administered by the Securities Division of the State Bank Department. Acts 1971, No. 38, § 16, transferred both the Banking and Securities Divisions of the State Bank Department to the Department of Commerce. Acts 1973, No. 471, separated the Securities Division from the State Bank Department and established the State Securities Department within the Department of Commerce. The State Securities Department retained all powers assigned by law to the Securities Division including the administration of the laws governing securities, credit unions, savings and loan associations, funeral expense organizations, and the sale of checks. Acts 1983, No. 691, abolished the Department of Commerce and provided, in § 3, that the State Securities Department should function as an independent agency the same as if it had never been placed in the Department of Commerce.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment redesignated (a) as (a)(1), and added (a)(2); inserted (b) and redesignated former (b) as (c); and inserted “or the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department” in (c).
23-42-202. Delegation of authority by Securities Commissioner.
- The Securities Commissioner may delegate to any person under any conditions which he or she deems appropriate any responsibilities of the commissioner as set forth in this chapter, the Credit Union Act, § 23-35-101 et seq., the Savings and Loan Act, § 23-37-101 et seq., or any other act for which the commissioner is responsible.
- The commissioner, subject to any restrictions which he or she in his or her discretion deems appropriate, may delegate to any person the exercise or discharge in the commissioner's name of any power, duty, or function, whether ministerial, discretionary, or of whatever character, vested by this chapter in the commissioner.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 19; 1977, No. 493, § 11; 1979, No. 754, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1253; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 3; 1997, No. 173, § 5.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
There is nothing in the Constitution of the United States which prohibits a state from conferring powers on the bank commissioner; and former act did not vest bank commissioner with arbitrary power since provision was made for proceedings in the chancery court. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
Cited: Madden v. United States Assocs., 40 Ark. App. 143, 844 S.W.2d 374 (1992).
23-42-203. Confidentiality of information or proceedings generally.
- It is unlawful for the Securities Commissioner or any of the officers or employees of the State Securities Department or officers or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department to use for personal benefit any information which is filed with or obtained by the commissioner and which is not made public.
- Neither the commissioner nor any of the officers or employees of the State Securities Department or officers or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department shall disclose the information except among themselves or when necessary or appropriate in a proceeding or investigation under this chapter or in any judicial proceedings when the information is not privileged.
- No provision of this chapter either creates or derogates from any privilege which exists at common law or otherwise when documentary or other evidence is sought under a subpoena directed to the commissioner or any of his or her officers or employees.
- Nothing herein shall prevent the commissioner or any officers or employees of the State Securities Department or officers or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department from sharing with state or federal law enforcement authorities, other state or federal regulatory authorities, or self-regulatory organizations authorized by law any information which they may have or obtain in aid of the enforcement of this chapter or any other securities act or the criminal provisions of any laws.
- The commissioner, in his or her discretion, shall determine when an administrative proceeding shall be public.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, §§ 18, 24; 1963, No. 479, § 4; 1985, No. 939, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1252, 67-1258; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 4; 2019, No. 910, § 576.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “the officers or employees of the State Securities Department or officers or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department” for “his or her officers or employees” in (a) and (b); and inserted “or officers or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department” in (d).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Case Notes
Cited: Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
23-42-204. Rules, forms, and orders of Securities Commissioner.
- The Securities Commissioner, from time to time, may make, amend, and rescind any rules, forms, and orders which are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. This includes rules and forms governing registration statements, applications, notice filings, and reports and defining any terms, whether or not used in this chapter, insofar as the definitions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter. For the purpose of rules and forms, the commissioner may classify securities, persons, and matters within his or her jurisdiction and prescribe different requirements for different classes.
- No rule, form, or order may be made, amended, or rescinded unless the commissioner finds that the action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, or for the protection of investors, and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of this chapter.
-
- In prescribing rules and forms, the commissioner may cooperate with the securities administrators of the other states, individually and as a group represented by the North American Securities Administrators Association, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and with self-regulatory organizations with a view to effectuating the policy of this chapter to achieve maximum uniformity in the form and content of registration statements, applications, rules, and reports wherever practicable.
- When the commissioner incorporates by reference in the rules and forms of the commissioner a form, rule, or portion thereof in accordance with this subsection, any change in that form, rule, or portion thereof shall become part of the rules and forms of the commissioner, unless the commissioner shall by order decline to accept the change within thirty (30) days of its adoption or promulgation.
-
-
The commissioner may by rule or order prescribe:
- The form and content of financial statements required under this chapter;
- The circumstances under which consolidated financial statements shall be filed; and
- Whether any required financial statements shall be certified by independent or certified public accountants.
- All financial statements shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices.
-
The commissioner may by rule or order prescribe:
- All rules and forms of the commissioner shall be published.
- No provision of this chapter imposing any liability applies to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any rule, form, or order of the commissioner, notwithstanding that the rule, form, or order may later be amended or rescinded or be determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.
-
- The commissioner may by order require an issuer, broker-dealer, or agent to obtain from the purchaser, in any initial sale of a security effected by means of a prospectus, a written statement signed by the purchaser that he or she had received a copy of the prospectus prior to his or her purchase of the security.
- The order may require the issuer, broker-dealer, or agent to keep a copy of the written statement at the principal office of the issuer, broker-dealer, or agent, subject to inspection by the commissioner or his or her agent for a period not to exceed two (2) years.
- This subsection shall not be applicable to the subsequent sale of the same securities to the same purchaser.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 24; 1963, No. 479, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1258; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 5; 1997, No. 173, § 6.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Case Notes
Cited: Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
23-42-205. Investigations.
-
The Securities Commissioner, in his or her discretion, may:
- Make any public or private investigations within or outside of this state which he or she deems necessary to determine whether any person has violated or is about to violate any provision of this chapter or any rule or order under this chapter, or to aid in the enforcement of this chapter or in the prescribing of rules and forms under this chapter;
- Require or permit any person to file a statement in writing, under oath, or otherwise as the commissioner determines, as to all the facts and circumstances concerning the matter to be investigated; and
- Publish information concerning any violation of this chapter or any rule or order hereunder.
- For the purpose of any investigation or proceeding under this chapter, the commissioner or any officer designated by him or her may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, agreements, or other documents or records which the commissioner deems relevant or material to the inquiry.
-
- In case of contumacy by or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any person, the Pulaski County Circuit Court, upon application by the commissioner, may order the person to appear before the commissioner or the officer designated by the commissioner to produce evidence or testify concerning the matter under investigation or in question.
- Failure to obey the order may be punished as contempt of court.
-
- No person is excused from attending and testifying, or from producing any document or record, before the commissioner, or in obedience to the subpoena of the commissioner or any officer designated by him or her, or in any proceeding instituted by the commissioner, on the ground that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him or her may tend to incriminate him or her or subject him or her to a penalty or forfeiture. However, no individual may be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he or she is compelled, after claiming his or her privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, except that the individual testifying is not exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury or contempt committed in testifying.
- However, no provision of this chapter shall be construed to require, or to authorize the commissioner to require, any investment adviser engaged in rendering investment advisory services to disclose the identity, investments, or affairs of any client of the investment adviser, except insofar as the disclosure may be necessary or appropriate in a particular proceeding or investigation having as its objective the enforcement of a provision of this chapter.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 19; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1253; Acts 2009, No. 462, § 1.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (c), subdivided the subsection, substituted “Pulaski County Circuit Court” for “Chancery Court of Pulaski County” in (c)(1), and made minor stylistic changes.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
There is nothing in the Constitution of the United States which prohibits a state from conferring powers on the bank commissioner; and former act did not vest bank commissioner with arbitrary power since provision was made for proceedings in the chancery court. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
23-42-206. Records of Securities Commissioner generally — Interpretive opinions.
-
- A document is filed when it is received by the Securities Commissioner or when the commissioner receives notice from his or her designee that a document was received by the designee.
- The disposition of any document received by the commissioner shall be in accordance with the Arkansas State Records Management and Archives Act of 1995, § 13-4-101 et seq. [repealed].
-
A document received by the commissioner's designee may be:
- Destroyed after the reproduction of the document by photograph, microphotograph, or electronic means of a permanent nature;
- Transferred to a permanent storage location maintained by the Central Registration Depository with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Securities Registration Depository with the North American Securities Administrators Association, or such other central depository system as may be determined by the commissioner; or
- Transferred to the commissioner to be disposed of in the manner of a document received by the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall keep a register of all notice filings, applications for registration, and registration statements which are, or have ever been, effective under this chapter and all denial, suspension, or revocation orders which have ever been entered under this chapter. The register shall be open for public inspection.
- The commissioner may rely upon and coordinate with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the North American Securities Administrators Association, and any other securities regulatory agencies for the proper maintenance of certain common registrations, records, and other documents maintained by the other regulatory agencies.
- Upon request, and at reasonable charges which he or she prescribes, the commissioner shall furnish to any person photostatic or other copies, certified under his or her seal of office if requested, of any entry in the register or any document which is a matter of public record. In any proceeding or prosecution under this chapter, any copy so certified is prima facie evidence of the contents of the entry or document certified.
- The commissioner in his or her discretion may honor requests from interested persons for interpretative opinions.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 25; 1975, No. 844, § 13; 1977, No. 493, §§ 17, 18; 1983, No. 836, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1259; Acts 1995, No. 845, §§ 6, 7; 1997, No. 173, § 7; 2009, No. 462, §§ 2, 3.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “Financial Industry Regulatory Authority” for “National Association of Securities Dealers” in (a)(3)(B) and (c); and made minor stylistic changes.
23-42-207. Public inspection of records — Exceptions.
-
- Unless otherwise specified below, all information filed with the Securities Commissioner shall be available for public inspection.
- The information contained in or filed with any registration statement, notice filing, application, or report may be made available to the public under any rules which the commissioner prescribes.
-
Except for reasonable segregable portions which are public information, the commissioner shall not publish or make available the following information:
- Information contained in reports, summaries, analyses, letters, or memoranda arising out of, in anticipation of, or in connection with an examination or inspection of the books and records of any person or any other investigation;
- Interagency or intraagency memoranda or letters, including generally records which reflect discussions between or consideration by the commissioner or members of his or her staff, or both, of any action taken or proposed to be taken by the commissioner or by any members of his or her staff, and, specifically, reports, summaries, analyses, conclusions, or any other work product of the commissioner or of attorneys, accountants, analysts, or other members of the commissioner's staff, prepared in the course of an inspection of the books or records of any person whose affairs are regulated by the commissioner, or prepared otherwise in the course of an examination or investigation or related litigation conducted by or on behalf of the commissioner, except those which by law would routinely be made to a party other than an agency in litigation with the commissioner;
- Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, including those concerning employees of the State Securities Department or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department and those concerning persons subject to regulation by employees of broker-dealers reported to the commissioner pursuant to the State Securities Department's rules concerning registration of broker-dealers and agents;
-
- Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes to the extent that production of the records would interfere with enforcement proceedings, deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, or disclose the identity of a confidential source.
- In a particular case the commissioner may also withhold investigatory records that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, disclose investigative techniques and procedures, or endanger the life or physical safety of law enforcement personnel.
- Investigatory records include all documents, records, transcripts, correspondence, and related memoranda and work product concerning examinations and other investigations and related litigation as authorized by law, which pertain to or may disclose the possible violations by any person of any provision of any of the statutes or rules administered by the commissioner, and all written communications from or to any person confidentially complaining or otherwise furnishing information respecting the possible violations, as well as all correspondence and memoranda in connection with the confidential complaints or information;
- Information contained in or related to examinations, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of any agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions;
-
- Financial records of broker-dealers, investment advisers, agents, or representatives obtained during or as a result of an examination by the State Securities Department.
- However, when those records are required by this chapter to be filed with the department as part of a notice filing, registration, annual renewal, or otherwise, the records, including financial statements prepared by certified public accountants, shall be public unless sections of the information are bound separately and marked privileged and confidential by the broker-dealer, investment adviser, agent, or representative upon its submission, in which case it shall be deemed nonpublic until ten (10) days after the commissioner has given the broker-dealer, investment adviser, agent, or representative notice that an order will be entered deeming the material public.
- If the broker-dealer, investment adviser, agent, or representative believes the commissioner's order is incorrect, the broker-dealer, investment adviser, agent, or representative may seek an injunction from the Pulaski County Circuit Court ordering the State Securities Department to hold the information as nonpublic pending a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction if the order of the commissioner is appealed pursuant to applicable law;
- Trade secrets obtained from any person; and
- Any other records which under the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq., or other laws are required to be closed to the public and are not deemed open to the public inspection.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 25; 1985, No. 939, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1259; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 8; 1997, No. 173, § 8; 2009, No. 462, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2512; 2019, No. 910, § 577.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “Pulaski County Circuit Court” for “Circuit Court or Chancery Court of Pulaski County” in (b)(6)(C).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “or rules” for “rules or regulations” in (b)(4)(C).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910, in (b)(3), deleted “all” preceding “employees of the State Securities Department”, inserted “or employees of the Department of Commerce working for the State Securities Department”, and substituted “State Securities Department's” for “department's”.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Watkins, Access to Public Records Under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, 38 Ark. L. Rev. 741.
23-42-208. Cooperation with other regulatory agencies.
- The Securities Commissioner may enter into an arrangement, agreement, or other working relationship with federal, other state, and self-regulatory authorities whereby documents may be filed and maintained in the Central Registration Depository with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Securities Registration Depository with the North American Securities Administrators Association, such other central depository system as determined by the commissioner, or the other agencies or authorities.
- It is the intent of this section that the commissioner be provided the authority to reduce duplication of filings, reduce administrative costs, and establish uniform procedures, forms, and administration with the states and federal authorities.
- The commissioner may permit initial and renewal registration filings required under this chapter to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the North American Securities Administrators Association, or other similar authorities.
- The commissioner may accept uniform securities examinations or other procedures designed to implement a uniform national securities regulatory system or facilitate common practices and procedures among the states.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 4; 1979, No. 754, § 5; 1983, No. 836, § 8; A.S.A. § 67-1238; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 9; 2009, No. 462, §§ 5, 6.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “Financial Industry Regulatory Authority” for “National Association of Securities Dealers” in (a) and (c).
23-42-209. Injunction, mandamus, or other ancillary relief.
-
-
- Whenever it appears to the Securities Commissioner, upon sufficient grounds or evidence satisfactory to the commissioner, that any person has engaged or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of this chapter, except the provisions of § 23-42-509, or any rule or order under this chapter, including any order issued under § 23-42-509, the commissioner may summarily order the person to cease and desist from the act or practice.
- Upon the entry of the order, the commissioner shall promptly notify the person that the order has been entered, of the reasons therefor, and of his or her right to a hearing on the order.
-
- A hearing shall be held on the written request of the person aggrieved by the order if the request is received by the commissioner within thirty (30) days of the date of the entry of the order, or if ordered by the commissioner.
- If a hearing is not requested and none is ordered by the commissioner, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner.
-
After notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the commissioner may:
- Affirm, modify, or vacate the cease and desist order under subdivision (a)(1)(A) of this section; and
-
For a violation of this chapter other than a violation of § 23-42-509, by order, levy a fine not to exceed:
- Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation or an amount equal to the total amount of money received in connection with each violation; or
-
If a victim of a violation is sixty-five (65) years of age or older:
- Twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each violation; or
-
Two (2) times the amount of money received in connection with each violation.
- After an order is issued under subdivision (a)(1) or subdivision (a)(2) of this section; or
- Without issuing an order under subdivision (a)(1) or subdivision (a)(2) of this section.
- An accounting;
- Disgorgement of profits;
- Restitution; or
- The assessment of a fine in an amount of not more than the total amount of money received in connection with a violation of this chapter.
-
-
- The commissioner may apply to the Pulaski County Circuit Court to temporarily or permanently enjoin an act or practice that violates this chapter and to enforce compliance with this chapter or any rule or order under this chapter:
- Upon a proper showing, a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or writ of mandamus shall be granted.
- The court shall not require the commissioner to post a bond.
-
The commissioner may also obtain upon proper showing any other ancillary relief in the public interest, including without limitation:
- The appointment of a receiver, temporary receiver, or conservator;
- A declaratory judgment;
- This chapter does not prohibit or restrict the informal disposition of a proceeding or allegations which might give rise to a proceeding by stipulation, settlement, consent, or default, in lieu of a formal or informal hearing on the allegations or in lieu of the sanctions authorized by this section.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 20; 1963, No. 479, § 3; 1979, No. 754, § 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1254; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 10; 1997, No. 173, § 9; 2009, No. 462, § 7; 2009, No. 534, § 2; 2011, No. 339, § 4; 2017, No. 668, § 12.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment by No. 462 rewrote (a)(3)(A), which read: “The commissioner may, after issuance of an order as set forth above, apply to the Chancery Court of Pulaski County to temporarily or permanently enjoin the act or practice and to enforce compliance with this chapter or any rule or order under this chapter.”
The 2009 amendment by No. 534 rewrote (a)(2)(C), which read: “If a hearing is requested or ordered, the commissioner, after notice of an opportunity for hearing, may affirm, modify, or vacate the order.”
The 2011 amendment subdivided (b); in the present introductory language of (b), substituted “obtain” for “seek and the appropriate court shall,” deleted “grant” following “showing,” and added “without limitation”; and substituted “a violation of this chapter” for “any violation, or other relief as may be appropriate in the public interest” in (b)(6).
The 2017 amendment substituted “If a hearing is not requested” for “If no hearing is requested” in (a)(2)(B); redesignated former (a)(3) through (a)(5) as present (b)(1) through (b)(3); substituted “shall” for “may” in (b)(3); redesignated former (b) as present (b)(4) and redesignated former (b)(1) through (b)(6) as (b)(4)(A) through (b)(4)(F); substituted “This chapter does not” for “Nothing herein shall” in (c); and made stylistic changes.
23-42-210. Judicial review.
-
- A person aggrieved by a final order of the Securities Commissioner may obtain a review of the order in any state court of competent jurisdiction by filing in court, within thirty (30) days after the entry of the order, a written petition praying that the order be modified or set aside in whole or in part.
- A copy of the petition shall be forthwith served upon the commissioner, and thereupon the commissioner shall certify and file in court a copy of the filing and evidence upon which the order was entered. When these copies have been filed, the court has exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, modify, enforce, or set aside the order, in whole or in part.
-
- The findings of the commissioner as to the facts, if supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence, are conclusive.
- If either party applies to the court for leave to adduce additional material evidence and shows to the satisfaction of the court that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce the evidence in the hearing before the commissioner, the court may order the additional evidence to be taken before the commissioner and to be adduced upon the hearing, in any manner and upon any conditions which the court considers proper. The commissioner may modify his or her findings and order by reason of the additional evidence and shall file in the court the additional evidence together with any modified or new findings or order.
- The judgment of the court is final, subject to review by the Supreme Court.
- The commencement of proceedings under subsection (a) of this section does not, unless specifically ordered by the court, operate as a stay of the commissioner's order.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 23; 1961, No. 248, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1257; Acts 2017, No. 668, § 13.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(1), substituted “A person” for “Any person” and “thirty (30)” for “sixty (60)”.
Case Notes
Cited: Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
23-42-211. Disposition of fees.
-
- There is created on the books of the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State, the Auditor of State, and the Treasurer of State a fund to be known as the “Securities Department Fund”.
- The Securities Department Fund shall be used for the maintenance, operation, support, and improvement of the State Securities Department in carrying out its functions, powers, and duties as set out by law and by rule not inconsistent with law.
- The Securities Department Fund shall consist of those portions of fees designated for deposit into the Securities Department Fund under § 23-42-304(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5), § 23-42-404(b)(1), and § 23-42-509(a).
- Notwithstanding subdivision (a)(3) of this section, at the end of each fiscal year, the Securities Commissioner shall transfer into the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund any moneys in the Securities Department Fund that exceed the amount of the department's next fiscal-year budget.
- The department is authorized to promulgate such rules necessary to administer the fees, rates, tolls, or charges for services established by this section and is directed to prescribe and collect such fees, rates, tolls, or charges for the services by the department in such manner as may be necessary to support the programs of the department as directed by the Governor and the General Assembly.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30; 1961, No. 248, § 10; 1973, No. 471, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1262; Acts 1993, No. 659, §§ 1, 5; 1993, No. 850, §§ 1, 5; 2003, No. 759, § 1; 2009, No. 534, § 3; 2011, No. 294, § 8; 2013, No. 438, § 2; 2017, No. 668, § 14; 2019, No. 110, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2513.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted “and (a)(5)” in (a)(3), and made related changes.
The 2011 amendment, in (a)(4), substituted “two million dollars ($2,000,000)” for “one million dollars ($1,000,000),” substituted “July 1, 2013” for “July 1, 2011,”and deleted “unless extended” at the end.
The 2013 amendment, in (a)(4), substituted “four million dollars ($4,000,000)” for “two million dollars ($2,000,000),” and deleted “until July 1, 2013, at which time this limitation shall expire” at the end.
The 2017 amendment deleted “and regulation” following “rule” in (a)(2); substituted “under § 23-42-304(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5), § 23-42-404(b)(1), and § 23-42-509(a)” for “pursuant to §§ 23-42-304(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5) and 23-42-404(b)(1) and such other funds as may be provided by law or regulatory action” in (a)(3); and substituted “two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000)” for “four million dollars ($4,000,000)” in (a)(4).
The 2019 amendment by No. 110 substituted “at the end of each fiscal year, the Securities Commissioner shall transfer into the General Revenue Fund Account of the State Apportionment Fund any moneys in the Securities Department Fund that exceed the amount of the department's next fiscal-year budget” for “no more than two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) shall be deposited into the fund in any one (1) fiscal year” in (a)(4).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
23-42-212. Registration or availability of exemption not construed as approval by Securities Commissioner — Inconsistent representation.
-
- Neither the fact that an application for registration, a notice filing, or a registration statement has been filed nor the fact that a person or security is effectively registered constitutes a finding by the Securities Commissioner that any document filed under this chapter is true, complete, and not misleading.
- Neither any such fact nor the fact that an exemption or exception is available for a security or a transaction means that the commissioner has passed in any way upon the merits or qualifications of, or recommended or given approval to, any person, security, or transaction.
- It is unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to any prospective purchaser, customer, or client any representation inconsistent with subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 17; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1251; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 10.
Case Notes
Cited: Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
23-42-213. Disposition of fines — Investor Education Fund.
- There is created on the books of the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State, the Auditor of State, and the Treasurer of State a fund to be known as the “Investor Education Fund”.
-
Except as provided by subsection (c) of this section, all fines imposed and collected under §§ 23-42-209 and 23-42-308 shall be deposited as special revenues into the State Treasury and credited to the fund, to be administered by the Securities Commissioner for the following purposes:
-
To inform and educate the public regarding investments in securities in order to help investors and potential investors:
- Evaluate their investment decisions;
- Protect themselves from unfair, inequitable, or fraudulent offerings;
- Choose their broker-dealers, agents, and investment advisers more carefully;
- Be alert for false or misleading advertising or other harmful practices; and
- Know their rights as investors; and
-
To pay for:
- Costs, expenses, and charges incurred by the State Securities Department in connection with the presentation and dissemination of information to the public as described in this section, including costs of printing copies of the Arkansas Securities Act, § 23-42-101 et seq., Rules of the Arkansas Securities Commissioner, and other materials designed to inform the public as set forth in this section;
- Costs of advertising and promotional materials designed to accomplish the purposes of this subdivision (b)(2);
- Costs of equipment necessary or useful for such presentations; and
- Costs and expenses associated with conducting a stock market game for educational purposes in selected schools in the state's public school system.
-
To inform and educate the public regarding investments in securities in order to help investors and potential investors:
- Fines collected in excess of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) in any one (1) fiscal year shall be deposited as general revenues.
History. Acts 2003, No. 759, § 2; 2013, No. 460, § 5; 2017, No. 668, §§ 15, 16.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote (c).
The 2017 amendment deleted “or moneys collected in lieu of a fine” following “imposed and collected” in (b); and, in (c), substituted “Fines collected” for “Funds”, deleted “collected” following “($150,000)”, and substituted “deposited as general revenues” for “designated as special revenues and deposited into the Securities Department Fund”.
Subchapter 3 — Broker-Dealers, Agents, and Investment Advisers
Cross References. Licenses and permits, removal of disqualification for criminal offenses, § 17-1-103.
Effective Dates. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30: July 1, 1959.
Acts 1961, No. 248, § 11: July 1, 1961.
Acts 1973, No. 47, § 20: Feb. 1, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities is in need of stricter regulation to assure the public that they receive the protection they deserve; that the filing fee for filing a registration statement is inadequate; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to deter the total number of violations and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved; therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 844, § 16: Apr. 4, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the filing fees are inadequate; that exemptions are necessary for certain types of securities; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 493, § 21: Mar. 18, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that securities transactions always involve a relationship of trust and usually involve fiduciary obligations. This relationship facilitates the cover-up of felonies committed under the securities laws. This act being necessary for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this State, it is effective from and after its passage and approval, and it applies to all schemes or courses of conduct continuing past its effective date; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 806, § 25: Mar. 28, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the authority of the Arkansas Securities Commissioner provide a duplicity of regulation which creates undue burden upon mortgage loan companies and loan brokers while at the same time not being in the public interest, and it is found that this Act will eliminate much of such duplicity and provide adequate protection of the public; therefore, an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1979, No. 6, § 5: Jan. 30, 1979. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the present laws governing the bonding of registered broker-dealers in the State of Arkansas creates an undue hardship upon those broker-dealers who operate as sole proprietor, and that the immediate passage of this Act is necessary to clarify and alleviate the existing laws in this respect. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 836, § 29: Mar. 25, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the ability of the State of Arkansas to become part of a national Central Registration Depository System will be beneficial to the citizens of the State and applicants for registration and provide substantial cost savings to the securities industry and that Arkansas' entry into the system is scheduled to be soon. This Act being necessary for the additional protection and savings for the citizens of this State which will be afforded by entry into the System, it is effective from and after its passage and approval; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 939, § 12: Apr. 15, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the occurrence of new types of securities being made available to investors in combination with the proliferation of unregulated security advisors offering their services to the investing public indicate an immediate need for additional regulatory scrutiny of the securities and the practice of offering security advice; that this Act grants the Securities Commissioner the necessary flexibility to deal with these situations and should be given immediate effect in order to adequately protect the citizens of the State of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 449, § 4: Mar. 30, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the increased demand on the State Securities office has resulted in an immediate need for additional revenues to provide the services demanded from that office; that this act provides some of those needed revenues by means of increasing certain fees; and that this Act should go into effect immediately in order to generate additional revenues as soon as possible. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, Nos. 659 and 850, § 9: Mar. 24, 1993. Emergency clauses provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the provisions of this act are of critical importance to the state's ability to continue the duties, responsibilities, and functions of the State Securities Department. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1995 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 14, § 5: Oct. 23, 1995. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eightieth General Assembly that requirements for resident principals established in Act 845 of 1995 operate as a hardship on certain securities agents in the State who work as independent contractors; that the immediate effectiveness of this act is essential in order to alleviate this undue burden and permit these productive member of our society to continue earning their livelihood while still implementing measures needed to protect the integrity of the securities industry. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secur. Reg. St., § 15 et seq.
C.J.S. 79 C.J.S. Supp., Secur. Reg., § 216 et seq.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislation of the 1983 General Assembly, Business Law, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 607.
23-42-301. Registration required — Unlawful acts — Supervision requirements.
- It is unlawful for a person to transact business in this state as a broker-dealer or agent unless he or she is registered under this chapter.
-
- It is unlawful for a registered broker-dealer or issuer to employ an unregistered agent except a nonresident agent who is registered by any other state securities administrator and who effects transactions in this state exclusively with registered broker-dealers.
-
The registration of an agent is not effective during a period when he or she is not associated with a particular:
- Broker-dealer registered under this chapter; or
- Issuer.
-
-
A broker-dealer or issuer shall notify promptly the Securities Commissioner or the commissioner's designee if an agent begins or terminates:
- An association with a broker-dealer or issuer; or
- The activities that make him or her an agent of the broker-dealer or issuer.
-
If an agent terminates or withdraws his or her registration with a broker-dealer or issuer, a subsequent application by the agent for registration is treated as:
- An initial registration; and
- A notification by the agent of termination or withdrawal of the previous registration or application.
-
A broker-dealer or issuer shall notify promptly the Securities Commissioner or the commissioner's designee if an agent begins or terminates:
- [Repealed.]
-
It is unlawful for a person to transact business in this state as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative without first being registered under this chapter unless the person:
-
Is registered as an investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013, and has filed with the commissioner or the commissioner's designee a notice filing consisting of:
- A copy of documents on file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that the commissioner may by rule or order prescribe; and
- The fee set forth in § 23-42-304(a)(3);
- Is not registered as an investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013, because the person is not an investment adviser under section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013;
- Is a “representative” of an investment adviser registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013, and has no place of business located in this state; or
- Is a supervised person of an investment adviser registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, but is not an investment adviser representative as defined by Rule 203A-3 of the rules and regulations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 17 C.F.R. § 275, as they existed on January 1, 2013.
-
Is registered as an investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2013, and has filed with the commissioner or the commissioner's designee a notice filing consisting of:
-
- A notice filing required by subdivision (c)(1) of this section becomes effective upon receipt by the commissioner or the commissioner's designee of the notice filing, consent to service of process, and the appropriate fee.
-
- The registration and notice filing required by subdivision (c)(1) of this section expires December 31 of each year unless renewed.
- Effective upon the commissioner's receipt of notification, an investment adviser may terminate the investment adviser's notice filing under subdivision (c)(1) of this section by providing the commissioner notification of the termination.
- A broker-dealer or investment adviser shall not conduct business from a branch office within this state unless the branch office is registered under this chapter.
-
- A broker-dealer shall establish, maintain, and enforce a system to supervise the activities of its agents and employees that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with this chapter, the rules and orders of the commissioner, all other applicable state and federal securities laws, and the rules of self-regulatory organizations.
-
A broker-dealer's supervisory system shall include without limitation the:
- Establishment and maintenance of written procedures designed to achieve compliance with subdivision (f)(1) of this section; and
- Appointment of at least one (1) agent of the broker-dealer, who is registered in Arkansas and meets the qualifications and performs the supervisory responsibilities of the broker-dealer for activities in this state under rules established by the commissioner.
-
- An investment adviser shall establish, maintain, and enforce a system to supervise the activities of its representatives and employees that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with this chapter, the rules and orders of the commissioner, all other applicable state and federal securities laws, and the rules of self-regulatory organizations.
-
An investment adviser's supervisory system shall include without limitation the:
- Establishment and maintenance of written procedures designed to achieve compliance with subdivision (g)(1) of this section; and
- Appointment of at least one (1) representative of the investment adviser, who is registered in Arkansas and meets the qualifications and performs the supervisory responsibilities of the investment adviser for activities in this state under rules established by the commissioner.
- The commissioner may by rule establish concurrent registration with a broker-dealer, issuer, or investment adviser or any combination of broker-dealers, issuers, and investment advisers.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 3; 1961, No. 248, § 1; 1973, No. 47, §§ 1, 2; 1975, No. 844, §§ 1, 5; 1977, No. 493, § 1; 1977, No. 806, § 24A; 1983, No. 836, §§ 1-4; 1985, No. 939, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1237; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 11; 1995 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 14, § 1; 1997, No. 173, § 11; 2009, No. 462, § 8; 2009, No. 534, § 4; 2011, No. 338, § 2; 2013, No. 460, §§ 6-10.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment by No. 462 inserted “15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et. seq., as it existed on January 1, 2009” in four places in (c); inserted “or the commissioner's designee” in (c)(1) and (d)(1); and made minor stylistic changes.
The 2009 by No. 534 amendment added (f).
The 2011 amendment subdivided (b)(2); rewrote (b)(3); subdivided (c)(1); substituted “January 1, 2011” for “January 1, 2009” in (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3); substituted “not an” for “exempted from the definition of” in (c)(3); rewrote (d)(2)(B); deleted (e) and redesignated former (f) as (e); and added present (f) and (g).
The 2013 amendment repealed (b)(4); rewrote (c); substituted “is registered in Arkansas and meets the qualifications and performs” for “shall meet the qualifications and carry out” in (f)(2)(B) and (g)(2)(B); and added (h).
U.S. Code. The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq.
U.S. Code. Sections 202 and 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, referred to in this section, are codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80b-2 and 15 U.S.C. § 80b-3, respectively.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Frances S. Fendler & A. Heath Abshure, Private Civil Liability Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 125 (2016).
Case Notes
Dealer.
An isolated sale of an interest in an oil and gas lease by the owner does not constitute the owner a broker-dealer in violation of this section. Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969).
Statute of Limitations.
In the absence of any indication that the legislature intended to make the extension of the statute of limitations by the 1973 amendment to § 23-42-106 retroactive, the longer statute of limitations was applicable only to causes of action arising after the 1973 act became effective; therefore, a civil action for an illegal sale of securities was barred where the sale was made prior to the enactment of the 1973 amendment, but suit was not commenced until after the expiration of the statute of limitations in effect prior to the 1973 amendment. Morton v. Tullgren, 263 Ark. 69, 563 S.W.2d 422 (1978).
23-42-302. Registration procedure.
-
- A broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, representative, or branch office may obtain an initial or renewal registration by filing with the Securities Commissioner or the commissioner's designee an application and fee, together with a consent to service of process under § 23-42-107(a).
- The commissioner may by rule or order approve a limited registration with such limitations, qualifications, or conditions as the commissioner deems appropriate.
- The commissioner may by rule set forth the form and content of the application and establish a procedure for renewal registration or initial registration.
-
The application shall contain whatever information the commissioner by rule requires concerning such matters as:
- The applicant's form and place of organization;
- The applicant's proposed method of doing business;
- The qualifications, disciplinary history, and business history of the applicant, including, in the case of a broker-dealer or investment adviser, the qualifications and history of any partner, officer, director, person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, or any persons directly or indirectly controlling the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
- Any investigation, proceeding, order, injunction, arrest, or conviction of any felony or misdemeanor; and
- The applicant's financial condition and history.
- The commissioner may provide for a written examination to be taken by each class of applicants to be used as one (1) of the bases in determining an applicant's qualifications to be registered.
- The commissioner is authorized to conduct an investigation in order that he or she may determine the fitness of any applicant. Each applicant shall pay to the commissioner an investigation fee, and the amount of each fee shall be determined on the same basis as is the examination fee required of broker-dealers under § 23-42-306(d).
- If no denial order is in effect or no proceeding is pending under § 23-42-308, registration becomes effective on the thirtieth day after the application is completed. The commissioner may determine an earlier effective date upon review of the application.
- Applications which have not been completed within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after filing with the commissioner may be deemed abandoned and considered withdrawn by the applicant, provided the applicant has been notified of the deficiencies to the application and afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct such deficiencies.
- A registered broker-dealer, investment adviser, or person required to make a notice filing pursuant to § 23-42-301(c)(1) may file an application for registration or notice filing of a successor, whether or not the successor is then in existence. The application or notice filing shall comply with the requirements for an initial application or notice filing.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 4; 1961, No. 248, § 2; 1973, No. 47, § 8; 1975, No. 844, § 5; 1983, No. 836, §§ 5, 6; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1238; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 12; 1997, No. 173, § 12; 2009, No. 462, § 9; 2009, No. 534, § 5; 2017, No. 668, § 17.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment by No. 462 deleted the last sentence in (d), which read: “Any agent, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or representative shall be exempt from examination, except such part as relates to this chapter, if he was engaged in the securities business in Arkansas on July 1, 1959, and was registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers or the federal Securities and Exchange Commission.”
The 2009 amendment by No. 534, in (a), inserted (a)(2), redesignated the remaining text accordingly, inserted “or branch office” in (a)(1), and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2017 amendment inserted “rule or” in (a)(2); and deleted “whereby registration may become effective prior to the filing of a completed application or fee” at the end of (b).
Case Notes
Applicability.
Subsection (e) of this section applies to applicants and registrants as defined within the Securities Act and is inapplicable to persons who only train applicants to take the broker-dealer examination. Bell v. Investment Training Inst., Inc., 271 Ark. 663, 609 S.W.2d 919 (1981).
Fraud not Shown.
Inconsistent recitals did not show that the whole scheme was fraudulent or that the trustee practiced a fraud on the Bank Commissioner (now Securities Commissioner) to secure a permit to do business. Palmer v. Taylor, 168 Ark. 127, 269 S.W. 996 (1925) (decision under prior law).
Grounds for Denial.
The Bank Commissioner (now Securities Commissioner) improperly refused a dealer's license to sell stock in a common-law trust on the ground that the laws of the state did not authorize such an association. Coleman v. McKee, 162 Ark. 90, 257 S.W. 733 (1924) (decision under prior law).
23-42-303. Minimum net capital requirement.
- The Securities Commissioner shall require a minimum net capital for registered broker-dealers in such amount as he or she may by rule prescribe and for registered investment advisers in the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500).
-
However, subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to any registered investment adviser which maintains its principal place of business in a state other than Arkansas that:
- Is registered or licensed as such in the state in which it maintains its principal place of business; and
- Is in compliance with the applicable net capital requirements of the state in which it maintains its principal place of business.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 4; 1961, No. 248, § 2; 1973, No. 47, § 3; 1975, No. 844, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1238; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 13; 1997, No. 173, § 13.
23-42-304. Filing fees — Rules.
-
Every applicant for initial or renewal registration and every person making a notice filing as required by § 23-42-301(c) shall pay a filing fee of:
- Three hundred dollars ($300) in the case of a broker-dealer;
- Seventy-five dollars ($75.00) in the case of an agent, of which twenty-five dollars ($25.00) shall be designated as special revenues and shall be deposited into the Securities Department Fund;
- Three hundred dollars ($300) in the case of an investment adviser;
- Seventy-five dollars ($75.00) in the case of a representative, of which twenty-five dollars ($25.00) shall be designated as special revenues and shall be deposited into the Securities Department Fund;
- Fifty dollars ($50.00) in the case of a branch office, of which the entire amount shall be designated as special revenues and deposited into the Securities Department Fund; and
- Three hundred dollars ($300) in the case of an exempt reporting adviser or investment adviser to a private fund that complies with exemption requirements.
- After an application for registration has been processed, in whole or in part, any filing fee shall be nonrefundable.
- The State Securities Department is hereby authorized to promulgate such rules necessary to administer the fees, rates, tolls, or charges for services established by this section and § 23-42-404 and is directed to prescribe and collect such fees, rates, tolls, or charges for the services by the department in such manner as may be necessary to support the programs of the department as directed by the Governor and the General Assembly.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 4; 1961, No. 248, § 2; 1975, No. 844, § 2; 1985, No. 939, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1238; Acts 1987, No. 449, § 1; 1993, No. 659, §§ 2, 5; 1993, No. 850, § 2, 5; 1995, No. 845, § 14; 1997, No. 173, § 14; 2009, No. 534, § 6; 2017, No. 668, § 18; 2019, No. 315, § 2514.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted (a)(5) and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2017 amendment substituted “Securities Department Fund” for “fund” in (a)(4) and (a)(5); and added (a)(6).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the section heading and in (c).
23-42-305. Corporate surety bonds — Alternatives.
-
- The Securities Commissioner shall require registered broker-dealers, investment advisers, and an agent for the issuer to maintain a bond in such form and amount as he or she may by rule prescribe.
-
However, this subsection does not apply to any registered investment adviser that maintains its principal place of business in a state other than Arkansas that:
- Is registered or licensed as such in the state in which it maintains its principal place of business; and
- Is in compliance with the applicable bonding requirements of the state in which it maintains its principal place of business.
-
The following apply to those bonds required to be posted with the commissioner under subsection (a) of this section:
- The total liability of the surety to all persons, cumulative or otherwise, shall not exceed the amounts specified in the bond;
- Every bond shall provide that a suit shall not be maintained to enforce any liability on the bond unless brought within five (5) years after the sale or other act upon which it is based; and
- Every bond shall provide for suit on the bond by any person who has a cause of action under this chapter.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 4; 1961, No. 248, § 2; 1973, No. 47, § 4; 1977, No. 493, § 2; 1979, No. 6, §§ 2, 3; 1983, No. 836, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1238, 67-1238.1; Acts 1991, No. 298, § 1; 1995, No. 845, §§ 15, 16; 1997, No. 173, § 15; 2009, No. 534, § 7.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1979, No. 6, § 1, provided it was the intent of the act to exempt those broker-dealers who operate as sole proprietorships which have no agents other than the sole proprietor from the fidelity bond requirements of this section.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (a), rewrote and subdivided the introductory language and redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly; deleted (b)(4); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
Research References
Ark. L. Notes.
Copeland, A Brief Survey of Some Important 1990 Insurance Law Decisions, 1991 Ark. L. Notes 75.
Ark. L. Rev.
Note, Fidelity Bonds for Broker-Dealers and the Scope of Liability in Arkansas: Foster v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 44 Ark. L. Rev. 865.
Case Notes
Indemnitor.
Subdivision (a)(4) of this section does not give an investor a right of direct action against an indemnitor without regard to the principal's liability; an indemnitor is entitled to the rights and defenses available to the principal. American Ins. Co. v. Cazort, 316 Ark. 314, 871 S.W.2d 575 (1994).
Limitations of Actions.
Any action on the bond or securities posted in lieu thereof must be brought within statutory period from the date of the sale or act upon which the suit is based. Wells v. Hill, 239 Ark. 979, 396 S.W.2d 946 (1965).
Fraudulent concealment of a misrepresentation of the value of the stock sold or traded did not toll the limitations period of this section. Martin v. Pacific Ins. Co., 245 Ark. 122, 431 S.W.2d 239 (1968).
Standing.
Subsection (b) of this section provides for suit by any person with a cause of action under the Arkansas Securities Act in order to effectuate the protection of the investing public. Foster v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 902 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir. 1990).
23-42-306. Records and reports — Examinations.
-
Every applicant, registered issuer, registered broker-dealer, or registered investment adviser shall make and keep any accounts, correspondence, memoranda, papers, books, and other records which the Securities Commissioner by rule prescribes. However, this subsection shall not apply to any registered investment adviser that maintains its principal place of business in a state other than Arkansas that:
- Is registered or licensed as such in the state in which it maintains its principal place of business; and
- Is in compliance with the applicable books and record-keeping requirements of the state in which it maintains its principal place of business.
- Every registered broker-dealer, issuer, or investment adviser shall file any financial reports which the commissioner by rule prescribes.
- If the information contained in any document filed with the commissioner or the commissioner's designee is or becomes inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, then the registrant shall promptly file a correcting amendment.
-
- All the records referred to in subsection (a) of this section are subject, at any time or from time to time, to such reasonable periodic, special, or other examinations by representatives of the commissioner, within or without this state, as the commissioner deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
-
- The applicant, issuer, broker-dealer, or investment adviser shall pay a fee for each examination, not to exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per examiner for each day or for each part of a day, during which examiners are absent from the office of the commissioner for the purpose of conducting the examination.
- In addition to the fee, the commissioner may require the applicant, issuer, broker-dealer, or investment adviser to pay the actual hotel and traveling expenses of each authorized examiner traveling to and from the office of the commissioner while the examiner is conducting the examination.
- For the purpose of avoiding unnecessary duplication of examination, the commissioner, insofar as he or she deems it practicable in administering this subsection, may cooperate with the securities administrators of other states, the Securities and Exchange Commission, any national securities exchange or national securities association registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or any other jurisdiction, agency, or organization charged by law or statute with regulating or prosecuting any aspect of the securities business, and in so cooperating may share any information he or she or his or her representatives may obtain as a result of any investigation or examination. “Examination” shall include the right to reproduce copies of the records referred to in subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 5; 1961, No. 248, § 3; 1963, No. 479, § 1; 1973, No. 47, §§ 5-7; 1975, No. 844, § 4; 1983, No. 836, § 9; 1985, No. 939, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1239; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 17; 1997, No. 173, § 16; 1999, No. 363, § 2; 2009, No. 534, § 8; 2011, No. 339, § 5.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment subdivided (d)(2), substituted “one hundred fifty dollars ($150)” for “one hundred dollars ($100)” in (d)(2)(A), substituted “the office of the commissioner while the examiner is conducting the examination” for “Little Rock Arkansas” in (d)(2)(B), and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment, in (d)(2)(B), inserted “the commissioner may require” and substituted “to pay” for “shall pay.”
U.S. Code. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq.
Case Notes
Information Required.
Requirement of bank commissioner of a statement of receipts and expenditures of company and a list of officers with their holdings of stocks and bonds of the company was not unreasonable. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
23-42-307. Unlawful acts by investment advisers.
-
It is unlawful for any investment adviser or representative:
- To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the other person;
- To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the other person; or
- To make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which it is made, not misleading.
-
It is unlawful for any investment adviser to enter into, extend, or renew any investment advisory contract unless it provides in writing that:
- Except as may be permitted by rule or order of the Securities Commissioner, the investment adviser shall not be compensated on the basis of a share of capital gains upon, or capital appreciation of, the funds or any portion of the funds of the client. This subdivision (b)(1) does not prohibit an investment advisory contract which provides for compensation based upon the total value of a fund averaged over a definite period, or as of definite dates, or taken as of a definite date;
-
- No assignment of the contract may be made by the investment adviser without the consent of the other party to the contract.
- “Assignment”, as used in this subdivision (b)(2), includes any direct or indirect transfer or hypothecation of an investment advisory contract by the assignor, or of a controlling block of the assignor's outstanding voting securities, by a security holder of the assignor.
- However, if the investment adviser is a partnership, no assignment of an investment advisory contract is considered to result from the death or withdrawal of a minority of the members of the investment adviser having only a minority interest in the business of the investment adviser, or from the admission to the investment adviser of one (1) or more members who, after admission, will be only a minority of the members and will have only a minority interest in the business; and
- The investment adviser, if a partnership, shall notify the other party to the contract of any change in the membership of the partnership within a reasonable time after the change.
-
It is unlawful for any investment adviser to take or have custody of any securities or funds of any client if:
- The commissioner by rule prohibits custody; or
- In the absence of rule, the investment adviser fails to notify the commissioner that he or she has or may have custody.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1236; Acts 1993, No. 566, § 1; 1995, No. 845, § 18; 2009, No. 462, § 10.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “investment adviser or representative” for “person who receives, directly or indirectly, any consideration from another person primarily for advising the other person as to the value of securities or their purchase or sale, whether through the issuance of analyses, reports, or otherwise” in (a).
23-42-308. Denial, suspension, revocation, or withdrawal of registration, and other penalties.
-
The Securities Commissioner may by order deny, suspend, make conditional or probationary, or revoke any registration if he or she finds that:
- The order is in the public interest; and
-
The applicant or registrant or, in the case of a broker-dealer or investment adviser, any partner, officer, or director; any person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions; or any person directly or indirectly controlling the broker-dealer or investment adviser:
- Has filed an application for registration, which as of its effective date, or as of any date after filing in the case of an order denying effectiveness, was incomplete in any material respect or contained any statement which was, in light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact;
- Has willfully violated or willfully failed to comply with any provision of this chapter or a predecessor act or any rule or order under this chapter or a predecessor act;
-
Has:
-
Been convicted of:
- A felony; or
- Within the previous ten (10) years, a misdemeanor involving a security, a commodity future or option contract, or any aspect of a business involving securities, commodities, investments, franchises, insurance, banking, or finance; or
- Pending against him or her a charge of unlawful conduct involving securities or any aspect of the securities business;
-
Been convicted of:
- Is permanently or temporarily enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice involving any aspect of the securities business;
- Is the subject of an order of the commissioner, including without limitation an order denying, suspending, revoking, or making conditional or probationary a registration as a broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative;
-
-
Is the subject of any of the following orders entered within the past five (5) years:
-
An order entered by:
- The securities administrator of any other state;
- Any national securities, commodities, or banking agency or jurisdiction;
- Any national securities or commodities exchange;
- Any securities or commodities self-regulatory organization;
- Any registered securities association or clearing agency denying, revoking, suspending, or expelling him or her from registration as a broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative, or the substantial equivalent of those terms; or
- The insurance administrator of any state; or
- A United States postal fraud order.
-
An order entered by:
-
However, the commissioner shall not:
- Institute a revocation or suspension proceeding under this subdivision (a)(2)(F) more than five (5) years from the date of the order relied on; or
- Enter an order under this subdivision (a)(2)(F) on the basis of an order under another state act, unless that order was based on facts that would currently constitute a ground for an order under this section;
-
Is the subject of any of the following orders entered within the past five (5) years:
- Has engaged in dishonest or unethical practices in the securities business;
- Is insolvent, either in the sense that his or her liabilities exceed his or her assets or in the sense that he or she cannot meet his or her obligations as they mature, but the commissioner may not enter an order against a broker-dealer or investment adviser under this subdivision (a)(2)(H) without a finding of insolvency as to the broker-dealer or investment adviser;
-
Is not qualified on the basis of such factors as training, experience, and knowledge of the securities business, except that:
- The commissioner shall not enter an order against a broker-dealer on the basis of the lack of qualification of any person other than the broker-dealer himself or herself, if he or she is an individual, or an agent of the broker-dealer;
- The commissioner shall not enter an order against an investment adviser on the basis of the lack of qualification of any person other than the investment adviser himself or herself, if he or she is an individual, or any other person who represents the investment adviser in doing any of the acts which make him or her an investment adviser;
- The commissioner shall not enter an order solely on the basis of lack of experience if the applicant or registrant is qualified by training or knowledge, or both;
- The commissioner shall consider that an agent who will work under the supervision of a registered broker-dealer need not have the same qualifications as a broker-dealer; and
- The commissioner shall consider that an investment adviser or representative is not necessarily qualified solely on the basis of experience as a broker-dealer or agent;
- Has failed reasonably to supervise the agents or employees of the broker-dealer or the representatives or employees of the investment adviser; or
- Has failed to pay the proper filing fee, but the commissioner may enter only a denial order under this subdivision (a)(2)(K), and he or she shall vacate the order when the deficiency has been corrected.
- The commissioner may not institute a suspension or revocation proceeding solely on the basis of a final judicial or administrative order known to him or her when registration became effective, unless the proceeding is instituted within one hundred eighty (180) days after registration or unless the applicant or registrant waives the time limitation. For the purpose of this provision, a final judicial or administrative order shall not include an order that is stayed or subject to further review or appeal. This provision shall not apply to renewal registration.
-
- The commissioner may by order summarily postpone or suspend registration pending final determination of any proceeding under this section.
- Upon the entry of the order, the commissioner shall promptly notify the applicant or registrant, as well as the employer or prospective employer, if the applicant or registrant is an agent or representative, that the order has been entered, and of the reasons therefor, and that within fifteen (15) days after the receipt of a written request the matter will be set down for hearing.
- If no hearing is requested and none is ordered by the commissioner, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner. If a hearing is requested or ordered, the commissioner, after notice of and opportunity for hearing, may modify or vacate the order or extend it until final determination.
-
The commissioner may by summary order cancel a registration or application if he or she finds that any registrant or applicant:
- Is no longer in existence;
- Has ceased to do business as a broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative; or
- Is subject to an adjudication of mental incompetence or to the control of a committee, conservator, or guardian or cannot be located after a reasonable search.
-
- Withdrawal from registration as a broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative becomes effective thirty (30) days after receipt of an application to withdraw, or within such shorter period of time as the commissioner may determine, unless a revocation or suspension proceeding is pending when the application to withdraw is filed or a proceeding to deny, revoke, or suspend or to impose conditions upon the withdrawal is instituted within thirty (30) days after the application to withdraw is filed.
- If a proceeding is pending or instituted, then withdrawal becomes effective at such time and upon such conditions as the commissioner by order determines.
- If no proceeding is pending or instituted and withdrawal automatically becomes effective, the commissioner may nevertheless institute a revocation or suspension proceeding under subdivision (a)(2)(B) of this section within one (1) year after withdrawal became effective and may enter a revocation or suspension order as of the last date on which registration was effective.
-
No order may be entered under any part of this section, except under subdivision (c)(1) of this section, without:
- Appropriate prior notice to the applicant or registrant and to the employer or prospective employer if the applicant or registrant is an agent or representative;
- Opportunity for hearing; and
- Written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
In addition to the authority granted in subsections (a)-(e) of this section, upon notice and opportunity for hearing as provided in subsection (f) of this section, the commissioner may for each violation of this chapter fine any broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative not to exceed:
- Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or an amount equal to the total amount of money received in connection with each separate violation; or
-
If a victim of a violation is sixty-five (65) years of age or older:
- Twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each violation; or
- Two (2) times the amount of money received in connection with each violation.
- Nothing in this section shall prohibit or restrict the informal disposition of a proceeding or allegations which might give rise to a proceeding by stipulation, settlement, consent, or default, in lieu of a formal or informal hearing on the allegations or in lieu of the sanctions authorized by this section.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 6; 1961, No. 248, § 4; 1983, No. 836, §§ 10-12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1240; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 19; 2009, No. 534, §§ 9, 10; 2011, No. 339, §§ 6, 7; 2013, No. 460, §§ 11, 12; 2017, No. 668, §§ 19, 20; 2019, No. 391, § 4.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The 2013 amendment omitted “for registration” following “or applicant” in the introductory language of (d) without striking through the language to indicate its repeal.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (a), inserted “make conditional or probationary” and “or she,” and made a related change; and rewrote (g), which read: “In addition to the authority granted in subsections (a)-(e) of this section, upon notice and opportunity for hearing as provided in subsection (f) of this section, the commissioner may fine any broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or representative up to a maximum of five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each separate violation of this chapter.”
The 2011 amendment substituted “revoking, or making conditional or probationary a registration”for “or revoking registration” in (a)(2)(E); and inserted “or employees” twice in (a)(2)(J).
The 2013 amendment added (a)(2)(F)(i) (g) ; in (d), inserted “may by summary order cancel a registration or application if he or she” and added subdivision designations; and deleted “then the commissioner may by order cancel the registration or application for registration” from the end of (d)(3).
The 2017 amendment rewrote (a)(2)(C); inserted “including without limitation an order” in (a)(2)(E); substituted “shall not” for “may not” in (a)(2)(F)(ii) and (a)(2)(I)(i) through (a)(2)(I)(iii); in (e)(1), inserted “to withdraw” following the second and third occurrences of “application” and inserted “deny”; and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment added “any of the following orders entered within the past five (5) years” in the introductory language of (a)(2)(F)(i); added the (a)(2)(F)(i) (a) designation, and redesignated former (a)(2)(F)(i) (a) through (e) and (g) as (a)(2)(F)(i) (a)(1) through (6) ; deleted “within the past five (5) years” preceding “by” in (a)(2)(F)(i) (a) ; deleted former (a)(2)(F)(i) (f) ; added “or” in (a)(2)(F)(i) (a)(6) ; added (a)(2)(F)(i) (b) ; and substituted “or” for “and” at the end of (a)(2)(F)(ii) (a)
Case Notes
Applicability.
Since § 23-42-302(e) and subdivision (a)(2)(I) and former subdivision (b)(6) of this section apply to applicants and registrants as defined in the Securities Act and are inapplicable to persons who only train applicants to take the broker-dealer examination, Securities Commissioner did not have a statutory basis to seek an injunction to prevent defendants from performing certain acts in regard to carrying on their business of tutoring applicants for license as broker-dealers under the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Bell v. Investment Training Inst., Inc., 271 Ark. 663, 609 S.W.2d 919 (1981).
Relation to Other Law.
Individual investor and an LLC failed to meet their burden of proving that an investment adviser (“debtor”) who declared Chapter 7 bankruptcy owed them debts that were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523 because he made false representations or acted willfully and maliciously in an attempt to injure them when he advised them to purchase certificates of deposit that were issued by a foreign bank, were not insured by the FDIC, and were issued as part of a Ponzi scheme, and the fact that the Arkansas Securities Department initiated an action to revoke the debtor's registration under this section was not sufficient, in and of itself, to show that he owed plaintiffs debts that were nondischargeable under § 523. McGraw v. Collier (In re Collier), 497 B.R. 877 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2013).
23-42-309. Protection of vulnerable adults from financial exploitation — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
-
“Agencies” means:
- The Adult Protective Services Unit of the Department of Human Services; and
- The Securities Commissioner;
-
“Eligible adult” means a person who is:
- Sixty-five (65) years of age or older; or
- Subject to supervision by the Arkansas Adult Protective Services Unit of the Department of Human Services; and
-
“Financial exploitation” means:
- The wrongful or unauthorized taking, withholding, appropriation, or use of funds, assets, or property of an eligible adult; or
-
Any act or omission made by a person, including through the use of an eligible adult's power of attorney, guardianship, or conservatorship, to:
- Obtain control, through deception, intimidation, or undue influence, over the eligible adult's funds, assets, or property that results in depriving the eligible adult of rightful ownership, use, benefit, access to, or possession of his or her money, assets, or property; or
- Convert funds, assets, or property of an eligible adult to deprive the eligible adult of the rightful ownership, use, benefit, access to, or possession of his or her funds, assets, or property.
-
“Agencies” means:
-
If an individual reasonably believes that financial exploitation of an eligible adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted, the individual:
- Should promptly disclose this information to the agencies;
- Who in good faith and exercising reasonable care makes a disclosure under subdivision (b)(1) of this section, shall be immune from administrative or civil liability that might otherwise arise from the disclosure or for any failure to notify the eligible adult of the disclosure; and
-
- May notify a third party previously designated by the eligible adult.
- Disclosure shall not be made to any designated third party that is suspected of financial exploitation or other abuse of the eligible adult.
- If an individual makes a disclosure under subdivision (b)(3)(A) of this section, the individual is immune from any administrative or civil liability that might otherwise arise from the disclosure.
-
-
A broker-dealer or investment adviser may delay a disbursement from an account of an eligible adult or an account on which an eligible adult is a current beneficiary if:
- Financial exploitation is suspected;
- After an internal review of a requested disbursement, the broker-dealer, investment adviser, or individual reasonably believes that the requested disbursement may result in financial exploitation; and
-
The broker-dealer or investment adviser immediately or within two (2) business days after the requested disbursement:
- Provides to all parties authorized to transact business on the account written notification of the delay and the reason for the delay, unless any such party is reasonably believed to have engaged in suspected or attempted financial exploitation;
- Notifies the agencies; and
- Continues its internal review of the suspected or attempted financial exploitation, as necessary, and reports the investigation's results to the agencies within seven (7) business days after the requested disbursement.
-
-
Except as provided under subdivision (c)(2)(B) of this section, a delay of a disbursement under this section shall expire upon the earliest of:
- A determination by the broker-dealer or investment adviser that the disbursement will not result in financial exploitation; or
- Fifteen (15) business days after the date on which the broker-dealer or investment adviser first delayed disbursement of the funds.
-
If either of the agencies requests that the broker-dealer or investment adviser extend the delay of disbursement, the delay shall expire:
- No more than twenty-five (25) business days after the date on which the broker-dealer or investment adviser first delayed disbursement of the funds;
- Upon the termination by the agencies of the hold on the disbursement; or
- As directed by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
-
Except as provided under subdivision (c)(2)(B) of this section, a delay of a disbursement under this section shall expire upon the earliest of:
-
A court of competent jurisdiction may enter an order extending the delay of the disbursement of funds or may order other protective relief upon application by:
- The agencies;
- The broker-dealer or investment adviser that initiated the delay of disbursement under subdivision (c)(1) of this section; or
- Any other interested party.
- If a broker-dealer or investment adviser delays a disbursement under subdivision (c)(1) of this section in good faith and exercising reasonable care and complies with this subsection, the broker-dealer or investment adviser is immune from any administrative or civil liability that might otherwise arise from the delay in a disbursement.
-
A broker-dealer or investment adviser may delay a disbursement from an account of an eligible adult or an account on which an eligible adult is a current beneficiary if:
-
-
A broker-dealer or investment adviser shall provide access to or copies of records that are relevant to the suspected or attempted financial exploitation, either as part of a referral or pursuant to an investigation, to:
- An agency charged with administering state adult protective services law; and
- A law enforcement agency or entity.
- The records may include historical records as well as records relating to recent transactions that may comprise financial exploitation.
- The records, materials, data, and information made available by a broker-dealer or investment adviser under subdivision (d)(1) of this section are confidential and are not subject to examination or disclosure as public information under the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq.
-
A broker-dealer or investment adviser shall provide access to or copies of records that are relevant to the suspected or attempted financial exploitation, either as part of a referral or pursuant to an investigation, to:
- This section does not limit or otherwise impede the authority of the commissioner to access or examine the books and records of broker-dealers and investment advisers as otherwise provided by this chapter.
History. Acts 2017, No. 668, § 21.
Subchapter 4 — Registration of Securities
Effective Dates. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30: July 1, 1959.
Acts 1961, No. 248, § 11: July 1, 1961.
Acts 1971, No. 131, § 9: Feb. 22, 1971. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities has become exceedingly complex and is in need of stricter regulation to assure that the purchasers of securities receive the protection that they deserve; that it is necessary for the Securities Commissioner to have the authority to immediately issue a stop order denying, suspending or revoking the effectiveness of a registration statement under certain conditions; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to curtail the total number of violations; and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 47, § 20: Feb. 1, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities is in need of stricter regulation to assure the public that they receive the protection they deserve; that the filing fee for filing a registration statement is inadequate; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to deter the total number of violations and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved; therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 493, § 21: Mar. 18, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that securities transactions always involve a relationship of trust and usually involve fiduciary obligations. This relationship facilitates the cover-up of felonies committed under the securities laws. This act being necessary for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this State, it is effective from and after its passage and approval, and it applies to all schemes or courses of conduct continuing past its effective date; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 836, § 29: Mar. 25, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the ability of the State of Arkansas to become a part of the Central Registration Depository System will be beneficial to the citizens of the State and applicants for registration and provide substantial cost savings to the securities industry and that Arkansas' entry into the system is scheduled to be soon. This Act being necessary for the additional protection and savings for the citizens of this State which will be afforded by entry into the System, it is effective from and after its passage and approval; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 939, § 12: Apr. 15, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the occurrence of new types of securities being made available to investors in combination with the proliferation of unregulated security advisors offering their services to the investing public indicate an immediate need for additional regulatory scrutiny of the securities and the practice of offering security advice; that this Act grants the Securities Commissioner the necessary flexibility to deal with these situations and should be given immediate effect in order to adequately protect the citizens of the State of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 449, § 4: Mar. 30, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the increased demand on the State Securities office has resulted in an immediate need for additional revenues to provide the services demanded from that office; that this act provides some of those needed revenues by means of increasing certain fees; and that this Act should go into effect immediately in order to generate additional revenues as soon as possible. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1993, Nos. 659 and 850, § 9: Mar. 24, 1993. Emergency clauses provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the provisions of this act are of critical importance to the state's ability to continue the duties, responsibilities, and functions of the State Securities Department. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secur. Reg. St., § 25 et seq.
C.J.S. 79 C.J.S. Supp., Secur. Reg., § 201 et seq.
23-42-401. Registration by notification.
-
The following securities may be registered by notification, whether or not they are also eligible for registration by coordination under § 23-42-402:
-
Any security whose issuer and any predecessors have been in continuous operation for at least five (5) years if:
- There has been no default during the current fiscal year or within the three (3) preceding fiscal years in the payment of principal, interest, or dividends on any security of the issuer, or any predecessor, with a fixed maturity or a fixed interest or dividend provision; and
-
The issuer and any predecessors during the past three (3) fiscal years have had average net earnings, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, which:
- Are applicable to all securities without a fixed maturity or a fixed interest or dividend provision outstanding at the date the registration statement is filed and are equal to at least three percent (3%) of the amount of the outstanding securities as measured by the maximum offering price or the market price on a day, selected by the registrant, within thirty (30) days before the date of filing the registration statement, whichever is higher, or book value on a day, selected by the registrant, within ninety (90) days of the date of filing the registration statement, to the extent that there is neither a readily determinable market price nor a cash offering price; or
- If the issuer and any predecessors have not had any security of the type specified in subdivision (a)(1)(B)(i) of this section outstanding for three (3) full fiscal years equal to at least five percent (5%) of the amount as measured in subdivision (a)(1)(B)(i) of this section of all securities which will be outstanding if all the securities being offered or proposed to be offered, whether or not they are proposed to be registered or offered in this state, are issued; and
-
Any security, other than a certificate of interest or participation in an oil, gas, or mining title or lease or in payments out of production under such a title or lease, registered for nonissuer distribution if:
- Any security of the same class has ever been registered under this chapter or a predecessor act; or
- The security being registered was originally issued pursuant to an exemption under this chapter or a predecessor act.
-
Any security whose issuer and any predecessors have been in continuous operation for at least five (5) years if:
-
A registration statement under this section shall contain the following information and be accompanied by the following documents in addition to the information specified in § 23-42-404(c) and the consent to service of process required by § 23-42-107(a):
- A statement demonstrating eligibility for registration by notification;
-
With respect to the issuer and any significant subsidiary:
- Its name, address, and form of organization;
- The state or foreign jurisdiction and the date of its organization; and
- The general character and location of its business;
-
With respect to any person on whose behalf any part of the offering is to be made in a nonissuer distribution:
- His or her name and address;
- The amount of securities of the issuer held by him or her as of the date of the filing of the registration statement;
- A description of the security being registered;
- The information and documents specified in § 23-42-403(b)(8), (b)(10), and (b)(12); and
- In the case of any registration under subdivision (a)(2) of this section which does not also satisfy the conditions of subdivision (a)(1) of this section, a balance sheet of the issuer for the calendar year immediately prior to the filing of the registration statement and a summary of earnings for each of the two (2) fiscal years preceding the date of the balance sheet and for any period between the close of the last fiscal year and the date of the balance sheet, or for the period of the issuer's and any predecessors' existence if less than two (2) years.
- If no stop order is in effect and no proceeding is pending under § 23-42-405, a registration statement under this section automatically becomes effective at three o'clock (3:00) Central Standard Time in the afternoon of the second full business day after the filing of the registration statement or the last amendment, or at such earlier time as the Securities Commissioner determines.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1242; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 20; 2011, No. 339, § 8.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment substituted “§ 23-42-404(c)” for “§ 23-42-404(d)” in (b).
23-42-402. Registration by coordination.
- Any security for which a registration statement has been filed under the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the same offering may be registered by coordination.
-
A registration statement under this section shall contain the following information and be accompanied by the following documents in addition to the information specified in § 23-42-404(c) and the consent to service of process required by § 23-42-107(a):
- One (1) copy of the prospectus together with all amendments filed under the Securities Act of 1933;
- If the Securities Commissioner, by rule or otherwise, requires, a copy of the articles of incorporation and bylaws or their substantial equivalents currently in effect, a copy of any agreements with or among underwriters, a copy of any indenture or other instrument governing the issuance of the security to be registered, and a specimen or copy of the security;
- If the commissioner requests, any other information, or copies of any other documents, filed under the Securities Act of 1933; and
- An undertaking to forward all amendments to the federal registration statement, other than an amendment which merely delays the effective date, promptly and in any event not later than the first business day after the day they are forwarded to or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, whichever first occurs.
-
-
A registration statement under this section automatically becomes effective at the moment the federal registration statement becomes effective if all the following conditions are satisfied:
- No stop order is in effect and no proceeding is pending under § 23-42-405;
- The registration statement has been on file with the commissioner for at least twenty (20) days; and
- A statement of the maximum and minimum proposed offering prices and the maximum underwriting discounts and commissions has been on file for two (2) full business days or such shorter period as the commissioner permits by rule or otherwise, and the offering is made within those limitations.
-
-
- The registrant shall promptly notify the commissioner by telephone or telegram of the date and time when the federal registration statement became effective and the content of the price amendment, if any, and shall promptly file a post-effective amendment containing the information and documents in the price amendment.
- “Price amendment” means the final federal amendment which includes a statement of the offering price, underwriting and selling discounts or commissions, amount of proceeds, conversion rates, call prices, and other matters dependent upon the offering price.
- Upon failure to receive the required notification and post-effective amendment with respect to the price amendment, the commissioner may enter a stop order, without notice or hearing, retroactively denying effectiveness to the registration statement or suspending its effectiveness until there is compliance with this subsection, if the commissioner promptly notifies the registrant by telephone or telegram and promptly confirms by letter or telegram when the commissioner notifies by telephone of the issuance of the order. If the registrant proves compliance with the requirements of this subsection as to notice and post-effective amendment, the stop order is void as of the time of its entry.
-
- The commissioner may by rule or otherwise waive either or both of the conditions specified in subdivisions (c)(1)(B) and (C) of this section.
- If the federal registration statement becomes effective before all the conditions in this subsection are satisfied and they are not waived, the registration statement automatically becomes effective as soon as all the conditions are satisfied. If the registrant advises the commissioner of the date when the federal registration statement is expected to become effective, the commissioner shall promptly advise the registrant by telephone, telegram, or by electronic means at the registrant's expense whether all the conditions are satisfied and whether the commissioner then contemplates the institution of a proceeding under § 23-42-405, but this advice by the commissioner does not preclude the institution of such a proceeding at any time.
-
A registration statement under this section automatically becomes effective at the moment the federal registration statement becomes effective if all the following conditions are satisfied:
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1243; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 21; 2005, No. 420, § 1; 2009, No. 462, § 11; 2011, No. 339, § 9.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment substituted “(c)(1)(B) and (C)” for “(c)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(B)” in (c)(3).
The 2011 amendment substituted “§ 23-42-404(c)” for “§ 23-42-404(d)” in (b).
U.S. Code. The Securities Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.
RESEARCH REFERENCES
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2005 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 28 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 393.
23-42-403. Registration by qualification.
- Any security may be registered by qualification.
-
A registration statement under this section shall contain the following information and be accompanied by the following documents in addition to the information specified in § 23-42-404(c), and the consent to service of process required by § 23-42-107:
-
With respect to the issuer and any significant subsidiary:
- Its name, address, and form of organization;
- The state or foreign jurisdiction and date of its organization;
- The general character and location of its business;
- A description of its physical properties and equipment; and
- A statement of the general competitive conditions in the industry or business in which it is or will be engaged;
-
With respect to every director and officer of the issuer, or person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions:
- His or her name, address, and principal occupation for the past five (5) years;
- The amount of securities of the issuer held by him or her as of a specified date within thirty (30) days of the filing of the registration statement;
- The amount of the securities covered by the registration statement to which he or she has indicated his or her intention to subscribe; and
- A description of any material interest in any material transaction with the issuer or any significant subsidiary effected within the past three (3) years or proposed to be effected;
- With respect to persons covered by subdivision (b)(2) of this section, the remuneration paid during the past twelve (12) months and estimated to be paid during the next twelve (12) months, directly or indirectly, by the issuer, together with all predecessors, parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates, to all those persons in the aggregate;
- With respect to any person owning of record, or beneficially, if known, ten percent (10%) or more of the outstanding shares of any class of equity security of the issuer, the information specified in subdivision (b)(2) of this section, other than his or her occupation;
-
With respect to every promoter if the issuer was organized within the past three (3) years:
- The information specified in subdivision (b)(2) of this section;
- Any amount paid to him or her within that period or intended to be paid to him or her; and
- The consideration for the payment;
-
With respect to any person on whose behalf any part of the offering is to be made in a nonissuer distribution:
- His or her name and address;
- The amount of securities of the issuer held by him or her as of the date of the filing of the registration statement;
- A description of any material interest in any material transaction with the issuer or any significant subsidiary effected within the past three (3) years or proposed to be effected;
- The capitalization and long-term debt, on both a current and a pro forma basis, of the issuer and any significant subsidiary, including a description of each security outstanding or being registered or otherwise offered, and a statement of the amount and kind of consideration, whether in the form of cash, physical assets, services, patents, goodwill, or anything else, for which the issuer or any subsidiary has issued any of its securities within the past two (2) years or is obligated to issue any of its securities;
-
- The kind and amount of securities to be offered;
- The proposed offering price or the method by which it is to be computed;
- Any variation therefrom at which any portion of the offering is to be made to any person or class of persons other than the underwriters, with a specification of the person or class;
- The basis upon which the offering is to be made if otherwise than for cash;
- The estimated aggregate underwriting and selling discounts or commissions and finders' fees, including, separately, cash, securities, contracts, or anything else of value to accrue to the underwriters or finders in connection with the offering, or, if the selling discounts or commissions are variable, the basis of determining them and their maximum and minimum amounts;
- The estimated amounts of other selling expenses, including legal, engineering, and accounting charges;
- The name and address of every underwriter and every recipient of a finder's fee;
- A copy of any underwriting or selling-group agreement pursuant to which the distribution is to be made, or the proposed form of any such agreement whose terms have not yet been determined; and
- A description of the plan of distribution of any securities which are to be offered otherwise than through an underwriter;
-
- The estimated cash proceeds to be received by the issuer from the offering;
- The purposes for which the proceeds are to be used by the issuer;
- The amount to be used for each purpose;
- The order or priority in which the proceeds will be used for the purposes stated;
- The amounts of any funds to be raised from other sources to achieve the purposes stated;
- The sources of any such funds; and
- If any part of the proceeds is to be used to acquire any property, including goodwill, otherwise than in the ordinary course of business, the names and addresses of the vendors, the purchase price, the names of any persons who have received commissions in connection with the acquisition, the amounts of those commissions, and any other expense in connection with the acquisition, including the cost of borrowing money to finance the acquisition;
- A description of any stock options or other security options outstanding or to be created in connection with the offering, together with the amount of those options held or to be held by every person required to be named in subdivision (b)(2), subdivision (b)(4), subdivision (b)(5), subdivision (b)(6), or subdivision (b)(8) of this section and by any person who holds or will hold ten percent (10%) or more in the aggregate of those options;
- The dates of, parties to, and general effect, concisely stated, of every management or other material contract made or to be made otherwise than in the ordinary course of business, if it is to be performed in whole or in part at or after the filing of the registration statement or was made within the past two (2) years, together with a copy of every such contract and with a description of any pending litigation or proceeding to which the issuer is a party and which materially affects its business or assets, including any such litigation or proceeding known to be contemplated by governmental authorities;
- A copy of any prospectus, pamphlet, circular, form letter, advertisement, television, radio, or other sales literature intended as of the effective date to be used in connection with the offering;
-
- A specimen or copy of the security being registered;
- A copy of the issuer's articles of incorporation and bylaws, or their substantial equivalents, as currently in effect; and
- A copy of any indenture or other instrument covering the security to be registered;
- A signed or conformed copy of an opinion of counsel as to the legality of the security being registered, with an English translation if it is in a foreign language, which shall state whether the security, when sold, will be legally issued, fully paid, and nonassessable, and, if a debt security, a binding obligation of the issuer;
- The written consent of any accountant, engineer, appraiser, or other person whose profession gives authority to a statement made by him or her, if any such person is named as having prepared or certified a report or valuation, other than a public and official document or statement, which is used in connection with the registration statement;
-
- A balance sheet of the issuer as of a date within four (4) months prior to the filing of the registration statement;
- A profit and loss statement and analysis of surplus for each of the three (3) fiscal years preceding the date of the balance sheet and for any period between the close of the last fiscal year and the date of the balance sheet, or for the period of the issuer's and any predecessors' existence if less than three (3) years; and
- If any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be applied to the purchase of any business, the same financial statements which would be required if that business were the registrant; and
- Such additional information as the Securities Commissioner requires by rule or order.
-
With respect to the issuer and any significant subsidiary:
- A registration statement under this section becomes effective when the commissioner so orders.
-
The commissioner may by rule or order require, as a condition of registration under this section, that a prospectus containing any designated part of the information specified in subsection (b) of this section be sent or given to each person to whom an offer is made concurrently with:
- The first written offer made to him or her, otherwise than by means of a public advertisement, by or for the account of the issuer or any other person on whose behalf the offering is being made, or by any underwriter or broker-dealer who is offering part of an unsold allotment or subscription taken by him or her as a participant in the distribution;
- The confirmation of any sale made by or for the account of any such person;
- Payment pursuant to any such sale; or
- Delivery of the security pursuant to any such sale, whichever first occurs.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1244; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 22; 2011, No. 339, § 10.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment substituted “§ 23-42-404(c)” for “§ 23-42-404(d)” in (b).
23-42-404. Registration statements generally.
- A registration statement may be filed by the issuer, any other person on whose behalf the offering is to be made, or a registered broker-dealer.
-
- Every person filing a registration statement shall pay a filing fee of one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the maximum aggregate offering price at which the registered securities are to be offered in this state, but the fee shall in no case be less than one hundred fifty dollars ($150) nor more than two thousand dollars ($2,000). Any portion of the fee in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) shall be designated as special revenues and shall be deposited into the Securities Department Fund. When a registration statement is withdrawn before the effective date or a preeffective stop order is entered under § 23-42-405, the Securities Commissioner shall retain one hundred fifty dollars ($150) of the filing fee.
- Sales of securities in excess of the amount of securities to have been offered in this state shall require the person filing the registration statement to pay a filing fee, calculated in the manner specified in subdivision (b)(1) of this section, for all securities sold. In addition, if the sales are in excess of one hundred five percent (105%) of the amount to have been offered, the person filing the registration statement shall pay a penalty fee of two hundred dollars ($200).
-
Every registration statement shall specify:
- The amount of securities to be offered in this state;
- The states in which a registration statement or similar document in connection with the offering has been or is to be filed; and
- Any adverse order, judgment, or decree entered in connection with the offering by the regulatory authorities in each state or by any court or the Securities and Exchange Commission.
- Any document filed under this chapter or a predecessor act, within five (5) years preceding the filing of a registration statement, may be incorporated by reference in the registration statement to the extent that the document is currently accurate.
- The commissioner may by rule or otherwise permit the omission of any item of information or document from any registration statement.
- In the case of a nonissuer distribution, information may not be required under § 23-42-403 or subsection (m) of this section unless it is known to the person filing the registration statement or to the persons on whose behalf the distribution is to be made, or can be furnished by them without unreasonable effort or expense.
-
-
The commissioner may, by rule or order, require as a condition of registration by qualification or coordination that:
- Any security issued within the past three (3) years or to be issued to a promoter for a consideration substantially different from the public offering price, or to any person for a consideration other than cash, be deposited in escrow;
- The proceeds from the sale of the registered security be impounded until the issuer receives a specified amount.
- The commissioner may by rule or order determine the conditions of any escrow or impounding required hereunder, but he or she may not reject a depository solely because of location in another state.
-
The commissioner may, by rule or order, require as a condition of registration by qualification or coordination that:
- The commissioner may require the issuer, as a condition of registration by qualification, to escrow up to ten percent (10%) of the maximum aggregate price of the offering, from the offering proceeds under such terms and conditions as he or she deems appropriate for up to three (3) years from the date of termination of the offering, or to post a corporate surety bond for up to ten percent (10%) of the maximum aggregate price of the offering for up to (3) years from the date of termination of the offering. Any security holder having a right under this chapter against the issuer shall have a right of action against the escrow or corporate surety bond.
- The commissioner may by rule or order require as a condition of registration that any security registered by qualification or coordination be sold only on an approved form of subscription or sale contract and that a signed or conformed copy of each subscription or sale contract be filed with the commissioner or preserved for any period up to three (3) years specified in the rule or order.
- Every registration statement is effective for one (1) year from its effective date and, upon renewal, for any longer period during which the security is being offered or distributed in a nonexempted transaction, except during the time a stop order is in effect.
- Renewal registration for the succeeding twelve-month period may be issued upon written application and upon payment of fees as provided by this section for original registration, even though the maximum fee was paid the preceding period, without filing of further statements or furnishing any further information except as requested by the commissioner. All applications for renewal received after the expiration of the previous registration shall be treated as original applications.
-
-
All outstanding securities of the same class as a registered security are considered to be registered for the purpose of any nonissuer transactions:
- So long as the registration statement is effective, whether by original or renewal registration; and
- Between the thirtieth day after the entry of any stop order suspending or revoking the effectiveness of the registration statement under § 23-42-405, if the registration statement did not relate in whole or in part to a nonissuer distribution, and one (1) year from the effective date of the registration statement.
- A registration statement may not be withdrawn for one (1) year from its effective date if any securities of the same class are outstanding. A registration statement may be withdrawn otherwise only in the discretion of the commissioner.
-
All outstanding securities of the same class as a registered security are considered to be registered for the purpose of any nonissuer transactions:
- So long as a registration statement is effective, the commissioner may by rule or order require the person who filed the registration to keep reasonably current the information contained in the registration statement and to disclose the progress of the offering.
- A registration statement relating to a security may be amended after its effective date so as to increase the securities specified as proposed to be offered. The amendment becomes effective when the commissioner so orders. Every person filing such an amendment shall pay a filing fee, calculated in the manner specified in subsection (b) of this section, with respect to the additional securities proposed to be offered.
- The State Securities Department is hereby authorized to promulgate such rules necessary to administer the fees, rates, tolls, or charges for services established by this section and § 23-42-304 and is directed to prescribe and collect the fees, rates, tolls, or charges for the services by the department in the manner that may be necessary to support the programs of the department as directed by the Governor and the General Assembly.
-
The commissioner may consider a registration statement abandoned and withdrawn by the applicant if the:
- Registration statement has not been completed within one hundred eighty (180) days after filing with the commissioner; and
- Applicant has been notified of the deficiencies in the application and provided a reasonable opportunity to correct the deficiencies.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 11; 1961, No. 248, § 5; 1971, No. 131, § 1; 1973, No. 47, § 9; 1977, No. 493, § 3; 1979, No. 754, § 1; 1983, No. 836, §§ 22-24; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1245; Acts 1987, No. 449, § 2; 1993, No. 659, §§ 3, 5; 1993, No. 850, § 3, 5; 1995, No. 845, § 23; 1997, No. 173, § 17; 2011, No. 339, § 11; 2019, No. 315, § 2515.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment added (p).
The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (o).
U.S. Code. The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified throughout Title 11 and 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-1 to 80a-52.
23-42-405. Stop order denying, suspending, or revoking registration statement.
-
The Securities Commissioner may issue a stop order denying effectiveness to, or suspending or revoking the effectiveness of, any registration statement if he or she finds that:
- The order is in the public interest; and
-
-
The registration statement is incomplete in any material respect or contains any statement that was, in the light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact as of the effective date of:
- The registration statement or an earlier date from an order denying the effective date of the registration statement;
- An amendment under § 23-42-404(n); or
- A report under § 23-42-404(m);
-
Any provision of this chapter or any rule, order, or condition lawfully imposed under this chapter has been willfully violated, in connection with the offering, by:
- The person filing the registration statement;
- The issuer, any partner, officer, or director of the issuer, any person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, or any person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the issuer, but only if the person filing the registration statement is directly or indirectly controlled by or acting for the issuer; or
- Any underwriter;
-
The security registered or sought to be registered is the subject of an administrative stop order or similar order or a permanent or temporary injunction of a court of competent jurisdiction entered under any other federal or state act applicable to the offering, but:
- The commissioner shall not institute a proceeding against an effective registration statement under this subdivision (a)(2)(C) more than one (1) year from the date of the order or injunction relied on; and
- The commissioner shall not enter an order under this subdivision (a)(2)(C) on the basis of an order or injunction entered under another state act unless that order or injunction was based on facts that would currently constitute grounds for a stop order under this section;
- The issuer's enterprise or method of business includes or would include activities which are illegal where performed;
- The offering has worked or tended to work a fraud upon purchasers or would so operate, or any aspect of the offering is substantially unfair, unjust, inequitable, or oppressive;
- The offering has been or would be made with unreasonable amounts of underwriters' and sellers' discounts, commissions, or other compensation, unreasonable amounts of promoters' profits or participation, or unreasonable amounts or kinds of options;
- When a security is sought to be registered by notification, it is not eligible for such a registration;
- When a security is sought to be registered by coordination, there has been a failure to comply with the undertaking required by § 23-42-402(b)(4); or
- The applicant or registrant has failed to pay the proper filing fee. The commissioner may enter only a denial order under this subdivision (a)(2)(I), and he or she shall vacate any such order when the deficiency has been corrected.
-
The registration statement is incomplete in any material respect or contains any statement that was, in the light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact as of the effective date of:
- The commissioner may not institute a stop order proceeding against an effective registration statement on the basis of a fact or transaction known to him or her when the registration statement became effective unless the proceeding is instituted within the next thirty (30) days.
-
- The commissioner may, by order, summarily postpone or suspend the effectiveness of the registration statement pending final determination of any proceeding under this section.
- Upon the entry of the order, the commissioner shall promptly notify each person specified in subsection (d) of this section that it has been entered and the reasons therefor and that within fifteen (15) days after the receipt of a written request the matter will be set down for hearing.
- If no hearing is requested and none is ordered by the commissioner, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner. If a hearing is requested or ordered, the commissioner, after notice of an opportunity for hearing to each person specified in subsection (d) of this section, may modify or vacate the order or extend it until final determination.
- In the case of a registration by coordination pursuant to § 23-42-402, the commissioner may accept a waiver of concurrent effectiveness submitted by the issuer, without the necessity of the entry of an order to summarily postpone effectiveness.
-
No stop order may be entered under any part of this section except subdivision (c)(1) of this section without:
- Appropriate prior notice to the applicant or registrant, the issuer, and the person on whose behalf the securities are to be or have been offered;
- Opportunity for hearing; and
- Written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
- The commissioner may vacate or modify a stop order if he or she finds that the conditions which prompted its entry have changed or that it is otherwise in the public interest to do so.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 12; 1971, No. 131, §§ 2, 3; 1985, No. 939, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1246; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 24; 2011, No. 339, §§ 12, 13.
Amendments. The 2011 amendment rewrote the introductory paragraph of (a)(2)(A) and inserted (a)(2)(A)(i) through (iii); and substituted “(a)(2)(C)” for “(a)(1)(C)” in (a)(2)(C)(i).
Subchapter 5 — Regulation of Transactions
Effective Dates. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 30: July 1, 1959.
Acts 1961, No. 248, § 11: July 1, 1961.
Acts 1971, No. 131, § 9: Feb. 22, 1971. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities has become exceedingly complex and is in need of stricter regulation to assure that the purchasers of securities receive the protection that they deserve; that it is necessary for the Securities Commissioner to have the authority to immediately issue a stop order denying, suspending or revoking the effectiveness of a registration statement under certain conditions; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to curtail the total number of violations; and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1973, No. 47, § 20: Feb. 1, 1973. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the field of securities is in need of stricter regulation to assure the public that they receive the protection they deserve; that the fee for filing a registration statement is inadequate; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; that the penalty for violation of the Securities Act should be increased to discourage further violations and to deter the total number of violations and that only by the immediate passage of this Act can this be achieved; therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 697, § 4: Apr. 3, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that existing laws determining the interrelationship between the Arkansas Securities Act and the Arkansas Savings and Loan Act are unclear; and that the Arkansas Securities Commissioner acting as Securities Commissioner and also as Arkansas Savings and Loan Supervisor must have a clarification of his authority in each area; and that therefore an emergency exists and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1975, No. 844, § 16: Apr. 4, 1975. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the filing fees are inadequate; that exemptions are necessary for certain types of securities; that there is a need for immediate clarification of certain portions of the Securities Act; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1977, No. 493, § 21: Mar. 18, 1977. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that securities transactions always involve a relationship of trust and usually involve fiduciary obligations. This relationship facilitates the cover-up of felonies committed under the securities laws. This act being necessary for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this State, it is effective from and after its passage and approval, and it applies to all schemes or courses of conduct continuing past its effective date; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1983, No. 836, § 29: Mar. 25, 1983. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and is hereby declared by the General Assembly that the ability of the State of Arkansas to become part of a national Central Registration Depository System will be beneficial to the citizens of the State and applicants for registration and provide substantial cost savings to the securities industry and that Arkansas' entry into the system is scheduled to be soon. This Act being necessary for the additional protection and savings for the citizens of this State which will be afforded by entry into the System, it is effective from and after its passage and approval; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1985, No. 939, § 12: Apr. 15, 1985. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the occurrence of new types of securities being made available to investors in combination with the proliferation of unregulated security advisors offering their services to the investing public indicate an immediate need for additional regulatory scrutiny of the securities and the practice of offering security advice; that this Act grants the Securities Commissioner the necessary flexibility to deal with these situations and should be given immediate effect in order to adequately protect the citizens of the State of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval.”
Acts 1987, No. 776, § 5: Apr. 7, 1987. Emergency clause provided: “It has been found and it is declared by the General Assembly that an urgent need exists to define the term “farm cooperative” in order to clarify which organizations are eligible for an exemption from registration under the Arkansas Securities Act (Act No. 254 of the Acts of Arkansas of 1959), as amended, of certain securities issued by farm cooperatives, and that immediate passage of this Act is necessary to provide such clarification. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this Act, being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall take effect and be in force from the date of its approval.”
Acts 1993, No. 1147, § 1705. Jan. 1, 1994.
Research References
Am. Jur. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secur. Reg. St., §§ 11-14 and § 69 et seq.
Ark. L. Rev.
Proxy and Insider-Trading Regulation: Federal-State Cooperation in the Protection of Investors, 19 Ark. L. Rev. 308.
Securities Regulation — Texas Gulf Sulphur — A Few Aspects, 23 Ark. L. Rev. 145.
C.J.S. 79 C.J.S. Supp., Secur. Reg., § 208 et seq.
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey of Arkansas Law: Business Organizations, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83.
Legislation of the 1983 General Assembly, Business Law, 6 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 607.
23-42-501. Sale of unregistered nonexempt securities.
It is unlawful for any person to offer or sell any security in this state unless:
- It is registered under this chapter;
- The security or transaction is exempted under § 23-42-503 or § 23-42-504; or
- It is a covered security.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1241; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 18.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey—Securities, 11 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 255.
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
John F. Griffee, IV, Guide to Structuring Resales of Restricted Securities Held by Control and Non-Control Holders Under Federal and Arkansas Law, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 1 (2015).
Frances S. Fendler & A. Heath Abshure, Private Civil Liability Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 125 (2016).
Case Notes
Purpose.
It was not the intent of the Arkansas Securities Act to allow the law to be used by sophisticated brokers and dealers for promotional projects thereby reaping consultant benefits, sales commissions, and other benefits, without fully complying with the requirements of the law. Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979).
Burden of Proof.
Upon the showing of a sale of a security, the burden shifts to the seller to show that the security was either registered or exempt from the Arkansas Securities Act, or that the buyer is estopped from claiming civil damages. McMullan v. Molnaird, 24 Ark. App. 126, 749 S.W.2d 352 (1988).
Duty to Register.
Since the law of this state imposes an absolute duty on directors to register securities prior to sale, blame for not registering securities cannot be shifted to the securities department investigators and enforcers. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Ignorance of a duty to register securities, or to procure their exemption, can in no way excuse the failure to do so; the only conceivable excuse under the “lack of knowledge” defense would be if the director affirmatively believed that the securities were registered, and even then, § 23-42-106 demands that such mistaken knowledge be not the product of negligence, and the director bears the burden of proving that he was not so negligent. Robertson v. White, 635 F. Supp. 851 (W.D. Ark. 1986).
Ignorance of the securities law in no way excuses failure to register securities, or to procure their exemption. Hogg v. Jerry, 299 Ark. 283, 773 S.W.2d 84 (1989).
Evidence.
It makes little difference whether defendants be classified as dealers, promoters or representatives; the evidence established that they were engaged in selling stock without first registering same, or obtaining a certificate of approval, and neither the stock nor the transactions were exempt and thus under the undisputed facts, defendants, as a matter of law, clearly violated the securities act. Arkansas Real Estate Co. v. Fullerton, 232 Ark. 713, 339 S.W.2d 947 (1960) (decision under prior law).
Conviction of one charged with violation of this section who defended on the ground that he had obtained an exemption for the security sold under § 23-42-504(a)(9) was not sustained by evidence that the defendant sold the security to persons who were not on the list of offerees filed with the Securities Commissioner in compliance with a rule of the commissioner. Gaskin v. State, 244 Ark. 541, 426 S.W.2d 407 (1968).
Investor's motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendants' liability for failure to register under the Arkansas Security Act, § 23-42-101 et seq. was denied because there were issues remaining concerning whether or not defendants were exempt from the state registration as a “covered security” under federal law; the fact that defendants did not file a Federal Form D did not, by itself, preclude defendants from asserting that the securities they sold were exempt. Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
Exemptions.
An agricultural and mechanical fair association was held exclusively “educational” so that no permit was required for the sale of its stock. Saxon v. Ark. State Fair Ass'n, 181 Ark. 750, 27 S.W.2d 505 (1930) (decision under prior law).
Where sellers of joint venture interests in an apartment complex received over $20,000 for “consulting fees,” and where the sellers organized, constructed, managed and controlled the properties of the joint venture, the joint venture interests were not exempt from registration. Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977).
Statute of Limitations.
In the absence of any indication that the legislature intended to make the extension of the statute of limitations by the 1973 amendment to § 23-42-106 retroactive, that statute of limitations was applicable only to causes of action arising after the 1973 act became effective; therefore a civil action for an illegal sale of securities was barred where the sale was made prior to the enactment of the 1973 amendment, but suit was not commenced until after the expiration of the statute of limitations prior to the 1973 amendment. Morton v. Tullgren, 263 Ark. 69, 563 S.W.2d 422 (1978).
Cited: Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979); Bank of Waldron v. Scott County Bank, 267 Ark. 407, 590 S.W.2d 654 (1979); Tanenbaum v. Agri-Capital, Inc., 885 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1989); Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997); Rooney v. Williamson, 167 F.3d 1185 (8th Cir. 1999).
23-42-502. Filing of prospectus, sales literature, etc.
The Securities Commissioner, by rule or order, may require the filing of any prospectus, pamphlet, circular, form letter, advertisement, television, radio, or other sales literature or advertising communication addressed or intended for distribution to prospective investors, including clients or prospective clients of an investment adviser, as part of a registered offering or as part of an exempt offering required to be filed under § 23-42-503(d) or § 23-42-504(b).
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 15; 1979, No. 754, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1249; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 19.
Case Notes
Cited: Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997).
23-42-503. Exempted securities.
-
The following securities are exempted from §§ 23-42-501 and 23-42-502:
-
- Any security, including a revenue obligation, issued or guaranteed by this state, any political subdivision of this state, or any agency or corporate or other instrumentality of one (1) or more of the foregoing, or any certificate of deposit for any of the foregoing.
- Any securities that are offered and sold pursuant to section 4(5) of the Securities Act of 1933 or that are “mortgage related securities” as that term is defined in section 3(a)(41) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are not covered securities in the same manner as obligations issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof. These instruments, commonly referred to as private mortgage-backed securities, may be exempt from the registration requirements of this chapter, provided that the transaction or the securities are otherwise exempt under this section. This provision specifically overrides the preemption of state law contained in section 106(c) of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-440, of the United States;
- Any security issued or guaranteed by Canada, any Canadian province, any political subdivision of any Canadian province, any agency or corporate or other instrumentality of one (1) or more of the foregoing, or by any other foreign government with which the United States currently maintains diplomatic relations, if the security is recognized as a valid obligation by the issuer or guarantor;
- Any security issued by and representing an interest in or a debt of any bank organized under the laws of the United States, or any federally insured savings bank, or any bank, savings institution, or trust company organized and supervised under the laws of any state, or any bank holding company regulated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956;
- Any security issued by and representing an interest in or a debt of any state or federal savings and loan association, or any federally insured savings bank, or any building and loan or similar association organized under the laws of any state and authorized to do business in this state, or any savings and loan holding company regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision [abolished] or its successor;
-
Any security issued or guaranteed by any public utility or holding company which is:
- A registered holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 or a subsidiary of such a company within the meaning of that act;
- Regulated in respect of its rates and charges by a governmental authority of the United States or any state; or
- Regulated in respect of the issuance or guarantee of the security by a governmental authority of the United States, any state, Canada, or any Canadian province;
- Any security of a world-class foreign issuer that meets the qualifications as set forth by rule of the Securities Commissioner;
- Any security issued by any person organized and operated not for private profit but exclusively for religious, educational, benevolent, charitable, fraternal, social, athletic, or reformatory purposes, or as a chamber of commerce or trade or professional association. Section 6(c) of the Philanthropy Protection Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-62, of the United States shall not preempt any provision of this chapter;
- Any investment contract or other security issued in connection with an employees' stock purchase, savings, pension, profit sharing, stock bonus, stock option, or similar benefit plan. Plans which do not meet the requirements for qualification under the Internal Revenue Code must file with the commissioner prior to any offer or sale a notice specifying the terms of the plan. The commissioner may by order disallow the exemption within ten (10) days; and
- Any security as to which the commissioner by rule or order finds that registration is not necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
-
- The commissioner may, from time to time, by his or her rules, and subject to any terms, conditions, and fees which may be prescribed therein, add any class of securities to the securities exempted as provided in this section if the commissioner finds that the enforcement of this chapter with respect to the securities is not necessary in the public interest and for the protection of investors by reason of the small amount involved or the limited character of the public offering, but no issue of securities shall be exempted under this section when the aggregate amount at which the issue is offered to the public exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000).
-
The following apply to a cooperative organized under the laws of this state as a business corporation but operated as a cooperative, or organized and operated in this state under laws addressing cooperatives, § 2-2-101 et seq., §§ 2-2-401 — 2-2-411, 2-2-413 — 2-2-430, 4-30-101 — 4-30-118, 4-30-201, 4-30-202, and 4-30-204 — 4-30-207, and to any nonprofit cooperative that is qualified to do business in this state:
-
Any common stock, preferred stock, promissory note, debenture, or other security may be issued to any cooperative member, if no commission or other remuneration is paid in connection with the sale or issuance of the securities or a registered agent is used, after either:
- Compliance with subsection (d) of this section; or
- Delivery to the cooperative member and filing, with the commissioner, of financial statements of the cooperative for each of the two (2) fiscal years as of a date not earlier than four hundred fifty-five (455) days before the issuance of the security, all of which statements shall have been audited, examined, and certified by independent public accountants to have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently maintained by the cooperative during the fiscal years represented by the statements;
-
Any interest or agreement that qualifies its holder to be a member or other patron of a cooperative or that represents the terms or conditions by which members or other patrons conduct permitted business of a cooperative as set forth in § 2-2-101 et seq.; the Cooperative Marketing Act, § 2-2-401 et seq.; § 4-30-101 et seq.; and §§ 4-30-201 — 4-30-207, or which represents a capital retain, or patronage distribution issued by a cooperative solely to its members or other patrons shall not be considered to be a security under this chapter and shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter, provided:
- The instruments or interests are properly identified and not labeled with the traditional names of investment securities as defined by § 23-42-102(17);
- The instruments or interests are not part of a class of instruments or interests regularly bought or sold for investment purposes or for which an active trading market exists. However, this limitation shall not in any way restrict the bona fide pledge of the instruments or interests; and
- No commission or other remuneration is paid in connection with the sale or issuance to members or other patrons of the interests and instruments. This exemption shall not apply to those interests or instruments which possess the characteristics of an investment contract or other security as interpreted under the laws of the State of Arkansas; and
- The commissioner may render foreign nonprofit cooperatives the privilege afforded Arkansas nonprofit cooperatives set forth in subdivision (c)(2) of this section, provided the foreign cooperative first files supporting documents verifying that it is qualified to do business in Arkansas, that members have substantially the same rights as members of cooperatives organized under the nonprofit cooperative corporate laws of this state, that the offering is within the scope of subdivision (c)(2) of this section, and any other information which the commissioner deems appropriate.
-
Any common stock, preferred stock, promissory note, debenture, or other security may be issued to any cooperative member, if no commission or other remuneration is paid in connection with the sale or issuance of the securities or a registered agent is used, after either:
-
- Before any security may be issued as an exempted security under subdivision (a)(7) of this section or subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section, a proof of exemption must first be filed with the commissioner, and the commissioner by order shall not have disallowed the exemption within the next ten (10) full business days.
- The proof of exemption shall contain a statement of the grounds upon which the exemption is claimed and a designation of the subsection of this section under which the exemption is claimed.
- Proofs of exemption which have not been completed within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after filing with the commissioner may be deemed abandoned and considered withdrawn by the applicant, provided the applicant has been notified of the deficiencies to the proof and afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct the deficiencies.
- Each offering shall be effective only for twelve (12) consecutive months.
-
For every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under:
- Subdivision (a)(7) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of five hundred dollars ($500); and
- Subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 14; 1961, No. 248, § 7; 1973, No. 47, §§ 12, 14; 1975, No. 697, § 1; 1975, No. 844, §§ 7, 8, 11; 1977, No. 493, §§ 6, 7, 10; 1979, No. 754, §§ 2, 8; 1983, No. 836, §§ 14, 15; 1985, No. 939, §§ 5-8; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 67-1247, 67-1248; Acts 1987, No. 776, § 2; 1989, No. 348, § 1; 1993, No. 1147, § 1807; 1995, No. 845, §§ 25, 26; 1997, No. 173, § 20; 2005, No. 420, § 2; 2017, No. 668, § 22.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Office of Thrift Supervision referred to in this section was abolished by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in the introductory language of (c), substituted “The following apply to a cooperative” for “The following shall apply to farm cooperatives”, inserted “laws addressing cooperatives”, and substituted “2-2-430” for “2-2-429”, “4-30-118” for “4-30-117”, and “nonprofit cooperative” for “nonprofit farm cooperative”; rewrote (c)(1) and the introductory language of (c)(2); in (c)(3), deleted “farm” preceding “cooperatives” throughout and deleted “farm” preceding “cooperative corporate”; inserted “or subdivision (c)(1)(A) of this section” in (d)(1); rewrote (d)(5); and made stylistic changes.
U.S. Code. The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.; the Philanthropy Protection Act of 1995 is codified as a note under 15 U.S.C. § 80a-51; the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 is codified as Title 26, U.S.C.; Section 4(5) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 3(a)(41) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are codified as 15 U.S.C. §§ 77d(5) and 78c(a)(41), respectively; and Section 106(c) of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77r-1.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Note, Promissory Demand Notes: Investor Protection or Peril, Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves, 42 Ark. L. Rev. 1075.
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2005 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 28 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 393.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Fact that reasonable exemptions were made did not make former act unconstitutional; and fact that former act which provided for the regulation and supervision of investment companies made exceptions in favor of notes secured by mortgages on real estate in Arkansas did not render the act void. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
Purpose.
This section was designed to protect both investors in common stock and those persons who, in substance, are the investors in the disguised business schemes of another. Union Nat'l Bank v. Farmers Bank, 786 F.2d 881 (8th Cir. 1986).
Proof of Exemption.
Contention of prosecution that exemption offered under this section is postponed unless and until the reasons set forth in the application as the basis for the exemption are true and are in good faith carried out was erroneous, since such interpretation would require, in effect, that the accused prove his innocence to avoid conviction, rather than the state being required to prove him guilty before obtaining a conviction. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).
The burden of proving an exemption or exception from an exemption is upon the person claiming it, and a proof of exemption must be filed with the commissioner to prove that the transaction was exempt. Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997).
Unlawful Sales.
In a prosecution for knowingly selling unregistered securities, a verdict of guilty on counts of knowingly causing unregistered stocks to be sold was supported by evidence that sales were made before the application for exemption under this section, notwithstanding exemption was thereafter obtained. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).
Cited: Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974); International Trading, Ltd. v. Bell, 262 Ark. 244, 556 S.W.2d 420 (1977); Wilkins v. M & H Fin., Inc., 476 F. Supp. 212 (E.D. Ark. 1979); Graham v. Kane, 264 Ark. 949, 576 S.W.2d 711 (1979); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); F & M Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners Ltd. Partnership, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988); Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
23-42-504. Exempted transactions.
-
The following transactions are exempted from §§ 23-42-501 and 23-42-502:
- Any isolated nonissuer transactions, whether effected through a broker-dealer or not, provided that repeated or successive transactions shall be prima facie evidence that the transactions are not isolated nonissuer transactions;
-
Any nonissuer transaction by a registered agent of a registered broker-dealer, and any resale transaction by a sponsor of a unit investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, in a security of a class that has been outstanding in the hands of the public for at least ninety (90) days, provided at the time of the transaction:
- The issuer of the security is actually engaged in business and not in the organization stage or in bankruptcy or receivership and is not a blank check, blind pool, or shell company whose primary plan of business is to engage in a merger or combination of the business with, or an acquisition of, an unidentified person or persons;
- The security is sold at a price reasonably related to the current market price of the security;
- The security does not constitute the whole or part of an unsold allotment to, or a subscription or participation by, the broker-dealer as an underwriter of the security;
-
A nationally recognized securities manual designated by rule or order of the Securities Commissioner or a document filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is publicly available through the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system and contains:
- A description of the business and operations of the issuer;
- The names of the issuer's officers and directors, if any, or, in the case of an issuer not domiciled in the United States, the corporate equivalents of such persons in the issuer's country of domicile;
- An audited balance sheet of the issuer as of a date within eighteen (18) months or, in the case of a reorganization or merger when the parties to the reorganization or merger had such audited balance sheets, a pro forma balance sheet; and
- An audited income statement for each of the issuer's immediately preceding two (2) fiscal years, or for the period of existence of the issuer, if in existence for less than two (2) years, or, in the case of a reorganization or merger when the parties to the reorganization or merger had such audited income statements, a pro forma income statement; and
-
The issuer of the security has a class of equity securities listed on a national securities exchange registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011, unless:
- The issuer of the security is a unit investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011;
- The issuer and predecessors of the issuer of the security have been engaged in continuous business for at least three (3) years; or
-
The issuer of the security has total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) based on:
- An audited balance sheet dated within the past eighteen (18) months; or
- In the case of a reorganization or merger of parties with audited balance sheets dated within the past eighteen (18) months showing total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000), a pro forma balance sheet;
- Any transaction between the issuer or other person on whose behalf the offering is made and an underwriter, or among underwriters;
- Any transaction in a bond or other evidence of indebtedness secured by a real or chattel mortgage or deed of trust, or by an agreement for the sale of real estate or chattels if the entire mortgage, deed of trust, or agreement, together with all the bonds or other evidences of indebtedness secured thereby, is offered and sold as a unit;
- Any transactions by an executor, administrator, sheriff, marshal, receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, guardian, or conservator;
- Any transaction executed by a bona fide pledgee without any purpose of evading this chapter;
- A transaction by a person exempted from registration under § 23-42-102(3)(B)(v) if the transaction would be lawful in the place of residence of the offeree or purchaser had it occurred there instead of in this state;
-
- Any offer or sale to a bank, savings institution, trust company, insurance company, investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, pension or profit-sharing trust, or other financial institution or institutional buyer, or to a broker-dealer, whether the purchaser is acting for itself or in some fiduciary capacity.
- The commissioner may by order, upon petition by any person, determine if the petitioner may be deemed, upon the basis of knowledge, experience, volume, and number of transactions, and other securities background, an “institutional buyer” for purposes of subdivision (a)(8)(A) of this section;
-
-
Any transaction pursuant to an offer and sale to not more than thirty-five (35) purchasers other than those designated in subdivision (a)(8) of this section during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, if:
- The seller reasonably believes that all the buyers are purchasing for investment; and
- A commission or other remuneration shall not be paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any prospective buyer in this state unless the person receiving any such commission or remuneration is registered under § 23-42-301.
- However, the commissioner may by rule or order, as to any security or transaction or any type of security or transaction, withdraw or further condition this exemption, or increase or decrease the number of purchasers permitted, or waive the conditions in subdivisions (a)(9)(A)(i) and (ii) of this section with or without the substitution of a limitation on remuneration;
-
Any transaction pursuant to an offer and sale to not more than thirty-five (35) purchasers other than those designated in subdivision (a)(8) of this section during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, if:
- Any transaction pursuant to an offer to existing security holders of the issuer, including persons who at the time of the transaction are holders of convertible securities or warrants, if no commission or other remuneration, other than a standby commission, is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any security holder in this state, unless the commissioner shall, upon written application, permit the payment of a commission or other remuneration with or without the substitution of a limitation on remuneration;
- Any offer, but not a sale, of a security for which registration statements have been filed under both this chapter and the Securities Act of 1933 if no order or refusal order is in effect and no public proceeding or examination looking toward such an order is pending under either act;
-
An offer or sale of a security by an issuer if:
-
Either of the following applies:
- The issuer of the security is a corporation or other business entity organized and operating under the laws of this state and has its principal place of business in Arkansas and the transaction meets the requirements of the federal exemption for intrastate offerings in section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(11), as it existed on January 1, 2017, and Rule 147 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 230.147, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and as such, the securities shall be offered to and sold only to persons who are residents of this state at the time of purchase; or
- The issuer of the security is a corporation or other business entity with its principal place of business in Arkansas and the transaction meets the requirements of the federal exemption for intrastate offerings in section 28 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77z-3, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and Rule 147A of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 230.147A, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and as such, the securities shall be sold only to persons who are residents of this state at the time of purchase;
- The sum of all cash and other consideration to be received for all sales of the security in reliance upon the exemption described in this subdivision (a)(12) shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000), less the aggregate amount received for all sales of securities by the issuer within six (6) months after the completion of the offering;
- The issuer shall not accept more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) from any single purchaser unless the purchaser is an accredited investor as defined by Rule 501 of United States Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation D, 17 C.F.R. § 230.501, as it existed on January 1, 2017;
- The issuer should reasonably believe that all purchasers of securities are purchasing for investment and not for sale in connection with a distribution of the security;
- A commission or remuneration shall not be paid or given, directly or indirectly, for a person's participation in the offer or sale of securities for the issuer unless the person is registered as a broker-dealer or agent under this chapter;
- The commissioner may by rule or order, as to any security or transaction or any type of security or transaction, withdraw or further condition the exemption under this subdivision (a)(12); and
- A filing fee of one hundred dollars ($100) shall be paid to the commissioner for every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under this subdivision (a)(12);
-
Either of the following applies:
- Any other transaction that the commissioner by rule or order exempts as not being necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of investors; and
-
An offer or sale of a security to a person who is not a resident of this state and is not present in this state, if the offer or sale is not:
- A violation of the laws of the state or foreign jurisdiction in which the offeree or purchaser is present; and
- Part of an unlawful plan or scheme to evade this chapter.
-
- Before any transaction shall be executed as an exempted transaction under subdivision (a)(9) or subdivision (a)(10) of this section, except, in the case of dividend reinvestment and stock purchase programs pursuant to subdivision (a)(10) of this section, a proof of exemption must first be filed with the commissioner and the commissioner by order shall not have disallowed the exemption within the next ten (10) full business days. Before any dividend reinvestment and stock purchase program shall be executed as an exempt transaction under subdivision (a)(10) of this section, an initial proof of exemption shall be filed. Thereafter, in every fifth year a proof of exemption must be filed with the commissioner, and the commissioner by order must not have disallowed the exemption within the next ten (10) full business days.
- The proof of exemption shall contain a statement of the grounds upon which the exemption is claimed and a designation of the subsection of this section under which the exemption is claimed.
- Proofs of exemption which have not been completed within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after filing with the commissioner may be deemed abandoned and considered withdrawn by the applicant, provided the applicant has been notified of the deficiencies to the proof and afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct such deficiencies.
-
- For every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under subdivision (a)(9) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the maximum aggregate offering price at which the securities are to be offered in this state, but the fee shall in no case be less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) or more than five hundred dollars ($500).
- For every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under subdivision (a)(10) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of fifty dollars ($50.00).
- The commissioner shall have authority under this subsection to amend or rescind the filing fees by rule or order if the commissioner determines that the fee is excessive under the circumstances.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 14; 1961, No. 248, § 7; 1963, No. 512, § 1; 1971, No. 131, § 4; 1973, No. 47, §§ 13, 15; 1975, No. 844, §§ 9, 10, 12; 1977, No. 493, § 8; 1983, No. 836, §§ 20, 25; 1985, No. 610, § 1; 1985, No. 939, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1248; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 27; 1997, No. 173, § 21; 1999, No. 363, § 3; 2005, No. 420, § 3; 2009, No. 462, § 12; 2011, No. 339, § 14; 2013, No. 460, § 13; 2017, No. 668, § 23; 2019, No. 110, §§ 3, 4.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Rule 147A of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission became effective April 20, 2017. The 2016 amendments to Rule 147 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission became effective April 20, 2017.
Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (a)(2)(E), inserted “15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2009” and deleted “or designated for trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System” preceding “unless,” inserted “15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2009” in (a)(2)(E)(i), subdivided (a)(2)(E)(iii), inserted “dated within the past eighteen (18) months showing total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000)” in (a)(2)(E)(iii)(b), and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2011 amendment substituted “January 1, 2011” for “January 1, 2009” in (a)(2)(E) and (a)(2)(E)(i).
The 2013 amendment, in (a)(7), substituted “A transaction” for “Any transaction” and “if the transaction” for “provided that the transaction.”
The 2017 amendment, in the introductory language of (a)(2)(D), substituted “Securities Commissioner” for “commissioner” and twice inserted “United States”; substituted “commissioner” for “Securities Commissioner” in (a)(8)(B); inserted present (a)(12); redesignated former (a)(12) as (a)(13); and made stylistic changes.
The 2019 amendment deleted former (a)(8)(A); redesignated the former introductory language of (a)(8) and the former first sentence of (a)(8)(B) as (a)(8)(A); substituted “subdivision (a)(8)(A) of this section” for “this subdivision (a)(8)” in (a)(8)(B); and added (a)(14).
U.S. Code. The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq. The Securities Act of 1933 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. Sections 12, 13, and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are codified as 15 U.S.C. §§ 78 l , 78m, and 78o(d), respectively.
Research References
Ark. L. Notes.
Carol Goforth, Crowdfunding in Arkansas? Yes, you can!, 71 Ark. L. Notes 1 (2019).
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Annual Survey of Caselaw, Business Law, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 885.
Survey of Legislation, 2005 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 28 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 393.
John F. Griffee, IV, Guide to Structuring Resales of Restricted Securities Held by Control and Non-Control Holders Under Federal and Arkansas Law, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 1 (2015).
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Fact that reasonable exemptions were made did not make former act unconstitutional; and fact that former act which provided for the regulation and supervision of investment companies made exceptions in favor of notes secured by mortgages on real estate in state of Arkansas did not render the act void. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).
Institutional Buyer.
Where individual himself, and not a bank, directed the investment of an IRA, and there was no indication that he was aided in any manner by a bank or its officials, that individual was not an “institutional buyer” within the meaning of subdivision (a)(8). F & M Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners Ltd. Partnership, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).
Isolated Nonissuer Transactions.
Certain stock transactions were “isolated nonissuer” as a result of the insider status of two of the purchases, and the small infrequent number of sales. Rucker v. La-Co, Inc., 496 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1974).
The purpose of the exemption of subdivision (a)(1) of this section is to exempt from registration small, isolated transactions between private individuals. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Where transactions were “transactions pursuant to an offer” as contemplated by former § 23-42-102(10)(B) (see now subdivision (a)(9) of this section) and corporation did not file proof of exemption as required, transactions of corporation were not exempt from registration as isolated nonissuer transaction under subdivision (a)(1) of this section. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Joint Ventures.
Where sellers of joint venture interests in an apartment complex received consulting fees, and organized, constructed, managed and controlled the properties of the joint venture, the joint venture interests were not exempt from registration. Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977).
Proof of Exemption.
Contention of prosecution that exemption offered under this section is postponed unless and until the reasons set forth in the application as the basis for the exemption are true and are in good faith carried out was erroneous, since such interpretation would require, in effect, that the accused prove his innocence to avoid conviction, rather than the state being required to prove him guilty before obtaining a conviction. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).
Nowhere in subdivision (a)(9) and subsection (b) of this section is there language that could be reasonably construed to give the Commissioner the power to waive the requirement that a proof of exemption must be filed; and rule promulgated by Securities Commissioner exempting certain transactions from the registration and proof of exemption requirement of subsection (b) of this section was not a valid exercise of the rulemaking authority granted to the commissioner under § 23-42-503. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Transactions Pursuant to Offers.
Stocks were held exempt under this section where less than 25 persons were offered the stock, the corporation believed the purchases were for investment, and the Arkansas Securities Commissioner had exempted the stock from registration. Rucker v. La-Co, Inc., 496 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1974).
Because an option to purchase a security is an interest in the security, corporation, by agreeing to grant individual an option to purchase stock, made him an offer and, for the purposes of subdivision (a)(9) of this section, all subsequent payments to escrow account and other subsequent transactions between the parties and involving the exercise of the option were “transactions pursuant to an offer” as contemplated by former § 23-42-102(10)(B) (see now subdivision (a)(9) of this section). Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).
Unlawful Sales.
Conviction of one charged with violation of § 23-42-501 and who defended on the ground that he had obtained an exemption for the security sold under subsection (a)(9) of this section was not sustained by evidence that the defendant had sold the security to persons who were not on the list of offerees filed with the Securities Commissioner in compliance with a rule of the commissioner. Gaskin v. State, 244 Ark. 541, 426 S.W.2d 407 (1968).
In a prosecution for knowingly selling unregistered securities, a verdict of guilty on counts of knowingly causing unregistered stocks to be sold was supported by evidence that sales were made before the application for exemption under this section, notwithstanding exemption was thereafter obtained. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).
Cited: Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997); Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
23-42-505. Denial or revocation of exemption.
- The Securities Commissioner may, by order, deny or revoke any exemption specified in § 23-42-503(a)(7) or (8), (b), or (c) or § 23-42-504(a) with respect to a specific security or transaction.
-
- No such order may be entered without appropriate prior notice to all interested parties, opportunity for hearing, and written findings of fact and conclusions of law, except that the commissioner may by order summarily deny or revoke any of the specified exemptions pending final determination of any proceeding under this section.
- Upon the entry of a summary order, the commissioner shall promptly notify all interested parties that it has been entered and of the reasons therefor and that within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of a written request the matter will be set down for hearing.
-
- If no hearing is requested and none is ordered by the commissioner, the order will remain in effect until it is modified or vacated by the commissioner.
- If a hearing is requested or ordered, the commissioner, after notice of and opportunity for hearing to all interested persons, may modify or vacate the order or extend it until final determination.
- No order under this section may operate retroactively.
- No person may be considered to have violated § 23-42-501 or § 23-42-502 by reason of any offer or sale effected after the entry of an order under this section if he or she sustains the burden of proof that he or she did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known of the order.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 14; 1961, No. 248, § 7; 1977, No. 493, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1248; Acts 1997, No. 173, § 22.
Case Notes
Proof of Exemption.
Contention of prosecution that exemption offered under this section is postponed unless and until the reasons set forth in the application as the basis for the exemption are true and are in good faith carried out was erroneous, since such interpretation would require, in effect, that the accused prove his innocence to avoid conviction, rather than the state being required to prove him guilty before obtaining a conviction. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).
Cited: Gordon v. Matson, 246 Ark. 533, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
23-42-506. Burden of proof of exemption.
In any proceeding under this chapter, the burden of proving an exemption or an exception from a definition is upon the person claiming it.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 14; 1961, No. 248, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1248.
Case Notes
In General.
Proof of exemption must be filed with the commissioner to prove that the transaction was exempt. Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997).
Cited: Gordon v. Matson, 246 Ark. 533, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); F & M Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners Ltd. Partnership, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).
23-42-507. Fraud or deceit in connection with offer, sale, or purchase of securities.
It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly:
- To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
- To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or
- To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1235.
Research References
Ark. L. Rev.
Wolff, The Unconstitutionality of the Arkansas Tender Statute, 36 Ark. L. Rev. 233.
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Frances S. Fendler & A. Heath Abshure, Private Civil Liability Under the Arkansas Securities Act, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 125 (2016).
Case Notes
Evidence.
Under §§ 23-42-210 and 25-15-212(h)(5), competing facts and substantial evidence covering falsified application, overreached authority, excessive mark-ups, and securities churning were conclusive of agent's violative behavior. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
In allowing testimony covering prior dealings involving stock transactions defendant had with other individuals, the court has two criteria as a guide: The previous conduct must not be too remote from the offense charged and it must be similar in nature to the event charged; when such evidence is admitted it must be accompanied by a limiting instruction. Smith v. State, 266 Ark. 861, 587 S.W.2d 50, 1979 Ark. App. LEXIS 378 (Ct. App. 1979), cert. denied, Smith v. Arkansas, 445 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1082, 63 L. Ed. 2d 321 (1980).
Statute of Limitations.
The evidence of defendant's actions in offering stock in a company that he founded on a fraudulent premise constituted the “last overt act in the furtherance of a scheme or course of conduct” which culminated in the sale of the stock and tolled the five-year statute of limitations. Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997).
Unethical Practices.
An agent instructed seller of bonds to draw the confirmation in agent's and buyer's name jointly in order to protect himself as to the collection of an extra fee, and this was held a dishonest practice. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
Under former § 23-42-102(4) (see now § 23-42-102(5)), the Securities Commissioner was not limited to common law deceit in adjusting an agent's unethical practice. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
Markup on bonds over cost held so excessive as to amount to fraud on clients. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
Twenty-nine sales and purchases of bonds in a short time held violative of this section. Selig v. Novak, 256 Ark. 278, 506 S.W.2d 825 (1974).
Untrue Statements.
Evidence sufficient to find that it could not be held that the agent had made untrue statements or misrepresentations under the Securities Act, or the Franchise Practice Act, in order to induce prospective distributor into entering into distributorship agreement. Kern v. Sells Enters., Inc., 271 Ark. 904, 612 S.W.2d 94 (1981).
Evidence sufficient to find statements untrue. Hardcastle v. State, 25 Ark. App. 157, 755 S.W.2d 228 (1988).
Use of Mails.
Contract for sale of securities made in Arkansas involving the use of the mails to clear check given by buyer to seller in the transaction was governed both by federal rule and by this Act for purposes of action wherein buyer sought recovery against seller under both for alleged fraud in the transaction. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares Corp., 337 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Ark. 1972).
23-42-508. Market manipulation.
It is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, in this state:
- To effect any transaction in a security which involves no change in the beneficial ownership thereof, or to enter any orders for the purchase or sale of any security with the knowledge that orders of substantially the same size, at substantially the same time, and at substantially the same price, for the sale or purchase of the security, have been or will be entered by or for the same or affiliated persons, for the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading in the security or a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for the security;
- To effect, alone or with one (1) or more other persons, a series of transactions in any security creating actual or apparent active trading in the security or raising or depressing the price of the security, for the purpose of inducing the purchase or sale of the security by others; or
- To induce the purchase or sale of any security by the circulation or dissemination of information to the effect that the price of the security will, or is likely to, rise or fall because of market operations of any one (1) or more persons conducted for the purpose of raising or depressing the price of the security, if he or she is selling or offering to sell or purchasing or offering to purchase the security or is receiving a consideration, directly or indirectly, from that person.
History. Acts 1971, No. 131, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1263.
23-42-509. Covered securities.
-
The Securities Commissioner, by rule or order, may require a notice filing consisting of any or all of the following documents with respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(2):
-
- Prior to the initial offering of such a covered security in this state, all documents that are part of a current federal registration statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, together with a consent to service of process signed by the issuer and with a fee in the amount of one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the maximum aggregate offering price at which the covered securities are to be offered in this state, but the fee shall in no case be less than one hundred fifty dollars ($150) nor more than two thousand dollars ($2,000). Any portion of the fee in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) shall be designated as special revenues and shall be deposited into the Securities Department Fund. When a notice filing is withdrawn before the effective date, the commissioner shall retain one hundred fifty dollars ($150) of the filing fee.
- Sales of the covered securities in excess of the amount of covered securities to have been offered in this state shall require the person making the notice filing to pay a fee, calculated in the manner specified in subdivision (a)(1)(A) of this section, for all securities sold. In addition, if the sales are in excess of one hundred five percent (105%) of the amount to have been offered, the person making the notice filing shall pay a penalty fee of two hundred dollars ($200).
- The initial notice filing of an investment company, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, shall be effective for a period commencing upon the commissioner's receipt of the notice filing, or, if not yet effective with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, concurrently with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission effectiveness, and ending two (2) months after the investment company's fiscal year end. Thereafter, the investment company must renew the notice filing by submitting the appropriate forms and documents as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, along with the appropriate fee, calculated in the manner specified in subdivision (a)(1) of this section, with respect to the additional securities proposed to be offered, within two (2) months after the expiration of the registrant's fiscal year end.
- The notice filing of a unit investment trust, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, shall be effective for one (1) year from the date of effectiveness granted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;
- After the initial offer of such covered securities in this state, all documents that are part of an amendment to a current federal registration statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933;
- An annual or periodic report of the value of the covered securities offered or sold in this state as necessary to compute fees.
-
- A notice filing relating to a covered security may be amended after its effective date so as to increase the securities specified as proposed to be offered. The amendment becomes effective upon receipt by the commissioner. Every person filing such an amendment shall pay a filing fee, calculated in the manner specified in subdivision (a)(1) of this section, with respect to the additional securities proposed to be offered.
-
-
With respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(4)(F) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(F), as it existed on January 1, 2017, the commissioner may by rule or order require that no later than fifteen (15) days after the first sale of a covered security, the issuer:
- File a notice on United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form D;
- Submit a consent to service of process signed by the issuer; and
-
- Pay a fee in the amount of one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the maximum aggregate offering price at which the securities are to be offered in this state.
- The fee shall be at least one hundred dollars ($100) and no more than five hundred dollars ($500).
- After the initial offer of the covered security in this state, any amendment to United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form D filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 shall be filed concurrently with the commissioner.
-
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (c)(1) of this section is effective for twelve (12) months from the date of the initial filing with the commissioner.
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (c)(1) of this section shall be renewed on or before the anniversary date of the initial notice filing, or the notice filing shall terminate.
-
To renew a notice filing, an issuer of a covered securities offering shall:
- Submit the appropriate forms and documents as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.; and
- Pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
- If a notice filing required to be filed under subdivision (c)(1) of this section is completed by an issuer at least fifteen (15) days after, but within one (1) year of, the first sale of the covered securities in this state, then the issuer shall pay a late notice filing penalty of five hundred dollars ($500).
- If a notice filing is filed more than one (1) year after the first sale of the covered securities in this state, then the issuer shall pay a late notice filing penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000).
-
With respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(4)(F) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(F), as it existed on January 1, 2017, the commissioner may by rule or order require that no later than fifteen (15) days after the first sale of a covered security, the issuer:
-
-
With respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(4)(C) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(C), if the issuer's principal place of business is located in this state or purchasers of fifty percent (50%) or greater of the aggregate amount of the offering are residents of this state, the commissioner may by rule or order require the issuer to:
- File concurrently with the commissioner the information required to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under section 4A(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77d-1(b); and
- Pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (d)(1) of this section is effective for twelve (12) months from the date of the initial filing with the commissioner.
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (d)(1) of this section shall be renewed on or before the anniversary date of the initial notice filing or the notice filing shall terminate.
-
To renew a notice filing, an issuer of a covered securities offering shall:
- Submit the appropriate forms and documents as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.; and
- Pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
With respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(4)(C) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(C), if the issuer's principal place of business is located in this state or purchasers of fifty percent (50%) or greater of the aggregate amount of the offering are residents of this state, the commissioner may by rule or order require the issuer to:
-
-
Except as provided under subsection (c) or subsection (d) of this section, with respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(3), as it existed on January 1, 2019, or section 18(b)(4) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4), as it existed on January 1, 2019, the commissioner may by rule or order require the issuer to:
- Concurrently file with the commissioner any document or information required to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission; and
- Pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (e)(1) of this section is effective for twelve (12) months from the date of the initial filing with the commissioner.
- A notice filing for a covered securities offering under subdivision (e)(1) of this section shall be renewed on or before the anniversary date of the initial notice filing, or the notice filing shall terminate.
-
To renew a notice filing, an issuer of a covered securities offering shall:
- Submit the appropriate forms and documents as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.; and
- Pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100).
-
Except as provided under subsection (c) or subsection (d) of this section, with respect to a covered security under section 18(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(3), as it existed on January 1, 2019, or section 18(b)(4) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4), as it existed on January 1, 2019, the commissioner may by rule or order require the issuer to:
-
The commissioner may issue a stop order suspending the offer and sale of a covered security, except a covered security under section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, if he or she finds that:
- The order is in the public interest; and
- A failure to comply with this section exists.
- The commissioner by rule or order may waive any or all of the provisions of this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 173, § 23; 1999, No. 363, § 4; 2013, No. 460, § 14; 2017, No. 668, §§ 24-26; 2019, No. 110, §§ 5-8.
Amendments. The 2013 amendment rewrote (c) and (d); added (e) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; and, in (f)(2), substituted “A” for “There is a” and “this section exists” for “any condition established under this section.”
The 2017 amendment, in the introductory language of (c)(1), substituted “18(b)(4)(F)” for “18(b)(4)(E)” and inserted “15 U.S.C. § 77r(b)(4)(F), as it existed on January 1, 2017”; and rewrote (d)(2) and (e).
The 2019 amendment rewrote (c)(3); added (c)(4); added (d)(2), and redesignated former (d) as (d)(1); added (e)(2), and redesignated former (e) as (e)(1); and substituted “January 1, 2019” for “January 1, 2017” twice in (e)(1).
U.S. Code. The Securities Act of 1933, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a et seq. The Investment Company Act of 1940 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq.
Case Notes
Cited: Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).
Chapter 43 Investor Protection Takeover Act
23-43-101 — 23-43-117. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This chapter, concerning the Investor Protection Takeover Act, was repealed by Acts 2009, No. 533, § 1. The chapter was derived from the following sources:
23-43-101. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.
23-43-102. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 1; 1979, No. 587, §§ 1, 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.
23-43-103. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 14; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.13.
23-43-104. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 15; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.14.
23-43-105. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 11; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.10.
23-43-106. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.12.
23-43-107. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 13; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.12.
23-43-108. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.6.
23-43-109. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 9; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.8.
23-43-110. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 2; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.1.
23-43-111. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 3; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.2.
23-43-112. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 6; 1979, No. 587, §§ 3-5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.5.
23-43-113. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 4; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.3.
23-43-114. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.4.
23-43-115. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 10; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.9.
23-43-116. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.11.
23-43-117. Acts 1977, No. 730, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1264.7.
Chapter 44 Commodities Futures
Effective Dates. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 12: approved Mar. 27, 1929. Emergency clause provided: “This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, peace and safety an emergency is declared and it shall take effect and be in force immediately after its passage.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Gambling, § 198 et seq.
C.J.S. 38 C.J.S., Gaming, § 9 et seq.
Case Notes
In General.
This chapter was taken from the laws of Oklahoma and an opinion by the Supreme Court of that state construing this chapter delivered prior to its adoption in this state would be given great weight. Orvis Bros. & Co. v. Oliver, 197 Ark. 307, 123 S.W.2d 1065 (1938).
23-44-101. Definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Bucket shop” means any place of business wherein contracts are made of the sort or character denounced by § 23-44-105;
- “Contract for sale” means sales, purchases, agreements of sale, agreements to sell, and agreements to purchase; and
- “Person” means individuals, associations, partnerships, and corporations.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, §§ 1, 5; Pope's Dig., §§ 3342, 3346; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 68-1001, 68-1005.
23-44-102. Penalties.
-
- Any person, acting either as agent or principal, who knowingly enters into or assists in making any contracts of sale of the sort or character denounced by § 23-44-105, for the future delivery of cotton, grain, stocks, or other commodities or who maintains or operates a bucket shop as that term is defined in § 23-44-101 shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction shall be fined in a sum not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or be imprisoned in the penitentiary not exceeding two (2) years.
- Any person who shall be guilty of a second offense under this section, in addition to the penalties above prescribed, and upon conviction, may be both fined and imprisoned in the discretion of the court.
-
- If a corporation commits the acts prohibited by subsection (a) of this section, it shall be liable to forfeiture of all its rights and privileges as a corporation, and the continuance of the establishment after the first conviction shall be deemed a second offense.
- It shall be the duty of the Attorney General to institute proceedings for the forfeiture of the charter of any corporation making itself liable to forfeiture under the provisions of this chapter.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 7; Pope's Dig., § 3348; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1007.
23-44-103. Requirements for validity of contracts.
-
All contracts of sale for future delivery of cotton, grain, stocks, or other commodities shall be valid and enforceable in the courts of this state, according to their terms, if they are:
- Made in accordance with the rules of any board of trade, exchange, or similar institution where the contracts of sale are executed;
- Actually executed on the floor of the board of trade, exchange, or similar institution and performed or discharged according to the rules thereof; and
- Made with or through a regular member in good standing of a cotton exchange, grain exchange, or similar institution organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas or any other state.
- However, contracts of sale for future delivery of cotton, in order to be valid and enforceable, must not only conform to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, but must also be made subject to the provisions of the United States Cotton Futures Act. If this clause should for any reason be held inoperative, then contracts for the future delivery of cotton shall be valid and enforceable if they conform to the requirement of subsection (a) of this section.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 2; Pope's Dig., § 3343; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1002.
U.S. Code. The United States Cotton Futures Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 7 U.S.C. § 15b et seq.
Case Notes
In General.
Contracts for future delivery of cotton in conformity with the requirements of this section were valid and enforceable and not gambling transactions. Orvis Bros. & Co. v. Oliver, 197 Ark. 307, 123 S.W.2d 1065 (1938).
Applicability.
This section does not apply to contracts for future delivery of actual commodities. J.L. McEntire & Sons v. Hart Cotton Co., 256 Ark. 937, 511 S.W.2d 179 (1974).
23-44-104. Recovery of advances under contract.
Any broker, agent, or any other person making advances to, or for account of, any party to any contract falling within and satisfying the provisions of § 23-44-103 shall be entitled to recover the amount of the advances from the party to, or for the account of, whom the advances were made.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 3; Pope's Dig., § 3344; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1003.
23-44-105. Bucket shop contracts void.
Any contract of sale for the future delivery of cotton, grain, stocks, or other commodities which is to be settled according to, or upon the basis of, the public market quotation or prices made on any board of trade, exchange, or similar institution, upon which contracts of sale for future delivery are executed and dealt in without any actual bona fide execution and the carrying out or discharge of the contracts upon the floor of the exchange, board of trade, or similar institution, in accordance with the rules thereof, shall be null and void and unenforceable in any court of this state, and no action shall lie thereon at the suit of any party thereto.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 4; Pope's Dig., § 3345; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1004.
Case Notes
Evidence.
Conviction could be had on proof that one of the parties to the transaction did not, in good faith, intend actual delivery at the time the contract was made. Huff v. State, 164 Ark. 211, 261 S.W. 654 (1924) (decision under prior law).
Indictment.
An indictment charging that the defendant became a party to an unlawful contract to buy bales of cotton to be settled on margin, without any intention of the cotton being actually delivered, was sufficient. Huff v. State, 164 Ark. 211, 261 S.W. 654 (1924) (decision under prior law).
23-44-106. Bucket shops prohibited.
The maintenance or operation of a bucket shop at any point in this state is prohibited.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 5; Pope's Dig., § 3346; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1005.
23-44-107. Exchanges and boards of trade — Organization — Records.
- There may be organized, in any city, town, or municipality in the State of Arkansas, voluntary associations to be known as cotton exchanges, grain exchanges, boards of trade, or similar institutions to receive and post quotations on cotton, grains, stocks, bonds, and other commodities for the benefit of their members and other persons engaged in the production of cotton, grain, and other commodities.
- The associations shall be composed of not fewer than twenty-five (25) active members and shall adopt a uniform set of rules not inconsistent with the laws of Arkansas and of the United States.
- They shall open their books to the inspection of proper courts and officers of the law when required.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 8; Pope's Dig., § 3349; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1008; Acts 2019, No. 315, § 2516.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b).
23-44-108. Exchanges and boards of trade — Use of public or private wires.
- Only members of cotton exchanges, grain exchanges, boards of trade, or similar institutions organized under the laws of Arkansas or any other state may provide for their use, and the use of their clients, private or public wires from cities in Arkansas where the cotton exchanges, grain exchanges, boards of trade, or similar institutions are located to other cities outside the State of Arkansas where cotton exchanges, grain exchanges, boards of trade, or similar institutions are operated.
- They may receive over the private or public wires, and post for their own use and that of their clients and of any person engaged in the production of cotton, grain, or other commodities, market quotations and market news covering cotton, grain, stock, and other commodities. They may also transmit, for execution, contracts of sale for future delivery.
- In all cases it is contemplated that the delivery of the commodity purchased or sold, as the case may be, will be carried out by the principals or other successors or assignees and that the contract for delivery thereof will be performed or discharged according to the rules of the exchange, board of trade, or similar institution where the contract is executed.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 9; Pope's Dig., § 3350; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1009.
23-44-109. Written statement to be furnished upon demand — Effect of noncompliance.
- Every person shall furnish, upon demand, to any principal from whom that person has executed any contract or sale for the future delivery of any cotton, grain, stocks, or other commodities, a written instrument setting forth the name and location of the exchange, board of trade, or similar institution upon which the contract has been executed, the date of execution of the contract, and the name and address of the persons with whom the contract was executed.
- If the person shall refuse or neglect to furnish the statement upon reasonable demand, the refusal or neglect shall be prima facie evidence that the contract was an illegal contract within the provisions of § 23-44-105, and that the person who executed it was engaged in the maintenance and operation of a bucket shop subject to the penalty provided by § 23-44-102.
History. Acts 1929, No. 208, § 6; Pope's Dig., § 3347; A.S.A. 1947, § 68-1006.
Chapter 45 Arkansas Banking Code of 1997
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 becomes effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 408, § 24: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 become effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of those certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 2003, No. 860, § 16: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the flow of development capital funds into and within the state has been and continues to be, insufficient to support the growth of businesses and infrastructure development; that as a result of the lack of available capital sources, the state has suffered economic losses because of the inability to compete with other states in providing capital resources for business and infrastructure development; that this legislation will stimulate the flow of private capital and long-term loan funds that are vital to the sound financing of businesses and will encourage growth, expansion, and modernization through the reinstatement of tax credits; that unless an adequate program to encourage private capital investment is undertaken, the state will suffer further irreparable loss as a result of the continued inability to support business and infrastructure development, and from the lost opportunities for economic expansion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be effective on July 1, 2003.”
Research References
Am. Jur. 10 Am. Jur. 2d, Banks, § 17 et seq.
Ark. L. Rev.
Watkins, Access to Public Records Under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, 37 Ark. L. Rev. 741.
C.J.S. 97 C.J.S. Witn., § 25.
23-45-101. Short title.
Chapters 45-50 of this title may be referred to as the “Arkansas Banking Code of 1997”.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-45-102. Definitions.
-
Subject to other definitions contained in subsequent sections of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, and unless the context otherwise requires, in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997:
- “Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified person, a person that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person;
- “Arkansas bank” means a bank whose home state is Arkansas;
- “Arkansas bank holding company” means a bank holding company that controls one (1) or more state banks. As used in this subdivision (a)(3), “control” has the meaning set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 1841(a)(2);
- “Arkansas Banking Code of 1997” means the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, chapters 45-50 of this title;
-
- “Bank” means a state bank or a national bank or an out-of-state state-chartered bank that has received a certificate of authority under § 23-48-1001.
- “Bank” shall also include any foreign bank organized under the laws of a territory of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, or the United States Virgin Islands, the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
-
-
“Bank holding company” means any company, foreign or domestic, including a bank:
- That directly or indirectly owns, controls, or holds with power to vote twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting shares of any bank;
- That controls in any manner the election of a majority of the directors of any bank; or
- For the benefit of whose shareholders or members twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting shares of any bank or a bank holding company is held by trustees.
-
Notwithstanding the foregoing:
- No company shall be a bank holding company by virtue of its ownership or control of shares that are acquired by it in connection with its underwriting of securities and that are held only for such period of time as will permit the sale thereof upon a reasonable basis; and
- No company formed for the sole purpose of participating in a proxy solicitation shall be a bank holding company by virtue of its control of voting rights of shares acquired in the course of the solicitation.
- As used in this definition of “bank holding company”, “company” means any corporation, limited liability company, or business trust doing business in this state but does not include any corporation the majority of the shares of which are owned by the United States or by any state;
-
“Bank holding company” means any company, foreign or domestic, including a bank:
- “Banking board” means the State Banking Board;
- “Bank premises” includes the state bank's or subsidiary trust company's main office site, all branch and other lawful office sites, the main office building and all other branch and other lawful office buildings, any or all of which may have additional space for occupancy by tenants, and any parking areas or parking structures that constitute adjuncts to any of the state bank or subsidiary trust company property;
-
“Bank supervisory agency” means:
- Any agency of another state with primary responsibility for chartering and supervising banks; and
- The United States Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and their successors;
- “Capital base” means the sum of capital, surplus, and undivided profits, plus any additions and less any subtractions which the Bank Commissioner may by rule prescribe;
- [Repealed.]
- “Commissioner” means the Bank Commissioner;
- “Court” means a court of competent jurisdiction;
- “Day” means a calendar day;
- “Department” means the State Bank Department of this state;
- “Department rules” or “department rule” means rules promulgated by the commissioner with the approval of the State Banking Board;
- “Deposit” and “deposit account” mean the unpaid balance of money or its equivalent received or held by a bank in the usual course of its banking business and which represents a liability of the bank, for which it has given or is obligated to give credit, either conditionally or unconditionally, to a checking, savings, time or similar account, or that is evidenced by its certificate of deposit or similar certificate or a check or draft drawn against a deposit account and certified by the bank or a draft or cashier's, officer's, or traveler's check or money order or similar instrument on which the bank is primarily liable, and that has not been paid and other obligations or instruments of a bank that may be included in the definition of “deposit” or “deposit account” in department rules;
-
- “De novo charter” means a charter for a bank that has been in existence for less than five (5) years, but it does not include a charter that is issued in connection with the acquisition of assets or liabilities from a predecessor financial institution.
- A bank resulting from the conversion of a savings and loan association to a bank, from the conversion of a state bank to a national bank, or from the conversion of a national bank to a state bank shall be deemed to have been in existence, for the purpose of determining whether it has a de novo charter, from the date the converting institution came into existence;
- “Depository institution” means any bank, savings and loan association, state or federal credit union, or any corporation that the commissioner determines to be operating in substantially the same manner as such entities;
- “Federal financial institutions' regulatory agency” means the Federal Reserve System, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the United States Comptroller of the Currency, or the Office of Thrift Supervision [abolished], or their successors;
- “Financial institution” means any state bank, registered out-of-state bank, bank holding company, trust company, or subsidiary trust company;
-
“Home state” means:
- With respect to a state-chartered bank, the state by which the bank is chartered;
- With respect to a national bank, the state in which the main office of the bank is located; and
- With respect to a foreign bank, the state determined to be the home state of the foreign bank under 12 U.S.C. § 3103(c);
- “Home state regulator” means, with respect to an out-of-state state-chartered bank, the bank supervisory agency of the state in which the bank is chartered;
- “Host state” means a state other than the home state of a bank in which the bank maintains or seeks to establish and maintain a branch;
-
“Interstate merger transaction” means:
- The merger or consolidation of banks with different home states and the conversion of branches of any bank involved in the merger or consolidation into branches of the resulting bank; or
- The purchase of all or substantially all of the assets including all or substantially all of the branches and the assumption of all or substantially all of the liabilities of a bank whose home state is different from the home state of the acquiring bank;
- “Main banking office” or “main office”, with respect to a bank, means the main banking office designated or provided for in the articles of incorporation of a state bank, and the main office designated or provided for in the articles of association of a national bank, at such identified location as shall have been or as hereafter may be approved by the commissioner, in the case of a state bank, or by the appropriate federal regulatory agency, in the case of a national bank;
- “Merging bank” means a bank that is a party to a merger or an interstate merger transaction and that is not the resulting bank;
- “National bank” means a national banking association organized pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 21—215(b);
- “National trust company” means a company organized under the laws of the United States to conduct trust business and business incidental to trust business in this state or of which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by a bank holding company that also owns, directly or indirectly, an affiliated bank as defined in § 23-47-801 et seq.;
- “Order” means all or any part of the final disposition, whether affirmative, negative, injunctive, or declaratory in form, by the commissioner or the State Banking Board, of any matter other than the making of rules of general application;
- “Out-of-state bank” means a bank whose home state is any state other than Arkansas;
- “Out-of-state state-chartered bank” means any bank chartered under the laws of any state other than Arkansas;
- “Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, estate, limited liability company or other unincorporated association, or any other legal or commercial entity;
- “Predecessor financial institution” means a depository institution whose charter ceased to exist in connection with the purchase of its assets or the assumption of its liabilities by a successor bank;
- “Registered out-of-state bank” means an out-of-state bank that has a certificate of authority pursuant to the terms of § 23-48-1001 et seq.;
-
“Resulting bank” means:
- One (1) or more banks created from a merger or conversion; or
- The bank purchasing over fifty percent (50%) of the assets or assuming over fifty percent (50%) of the liabilities of another depository institution in a purchase or assumption transaction or an interstate merger transaction;
- “Safe deposit box” means a safe, box, or other receptacle for the safekeeping of property, that is located on a bank's premises and leased by the bank to a lessee;
- “Savings and loan association” means a corporation carrying on the business of a savings and loan association or a building and loan association under a charter issued by this state, or any federal savings association or federal savings bank which is chartered under federal law;
-
“State bank” means:
- A corporation created pursuant to either Acts 1913, No. 113, or Acts 1969, No. 179, or pursuant to any predecessor or successor act or acts of either of the foregoing, and existing and authorized under the laws of this state on May 30, 1997, to engage in a general commercial banking business; and
- A corporation organized under the provisions of this chapter and authorized thereunder to engage in a general commercial banking business; and
- “Subsidiary trust company” means a corporation organized under the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-27-101 et seq., and authorized by the commissioner pursuant to § 23-47-801 et seq. or the Bank Holding Company Subsidiary Trust Company Formation Act of 1989, § 23-32-1901 et seq. [repealed], to conduct trust business and business incidental to trust business in this state, of which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by a bank holding company that also owns, directly or indirectly, an affiliated bank as that term is defined in § 23-47-801 et seq.
- For the purposes of defining, “home state”, “host state”, “home state regulator”, “out-of-state bank”, and “out-of-state state-chartered bank”, the term “state” means any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, any territory of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Northern Marianas Islands.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 1; 1999, No. 113, § 1; 2003, No. 860, § 12; 2007, No. 170, §§ 3, 4; 2017, No. 426, § 11; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2517-2519.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The Office of Thrift Supervision referred to in this section was abolished by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203. The responsibilities of the former entity have been largely assumed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Publisher's Notes. Acts 1913, No. 113, referred to in this section, is codified as § 16-110-406. Acts 1969, No. 179, also referred to in this section, was codified as §§ 23-31-401 — 23-31-406 [repealed]. Former §§ 23-31-401 — 23-31-406 were repealed by Acts 1997, No. 89, § 3.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment deleted “provided that the charter of the bank selling its assets is surrendered as a part of the transaction” at the end of (25); in (36), redesignated the provisions as (A) and (B) and substituted “One (1) or more banks created from” for “the bank resulting from” in present (36)(A); and made related and stylistic changes.
The 2017 amendment repealed (a)(11).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(10) and (a)(16); and substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a)(16) twice, in (a)(17), and in (a)(30).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Annual Survey of Caselaw: Business Law, 27 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 593.
23-45-103. Effect on existing financial institutions.
- The charters of state banks existing at the time of the adoption of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 shall continue in full force and effect, and all financial institutions and, to the extent applicable, all national banks and national trust companies, shall hereafter be operated in accordance with the provisions of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, and other applicable law.
- Except as otherwise provided in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, the repeal of any provision of chapters 30-34 of this title at the time of adoption of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 shall not affect any right accrued or established, or any liability or penalty incurred, under such provision, prior to the repeal thereof.
- All powers granted in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 may be freely exercised by any financial institution to which such powers apply without the necessity of amending its articles of incorporation, unless such articles expressly prohibit the exercise of such powers.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-45-104. Unauthorized activity as a financial institution — Incorporation of industrial loan institutions prohibited — Individuals and partnerships not to transact general commercial banking business.
-
From and after May 31, 1997:
- It shall be unlawful for any person, by whatever name called, to do business as a bank within this state or to maintain any office in this state for the purpose of doing such business, except state banks, registered out-of-state banks, and national banks chartered to do business in this state;
-
- No certificate of incorporation for a new state bank in this state shall be issued, and no new state bank shall be permitted to engage in business within Arkansas except by permission of the Bank Commissioner and upon approval of an application for a new state bank charter by the commissioner and the State Banking Board.
- The issuance of the certificate shall be within the sole discretion of the commissioner and the board, and the giving of the permission shall be within the sole discretion of the commissioner;
- Whenever it shall appear to the commissioner that any person is conducting business as a state bank without authority, the commissioner may determine that the person is fully subject to the commissioner's supervisory and regulatory powers and to the provisions of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997;
- No new industrial loan institution shall be incorporated in this state; and
- No partnership or individual or other unincorporated person may lawfully transact a general commercial banking business in this state.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit or interfere with the operations of duly and lawfully organized savings and loan associations or credit unions qualified to do business in this state.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 2; 1997, No. 940, § 112.
A.C.R.C. Notes. As amended by Acts 1997, No. 940, subdivisions (a)(4) and (5) read as follows:
“(4) No new industrial loan institution shall be incorporated in this state after the effective date of the Arkansas Banking Code.
“(5) No partnership or individual, or other unincorporated person, may lawfully transact a general commercial banking business in this state after the effective date of the Arkansas Banking Code.”
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-45-105. Headings.
The headings and captions contained in this chapter are for convenience only, do not constitute any part of the statutes composing this code, and shall not be used in construing or interpreting the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-45-106. Rules of construction.
-
- Unless otherwise specifically indicated, and to the fullest extent permitted by the Arkansas Constitution, any reference in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 to an existing state or federal statute or regulation shall mean to the statute or regulation as it has been or may in the future be amended or supplemented.
- If in any case the construction is not constitutionally permissible, the reference shall mean to the statute or regulation as it existed on May 31, 1997.
-
Unless the context otherwise requires:
- Any reference in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 to “applicable law”, “existing law”, or similar references, shall encompass the laws of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the appropriate jurisdiction;
- Any reference in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 to the discretion of the Bank Commissioner shall mean the sole, uncontrolled discretion of the commissioner; and
- Any reference in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall also reference any successor thereof.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Chapter 46 State Bank Department and State Banking Board
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 becomes effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 408, § 24: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 become effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of those certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
Effective Dates. Acts 2003, No. 860, § 16: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the flow of development capital funds into and within the state has been and continues to be, insufficient to support the growth of businesses and infrastructure development; that as a result of the lack of available capital sources, the state has suffered economic losses because of the inability to compete with other states in providing capital resources for business and infrastructure development; that this legislation will stimulate the flow of private capital and long-term loan funds that are vital to the sound financing of businesses and will encourage growth, expansion, and modernization through the reinstatement of tax credits; that unless an adequate program to encourage private capital investment is undertaken, the state will suffer further irreparable loss as a result of the continued inability to support business and infrastructure development, and from the lost opportunities for economic expansion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be effective on July 1, 2003.”
23-46-101. Confidential records.
-
Notwithstanding the Freedom of Information Act of 1967, § 25-19-101 et seq., the following records of the State Bank Department shall be confidential and shall not be exhibited or revealed to the public except as stated in this section or in accordance with department rules:
- All examination reports filed with the department;
- All records disclosing information obtained from examinations;
- Investigations and reports revealing facts concerning a financial institution or the customers of a financial institution; and
- All personal financial statements submitted to the department for any purpose.
-
Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, records deemed confidential in accordance with this section may be disclosed, in the Bank Commissioner's discretion, as follows:
- Under a validly issued subpoena and in the interest of justice, the commissioner may waive the privilege created in this section and produce examination reports and other related documents under the provisions of a protective order entered by a court or administrative tribunal of competent jurisdiction when the order is designed to protect the confidential nature of the information so disclosed from public dissemination;
- Official orders of the department may be disclosed within the discretion of the commissioner if the commissioner makes a determination that such a disclosure would not give advantage to a competitor or adversely affect the safety and soundness of the financial institution; and
- To state and federal regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over financial institutions or entities engaging in financial activities, including, but not limited to, insurance and securities brokerage and underwriting.
- The commissioner shall have the power to promulgate rules with regard to disclosure of confidential information.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2001, No. 1056, § 1; 2003, No. 860, § 13; 2017, No. 426, § 12; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2520, 2521.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a)(3), substituted “or the customers of a financial institution” for “a capital development company, or the customers of these organizations”.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (a) and in (c).
Subchapter 2 — State Bank Department
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, No. 426, § 5: Mar. 22, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that there is an immediate and urgent need to provide for the acquisition and efficient means of financing adequate facilities for housing the operations of the State Bank Department; that the shortage of safe, efficient, modern, and environmentally safe facilities impedes the orderly operation of the department and threatens the essential governmental function of the department; that the continuation of these conditions is inimical to the health, safety, public morals, welfare, and economic security of the inhabitants of this state; and that these conditions can be remedied or alleviated through the powers and authority provided by this act. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall be effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2015 (1st Ex. Sess.), Nos. 7 and 8, § 153: July 1, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the Arkansas Building Authority, the Arkansas Science and Technology Authority, the Department of Rural Services, and the Division of Land Surveys of the Arkansas Agriculture Department are inefficiently structured; that this inefficient structuring causes an excessive and unnecessary cost to the taxpayers of the this state; and that this act is essential to alleviating that financial burden. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2015.”
Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-46-201. Creation of State Bank Department.
There is created and established, at the seat of government of this state, a department to be known as the “State Bank Department”. The State Bank Department shall be a division of the Department of Commerce.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 578.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment added “of State Bank Department” in the section heading; and added the second sentence.
23-46-202. [Repealed.]
A.C.R.C. Notes. This section was repealed by Acts 2019, No. 910, § 579. The repeal of this section by Acts 2019, No. 910, § 579, supersedes the amendment of this section by Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6253. Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6253, amended former subsection (b) to read as follows: “(b) The State Bank Department is authorized and empowered to obtain the necessary funds to accomplish the purposes stated in subsection (a) of this section from any source or sources necessary, including without limitation contracting with the Building Authority Division or the Arkansas Development Finance Authority to provide for the issuance of bonds under the State Agencies Facilities Acquisition Act of 1991, § 22-3-1401 et seq., or the Arkansas Development Finance Authority Act, § 15-5-101 et seq., § 15-5-201 et seq., and § 15-5-301 et seq.”
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning offices, was repealed by Acts 2019, No. 910, § 579, effective July 1, 2019. The section was derived from Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2007, No. 426, § 1; 2015 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 7, § 58; 2015 (1st Ex. Sess.), No. 8, § 58; 2019, No. 910, § 6253.
23-46-203. Seal — Evidentiary effect — Fees.
- An appropriate seal shall be procured to be the official seal for the State Bank Department.
- Every paper executed by the Bank Commissioner in pursuance of the authority conferred upon him or her by law and sealed with the seal of the department or certified by the department shall be received in evidence and recorded in the proper recording offices in the same manner as deeds regularly acknowledged.
-
- Whenever it is necessary for the commissioner to approve any instrument and to affix the official seal thereto, the commissioner shall charge a fee as provided by rule for affixing his or her approval and the official seal to the instrument.
- Copies of all records and papers in the office of the department certified by the commissioner and authenticated by the seal shall be received in evidence in all cases equally and of like effect as the originals thereof.
- Whenever it is proper to furnish a copy of any paper filed in the department and to certify that paper, the commissioner may charge a fee as provided by department rule.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2522.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c)(1) and (c)(3).
23-46-204. Bank Commissioner — Appointment and removal.
-
The Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a Bank Commissioner who shall:
- Be a resident of this state;
- Be at least thirty (30) years of age; and
- Have not less than five (5) years' experience either in practical banking or in the bank department of a state.
- The commissioner shall be the head of the State Bank Department and shall hold his or her office for the term of four (4) years beginning from the date of actual appointment by the Governor and expiring four (4) years from that date and until a successor is appointed.
- The commissioner may be removed by the Governor from office for neglect of duty, malfeasance, misfeasance, extortion or corruption in office, incompetency, or mental or physical disability to such an extreme as to render the commissioner unable or unfit for the discharge of his or her duties, or for any offense involving moral turpitude while in office committed under color of or connected with such an office.
- In the event there shall be an inability to serve in the office caused by death, suspension, removal, disability, disqualification, or resignation of the commissioner, a deputy commissioner previously designated by the commissioner shall exercise the powers and perform the duties of the commissioner until a successor is appointed by the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term fixed by law.
- The commissioner shall report to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 580.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment added (e).
23-46-205. Bank Commissioner — Powers and duties.
- The Bank Commissioner shall be charged with the general supervision of financial institutions, the execution of all laws passed by the State of Arkansas relating to the organization, operations, inspection, supervision, control, liquidation, and dissolution of banks, bank holding companies, subsidiary trust companies, and the general commercial banking business of Arkansas, and such other duties as prescribed by law.
-
- The commissioner shall have the power to issue such rules as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent and purposes of all those laws and to issue cease and desist orders against any financial institution, or an officer, director, or employee of any financial institution, found to be violating federal banking laws or regulations, violating the banking laws of this state or State Bank Department rules, violating any regulatory agreement, or jeopardizing the safety and soundness of any financial institution.
-
- The commissioner may issue rules only with the approval and consent of the State Banking Board, but he or she shall have the power to issue cease and desist orders upon his or her own motion.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to curtail the commissioner's power to issue emergency rules with the approval and consent of the board.
-
- Any person subject to a cease and desist order issued by the commissioner who refuses or fails to comply with the terms of the order may be assessed a monetary penalty for the failure to comply with the provisions of the cease and desist order after a ten-day notice given by the commissioner to the institution or person subject to the order.
- The amount of the monetary penalty shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day of violation against each institution and each officer, director, or employee contributing to the institution's or the individual's failure to comply with the provisions of the cease and desist order.
- Subject to such a limitation, the amount of the monetary penalty shall be determined by the commissioner.
-
The commissioner has grounds for and may issue a cease and desist order for the permanent or temporary removal of an officer, director, employee, agent, or any other person participating in the affairs of or otherwise connected with a financial institution, or any affiliate thereof, subject to the supervision of the commissioner from service to any institution or affiliate subject to the supervision of the commissioner if he or she is found by the commissioner to be or to have been:
- Violating state or federal law, rules and regulations of a federal financial institution's regulatory agency, or State Bank Department rules;
- Acting incompetently, recklessly, or dishonestly;
- Indicted of a crime involving moral turpitude; or
- Otherwise impairing the safety and soundness of the financial institution.
-
- Any person aggrieved and directly affected by an order of the commissioner issued pursuant to this section is entitled to judicial review.
- A person so aggrieved may seek judicial review by petition to a circuit court having jurisdiction in the matter.
- The petition must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the order.
- If no petition for review is filed within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the order, the order may not be appealed and is permanently binding upon the person until terminated by the commissioner.
- Department rules shall be distributed, in form and method selected by the commissioner, to all state banks chartered in the State of Arkansas.
-
In addition to other powers, the commissioner shall have the power and authority to:
- Inspect and copy all books, records, and other information relating to the financial institutions he or she regulates;
- Restrict withdrawal of deposits from state banks under extraordinary circumstances;
- Subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, require production of evidence, and administer oaths;
- Approve or disapprove applications for new state bank charters or branch facilities in connection with failed institutions as provided in § 23-48-511;
- Approve or disapprove applications for voluntary liquidations as provided in § 23-49-119;
- Define any term or phrase used in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 which is not defined by the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997;
- Issue orders or declaratory statements, disseminate information, and otherwise exercise discretion to effectuate the purposes of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 and all laws described in subsection (a) of this section, and to interpret and implement the provisions of those laws consistently with such purposes;
- Authorize state banks to engage in any banking activity in which national banks are authorized or may hereafter be authorized by federal legislation or regulations to engage;
- Cooperate with federal financial institutions' regulatory agencies;
-
- Perform preemployment state criminal background checks through the Division of Arkansas State Police and preemployment federal criminal background checks through the Federal Bureau of Investigation on all applicants selected for employment as examiners with the department.
- The federal background check shall include taking fingerprints of the applicant.
- The applicant shall sign a release authorizing the Division of Arkansas State Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to disclose criminal history information about the applicant to the department.
- The commissioner shall treat the information as confidential and shall disclose the information only to the applicant; and
-
Approve and execute on behalf of the department:
- An agreement issuing bonds under § 23-46-202; and
- Any documents necessary for issuing bonds under § 23-46-202.
-
- As soon as practicable after acceptance of any application referred to either in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 or in department rules for filing, regardless of whether the application is of a type referred to in § 23-46-403, and receipt of the filing fee therefor, the commissioner shall cause the merits of the application to be investigated.
- The investigation shall enable the commissioner to determine the fitness of the applicants and shall address all questions which bear directly or indirectly upon the appropriateness of granting the application and the need from the public standpoint for granting the application.
-
To the extent that the commissioner deems it appropriate, the scope of the commissioner's investigation of any application may include:
- The investigation of those matters described in § 23-48-304 pertaining to applications for new state bank charters; and
-
- The performance of state criminal background checks through the Division of Arkansas State Police and federal criminal background checks through the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
- The federal background check shall include the taking of fingerprints.
- The applicant shall sign a release authorizing the Division of Arkansas State Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to disclose criminal history information about the applicant to the department.
- The commissioner shall treat the information as confidential and shall disclose the information only to the applicant.
- The background checks shall be used to determine the applicant's fitness to participate in the affairs of a state bank.
- A criminal background check obtained under this section shall be destroyed by the commissioner within six (6) months of the commissioner's receipt of the background check.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2005, No. 1528, § 1; 2007, No. 426, § 2; 2019, No. 315, §§ 2523, 2524; 2019, No. 910, § 581.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment added (d)(11).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315, in (b)(1), deleted “and regulations” following the first occurrence of “rules”, and substituted the second occurrence of “rules” for “regulations”; deleted “or regulations” following “rules” in (b)(2)(A); deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b)(2)(B); and substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (b)(4)(A), (c), and (e)(1).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Division of Arkansas State Police” for “Department of Arkansas State Police” in (d)(10)(A) and (d)(10)(C).
23-46-206. Employment and duties of staff generally.
-
- The Bank Commissioner, in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, shall employ from time to time the assistants, examiners, clerks, stenographers, counsel, and other personnel as he or she may find necessary to properly and efficiently discharge the duties of his or her office.
- The commissioner shall be authorized to set minimum qualifications for these persons and to fix their levels of compensation within the limitations of the numbers of employees and the appropriations for their salaries as provided from time to time by acts of the General Assembly, provided he or she shall incur no expense until an appropriation shall have been made therefor nor in excess of the revenues of the State Bank Department.
- Counsel employed by the commissioner shall advise the commissioner in all legal matters affecting the State Bank Department.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of state law, and in order to maintain the confidentiality of information and the security of State Bank Department personnel in the performance of their duties, the commissioner shall be authorized to establish travel reimbursement guidelines for payment of expenses of State Bank Department personnel incurred in the performance of their duties.
- If the commissioner is not himself or herself at any time available for the transaction of any specific matter committed by law to his or her authority or discretion, any one of the deputy commissioners, or any other staff member so designated by the commissioner in writing, may transact such matter in the name and stead of the commissioner.
-
- The commissioner, each member of the State Banking Board, the deputy commissioners, chief examiners, counsel, each examiner, each accountant, each attorney, and each other officer, person, or employee, or both, of or for the State Bank Department shall not be personally liable for damages occasioned by his or her official acts or omissions, except when the acts or omissions are corrupt and malicious.
- The Attorney General shall defend any action brought against any of the above-mentioned persons by reason of his or her official acts or omissions, regardless of whether at the time of institution of the action the defendant has terminated his or her service with the State Bank Department.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 582.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment inserted “in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Commerce” in (a)(1); and substituted “State Bank Department” for “department” throughout (b), (c), and (e).
23-46-207. Interests in financial institutions prohibited.
-
- No employee or officer of the State Bank Department, or employee or officer of the Department of Commerce working within the State Bank Department, who participates in the examination of a financial institution, or who may be called upon to make an official decision or determination affecting the operation of a financial institution, shall be an officer, director, attorney, owner, or holder of stock in any state bank, registered out-of-state bank, or bank holding company which controls a state bank or a registered out-of-state bank, or receive, directly or indirectly, any payment or gratuity from any such organizations.
- A person subject to this section may not borrow money from a state bank or registered out-of-state bank which is an out-of-state state-chartered bank except as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
-
A person subject to this section may:
- Be a depositor in any financial institution that the department regulates and participate in such overdraft programs associated with such deposit relationships as the commissioner may, by rule, allow; and
- Purchase banking services, other than credit services, under rates and terms generally available to other customers of the financial institution.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 3; 2019, No. 315, § 2525; 2019, No. 910, § 583.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (b)(1).
The 2019 amendment by No. 910 inserted “or employee or officer of the Department of Commerce working within the State Bank Department” in (a)(1).
23-46-208. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning employee bonds, was repealed by Acts 2019, No. 910, § 584, effective July 1, 2019. The section was derived from Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-209. Records and financial reports — Disposition of funds.
- The Bank Commissioner shall keep a true and perfect record of all of the business of the State Bank Department and shall make monthly reports to the Auditor of State of all fees he or she collects.
- All fees and other revenues received by the department shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues and credited to the Bank Department Fund to be used solely for the payment of the expenses of the department pursuant to the appropriations therefor.
- Upon proper voucher from the commissioner, the Auditor of State shall issue the Auditor of State's warrant on the Treasurer of State in payment of all salaries and other expenses incurred in the administration of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2007, No. 426, § 3; 2019, No. 910, § 585.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment rewrote (a); inserted “not necessary for the payments required by subdivision (a)(2) of this section” following “department” in (b); and in (c), substituted “Upon proper voucher from the commissioner, the Auditor of State shall” for “The Auditor of State shall, upon proper voucher from the commissioner” and deleted “his” following “issue.”
The 2019 amendment redesignated (a)(1) as (a), and deleted (a)(2) and (a)(3); and deleted “not necessary for the payments required by subdivision (a)(2) of this section” preceding “shall be deposited” in (b).
23-46-210. Annual and biennial reports of Bank Commissioner.
- The Bank Commissioner shall make an annual report to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce of the work and the business of the State Bank Department, which shall embrace a statement of all receipts and expenditures and the name, officers, directors, domicile, capital, surplus, net profits, and deposits of each state bank, in the state, and such other information as the commissioner deems advisable.
- The commissioner shall also, biennially, make a detailed estimate of the expenses of the State Bank Department for the two (2) succeeding fiscal years.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 586.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Secretary of the Department of Commerce” for “Governor” in (a); and, in (b), substituted “The commissioner” for “He or she” and “State Bank Department” for “department”.
23-46-211. Retention of State Bank Department records.
-
The State Bank Department shall retain its general records for at least ten (10) years, with the following exceptions:
- Transcripts of hearings before the State Banking Board or the Bank Commissioner shall be retained for at least three (3) years;
- Applications submitted to the department shall be retained for at least three (3) years; and
- Articles of incorporation and amendments thereto and stock transfer certificates and approvals shall be retained permanently, except in cases in which the records concern a bank which has been merged, sold, or liquidated, in which cases the records shall be retained for at least five (5) years.
-
- In lieu of retention of the original records thereof, the department may cause any or all of its records and records held at any time in its custody to be photographed or otherwise reproduced in permanent form.
- Any photograph or other reproduction shall have the same force and effect as the original thereof and be admitted into evidence equally as with the original.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-212. Emergency powers of Bank Commissioner — Legislative findings and intent — Definitions.
-
The General Assembly:
- Finds that in the event of an emergency, the Bank Commissioner should be authorized to take appropriate action to expedite the recovery of a community affected by the emergency and to encourage banks to meet the credit, deposit, and other financial needs of the community; and
-
Intends by the enactment of this section to authorize the commissioner when warranted by a state of emergency to assist the affected community by:
- Declaring with the consent of the Governor a state of emergency;
- Temporarily modifying or suspending banking laws, regulations, or requirements; and
-
Taking any other action appropriate to assist affected banks so that:
- Customary banking services can continue to be provided; and
- Financial stability can be maintained.
-
As used in this section:
- “Affected area” means the geographic location described in a proclamation by the commissioner declaring a state of emergency;
- “Affected bank” means a bank with an office in the geographic location described in a proclamation by the commissioner declaring a state of emergency;
- “Office” means a physical location where a bank transacts business or conducts banking operations;
-
“Officer” means:
- A person designated by the board of directors, board of trustees, or other governing body of a bank to act for the bank under this section; or
-
The president or chief executive officer or other person in charge of an office if:
- A designation under subdivision (b)(4)(A) of this section has not been made; or
- An officer designated under subdivision (b)(4)(A) of this section is not available; and
-
-
“State of emergency” means a natural or man-made occurrence or condition that may:
- Affect the ability of a bank to conduct normal business operations; or
- Pose a threat to the safety or security of a person or property.
-
“State of emergency” includes without limitation an occurrence or condition caused by:
- A natural disaster;
- A tornado;
- A storm;
- A flood;
- High water;
- An earthquake;
- A drought;
- A fire;
- An act of war, rebellion, violent demonstration, or terrorism;
- A robbery of a bank or other financial institution; or
- A cyberattack on, or a cybersecurity breach of, a bank or other depository institution.
-
“State of emergency” means a natural or man-made occurrence or condition that may:
-
- In addition to any other law of this state or of the United States authorizing the closing of a bank or excusing the delay by a bank in the performance of its duties and obligations because of a situation or condition beyond the bank's control, the commissioner may with the Governor's consent declare by written proclamation that a state of emergency exists in all or part of the state.
-
The proclamation and any order issued under this section:
- Shall be published on the commissioner's website; and
- May be disseminated in any other manner deemed appropriate by the commissioner under the circumstances.
-
-
If the commissioner declares a state of emergency under this section, the commissioner may authorize an affected bank by written order to:
- Close an office within the affected area; and
- Keep the office closed for a reasonable amount of time until the office can be reopened.
-
A bank that closes an office under this section shall notify the commissioner as promptly as conditions permit by any means reasonably available of the:
- Reason for closing the office; and
- Expected length of time the office will be closed.
-
If an office is closed under this section:
- Each day that the office is closed shall be treated for banking purposes as a legal holiday; and
-
An affected bank or a director, officer, or employee of an affected bank shall not because the office is closed:
- Incur any liability; or
- Forfeit any legal or equitable rights.
-
If the commissioner declares a state of emergency under this section, the commissioner may authorize an affected bank by written order to:
-
-
- If the commissioner finds that an affected bank closed an office as a result of a state of emergency and that the opening of a temporary office by the affected bank will help meet the credit, deposit, and other financial needs of the customers of the affected area, the commissioner may authorize the affected bank by written order to open a temporary office either within the state or at a location in another state.
- The temporary office may be a mobile branch, temporary office space, or any other facility approved by the commissioner.
- The formal application process, requirements, and fees for opening a temporary office may be suspended when a state of emergency exists.
- A temporary office opened under this section may remain open until the commissioner with the consent of the Governor declares that the state of emergency no longer exists unless written permission to remain open is granted by the commissioner upon application by an affected bank to establish an office at the site of the temporary office.
-
-
- An order issued by the commissioner under this section becomes effective upon issuance and continues for one hundred twenty (120) days or unless terminated sooner by the commissioner.
- The commissioner may extend an order issued under this section for an additional period not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days if the commissioner with the consent of the Governor finds that the existing state of emergency continues or that a new state of emergency exists.
-
The commissioner may by rule:
- Adopt additional procedures to implement this section; and
- Impose sanctions under § 23-46-205 for a violation of this section.
History. Acts 2009, No. 233, § 1; 2017, No. 169, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment by No. 169 added (b)(5)(B)(xi).
The 2017 amendment by No. 198 inserted “or chief executive officer” in the introductory language of (b)(4)(B).
Subchapter 3 — State Banking Board
Effective Dates. Acts 2019, No. 910, § 6346(b): July 1, 2019. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act revises the duties of certain state entities; that this act establishes new departments of the state; that these revisions impact the expenses and operations of state government; and that the sections of this act other than the two uncodified sections of this act preceding the emergency clause titled ‘Funding and classification of cabinet-level department secretaries’ and ‘Transformation and Efficiencies Act transition team’ should become effective at the beginning of the fiscal year to allow for implementation of the new provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and Sections 1 through 6343 of this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on July 1, 2019”.
23-46-301. Creation — Members — Administration.
- There is created a commission which shall be known as the “State Banking Board”.
-
- The board shall be composed of six (6) members appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate, for terms of five (5) years or until a successor has been appointed and qualified.
-
- At the time of their appointment, all members of the board shall be, and shall continue thereafter to be, residents of the State of Arkansas.
- They shall be age thirty (30) or over.
- Board members serving on May 30, 1997, shall continue to serve the remainder of their terms.
-
-
- For purposes of filling vacancies on the board, members shall be numbered one (1) through six (6), inclusive.
-
- Three (3) members shall be designated banker members, two (2) members shall be designated public members, and one (1) member shall be designated as the representative of the elderly.
- A banker member is a person whose primary occupation is banking. A public member is a person whose primary occupation is outside the field of banking. The representative of the elderly shall be sixty (60) years of age or older and shall not be actively engaged in or retired from the occupation of banking.
- One (1) of the banker members shall be designated the State Bank Department member, and the other two (2) shall be designated the Arkansas Bankers Association members. These positions are to be determined by lot.
- On the occasion of a vacancy on the board of a department member, a successor shall be selected from among two (2) or more bankers whose names shall be supplied by the Bank Commissioner.
- On the occasion of a vacancy on the board of one (1) of the Arkansas Bankers Association banker members, a successor shall be appointed by the Governor after consulting the Arkansas Bankers Association, and the appointment shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate.
- The board shall consist of one (1) member from each of the four (4) congressional districts as prescribed in § 7-2-101 et seq., and two (2) members from the state at large, one (1) of whom shall be the representative of the elderly.
-
-
- No member of the board shall receive, directly or indirectly, any compensation or recompense for his or her services on the board.
- Notwithstanding § 25-16-901 et seq., should any member of the board live outside the capital city of the state, he or she may, upon application to the commissioner, be reimbursed out of the income of the office of the commissioner and in the manner provided by law for the actual travel and subsistence expense as may actually have been incurred by him or her in connection with attendance at any meeting of the board.
- The office of the commissioner shall be the office of the board.
- The board may select as its secretary, a deputy bank commissioner, or a stenographer employed in the office of the commissioner, but no compensation shall be paid to any person whatsoever for services rendered as secretary of the board.
-
- Except as provided in § 23-46-402, the presence at any meeting of at least four (4) members of the board shall be necessary to constitute a quorum, and the concurring votes of not less than a majority of the members present at any meeting shall be necessary to the decision of any question or issue or the authorization of any action.
- The representative of the elderly shall be a full voting member.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2015, No. 1100, § 56.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment, in (c)(3), substituted “appointed by the Governor after consulting” for “selected from among two (2) or more bankers whose names shall be supplied by” and added “and the appointment shall be subject to confirmation by the Senate”; and deleted “The Governor shall make the appointment of all successor board members from among those persons recommended as provided in this section, provided that” preceding “The board” in (c)(4).
23-46-302. Special State Banking Board members.
- When any member of the State Banking Board is disqualified for any reason to hear and participate in the determination of any matter pending before the board, the Governor shall appoint a qualified person to hear and participate in the decision on the particular matter.
- The special board member so appointed shall have all authority and responsibility of a regular board member with respect to the particular matter before the board but shall have no authority or responsibility with respect to any other matter before the board.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-303. Study of banking statutes.
The State Banking Board is authorized, at such times as it deems appropriate, to request a review or study of state banking law and to recommend any changes that it may deem appropriate to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 910, § 587.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “Secretary of the Department of Commerce” for “Governor”.
23-46-304. Powers of State Banking Board — Filings with Bank Commissioner.
-
In addition to all other powers conferred by Arkansas law, the State Banking Board shall have the power and duty to:
- Approve or disapprove all applications for charters for new state banks, except applications for new state bank charters in connection with failed institutions as provided in § 23-48-511;
- Approve or disapprove all applications for the merger or consolidation of one (1) or more banks, out-of-state banks, or savings and loan associations into a state bank;
- Approve or disapprove all applications for the purchase by one (1) state bank of over fifty percent (50%) of the assets of another depository institution, and all applications for the assumption by one (1) state bank of over fifty percent (50%) of the liabilities of another depository institution;
- Approve or disapprove all applications by a savings and loan association to convert to a state bank;
- Approve or disapprove all applications for amendments to the articles of incorporation of an existing state bank;
- Approve or disapprove all applications for the relocation of a state bank's main office from one (1) municipality to another;
- Approve or disapprove all rules promulgated by the Bank Commissioner;
- Authorize a state bank under circumstances in which it is not given authority under state law to participate in any public agency hereinafter created under the laws of this state or of the United States, the purpose of which is to afford advantages or safeguards to banks or trust companies, and to authorize compliance with all requirements and conditions imposed upon the participants;
- Subpoena witnesses; and
- Require such clerical and technical assistance as is necessary or appropriate to carry out its duties.
- Upon the submission to it by the commissioner of each application, the board shall review the results of the commissioner's investigation and make further investigation, if any, that it may deem appropriate to enable it to determine the fitness of the applicants, the need from the public standpoint for the granting of the application, and all other questions, whether or not of like kind with those referred to in this section, which bear directly or indirectly upon the need or desirability from the public standpoint for the granting of the application.
-
- Filing with the commissioner of any application or document required by the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 or by State Bank Department rules shall be public notice of the matters contained in that application or document.
- The commissioner shall maintain the applications or documents in his or her custody.
- Upon request, the commissioner shall provide verification of the filing and reasonable access to inspection by the public.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the prohibitions upon the disclosure of confidential information contained in § 23-46-101 or the commissioner's authority to issue rules concerning the disclosure of confidential information.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2526.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (c)(1) and (c)(4).
23-46-305. Applications.
- All applications which the State Banking Board is empowered to consider for approval or disapproval shall, as soon as practicable, be submitted by the Bank Commissioner to the board for consideration at a regular meeting of the board or at a special meeting called for the purpose thereof.
- Applications of the types described in § 23-46-304(a)(1)-(4) must demonstrate that the applicant has the minimum amount of capital that the commissioner may require.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 4 — Proceedings Before State Banking Board and Bank Commissioner
23-46-401. Applicability.
Nothing in this subchapter is intended to have any application to:
- A merger under which a state bank merges into a national bank which is an Arkansas bank;
- Any consolidation proceeding under which a state bank becomes consolidated into a national bank which is an Arkansas bank; or
- Any proceeding under which a state bank is converted into a national bank or a national bank is converted into a state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 5.
23-46-402. Meetings of board — Notice.
-
- The Chair of the State Banking Board or the Bank Commissioner may call a special meeting of the board upon notice through a personal communication with each member of the board by telephone or through a written notice transmitted by ordinary, certified, or registered mail, personal delivery, overnight delivery, or telefacsimile directed to each member of the board at his or her business or residence address as shown on the records of the board.
- The records of the State Bank Department shall affirmatively reflect the time and manner in which the meeting was called and notice thereof given.
- The board members may waive any notice of a special meeting by signing a written consent to the holding of the meeting or by appearing at the meeting and participating therein.
- In the instances in which notice of a special meeting is not waived by the board members, the notice shall be given to the board members at least fourteen (14) days before the meeting.
-
- If at any time it is impossible for the commissioner or the chair to give notice of a meeting to board members because of the death, disability, or absence from the state of the members, a meeting of the board may be called by notice given to the members who are available.
- In this event, the unanimous action of three (3) of the members who were so served with notice shall be the action of the board.
- This rule shall also be applicable in situations in which, under subsection (g) of this section, the board is permitted to act informally without a fixed meeting.
- The board may also hold regular meetings on dates fixed in its procedures, policies, and rules.
-
- The board may permit any or all of its members to participate in a regular or special meeting by, or conduct the meeting through the use of, any means of communication by which all members participating may simultaneously hear each other during the meeting.
- A member participating in a meeting by this means is deemed to be present in person at the meeting.
-
- Matters other than applications described in § 23-46-403 requiring the board's consideration and which are not contested may, in the commissioner's discretion, be considered by the board through mailing or delivering of all necessary documents and correspondence to all board members, no formal meeting being necessary.
- Applications submitted to the board according to this procedure must be filed with the commissioner for at least three (3) days prior to submission to the board with no protest’s having been filed.
- Where the application is thus submitted, the written approval or disapproval endorsed upon the application, or a copy thereof, and transmitted to the commissioner by at least four (4) members of the board shall represent the action of the board.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2527.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (e).
23-46-403. Applications.
When any of the following applications are filed with the Bank Commissioner, the sponsors of the applications shall give notice of filing in accordance with State Bank Department rules:
- An application for the issuance of a new state bank charter;
- An application for the merger or consolidation of one (1) or more banks into a state bank;
- An application for the merger or consolidation of one (1) or more savings and loan associations into a state bank;
- An application for the purchase by one (1) state bank of greater than fifty percent (50%) of the assets of another depository institution or an application for the assumption by one (1) state bank of greater than fifty percent (50%) of the liabilities of another depository institution; or
- An application for the change of a state bank's place of business from one municipality to another.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 113, § 2; 2001, No. 63, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2528.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The 1999 amendment to this section deleted all references to applications previously listed in this section.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
23-46-404. Applications fees — Bank Commissioner's rules.
- The State Banking Board shall have the power to set and impose fees for any and all applications, regardless of whether the applications are of a type described in § 23-46-403, which are reasonably calculated to defray the costs associated with the consideration, investigation, and processing of those applications.
-
- The Bank Commissioner may issue rules specifying the circumstances under which any application must be filed and the procedural and substantive requirements governing the filing of any and all applications of whatever type.
- The commissioner may also issue rules requiring the submission of applications that are not described in the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2529.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the section heading; and deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in (b)(1) and (b)(2).
23-46-405. Investigation — Notice of hearing.
- When the departmental investigation pursuant to § 23-46-205 or § 23-48-304 is closed and the application fees have been paid, an application filed pursuant to § 23-46-403 shall be referred to the State Banking Board for consideration by it and the Bank Commissioner at a public hearing.
-
Notice of the time, place, and purpose of the meeting shall be given at least thirty (30) days before the hearing as follows:
- By letter from the commissioner to the sponsors of the application and to any protestant that has filed an official written protest to the application; and
- By release to news media.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 113, § 3.
23-46-406. Hearing.
-
- No person shall appear in opposition to the application unless the person has filed a written protest to the application within fifteen (15) days after the actual filing of the application.
- The protest must be accompanied by a filing fee of not less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each protestant, such amount to be set by State Bank Department rule.
- At the hearing all persons sponsoring the application and any person making a timely written protest against the application may appear. The attorneys for any such person may appear and be heard.
- The Bank Commissioner will participate with the State Banking Board in the hearing.
- The board or the commissioner may subpoena witnesses on their own motion or on the request of any party to the proceedings.
-
- The admission of evidence at the hearing shall be controlled by § 25-15-213. The parties shall have the right to cross-examine witnesses.
- Official notice may be taken of judicially cognizable facts and of generally recognized technical or scientific facts within the board's specialized knowledge.
- The parties may bind themselves by stipulation.
- The applicant shall be responsible for procuring and paying for a verbatim record of the proceeding. It will be the duty of the applicant to furnish at least one (1) copy of the transcript to the commissioner free of charge.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 113, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2530.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(2).
23-46-407. Decision — Judicial review.
- The State Banking Board shall render its decision in writing at or after a hearing before it, which decision shall include the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
-
- If the application is approved by the board, the Bank Commissioner may, in the event that he or she also shall approve the application, grant the relief sought.
- If the commissioner does not concur in the board's grant of the application, the relief sought shall not be granted, and the commissioner's written decision stating his or her reasons for not concurring shall be attached to the copy of the board's decision and shall be mailed to each person who actively appeared and participated in the hearing.
- If the board shall disapprove the application, the commissioner shall not grant the relief sought.
-
-
- The time for filing a petition for judicial review under the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., shall run from the date the final decision of the board is mailed or delivered in written form to the parties desiring to appeal.
- The hearing of the petition for review will be advanced on the docket of each reviewing court as a matter of public interest.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 5 — Reports and Examinations
Effective Dates. Acts 2017, No. 507, § 2: Mar. 15, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that to enhance economic development, the Bank Commissioner needs to examine financial entities in Arkansas; and that this act is immediately necessary because of the need to take advantage of any opportunities that may be encouraged by the enhanced economic development created as a result of the examinations. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-46-501. Call for reports.
The Bank Commissioner shall have power to call for reports from state banks and subsidiary trust companies whenever deemed necessary, in order to obtain a full and complete knowledge of their condition or the status of their reserves, but he or she shall call upon each of them for at least two (2) reports each year.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-502. Statement on call.
- Every state bank and subsidiary trust company operating under the supervision of the Bank Commissioner shall make to the commissioner, whenever required by him or her, a statement of its assets and liabilities as shown by its records at the close of business on the day designated, which day shall be prior to the call of the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall not give notice to any person whomsoever of the date on which he or she will call for the statement.
- The reports shall be verified by the institution's president or chief executive officer or a vice president and shall be attested by at least two (2) directors.
-
- The reports required by this section shall embrace the amount of paid-up capital, surplus, net undivided profits, deposits, and all other liabilities of whatsoever character.
-
- It shall also state the amount loaned upon real estate, notes, bills of exchange, overdrafts, bonds, and other securities, stating the actual market value of the bonds or securities, the amount invested in real estate for banking premises, other real estate owned, when and how acquired, and the actual cost, cash on hand and on deposit in other banks, subject to check, with the amount and character of all other assets, together with such other information as the commissioner may require.
- Any commercial or other unsecured paper past due twelve (12) months on which the interest is unpaid and not in process of collection shall not be included as an asset in the report.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 2.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “or chief executive officer or a vice president and shall be attested by at least two (2) directors” for “or a vice president, and in addition thereto, shall be attested by not fewer than two (2) directors” in (c).
23-46-503. When examinations made.
- The Bank Commissioner shall, as often as may be deemed necessary or proper, appoint suitable persons to make an examination of each state bank or subsidiary trust company.
-
- A thorough examination into the affairs of each state bank or subsidiary trust company shall be made at least once every twenty-four-month period. Provided, however, the twenty-four-month period may be extended to a thirty-six-month period if an interim thorough examination is performed by the state bank's or subsidiary trust company's primary federal regulatory authority.
- The commissioner may authorize examinations at more frequent intervals if he or she shall deem it proper.
-
- The commissioner shall direct the State Bank Department to make an annual examination into the affairs of nonprofit corporations that have registered with the commissioner to be a regulated economic development enterprise under this subsection and that registration has been approved by the State Banking Board.
-
A nonprofit corporation electing to be a regulated economic development enterprise shall certify in its registration to the commissioner that the nonprofit corporation:
- Was previously registered under the Arkansas Development Finance Corporation Act, § 15-4-901 et seq. [repealed];
- Is a domestic nonprofit corporation with a total equity of the nonprofit corporation and any subsidiaries exceeding five million dollars ($5,000,000);
- Provides financing for the promotion, development, and conduct of Arkansas business;
- Together with any of its subsidiaries, has loan receivables that exceed fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000); and
- Shall provide reasonable cooperation and assistance to the department during an examination.
-
- A regulated economic development enterprise registered under this subsection shall pay to the department, within ten (10) days after notice from the commissioner in the months of January and July of each year, an assessment fee in accordance with an assessment fee schedule approved by the commissioner.
- The commissioner, with the approval of the board, shall also have the authority to establish a schedule of fees to be charged by the department relative to registrations which are reviewed by the department, as well as a schedule of other fees to be charged for service performed by the department.
- The assessments may be increased if not sufficient in connection with other fees received as mentioned in this section to defray the expenses of the department.
-
- The commissioner shall be charged with the general supervision of regulated economic development enterprises, with the power to issue cease-and-desist orders against any regulated economic development enterprise, or an officer, director, or employee of a regulated economic development enterprise, found to be violating state or federal law, rules, or regulations of a federal regulatory agency, violating any regulatory agreement, or jeopardizing the safety and soundness of the regulated economic development enterprise.
-
The commissioner has grounds for and may issue a cease-and-desist order for the permanent or temporary removal of an officer, director, employee, agent, or any other person participating in the affairs of or otherwise connected with a regulated economic development enterprise, or any affiliate thereof, if he or she is found by the commissioner to be or to have been:
- Violating state or federal law, rules and regulations of a federal regulatory agency, or department rules;
- Acting incompetently, recklessly, or dishonestly;
- Indicted of a crime involving moral turpitude; or
- Otherwise impairing the safety and soundness of the regulated economic development enterprise.
-
- A person who is subject to a cease-and-desist order issued by the commissioner who refuses or fails to comply with the terms of the order may be assessed a monetary penalty for the failure to comply with the cease-and-desist order after a ten-day notice given by the commissioner to the regulated economic development enterprise or person who is subject to the order.
- The amount of the monetary penalty shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day of the violation against each regulated economic development enterprise and each officer, director, or employee contributing to the regulated economic development enterprise's or the person's failure to comply with the cease-and-desist order.
- Subject to the limitation described in subdivision (c)(4)(C)(ii) of this section, the amount of the monetary penalty shall be determined by the commissioner.
-
The commissioner may revoke a nonprofit corporation's status as a regulated economic development enterprise under this subsection if the commissioner determines, after examination and investigation, that the regulated economic development enterprise:
- Is or has been violating state or federal law;
- Is violating the rules and regulations of a federal regulatory agency;
- Fails to meet the minimum equity requirements under subdivision (c)(2) of this section; or
- Is operating or has been operated in a manner that jeopardizes the safety and soundness of the regulated economic development enterprise.
-
- The commissioner shall have the power to issue such rules as may be necessary or appropriate with the approval and consent of the board.
- This section shall not be construed to curtail the commissioner's power to issue emergency rules with the approval and consent of the board.
-
In addition to other powers under this section, the commissioner shall have the power and authority to:
- Inspect and copy all books, records, and other information relating to a regulated economic development enterprise; and
- Subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, require production of evidence, and administer oaths.
-
- A person or regulated economic development enterprise aggrieved and directly affected by an order of the commissioner issued under this subsection is entitled to judicial review.
- A person or regulated economic development enterprise may seek judicial review by petition to a circuit court of competent jurisdiction.
- The petition shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the order.
- If a petition is not filed within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the order, the order shall not be appealed and is permanently binding upon the person until terminated by the commissioner.
- A nonprofit corporation that is registered as a regulated economic development enterprise, that is in compliance with federal and state laws, rules, and regulations, and that does not have any regulatory proceeding pending against it may withdraw its registration as a regulated economic development enterprise.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 507, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2531.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added (c).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (c)(4)(B)(i).
23-46-504. Examination of affiliates.
The Bank Commissioner may make at any time, and from time to time, such examinations of the affairs of affiliates of state banks or of affiliates of subsidiary trust companies as shall be necessary to disclose fully the relations between the state banks and their affiliates or between the subsidiary trust companies and their affiliates, and the effect of those relations on the affairs of the state banks or subsidiary trust companies.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-505. Noncompliance with banking law — Special examinations.
Whenever it shall come to the knowledge of the Bank Commissioner that any state bank or subsidiary trust company has failed or refused to comply with any of the provisions of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, with any provision of federal law or federal regulations applicable to financial institutions, with any State Bank Department rules, or with any direction of the commissioner made specifically to that state bank or subsidiary trust company as a result of an examination into its affairs, he or she is authorized, as a penalty for that failure or refusal, to make a special examination of the state bank or subsidiary trust company, to charge and collect the same fees therefor as for a regular examination, and to continue such examinations and charges at intervals of thirty (30) days or less until such provisions, regulations, rules, and directions are complied with.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2532.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “State Bank Department rules” for “department regulations”, and inserted the second occurrence of “rules”.
23-46-506. Examination procedure.
- The Bank Commissioner or any examiner appointed by him or her shall have power to make a thorough examination of all the records and affairs of any state bank, any Arkansas bank holding company, or any subsidiary trust company.
-
- In making examinations, the representative of the State Bank Department may examine under oath any stockholder, director, officer, agent, clerk, or other employee or representative of the state bank, Arkansas bank holding company, or subsidiary trust company, or any other person, touching the matters he or he may be authorized to inquire and examine into.
-
- He or she may subpoena and, by attachment, compel the attendance of any person in this state to testify under oath before him or her in relation to the affairs of the state bank, Arkansas bank holding company, or subsidiary trust company.
- All witnesses who appear in obedience to a subpoena shall be entitled to and shall receive the same per diem fees and mileage as witnesses in civil cases in the circuit courts of this state.
-
- The representative of the department making the examination shall make a detailed report of the financial institution so examined, which report shall be filed in the office of the commissioner.
- All comments or criticisms contained in each report shall be presented to the board of directors by the management of the financial institution so examined promptly after receipt thereof.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-507. Information furnished state or federal agencies.
- The Bank Commissioner may share with or furnish to any state or federal examiner or regulatory agency with jurisdiction over any financial institution or other entity conducting financial activities, including, but not limited to, insurance or securities brokerage or underwriting, copies of any or all examinations or any information with reference to the condition of the affairs of any state bank, subsidiary trust company, or other institution which the State Bank Department regulates.
- The commissioner is authorized to enter into cooperative arrangements with state and federal regulatory agencies to achieve the purposes of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2001, No. 1056, § 2.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-46-508. Noncooperation with examiners.
-
The Bank Commissioner may revoke a state bank's or subsidiary trust company's authority to transact business and may proceed to wind up its business whenever any officer of the state bank or subsidiary trust company:
- Refuses to submit the books, papers, and effects thereof to the inspection of the commissioner or examiners;
- In any manner obstructs or interferes with the commissioner, or examiner, in the discharge of his or her duties; or
- Refuses to be examined on oath touching the affairs of the financial institution.
- The commissioner may issue a cease and desist order whenever an officer of any financial institution acts in any manner described in subsections (a)(1)-(3) of this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-509. Assessment fees, application fees, and other department fees.
- Every state bank and subsidiary trust company shall pay to the State Bank Department, within ten (10) days after notice from the Bank Commissioner in the months of January and July of each year, an assessment fee which will be charged in accordance with an assessment fee schedule approved by the commissioner.
- The commissioner, with the approval of the State Banking Board, shall also have the authority to establish a schedule of fees to be charged by the department relative to applications which are reviewed by the department, as well as a schedule of other fees to be charged for service performed by the department.
- For each examination made in excess of two (2) per year, the state bank or subsidiary trust company so examined shall pay an additional assessment equal to the January assessment of the year in which the excess examination is made.
-
- The assessments provided for in this section may be reduced by the commissioner if the assessments, with other fees received by the department, produce a greater sum than is required to pay the expenses of the department.
- The assessments may be increased if not sufficient in connection with other fees received as aforesaid to defray the expenses of the department.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-510. Failure to make report or pay fees — Penalty.
- Any financial institution that refuses or fails, for thirty (30) days after notice from the Bank Commissioner, to make any report to the commissioner, or fails to pay any fees for ten (10) days after the date of notice by the commissioner, shall be given an additional notice through personal service or by letter from such person of the office of the commissioner as the commissioner may designate.
-
- If the failure continues for ten (10) days after the receipt of the additional notice, then the commissioner may assess a monetary penalty against the financial institution for each separate failure or refusal of one hundred dollars ($100) each day for the first thirty (30) days after receiving the notice of delinquency from the commissioner and one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day of violation for every day thereafter.
- Alternatively, in the case of a state bank or subsidiary trust company, if the failure continues for ten (10) days after the receipt of the additional notice, the commissioner may take charge of the state bank or subsidiary trust company, as provided in case of insolvency.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-46-511. Retention of records.
- Every state bank or subsidiary trust company shall retain its business records for periods that are or may be prescribed by or in accordance with the terms of this section.
- Each state bank or subsidiary trust company shall retain permanently the minute books of meetings of its stockholders and directors, its capital stock ledger and capital stock certificate ledger or stubs, and all records which the Bank Commissioner and the State Banking Board shall, in accordance with the terms of this section, require to be retained permanently.
- All records other than those described in subsection (b) of this section shall be retained for periods that the commissioner and board, in accordance with the terms of this section, shall prescribe.
- The commissioner shall issue rules, with the approval of the board, prescribing the period for which records must be maintained. The periods may be permanent or for a term of years.
- Any state bank or subsidiary trust company may dispose of any records which have been retained for the period prescribed in accordance with the terms of this section and shall, after it has disposed of a record, thereafter be under no duty to produce the record in any action or proceeding.
-
- In lieu of retention of the original records, any state bank or subsidiary trust company may cause any or all of its records, and records held at any time in its custody, including those held by it as a fiduciary, to be photographed or otherwise reproduced in permanent form.
- Any photograph or other reproduction shall have the same force and effect as the original thereof and be admitted into evidence equally as with the original.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2534.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (d).
23-46-512. Changes in chief executive officer and directors.
Every financial institution shall report promptly to the Bank Commissioner any change for whatever reason in the chief executive officer and directors, including in its report a statement of the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief executive officer and directors.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 6 — Examination of Technology Service Providers Act
Effective Dates. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 2: Mar. 24, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the connections between banks and technology service providers create unknown risks to the financial system as banks are increasingly reliant on third parties to provide everyday services or enable access to key banking functions; that because of the vital role technology service providers play in the safety and soundness of banks and the stability of the financial system, it is imperative for bank supervisory agencies to examine technology service providers because a significant disruption affecting a single technology service provider could have an adverse impact on a large number of banks; and that this act is immediately necessary because it provides the requisite legal authority for bank supervisory agencies to examine technology service providers that provide covered services to banks. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-46-601. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Examination of Technology Service Providers Act”.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-602. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Bank supervisory agency” means the same as defined in § 23-45-102;
-
- “Covered service” means a service provided by a technology service provider to a depository institution in this state to the extent that the service is designed and marketed specifically for use by depository institutions to provide financial services to their customers.
-
“Covered service” includes:
- Data processing services;
- Activities that support financial services, including without limitation lending, funds transfer, fiduciary activities, trading activities, and deposit-taking;
- Internet-related services, including without limitation web services, electronic bill payments, mobile applications, system and software development and maintenance, and security monitoring; and
- Activities related to the business of banking;
- “Depository institution” means an entity or financial institution as defined in § 23-45-102(a)(19) or § 23-45-102(a)(21), including any subsidiary or affiliate of the depository institution that is subject to examination by the Bank Commissioner;
- “Internet service provider” means any provider that provides a subscriber with access to the internet; and
-
- “Technology service provider” means a person, company, corporation, or other legal entity that provides a covered service.
-
“Technology service provider” does not mean:
- An internet service provider or a general audience internet platform;
- A person, company, corporation, or other legal entity licensed under the Uniform Money Services Act, § 23-55-101 et seq.; or
- An authorized delegate of a licensee under the Uniform Money Services Act, § 23-55-101 et seq.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-603. Technology service providers subject to examination by Bank Commissioner.
When a depository institution receives a covered service, by contract or otherwise, the performance of that service by a technology service provider to the depository institution is subject to examination by the Bank Commissioner to the same extent as if the covered service were performed by the depository institution itself.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-604. Authorization for agreements with bank supervisory agencies regarding use of examiners.
The Bank Commissioner may enter into agreements with any bank supervisory agency that has jurisdiction over a technology service provider to:
- Engage the services of the bank supervisory agency's examiners at a reasonable rate of compensation; or
- Provide the services of the State Bank Department's examiners to the bank supervisory agency at a reasonable rate of compensation.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-605. Authorization for joint examinations or joint enforcement actions with bank supervisory agencies.
The Bank Commissioner may enter into joint examinations or joint enforcement actions with a bank supervisory agency having jurisdiction over a technology service provider.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-606. Acceptance of examinations from bank supervisory agency.
The Bank Commissioner may accept an examination that is conducted by a bank supervisory agency that has jurisdiction over a technology service provider as a substitution for an examination under this subchapter.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
23-46-607. Enforcement — Rules.
The Bank Commissioner may by rule:
- Adopt additional procedures to implement this subchapter; and
- Impose sanctions under § 23-46-205 for violations of this subchapter by a technology service provider if the commissioner considers the enforcement action to be necessary or appropriate to enforce this subchapter and ensure compliance with the laws of this state.
History. Acts 2017, No. 646, § 1.
Chapter 47 Bank Powers — Subsidiaries
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 becomes effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Subchapter 1 — Powers Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 2003, No. 860, § 16: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the flow of development capital funds into and within the state has been and continues to be, insufficient to support the growth of businesses and infrastructure development; that as a result of the lack of available capital sources, the state has suffered economic losses because of the inability to compete with other states in providing capital resources for business and infrastructure development; that this legislation will stimulate the flow of private capital and long-term loan funds that are vital to the sound financing of businesses and will encourage growth, expansion, and modernization through the reinstatement of tax credits; that unless an adequate program to encourage private capital investment is undertaken, the state will suffer further irreparable loss as a result of the continued inability to support business and infrastructure development, and from the lost opportunities for economic expansion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be effective on July 1, 2003.”
Acts 2017, No. 548, § 11: Mar. 21, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the efficient operation of state banks and bank holding companies doing business in Arkansas is a critical need for Arkansas and the banking and financial institutions industry operating under state law; that the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 does not currently allow a state bank in Arkansas to pursue efficient operations and regulatory cost savings under state law through a merger transaction with a wholly owned subsidiary bank of an Arkansas bank holding company that results in the subsidiary bank as the surviving entity of the merger transaction; and that this act is immediately necessary because it is critical that the provisions of this act become effective as soon as possible to encourage efficiency and regulatory costs savings to banks and financial institutions operating in Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-47-101. Powers of state banks generally.
-
Subject to any State Bank Department rule and consistent with any restrictions imposed by the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, each state bank shall, unless it shall be determined to be unsafe and unsound by the Bank Commissioner, and without specific mention thereof in its articles of incorporation, have the following powers and be permitted, in addition to other powers conferred upon it by other provisions of law:
- To receive by any means money for deposit and to provide by its rules or by agreement for the terms of withdrawal and payment of interest thereon pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-201 et seq.;
- To receive by any means money for transmission to another person and to transmit money by any means to another person;
- To buy, sell, and exchange coin and bullion;
- To buy, sell, and exchange bonds and certificates of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by the United States, its agencies and instrumentalities thereof, the State of Arkansas or of any other state, or of any city, county, school district, or other municipal corporation, improvement district, public facilities board, or other agencies or instrumentalities of such state or states;
- To purchase and sell securities, other than bonds and certificates of indebtedness described in subdivision (a)(4) of this section, and stock without recourse, solely upon the order and for the account of customers and other persons, and in no case for its own account;
- To purchase, sell, and exchange for its own account securities pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-401;
- To lend money, either without security or upon the security that the bank may require, pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-501 et seq.;
- To issue capital notes, with or without conversion features, with the prior written approval of the commissioner, and to otherwise become indebted to other persons through other types of obligations, including purchase money obligations, leases, Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank advances, federal funds transactions, and securities repurchase agreements, all without limitations on interest rates and term;
- To have such amounts of authorized but unissued stock as it may deem appropriate;
- To purchase insurance, including key-man insurance, and to establish employee and director benefit plans including, without limitation, stock options and stock purchase and compensation plans;
- To own and lease personal property acquired upon the specific request and for the use of a customer and to incur obligations incident thereto, the lease obligation to be subject to borrower loan limits and to a schedule of periodic regular rental payments that shall be consistent with a timely recovery by the bank of its cost for the leased property;
-
To make contributions to or for the benefit of the following:
- The United States, any state, territory, or political subdivision thereof, the District of Columbia, or any possession of the United States, for exclusively public purposes;
- A corporation, foundation, trust, community chest, or other organization created or organized in the United States, or any state or territory, or the District of Columbia, or any possession of the United States, exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, veteran rehabilitation service, civic enterprise, literary or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, and no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation; or
- Other lawful expenditures, contributions, and donations, to the extent authorized, approved, or ratified by action of the board of directors of the bank, except as otherwise specifically provided or limited by its articles of incorporation, its bylaws, or by resolution adopted by its stockholders;
- To service loans made by it or by others, whether or not held by the bank;
- To warehouse or act as agent in warehousing mortgages and other loans;
- With the prior approval of the commissioner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed by the commissioner, to provide messenger service between the bank and its customers;
- To engage in any activities which are a part of the business of banking or incidental thereto by means of an operating subsidiary pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-601;
- To invest in bank service companies pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-603;
- [Repealed.]
- To invest in a community development company pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-605;
- To invest in small business investment companies and minority enterprise small business investment companies as defined by the Arkansas Development Finance Authority Small Business Act of 1989, § 15-5-701 et seq., pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-606;
- To invest in corporations organized under the Edge Act, pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-607;
- To operate a travel agency;
- To engage in leasing real property;
- To act as escrow agent and closing agent;
- To act as a fiscal or transfer agent, assignee, receiver, and depository;
- To act as an executor, administrator, trustee, or other fiduciary pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-701 et seq.;
- To guaranty signatures;
- To provide third-party payment services;
- To issue, advise, and confirm letters of credit;
- To act as an agent to collect checks, drafts, and other items of commercial paper, to become a member of a clearing house, and to grant security interests in its assets for its qualification therein;
- To receive property as custodian for safekeeping;
- To lease safe-deposit boxes pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-901 et seq.;
- To enter into agreements to provide for losses arising from the cancellation of outstanding loans upon the death of borrowers;
- Through a separate subsidiary, to act as agent in the sale of title insurance and perform title searches and other abstractor services;
- To invest in clearing corporations and banker's banks;
- To invest in bank premises real estate pursuant to the provisions of § 23-47-103; and
- To acquire, develop, and dispose of real estate through foreclosure or in lieu of foreclosure of debts previously contracted in the ordinary course of its banking business, including single-family lots and single-family residences consisting of one (1) through four (4) family units.
- In addition to the foregoing, a state bank may exercise any other powers which are incidental to the business of banking.
- In addition to the powers conferred upon state banks under this or any other law of this state, upon action of the commissioner authorizing state banks to undertake such activities, a state bank may engage in any banking activities in which state banks could engage were they acting as national banks at the time such authority is granted.
-
- If a state bank or bank holding company is located in a town with a population of fewer than two thousand five hundred (2,500) people according to the latest federal decennial census, the bank or bank holding company may acquire, purchase, or construct a dwelling for use as the residence of the bank's or bank holding company's chief executive officer as part of his or her compensation.
- The expenditure for the dwelling shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000).
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2003, No. 860, § 14; 2017, No. 426, § 13; 2019, No. 315, § 2535.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment repealed (a)(18).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (a).
U.S. Code. The Edge Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.
23-47-102. Acquisition and disposition of own stock.
- No state bank shall be the purchaser or holder of its own capital stock, unless such security or purchase shall be necessary to prevent loss upon a debt previously contracted in good faith.
- Stock so purchased or acquired shall be sold or disposed of as expeditiously as possible within twenty-four (24) months of its purchase or acquisition. After the expiration of twenty-four (24) months, any such stock shall not be considered as part of the assets of the state bank.
-
This section does not apply to:
- The payment by a state bank of the value of shares held by shareholders dissenting from any proposed merger, consolidation, purchase or assumption, or other reorganization involving a plan of exchange of any of the stock of the state bank, who perfect their statutory rights as dissenting shareholders; or
- The repurchase by a state bank of its shares of capital stock if the state bank is required to file reports under section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017, or has a class of equity securities registered under section 12(b) or section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017, when the terms of the repurchase, or any repurchase plan or program, has been approved by the Bank Commissioner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 1.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated former (c) as the present introductory language of (c) and (c)(1); substituted “This section does not apply” for “The provisions of this section shall not apply” in the introductory language of (c); and added (c)(2).
U.S. Code. Sections 12, 13, and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, are codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78l, 15 U.S.C. § 78m, and 15 U.S.C. § 78o, respectively.
23-47-103. Acquisition of bank premises.
- A state bank or subsidiary trust company, acting with the prior approval of the Bank Commissioner, may acquire bank premises to be used, occupied, or owned by it.
-
- Any state bank acting with the prior approval of the commissioner may cause the title to its bank premises, now owned or at any time hereafter acquired by the bank to be held by a subsidiary corporation which shall be wholly owned by the bank.
- A state bank having such a subsidiary may rent the bank premises or any portion thereof from the subsidiary or acquire the title to the premises by purchase from the subsidiary or through its liquidation under such terms and conditions as may be approved by the commissioner.
- A state bank may with the prior approval of the commissioner invest in bank premises or in the stock, bonds, debentures, or other obligations of the subsidiary owning the bank premises, or make loans to, or upon the security of the stock of the subsidiary, if the aggregate of all such investments or loans, together with the amount of any indebtedness incurred by the subsidiary, will not exceed one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the capital base of the state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 112, § 1.
23-47-104. Prohibition on engaging in business as real estate salespersons or brokers.
Banks, bank holding companies, and subsidiaries of banks or bank holding companies may not engage in business as real estate salespersons or brokers.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 2 — Deposits
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, No. 586, § 5: June 1, 2015. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that an account holder of a deposit account may only designate a natural person as a beneficiary under a payable on death designation; that many bank customers in this state desire to designate a beneficiary who is not a natural person and would have the ability to do so if the limitation was removed; and that this act is necessary because it allows an account holder of a deposit account to designate a trust or an entity and not limited to a natural person as a beneficiary. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on June 1, 2015.”
23-47-201. Notice of rules governing deposits.
-
- Banks shall have the power to make rules governing deposits, including provisions for reasonable notice, not to exceed ninety (90) days, for the withdrawal of deposits and for changes in or amendments to those rules to be made by the bank without approval of the depositor.
- Notice of the rules and all changes therein shall be given to each customer whose deposits are affected by the rules, either by delivery or mailing of a copy to the customer or by posting them in a conspicuous area in the main office and in all branch offices of the bank.
- If the rules are stated on a signature card or other document signed by the customer, the bank shall be deemed to have given notice of the rules for purposes of this provision even if the signature card or document is returned to the bank.
- Rules so made shall be a valid contract between the depositor and the bank, subject to the right of the bank to change or amend the rules in the manner provided in the rules.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-202. Deposits by minors.
When any deposit is made in any bank by a minor, the bank may pay to the depositor the sums due him or her and the receipt or check of the minor shall be, in all respects, valid in law.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-203. Securing of deposits.
-
It shall be lawful for any state bank to secure deposits made with it by any of the following:
- The United States, the State of Arkansas, any county of this state, any municipality of this state, or any agency, corporate instrumentality, or political subdivision of any of the foregoing;
- Any university or college supported by this state;
- Any school district of this state;
- Any community college district of this state;
- Any relief body of the United States or of this state;
- Any road, drainage, levee, bridge, street, sewer, paving, or other improvement district organized under the laws of this state;
- Any regional water distribution district organized under the laws of this state;
- Any federal agency;
- The United States Postal Service;
- Any receiver of any state or federal court, whether appointed in proceedings pending in this state or elsewhere;
- Any referee in bankruptcy;
- Any receiver, trustee, or operating officials appointed by any federal court in any bankruptcy, debt-adjustment, or composition proceeding pending within this state or elsewhere;
- Any pension or retirement fund for employees of any county or municipality in this state or any agency, corporate instrumentality, or political subdivision of any of the foregoing; and
- The Treasurer of State.
-
It shall be lawful for any state bank to secure the deposit with it of the following described funds:
- Any funds deposited into the bank and which are held in trust by the bank, awaiting investment or distribution if not prohibited by the instrument or judgment creating the trust; and
- Any funds deposited for such other purposes as are approved by the Bank Commissioner.
-
-
A state bank may secure the deposits described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, subject to the depositor's discretion regarding the suitability of the collateral, by:
- The pledge or escrow of the assets of the bank consisting of any investment in which a state bank may invest pursuant to § 23-47-401;
-
A surety bond issued by an insurance company licensed under the laws of the State of Arkansas and either:
-
Rated “A” or better by any one (1) or more of the following rating agencies:
- A.M. Best Company, Inc.;
- Standard & Poor's Insurance Rating Service;
- Moody's Investors Service, Inc.; or
- Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co.; or
- Listed on the then-current United States Department of the Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties;
-
Rated “A” or better by any one (1) or more of the following rating agencies:
-
Private deposit insurance issued by an insurance company licensed under the laws of the State of Arkansas and either:
-
Rated “A” or better by any one (1) or more of the following rating agencies:
- A.M. Best Company, Inc.;
- Standard & Poor's Insurance Rating Service;
- Moody's Investors Service, Inc.; or
- Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co.; or
- Listed on the then-current United States Department of the Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties; or
-
Rated “A” or better by any one (1) or more of the following rating agencies:
- An irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by a Federal Home Loan Bank.
- The aggregate market value of assets pledged or escrowed or the face amount of the surety bond, private deposit insurance, or letter of credit securing the deposit of funds by any single depositor must be equal to or exceed the amount of the deposit to be secured.
-
A state bank may secure the deposits described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, subject to the depositor's discretion regarding the suitability of the collateral, by:
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, or the provision of any other law requiring security for deposit of funds in the form of the deposit or pledge of securities, security for such deposits shall not be required to the extent that such deposits are insured under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
- The powers herein conferred upon state banks are cumulative to such similar powers as they now may hold under existing laws.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 116, § 1; 2001, No. 310, § 2.
U.S. Code. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1811 et seq.
Cross References. Eligible security for deposits, § 19-8-203.
23-47-204. Deposit accounts — Definitions.
-
-
As used in this section:
- “Multiple-party deposit account” means a deposit account established in the names of two (2) or more persons and payable to or in a form subject to withdrawal by one (1) or more of the persons named on the deposit account; and
- “Single-party deposit account” means a deposit account established in the name of one (1) person and payable to or in a form subject to withdrawal by the person named on the deposit account.
- A deposit account may be established as a single-party deposit account or a multiple-party deposit account.
-
As used in this section:
-
-
When opening a multiple-party deposit account or amending an existing deposit account so as to create a multiple-party deposit account, a bank shall utilize account documents which enable the depositor to designate ownership interest therein in terms substantially similar to one (1) or more of the following:
- Joint tenants with right of survivorship;
- Tenants in common;
- Tenants by the entirety;
- Payable on death;
- “Totten” or tentative trust; and
- Such other deposit designation as may be acceptable to the bank.
-
Account documents which enable the depositor to indicate the depositor's intent of the ownership interest in any multiple-party deposit account may include any of the following:
- The signature card;
- The deposit agreement;
- A certificate of deposit;
- A document confirming purchase of a certificate of deposit; or
- Such other document acceptable to the bank which indicates the intent of the depositor.
- The designation of ownership interest contained in account documents shall be conclusive evidence in any action or proceeding involving the deposit account of the intention of all depositors to vest title to the deposit account in the manner specified in the account documents.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a bank to offer any particular type of multiple-party deposit account.
-
When opening a multiple-party deposit account or amending an existing deposit account so as to create a multiple-party deposit account, a bank shall utilize account documents which enable the depositor to designate ownership interest therein in terms substantially similar to one (1) or more of the following:
-
Multiple-party deposit accounts which do not expressly designate ownership interest as tenants in common, payable on death, or “Totten” or tentative trust shall constitute:
- A joint tenant with right of survivorship deposit account, if the depositors have not indicated in the account documents that the depositors are married to each other; and
- A tenants by the entirety deposit account, if the depositors have indicated in the account documents that they are married to each other, whether or not they are at that time husband and wife.
-
- A joint tenant with right of survivorship deposit account may be paid to or on the order of any one (1) of the depositors during his or her lifetime unless a contrary written designation, in a form acceptable to the bank, is given to the bank, or to or on the order of any one (1) of the survivors of them after the death of any one (1) or more of them.
- A tenants by the entirety deposit account may be paid to or on the order of either depositor during his or her lifetime, or to or on the order of the survivor after the death of one (1) of them.
-
- A tenants in common deposit account may be paid, prior to the receipt by the bank of a specific written notice of death of a depositor, to or on the order of any one (1) depositor unless a contrary written designation in a form acceptable to the bank is given to the bank.
- Upon receipt of a specific written notice of death of a depositor in a form acceptable to the bank, the respective pro rata parts of a tenants in common deposit account may be paid to or on the order of the surviving tenant in common, and to the estate of the deceased depositor.
- All tenants in common deposit accounts shall be deemed to be owned pro rata by the depositors unless a contrary written designation in a form acceptable to the bank is given to the bank.
-
-
- A deposit account may have a payable on death designation.
-
A payable on death deposit account is created if the depositor indicates on the account documents that:
- The deposit account is payable to one (1) or more living account holders during the life of the account holders; and
- Upon the death of the person or persons to whom the deposit account is payable under subdivision (e)(1)(B)(i) of this section, the deposit account shall be paid to or held by another person or persons, as defined in § 23-45-102.
-
- Upon the death of the person or persons to whom the deposit account is payable under subdivision (e)(1)(B)(i) of this section, the owner of the deposit account shall be the person or persons designated by the depositor as a beneficiary on the account documents and that beneficiary is a person, as defined in § 23-45-102.
-
- If more than one (1) person becomes an owner of the deposit account under subdivision (e)(2)(A) of this section, ownership of the deposit account shall be as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
- If a designated beneficiary does not survive or is not a person as defined in § 23-45-102, the proceeds remaining on deposit in the deposit account belong to the estate of the last surviving account holder.
- During the lifetime of the depositor, he or she may change the designation of the beneficiary who shall be the owner at his or her death by written direction in a form acceptable to the bank.
- The State Bank Department shall promulgate rules that set out procedures a bank may take before transferring ownership of a deposit account, closing a deposit account, and distributing the proceeds to a person designated by the account documents as a beneficiary.
-
-
- A “Totten” or tentative trust deposit account is created when the depositor indicates on the account document that he or she is the trustee for another person and there is no written trust agreement which affects the deposit account.
- Upon the death of the person named as trustee, the other person shall be the owner of the deposit account and, if more than one (1) person shall be the owners of the deposit account, ownership shall be as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
- During the lifetime of the person named as trustee, he or she may change the classification of the person he or she is trustee for by written direction in a form acceptable to the bank.
- A bank shall also pay partial withdrawal requests, accept pledges of a deposit account, and otherwise deal with the deposit account in the same manner it pays the deposit account pursuant to the provisions of this section.
-
- Any payment of a deposit account, acceptance of pledge of a deposit account, change in the form of a deposit account, or otherwise dealing with a deposit account by a bank in the manner provided by this section shall be a complete and valid release and discharge of the bank as to the amount paid or action taken.
- No bank shall have any liability whatsoever for the way in which the ownership interest of a deposit account is designated when it is opened or in which a deposit account is amended if the deposit account is opened or amended as the depositor specified in the account document.
- No bank making any payment in accordance with the provisions of this section shall thereby be liable for any estate, inheritance, or succession taxes which may be due.
- The terms “written direction” and “written designation” shall not be construed to require that the depositor affix his or her signature to an instrument unless the bank requires the signature of the depositor to the instrument.
- This section applies to a deposit account established on or after June 1, 2015.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2015, No. 586, §§ 1-4.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment substituted “Deposit accounts” for “Multiple party deposits” in the section heading; rewrote (a) and (e); and added (k).
Case Notes
Fraud and Misrepresentation.
Trial court did not err in overruling heirs' objections to an executor's accounting for a grandmother's estate because in the absence of fraud, the executor, as the surviving joint tenant of the bank accounts on which a grandmother and her husband had included the executor as a joint tenant with right of survivorship, owned the accounts by operation of law; the heirs failed to present sufficient evidence to warrant the imposition of a construction trust on the proceeds of the joint accounts because there was scant evidence that the executor made a false promise to the grandmother. Williams v. Davis, 2009 Ark. App. 850, 373 S.W.3d 381 (2009).
No Setoff Awarded.
Trial court did not err in not awarding a setoff of $11,000 claimed to belong to the decedent that the companion spent solely for her benefit; the decedent's heirs did not argue that the account was not a joint account co-owned by the decedent and companion, generally funds deposited into a joint account were owned by both parties, and the decedent had testified that he deposited the check, and this was a matter of credibility and clear error was not shown. Campbell v. Graf, 2014 Ark. App. 98, 432 S.W.3d 96 (2014).
23-47-205. Adverse claim to deposit.
Notice to a bank of an adverse claim to a deposit standing on its books to the credit of any person shall not be sufficient to require the bank to pay the deposit to the adverse claimant or otherwise recognize the adverse claim unless the adverse claimant also:
- Procures a restraining order, injunction, or other appropriate process, which has become final and not further appealable, against the bank from a court of competent jurisdiction in a cause therein instituted by him or her wherein the person to whose credit the deposit stands is made a party and served with summons; or
- Executes to the bank, in form and with sureties acceptable to it, a bond indemnifying the bank from any and all liability, loss, damage, costs, and expenses for and on account of the payment of the adverse claim or the dishonor of the check or other order of the person to whose credit the deposit stands on the books of the bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-206. Settlement of checks at par — Exception.
- No state bank shall settle any check drawn on it against an account with a sufficient balance otherwise than at par.
- However, the provisions of this section shall not apply with respect to the settlement of a check sent to a state bank for special handling or as a special collection item.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-207. Payment of overdrafts — Liability of officer or employee.
- Any officer or employee who knowingly pays out the funds of any state bank upon the check, order, or draft of any individual, firm, corporation, or association which does not have on deposit with the bank a sum equal to the check, order, or draft is personally liable to it for the amount so paid unless the drawer of the check, order, or draft has previously arranged with the bank for a line of credit sufficient to cover the payment or unless the payment was made pursuant to a general authorization approved by the board of directors for the officer or employee to cover the payment.
- However, the board of directors may ratify the overdraft and relieve the employee from liability.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-208. Deferred income investment accounts.
-
On behalf of depositors, state banks may create and open deferred income investment accounts of the following types:
- The depositor makes a deposit of a lump sum, and the bank agrees to pay the depositor an agreed monthly or annual payment for life or for a term certain beginning immediately or at some time in the future; and
- The depositor makes a deposit periodically on an agreed basis, and the bank agrees to pay the depositor, on a periodic basis beginning at some time in the future for life or a term certain, an agreed monthly or annual payment.
-
The depositor and the state bank may agree that:
- A partial refund of the deposit may occur upon specified events, or no refund may occur;
- The depositor may elect to stop payments from the bank for a term;
- The payments may go to designated beneficiaries in all cases both before and after death of the depositor;
- The amount of the payments to the bank and to the depositor will be fixed for the term agreed upon; or
- The payment to the depositor will be determined by an index or criteria beyond the control of the depositor or bank.
- The Bank Commissioner shall promulgate such rules as may be necessary and proper to carry out the intent and purpose of this section and to issue cease and desist orders to any state bank found to be violating this section or State Bank Department rules. These department rules shall incorporate §§ 23-81-121 — 23-81-128, where applicable.
- The deferred income investment accounts allowed in this section shall be exempt from §§ 23-42-501 and 23-42-502.
- It is the intent of this section that distributions from deferred income investment accounts be treated as nontaxable to the greatest extent possible under section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2536.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment, in (c), deleted “and regulations” following the first occurrence of “rules”, and substituted the second and third occurrences of “rules” for “regulations”.
U.S. Code. Section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in this section, is codified as 26 U.S.C. § 72.
23-47-209. Savings promotion raffle — Definitions.
-
As used in this section:
-
- “Financial institution” means a banking institution that may accept deposits from depositors under any state or federal law, the accounts of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Administration, and is a state or federally regulated institution.
-
“Financial institution” includes without limitation:
- A state bank regulated by the State Bank Department or similar state regulator in the domicile of the state bank;
- A national bank or association;
- A state or federal savings and loan association;
- A mutual savings bank;
- A state or federal credit union; and
- A community or rural development bank;
- “Savings promotion deposit” means the specified amount of moneys required by a depositor to be deposited into a savings account to be entered in a savings promotion raffle; and
- “Savings promotion raffle” means a raffle conducted by a financial institution in which the sole consideration required for a chance of winning designated prizes is the deposit of at least a specified amount of moneys into a savings account or other savings program offered by the financial institution.
-
- A financial institution may conduct a savings promotion raffle for depositors who make a savings promotion deposit into a savings account of the financial institution.
- A savings promotion raffle shall be conducted so that each savings promotion deposit provides a depositor with an equal chance of winning a prize as designated by the financial institution.
History. Acts 2015, No. 589, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2015, No. 589, § 1, provided: “Title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Arkansas Savings Promotion Act’.”
Subchapter 3 — Agency Designation on Certificates of Deposit
23-47-301. Definitions.
In this subchapter:
- “Account” means a contract of deposit between a depositor and a bank, and includes a checking account, savings account, and certificate of deposit;
- “Agent” means a person authorized to make account transactions for a party;
- “Beneficiary” means a person named as one (1) to whom sums on deposit in an account are payable on request after the death of all parties or for whom a party is named as trustee;
- “Devisee” means any person designated in a will to receive a testamentary disposition of real or personal property;
- “Party” means a person who, by the terms of an account, has a present right, subject to request, to payment from the account other than as a beneficiary or agent;
- “Payment” of sums on deposit includes withdrawal, payment to a party or third person pursuant to check or other request, and a pledge of sums on deposit by a party, or a setoff, reduction, or other disposition of all or part of an account pursuant to a pledge; and
- “Personal representative” includes an executor, administrator, successor personal representative, special administrator, and persons who perform substantially the same function under the law governing their status.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-302. Scope of subchapter.
- This subchapter applies to accounts in this state.
-
This subchapter does not apply to:
- An account established for a partnership, joint venture, or other organization for a business purpose;
- An account controlled by one (1) or more persons as an agent or trustee for a corporation, unincorporated association, or charitable or civic organization; or
- A fiduciary or trust account in which the relationship is established other than by the terms of the account.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-303. Forms.
A contract of deposit that substantially contains the following form establishes an agency account, and the account is governed by the provisions of this subchapter applicable to agency accounts:
“AGENCY (POWER OF ATTORNEY) DESIGNATION Agents may make account transactions for parties but have no ownership or rights at death unless named as POD beneficiaries. [To Add Agency Designation To Account, Name One Or More Agents]. [Select One and Initial]: AGENCY DESIGNATION SURVIVES DISABILITY OR INCAPACITY OF PARTIES AGENCY DESIGNATION TERMINATES ON DISABILITY OR INCAPACITY OF PARTIES”
Click to view form.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-304. Designation of agent.
- Unless the terms of an agency designation provide that the authority of the agent terminates on disability or incapacity of a party, the agent's authority survives disability and incapacity. The agent may act for a disabled or incapacitated party until the authority of the agent is terminated.
- Death of the sole party or last surviving party terminates the authority of an agent.
- An agent in an account with an agency designation has no beneficial right to sums on deposit.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-305. Payment to designated agent.
On request of an agent under an agency designation for an account, a bank may, unless it actually knows that the authority of agency has terminated, pay to the agent sums on deposit in the account.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-306. Payment to minor.
If a bank is required or permitted to make payment pursuant to this subchapter to a minor designated as a beneficiary, payment may be made pursuant to the Arkansas Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, § 9-26-201 et seq.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-307. Discharge.
-
- Payment made pursuant to this subchapter in accordance with an agency account discharges the bank from all claims for amounts so paid, whether or not the payment is consistent with the beneficial ownership of the account as between parties, beneficiaries, or their successors.
- Payment may be made whether or not a party, beneficiary, or agent is disabled, incapacitated, or deceased when payment is requested, received, or made.
-
- Protection under this section does not extend to payments made after a bank has received written notice from a party, or from the personal representative, surviving spouse, or heir or devisee of a deceased party, to the effect that payments in accordance with the terms of the agency account should not be permitted and the bank has had a reasonable opportunity to act on it when payment is made.
- Unless the notice is withdrawn by the person giving it, the successor of any deceased party must concur in a request for payment if the bank is to be protected under this section.
- Unless a bank has been served with process in an action or proceeding, no other notice or other information shown to have been available to the bank affects its right to protection under this section.
- A bank that receives written notice pursuant to this section or otherwise that has reason to believe that a dispute exists as to the rights of the parties may refuse, without liability, to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agency account.
- Protection of a bank under this section does not affect the rights of parties in disputes between themselves or their successors concerning the beneficial ownership of sums on deposit in agency accounts or payments made from agency accounts.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-308. Setoff.
- Without qualifying any other statutory right to setoff or lien and subject to any contractual provision, if a party is indebted to a bank, the bank has a right to setoff against the agency account.
- The amount of the agency account subject to setoff is the proportion to which the party is, or immediately before death was, beneficially entitled or, in the absence of proof of that proportion, an equal share with all parties.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-309. Effect on other laws.
This subchapter is supplemental to all laws pertaining to the deposit of funds in banks.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 4 — Investments
23-47-401. Investment powers and limitations.
-
A state bank may invest its funds without limitation in the following:
- Direct obligations of the United States Government;
- Obligations of agencies and instrumentalities created by act of Congress and authorized thereby to issue securities or evidences of indebtedness, regardless of guarantee of repayment by the United States Government;
- Obligations the principal and interest of which are fully guaranteed by the United States Government or an agency or an instrumentality created by an act of Congress and authorized thereby to issue such a guarantee;
- Obligations the principal and interest of which are fully secured, insured, or covered by commitments or agreements to purchase by the United States Government or an agency or instrumentality created by an act of Congress and authorized thereby to issue such commitments or agreements;
- General obligations of the states of the United States and of the political subdivisions, municipalities, commonwealths, territories, or insular possessions thereof;
- Obligations issued by the State Board of Education under authority of the Arkansas Constitution or applicable statutes;
- Warrants of political subdivisions of the State of Arkansas and municipalities thereof having maturities not exceeding one (1) year;
- Prerefunded municipal bonds, the principal and interest of which are fully secured by the principal and interest of a direct obligation of the United States Government;
- The sale of federal funds with a maturity of not more than one (1) business day;
- Demand, savings, or time deposits or accounts of any depository institution chartered by the United States, any state of the United States, or the District of Columbia, provided funds invested in such demand, savings, or time deposits or accounts are fully insured by a federal deposit insurance agency;
- Repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by direct obligations of the United States Government, and general obligations of any state of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, provided that the repurchase agreement shall provide for the taking of delivery of the collateral, either directly or through an authorized custodian; and
- Securities of, or other interest in, any open-end type investment company or investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and which is defined as a “money market fund” under 17 C.F.R. § 270.2a-7, provided that the portfolio of the investment company or investment trust is limited principally to United States Government obligations and to repurchase agreements fully collateralized by United States Government obligations, and provided further that the investment company or investment trust shall take delivery of the collateral either directly or through an authorized custodian.
-
A state bank may invest no more than twenty percent (20%) of its capital base in any single investment of the following types:
- Corporate debt obligations, including commercial paper, of any corporation that is not an affiliate or subsidiary of the bank;
- Revenue bond issues of any state of the United States or any municipality or any political subdivision thereof;
- Industrial development bonds for corporate obligors issued through any state of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;
- Securities of, or other interests in, an open-end or closed-end management type investment company or investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, provided that the portfolio of such an investment company or investment trust is limited to United States Government obligations and to repurchase agreements fully collateralized by United States Government obligations, and provided further that any such investment company or investment trust shall take the delivery of the collateral either directly or through an authorized custodian;
- Securities or other interests issued, assumed, or guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Asian Development Bank, or the African Development Bank; and
- Uninsured demand, savings, or time deposits or accounts of any depository institution chartered by the United States, any state of the United States, or the District of Columbia.
- Subject to such additional restrictions and limitations as may be imposed by the Bank Commissioner, a state bank may invest in any other investment securities which are not described in subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this section to the extent that such investment securities are authorized for national banks.
- A state bank may invest in any investment not described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section as may be authorized by State Bank Department rules.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2537.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (d).
U.S. Code. The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq.
Subchapter 5 — Loans
23-47-501. Loan limits — Maximum generally.
- The total indebtedness to any state bank of any person shall at no time exceed twenty percent (20%) of the capital base of the bank.
-
- Obligations of a person as endorser or guarantor, accommodation or otherwise, of notes or other obligations shall be included in that person's loan limit.
- However, in the case of obligations that are endorsed without recourse, the limitation of twenty percent (20%) shall be applied to each primary debtor, but not to the liability, in such capacity, of the endorser.
-
- A loan or group of loans that are within the legal loan limit of a state bank at the time the loan or loans are made shall be valid for legal loan limit purposes until maturity, as stated in the original contract, regardless of fluctuations in the bank's legal loan limit. However, if a bank's legal loan limit is reduced due to fluctuations in its capital base, a loan or group of loans to a borrower or borrowers that were within the legal loan limit prior to the reduction may become in violation of the bank's reduced legal loan limit upon the extension, renewal, or advancement of additional funds on the loan or group of loans occurring after the reduction in the bank's legal loan limits.
- State banks are required to calculate their legal loan limits on a quarterly basis to coincide with the requirement to calculate their capital base.
-
- If in any instance it shall appear, as determined by the Bank Commissioner, that the interests of a group composed of individuals, partnerships, unincorporated associations, or corporations are so interrelated that, from a credit standpoint, applying standard and customary banking practice, they should be considered as a single unit for the purposes of extensions of credit, the total indebtedness of these interrelated customers shall be combined and treated as the indebtedness of a single customer in applying the loan limit.
- A state bank shall not be deemed to have violated this section solely by reason of the fact that the indebtedness of a group held by the bank exceeds the limitation of this section at the time the commissioner determines that the indebtedness of the group must be combined. However, if required by the commissioner, the state bank shall dispose of indebtedness of the group in the amount of excess of the limitation of this section within such reasonable time as shall be fixed by the commissioner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2005, No. 427, § 1; 2019, No. 62, § 1.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment deleted (b)(2)(B) and redesignated former (b)(2)(A) as (b)(2); in (b)(2), deleted “on consumer loans” following “obligations” and substituted “limitation of twenty percent (20%)” for “twenty percent (20%) limitation”; and made a stylistic change.
23-47-502. Loan limits — Inclusions and exceptions.
-
The following loans and other forms of indebtedness shall not be included in the limitation of twenty percent (20%) imposed by § 23-47-501 and may be made or acquired without being subject to any loan limit:
- Obligations in the form of drafts or bills of exchange drawn in good faith against actually existing values;
- Nonconforming assets acquired as a result of acquisition of a failed bank or savings and loan association, so long as a plan for divestiture within a reasonable amount of time is approved by the Bank Commissioner;
- Obligations drawn in good faith against actually existing values and fully secured by goods or commodities in process of shipment may be acquired without limit;
- Obligations in the form of bankers' acceptances of other banks; and
- Obligations secured by investments which the state bank, pursuant to § 23-47-401 could invest in without limit, having a market value at all times at least equal to the principal balance of the obligation.
-
-
The loan limit of twenty percent (20%) provided by § 23-47-501 shall be modified so that a loan limit not to exceed sixty percent (60%) shall apply to obligations secured by transferable documents of title covering:
- Livestock; or
- Readily marketable and nonperishable commodities or staples fully insured, if of a type that is customarily insured.
- The property in each instance must have a value of at least one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the amount of the secured obligation.
- An obligation secured in this manner shall not be deemed non- conforming on the grounds that, for the purpose of loading, unloading, storing, shipping, or transshipping, the title documents or the property covered thereby may be released under trust receipt to the possession of the obligor or borrower if, within twenty-one (21) days after the release, the property or valid title documents covering the property is redelivered to the state bank, and provided that, during the interim, the bank holds a perfected security interest in all such property under the Uniform Commercial Code, § 4-1-101 et seq.
- The standard twenty percent (20%) loan limit will apply even to the obligations secured by transferable documents of title if the warehouser who issued the documents of title under applicable law can transfer marketable title to the commodities described in the documents to a purchaser in the ordinary course of business.
-
The loan limit of twenty percent (20%) provided by § 23-47-501 shall be modified so that a loan limit not to exceed sixty percent (60%) shall apply to obligations secured by transferable documents of title covering:
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-503. Loans involving stock of state bank.
-
It shall be unlawful for any state bank to knowingly:
- Loan its funds to its stockholders on its own stock, or stock in its bank holding company, as collateral security;
- Make any loan, the proceeds of which are used to purchase its own stock or stock of its bank holding company; or
- Carry as an asset any loan representing, either directly or indirectly, an investment in its own stock or that of its bank holding company. Provided, however, that there shall be no violation of this subdivision (a)(3) when a bank acquires its own stock or stock in its bank holding company in the regular course of collecting a debt previously contracted in good faith if the bank complied with subdivisions (a)(1) and (2) of this section at the time the loan was made and if the bank divests the stock within two (2) years.
-
- Any officer or director of any state bank or any stockholder violating the provisions of this section shall be subject to civil money penalties of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day, up to a maximum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in the aggregate, for each violation.
- The civil penalties may be imposed by the commissioner pursuant to his or her power to and the procedure for issuing cease and desist orders.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-504. Loans to affiliates and insiders.
The provisions of subsections (g) and (h) of section 22 of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 375a and 375b, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, shall apply to any state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-505. Illegal loans — Liability of officer or director.
Any officer or director of any state bank who shall knowingly make or approve a loan in violation of §§ 23-47-501 — 23-47-504 or who shall knowingly permit such a loan to be made, or who shall fail to exercise his or her authority to prevent the making of the loan shall be personally liable to the bank, or to the Bank Commissioner, for the full amount thereof. However, written notice of disapproval of the loan, served on the board of directors and also the commissioner at the time the making or existence of the loan first comes to his or her knowledge, shall relieve any officer or director from personal liability.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-506. Sale of certain mortgage loans.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any state bank which has as one (1) of its principal purposes the making or purchasing of loans secured by real estate mortgages is authorized to:
- Sell the mortgage loans to the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Government National Mortgage Association, or any other corporation chartered by an act of Congress for such purposes, or any successor thereof;
- In connection therewith, make payments of any capital contributions required pursuant to law in the nature of subscriptions for stock of the entities described in subdivision (1) of this section;
- Receive stock evidencing such capital contributions; and
- Hold or dispose of such stock.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-507. Power to hold and sell collateral.
- A state bank may hold and sell all kinds of property that may come into its possession as collateral security for loans or any ordinary collection of debts in the manner provided by law.
- Any personal property coming into its possession in this manner and which is not otherwise authorized for state banks to own as an asset shall be disposed of as soon as possible and after twelve (12) months from the date of acquisition shall cease to be considered as a part of its assets.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-508. Disposition of real estate acquired through debt collection.
- Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, real estate acquired through the collection of debts previously contracted in the ordinary course of business shall not be held by the state bank as an asset for a longer period than five (5) years.
- The Bank Commissioner is authorized to grant an extension of the holding period not to exceed five (5) additional years, or for shorter periods as circumstances warrant, based upon his or her discretion.
- Real estate held pursuant to this section shall be considered an asset of the bank. The value of the asset shall be based upon fair market value supported by an appraisal or appropriate evaluation when the bank acquires ownership of the property or as established by rule of the commissioner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2001, No. 62, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 533.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c).
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
23-47-509. Loans to minors.
Whenever a minor borrows money from a bank for the purpose of defraying the expenses of his or her higher education or for necessaries, any contract, promissory note, loan agreement, or other loan instrument entered into by and between the bank and the minor shall constitute a valid contract between the bank and the minor and shall be binding upon the minor with like effect as if he or she were of full age and legal capacity.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-510. Casualty insurance — Replacement cost coverage.
- A state bank, when making a mortgage loan, may not require, as a condition or term of the mortgage, that the mortgagor purchase casualty insurance on property which is the subject of the mortgage in an amount in excess of the fair market value of the buildings or appurtenances on the mortgaged premises.
- This section shall not be construed as limiting the right of the mortgagor to purchase replacement cost coverage on the property which is the subject of the mortgage.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 6 — Subsidiaries
Effective Dates. Acts 2003, No. 860, § 16: July 1, 2003. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the flow of development capital funds into and within the state has been and continues to be, insufficient to support the growth of businesses and infrastructure development; that as a result of the lack of available capital sources, the state has suffered economic losses because of the inability to compete with other states in providing capital resources for business and infrastructure development; that this legislation will stimulate the flow of private capital and long-term loan funds that are vital to the sound financing of businesses and will encourage growth, expansion, and modernization through the reinstatement of tax credits; that unless an adequate program to encourage private capital investment is undertaken, the state will suffer further irreparable loss as a result of the continued inability to support business and infrastructure development, and from the lost opportunities for economic expansion. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be effective on July 1, 2003.”
23-47-601. Operating subsidiaries.
-
- With the prior approval of the Bank Commissioner, and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed by him or her, a state bank may engage in any activities which are a part of the business of banking or incidental thereto by means of an operating subsidiary and other activities permissible for state banks or their subsidiaries under statutory authority or as authorized by rules of the State Banking Board.
- For purposes of this section, an operating subsidiary in which a state bank may invest includes a corporation, limited liability company, or similar entity if the parent bank owns more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting, or similar type of controlling, interest of the subsidiary; or the parent bank otherwise controls the subsidiary and no other party controls more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting, or similar type of controlling interest, of the subsidiary.
-
Subsidiaries which are not subject to this section are:
- A subsidiary in which the state bank's investment is made and limited pursuant to specific authorization in a statute or by rule; and
- A subsidiary, in which the state bank has acquired, in good faith, shares through foreclosure on collateral, by way of compromise of a doubtful claim, or to avoid loss in connection with a debt previously contracted.
- The total of each state bank's loans and investments in any single operating subsidiary and the total of each state bank's loans and investments in all subsidiaries, and bank service companies, will be considered by the commissioner and may be limited according to the commissioner's discretion, for safety and soundness purposes.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 112, § 2; 2019, No. 315, § 2538.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (a)(1); and substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a)(3)(A).
23-47-602. Real estate subsidiaries.
-
A state bank acting through an operating subsidiary or a bank holding company acting, directly or through a subsidiary, may, with the prior approval of the Bank Commissioner, engage in real estate investment and development, including without limitation:
- Development of subdivisions or additions;
- Construction of improvements;
- Acquisition of stock or equity interests in any entity created primarily for the purpose of owning and developing real estate, including those activities authorized for community development corporations pursuant to § 23-47-605; and
- Any other activities necessary and proper in connection with real estate investment and development.
- A state bank's investment in real estate and in real estate subsidiaries, excluding its bank premises, shall not exceed one hundred fifty percent (150%) of its capital base.
- A state bank acting through an operating subsidiary or a bank holding company acting directly or through a subsidiary may carry out any one (1) or more of the purposes, activities, and objectives set forth in this section as principal, factor, agent, or otherwise, either alone, through, or in conjunction with any person, including the performance and carrying out of the purposes and objects herein enumerated as a member of a partnership or joint venture.
- Loans to an operating subsidiary engaged in real estate investment and development that are fully secured by securities that the state bank could invest in without limitation pursuant to § 23-47-401 shall not be subject to the limitations of this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 112, § 3.
23-47-603. Bank service companies.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Bank service company” means a corporation or limited liability company organized for the exclusive purpose of performing bank services for one (1) or more persons, which is owned by one (1) or more state banks and one (1) or more persons; and
- “Bank services” means services such as check and deposit sorting and posting, computation and posting of interest and other credits and charges; preparation and mailing of checks, statements, notices, and similar items; any other clerical, bookkeeping, accounting, statistical, or similar functions performed for a person; or any other activities authorized by the Bank Commissioner.
-
- With the prior approval of the commissioner and subject to the conditions that may be prescribed by him or her, a state bank may establish, create, or invest in a bank service company to furnish bank services to owners of the bank service company and other persons.
- The total of a state bank's loans to and investments in a bank service company shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the bank's capital base.
- When a state bank becomes the sole owner of a bank service company, it shall become an operating subsidiary of the bank and be governed by § 23-47-601.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-604. [Repealed.]
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning capital development companies, was repealed by Acts 2017, No. 426, § 14. The section was derived from Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2003, No. 860, § 15.
23-47-605. Community development corporations.
- As used in this section, the term “public welfare” means developing housing, fostering economic growth and revitalization, creating small businesses, including minority-owned businesses, and supporting other community development initiatives approved by the Bank Commissioner.
- A state bank may make investments designed primarily to promote the public welfare, either directly or by purchasing interests in an entity primarily engaged in making the investments.
- A state bank shall not make any investment if the investment would expose the bank to unlimited liability.
- The commissioner may limit a state bank's investments in any one (1) project and a bank's aggregate investments under this section.
- In no case shall a state bank's aggregate investments under this section exceed ten percent (10%) of the bank's capital base.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-606. Small business investment companies.
- A state bank may purchase up to one hundred percent (100%) of the capital stock of small business investment companies and minority enterprise small business investment companies as defined by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.
- However, in no event may any state bank acquire shares of any small business investment company or minority enterprise small business investment company if, upon the making of that acquisition, the aggregate amount of shares in small business investment companies or minority enterprise small business investment companies then held by the bank would exceed ten percent (10%) of the bank's capital base.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Small Business Investment Act of 1958, referred to in this section, is primarily codified as 15 U.S.C. § 661 et seq.
23-47-607. Investment in stock of certain banks authorized to do foreign banking.
- Any state bank may purchase up to one hundred percent (100%) of the capital stock of any corporation organized and existing under the Edge Act, and any amendments thereto.
- However, in no event may any state bank acquire shares of any such corporation if, upon the making of that acquisition, the aggregate amount of shares of all corporations organized and existing under the Edge Act then held by the bank would exceed ten percent (10%) of the bank's capital base.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Edge Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.
23-47-608. Authority to act through subsidiaries.
With prior notice to the Bank Commissioner and in accordance with the state and federal law, state banks are authorized to engage in activities through financial subsidiaries.
History. Acts 2001, No. 62, § 1.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Survey of Legislation, 2001 Arkansas General Assembly, Regulated Industries, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 595.
Subchapter 7 — Trust Powers
23-47-701. Authority of Bank Commissioner.
The Bank Commissioner shall be authorized and empowered to grant to state banks applying therefor the right to operate a trust department to act as trustee, executor, administrator, custodian, registrar, paying agent or transfer agent of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, or receiver or to act in any other fiduciary capacity in which national banks, subsidiary trust companies, national trust companies, or other corporations which come into competition with state banks are permitted to act.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-702. Considerations determinative of grant or denial of applications.
In determining whether to grant an application by a state bank for permission to operate a trust department to exercise the powers enumerated in this subchapter, the Bank Commissioner may take into consideration the sufficiency of the capital base of the applying state bank, the needs of the community to be served, and any other facts and circumstances that seem to him or her proper, and may grant or refuse the application accordingly.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-703. Grant and exercise of powers deemed not in contravention of Arkansas law.
The granting and exercise of such powers as are authorized by this subchapter shall not be deemed to be in contravention of any other provision of Arkansas law.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-704. Segregation of fiduciary and general assets — Separate books and records.
State banks exercising any or all of the powers enumerated in this subchapter shall segregate all assets held in its trust department from the general assets of the bank and shall keep a separate set of books and records showing in proper detail all transactions engaged in under authority of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-705. Prohibited operations — Separate investment account — Collateral for certain funds used in conduct of business — Lien and claim upon state bank failure.
-
- No state bank shall receive in its trust department deposits of current funds subject to check or the deposit of checks, drafts, bills of exchange, or other items for collection or exchange purposes.
- Funds deposited or held in trust by the state bank awaiting investment shall be carried in a separate account and shall not be used by the bank in the conduct of its business unless it shall secure the funds deposited or held in trust with investments in which a state bank may invest without limitation pursuant to § 23-47-401.
- No security shall be required to the extent the funds so deposited or held in trust are insured under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
- In the event of the failure of the state bank, the owners of the funds held in trust for investment shall have a first priority lien on the bonds or other securities so set apart in addition to their claim against the estate of the bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
U.S. Code. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1811 et seq.
23-47-706. Official's oath or affidavit.
If Arkansas law requires that a corporation acting as trustee, executor, administrator, or in any capacity specified in this subchapter shall take an oath or make an affidavit, the president or chief executive officer, a vice president, or a trust officer of a state bank may take the necessary oath or execute the necessary affidavit.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 3.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “If Arkansas law” for “In any case in which Arkansas law” and inserted “or chief executive officer”.
23-47-707. Loans of trust funds to officers and employees prohibited — Penalties.
- It shall be unlawful for any state bank to lend to any officer, director, or employee any funds held in trust under the powers conferred by this subchapter, or to sell assets held in trust to any such persons, without the prior written approval of the Bank Commissioner.
- In the absence of the prior written approval of the commissioner, any officer, director, or employee making the loan or sale, or to whom the loan or sale is made is guilty of a Class D felony.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-708. Surrender of authorization — Board resolution — Commissioner certification — Activities affected.
-
- Any state bank desiring to surrender its right to operate a trust department and to exercise the powers granted under this subchapter, in order to relieve itself of the necessity of complying with the requirements of this subchapter, or to have returned to it any securities which it may have deposited with the state and local authorities for the protection of private or court trusts, or for any other purpose, may file with the Bank Commissioner a certified copy of a resolution of its board of directors signifying the desire.
- Upon receipt of the resolution, the commissioner, after satisfying himself or herself that the bank has been relieved in accordance with Arkansas law of all duties as trustee, executor, administrator, custodian, registrar, paying agent or transfer agent of stocks or bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, or other fiduciary, under court, private, or other appointments previously accepted under authority of this subchapter may, in his or her discretion, issue to the bank a certificate certifying that the bank is no longer authorized to operate a trust department and exercise the powers granted by this subchapter.
-
Upon the issuance of a certificate by the commissioner certifying that a state bank is no longer authorized to operate a trust department, the bank:
- Shall no longer operate a trust department or be subject to the provisions of this subchapter or State Bank Department rules made pursuant thereto;
- Shall be entitled to have returned to it any securities which it may have deposited with state or local authorities for the protection of private or court trusts; and
- Shall not operate a trust department or exercise thereafter any of the powers granted by this subchapter without first applying for and obtaining a new permit to operate a trust department to exercise such powers pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2539.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations” in (b)(1).
23-47-709. Revocation — Procedures available.
-
- In addition to the authority conferred by any other law, if, in the opinion of the Bank Commissioner, a state bank is unlawfully or unsoundly operating a trust department or exercising, or has unlawfully or unsoundly operated or exercised, or has failed for a period of five (5) consecutive years to operate a trust department or exercise the powers granted by this subchapter, or otherwise fails or has failed to comply with the requirements of this subchapter, the commissioner may issue and serve upon the bank a notice of intent to revoke the authority of the bank to operate its trust department and exercise the powers granted by this subchapter.
- The notice shall contain a statement of the facts constituting the alleged unlawful or unsound operation or exercise of powers, or failure to operate or exercise powers, or failure to comply, and shall fix a time and place at which a hearing will be held to determine whether an order revoking the authority to exercise the powers should issue against the bank.
- The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., and shall be fixed for a date not earlier than thirty (30) days nor later than sixty (60) days after service of the notice unless an earlier or later date is set by the commissioner at the request of any state bank so served.
-
- Unless the state bank so served shall appear at the hearing by an authorized representative, it shall be deemed to have consented to the issuance of the revocation order.
- In the event of consent, or if upon the record made at the hearing, the commissioner shall find that any allegation specified in the notice of charges has been established, the commissioner may issue and serve upon the state bank an order prohibiting it from accepting any new or additional trust accounts and revoking authority to operate its trust department and exercise any and all powers granted by this subchapter, except that the order shall permit the bank to continue to service all previously accepted trust accounts pending their expeditious divestiture or termination.
- A revocation order shall become effective not earlier than the expiration of thirty (30) days after service of the order upon the state bank so served, except in the case of a revocation order issued upon consent, which shall become effective at the time specified therein, and shall remain effective and enforceable, except to the extent that it is stayed, modified, terminated, or set aside by action of the commissioner or a reviewing court.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-710. Services provided by affiliates.
- Any bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company qualified to act as a fiduciary in this state is hereby specifically authorized to utilize its respective affiliates to provide services for any trust or estate for which the bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company acts as a trustee or other fiduciary, provided the bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company believes, in the exercise of the standard of care described in § 28-71-105, that the services are reasonably necessary and that its affiliate can render the services, including, but not limited to, securities brokerage services, computer services, and banking services to the trust or estate as competently as similar services rendered by nonaffiliates and for compensation equal to or less than that charged by nonaffiliates.
- Provided the foregoing requirements are met, an affiliate may be utilized by the bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company without the approval or consent of any person or specific authorization in the trust instrument, unless the power is expressly withheld in the trust instrument.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 6.
Subchapter 8 — Subsidiary Trust Companies
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 408, § 24: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 become effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of those certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
23-47-801. Definitions.
For purposes of this subchapter, “affiliated bank” means a bank, having authority to conduct trust business and business incidental to trust business within this state, more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock of which is owned directly or indirectly by:
- The same bank holding company that owns, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock of a subsidiary trust company or national trust company; or
- The same five (5) or fewer persons who are individuals, estates, or trusts that own directly or indirectly more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock of the bank holding company described in subdivision (1) of this section, taking into account the stock ownership of each such person only to the extent the ownership is identical with respect to each of the bank and the bank holding company.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 7.
23-47-802. Subsidiary trust companies — Creation, formation, etc. — Powers — Location.
-
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 23-48-405, bank holding companies that own, directly or indirectly, an affiliated bank are authorized and empowered by the provisions of this subchapter to apply to the Bank Commissioner for authority to:
- Create, form, and establish subsidiary trust companies under this subchapter for the purpose of combining the trust operations of their affiliated banks into a single trust operation; and
- Create, form, and establish national trust companies under the laws of the United States.
- In determining whether to grant an application for permission to establish a subsidiary trust company, the commissioner shall take into consideration the sufficiency of the capital base of the applying bank holding company, the needs of the communities to be served, and any other facts and circumstances that seem to him or her proper, and may grant or refuse the application accordingly.
- The subsidiary trust company shall be formed as a business corporation under the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-27-101 et seq. The newly formed subsidiary trust company shall only have the ability to conduct trust business that could be conducted by the individual trust departments combined from the affiliated banks to create the subsidiary trust company.
-
Offices of a subsidiary trust company may be located only in:
- Communities where its affiliated banks are located or in communities where their branches are or could be located; or
- Communities where it would be authorized to have an office if it were a national trust company.
- A subsidiary trust company shall be fully subject to the provisions of § 23-50-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-803. Substitution of subsidiary trust company or national trust company for affiliated bank.
-
A subsidiary trust company or national trust company and one (1) or more of its affiliated banks may enter into one (1) or more agreements under which the subsidiary trust company or national trust company is substituted as fiduciary for each affiliated bank in each fiduciary account listed in the agreement. The agreement shall be filed with the Bank Commissioner before the effective date of the substitution and must include:
- A list of each fiduciary account for which substitution is requested; and
- The effective date of the substitution, which may not be less than ninety (90) days after the date of the agreement.
-
Not later than ninety (90) days before the effective date of a substitution under this section, the parties to the substitution agreement shall send written notice of the substitution to the following:
- Each person who is readily ascertainable as a beneficiary of the account because of the receipt of statements of account by the person, or in the case of a minor beneficiary, by a parent, conservator, or guardian of the minor beneficiary;
- Each cofiduciary;
- Each surviving settlor of a trust;
- Each issuer of a security for which the affiliated bank administers a fiduciary account;
- The plan sponsor of each employee benefit plan;
- The principal of each agency account; and
- The guardian of the person of each ward under guardianship.
-
- The notice must be sent by United States mail to the person's current address as shown on the fiduciary records.
- If the fiduciary has no address for the person on its records, the fiduciary shall make a reasonable attempt to ascertain the person's current address.
- The notice must disclose the person's rights with respect to objecting to the transfer of the fiduciary account and the liability of the existing fiduciary and the substitute fiduciary for their actions.
- Intentional failure to send the required notice renders the substitution of fiduciary ineffective, but an unintentional failure to send the required notice does not impair the validity or effect of substitution.
- If a substitution of a subsidiary trust company is ineffective because of a defect in the required notice, the actions taken by the subsidiary trust company before the determination of the invalidity of the substitution are valid if the actions would have been valid if performed by the affiliated bank.
-
- Except as provided by this subsection, the prospective designation in a will or other instrument of the affiliated bank as fiduciary is considered designation of the subsidiary trust company or national trust company, and any grant in the will or other instrument of any discretionary power is considered conferred on the subsidiary trust company or national trust company.
- However, the affiliated bank and subsidiary trust company or national trust company may agree in writing to have the designation of the affiliated bank as fiduciary be binding, or the creator of the fiduciary account may, by appropriate language in the document creating the fiduciary account, provide that the fiduciary account is not eligible for substitution under this subchapter.
- Substitution under this section is effective for all purposes on the effective date stated in the agreement between the subsidiary trust company or national trust company and the affiliated bank, unless, not later than fifteen (15) days before the effective date, a party entitled to notice of the substitution under subsection (b) of this section files a written petition in a court of competent jurisdiction seeking to have the substitution denied under § 23-47-804 and provides the affiliated bank with a copy of the filed petition.
- If a petition is filed and notice is given under subsection (e) of this section, the substitution takes effect when the petition is withdrawn or dismissed or when the court enters a final order denying the relief sought.
-
- On the effective date, the subsidiary trust company or national trust company succeeds to all right, title, and interest in all property that the affiliated bank holds as fiduciary, except property held for accounts for which there has been no substitution under this subchapter, without the necessity of any instrument of transfer or conveyance, and the subsidiary trust company or national trust company shall, without the necessity of any judicial action or action by the creator of the fiduciary account, become fiduciary and perform all the duties and obligations and exercise all the powers and authority connected with or incidental to that fiduciary capacity in the same manner as if the subsidiary trust company or national trust company had been originally named or designated fiduciary.
- However, the affiliated bank is responsible and liable for all actions taken by it while it acted as fiduciary.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-804. Removal of accounts from operation of substitution agreement — Denial of substitution.
- A fiduciary account may be removed from the operation of the agreement by an amendment to the agreement filed with the Bank Commissioner before the effective date stated in the agreement.
- The substitution of a subsidiary trust company or national trust company as fiduciary of an account may be denied if the court having jurisdiction, on notice and hearing, determines that the substitution of fiduciary is a material detriment to the account or to the beneficiaries of the account.
- Subsection (b) of this section is cumulative to any applicable provision for removal of a fiduciary or appointment of a successor fiduciary under Arkansas law or in the instrument creating the fiduciary relationship.
- In any proceeding under this section, the court may award costs and reasonable and necessary attorney's fees as the court considers equitable and just.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-805. Deposits.
- A subsidiary trust company or national trust company may deposit with an affiliated bank fiduciary funds that are being held pending investment, distribution, or payment of debts.
- A subsidiary trust company or national trust company may deposit with an affiliated bank fiduciary funds as a permanent investment if authorized by the settlor in the instrument creating the trust or if authorized in a writing delivered to the trustee by a beneficiary currently eligible to receive distributions from a trust.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-806. Responsibility for acts and omissions.
- The bank holding company owning a subsidiary trust company or national trust company shall file with the Bank Commissioner an irrevocable undertaking to be fully responsible for the existing and future fiduciary acts and omissions of its subsidiary trust company or national trust company.
- If an affiliated bank has given bond to secure performance of its duties and the subsidiary trust company or national trust company qualifies as successor fiduciary, the subsidiary trust company or national trust company shall give bond to secure performance of its duties in the same manner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-807. Qualification as successor fiduciary.
For the purposes of qualification as successor fiduciary under any requirements contained in any document creating a fiduciary account or any statute of this state relating to fiduciary accounts, the subsidiary trust company or national trust company:
- Is considered to have capital and surplus equal to its capital and surplus plus the capital and surplus of its owning bank holding company; and
-
Shall be treated as a national bank, unless:
- It is not a national bank under federal law relating to national banks; and
- It has not entered into a substitution agreement with an affiliated bank that is a national bank under federal law relating to national banks.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 9 — Safe-deposit Facilities
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 408, § 24: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 become effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of those certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
23-47-901. Safe deposit facilities — Liability of lessor.
- A bank may lease safe-deposit boxes for the keeping of property on terms as may be agreed to by the parties.
- No bank shall be liable for any loss of the property in a safe-deposit box by theft, robbery, fire, or other cause.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 8.
23-47-902. Multiple-party leases.
- If a safe-deposit box is held in the name of two (2) or more persons, any one (1) of such persons shall be entitled to access the safe-deposit box and shall be permitted to remove the contents thereof, and the bank shall not be responsible for any damage arising by reason of such access or removal by one (1) of the persons.
- The death of one (1) holder of a safe-deposit box held in the name of two (2) or more persons does not affect the right of any other holder of the safe-deposit box to have access to and to remove contents from the safe-deposit box.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-903. Lease to a minor.
A bank may lease a safe-deposit box to a minor and in connection therewith, deal with him or her to the same effect as if leasing to and dealing with a person of full legal capacity.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-904. Limiting right of access for failure to comply with security procedures.
If any lessee is unwilling or unable to comply with any of the bank's normal requirements or procedures in connection with access to a safe-deposit box relating to security, safety, or protection, the bank has the right to limit or deny access to the safe-deposit box by that lessee unless all lessees of the safe-deposit box take such action as is necessary to ensure reasonable compliance with the security, safety, or protection requirements or procedures.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-905. Adverse claims to contents of safe-deposit box.
Notice to a bank of an adverse claim to the contents of a safe-deposit box shall not be sufficient to require the bank to deny access to its lessee unless the adverse claimant also procures a restraining order, injunction, or other process, which has become final and not further appealable, issued in an action by a court of competent jurisdiction in which the lessee is served with process and named as a party.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-47-906. Remedies and procedures for nonpayment of rent.
- If the safe-deposit box rental is delinquent for six (6) months, the bank, after at least thirty (30) days' notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the lessee at the lessee's last known address on the books of the bank, may, if the rent is not paid within the time specified in the notice, open the safe-deposit box in the presence of a notary public and two (2) employees, at least one (1) of whom is an officer of the bank.
- The bank shall inventory the contents of the safe-deposit box in detail and place the contents of the safe-deposit box in a sealed envelope or container bearing the name of the lessee.
-
- The bank shall hold the contents of the safe-deposit box subject to a lien for its rental, the cost of opening the safe-deposit box, and the damages in connection therewith.
- If the rental, cost, damages, and any other lawful charges for the use of the safe-deposit box or the holding of the contents of the safe-deposit box are not paid within two (2) years from the date of opening of the safe-deposit box, the bank may sell at that time or at any time before the period of time established by § 18-28-203 from the date the safe-deposit box lease expired, any of the contents of the safe-deposit box at public auction in the manner and upon the notice as is prescribed for the sale of real property under mortgage or deed of trust.
- Any unauctioned contents of safe-deposit boxes and any excess proceeds from the sale shall be remitted to the Auditor of State under the procedures prescribed by § 18-28-201 et seq.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 63, § 1.
A.C.R.C. Notes. The former Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, referred to in this section, was repealed, with the exception of what will be current § 18-28-230, and replaced by the enactment of the Unclaimed Property Act by Acts 1999, No. 850. The Unclaimed Property Act is now codified as § 18-28-201 et seq.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment, in (c)(2), substituted “holding of the contents of the safe-deposit box” for “holding of the contents thereof”, “before the period of time established by § 18-28-203” for “prior to seven (7) years”, and “any of the contents of the safe-deposit box” for “any part or all of the contents”, and made stylistic changes.
Chapter 48 Organization and Operation
Effective Dates. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 5: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 becomes effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Acts 1997, No. 408, § 24: May 31, 1997. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 become effective on June 1, 1997 and that this act should become effective prior to the effective date of those certain provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall be in full force and effect from and after May 31, 1997.”
Subchapter 1 — General Provisions
23-48-101. Banks subject to gross receipts and compensating use taxes.
All banks shall be subject to the Arkansas Gross Receipts Act, § 26-52-101 et seq., and the Arkansas Compensating Tax Act, § 26-53-101 et seq.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-102. Trust companies no longer subject to banking laws.
- All trust companies, other than national trust companies and subsidiary trust companies, in existence on May 30, 1997, must cease operations as a trust company.
- Trust companies, other than subsidiary trust companies and national trust companies, which have not become banks by May 31, 1997, by complying with the provisions of law for the formation of a bank, shall no longer act as or be authorized to act as a fiduciary, nor shall they be subject to laws governing banks or trust companies, or exercise or be authorized to exercise any powers granted banks or trust companies by those laws, but instead will automatically become business corporations and be subject to the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-27-101 et seq., and the Bank Commissioner shall deliver certified copies of the articles of incorporation, all amendments thereto, and all other corporate filings of those trust companies to the Secretary of State for inclusion in his or her official records of filings of business corporations.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-103. Bank holidays.
-
- Any bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company doing business in this state may close its office for the transaction of business upon any day which has been or may hereafter be set apart or designated under the laws of this state or of the United States as a legal holiday.
- All acts omitted or done by any bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company upon any such day shall have the same consequence and effect as if omitted or done upon the next succeeding business day.
-
- Any bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company transacting business in the State of Arkansas may close on any one (1) business day of each week.
- Any day upon which a bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company may elect to close shall, with respect to the institution, be deemed a holiday for all purposes and not a business day.
- All acts omitted or done by a bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company upon any such day shall have the same consequence and effect as if omitted or done upon the next succeeding business day.
- Any act authorized, required, or permitted to be performed at or with respect to any such bank, subsidiary trust company, or national trust company on the days closed may be performed on the next succeeding business day, and no liability or loss of rights of any kind shall result from the delay.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-104. Dealings with agents, fiduciaries, etc.
A bank dealing, whether to its own benefit or otherwise, with, through, or under any person who is or may be an officer, employee, member, agent, trustee, representative, or other fiduciary of another person shall not be deemed to have notice of nor be obligated to inquire as to any lack of or limitation upon the power of the person solely by reason either of:
- The fact that the person has executed in his or her representative capacity and is himself or herself the payee or endorsee of any check, bill, note, or other promise or order; or
- The use of descriptive words in connection with his or her deposit account or accounts, any transfer, certificate, or memorandum thereof, or in connection with any signature or endorsement of the person.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-105. Agents for affiliate — Definitions.
-
- As used in this section, “institution” means a bank, savings and loan association, or savings bank organized under the laws of any state or the United States.
- For the purpose of determining what constitutes an affiliated institution in this section, “control”, as it pertains to the definition of “affiliate”, has the meaning set forth in § 2(a)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, 12 U.S.C. § 1841.
- Any state bank may, upon compliance with the requirements of this section, agree to receive deposits, renew time deposits, close loans, service loans, receive payments on loans and other obligations, perform such other services as may receive the prior approval of the Bank Commissioner, and act as an agent for any affiliated institution.
-
A state bank that proposes to enter into an agency agreement under this section shall, prior to entering into such an agreement, file with the commissioner:
- A notice of intention to enter into an agency agreement with an affiliated institution;
- A description of the services proposed to be performed under the agency agreement; and
- A copy of the agency agreement.
-
- If any proposed service is not specifically designated in subsection (b) of this section, and has not previously been approved in a State Bank Department rule, the commissioner shall decide whether to approve the offering of the service after receipt of the notice required in subsection (c) of this section.
- In deciding whether to approve any proposed service that is not specifically designated in subsection (b) of this section, the commissioner shall consider whether the service would be consistent with applicable federal and state law and the safety and soundness of the principal and agent institutions.
-
A state bank may not under an agency agreement:
- Conduct any activity as an agent that it would be prohibited from conducting as a principal under applicable state or federal law; or
- Have an agent conduct any activity that the state bank, as principal, would be prohibited from conducting under applicable state or federal law.
- The commissioner may order a state bank or any other institution subject to the commissioner's enforcement powers to cease acting as an agent or principal under any agency agreement that the commissioner finds to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of this state, a state bank acting as an agent for an affiliated institution in accordance with this section shall not be considered to be a branch of that institution.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2540.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (d)(1).
23-48-106. Exemption from posting bond in certain transactions.
-
Except when the dollar amount of responsibility assumed exceeds its capital base, no bank chartered or licensed to do business in this state shall be required to furnish fidelity, surety, or performance bond, in business transactions involving:
- Garnishment;
- Replevin;
- Foreclosure; or
- Forcible entry and detainer.
- At the beginning of any proceeding in all such business transactions, the bank shall, upon request, furnish to each party to the transaction a copy of its most recent statement of financial condition.
-
Nothing in this section shall be construed to:
- Prevent a bank from electing or agreeing to furnish bond at its own cost;
- Prevent any other party of interest desiring protection in a business transaction with a bank from electing to secure and pay for a bond covering the bank to the benefit of the party to the transaction; or
-
Amend or repeal any law pertaining to:
- Corporate surety or indemnity bonds covering directors, officers, or employees of the bank;
- Foreign corporations, associations, or persons not authorized to do business in this state;
- Actions available against the bank for injury or damage; or
- Bonding requirements involving fiduciary activities.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Subchapter 2 — Reserves and Dividends
23-48-201. Membership in Federal Reserve System.
Any state bank shall have the right to own such amount of stock in a federal reserve bank as may be required for it to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-202. Reserve requirements.
A state bank not a member of the Federal Reserve System shall maintain at all times a reserve fund as required by the Federal Reserve Board, unless otherwise provided by State Bank Department rules.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2541.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations”.
23-48-203. Payment of dividends.
Any state bank may, from time to time, declare and pay dividends in accordance with State Bank Department rules.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2542.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations”.
Subchapter 3 — Organization and Management Generally
Effective Dates. Acts 2017, No. 548, § 11: Mar. 21, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the efficient operation of state banks and bank holding companies doing business in Arkansas is a critical need for Arkansas and the banking and financial institutions industry operating under state law; that the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 does not currently allow a state bank in Arkansas to pursue efficient operations and regulatory cost savings under state law through a merger transaction with a wholly owned subsidiary bank of an Arkansas bank holding company that results in the subsidiary bank as the surviving entity of the merger transaction; and that this act is immediately necessary because it is critical that the provisions of this act become effective as soon as possible to encourage efficiency and regulatory costs savings to banks and financial institutions operating in Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-48-301. Application for incorporation.
- Any one (1) or more natural persons, eighteen (18) years of age or older, a majority of whom shall be bona fide residents of this state, who may desire to associate themselves by articles of incorporation for the purpose of establishing any state bank, may apply to the Bank Commissioner to be incorporated.
-
-
An application for authority to organize a state bank shall be submitted to the commissioner in the form that the commissioner may prescribe and shall include the following information:
- The name, citizenship, residence, and occupation of each incorporator, and of each of the initial directors, and the name and address of each stock subscriber, and the amount of stock paid for by each;
- The name and address of an individual within the state to whom notice to all incorporators may be sent;
- The total initial capital and the number of shares of each class of the capital stock to be authorized;
- The corporate name;
- The proposed location of the main banking office;
- If known, the name and residence of the proposed president or chief executive officer, operations officer, and, if applicable, the name and address of the proposed trust officer;
- The names of the natural persons who propose to own or control more than five percent (5%) of the capital stock;
- The past and present connection with any depository institution, financial institution, or national trust company, other than as a customer on terms generally available to the public, of each proposed director and each subscriber to more than five percent (5%) of the capital stock;
- Evidence of the character, financial responsibility, and ability of the incorporators and proposed directors;
- A brief statement of the purposes for which the state bank is incorporated, and whether it shall operate a trust department;
- The term for which the state bank is to exist, which shall be perpetual unless otherwise limited;
- A statement signed and verified by the incorporators that the capital stock has been fully subscribed and the purchase price therefor has been paid into an escrow account approved by the commissioner and that the requirements of § 23-48-310 have been met;
- Proof that application for federal deposit insurance has been made;
- Recitation of the need for and advisability of the approval to organize;
- Any information required under subdivision (b)(2) of this section not otherwise listed in this subdivision (b)(1); and
- Any additional information that the commissioner may require.
-
The proposed articles of incorporation shall contain the following information:
- The name of the proposed institution;
- The town or city in which the proposed institution is to be located;
- The amount of capital stock authorized, the number of shares of each class, the relative preferences, powers, and rights of each class, and the amount of paid-in surplus;
- The names and places of residence of the stockholders and the number of shares held by each;
- A statement whether voting for directors shall or shall not be cumulative and the extent, if any, of the preemptive rights of stockholders;
- The term of the proposed institution's existence, which shall be perpetual unless otherwise limited;
- The names of the initial board of directors composed of no fewer than three (3) natural persons who shall serve until the next annual meeting or until their successors are regularly elected and qualified;
- Other information that the State Bank Department may require; and
- Other proper provisions that the incorporators may choose to insert for the regulation of the internal affairs and business of the state bank.
-
- Five (5) copies of the proposed articles of incorporation and proposed bylaws shall be filed with the application under subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
- The application and articles of incorporation shall be signed by each of the incorporators and shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee of not more than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) as set by department rules.
-
An application for authority to organize a state bank shall be submitted to the commissioner in the form that the commissioner may prescribe and shall include the following information:
- All persons purporting to act as or on behalf of a state bank knowing there was no incorporation under this chapter are jointly and severally liable for all liabilities created while so acting.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 4; 2019, No. 315, § 2543; 2019, No. 391, § 5.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “president or chief executive officer” for “president, chief executive officer” in (b)(6).
The 2019 amendment by No. 315 substituted “rules” for “regulations” in the introductory language of (b).
The 2019 amendment by No. 391 substituted “eighteen (18) years of age or older” for “eighteen (18) years old or older” in (a); redesignated the introductory language of (b) as (b)(1); in the introductory language of (b)(1), inserted “following” preceding “information”, deleted “set forth in this subsection and subsection (c) of this section, and contain additional information which the commissioner may require” following “information”, and deleted the second and third sentences; redesignated former (b)(1) through (b)(14) as (b)(1)(A) through (b)(1)(N); added (b)(1)(O) and (b)(1)(P); redesignated former (c) as (b)(2); added “information” following “following” in the introductory languages of (b)(2) and (c)(2); redesignated former (c)(1) through (c)(9) as (b)(2)(A) through (b)(2)(I); added (b)(3); and redesignated former (d) as (c).
23-48-302. Organizational expenses.
- Organizational expenses shall not be paid from capital or surplus funds of the state bank without the prior written consent of the Bank Commissioner.
-
- Prior to applying for a charter, the incorporators shall establish an organizational expense fund in an amount the commissioner deems adequate.
- The fund shall be used for expenses incurred by the incorporators in connection with the organization of the proposed state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-303. Promoter's fees prohibited.
- A state bank shall not pay any fee, compensation, or commission for promotion in connection with its organization or apply any money received on account of shares or subscriptions, selling shares, or other services in connection with its organization or for securing subscriptions for stock, except legal fees and other usual and ordinary expenses necessary for its organization.
-
A majority of incorporators shall file with the State Bank Department, at the time of filing of the articles, an affidavit:
- Setting forth all expenses incurred or to be incurred in connection with the organization of the state bank, subscription for its shares, and sale of its shares; and
- Stating that no fee, compensation, or commission prohibited by this section has been paid or incurred.
- In the event of a violation of this section, the Bank Commissioner may disapprove the articles on account of the violation.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-304. Investigation of new charter applications by Bank Commissioner.
- As soon as practicable after acceptance of any application for a new state bank charter and receipt of the filing fee, the Bank Commissioner shall ascertain, from the best sources of information at his or her command, the character and general fitness of the persons named as stockholders of more than five percent (5%) of the issued stock and their standing in the community in which the proposed institution is to be located.
- The investigation shall seek to determine the probable support for the new state bank and the adequacy of existing facilities and services in the community.
-
The investigation shall address:
- The proposed institution's earnings and deposits prospects;
- The ability and character of its proposed management;
- The adequacy of initial capital;
- The safety and soundness of intended operations;
- The economic conditions in the market to be served;
- The convenience and needs of the community to be served; and
- Whether or not its proposed corporate powers are consistent with applicable banking law.
-
The commissioner shall also determine to his or her satisfaction that:
- The persons named as stockholders of more than five percent (5%) of the issued stock, incorporators, and directors have the confidence of the community and are able, financially and otherwise, to discharge the obligations resting upon them under any of the provisions of this chapter;
- The requisite capital has been fully subscribed and the purchase price therefor has been paid into an escrow account approved by the commissioner and that the requirements of § 23-48-310 have been met;
- A majority of the stockholders are residents of this state; and
- There exists an economic need for the business in the community.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-305. Issuance and filing of certificate of incorporation.
- Upon approval of the State Banking Board and payment of the fees, the Bank Commissioner shall give to the persons named as incorporators a certificate of incorporation, in the form that he or she may prescribe, if the commissioner has made satisfactory determinations as to the matters described in § 23-48-304(d)(1)-(4) and is also satisfied that appropriate federal deposit insurance has been obtained.
- The commissioner shall also return one (1) of the copies submitted to him or her of the articles of incorporation upon which he or she has endorsed the fact of the issuance by him or her of the certificate of incorporation.
- Upon receipt of the certificate of incorporation, the institution may proceed with its business.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 113, § 5.
23-48-306. Relocation of place of business — Amendment of articles.
-
- Any state bank may apply for authority to change its place of business from one (1) municipality to another by filing with the Bank Commissioner, as an amendment to its articles of incorporation, two (2) copies of a resolution to that effect, and such additional information which the commissioner may require.
- The resolution must be adopted upon the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a simple majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, at any annual or special meeting of the stockholders.
- Both copies of the resolution shall be signed by the president or chief executive officer or a vice president.
- One (1) of the copies of the resolution shall be retained by the commissioner. The other copy, if the commissioner and State Banking Board approve the amendment, shall be returned with the commissioner's endorsement of approval thereof.
- The amendment shall become effective when it has been approved by the commissioner and the board.
- Each application for authority to change a state bank's place of business shall be accompanied by a fee as shall be set by State Bank Department rule, which fee shall be paid to the department.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 5; 2019, No. 315, § 2544.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment inserted “or chief executive officer” in (a)(3).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c).
23-48-307. Objects and method of charter amendment.
-
Any state bank, through amendment to its articles of incorporation, may from time to time do the following, which shall be in addition to all things it may otherwise do through amendment under the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997:
- Change its corporate name;
- Change, enlarge, or diminish its corporate purposes, in accordance with the applicable state law;
- Increase or decrease its authorized capital stock, subject to the limitations and in the manner set out in § 23-48-311;
- Effect splits of its shares or a distribution of some portion of its assets, other than cash or its own stock; and
- Effect any fundamental change in its corporate affairs which may be accomplished by charter amendment under any other statute of Arkansas.
- Articles of incorporation of a state bank may be amended at any annual or special meeting of the stockholders.
- Except as provided in § 23-48-313(a)(1)(C), unless a greater percentage of votes is required in the articles of incorporation for an amendment of any provision of the articles of incorporation, an amendment to the articles of incorporation may be adopted on the affirmative vote of the owners of a simple majority of each class of stock entitled to vote on the proposed amendment.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 2.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added “Except as provided in § 23-48-313(a)(1)(C), unless a greater percentage of votes is required in the articles of incorporation for an amendment of any provision of the articles of incorporation” in (c).
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-48-308. Filing of amendments to articles of incorporation.
-
- An application for approval of a proposed charter amendment described in § 23-48-307 shall be submitted to the Bank Commissioner in the manner and form that the commissioner may prescribe and shall include the information set forth in subsection (b) of this section, and contain additional information which the commissioner may require.
- The application shall include duplicate copies of each proposed charter amendment, in the form of an amendment to the articles of incorporation, each copy to be certified by the president or chief executive officer or a vice president.
-
Each duplicate shall have annexed thereto, over the official signatures, a certificate showing:
- The date on which the amendment was authorized by the stockholders;
- The number of shares of each class entitled to vote on the amendment which were outstanding on the date of the stockholders' meeting;
- The number of shares of each class entitled to vote on the amendment whose owners were present in person or by proxy;
- The number of shares of each class voted for and against the amendment; and
- The manner in which the meeting was called and the time and manner of giving notice, with a certification that the meeting was lawfully called and held.
- The commissioner may also require the delivery to him or her of additional copies of the proposed amendment that he or she may desire in order to present the matter to the State Banking Board and any parties opposing the amendment.
-
- One (1) of the duplicate copies of any charter amendment filed with the commissioner and certified as prescribed in this section, bearing an endorsement of the commissioner showing that the amendment has been approved by him or her and by the board, shall be returned to the applicant state bank.
- The amendment shall become effective when it has been approved by the commissioner and the board.
-
- Each application for approval of a proposed charter amendment described in § 23-48-307 shall be accompanied by a fee of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).
- The fee shall be set by State Bank Department rule and shall be paid to the department.
- This section does not apply to the issuance of preferred stock when the issuance is authorized and issued by a state bank when approved by the commissioner and otherwise in compliance with § 23-48-313(a)(1)(C).
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 6; 2017, No. 548, § 3; 2019, No. 315, § 2545.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment by No. 198 inserted “chief executive officer or” in (a)(2).
The 2017 amendment by No. 548 added (f).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (e)(2).
23-48-309. Names of state banks and subsidiary trust companies.
-
- Prior to the formation of a state bank, or prior to the consummation of an interstate merger transaction, a person may reserve the exclusive use of a corporate name for a bank by delivering an application to the Bank Commissioner for filing.
- The application must set forth the name and address of the applicant and the name proposed to be reserved.
- If the commissioner finds that the corporate name applied for is available, he or she shall reserve the name for the applicant's exclusive use for a nonrenewable two-hundred-seventy-day period.
- The owner of a reserved corporate name may transfer the reservation to another person by delivering to the commissioner a signed notice of transfer that states the name and address of the transferee.
-
No state bank, registered out-of-state bank, or subsidiary trust company shall conduct any business in this state under a fictitious name unless it first files with the commissioner a form supplied or approved by the commissioner giving the following information:
- The fictitious name under which business is being or will be conducted by the applicant entity;
- A brief statement of the character of business to be conducted under the fictitious name; and
- The name, home state, and location, giving city and street address, of the registered office in this state of the applicant entity.
-
- Each form shall be executed in duplicate and filed with the commissioner, who shall maintain an index of the filings.
- The commissioner shall retain one (1) counterpart, and the other counterpart, bearing the file marks of the commissioner, shall be returned to the state bank, registered out-of-state bank, or subsidiary trust company.
- However, the commissioner shall not accept the filing if the proposed fictitious name is the same as, or confusingly similar to, the name of any bank, domestic corporation, or any foreign corporation authorized to do business in this state, or any name reserved for any such entity.
- Copies of the filed forms, certified by the commissioner, shall be admitted in evidence when the question of filing may be material.
-
- If, after filing hereunder, the applicant is dissolved, or, being a foreign corporation or registered out-of-state bank, surrenders or forfeits its rights to do business in Arkansas or ceases to do business in Arkansas under the specified fictitious name, the bank or subsidiary trust company shall be obligated to file with the commissioner a cancellation of its privilege under this section.
- If the cancellation is not filed, the commissioner, upon satisfactory evidence, may cancel the privilege, in which event the cancellation shall be certified by the commissioner, who will file the same without a fee.
-
- If a state bank, registered out-of-state bank, or subsidiary trust company which has not filed hereunder has heretofore or shall hereafter become a party to any contract, deed, conveyance, assignment, or instrument of encumbrance in which the bank or subsidiary trust company is referred to exclusively by a fictitious name, the obligations imposed upon the bank or subsidiary trust company under the instrument and the right sought to be conferred on third parties thereunder may be enforced against it.
- But the rights accruing to the bank or subsidiary trust company under the instrument may not be enforced by the bank or subsidiary trust company in the courts of this state until it has complied with this section and pays to the commissioner a civil penalty of three hundred dollars ($300).
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 9.
23-48-310. Minimum capital requirements generally.
-
For all state banks chartered after May 30, 1997, the fully paid-up capital shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). For all state banks, regardless of the dates of their charters, the following capital requirements shall apply:
- The minimum “capital base” shall be determined by the Bank Commissioner; and
- The capital requirements for any state bank must also satisfy the requirements for deposit insurance of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor.
-
- The commissioner may increase the minimum capital requirement of any state bank, regardless of the date of its charter when, in the commissioner's judgment, conditions within the state bank or the state bank's service area warrant such an increase.
- In the event the commissioner orders an increase in a state bank's capital requirement, the state bank shall have at least thirty (30) days from the date of the order to comply with the order, or such longer period as the commissioner may allow.
- In the event a state bank disagrees with the commissioner's judgment in ordering an increase in its minimum capital requirement, it may appeal the commissioner's decision to the State Banking Board. An appeal may be had by following the procedures specified by the board.
- Shares of a newly chartered state bank may be issued only for cash in an amount sufficient to meet the capitalization requirements set by the commissioner which shall be at least the aggregate par value of the shares plus the amounts, if any, necessary to assure that after issuance of the shares the bank will have the minimum capital base required by the commissioner under this section and the expense fund required by § 23-48-302.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-311. Increase or decrease of capital stock.
- The authorized capital stock of any state bank may be increased or decreased by amendment to its articles of incorporation, subject to the requirements pertaining to such amendments contained in §§ 23-48-307 and 23-48-308.
- A capital stock increase may be effected by the issuance and sale of additional shares, which additional shares may be of the same class as the shares then outstanding or may be represented by a different class or classes having privileges, preferences, and voting rights greater or less than those appurtenant to the then outstanding shares, whether common stock or preferred stock.
- Stock dividends may be paid out of surplus or undivided profits.
- A state bank may authorize common stock, which may be retained, unissued by the institution, until such time as the board of directors shall order its sale or distribution.
- Except as otherwise permitted under § 23-47-102(c), a decrease of the capital stock shall not be permitted without the consent of the Bank Commissioner and in no event shall the capital be reduced to a figure below the minimum prescribed by law.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 4.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Except as otherwise permitted under § 23-47-102(c), a decrease of the capital stock shall not be” for “No decrease of the capital stock shall be” in (e).
23-48-312. Liability of shareholders — Assessment of stock.
-
- Except as otherwise provided in this section, a purchaser from a state bank of its own shares is not liable to the state bank or its creditors with respect to the shares except to pay the full consideration, fixed as provided by law, for which the shares were issued or were to be issued.
- Except as otherwise provided in this section, or unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, a shareholder of a state bank is not personally liable for the acts or debts of the state bank except that he or she may become personally liable by reason of his or her own acts or conduct.
-
- When, in the opinion of the Bank Commissioner, the report of an examination of a state bank discloses bad or worthless assets which should be charged off, he or she shall immediately instruct the officers of the state bank to collect and realize upon the assets within a time fixed by him or her, and, if not collected or realized upon within that time, the assets shall immediately be charged off.
- If the capital, as defined by the commissioner, is thereby impaired, the commissioner shall order the directors to make an assessment upon the capital stock in form and manner as provided in subsection (c) of this section to restore capital.
-
- The directors of every state bank shall have power and authority to levy and collect assessments on the stock of the state bank and shall make the levy on the order of the commissioner for the purpose of restoring any deficiency that may occur by reason of the impairment of the capital of the state bank.
- Should the assessment not be paid within thirty (30) days from the date the assessment is made, the assessed stock, or so much thereof as may be necessary, shall be sold at public auction to provide funds to meet the assessment.
- A lien is created in favor of the state bank on the stock to pay the assessments so made.
-
- For purposes of this section, a state bank's capital is impaired when, in the opinion of the commissioner, its assets are of such a character and value that it is unable in the ordinary course of business to meet the minimum capital requirements as specified from time to time by administrative policies adopted by the commissioner.
- In the absence of fraud or collusion, the determination of the commissioner as to impairment of capital is conclusive.
-
Subdivision (b)(2) of this section and subsection (c) of this section do not apply to a state bank if the state bank:
- Is required to file reports under section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017; or
- Has a class of equity securities registered under section 12(b) or section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 5.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added (e).
U.S. Code. Sections 12, 13, and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, are codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78l, 15 U.S.C. § 78m, and 15 U.S.C. § 78o, respectively.
23-48-313. Classes of stock — Fractional shares — Scrip.
-
-
- The shares of the capital stock of any state bank may consist of shares of common stock or of common and preferred stock.
- Common or preferred stock may be divided into classes with the designations, preferences, limitations, retirement provisions, and relative rights as shall be stated in the articles of incorporation or an amendment thereto.
-
-
If provided in the articles of incorporation of a state bank, the board of directors may determine, in whole or part, the preferences, limitations, and relative rights, within the limits stated in § 4-27-601, of:
- Any class of shares before any shares of that class are issued; or
- One (1) or more series within a class before any shares of that series are issued.
- Each series of a class shall be given a distinguishing designation.
- All shares of a series shall have preferences, limitations, and relative rights that are identical with those of other shares of the same series and, except to the extent otherwise provided in the description of the series, with those of other series of the same class.
-
- Before issuing any shares of a class or series created under this section, the state bank shall deliver to the Bank Commissioner for filing the articles of amendment that are effective without shareholder action and provide a copy of the resolutions adopted by the board of directors approving the amendment.
-
The articles of amendment shall include:
- The name of the state bank;
- A statement that the number of shares to be issued under this section are within the number of shares authorized to be issued under the articles of incorporation of the state bank;
- The text of the amendment determining the terms of the class or series of shares;
- The date of adoption of the amendment; and
- A statement that the amendment was adopted by the board of directors.
-
If provided in the articles of incorporation of a state bank, the board of directors may determine, in whole or part, the preferences, limitations, and relative rights, within the limits stated in § 4-27-601, of:
-
- The voting rights of any class of stock may be denied or restricted, except that the holder of stock belonging to a class of stock issued as nonvoting shall be entitled to vote in respect to a dissolution or a merger or consolidation, or in respect to any proposal that would adversely affect the preferences, privileges, and other rights annexed to the shares.
- A stockholder's right to vote under Arkansas Constitution, Article 12, § 8, upon a proposal to increase the stock of the state bank may not be abridged.
-
-
- Unless prohibited by the articles of agreement, or an amendment thereto, or by bylaws, a state bank may issue a certificate for a fractional share or, by action of its board of directors, may issue, in lieu thereof, scrip in bearer or registered form which shall entitle the holder to receive a certificate for a full share upon the surrender of the scrip aggregating a full share.
- Unless otherwise provided in the articles of agreement or in an amendment thereto, or in the bylaws, a fractional share shall, but scrip shall not, entitle the holder to exercise voting rights, to receive dividends thereon, and to participate in any of the assets of the corporation in the event of liquidation.
- When scrip is issued, the directors may provide that it shall become void if not exchanged for certificates representing full shares before a specified date, or the board may provide that the shares for which the scrip is exchangeable may be sold by the state bank and the proceeds thereof distributed to the holders of the scrip.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 6.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added (a)(1)(C).
23-48-314. Preemptive rights of stockholders.
- Unless otherwise provided by the articles of incorporation, every stockholder, upon the sale for cash of any new stock of the same class as that which he or she already holds, shall have the right to purchase his or her pro rata share thereof at a price not exceeding the price at which it may be offered to others, which price may be in excess of par.
-
- Where the articles of incorporation do not prohibit the preemptive rights, the terms and conditions of the rights, and the time limit fixed for the exercise thereof, may be prescribed in the articles of incorporation or, if not so prescribed in the articles of incorporation, then in the bylaws or in the resolution of the board of directors adopted in connection with the stock increase.
- Provided, however, that for all state banks chartered after May 30, 1997, there shall be no preemptive rights in stockholders except as specified in the articles of incorporation.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-315. Issuance and sale of capital notes and other subordinated indebtedness.
-
-
With the written consent of the Bank Commissioner, a state bank may, through action of its board of directors and without requiring any action by stockholders, issue and sell its capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness at:
- Not less than par; or
- Par, less a customary discount if sold through a broker-dealer registered under section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017, or exempt from such registration pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102.
- The capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness may be sold for cash or, with the written consent and approval of the commissioner, for property.
-
With the written consent of the Bank Commissioner, a state bank may, through action of its board of directors and without requiring any action by stockholders, issue and sell its capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness at:
-
- The capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness shall be in such denominations, and the holders thereof shall be entitled to such annual return thereon, as the commissioner may approve.
- The capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness shall provide that they may be retired at such time or times and in such manner as may be fixed by the board of directors of the state bank but in no event later than twenty (20) years, in the case of capital notes, or thirty (30) years, in the case of other subordinated indebtedness, after the date of their issuance.
- The aggregate par value of the capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness shall not exceed one-half (½) of the capital base of the issuing state bank, or such lesser proportion of the capital base as may be determined by rule or order of the commissioner.
-
-
The state bank, in connection with the issue, subscription, or sale of capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness, may confer upon the holder of each capital note or other subordinated indebtedness the right to convert the obligation into shares of the common stock of the state bank on such terms as are set forth in the instrument evidencing the conversion rights. The terms may include any agreements not repugnant to law for the protection of the conversion rights, including without limitation the generality of such authority:
- Restrictions upon the authorization or issuance of additional shares;
- Provisions for the adjustment of the conversion price or ratio;
- Provisions concerning rights in the event of reorganization, merger, consolidation, or sale or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the state bank; and
- Provisions for the reservation of authorized but unissued shares to satisfy the conversion rights.
- If the shares into which the obligations are convertible would be subject to preemptive rights if issued for cash, the conferring of the conversion rights must be authorized at a stockholders' meeting on a vote of at least a majority of the shares of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the state bank. The vote shall release the preemptive rights to the shares required to satisfy such conversion rights.
-
The state bank, in connection with the issue, subscription, or sale of capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness, may confer upon the holder of each capital note or other subordinated indebtedness the right to convert the obligation into shares of the common stock of the state bank on such terms as are set forth in the instrument evidencing the conversion rights. The terms may include any agreements not repugnant to law for the protection of the conversion rights, including without limitation the generality of such authority:
-
- Capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness shall at the time of their issuance be, and shall at all times thereafter remain, subordinate in rank and subject to the prior payment of all types of deposits of the state bank.
- The state bank may, for the security and protection of the holders of the capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness, agree upon such restrictions on the distribution or payment of dividends on its capital stock as the board of directors may decide.
-
- Capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness and accrued return thereon may be retired at any time, in whole or in part, with the written approval of the commissioner, unless otherwise provided in the capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness, as applicable.
- In any case in which capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness issued under the provisions of this section are callable in a period less than thirty (30) years after their issuance, the state bank issuing the capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness may, by a provision inserted therein to that effect, reserve the right, from time to time, to extend the time for the retirement or redemption of the capital notes or other subordinated indebtedness. In that event, the state bank issuing the capital notes or subordinated indebtedness may, by vote of a majority of its board of directors, with the consent of the commissioner, make the extension.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 7.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added “and other subordinated indebtedness” in the section heading; inserted “or other subordinated indebtedness” throughout the section; redesignated former (a)(1) as present (a)(1) and (a)(1)(A); in the introductory language of (a)(1), added “With the written consent of the Bank Commissioner” and deleted “with the written consent of the Bank Commissioner” following “stockholders”; added (a)(1)(B); inserted “in the case of capital notes, or thirty (30) years, in the case of other subordinated indebtedness” in (b)(2); in (b)(3), inserted “aggregate”, inserted the first occurrence of “capital”, and added “or such lesser proportion of the capital base as may be determined by rule or order of the commissioner”; in (b)(4)(A), substituted “obligation” for “note” and “without limitation” for “but without limiting”; substituted “state bank” for “corporation” in (b)(4)(A)(iii); added “as applicable” at the end of (d)(1); and, in (d)(2), substituted “thirty (30)” for “twenty (20)” and inserted “or redemption”.
U.S. Code. Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78o.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, referred to in this section, is codified in part as 12 U.S.C. §§ 1831v–1831y, 12 U.S.C. § 1848a, 12 U.S.C. § 2908, 15 U.S.C. § 6701 et seq., 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq., and 15 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq., and as amendments to 12 U.S.C. § 1821, 12 U.S.C. § 1828, 12 U.S.C. § 1831u, 12 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq., 15 U.S.C. § 78c et seq., and other sections within Titles 12, 15, 16, and 18.
23-48-316. Transfer of stock.
- The stock of every state bank shall be transferrable only on the books of the bank.
-
- When any number of shares of the stock of a state bank or shares of stock in an Arkansas bank holding company shall be transferred to any transferee or joint transferees, the state bank or Arkansas bank holding company shall promptly transmit to the Bank Commissioner a certificate, on a form prescribed by the commissioner, showing the transfer.
- The certificate also shall show the total number of shares at that time outstanding in the name of the transferee or anyone known by the state bank or Arkansas bank holding company to be the nominee of the transferee or holding in trust for the transferee.
-
This subsection does not apply to a state bank or Arkansas bank holding company that:
- Is required to file reports under section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017; or
- Has a class of equity securities registered under section 12(b) or section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2017.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 8.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment rewrote (b)(3).
U.S. Code. Sections 12, 13, and 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in this section, are codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78l, 15 U.S.C. § 78m, and 15 U.S.C. § 78o, respectively.
23-48-317. Change in control.
- As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, “control” has the meaning set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 1841(a)(2).
-
-
Prior approval by the Bank Commissioner of any transfer of ownership shall not be required unless and until:
- A transfer reported to the commissioner would result in the control by the transferee and any nominee of the transferee and any person holding in trust for the transferee of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the capital stock of the state bank or Arkansas bank holding company; or
- A transfer reported to the commissioner would increase a then-existing ownership of the capital stock of a state bank or Arkansas bank holding company already controlled by the transferee to twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the capital stock of the state bank or Arkansas bank holding company.
-
- In either of the situations set out in subdivisions (b)(1)(A) and (B) of this section, no shares held in such ownership may be voted unless the ownership, and the transfers mentioned in subdivisions (b)(1)(A) and (B) of this section, shall be approved by the commissioner and his or her approval given to the transferee in writing.
- The commissioner in his or her discretion may at any time require any transferee to certify in writing as to the extent of the legal or beneficial ownership by the transferee of the stock of the state bank or Arkansas bank holding company.
-
Prior approval by the Bank Commissioner of any transfer of ownership shall not be required unless and until:
-
- Any transferee seeking to acquire twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the capital stock of a state bank or Arkansas bank holding company shall file with the commissioner an application for approval submitted to the commissioner in the form that the commissioner may prescribe, the application to be accompanied by a filing fee of not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) as set by State Bank Department rule.
- The application shall include the information set forth in subsection (d) of this section and contain such additional information as the commissioner may require.
-
An application for approval to acquire control of a state bank or an Arkansas bank holding company shall contain evidence that:
- The proposed transaction will promote the safety and soundness of the institution to be controlled;
- If the applicant is a bank holding company, the transaction will not result in a violation of the provisions of § 23-48-405;
- The applicant bank or the bank subsidiaries of an applicant bank holding company adequately serve the convenience and needs of the communities served by them in accordance with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977; and
-
- The applicant intends to adequately serve the convenience and needs of the communities served by the state bank or state bank subsidiaries proposed to be controlled in accordance with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.
- The application shall specifically address the proposed initial capital investments, proposed loan policies, proposed investment policies, proposed dividend policies, and general plan of proposed business of the institution proposed to be controlled, including the full range of consumer and business services which are proposed to be offered.
-
The commissioner shall approve an application to acquire control of a state bank or an Arkansas bank holding company if he or she is satisfied that:
- The evidence and information contained in the application would result in the likelihood that the public interest would be served;
- The safety and soundness of the institution to be controlled is adequately addressed; and
- Approval of the application, if the applicant is a bank holding company, will not result in a violation of the provisions of § 23-48-405.
-
The commissioner may by rule or order waive the requirements required under this section if:
- A change in control will simultaneously occur with a proposed merger transaction under § 23-48-503(a); and
-
A transferee submits a merger application to:
- The commissioner and the federal bank supervisory agency, in the case of a state bank;
- The home-state regulator and the federal bank supervisory agency, in the case of an out-of-state bank; or
- The United States Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in the case of a national bank.
-
A plan of exchange approved by the commissioner under § 23-48-601 does not satisfy the requirements for a change in control under subsection (b) of this section unless:
- The plan of exchange is executed by a bank holding company as defined in § 23-45-102; and
- The bank holding company executing the plan of exchange under § 23-48-601 is the existing bank holding company of the subject state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 195, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2546.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added (f) and (g).
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (c)(1).
U.S. Code. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, referred to in this section, is codified as 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.
23-48-318. Stockholder meetings — Notice of special meeting.
- A special meeting of the stockholders, whether held for the purpose of amending the articles of incorporation or for any other lawful purpose, may be called as prescribed in the bylaws or, if the bylaws are silent in that respect, by the president or chief executive officer or by resolution of the board of directors.
-
Written notice of the special meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting, other than stockholders who waive notice in writing, for the time and in the manner set out in the bylaws subject to the following minimum requirements:
- The notice must be signed by an officer of the state bank;
- The notice must state the time and place of the meeting and must also state the nature of the proposals to be submitted to the stockholders at the meeting;
- The notice must be mailed to each such stockholder, other than those waiving notice, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, directed to the stockholder at the address of the stockholder shown on the stock records of the state bank. The depositing of the notice in the mail as above prescribed shall constitute the giving of the notice. It is not necessary in any event that the mailing be by registered or certified mail; and
- If the meeting is called for the purpose of increasing the authorized capital stock of the state bank, the notice shall be mailed at least sixty (60) days prior to the meeting, but if the meeting is called for any other purpose, the notice shall be mailed for such number of days prior to the meeting as may be prescribed in the bylaws. In no event shall mailing be less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting.
-
Any stockholder may waive the right to receive notice of special meetings of the stockholders by:
- A written waiver of the right, signed by the stockholder, which shall be effective as a waiver until revoked; or
- The stockholder's attendance, in person or by proxy, at the meeting.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 7.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment, in (a), substituted “that respect” for “such respect” and “president or chief executive officer or” for “president or”.
23-48-319. Stockholder meetings — Notice of annual meeting.
- Not less than ten (10) days' written notice of an annual meeting shall be given to each stockholder, other than stockholders who waive notice in writing, which notice shall be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, and directed to the stockholder at his or her address shown on the stock records of the state bank.
-
- However, if it is proposed at an annual meeting to approve an amendment to the articles of incorporation, or to approve a merger, consolidation, conversion, corporate dissolution, or reorganization through a plan of exchange, the annual meeting will be regarded, so far as these special matters are concerned, as a special meeting.
- It shall not be lawful to submit the special matters at an annual meeting unless, in respect to the special matters, there shall have been a call of the meeting and written notice given all as required in § 23-48-318 concerning special meetings.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-320. Stockholder meetings — Quorum — Voting.
-
- Each share of stock shall be entitled to one (1) vote on each matter submitted at a meeting of stockholders except to the extent that the voting rights of any class are limited or denied, to an extent permitted by law, by the articles of incorporation or an amendment thereto.
-
- Subject to the provisions of subsection (d) of this section, in electing directors at meetings of stockholders, each stockholder of a state bank shall have a right to vote the number of shares owned by him or her for as many persons as there are directors to be elected, or to cumulate the shares so as to give one (1) candidate as many votes as the number of directors multiplied by the number of shares of stock held by him or her shall equal.
- The stockholder may distribute his or her votes on the same principle among as many candidates as he or she shall see fit, unless it is provided otherwise in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws of the state bank.
-
- A majority of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting shall constitute a quorum.
- If a quorum is present, the vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the stockholders unless the vote of a larger majority is required by the bylaws or by this or any other applicable statute.
-
- A stockholder may vote in person or by written proxy.
- No proxy shall be valid after eleven (11) months from the date of its execution unless otherwise provided in the proxy, but a proxy may be of indefinite duration if coupled with an interest.
-
- For a state bank chartered on or before May 30, 1997, the shareholders of the state bank shall have cumulative voting privileges in the election of directors unless the articles of incorporation of the state bank otherwise provide.
- For a state bank chartered after May 30, 1997, there shall be no cumulative voting privilege unless the state bank's articles of incorporation so provide.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 548, § 9.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated former (d) as (d)(2); substituted “a state bank” for “all state banks” in (d)(2); and added (d)(1).
RESEARCH REFERENCES
U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.
Annual Survey of Caselaw: Business Law, 27 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 593.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Elimination of cumulative voting under this section for bank holding companies does not unconstitutionally deprive shareholders of the vested right to cumulative voting because Ark. Const. Art. 12, § 6 permits the Arkansas General Assembly to repeal, amend, or alter corporate laws at any time. Bennett v. Lonoke Bancshares, Inc., 356 Ark. 371, 155 S.W.3d 15 (2004).
Cumulative Voting.
Bank holding company is not included within this section, which governs cumulative voting; therefore, cumulative voting was not required in a bank holding company created under the Arkansas Business Corporation Act of 1987, § 4-27-101 et seq., because it was not mandated in the articles of incorporation. Bennett v. Lonoke Bancshares, Inc., 356 Ark. 371, 155 S.W.3d 15 (2004).
23-48-321. Closing transfer books — Fixing record date.
- For the purpose of determining stockholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any annual or special meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or entitled to receive payment of any dividend, the board of directors of a state bank may provide that the stock transfer books shall be closed for a stated period but not to exceed, in any case, seventy (70) days before the date of the meeting.
- In lieu of closing the stock transfer books, the board of directors may fix a date in advance of the meeting as the record date for any such determination of stockholders. The date in any case may not be more than seventy (70) days prior to the date on which the meeting is to be held.
- If the stock transfer books are not closed and no record date is fixed for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at, a meeting of stockholders, or stockholders entitled to receive payment of a dividend, the date on which notice of the meeting is mailed or the date on which the resolution of the board of directors declaring the dividend is adopted, as the case may be, shall be the record date for the determination of stockholders.
- When a determination of stockholders entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders has been made as provided in this section, the determination shall apply to any adjournment thereof.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-322. Board of directors — Standard of conduct.
-
-
- The affairs of any state bank shall be managed and controlled by a board of directors of not fewer than three (3) persons, who shall be selected at such times and in such manner as may be provided by its bylaws.
- Members of the board are not required to be stockholders of the state bank or of its bank holding company unless so provided in the bylaws of the state bank.
- The initial board may be elected by the incorporators, with the privilege of cumulative voting to have no application to the election of the initial board.
-
- Any vacancy in the board of directors of any state bank shall be filled by appointment by the remaining directors, and any director so appointed shall hold office until the election of his or her successor.
- Unless the articles of incorporation, or an amendment thereto, shall provide to the contrary, the directors shall have exclusive power to promulgate, amend, or repeal bylaws of the state bank.
-
A director of a bank which maintains its main banking office within the State of Arkansas shall discharge his or her duties as a director, including his or her duties as a member of any committees:
- In good faith;
- With the care an ordinary prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and
- In a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the bank.
-
In discharging his or her duties, a director shall be entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:
- One (1) or more officers or employees of the bank whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;
- Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence; or
- A committee of the board of directors of which he or she is not a member, if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence.
- A director is not acting in good faith if he or she has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted in subsection (e) of this section unwarranted.
- A director is not liable for any action taken as a director, or any failure to take any action, if he or she performed the duties of his or her office in compliance with this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-323. Officers — Selection — Terms — Bonds.
-
-
A state bank shall have:
- A president or chief executive officer, or both;
- A secretary; and
- Any other officers as the directors may from time to time designate.
- An individual may hold more than one (1) office.
-
A state bank shall have:
- The officers shall hold their offices for a term of one (1) year or until successors are elected unless sooner removed by the board of directors.
- The board shall require bonds of the officers as it shall deem proper and necessary to protect the funds of the state bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 8.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment redesignated former (a) as (a)(1) and (a)(2); added “or chief executive officer, or both” in (a)(1)(A); and added “Any” in (a)(1)(C).
23-48-324. Officers — Taking acknowledgments.
- An official of a bank who holds a commission as notary public may act as notary in taking the acknowledgment of mortgages and deeds of trust executed in favor of the bank. All such instruments previously acknowledged in this manner are declared to have been lawfully acknowledged and entitled to record.
- This section does not authorize such an official to take the acknowledgment of a deed of trust wherein he or she is named the trustee.
History. Acts 1997, No.9, § 1.
23-48-325. Banker's banks.
-
Any state bank may purchase, for its own account, shares of a bank or bank holding company if:
- The stock of the bank or bank holding company whose shares are being purchased is owned exclusively by financial institutions; and
- The bank or bank holding company whose shares are being purchased and all subsidiaries thereof are engaged exclusively in providing services for financial institutions, their parent holding companies, subsidiaries thereof, and the officers, directors, and employees of each.
-
- In no event shall the total amount of stock held by a bank in any bank or bank holding company described in subsection (a) of this section exceed at any time ten percent (10%) of the holding bank's capital base.
- In no event shall the purchase of that stock result in the purchasing bank's acquiring more than five percent (5%) of any class of voting securities of the bank or bank holding company whose shares are purchased.
- The Bank Commissioner is authorized to receive applications, hold hearings on the applications, and, with the approval of the State Banking Board, issue charters for a banker's bank.
- Any banker's bank chartered under this section must have its deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-326. Application of Arkansas Business Corporation Act.
All state banks and subsidiary trust companies shall be subject to current provisions of the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-27-101 et seq., to the extent that those provisions are not in conflict with the provisions of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997. In the event that any provision of the Arkansas Business Corporation Act, § 4-27-101 et seq., is in conflict with any provision of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997, then the provision of the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 shall control.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Publisher's Notes. The Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 referred to in this section is codified as chapters 45-50 of this title.
23-48-327. Registered office and registered agent for service of process.
-
- A state bank may designate and maintain a registered office and registered agent for service of process by filing a written designation with the Bank Commissioner.
-
The registered office:
- May be the same as any of the bank's places of business; and
- Shall have the same address as the office of the registered agent.
-
The registered agent may be a:
- Resident of the State of Arkansas;
- State bank or domestic profit or nonprofit corporation; or
- Foreign profit or nonprofit corporation authorized to transact business in this state.
-
The written designation shall contain the:
- Name of the state bank;
- Street address of the bank's registered office; and
- Name of the bank's registered agent at the bank's registered office.
-
- The state bank may revoke the written designation by filing a statement of revocation with the commissioner.
- The statement of revocation is effective thirty-one (31) days after filing.
-
-
A state bank may change its registered office or registered agent by filing a statement of change with the commissioner that sets forth:
- Its name;
- The name and street address of its current registered office and registered agent;
- The name and street address of its new registered agent and registered office; and
- The new registered agent's written consent, either on the statement or attached to it, to the appointment.
-
A registered agent may change the street address of the registered office of any state bank to the agent's current office by:
- Notifying the bank in writing of the change; and
- Signing, either manually or by facsimile, and filing with the commissioner a statement of change that complies with the requirements of this subsection and recites that the bank has been notified of the change.
-
A state bank may change its registered office or registered agent by filing a statement of change with the commissioner that sets forth:
-
- The registered agent of a state bank may resign and discontinue the registered office by filing with the commissioner the original and two (2) exact or conformed copies of a signed statement of resignation.
- The statement of resignation may include a statement that the registered office is discontinued.
- The commissioner shall mail a filed copy of the statement to the registered office if not discontinued.
- The commissioner shall mail the other filed copy to the main office of the state bank as listed on the records of the State Bank Department.
- The termination of the registered agent's appointment and, if applicable, discontinuance of the registered office is effective thirty-one (31) days after the statement is filed.
- The State Banking Board shall provide by rule a filing fee of not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for the filings under this section.
-
- If a state bank designates and maintains a registered office and registered agent under this section, then the registered agent is the state bank's exclusive agent for service of any process, notice, or demand required or permitted to be served on the bank.
- If a state bank does not designate and maintain a registered office and registered agent under this section, then the president or chief executive officer of the state bank is the bank's agent for service of any process, notice, or demand required or permitted to be served on the state bank.
History. Acts 2005, No. 426, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 9.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment inserted “or chief executive officer” in (e)(2).
Subchapter 4 — Bank Holding Companies
23-48-401. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
“Bank subsidiary”, with respect to a specified bank holding company, means:
- Any bank, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of whose shares, excluding shares owned by the United States or by any company wholly owned by the United States, are owned or controlled by the bank holding company;
- Any bank, the election of a majority of whose directors is controlled in any manner by the bank holding company;
- Any bank, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of whose voting shares are held by a trustee for the benefit of the shareholders or members of the bank holding company;
- Any bank, with respect to the management or policies of which, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve has determined that the bank holding company has the power, directly or indirectly, to exercise a controlling influence; or
- Any bank which has been found by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to be controlled by a bank holding company; and
- “Company” means any corporation, limited liability company, or business trust doing business in this state but shall not include any corporation the majority of the shares of which are owned by the United States or by any state.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-402. Nonapplicability of subchapter.
-
This subchapter shall not apply to shares of any company:
- Acquired by a bank holding company or by a bank in satisfaction of a debt previously contracted in good faith;
- Which are held or acquired by a bank in good faith in a fiduciary capacity; or
- Which are of the kinds and amounts eligible for investments by state banks under the provisions of § 23-47-401.
-
- Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a bank holding company or a state bank shall dispose of shares acquired in satisfaction of a debt previously contracted in good faith within a period of two (2) years from the date on which they were acquired.
-
- The Bank Commissioner is authorized upon application to extend, from time to time for up to an additional three (3) years, for not more than one (1) year at a time, the two-year period referred to in this section for disposing of any shares acquired by a bank holding company, or state bank, in the regular course of securing or collecting a debt previously contracted in good faith, if, in the commissioner's judgment, such an extension would not be detrimental to the public interest, but no extensions shall, in the aggregate, exceed three (3) years.
- However, a bank holding company shall not be prohibited from purchasing shares from any of its banking subsidiaries, subject to the provisions of §§ 23-48-405 and 23-48-406.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-403. Penalties.
- Any person who willfully violates any provision of this subchapter or order issued by the Bank Commissioner pursuant to this subchapter or any State Bank Department rule is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
- Any person who willfully participates in a violation of any provision of this subchapter is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 354; 2019, No. 315, § 2547.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (a).
23-48-404. Administration.
The Bank Commissioner is authorized to and shall administer and carry out the provisions of this subchapter and shall issue such rules and orders as may be necessary to discharge this duty and to prevent evasions of this subchapter.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2548.
Amendments. The 2019 amendment substituted “rules” for “regulations”.
23-48-405. Ownership or control of subsidiaries.
It shall be unlawful for a bank holding company to directly or indirectly own or control more than one (1) bank subsidiary if any such bank subsidiary with its main office in Arkansas has a de novo charter.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 10.
23-48-406. Acquisition of bank stock or assets — Limitations.
- A bank holding company is prohibited from acquiring ownership or control of the stock or the assets of any bank that has its main office or any branch office in Arkansas, if, after giving effect to the acquisition of the stock or the assets of that bank, the acquiring bank holding company would own or control, directly or indirectly, banks having in the aggregate more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total deposits within the State of Arkansas held by banks.
-
- Determinations of the percentage of total deposits required by subsection (a) of this section shall be made as of the date of acquisition of the stock or assets.
- The determinations shall be made with reference to the average total deposits of the respective banks as reflected on their quarterly financial reports for the four (4) fiscal quarters immediately preceding the date of acquisition as filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or its successor, or if the deposits of the bank are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, then as filed with the State Bank Department, or its successor.
- For the purpose of this section, the term “deposits” shall include, without limitation, all demand, savings, time, certificates of deposit, and other similar depository accounts of any person, but shall not include depository accounts of banks or public funds.
-
- Nothing in this section is intended to prevent any bank holding company domiciled in the State of Arkansas from acquiring ownership or control of banks domiciled outside the State of Arkansas if applicable state or federal laws permit the Arkansas bank holding company to do so.
- However, except as permitted by applicable federal law or specifically authorized by this subchapter, no bank holding company domiciled outside the State of Arkansas shall be authorized to acquire direct or indirect control of a bank domiciled within the State of Arkansas.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 11.
Subchapter 5 — Mergers, Consolidations, Conversions, Emergency Acquisitions, Purchases, or Assumptions
Effective Dates. Acts 2017, No. 548, § 11: Mar. 21, 2017. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the efficient operation of state banks and bank holding companies doing business in Arkansas is a critical need for Arkansas and the banking and financial institutions industry operating under state law; that the Arkansas Banking Code of 1997 does not currently allow a state bank in Arkansas to pursue efficient operations and regulatory cost savings under state law through a merger transaction with a wholly owned subsidiary bank of an Arkansas bank holding company that results in the subsidiary bank as the surviving entity of the merger transaction; and that this act is immediately necessary because it is critical that the provisions of this act become effective as soon as possible to encourage efficiency and regulatory costs savings to banks and financial institutions operating in Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-48-501. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
- “Converting bank” means a state bank converting to a national bank, a national bank converting to a state bank, or a savings and loan association converting to a state bank;
- “Dissenters' rights” means the rights of dissenting stockholders specified in § 23-48-506;
-
“Interstate merger transaction” means:
- The merger or consolidation of banks with different home states and the conversion of branches of any bank involved in the merger or consolidation into branches of the resulting bank; or
- The purchase of all or substantially all of the assets, including all or substantially all of the branches and the assumption of all or substantially all of the liabilities of a bank whose home state is different from the home state of the acquiring bank;
- “Merger” includes consolidation in all sections of this subchapter except § 23-48-509;
- “Purchase or assumption” means the purchase by a state bank of over fifty percent (50%) of the assets of another depository institution, or the assumption by a state bank of over fifty percent (50%) of the liabilities of another depository institution;
-
“Resulting bank” means:
- One (1) or more banks created from a merger or conversion; or
- The bank purchasing over fifty percent (50%) of the assets or assuming over fifty percent (50%) of the liabilities of another depository institution in a purchase or assumption transaction or an interstate merger transaction; and
- “Wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company” means a “bank holding company”, as that term is defined in § 23-45-102, incorporated under the laws of the State of Arkansas, all of the outstanding shares of each class of the capital stock of which are owned by a single individual or entity.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 12; 2007, No. 170, § 1.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment deleted “unless the context otherwise requires” at the end of the introductory paragraph; added (3) and (6) and redesignated subsections accordingly; and made related changes.
23-48-502. Merger or conversion of state bank into national bank.
- Subject to the provisions of this subchapter and provided that no Arkansas bank which is a party to the merger has a de novo charter, a state bank may merge into a national bank, including a national bank with a home state other than Arkansas.
-
The action to be taken by a merging or converting state bank and its rights and liabilities and those of its shareholders shall be the same as those prescribed for national banks, at the time of the action, by the laws of the United States, and not by the law of this state, except that:
- The assenting vote of the holders of a simple majority of each class of voting stock of a state bank shall be required for the merger or conversion;
- Upon the merger of a state bank into a national bank, the stockholders of the state bank shall have dissenters' rights; and
- If the national bank is an out-of-state bank, then § 23-48-901 et seq. shall be applicable to the merger.
-
- Approval by the Bank Commissioner or any other state authority is not necessary for a state bank to convert or merge into a resulting national bank as provided by federal law.
-
- However, within ten (10) days following the effective date of the merger or conversion, the resulting bank shall be required to file in the office of the commissioner, a complete copy of the articles of merger or conversion.
- The copy of the articles of merger or conversion shall be certified by the president or chief executive officer or a vice president of the resulting bank.
- Upon the completion of the merger or conversion, the charter of any merging or converting state bank shall automatically terminate.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 13; 2017, No. 198, § 10.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “Approval by the Bank Commissioner or any other state authority is not” for “No approval by the Bank Commissioner or by any other state authority shall be” in (c)(1); redesignated former (c)(2) as (c)(2)(A) and (B); and, in (c)(2)(B), substituted “The copy of the articles of merger or conversion shall” for “This copy must” and inserted “or chief executive officer”.
23-48-503. Merger of bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association into state bank.
-
-
- With the approval of the Bank Commissioner and the State Banking Board and after a public hearing as prescribed by the applicable law of this state, any bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association, including an out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association, may be merged with a state bank creating one (1) or more resulting banks.
- However, if any national bank, out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association is involved in the merger under subdivision (a)(1)(A) of this section, there shall be compliance with the requirements of the state or federal laws applicable to the national bank, out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association.
-
-
A plan of merger involving a state bank shall provide:
- The name of each party to the merger;
- The name of each entity that will result from the merger; and
- The terms and conditions of the merger.
-
If more than one (1) bank, out-of-state bank, or savings and loan association will result or be created by the terms of the plan of merger, the terms and conditions of the merger shall include:
- The manner and basis of allocating and vesting the assets from the merger among one (1) or more of the parties;
- The name of the party that will be obligated to pay the fair value of any shares of stock of a bank that is a party to the merger that are held by a shareholder that has complied with the requirements of § 23-48-506 for the recovery of the fair value of the shareholder's shares; and
-
Either of the following:
- The manner and basis of allocating the liabilities and obligations of each bank, out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association that is a party to the merger among one (1) or more of the parties; or
- Adequate provision for the payment and discharge of the liabilities and obligations of each bank, out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association that is a party to the merger among one (1) or more of the parties.
-
A plan of merger involving a state bank shall provide:
- A bank, including an out-of-state bank, a bank holding company, or a savings and loan association may merge into a state bank if none of the Arkansas banks that are parties to the merger have a de novo charter.
-
- The applicant shall file an application with the commissioner containing the information that the commissioner requires.
- If an out-of-state bank is a party to the merger, all applicable provisions of § 23-48-901 et seq. and the applicable law of the home state of the merging bank shall be satisfied.
-
- Unless otherwise provided for by the charter or governing law of any out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association, the assenting vote of a simple majority of each class of voting stock of the merging banks, bank holding companies, or savings and loan associations and the resulting bank shall be required for the merger.
- However, a vote of the shareholders of the resulting bank shall not be required if the number of shares to be issued in connection with the merger does not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding shares of the resulting bank before the merger.
-
- The commissioner shall provide the board with the results of the investigation of the application.
-
The commissioner shall approve the application if at the hearing both the commissioner and the board find that:
- The proposed merger provides adequate capital structure;
- The terms of the merger agreement are fair;
- The merger is not contrary to the public interest;
- The proposed merger adequately provides for dissenters' rights; and
- The requirements of all applicable state and federal laws have been complied with.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 14; 2007, No. 170, § 2; 2009, No. 164, § 12; 2017, No. 548, § 10.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment, in (a), redesignated (a)(1), substituted “creating one (1) or more resulting banks” for “to result in a state bank” in present (a)(1)(A), inserted “under subdivision (a)(1)(A) of this section” in present (a)(1)(B), added (a)(2) and redesignated the following subdivisions accordingly, and made related and stylistic changes.
The 2009 amendment redesignated (a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5), and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2017 amendment inserted “bank holding company” throughout (a)(1)(B) through (a)(3); in (a)(1)(A), substituted “bank holding company” for “including an out-of-state bank upon compliance with § 23-48-901 et seq.” and inserted “including an out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association”; in (a)(2)(B)(ii), substituted “shareholder” for “stockholder” and “shareholder's” for “stockholder's”; in (a)(5)(A), added “Unless otherwise provided for by the charter or governing law of any out-of-state bank, bank holding company, or savings and loan association” and inserted “bank holding companies, or savings and loan associations”; and made stylistic changes.
23-48-504. Conversion of national bank or savings and loan association into state bank.
- A national bank or savings and loan association having its main office in this state which follows the procedure prescribed by applicable federal or other law may convert into a state bank and may be granted a charter by the State Banking Board with the concurrence of the Bank Commissioner.
- The national bank or savings and loan association may apply for a state charter by filing with the commissioner an application containing the information that the commissioner may require along with a certificate signed by its president or chief executive officer or a vice president stating the action taken in compliance with the provisions of the applicable laws, accompanied by the articles of incorporation approved by a majority vote of the stockholders for the governance of the applicant as a state bank.
-
The public hearing at which the issuance of the state charter is authorized shall be called by the commissioner:
- On not less than fourteen (14) days' written notice to the applicant and to each member of the board; and
- Upon publication in a newspaper published in the City of Little Rock and having a general and substantially statewide circulation, at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing, the publication to show the time, place, and purpose of the hearing.
- If, at the hearing, both the commissioner and the board find that the proposed state bank meets the standards as to location of offices, capital structure, and character of officers and directors required for the incorporation of a state bank, they shall grant the application for conversion.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 11.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment substituted “president or chief executive officer or a vice president stating” for “president or a vice president setting forth” in (b).
23-48-505. Merger of state bank into an out-of-state state-chartered bank.
- Subject to the provisions of this subchapter and provided that no Arkansas bank which is a party to the merger has a de novo charter, a state bank may merge into an out-of-state bank.
-
The action to be taken by a merging state bank and its rights and liabilities and those of its shareholders shall be the same as those prescribed for the out-of-state state-chartered banks, at the time of the action, by the laws of the home state of the out-of-state state-chartered bank, and not by the law of this state, except that:
- The assenting vote of the holders of a simple majority of each class of voting stock of a state bank shall be required for the merger; and
- Upon the merger of a state bank into an out-of-state state-chartered bank, the stockholders of the state bank shall have dissenters' rights.
- The merger shall only be consummated after compliance with all applicable provisions of § 23-48-901 et seq.
- Upon the completion of the merger, the charter of any merging state bank shall automatically terminate.
History. Acts 1997, No. 408, § 15.
Publisher's Notes. Former § 23-48-505 has been renumbered as § 23-48-512.
23-48-506. Dissenting stockholders.
-
For purposes of this section, with respect to a state bank:
-
“Corporate action” means:
- Consummation of a merger to which the state bank is a party;
- Consummation of a sale or transfer of over fifty percent (50%) of the state bank's assets to another depository institution; or
- Consummation of a sale or transfer of over fifty percent (50%) of the state bank's liabilities to another depository institution; and
- “Selling bank” means a state bank selling or transferring over fifty percent (50%) of its assets or over fifty percent (50%) of its liabilities to another depository institution.
-
“Corporate action” means:
-
- The owner of shares of a state bank which were not voted for a corporate action, and who has given notice in writing to the state bank at or prior to the meeting of the stockholders approving the corporate action, that he or she dissents from the corporate action shall be entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by him or her, if the dissenting stockholder has delivered a written demand for payment to the resulting bank at any time within ten (10) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded.
- This written demand for payment shall state the number and the class of shares owned by the dissenting stockholder. Any dissenting stockholder failing to make the demand shall be bound by the terms of the purchase or assumption, or merger.
-
- The resulting bank shall fix an amount, which it considers to be not more than the fair market value of the shares of the merging, resulting, or selling bank as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded, which it will offer to pay dissenting stockholders entitled to payment in cash.
- Upon receipt from a dissenting stockholder of a written demand for payment in cash of the fair value of his or her shares, the resulting bank shall give the dissenting stockholder notice of the amount it will pay for dissenting shares within twenty (20) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded.
- Any dissenting stockholder may agree to accept the amount in lieu of pursuing the appraisal remedy set forth in subdivision (c)(1) of this section by delivering a written acceptance of the offer to the resulting bank within thirty (30) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded.
-
-
The value of shares held by dissenting stockholders entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by them, who do not accept the offer of the resulting bank within the thirty-day period set forth in subdivision (b)(4) of this section, shall be determined as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded by three (3) appraisers. The appraisers are to be chosen as follows:
- One (1) shall be selected by the dissenting stockholders by the vote of a majority of the aggregate number of dissenting shares held by the dissenting stockholders;
- One (1) shall be selected by the board of directors of the resulting bank; and
- The third shall be selected by the two (2) so chosen.
- The valuation agreed upon by any two (2) of the three (3) appraisers thus chosen shall govern. However, if the value so fixed shall not be satisfactory to any dissenting stockholder who has requested payment as provided herein, the stockholder may, within five (5) days after being notified of the appraised value of his or her shares, appeal to the Bank Commissioner, who shall cause a reappraisal to be made, which shall be final and binding as to the value of the shares of the appellant.
- If, within ninety (90) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded, for any reason, one (1) or more of the appraisers is not selected as provided in this section, or the appraisers fail to determine the value of dissenting shares, the commissioner shall, upon written request of any interested party made within five (5) days after the expiration of the ninety-day period, cause an appraisal to be made which shall be final and binding upon all parties.
-
The value of shares held by dissenting stockholders entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by them, who do not accept the offer of the resulting bank within the thirty-day period set forth in subdivision (b)(4) of this section, shall be determined as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded by three (3) appraisers. The appraisers are to be chosen as follows:
-
- The expenses of the appraiser selected by the dissenting stockholders shall be paid by the dissenting stockholders.
- The expenses of the appraiser selected by the board of directors of the resulting bank shall be paid by the resulting bank.
- The expenses of the third appraiser shall be paid by and prorated among the dissenting stockholders and the resulting bank in such a manner as is determined by the commissioner to be fair and equitable under the circumstances.
-
- If the commissioner is required to make the appraisal, his or her expenses in making the appraisal shall be paid by and prorated among the dissenting stockholders and the resulting bank in such a manner as is determined by the commissioner to be fair and equitable under the circumstances.
- If the commissioner is required to make a reappraisal, his or her expenses in making the reappraisal shall be paid by the appellant.
- If, within ninety (90) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the corporate action was concluded, for any reason, one (1) or more of the appraisers are not selected as provided in this section or the appraisers fail to determine the value of dissenting shares, and if no written request to value the dissenting shares is filed with the commissioner within five (5) days after the expiration of the ninety-day period, then all dissenting stockholders who have failed to accept the offer of the resulting bank within the thirty-day period prescribed in subdivision (b)(4) of this section shall be bound by the terms of the purchase or assumption, or merger.
- The amount due a dissenting stockholder under an accepted offer of the resulting bank or under the appraisal shall constitute a debt of the resulting bank which must be paid, if and when the purchase or assumption, or merger, is consummated, simultaneously with the surrender by the dissenting stockholder of his or her shares.
- Within ten (10) days after the corporate action, the resulting bank shall give written notice of the consummation of the corporate action to each dissenting stockholder who is entitled to receive in cash the fair value of his or her shares.
- The plan of merger, or the plan of purchase or assumption, shall provide for payment of or the manner of disposing of any shares of the resulting bank not taken by dissenting stockholders.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Case Notes
Reviewability.
Minority shareholders' contention that the State Banking Board's notice of a general hearing on a proposed merger was constitutionally deficient failed where the minority shareholders were timely informed of all public and private avenues to challenge the bank's valuation of their shares and the hearing did not implicate the minority shareholders in any special way that required more than newspaper announcements. Booth v. Franks, 2017 Ark. 193, 519 S.W.3d 696 (2017).
Minority shareholders' failure to file a written protest within the time period required by § 23-46-406 prevented them from making arguments before the State Banking Board, and therefore their arguments concerning the bank merger were not preserved for review. Booth v. Franks, 2017 Ark. 193, 519 S.W.3d 696 (2017).
23-48-507. Continuation of corporate entity — Use of old name.
- A resulting bank shall be the same business and corporate entity as each party to the merger or as the converting bank, with all the property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties of each party to the merger or the converting bank, except as affected by the state law in the case of a resulting state bank or the federal law in the case of a resulting national bank and by the charter and bylaws of the resulting bank.
- A resulting bank shall have the right to use the name of any party to the merger or of the converting bank whenever it can more conveniently do any act under that name.
- Any reference to a party to the merger or converting bank in a contract, will, or document, whether executed or taking effect before or after the merger or conversion, shall be deemed to refer and apply to the resulting bank if not inconsistent with the other provisions of the writing.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-508. Resulting state bank — Time for conformance with state law.
If a party to a merger or converting bank has assets which do not conform to the requirements of state law for the resulting state bank or if it carries on business activities which are not permitted for the resulting state bank, the Bank Commissioner may permit a reasonable time in which to conform with state law.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-509. Merger of wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company into state bank.
- With the approval of the Bank Commissioner, any wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company that owns all of the outstanding shares of each class of the capital stock of a subsidiary state bank may be merged into the bank to result in a state bank without the approval of the shareholders of either the wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company or the state bank, provided that the merger otherwise complies with the then-applicable law of this state.
-
The board of directors of the wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company and the board of directors of the state bank shall adopt a plan of merger that sets forth:
- The names of the wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company and state bank; and
- The manner and basis of converting the shares of the wholly owned Arkansas bank holding company into shares of the state bank.
- The articles of merger containing the plan of merger, signed by each constituent corporation by its president or chief executive officer or a vice president, shall be filed with the commissioner in the manner required by law for the merger of state banks, and after the commissioner's approval, with the Secretary of State in the manner required by law for the merger of business corporations.
- The articles of merger shall become effective upon the filing of the articles with the Secretary of State and, not more than sixty (60) days after the approval of the articles by the commissioner, as may be specified in the articles as the time when the merger shall become effective.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2017, No. 198, § 12.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment inserted “or chief executive officer” in (c).
23-48-510. Purchases or assumptions by a state bank.
-
- With the approval of the State Banking Board and the concurrence of the Bank Commissioner and subject to the provisions of this subchapter and provided that no party to a proposed transaction has a de novo charter, a state bank may purchase all or a majority of the assets or assume all or a majority of the liabilities of another depository institution.
-
- The agreement of purchase and sale shall be authorized and approved by the boards of directors of the purchasing state bank and selling depository institution.
- The agreement shall be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a simple majority of the outstanding shares of the selling depository institution entitled to vote thereon, at a meeting called for the purpose in like manner as meetings to approve mergers are called, and an application containing the information that the commissioner may require shall be filed with the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall cause the application to be investigated as soon as practicable, and the application and the results of the investigation shall be forwarded to the board.
- The board shall hold a public hearing on the application pursuant to notice and procedure required for the applications.
-
The commissioner shall approve the application if, at the hearing, both the commissioner and the board find that the proposed purchase or assumption:
- Provides adequate capital structure;
- Is fair;
- It is not contrary to public interest; and
- Adequately provides for dissenters' rights for the stockholders of any selling state bank.
-
- With the approval of the commissioner, a state bank may assume less than a majority of the liabilities of another depository institution.
- The agreement of purchase and sale for the assumption of the liabilities referred to in subdivision (b)(1) of this section shall be authorized and approved by the boards of directors of the assuming state bank and selling depository institution.
-
- A state bank seeking to assume less than a majority of the liabilities of another depository institution shall file with the commissioner an application containing the information that the commissioner may require.
-
The commissioner shall have the application investigated as soon as practicable and shall approve the application if he or she is satisfied that the proposed assumption:
- Provides adequate capital structure;
- Is fair; and
- Is not contrary to public interest.
- No approval by the commissioner or the board is required for the purchase by a state bank of less than a majority of the assets of another depository institution.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-511. Commissioner's granting of new charter or branch facility in connection with failed institutions.
- Upon application of either individual incorporators or a bank holding company, the Bank Commissioner is authorized to grant a state bank charter to the applicant immediately and without the approval of the State Banking Board if the commissioner finds that the immediate formation of a new state bank will protect the depositors of a failed depository institution when the receiver of the failed depository institution has solicited bids for the sale of its deposits.
- The commissioner is further authorized to grant more than one (1) state bank charter pursuant to solicitation of bids by the receiver of a failed depository institution should the receiver determine to solicit bids for deposits at separate offices or branches of a failed depository institution.
- Any state bank charter granted by the commissioner pursuant to this section shall not be considered a de novo charter as that term is defined in § 23-45-102.
-
- The commissioner may grant a branch bank application for a state bank to acquire the deposits and operate a branch of a failed depository institution regardless of state law limiting branch locations should the application be submitted pursuant to the solicitation of bids by the receiver of a failed depository institution and should the commissioner find the action would protect depositors of the failed depository institution.
- The commissioner may grant an application for a state bank to acquire deposit liabilities without continued operation of a bank facility if the applicant has submitted an application therefor pursuant to this section.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
23-48-512. Provisions when resulting state bank not to exercise trust powers.
When a resulting state bank is not to exercise trust powers, the Bank Commissioner shall not approve a merger or conversion until satisfied that adequate provision has been made for successors to fiduciary positions held by the merging banks or the converting bank.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1997, No. 408, § 15.
Publisher's Notes. This section was codified as § 23-48-505 by Acts 1997, No. 89 and renumbered as § 23-48-512 by Acts 1997, No. 408.
Subchapter 6 — Reorganization Through Plan of Exchange
Effective Dates. Acts 2001, No. 65, § 3: Feb. 1, 2001. Emergency clause provided: “It is hereby found and determined by the Eighty-third General Assembly, that it is immediately necessary for the fair and efficient administration of this act that, among other things, the criteria for the determination of the fairness and equity to the shareholders involved in the transactions covered by the plans of exchange be revised. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety shall become effective on the date of its approval by the Governor. If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, it shall become effective on the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill. If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, it shall become effective on the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-48-601. Authority to adopt plan of exchange — Approval by Bank Commissioner required.
-
- A state bank may adopt a plan of exchange for shares of the outstanding capital stock held by its stockholders, for the consideration designated in this section to be paid or provided by a bank holding company which acquires the stock, in the manner provided in this subchapter, by complying with the provisions of this subchapter, subject to subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
-
The plan of exchange may provide that the bank holding company, as the acquiring person, as consideration for the stock of the state bank may:
- Transfer shares of its capital stock;
- Transfer other securities issued by it;
- Pay cash;
- Pay or provide other consideration; or
- Pay or provide any combination of the foregoing types of consideration.
-
No such plan of exchange shall be effectuated unless, in advance thereof, the plan has been filed with the Bank Commissioner and approved in writing by him or her after notice and a hearing thereon. The commissioner shall give approval within a reasonable time after the hearing if he or she finds that the plan:
- Complies with the law;
- Is fair and equitable to the stockholders of the state bank involved;
- Provides a satisfactory means for disposing of shares of the state bank resulting from dissenting stockholders; or
- Would not substantially reduce the security of or service to be rendered to depositors or other customers of the state bank or any affiliate bank of the state bank or the bank holding company.
- No director, officer, agent, or employee of any party to an exchange of stock shall receive any fee, commission, compensation, or other valuable consideration whatsoever for in any manner aiding, promoting, or assisting therein except as set forth in the plan of exchange.
- If the commissioner does not approve the plan of exchange, the commissioner shall notify the state bank in writing specifying the reasons therefor.
-
- For every plan of exchange filed with the commissioner under subsection (b) of this section, there shall be paid to the State Bank Department by the state bank involved a filing fee equal to one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the paid-up capital stock of the state bank.
- However, the fee shall in no case be less than five hundred dollars ($500) or more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
- In addition, the state bank shall pay all expenses and costs of the department incurred in connection with the plan of exchange and the hearing thereon including, but not limited to, travel expenses, mail and delivery charges, copying costs, and court reporters' fees.
- The commissioner may by order reduce or waive the filing fee, but not the payment of the expenses and costs of the department, if the commissioner determines that the fee is excessive under the circumstances.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 117, § 1; 2001, No. 65, § 1.
Case Notes
In General.
This section is clear on its face that the sale of the shares must be a sale of “all” shares under subsection (a)(1). Ford v. Keith, 338 Ark. 487, 996 S.W.2d 20 (1999).
Authority Exceeded.
A proposed plan of exchange exceeded the authority and scope of this section where the plan constituted a forced sale, or “freeze-out,” of the non-favored minority shareholders' property to the control group. Ford v. Keith, 338 Ark. 487, 996 S.W.2d 20 (1999).
23-48-602. Procedure for adopting and filing plan of exchange.
-
The directors, consisting of at least a majority, of a state bank and bank holding company who desire to adopt a plan of exchange pursuant to this subchapter shall adopt a plan of exchange, signed by them under their respective corporate seals, which shall prescribe and set forth:
- The terms and conditions of the plan of exchange;
- The mode of carrying it into effect;
- Provisions with respect to abandonment;
- The effective date of the exchange of shares or the method of determination thereof;
- The manner and basis of any cash payment or issuance or exchange of shares of stock or other securities of the bank holding company for shares of the state bank; and
- Such other details and provisions as are deemed necessary or desirable.
-
- The plan of exchange shall be submitted to the stockholders of the state bank to be acquired at a meeting thereof called for that purpose.
- Notice shall be given of the time, place, and purpose of the meeting to each stockholder or member of record, whether entitled to vote or not.
- A copy of any proxy statement or other solicitation materials provided to the shareholders of the state bank shall be filed with the Bank Commissioner on or before delivery to the shareholders.
-
- At the meeting, the plan of exchange shall be considered by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon.
- A vote by ballot, in person or by proxy, shall be taken for the adoption or rejection of the plan.
- Unless otherwise provided in the state bank's articles of incorporation for voting on a plan of exchange, the plan of exchange shall be approved upon receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a simple majority of the outstanding shares of the state bank entitled to vote thereon.
- However, if any class of shares of the state bank is entitled to vote as a class on the plan, the plan of exchange shall be approved upon receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a simple majority of the outstanding shares of each class of shares entitled to vote as a class on the plan and the total outstanding shares entitled to vote on the plan.
- If the plan of exchange is approved by the stockholders of the state bank, then that fact shall be certified in the plan by the president or chief executive officer or a vice president of the state bank.
- The plan so adopted and certified shall be signed by the president or a vice president of each party to the plan of exchange and acknowledged before an officer authorized by law to take acknowledgment of deeds.
- The plan, adopted and certified as provided in subsection (b) of this section, shall be filed in duplicate originals with the Bank Commissioner prior to the hearing on the plan and within ten (10) days following the approval of stockholders and, after approval thereof by the commissioner as provided in § 23-48-601, shall be taken and deemed to be the plan of exchange of the parties thereto.
- Any plan of exchange may be abandoned in conformity with the terms thereof as approved by the commissioner provided, in that event, due notice of abandonment shall be forthwith transmitted to the stockholders of the state bank, and to the secretary of the bank holding company which are parties thereto, within ten (10) days of the abandonment in a manner and form prescribed or approved by the commissioner.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2001, No. 65, § 2; 2017, No. 198, § 13.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment inserted “or chief executive officer” in (b)(4)(E).
23-48-603. Dissenting from plan of exchange.
-
-
The owner of shares of a state bank which were voted against a plan of exchange, and who has given notice in writing to the state bank at or prior to the meeting of the stockholders approving the plan that he or she dissents from the plan of exchange, shall be entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by him or her, if:
- The plan of exchange is consummated; and
- The dissenting stockholder has delivered a written demand for payment to the state bank at any time within ten (10) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded.
-
- This written demand for payment shall state the number and the class of shares owned by the dissenting stockholder.
- Any dissenting stockholder failing to make such a demand shall be bound by the terms of the plan of exchange.
-
- The state bank shall fix an amount which it considers to be not more than the fair market value of the shares of the state bank as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded, which it will offer to pay dissenting stockholders entitled to payment in cash.
- Upon receipt from a dissenting stockholder of a written demand for payment in cash of the fair value of his or her shares, the state bank shall give the dissenting stockholder notice of the amount it will pay for dissenting shares within twenty (20) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded.
- Any dissenting stockholder may agree to accept the amount in lieu of purchasing the appraisal remedy set forth in subsection (b) of this section by delivering a written acceptance of the offer to the state bank within thirty (30) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded.
-
The owner of shares of a state bank which were voted against a plan of exchange, and who has given notice in writing to the state bank at or prior to the meeting of the stockholders approving the plan that he or she dissents from the plan of exchange, shall be entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by him or her, if:
-
-
The value of shares held by dissenting stockholders, entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by them, who do not accept the offer of the state bank within the thirty-day period set out in subdivision (a)(4) of this section shall be determined as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded by three (3) appraisers:
- One (1) shall be selected by the dissenting stockholders by the vote of a majority of the aggregate number of dissenting shares held by the dissenting stockholders;
- One (1) shall be selected by the board of directors of the state bank; and
- The third shall be selected by the two (2) so chosen.
-
- The valuation agreed upon by any two (2) of the three (3) appraisers thus chosen shall govern.
-
- However, if the value so fixed shall not be satisfactory to any dissenting stockholder who has requested payment as provided in subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the stockholder may, within five (5) days after being notified of the appraised value of his or her shares, appeal to the Bank Commissioner.
- The commissioner shall cause a reappraisal to be made, which shall be final and binding as to the value of the shares of the appellant.
- If, within ninety (90) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded, for any reason, one (1) or more of the appraisers is not selected as provided in subdivision (b)(1) of this section, or the appraisers fail to determine the value of dissenting shares, the commissioner shall, upon written request of any interested party made within five (5) days after the expiration of the ninety-day period, cause an appraisal to be made which shall be final and binding upon all parties.
-
The value of shares held by dissenting stockholders, entitled to receive in cash the value of the shares held by them, who do not accept the offer of the state bank within the thirty-day period set out in subdivision (a)(4) of this section shall be determined as of the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded by three (3) appraisers:
-
- The expenses of the appraiser selected by the dissenting stockholders shall be paid by the dissenting stockholders.
- The expenses of the appraiser selected by the board of directors of the state bank shall be paid by the state bank.
- The expenses of the third appraiser shall be paid by and prorated among the dissenting stockholders and the state bank in such manner as is determined by the commissioner to be fair and equitable under the circumstances.
-
- If the commissioner is required to make the appraisal, the expenses of the commissioner in making the appraisal shall be paid by and prorated among the dissenting stockholders and the state bank in such manner as is determined by the commissioner to be fair and equitable under the circumstances.
- If the commissioner is required to make a reappraisal, the expenses of the commissioner in making the reappraisal shall be paid by the appellant.
- If, within ninety (90) days after the date on which the stockholders' meeting authorizing the plan of exchange was concluded, for any reason, one (1) or more of the appraisers is not selected as provided in subsection (b) of this section or the appraisers fail to determine the value of dissenting shares, and, if no written request to value the dissenting shares is filed with the commissioner within five (5) days after the expiration of the ninety-day period, then all dissenting stockholders who have failed to accept the offer of the state bank within the thirty-day period prescribed in subdivision (a)(4) of this section shall be bound by the terms of the plan of exchange.
- The amount due a dissenting stockholder under an accepted offer of the state bank or under the appraisal shall constitute a debt of the state bank which must be paid, if and when the plan of exchange is consummated, simultaneously with the surrender by the dissenting stockholder of his or her shares.
- Within ten (10) days after the plan of exchange is consummated, the state bank shall give written notice thereof to each dissenting stockholder who is entitled to receive in cash the fair value of his or her shares.
- The plan of exchange shall provide for payment of or the manner of disposing of any shares of the state bank not taken by dissenting stockholders.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1.
Case Notes
Interest.
This section did not allow the Arkansas Bank Commissioner to award interest to dissenting shareholders for the period between the date the surviving bank tendered an offer of the fair value of the shares until the final determination of the value of the shares after the appraisal process because the Arkansas General Assembly did not grant the Commissioner the authority to award either prejudgment or postjudgment interest under this section. Brookshire v. Adcock, 2009 Ark. 207, 307 S.W.3d 22 (2009).
23-48-604. Effect of exchange.
-
- When the plan of exchange of shares as filed with the Bank Commissioner and approved by the commissioner under § 23-48-603 becomes effective in accordance with the terms of the plan, the exchange provided for therein shall be deemed to have been consummated, and each shareholder of the state bank whose shares were acquired shall thereupon cease to be a shareholder of the state bank.
- The ownership of shares acquired in the plan of exchange, except shares payment of the value of which is required to be made under § 23-48-603, hereinafter sometimes referred to as “dissenting shares”, shall automatically vest in the bank holding company as the acquiring person without any physical transfer or deposit of certificates representing the shares.
- All dissenting shares shall be considered authorized but no longer outstanding shares of the state bank and may be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the plan of exchange or as otherwise approved by the commissioner.
-
-
Certificates representing shares acquired in the plan of exchange of the state bank prior to the plan of exchange's becoming effective, except certificates representing dissenting shares, shall represent, after the plan of exchange becomes effective:
- Shares of the capital stock or other securities of the bank holding company to be issued in exchange for shares of the state bank; and
- The right, if any, to receive cash or other consideration upon terms specified in the plan of exchange.
- However, the plan of exchange may specify that all such certificates shall represent, after the plan of exchange becomes effective, only the right to receive shares of stock or other securities issued by the bank holding company, cash, or a combination thereof upon such terms as specified in the plan of exchange.
-
Certificates representing shares acquired in the plan of exchange of the state bank prior to the plan of exchange's becoming effective, except certificates representing dissenting shares, shall represent, after the plan of exchange becomes effective:
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 117, § 2.
23-48-605. State bank and holding company to remain separate — Nonliability of directors, officers, etc.
The state bank and the bank holding company shall remain separate and distinct entities in all respects, with neither entity having any liability to the creditors or depositors, if any, or the stockholders of the other, or for any acts or omissions of the officers, directors, stockholders, or representatives of the other, other than obligations which may be expressly provided for in the plan of exchange.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 1999, No. 117, § 3.
Subchapter 7 — Branch Offices
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, No. 42, § 4: Jan. 30, 2007. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that federal and out-of-state banks have the benefit of less cumbersome branch application procedures and policies; that state-chartered banks are thereby placed at a competitive disadvantage; and that this act is necessary to help state-chartered banks compete with other banks and to allow the Bank Commissioner appropriate flexibility in administering the state's banking laws. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
Acts 2011, No. 796, § 6: Mar. 30, 2011. Emergency clause provided: “It is found and determined by the General Assembly that federal law allows out-of-state bank holding companies to acquire control of Arkansas banks; that the Federal Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 preempts all state laws prohibiting branching by all banks across state lines; and that this act is necessary to amend and repeal certain provisions within the Arkansas Banking Code pertaining to the authority of Arkansas banks to establish branch bank facilities outside the State of Arkansas and out-of-state banks to establish branch facilities within the State of Arkansas. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto.”
23-48-701. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
-
- “Full service branch” means a banking facility separate from the main office of the bank at which all lawful banking activities may be conducted as fully as in the main office.
-
“Full service branch” includes a mobile facility that:
- Conducts banking business within the same county as the main office or another full service branch of the bank;
- Does not have a single, permanent site;
- Does not remain within five (5) miles of any banking location for more than two (2) business days;
- Travels to various locations within the county to enable customers to conduct banking business; and
- Maintains a log of operations indicating the date and specific location of each stop;
- “Healthy bank” means a state bank whose financial condition satisfies the criteria established by State Bank Department rule; and
- “Supervisory banking authority” means the Bank Commissioner for state banks and the United States Comptroller of the Currency for national banks.
History. Acts 1997, No. 89, § 1; 2005, No. 1816, § 1; 2007, No. 42, § 1; 2019, No. 315, § 2549.
Amendments. The 2007 amendment inserted present (2), redesignated former (2) as present (3), and made a related change.
The 2019 amendment substituted “rule” for “regulation” in (2).
23-48-702. Establishment of full-service branches and limited-purpose offices — Locations.
-
- No bank shall engage in core banking activities, receiving deposits, paying checks, or lending money at any location other than at a main banking office or full-service branch, except as otherwise permitted by law.
- Unless otherwise restricted by applicable law, banks may engage in permitted activities other than core banking activities at a main office, any branch, or a limited purpose office.
-
- All communities and banking markets shall be presumed to be suitable for bank branches.
- The prior existence of a main or branch office of any bank in a community does not grant the bank any right or power to preclude any other bank from branching into the community.
-
-
- An Arkansas bank may establish a full-service branch anywhere within the United States with the approval of its supervisory banking authority.
- A state bank that relocates its main banking office may continue to use its former main banking office location as a full-service branch as long as the use of the banking facility is uninterrupted.
-
A registered out-of-state bank may establish a full-service branch anywhere within the State of Arkansas:
- With the approval of its bank supervisory agencies; and
- Upon receiving a certificate of authority from the Bank Commissioner.
- An Arkansas bank possessing a capital and surplus of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more may file an application with the commissioner for permission to exercise, upon such conditions as the commissioner may prescribe, the power to establish branches in foreign countries or dependencies or insular possessions of the United States and to act as fiscal agent for any government entity.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of state law regarding locations of full-service branches, a federal or state savings bank or association chartered and in operation before August 13, 2001, with branches in operation in one (1) or more states, may convert to a state bank in accordance with § 23-48-504 and may retain its branches, both in state and out of state, as branches of the state bank.
-
-
- None of the provisions of this section which restrict the locations in which full-service branches may be established shall be effective in emergency instances in which the purchase or assumption of the assets and liabilities of a failed bank becomes necessary due to state or federal regulatory action.
- The restrictions on the location of banking services by an authorized bank may be suspended by the commissioner during a disaster, emergency, or other cause which disables the operation of a permanent location of the bank under the terms and conditions considered appropriate by the commissioner.
-
- Any state bank may file a notice with the commissioner to relocate any existing full-service branch to another location then authorized by law.
- A fee of not less than three hundred dollars ($300) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) established by State Bank Department rule shall accompany the notice.
-
The notice shall:
- Be filed not less than thirty (30) days prior to the proposed relocation; and
- Contain any information concerning the new location required by the commissioner.
- The commissioner shall approve the relocation unless it is determined that the relocation is not consistent with the standards contained in § 23-48-703(a).
-
-
No notice to relocate a full-service branch is required if:
-
-
A full-service branch is:
- Opened or built within the immediate neighborhood of a
-
A full-service branch is:
-
-
No notice to relocate a full-service branch is required if: